Next Article in Journal
Comparison of CrN Coatings Prepared Using High-Power Impulse Magnetron Sputtering and Direct Current Magnetron Sputtering
Next Article in Special Issue
Deferiprone-Gallium-Protoporphyrin Chitogel Decreases Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm Infection without Impairing Wound Healing
Previous Article in Journal
Damage Detection in a Polymer Matrix Composite from 4D Displacement Field Measurements
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Novel Antibacterial Materials and Coatings—A Perspective by the Editors

1
Future Industries Institute, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia
2
Biomedical Nanoengineering Laboratory, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(18), 6302; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186302
Submission received: 6 September 2023 / Revised: 18 September 2023 / Accepted: 18 September 2023 / Published: 20 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Antibacterial Materials and Coatings)

1. Introduction

The fight between humans and bacteria has escalated to a new level. The past several decades witnessed an alarming increase in the occurrence of bacterial infections on a global scale, presenting enormous clinical challenges with great morbidity and mortality, as well as financial burden [1]. A major reason for this is the increased prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the decline in the development of new antimicrobial agents. These factors have made it challenging to provide effective treatment options for even common bacterial infections [2]. Antibiotics have been crucial in modern medicine for a long time; however, the loss of their effectiveness has jeopardized the fight against infections, particularly when treating wounds, catheters, and implants, which often turn simple infections into life-threatening medical conditions [3,4]. Like never before, there is a pressing demand to act collaboratively and implement a holistic approach to mitigate the ever-growing threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) worldwide [5].
This Special Issue focuses on a collection of primary research and review articles in the area of emerging antimicrobial materials for various fields of application, including medicine, agriculture, marine fouling, and food production. This Special Issue is highly timely as it is essential to encourage a collaborative research approach to develop novel antibacterial materials with translational potential and capacity for reaching healthcare providers to assist them in managing bacterial-associated infections. Collectively, over recent years, the scientific and medical communities have made substantial progress in devising new and alternative approaches to combat the threat of superbugs [6]. The focus has been concentrated on non-traditional approaches, primarily because pathogenic bacterial infections are complex phenomena requiring materials with new modes of action with higher potency and strategies to deliver active molecules efficiently to the bacterial targets [7]. So far, progress has been reflected in the utilization of nanotechnology to design and develop antibacterial nanomaterials and surface-functionalized coatings with novel properties to break infection cycles, either preventing colonization or dispersing established biofilms.
Nanotechnology-based materials have transformed human medicine and health care, especially in infectious disease diagnostics and drug delivery. A variety of materials have been explored, including polymeric nanoparticles, inorganic nanoparticles (silver, copper, and gold), and nanoparticles assisted with stimuli (heat, photon) [7,8]. Traditionally, the mechanism of action of antimicrobial materials has been consistent, either causing contact killing or releasing the biocides when in the vicinity of the device [9]. Current developments in antibacterial materials have utilized newly devised strategies to provide targeted delivery to the infectious environment with high specificity and reduced drug exposure to un-intended sites. Furthermore, increased permeability and transportation to complex infections, including biofilm matrixes, have improved the bioavailability of drugs and multifaceted mechanisms of action, making them more potent and making it more difficult for bacteria to develop resistances. All these mechanisms have been pivotal in decreasing bacterial resistance while improving therapeutic outcomes.
Amongst all of these breakthroughs, silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have gained tremendous popularity in commercial products and applied research due to their potential to address the challenge of multidrug-resistant infections [10,11]. Silver has broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity that is effective against bacteria, viruses, and fungi. The antibacterial potential of AgNPs has been widely explored and believed to be influenced by nanoparticles’ physiochemical properties such as stability, size, shape, and surface chemistry, as well as release mechanisms. However, the safe delivery of AgNPs has been the main drawback towards clinical translation, with high unwanted silver toxicity, poor stability, and lack of inconsistent antibacterial efficacy being encountered often. Research in this space has been dominated by developing alternative delivery systems. For example, Haidari and colleagues have carried out extensive fundamental and applied studies of AgNP development for targeted and smart delivery systems for wound disinfection [12]. The team has developed ultrasmall AgNPs loaded with a biocompatible stimuli-responsive hydrogel for targeted and enhanced silver delivery to facilitate better bacterial biofilm penetration and dispersion [13,14]. Furthermore, the use of smart hydrogel AgNPs has allowed for the on-demand release of the therapeutics, enabling effective infection controls supported with desirable wound healing outcomes [15]. These studies demonstrate that AgNPs could be used for clinical wound infections, offering a controlled and safe release mechanism that is effective in clearing infection and promoting the recovery of infected wounds without developing bacterial resistance [16,17]. The delivery of AgNPs has been a huge research focus utilizing different kinds of platforms, including pH- and temperature-responsive hydrogels [18], mesoporous silica [19], microneedles [20], and 3D printings [21], all of which show exceptional potential to eliminate infection safely. Other attractive approaches include photothermal therapy of bacteria using near-infrared light (NIR), generating a cocktail of reactive oxygen species and spatial heat and providing a convenient method for ablating bacterial infection with an on-demand release strategy [22,23]. For example, Min and colleagues developed a dual-function pH-sensitive hydrogel capable of real-time wound monitoring with on-demand photothermal therapy that resulted in 99% bacterial inhibition, offering a highly innovative platform for smart infection management [24]. This type of approach with real-time sensing and on-demand release is gaining research interest and no doubt will have a significant impact on treating either superficial or deep wound infections.
Another attractive and emerging approach for infection control is the utilization of liquid metals such as Galium. Progress in this field was recently summarised and critically discussed in an excellent review published in ACS Nano [25]. The liquid metals can be easily deposited as coatings via established conventional techniques to be used as a suspension. They can also be combined with other metals to create fascinating shape-changing nanoparticles capable of destroying established biofilms [26,27]. We recommend this space be monitored since the potential of these new materials in fighting resistant pathogens is high.
Research in the field continues to evolve, with the discovery and development of new strategies to fight against bacteria occurring regularly. For instance, it is well-known that a large proportion of nosocomial infections are closely associated with medical devices such as ventilators, catheters, injectors, and implantable scaffold devices [28,29]; indeed, infection is one of the main causes of implant failure. For this purpose, a huge variety of antibacterial coatings with different compositions and fabrication strategies have emerged to either prevent or eliminate bacterial attachments. Medical device infections pose a high risk to the patient as they are often undiagnosed at early stages, presenting recurrent and complex infections. As a result, researchers around the world have focused on the development of antibacterial coatings on the surface of medical devices to confer bacterial attachment and colonization [30,31]. It has been shown that this strategy is an effective way to reduce the occurrence of healthcare device-associated infections. This is achieved by modifying the interfacial properties of medical devices without disrupting the bulk properties of materials. Over the past decade, a variety of surface modification or treatment techniques has emerged for the fabrication of antibacterial surfaces, either presenting bacteria-repellent properties [32], contact-killing mechanisms [33], or the release of antimicrobial agents [34]. Antibacterial surfaces have been functionalized by plasma polymerization to improve the functionality of the surface, enabling the binding of antimicrobial agents, which has received considerable research interest and has broad applications.
One effective strategy to employ a robust and clinically acceptable coating is grafting with antimicrobial agents. Release-based antibacterial surfaces are loaded with leachable bactericidal compounds such as antibiotics [35], cationic polymers [36], antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) [37], nitric oxide (NO) [38], and metallic nanoparticles [39]. Avoidance of antibiotic coatings is always encouraged to prevent the issue of bacterial resistance. Taheri et al. developed silver-nanoparticle-immobilized surfaces for the prevention and eradication of pathogenic bacteria, resulting in a promising platform to eliminate clinical signs of infections [40]. Another strategy employed by Bright and colleagues has shown the generation of a sharp nanostructured surface with titanium that effectively ruptures and eliminates pathogens, offering a potential strategy to be employed in medical devices that could help clinicians prevent implant-associated infections and recurrence. It should be noted that recent studies from Vasilev and co-workers have demonstrated that these nanostructures can work synergistically with conventional antibiotics currently used in clinical practice [41]. This discovery can have a tremendous impact on how infections are treated and prevented in the near future. Other strategies employed use a bacteria-repelling mechanism where the surface is functionalized using polymers such as polyethylene glycol and polyoxazoline [42] that have anti-fouling properties or by using zwitterionic polymers such as quaternary ammonium [43]. These approaches are considered biologically safe and effective for biomedical devices. Research in this space continues to adapt and evolve, as does the pursuit of promising antibiotic-free approaches to efficiently target bacteria with high clinical prospects [44,45].

2. Conclusions

This extended editorial perspective highlights recent progress and provides a future outlook for novel and emerging antibacterial materials. We have stressed the great importance of developing innovative antibacterial materials and surface coatings that could provide a much-needed solution for clinical infections. Despite the rapid progress in the field, clinical translation of these products is far from sufficient, and there are still many challenges, including clinical efficacy, safety, and regulatory burden. However, taking these discoveries into the next stage requires global interdisciplinary cooperation between researchers, clinicians, and industries. This Special Issue is timely, targeted, and focused, and we hope to encourage and promote imaginative and disruptive strategies to fight against AMR, which is expected to have huge consequences if there are no immediate collective actions.

Acknowledgments

K.V. thanks NHMRC for Fellowship GNT1194466 and ARC for grant DP220103543.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Frieri, M.; Kumar, K.; Boutin, A. Antibiotic resistance. J. Infect. Public Health 2017, 10, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Farha, M.A.; Brown, E.D. Drug repurposing for antimicrobial discovery. Nat. Microbiol. 2019, 4, 565–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Elbourne, A.; Crawford, R.J.; Ivanova, E.P. Nano-structured antimicrobial surfaces: From nature to synthetic analogues. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 508, 603–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Darby, E.M.; Trampari, E.; Siasat, P.; Gaya, M.S.; Alav, I.; Webber, M.A.; Blair, J.M.A. Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance revisited. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 21, 280–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hinchliffe, S.; Butcher, A.; Rahman, M.M. The AMR problem: Demanding economies, biological margins, and co-producing alternative strategies. Palgrave Commun. 2018, 4, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhong, Y.; Zheng, X.T.; Zhao, S.; Su, X.; Loh, X.J. Stimuli-Activable Metal-Bearing Nanomaterials and Precise On-Demand Antibacterial Strategies. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 19840–19872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Xie, M.; Gao, M.; Yun, Y.; Malmsten, M.; Rotello, V.M.; Zboril, R.; Akhavan, O.; Kraskouski, A.; Amalraj, J.; Cai, X.; et al. Antibacterial Nanomaterials: Mechanisms, Impacts on Antimicrobial Resistance and Design Principles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202217345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Makvandi, P.; Wang, C.-y.; Zare, E.N.; Borzacchiello, A.; Niu, L.-n.; Tay, F.R. Metal-Based Nanomaterials in Biomedical Applications: Antimicrobial Activity and Cytotoxicity Aspects. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1910021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Quek, J.Y.; Uroro, E.; Goswami, N.; Vasilev, K. Design principles for bacteria-responsive antimicrobial nanomaterials. Mater. Today Chem. 2022, 23, 100606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zheng, K.; Setyawati, M.I.; Leong, D.T.; Xie, J. Antimicrobial silver nanomaterials. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 357, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Medici, S.; Peana, M.; Nurchi, V.M.; Zoroddu, M.A. Medical Uses of Silver: History, Myths, and Scientific Evidence. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 5923–5943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Haidari, H.; Kopecki, Z.; Sutton, A.T.; Garg, S.; Cowin, A.J.; Vasilev, K. pH-Responsive “Smart” Hydrogel for Controlled Delivery of Silver Nanoparticles to Infected Wounds. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Haidari, H.; Kopecki, Z.; Bright, R.; Cowin, A.J.; Garg, S.; Goswami, N.; Vasilev, K. Ultrasmall AgNP-Impregnated Biocompatible Hydrogel with Highly Effective Biofilm Elimination Properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 41011–41025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Haidari, H.; Bright, R.; Strudwick, X.L.; Garg, S.; Vasilev, K.; Cowin, A.J.; Kopecki, Z. Multifunctional ultrasmall AgNP hydrogel accelerates healing of S. aureus infected wounds. Acta Biomater. 2021, 128, 420–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yuan, X.; Setyawati, M.I.; Leong, D.T.; Xie, J. Ultrasmall Ag+-rich nanoclusters as highly efficient nanoreservoirs for bacterial killing. Nano Res. 2014, 7, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Haidari, H.; Bright, R.; Kopecki, Z.; Zilm, P.S.; Garg, S.; Cowin, A.J.; Vasilev, K.; Goswami, N. Polycationic Silver Nanoclusters Comprising Nanoreservoirs of Ag+ Ions with High Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 390–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cheng, X.; Pei, X.; Xie, W.; Chen, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Gao, H.; Wan, Q. pH-Triggered Size-Tunable Silver Nanoparticles: Targeted Aggregation for Effective Bacterial Infection Therapy. Small 2022, 18, e2200915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Haidari, H.; Vasilev, K.; Cowin, A.J.; Kopecki, Z. Bacteria-Activated Dual pH- and Temperature-Responsive Hydrogel for Targeted Elimination of Infection and Improved Wound Healing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 51744–51762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, J.; Li, S.; Fang, Y.; Zhu, Z. Boosting antibacterial activity with mesoporous silica nanoparticles supported silver nanoclusters. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 555, 470–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. González García, L.E.; MacGregor, M.N.; Visalakshan, R.M.; Ninan, N.; Cavallaro, A.A.; Trinidad, A.D.; Zhao, Y.; Hayball, A.J.D.; Vasilev, K. Self-sterilizing antibacterial silver-loaded microneedles. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 171–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sánchez-Salcedo, S.; García, A.; González-Jiménez, A.; Vallet-Regí, M. Antibacterial effect of 3D printed mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds doped with metallic silver nanoparticles. Acta Biomater. 2023, 155, 654–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Qing, G.; Zhao, X.; Gong, N.; Chen, J.; Li, X.; Gan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, W.; et al. Thermo-responsive triple-function nanotransporter for efficient chemo-photothermal therapy of multidrug-resistant bacterial infection. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wei, H.; Yang, L.; Pang, C.; Lian, L.; Hong, L. Bacteria-targeted photothermal therapy for combating drug-resistant bacterial infections. Biomater. Sci. 2023, 11, 5634–5640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Min, Y.; Han, R.; Li, G.; Wang, X.; Chen, S.; Xie, M.; Zhao, Z. The pH-Sensitive Optical Fiber Integrated CMCS-PA@Fe Hydrogels for Photothermal Therapy and Real-Time Monitoring of Infected Wounds. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2212803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Truong, V.K.; Hayles, A.; Bright, R.; Luu, T.Q.; Dickey, M.D.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Vasilev, K. Gallium Liquid Metal: Nanotoolbox for Antimicrobial Applications. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 14406–14423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Elbourne, A.; Cheeseman, S.; Atkin, P.; Truong, N.P.; Syed, N.; Zavabeti, A.; Mohiuddin, M.; Esrafilzadeh, D.; Cozzolino, D.; McConville, C.F.; et al. Antibacterial Liquid Metals: Biofilm Treatment via Magnetic Activation. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 802–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, K.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Yuan, K.; Yang, Y.; Li, F.; Sun, X.; Chang, H.; Liang, Y.; Zhao, J.; et al. Sub 150 nm Nanoscale Gallium Based Metal–Organic Frameworks Armored Antibiotics as Super Penetrating Bombs for Eradicating Persistent Bacteria. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2204906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, X.; Sun, L.; Zhang, P.; Wang, Y. Novel Approaches to Combat Medical Device-Associated BioFilms. Coatings 2021, 11, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ladhani, H.A.; Yowler, C.J.; Claridge, J.A. Burn Wound Colonization, Infection, and Sepsis. Surg. Infect. 2021, 22, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, L.; Shi, H.; Yu, H.; Yan, S.; Luan, S. The recent advances in surface antibacterial strategies for biomedical catheters. Biomater. Sci. 2020, 8, 4095–4108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sheridan, M.; Winters, C.; Zamboni, F.; Collins, M.N. Biomaterials: Antimicrobial surfaces in biomedical engineering and healthcare. Curr. Opin. Biomed. 2022, 22, 100373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abu Jarad, N.; Rachwalski, K.; Bayat, F.; Khan, S.; Shakeri, A.; MacLachlan, R.; Villegas, M.; Brown, E.D.; Hosseinidoust, Z.; Didar, T.F.; et al. A Bifunctional Spray Coating Reduces Contamination on Surfaces by Repelling and Killing Pathogens. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 16253–16265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ao, H.; Yang, S.; Nie, B.e.; Fan, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Zong, J.; Guo, S.; Zheng, X.; Tang, T. Improved antibacterial properties of collagen I/hyaluronic acid/quaternized chitosan multilayer modified titanium coatings with both contact-killing and release-killing functions. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 1951–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Vasilev, K.; Poulter, N.; Martinek, P.; Griesser, H.J. Controlled Release of Levofloxacin Sandwiched between Two Plasma Polymerized Layers on a Solid Carrier. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 4831–4836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lee, J.S.; Lee, S.J.; Yang, S.B.; Lee, D.; Nah, H.; Heo, D.N.; Moon, H.-J.; Hwang, Y.-S.; Reis, R.L.; Moon, J.-H.; et al. Facile preparation of mussel-inspired antibiotic-decorated titanium surfaces with enhanced antibacterial activity for implant applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 496, 143675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ghosh, S.; Mukherjee, R.; Basak, D.; Haldar, J. One-Step Curable, Covalently Immobilized Coating for Clinically Relevant Surfaces That Can Kill Bacteria, Fungi, and Influenza Virus. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 27853–27865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Majhi, S.; Arora, A.; Mishra, A. Surface immobilization of a short antimicrobial peptide (AMP) as an antibacterial coating. Materialia 2019, 6, 100350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mondal, A.; Singha, P.; Douglass, M.; Estes, L.; Garren, M.; Griffin, L.; Kumar, A.; Handa, H. A Synergistic New Approach Toward Enhanced Antibacterial Efficacy via Antimicrobial Peptide Immobilization on a Nitric Oxide-Releasing Surface. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 43892–43903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. He, Y.; Li, H.; Fei, X.; Peng, L. Carboxymethyl cellulose/cellulose nanocrystals immobilized silver nanoparticles as an effective coating to improve barrier and antibacterial properties of paper for food packaging applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 252, 117156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Taheri, S.; Cavallaro, A.; Christo, S.N.; Smith, L.E.; Majewski, P.; Barton, M.; Hayball, J.D.; Vasilev, K. Substrate independent silver nanoparticle based antibacterial coatings. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 4601–4609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bright, R.; Hayles, A.; Wood, J.; Palms, D.; Brown, T.; Barker, D.; Vasilev, K. Surfaces Containing Sharp Nanostructures Enhance Antibiotic Efficacy. Nano Lett. 2022, 22, 6724–6731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Ikkene, D.; Eggenberger, O.M.; Schoenenberger, C.-A.; Palivan, C.G. Engineering antimicrobial surfaces by harnessing polymeric nanoassemblies. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface 2023, 66, 101706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhu, M.-M.; Fang, Y.; Chen, Y.-C.; Lei, Y.-Q.; Fang, L.-F.; Zhu, B.-K.; Matsuyama, H. Antifouling and antibacterial behavior of membranes containing quaternary ammonium and zwitterionic polymers. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 584, 225–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhao, C.; Li, Y.; Zhao, J.; Li, H.; Xu, J.; Gao, Z.; Ding, C.; Song, Y.-Y. A “Test-to-Treat” Pad for Real-Time Visual Monitoring of Bacterial Infection and On-Site Performing Smart Therapy Strategies. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 13296–13309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lai, C.K.C.; Ng, R.W.Y.; Leung, S.S.Y.; Hui, M.; Ip, M. Overcoming the rising incidence and evolving mechanisms of antibiotic resistance by novel drug delivery approaches—An overview. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2022, 181, 114078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Haidari, H.; Vasilev, K. Novel Antibacterial Materials and Coatings—A Perspective by the Editors. Materials 2023, 16, 6302. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186302

AMA Style

Haidari H, Vasilev K. Novel Antibacterial Materials and Coatings—A Perspective by the Editors. Materials. 2023; 16(18):6302. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186302

Chicago/Turabian Style

Haidari, Hanif, and Krasimir Vasilev. 2023. "Novel Antibacterial Materials and Coatings—A Perspective by the Editors" Materials 16, no. 18: 6302. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16186302

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop