Next Article in Journal
Efficient, Fine-Grained Fly Ash Concrete Based on Metal and Basalt Fibers
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Simulation of Physical Fields during Spark Plasma Sintering of Boron Carbide
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Cerium on Inclusion Modification in a Secondary-Hardening Steel

Research Institute of Special Steels, Central Iron and Steel Research Institute, Bejing 100081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(11), 3972; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16113972
Submission received: 5 April 2023 / Revised: 4 May 2023 / Accepted: 5 May 2023 / Published: 25 May 2023

Abstract

:
Owing to the continuous increasing of steel strength, mechanical properties including toughness and fatigue performance are becoming increasingly sensitive to inclusions in ultra-high strength steel. Rare-earth treatment is considered as an effective method to reduce the harmful effects of inclusions, but is rarely applied in secondary-hardening steel. In the present study, different amounts of cerium were added in a secondary-hardening steel to investigate the modification effect of Ce on non-metallic inclusions in steel. The characteristics of inclusions were observed experimentally using SEM-EDS and the modification mechanism was analyzed based on thermodynamic calculations. The results indicated that the main inclusions in Ce-free steel are Mg-Al-O + MgS. Thermodynamic calculation indicated that MgAl2O4 is firstly formed in liquid steel and then successively transformed into MgO and MgS during cooling process. When the Ce content is 0.0030%, the typical inclusions in steel were individual Ce2O2S and MgO + Ce2O2S complex inclusions. When the Ce content was increased to 0.0071%, the typical inclusions in steel were individual Ce2O2S- and Mg-containing inclusions. Ce treatment modifies the angular magnesium aluminum spinel inclusions into spherical and ellipsoidal Ce-containing inclusions, thus reducing the harmful effect of inclusion on steel properties.

1. Introduction

As the aviation, aerospace, military equipment, and other fields continue to develop, their requirement for high-performance structural materials is also significantly increased. Owing to its excellent combination of strength, toughness, and fatigue properties, secondary-hardening steel has become a key material in many load-bearing components, such as aircraft landing gears and engine shafts [1,2].
However, with the strength enhancement of steel, the damage caused by inclusions to the fatigue performance is also more serious. Because fatigue failure preferentially originates from inclusions, the characteristics of inclusions, including size, type, and morphology, obviously affected the fatigue performance of high-strength steel [3,4,5]. In recent decades, the development of metallurgical equipment and smelting technology has significantly improved the cleanliness of molten steels [6,7]. As commercial smelting processes of ultra-high-strength steel, vacuum induction melting and vacuum arc remelting are used to control the total oxygen (T.O) content of steel below 0.0010% [8,9]. However, it is difficult to further enhance steel cleanliness by improving metallurgical equipment in a short period. Rare-earth treatment is considered an effective method for modifying inclusions and reducing their harmful effects [10,11,12].
Wang et al. [13] investigated the effect of cerium (Ce) on the morphology of Al2O3 inclusions and determined that, after adding Ce, inclusions changed from a morphology of long strip and sharp angle to spherical and spindle surface. Zhang et al. [14] demonstrated the evolution path of inclusions with an increased Ce content in Si-Mn-killed steel, from Al2O3-SiO2-MnO-CaO to Ce2O3-Al2O3-SiO2-MnO-CaO, Ce2O3, and Ce2O3-CeS. Huang et al. [15] reported the inclusion evolution process when the Ce content increased from 0–0.03% in H13 steel, as changed from MgO·Al2O3 to CeAlO3, Ce-O, and Ce-O-S
The modified rare-earth inclusions also played a crucial role in improving the properties of steel. Huang et al. [16] found that MnS and MnO-SiO2 inclusions were modified into (Ce,La)2O2S; a good compatibility between rare-earth inclusions and the matrix decreased the corrosion rate and improved the corrosion resistance. Ji et al. [17] summarized the beneficial role of rare-earth treatment on grain refinement, indicating that rare-earth inclusions acted as a nucleation core to promote the formation of the δ-Fe (BCC structure) and γ-Fe (FCC structure) in liquid steel, refining solidification microstructures and reducing element segregation. Yang et al. [18,19] indicated that the rare-earth addition modified the (Ca,Mn)S inclusion into a rare-earth inclusion in bearing steel, prolonging the fatigue life over ten times. The beneficial effects of rare-earth inclusions on welding performance has also been reported [20,21].
However, although rare-earth treatment has been applied to many types of steels, including bearing steel [22], high-speed steel [23], die steel [24], etc., its application in secondary-hardening steel was rarely reported. In addition, there is also little research on the inclusion evolution in rare-earth steel containing high contents of Mg and Al. Therefore, the effect of cerium on inclusion modification in a secondary-hardening steel with a high Al content was investigated in the present study. Ingots with different Ce contents were smelted and casted, the characteristics of inclusions were observed experimentally, and the modification mechanism was analyzed based on thermodynamic calculations.

2. Materials and Methods

The experimental steels were prepared by a 25 kg vacuum arc melting furnace in this study. To ensure high cleanliness of experimental steels, raw materials with low impurity contents was melted in a MgO crucible at 1550 °C. After melting, the liquid steel was cast into a shell ingot, designated ingot S1. For comparing Ce modification on inclusions, pure Ce alloy was added into liquid steel after deoxidation process. For comparison, two ingots containing different rare-earth contents were manufactured, designated as S2 and S3, respectively.
Each ingot was machined into steel powders to analyze the Ca, Mg, and Ce contents using inductively coupled plasma spectrometry ((NCS Plasma MS 300, NCS Testing Technology Corporation, Beijing, China). The T.O and N contents were determined using an O, N, and H analyzer (NCS ONH-5500, NCS Testing Technology Corporation, Beijing, China). The C and S contents were measured using a C and S analyzer (NCS CS-3000, NCS Testing Technology Corporation, Beijing, China). The contents of other elements were tested using an optical emission spectrometer (NCS SparkCCD 7000, NCS Testing Technology Corporation, Beijing, China). Table 1 gives the chemical compositions of the experimental steels. The non-metallic inclusions in the samples were observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, EVO LS 25, ZEISS Corporation, Oberkochen Germany), and their compositions were determined using an energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS) equipped with an acceleration voltage of 20 kV.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Inclusions in Ce-Free Steel

Figure 1 presents the backscattered electron images (BSE) and EDS results of the typical inclusions in sample S1. From the element mappings shown in Figure 1a–c, it was concluded that the distributions of Al and O showed a good consistency, in which a little Mg was also present. Moreover, Mg was also present in areas containing S. The same conclusion could also be drawn from the line-scanning results as shown in Figure 1d,e. The typical inclusions in the sample without a Ce addition could be identified as Mg-Al-O + MgS based on the SEM-EDS determination.
Due to a strong binding ability with O, Al2O3 inclusion is a common deoxidation product in Al-containing steel. Soluble Mg came from the refractory materials during the vacuum arc melting process, and can react with Al2O3 inclusions to form an Mg-Al-O inclusion [25,26]. With the increasing Al content, the inclusions gradually transformed from Al2O3 into MgO·Al2O3 after Mg treatment, and the mole ratio of MgO/Al2O3 in the inclusions decreased [27].

3.2. Inclusions in Steel Containing 0.0030% Ce

In recent years, rare-earth treatment to modify inclusions in steel have been extensively studied [28,29], to reduce their harmful effects and even play a beneficial role in some fields, such as oxide metallurgy [30]. Figure 2 presents the typical inclusions in the steel containing 0.0030% Ce.
From SEM-EDS analysis, the typical inclusions in sample S2 can be classified into two types. The first was an individual Ce-containing inclusion, which could be identified as Ce2O2S (Figure 2a). The other was the MgO + Ce2O2S complex inclusion, in which MgO as a black core was surrounded by Ce2O2S (Figure 2b,c). This morphology of the MgO + Ce2O2S complex inclusion was mainly influenced by the modification mechanism of Ce on MgO inclusion, which will be analyzed in detail later.

3.3. Inclusions in Steel Containing 0.0071% Ce

Figure 3 presents the element mappings of the rare-earth inclusions in sample S3. When the Ce content increased to 0.0071%, many individual rare-earth inclusions were formed in the sample based on the SEM-EDS determination results. The elemental mapping results indicated that the rare-earth inclusions were Ce2O2S. In addition, many individual Mg-containing inclusions were observed in sample S3, as shown in Figure 4, and were mainly composed of MgO, MgS, and Mg(O,S). In addition, Figure 3a–d exhibited that Ce2O2S inclusions were smaller than the inclusions in sample S1, and were basically spherical.

3.4. Thermodynamic Calculation of Magnesium Aluminum Spinels

The formation of magnesium aluminum spinel inclusions was related to the contents of Mg, Al, O, and S. Figure 5 gives the inclusion-forming region of Fe-O-S-Mg-Al system at 1550 °C, calculated using FactSage 8.0. Based on the chemical compositions listed in Table 1, the databases of FSstel, FactPA and FToxid were used in the calculation. The Mg and Al contents varied from 0.0001–0.0050% and 0.0001–2%, respectively. In addition, different T.O contents from 0.0008–0.0014% were also considered in the calculation. Figure 5a shows that when the Al content was more than 0.0030%, magnesium aluminum spinel inclusions could be formed in the liquid steel, even at an Mg content of as low as 1 ppm. At the same Al content, such as that containing 0.01% Al, as the Mg content increased, the inclusion-forming region gradually changed from Al2O3 + MgAl2O4 to MgAl2O4 and MgO. The stability diagram under different oxygen contents indicated that a higher oxygen content obviously enhanced the region of L + MgO + MgAl2O4 and L + Al2O3 + MgAl2O4, while the forming region of MgO is reduced.
To further investigate the inclusion evolution in sample S1, the inclusion transformation from 1100 °C to 1550 °C was analyzed, with a calculation step size of 10 °C, as shown in Figure 6. The liquidus and solidus temperatures of the experimental steel were calculated as 1450 °C and 1370 °C, respectively, and marked using dashed lines. MgAl2O4 was firstly formed in liquid steel at 1550 °C. With the temperature decreased to 1380 °C, MgO gradually formed, accompanied by a decrease in MgAl2O4. This reaction can be expressed as Equation (1) [31,32]. A high Mg content can promote this reaction.
MgAl 2 O 4 ( s ) + 3 [ M g ] = 4 M g O ( s ) + 2 [ A l ]
Then, MgO transformed into MgS and the amount of MgAl2O4 increased, at temperatures lower than 1180 °C. This result was consistent with the inclusions through experimental observation.

3.5. The Effect of Ce on Oxide Inclusions

Figure 7 shows the inclusion transformation with different Ce contents at 1550 °C, wherein the chemical composition of sample S2 was used. It could be concluded that MgAl2O4 was formed at molten steel without adding Ce. With the increasing Ce content, the amount of MgAl2O4 decreased, and MgO was gradually formed. When the Ce content reached 0.0007%, CeAlO3 was formed in steel and its amount gradually increased with the increasing Ce contents. The maximum mass fraction of CeAlO3 was obtained in molten steel containing 0.0035% Ce. Further increasing the Ce content, CeAlO3 inclusion was transformed into Ce2O2S. The thermodynamic calculations showed that the inclusion transformation path was MgAl2O4→CeAlO3→Ce2O2S.
However, rare-earth aluminates were directly transformed into rare-earth oxide sulfides in this calculation, while no rare-earth oxides were formed. This result was slightly different from other reports [15,28], which may be influenced by the high Mg content. Thus, the rare-earth inclusion forming region with different Mg contents from 0 to 0.0050% at 1550 °C was calculated (Figure 8). The T.O and S contents varied from 0.0001–0.0020% and 0.0010–0.0030%, respectively, set as the vertical and horizontal co-ordinates of the figure. In addition, the Ce and Al contents were fixed as 0.0070% and 0.01%, respectively.
Figure 8a indicated that when the Mg content was 0, the typical rare-earth inclusions at 1550 °C were CeAlO3, Ce2O3, and Ce2O2S. When the Mg content was increased to 0.0020%, the stability region of MgO was formed. Figure 8d demonstrated that, by further increasing the Mg content to 0.0030%, 0.0040%, and 0.0050%, the formation region of Ce-containing sulfides and MgO were enlarged. Li et al. [33] reported similar results and indicated that the activity interaction coefficients e O Mg and e S Mg in molten steel at 1600 °C were −300 and −1.82, respectively. Thus, the generation of rare-earth oxides was reduced and that of rare-earth sulfides was promoted by the addition of Mg.
Figure 9a shows the inclusion transformation in sample S2 from 1100 °C to 1550 °C. Containing 0.0030% Ce, CeAlO3 was formed in liquid steel at 1550 °C, the remelting temperature. MgO was precipitated at 1540 °C. When the temperature was cooled to 1490 °C, CeAlO3 inclusions were transformed into Ce2O2S, which could be expressed as Equation (2) [28].
CeAlO 3 ( s ) + 2 [ C e ] + 3 / 2 [ S ] = 3 / 2 C e 2 O 2 S ( s ) + [ A l ]
When the temperature further decreased to 1280 °C, Ce2O2S furtherly transformed into Ce2S3 inclusions. Ren et al. [34] has reported this transformation in ultra-low-carbon aluminum-killed steel, as shown in Equation (3).
Ce 2 O 2 S ( s ) + 4 / 3 [ A l ] + 2 [ S ] = 2 / 3 A l 2 O 3 ( s ) + C e 2 S 3 ( s )
However, in the present study, the experimental steel had a high Mg content. The O in Ce2O2S combined with soluble Mg in steel to produce MgO instead of the formation of Al2O3, which was obtained from the calculation as the increase in the amount of MgO. Thus, this reaction in the present study should be expressed as Equation (4).
Ce 2 O 2 S ( s ) + 2 [ M g ] + 2 [ S ] = 2 M g O ( s ) + C e 2 S 3 ( s )
The morphology of inclusions after the Ce addition was closely related to the inclusion before adding Ce. Therefore, Figure 9b also presents the inclusion precipitation while neglecting the effect of Ce. Furthermore, MgO was the predominant inclusion at 1550 °C. Thus, after the Ce addition, Ce firstly reacted with MgO in molten steel to form Ce2O2S. Moreover, Figure 2b,c exhibited a morphology of an unreacted core of the Mg-containing inclusion surrounded by an outer Ce-containing inclusion, which represents an incomplete modification of Ce treatment, and this process could be explained using the unreacted core model [35,36].
The inclusion transformation in sample S3 was also calculated by considering the effect of Ce and neglecting its effect, as exhibited in Figure 10a,b, respectively. Before the Ce addition, the typical inclusions in sample S3 were MgO. When the Ce content was 0.0071%, the typical inclusions in molten steel were Ce2O2S. Then, Ce2O2S was transformed into Ce2S3 and MgO as the temperature was lower than 1330 °C.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the effect of Ce on inclusion modification in a secondary-hardening steel was investigated. The characteristics of inclusions in Ce-free and Ce-containing steel were contrastively studied based on experimental determinations and thermodynamic calculations. The following conclusions are obtained:
  • For the steel considered herein, typical inclusions in Ce-free steel were Mg-Al-O + MgS. Thermodynamic calculations indicated that MgAl2O4 was firstly formed in liquid steel, successively transforming into MgO and MgS during cooling.
  • When the Ce content was 0.0030%, the typical inclusions in steel were individual Ce2O2S and MgO + Ce2O2S complex inclusions. For the latter type of inclusion, MgO as a core was surrounded by an outer layer of Ce2O2S, for which the modification process could be explained through the unreacted core model. When the Ce content was 0.0071%, the steel mainly consisted of individual Ce2O2S- and Mg-containing inclusions. The latter included MgO, MgS, and Mg(O,S).
  • Ce treatment modified the angular magnesium aluminum spinel inclusions into spherical and ellipsoidal Ce-containing inclusions, which was beneficial for reducing the harmful effect of inclusion on steel properties. Thermodynamic calculations indicated that the generation of rare-earth oxides was reduced and that of rare-earth sulfides was promoted by the addition of Mg.

Author Contributions

Data curation, formal analysis, and investigation, S.H., Y.L. and C.W.; methodology, R.G. and S.L.; software, R.G. and S.L.; writing—original draft, S.H. and C.W.; writing—review and editing, Y.L. and C.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, H.L.; Zhang, G.Q.; Zhou, H.C.; Liu, Z.H.; Xu, B.; Hao, L.H.; Sun, M.Y.; Li, D.Z. Influence of cooling rate during cryogenic treatment on the hierarchical microstructure and mechanical properties of M54 secondary hardening steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2022, 851, 143659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, F.; Qian, D.S.; Xie, L.C.; Dong, Z.H.; Song, X.D. Microstructure evolution and tempering transformation kinetics in a secondary hardened M50 steel subjected to cold ring rolling. ISIJ Int. 2021, 61, 361–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, P.; Wang, B.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, P.; Luan, Y.K.; Li, D.Z.; Zhang, Z.F. Effects of inclusion types on the high-cycle fatigue properties of high-strength steel. Scr. Mater. 2022, 206, 114262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhu, M.L.; Jin, L.; Xuan, F.Z. Fatigue life and mechanistic modeling of interior micro-defect induced cracking in high cycle and very high cycle regimes. Acta Mater. 2018, 157, 259–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sun, C.Q.; Lei, Z.Q.; Xie, J.J.; Hong, Y.S. Effects of inclusion size and stress ratio on fatigue strength for high-strength steels with fish-eye mode failure. Int. J. Fatigue 2013, 48, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, L.F.; Thomas, B.G. State of the art in evaluation and control of steel cleanliness. ISIJ Int. 2003, 43, 271–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhan, D.P.; Zhang, Y.P.; Liu, R.J.; Jiang, Z.H.; Zhang, H.S. Effect of protected electroslag remelting on cleanliness of G20CrNi2Mo bearing steel. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2017, 44, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, Z.G.; Li, S.X.; Zhang, J.M.; Zhang, J.F.; Li, G.Y.; Li, Z.B.; Hui, W.J.; Wen, Y.Q. The fatigue behaviors of zero-inclusion and commercial 42CrMo steels in the super-long fatigue life regime. Acta Mater. 2004, 52, 5235–5241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Feng, H.; Li, H.B.; Liu, Z.Z.; Jiang, Z.H.; Lu, P.C.; He, T. Cleanliness control of high nitrogen stainless bearing steel by vacuum carbon deoxidation in a PVIM furnace. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2021, 52, 3777–3787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gao, S.; Wang, M.; Guo, J.L.; Wang, H.; Zhi, J.G.; Bao, Y.P. Characterization transformation of inclusions using rare earth Ce treatment on Al-killed titanium alloyed interstitial free steel. Steel Res. Int. 2019, 90, 1900194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, H.P.; Xiong, L.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Y.; Shu, Y.Y.; Zhou, Y.H. Investigation of RE-O-S-As inclusions in high carbon steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2017, 48, 2849–2858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dong, Z.H.; Qian, D.S.; Yin, F.; Wang, F. Enhanced impact toughness of previously cold rolled high-carbon chromium bearing steel with rare earth addition. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 2021, 30, 8178–8187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, H.; Bao, Y.P.; Zhi, J.G.; Duan, C.Y.; Gao, S.; Wang, M. Effect of rare earth Ce on the morphology and distribution of Al2O3 inclusions in high strength IF steel containing phosphorus during continuous casting and rolling process. ISIJ Int. 2021, 61, 657–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, J.; Ren, Y.; Ren, Q.; Zhang, L.F. Transient evolution of nonmetallic inclusions in a Si-Mn-killed stainless steel with cerium addition. Steel Res. Int. 2022, 93, 2100773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Huang, Y.; Cheng, G.G.; Li, S.J.; Dai, W.X. Effect of cerium on the behavior of inclusions in H13 steel. Steel Res. Int. 2018, 89, 1800371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Huang, F.; Li, J.; Geng, R.M.; Wang, C.C. Effect of rare earth on inclusion evolution and corrosion resistance of HRB400E steel. Mater. Corros. 2023, 74, 53–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ji, Y.P.; Zhang, M.X.; Ren, H.P. Roles of lanthanum and cerium in grain refinement of steels during solidification. Metals 2018, 8, 884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, C.Y.; Luan, Y.K.; Li, D.Z.; Li, Y.Y.; Tariq, N.U. Very high cycle fatigue behavior of bearing steel with rare earth addition. Int. J. Fatigue 2020, 131, 105263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, C.Y.; Liu, P.; Luan, Y.K.; Li, D.Z.; Li, Y.Y. Study on transverse-longitudinal fatigue properties and their effective-inclusion-size mechanism of hot rolled bearing steel with rare earth addition. Int. J. Fatigue 2019, 128, 105193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, X.P.; Li, X.D.; Langelier, B.; Gault, B.; Subramanian, S.; Collins, L. Effects of carbon variation on microstructure evolution in weld heat-affected zone of Nb-Ti microalloyed steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2018, 48, 4824–4837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Song, M.M.; Song, B.; Zhang, S.H.; Xue, Z.L.; Yang, Z.B.; Xu, R.S. Role of lanthanum addition on acicular ferrite transformation in C-Mn steel. ISIJ Int. 2017, 7, 1261–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, T.F.; Zhong, Y.F.; Qu, S.; Zhang, Z.F. Influences of the characteristics of carbide particles on the rolling contact fatigue life of rare earth modified, highly clean bearing steel. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2023, 143, 106888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhou, X.F.; Yin, X.Y.; Fang, F.; Jiang, J.Q.; Zhu, W.L. Influence of rare earths on eutectic carbides in AISIM2 high speed steel. J. Rare Earths 2012, 30, 1075–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, X.; Jiang, Z.H.; Geng, X.; Chen, M.J.; Peng, L.Z. Evolution mechanism of inclusions in H13 steel with rare earth magnesium alloy addition. ISIJ Int. 2019, 59, 1552–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, H.; Li, J.; Shi, C.B.; Li, J. Evolution of Al2O3 inclusions by magnesium treatment in H13 hot work die steel. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2017, 44, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Geng, R.M.; Li, J.; Shi, C.B. Evolution of calcium aluminate inclusions by cerium treatment in Al-killed steel during Ruhrstahl-Heraeus refining process. Steel Res. Int. 2020, 91, 2000117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yu, Z.; Liu, C.J. Evolution mechanism of inclusions in medium-manganese steel by Mg treatment with different aluminum contents. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2019, 50, 772–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ren, Y.; Zhang, L.F. Effect of cerium content on inclusions in an ultra-low-carbon aluminum-killed steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2020, 51, 589–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Geng, R.M.; Li, J.; Shi, C.B. Evolution of inclusions with Ce addition and Ca treatment in Al-killed steel during RH refining process. ISIJ Int. 2021, 61, 1506–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liang, W.; Geng, R.M.; Zhi, J.G.; Li, J.; Huang, F. Oxide metallurgy technology in high strength steel: A review. Materials 2022, 15, 1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Seo, W.G.; Han, W.H.; Kim, J.S.; Pak, J.J. Deoxidation equilibria among Mg, Al and O in liquid iron in the presence of MgO·Al2O3 spinel. ISIJ Int. 2003, 42, 201–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ma, W.J.; Bao, Y.P.; Wang, M.; Zhao, L.H. Effect of Mg and Ca treatment on behavior and particle size of inclusions in bearing steels. ISIJ Int. 2014, 54, 536–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, X.; Jiang, Z.H.; Geng, X.; Chen, M.J.; Cui, S. Effect of rare earth-magnesium alloy on inclusion evolution in industrial production of die steel. Steel Res. Int. 2019, 90, 1900103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ren, Y.; Zhang, L.F.; Liu, Y.B.; Cui, L.X.; Yang, W. Transformation of cerium-containing inclusions in ultra-low-carbon aluminum-killed steels during solidification and cooling. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 8197–8206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, H.; Yu, Y.C.; Ren, X.; Zhang, S.H.; Wang, S.B. Evolution of Al2O3 inclusions by cerium treatment in low carbon high manganese steel. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2017, 24, 925–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, L.J.; Liu, Y.Q.; Wang, Q.; Chou, K.C. Evolution mechanisms of MgO·Al2O3 inclusions by cerium in spring used in fasteners of high-speed railway. ISIJ Int. 2015, 55, 970–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Typical inclusions observed in sample S1: (ac) elements mappings, (d,e) line scanning results of the blue lines marked in (b,c), respectively.
Figure 1. Typical inclusions observed in sample S1: (ac) elements mappings, (d,e) line scanning results of the blue lines marked in (b,c), respectively.
Materials 16 03972 g001
Figure 2. Typical inclusions observed in sample S2: (ac) elements mappings, (d,e) EDS analysis of the points marked in (c).
Figure 2. Typical inclusions observed in sample S2: (ac) elements mappings, (d,e) EDS analysis of the points marked in (c).
Materials 16 03972 g002
Figure 3. Characteristics of rare-earth inclusions observed in sample S3. (ad) elements mappings of rare-earth inclusions.
Figure 3. Characteristics of rare-earth inclusions observed in sample S3. (ad) elements mappings of rare-earth inclusions.
Materials 16 03972 g003
Figure 4. Individual Mg-containing inclusions observed in sample S3: (ad) SEM photos of inclusions, (eh) EDS analysis of the points marked in (ad), respectively.
Figure 4. Individual Mg-containing inclusions observed in sample S3: (ad) SEM photos of inclusions, (eh) EDS analysis of the points marked in (ad), respectively.
Materials 16 03972 g004
Figure 5. Inclusion-forming region of Fe−O−S−Mg−Al system at 1550 °C: (a) T.O content is 8 ppm, (b) T.O content is 10 ppm, (c) T.O content is 12 ppm, (d) T.O content is 14 ppm.
Figure 5. Inclusion-forming region of Fe−O−S−Mg−Al system at 1550 °C: (a) T.O content is 8 ppm, (b) T.O content is 10 ppm, (c) T.O content is 12 ppm, (d) T.O content is 14 ppm.
Materials 16 03972 g005
Figure 6. Inclusion transformation in sample S1 from 1100 °C to 1550 °C.
Figure 6. Inclusion transformation in sample S1 from 1100 °C to 1550 °C.
Materials 16 03972 g006
Figure 7. Inclusion transformation with different Ce contents at 1550 °C.
Figure 7. Inclusion transformation with different Ce contents at 1550 °C.
Materials 16 03972 g007
Figure 8. Rare-earth-inclusion-forming region of Fe−Ce−O−S−Mg−Al system at 1550 °C: (a) Mg content is 0 ppm, (b) Mg content is 10 ppm, (c) Mg content is 20 ppm, (d) Mg contents are 30, 40 and 50 ppm.
Figure 8. Rare-earth-inclusion-forming region of Fe−Ce−O−S−Mg−Al system at 1550 °C: (a) Mg content is 0 ppm, (b) Mg content is 10 ppm, (c) Mg content is 20 ppm, (d) Mg contents are 30, 40 and 50 ppm.
Materials 16 03972 g008
Figure 9. Inclusion transformation in sample S2 from 1100 °C to 1550 °C: (a) containing 0.0030% Ce, (b) neglecting the effect of Ce.
Figure 9. Inclusion transformation in sample S2 from 1100 °C to 1550 °C: (a) containing 0.0030% Ce, (b) neglecting the effect of Ce.
Materials 16 03972 g009
Figure 10. Inclusion transformation in sample S3 from 1100 °C to 1550 °C: (a) containing 0.0071% Ce, (b) neglecting the effect of Ce.
Figure 10. Inclusion transformation in sample S3 from 1100 °C to 1550 °C: (a) containing 0.0071% Ce, (b) neglecting the effect of Ce.
Materials 16 03972 g010
Table 1. Chemical compositions of experiment steels (mass%).
Table 1. Chemical compositions of experiment steels (mass%).
Sample numbersCCrNiMoAlCo
S10.232.314.001.51.0010
S20.232.314.001.51.0010
S30.232.314.001.51.0010
Sample numbersCaMgCeT.OSN
S1<0.00050.001500.00130.00200.0010
S2<0.00050.00320.00300.00120.00220.0009
S3<0.00050.00370.00710.00100.00340.0009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, S.; Geng, R.; Lei, S.; Li, Y.; Wang, C. Effect of Cerium on Inclusion Modification in a Secondary-Hardening Steel. Materials 2023, 16, 3972. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16113972

AMA Style

Han S, Geng R, Lei S, Li Y, Wang C. Effect of Cerium on Inclusion Modification in a Secondary-Hardening Steel. Materials. 2023; 16(11):3972. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16113972

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Shun, Ruming Geng, Simin Lei, Yong Li, and Chunxu Wang. 2023. "Effect of Cerium on Inclusion Modification in a Secondary-Hardening Steel" Materials 16, no. 11: 3972. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16113972

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop