Next Article in Journal
Structure and Crystallization of High-Calcium, CMAS Glass Ceramics Synthesized with a High Content of Slag
Next Article in Special Issue
Nitric Acid Dissolution of Tennantite, Chalcopyrite and Sphalerite in the Presence of Fe (III) Ions and FeS2
Previous Article in Journal
The Application of Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Evaluation of Clinical Studies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Modeling the Filler Phase Interaction with Solidification Front in Al(TiC) Composite Produced by the In Situ Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Recovery of Tantalum and Manganese from Epoxy-Coated Solid Electrolyte Tantalum Capacitors through Selective Leaching and Chlorination Processes

Department of Resources Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1 Daxue Road, Tainan 701401, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(2), 656; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020656
Submission received: 28 December 2021 / Revised: 10 January 2022 / Accepted: 14 January 2022 / Published: 16 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research Progress on the Extractive Metallurgy)

Abstract

:
Electronic products are ever growing in popularity, and tantalum capacitors are heavily used in small electronic products. Spent epoxy-coated solid electrolyte tantalum capacitors, containing about 22 wt.% of tantalum and 8 wt.% of manganese, were treated with selective leaching by hydrochloric acid and chlorination after removing the epoxy resin, and the products converted, respectively, to Mn(OH)2 and TaCl5. The effects of acid type, acid concentration, liquid–solid ratio, and reaction time were investigated to dissolve the manganese. The optimal selective leaching conditions were determined as 3 mol/L of HCl, 40 mL/g at 25 °C for 32 min. Next, residues of selective leaching after washing and drying were heated with ferrous chloride to convert to pure TaCl5. Mixing 48 wt.% of chloride and 52 wt.% of residues for a total of 5 g was conducted to complete the chlorination process in the tube furnace at 450 °C for 3 h. A total of 2.35 g of Ta was collected and the recovery of Ta achieved 94%. Finally, Mn(OH)2 and TaCl5 were separated and purified as the products.

1. Introduction

The demand for tantalum capacitors is steadily increasing due to the popularity of small electronic products. At the same time, small electronic products are eliminated rapidly, which represents a large amount of waste [1,2,3]. Tantalum is a transition element with an atomic number of 73, an atomic weight of 180.95, and a melting point of about 3000 °C (2980 ± 20 °C), which is slightly lower than tungsten and rhenium. The resources of tantalum, which usually co-exist with niobium, are mainly from the coltan or columbite [4,5], making refinement difficult due to their similar chemical characteristics. Tantalum was discovered in 1802, one year after niobium, and the average amount of tantalum in the Earth’s crust is 2 ppm [6]. Therefore, it is feasible to recover tantalum from tantalum capacitors that do not contain niobium [7,8,9]. Tantalum has high capacitance/unit volume, high thermal stability, and high oxidation resistance which can be used in electronic and biotechnology industries [10,11,12]. In the year 2016, about 34% of tantalum was used in manufacturing capacitors, followed by superalloy, chemical, sputtering target, mill product, and carbide industries [11,13].
Epoxy-coated solid electrolyte tantalum capacitors (EcSETCs) consist of electrodes, an epoxy resin, and wires. Electrodes include cathodes, anodes, and dielectrics. Anodes and dielectrics are made of tantalum and a small amount of its oxide powder, while cathodes are made of manganese oxide, graphite, and silver paste. The epoxy resin, which has silicon added to enhance its thermal durability, comprises halogenated compounds.
Tantalum-rich electrodes are sealed with epoxy resin. Hence, the removal of epoxy resin is conducted before any recovery process. Many methods can remove the epoxy resin, such as combustion [14], pyrolysis [15,16,17,18], solubilization [19,20], and supercritical water treatment [21]. After removing the epoxy resin, the recovery of tantalum mainly chooses one of two methods: the hydrometallurgy process and the chlorination process. In the hydrometallurgy process, leaching agents such sulfuric acid (H2SO4) [22,23], hydrofluoric acid (HF) [24], or a mixture of both [14,15], all applied at normal temperatures, have been investigated. Previous studies have indicated that pressure leaching using HF has better leaching efficiency [7]. After leaching, several extractants such as MIBK [25], CHO [26], and Alamine 336 [17,27] have been studied. The drawbacks of traditional extraction are high volatility and low thermal stability. To overcome these shortcomings, ionic liquids are studied in hydrometallurgy [24,28,29]. In the chlorination process, chlorine gas or hydrogen applied to tantalum and niobium raw ore [6] or ferrous chloride applied to tantalum capacitors [15,30,31,32] have both been studied.
In most of the studies mentioned above, the recovery of tantalum is higher in the hydrometallurgy process but the purify of tantalum is higher in the chlorination process. In this study, a feasible recycling process that combines the advantage of hydrometallurgy and chloride metallurgy was designed. After first removing the epoxy resin from EcSETCs, selective leaching was conducted to remove the manganese and increase the recovery of tantalum. Previous studies on leaching manganese from the different wastes were researched [33,34,35,36,37,38] to investigate the best leaching efficiency and increase the recovery rate of manganese. Low concentrate ordinary inorganic acid, which is applied to dissolve the manganese through selective leaching, was chosen instead of hydrofluoric acid, which is more dangerous and a pollutant. The parameters were investigated, such as acid concentrate, liquid–solid ratio, and reaction time to increase the leaching efficiency of manganese. Then, manganese hydroxide was obtained through chemical precipitation. Furthermore, chlorination with ferrous chloride was used in the recovery of tantalum. The manganese hydroxide and the tantalum chloride were separated individually as the final productions in this study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The EcSETCs in this study were made in Taiwan with 100 µF/16 Volt. An EcSETC include an epoxy resin, wires, and an electrode. The mass ratio of each physical component is shown in Table 1. The elements in EcSETCs were dissolved with 90% v/v of aqua regia and 10% v/v of hydrofluoric acid and the ion concentration in the solution measured by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES; VISTA-MPX, Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). The concentration of the main element compositions is shown in Table 2. The sulfuric acid (≥98.0%), nitric acid (≥65.0%), hydrofluoric acid (≥45%), hydrochloric acid (≥37.0%), and ferrous chloride (≥99%) were purchased from Uni-Onward Corp (New Taipei City, Taiwan). Chemicals used in this study were all of the analytical quality. The purity of the nitrogen gas used in pyrolysis was 99.0% from Yunshan Gas Co., Ltd. (Tainan, Taiwan).

2.2. Experimental Procedures

2.2.1. Pretreatment

Silicon added in the epoxy resin is the main factor affecting tantalum recycling because it is recovered with tantalum through chlorination. On the other hand, iron and nickel from wires also affect the efficiency of selective leaching. Due to the reasons mentioned above, pretreatment is necessary. The epoxy resin can be removed through pyrolysis with nitrogen gas. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA, Perkin Elmer, Pyris Diamond TG/DTA, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to determine the pyrolysis temperature in the pretreatment. After the pyrolysis process, grinding and washing with deionized water to flush the epoxy resin was conducted. Next, the electrode was crushed to increase the specific surface area that can improve the efficiency of selective leaching. Finally, the iron and nickel were removed from the wires through magnetic separation. The results of samples without epoxy resin and wires after pretreatment were analyzed by the multi-function environmental field emission scanning electron microscope (EFE-SEM; SU-5000, HITACHI, Chiyoda ku, Japan) with electronic data systems (EDS; EDAX, Mahwah, NJ, USA) and ICP-OES.

2.2.2. Selective Leaching

After the pretreatment, the samples were dissolved by the three kinds of inorganic acids. Hydrochloric acid, nitric acid, and sulfuric acid were chosen. The leaching agent with the best efficiency of selective leaching was chosen. Next, parameters such as acid concentration, liquid–solid ratio (L/S ratio), and reaction time were studied. The effect of acid concentration from 0.25 M (mol/L) to 5 M (mol/L), L/S ratio from 10 mL/g to 50 mL/g, and reaction time from 2 min to 256 min were set to increase the efficiency of selective leaching in this study. After the best parameters were tested and chosen, precipitating manganese hydroxide through adjusting the pH value was conducted. Next, manganese hydroxide was obtained through calcination as one of the final productions in this study.

2.2.3. Chlorination

The residues from the selective leaching process were washed and dried. Subsequently, the samples were heated in the tube furnace with ferrous chloride. After the stoichiometry, 48 wt.% of residues of selective leaching and 52 wt.% of ferrous chloride were chosen. Tantalum was collected in the form of TaCl5. The experiment process is shown in Figure 1.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Pretreatment

The epoxy resin and wires are the main factors to affect the recovery efficiency. Therefore, removing the epoxy resin and wires is the first step before any recovery process. A pretreatment process was conducted in this experiment.
Figure 2 illustrates the TG/DTG patterns showing that the first decomposition stage began at 350 °C until 420 °C. Then, the second stage of decomposition is from 420 °C to 600 °C. Due to the two stages of decomposition, we speculate that the epoxy resin has two mainly organic phases. According to the TG/DTA patterns, 600 °C was chosen, and the holding time found through experiments was 10 min to avoid burning the electrodes. After the pyrolysis process, grinding and washing were conducted to remove the epoxy resin. The SEM-EDS patterns are shown in Figure 3, which demonstrates that silicon was removed from the samples. Next, the wires with iron and nickel were removed through a magnetic separation after crushing. Table 3 shows the removed efficiency of silicon, iron, and nickel in the samples after pretreatment. These data showed that silicon, iron, and nickel were successfully removed through pretreatment.

3.2. Selective Leaching for Manganese Separation

After pretreatment, three kinds of inorganic acids were chosen to discuss manganese leaching efficiency. As tantalum does not dissolve in the typical inorganic acids, Table 4 shows that the leaching efficiencies of tantalum are quite low in three kinds of inorganic acids. On the other hand, Table 4 shows that hydrochloric acid had the best leaching efficiency of manganese. Therefore, this study chose hydrochloric acid as a leaching agent to selective leach from the samples after pretreatment.

3.2.1. Effect of the Hydrochloric Acid Concentration

The effect of HCl concentration on the selective leaching of tantalum and manganese was investigated from 0.5 M to 5 M at 25 °C for 3 h. The results are shown in Figure 4. The leaching efficiency of manganese increased as the hydrochloric acid concentration increased from 0.5 M to 3 M. The fact that tantalum did not dissolve through this step was confirmed. The highest leaching efficiency of manganese was achieved when hydrochloric acid concentration reached 3 M. On the other hand, the minimal amount of silver in the cathodes was not dissolved due to the chloride ion from the hydrochloric acid. Here, 3 M of hydrochloric acid was chosen as the optimal concentration in this study.

3.2.2. Effect of the Liquid–Solid Ratio

The effect of the liquid–solid ratio on the selective leaching of tantalum and manganese was studied from 10 mL/g to 50 mL/g. The results are shown in Figure 5. The leaching efficiency of manganese increased as the liquid–solid ratio increased until the liquid–solid ratio was 40 mL/g, achieving the best leaching efficiency. Hence, 40 mL/g of liquid–solid ratio was chosen as the optimal ratio in this study.

3.2.3. Effect of the Reaction Time

The effect of the reaction time on the selective leaching of tantalum and manganese was studied from 2 min to 256 min. The results are shown in Figure 6. The leaching efficiency of manganese continues to increase over time until the maximum efficiency is reached in 32 min. At the same time, we wanted to ensure that the tantalum did not dissolve. Therefore, 32 min was chosen as the optimal time in this study.

3.2.4. Manganese Chemical Precipitation

The precipitation of manganese was investigated using the liquors obtained at the best optimal conditions in this study. Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was used to adjust the pH value. The changes in the manganese precipitation as a function of pH value are shown in Figure 7. The manganese ions begin to precipitate when the pH value rises. At pH = 12, manganese ions almost convert to Mn(OH)2. Hence, pH = 12 was chosen as the best parameter for precipitation. After precipitation, Mn(OH)2 was analyzed by the ICP-OES (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) to confirm the compositions. Table 5 shows that the purity of Mn achieves 98.5%. Due to the addition of NaOH to adjust the pH value, the productions contain a small amount of Na. Compared to previous studies [33,34,35,36,37,38], the results in this study achieved a higher leaching rate and shorter reaction times but used more acid dosage. Thus, the addition of oxidants to decrease the acid dosage and studying the temperature parameter will be discussed in future work.

3.3. Chlorination of Tantalum

After pretreatment and selective leaching, the epoxy resin, wires, and manganese cathodes were removed. Then, chlorination was used to extract the selective leaching residues. After the selective leaching, the remaining residues contain tantalum, graphite, and a small amount of silver chloride (AgCl). According to the previous study, tantalum could selectively react with ferrous chloride (FeCl2), and the reaction equation between tantalum and FeCl2 is as follows [31]:
2Ta (s) + 5FeCl2 (g) → 2TaCl5 (g) + 5Fe (T > 380 °C),
The boiling temperature of TaCl5 and AgCl at standard atmospheric pressure is 234 °C and 1547 °C, respectively. When the tube furnace reaches the reaction temperature, the generated TaCl5 evaporates into the gas phase while the remaining compounds do not. Next, the gas of TaCl5 enters the condensing equipment to condense into the solid. In this study, the mixture of Ta residues and FeCl2 were heated at 450 °C for 3 h. The products were dissolved with hydrofluoric acid and analyzed by ICP-OES and the results are shown in Table 6. The recovery of tantalum reaches 94% and the purity of TaCl5 is about 99%. Comparing to previous studies [15,17,30,31,32], the results in this study achieved equivalent recovery of Ta in the chlorination process but lower than the hydrometallurgy. Therefore, the detailed reaction mechanism and optimal chlorination process will be discussed in future work.

4. Conclusions

As the demand for tantalum continuously increases, natural resources are mined and decrease gradually. Finding alternatives to mitigate this situation has become critical. The EcSETCs used in this study contain over 20 wt.% of tantalum and 8% of manganese, which have a great potential to provide a tremendous second resource. In this study, the epoxy resins must be removed from the EcSETCs by pyrolysis at 600 °C for 10 min, grinding, and washing. Next, the separation of iron and nickel through a magnetic separation is conducted to affect the efficiency of selective leaching. In summary, 3M of hydrochloric acid and the liquid–solid ratio of 40 mL/g at 25 °C for 32 min are chosen as the optimal parameters for selective leaching. With the optimal conditions, the leaching efficiency of Mn can achieve 99%. As Ta does not dissolve in hydrochloric acid, the leaching efficiency of Ta is almost 0%. It means that selective leaching is successful and feasible. After the filtering process, the leaching solution is divided into clear Mn ion-rich solution and Ta residues. By adjusting the pH value to 12, Mn(OH)2 will precipitate as one of the final productions. Then, Ta residues are washed and dried. Additionally, 48 wt.% of Ta residues and 52 wt.% of FeCl2 are mixed evenly and heated at 450 °C for 3 h by tube furnace. The gas of TaCl5 will generate and condense into the solid as the final production. In this study, the purity of Mn(OH)2 and TaCl5 is 98.5% and 99%, respectively; the recovery of Mn and Ta is 98% and 94%, respectively.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.-S.C., C.-Y.H. and C.-H.L.; Data curation, C.-Y.H.; Formal analysis, C.-Y.H.; Investigation, C.-Y.H.; Methodology, W.-S.C., C.-Y.H. and C.-H.L.; Supervision, W.-S.C. and C.-H.L.; Validation, C.-Y.H. and C.-H.L.; Visualization, C.-Y.H.; Writing—original draft, C.-Y.H.; and Writing—review and editing, C.-Y.H. and C.-H.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge the support of the Laboratory of Resources Circulation (LRC) at National Cheng Kung University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Balde, V.F.C.P.; Gray, V.; Kuehr, R.; Stegmann, P. The Global E-Waste Monitor 2017; United Nations University, IAS–SCYCLE: Bonn, Germany, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bleiwas, J.P.D.; Yager, T. Shift in Global Tantalum Mine Production, 2000–2014; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USA, 2015.
  3. Bloodworth, A. Track flows to manage technology-metal supply. Nature 2014, 505, 19–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Ekeberg, A.G.T. Who Discovered Tantalum and When. Available online: https://www.tanb.org/about-tantalum/tantalum-history (accessed on 15 October 2021).
  5. Li, X.; Yu, X.; Wang, C.; Tan, L. Preparation method of porous tantalum. Sci. Tech. Inn. Her. 2008, 1, 83–85. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gonzalez, J.; Gennari, F.; Bohé, A.; Ruiz, M.D.C.; Rivarola, J.; Pasquevich, D. Chlorination of niobium and tantalum ore. Thermochim. Acta 1997, 311, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Buchert, A.M.M.; Bleher, D.; Pingel, D. Recycling Critical Raw Materials from Waste Electronic Equipment; Oko-Institut e.V.: Freiburg, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  8. Buchert, D.S.M.; Bleher, D. Critical Metals for Future Sustainable Technologies and their Recycling Potential; Oko-Institut e.V.: Freiburg, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  9. Brunette, B. The Basics & Benefits of Tantalum & Ceramic Capacitors. Passiv. Compon. Blog. 2019. Available online: https://passive-components.eu/the-basics-benefits-of-tantalum%02ceramic-capacitors (accessed on 17 October 2021).
  10. Commission, E. Critical Raw Materials for the EU- Technical Report Report of the Ad-hoc Working Group on Defining Critical Raw Materials. Eur. Comm. 2010, 1–84. [Google Scholar]
  11. Agrawal, M.; Singh, R.; Ranitović, M.; Kamberovic, Z.; Ekberg, C.; Singh, K.K. Global market trends of tantalum and recycling methods from Waste Tantalum Capacitors: A review. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2021, 29, e00323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Singh, K.K.; Verma, H.R.; Mankhand, T.R. Comparative study of printed circuit board recycling by cracking of internal layers using organic solventsdimethylformamide and dimethylacetamide. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 142, 1721–1727. [Google Scholar]
  13. TIC. Bulletin No 172: Announcing the Anders Gustaf Ekeberg Tantalum Prize; Tantalum-Niobium International Study Center: Lasne, Belgium, 2018; Available online: https://www.tanb.org/images/T_I_C__Bulletin_no_172_(January2018).pdf (accessed on 30 November 2021).
  14. Mineta, K.; Okabe, T.H. Development of a recycling process for tantalum from capacitor scraps. Phys. Chem. Solids 2005, 66, 318–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Niu, B.; Xu, Z.; Chen, Z. Application of pyrolysis to recycling organics from waste tantalum capacitors. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 335, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, Z.; Niu, B.; Zhang, L.; Xu, Z. Vacuum pyrolysis characteristics and parameter optimization of recycling organic materials from waste tantalum capacitors. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 342, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ho, H.-J.; Chen, W.S.; Lin, K.-Y. Hydrometallurgical Process for Tantalum Recovery from Epoxy-Coated Solid Electrolyte Tantalum Capacitors. Materials 2019, 12, 1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zhou, W.W.Y.; Qiu, K. Recovery of materials from waste printed circuit boards by vacuum pyrolysis and vacuum centrifugal separation. Waste Manag. 2010, 30, 2299–2304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Sasaki, S.I.M.; Nasu, K.; Quitain, A.T.; Goto, M. Recovery of tantalum from capacitor with solvothermal treatment. ISFR 2011 Toledo 2011, 147–148. [Google Scholar]
  20. Katanoa, S.; Wajima, T.; Nakagome, H. Recovery of Tantalum Sintered Compact from Used Tantalum Condenser Using Steam Gasification with Sodium Hydroxide. ICESD 2014, 10, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Niu, B.; Xu, Z.; Chen, Z. Recovery of Tantalum from Waste Tantalum Capacitors by Supercritical Water Treatment. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 4421–4428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. El-Hussaini, O.; Mahdy, M. Sulfuric acid leaching of Kab Amiri niobium–tantalum bearing minerals, Central Eastern Desert, Egypt. Hydrometallurgy 2002, 64, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wu, B.; Shang, H.; Wen, J.-K. Sulfuric acid leaching of low-grade refractory tantalum–niobium and associated rare earths minerals in Panxi area of China. J. Rar. Met. 2015, 34, 202–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Micheau, C.; Lejeune, M.; Arrachart, G.; Draye, M.; Turgis, R.; Michel, S.; Legeai, S.; Pellet-Rostaing, S. Recovery of tantalum from synthetic sulfuric leach solutions by solvent extraction with phosphonate functionalized ionic liquids. Hydrometallurgy 2019, 189, 105107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nikolaev, A.I.; Maiorov, V.G. New approaches to niobium and tantalum extraction technology. Dokl. Chem. 2007, 415, 167–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Okada, T. Manufacturing of special nibium oxides for optical and ceramic applications. In Proceedings of the International Symposium Niobium, Orlando, FL, USA, 2–5 December 2001; pp. 141–8094. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhu, Z.; Cheng, C.Y. Solvent extraction technology for the separation and purification of niobium and tantalum: A review. Hydrometallurgy 2011, 107, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nahraa, M.; Svecova, L.; Chaînet, E. Pentavalent tantalum reduction mechanism from 1-butyl-3-methyl pyrrolidinium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ionic liquid. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 182, 891–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Turgis, R.; Arrachart, G.; Michel, S.; Legeai, S.; Lejeune, M.; Draye, M.; Pellet-Rostaing, S. Ketone functionalized task specific ionic liquids for selective tantalum extraction. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 196, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Niu, B.; Chen, Z.; Xu, Z. An integrated and environmental-friendly technology for recovering valuable materials from waste tantalum capacitors. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 166, 512–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Niu, B.; Chen, Z.; Xu, Z. Recycling waste tantalum capacitors to synthesize high value-added Ta2O5 and polyaniline-decorated Ta2O5 photocatalyst by an integrated chlorination-sintering-chemisorption process. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 252, 117206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Niu, B.; Chen, Z.; Xu, Z. Method for Recycling Tantalum from Waste Tantalum Capacitors by Chloride Metallurgy. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1376–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. de Michelis, I.; Ferella, F.; Karakaya, E.; Beolchini, F.; Vegliò, F. Recovery of zinc and manganese from alkaline and zinc-carbon spent batteries. J. Power Sources 2007, 172, 975–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Furlani, G.; Moscardini, E.; Pagnanelli, F.; Ferella, F.; Vegliò, F.; Toro, L. Recovery of manganese from zinc alkaline batteries by reductive acid leaching using carbohydrates as reductant. Hydrometallurgy 2009, 99, 115–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Francesco, F.; Michelis, I.D.; Beolchini, F.; Innocenzi, V.; Vegli, F. Extraction of Zinc and Manganese from Alkaline and Zinc-Carbon Spent Batteries by Citric-Sulphuric Acid Solution. Int. J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 2010, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Sayilgan, E.; Yigit, N.O.K.; Civelekoglu, G.; Kitis, M. Acidic leaching and precipitation of zinc and manganese from spent battery powders using various reductants. J. Hazard Mater. 2010, 173, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Buzatu, M.; Săceanu, S.; Petrescu, M.; Ghica, G.; Buzatu, T. Recovery of zinc and manganese from spent batteries by reductive leaching in acidic media. J. Power Sources 2014, 247, 612–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, W.-S.; Liao, C.-T.; Lin, K.-Y. Recovery Zinc and Manganese from Spent Battery Powder by Hydrometallurgical Route. Energy Procedia 2016, 107, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The recovery process of tantalum from EcSETCs. SEM/EDS: multi-function environmental field emission scanning electron microscope with electronic data systems. ICP-OES: inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. TG/DTA: Thermogravimetric analysis.
Figure 1. The recovery process of tantalum from EcSETCs. SEM/EDS: multi-function environmental field emission scanning electron microscope with electronic data systems. ICP-OES: inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. TG/DTA: Thermogravimetric analysis.
Materials 15 00656 g001
Figure 2. TG/DTG curves of EcSETCs with nitrogen gas (N2).
Figure 2. TG/DTG curves of EcSETCs with nitrogen gas (N2).
Materials 15 00656 g002
Figure 3. The SEM-EDS patterns of the samples after pyrolysis, grinding, washing, and crushing and the quantitative analysis of samples by SEM-EDS.
Figure 3. The SEM-EDS patterns of the samples after pyrolysis, grinding, washing, and crushing and the quantitative analysis of samples by SEM-EDS.
Materials 15 00656 g003
Figure 4. Effect of HCl concentration on the selective leaching efficiency. (L/S ratio: 50 mL/g; reaction time: 3 h; reaction temperature: 25 °C).
Figure 4. Effect of HCl concentration on the selective leaching efficiency. (L/S ratio: 50 mL/g; reaction time: 3 h; reaction temperature: 25 °C).
Materials 15 00656 g004
Figure 5. Effect of liquid–solid ratio on the selective leaching efficiency. (HCl concentration: 3 M; reaction time: 3 h; reaction temperature: 25 °C).
Figure 5. Effect of liquid–solid ratio on the selective leaching efficiency. (HCl concentration: 3 M; reaction time: 3 h; reaction temperature: 25 °C).
Materials 15 00656 g005
Figure 6. Effect of reaction time on the selective leaching efficiency. (HCl concentration: 3 M; L/S ratio: 40 mL/g; reaction temperature: 25 °C).
Figure 6. Effect of reaction time on the selective leaching efficiency. (HCl concentration: 3 M; L/S ratio: 40 mL/g; reaction temperature: 25 °C).
Materials 15 00656 g006
Figure 7. Precipitation rate of manganese.
Figure 7. Precipitation rate of manganese.
Materials 15 00656 g007
Table 1. The mass ratio of each physical component in the EcSETCs (wt.%).
Table 1. The mass ratio of each physical component in the EcSETCs (wt.%).
ElectrodeEpoxy ResinWire
25.67%53.41%17.92%
Table 2. The concentration of the main element compositions in the EcSETCs (wt.%).
Table 2. The concentration of the main element compositions in the EcSETCs (wt.%).
ElementTaMnNiFeSiAg
wt.%20–22%8%10%8%4–6%1%
Table 3. Removed efficiency of silicon, iron, and nickel after the pretreatment.
Table 3. Removed efficiency of silicon, iron, and nickel after the pretreatment.
SiFeNiTa
Before46.35 mg/g80.30 mg/g90.75 mg/g208.60 mg/g
After0.01 mg/g0.40 mg/g0.50 mg/g208.60 mg/g
Removed efficiency99.8%99.5%99.4%0%
Table 4. The leaching efficiency of manganese and tantalum with three kinds of inorganic acids.
Table 4. The leaching efficiency of manganese and tantalum with three kinds of inorganic acids.
Acid TypeLeaching Efficiency of MnLeaching Efficiency of Ta
HCl99.7%0.10%
HNO391.4%0.13%
H2SO483.1%0.01%
(Concentration: 5 mol/L; L/S ratio: 50 mL/g; reaction time: 3 h; reaction temperature: 25 °C).
Table 5. The metals compounds of Mn(OH)2 after precipitation.
Table 5. The metals compounds of Mn(OH)2 after precipitation.
ElementMnNaFeNiTa
Content98.5%0.7%0.4%0.3%0.1%
Table 6. The metals compounds of TaCl5.
Table 6. The metals compounds of TaCl5.
ElementTaMnFeNi
Content99%0.2%0.5%0.3%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, W.-S.; Hsiao, C.-Y.; Lee, C.-H. Recovery of Tantalum and Manganese from Epoxy-Coated Solid Electrolyte Tantalum Capacitors through Selective Leaching and Chlorination Processes. Materials 2022, 15, 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020656

AMA Style

Chen W-S, Hsiao C-Y, Lee C-H. Recovery of Tantalum and Manganese from Epoxy-Coated Solid Electrolyte Tantalum Capacitors through Selective Leaching and Chlorination Processes. Materials. 2022; 15(2):656. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020656

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Wei-Sheng, Chih-Yuan Hsiao, and Cheng-Han Lee. 2022. "Recovery of Tantalum and Manganese from Epoxy-Coated Solid Electrolyte Tantalum Capacitors through Selective Leaching and Chlorination Processes" Materials 15, no. 2: 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020656

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop