Next Article in Journal
Artificial Neural Networks for Predicting Plastic Anisotropy of Sheet Metals Based on Indentation Test
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Diamond Grain Size on the Basic Properties of WC-Co/Diamond Composites Used in Tools for Wood-Based Materials Machining
Previous Article in Journal
Fundamental Properties and Self-Healing Performance of Repair Mortar with Solid Capsules Made Using Inorganic Reactive Powder
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental Method of Machining Gears with an Involute Profile Using CNC Lathe with Driven Tools
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Surface State after Turning of High Tempered Bearing Steel

1
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 1, 01026 Žilina, Slovakia
2
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VŠB—Technical University of Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 2172/15, 70800 Ostrava, Czech Republic
3
Research Centre, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 1, 01026 Žilina, Slovakia
4
Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, Ke Karlovu 5, 12116 Prague, Czech Republic
5
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Technická 2896/2, 61669 Brno, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(5), 1718; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051718
Submission received: 1 February 2022 / Revised: 15 February 2022 / Accepted: 22 February 2022 / Published: 24 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Machining and Manufacturing of Alloys and Steels)

Abstract

:
This paper investigates surface state after turning of the high tempered bearing steel 100Cr6 with a hardness of 40 HRC. White layer (WL) thickness and its microhardness, as well as surface roughness, are investigated as a function of tool flank wear VB as well as cutting speed vc. The mechanical and thermal load of the machined surface were analysed in order to provide a deeper insight into their superimposing contribution. Cutting energy expressed in terms of cutting force was analyses as that consumed for chip formation Fγ and consumed in the flank wear land Fα. It was found that the mechanical energy expressed in terms of the shear components of the Fα grows with VB, converts to the heat and strongly affects the thickness of the re-hardened layer. Furthermore, the superimposing contribution of the heat generation and its duration in the VB region should also be taken into account. It was also found that the influence of VB predominates over the variable cutting speed.

1. Introduction

Increasing demands on components’ functionality has led to novel concepts for their manufacturing, together with the application of progressive materials [1,2,3]. The high tempered steels undergo the conventional quenching process when a component is rapidly cooled down from a high temperature, followed by tempering in the furnace at an elevated temperature. The final hardness and the corresponding microstructure is usually a function of tempering temperature. Such heat treatment produces a matrix in which the outstanding combination of hardness and toughness is mixed. Components made of these steels are produced mostly via machining cycles and a subsequent final surface treatment. The term hard machining (hard turning) is usually associated with the steels of hardness above 50 HRC. On the other hand, some aspects predominant in hard turning cycles can be found during machining of the steels below this threshold as well, especially the formation of a surface white layer (WL) as a re-hardened matrix [4]. WL is produced on machined surface when the temperature in the flank wear land is above 770 °C followed by the high cooling rate. Such conditions are met when flank wear VB exceeds a certain threshold [2,4]. Thermally softened layer (dark region) lying below the near surface WL usually cannot be recognized in the case of high tempered samples due to the shadowing effect of the previous tempering in the furnace during heat treatment. WL thickness is affected mainly by the size of VB region and the main cutting motion vc [4,5,6,7,8]. In contrast with grinding, dislocation density in WL after turning is usually higher, causing severely strained matrix [4,8,9]. Despite high temperatures and superimposing high stresses, the size of the carbides inside WL remains unchanged, whereas martensite matrix is refined down to several tens of nanometers [8,10,11,12]. Li et al. [11] also reported the steep grain size gradient in the near surface region. Ramesh et al. [12] investigated microstructure of WL of hardened steel 52100 and discussed the significance of thermal cycle. The deep insight into thermal cycle during formation of WL was reported by Hosseini et al. [13] as well. It should be mentioned that the surface state of quenched steel remarkably affects its functional properties as was reported in new studies [14,15,16]. Contribution of WL depends on the manner in which surface after hard turning is exploited [17,18]. Presence of WL is acceptable in the sliding contact whereas the cycling rolling contact is quite sensitive to the surface re-hardening [17,18,19].
Machining cycles are usually performed at constant cutting conditions in production of real industrial components whereas tool wear and the corresponding cutting edge geometry change. Developed deviations in tool geometry affect energy consumption and the corresponding cutting force. It should be noted that this energy is converted into the heat and high temperatures in the cutting zone strongly affect the surface state of turned parts. It was reported that WL at low VB is low or missing [20], followed by continuous increase in cutting force and WL thickness at higher VB. However, measured components Fc and Fp are composed of those consumed in the tool-chip interface (Fγ) and flank wear land (Fα). For this reason, only the shear and normal components of Fα should be involved in correlation analyses in which surface state of produced parts is analysed.
Wang and Liu [8] employed Green’s function in order to distinguish between Fα and Fγ and their normal and shear components). The authors demonstrated the strong correlation between VB and WL thickness as well as the growth of Fα and moderate decrease in Fγ when flank wear becomes more developed. However, Neslušan et al. [7] reported on the methodology for experimental decomposition of cutting force components and indicated that the components of Fγ grow due to crater wear. The authors carried out the measurement of cutting force components and their decomposition as a function of VB. It is worth mentioning that cutting force components (especially their shear components) can be linked with the thermal load of the machined surface as almost the whole mechanical energy consumed by the turning process is converted into heat. For this reason, cutting force decomposition also provides information about the superimposing thermal effects.
This study investigates the surface state of the high tempered bearing steel after turning. The investigation is focused on the observation of surface roughness, WL thickness and its microhardness as a function of VB, as well as cutting speed vc based on the measurement of cutting force components and their decomposition, as reported in [7]. Finally, the thermal load of the produced surfaces is discussed as well. As contrasted with the previous studies [5,6,8], this study provides deeper insight into pure contribution of the shear and normal components in the different regions and their relationship to the thermal load. As compared with the study of Wang and Liu [8] or our previous work [7], this study also discusses contribution of the thermal cycle duration, as well as the role of specific heat to the thickness of WL. Finally, as compared with [7], thermal cycle and the produced WL are investigated as a function of cutting speed and supplemented by the measurement of microhardness in WL.

2. Experimental Setup

The experiments were performed on the high tempered steel 100Cr6 (40 ± 2 HRC, temperature of austenitisation 840 °C, quenching temperature 60 °C followed by 2 h tempering at 530 °C). The sample dimensions were: outer diameter 55 mm, inner diameter 40 mm, and length 70 mm. Details associated with turning process are listed in Table 1. Cutting feed, depth, and speed were chosen on the base of recommendations provided by the producer of inserts. Moreover, these cutting conditions can be considered as the conventional parameters for hard machining cycles, especially when the cutting depth and feed should be kept low with respect of thermal softening effect in the cutting zone.
The inserts with sufficiently high VB were used in this study to make WL as thick as possible. Furthermore, the influence of variable cutting speed (as the additional aspects remarkably contributing to WL thickness) was investigated as well.
The decomposition of cutting force components is illustrated in Figure 1. Separation of the shear and normal components Fαt, Fαtn, Fγt, and Fγtn was carried out by the use of a sample with a variable cutting depth [6]. Further details about the methodology, the employed equations, a brief sketch of the turned sample, and the appearance of tool wear land, can be found in the previous study [7].
The cutting edge geometry alterations were investigated by Alicona 5 device (IF-Edge MasterModule) (Alicona Imaging GmbH, Graz, Austria) at the different phases of VB. The rake angle γn as well as the cutting edge radius rn were obtained from 25 measurements regularly distributed along the cutting edge length. Chip’s morphology was observed in scanning electron microscope (SEM) ZEISS Auriga Compact (AZoNetwork UK Ltd., Manchester, UK). The surface roughness was measured by Hommeltester T 2000 (Hommelwerke GmbH, Schwenningen, Germany) along 4 × 0.8 mm length (probe T 100).
Measurement of Fc as well as Fp was carried out by the use of a dynamometer Kistler 9441 (sampling frequency 2 kHz, DasyLab software- measX GmbH, Aachen, Germany). Fc as well as Fp were obtained by averaging the three repetitive passes after the signal filtration (the low pass filter 20 Hz). To reveal the microstructural transformations induced by hard turning (for ap = 0.25 mm and direction of Fc), 10 mm long pieces were prepared for metallographic observations (etched by 5% Nital for 8 s). Microhardness measurement of HV 0.05 in WL was carried out only for samples turned by the insert of VB = 0.8 mm because the thickness of WL was sufficiently high only for this VB. Microhardness measurements were carried out using an Innova Test 400 TM (50 g for 10 s) (Innovatest, Maastricht, The Netherlands) on the cross sectional cuts after metallographic observations. Five repetitive measurements of WL thickness, microhardness, and surface roughness were carried out (average values as well as the corresponding standard deviations were calculated and provided in the paper).

3. Results and Discussion

The recorded cutting force evolutions (as that illustrated in Figure 2) show five different stages. The initial stage is associated with zero cutting depth (elastic deformation of the produced surface only [21]) whereas the consecutive stages represent the increasing ap in which chip is generated. Measured Fc as well as Fp are progressively growing along with ap but saturation of this growth can be observed at higher VB and ap.
The evolution of VB versus ap appears to be linear (see Figure 3). It is known that the cutting forces grow along with cutting depth is driven by the power law but the exponent for the cutting depth is near by 1 [3]. For this reason, the linear fit for the measured components is reasonable. The increase in Fp is higher than Fc. A much steeper increase can be found for VB = 0.8 mm, whereas only a moderate one can be reported for lower VB (especially in the case of Fc). The similar evolution can be found for the extracted components Fαt and Fαtn (see the values in Table 2). The average friction coefficient (Fαt/Fαtn) drops down along with VB due to predominate grow of Fαtn components (see also the values in Table 2). Note that the values in Table 2 represent the average values in the flank wear land. In reality, a heterogeneous distribution is observed [22] but the simplified uniform model is employed in this particular case.
It was reported [8] that Fγ moderately decreases along with VB in hard tuning. On the other hand, it was also demonstrated [23,24] that the components associated with chip formation are unchanged when turning annealed steel. It should be considered that the process of tool wear is complex and involves the alterations of tool rake geometry as well (see appearance of the cutting edge in [7]). For this reason, Fγc and Fγp also grow (see Figure 4) as a results of altered rake angle and cutting edge radius (see Table 2). Figure 4 also depicts that the changes in the rake angle geometry strongly affect the normal components of Fγ as compared with the shear one.
Plasticity in the cutting zone in the case of hardened matrix is due to its self-heating (matrix softens and becomes formable [25,26]) as well as the superimposing high hydrostatic pressure [27]. However, matrix softening occurs near the cutting edge only and vanishes along with increasing distance from the tool-chip interface. For this reason, Fγc and Fγp are growing versus ap. The changes in shear instability and the corresponding shape of produced segmented chips (see Figure 5) are due to the alterations in thermal and stress state in the tool-chip interface as a result of altered tool rake geometry [2,7,28]. It can be seen that the more developed crater wear increases the distance between the neighbouring segments, their size, and degree of chip segmentation [7], as well as the corresponding segmentation frequency [3]. This is a result of prolonged accumulation of stress ahead of the cutting edge and its abrupt release when the segment is initiated by the brittle cracking on the free surface [25]. Such behaviour has been already reported [3,28].
Figure 6 shows the typical WL produced during turning of hardened as well as tempered steels. Its white colour is due to flatness of the surface after etching and the corresponding missing phases contrast. Presence of the re-hardened layer indicates that the machined surface temperature exceeds austenitising temperature followed by the rapid cooling [2,14]. WL for lower VB is discontinuous and quite thin, progressively growing with VB, see Figure 6. Figure 7 also shows that a local minimum occurs in the region of insert wear in which the tool geometry is markedly altered, see also Figure 6. Figure 7 also depicts that WL thickness grows along with increasing vc as well, but the contribution of VB prevails.
The growth of WL thickness fits well with findings of Chaudhari and Hashimoto [20]. Authors reported that growth of the normal force is only sluggish in the initial phase of tool wear in which WL cannot be found, followed by a much steeper increase in force as soon as the continuous WL increases in thickness along with increasing VB. Figure 7 and Table 2 indicate the low Fαt and Fαtn corresponds with the low thickness of WL and vice versa. Moreover, the altered cutting edge shape and geometry, together with the increasing cutting force components, affect the new surface generation expressed in terms of its topography (surface roughness), see Figure 8 and Figure 9. Increasing intensity of machined material side flow increases the height of surface irregularities and the corresponding values of Ra. The values of the shear and normal components per 1 mm of VB (last two columns in Table 2) indicate that the straightforward correlation between the high Fαt and Fαtn and WL thickness is quite debatable as the specific mechanical load per 1 mm of VB decreases along with VB. Expressed in other words, it can be reported that the average stress in the VB region decreases with VB. For this reason, the thermal effect and its duration should also be taken into account.
The time interval τ during which the produced surface is exposed to the elevated temperatures is driven by vc and VB as follows:
τ   = V B v c   ( ms )
The heat generated in the VB region Qα can be calculated as follows:
Q α = F α t v c   ( kJ · min 1 )
Calculations and Figure 10 show that WL thickness only increases with τ when the vc is kept constant. As soon as the influence of vc is considered, the pure contribution of τ is quite controversial. The increasing vc reduces the time τ during which the produced surface is exposed to the heat (and the corresponding elevated temperatures) but WL thickness increases. Therefore, the superimposing contribution of τ and Qα (see Figure 11) should be taken into account and specific heat Qα′ should be calculated as follows:
Q α = F α t v c τ   ( kJ · min 1 · ms )
Figure 12 depicts that the specific heat Qα better explains the contribution of the thermal load to the WL thickness. WL thickness increases with vc progressively for all VB. However, the evolution of VB versus Qα′ with respect of WL thickness shows that a lower WL thickness is obtained for VB = 0.6 mm despite the higher Qα′ as compared with VB = 0.4 mm. Such an evolution strongly correlates with the evolution of the Fαtn components (see Figure 4) which indicates that the formation of WL is not a pure product of the thermal cycle (austenitising followed by rapid self-cooling), but that the influence and superimposing contribution of the mechanical load should be considered as well. Expressed in other words, the phase transformation in the VB region is under stress which affects its dynamics, extent, and hardness. Figure 13 demonstrates that the microhardness HV 0.05 in WL progressively drops down with vc. The thicker the WL is produced, the lower the microhardness is and vice versa, see Figure 14. It is considered that the microhardness of WL is mainly driven by (i) the rate of cooling which should be higher at lower vc due to the lower accumulation of thermal energy expressed in Qα′ and (ii) the superimposing contribution of higher Fαtn.
The thermal softening which also affects the deeper regions below the near surface WL is only minor (in this particular case) as this effect is shadowed by the previous thermal softening during samples tempering in the furnace.

4. Conclusions

It can be concluded that the influence of cutting edge wear on hard turning is complex. The crater wear alters the shear instability in the tool-chip interface and the corresponding chip appearance. On the other hand, Fαt and Fαtn grow with VB and contribute to the thicker WL. However, WL is a product of energy consumed in the tool flank region and the superimposing thermal cycles. The time within the machined surface is exposed to heating plays significant role together with the specific heat strongly affected by cutting speed.
From the practice point of view, it can be reported that VB should not exceed 0.2 mm. The WL in this region is discontinuous or its thickness is low. Employment of the insert of higher VB results into remarkable increase in WL thickness. Employment of the inserts of higher VB could be allowed for roughing cycles only as the thick WL will be removed during the consecutive grinding or turning finishing. Intensification of hard turning cycles via higher cutting speed increases WL thickness but drops down its microhardness.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Č. and A.M.; methodology, R.Č., M.N. and P.M.; software, M.J. and M.Č.; validation, R.Č. and M.J.; formal analysis, R.Č., A.M. and M.J.; investigation, M.Č., A.M., M.N. and P.M.; resources, A.M. and R.Č.; data curation, M.N. and K.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Č., M.N. and A.M.; writing—review and editing, M.Č. and A.M.; visualization, A.M., P.M. and M.J.; supervision, M.Č. and K.K.; project administration, A.M. and M.Č.; funding acquisition, A.M. and M.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication was realized with support of Operational Program Integrated Infrastructure 2014–2020 of the project: Innovative Solutions for Propulsion, Power and Safety Components of Transport Vehicles, code ITMS 313011V334, co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund. Additionally, support of the KEGA project 010ŽU-4/2021 and VEGA project 1/0052/22 is also gratefully acknowledged.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared easily due to technical limitations (some files are too large). However, authors can share the data on any individual request (please contact the corresponding author by the use of their mailing address).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Breidenstein, B.; Denkena, B.; Krödel, A.; Prasanthan, V.; Poll, G.; Pape, F.; Coors, T. Production-Related Surface and Subsurface Properties and Fatigue Life of Hybrid Roller Bearing Components. Metals 2020, 10, 1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tonshoff, H.K.; Arendt, C.; Ben Amor, R. Cutting of hardened steel. CIRP Ann. 2000, 2, 547–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Neslušan, M. Turning of Hardened Steels, 1st ed.; University of Žilina: Žilina, Slovakia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bosheh, S.S.; Mativenga, P.T. White Layer Formation in Hard Turning of H13 Tool Steel at High Cutting Speed using CBN Tooling. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 2006, 46, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Guo, Y.B.; Sahni, J. A comparative study of hard turned and cylindrical ground white layers. Int. J. Mach. Tool Manuf. 2004, 44, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bandt, D. Randzonenbeeinflussung Beim Hartdrehen. Ph.D. Thesis, Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  7. Neslušan, M.; Uríček, J.; Mičietová, A.; Minárik, P.; Píška, M.; Čilliková, M. Decomposition of cutting forces with respect to chip segmentation and white layer thickness when hard turning 100Cr6. J. Manuf. Proc. 2020, 50, 475–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, J.Y.; Liu, C.R. The effect of tool flank wear on the heat transfer, thermal damage and cutting mechaniucs in finishing hard turning. CIRP Ann. 1999, 48, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hosseini, S.B.; Klement, U.; Yao, Y.; Ryttberg, K. Formation mechanisms of white layers induced by hard turning of AISI 52100. Acta Mater. 2015, 89, 258–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bedekar, V.; Shivpuri, R.; Chaudhari, R.; Scott Hyde, R. Nanostructural evolution of hard turning layers in response to insert geometry, cutting parameter and material microstructure. CIRP Ann. 2013, 62, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, J.G.; Umemoto, M.; Todaka, Y.; Tuschiya, K. Nanocrystalline structure formation in carbon steel introduced by high speed drilling. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2006, 435–436, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tekkaya, B.; Meurer, M.; Münstermann, S. Modeling of grain size evolution with different approaches via FEM when hard machining of AISI 4140. Metals 2020, 10, 1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ramesh, A.; Melkote, S.N.; Allard, L.F.; Riester, L.; Watkins, L. Analysis of white layers formed in hard turning of ISIS 52100 steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2005, 390, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hosseini, S.B.; Beno, T.; Klement, U.; Kaminski, J.; Ryttberg, K. Cutting temperature during hard turning measurements of effects on white layer formation in AISI 52100. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2014, 214, 1293–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Erişir, E.; Ararat, Ö.; Bilir, O.G. Enhancing Wear Resistance of 100Cr6 Bearing Steels by New Heat Treatment Method. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 2022, 53, 850–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Khayatzadeh, A.; Sippel, J.; Guth, S.; Lang, K.H.; Kerscher, E. Influence of a Thermo-Mechanical Treatment on the Fatigue Lifetime and Crack Initiation Behavior of a Quenched and Tempered Steel. Metals 2022, 12, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Reichelt, M.; Cappella, B. Wear Volume of Self-Mated Steel at the Submicron-Scale: An Atomic Force Microscopy Study. J. Tribol. 2022, 144, 061702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Agha, S.R.; Liu, R. The Effect of cutting Conditions on Rolling Contact fatigue Life of Superfinish Hard Turned Surfaces. In Proceedings of the NSF and Manufacturing Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 1–3 July 1999. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hashimoto, F.; Guo, Y.B.; Waren, A.W. Surface Intergiry Difference between Hard Turned and Ground Surafces and its Impact on Fatique Life. CIRP Ann. 2006, 55, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chaudhari, R.G.; Hashimoto, F. Process controls for surface integrity generated by hard milling. Procedia CIRP 2016, 45, 15–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Mičietová, A.; Neslušan, M.; Mrkvica, I. Study of elastic deformations in hard turning. Key Eng. Mater. 2013, 581, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Buryta, D.; Sowerby, R.; Yellowley, I. Stress distribution on the rake face during ortogonal cutting. Int. J. Mach. Tool Manuf. 1994, 34, 721–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dubec, J.; Neslušan, M.; Mičietová, A.; Čilliková, M. Influence of flank wear on decomposition of cutting force in turning. MM Sci. J. 2013, 2013, 448–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nakayama, K.; Arai, M.; Kanda, T. Machining Characteristic of Hardened Steels. CIRP Ann. 1988, 37, 89–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Poulachon, G.; Moisan, A. Contribution to the study of the cutting mechanism during high speed machining of hardened steel. CIRP Ann. 1998, 47, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Recht, R.F. Catastrophic thermoplastic shear. J. Appl. Mech. 1964, 86, 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tonshoff, H.K.; Wobker, H.G.; Brandt, D. Hartbearbeitung aus der sicht der forschung. VDI-Berichte 1993, 988, 189–209. [Google Scholar]
  28. Neslušan, M.; Mičieta, B.; Mičietová, A.; Čilliková, M.; Mrkvica, I. Detection of tool breakage during hard turning through acoustic emission at low removal rates. Measurement 2015, 70, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Decomposition of cutting force in the cutting zone.
Figure 1. Decomposition of cutting force in the cutting zone.
Materials 15 01718 g001
Figure 2. Record of cutting force components Fc and Fp as a function of cutting depth (low pass filter 20 Hz). (a) VB = 0.1 mm, (b) VB = 0.8 mm.
Figure 2. Record of cutting force components Fc and Fp as a function of cutting depth (low pass filter 20 Hz). (a) VB = 0.1 mm, (b) VB = 0.8 mm.
Materials 15 01718 g002
Figure 3. Fc and Fp versus ap. (a) Fc versus ap, (b) Fp versus ap.
Figure 3. Fc and Fp versus ap. (a) Fc versus ap, (b) Fp versus ap.
Materials 15 01718 g003
Figure 4. Evolution of Fγc and Fγp, ap = 0.25 mm. (a) Fγc versus ap, (b) Fγp versus ap. Note: the standard deviations of obtained Fγc is ± 7 N and ± 13 N for Fγp.
Figure 4. Evolution of Fγc and Fγp, ap = 0.25 mm. (a) Fγc versus ap, (b) Fγp versus ap. Note: the standard deviations of obtained Fγc is ± 7 N and ± 13 N for Fγp.
Materials 15 01718 g004
Figure 5. SEM observation of produced chips. (a) VB = 0.05 mm, γn = −32°, rn = 47 μm, (b) VB = 0.1 mm, γn = −26°, rn = 44 μm, (c) VB = 0.2 mm, γn = −22°, rn = 35 μm, (d) VB = 0.4 mm, γn = −2°, rn = 22 μm, (e) VB = 0.6 mm, γn = −13°, rn = 67 μm, (f) VB = 0.8 mm, γn = −12°, rn = 62 μm.
Figure 5. SEM observation of produced chips. (a) VB = 0.05 mm, γn = −32°, rn = 47 μm, (b) VB = 0.1 mm, γn = −26°, rn = 44 μm, (c) VB = 0.2 mm, γn = −22°, rn = 35 μm, (d) VB = 0.4 mm, γn = −2°, rn = 22 μm, (e) VB = 0.6 mm, γn = −13°, rn = 67 μm, (f) VB = 0.8 mm, γn = −12°, rn = 62 μm.
Materials 15 01718 g005
Figure 6. Metallographic images of machined surfaces, vc = 100 m.min−1. (a) VB = 0.05 mm, (b) VB = 0.1 mm, (c) VB = 0.2 mm, (d) VB = 0.4 mm, (e) VB = 0.6 mm, (f) VB = 0.8 mm.
Figure 6. Metallographic images of machined surfaces, vc = 100 m.min−1. (a) VB = 0.05 mm, (b) VB = 0.1 mm, (c) VB = 0.2 mm, (d) VB = 0.4 mm, (e) VB = 0.6 mm, (f) VB = 0.8 mm.
Materials 15 01718 g006
Figure 7. WL thickness as a function of vc and VB.
Figure 7. WL thickness as a function of vc and VB.
Materials 15 01718 g007
Figure 8. Records of height of irregularities for different VB. (a) VB = 0.05 mm, (b) VB = 0.6 mm.
Figure 8. Records of height of irregularities for different VB. (a) VB = 0.05 mm, (b) VB = 0.6 mm.
Materials 15 01718 g008
Figure 9. Ra as a function of vc and VB.
Figure 9. Ra as a function of vc and VB.
Materials 15 01718 g009
Figure 10. Time interval τ during which the produced surface is exposed to the elevated temperatures.
Figure 10. Time interval τ during which the produced surface is exposed to the elevated temperatures.
Materials 15 01718 g010
Figure 11. Heat Qα generated in the VB region.
Figure 11. Heat Qα generated in the VB region.
Materials 15 01718 g011
Figure 12. Specific heat Qα′ generated in the VB region.
Figure 12. Specific heat Qα′ generated in the VB region.
Materials 15 01718 g012
Figure 13. Microhardness and WL thickness as a function of vc, VB = 0.8 mm.
Figure 13. Microhardness and WL thickness as a function of vc, VB = 0.8 mm.
Materials 15 01718 g013
Figure 14. WL thickness versus microhardness HV0.05, VB = 0.8 mm.
Figure 14. WL thickness versus microhardness HV0.05, VB = 0.8 mm.
Materials 15 01718 g014
Table 1. Cutting and other conditions of turning process.
Table 1. Cutting and other conditions of turning process.
Cutting insertDNGA 150,408, PCBN, 70% of CBN, TiN coated
Inset geometryrε = 0.8 mm, chamfer angle −35°, chamfer width 250 μm
Flank wear VBfrom 0.05 to 0.8 mm (prepared before the test)
Feed f0.09 mm
Cutting depth apfrom 0.125 to 0.5 mm
Cutting speed vcfrom 70 to 230 m·min−1
Cutting environmentdry machining
Table 2. Shear and normal components of Fα, rake angle γn, and cutting edge radius rn as well as Fαt and Fαtn per 1 mm of VB.
Table 2. Shear and normal components of Fα, rake angle γn, and cutting edge radius rn as well as Fαt and Fαtn per 1 mm of VB.
VB, mmFαt, NFαtn, NFαt/Fαtnγn, °rn, μmFαt,/VB, N·mm−1Fαtn,/VB, N·mm−1
0.05 ± 0.01571640.35−32 ± 1.247 ± 811403280
0.1 ± 0.013571630.35−26 ± 3.744 ± 75701630
0.2 ± 0.025742820.26−22 ± 4.035 ± 73701410
0.4 ± 0.030883720.23−2 ± 3.622 ± 7220930
0.6 ± 0.038962650.26−13 ± 3.367 ± 12160608
0.8 ± 0.0551346840.19−12 ± 4.062 ± 13168855
Note: the standard deviations of obtained Fαt is about ± 7 N and ± 13 N for Fαtn.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Čilliková, M.; Mičietová, A.; Čep, R.; Jacková, M.; Minárik, P.; Neslušan, M.; Kouřil, K. Analysis of Surface State after Turning of High Tempered Bearing Steel. Materials 2022, 15, 1718. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051718

AMA Style

Čilliková M, Mičietová A, Čep R, Jacková M, Minárik P, Neslušan M, Kouřil K. Analysis of Surface State after Turning of High Tempered Bearing Steel. Materials. 2022; 15(5):1718. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051718

Chicago/Turabian Style

Čilliková, Mária, Anna Mičietová, Róbert Čep, Martina Jacková, Peter Minárik, Miroslav Neslušan, and Karel Kouřil. 2022. "Analysis of Surface State after Turning of High Tempered Bearing Steel" Materials 15, no. 5: 1718. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15051718

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop