Next Article in Journal
Effect of Chromium Content on the Oxidation Behavior of a Ta Stabilized γ’-Strengthened Polycrystalline Co-30Ni-10Al-4W-4Ti-2Ta Alloy
Next Article in Special Issue
Review on Fluorescent Carbon/Graphene Quantum Dots: Promising Material for Energy Storage and Next-Generation Light-Emitting Diodes
Previous Article in Journal
A Nonlinear Viscoelastic Constitutive Model for Solid Propellant with Rate-Dependent Cumulative Damage
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prediction of Exchange-Correlation Energy of Graphene Sheets from Reverse Degree-Based Molecular Descriptors with Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 15
Issue 17
10.3390/ma15175832
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Mini Review on Persulfate Activation by Sustainable Biochar for the Removal of Antibiotics

by
Mengxue Li
1,*,
Peng Li
2,
Qi Zhou
3 and
Stephanie Ling Jie Lee
1
1
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
2
Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
3
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(17), 5832; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175832
Submission received: 18 July 2022 / Revised: 19 August 2022 / Accepted: 20 August 2022 / Published: 24 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress in Carbon-Based Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Antibiotic contamination in water bodies poses ecological risks to aquatic organisms and humans and is a global environmental issue. Persulfate-based advanced oxidation processes (PS-AOPs) are efficient for the removal of antibiotics. Sustainable biochar materials have emerged as potential candidates as persulfates (Peroxymonosulfate (PMS) and Peroxydisulfate (PDS)) activation catalysts to degrade antibiotics. In this review, the feasibility of pristine biochar and modified biochar (non-metal heteroatom-doped biochar and metal-loaded biochar) for the removal of antibiotics in PS-AOPs is evaluated through a critical analysis of recent research. The removal performances of biochar materials, the underlying mechanisms, and active sites involved in the reactions are studied. Lastly, sustainability considerations for future biochar research, including Sustainable Development Goals, technical feasibility, toxicity assessment, economic and life cycle assessment, are discussed to promote the large-scale application of biochar/PS technology. This is in line with the global trends in ensuring sustainable production.

1. Introduction

Antibiotics are used as medicines to protect human and animal health from bacterial infections [1]. The global antibiotics consumption increased from 21.1 to 34.8 billion tons daily from 2000 to 2015 [2]. Based on the chemical structure of antibiotics, the common classes of antibiotics are sulfonamides, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, and β-lactams [3]. The antibiotics are partially metabolized in vivo, and a significant fraction are released into wastewater with urines and feces. However, the treatment capacity of antibiotics in wastewater treatment plants is limited because of the antibacterial property of antibiotics [4,5]. Residual antibiotics result in the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, threatening public healthcare [6]. Therefore, it is essential to effectively remove them from wastewater.
Various approaches have been used to remove antibiotics from wastewater, such as biological degradation, adsorption (e.g., plants, materials), membrane filtration, and oxidation processes [7,8,9]. Biological degradation has a low removal efficiency owing to the antibacterial activities of antibiotics. The process of adsorption and membrane filtration can only transfer antibiotics to solid matrices but cannot degrade antibiotics into small molecules [10]. Persulfate-based advanced oxidation processes (PS-AOPs) can induce the generation of highly reactive radicals (sulfate radicals (SO4•−), hydroxyl radicals (•OH), and superoxide radicals (O2•−)) to degrade antibiotics into other compounds, water (H2O), and carbon dioxide (CO2). The persulfates (peroxymonosulfate (PMS) and peroxydisulfate (PDS)) can be activated via ultraviolet light, heat, ultrasound, carbon materials, and transition metals, generating active radicals [11,12]. To overcome the disadvantages of additional energy consumption, high cost, and the problem of metal leaching, the utilization of biochar materials in PS activation has generated increasing attention.
Biochar is usually produced by the pyrolysis of biomass from plants [13,14,15], sludge [16], agricultural waste [17], and wood-processing wastes [18] under anoxic or anaerobic conditions, which can recover and re-utilize the resources in an eco-sustainable manner. Many of the physiochemical properties of biochar, such as high porosity, large surface area, abundant surface functional groups, environmental compatibility, and low cost, favor its usage in PS-AOPs to degrade antibiotics [19,20,21]. To our knowledge, many reviews have focused on the utilization of biochar in soil and water remediation using PS-AOPs technology [11,22,23]. However, they do not specifically consider the removal of antibiotics. It is worth noting that the removal of antibiotics relates to the active sites on the biochar surface, which contribute to PS activation [22]. Moreover, most reviews lack recommendations on future perspectives regarding environmental sustainability to promote the commercialization of biochar.
In this review, a brief overview of the PS activation mechanisms (the radical and non-radical pathways) is provided. The active sites of biochar materials involved in PS activation for antibiotics degradation are summarized. The catalytic activities and activation mechanism of pristine biochar with desirable active sites and biochar with surface modification (non-metal heteroatom-doped biochar and metal-loaded biochar) in PS-AOPs systems are thoroughly discussed. Finally, the existing challenges and future opportunities for the application and commercialization of biochar for antibiotic removal are raised, considering sustainable biochar development regarding Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), technology, economy and environmental safety aspects. This review provides directions for the design of biochar for the removal of antibiotics in PS-AOPs and supplies constructive recommendations for the development of the biochar/PS system in a scale-up application. The explanation of abbreviations is provided (Table 1) as a quick reference in this review.

2. Mechanism of PS Activation

The mechanism of PS activation by biochar materials mainly includes free radical (SO4•−, •OH and O2•−) and non-radical pathways (singlet oxygen (1O2) and surface electron transfer) [24].
The active sites, such as persistent free radicals (PFRs), oxygen-containing groups (C=O, C-OH, C-OOH, C-O-C, etc.), free-flowing electrons in biochar, structural defects, oxygen vacancy, and the redox cycle of metal ions, can activate PS to produce free radicals (Table 2). SO4•− with a redox potential of 2.5–3.1 V shows a strong oxidation capacity in comparison with •OH (1.9–2.7 V). SO4•− can also react with -OH to form •OH. Biochar materials may deliver an electron to O2 to produce O2•−, which can be an intermediate product for 1O2 formation [25].
1O2, as a non-radical reactive species, can be generated in the self-degradation reaction of both PMS and PDS with a slow rate (k = 4.7–5.9 × 10−2 M−1·s−1) [25]. The graphitization of biochar, doped heteroatoms, pyridinic nitrogen (N), graphitic N, oxygen vacancy, and the redox cycle of metal ions and surface groups (C=O, C-OH, etc.) can act as the active sites promoting the formation of 1O2 (Table 2). The surface electron transfer process, which is related to the active sites of graphitization, N species, defects, and oxygen vacancy (Table 2), is also a non-radical mechanism for biochar in the PS-AOPs. Specifically, biochar catalysts, serving as a transmission medium, facilitate electron transfer from the adsorbed pollutants (electron donor) to metastable PS (electron acceptor) to achieve pollutant oxidation. The non-radical pathway has a lower degradation rate and mineralization extent than the radical pathway due to the relatively weaker oxidation capacity. The non-radical pathway can oxidize organic pollutants at the initial stage, whereas free radicals can further degrade the pollutants into CO2 and H2O [51,52,53]. Due to its higher selectivity, the non-radical pathway is resistant to various inorganic ions (NO3−, HCO3−, halogens, etc.) and background organic matter, which benefits biochar application in natural water.

3. Pristine Biochar with Desirable Active Sites for PS Activation to Degrade Antibiotics

Pristine biochar is produced via pyrolysis at >500 °C under inert conditions. Pristine biochar serves as an excellent catalyst for PS activation owning to the high specific surface area, persistent free radicals (PFRs), defects, oxygen-containing functional groups, graphitization properties, and a small quantity of metal components (Table 3).
Studies have shown that pollutant degradation may occur on the biochar surface [38,62]. The high specific surface area of biochar can provide sufficient space for the reaction and enhance the loading of active sites and the adsorption capacity for pollutants [63,64,65]. Adsorption of PS on biochar was reported as the essential step for PS activation, due to the facilitated electron transfer between biochar and PS [55]. The adsorption capacity of biochar for PS (Figure 1a) was consistent with the specific surface area, and so was ofloxacin degradation, indicating that the adsorption of PS on biochar may promote PS activation and ofloxacin degradation.
PFRs are free radicals on the surface or interior of biochar, which have a lifetime of hours to months. PFRs can provide electrons to oxidants for organic pollutant degradation, thus endowing pristine biochar with catalytic capacity [66]. As shown by Zhang et al. [26], PFRs were verified on the biochar surface. The PFRs and defects were the active sites for PMS activation to generate radicals (SO4•−, •OH), which were responsible for the degradation of tetracycline antibiotics. Intrinsic defects could also contribute to the electron transfer non-radical process. Miao et al. [49] used in situ Raman spectroscopy to indicate the formation of metastable surface species (biochar-PDS*) (Figure 1b), which could subsequently oxidize the adsorbed tetracycline via a direct electron transfer pathway [67]. Together with the reduction in the current in chronoamperometry tests after adding PDS or tetracycline solution, electron transfer was achieved in the co-presence of tetracycline molecules and biochar-PDS*. On the surface of biochar, oxygen-containing functional groups with an electron-rich nature are desirable for the mediation and promotion of redox reactions. Wang et al. [19] revealed graphite N and C=O were the active sites using the linear correlations between values of log (k) and active sites (Figure 1c,d). Graphitic N played an essential role in PMS activation by promoting electron transfer from biochar to O2 to produce 1O2 [68]. C=O on the edge of biochar could activate PMS to produce 1O2 [69]. Together with defects which contributed to the radical pathway and surface electron transfer, free radicals and the non-radical pathways were involved in the biochar/PMS system for sulfamethoxazole degradation (Figure 1e). The existence of metal ions in biochar could facilitate PS activation. Fang et al. [70] reported that the C=O and Fe2+/Fe3+ on the sludge biochar samples were the main active sites for PDS activation to produce a large amount of 1O2. 1O2 was found to be reactive to degrade the tertiary amine of enrofloxacin. Piperazine ring cleavage (P1 and P2), quinolone ring decomposition (P7 and P8), decarboxylation, and defluorination (P10) (Figure 1f) were proposed as the degradation pathways of enrofloxacin. The other products were produced by further oxidization. The toxicity of degraded enrofloxacin products decreased during the oxidation process (Figure 1g).

4. Biochar with Surface Modification for PS Activation to Degrade Antibiotics

In order to enhance the catalytic performance of pristine biochar, pristine biochar needs to be treated by functionalization processes. Non-metal heteroatom-doped biochar, and metal-loaded biochar can attach more functional groups to the biochar surface. The abundant active sites, such as PFRs, defects, oxygen-containing functional groups, heteroatom species, metal ions, oxygen vacancy, and graphitized carbon boost the catalytic capacity of biochar for the degradation of antibiotics (Table 3).

4.1. Non-Metal Heteroatom-Doped Biochar

Researchers found that non-metal heteroatom-doped biochar could tune the electronic properties and enhance the catalytic performance of pristine biochar [71]. N atoms can easily substitute the carbon (C) atoms in biochar due to the similar molecular properties to C atoms. N can reconstruct the electron arrangement and enhance the active sites (Pyridinic N, graphitic N, and pyrrolic N) of biochar materials. Ye et al. [42] found that the efficient catalytic performance was due to the facilitated electron transfer originating from graphitization and N functionalization, in which the non-radical pathways (surface electron-transfer and 1O2) were the dominant pathways for the degradation of tetracycline. Moreover, pyridinic N and graphitic N were the potential active sites for PMS activation (Figure 2a). Liang et al. [40] prepared N-doped biochar from sewage sludge and red mud. Sulfanilamide degradation was enhanced in the N-doped biochar (NSRCBs)/PMS system (Figure 2b), reflecting the important role of N dopants. The as-prepared biochar had abundant catalytic sites for PMS activation to degrade sulfanilamide (Figure 2c). Specifically, the redox cycle of Fe2+/Fe3+ could generate SO4•− and •OH. The pyridinic N could activate PMS to generate O2•−. The electronic properties of biochar could be regulated by the edge nitrogen. Hence the biochar samples could act as electron mediators to promote electron transfer from sulfanilamide to metastable PMS. Pyridinic N and the C=O group were responsible for the non-radical pathway of 1O2.
In addition to the N heteroatom, sulfur (S) and boron (B) heteroatoms could also be doped in biochar to improve its catalytic activity. Zhang et al. [39] synthesized N/S-doped moso bamboo biochar. N/S doping increased the concentration of PFRs in biochar, which played the key role in activating PMS. The antibiotic removal efficiency was 92.23%, 88.86%, and 70.97% in 30 min in N-biochar/PMS, S-biochar/PMS, and N/S-biochar/PMS systems, respectively, which were higher than that in the biochar/PMS system (79.86%). The degradation efficiency was consistent with the concentration of PFRs. Dou et al. [17] showed that N and B co-doped biochar not only enhanced the catalytic performance but also switched the radical pathway into the electron transfer-dominated non-radical pathway, as confirmed by theoretical calculations. Due to the narrowest energy gap of N and B co-doping biochar, the electrons of tetracycline (HOMO, −8.202 eV) tended to transfer to BC-PDS* (LUMO, 2.806 eV) via an N/B co-doped biochar bridge (Figure 2d), triggering PDS decomposition without the generation of free radicals. In the catalytic reaction, it was proven that pyridinic N and BC3 species were the main contributors in PDS activation to degrade tetracycline.

4.2. Metal-Loaded Biochar

Doping with transition metal/metal oxides (Mn, Ce, Cu, ZnO, Cr2O3, Fe0, Fe3O4, etc.) was also reported to enhance the catalytic performance via synergetic effects [13,72]. The composites can also avoid the aggregation of metal/metal oxides [73] and the potential risk of metal ion leaching. As shown by Xu et al. [13], benefiting from the synergistic effect between biochar and ZnO nanoparticles, more PFRs were created to improve catalytic efficiency. They extrapolated that the molecules with one phenolic hydroxyl, or two adjacent phenolic hydroxyls would produce PFRs through dehydration and electron transport with Zn. Then, PFRs in ZnO/biochar provided electrons to PS to produce SO4•− and •OH to remove tetracycline hydrochloride (Figure 3a).
The modified biochar with iron-based compounds (Fe0/biochar [27,58], Fe2O3/biochar [74], Fe3O4/biochar [37,57], Fe-Mn oxides/biochar [59]) not only enhances the catalytic activity, but also makes the material magnetism to facilitate the recycling of magnetic compounds from water. Huang et al. [57] synthesized a recyclable magnetic rape straw biochar with the saturated magnetization at 18.45 emu/g (Figure 3b). The Fe3O4 content in the composites promoted PS activation for tetracycline hydrochloride degradation in water via radical and non-radical pathways. Fe0 on the surface of biochar acts as an activation center to produce reactive oxygen species for the removal of antibiotics in wastewater. As reported by Ma et al. [58], PDS or dissolved oxygen reacted with Fe0 to release Fe2+. PDS was activated with Fe2+ to form SO4•−. The part of SO4•− transformed to •OH. Fe2+ also reacted with dissolved oxygen to generate O2•− which could produce 1O2. Fe2+ was oxidized to produce Fe3+, which could be reduced by Fe0 into Fe2+. Moreover, the electron transfer mediated by biochar also facilitated the reduction process of Fe3+. Overall, SO4•−, •OH, O2•−, and 1O2 contributed to sulfadiazine degradation. Mn doping in magnetic biochar can further enhance the activation of PS. Huang et al. [59] concluded that the redox cycle of Fe (Fe2+/Fe3+) and Mn (Mn2+/Mn3+/Mn4+) were present in the catalytic reaction. The results demonstrated that iron–manganese oxide, functional groups, and defects of the composites activated PS to generate free radicals (Figure 3c). Huang et al. also found that tetracycline was degraded through hydroxylation, carbon chain-breaking, ring-opening, demethylation, and hydrogen abstraction (Figure 3d).
Two-dimensional metal materials (layered double hydroxides (LDH), metal–organic frameworks (MOFs)) are used to combine with biochar to improve catalytic capacity synergistically. A biochar scaffold can improve the dispersion and stability of two-dimensional materials and trigger the non-radical route in PS-AOPs [21,75,76,77]. MgFe-LDH/biochar was fabricated using derivatives from the activated sludge and applied for PMS activation to remove aqueous doxycycline [34]. The 1O2-based non-radical pathway played an important role in doxycycline removal. Biochar-loaded MIL-53(Fe) derivatives (FexC/biochar) with surface area (1685 m2/g) were prepared to activate PDS for norfloxacin removal [21]. SO4•−, •OH, and 1O2 were involved in the degradation of norfloxacin in the system. Moreover, the FexC/biochar/PDS system exhibited excellent stability in different water bodies.

4.3. Non-Metal Heteroatoms and Metal Co-Modified Biochar

Non-metal and metal species can modify biochar to improve its catalytic performance synergistically. Xiao et al. [60] embedded Fe and Ce into N-enriched biochar (Fe/Ce/N-biochar) for PMS activation to remove metronidazole. The second-order rate constant of the Fe/Ce/N-biochar/PMS system was 0.0566 min−1, which was 10.5 times greater than that of the biochar/PMS system (0.0054 min−1). The Fe and Ce oxides on the biochar served as the centers to activate PMS, while N doping increased the porosity and surface area of biochar, and enhanced the PMS activation capacity. The results revealed that C=O groups and graphitic N in biochar activated PMS via a non-radical pathway, and the redox cycle of Fe (Fe2+/Fe3+) and Ce (Ce3+/Ce4+) participated in the radical pathway. Liu et al. [20] focused on the preparation of Fe and N co-doped biochar, due to the improved surface affinity of catalysts by N doping and the high effectiveness, recoverability, and nontoxicity of iron.

5. Future Perspectives Considering Sustainability

In 2015, the United Nations General Assembly proposed the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), containing 17 items [78]. The sustainable biochar used for antibiotic treatment in PS-AOPs assists in the partial achievement of SDGs (Figure 4). The role of valued-added biochar derived from waste biomass can promote the commercialization of biochar (SDG 11) and the creation of jobs (SDG 8) and provide a strategy for carbon footprint reduction as well as climate change (SDG 13). The biochar/PS technology can degrade antibiotics, thus reducing pollution to life below water and human health (SDG 3, 6 and 14). In addition, the biochar/PS system can serve as an alternative water treatment agent (SDG 12).
A surge of interest has occurred towards the application of biochar to satisfy the sustainability requirements, which benefits the commercialization of biochar products. Although great progress has been made, the following issues need to be addressed in the future to improve the technical feasibility, economic feasibility, and environmental safety.

5.1. Technical Aspects

Regarding the large-scale applicability of pristine biochar and modified biochar as discussed above, biochar can be considered as a promising candidate for PS activation to efficiently degrade antibiotics (Table 3). The performance of the biochar/PS system under realistic conditions is identified as an aspect of its sustainability concern, whereas most of the current reports have been conducted in simulated or artificial wastewater rather than actual wastewater. Considering the complexity of actual wastewater, the performance in multi-pollutant systems in actual wastewater needs to be investigated. The efficient catalytic activity is attributed to the abundant active sites in biochar catalysts (Table 2 and Table 3). Novel technologies should be developed to further analyze the role of active sites at the molecular level, to provide direct evidence of the radical and non-radical pathways.

5.2. Toxicity Assessment

Toxicity assessments during the production and application of biochar are critical to satisfy sustainability. Risks to occupational health and safety can occur through the exposure via dermal, oral, inhalational, and ocular routes [79]. Biochar may contain toxic compounds, such as heavy metals or organics (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated aromatic compounds, etc.) [80]. The contents of the toxic matters generally depend on the feedstock and preparation methods [14,56,81]. However, to date, the toxicity analysis of biochar catalysts used in biochar/PS system has not been well studied and documented.
Highly toxic intermediates can be generated in the water treatment process [82,83]. For example, the intermediate (m/z 477.15) of tetracycline was deemed as the molecule leading to the toxicity of the solution [84]. Additionally, 4-nitro-sulfamethoxazole as one of the sulfamethoxazole transformation products was found to be carcinogenic and mutagenic [85]. Few researchers analyzed the toxicity of products from antibiotics degradation in the biochar/PS system. For instance, Wang et al. [86] found that sulfamethoxazole significantly affected the growth of Chinese cabbage seed root. However, the N-biochar/PMS system efficiently reduced the phytotoxicity of sulfamethoxazole and its degradation products. Xiao et al. [60] evaluated the exposure risk of the degradation products of metronidazole in the Fe/Ce/N-BC/PMS system using 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thia-zolyl)-2, 5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay (A375 skin cell line). The results showed that most cells survived in the reaction solutions. Accordingly, the ecotoxicity of biochar and degradation intermediates are indispensable research topics for the application of the biochar/PS system in the future.

5.3. Economic and Life Cycle Assessment

Consideration of the costs in the production of biochar and application of the biochar/PS system is important for commercialization. The main production costs refer to biomass collection, chemicals, electricity, equipment maintenance, transportation, labor, and so on. Du et al. [87] calculated the economic value of biochar prepared via pyrolysis at 550 °C. The biochar yields were 42.34%. The net production cost of the biochar was estimated to be USD 0.18/kg. However, surface modifications of biochar with other chemicals are required to promote PS activation (Table 3), leading to increased production costs of the derived catalysts. Cheng et al. [88] assessed the production costs of biochar activated with potassium hydroxide (KOH). Considering the costs of biomass, KOH, electricity, and transport, the total cost of the biochar was USD 9.82/kg, which was lower than that of activated carbon (~USD 45.71/kg) sold in Henan Huasheng Charcoal Industry Ltd. (Henan, China), but higher than that of unmodified biochar. Future studies are expected to find ways to reduce the production costs of the functionalized biochar to satisfy the sustainability considerations [89]. It is also necessary to predict the cost of the biochar/PS system in application. Wang et al. [90] evaluated the cost of sodium persulfate (USD 3.87/kg) and sludge-derived biochar (USD 0.222–0.584/kg). Their calculation of biochar/PS system for treating 1 L membrane bio-reactor effluent with biochar of 5 g/L and PS of 150 mM was less than USD 0.16. Within this context, biochar can be considered as a cheap and cost-effective option for treating antibiotic-polluted water in PS-AOPs, though more studies are required to further enhance the economic feasibility of biochar materials.
Concerns have been raised in relation to the environmental sustainability of a newly proposed technology, rather than focusing solely on technical efficiency. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is one of the major tools for the analysis of environmental impacts throughout the whole life cycle of a product/process [91]. Huang et al. [92] compared the Fenton oxidation of trichloroethylene by biochar synthesized at various microwave power levels (200–400 W). According to the removal efficiency and LCA results, the microwave power level of 300 W induced the highest catalytic effect and the lowest environmental impact. However, the LCA evaluation for the use of biochar in PS-AOPs is still missing in published reports.

6. Conclusions

This review summarized biochar for the treatment of antibiotic-polluted water in PS-AOPs. The radical (SO4•−, •OH and O2•−) and non-radical (1O2 and surface electron transfer) processes contribute to the degradation of antibiotics. The high specific surface area of biochar and the active sites on the biochar surface (PFRs, oxygen-containing groups, defects, sp2 carbon network, heteroatoms, the redox cycle of metal ions, and oxygen vacancy) are responsible for PS activation to remove antibiotics. Generally, the biochar applied in the PS-AOPs is divided into pristine biochar, non-metal heteroatom-doped biochar, metal-loaded biochar, and non-metal heteroatoms and metal co-modified biochar. Pristine biochar has a relatively low catalytic efficiency, which is related to the limited active sites. The contents of active sites can be regulated through heteroatom doping and metal loading, thus enhancing the catalytic performances of pristine biochar. The synthesis and application of biochar materials can be a sustainable option for converting biomass waste into value-added biochar, resulting in the partial achievement of SDGs. The sustainable prospective of biochar applied in PS-AOPs for the treatment of antibiotics is also discussed, considering the technical aspects, toxicity assessment, and economic and life cycle assessment, to promote the further development of biochar materials. Thus, this review will improve the basic understanding of utilization of biochar in PS-AOPs to remove antibiotics and provide preliminary guidance for real-word application and commercialization of biochar products.

Author Contributions

M.L.: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing—original draft. P.L.: Writing—review and editing. Q.Z.: Writing—review and editing. S.L.J.L.: Writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work received financial support from Shanghai Yangpu District Innovation and Practice base project for postdocs (No. 4270229001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Saleem, M.; Nazir, M.; Ali, M.S.; Hussain, H.; Lee, Y.S.; Riaz, N.; Jabbar, A. Antimicrobial natural products: An update on future antibiotic drug candidates. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2010, 27, 238–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Klein, E.Y.; Van Boeckel, T.P.; Martinez, E.M.; Pant, S.; Gandra, S.; Levin, S.A.; Goossens, H.; Laxminarayan, R. Global increase and geographic convergence in antibiotic consumption between 2000 and 2015. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E3463–E3470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Gao, Y.; Wang, Q.; Ji, G.; Li, A. Degradation of antibiotic pollutants by persulfate activated with various carbon materials. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 429, 132387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Osińska, A.; Korzeniewska, E.; Harnisz, M.; Felis, E.; Bajkacz, S.; Jachimowicz, P.; Niestępski, S.; Konopka, I. Small-scale wastewater treatment plants as a source of the dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes in the aquatic environment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 381, 121221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jjemba, P.K. Excretion and ecotoxicity of pharmaceutical and personal care products in the environment. Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 2006, 63, 113–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhou, J.; Zhang, Z.; Banks, E.; Grover, D.; Jiang, J. Pharmaceutical residues in wastewater treatment works effluents and their impact on receiving river water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 166, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Homem, V.; Santos, L. Degradation and removal methods of antibiotics from aqueous matrices—A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92, 2304–2347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Asghar, H.; Hussain, S.; Brown, N.; Roberts, E. Comparative adsorption–regeneration performance for newly developed carbonaceous adsorbent. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 69, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Azanu, D.; Mortey, C.; Darko, G.; Weisser, J.J.; Styrishave, B.; Abaidoo, R.C. Uptake of antibiotics from irrigation water by plants. Chemosphere 2016, 157, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Watkinson, A.; Murby, E.; Costanzo, S. Removal of antibiotics in conventional and advanced wastewater treatment: Implications for environmental discharge and wastewater recycling. Water Res. 2007, 41, 4164–4176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, Y.; Yuan, X.; Li, X.; Jiang, L.; Wang, H. Burgeoning prospects of biochar and its composite in persulfate-advanced oxidation process. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 409, 124893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhong, X.; Zou, Z.-S.; Wang, H.-L.; Huang, W.; Zhou, B.-X. Enhanced activation of persulfate by Co-doped bismuth ferrite nanocomposites for degradation of levofloxacin under visible light irradiation. Materials 2019, 12, 3952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Xu, R.; Li, M.; Zhang, Q. Collaborative optimization for the performance of ZnO/biochar composites on persulfate activation through plant enrichment-pyrolysis method. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 429, 132294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ding, D.; Zhou, L.; Kang, F.; Yang, S.; Chen, R.; Cai, T.; Duan, X.; Wang, S. Synergistic Adsorption and Oxidation of Ciprofloxacin by Biochar Derived from Metal-Enriched Phytoremediation Plants: Experimental and Computational Insights. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 53788–53798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ryłko-Polak, I.; Komala, W.; Białowiec, A. The Reuse of Biomass and Industrial Waste in Biocomposite Construction Materials for Decreasing Natural Resource Use and Mitigating the Environmental Impact of the Construction Industry: A Review. Materials 2022, 15, 4078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hu, Y.; Chen, D.; Zhang, R.; Ding, Y.; Ren, Z.; Fu, M.; Cao, X.; Zeng, G. Singlet oxygen-dominated activation of peroxymonosulfate by passion fruit shell derived biochar for catalytic degradation of tetracycline through a non-radical oxidation pathway. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 419, 126495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dou, J.; Cheng, J.; Lu, Z.; Tian, Z.; Xu, J.; He, Y. Biochar co-doped with nitrogen and boron switching the free radical based peroxydisulfate activation into the electron-transfer dominated nonradical process. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2022, 301, 120832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Du, L.; Xu, W.; Liu, S.; Li, X.; Huang, D.; Tan, X.; Liu, Y. Activation of persulfate by graphitized biochar for sulfamethoxazole removal: The roles of graphitic carbon structure and carbonyl group. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 577, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, Y.; Song, Y.; Li, N.; Liu, W.; Yan, B.; Yu, Y.; Liang, L.; Chen, G.; Hou, L.; Wang, S. Tunable active sites on biogas digestate derived biochar for sulfanilamide degradation by peroxymonosulfate activation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 421, 126794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, T.; Wang, Q.; Li, C.; Cui, M.; Chen, Y.; Liu, R.; Cui, K.; Wu, K.; Nie, X.; Wang, S. Synthesizing and characterizing Fe3O4 embedded in N-doped carbon nanotubes-bridged biochar as a persulfate activator for sulfamethoxazole degradation. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 353, 131669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tong, J.; Chen, L.; Cao, J.; Yang, Z.; Xiong, W.; Jia, M.; Xiang, Y.; Peng, H. Biochar supported magnetic MIL-53-Fe derivatives as an efficient catalyst for peroxydisulfate activation towards antibiotics degradation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 294, 121064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, T.; Yao, B.; Luo, Z.; Li, W.; Li, C.; Ye, Z.; Gong, X.; Yang, J.; Zhou, Y. Applications and influencing factors of the biochar-persulfate based advanced oxidation processes for the remediation of groundwater and soil contaminated with organic compounds. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 836, 155421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, C.; Huang, R.; Sun, R.; Yang, J.; Sillanpää, M. A review on persulfates activation by functional biochar for organic contaminants removal: Synthesis, characterizations, radical determination, and mechanism. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kohantorabi, M.; Moussavi, G.; Giannakis, S. A review of the innovations in metal-and carbon-based catalysts explored for heterogeneous peroxymonosulfate (PMS) activation, with focus on radical vs. non-radical degradation pathways of organic contaminants. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 411, 127957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lee, J.; Von Gunten, U.; Kim, J.-H. Persulfate-based advanced oxidation: Critical assessment of opportunities and roadblocks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 3064–3081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, Y.; Xu, M.; Liang, S.; Feng, Z.; Zhao, J. Mechanism of persulfate activation by biochar for the catalytic degradation of antibiotics: Synergistic effects of environmentally persistent free radicals and the defective structure of biochar. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 794, 148707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shao, F.; Wang, Y.; Mao, Y.; Shao, T.; Shang, J. Degradation of tetracycline in water by biochar supported nanosized iron activated persulfate. Chemosphere 2020, 261, 127844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dong, F.-X.; Yan, L.; Huang, S.-T.; Liang, J.-Y.; Zhang, W.-X.; Yao, X.-W.; Chen, X.; Qian, W.; Guo, P.-R.; Kong, L.-J.; et al. Removal of antibiotics sulfadiazine by a biochar based material activated persulfate oxidation system: Performance, products and mechanism. Process. Saf. Environ. 2022, 157, 411–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Su, X.; Guo, Y.; Yan, L.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, W.; Li, X.; Song, W.; Li, Y.; Liu, G. MoS2 nanosheets vertically aligned on biochar as a robust peroxymonosulfate activator for removal of tetracycline. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 282, 120118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guo, Y.; Yan, L.; Li, X.; Yan, T.; Song, W.; Hou, T.; Tong, C.; Mu, J.; Xu, M. Goethite/biochar-activated peroxymonosulfate enhances tetracycline degradation: Inherent roles of radical and non-radical processes. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 783, 147102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yao, B.; Luo, Z.; Du, S.; Yang, J.; Zhi, D.; Zhou, Y. Magnetic MgFe2O4/biochar derived from pomelo peel as a persulfate activator for levofloxacin degradation: Effects and mechanistic consideration. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 346, 126547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jiang, Z.-R.; Li, Y.; Zhou, Y.-X.; Liu, X.; Wang, C.; Lan, Y.; Li, Y. Co3O4-MnO2 nanoparticles moored on biochar as a catalyst for activation of peroxymonosulfate to efficiently degrade sulfonamide antibiotics. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 281, 119935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Q.; Shi, Y.; Lv, S.; Liang, Y.; Xiao, P. Peroxymonosulfate activation by tea residue biochar loaded with Fe3O4 for the degradation of tetracycline hydrochloride: Performance and reaction mechanism. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 18525–18538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ma, R.; Yan, X.; Mi, X.; Wu, Y.; Qian, J.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, G.-H. Enhanced catalytic degradation of aqueous doxycycline (DOX) in Mg-Fe-LDH@biochar composite-activated peroxymonosulfate system: Performances, degradation pathways, mechanisms and environmental implications. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 425, 131457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guo, L.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, L.; Tang, Y.; Zhou, J.; Shi, B. Persulfate activation by Cr2O3/BC derived from chrome shavings for antibiotics degradation. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 420, 127698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yu, Y.; Li, N.; Lu, X.; Yan, B.; Chen, G.; Wang, Y.; Duan, X.; Cheng, Z.; Wang, S. Co/N co-doped carbonized wood sponge with 3D porous framework for efficient peroxymonosulfate activation: Performance and internal mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 421, 126735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Pi, Z.; Li, X.; Wang, D.; Xu, Q.; Tao, Z.; Huang, X.; Yao, F.; Wu, Y.; He, L.; Yang, Q. Persulfate activation by oxidation biochar supported magnetite particles for tetracycline removal: Performance and degradation pathway. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 235, 1103–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, B.; Li, Y.-N.; Wang, L. Metal-free activation of persulfates by corn stalk biochar for the degradation of antibiotic norfloxacin: Activation factors and degradation mechanism. Chemosphere 2019, 237, 124454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, Y.; Xu, M.; He, R.; Zhao, J.; Kang, W.; Lv, J. Effect of pyrolysis temperature on the activated permonosulfate degradation of antibiotics in nitrogen and sulfur-doping biochar: Key role of environmentally persistent free radicals. Chemosphere 2022, 294, 133737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liang, L.; Chen, G.; Li, N.; Liu, H.; Yan, B.; Wang, Y.; Duan, X.; Hou, L.; Wang, S. Active sites decoration on sewage sludge-red mud complex biochar for persulfate activation to degrade sulfanilamide. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 608, 1983–1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Qu, S.; Yuan, Y.; Yang, X.; Xu, H.; Mohamed, A.K.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, C.; Liu, L.; Wang, B.; Wang, X.; et al. Carbon defects in biochar facilitated nitrogen doping: The significant role of pyridinic nitrogen in peroxymonosulfate activation and ciprofloxacin degradation. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 441, 135864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ye, S.; Zeng, G.; Tan, X.; Wu, H.; Liang, J.; Song, B.; Tang, N.; Zhang, P.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Q.; et al. Nitrogen-doped biochar fiber with graphitization from Boehmeria nivea for promoted peroxymonosulfate activation and non-radical degradation pathways with enhancing electron transfer. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2020, 269, 118850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, J.; Shen, M.; Wang, H.; Du, Y.; Zhou, X.; Liao, Z.; Wang, H.; Chen, Z. Red mud modified sludge biochar for the activation of peroxymonosulfate: Singlet oxygen dominated mechanism and toxicity prediction. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 740, 140388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhang, X.; Yang, Z.; Cui, X.; Liu, W.; Zou, B.; Liao, W. Cobalt/calcium bimetallic oxides based on bio-waste eggshells for the efficient degradation of norfloxacin by peroxymonosulfate activation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 621, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Huang, W.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, J. nZVI-biochar derived from Fe3O4-loaded rabbit manure for activation of peroxymonosulfate to degrade sulfamethoxazole. J. Water Process. Eng. 2022, 45, 102470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Feng, Z.; Zhou, B.; Yuan, R.; Li, H.; He, P.; Wang, F.; Chen, Z.; Chen, H. Biochar derived from different crop straws as persulfate activator for the degradation of sulfadiazine: Influence of biomass types and systemic cause analysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 440, 135669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, S.; Wang, J. Nitrogen doping sludge-derived biochar to activate peroxymonosulfate for degradation of sulfamethoxazole: Modulation of degradation mechanism by calcination temperature. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 418, 126309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, H.; Guo, W.; Liu, B.; Wu, Q.; Luo, H.; Zhao, Q.; Si, Q.; Sseguya, F.; Ren, N. Edge-nitrogenated biochar for efficient peroxydisulfate activation: An electron transfer mechanism. Water Res. 2019, 160, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Miao, X.; Chen, X.; Wu, W.; Lin, D.; Yang, K. Intrinsic defects enhanced biochar/peroxydisulfate oxidation capacity through electron-transfer regime. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 438, 135606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhong, J.; Feng, Y.; Yang, B.; Xiong, Q.; Ying, G.-G. Accelerated degradation of sulfadiazine by nitrogen-doped magnetic biochar-activated persulfate: Role of oxygen vacancy. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 289, 120735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, C.; Chen, L.; Ding, D.; Cai, T. From rice straw to magnetically recoverable nitrogen doped biochar: Efficient activation of peroxymonosulfate for the degradation of metolachlor. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2019, 254, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhu, S.; Huang, X.; Ma, F.; Wang, L.; Duan, X.; Wang, S. Catalytic removal of aqueous contaminants on N-doped graphitic biochars: Inherent roles of adsorption and nonradical mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 8649–8658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Xie, Y.; Hu, W.; Wang, X.; Tong, W.; Li, P.; Zhou, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Molten salt induced nitrogen-doped biochar nanosheets as highly efficient peroxymonosulfate catalyst for organic pollutant degradation. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 260, 114053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhang, Y.; Xu, M.; Liu, X.; Wang, M.; Zhao, J.; Li, S.; Yin, M. Regulation of biochar mediated catalytic degradation of quinolone antibiotics: Important role of environmentally persistent free radicals. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 326, 124780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, H.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, F.; Bai, X.; Li, H.; Lang, D.; Wang, L.; Pan, B. Persulfate adsorption and activation by carbon structure defects provided new insights into ofloxacin degradation by biochar. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 806, 150968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Li, R.; Lu, X.; Yan, B.; Li, N.; Chen, G.; Cheng, Z.; Hou, L.; Wang, S.; Duan, X. Sludge-derived biochar toward sustainable Peroxymonosulfate Activation: Regulation of active sites and synergistic production of reaction oxygen species. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 440, 135897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Huang, H.; Guo, T.; Wang, K.; Li, Y.; Zhang, G. Efficient activation of persulfate by a magnetic recyclable rape straw biochar catalyst for the degradation of tetracycline hydrochloride in water. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 758, 143957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ma, D.; Wang, J.; Feng, K.; Liu, B.; Xie, G.; Xing, D. A green strategy from waste red mud to Fe0-based biochar for sulfadiazine treatment by peroxydisulfate activation. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 446, 136944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Huang, D.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, C.; Wang, R.; Deng, R.; Luo, H.; Li, T.; Li, J.; Chen, S.; Liu, C. Mn doped magnetic biochar as persulfate activator for the degradation of tetracycline. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 391, 123532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Xiao, K.; Liang, F.; Liang, J.; Xu, W.; Liu, Z.; Chen, B.; Jiang, X.; Wu, X.; Xu, J.; Beiyuan, J.; et al. Magnetic bimetallic Fe, Ce-embedded N-enriched porous biochar for peroxymonosulfate activation in metronidazole degradation: Applications, mechanism insight and toxicity evaluation. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 433, 134387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhong, Q.; Lin, Q.; Huang, R.; Fu, H.; Zhang, X.; Luo, H.; Xiao, R. Oxidative degradation of tetracycline using persulfate activated by N and Cu codoped biochar. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 380, 122608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yang, J.; Pan, B.; Li, H.; Liao, S.; Zhang, D.; Wu, M.; Xing, B. Degradation of p-nitrophenol on biochars: Role of persistent free radicals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 694–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zhang, P.; Tan, X.; Liu, S.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, G.; Ye, S.; Yin, Z.; Hu, X.; Liu, N. Catalytic degradation of estrogen by persulfate activated with iron-doped graphitic biochar: Process variables effects and matrix effects. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 378, 122141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, D.; Astruc, D. The recent development of efficient Earth-abundant transition-metal nanocatalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 816–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Song, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhong, L.; Liu, Y.; Sun, X.; He, B.; Li, Y.; Cao, S. Preparing Biochars from Cow Hair Waste Produced in a Tannery for Dye Wastewater Treatment. Materials 2021, 14, 1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, Y.; Sun, X.; Bian, W.; Peng, J.; Wan, H.; Zhao, J. The key role of persistent free radicals on the surface of hydrochar and pyrocarbon in the removal of heavy metal-organic combined pollutants. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 318, 124046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ren, W.; Xiong, L.; Yuan, X.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Duan, X.; Wang, S. Activation of peroxydisulfate on carbon nanotubes: Electron-transfer mechanism. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 14595–14603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, G.; Chen, S.; Quan, X.; Yu, H.; Zhang, Y. Enhanced activation of peroxymonosulfate by nitrogen doped porous carbon for effective removal of organic pollutants. Carbon 2017, 115, 730–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liu, W.; Nie, C.; Li, W.; Ao, Z.; Wang, S.; An, T. Oily sludge derived carbons as peroxymonosulfate activators for removing aqueous organic pollutants: Performances and the key role of carbonyl groups in electron-transfer mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 414, 125552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Fang, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Xue, G.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Cheng, B.; Ge, Y.; Qian, Y. Application of sludge biochar combined with peroxydisulfate to degrade fluoroquinolones: Efficiency, mechanisms and implication for ISCO. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 426, 128081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Huang, Q.; Song, S.; Chen, Z.; Hu, B.; Chen, J.; Wang, X. Biochar-based materials and their applications in removal of organic contaminants from wastewater: State-of-the-art review. Biochar 2019, 1, 45–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Li, Y.; Ma, S.; Xu, S.; Fu, H.; Li, Z.; Li, K.; Sheng, K.; Du, J.; Lu, X.; Li, X. Novel magnetic biochar as an activator for peroxymonosulfate to degrade bisphenol A: Emphasizing the synergistic effect between graphitized structure and CoFe2O4. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 387, 124094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Li, Z.; Sun, Y.; Yang, Y.; Han, Y.; Wang, T.; Chen, J.; Tsang, D.C. Biochar-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron as an efficient catalyst for organic degradation in groundwater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 383, 121240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Niu, L.; Zhang, G.; Xian, G.; Ren, Z.; Wei, T.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zou, Z. Tetracycline degradation by persulfate activated with magnetic γ-Fe2O3/CeO2 catalyst: Performance, activation mechanism and degradation pathway. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 259, 118156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Hamblin, M.R. Shining light on the head: Photobiomodulation for brain disorders. BBA Clin. 2016, 6, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. dos Santos, G.E.d.S.; dos Santos Lins, P.V.; de Magalhães Oliveira, L.M.T.; da Silva, E.O.; Anastopoulos, I.; Erto, A.; Giannakoudakis, D.A.; de Almeida, A.R.F.; da Silva Duarte, J.L.; Meili, L. Layered double hydroxides/biochar composites as adsorbents for water remediation applications: Recent trends and perspectives. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 284, 124755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Li, M.; Li, P.; Zhang, L.; Chen, M.; Tang, J.; Qin, C.; Ling Jie Lee, S.; Lin, S. Facile fabrication of ZnO decorated ZnFe-layered double hydroxides @ biochar nanocomposites for synergistic photodegradation of tetracycline under visible light. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 434, 134772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Uday, V.; Harikrishnan, P.; Deoli, K.; Mahlknecht, J.; Kumar, M. Current Trends in Production, Morphology, and Real-World Environmental Applications of Biochar for the Promotion of Sustainability. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 359, 127467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kamali, M.; Persson, K.M.; Costa, M.E.; Capela, I. Sustainability criteria for assessing nanotechnology applicability in industrial wastewater treatment: Current status and future outlook. Environ. Int. 2019, 125, 261–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Flesch, F.; Berger, P.; Robles-Vargas, D.; Santos-Medrano, G.E.; Rico-Martínez, R. Characterization and determination of the toxicological risk of biochar using invertebrate toxicity tests in the state of Aguascalientes, México. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Paz-Ferreiro, J.; Lu, H.; Fu, S.; Mendez, A.; Gasco, G. Use of phytoremediation and biochar to remediate heavy metal polluted soils: A review. Solid Earth 2014, 5, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Osin, O.A.; Yu, T.; Cai, X.; Jiang, Y.; Peng, G.; Cheng, X.; Li, R.; Qin, Y.; Lin, S. Photocatalytic Degradation of 4-Nitrophenol by C, N-TiO2: Degradation Efficiency vs. Embryonic Toxicity of the Resulting Compounds. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Zhao, T.; Zheng, M.; Fu, C.; Li, G.; Xiong, Y.; Qiu, W.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, C. Effect of low-level H2O2 and Fe (II) on the UV treatment of tetracycline antibiotics and the toxicity of reaction solutions to zebrafish embryos. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 394, 125021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Han, C.-H.; Park, H.-D.; Kim, S.-B.; Yargeau, V.; Choi, J.-W.; Lee, S.-H.; Park, J.-A. Oxidation of tetracycline and oxytetracycline for the photo-Fenton process: Their transformation products and toxicity assessment. Water Res. 2020, 172, 115514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Yang, Y.; Lu, X.; Jiang, J.; Ma, J.; Liu, G.; Cao, Y.; Liu, W.; Li, J.; Pang, S.; Kong, X. Degradation of sulfamethoxazole by UV, UV/H2O2 and UV/persulfate (PDS): Formation of oxidation products and effect of bicarbonate. Water Res. 2017, 118, 196–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, W.; Chen, M. Catalytic degradation of sulfamethoxazole by peroxymonosulfate activation system composed of nitrogen-doped biochar from pomelo peel: Important roles of defects and nitrogen, and detoxification of intermediates. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 613, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Du, J.; Zhang, L.; Liu, T.; Xiao, R.; Li, R.; Guo, D.; Qiu, L.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Z. Thermal conversion of a promising phytoremediation plant (Symphytum officinale L.) into biochar: Dynamic of potentially toxic elements and environmental acceptability assessment of the biochar. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 274, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Cheng, D.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W.; Chang, S.W.; Nguyen, D.D.; Zhang, X.; Varjani, S.; Liu, Y. Feasibility study on a new pomelo peel derived biochar for tetracycline antibiotics removal in swine wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 720, 137662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kamali, M. An Opinion on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis for Sustainability-Based Spatial Planning Practices. Time to Improve? J. Settl. Spat. Plan. 2020, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wang, J.; Liao, Z.; Ifthikar, J.; Shi, L.; Du, Y.; Zhu, J.; Xi, S.; Chen, Z.; Chen, Z. Treatment of refractory contaminants by sludge-derived biochar/persulfate system via both adsorption and advanced oxidation process. Chemosphere 2017, 185, 754–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Jacquemin, L.; Pontalier, P.-Y.; Sablayrolles, C. Life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to the process industry: A review. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2012, 17, 1028–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Huang, Y.F.; Huang, Y.Y.; Chiueh, P.T.; Lo, S.L. Heterogeneous Fenton oxidation of trichloroethylene catalyzed by sewage sludge biochar: Experimental study and life cycle assessment. Chemosphere 2020, 249, 126139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Materials 15 05832 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) The amounts of persulfate (PS) adsorbed on cellulose and lignin–derived biochar prepared at 500 or 1000 °C (C500, C1000, L500 and L1000). Reproduced with permission from [55]. (b) In situ Raman spectra of graphitic biochar prepared at 1000 °C (GBC-1000). Reproduced with permission from [49]. Sulfamethoxazole degradation rate in a log (k) versus (c) C=O content; (d) graphite N content. (e) Mechanism scheme of sulfamethoxazole removal in dairy manure digestate–derived biochar (DMDB)/PMS system. Reproduced with permission from [19]. (f) Possible degradation pathways of enrofloxacin in sludge–derived biochar (SDBC)/PDS system. (g) The toxicity of enrofloxacin and degraded products in an oxidation reaction. Reproduced with permission from [70].
Figure 1. (a) The amounts of persulfate (PS) adsorbed on cellulose and lignin–derived biochar prepared at 500 or 1000 °C (C500, C1000, L500 and L1000). Reproduced with permission from [55]. (b) In situ Raman spectra of graphitic biochar prepared at 1000 °C (GBC-1000). Reproduced with permission from [49]. Sulfamethoxazole degradation rate in a log (k) versus (c) C=O content; (d) graphite N content. (e) Mechanism scheme of sulfamethoxazole removal in dairy manure digestate–derived biochar (DMDB)/PMS system. Reproduced with permission from [19]. (f) Possible degradation pathways of enrofloxacin in sludge–derived biochar (SDBC)/PDS system. (g) The toxicity of enrofloxacin and degraded products in an oxidation reaction. Reproduced with permission from [70].
Materials 15 05832 g001
Materials 15 05832 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) High resolution XPS spectrum of N 1s of N–biochar derived from biomass fiber before and after the catalytic reaction. Reproduced with permission from [42]. (b) Sulfanilamide degradation by peroxymonosulfate (PMS) activation with biochar materials and (c) mechanism scheme. SRCB: sewage sludge–red mud complex biochar. Sulfanilamide: SMX. Reproduced with permission from [40]. (d) Electron–transfer pathways driven by different energy gap of biochar materials for tetracycline degradation. Reproduced with permission from [17].
Figure 2. (a) High resolution XPS spectrum of N 1s of N–biochar derived from biomass fiber before and after the catalytic reaction. Reproduced with permission from [42]. (b) Sulfanilamide degradation by peroxymonosulfate (PMS) activation with biochar materials and (c) mechanism scheme. SRCB: sewage sludge–red mud complex biochar. Sulfanilamide: SMX. Reproduced with permission from [40]. (d) Electron–transfer pathways driven by different energy gap of biochar materials for tetracycline degradation. Reproduced with permission from [17].
Materials 15 05832 g002
Materials 15 05832 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Proposed pathway of persistent free radicals (PFRs) formation and persulfate (PS) activation by ZnO/biochar. Reproduced with permission from [13]. (b) The magnetization curve of the magnetic rape straw biochar (MRSB). Reproduced with permission from [57]. (c) Main catalytic mechanism of PS activation on Mn–doped magnetic biochar for tetracycline degradation. (d) Proposed corresponding tetracycline degradation pathways. Reproduced with permission from [59].
Figure 3. (a) Proposed pathway of persistent free radicals (PFRs) formation and persulfate (PS) activation by ZnO/biochar. Reproduced with permission from [13]. (b) The magnetization curve of the magnetic rape straw biochar (MRSB). Reproduced with permission from [57]. (c) Main catalytic mechanism of PS activation on Mn–doped magnetic biochar for tetracycline degradation. (d) Proposed corresponding tetracycline degradation pathways. Reproduced with permission from [59].
Materials 15 05832 g003
Materials 15 05832 g004 550
Figure 4. Feasible achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through the application of the biochar/persulfate (PS) system for the removal of antibiotics.
Figure 4. Feasible achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through the application of the biochar/persulfate (PS) system for the removal of antibiotics.
Materials 15 05832 g004
Table
Table 1. List of abbreviations.
Table 1. List of abbreviations.
AbbreviationsFull Names
PS-AOPsPersulfate-based advanced oxidation processes
PSPersulfate
PMSPeroxymonosulfate
PDSPeroxydisulfate
SO4•−Sulfate radicals
•OHHydroxyl radicals
O2•−Superoxide radicals
1O2Singlet oxygen
H2OWater
CO2Carbon dioxide
SDGsSustainable Development Goals
PFRsPersistent free radicals
NNitrogen
CCarbon
SSulfur
BBoron
LDHLayered double hydroxides
MOFsMetal–organic frameworks
MTT3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thia-zolyl)-2, 5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide
KOHPotassium hydroxide
LCALife cycle assessment
Table
Table 2. Active sites on biochar catalysts for PS activation to remove antibiotics.
Table 2. Active sites on biochar catalysts for PS activation to remove antibiotics.
MechanismActive Sites
A free radical pathwaySO4•−, •OHPFRs [26], oxygen-containing groups (C=O, C-OH, C-OOH, C-O-C, etc.) [27,28,29,30], sp2 hybridized carbon network [31], the redox cycle of metal ions [32,33], defects [34,35]
O2•−PFRs [30], the redox cycle of metal ions [36], oxygen vacancy [20], defects [34], C=O [37]
A non-radical pathway1O2Graphitization [38], heteroatom doping [39], pyridinic N [40,41], graphitic N [42], oxygen vacancy [43,44], the redox cycle of metal ions [32,33], C=O [16], C-OH [28,45]
Surface electron transferGraphitization [46,47], graphite N [42], pyridine N, pyrrolic N [48], defects [49], oxygen vacancy [50]
Table
Table 3. Application of biochar catalysts in PS-AOPs for the removal of antibiotics.
Table 3. Application of biochar catalysts in PS-AOPs for the removal of antibiotics.
CatalystsBiomassAntibioticsAttached Functional GroupsPyrolysis Temperature (°C)Specific Surface Area (m2/g)Active SitesMechanismRefs.
Pristine biocharPoplar and pine sawdustTetracycline, Chlortetracycline, Doxycycline/500–90076.6–405PFRs, defectsSO4•−, •OH[26]
Coconut shell, eucalyptus leaves, walnut shellQuinolone500/PFRsSO4•−, •OH [54]
SludgeTetracycline900537Graphite N, C=OO2•−, 1O2, electron transfer[16]
DigestateSulfanilamide800252Graphite N, defects, C=OSO4•−, •OH, 1O2, electron transfer[19]
Wood chipSulfamethoxazole900298Graphitic carbon, C=OSO4•−, •OH, O2•−, 1O2, electron transfer[18]
Cellulose, ligninOfloxacin500–10005.74–58.9Defects1O2[55]
Wood chipsTetracycline1000600DefectsElectron transfer [49]
SludgeCiprofloxacin70052.7Fe0/Fe2+/Fe3+, N, OSO4•−, •OH, 1O2[56]
HyperaccumulatorsCiprofloxacin700973Graphitic NElectron transfer[14]
Modified biocharPinewoodCiprofloxacinN8001398Pyridinic N, C=OSO4•−, •OH, 1O2, electron transfer[41]
Moso bambooOxytetracycline, Chlortetracycline, PefloxacinN, S300–600104PFRs, heteroatom dopingSO4•−, •OH, O2•−, 1O2[39]
Wheat strawTetracyclineN, B70045Pyridinic N, BC3SO4•−, •OH, electron transfer[17]
PlantTetracycline hydrochlorideZnO400140PFRsSO4•−, •OH[13]
Chrome shavingsTetracyclineCr2O3400/8001578PFRs, defects, Cr3+/Cr4+, C-O-C, C=O, pyridinic N, oxidized NSO4•−, •OH, O2•−, 1O2[35]
Rape strawTetracycline hydrochlorideFe3O440014.6Fe2+/Fe3+, C=OSO4•−, •OH, O2•−, 1O2[57]
Red mudSulfadiazineFe0800119Fe0/Fe2+/Fe3+, C=OSO4•−, •OH, O2•−, 1O2[58]
EggshellsNorfloxacinCo-Ca bimetallic oxide400/9001.22Co3+/Co2+, oxygen vacancySO4•−, •OH, 1O2[44]
Bamboo TetracyclineFe-Mn bimetallic oxide900365Mn2+/Mn3+/Mn4+, Fe2+/Fe3+, oxygen functional groups, defectsSO4•−, •OH, electron transfer[59]
Banyan branchMetronidazoleFe, Ce, N800225Fe2+/Fe3+, Ce3+/Ce4+, graphitic N, C=OSO4•−, •OH, O2•−, 1O2[60]
GlucoseTetracyclineCu, N700352Cu2+/Cu3+•OH, electron transfer[61]
SludgeDoxycyclineMgFe-LDH500/15084.7Fe2+/Fe3+, defects, C=OSO4•−, •OH, O2•−, 1O2[34]
Bamboo chipsNorfloxacinMIL-53(Fe)450/9001685Fe0/Fe2+/Fe3+, defects, graphitized carbonSO4•−, •OH, 1O2[21]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, M.; Li, P.; Zhou, Q.; Lee, S.L.J. A Mini Review on Persulfate Activation by Sustainable Biochar for the Removal of Antibiotics. Materials 2022, 15, 5832. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175832

AMA Style

Li M, Li P, Zhou Q, Lee SLJ. A Mini Review on Persulfate Activation by Sustainable Biochar for the Removal of Antibiotics. Materials. 2022; 15(17):5832. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175832

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Mengxue, Peng Li, Qi Zhou, and Stephanie Ling Jie Lee. 2022. "A Mini Review on Persulfate Activation by Sustainable Biochar for the Removal of Antibiotics" Materials 15, no. 17: 5832. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15175832

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop