Next Article in Journal
Experimental Investigation on the Mechanical Performance of Steel-ECC Composite Girders with Corrugated Webs under Negative Moment
Next Article in Special Issue
Adsorption of Pyrethroids in Water by Calcined Shell Powder: Preparation, Characterization, and Mechanistic Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Corrosion Properties of Boron- and Manganese-Alloyed Stainless Steels as a Material for the Bipolar Plates of PEM Fuel Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
Facile Approach to the Fabrication of Highly Selective CuCl-Impregnated θ-Al2O3 Adsorbent for Enhanced CO Performance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thermally Modified Palygorskite Usage as Adsorbent in Fixed-Bed Reactor for High Concentration NH4+-N Removal and Further Application as N—Fertilizer in Hydroponic Cultivation

by
Christina Vasiliki Lazaratou
1,*,
Stylianos Dimitrios Panagopoulos
2,
Dimitrios V. Vayenas
2,3,
Dionisios Panagiotaras
4 and
Dimitrios Papoulis
1
1
Department of Geology, University of Patras, GR-26504 Patras, Greece
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Patras, GR-26504 Patras, Greece
3
Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, Foundation for Research and Technology, GR-26504 Patras, Greece
4
Department of Environment, Ionian University, M. Minotou-Giannopoulou 26, GR-29100 Zakynthos, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(19), 6541; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196541
Submission received: 22 August 2022 / Revised: 12 September 2022 / Accepted: 18 September 2022 / Published: 21 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Adsorbents and Their Applications)

Abstract

:
Palygorskite sample (Pal) underwent thermal treatment at 400 °C (T-Pal) to be used as adsorbent for the removal of 200 mg NH4+-N/L from artificial solution. After thermal treatment, the sample was characterized via X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). For NH4+-N removal, T-Pal was added as a bed matrix in fixed-bed reactor experiments and the effect of flow rate was determined. It was indicated that with the flow rate increase from 10 mL/min to 50 mL/min, fewer liters of the solution were purified, rendering a longer residual time of interactions, which is optimal for NH4+-N removal from T-Pal. The maximum removed amount was calculated at 978 mg NH4+-N (qtotal), suggesting T-Pal is a promising ammonium adsorbent. The data of kinetic experiments were applied to Clark, Yoon–Nelson, and Thomas kinetic models, with Clark having the best fit, highlighting a heterogenous adsorption. At the end of kinetic experiments, T-Pal applied in hydroponic cultivations and presented a sufficient release rate, which was found utilizable for saturated T-Pal usage as N fertilizer that satisfactory results were deemed concerning lettuces characteristics and growth.

1. Introduction

Palygorskite (Pal) belongs to the fibrous clay minerals with a typical 2:1 ribbon-like structure [1]. In parallel with these SiO4 ribbons, channels are extended at an approximate width of 7.3 Å [2] which are full of exchangeable cations, coordinated and zeolitic water molecules that balance the layer charge [1]. The specific structural arrangement is responsible for Pal porosity, high specific surface area (SSA > 200 m2/g), and sorption capacity [3]. At temperatures above 300 °C, the zeolitic water is lost, whereas above 350 °C part of coordinated water is lost as well, and dehydroxylation starts taking place. Water molecules’ absence and dehydroxylation lead to emptying space of the channels, as well as the reveal of more active sites (-OH groups), respectively, allowing the adsorption of more, or even bigger size cations [2,4]. Based on these enhanced-adsorption properties, thermally modified palygorskite (T-Pal) was previously used for a variety of contaminant removal from water systems, such as dyes [5,6,7], heavy metals [8], or radioactive uranium [9].
Moreover, T-Pal was previously applied as a low-concentration ammonium adsorbent in water systems, achieving removal efficiencies exceeding 75% [10,11]. Ammonium (NH4+) can be a common inorganic contaminant in groundwater, mostly derived from N-fertilizer consumption and animals’ feedlots, but is also the most frequent nitrogenous pollutant in wastewaters at varying concentrations (10–1000 mg L−1) [12]. Municipal wastewater, landfill leachates, livestock, poultry, and industrial wastewaters are the main sources of water bodies contamination from NH4+/NH3, which can finally lead to eutrophication and toxicity to humans and other organisms [13]. A variety of methods has been examined for the immense NH4+ removal from the wastewaters, among them air stripping [14], membranes [15], or adsorption [16,17], whereas from these techniques, the NH4+ could be recovered [13].
The recovery of NH4+ can be essential since N is a crucial element for agriculture and plant growth which can be provided by ammonium solely or in combination with nitrate [18,19]. A great advantage of the adsorption method is the usage of low-cost, environmentally friendly, and in many cases natural materials, such as Pal or zeolite as adsorbents. Natural materials, saturated with NH4+ or other nutrients can potentially be further exploited without causing secondary pollution, such as fertilizers in cultivations, even in hydroponics [16,20,21].
The present study highlights the potential application of thermally treated palygorskite (T-Pal) as an adsorbent of high concentration NH4+-N that could be representative of wastewaters. T-Pal was applied as the support media on a lab-scale fixed-bed reactor, for the conduction of continuous flow rate experiments till saturated. The N-saturated T-Pal was further used in hydroponic cultivations for lettuce growth for N-supply, as an environmentally friendly and cost-effective solution for N recovery. The kinetics of the fixed-bed reactor experiments were fitted in Clark, Yoon–Nelson, and Thomas’s kinetic models, while the evaluation of lettuce characteristics was analyzed via ANOVA statistical analysis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation and Characterization

Pal sample was provided by Geohellas S.A. (Grevena, Greece) at specific grain size of 1.4–2.36 mm, which was washed and dried at 50 °C. The dried sample was further thermally treated at 400 °C in a controlled muffled oven for 2 h and then cooled at room temperature in a desiccator. The temperature of 400 °C was selected since it is the minimum where both zeolitic water loss and dehydroxylation may take place within the sample, thus, ensuring structural changes and cost-effectiveness [5]. The X-ray fluorescence (XRF) measurements of the major (SiO2, Al2O3, CaO, MgO, MnO, Fe2O3, K2O, Na2O, P2O5, TiO2) elements were performed. An amount of 1.8 g of dried ground sample was mixed with 0.2 g of wax (acting as a binder) and pressed on a base of boric acid to a circular powder pellet of 3.2 cm in diameter. Analyses were performed with a RIGAKU ZSX PRIMUS II spectrometer, which was equipped with an Rh anode running at 4 kW, for major and trace element analysis. The spectrometer was equipped with the diffracting crystals: LIF (200), LIF (220), PET, Ge, RX-25, RX-61, RX-40, and RX-75. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained for the samples in a 2θ range of 2° to 60° and at a scanning rate of 2 °/min, using an XRD Bruker D8 advance diffractometer, with Ni-filtered CuKα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Ǻ). Their typical morphological characteristics were verified with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), using an SEM LEO SUPRA 35VP. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra were obtained using FTIR spectrophotometer Spectrum (Patras, Greece) RXI (Perkin Elmer) at room temperature. The samples were prepared by mixing 0.1 mg of Pal, T-Pal, and T-Pal after NH4 +-N adsorption with KBr, and then were pressed till pellets were formed. The wavenumbers range from 400 cm−1 to 4000 cm−1 and were analyzed using Spectrum v5.3.1 software. The Cations Exchange Capacity (CEC) was determined using sodium acetate, according to the US-EPA 9081 method.

2.2. Fixed-Bed Reactor Experiments

The adsorption experiments on fixed—bed reactors were conducted on Plexiglas tubes (columns) of laboratory scale (Figure 1). The tube dimensions were 40.0 cm in height and 4.0 cm internal diameter, with 450 mL operational volume, equipped with four sampling valves at various heights. The column was firstly filled with 288 g of T-Pal sample at 1.4–2.36 mm grain size and 0.67 gr cm−3 density. The removal of NH4+-N was examined using NH4Cl standard solution of 200 mg/L initial concentration which was supplied after the column was filled with the matrix. The specific concentration was selected to be comparable to previous experiments with zeolite from Kotoulas et al. [16], which were conducted at the same laboratory and equipment. The effect of continuous flow rate (15, 35, and 50 mL/min) was considered. Various samples were selected at various time intervals till the saturation of T-Pal was achieved and the breakthrough curve could be formed. Each sample was centrifuged at 5.500 rpm for 3 min and filtrated through Whatman filters (0.45 μm) to remove the finest suspended.
The final concentration of each time interval was measured at UV–Vis spectrophotometer at 625 nm according to modified Salicylate method of Verdouw et al. [22]. From the data obtained, the adsorption capacity (qe) and maximum removal efficiency (Y%) were determined based on Equations (1)–(4).
q t o t a l = Q 1000 t = 0 t = t t o t a l C a d s d t
q e ( exp ) = q t o t a l x
W t o t a l = C 0 Q t t o t a l 1000
Y = q t o t a l W t o t a l × 100
where qtotal is the amount of adsorbed NH4+-N (mg) and was calculated with the area method [23], Q is the applied flow rate (mL/min), ttotal is the 90% of time needed for adsorbent saturation (min), Cads the adsorbed NH4+-N amount (mg/L) (Cads = C0 − C), x the total mass of the adsorbent and Wtotal the total amount of NH4+-N (mg) sent to the column.

2.3. Kinetic Models

Some of the most representative models to express the breakthrough curve results are the Thomas, Yoon–Nelson, and Clark kinetic models. These models can adequately determine the maximum solid-phase concentration, which can be estimated at 50% of bed saturation approximately [24].
Specifically, the Thomas model expresses the second-order reversible reaction kinetics, while assuming that adsorption follows the Langmuir isotherm. The linearized Thomas equation is described in Equation (5):
l n C 0 C t = K T h q m a x m F K T h C 0 t
where C0 the initial pollutant concentration (mg/L), Ct is the pollutant concentration in the effluent (mg/L), F the flow rate (ml/min), KTh is the Thomas adsorption rate constant (L/mg min); m the adsorbent mass (g) and qmax is the maximum adsorption capacity (mg/g).
The Yoon–Nelson model is the simplest of the fixed-bed studies since it does not include the bed parameters or detailed data about the adsorbent-adsorbate interactions [25]. It is a model based on the decrease in the adsorption probability, and the most concise to predict the concentration change till the adsorbent breakthrough. The linearized Yoon–Nelson model is expressed as presented in Equation (6):
l n C t C 0 C t = K Y N t K Y N t 50  
where C0 the initial pollutant concentration (mg/L), Ct is the pollutant concentration in the effluent (mg/L), KYN the Yoon–Nelson constant (1/min), t time (min) and t50 the required time for adsorbate breakthrough (min).
The Clark model is based on the adsorption equilibrium and mass transfer phenomenon to predict the breakthrough curve, while also assumes that the Freundlich isotherm expresses the adsorbent–adsorbate interactions [25]. The linearized Clark model is expressed as in Equation (7).
l n [ ( C t / C 0 ) n 1 1 ] = r t + l n A
where C0 the initial pollutant concentration (mg/L), Ct is the pollutant concentration in the effluent (mg/L), n the Freundlich constant derived from the batch tests, r and A the Clark constants (1/min) and t time (min).

2.4. Determination of Error Functions and Coefficients

The parameters of each nonlinear kinetic model are the result of linearizing the non-linear model expressions and least squares fit [26]. For comparison and quantification of the deviation and to determine the uncertainty in error distribution, the coefficient of determination (R2) and the sum of squares of errors (SSE) were determined for both linear and nonlinear models as it is expressed in Equations (8)–(10), respectively.
R 2 = i = 1 p ( q e , t h e o r i q ¯ e , m e a n s i ) 2 i = 1 p [ ( q e , t h e o r i q ¯ e , m e a n s i ) + ( q e , t h e o r i q e , m e a n s i ) 2 ]
SSE = i = 1 p ( q e , t h e o r i q e , m e a n s i ) 2
RMSE = 1 n 1   i = 1 p ( q e , t h e o r i q e , m e a n s i ) 2
where i is the experimental run, qe,theor is the theoretically evaluated equilibrium values from the model (mg/g) and qe,means (mg/g) is the experimental equilibrium data (mg/g).

2.5. Hydroponic Cultivations

The impact of NH4+-saturated samples on hydroponic lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) cultivations as nitrogen fertilizers in laboratory-scale, was estimated based on the study of Urlić et al. [19], where various ammonium concentrations were examined as the sole N-supply source. Tap water from University of Patras was used as the nutrient solution as it contained 5 mg NO3-N/L, 0.02 mg NH4+-N/L, and other nutrient minerals, mostly Ca2+ and Mg2+ as can be seen in Table 1. There was no synthetic nutrient solution since the study is focused on the interactions of T-Pal/NH4+-N release and NH4+-N/roots uptake. The added mass of T-Pal was 15.8 ± 0.32 g/L in tap water in order to release 3 mmol/L NH4+ as N—fertilizer, according to the optimal conditions that were determined in the study [19]. The exact mass was determined based on the T-Pal adsorption capacity from the fixed-bed reactor experiments. Additionally, there was a control system where lettuce cultivations were growing in tap water only. The cultivation consisted of seedlings of 5 cm height in 51 mm diameter hydroponic pots, filled with inactive expanded clay for plant support. The total volume capacity of the used hydroponic boxes was 1 L per seedling. The NH4+-N and NO3-N consumption was measured three times per week. pH was not adjusted and remained neutral at 7.1 ± 0.3, while room temperature was stable at 20 ± 1 °C. On day 40 of the experiment, the final height, shoot, root lengths, and wet shoot and root weights were measured after the lettuce plants harvest. The shoots and roots were further dried at 45 °C for 48 h and then measured again for dry shoot and root weights. Statistical analysis was performed between hydroponic systems using single-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA). The statistical significance of p < 0.05 was set using the one-way ANOVA program in Microsoft Excel 2010.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of Pal before and after Thermal Treatment

The chemical composition information was provided with X-ray fluorescence (XRF). It was indicated that Pal composition was 63.7% SiO2, 1.10% Al2O3, 19.8% MgO, 9.4% Fe2O3, 0.3% CaO, 0.4% MnO, 0–0.06 of N2O, KOH, TiO2, and P2O5 and 10% LOI. Additionally, the CEC of palygorskite was estimated at 30 meq/100 g. The mineralogical composition of the palygorskite sample before and after thermal treatment was identified via the X-ray diffraction (XRD) method, whereas T-Pal after NH4+-N was also analyzed for potential alterations after adsorption. As shown in Figure 2, palygorskite is the dominant mineralogical phase of the sample, while saponite impurity was also detected, since these two clay minerals co-exist in Ventzia Basin (Grevena, Greece) [27]. The typical palygorskite reflections can be observed at 2θο values 8.3°, 20°, 27°, and 34°, while the reflection at 6° is referred to as saponite. After thermal treatment, differences were shown in T-Pal reflections, since the intensity of the first characteristic reflection at 8.3° was decreased, contrary to the saponite reflection which showed sharper. In the study of Chen et al. [5], decreased palygorskite reflections were recorded, while in the present study, new reflection at 30° was formed, most likely by dehydration and structural rearrangement [28]. After the adsorption of NH4+-N on T-Pal at the fixed-bed reactor (T-Pal-N), there are no significant differences, showing that the T-Pal structure was unaffected after the interaction with NH4+ -N. More specifically, the most notable alteration at the spectra was a slight peak shifting at the basal reflections of 20° (Figure 1), while the reflections were slightly decreased. The intensity change in the reflections renders the surficial interaction between adsorbent–adsorbate most probable [29], whereas the peak shifting can be attributed either to the ion exchange that took place or to the surficial bonding that may affect the crystallinity. Concerning the reflection of saponite, at T-Pal-N sample was steeper than palygorskite, displaying potential surficial H-bonded interactions [30].
Furthermore, the fibrous morphology was verified with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The typical fibers are depicted in Figure 3, showing fibers with lengths ranging from 250 nm to 1 μm. The effect of thermal treatment at 400 °C was significant (Figure 3a). Specifically, T-Pal fibers (Figure 3b) were strongly agglomerated (bundles) while their length decreased as a result of the total loss of coordinated water molecules [31].
Concerning the FTIR analysis, the spectra of Pal, T-Pal, and T-Pal-N can be shown in Figure 4. At 478 cm−1, 1030 cm−1, and 1120 cm−1, typical bands of Si-O stretching were presented, whereas the bands at 985 cm−1, 1024 cm−1, and 1120 cm−1 are typical of the palygorskite [28], and the band of 1200 cm−1 is characteristic of the ribbon structure [32]. After thermal treatment, the mineralogical phase was not influenced; however, most of the bands presented decreased vibration, and a slight shifting at ~3400 cm−1 to ~3600 cm−1 that was followed and can be attributed to a partial loss of bound water after the thermal treatment. Moreover, after NH4+-N adsorption on Pal (T-Pal-N), an intense band at 1380 cm−1 can be attributed to the newly formed N-H bond, rendering the ammonium removal on T-Pal takes place [33].

3.2. Fixed-Bed Reactor Experiments

3.2.1. Effect of Flow Rate

The effect of the three different flow rates (10 mL/min, 35 mL/min, and 50 mL/min) was examined via continuous flow rate experiments in a fixed-bed reactor. It was observed that increased flow rates (35 mL/min and 50 mL/min) came with decreased time for the breakthrough point, whereas at 10 mL/min more than the double time was necessary for the T-Pal saturation (Figure 5). Specifically, 2.2 L of the solution was purified within 1500 min that the breakthrough curve ended, for 10 mL/min influent. This removal corresponds to 4.38 bed volumes instead of 3.48 and 2.98 for 35 mL/min and 50 mL/min, respectively. The lower the flow rate is, the longer the residual time of ammonium to interact with T-Pal active sites and interlayer space, resulting in higher removal efficiencies [24]. Moreover, the breakthrough curves under all the examined flow rates presented similar shapes, as well as the same NH4+-N adsorption behavior, which can be characterized by the highest possible removal at the beginning, continuing with the steep increased NH4+-N concentration in the effluent, and ending at the almost stable final concentration where almost there is no adsorption. The first and final steps can be better depicted at a 10 mL/min flow rate, but the steep concentration increase can be clearly shown at a 50 mL/min flow rate (Figure 5).
At the end of the kinetic experiments, the operational parameters were determined. Table 2 shows the maximum NH4+-N removal efficiency (Y%) and adsorption capacity (qe) of T-Pal, as well as the liters of water that were treated during the 90% of saturation that was calculated based on Equations (1)–(4). The same equations were applied for time t, which represents the time needed to produce an effluent NH4+-N concentration below the permeable limits for wastewaters, according to Greek legislation [34]. According to the calculations presented in Table 2, can be observed that the highest examined flow rate 10 mL/min achieved the highest removal efficiency and capacity, whereas more liters of water were treated till the breakthrough. Moreover, as shown in Table 3, more liters of the solution were purified effluent at the flow rate of 10 mL/min, which can be characterized as the most efficient for NH4+-N treatment. Additionally, the highest adsorption capacity (qe), and removal efficiency were obtained for 10 mL/min for time t. The decreased flow rate values provided longer residence time for interactions between wastewater and bed material, rendering that probably the intraparticle mass transfer is dominant [35].
The results obtained were compared to the previous study of Kotoulas et al. [16], where zeolite was used at the same dimension reactor (for the removal of 200 mg NH4+-N/L as well at 8 mL/min flow rate), aiming to the competitive analysis of T-Pal as adsorbent for NH4+-N. In general, zeolite is considered the most widespread aluminosilicate adsorbent for ammonium [16,17,36,37]; nevertheless, T-Pal achieved removal efficiencies were quite promising and worth to be evaluated. It must be admitted that almost double the zeolite dose (500 g) presented higher adsorption capacity under similar experimental conditions [16], which would still be higher if the same dosage of T-Pal was used. Nevertheless, the values are quite comparable, rendering T-Pal a competitive adsorbent for NH4+-N.

3.2.2. Application of Kinetic Models

The results obtained from the kinetic experiments for all the flow rate values were evaluated with the application of each breakthrough curve on different kinetic models such as Clark, Yoon–Nelson, and Thomas.
In all cases, quite high values of correlation coefficient were obtained (R2 > 0.92), highlighting those models’ sufficiency to express the NH4+-N interactions with T-Pal. Table 4 displays the calculated parameters for the above-mentioned kinetic models for all the examined flow rates, whereas Figure 6 presents the exact fit of each model. Based on the R2 values, the Clark model noted the highest ones when 10 mL/min (0.942 > 0.929) and 35 mL/min (0.902 > 0.897) were the applied flow rates. Clark’s model associates the mass-transfer concepts and Freundlich isotherm [38]. The expression of kinetics via the Clark model indicates the heterogenous nature of adsorption, which also came in agreement with the data obtained from batch experiments conducted in the previous study [11], where Freundlich isotherm was most suitable to describe the removal of NH4+-N from T-Pal. However, with the flow rate increase at 50 mL/min, Thomas and Yoon–Nelson models yield slightly better R2 values than the Clark model (0.989 > 0.987), which can be attributed to the decreased mass transfer phenomena when the flow rate increases [38,39]. This can be verifying from the Thomas or Yoon–Nelson model values, in specific the Kth or KYN, which keep increasing with the flow rate increase as well, due to the lower mass transfer resistance, as was also reported in the study by Futalan and Wan [39].
The mass transfer phenomena found to have an impact on T-Pal and NH4+-N interactions, while as it was mentioned in Table 3, more liters of aqueous solution can be purified at lower flow rates, as well as it was shown from the difference in the optimal kinetic model fitting.

3.3. Hydroponic Cultivations for Lettuce Growth Using T-Pal for NH4+-N Supply

At the end of the kinetic experiments in the fixed-bed reactor, the used T-Pal was saturated with 978 mg of NH4+-N, as it was calculated based on Equation (1). As an N-enriched material, it was considered to be exploited as nitrogenous fertilizer in hydroponic cultivation of Lactuca sattiva L. The supply of 3 mmol of NH4+-N was found sufficient as lettuce nutrient [19], so it was selected to be examined in this case study as well, whereas 10% of NO3-N would be also provided due to the tap water composition.
The overall 40-day experiments indicated that the added NH4+-N was not fully consumed from the lettuce plants (Figure 7), whereas the NH4+-N released amount from the saturated samples was less than it was expected, concerning the qtotal. This could be attributed to the strong interactions between NH4+ and clay minerals that continuous and intense agitation would be necessary to be broken. Despite that fact, the maximum ammonium was noted during the first day of hydroponics, and then steady consumption was observed (Figure 7). Moreover, it is important to mention that in the system with T-Pal, the NO3-N consumption was higher compared to the control system, highlighting the boost in NO3-N consumption under NH4+-N presence (Figure 7 and Figure 8).
Finally, the effect of N consumption on the plants’ characteristics was significant. Specifically, the produced lettuce plants provided with both NO3-N and NH4+-N, gained much more shoot or root weight and length compared to the control system (Table 5). The enhanced N supply was further evaluated with the ANOVA statistical analysis, verifying the synergistic effect of NO3-N/NH4+-N on plant growth. In detail, Figure 8a,b depict the quality characteristics of plants that presented statistical differences (p < 0.05). It can be observed the lettuces derived from the system with T-Pal presented enhanced root and shoot weight than the lettuces from the control system; however, the most crucial notification was the statistical difference at NO3-N consumption. All the measurements were evaluated via statistical analysis during the 40-day cultivation, suggesting that the gradual consumption of nitrates was found to be optimal when ammonium co-exists, despite the fact that the final consumed concentration had no significant difference.

4. Conclusions

In the present study, experiments were conducted at fixed-bed reactors, using T-Pal of 1.4–2.3 mm as the support media for the removal of 200 mg NH4+-N from artificial solution. The effect of three different flow rates was examined, where in all cases, satisfactory removal rates were achieved, ranging from 33% up to 50% with a flow rate decrease from 50 mL/L to 10 mL/L. For the lower examined flow rate, more than 90% of the solution was purified, rendering 10 mL/min the most sufficient one. The data were fitted on kinetic models of Clark, Yoon–Nelson, and Thomas with increased distribution of A, KYN, and KTH for each model, respectively, with the flow rate increase. The difference in these distribution yields the ammonium removal was affected by the mass transfer phenomena impact. The Clark model, which assumes that the Freundlich isotherm is dominant, was found to satisfactorily express the procedure, highlighting the heterogeneity of the interactions. Saturated T-Pal proved sufficient for N supply at the hydroponic cultivations, as the lettuces presented normal growth and better characteristics than the control system. The statistical analysis confirmed these results, especially about plant dry or wet weight. Further investigation for pilot scale application concerning NH4+ removal, or usage as fertilizers either in hydroponic cultivations or soils is worthy to be examined.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.V.V. and D.P. (Dimitrios Papoulis); methodology, C.V.L. and S.D.P.; validation, D.V.V., D.P. (Dimitrios Papoulis) and D.P. (Dionisios Panagiotaras); formal analysis, C.V.L. and S.D.P.; investigation, C.V.L. and S.D.P.; resources, D.V.V.; writing—original draft preparation, C.V.L.; writing—review and editing D.V.V., D.P. (Dimitrios Papoulis) and D.P. (Dionisios Panagiotaras); visualization, C.V.L. and S.D.P.; supervision, D.P. (Dimitrios Papoulis); project administration D.V.V. and D.P. (Dimitrios Papoulis). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Geohellas S.A. for providing the palygorskite sample. Moreover, the authors are grateful to Paraskevi Lampropoulou (University of Patras) for XRD analysis, Vayia Xanthopoulou from the Laboratory of Electron Microscopy and Microanalysis at the University of Patras for the XRF analysis, C. Anastasopoulos from Advanced Polymers & Hybrid Nanomaterials Research Laboratory of Chemistry Department at the University of Patras for FTIR samples preparation, and to Vassilios Dracopoulos from FORTH, Patras, for the SEM images analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Galan, E. Properties and Applications of Palygorskite-Sepiolite Clays. Clay Miner. 1996, 31, 443–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chiari, G.; Giustetto, R.; Ricchiardi, G. Crystal Structure Refinements of Palygorskite and Maya Blue from Molecular Modelling and Powder Synchrotron Diffraction. EJM 2003, 15, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Moreira, M.A.; Ciuffi, K.J.; Rives, V.; Vicente, M.A.; Trujillano, R.; Gil, A.; Korili, S.A.; de Faria, E.H. Effect of Chemical Modification of Palygorskite and Sepiolite by 3-Aminopropyltriethoxisilane on Adsorption of Cationic and Anionic Dyes. Appl. Clay Sci. 2017, 135, 394–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Rusmin, R.; Sarkar, B.; Biswas, B.; Churchman, J.; Liu, Y.; Naidu, R. Structural, Electrokinetic and Surface Properties of Activated Palygorskite for Environmental Application. Appl. Clay Sci. 2016, 134, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, H.; Zhao, J.; Zhong, A.; Jin, Y. Removal Capacity and Adsorption Mechanism of Heat-Treated Palygorskite Clay for Methylene Blue. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 174, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, H.; Zhong, A.; Wu, J.; Zhao, J.; Yan, H. Adsorption Behaviors and Mechanisms of Methyl Orange on Heat-Treated Palygorskite Clays. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 14026–14036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Silva, V.C.; Araújo, M.E.B.; Rodrigues, A.M.; do Vitorino, M.B.C.; Cartaxo, J.M.; Menezes, R.R.; Neves, G.A. Adsorption Behavior of Crystal Violet and Congo Red Dyes on Heat-Treated Brazilian Palygorskite: Kinetic, Isothermal and Thermodynamic Studies. Materials 2021, 14, 5688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pyrgaki, K.; Messini, P.; Zotiadis, V. Adsorption of Pb and Cu from Aqueous Solutions by Raw and Heat-Treated Attapulgite Clay. Geosciences 2018, 8, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, A.; Wang, J. Recovery of U(VI) from Simulated Wastewater with Thermally Modified Palygorskite Beads. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2018, 318, 1119–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yin, H.; Kong, M. Simultaneous Removal of Ammonium and Phosphate from Eutrophic Waters Using Natural Calcium-Rich Attapulgite-Based Versatile Adsorbent. Desalination 2014, 351, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lazaratou, C.V.; Triantaphyllidou, I.-E.; Pantelidis, I.; Chalkias, D.A.; Kakogiannis, G.; Vayenas, D.V.; Papoulis, D. Using Raw and Thermally Modified Fibrous Clay Minerals as Low Concentration NH4+–N Adsorbents. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 17737–17756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Han, B.; Butterly, C.; Zhang, W.; He, J.; Chen, D. Adsorbent Materials for Ammonium and Ammonia Removal: A Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 283, 124611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xiang, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, G.; Ruan, R.; Wang, Y.; Wu, X.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, Q.; Cao, L. New Progress of Ammonia Recovery during Ammonia Nitrogen Removal from Various Wastewaters. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 36, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. dos Santos, H.A.P.; de Castilhos Júnior, A.B.; Nadaleti, W.C.; Lourenço, V.A. Ammonia Recovery from Air Stripping Process Applied to Landfill Leachate Treatment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 45108–45120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, C.; Ma, J.; Song, J.; He, C.; Waite, T.D. Continuous Ammonia Recovery from Wastewaters Using an Integrated Capacitive Flow Electrode Membrane Stripping System. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 14275–14285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kotoulas, A.; Agathou, D.; Triantaphyllidou, I.E.; Tatoulis, T.I.; Akratos, C.S.; Tekerlekopoulou, A.G.; Vayenas, D.V. Second Cheese Whey Treatment Using Zeolite under Continuous Flow Mode and Its Application on Wheat Growth. Water 2019, 11, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Genethliou, C.; Triantaphyllidou, I.E.; Giannakis, D.; Papayianni, M.; Sygellou, L.; Tekerlekopoulou, A.G.; Koutsoukos, P.; Vayenas, D.V. Simultaneous Removal of Ammonium Nitrogen, Dissolved Chemical Oxygen Demand and Color from Sanitary Landfill Leachate Using Natural Zeolite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 406, 124679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Savvas, D.; Passam, H.C.; Olympios, C.; Nasi, E.; Moustaka, E.; Mantzos, N.; Barouchas, P. Effects of Ammonium Nitrogen on Lettuce Grown on Pumice in a Closed Hydroponic System. HortScience 2006, 41, 1667–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Urlić, B.; Špika, M.J.; Becker, C.; Kläring, H.-P.; Krumbein, A.; Ban, S.G.; Schwarz, D. Effect of NO3 and NH4 Concentrations in Nutrient Solution on Yield and Nitrate Concentration in Seasonally Grown Leaf Lettuce. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 2017, 67, 748–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lazaratou, C.V.; Triantaphyllidou, I.E.; Spyridonos, I.; Pantelidis, I.; Kakogiannis, G.; Vayenas, D.V.; Papoulis, D. NO3-N Removal from Water Using Raw and Modified Fibrous Clay Minerals and Their Potential Application as Nitrogen Fertilizers in Hydroponic Lettuce Cultivations. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 24, 102021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hong, S.-H.; Ndingwan, A.M.; Yoo, S.-C.; Lee, C.-G.; Park, S.-J. Use of Calcined Sepiolite in Removing Phosphate from Water and Returning Phosphate to Soil as Phosphorus Fertilizer. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 270, 110817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Verdouw, H.; Van Echteld, C.J.A.; Dekkers, E.M.J. Ammonia Determination Based on Indophenol Formation with Sodium Salicylate. Water Res. 1978, 12, 399–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Unuabonah, E.I.; El-Khaiary, M.I.; Olu-Owolabi, B.I.; Adebowale, K.O. Predicting the Dynamics and Performance of a Polymer–Clay Based Composite in a Fixed Bed System for the Removal of Lead (II) Ion. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2012, 90, 1105–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Khalfa, L.; Sdiri, A.; Bagane, M.; Cervera, M.L. A Calcined Clay Fixed Bed Adsorption Studies for the Removal of Heavy Metals from Aqueous Solutions. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 278, 123935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xu, Z.; Cai, J.; Pan, B. Mathematically Modeling Fixed-Bed Adsorption in Aqueous Systems. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. A 2013, 14, 155–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Karri, R.R.; Sahu, J.N.; Jayakumar, N.S. Optimal Isotherm Parameters for Phenol Adsorption from Aqueous Solutions onto Coconut Shell Based Activated Carbon: Error Analysis of Linear and Non-Linear Methods. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2017, 80, 472–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kastritis, I.D.; Kacandes, G.H.; Mposkos, E. The Palygorskite and Mg-Fe-Smectite Clay Deposits of the Ventzia Basin, Western Macedonia, Greece. In Proceedings of the the 7th SGA Meeting—Mineral Exploration and Sustainable Development, Athens, Greece, 24–28 August 2003. [Google Scholar]
  28. Yan, W.; Liu, D.; Tan, D.; Yuan, P.; Chen, M. FTIR Spectroscopy Study of the Structure Changes of Palygorskite under Heating. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2012, 97, 1052–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Papoulis, D.; Somalakidi, K.; Todorova, N.; Trapalis, C.; Panagiotaras, D.; Sygkridou, D.; Stathatos, E.; Gianni, E.; Mavrikos, A.; Komarneni, S. Sepiolite/TiO2 and Metal Ion Modified Sepiolite/TiO2 Nanocomposites: Synthesis, Characterization and Photocatalytic Activity in Abatement of NOx Gases. Appl. Clay Sci. 2019, 179, 105156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bisio, C.; Gatti, G.; Boccaleri, E.; Marchese, L.; Superti, G.B.; Pastore, H.O.; Thommes, M. Understanding Physico–Chemical Properties of Saponite Synthetic Clays. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2008, 107, 90–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xavier, K.C.M.; Santos, M.S.F.; Osajima, J.A.; Luz, A.B.; Fonseca, M.G.; Silva Filho, E.C. Thermally Activated Palygorskites as Agents to Clarify Soybean Oil. Appl. Clay Sci. 2016, 119, 338–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Blanco, C.; González, F.; Pesquera, C.; Benito, I.; Mendioroz, S.; Pajares, J.A. Differences Between One Aluminic Palygorskite and Another Magnesic by Infrared Spectroscopy. Spectrosc. Lett. 1989, 22, 659–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. He, Y. Simultaneous Removal of Ammonium and Phosphate by Alkaline-Activated and Lanthanum-Impregnated Zeolite. Chemosphere 2016, 164, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gazette of the Greek Government (GR) 2011/354B of 8 March 2011 on the “Establishment of Measures, Conditions and Procedures for the Reuse of TreatedWastewater and other Provisions”. Available online: www.et.gr (accessed on 5 August 2022).
  35. Sotelo, J.L.; Ovejero, G.; Rodríguez, A.; Álvarez, S.; García, J. Study of Natural Clay Adsorbent Sepiolite for the Removal of Caffeine from Aqueous Solutions: Batch and Fixed-Bed Column Operation. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2013, 224, 1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fu, H.; Li, Y.; Yu, Z.; Shen, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, M.; Ding, T.; Xu, L.; Lee, S.S. Ammonium Removal Using a Calcined Natural Zeolite Modified with Sodium Nitrate. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 393, 122481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Temel, F.A.; Kuleyin, A. Ammonium Removal from Landfill Leachate Using Natural Zeolite: Kinetic, Equilibrium, and Thermodynamic Studies. Desalination Water Treat. 2016, 57, 23873–23892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ngah, W.S.W.; Teong, L.C.; Toh, R.H.; Hanafiah, M.A.K.M. Utilization of Chitosan–Zeolite Composite in the Removal of Cu(II) from Aqueous Solution: Adsorption, Desorption and Fixed Bed Column Studies. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 209, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Futalan, C.M.; Wan, M.-W. Fixed-Bed Adsorption of Lead from Aqueous Solution Using Chitosan-Coated Bentonite. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The Plexiglas column used for the experimental setup.
Figure 1. The Plexiglas column used for the experimental setup.
Materials 15 06541 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of raw Pal and thermally treated T-Pal samples, and T-Pal after NH4+-N adsorption (T-Pal-N). (S: saponite, P: palygorskite).
Figure 2. XRD patterns of raw Pal and thermally treated T-Pal samples, and T-Pal after NH4+-N adsorption (T-Pal-N). (S: saponite, P: palygorskite).
Materials 15 06541 g002
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images from (a) Pal sample at 100 nm and (b) T-Pal sample at 200 nm.
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images from (a) Pal sample at 100 nm and (b) T-Pal sample at 200 nm.
Materials 15 06541 g003
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of raw Pal and thermally treated T-Pal samples, and T-Pal after NH4+-N adsorption (T-Pal-N).
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of raw Pal and thermally treated T-Pal samples, and T-Pal after NH4+-N adsorption (T-Pal-N).
Materials 15 06541 g004
Figure 5. Effect of 10, 35 and 50 mL/min flow rates for NH4+-N removal (200 mg NH4+-N/L). The zoom area displays the NH4+-N removal within 120 min for flow rates 35 mL/min (red) and 50 mL/min (blue).
Figure 5. Effect of 10, 35 and 50 mL/min flow rates for NH4+-N removal (200 mg NH4+-N/L). The zoom area displays the NH4+-N removal within 120 min for flow rates 35 mL/min (red) and 50 mL/min (blue).
Materials 15 06541 g005
Figure 6. Fitting of Clark, Yoon–Nelson, and Thomas models for flow rate (a) 10 mL/min, (b) 35 mL/min, and (c) 50 mL/min.
Figure 6. Fitting of Clark, Yoon–Nelson, and Thomas models for flow rate (a) 10 mL/min, (b) 35 mL/min, and (c) 50 mL/min.
Materials 15 06541 g006aMaterials 15 06541 g006b
Figure 7. NH4+-N and NO3-N concentrations over time in hydroponic solutions of control, and T-Pal-supplied systems for lettuce cultivation (pH: 7.1 ± 0.3, temperature: 21 °C).
Figure 7. NH4+-N and NO3-N concentrations over time in hydroponic solutions of control, and T-Pal-supplied systems for lettuce cultivation (pH: 7.1 ± 0.3, temperature: 21 °C).
Materials 15 06541 g007
Figure 8. Parameters that presented statistical difference with ANOVA p values < 0.05 (a) NO3-N uptake by lettuce plants (b) wet/dry root weight and shoot dry weight.
Figure 8. Parameters that presented statistical difference with ANOVA p values < 0.05 (a) NO3-N uptake by lettuce plants (b) wet/dry root weight and shoot dry weight.
Materials 15 06541 g008
Table 1. Physicochemical characteristics of University of Patras tap water.
Table 1. Physicochemical characteristics of University of Patras tap water.
Physicochemical CharacteristicsTap Water Sample
pH7.3
Total Hardness (mg/L, CaCO3)487
Ca+2 (mg/L)159
Mg+2 (mg/L)22
Na+ (mg/L)26
Table 2. The NH4+-N removal efficiency (Y%), adsorption capacity (qe) of 287 g T-Pal, and liters of treated water (Vw) till the end of breakthrough curve for 15, 35, and 50 mL/min flow rates.
Table 2. The NH4+-N removal efficiency (Y%), adsorption capacity (qe) of 287 g T-Pal, and liters of treated water (Vw) till the end of breakthrough curve for 15, 35, and 50 mL/min flow rates.
Q (mL/min)Y%Vw (L)qe (mg/g)
1048.410.103.40
3539.28.752.39
5033.73.001.88
Table 3. The NH4+-N removal efficiency (Y%), adsorption capacity (qe) of 287 g T-Pal, and liters of treated water (Vw) till the permeable nitrate limit for 15, 35, and 50 mL/min flow rates.
Table 3. The NH4+-N removal efficiency (Y%), adsorption capacity (qe) of 287 g T-Pal, and liters of treated water (Vw) till the permeable nitrate limit for 15, 35, and 50 mL/min flow rates.
Q (mL/min)Y%Vw (L)qe (mg/g)
1099.82.201.53
3595.81.751.17
5092.71.500.97
Table 4. Kinetic parameters of nonlinear Clark, Yoon–Nelson, and Thomas kinetic models for NH4+-N adsorption from T-Pal.
Table 4. Kinetic parameters of nonlinear Clark, Yoon–Nelson, and Thomas kinetic models for NH4+-N adsorption from T-Pal.
Q (mL/min)Clark
Yoon—Nelson
Thomas
ArR2RMSESSEKYNτR2RMSESSEKTHqTHR2RMSESSE
100.931 0.0050.942 0.0930.2950.078 413.59 0.9290.1090.4073.94 × 10−6 2.88 0.929 0.1090.407
353.472 0.017 0.902 0.1010.1950.193 114.69 0.897 0.108 0.2259.65 × 10−5 2.79 0.8970.1080.225
507.824 0.212 0.987 0.1620.0230.299 53.58 0.989 0.0450.0181.50 × 10−3 1.86 0.9890.0450.018
Table 5. Shoot and root characteristics at the end of hydroponic cultivation.
Table 5. Shoot and root characteristics at the end of hydroponic cultivation.
SamplesShoot Weight (g)Shoot Dry Weight (g)Shoot Height (cm)Root Weight
(g)
Root Dry Weight
(g)
Root Height
(cm)
T-Pal2.630 ± 0.5640.307 ± 0.00513.30 ± 0.750.8919 ± 0.1080.113 ± 0.02022.5 ± 0.9036
Control1.791 ± 0.0650.174 ± 0.03211.75 ± 0.250.3215 ± 0.2200.072 ± 0.02516.0 ± 1.0282
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lazaratou, C.V.; Panagopoulos, S.D.; Vayenas, D.V.; Panagiotaras, D.; Papoulis, D. Thermally Modified Palygorskite Usage as Adsorbent in Fixed-Bed Reactor for High Concentration NH4+-N Removal and Further Application as N—Fertilizer in Hydroponic Cultivation. Materials 2022, 15, 6541. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196541

AMA Style

Lazaratou CV, Panagopoulos SD, Vayenas DV, Panagiotaras D, Papoulis D. Thermally Modified Palygorskite Usage as Adsorbent in Fixed-Bed Reactor for High Concentration NH4+-N Removal and Further Application as N—Fertilizer in Hydroponic Cultivation. Materials. 2022; 15(19):6541. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196541

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lazaratou, Christina Vasiliki, Stylianos Dimitrios Panagopoulos, Dimitrios V. Vayenas, Dionisios Panagiotaras, and Dimitrios Papoulis. 2022. "Thermally Modified Palygorskite Usage as Adsorbent in Fixed-Bed Reactor for High Concentration NH4+-N Removal and Further Application as N—Fertilizer in Hydroponic Cultivation" Materials 15, no. 19: 6541. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196541

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop