Next Article in Journal
Realization of Microfluidic Preconcentrator for N-Pentane Traces Impurities from the Gaseous Media
Previous Article in Journal
Ag-Decorated Si Microspheres Produced by Laser Ablation in Liquid: All-in-One Temperature-Feedback SERS-Based Platform for Nanosensing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microstructure and Soil Wear Resistance of a Grey Cast Iron Alloy Reinforced with Ni and Cr Laser Coatings
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Optimization of Selective Laser Melting Parameter for Invar Material by Using JAYA Algorithm: Comparison with TLBO, GA and JAYA

Materials 2022, 15(22), 8092; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15228092
by Hiren Gajera 1, Faramarz Djavanroodi 2,3, Soni Kumari 4,*, Kumar Abhishek 5, Din Bandhu 6, Kuldeep K. Saxena 4, Mahmoud Ebrahimi 7,*, Chander Prakash 8 and Dharam Buddhi 9
Materials 2022, 15(22), 8092; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15228092
Submission received: 20 September 2022 / Revised: 27 October 2022 / Accepted: 4 November 2022 / Published: 15 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Laser-Assisted Processing of Alloys and Metal Surface Layers)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please find my comments in the attached pdf file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Reviewer Response attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The work is interesting and brings important information to the scientific community, but the authors need to describe better the optimization methods used and also detail how they were used in the problem. In addition, it is necessary to carry out a greater discussion of the results and present better formatting of the graphs and tables.

 

In the attached file I present some suggestions.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Reviewer response attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have done requested revisions from my previous feedback. I have no further technical comment. However, I feel that thorough English language check is required on the manuscript before publication.

Author Response

Authors are very much thankful to the reviewer and as per his suggestions, entire manuscript has been scrolled to rectify grammatical issues.

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors implemented most of the suggestions and with that, I believe that the manuscript can be accepted. Please improve the way you present equation 3.3, maybe if you remove the symbol "*" from the equation it will be better.

Author Response

Authors have corrected the suggested portion of the manuscript. Details are attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop