Next Article in Journal
In Situ Formation of MoS2 on the Surface of CF to Improve the Tribological Properties of PUE
Next Article in Special Issue
Ternary Graphene Oxide and Titania Nanoparticles-Based Nanocomposites for Dye Photocatalytic Degradation: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Review in Waste Tire Management—Potential Applications in Mitigating Environmental Pollution
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Dye-Modified, Sonochemically Obtained Nano-SnS2 as an Efficient Photocatalyst for Metanil Yellow Removal

by
Grzegorz Matyszczak
1,*,
Paweł Jóźwik
2,
Magdalena Zybert
1,
Albert Yedzikhanau
1 and
Krzysztof Krawczyk
1
1
Department of Chemical Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Warsaw University of Technology, Noakowskiego Street 3, 00-664 Warsaw, Poland
2
Faculty of Advanced Technologies and Chemistry, Military University of Technology, Gen. Sylwester Kaliski Street 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(17), 5774; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16175774
Submission received: 6 June 2023 / Revised: 2 August 2023 / Accepted: 10 August 2023 / Published: 23 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Catalytic Technology and Nanomaterials for Water Treatment)

Abstract

:
We investigate the possibility of modification of SnS2 powder through sonochemical synthesis with the addition of an organic ligand. For that purpose, two organic dyes are used, Phenol Red and Anthraquinone Violet. All obtained powders are characterized using XRD, SEM, EDX, FT-IR, and UV-Vis investigations. Synthesized samples showed composition and structural properties typical for sonochemically synthesized SnS2. However, investigation with the Tauc method revealed that SnS2 powder modified with Phenol Red exhibits a significant shift in value of optical bandgap to 2.56 eV, while unmodified SnS2 shows an optical bandgap value of 2.42 eV. The modification of SnS2 powder with Anthraquinone Violet was unsuccessful. The obtained nanopowders were utilized as photocatalysts in the process of Metanil Yellow degradation, revealing that SnS2 modified with Phenol Red shows about 23% better performance than the unmodified one. The mean sonochemical efficiency of the performed synthesis is also estimated as 9.35 µg/W.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The first structural report on tin(IV) sulphide is almost 100 years old; however, it is a very interesting and useful material according to many studies [1]. It is continuously investigated in a wide spectrum of practical applications, amongst which the most recent for standalone, composite, or combined in heterostructure SnS2 include electrocatalysis, gas sensors, humidity sensing, energy storage, and Li-ion batteries, solid-state extraction of antibiotics, photodetectors, and photocatalysis [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Tin selenides (SnSe, SnSe2), which are closely related to tin sulphides (SnS, SnS2), have many similar applications as well [10].
The above applications typically require materials in the form of nano- or microparticles, and thin films. There are many methods of obtaining such products, e.g., high-temperature solvent reaction, hot-injection method, solvothermal reaction, electrodeposition, etc. [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Another useful preparative method for the production of materials, which is easy to scale up, is sonochemical synthesis, which is a green method due to avoiding the use of toxic solvents and extreme conditions [19]. An additional advantage of this method is the possibility for wide modifications of synthesis conditions and combinations with other techniques, such as electrochemistry, allowing for better control of the properties of obtained particles [19,20,21]. As well as in the case of many materials, the synthesis of nano- and micropowders of SnS2 via the sonochemical route was demonstrated and thoroughly investigated, showing the broad dependence of the optical energy bandgap, morphology, and particle size on the used reagents and the applied experimental conditions [22,23,24].
Advanced materials have many applications, as mentioned earlier. One of them is photocatalysis. Particularly, inorganic materials may be utilized as photocatalysts in the degradation of organic compounds such as dyes and pharmaceuticals [25,26,27]. Examples of such materials are magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles, the TiO2/CoFe2O4 nanocomposite, and the ternary TiO2/g-C3N4@Ag nanocomposite [25,26,27,28]. Many properties of photocatalysts may be tuned to increase their efficiency. In this context, one can mention the ability for light absorption, trapping, and recombination of the excited holes and electrons, the energy bandgap of the material, the presence of impurities, the size of particles, and more [29]. The energy bandgap determines what light (i.e., of what energy) is absorbed by the material [29]. The improvement of catalytic properties of photocatalysts may be achieved through dye functionalization (sensitization) which may affect the energy bandgap [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37].
Theoretical and experimental investigations of monolayers, nanoparticles, surfaces, and clusters of distinct chemical compounds reveal the possibility of bandgap tuning via functionalization with ligands, such as chromophores or conjugated organic groups [38,39,40,41]. Synthesis of a nanopowder with a bandgap tuning ligand was demonstrated (for example) in the case of a high-temperature reaction in a solvent, but there are no reports on such an approach in sonochemical synthesis [42]. This is probably because it may yet be hampered by the possible modification or even destruction of molecules of organic ligands by radicals generated in the reaction medium as a result of the action of ultrasound radiation (e.g., water sonolysis) [43,44].
This study presents the investigation of the possibility for modification of SnS2 nanopowder with organic molecules in sonochemical synthesis. The attempt of modification is performed using two organic dyes—Phenol Red and Anthraquinone Violet. These dyes were chosen because they represent distinct dye types and colors on opposite sides of the visible light spectrum. The obtained products of the syntheses are characterized using X-ray powder diffraction, EDX spectroscopy, and FT-IR spectroscopy to confirm the presence of SnS2. The Tauc method is used to study the influence of functionalization on the optical bandgap of the synthesized materials, and SEM observations reveal the morphology of their powders. The obtained products are compared in terms of the efficiency of photocatalytic removal of Metanil Yellow under UV-C irradiation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Reagents

All chemicals used in this study were pure for analysis (producer: POCH—Polskie Odczynniki Chemiczne, Warsaw, Poland). For sonochemical syntheses, SnCl4∙5H2O and thioacetamide (TAA) were used as reagents, and Anthraquinone Violet (Figure 1a) and Phenol Red (Figure 1b) were used as modifying ligands. Ethanol was used as a solvent and for the purification of prepared suspensions. Tert-Butanol (99.5%, Acros Organics, Waltham, MA, USA) was used as a radicals scavenger.

2.2. Sonochemical Syntheses

The sonochemical syntheses were conducted in conical flasks of 50 mL volume in an ultrasonic cleaner (PS 10A) generating an ultrasound of 40 kHz frequency with a nominal power of ultrasounds at 60 W. The acoustic power determined calorimetrically was 27.9 W/L. The procedure for syntheses and purification of obtained powders was adopted from the Matyszczak et al. investigation [24].
In all syntheses, the following amounts of reagents were used: 701 mg of SnCl4∙5H2O, 376 mg of thioacetamide, and 20 mL of solvent. Additionally, 10 mg of relevant dye was added to the reaction mixture before sonication. All reagents were stirred for 10 min with a magnetic stirrer before the start of the reaction. The duration of sonication was 100 min. After that and before the purification, the open conical flasks with obtained powders suspended in the original reaction mixture were kept under laboratory hood for 3 days.
Photograph of dried powders (products of syntheses) and used dyes is presented in Figure 2.

2.3. Evaluation of Sonochemical Efficiency and Percentage Yield of the Synthesis Process

The percentage yield and the sonochemical efficiency of the synthesis process were calculated according to the two following equations:
Y = m d r y m t h e o r e t i c a l 100 %
S E = m d r y P u l t r a s o u n d
where
Y —percentage yield [%].
m d r y —mass of dried product [µg].
m t h e o r e t i c a l —theoretical mass of dried product calculated based on the taken amount of reagents assuming full overreaction [µg].
S E —sonochemical efficiency [µg/W].
P u l t r a s o u n d —the power of ultrasound determined calorimetrically [W].
Both values (Y and SE) are calculated in reference to the dried products which were obtained by drying purified suspensions in ethanol under a laboratory hood for 3 days.

2.4. Characterization of Products

The characterization of synthesized products was performed according to the procedure presented in the Matyszczak et al. study [24]. Powders were investigated using the following techniques: powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) (RTG HZG-4 diffractometer, Siemens, Munich, Germany), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Quanta 3D FEG, FEI Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hillsboro, OR, USA) equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) (EDAX, Gatan, Pleasanton, CA, USA), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) (NICOLET 6700 FT-IR spectrometer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and UV-Vis spectrophotometry (the Tauc method) (UV1600 spectrophotometer AOE Instruments, Shanghai, China).
The UV-Vis spectra were collected using suspensions in ethanol of synthesized powders, instead of suspensions in chloroform.

2.5. Photocatalytic Degradation of Metanil Yellow

As a sample dye for photocatalytic removal, we used Metanil Yellow (Figure 3) which is highly toxic and widely used in the food industry [45,46,47,48]. The process was conducted in a glass beaker of 50 mL volume under ambient temperature and pressure. An amount of 20 mL of dye solution in distilled water was placed in the beaker equipped with a magnetic bar. Then, 20 mg of dried relevant SnS2 powder was used to make 10 mL of photocatalyst’s suspension in distilled water. The suspension was sonicated for 30 min. Such a suspension was then transferred quantitatively to the previously measured 20 mL of dye solution. The prepared mixture was then mixed with a magnetic stirrer with a speed of 600 rpm under dark conditions for 30 min to ensure the establishment of adsorption–desorption equilibrium, and then, the UV-C lamp (72 W) or UV-A lamp (10 W) was turned on for 150 min. After the process, the mixture was centrifuged (8000 rpm, 6 min) twice to obtain a clear dye solution, free of suspended catalyst and ready for absorbance measurement. The absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 440 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV1600 spectrophotometer AOE Instruments, Shanghai, China). Each experiment, including the blind test, was conducted 3 times.
Additional experiments were also conducted with the addition of 1 mL of t-BuOH as a scavenger of hydroxyl radicals. This amount of t-BuOH was added instead of 1 mL of distilled water during the preparation of the suspension of catalyst (i.e., 20 mg of catalyst was suspended in a mixture of 9 mL of distilled water and 1 mL of t-BuOH). Also, KI was used as a scavenger of positive holes in a concentration of 10 mM in the reaction mixture.

2.6. N2 Physisorption Measurements

The specific surface area and porosity of the samples were determined using the nitrogen physisorption method (ASAP2020 instrument, Micromeritics Instrument Co., Norcross, GA, USA). Before the experiments, each sample was degassed at 50 °C for 1 h and then at 90 °C for 4 h under vacuum. The results of measurements in the relative pressure range of p/p0 = 0.05–0.3 were approximated using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller isotherm model and provided information about the specific surface area. The approximation of the measurement results in the relative pressure range of p/p0 = 0.01–1.0 using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda isotherm model was applied to obtain information about the porosity and pore distribution of the samples.

3. Results and Discussion

As expected, all performed syntheses led to obtaining powders of SnS2. The dried products have a color typical for SnS2, while the product obtained with the addition of Phenol Red has its color changed to red (see Figure 2a,b,d). Powder X-ray diffraction investigation confirms the presence of low crystalline SnS2 (Figure 4). All three obtained products have similar diffraction patterns and exhibit the same reflexes. The broadening of reflexes indicates the presence of nanocrystallites. The mean particle sizes were calculated using the Scherrer equation:
D = K λ β h k l c o s θ
where
βhkl—full-width at half maxima of diffraction peak in 2θ scale (in radians).
θ—the diffraction angle (in radians).
λ—the wavelength of applied X-rays (in this study, λ = 1.54 Å).
K—the shape factor, assumed as 0.9 in this study.
D—the average crystallite size.
The crystals are ca. 4–5 nm (taking the value of shape factor 0.9). Due to the low crystallinity of obtained samples, such a result should be threatened only qualitatively.
Additionally, the presence of SnS2 in all synthesized samples is confirmed by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. For all samples, the atomic ratio of S to Sn is near 2:1 (exact ratios are in the range of 1.81–1.87). The sample EDX spectrum is presented in Figure 5.
Calculated percentage yields (Y) and sonochemical efficiencies (SE) for three different syntheses are almost the same. It seems that the dye addition does not affect the reaction course. The mean percentage yield estimated according to Equation (1) is 12.97% while the mean sonochemical efficiency calculated using Equation (2) is 9.35 µg/W. It should be emphasized that these values apply to the whole process, including the purification step, and to the reaction time of 100 min. Some losses are possible while removing the supernatant after centrifugations during the purification step. The calculated values of sonochemical efficiency and percentage yield may be used for process intensification.
Figure 2 shows that synthesis with the addition of Phenol Red led to a powder of SnS2 with changed color. This points to successful modification. However, the product of synthesis with the addition of Anthraquinone Violet remains unchanged. It seems that this dye is unable to modify SnS2 powder in the sonochemical synthesis in the applied conditions. Phenol Red has two groups potentially capable of bonding with the surface of SnS2: sulfone and hydroxyl groups. Anthraquinone Violet also contains sulfone groups in addition to amino and carbonyl groups. Taking into account that the modification was successful only in the case of Phenol Red, hypothetically, the hydroxyl groups are responsible for bonding with SnS2 particles.
To further investigate the obtained powders and to check for the occurrence of dye molecules in them, FT-IR spectroscopy is applied. FT-IR spectra of synthesized SnS2 powders are in agreement with that reported previously (Figure 6) [24]. As Figure 6a shows, the Phenol Red in the modified SnS2 powder is present in an amount that is undetectable by FT-IR spectroscopy.
Additionally, the modification by Phenol Red is stable, because after several centrifugations (each time removing the supernatant and adding fresh ethanol), the color of the suspension of powder remains unchanged (Figure 7).
Scanning electron microscopy investigation reveals that all synthesized powders, despite the addition of organic additives, share similar flower-like morphology, typical for SnS2 synthesized sonochemically [24] (Figure 8 and Figure 9). Also, there is no significant variation in the size of the particles. Apparently, due to the flower-like morphology, the particles would have the ability to lock the dye molecules inside them. However, this mechanism is not responsible for the modification of powder with Phenol Red, as according to such mechanism Anthraquinone Violet should also be incorporated into the powder changing its color, which is not observed.
SEM images of greater magnitudes (Figure 9) show that prepared SnS2 powders have elongated structures (thread-like) that have dimensions much less than 1 μm and lie in the nanorange.
According to the N2 physisorption measurements, there were no significant differences in the textural properties of the prepared materials. The specific surface area and total pore volume were similar for both samples (Table 1). As shown in Figure 10, the materials’ low porosity was associated with a small number of mesopores and macropores, the presence of which was confirmed by the shape of N2 adsorption–desorption curves. Type IV isotherms with H3 hysteresis loop were observed for both materials. According to the IUPAC classification [49], this type of loop can be given by nonrigid aggregates of plate-like particles. Also, it may be connected with macropores not completely filled with pore condensate. The presence of both types of pores (mesopores and macropores) was also confirmed by the pore volume distribution presented in Figure 11.
The optical bandgap of unmodified SnS2 determined using the Tauc method is 2.42 eV (Figure 12a). Such a value is typical for SnS2 [50]. Interestingly, the same method implies that SnS2 powder modified with Phenol Red has its optical bandgap significantly shifted to 2.56 eV (Figure 12b).
UV experiments proved the photocatalytic properties of both unmodified and modified SnS2. The dye solution without added catalyst irradiated with UV-C light for 150 min under dark conditions did not exhibit decolorization (blind test). For both catalysts, the experiment was conducted 3 times and the decrease in absorbance was converted (using the calibration curve and the reaction mixture volume) to a decrease in the amount of dye (in micrograms). Photocatalytic activities of the investigated powders were calculated according to the following equation (Equation (4)):
P A = m d y e m c a t a l y s t
where
P A —photocatalytic activity [µg/mg].
m d y e —a mass of dye degraded during the photocatalytic process [µg].
m c a t a l y s t —a mass of catalyst used in an experiment [mg] (20 mg in this study).
The mean photocatalytic activity of unmodified SnS2 is 13.73 µg of dye per 1 mg of catalyst. In the case of SnS2 powder modified with Phenol Red, the mean photocatalytic activity is 16.86 µg of dye per 1 mg of catalyst. These values are the results of experiments with the UV-C lamp of power 72 W. The Phenol Red-modified SnS2 powder has about 23% greater photocatalytic activity than the unmodified one which is apparently caused by dye modification. The kinetic study of degradation of Metanil Yellow by SnS2 photocatalysts synthesized in this study under UV-C lamp (72 W) shows that the decrease in the concentration of dye approaches asymptotic value at the time in a range ca. 120–150 min (Figure 13). Under the UV-A lamp of power 10 W, the catalytic activity of modified SnS2 was only 2.76 µg of dye per 1 mg of catalyst, which is ca. 6 times less than in the case of UV-C lamp of power 72 W.
The UV-Vis spectra measured during the photocatalytic processes show the decrease in the main peak of absorption in the visible region, near 440 nm (Figure 14). The decrease is greater in the case where SnS2 modified with Phenol Red is used as a photocatalyst. Both materials also adsorb the degraded dye in similar amounts. The main peak near 440 nm is related to the azo group so the degradation of Metanil Yellow in the conducted experiments goes through the oxidation of the -N=N- fragment. In the UV region, two peaks may be seen, near 197 nm and 270 nm, which are related to the benzene rings present in the molecule of Metanil Yellow. These peaks slightly increase (197 nm) and decrease (270 nm) during the degradation. Moreover, they change their position from 197 nm to 201 nm and 270 nm to 281 nm, which is likely caused by the formation of various intermediate compounds with molecular structures based on Metanil Yellow but changed due to the action of hydroxyl radicals.
There are not many studies on the photocatalytic degradation of Metanil Yellow; however, it was previously reported that a catalyst consisting of TiO2 immobilized into polyvinyl alcohol/acrylic acid microgels showed photocatalytic activity on a level of 0.4–0.9 µg of dye per 1 mg of catalyst, which is far less than the results presented in this study [51]. The estimated values of the photocatalytic activity of synthesized powders may be used for the intensification of the photodegradation process.
Additionally, experiments conducted with the addition of tert-Butanol to the reaction mixture showed no decolorization. As tert-Butanol is a scavenger of hydroxyl radicals ·OH, it is concluded that the photocatalytic processes conducted in this study are generally mediated by ·OH radicals [52,53,54]. The photocatalytic degradation of dyes typically occurs via oxidation by holes and/or hydroxyl radicals so our results are in agreement with the findings of other researchers [53,54]. The experiments with KI scavenger showed a ca. 31% decrease in decolorization for both photocatalysts, which additionally proves that the process is mediated mainly by hydroxyl radicals. The mechanism of the photocatalytic process is proposed below:
the photocatalyst absorbs the photon and is excited, then generates a pair of positive hole and negative electron:
SnS2 + hν → SnS2 + e + h+
the hole reacts with a molecule of water generating hydroxyl radicals:
h+ + H2O → H+ + ·OH
the hydroxyl radicals attack the dye molecules and degrade (oxidize) them in many consecutive steps:
Dye molecule + x ·OH →→→ y CO2 + z H2O
The ·OH radicals are the main intermediates for both catalysts (modified and unmodified); thus, the explanation of increased photocatalytic activity cannot be provided based on the mechanism of the process. The modified SnS2 has a larger bandgap so it should be harder to excite it with light; however, it shows better efficiency than the unmodified one. This could be due to two potential reasons. Firstly, the modified SnS2 may exhibit a much greater light absorption coefficient, absorbing more light than the unmodified SnS2 and generating more hole–electron pairs at the same time. Secondly, the presence of Phenol Red molecules on the surface of the photocatalyst may diminish the recombination of hole and electron which leads to a greater production of hydroxyl radicals.

4. Conclusions

We presented a novel method of modification of the optical properties of SnS2 obtained in the sonochemical synthesis. We showed that SnS2 may be modified with Phenol Red, while Anthraquinone Violet does not exhibit such behavior. Moreover, such modification is stable and does not change the structural or morphological properties of SnS2 powder. At the same time, it allows for a significant change in the value of the optical bandgap. This result may be used for bandgap tuning in a wide spectrum of applications, e.g., for solar energy harvesting and (as demonstrated in this study) photocatalysis. The values of sonochemical efficiency and photocatalytic activity presented in this study allow for intensification of the synthesis and photodegradation processes. Scavenging experiments showed that the process is ·OH mediated. The photocatalytic activity of the studied catalysts was much better than the one reported in the literature for the degradation of Metanil Yellow.

Author Contributions

G.M.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing—Original draft preparation, Investigation, Writing—reviewing and editing, Visualization, Formal analysis. P.J.: Visualization, Investigation, Formal analysis. M.Z.: Investigation, Visualization, Writing—reviewing and editing. A.Y.: Investigation, Visualization. K.K.: Writing—reviewing and editing, Supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research was funded by POB Technologie Materiałowe of Warsaw University of Technology within the Excellence Initiative: Research University (IDUB) programme.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time due to technical or time limitations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Oftedal, I. Die Kristallstruktur von SnS2. Nor. Geol. Tidsskr. IX 1926, 9, 225–233. [Google Scholar]
  2. Gao, Y.; Bai, L.; Zhang, X.; Yang, F. Non-Parallel Photo-Assisted Electrocatalysis Mechanism of SnS2/NiO Heterojunction for Efficient Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Reaction. ChemElectroChem 2021, 8, 2087–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, H.; Jiang, H.; Liang, T. Research Progress of SnS2/rGO Material in Gas Sensor. E3S Web Conf. 2021, 267, 02045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liang, A.; Ming, J.; Zhu, W.; Guan, H.; Han, X.; Zhang, S.; Lin, Y.; Dong, J.; Huang, Y.; Qiu, W.; et al. Tin Disulfide-Coated Microfiber for Humidity Sensing with Fast Response and High Sensitivity. Crystals 2021, 11, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, X.; Najam, T.; Yasin, G.; Kumar, M.; Wang, M. One-Pot Synthesis of High-Performance Tin Chalcogenides/C Anodes for Li-Ion Batteries. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 17391–17399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhu, C.; Wan, F.; Ping, H.; Wang, H.; Wang, W.; Fu, Z. Biotemplating synthesis of rod-shaped tin sulfides assembled by interconnected nanosheets for energy storage. J. Power Sources 2021, 506, 230180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Qiao, L.; Yu, C.; Sun, R.; Tao, Y.; Li, Y.; Yan, Y. Three-dimensional magnetic stannic disulfide composites for the solid-phase extraction of sulfonamide antibiotics. J. Chromatogr. A 2021, 1652, 462372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gao, F.; Chen, H.; Feng, W.; Hu, Y.; Shang, H.; Xu, B.; Zhang, J.; Xu, C.-Y.; Hu, P. High-Performance van der Waals Metal-Insulator-Semiconductor Photodetector Optimized with Valence Band Matching. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2104359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arunkumar, M.; Veerakumar, S.; Mohanavel, V.; Vairamuthu, J.; Vijayan, V.; Senthilkumar, N. A Novel Visible Light-Driven p-Type BiFeO3/n-Type SnS2 Heterojunction Photocatalyst for Efficient Charge Separation and Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity. J. Clust. Sci. 2021, 32, 1431–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kumar, M.; Rani, S.; Singh, Y.; Gour, K.S.; Singh, V.N. Tin-selenide as a futuristic material: Properties and applications. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 6477–6503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhu, H.; Yang, D.; Ji, Y.; Zhang, H.; Shen, X. Two-dimensional SnS nanosheets fabricated by a novel hydrothermal method. J. Mater. Sci. 2005, 40, 591–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. An, C.; Tang, K.; Shen, G.; Wang, C.; Yang, Q.; Hai, B.; Qian, Y. Growth of belt-like SnS crystals from ethylenediamine solution. J. Cryst. Growth 2002, 244, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hickey, S.G.; Waurisch, C.; Rellinghaus, B.; Eychmüller, A. Size and Shape Control of Colloidally Synthesized IV-VI Nanoparticulate Tin(II) Sulfide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14978–14980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liu, Y.; Hou, D.; Wang, G. Synthesis and characterization of SnS nanowires in cetyltrimethylammoniumbromide (CTAB) aqueous solution. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 379, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shen, G.; Chen, D.; Tang, K.; Huang, L.; Qian, Y.; Zhou, G. Novel polyol route to nanoscale tin sulfides flaky crystallines. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2003, 6, 178–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gajendiran, J.; Rajendran, V. Synthesis of SnS2 nanoparticles by a surfactant-mediated hydrothermal method and their characterization. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 015001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xiao, H.; Zhang, Y.C. In air synthesis of SnS2 nanoplates from tin, sulfur and ammonium choride powders. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2008, 112, 742–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Giberti, A.; Gaiardo, A.; Fabbri, B.; Gherardi, S.; Guidi, V.; Malagu, C.; Bellutti, P.; Zonta, G.; Casotti, D.; Cruciani, G. Tin(IV) sulfide nanorods as a new gas sensing material. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 223, 827–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gedanken, A. Using sonochemistry for the fabrication of nanomaterials. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2004, 11, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Metters, J.P.; Banks, C.E.; Pollet, B.G. Sonoelectrochemical Synthesis of Nanomaterials. In Cavitation: A Novel Energy-Efficient Technique for the Generation of Nanomaterials; Manickam, S., Ashokkumar, M., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014; pp. 173–201. [Google Scholar]
  21. Islam, M.H.; Paul, M.T.Y.; Burheim, O.S.; Pollet, B.G. Recent developments in the sonoelectrochemical synthesis of nanomaterials. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2019, 59, 104711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Khimani, A.J.; Chaki, S.H.; Chauhan, S.M.; Mangrola, A.V.; Meena, R.R.; Deshpande, M.P. Synthesis, characterization, antimicrobial and antioxidant study of the facile sonochemically synthesized SnS2 nanoparticles. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects 2019, 18, 100286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Matyszczak, G.; Fidler, A.; Polesiak, E.; Sobieska, M.; Morawiec, K.; Zajkowska, W.; Lawniczak-Jablonska, K.; Kuzmiuk, P. Application of sonochemically synthesized SnS and SnS2 in the electro-Fenton proces: Kinetics and enhanced decolorization. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2020, 68, 105186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Matyszczak, G.; Jóźwik, P.; Polesiak, E.; Sobieska, M.; Krawczyk, K.; Jastrzębski, C.; Płociński, T. Sonochemical preparation of SnS and SnS2 nano- and micropowders and their characterization. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2021, 75, 105594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ibrahim, I.; Belessiotis, G.V.; Elseman, A.M.; Mohamed, M.M.; Ren, Y.; Salama, T.M.; Mohamed, M.B.I. Magnetic TiO2/CoFe2O4 Photocatalysts for Degradation of Organic Dyes and Pharmaceuticals without Oxidants. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Elashery, S.E.A.; Ibrahim, I.; Gomaa, H.; El-Bouraie, M.M.; Moneam, I.A. Comparative Study of the Photocatalytic Degradation of Crystal Violet Using Ferromagnetic Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles and MgO-Bentonite Nanocomposite. Magnetochemistry 2023, 9, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ibrahim, I.; Belessiotis, G.V.; Antoniadou, M.; Kaltzoglou, A.; Sakellis, E.; Katsaros, F.; Sygellou, L.; Arfanis, M.K.; Salama, T.M.; Falaras, P. Silver decorated TiO2/g-C3N4 bifunctional nanocomposites for photocatalytic elimination of water pollutants under UV and artificial solar light. Results Eng. 2022, 14, 100470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ibrahim, I.; Kaltzoglou, A.; Athanasekou, C.; Katsaros, F.; Devlin, E.; Kontos, A.G.; Ioannidis, N.; Perraki, M.; Tsakiridis, P.; Sygellou, L.; et al. Magnetically separable TiO2/CoFe2O4/Ag nanocomposited for the photocatalytic reduction of hexavalent chromium pollutant under UV and artificial solar light. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 381, 122730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fu, C.-F.; Wu, X.; Yang, J. Material Design for Photocatalytic Water Splitting from a Theoretical Perspective. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1802106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hagiwara, H.; Nagatomo, M.; Seto, C.; Ida, S.; Ishiahara, T. Dye Modification Effects on TaON for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production from Water. Catalysts 2013, 3, 614–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hagiwara, H.; Higashi, K.; Watanabe, M.; Kakigi, R.; Ida, S.; Ishihara, T. Effect of Porphyrin Molecular Structure on Water Splitting Activity of a KTaO3 Photocatalyst. Catalysts 2016, 6, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hagiwara, H.; Nagatomo, M.; Seto, C.; Ida, S.; Ishihara, T. Dye-modification effects on water splitting activity of GaN:ZnO photocatalyst. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2013, 272, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chatterjee, D.; Dasgupta, S.; Rao, N.N. Visible light assisted photodegradation of halocarbons on the dye modified TiO2 surface using visible light. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2006, 90, 1013–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chatterjee, D. Effect of excited state redox properties of dye sensitizers on hydrogen production through photo-splitting of water over TiO2 photocatalyst. Catal. Commun. 2010, 11, 336–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hagiwara, H.; Nagatomo, M.; Ida, S.; Ishihara, T. Photocatalytic splitting of water into hydrogen and oxygen on organic dye modified KTa(Zr)O3 catalyst. Energy Procedia 2012, 22, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yamamoto, A.; Teramura, K.; Hosokawa, S.; Shishido, T.; Tanaka, T. Visible-Light-Assisted Selective Catalytic Reduction of Nitric Oxide with Ammonia over Dye-Modified Titania Photocatalysts. ChemCatChem 2015, 7, 1818–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jiang, D.; Xu, Y.; Wu, D.; Sun, Y. Visible-light responsive dye-modified TiO2 photocatalyst. J. Solid State Chem. 2008, 181, 593–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yu, Y.-Z.; Zhang, Y.-R.; Geng, C.-H.; Sun, L.; Guo, Y.; Feng, Y.-R.; Wang, Y.-X.; Zhang, X.-M. Precise and Wide-Ranged Band-Gap Tuning of Ti6-Core-Based Titanium Oxo Clusters by the Type and Number of Chromophore Ligands. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 16785–16791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, S.; Prendergast, D.; Neaton, J.B. Tuning Semiconductor Band Edge Energies for Solar Photocatalysis via Surface Ligand Passivation. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tang, Q.; Jiang, D.-E. Stabilization and Band-Gap Tuning of the 1T-MoS2 Monolayer by Covalent Functionalization. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 3743–3748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhou, T.; Anderson, R.T.; Li, H.; Bell, J.; Yang, Y.; Gorman, B.P.; Pylypenko, S.; Lusk, M.T.; Sellinger, A. Bandgap Tuning of Silicon Quantum Dots by Surface Functionalization with Conjugated Organic Groups. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 3657–3663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Podsiadło, S.; Białogłowski, M.; Fadaghi, M.; Matyszczak, G.; Kardas, K.; Dłużewski, P.; Data, P.; Łapkowski, M. Synthesis of kesterite nanopowders with bandgap tuning ligands. Cryst. Res. Technol. 2015, 50, 743–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chowdhury, P.; Viraraghavan, T. Sonochemical degradation of chlorinated organic compounds, phenolic compounds and organic dyes—A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 2474–2492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yanagida, H.; Masubuchi, Y.; Minagawa, K.; Ogata, T.; Takimoto, J.; Koyama, K. A reaction kinetics model of water sonolysis in the presence of a spin-trap. Ultrason. Sonochem. 1999, 5, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ghosh, D.; Singha, P.S.; Firdaus, S.B.; Ghosh, S. Metanil Yellow: The toxic food colorant. Asian Pac. J. Health Sci. 2017, 4, 65–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Khan, I.S.; Ali, M.N.; Hamid, R.; Ganie, S.A. Genotoxic effect of two commonly used food dyes metanil yellow and carmoisine using Allium cepa L. as indicator. Toxicol. Rep. 2020, 7, 370–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Muliadi, F.N.A.; Halmi, M.I.E.; Wahid, S.B.A.; Gani, S.S.A.; Zaidan, U.H.; Mahmud, K.; Shukor, M.Y.A. Biostimulation of Microbial Communities from Malaysian Agricultural Soil for Detoxification of Metanil Yellow Dye; a Response Surface Methodological Approach. Sustainability 2021, 13, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Dhakal, S.; Chao, K.; Schmidt, W.; Qin, J.; Kim, M.; Chan, D. Evaluation of Turmeric Powder Adulterated with Metanil Yellow Using FT-Raman and FT-IR Spectroscopy. Foods 2016, 5, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Alexander, V.N.; James, P.O.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Kenneth, S.W.S. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Burton, L.A.; Whittles, T.J.; Hesp, D.; Linhart, W.M.; Skelton, J.M.; Hou, B.; Webster, R.F.; O’Dowd, G.; Reece, C.; Cherns, D.; et al. Electronic and optical properties of single crystal SnS2: An earth-abundant disulfide photocatalyst. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 1312–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. El-Rehim, H.A.A.; Hegazy, E.-S.A.; Diaa, D.A. Photo-catalytic degradation of Metanil Yellow dye using TiO2 immobilized into polyvinyl alcohol/acrylic acid microgels prepared by ionizing radiation. React. Funct. Polym. 2012, 72, 823–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tizaoui, C.; Grima, N.M.; Derdar, M.Z. Effect of the radical scavenger t-butanol on gas-liquid mass transfer. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2009, 64, 4375–4382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Belessiotis, G.V.; Falara, P.P.; Ibrahim, I.; Kontos, A.G. Magnetic Metal Oxide-Based Photocatalysts with Integrated Silver for Water Treatment. Materials 2022, 15, 4629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Falara, P.P.; Ibrahim, I.; Zourou, A.; Sygellou, L.; Sanchez, D.E.; Romanos, G.E.; Givalou, L.; Antoniadou, M.; Arfanis, M.K.; Han, C.; et al. Bi-functional photocatalytic heterostructures combining titania thin films with carbon quantum dots (C-QDs/TiO2) for effective elimination of water pollutants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 2023, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Molecular structure of (a) Anthraquinone Violet and (b) Phenol Red.
Figure 1. Molecular structure of (a) Anthraquinone Violet and (b) Phenol Red.
Materials 16 05774 g001
Figure 2. Photograph of synthesized powders and (for comparison) dyes: (a) unmodified SnS2, (b) SnS2 modified with Phenol Red, (c) Phenol Red, (d) SnS2 unmodified with Anthraquinone Violet (unsuccessful modification), (e) Anthraquinone Violet.
Figure 2. Photograph of synthesized powders and (for comparison) dyes: (a) unmodified SnS2, (b) SnS2 modified with Phenol Red, (c) Phenol Red, (d) SnS2 unmodified with Anthraquinone Violet (unsuccessful modification), (e) Anthraquinone Violet.
Materials 16 05774 g002
Figure 3. Molecular structure of Metanil Yellow azo-dye.
Figure 3. Molecular structure of Metanil Yellow azo-dye.
Materials 16 05774 g003
Figure 4. Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of synthesized products. (* denotes peaks linked to SnS2 phase)
Figure 4. Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of synthesized products. (* denotes peaks linked to SnS2 phase)
Materials 16 05774 g004
Figure 5. Typical EDX spectrum of synthesized powders.
Figure 5. Typical EDX spectrum of synthesized powders.
Materials 16 05774 g005
Figure 6. FT-IR spectra of used dyes and synthesized powders: (a) Phenol Red, unmodified SnS2, SnS2 synthesized with the addition of Phenol Red, (b) Anthraquinone Violet, unmodified SnS2, SnS2 synthesized with the addition of Anthraquinone Violet.
Figure 6. FT-IR spectra of used dyes and synthesized powders: (a) Phenol Red, unmodified SnS2, SnS2 synthesized with the addition of Phenol Red, (b) Anthraquinone Violet, unmodified SnS2, SnS2 synthesized with the addition of Anthraquinone Violet.
Materials 16 05774 g006aMaterials 16 05774 g006b
Figure 7. Photograph of suspensions in ethanol of SnS2 powder modified with Phenol Red before (left) and after (right) several centrifugations (each time adding a portion of fresh ethanol).
Figure 7. Photograph of suspensions in ethanol of SnS2 powder modified with Phenol Red before (left) and after (right) several centrifugations (each time adding a portion of fresh ethanol).
Materials 16 05774 g007
Figure 8. Scanning electron microscopy images of synthesized powders, recorded using back-scattered electrons. (A) SnS2 synthesized without organic additives (unmodified), (B) SnS2 synthesized with the addition of Phenol Red, and (C) SnS2 synthesized with the addition of Anthraquinone Violet.
Figure 8. Scanning electron microscopy images of synthesized powders, recorded using back-scattered electrons. (A) SnS2 synthesized without organic additives (unmodified), (B) SnS2 synthesized with the addition of Phenol Red, and (C) SnS2 synthesized with the addition of Anthraquinone Violet.
Materials 16 05774 g008
Figure 9. More scanning electron microscopy images of synthesized powders, recorded using back-scattered electrons with greater magnitude. (A) SnS2 synthesized with the addition of Phenol Red, (B) SnS2 synthesized without organic additives (unmodified).
Figure 9. More scanning electron microscopy images of synthesized powders, recorded using back-scattered electrons with greater magnitude. (A) SnS2 synthesized with the addition of Phenol Red, (B) SnS2 synthesized without organic additives (unmodified).
Materials 16 05774 g009
Figure 10. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms for the studied samples.
Figure 10. Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms for the studied samples.
Materials 16 05774 g010
Figure 11. Pore volume distribution for the studied samples.
Figure 11. Pore volume distribution for the studied samples.
Materials 16 05774 g011
Figure 12. Tauc plots of the suspension in ethanol of SnS2: (a) unmodified; (b) modified with Phenol Red.
Figure 12. Tauc plots of the suspension in ethanol of SnS2: (a) unmodified; (b) modified with Phenol Red.
Materials 16 05774 g012
Figure 13. Decrease in concentration of azo-dye Metanil Yellow in the photocatalytic degradation process with usage of SnS2 modified with Phenol Red as photocatalyst in the function of process duration (squares—data for unmodified SnS2, rhombus—data for SnS2 modified with Phenol Red).
Figure 13. Decrease in concentration of azo-dye Metanil Yellow in the photocatalytic degradation process with usage of SnS2 modified with Phenol Red as photocatalyst in the function of process duration (squares—data for unmodified SnS2, rhombus—data for SnS2 modified with Phenol Red).
Materials 16 05774 g013
Figure 14. The raw UV-Vis absorption data during photocatalytic experiments (UV-C lamp 72 W) using unmodified SnS2 (left) and SnS2 modified with Phenol Red (right).
Figure 14. The raw UV-Vis absorption data during photocatalytic experiments (UV-C lamp 72 W) using unmodified SnS2 (left) and SnS2 modified with Phenol Red (right).
Materials 16 05774 g014
Table 1. Textural parameters of the studied samples.
Table 1. Textural parameters of the studied samples.
SampleSpecific Surface Area (m2 g−1)Total Pore Volume (cm3 g−1)
SnS2 unmodified11.40.056
SnS2 modified with Phenol Red13.10.070
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Matyszczak, G.; Jóźwik, P.; Zybert, M.; Yedzikhanau, A.; Krawczyk, K. Dye-Modified, Sonochemically Obtained Nano-SnS2 as an Efficient Photocatalyst for Metanil Yellow Removal. Materials 2023, 16, 5774. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16175774

AMA Style

Matyszczak G, Jóźwik P, Zybert M, Yedzikhanau A, Krawczyk K. Dye-Modified, Sonochemically Obtained Nano-SnS2 as an Efficient Photocatalyst for Metanil Yellow Removal. Materials. 2023; 16(17):5774. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16175774

Chicago/Turabian Style

Matyszczak, Grzegorz, Paweł Jóźwik, Magdalena Zybert, Albert Yedzikhanau, and Krzysztof Krawczyk. 2023. "Dye-Modified, Sonochemically Obtained Nano-SnS2 as an Efficient Photocatalyst for Metanil Yellow Removal" Materials 16, no. 17: 5774. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16175774

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop