A Study of Repair Mortars for Restoration of Wall Painted Plasters in a Hypogeum Rock-Cut Church of Matera (Southern Italy)
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. The Pre-Existing Rock and Plaster
2.2. Experimental Materials
2.2.1. Retouchable Mortars (R)
2.2.2. Non-Retouchable Mortars (NR)
2.3. Analyses and Tests
- The mortars’ microstructure was investigated on thin sections under polarized transmitted light using optical microscopy (Eclipse LV100 Nikon);
- Porosity features were determined using mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP). Pore size distribution (pore radii in a range from 0.001 µm to 100 µm) and the integral open porosity were measured with a Pascal 140/240 Series porosimeter from Thermo Finningan (maximum injection pressure of 200 MPa). For each mortar mix, three specimens with a volume between 2 and 3 cm3 were tested. The apparent density (γa) of the specimens was also measured using MIP;
- Physical behaviour under the ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) test was investigated according to ASTM standard D2845-05 [37]. Three cubes 4 × 4 × 4 cm for each mix were used. Before the test, they were dried in an oven at 60 °C until they reached a constant weight. The direct transmission method was employed, with the transmitter and the receiver positioned on the opposite faces of the specimens. The UPV results were expressed as the average of the measurements along the x, y, and z directions, and at each point the average of three acquisitions was considered. A Panametrics Epoch 4 Plus Ultrasonic Flaw Detector (Olympus), with a pair of ultrasonic transducers of 18 mm diameter and 1 MHz central frequency, was used for the measurements. A coupling agent (ultrasonic gel) served to improve the signal readability. The pulse velocity was calculated as the ratio of the distance between the transducers (measured using a digital calliper with a precision of 0.01 mm) and the time of flight (automatically registered by the instrument).
- The capillary water absorption test was executed on five 5 × 5 × 2 cm specimens, according to the UNI EN 15801 standard [38]. The mortars’ weights were recorded up to 5 days, that is, when the absorption reached a constant value (successive weight variations less than 0.1%). The ratios of the weight of the absorbed water to the absorbing surface area were plotted versus the square root of time (in seconds) to obtain the corresponding curves. The total water amount (Q) absorbed by the samples and the absorption coefficient (AC) were calculated.
- The water vapour permeability test was carried out on five specimens 5 × 5 × 1 cm for each mix according to the UNI EN15803 standard [39]. The test conditions were 23 °C and 50% RH. The water vapour permeability (δp) was expressed as:
- Uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) and flexural strength (FS) were determined following the UNI EN 1015-11 standard [40]. The FS test was carried out on three 4 × 4 × 16 cm specimens for each mortar. The two resulting halves of each specimen, obtained from the bending rupture, were used for the UCS test. Both tests were conducted with a Controls Model 65 testing machine equipped with 15 kN load pistons.
- A microdrilling test was also performed to determine the resistance of the mortars to a rotating tip. Drilling resistance was measured using a Drilling Resistance Measurement System (DRMS) Cordless device (SINT Technology), equipped with a polycrystalline diamond-coated flat-tip drill bit of 5 mm diameter. The drilling test was performed on one 4 × 4 × 16 cm specimen for each mortar mix. Three holes per specimen were drilled up to a depth of 20 mm. The penetration force was recorded every 0.05 mm for a total of 200 acquisitions for each hole. The wearing of the drill was almost negligible for the soft lime mortars used in this study. The penetration rate and rotational speed were established after preliminary tests and were set at 20 mm/min and 50 rpm, respectively.
- Salt ageing test. There is still no commonly accepted procedure for mortar salt ageing [41,42]. The test was performed following the RILEM MSA2 recommendation [43] with some modifications, such as a lower concentration of the saline solution to reproduce more realistic conditions. Cubic specimens with sides of 4 cm were dried in an oven at 60 °C and then sealed on the lateral surfaces using Parafilm stripes in order to convey the evaporation flow only along the z-direction. Then, they were immersed 10 mm high from their base for 2 h in a 3% sodium sulphate solution, which reproduced more realistic conditions compared to higher salt concentrations [44]. After the absorption of the saline solution, they were dried on a plastic tray for 22 h at 20 °C and 50% RH in a CH250 CLIMATEST ARGOLAB climatic chamber, after which salts formed on the surface and they were removed by brush. Daily cycles were repeated over 12 weeks (84 days). After each cycle, visual observations and weight measurements were carried out, and a graph of the weight variations as a function of time was elaborated.
3. Results and Discussions
3.1. Mortars’ Microstructure and Porosity Features
3.2. Behaviour in Water Transfer
3.3. UPVs and Mechanical Properties
3.4. Resistance to Salt Ageing
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mazzei, B. Preservation and use of the religious sites: The case study of the roman catacombs. Eur. J. Sci. Theol. 2015, 11, 33–43. [Google Scholar]
- Scatigno, C.; Gaudenzi, S.; Sammartino, M.P.; Visco, G. A microclimate study on hypogea environments of ancient roman building. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 566–567, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sánchez Moral, S.; Cuezva, S.; García Antón, E.; Fernández Cortés, A.; Elez, J.; Benavente, D.; Cañaveras, J.C.; Jurado, V.; Rogerio Candelera, M.A.; Sáiz-Jiménez, C. Microclimatic monitoring in Altamira Cave: Two decades of scientific projects for its conservation. In The Conservation of Subterranean Cultural Heritage; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014; pp. 139–144. [Google Scholar]
- Herráez, I.A.; Rodriguez, M.A.; De Alvaro, E. The conservation of the Cueva de Altamira. Stud. Conserv. 1994, 39, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agnew, N.; Maekawa, S.; Wei, S. Causes and Mechanisms of Deterioration and Damage in Cave 85. In Conservation of Ancient Sites on the Silk Road, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Conservation of Grotto Sites, Mogao Grottoes, Dunhuang, China, 28 June–3 July 2004; The Getty Conservation Institute: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Germinario, L.; Oguchi, C.T. Underground salt weathering of heritage stone: Lithological and environmental constraints on the formation of sulfate efflorescences and crusts. J. Cult. Herit. 2021, 49, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pender, R.J. The behaviour of water in porous building materials and structures. Stud. Conserv. 2004, 49, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Price, C.; Brimblecombe, P. Preventing salt damage in porous materials. Stud. Conserv. 1994, 39, 90–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peroni, S.; Tersigni, G.; Torraca, G.; Cerea, S.; Forti, M.; Guidobaldi, F.; Rossi Doria, P.; De Rege, A.; Picchi, D.; Pietrafitta, F.J.; et al. Lime Based Mortars for the Repair of Ancient Masonry and Possible Substitutes. In Proceedings of the Symposium Mortars, Cements and Grouts Used in the Conservation of Historic Buildings, Rome, Italy, 3–6 November 1981; ICCROM: Rome, Italy, 1982; pp. 63–99. [Google Scholar]
- Isebaert, A.; Van Parys, L.; Cnudde, V. Composition and compatibility requirements of mineral repair mortars for stone—A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 59, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mora, P.; Mora, L.; Philipphot, P. La Conservation des Peintures Murales; ICCROM: Rome, Italy; Editrice Compositori: Bologna, Italy, 1977. [Google Scholar]
- Schueremans, L.; Cizer, Ö.; Janssens, E.; Serré, G.; Van Balen, K. Characterization of repair mortars for the assessment of their compatibility in restoration projects: Research and practice. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 4338–4350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schäfer, J.; Hilsdorf, H.K. Ancient and new lime mortars—The correlation between their composition, structure and properties. In Conservation of Stone and Other Materials Volume 2: Prevention and Treatments, Proceedings of the International RILEM/UNESCO Congress Conservation of Stone and Other Materials: Research, Industry, Media, Held at UNESCO Headquarters, Paris, France, 29 June–1 July 1993; Thiel, M.-J., Ed.; Spon Press: London, UK, 1993; pp. 605–612. [Google Scholar]
- Torraca, G. Porous Building Materials: Materials Science for Architectural Conservation; ICCROM: Rome, Italy, 1981; p. 149. [Google Scholar]
- Lawrence, M.; Walker, P.; D’Ayala, D. Non-Hydraulic lime mortars. J. Archit. Conserv. 2006, 12, 7–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arizzi, A.; Cultrone, G. The influence of aggregate texture, morphology and grading on the carbonation of non-hydraulic (aerial) lime-based mortars. Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. 2013, 46, 507–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lanas, J.; Alvarez, J.I. Masonry repair lime-based mortars: Factors affecting the mechanical behavior. Cem. Concr. Res. 2003, 33, 1867–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lea, F.M. The Chemistry of Cement and Concrete, 3rd ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: London, UK, 1970; p. 896. [Google Scholar]
- Venice Charter, International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites, Venice. 1964. Available online: http://www.icomos.org/docs/venice_charter.html (accessed on 26 June 2023).
- Conclusions of the Symposium Mortars, Cements and Grouts Used in the Conservation of Historic Buildings; ICCROM: Rome, Italy, 3–6 November 1981. Mater. Struct. 1990, 23, 235.
- Veiga, R. Air lime mortars: What else do we need to know to apply them in conservation and rehabilitation interventions? A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 157, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goncalves, T.D.; Rodrigues, J.D.; Abreu, M.M.; Esteves, A.M.; Silva Santos, A. Causes of Salt Decay and Repair of Plasters and Renders of Five Historic Buildings in Portugal. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Heritage, Weathering and Conservation, Madrid, Spain, 21–24 June 2006; Gomez-Heras, C.V., Ed.; Taylor & Francis: Madrid, Spain, 2006; pp. 273–284. [Google Scholar]
- Hughes, J.; Valek, J. Mortars in Historical Buildings. A Review of the Conservation, Technicaland Scientific Literature; Historic Scotland: Edinburgh, UK, 2003; p. 80. [Google Scholar]
- Pelosi, C.; Agresti, G.; Andaloro, M.; Baraldi, P.; Pogliani, P.; Santamaria, U. The rock hewn wall paintings in Cappadocia (Turkey). Characterization of the constituent materials and a chronological overview. E-Preserv. Sci. 2013, 10, 99–108. [Google Scholar]
- Pelosi, C.; Agresti, G.; Andaloro, M.; Baraldi, P.; Pogliani, P.; Santamaria, U.; LaRussa, M.F.; Ruffolo, S.A.; Rovella, N. Micro-Raman and micro-stratigraphic analysis of the painting materials in the rock-hewn church of the Forty Martyrs in Şahinefendi, Cappadocia (Turkey). Archaeometry 2016, 58, 659–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fonseca, C.D. Civiltà Delle Grotte: Mezzogiorno Rupestre; Edizioni del Sole: Napoli, Italy, 1988; p. 372. [Google Scholar]
- Andriani, G.F.; Walsh, N. Physical properties and textural parameters of calcarenitic rocks: Qualitative and quantitative evaluations. Eng. Geol. 2002, 67, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andriani, G.F.; Walsh, N. Fabric, porosity and water permeability of calcarenites from Apulia (SE Italy) used as building and ornamental stone. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2003, 62, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calia, A.; Lettieri, M.; Mecchi, A.; Quarta, G. The role of the petrophysical characteristics on the durability and conservation of some porous calcarenites from Southern Italy. J. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 2015, 416, 183–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Capasso, F.E.; Giandomenico, M.; Muca, S. IL Restauro Dei Dipinti Murali Della Cripta Rupestre Dei Ss. Pietro E Paolo a Matera. Studio Sperimentale Sulle Stuccature E SUI Leganti Della Reintegrazione Pittorica per Gli Ambienti Ipogeiil. Master’s Thesis, Istituto Centrale per IL Restauro, Rome, Italy, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Navrátilová, E.; Tihlaříková, E.; Neděla, V.; Rovnaníková, P.; Pavlìk, J. Effect of the preparation of lime putties on their properties. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 17260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aggelakopoulou, E.; Bakolas, A.; Moropoulou, A. Lime putty versus hydrated lime powder: Physicochemical and mechanical characteristics of lime-based mortars. Constr. Build. Mat. 2019, 225, 633–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNI EN 459-1:2010; Building Lime—Part 1: Definitions, Specifications and Conformity Criteria. UNI: Milan, Italy, 2011.
- Boenzi, F.; Radina, B.; Ricchetti, G.; Valduga, A. Note Illustrative Della Carta Geologica d’Italia 1:100.000, Foglio 201 Matera; Servizio Geologico d’Italia, Nuova Tecnica Grafica: Roma, Italy, 1971. [Google Scholar]
- Cazzalla, O.; Rodriguez-Navarro, C.; Sebastian, E.; Cultrone, G. Aging of lime putty: Effect on traditional lime mortar carbonation. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2000, 83, 1070–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lanas, J.; Pères Bernal, J.L.; Bello, M.A.; Alvarez, J.I. Mechanical properties of masonry repair dolomitic lime-based mortars. Cem. Concr. Res. 2006, 36, 951–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ASTM D2845-08; Standard Test Method for Laboratory Determination of Pulse Velocities and Ultrasonic Elastic Constants of Rock. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2008.
- UNI EN 1580:2010; Conservation of Cultural Property—Test Methods—Determination of Water Absorption by Capillarity. UNI: Milan, Italy, 2010.
- UNI EN15803:2010; Conservation of Cultural Property—Test Methods—Determination of Water Vapour Permeability. UNI: Milan, Italy, 2012.
- UNI EN 1015-11:2019; Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry—Part 11: Determination of Flexural and Compressive Strength of Hardened Mortar. UNI: Milan, Italy, 2019.
- Lubelli, B.; Cnudde, V.; Diaz-Goncalves, T.; Franzoni, E.; Van Hees, R.P.J.; Ioannou, V.; Menendez, B.; Nunes, C.; Siedel, H.; Stefanidou, M.; et al. Towards a more effective and reliable salt crystallisation test for porous building materials: State of the art. Mater. Struct. 2018, 51, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arizzi, A.; Viles, H.; Cultrone, G. Experimental testing of the durability of lime-based mortars used for rendering historic buildings. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 28, 807–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- RILEM TC 127-MS: Tests for Masonry Materials and Structures, MS-A.2 Uni-directional salt crystallization test for masonry units. Mater. Struct. 1998, 31, 10–15. [CrossRef]
- Lubelli, B.; Van Hees, R.P.J.; Nijland, T.G. Salt crystallization damage: How realistic are existing ageing tests? In Proceedings of the AMS 2014—1st International Conference on Ageing of Materials and Structures, Delft, The Netherlands, 26–28 May 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Pinto, A.F.; da Fonseca, B.S.; Silva, D.V. The role of aggregate and binder content in the physical and mechanical properties of mortars from historical rubble stone masonry walls of the National Palace of Sintra. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 268, 121080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arandigoyen, M.; Perez Bernal, J.L.; Bello Lopez, M.A.; Alvarez, J.I. Lime-pastes with different kneading water: Pore structure and capillary porosity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2005, 252, 1449–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawrence, R.M.; Mays, T.J.; Rigby, S.P.; Walker, P.; D’Ayala, D. Effects of carbonation on the pore structure of non-hydraulic lime mortars. Cem. Concr. Res. 2007, 37, 1059–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andriani, G.F.; Walsh, N. Petrophysical and mechanical properties of soft and porous building rocks used in Apulian monuments (South Italy). J. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 2010, 333, 129–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santos, A.R.; Do Rosario Veiga, M.; Santos Silva, A.; De Brito, J.; Alvarez, J.I. Evolution of the microstructure of lime-based mortars and influence on the mechanical behaviour: The role of the aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 187, 907–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fragata, A.; Veiga, R. Air lime mortars: The influence of calcareous aggregate and filler addition. Mater. Sci. Forum 2010, 636–637, 1280–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ioannou, I.; Andreou, A.; Tsikouras, B.; Hatzipanagiotou, K. Application of the Sharp Front Model to capillary absorption in a vuggy limestone. Eng. Geol. 2009, 105, 20–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia del Cura, M.A.; Benavente, D.; Martinez, J.M.; Cueto, N. Sedimentary structures and physical properties of travertine and carbonate tufa building stone. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 28, 456–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faria, P.; Henriques, F.; Rato, V. Comparative evaluation of lime mortars for architectural conservation. J. Cult. Herit. 2008, 9, 338–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Branco, F.G.; Belgas, M.D.L.; Mendes, C.; Pereira, L.; Ortega, J.M. Mechanical Performance of Lime Mortar Coatings for Rehabilitation of Masonry Elements in Old and Historical Buildings. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Veiga, M.d.R.; Fragata, A.; Velosa, A.L.; Magalhães, A.C.; Margalha, G. Lime-based mortars: Viability for use as substitution renders in historical buildings. Int. J. Archit. Herit. 2010, 4, 177–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bianco, N.; Calia, A.; Denotarpietro, G.; Negro, P. Hydraulic mortar and problems related to the suitability for restoration. Period. Mineral. 2013, 82, 529–542. [Google Scholar]
- UNI EN 998-1:2016; Specification for Mortar for Masonry—Part 1: Rendering and Plastering Mortar. UNI: Milan, Italy, 2017.
- WTA Merkblatt 2-9-04/D Sanierputzsysteme. Wissenschaftlich-Technischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Bauwerkserhaltung und Denkmalpflege. 2004. Available online: https://www.wta-international.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Geschaeftsstelle/Schriften/Kurzfassungen/2-9-20.pdf (accessed on 26 June 2023).
- Velosa, A.L.; Rocha, F.; Veiga, M.R. Influence of chemical and mineralogical composition of metakaolin on mortar characteristics. Acta Geodyn. Geomater. 2009, 153, 121–126. [Google Scholar]
- Válek, J.; Matas, T. Experimental Study of Hot Mixed Mortars in Comparison with Lime Putty and Hydrate Mortars. In Historic Mortars; RILEM Bookseries, 7; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 269–281. [Google Scholar]
- Vasanelli, E.; Calia, A.; Masieri, M.; Quarta, G. New insights into the use of drilling test for the characterization of soft lime mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 316, 125894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scherer, G.W. Stress from crystallization of salt. Cem. Concr. Res. 2004, 34, 1613–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espinosa, R.M.; Franke, L.; Deckelmann, G. Model for themechanical stress due to the salt crystallization in porous materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2008, 22, 1350–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alves, C.; Figueiredo, C.; Maurício, A.; Aires-Barros, L. Susceptibility of limestone petrographic features to salt weathering: A scanning electron microscopy study. Microsc. Microanal. 2013, 19, 1231–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calia, A.; Mecchi, A.M.; Colangiuli, D.; Baccelle, L.S. Conservation issues with calcarenites used as historical building materials in Syracuse (Southern Italy). Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. 2013, 46, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
RF | RM | RC | |
---|---|---|---|
Aggregate Size | Aggregate Amount (%) | ||
Coarse (a): 500 µm–1 mm | 10 | 20 | 40 |
Medium: 250 µm–500 µm | 40 | 60 | 50 |
Fine: 125 µm–250 µm | 50 | 20 | 10 |
Mortars’ Aggregate | Mortars’ Composition | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Real Density (kg/m3) | Bulk Density (kg/m3) | Lime Putty (kg/m3) | Aggregate (kg/m3) | * Total Water (kg/m3) | |
RF | 2720 | 1.41 | 319 | 1061 | 276 |
RM | 2720 | 1.33 | 319 | 997 | 276 |
RC | 2720 | 1.25 | 319 | 938 | 276 |
NRF | 2678 | 1.43 | 319 | 1073 | 276 |
NRM | 2678 | 1.38 | 319 | 1036 | 276 |
NRC | 2682 | 1.30 | 319 | 974 | 276 |
NRF | NRM | NRC | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aggregate Size | Aggregate Type and Amounts (%) | ||||||||
C | G | (C + G) | C | G | (C + G) | C | G | (C + G) | |
Coarse (b): 1 mm–1.4 mm | - | 10 | 10 | - | 20 | 20 | 10 | 20 | 30 |
Coarse (a): 500 µm–1 mm | - | 10 | 10 | 20 | 10 | 30 | - | 50 | 50 |
Medium: 250 µm–500 µm | 20 | 20 | 40 | - | 30 | 30 | 20 | - | 20 |
Fine: 125 µm–250 µm | - | 40 | 40 | - | 20 | 20 | - | - | - |
Mix | Apparent Density (g/cm3) | Porosity (%) | Pore Volume (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.01–<1 µm | ≥1–<10 µm | ≥10–100 µm | |||
RF | 1.75 ± 0.02 | 38.8 ± 1.7 | 32 | 58 | 10 |
RM | 1.69 ± 0.01 | 36.2 ± 0.1 | 40 | 53 | 8 |
RC | 1.72 ± 0.04 | 38 ± 0.6 | 36 | 37 | 27 |
NRF | 1.85 ± 0.01 | 33.2 ± 0.3 | 36 | 20 | 42 |
NRM | 1.82 ± 0.06 | 34.7 ± 0.8 | 33 | 16 | 47 |
NRC | 1.81 ± 0.02 | 33.6 ± 0.3 | 34 | 14 | 49 |
original plaster | 1.66 ± 0.01 | 45.5 ± 0.5 | 13 | 74 | 13 |
Mix | AC (mg/cm2s−1/2) | Q (mg/cm2) | µ |
---|---|---|---|
RF | 17 ± 1 | 497 ± 18 | 8.5 ± 0.4 |
RM | 19 ± 1 | 515 ± 6 | 9.6 ± 0.4 |
RC | 19 ± 2 | 523 ± 12 | 8.9 ± 1.0 |
NRF | 22 ± 2 | 492 ± 23 | 7.9 ± 0.7 |
NRM | 31 ± 3 | 535 ± 34 | 10.1 ± 0.5 |
NRC | 34 ± 7 | 523 ± 25 | 8.7 ± 0.9 |
MIX | UPV (m/s) | FS (MPa) | UCS (MPa) | DR Mean (N) |
---|---|---|---|---|
RF | 1482 ± 79 | 1.82 ± 0.18 | 1.83 ± 0.28 | 4.51 ± 0.37 |
RM | 1442 ± 75 | 2.01 ± 0.08 | 2.07 ± 0.16 | 4.77 ± 0.22 |
RC | 1386 ± 52 | 1.81 ± 0.26 | 2.03 ± 0.19 | 2.09 ± 0.98 |
NRF | 1180 ± 53 | 0.74 ± 0.11 | 1.10 ± 0.05 | 2.58 ± 0.51 |
NRM | 1106 ± 80 | 0.68 ± 0.06 | 1.25 ± 0.19 | 2.55 ± 0.38 |
NRC | 947 ± 68 | 0.48 ± 0.18 | 0.89 ± 0.09 | 2.66 ± 0.35 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Giandomenico, M.; Capasso, F.E.; Muca, S.; Gaetani, M.C.; Quarta, G.; Iafrate, S.; Melica, D.; Calia, A. A Study of Repair Mortars for Restoration of Wall Painted Plasters in a Hypogeum Rock-Cut Church of Matera (Southern Italy). Materials 2023, 16, 5715. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16165715
Giandomenico M, Capasso FE, Muca S, Gaetani MC, Quarta G, Iafrate S, Melica D, Calia A. A Study of Repair Mortars for Restoration of Wall Painted Plasters in a Hypogeum Rock-Cut Church of Matera (Southern Italy). Materials. 2023; 16(16):5715. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16165715
Chicago/Turabian StyleGiandomenico, Manuel, Filippo Edoardo Capasso, Sokol Muca, Maria Carolina Gaetani, Giovanni Quarta, Sara Iafrate, Davide Melica, and Angela Calia. 2023. "A Study of Repair Mortars for Restoration of Wall Painted Plasters in a Hypogeum Rock-Cut Church of Matera (Southern Italy)" Materials 16, no. 16: 5715. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16165715