Next Article in Journal
Cobalt Impregnation on Titania Photocatalysts Enhances Vis Phenol Photodegradation
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Waste Glass Incorporation in Asphalt Concrete for Surface Layer Construction
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Al-Mg2Si Alloy Hybrid Surface Composites by Friction Stir Processing: Mechanical, Wear, and Microstructure Evaluation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neural Network Aided Homogenization Approach for Predicting Effective Thermal Conductivity of Composite Construction Materials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Interlayer Bonding Temperature on the Bending Properties of Asphalt Concrete Core Wall

1
State Key Laboratory of Eco-Hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China
2
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(11), 4133; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16114133
Submission received: 16 March 2023 / Revised: 25 May 2023 / Accepted: 29 May 2023 / Published: 1 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Asphalt Mixtures and Pavements Design)

Abstract

:
In the construction process of an asphalt concrete impermeable core wall, the interlayer bonding of the core wall is the weak link of the core wall structure and also the focus of construction, so it is important to carry out research on the influence of interlayer bonding temperature on the bending performance of an asphalt concrete core wall. In this paper, we study whether asphalt concrete core walls could be treated with cold-bonding by fabricating small beam bending specimens with different interlayer bond temperatures and conducting bending tests on them at 2 °C. The effect of temperature variation on the bending performance of the bond surface under the asphalt concrete core wall is studied through experimental data analysis. The test results show that the maximum value of porosity of bituminous concrete specimens is 2.10% at lower bond surface temperature of −25 °C, which does not meet the specification requirement of less than 2%. The bending stress, strain, and deflection of bituminous concrete core wall increase with the increase of bond surface temperature, especially when the bond surface temperature is less than −10 °C. If the lower bonding surface temperature is less than 10 °C, the upper layer of asphalt mixture with large grain size aggregate cannot be effectively buried in the low bond surface, resulting in flat fracture and brittle damage to the specimen, which is detrimental to construction quality; therefore, the bonding surface should be heated so that the temperature of the bottom bonding surface is 30 °C. If the lower bonding surface temperature is 10 °C or above, no heating is required.

1. Introduction

Hydraulic asphalt concrete core walls, panels, and geomembranes are the main impermeable structures for pumped storage power plants [1,2,3], among which asphalt concrete core wall dams are widely used in water conservancy projects because of their simple structure, fast construction, and excellent impermeability with good deformation and seismic resistance [4,5,6]. During the construction process of an asphalt concrete impermeable core wall, the bond between core layers is the weak link of the core wall structure [7,8] and thus also the focus of construction, because hydraulic asphalt concrete has a strong temperature sensitivity [9,10,11]. Especially in low-temperature environments [12,13,14], asphalt concrete is most affected by temperature. Its construction is usually carried out at room temperature, but in some low-temperature environments, if the base temperature of asphalt concrete is too low, the construction difficulty will increase and the quality of construction will be difficult to guarantee. Therefore, China stipulates that the temperature of the combined surface of the asphalt concrete core wall cannot be lower than 70 °C [15].
The surface temperature of the hydraulic asphalt concrete core wall bond is mostly inconsistent within each country, and some of the German asphalt roll concrete dams, when paved, require the subgrade surface temperature to be in excess of 25 °C; if this is not the case, heating of the subgrade surface is required [16]. In 1989, for example, for the construction of the German Schmalwasser (Schmalwasser) asphaltic concrete heart wall dam, depending on the construction requirements, the surface temperature of the bottom layer needed to be greater than 25 °C before the top layer of the mixture was paved; if this was not the case, the bonding surface of the asphalt concrete core wall had to be heated [17]. The Yeller asphalt concrete core wall dam was completed in China in 2005 and required an interlayer heating temperature of no less than 70 °C, but it had been successfully built in a low-temperature environment, and observations during and after construction showed that the asphalt concrete core wall worked well [18]. In recent years, a project in Xinjiang, China [19] and a project on the construction of an asphalt concrete core wall in Shiazi Mountain, Yunnan [20] used the top layer of hot material to raise the temperature of the bonding layer, but more projective construction used the intermediate layer heating specification to treat the bonding surface [21].
Researchers are currently studying the interlayer bonding performance of asphalt concrete core walls at a variety of temperatures. Cai Qian [22], for example, concluded that the flexural strength and flexural deformation of the asphalt concrete bond did not vary greatly and satisfied the quality requirements by not heating the asphalt concrete bond during the construction of the simulated core wall. Wan Lianbin [23] showed through field tests that, when the temperature of the bond surface of asphalt concrete core wall is reduced to 40 °C, the bond surface does not need to be heated, and the bond surface quality can satisfy the conditions. On the basis of an indoor simulation test, Zhu Xichao [24] concluded that the top and bottom layers of asphalt concrete can be compactly combined when the bond surface temperature of the asphalt concrete core wall is 30 °C, and there is no significant decrease in the mechanical properties of asphalt concrete at the bonding surface. Through field construction, Gao Taotao [25] found that the bond surface bending performance of the asphaltic concrete core wall did not have a strong effect as the bond surface temperature fell to 0 °C. For a core wall made of asphalt concrete with a lower bond area temperature of −20 °C or lower, Qiao Yong and Du Lihong [26] verified the construction of the core wall without heating the underlying asphalt concrete by carrying out an experimental investigation. Zhu Xichao [27] found that the porosity of the specimens was not able to meet the requirement of less than 2% in the specification when the surface temperature of the bond was brought down to −25 °C. Liu Rubo [28] and Fan Zhenjun [29] also tested the core wall made of asphalt concrete under a low-temperature environment and found that there was no obvious delamination at the surface of the bond, and that the position of the binding surface could not be distinguished by eye and binding was satisfactory.
Temperature regulation is a major challenge in the construction of hydraulic asphalt concrete fields. The majority of the aforementioned researchers’ studies on the bonding surface of an asphalt concrete core wall are performed at room temperature, although it is unclear whether cold, low-temperature binding meets the quality criteria.
Small beam bending specimens were prepared in this study by designing different bond-surface temperatures, by controlling the temperature of the binding surface (−25 °C to 70 °C), and by performing bending tests at 2 °C. The primary problem addressed in this study is verifying that the binding surface can be treated with cold binding, which may provide a benchmark for later construction and maintenance of asphalt concrete core walls in colder regions. It is therefore important to perform investigations into the effect of interlayer bond temperature on the flexural performance of asphalt concrete core walls.

2. Test Program

2.1. Test Content

The trabecular bending specimens were prepared by designing different joint surface temperatures and the bending test was carried out at 2 °C. The flexural strength of asphalt concrete and the strain corresponding to flexural strength and deflection across the middle span are obtained. Finally, stress strain analysis, fracture section analysis, and data comparison analysis are carried out according to the experimental results.

2.2. Testing Raw Materials

The asphalt model used in this test is Karamay 70 asphalt. The coarse aggregates were limestone aggregates, divided into three categories, according to 9.5–16, 4.75–9.5, and 2.36–4.75 mm; the fine aggregate was limestone artificial sand, 0.075–2.36 mm, and the filling was limestone mineral powder, up to 0.075 mm, ground by a laboratory ball mill [30].

2.3. Raw Material Testing

The raw material testing was based on SL 501-2010 “Design code of asphalt concrete facings and cores for embankment dams” [31]. The performance of the asphalt concrete impermeable layer is directly affected by the properties of raw materials, so the key to ensuring the performance of asphalt concrete is to choose the raw materials that meet the requirements. The main raw materials of hydraulic asphalt concrete are asphalt, coarse aggregate, fine aggregate, fillings, etc. The selection criteria and requirements of raw materials are introduced below, as well as the basic performance test analysis; the basic requirements are shown in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4.
(1)
Coarse aggregates
Crude aggregate has a particle size of 19~2.36 mm and acts mainly as a skeleton in asphalt concrete, the quality of which is an important index of asphalt concrete strength. In this paper, limestone was used as coarse aggregate, which was divided into 5 particle size classes by broken sieve. The surface density, water absorption, adhesion to asphalt, crushing rate, and durability of the two coarse aggregates were tested and compared. The results of mass tests of the coarse aggregate are shown in Table 1.
(2)
Fine aggregates
Fine aggregate particle size falls within 2.36–0.075 mm, and its main role is to lubricate the asphalt concrete, in order to provide fluidity for the asphalt concrete, so that the asphalt concrete at a certain temperature can better form the flow dynamic, be easy to pave, and have good compaction. The fine aggregate also fills the larger gaps between the coarse aggregate, making the aggregate more dense. In this paper, fine aggregate was prepared from hard limestone, and its surface density, water absorption, water stability grade, durability, and mud content were tested and compared. The results of quality inspection of fine aggregate are shown in Table 2.
(3)
Filler
The role of filler is to fill the fine voids between coarse and fine aggregates to make the asphalt concrete aggregate more dense, which helps to better improve the impermeability properties of asphalt concrete. The filler comprises ground limestone as the raw material, and the main test indexes are surface density, water content, hydrophilic coefficient, and so on. The quality test results of the fillers are shown in Table 3.
(4)
Asphalt
Asphalt is the core material of the asphalt concrete impermeable layer, and the quality of asphalt is related to its impermeable performance. At present, the comprehensive performance of asphalt concrete is mainly judged by three indexes: needle penetration, softening point, and ductility. Therefore, in this paper, the three major indicators of the selected asphalt (before film oven and after film oven) were tested. The asphalt quality test results are shown in Table 4.
The test results in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 show that all the test indicators of the coarse and fine aggregates, fillers, and asphalt meet the requirements of the current specifications [31,32].

2.4. Material Matching Ratio

The design grading of mineral for hydraulic asphalt concrete is calculated using the improved Ding Purong formula based on Fuller’s (Fuller) formula.
P i = P 0.075 + ( 100 P 0.075 ) ( d i ) r ( 0.075 ) r ( D m a x ) r ( 0.075 ) r
In the Formula (1): Pi is the passing rate of aggregate at di, %; di is the particle size of a grade, mm; P0.075 is the passing rate of aggregate when the sieve is 0.075 mm, %; Dmax is the maximum particle size of aggregate, mm; and r is the grading index.
The mineral grading index is 0.38, the oil to stone ratio is 7.2%, and the filler amount is 12%. The aggregate grading curve is shown in Figure 1.
The mineral aggregate gradation index refers to the proportion of mineral aggregate that constitutes each particle size of asphalt mixture. The oil-to-stone ratio means the weight percentage of the amount of asphalt and minerals in the asphalt mixture. The amount of filler refers to the amount of mineral powder used in the asphalt mixture to fill the voids of asphalt concrete in the overall mineral content.

3. Test Overview

3.1. Test Equipment

The test equipment mainly include the following: bending test machine (1 KN, 5 KN); motor controller (500 W); data collector (N); computer; pressure sensor (specification 50 N, 800 N); thermometer (−30 °C~70 °C ); cold box (−35 °C~24 °C ); glass water; and flame spray lamp.
The bending test uses the motor controller to control the motor at the bottom of the bending test instrument, drives the thermostatic waters support in the specimen to move upwards, and fixes the pressurized rod position, so that the support forms a three-point bending test on the asphalt concrete beam. The force applied to the middle of the specimen is transmitted from the rod to the upper pressure sensor and then transmitted to the data collector by the pressure sensor; the bending deformation in the middle of the specimen is transmitted to the data collector by the displacement sensor and finally stored in the computer in the form of electrical signals in the computer’s asphalt concrete bending test system.

3.2. Specimen Forming Method

The sample size for the trabecular bending test is a rectangular specimen of 250 mm × 35 mm × 40 mm as required by specification [32], which is formed mainly by compaction and cutting. The operation is as follows:
(1)
Aggregates of a certain ratio are heated in a high-temperature oven for 3 to 4 h at 170 °C;
(2)
The aggregate and bitumen in proportion to the bituminous concrete mixer are heated, stirring at 160 °C for 90 s to form an asphalt mixture;
(3)
In a mold used for the production of specimens sized 300 × 150 mm, samples are divided into four layers of 75 mm each in order to simulate the mass of interlayer adhesion under different test conditions. The lower layer of asphalt concrete is prepared, and compaction is performed 7 times each round, with a total of 15 rounds;
(4)
The temperature change rate is controlled to about 28.6% of the lower temperature limit of 70 °C specified in the construction specification [15] for low-level blends. The same mixture ratio of −25 °C, −10 °C, 10 °C, 30 °C, 50 °C, 70 °C is then laid on top of the mixture of 160 °C asphalt, with the same test preparation method as before;
(5)
The mold is removed after the test block has cooled (Figure 2);
(6)
The specimen is then cut into a small, curved specimen size of 250 mm × 35 mm × 40 mm, deviation ±1 mm, ±1 mm, ±2 mm, respectively, with a special cutter. The combined surface located at 125 mm along the length of the cut specimen is well marked.

3.3. Test Procedure

(1)
The first step requires the sample to be treated at constant temperature, adjusting the thermostat according to the temperature required for the test. When the thermostat reaches the minimum underwater temperature of [31] 2 °C in China, the sample is put and activated at a set time, and after 4 h the sample temperature can meet the test temperature requirements with an error of ±0.5 °C.
(2)
The next step is to adjust the test machine. Place and adjust the test machine test piece support, with support distance of 200 mm, and ensure that the upper force rod lower indenter and the support are parallel and centered. Then, turn the motor until the indenter and support are in a horizontal direction and form a certain distance, in order to facilitate the placement of test pieces;
(3)
Next is to adjust the test specimen thermostat, the thermostatic water tank on the curved test stand, and the temperature of the glass water (specification: −40 °C) as required by the test. Measure the temperature of the water by thermometer and adjust the temperature in real time so that the temperature of the water is within ±1 °C of the test requirement;
(4)
The constant temperature and temperature-adjusted specimens are placed in the test machine at a height of 35 mm and width of 40 mm, provided that the temperature of the bath meets the test requirements (Figure 3);
(5)
The motor controller is adjusted so that the motor rotates at a certain speed with a strain rate of 1%/min, i.e., a span deformation rate of 1.67 mm/min. The load is applied between the specimens and data are automatically collected by computer.

3.4. Specimen Forming

Figure 4 presents the following:
(1)
When the lower layer of asphalt is applied with the bonding layer temperature of −25 °C and −10 °C, a large band gap appears at the binding surface and can obviously be seen to delaminate, denoting that the binding quality is poor.
(2)
When the lower asphalt mixture layer is applied with the 10 °C and 30 °C surface temperature setting, small voids appear on the surface and there is no clear delamination, thus denoting good quality.
(3)
When the lower asphalt mixture layer is applied with the surface temperature setting at both 50 °C and 70 °C, there is no visible delamination and there are no voids in the combined surface, thus denoting good quality.

4. Test Results and Analysis

According to DL/T 5362-2018, the tensile strength of asphalt concrete is calculated by Equation (2), and the maximum bending tensile strain is calculated by Equation (3). The stress–strain curves of asphalt concrete at different temperatures are produced separately from the experimental data.
R b = 3 L P b 2 b h 2
ε b = 6 h f L 2 × 100 %
In the formula: Rb—flexural strength of asphalt concrete, Mpa; b—width of the span-interrupted specimen, mm; h—height of the span-interrupted specimen, mm; L—span diameter of the specimen, mm; Pb—specimen damage at the maximum load, N; εb—maximum bending tensile strain of asphalt concrete, %; and f—the deflection of the span midpoint when the specimen is damaged, mm.
After the density and porosity of the sample are measured, three specimens are prepared according to the above test procedure at different bonding surface temperatures and the mean of the test results is used as the test result. When the difference between the maximum or minimum of three specimens and the mean of the test value exceeds 15%, the mean value shall be the average. When the maximum and minimum values of the three test samples differ by more than 15% from the median values, the test should be repeated. The relationship between the heating temperatures and the bending strength and tensile strength of the bonding surface at different heating temperatures is compared and analyzed. The experimental results are shown in Table 5 and the stress–strain curve is shown in Figure 5.
Density: The density of a material is the mass per unit volume of the material in an absolutely dense state.
Porosity: It is the percentage of pore volume in the block material to the total volume of the material in its natural state.
P = V 0 V × 100 % = ( 1 ρ 0 ρ ) × 100 %
In the formula: P—material porosity, %; V0—material volume in the natural state, or apparent volume, cm3; ρ0—material bulk density, g/cm3; V—absolute dense volume of material, cm3; and ρ—material density, cm3.
As can be seen from Table 5 and Figure 5, the density of trabecular bending specimens increases with the increase of the bond surface temperature and the porosity decreases with the decrease of the bond surface temperature. The maximum flexural strength, the maximum bending tensile strain, and the deflection in the span corresponding to the maximum flexural strength all increase with the increase of the bond surface temperature.
The maximum porosity of bituminous concrete specimens is 2.10% when the temperature of the lower bond surface is −25 °C, which does not meet the requirement of <2% in the design specification for hydraulic bituminous concrete. This is because −25 °C is below the asphalt brittle point, the upper layer of hot material poured into the temperature dissipates faster, and large particles of aggregate in the compaction molding are difficult to embed in the lower layer of material, so the density of the test piece in the compaction molding is difficult to achieve.
When the initial loading temperature of the lower bond surface is −25 °C and −10 °C, the force of the specimen is unstable, and force interruption and loading deflections are likely to occur. This phenomenon is due to poor adhesion between the upper and lower layers of the specimen and gaps in the bond surface, as shown in Figure 4. The bending stress–strain curve reflects poor bending performance, and there is a large unstable gap between the data peaks. This is mainly due to the poor adhesion between the upper and lower layers of the thermal materials and the brittleness damage after stress.
As can be seen from Figure 6, when the temperature of the lower bonding surface is −25 °C and −10 °C, the trabecular curved sample has a smoother cross section, indicating poor binding quality of the bonded surface, as there is no aggregate embedded in the larger particles in the lower asphalt concrete when the sample is intercalated. When the surface temperature of the lower bond is 10 °C, 30 °C, 50 °C, and 70 °C, the surface bond is rougher and the bond is good. This is because the upper 160 °C mixture will be present in the "exhaust" process during paving [33], so the contact portion of the upper asphalt mixture and the lower asphalt mixture will increase their lower temperature to 70 °C in 30 min, bringing the lower mixture down. It can be seen that different heating temperatures have a great influence on the interlayer binding quality below −10 °C.
In order to better analyze the effect of interlayer heating temperature on the bending performance, by using 70 °C as the study ontology, the stress ratio, strain ratio, and deflection ratio variation curves were constructed, and the effect of the interlayer heating temperature on the bending performance of asphalt concrete is shown in Figure 7.
Stress ratio is the ratio of stress measured at different temperatures to stress measured on bonding surface; strain ratio is the ratio of strain measured at different temperatures to strain measured on the bonding surface; and deflection ratio is the ratio of deflection measured at different temperatures to the deflection measured on the bonding surface.
As can be seen from Figure 7, the bending stress ratio, bending strain ratio, and deflection ratio are close to 1 at different temperatures, and the bond layer temperature increases at 2 °C. Overall, the ratio of all three is close to 1, with a smaller slope at temperatures of 10, 30, 50, and 70 °C in the bond layer, indicating good bond quality between layers.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, bending tests were conducted on asphalt concrete specimens in a 2 °C temperature environment, and the bending properties of −25 °C, −10 °C, 10 °C, 30 °C, 50 °C, and 70 °C interlayer bonding temperatures were analyzed. The results are concluded as follows:
(1)
There is a lower bond surface temperature of −25 °C and maximum porosity of 2.10% in bituminous concrete specimens, which does not meet the specification requirement of less than 2%. The bending resistance of asphalt concrete samples met the specification requirements at −10 °C, 10 °C, 30 °C, 50 °C, and 70 °C at lower bonding temperatures but was stable at lower bonding temperatures of 10 °C, 30 °C, 50 °C, and 70 °C. The results show that the critical temperature of the interlayer bond is −10 °C when the temperature of the lower the interlayer bond surface is −10 °C.
(2)
The bending stress, strain, and deflection of bituminous concrete core wall increase with the increase of the bond surface temperature, especially when the bond surface temperature is less than −10 °C. Through the specimen after fracture cross-section, it can be seen that, when the asphalt concrete lower bond surface is at 10 °C or below, the specimen has brittle damage, and the upper layer of the asphalt mixture with large-diameter aggregates can not be effectively embedded in the lower layer of the mixture, thus resulting in a more flat bond fracture cross-section.
(3)
According to the test analysis, the temperature of the combined surface of the lower layer of asphalt concrete is less than 10 °C, which does not guarantee the bonding mass between layers, and should be heated to 30 °C and not to 70 °C as required by the specification. If the temperature of the lower bond surface is above 10 °C, no heating measures are needed, which provides a theoretical basis for the construction of an asphalt concrete core wall under low temperature.

Author Contributions

Investigation, Q.H., H.D. and Y.Z.; Writing—original draft: Q.H., H.D., T.G. and Y.Z.; Funding acquisition, Q.H., H.D. and Y.Z.; Visualization, Q.H., H.D., Y.Z., T.G., G.S. and S.W.; Resources, Q.H., H.D. and Y.Z.; Writing—review and editing, Q.H., H.D. and Y.Z.; Data curation, Q.H., H.D. and Y.Z.; Formal analysis: H.D. and Y.Z.; Writing—review and editing: Q.H., H.D. and Y.Z.; Conceptualization, H.D. and Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 52039008 and. National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 51479163.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Manli, Q.; Weibiao, W.; Xinhe, C. Experimental research on asphalt concrete impervious core wall for Yele hydropower station. J. Hydroelectr. Eng. 2004, 23, 80–82. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang, Y.; Wang, W.; Kaare, H. Watertightness, cracking resistance, and self-healing of asphalt concrete used as a water barrier in dams. J. Can. Geotech. J. 2013, 50, 275–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ailin, W.; Yingjun, W.; Xianyang, L. Design of seepage control of upper reservoir bottom of a pumped-storage power station by using geomembrane. J. Chin. J. Geotech. Eng. 2016, 38, 10–14. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yingbo, Z.; Weibiao, W.; Xiao, L.; Yuanhong, Z. Research on the suitability of acidic gravels for asphalt core of embankment dam. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2012, 43, 460–466. [Google Scholar]
  5. Jutao, H. Important topics in development of asphalt concrete technology in China. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2008, 10, 1213–1219. [Google Scholar]
  6. Qiubing, R.; Mingchao, L.; Yang, S.; Ye, Z.; Shuo, B. Pixel-level shape segmentation and feature quantification of hydraulic concrete cracks based on digital images. J. Hydroelectr. Eng. 2021, 40, 234–246. [Google Scholar]
  7. Youjun, G.; Kaike, W.; Bi, H.; Haojing, Y.; Hongkun, W.; Moyun, Y.; Ming, L. Construction control points of asphalt concrete interlayer joint of asphalt concrete heart wall dam of water conservancy project. J. Constr. Technol. 2019, 48, 1430–1432. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yu, S.; Guoan, X.; Rui, Z.; Xiaoxia, L. Seepage Control and Numerical Analysis of Daxigou Asphalt Core Rockfill Dam. J. Yangtze River Sci. Res. Inst. 2009, 26, 76–81. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ning, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, W. Compressive behavior of hydraulic asphalt concrete under different temperatures and strain rates. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2021, 33, 04021013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, W.; Hu, K.; Feng, S.; Li, G.; Höeg, K. Shear behavior of hydraulic asphalt concrete at different temperatures and strain rates. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 230, 117022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, J.; Zhou, M.; Liu, J.; Huang, X. Experimental Study of Stress and Deformation of Reclaimed Asphalt Concrete at Different Temperatures. Materials 2023, 16, 1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liang, W.; Liu, Y.-H.; Yifan, Y.; Zhiyuan, N.; Xiao, M. Different temperature and strain rate of hydraulic asphalt concrete mesoscopic energy evolution study. J. Hydropower Energy Sci. 2021, 33, 152–155+176. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang, K.; Li, D.; He, Z.; Zhou, H.; Li, J. Study on Acoustic Emission Characteristics of Low-Temperature Asphalt Concrete Cracking Damage. Materials 2021, 14, 881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pszczola, M.; Jaczewski, M.; Rys, D.; Jaskula, P.; Szydlowski, C. Evaluation of Asphalt Mixture Low-Temperature Performance in Bending Beam Creep Test. Materials 2018, 11, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. SL 514-2013; Specifications for Construction of Hydraulic Asphalt Concrete. China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower: Beijing, China, 2013.
  16. Xin, J.; Yitao, H.; Hua, J. Temperature control of asphalt concrete core wall construction of Maopingxi earth-rock dam. J. Yangtze River 2004, 11, 17–18. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jinsheng, J.; Zheren, D. Progress of hydraulic asphalt concrete technology in Germany. J. Water Power 1997, 10, 61–64. [Google Scholar]
  18. Jiayan, M.; Kaiming, H.; Zhijian, Z. Construction technology of the more cold and much rain roller compacted asphalt concrete core wall. J. Water Power 2005, 10, 61–63. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yiming, K. Winter construction technology of crushed asphalt concrete core wall of a reservoir cofferdam. J. Yangtze River 2014, 45, 114–116. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kaike, W.; Jiaxiang, L. Effect of Temperature Control of Asphalt Concrete Core Wall Dam on the Quality of Asphalt Concrete Construction. J. Constr. Technol. 2018, 47, 513–514. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wei, D. Construction quality control of crushed asphalt concrete core wall dams. J. Gansu Water Resour. Hydropower Technol. 2016, 52, 57–59. [Google Scholar]
  22. Qian, C. Study on the Effect of Different Construction Factors on the Interlayer Bonding Quality of Asphalt Concrete Core Wall. Master’s Thesis, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lianbin, W.; Chengyuan, P.; Hegang, Y. Study on interlayer bonding quality of placement of asphalt concrete core wall under normal temperature. J. Water Resour. Hydropower Eng. 2011, 42, 62–64, 68. [Google Scholar]
  24. Xichao, Z. Experimental Study on the Performance of Asphalt Concrete Rolling Layer Combined at Low Temperature Environment. Master’s Thesis, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  25. Taotao, G. Experimental Study on the Mechanical Properties of the Asphalt Concrete Core Wall. Master′s Thesis, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yong, Q.; Lihong, D. Discussion on the interlayer construction of roller-compacted asphalt concrete core wall under low temperature conditions. J. Shaanxi Water Resour. 2013, 6, 93–94. [Google Scholar]
  27. Xichao, Z.; Jianxin, H.; Haihua, Y. Research on the Strength Influence of Roller Compacted Asphalt on Concrete Core Wall Combining Surface Temperature. J. China Rural Water Hydropower 2014, 8, 138–141. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rubo, L.; Zongli, L.; Yijun, L. Study on Winter Temperature Control of Roller Compacted Asphalt Concrete Corewall. J. China Rural Water Hydropower 2012, 6, 172–175. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhenjun, F. A brief discussion on the temperature rise of the bond surface of asphalt concrete core wall. J. Shaanxi Water Resour. 2017, 4, 118–120. [Google Scholar]
  30. Liangshu, Y.; Bin, M.; Wenjin, W.; Qingyu, X. Study on optimization design method for mix of impervious structure of pouring asphalt concrete. J. Hydroelectr. Eng. 2004, 6, 75–79, 87. [Google Scholar]
  31. SL 501-2010; Design Code of Asphalt Concrete Facings and Cores for Embankment Dams. China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower: Beijing, China, 2010.
  32. DL/T 5362-2018; Test Code for Hydraulic Bitumen Concrete. China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower: Beijing, China, 2018.
  33. Zhifa, M.; Guoxing, H.; Hongjuan, G.; Yuansheng, Y.; Guixi, C.; Wei, S. Main points of construction quality control for rolled asphalt concrete impervious core wall. J. Water Resour. Hydropower Northeast. China 2009, 27, 13–14, 24, 71. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Aggregate grading curve.
Figure 1. Aggregate grading curve.
Materials 16 04133 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of specimen forming.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of specimen forming.
Materials 16 04133 g002
Figure 3. Schematic of trabecular bending test.
Figure 3. Schematic of trabecular bending test.
Materials 16 04133 g003
Figure 4. Asphalt concrete specimens at different bonding surface temperatures: (a) lower bond surface temperature of −25 °C; (b) lower bond surface temperature of −10 °C; (c) lower bond surface temperature of 10 °C; (d) lower bond surface temperature of 30 °C; (e) lower bond surface temperature of 50 °C; (f) lower bond surface temperature of 70 °C.
Figure 4. Asphalt concrete specimens at different bonding surface temperatures: (a) lower bond surface temperature of −25 °C; (b) lower bond surface temperature of −10 °C; (c) lower bond surface temperature of 10 °C; (d) lower bond surface temperature of 30 °C; (e) lower bond surface temperature of 50 °C; (f) lower bond surface temperature of 70 °C.
Materials 16 04133 g004
Figure 5. Bending stress–strain curves at different bond surface temperatures: (a) lower bond surface temperature of −25 °C; (b) lower bond surface temperature of −10 °C; (c) lower bond surface temperature of 10 °C; (d) lower bond surface temperature of 30 °C; (e) lower bond surface temperature of 50 °C; (f) lower bond surface temperature of 70 °C.
Figure 5. Bending stress–strain curves at different bond surface temperatures: (a) lower bond surface temperature of −25 °C; (b) lower bond surface temperature of −10 °C; (c) lower bond surface temperature of 10 °C; (d) lower bond surface temperature of 30 °C; (e) lower bond surface temperature of 50 °C; (f) lower bond surface temperature of 70 °C.
Materials 16 04133 g005
Figure 6. Fracture sections of small beam bending specimens at different bonding surface temperatures: (a) lower bond surface temperature of −25 °C; (b) lower bond surface temperature of −10 °C; (c) lower bond surface temperature of 10 °C; (d) lower bond surface temperature of 30 °C; (e) lower bond surface temperature of 50 °C; (f) lower bond surface temperature of 70 °C.
Figure 6. Fracture sections of small beam bending specimens at different bonding surface temperatures: (a) lower bond surface temperature of −25 °C; (b) lower bond surface temperature of −10 °C; (c) lower bond surface temperature of 10 °C; (d) lower bond surface temperature of 30 °C; (e) lower bond surface temperature of 50 °C; (f) lower bond surface temperature of 70 °C.
Materials 16 04133 g006aMaterials 16 04133 g006b
Figure 7. Curves of stress ratio, strain ratio, and deflection ratio with the temperature of the bonding layer: (a) stress ratio with the temperature of the bonding layer; (b) strain ratio with the temperature of the bonding layer; (c) deflection ratio with the temperature of the bonding layer.
Figure 7. Curves of stress ratio, strain ratio, and deflection ratio with the temperature of the bonding layer: (a) stress ratio with the temperature of the bonding layer; (b) strain ratio with the temperature of the bonding layer; (c) deflection ratio with the temperature of the bonding layer.
Materials 16 04133 g007
Table 1. Test results of coarse aggregate quality.
Table 1. Test results of coarse aggregate quality.
Technical SpecificationsSpecification RequirementsTest Results
Surface Density/(g/cm3)≥2.62.710
Water absorption rate/%≤20.48
Adhesion to asphalt/level≥45
Crushing rate/%≤3012.55
Durability/%≤121.3
Table 2. Test results of fine aggregate quality.
Table 2. Test results of fine aggregate quality.
Technical SpecificationsSpecification RequirementsTest Results
Surface Density/(g/cm3)≥2.552.734
Water absorption rate/%≤20.4
Water stability grade/level≥69
Sodium sulfate 5 times cycle weight loss/%≤153.4
Organic matter content≤20
Table 3. Filler quality test results.
Table 3. Filler quality test results.
Technical SpecificationsSpecification RequirementsTest Results
Surface Density/(g/cm3)≥2.52.708
Water content/%≤0.50.18
Hydrophilic coefficient≤1.00.71
Packing grade sieving results/%0.075 mm>8599.8
0.15 mm>90100
0.6 mm>100100
Table 4. Quality test results of Karamay No.70 petroleum asphalt.
Table 4. Quality test results of Karamay No.70 petroleum asphalt.
ProjectsQuality IndicatorsTest Results
Needle penetration(25 °C, 0.1 mm)60~8068.1
Crisp Point (15 °C)≤−10−20.8
Latency (15 °C, 5 cm/min)≥150>150
Latency (4 °C, 1 cm/min)≥1023.0
Softening point/°C≥4648.1
Solubility/%≥99.599.9
Flash Point/%≥260310.0
Density 25 °C (g/cm3)Actual test0.986
Wax content/%≤21.8
After the film ovenQuality change/%±0.8−0.10
Residual needle penetration ratio (25 °C)/%≥6180.6
Latency (10 °C)/cm≥628.3
Table 5. Trabecular bending test results at different joint surface temperatures.
Table 5. Trabecular bending test results at different joint surface temperatures.
Combined Surface Temperature/°CSpecimen NumberDensity/
(g·cm−3)
Porosity/%Deflection/mmMaximum Bending Strength/MPaMaximum Bending and Pulling Strain/%
−25ZY-1-12.3812.102.920.231.7535
ZY-1-22.3931.591.950.161.1690
ZY-1-32.3812.102.560.201.5364
Average value2.3851.932.560.201.5364
−10ZY-2-12.3961.453.420.312.0541
ZY-2-22.4021.223.760.292.2545
ZY-2-32.3971.413.590.292.1543
Average value2.3981.363.590.302.1543
10ZY-3-12.4031.194.010.312.4048
ZY-3-22.4110.854.090.312.4549
ZY-3-32.4011.284.180.302.5050
Average value2.4051.194.180.302.5050
30ZY-4-12.4080.964.340.302.6052
ZY-4-22.4031.204.510.272.7054
ZY-4-32.4011.264.180.322.505
Average value2.4041.204.340.302.6052
50ZY-5-12.4021.224.760.322.8557
ZY-5-22.4061.074.680.332.8056
ZY-5-32.4071.024.090.342.4549
Average value2.4051.104.510.332.7054
70ZY-6-12.3871.834.840.322.9058
ZY-6-22.3881.804.760.332.8557
ZY-6-32.3981.384.680.342.8056
Average value2.3911.804.760.332.8557
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, Q.; Dong, H.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, T.; Song, G.; Wang, S. Effect of Interlayer Bonding Temperature on the Bending Properties of Asphalt Concrete Core Wall. Materials 2023, 16, 4133. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16114133

AMA Style

Han Q, Dong H, Zhang Y, Gao T, Song G, Wang S. Effect of Interlayer Bonding Temperature on the Bending Properties of Asphalt Concrete Core Wall. Materials. 2023; 16(11):4133. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16114133

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Qunzhu, Haoyu Dong, Yingbo Zhang, Taotao Gao, Ge Song, and Shanwang Wang. 2023. "Effect of Interlayer Bonding Temperature on the Bending Properties of Asphalt Concrete Core Wall" Materials 16, no. 11: 4133. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16114133

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop