Next Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of Stress in the Periodontal Ligament and Center of Rotation in the Tooth after Orthodontic Treatment Depending on Clear Aligner Thickness—Finite Element Analysis Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Thermal Evolutions to Glass-Ceramics Bearing Calcium Tungstate Crystals in Borate Glasses Doped with Photoluminescent Eu3+ Ions
Previous Article in Journal
Reduced Graphene Oxide Aerogel inside Melamine Sponge as an Electrocatalyst for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 14
Issue 2
10.3390/ma14020317
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transparent Glasses and Glass-Ceramics in the Ternary System TeO2-Nb2O5-PbF2

by
Juliana Santos Barbosa
1,
Gislene Batista
1,
Sylvain Danto
2,
Evelyne Fargin
2,
Thierry Cardinal
2,
Gael Poirier
1,* and
Fabia Castro Cassanjes
1
1
Institute of Science and Technology, Federal University of Alfenas, Campus Poços de Caldas, MG CEP, Poços de Caldas 37715-400, Brazil
2
Institut de Chimie de la Matière Condensée de Bordeaux—ICMCB, Université de Bordeaux, 87 Avenue du Dr. Schweitzer, F-33608 Pessac, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(2), 317; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14020317
Submission received: 16 November 2020 / Revised: 28 December 2020 / Accepted: 4 January 2021 / Published: 9 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Glass-Ceramics: Structural Investigations and Luminescence Properties)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Transparent fluorotellurite glasses were prepared by melt-quenching in the ternary system TeO2-Nb2O5-PbF2. The synthesis conditions were adjusted to minimize fluorine loss monitored as HF release. It was found that 10 mol% of Nb2O5 is the optimum content for PbF2 incorporation up to 35 mol% in the tellurite matrix without loss of glass forming ability. Such glass compositions exhibit a wide optical window from 380 nm to about 6 μm. Crystallization properties were carefully investigated by thermal analysis and compositions with higher PbF2 contents exhibit preferential precipitation of lead oxyfluoride Pb2OF2 at lower temperatures. The lead oxyfluoride crystallization mechanism is also governed by a volume nucleation, barely reported in tellurite glasses. Eu3+ doping of these glass compositions also promotes a more efficient nucleation step under suitable heat-treatments, resulting in transparent Eu3+-doped glass-ceramics whereas undoped glass-ceramics are translucent. Finally, Eu3+ spectroscopy pointed out a progressive, more symmetric surrounding around the rare earth ions with increasing PbF2 contents as well as higher quantum efficiencies. These new fluorotellurite glass compositions are promising as luminescent hosts working in the middle infrared.

1. Introduction

Oxyfluoride glasses are well-known in glass science for their famous combined properties, taking advantage of both oxide and fluoride compounds as in composite materials [1,2,3,4,5]. The final goal of oxyfluoride glasses is usually related to optical applications since fluoride compounds bring higher optical performances in key areas such as luminescence quantum efficiencies or very low optical attenuations [6], whereas oxide glassy materials are cheaper, easier to prepare, and more thermally and chemically stable for large pieces production or fiber drawing design [7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Such optical properties can be further improved when heavy metal fluoride nanocrystals are grown in the oxyfluoride glass by suitable heat-treatments. In fact, the fluoride crystalline material governs the optical response whereas the oxide glassy matrix ensures the mechanical and thermal properties of the whole material [14,15,16,17,18,19]. Spatially-controlled precipitation of crystalline fluorides can also induce a local refractive index variation in the so-called photothermorefractive glasses with important associated applications such as diffraction gratings or holographic recording [20,21,22,23,24].
However, some important intrinsic optical characteristics of oxyfluoride glasses and glass-ceramics are also limited by the oxide glass former and cannot be overcome by simply adding fluoride compounds. In particular, extended optical transparency in the middle infrared, which is a key parameter for optical devices working above 3 μm, is related to harmonics of the fundamental molecular motions and is usually governed by the high frequency modes of the oxide molecular units [25]. In this case, well-known fluorosilicate, fluoroborate, and fluorophosphate glasses and glass-ceramics do not meet these technical requirements and other oxide formers with lower fundamental frequency motions, i.e., with heavier cations, must be considered. Among the known oxide glass formers, tellurium oxide TeO2 is the best candidate for such purposes with the wider optical window up to 6 μm [26]. Moreover, the higher atomic number of tellurium promotes other interesting optical characteristics in tellurite glasses such as lower phonon energies and higher polarizabilities, explaining why these glasses display strong interest as rare earth hosts [26,27,28,29,30,31,32] and third order non-linear optical materials [26,33,34,35,36,37].
However, despite the promising potentialities of transparent fluorotellurite glasses and glass-ceramics, such materials were less investigated when compared with fluorosilicates, fluorophosphates, and fluorogermanates since large incorporations of heavy metal fluoride compounds usually induce glass devitrification. Another critical drawback of tellurite glasses for transparent glass-ceramics production is related to their dominant surface-induced crystallization. Most reported works on this subject are devoted to high alkaline [38,39] and zinc fluoride [40,41,42,43,44,45] contents in transparent tellurite glasses without a loss of the glass forming ability. Only a few works reported on transparent tellurite glasses with high heavy metal fluoride contents such as BaF2 and PbF2 up to 30 mol% [46,47,48,49,50]. A single report describes tellurite glasses with up to 50 mol% of PbF2, even if the glassy state of the resulting samples obtained by melt-quenching is not demonstrated [51]. Fluorotellurite glass-ceramics containing calcium and barium fluoride crystalline nanocrystals were also reported but with a final translucent aspect associated to crystallites scattering [52,53,54,55].
Based on these considerations, this work intended to investigate glass formation as well as structural, optical, and crystallization properties in the ternary system TeO2-Nb2O5-PbF2 where niobium oxide acts as an intermediate compound used to increase the glass thermal stability for lead fluoride addition. Loss of starting compounds by evaporation or decomposition were investigated and synthesis parameters optimized. The effect of europium doping on the crystallization mechanisms of fluorine-based crystalline phases was investigated for functional transparent oxyfluoride glass-ceramics. Eu3+ spectroscopy was also used as a structural probe for a better understanding of the structural changes versus composition and crystallization state.

2. Materials and Methods

Glass formation was investigated in the ternary system TeO2-Nb2O5-PbF2. For this preliminary investigation, starting compounds TeO2 (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany, 99+%), Nb2O5 (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany 99.9%) and PbF2 (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany, 99.9%) were ground in an agate mortar, melted in a gold crucible at 890 °C for 10 min and quenched in a cold stainless-steel mold. In this first step, the identification of the final material as glass, glass-ceramic, or ceramic was determined by the visual aspect and transparency of the sample as depicted in Figure 1. Glass compositions identified in our ternary system and labeled as xNbyPb where x and y represent the Nb2O5 and PbF2 contents (mol%) respectively along with their characteristic temperatures (Tg: glass transition temperature, Tx: temperature at the onset of crystallization, Tc: temperature at the peak of crystallization) are resumed in Table 1. Glasses in the series (100-y)TeO2-10Nb2O5-yPbF2 (0 ≤ y ≤ 30) were selected for further investigations. For preparing larger glass pieces with good optical quality and mechanical properties, a detailed study of mass loss of the starting compounds during heating was performed to define suitable synthesis parameters (melting temperature and time): a starting powder mixture of composition 65TeO2-10Nb2O5-25PbF2 was analyzed using a FTIR-coupled thermogravimetric balance. These TG-FTIR measurements were performed with a TG Setsys “Evo” apparatus (Setaram Instrumentation, Caluire-et-Cuire, France) coupled on-line to a FTIR Thermo Nicolet 380 spectrometer equipped with corrosive gas version (ThermoFisherScientific, Waltham, MA, USA). In all experiments, the carrier gas was Nitrogen (Air Liquide—Alphagaz 2, with a purity of: O2 < 100 ppb, H2O < 500 ppb and total hydrocarbon (CxHy) < 100 ppb) at a flow of 50 mL/min−1.
Heating was carried out at a rate of 5 K·min−1, and a platinum crucible was used as the sample holder. TG-FTIR results were obtained using a stainless steel cell equipped with a BaF2 optical window which allows infrared detection in the range of 4400–740 cm−1. Evolved gaseous species were passed through a temperature gas transfer line equipped with a PFA (PerFluoroAlkoxy) capillary. Both gas sample cell and gas transfer line were maintained at a constant temperature of 443 K to avoid cold surfaces and thus to prevent the condensation of evolved gases. FTIR spectra were collected with a resolution of 2 cm−1, 32 scans being collected per spectrum. Based on these thermogravimetric results and related released species (described in the results and discussion section), melting temperatures and times were optimized to the lower values resulting in a homogeneous melt before casting. According to these considerations, starting powders were ground in an agate mortar for 15 min and melted in a covered gold crucible for specific melting times and temperatures as follows: 890 °C during 10 min for 10Nb0Pb, 890 °C during 5 min for 10Nb10Pb, 870 °C during 5 min for 10Nb20Pb and 850 °C during 5 min for 10Nb30Pb. Then, the homogeneous melt was quenched in a stainless-steel mold preheated at 40 °C below the glass transition temperature and annealed at this temperature for 4 h before slow cooling to room temperature. Eu3+-doped compositions were obtained following the same methodology (Eu2O3 from Sigma-Aldrich, São Paulo, Brazil, 99.99%) using low doping contents of 0.1% in order to avoid energy transfer processes between Eu3+ ions. The glasses were cut and polished in both sides using polishing sandpaper until a 1mm-thick glass sample is obtained. Glass-ceramics of selected compositions were prepared by heat-treatment of the pristine glasses at the onset of crystallization (Tx) for 1 h and labeled as xNbyPb-TT for undoped samples and xNbyPb-Eu-TT for Eu3+-doped samples. DSC (Differential Scanning Calorimetry) measurements were performed on bulk samples using a DSC Maia F200 calorimeter (Netzsch-Gerätebau GmbH, Selb, Germany) between 200 °C and 450 °C, since higher temperatures promote mass losses, using a heating rate of 10 °C/min in sealed aluminum pans under N2 flowing atmosphere. The crystallization study was performed by DSC analysis on powder samples with controlled grain sizes. The glass compositions were ground in an agate mortar and the final powder separated using nylon sieves with mesh 63 μm, 53 μm, 45 μm, 38 μm, and 20 μm. Powders with grain sizes above 63 μm and below 20 μm were not analyzed. Raman spectra were collected in backscattering mode on polished undoped glasses between 200 cm−1 and 1000 cm−1 with a LabRam Micro-Raman (Horiba Jobin-Yvon, Kyoto, Japan) working with a He-Ne laser at 632.8 nm.
X-ray diffraction measurements were performed on powder samples using a Rigaku ultima IV diffractometer (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) working at 40 KV and 30 mA between 10° and 80° in continuous step mode of 0.02°/s. The crystalline phases were identified according to X-ray powder diffraction patterns (PDF file). UV-visible transmission and attenuation spectra were recorded between 350 nm and 2500 nm at 0.5 nm/s using a Cary 7000 spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Transmission infrared spectra were collected between 650 cm−1 and 4000 cm−1 using a spectrometer Cary 630 (Agilent technologies). Finally, the emission spectra of Eu3+-doped samples were recorded in a spectrofluorimeter model Fluorolog FL3-221 (Horiba Jobin Yvon, Kyoto, Japan), equipped with CW xenon flash lamp and a photodiode detector (HORIBA PPD-850). The excited state lifetime values of Eu3+ (5D0 state) were determined by exponentially fitting the PL decay curves obtained from excitation with a pulsed flash lamp.

3. Results and Discussion

The glass forming ability in the ternary system TeO2-Nb2O5-PbF2 is depicted in Figure 1. As expected, in a preliminary analysis of the glass-forming domain, it appears that Nb2O5 behaves as an intermediary compound since it stabilizes higher lead fluoride contents when compared to the binary system TeO2-PbF2. In fact, 10 and 15 mol% of Nb2O5 allows incorporating 35 and 30% of PbF2 respectively. On the other hand, high niobium oxide contents increase the melting point and viscosity of the final batch and should require higher melting times and temperatures. For this reason, glass-forming ability was not investigated beyond 15 mol% Nb2O5 since the starting compounds do not melt properly under our synthesis conditions. In this sense, the series (100 − y)TeO2-10Nb2O5-yPbF2 seems to be the most promising for further investigations. One should note that such high PbF2 contents in tellurite glasses are barely reported and these reports do not give details of the synthesis conditions, final glassy state and fluoride losses [50,51]. DSC measurements were performed on all glass compositions as presented in Figure 2 with characteristic temperatures resumed in Table 1.
These thermal results highlight the opposite intermediary and modifier behaviors of Nb2O5 and PbF2 on the tellurite glass network since niobium insertion progressively increases the glass transition temperature along the three series whereas higher PbF2 contents clearly promote a Tg decrease and lower glass thermal stability against devitrification within each series. Such behavior can be understood by insertion of NbO6 units inside the tellurite network built from TeO4 and TeO3, resulting in cross-linking between the tellurite chains and higher overall connectivity. On the other hand, fluorine addition should promote the formation of terminal Te-F and Nb-F bonds i.e., a less-connected glass structure. Besides these considerations, an intense sharp crystallization event is detected in series 5NbyPb and 10NbyPb at low temperatures for high PbF2 contents whereas another weak and broad crystallization peak occurs at higher temperatures. Since such an event is related to the lead fluoride content, one can suggest that this crystalline phase contains fluorine and, in a first attempt, is attributed to a fluoride or oxyfluoride compound. In the series 15NbyPb, no crystallization is detected up to 450 °C, in agreement with the stabilizing behavior of niobium, while investigations at higher temperatures were not performed as the mass loss was detected beyond 450 °C. Since this work is devoted to the study of niobium-tellurite glasses with high PbF2 contents as well as the precipitation of fluorine-based crystalline phases for technological glass-ceramics, the series 10NbyPb was selected for further thermal, structural and optical investigations.
Owing to the well-known sublimation and evaporation tendencies of tellurium oxide TeO2 and lead fluoride PbF2 under heating, this work first focused on the understanding of chemical losses during melting of the starting powders in the ternary system TeO2-Nb2O5-PbF2. FTIR coupled-thermogravimetric analyzes were performed on a powder mixture of composition 65TeO2-10Nb2O5-25PbF2 in an open crucible from room temperature to 850 °C as a first attempt to understand the origin of mass losses during heating and melting, as depicted in Figure 3a. Upon a heating rate of 10 °C/min from room temperature, one could note that mass loss of the starting powders begins around 400 °C and reaches about 10% at 850 °C with a continuous and linear mass loss at such isotherm.
Coupled FTIR measurements of the evolved gases during thermogravimetry detected increasing amounts of released hydrogen fluoride HF from 400 °C to the end of the measurement, identified by a clear FTIR signature around 4000 cm−1 as highlighted in Figure 3b. Another FTIR signal centered at 1028 cm−1 appears at the beginning of mass loss between 350 °C and 650 °C but could not be attributed with specific reported molecular vibrations related to our starting compounds. However, a report on the reaction of molten Nb2O5 with gaseous F2 identified several gaseous niobium oxyfluoride of general formula NbOxFy, which are precisely released between 350 °C and 550 °C. In this sense, one can suggest that fluoride ions from lead fluoride react with niobium oxide in this temperature range. Such complex niobium oxyfluoride species could be at the origin of our IR signal at 1028 cm−1 [56].
These results highlighted a significative mass loss of fluorine upon heating, justifying our choice to use the lowest melting temperatures and times able to produce a homogeneous melt for each composition as detailed in the experimental section. Keeping in mind that all compositions containing PbF2 in the 10NbyPb series were melted for 5 min between 850 °C and 890 °C, thermogravimetric data of the isotherm allowed to estimate a mass loss around 1.2% for a 5 min heating step at 850 °C. Thus, for a starting powder mixture of composition 65TeO2-10Nb2O5-25PbF2 and considering that all fluorine is lost as HF produced by reaction between H2O or hydroxyls and PbF2, a 1.2% mass loss of the starting mixture gives a final molar composition 65TeO2-10Nb2O5-20PbF2-5PbO.
Raman spectroscopy performed on the polished undoped glasses (Figure 4) in the series 10NbyPb also supported our previous structural hypothesis depicted from thermal data. For Raman measurements, additional glass compositions were prepared in the ternary system TeO2-Nb2O5-PbF2. Sample 3Nb0Pb of composition 97TeO2-3Nb2O5 presents the lowest niobium oxide content required for glass formation and represents a glass composition close to pure TeO2 which cannot be vitrified alone under classical quenching conditions. The other intermediary compositions 10Nb5Pb, 10Nb15Pb, and 10Nb25Pb were prepared for a better visualization and understanding of the Raman spectral changes. The spectrum of 3Nb0Pb is dominated by three broad signals centered at 450 cm−1, 660 cm−1 and 740 cm−1. These tellurite bands are well-known and largely described in the literature as being due to bending modes of Te-O-Te bridges, stretching modes of seesaw TeO4 units and stretching modes of pyramidal TeO3 units respectively [57,58,59]. In other words, the glass network of a “pure” TeO2 glass is built from 3D chains of interconnected TeO4 and TeO3. By adding 10 mol% of Nb2O5 (sample 10Nb0Pb), the Raman spectrum is very similar but with a shift of the band at 660 cm−1 to higher frequencies, mainly attributed to a richer niobium environment around TeO4 units. Under lead fluoride incorporation from 5 to 30 mol%, the ratio of the signal intensity at 740 cm−1 with respect to the other one at 660 cm−1 progressively increases, supporting the previously suggested modifier behavior of PbF2 with a related conversion of TeO4 to TeO3 units.
Oxyfluoride units TeOxFy are also probably formed since fluoride ions are known to decrease the glass connectivity through terminal fluoride bonds. Another Raman band centered around 870 cm−1 also appears for higher lead fluoride contents and is often attributed to terminal Nb-O bonds in distorted NbO6 units. It is worthy to note that the Nb2O5 content remains constant along the 10NbyPb series, but this signal is very weak for sample 10Nb0Pb when compared to 10Nb30Pb. This is another proof of the modifier behavior of lead fluoride, which progressively breaks the 3D covalent network and promotes the formation of terminal Nb-O bonds. One can also suggest that Nb-F terminal bonds could be formed but their Raman signal is probably close to the Nb-O one within the broad Raman band around 870 cm−1.
The whole optical window of these heavy metal fluorotellurite glasses was also investigated in the UV-visible-NIR-MIR range and is presented between 350 nm and 8 μm in Figure 5. In the UV-visible range, the UV cut-off, supposed to be governed by the bandgap energy, is best visualized in the inset of Figure 5 and it appears that lead fluoride incorporation extends the optical window from 400 nm to about 370 nm. Such behavior of an increasing bandgap energy can be understood by the formation of molecular orbitals with a higher bonding character in the valence band and molecular orbitals with a higher antibonding character in the conduction band correlated with stronger chemical bonds formed in the glass network by fluorine incorporation (terminal Te-F and Nb-F bonds). However, the absorption of other impurities from the row materials (mainly transition metals) in this wavelength range can also not be neglected. In the middle infrared part of the optical window, the transparency is limited to about 6 μm by the multiphonon absorption of the tellurite network. The strong absorption band centered at 3.2 μm is due to hydroxyl groups OH, probably present through Te-OH and Nb-OH terminal bonds. The wide optical window of these fluorotellurite glasses is a key parameter for optical applications up to 3 μm reached by silicate and phosphate glasses.
The crystallization properties were further investigated by comparing the thermal behavior of undoped and Eu3+-doped glass samples in the series 10NbyPb as presented by the DSC curves in Figure 6. Although Eu3+ doping does not modify the thermal properties in compositions 10Nb0Pb and 10Nb10Pb, as better seen by the glass transition temperatures in Table 1, the low temperature crystallization event is highly influenced by Eu3+ in the glass network: whereas crystallization could not be detected for the undoped composition 10Nb20Pb in the temperature range 250–450 °C, the doped glass composition exhibits a sharp and intense crystallization event around 355 °C and another weaker and broader event above 400 °C, such behavior being very similar to the thermal events detected for undoped glass compositions with 30 and 35 mol% PbF2 (Figure 2).
In the case of sample 10Nb30Pb, Eu3+ doping promotes a shift of about 14 °C of the first crystallization event to lower temperature whereas the high temperature crystallization peak remains unchanged. Hence, one should emphasize the nucleating behavior of europium for precipitation of the low temperature crystalline phase, which was already attributed to a fluoride or oxyfluoride phase. Nucleating species are usually used to promote a preferential volume nucleation with homogeneously distributed crystallites in the glass bulk. Such crystallization mechanism is required for the production of transparent glass-ceramics. As demonstrated in Figure 7a, heat-treatments for 1 h at Tx were able to crystallize only the low temperature phase through a phase separation mechanism since the high temperature crystallization event was not affected by such treatment. In addition, DSC measurements performed on powder samples with controlled grain sizes (Figure 7b) pointed out that the position and intensity of the first crystallization event is not dependent of the surface area, which is a characteristic behavior of volume crystallization.
The glass-ceramic samples 10Nb30Pb-TT and 10Nb30Pb-Eu-TT were also characterized for a better overview of their crystalline/glassy relative composition and transparency. X-rays diffraction patterns of both glass-ceramics are presented in Figure 8 and the diffraction peaks could be attributed to tetragonal lead oxyfluoride Pb2OF2, in agreement with our previous assumption that the intense low temperature crystallization event should contain fluorine. These thermal and structural data support a phase separation mechanism between Pb2OF2 and the residual glassy phase with a preferential volume crystallization as well as the ability of Eu3+ to act as a nucleating agent for a better control of the nucleation and growth steps. Based on these results, it is assumed that the same crystalline phase is precipitated in both samples but the number of nuclei for this phase growth is much higher in the Eu3+-doped glass. Indeed, Figure 9 presents the UV-visible-NIR attenuation spectra of both undoped and Eu3+-doped precursor glasses and final glass-ceramics between 350 nm and 2500 nm as well as the samples visual aspect. Along this wavelength range, attenuation of incident light through the samples is promoted by both scattering and absorption mechanisms. Whereas the undoped glass-ceramic exhibits a low transparency and increasing attenuation for shorter wavelengths, the Eu3+-doped glass-ceramic prepared under the same heat-treatment conditions is highly transparent and similar to the precursor glass samples. This increasing loss in transparency for sample 10Nb30Pb-TT is attributed to light scattering of the lead oxyfluoride crystallites related to larger crystallite sizes. It is inferred that Eu3+ promotes the formation of more nucleation centers in the doped sample with an associated lower overall growth rate and smaller lead fluoride crystallites with very low scattering effects.
Finally, the emission spectra of the Eu3+-doped glasses and glass-ceramic 10Nb30Pb-Eu-TT under excitation at 394 nm were recorded as shown in Figure 10. Experimental decay rates from the excited state 5D0 together with the emission spectra also allowed to access transition probabilities, theoretical radiative lifetimes and quantum efficiencies through the Judd-Ofelt theory [60,61] as resumed in Table 2. Along the 10NbyPb glass series, all optical parameters suggest a progressive richer fluorine environment around europium ions. In fact, emission intensity ratios between 5D0 → 7F2 and 5D0 → 7F1 progressively decrease for higher lead fluoride contents. As described in detail in many works, the intensity ratio between these two transitions gives access to the overall symmetry around Eu3+ ions since (a) 5D0 → 7F2 is a forced electric dipole transition which is hypersensitive to the europium surrounding and is forbidden for centrosymmetric sites and (b) 5D0 → 7F1 is a magnetic dipole transition weakly affected by the local symmetry. Thus, our decreasing experimental intensity ratios with increasing lead fluoride contents is related to a more symmetric first coordination shell around Eu3+ ions. Experimental emission lifetimes and quantum efficiencies accordingly increase along the composition series because of a lower local phonon energy and reduced non-radiative processes.
Once again, such behavior is in good agreement with a richer fluorine environment in these glasses, making glass composition 10Nb30Pb promising as a heavy metal oxyfluoride glass host for luminescent applications in the near and middle infrared. On the other hand, optical parameters in the doped glass 10Nb30Pb-Eu and glass-ceramic 10Nb30Pb-Eu-TT are almost similar, pointing out that the crystallization process does not significantly affect the europium neighborhood and luminescence properties. Based on the similar sharp emission bands for both glasses and glass-ceramics, it is inferred that europium ions could stay in the residual glassy phase during crystallization instead of migrating in the crystalline lead oxyfluoride phase. Taking once again in mind that the Eu3+ optical features are not affected by ceramization, one should propose that part of fluorine also remains in the glassy phase and surrounds the luminescent ions.

4. Conclusions

Glass formation was investigated in the ternary system TeO2-Nb2O5-PbF2 by melt-quenching and it was found that an optimum niobium oxide content of 10 mol% allowed lead fluoride incorporation up to 35 mol%. Synthesis conditions were investigated and optimized to minimize fluorine loss released as HF(g). The glass series with increasing PbF2 contents exhibits lower glass transition temperatures as well as a phase separation with precipitation of lead oxyfluoride Pb2OF2 for the most PbF2-concentrated compositions. Lead fluoride also acts as a glass network modifier through terminal fluorine bonds and associated conversion of seesaw TeO4 units to trigonal pyramids TeO3. The optical window of these fluorotellurite glasses ranges from 370 nm to 6 μm. In the most PbF2-concentrated glasses (20 mol% and 30 mol%), Eu3+ ions play the role of nucleating agents of the lead oxyfluoride phase, the crystallization mechanism of which is governed by volume nucleation. Hence, the nucleation and growth kinetics are better controlled in these Eu3+-doped samples and allowed the production of transparent glass-ceramics whereas the corresponding undoped glass-ceramics are almost translucent. Fluorine incorporation also enhances the luminescent properties of Eu3+ ions explained by a higher overall symmetry around the europium ions and associated higher excited state lifetimes and higher quantum efficiencies. Based on these considerations, it seems that these new lead fluorotellurite glass compositions are promising materials to be used as luminescent hosts as well as photothermorefractive materials with a wide infrared optical window.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.P., F.C.C. and T.C. methodology, J.S.B., G.B., S.D. and F.C.C.; formal analysis, J.S.B., G.B., S.D., F.C.C. and E.F.; investigation, J.S.B., F.C.C. and S.D.; resources, G.P., T.C. and E.F.; data curation, J.S.B., G.B., F.C.C. and S.D.; writing—original draft preparation, J.S.B., F.C.C., G.P., T.C., S.D. and E.F.; writing—review and editing, G.P., T.C. and S.D.; supervision, G.P., T.C. and E.F.; project administration, G.P., T.C. and E.F.; funding acquisition, G.P., T.C. and E.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by brazilian agencies FAPEMIG, FAPESP, FINEP, CNPq and CAPES and Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) (ANR-10-IDEX-03-02, ANR-17-CE08-0042-01), the Idex Bordeaux and the New Aquitaine Region.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Polishchuk, S.A.; Ignat’eva, L.N.; Marchenko, Y.V.; Bouznik, V.M. Oxyfluorideglasses: A review. Glass Phys. Chem. 2011, 37, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Adam, J.L. Fluorideglass research in France. J. Fluor. Chem. 2001, 107, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dejneka, M.J. Theluminescence and structure of novel, transparent oxyfluoride glass-ceramics. J. Non Cryst. Solids 1998, 239, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fedorov, P.P.; Luginina, A.A.; Popov, A.I. Transparentoxyfluoride glass ceramics. J. Fluor. Chem. 2015, 172, 22–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dejneka, M.J. Transparentoxyfluoride glass ceramics. MRS Bull. 1998, 23, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tran, D.C.; Sigel, G.H.; Bendow, B. Heavymetal fluoride glasses and fibers: A review. J. Lightwave Technol. 1984, 2, 566–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lakshminarayana, G.; Yang, R.; Qiu, J.R.; Brik, M.G.; Kumar, G.A.; Kityk, I.V. Whitelight emission from Sm3+/Tb3+ codoped oxyfluoride aluminosilicate glasses under UV light excitation. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2009, 42, 015414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guo, H.; Wang, X.F.; Chen, J.D.; Li, F. Ultravioletlight induced white light emission in Ag and Eu3+ co-doped oxyfluoride glasses. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 18900–18905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lakshminarayana, G.; Yang, H.; Qiu, J. Whitelight emission from Tm3+/Dy3+ co-doped oxyfluoride germanate glasses under UV light excitation. J. Solid State Chem. 2009, 182, 669–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, S.; Yang, Z.; Dai, S.; Yang, J.; Hu, L.; Jiang, Z. Spectralproperties and thermal stability of Er3+-doped oxyfluoride silicate glasses for broadband optical amplifier. J. Alloys Compd. 2003, 361, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lavin, V.; Babu, P.; Jayasankar, C.K.; Martın, I.R.; Rodrıguez, V.D. On the local structure of Eu3+ ions in oxyfluoride glasses. Comparison with fluoride and oxide glasses. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 10935–10944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Feng, L.; Wang, J.; Tang, Q.; Liang, L.; Liang, H.; Su, Q. Opticalproperties of Ho3+-doped novel oxyfluoride glasses. J. Lumin. 2007, 124, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, Z.; Xu, S.; Hu, L.; Jiang, Z. Thermalanalysis and optical properties of Yb3+/Er3+-codoped oxyfluoride germanate glasses. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2004, 21, 951–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, W.; Gao, X.; Zheng, L.; Zhang, Z.; Cao, W. Anoptical temperature sensor based on the upconversion luminescence from Tm3+/Yb3+ codoped oxyfluoride glass ceramic. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 173, 250–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Babu, P.; Jang, K.H.; Rao, C.S.; Shi, L.; Jayasankar, C.K.; Lavín, V.; Seo, H.J. Whitelight generation in Dy3+-doped oxyfluoride glass and transparent glass-ceramics containing CaF2 nanocrystals. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 1836–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Abril, M.; Martín, I.R.; Rodríguez-Mendoza, U.R.; Lavín, V.; Delgado-Torres, A.; Rodríguez, V.D.; Núñez, P.; Lozano-Gorrín, A.D. Optical properties of Nd3+ ions in oxyfluoride glasses and glass ceramics comparing different preparation methods. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 95, 5271–5279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Takahashi, M.; Izuki, M.; Kanno, R.; Kawamoto, Y. Up-conversion characteristics of Er3+ in transparent oxyfluoride glass-ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 1998, 83, 3920–3922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, D.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Ma, E.; Bao, F.; Hu, Z.; Cheng, Y. Influencesof Er3+ content on structure and upconversion emission of oxyfluoride glass ceramics containing CaF2 nanocrystals. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2006, 95, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mortier, M.; Bensalah, A.; Dantelle, G.; Patriarche, G.; Vivien, D. Rare-earth doped oxyfluoride glass-ceramics and fluoride ceramics: Synthesis and optical properties. Opt. Mater. 2007, 29, 1263–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Borgman, V.A.; Glebov, L.B.; Nikonorov, N.V.; Petrovskii, G.T.; Savvin, V.V.; Tsvetkov, A.D. Photothermorefractiveeffect in silicate glasses. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 1989, 309, 336–339. Available online: http://mi.mathnet.ru/eng/dan/v309/i2/p336 (accessed on 15 June 2020).
  21. Efimov, O.M.; Glebov, L.B.; Glebova, L.N.; Richardson, K.C.; Smirnov, V.I. High-efficiency Bragg gratings in photothermorefractive glass. Appl. Opt. 1999, 38, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Efimov, O.M.; Glebov, L.B.; Smirnov, V.I. High-frequency Bragg gratings in a photothermorefractive glass. Opt. Lett. 2000, 25, 1693–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ivanov, S.A.; Ignat’ev, A.I.; Nikonorov, N.V.; Aseev, V.A. Holographiccharacteristics of a modified photothermorefractive glass. J. Opt. Technol. 2014, 81, 356–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Souza, G.P.; Fokin, V.M.; Zanotto, E.D.; Lumeau, J.; Glebova, L.; Glebov, L.B. Microand nanostructures in partially crystallised photothermorefractive glass. Phys. Chem. Glasses B 2009, 50, 311–320. [Google Scholar]
  25. Nakamoto, K. Infraredand Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds: Part A: Theory and Applications in Inorganic Chemistry, 6th ed.; John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  26. El-Mallawany, R.A.H. Tellurite Glasses Handbook: Physical Properties and Data, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  27. Jha, A.; Richards, B.; Jose, G.; Teddy-Fernandez, T.; Joshi, P.; Jiang, X.; Lousteau, J. Rare-earth ion doped TeO2 and GeO2 glasses as laser materials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2012, 57, 1426–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bahgat, A.A.; Shaisha, E.E.; Sabry, A.I. Physical-properties of some rare-earth tellurite glasses. J. Mater. Sci. 1987, 22, 1323–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rolli, R.; Gatterer, K.; Wachtler, M.; Bettinelli, M.; Speghini, A.; Ajò, D. Opticalspectroscopy of lanthanide ions in ZnO-TeO2 glasses. Spectrochim. Acta A 2001, 57, 2009–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. El-Mallawany, R.; Patra, A.; Friend, C.S.; Kapoor, R.; Prasad, P.N. Studyof luminescence properties of Er3+-ions in new tellurite glasses. Opt. Mater. 2004, 26, 267–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. El-Mallawany, R.A. Theoretical and experimental IR-spectra of binary rare-earth tellurite glasses. Infrared Phys. 1989, 29, 781–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Reinsfeld, R.; Boehm, L.; Eckstein, Y.; Lieblich, N. Multiphononrelaxation of rare-earth ions in borate, phosphate, germanate and tellurite glasses. J. Lumin. 1975, 10, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lin, J.; Huang, W.H.; Sun, Z.R.; Ray, C.S.; Day, D.E. Structureand non-linear optical performance of TeO2-Nb2O5-ZnO glasses. J. Non Cryst. Solids 2004, 336, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Thomas, R.L.; Hari, M.; Nampoori, V.P.N.; Radhakrishnan, P.; Thomas, S. Optical non-linearity in ZnO doped TeO2 glasses. J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 2011, 13, 523–527. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kassab, L.R.P.; Pinto, R.A.; Kobayashi, R.A.; Piasecki, M.; Bragiel, P.; Kityk, I.V. Photoinducednon-linear optics of Eu2O3 doped TeO2-GeO2-PbO glasses. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2007, 40, 1642–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Suehara, S.; Thomas, P.; Mirgorodsky, A.; Merle-Méjean, T.; Champarnaud-Mesjard, J.C.; Aizawa, T.; Hishita, S.; Todoroki, S.; Konishi, T.; Inoue, S. Non-linear optical properties of TeO2-based glasses: Ab initio static finite-field and time-dependent calculations. J. Non Cryst. Solids 2004, 345, 730–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kim, S.H.; Yoko, T. Non-linear optical properties of TeO2 based glasses: PbX2 (X = F, Cl and Br)-TeO2 binary glasses. Met. Mater. Process. 1997, 8, 291–300. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kumar, V.V.R.K.; Bhatnagar, A.K.; Jagannathan, R. Structuraland optical studies of Pr3+. Nd3+, Er3+ and Eu3+ ions in tellurite based oxyfluoride, TeO2-LiF, glass. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2001, 34, 1563–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Elkhoshkhany, N.; Syala, E. Detailedstudy about the thermal behavior and kinetics characterization of an oxyfluoride tellurite glass. J. Non Cryst. Solids 2018, 486, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nazabal, V.; Todoroki, S.; Nukui, A.; Matsumoto, T.; Suehara, S.; Hondo, T.; Araki, T.; Inoue, S.; Rivero, C.; Cardinal, T. Oxyfluoridetellurite glasses doped by erbium: Thermal analysis, structural organization and spectral properties. J. Non Cryst. Solids 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yousef, E.S.S. Characterizationof oxyfluoride tellurite glasses through thermal, optical and ultrasonic measurements. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2005, 38, 3970–3975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nazabal, V.; Todoroki, S.; Inoue, S.; Matsumoto, T.; Suehara, S.; Hondo, T.; Araki, T.; Cardinal, T. Spectralproperties of Er3+ doped oxyfluoride tellurite glasses. J. Non Cryst. Solids 2003, 326, 359–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chillcce, E.F.; Mazali, I.O.; Alves, O.L.; Barbosa, L.C. Opticaland physical properties of Er3+-doped oxy-fluoride tellurite glasses. Opt. Mater. 2011, 33, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, F.F.; Zhang, W.J.; Yuan, J.; Chen, D.D.; Qian, Q.; Zhang, Q.Y. Enhanced2.7µm emission from Er3+ doped oxyfluoride tellurite glasses for a diode-pump mid-infrared laser. AIP Adv. 2014, 4, 047101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ma, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L.; Huang, F.; Hu, L. Increasedradiative lifetime of Tm3+: 3F4 → 3H6 transition in oxyfluoride tellurite glasses. Mater. Res. Bull. 2015, 64, 262–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, F.; Wei, T.; Jing, X.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xu, S. Investigationof mid-infrared emission characteristics and energy transfer dynamics in Er3+ doped oxyfluoride tellurite glass. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Zhang, Y.; Lu, C.; Feng, Y.; Sun, L.; Ni, Y.; Xu, Z. Effectsof GeO2 on the thermal stability and optical properties of Er3+/Yb3+-codoped oxyfluoride tellurite glasses. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2011, 126, 786–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhanci, Y.; Shihua, H.; Shaozhe, L.; Baojiu, C. Radiativetransition quantum efficiency of 2H11/2 and 4S3/2 states of trivalent erbium ion in oxyfluoride tellurite glass. J. Non Cryst. Solids 2004, 343, 154–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Aishwarya, K.; Vinitha, G.; Varma, G.S.; Asokan, S.; Manikandan, N. Synthesisand characterization of barium fluoride substituted zinc tellurite glasses. Physica B 2017, 526, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xu, S.; Zhang, J.; Dai, S.; Wang, G.; Hu, L.; Jiang, Z. Hostdependent frequency upconversion of Er3+-doped oxyfluoride tellurite glasses. J. Alloys Compd. 2004, 376, L1–L4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xu, S.; Fang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, S.; Jiang, Z. Hostdependent frequency upconversion of Yb3+/Tm3+-codoped oxyfluoride tellurite glasses. Mater. Sci. Eng. B Adv. 2005, 122, 236–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hou, Z.X.; Xue, Z.L.; Wang, S.H. Synthesisand spectroscopic properties of Er3+-doped CaF2 nanocrystals in transparent oxyfluoride tellurite glass-ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2012, 514, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hou, Z.X.; Xue, Z.L.; Li, F.; Wang, M.H.; Hu, X.D.; Wang, S.H. Luminescenceand up-conversion mechanism of Er3+/Ho3+ co-doped oxyfluoride tellurite glasses and glass-ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 577, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ansari, G.F.; Mahajan, S.K. Intensecooperative upconversion emission in Yb/Er: TeO2-Li2O-WO3 oxyfluoride glass ceramics. J. Lumin. 2014, 156, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lesniak, M.; Amojda, J.; Kochanowicz, M.; Miluski, P.; Baranowska, A.; Mach, G.; Kuwik, M.; Pisarska, J.; Pisarski, W.A.; Dorosz, D. Spectroscopicproperties of erbium-doped oxyfluoride phospho-tellurite glass and transparent glass-ceramic containing BaF2 nanocrystals. Materials 2019, 12, 3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Rosenthal, M.W.; Briggs, R.B.; Haubenreich, P.N. Molten-Salt Reactor Program—Semiannual; National Technical Information Service, US Department of Commerce: Springfield, VA, USA, 1972; p. 80.
  57. Sekiya, T.; Mochida, N.; Ohtsuka, A.; Tonokawa, M. Raman-spectra of MO1/2-TeO2 (M = Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs and Tl) glasses. J. Non Cryst. Solids 1992, 144, 128–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sekiya, T.; Mochida, N.; Ohtsuka, A. Raman-spectra of MO1/2-TeO2 (M = Mg, Sr, Ba and Zn) glasses. J. Non Cryst. Solids 1994, 168, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Champarnaud-Mesjard, J.C.; Blanchandin, S.; Thomas, P.; Mirgorodsky, A.; Merle-Méjean, T.; Frit, B. Crystalstructure, Raman spectrum and lattice dynamics of a new metastable form of tellurium dioxide: γ-TeO2. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2000, 61, 1499–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Carlos, L.D.; Ferreira, R.A.S.; Bermudez, V.Z.; Ribeiro, S.J.L. Lanthanide-containing light emitting organic-inorganic hybrids: A bet on the future. Adv. Mater. 2009, 51, 509–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Moura, R.T., Jr.; Neto, A.N.C.; Longo, R.L.; Malta, O.L. Onthe calculation and interpretation of covalency in the intensity parameters of 4f-4f transitions in Eu3+ complexes based on the chemical bond overlap polarizability. J. Lumin. 2016, 170, 420–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 14 00317 g001 550
Figure 1. Glass-forming domain in the ternary system TeO2-Nb2O5-PbF2.
Figure 1. Glass-forming domain in the ternary system TeO2-Nb2O5-PbF2.
Materials 14 00317 g001
Materials 14 00317 g002 550
Figure 2. DSC curves of glasses in the glass series (a) 5NbyPb, (b) 10NbyPb and (c) 15NbyPb.
Figure 2. DSC curves of glasses in the glass series (a) 5NbyPb, (b) 10NbyPb and (c) 15NbyPb.
Materials 14 00317 g002
Materials 14 00317 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Thermogravimetry of a starting powder mixture of composition 65TeO2-10Nb2O5-25PbF2, correlated absorption intensities of FTIR signals centered at 1028 cm−1 and 4000 cm−1 and (b) corresponding FTIR spectrum after 4130 s of measurement (grey arrow).
Figure 3. (a) Thermogravimetry of a starting powder mixture of composition 65TeO2-10Nb2O5-25PbF2, correlated absorption intensities of FTIR signals centered at 1028 cm−1 and 4000 cm−1 and (b) corresponding FTIR spectrum after 4130 s of measurement (grey arrow).
Materials 14 00317 g003
Materials 14 00317 g004 550
Figure 4. Raman spectra of glass samples in the ternary system (90 − x)TeO2-10Nb2O5-xPbF2.
Figure 4. Raman spectra of glass samples in the ternary system (90 − x)TeO2-10Nb2O5-xPbF2.
Materials 14 00317 g004
Materials 14 00317 g005 550
Figure 5. Optical window of glass samples in the (a) UV-visible-near infrared and (b) middle infrared ranges between 350 and 8000 nm.
Figure 5. Optical window of glass samples in the (a) UV-visible-near infrared and (b) middle infrared ranges between 350 and 8000 nm.
Materials 14 00317 g005
Materials 14 00317 g006 550
Figure 6. DSC curves of undoped and Eu3+-doped glass samples.
Figure 6. DSC curves of undoped and Eu3+-doped glass samples.
Materials 14 00317 g006
Materials 14 00317 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) DSC curves of samples 10Nb30Pb and 10Nb30Pb-Eu before and after heat-treatment and (b) DSC curves of sample 10Nb30Pb for different granulometries.
Figure 7. (a) DSC curves of samples 10Nb30Pb and 10Nb30Pb-Eu before and after heat-treatment and (b) DSC curves of sample 10Nb30Pb for different granulometries.
Materials 14 00317 g007
Materials 14 00317 g008 550
Figure 8. X-ray diffraction patterns of samples 10Nb30Pb-TT, 10Nb30Pb-Eu-TT, and crystalline reference Pb2OF2.
Figure 8. X-ray diffraction patterns of samples 10Nb30Pb-TT, 10Nb30Pb-Eu-TT, and crystalline reference Pb2OF2.
Materials 14 00317 g008
Materials 14 00317 g009 550
Figure 9. UV-visible spectra of glasses 10Nb30Pb, 10Nb30Pb-Eu, and glass-ceramics 10Nb30Pb-TT, 10Nb30Pb-Eu-TT.
Figure 9. UV-visible spectra of glasses 10Nb30Pb, 10Nb30Pb-Eu, and glass-ceramics 10Nb30Pb-TT, 10Nb30Pb-Eu-TT.
Materials 14 00317 g009
Materials 14 00317 g010 550
Figure 10. Emission spectra of Eu3+-doped glasses and glass-ceramics in the ternary system (90 − x)TeO2-10Nb2O5-xPbF2 under excitation at 394 nm.
Figure 10. Emission spectra of Eu3+-doped glasses and glass-ceramics in the ternary system (90 − x)TeO2-10Nb2O5-xPbF2 under excitation at 394 nm.
Materials 14 00317 g010
Table
Table 1. Samples label, molar composition and characteristic temperatures.
Table 1. Samples label, molar composition and characteristic temperatures.
SchemeComposition (mol%)Characteristic Temperatures (°C)
TeO2Nb2O5PbF2Eu2O3TgTx1Tc1Tx1 − Tg
5Nb0Pb9550-33542445389
5Nb10Pb85510-29536038865
5Nb20Pb75520-26530731042
10Nb0Pb90100-365---
10Nb0Pb-Eu89.91000.1365---
10Nb10Pb801010-323---
10Nb10Pb-Eu79.910190.1324---
10Nb20Pb701020-298---
10Nb20Pb-Eu69.910200.129635435758
10Nb30Pb601030-26932232553
10Nb30Pb-Eu59.910300.127130831037
10Nb35Pb551035-26429529731
15Nb0Pb85150-390---
15Nb10Pb751510-362---
15Nb20Pb651520-327---
15Nb30Pb551530-310---
Table
Table 2. 5D0 → 7F2/5D0 → 7F1 intensity ratios, experimental lifetime (τexp, ms) from 5D0 → 7F2 transition for Eu3+ ions, total radiative transition probability from level 5D0 (AT, s−1), radiative lifetime (τrad, ms), and quantum efficiency (η, %) in Eu3+-doped glasses and glass-ceramic.
Table 2. 5D0 → 7F2/5D0 → 7F1 intensity ratios, experimental lifetime (τexp, ms) from 5D0 → 7F2 transition for Eu3+ ions, total radiative transition probability from level 5D0 (AT, s−1), radiative lifetime (τrad, ms), and quantum efficiency (η, %) in Eu3+-doped glasses and glass-ceramic.
Sample5D0 → 7F2/5D0 → 7F1
5D0 → 7F1
(λexc = 464 nm)		τexp
(ms)		ATτrad
(ms)		η
(%)
10Nb0Pb-Eu4.160.718701.1561
10Nb10Pb-Eu3.460.927671.3070
10Nb20Pb-Eu2.641.356471.5487
10Nb30Pb-Eu2.001.755351.8793
10Nb30Pb-Eu-TT1.981.675511.8192
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santos Barbosa, J.; Batista, G.; Danto, S.; Fargin, E.; Cardinal, T.; Poirier, G.; Castro Cassanjes, F. Transparent Glasses and Glass-Ceramics in the Ternary System TeO2-Nb2O5-PbF2. Materials 2021, 14, 317. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14020317

AMA Style

Santos Barbosa J, Batista G, Danto S, Fargin E, Cardinal T, Poirier G, Castro Cassanjes F. Transparent Glasses and Glass-Ceramics in the Ternary System TeO2-Nb2O5-PbF2. Materials. 2021; 14(2):317. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14020317

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santos Barbosa, Juliana, Gislene Batista, Sylvain Danto, Evelyne Fargin, Thierry Cardinal, Gael Poirier, and Fabia Castro Cassanjes. 2021. "Transparent Glasses and Glass-Ceramics in the Ternary System TeO2-Nb2O5-PbF2" Materials 14, no. 2: 317. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14020317

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop