Precision Control in Vat Photopolymerization Based on Pure Copper Paste: Process Parameters and Optimization Strategies
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Material and Methods
2.1. Raw Materials and Fabrication of Copper Samples
2.2. Print Pattern Design and Parameter Election
2.3. Experimental Design and Characterization
3. Results and Discussions
3.1. Effect of Printing Parameters on Dimensional Accuracy
3.2. ANOVA
3.3. Further Optimization
3.4. Properties of Metal Copper
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Singh, G.; Pandey, P.M. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2020, 234, 82–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Suo, H.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, L.; Liu, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, Q. Exploration of Correlation between the Material Characteristics of the Copper Layer on the Electrical and Thermal Properties of REBCO Tape and Coil. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 925, 166770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Chang, S.; Khuje, S.; Ren, S. Recent Advancement of Emerging Nano Copper-Based Printable Flexible Hybrid Electronics. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 6211–6232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sanjeev, K.C.; Nezhadfar, P.D.; Phillips, C.; Kennedy, M.S.; Shamsaei, N.; Jackson, R.L. Tribological Behavior of 17–4 PH Stainless Steel Fabricated by Traditional Manufacturing and Laser-Based Additive Manufacturing Methods. Wear 2019, 440–441, 203100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pereira, T.; Kennedy, J.V.; Potgieter, J. A Comparison of Traditional Manufacturing vs Additive Manufacturing, the Best Method for the Job. Procedia Manuf. 2019, 30, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strong, D.; Sirichakwal, I.; Manogharan, G.P.; Wakefield, T. Current State and Potential of Additive—Hybrid Manufacturing for Metal Parts. Rapid Prototyp. J. 2017, 23, 577–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Upadhyay, M.; Sivarupan, T.; El Mansori, M. 3D Printing for Rapid Sand Casting—A Review. J. Manuf. Process. 2017, 29, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, P.S.; Liang, K.M. Review Functional Materials of Porous Metals Made by P/M, Electroplating and Some Other Techniques. J. Mater. Sci. 2001, 36, 5059–5072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rane, K.; Strano, M. A Comprehensive Review of Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing Processes for Rapid Production of Metallic and Ceramic Parts. Adv. Manuf. 2019, 7, 155–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, K.R.; Down, M.P.; Banks, C.E. Future of Additive Manufacturing: Overview of 4D and 3D Printed Smart and Advanced Materials and Their Applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 403, 126162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frazier, W.E. Metal Additive Manufacturing: A Review. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2014, 23, 1917–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, N.; Huang, S.; Zhang, G.; Qin, R.; Liu, W.; Xiong, H.; Shi, G.; Blackburn, J. Progress in Additive Manufacturing on New Materials: A Review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2019, 35, 242–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Yang, S.; Zhao, Y.F. Manufacturability Analysis of Metal Laser-Based Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing—A Survey. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 110, 57–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, B.; Zhao, X.; Li, S.; Han, C.; Wei, Q.; Wen, S.; Liu, J.; Shi, Y. Differences in Microstructure and Properties between Selective Laser Melting and Traditional Manufacturing for Fabrication of Metal Parts: A Review. Front. Mech. Eng. 2015, 10, 111–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, C.; Hao, L.; Hussein, A.; Young, P.; Raymont, D. Advanced Lightweight 316L Stainless Steel Cellular Lattice Structures Fabricated via Selective Laser Melting. Mater. Des. 2014, 55, 533–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tan, C.; Li, S.; Essa, K.; Jamshidi, P.; Zhou, K.; Ma, W.; Attallah, M.M. Laser Powder Bed Fusion of Ti-Rich TiNi Lattice Structures: Process Optimisation, Geometrical Integrity, and Phase Transformations. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2019, 141, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Roumanie, M.; Flassayer, C.; Resch, A.; Cortella, L.; Laucournet, R. Influence of Debinding and Sintering Conditions on the Composition and Thermal Conductivity of Copper Parts Printed from Highly Loaded Photocurable Formulations. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chartier, T.; Dupas, C.; Geffroy, P.-M.; Pateloup, V.; Colas, M.; Cornette, J.; Guillemet-Fritsch, S. Influence of Irradiation Parameters on the Polymerization of Ceramic Reactive Suspensions for Stereolithography. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 37, 4431–4436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shen, M.; Zhao, W.; Xing, B.; Sing, Y.; Gao, S.; Wang, C.; Zhao, Z. Effects of Exposure Time and Printing Angle on the Curing Characteristics and Flexural Strength of Ceramic Samples Fabricated via Digital Light Processing. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 24379–24384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.W.; Lee, I.H.; Cho, D.-W. Development of Micro-Stereolithography Technology Using Metal Powder. Microelectron. Eng. 2006, 83, 1253–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sano, D.; Kirihara, S. Fabrication of Metal Photonic Crystals with Graded Lattice Spacing by Using Micro-Stereolithography. Mater. Sci. Forum 2010, 631–632, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitteramskogler, G.; Gmeiner, R.; Felzmann, R.; Gruber, S.; Hofstetter, C.; Stampfl, J.; Ebert, J.; Wachter, W.; Laubersheimer, J. Light Curing Strategies for Lithography-Based Additive Manufacturing of Customized Ceramics. Addit. Manuf. 2014, 1–4, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Felzmann, R.; Gruber, S.; Mitteramskogler, G.; Tesavibul, P.; Boccaccini, A.R.; Liska, R.; Stampfl, J. Lithography-Based Additive Manufacturing of Cellular Ceramic Structures. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2012, 14, 1052–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lakhdar, Y.; Tuck, C.; Binner, J.; Terry, A.; Goodridge, R. Additive Manufacturing of Advanced Ceramic Materials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2021, 116, 100736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, C.; Hu, H.; Zhuo, M.; Shen, C. Effects of Particle Grading Composition of SiC on Properties of Silicon-Bonded SiC Porous Ceramics. Mater. Res. Express 2022, 9, 015501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, C.; Hu, K.; Li, J.; Li, P.; Lu, Z. The Effect of Light Scattering in Stereolithography Ceramic Manufacturing. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 7141–7154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griffith, M.L.; Halloran, J.W. Scattering of Ultraviolet Radiation in Turbid Suspensions. J. Appl. Phys. 1997, 81, 2538–2546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brandau, B.; Da Silva, A.; Wilsnack, C.; Brueckner, F.; Kaplan, A.F.H. Absorbance Study of Powder Conditions for Laser Additive Manufacturing. Mater. Des. 2022, 216, 110591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J.; Binner, J.; Bai, J. 3D Printing of Zirconia via Digital Light Processing: Optimization of Slurry and Debinding Process. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 5837–5844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Yang, W.; Qin, Y.; Liang, W.; Yu, H.; Liu, L. Digital Micro-Mirror Device -Based Light Curing Technology and Its Biological Applications. Opt. Laser Technol. 2021, 143, 107344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, L.; Liu, C.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, S.; Tan, M.; Liu, M.; Jia, Z.; Zhai, R.; Liu, H. Technology of Static Oblique Lithography Used to Improve the Fidelity of Lithography Pattern Based on DMD Projection Lithography. Opt. Laser Technol. 2023, 157, 108666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ożóg, P.; Blugan, G.; Kata, D.; Graule, T. Influence of the Printing Parameters on the Quality of Alumina Ceramics Shaped by UV-LCM Technology. J. Ceram. Sci. Technol. 2019, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kovacev, N.; Li, S.; Essa, K. Effect of the Preparation Techniques of Photopolymerizable Ceramic Slurry and Printing Parameters on the Accuracy of 3D Printed Lattice Structures. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 7734–7743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aloui, F.; Lecamp, L.; Lebaudy, P.; Burel, F. Relationships between Refractive Index Change and Light Scattering during Photopolymerization of Acrylic Composite Formulations. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2016, 36, 1805–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, R.-J.; Jiang, Q.-G.; Wu, H.-D.; Li, Y.-H.; Liu, W.-Y.; Lu, X.-X.; Wu, S.-H. Fabrication of Complex Shaped Ceramic Parts with Surface-Oxidized Si3N4 Powder via Digital Light Processing Based Stereolithography Method. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 5158–5162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, W.; Yang, P.; Lin, L.; Li, Y.; Wu, S. Improving Cure Performance of Si3N4 Suspension with a High Refractive Index Resin for Stereolithography-Based Additive Manufacturing. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 12569–12577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, S.; Ding, J.; Fu, J.; Fu, M.; Zhang, B.; Song, X. High-Precision Laser Powder Bed Fusion Processing of Pure Copper. Addit. Manuf. 2021, 48, 102417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Conti, L.; Bienenstein, D.; Borlaf, M.; Graule, T. Effects of the Layer Height and Exposure Energy on the Lateral Resolution of Zirconia Parts Printed by Lithography-Based Additive Manufacturing. Materials 2020, 13, 1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Exposure Time (ET) (s) | Exposure Intensity (EI) (mW/cm2) | Layer Thickness (LT) (μm) | Sweeper Moving Speed (SMS) (mm/min) |
---|---|---|---|
15, 20, 25 | 150, 200 | 20, 30 | 500, 1000 |
No. | ET (s) | EI (mW/cm2) | LT (μm) | SMS (mm/min) | RMSD (μm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 15 | 150 | 30 | 500 | 213.06 |
2 | 15 | 150 | 30 | 1000 | 228.02 |
3 | 15 | 150 | 20 | 500 | 144.12 |
4 | 15 | 150 | 20 | 1000 | 162.21 |
5 | 15 | 200 | 30 | 500 | 167.06 |
6 | 15 | 200 | 30 | 1000 | 192.10 |
7 | 15 | 200 | 20 | 500 | 111.19 |
8 | 15 | 200 | 20 | 1000 | 146.15 |
9 | 20 | 150 | 30 | 500 | 145.21 |
10 | 20 | 150 | 30 | 1000 | 196.04 |
11 | 20 | 150 | 20 | 500 | 130.01 |
12 | 20 | 150 | 20 | 1000 | 148.03 |
13 | 20 | 200 | 30 | 500 | 40.22 |
14 | 20 | 200 | 30 | 1000 | 53.04 |
15 | 20 | 200 | 20 | 500 | 102.02 |
16 | 20 | 200 | 20 | 1000 | 123.03 |
17 | 25 | 150 | 30 | 500 | 88.22 |
18 | 25 | 150 | 30 | 1000 | 94.17 |
19 | 25 | 150 | 20 | 500 | 118.01 |
20 | 25 | 150 | 20 | 1000 | 140.02 |
21 | 25 | 200 | 30 | 500 | 42.10 |
22 | 25 | 200 | 30 | 1000 | 70.03 |
23 | 25 | 200 | 20 | 500 | 202.02 |
24 | 25 | 200 | 20 | 1000 | 214.03 |
Level | ET | EI | LT | SMS |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 170.5 | 150.6 | 145.1 | 125.3 |
2 | 117.2 | 121.9 | 127.4 | 147.2 |
3 | 121.1 | |||
Delta | 53.3 | 28.7 | 17.6 | 22.0 |
Rank | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
Source | p-Values for Gap Model | p-Values for Hole Model | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
dModel = 100 μm | dModel = 200 μm | dModel = 300 μm | ФModel = 300 μm | ФModel = 400 μm | ФModel = 500 μm | |
ET | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.020 | 0.000 |
EI | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.003 | 0.002 |
LT | 0.623 | 0.117 | 0.365 | 0.054 | 0.953 | 0.806 |
SMS | 0.017 | 0.001 | 0.036 | 0.022 | 0.037 | 0.022 |
ET & EI | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.028 | 0.003 | 0.232 | 0.010 |
ET & LT | 0.030 | 0.352 | 0.300 | 0.000 | 0.039 | 0.040 |
ET & SMS | 0.120 | 0.984 | 0.980 | 0.900 | 0.823 | 0.467 |
EI & LT | 0.004 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.009 | 0.015 |
EI & SMS | 0.523 | 0.158 | 0.877 | 0.968 | 0.815 | 0.832 |
LT & SMS | 0.733 | 0.210 | 0.447 | 0.903 | 0.907 | 0.832 |
ET | EI | Ф = 200 μm | Ф = 300 μm | Ф = 400 μm | Ф = 500 μm | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 20 | 200 | 113 | 248 | 353 | 457 |
2 | 20 | 210 | 125 | 253 | 362 | 464 |
3 | 20 | 220 | 127 | 259 | 367 | 472 |
4 | 20 | 230 | 137 | 265 | 384 | 489 |
5 | 21 | 200 | 132 | 261 | 373 | 453 |
6 | 21 | 210 | 141 | 270 | 380 | 479 |
7 | 21 | 220 | 149 | 287 | 391 | 498 |
8 | 21 | 230 | 136 | 279 | 353 | 492 |
9 | 22 | 200 | 138 | 275 | 375 | 485 |
10 | 22 | 210 | 145 | 279 | 380 | 487 |
11 | 22 | 220 | 132 | 253 | 359 | 479 |
12 | 22 | 230 | 113 | 233 | 350 | 478 |
13 | 23 | 200 | 140 | 270 | 385 | 485 |
14 | 23 | 210 | 124 | 266 | 355 | 483 |
15 | 23 | 220 | 129 | 228 | 353 | 473 |
16 | 23 | 230 | 111 | 219 | 338 | 452 |
17 | 24 | 200 | 125 | 284 | 369 | 485 |
18 | 24 | 210 | 119 | 241 | 344 | 475 |
19 | 24 | 220 | 108 | 226 | 341 | 457 |
20 | 24 | 230 | 107 | 210 | 335 | 448 |
21 | 25 | 200 | 112 | 236 | 348 | 482 |
22 | 25 | 210 | 109 | 220 | 347 | 460 |
23 | 25 | 220 | 105 | 216 | 326 | 438 |
24 | 25 | 230 | 106 | 218 | 329 | 433 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, W.; Feng, M.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Xing, B.; Zhao, Z. Precision Control in Vat Photopolymerization Based on Pure Copper Paste: Process Parameters and Optimization Strategies. Materials 2023, 16, 5565. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16165565
Wang W, Feng M, Wang Z, Jiang Y, Xing B, Zhao Z. Precision Control in Vat Photopolymerization Based on Pure Copper Paste: Process Parameters and Optimization Strategies. Materials. 2023; 16(16):5565. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16165565
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Weiqu, Mengzhao Feng, Zhiwei Wang, Yanlin Jiang, Bohang Xing, and Zhe Zhao. 2023. "Precision Control in Vat Photopolymerization Based on Pure Copper Paste: Process Parameters and Optimization Strategies" Materials 16, no. 16: 5565. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16165565