Next Article in Journal
2-Thiohydantoin Moiety as a Novel Acceptor/Anchoring Group of Photosensitizers for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells
Previous Article in Journal
On the Broadening of Single-Layer Metasurface Bandwidth by Coupling Resonances
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nanomaterials Used in Conservation and Restoration of Cultural Heritage: An Up-to-Date Overview

by
Madalina Elena David
1,2,
Rodica-Mariana Ion
1,2,*,
Ramona Marina Grigorescu
1,
Lorena Iancu
1,2 and
Elena Ramona Andrei
1
1
“Evaluation and Conservation of Cultural Heritage” Research Group, National Institute for Research and Development in Chemistry and Petrochemistry–ICECHIM, 060021 Bucharest, Romania
2
Doctoral School of Materials Engineering Department, Valahia University, 130104 Targoviste, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(9), 2064; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13092064
Submission received: 2 April 2020 / Revised: 16 April 2020 / Accepted: 27 April 2020 / Published: 29 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Analytical Characterization of Functionalized Surfaces)

Abstract

:
In the last few years, the preservation of cultural heritage has become an important issue globally, due to the fact that artifacts and monuments are continually threatened by degradation. It is thus very important to find adequate consolidators that are capable of saving and maintaining the natural aspect of these objects. This study aims to provide an updated survey of the main nanomaterials used for the conservation and restoration of cultural heritage. In the last few years, besides the classic nanomaterials used in this field, such as metal nanoparticles (copper and silver) and metal oxides (zinc and aluminum), hydroxyapatite and carbonated derivatives, tubular nanomaterials (such as carbon nanotubes) have been used as a potential consolidate material of cultural heritage. Tubular nanomaterials have attracted attention for use in different fields due to their structures, as well as their ability to present multiple walls. These nanotubes have the necessary properties in preserving cultural heritage, such as superior mechanical and elastic strength (even higher than steel), high hydrophobicity (with a contact angle up to 140°), optical properties (high photodegradation protection), large specific surface area (from 50 to 1315 m2/g, depending on the number of walls) for absorption of other nanomaterials and relatively good biocompatibility.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The preservation of cultural heritage is essential for humanity to maintain the history of mankind, as well as the authenticity of artifacts and constructions. An artifact represents any object created or modified by humans bearing historical value. In archeology, an artifact is an object recovered by archaeological methods which may have a cultural interest. These artifacts are continually threatened by degradation factors. For example, stone, paper and wood artifacts are constantly subject to several serious degradation factors, such as biological or chemical degradation, which affect more or less the structural integrity and mechanical strength of these materials [1,2,3,4]. Nanomaterials (1–100 nm) with higher surface areas than similar larger-scale materials have the possibility to penetrate deep into the damaged artifacts due to their particle size [5].
In the last few decades, nanomaterials have received special attention in the field of cultural heritage due to their unique properties. Currently, the obtaining of new systems (such as metal oxides and hydroxides (TiO2, ZnO, Ca(OH)2, Mg(OH)2, Sr(OH)2, and metal nanoparticles (Au, Ag, Pt)) and their potential as consolidants on different artifacts and works of art have been reported in the literature [1,6,7]. For example, metal oxide nanoparticles have been used in the last decade to protect building surfaces against biofilm formation. The potential of these nanoparticles in the conservation and restoration of cultural heritage has been established for the consolidation of decomposed materials, self-cleaning, improving the surface of the material or as biocide to reduce biodeterioration [8].
Presently, the efficiency of these nanoparticles has been tested on different materials belonging to the cultural heritage. Barberio M. and co-workers investigated the possibility of using nanoparticles of TiO2 and SiO2 as consolidating materials without introducing chemical, physical or aesthetic changes on the surfaces of ceramic artifacts. After the artifacts were treated, it was observed that this layer was perfectly transparent, uniform and hydrophobic, and the nanoparticles penetrated the surface of the artifacts, giving them a higher resistance [9]. In the case of wooden artifacts, several studies that evaluate the performance of Ag, Cu, ZnO, and TiO2 nanoparticles have been reported. Tests against termites, rot, mold, fungi and UV degradation have shown that these nanoparticles significantly improve the wood’s resistance and provide protection against degradation. Also, it has been reported that ZnO and TiO2 nanoparticles have promising antifungal and antibacterial properties [10,11,12]. Ciliberto E. and co-workers obtained Sr(OH)2 nanoparticles and applied them on various cultural heritage artifacts (wood, paintings, paper and stone). Following the experiments, they showed that these nanoparticles can be successfully used for the protection and consolidation of cultural heritage artifacts [13]. In another study, MgO nanoparticles were successfully used to de-acidify the paper, ensuring the prevention of paper degradation [14,15]. Sassoni E. and co-workers and Ion R.-M. and co-workers were pioneers in the use of hydroxyapatite (HAp) as an alternative to calcium oxalate for the consolidation of carbonate stones used in building heritage [16,17]. Also, based on its good compatibility with the crystal structure and lattice parameters of calcite, HAp has been applied for the consolidation of limestones [16], marbles [18] and chalk stone [19,20]. Thanks to its low viscosity, this aqueous consolidant product is able to penetrate deeply into the stone, generating significant improvement in mechanical properties [21]. Presently, carbonated hydroxyapatite and its metallic derivatives seem to be alternatives for older consolidants [22].
Referring to all nanoparticles used to consolidate different artifacts, the situation of the diffusion over time of papers related to the application of nanoparticles on different artifacts is presented in Figure 1.
In recent years, researchers have tried to find new materials in order to improve the properties of consolidating materials (Figure 2). From this point of view, nanotubes have received a real interest from researchers because of their ideal properties: open interior and a large volume (reported to the size of the tube), which makes the inner surface accessible and thus allows the attachment of different nanomaterials/agents inside the tubes; the surface porosity or its shape does not change with pH variations; not being vulnerable to microbial attack; high mechanical and elasticity resistance [23,24].
Currently, several studies have been reported regarding the successful use of tubular materials in art conservation [25]. Also, a new challenge regarding these tubular materials is to attach nanoparticles on the surface of nanotubes in order to test their potential in preserving/restoring cultural heritage [26,27].

2. Types of Consolidating Materials and Substrates

Wood and stone are the oldest materials used in the construction of different types of structure founded in many parts of the world [28]. Initially, these materials were used in the construction of different buildings (houses, churches, etc.), and later they were used to make various decorative objects (furniture, statues, instruments, etc.) [29]. One of the most important applications of wood, which has been discovered by humans, remains the manufacture of paper [3].
Wood is an organic material that is continuously subject to damage through various processes encountered in nature (heat, frost, the presence of various organisms, etc.). The most used wood in the manufacture of artifacts is poplar, lime and spruce [30,31]. In the case of the wood, several factors that affect its integrity have been identified:
extreme temperatures, that lead to the loss of the structural strength of the wood [1];
biological attack (insects and fungi) which makes the wood becomes soft and fragile [32,33];
relative high humidity, that can cause severe alteration of the wood substrate [30].
Thus, the consolidation of fragile and degraded wood becomes a serious problem worldwide. Therefore, researchers are trying to obtain new materials and capable methods to provide long lasting wood durability. The purpose of such treatment is to improve mechanical resistance of the degraded material, preserving the restored authenticity of the object at the highest level.
Generally, any conservation treatment should follow the internationally established principles: the used treatment for preservation should not alter the object’s integrity and authenticity; the used treatment must have potential reversibility and allow for additional restoration interventions, whenever necessary; the used treatment must remain stable for long periods of time; the used treatment must penetrate and be evenly distributed throughout the wood surface [1,34].
Currently, researchers have proposed tested and analyzed various materials that can be used in wood preservation/restoration, for example, synthetic polymers, such as Paraloid B67, Paraloid B72 and Paraloid B44, and metallic nanoparticles. These synthetic polymers are used in the consolidation process in two phases: the impregnation phase (the polymer solution enters in the wood structure), followed by a conditioning phase (the solid polymer is fixed in the wood structure and the solvents evaporate). The techniques commonly used in a consolidation treatment are total immersion, brushing, spraying, but the technique must be chosen according to the particularities of the object [1,35].
Stone is an inorganic material found in nature and is used for the manufacture of utensils, weapons, jewelry, sculptures and architectural elements. This material represents the oldest traces of human activity, such as in artifacts dating from 700,000 to 130,000 years ago. The first rocks used were granite, diorite, basalt and quartz, due to their high hardness. Later, with the discovery of metals, any type of rock could be processed, for example, marble carvings. Limestone and sandstone are the main materials from which the vast majority of buildings are built; therefore, these types of material are among the most studied for conservation and restoration [3,36].
Over time, different situations have been observed that endanger the integrity of the stone, such as the poor condition of the protection cornices, improper jointing in masonry, temperature fluctuations, rainfall or inefficient precipitation removal [37,38].
The main challenges in the case of stone protection are related to the creation of a hydrophobic surface, its protection against pollutants and the deposition of organic/inorganic particles, while ensuring aesthetic compatibility with the substrate and the reversibility of the treatment [39]. Presently, various materials used for the conservation and restoration of stone have been reported in the literature, such as hydrophobic coatings, antifouling treatments and self-cleaning nanoparticles. Also, nano-HAp was successfully applied to marble and limestone [40], and in a recent study, Ion R.-M. and co-workers successfully applied carbonated hydroxyapatite together with its metal derivatives (silver, strontium, barium, potassium and zinc) on stone models in order to improve the mechanical properties and the resistance to repeated cycles of freeze-thaw [22]. Scherer G.W. tested HAp as a protective treatment for marble against acid rain corrosion, showing an improvement in the marble resistance to the dissolution [41]. Also, Sassoni E. and co-workers investigated the effectiveness and compatibility of HAp treatment for limestone, in comparison with ethyl silicate. It was reported that HAp was able to overcome some ethyl silicate limitations (mainly, prolonging curing time and compatibility), being a very promising consolidant product of porous limestones [42]. The same group evaluated the durability of the HAp treatment to wetting–drying, freezing–thawing and salt weathering cycles, in comparison with ethyl silicates. It was concluded that HAp was a better option for limestone consolidation compared to ethyl silicates, because the samples treated with HAp presented less deterioration than the samples treated with ethyl silicates [43].

3. Nanomaterials with Applications in the Conservation and Restoration of Cultural Heritage

3.1. Main Used Nanomaterials

In the last few years, nanomaterials have been successfully tested to conserve architectural heritage, due to their ability to consolidate and protect damaged building materials. The nanoparticles used for the preservation/restoration of objects have an important role; namely, they cover the surface of the material in order to create a self-cleaning system, preserving the initial appearance of the treated elements, while decreasing the deposition of pollutants and reducing the external degradation processes due to the dirt phenomena. In order to be used in applications of conservation and restoration of the cultural heritage, these nanoparticles must have the following attributes: thermal stability, be biologically and chemically inert, non-toxic, low cost, good adaptability to various environments and good absorption in the solar spectrum [6,11,44,45]. Presently, nanomaterials such as metal nanoparticles (gold, copper and silver) and metal oxides (zinc and aluminum) are widely applied to provide wood protection [46].
In the case of wood, its wall has a porosity of dimensions on a molecular scale due to the partial filling of the spaces between the cellulose microfibrils. Small nanoparticles can deeply and efficiently penetrate into wood, changing the chemistry of the wood surface and improving its properties. In addition, full penetration and even distribution are obtained if the nanoparticle size is smaller than the pore diameter in the wood wall [1,46]. It has been reported that a thin and homogeneous layer of TiO2 nanoparticles, with an average size of 50 nm, covers the internal structures of the wood, without changing its natural appearance [11]. In Table 1, the main nanomaterials used for wood consolidation and their properties are presented.

3.2. Physico-Chemical and Mechanical Properties

In the last decade, nanotechnologies have become a key factor in the field of cultural heritage, due to their ideal properties that help to protect heritage objects, for example: cleaning surfaces, acting against microorganisms, protecting materials from the negative effects of UV radiation, etc. The advantage of applying nanomaterials is represented by the possibility of obtaining a great depth of penetration in the structure of the materials (mainly it varies according to the porosity and the moisture content of the material) and a high efficiency, preserving the original material [6,44,57].
Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is an inorganic material that is found in the form of nanocrystals or nanogranules, and is intensely used in various applications due to its properties. In recent decades, this material has been intensely used as a pigment, in UV protection, paints, ointments, toothpaste, etc. This material has many advantages that make it ideal for different applications, such as the high surface area offered by the small size of the TiO2 particles or the increased antimicrobial activity. These two characteristics are closely related to the crystalline structure, shape and size of nanomaterials [58,59].
TiO2-based nanomaterials are obtained by various methods, such as sol-gel, the hydrothermal method, the direct oxidation method, chemical vapor deposition, electrodeposition, etc. [58]. Depending on the method of preparation, TiO2 can be obtained in various forms, including nanoparticles, nanofibers and nanotubes [58,60]. The most widely used process for obtaining these nanomaterials is the sol-gel method. In a typical sol-gel process, a colloidal suspension (sol) is formed from the hydrolysis and polymerization reactions of the precursors, and then the complete polymerization and loss of the solvent leading to the passage from the liquid sol to a solid gel phase occurs. TiO2 nanomaterials are synthesized by the sol-gel method of hydrolysis of a titanium precursor [61,62,63,64,65]. Sugimoto T. and co-workers obtained different shapes and sizes of TiO2 nanoparticles by varying the reaction parameters. Thus, it was observed that the morphology of the TiO2 nanoparticles changes from cubic to ellipsoidal, when the solution is brought to a pH above 11 with triethanolamine (it acts as a surfactant). When diethylenetriamine was used, at pH above 9.5, it was observed that the shape of TiO2 nanoparticles evolves in ellipsoids with a higher appearance than that with triethanolamine [66]. Also, it has been reported in the literature that the shape of TiO2 nanoparticles can be changed from a round to a cubic form by using sodium oleate and sodium stearate. The shape control is attributed to the growth rate regulation of the different crystalline planes of the TiO2 nanoparticles by the specific adsorption of the shape regulators to these planes under different pH conditions [66,67,68]. In another study, TiO2 nanoparticles were obtained by the sol-gel method, and subsequently, the influence of acid pH (3.2–6.8 with a hydrochloric acid solution) on the formation of TiO2 nanocrystalline powders and photoluminescent properties was studied. Thus, it was reported that the best luminescence property was obtained for the TiO2 nanoparticles synthesized at a pH of 5.0 [69].
Presently, TiO2-based nanomaterials have been tested on different materials in order to consolidate or restore the cultural heritage. For example, La Russa M.F. and co-workers studied the efficiency of TiO2 nanoparticles dispersed in an acrylic polymer solution on limestone and marble samples. The biocidal efficacy of TiO2 against A. Niger fungi was evaluated, and the results show a high efficiency of growth inhibition on both types of samples. Also, the photodegradation tests revealed the efficiency of increasing the speed of oxidation of the methylene blue stains. After aging, the behavior of the two types of samples was different. The treated limestone surfaces do not appear to be affected by solar radiation, while in the case of marble, the coating is almost inefficient after aging, suggesting that the composition of the sample also plays an important role [70]. In another study, De Filpo G. and co-workers tested these nanomaterials in order to study their efficiency as antifungal and biocidal agents for woodworking. After the wood samples were treated, they were put in contact with two species of fungi, Hypocrea lixii and Mucor circinelloides, which are known to be responsible for the rapid degradation of the wood. The results show that the photo-catalytic activity of TiO2 nanoparticles prevents fungal colonization of wood samples for a much longer period, compared to untreated samples [71]. Also, this treatment was deposited on the wood surfaces using a plasma jet with atmospheric pressure in order to improve the stability of the wood against the ultraviolet (UV) light and humidity resistance capacities. Color changes during UV exposure for both uncoated and coated wood samples were measured. It was observed that the sample coated with TiO2 had become more resistant to color change after exposure to UV radiation than untreated wood [72].
Zinc oxide (ZnO) is an inorganic compound used in various applications: pharmaceutical industry, cosmetics, chemicals, ceramics, paint and glass [73]. The antibacterial activity of ZnO increases with decreasing particle size and such action can be stimulated by visible light. Also, the absorption property of UV radiation improves the stability of the composite [74].
Currently, various obtained methods involving ZnO-based nanomaterials have been developed, such as: vapor phase growth, the vapor-liquid-solid process, electrophoretic deposition, sol-gel processes, homogeneous precipitation, etc. The properties of ZnO nanoparticles, such as crystallinity and morphology, can be controlled by adjusting factors such as pH, reaction temperature, time and solvent [75].
Like TiO2, zinc oxide has been intensively studied as a potential enhancer used in conservation and restoration applications of cultural heritage, thus demonstrating that it can be used successfully in this field. For example, the humidity of the ZnO surfaces was examined; these flat ZnO substrates had a water contact angle of up to 109°, confirming the material’s ability to provide hydrophobicity to the surface on which it is applied [76]. In another study, pine samples were treated with ZnO nanoparticles in order to investigate the efficiency of the consolidant for water absorption. It has been reported that ZnO nanoparticles (at a concentration greater than or equal to 2.5%) significantly improved water absorption resistance for 12 months of outdoor exposure, compared to control [50]. Also, David M.E. and co-workers confirmed the capacity of cellulose acetate-based micronized particles (ZnO and TiO2) to provide hydrophobicity on the pinewood surface [77]. Clausen C.A. and the co-workers reported that the use of ZnO nanoparticles as a wood coating product leads to a significant decrease (under 4%) in the consumption of eastern subterranean termites in the case of wood blocks and to an increase in the mortality of these termites by over 94% [78]. In another study, it was reported that delamination between the wood surface and the coating layer caused by UV and moisture irradiation could be avoided using ZnO nanoparticles [79].
Gold (Au) nanoparticles are intensively used in various applications due to their unique properties and increased surface functionalization ability with different compounds [80]. These nanoparticles can be synthesized into different shapes and sizes due to the various synthesis methods available. The most commonly used methods for the synthesis of Au nanoparticles are chemical and biological methods, but the chemical method offers the advantage of better control over the size and shape of the nanoparticles. Since the size and shape of the nanoparticles depend on the synthesis method and it can be controlled by adjusting the reaction parameters (including temperature, concentration and pH) [81,82]. The physical, chemical and optical properties are strongly influenced by the size of the nanoparticles. For example, it has been shown that Au nanoparticles with dimensions below 100 nm provide a large surface-volume ratio, and the chemical, physical and optical properties are different from those of the same bulk material [83,84]. Also, another important advantage of these nanoparticles are the microbiological properties, these nanoparticles presenting an increased antimicrobial, antifungal and antibiofilm activity [85,86].
Due to these properties, Au nanoparticles have attracted the attention to be studied in different fields, including the conservation and restoration of cultural heritage. For example, Ion R.M. and co-workers studied the efficacy of a new system based on Au and hydroxyapatite (HAp) nanoparticles on hazelnut wood samples. Following the obtained results, it was observed that the wood samples treated with the Au and HAp system were more stable and have superior mechanical and hydrophobic properties, compared to the samples treated with either Au, HAp or untreated (control) samples. These improved properties are mainly due to the presence of gold nanoparticles, which have the ability to insert/penetrate into the wood channels, thus leading to hardening and protecting the wood (Figure 3). Also, compared to HAp, the surface hardness increased considerably in the case of the sample on which the Au and HAp based system was applied, due to the network of fibers generated on the wood surface [1].
Silver (Ag) nanoparticles and their nanocomposites are among the most used nanomaterials, being used in almost all types of applications (medicine, antimicrobial agents, sensors, catalysts, coating agents, cosmetics, water treatment, etc.) [87,88,89]. Of the entire range of metallic nanoparticles, Ag nanoparticles are the most widely used due to their unique physical, chemical and biological properties. The advantage of these nanoparticles as compared to the other noble metals, in terms of their physico-chemical properties are: high electrical and thermal conductivity, non-toxicity, stability under environmental conditions, low costs of obtaining, wide absorption of light, chemical stability and catalytic activity. Moreover, they have a broad spectrum of high antimicrobial activity (bactericidal and fungicidal activity) [90,91]. Currently, Ag nanoparticles can be synthesized by physical, chemical and biological methods. Physical and chemical methods are the most laborious, compared to biological synthesis, which consists of a fairly simple and easy process to produce large-scale nanoparticles that have attractive properties, such as high yield, solubility and stability [89,92].
As in the case of Au nanoparticles, the properties of Ag nanoparticles depend on the size and shape of the nanoparticles, characteristics that are closely dependent on the synthesis method (they can be controlled by adjusting the reaction parameters). For example, it has been reported that the bactericidal activity of Ag nanoparticles is strongly influenced by nanoparticle size; the smaller the nanoparticle size, the stronger the bactericidal activity is [93,94].
In recent years, Ag nanoparticles have been intensively studied to demonstrate their efficiency as a consolidant for the conservation and restoration of cultural heritage. In a study, Berrocal A. and co-workers tested a solution of Ag nanoparticles (50 ppm (parts per million)), which was incorporated by pressure into three commercial wood species (Acacia mangium, Cedrela odorata and Vochysia guatemalensis) from Costa Rica. Following the experiment, it was observed that the mass loss was less than 5% for all three types of wood treated with Ag nanoparticles, while untreated wood showed a mass loss of more than 20%. Also, the water absorption capacity was reduced for the three wood species treated with Ag nanoparticles, while the dimensional stability increased for two of the three wood types (Cedrela odorata and Vochysia guatemalensis) [95].
In another study, Mantanis G. and Papadopoulos A.N. studied the improvement of pine wood from the point of view of water absorption using Ag nanoparticles. It has been observed that the immersion of pine wood in an Ag nanoparticle solution for 2 min significantly reduces water absorption, thus confirming the ability of this material to be used as a consolidate in cultural heritage [96].
Magnesium oxide (MgO) is a basic oxide and can be formed by the reaction of metal with oxygen gas [97]. MgO nanoparticles can be synthesized by various methods, such as sol-gel, thermal decomposition, precipitation reactions, etc. [45]. Currently, magnesium oxide has various applications, such as an adsorbent for chemical agents, photocatalyst, antibacterial agent, antioxidant agent, etc. Comparing the antimicrobial activity of MgO nanoparticles on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, it has been shown that this material is more effective against Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus). It has also been shown that these nanoparticles possess photocatalytic activity both under UV irradiation and in sunlight, which opens up several possible areas of application of these ecological MgO nanoparticles [98,99,100].
In the last few years, MgO nanoparticles have been tested as potential consolidates for various materials (wood, paper, etc.). In one study, it was reported that MgO is an excellent paper de-acidification agent, which ensures good physico-chemical compatibility with the substrate, without producing undesirable side effects on the treated material [45]. Also, Castillo I.F. and co-workers treated old paper with MgO nanoparticles to prevent fungal damage of paper artifacts from fungi commonly found on the surface of old colonizing paper: A. niger, C. cladosporioides and T. reesei. After treatment, it was observed that dispersions of MgO nanoparticles on original paper samples from the 18th century were effective in preventing fungal colonization without altering the appearance of paper artifacts. In addition, this treatment inhibited activity in A. niger and T. reesei fungi [101].
Iron oxides are found in a wide variety of structures and are present in many types of applications, from geological to nano-technological applications. They have seven crystalline phases, the most common being α-Fe2O3 (hematite), γ-Fe2O3 (maghemite) and Fe3O4 (magnetite). Due to their ideal properties (magnetic, electrical, optical), all these oxides have been extensively investigated by chemists, engineers and physicists. Iron oxide nanomaterials can be synthesized by different methods (co-precipitation, hydrothermal method, microemulsion, thermal decomposition, sol-gel, etc.) in different shapes and sizes, such as nanotubes, nanowires, fibers and rings. The performance of iron oxides is strictly influenced by their morphology, size and porosity [102,103,104]. These nanomaterials have been successfully used in many applications, such as medicine, water cleaning, cathodes, photoelectrochemical systems, dyes, etc. [103,105]. These nanomaterials have also been used to protect and improve the resistance of wood. Schauwecker C.F. and the co-workers used iron oxide particles with different crystalline shapes and sizes to protect against the discoloration of wood under solar radiation. The results of this study suggest that the large size of the oxide particles offered both greater opacity and protection [106]. Another advantage of these transparent iron oxides is that they are multifunctional non-toxic pigments, which can be combined with a range of color shades with excellent UV absorption, transparency and weather stability; factors that lead to increased protection of the wood [107].
Silicon dioxide (SiO2) is a colorless, crystalline solid substance that does not react with water and is resistant to acids. SiO2 particles can be used as a source of material for photovoltaic cells, semiconductor electronic devices, catalysts, film substrates, ceramics, plastics fillers, humidity sensors, absorbents, anti-corrosive agents, etc.
The synthesis of SiO2 particles can be realized by several methods, such as chemical vapor deposition, plasma and combustion synthesis, the hydrothermal method and sol-gel processing. Among these synthesis methods, sol-gel has low cost advantages in processing and also facilitates the control of SiO2 properties (purity, composition and material homogeneity) [108,109,110]. The SiO2 properties are dependent on the conditions of its synthesis, such as temperature, pH, washing and drying modes. These factors influence the size of the SiO2 particles, their aggregation and the specific surface area [109].
SiO2 nanoparticles were also used in coatings for materials belonging to the cultural heritage. Doubek S. V. and co-workers investigated the SiO2 capacity on beech (Fagus sylvatica) and fir (Abies alba) wood. Following the treatment, it has been observed that silica mineralization can improve some of the technical properties of the wood, leading to the prolongation of the life of the wooden structures. It has also been reported that silicon dioxide has not shown anti-mold efficiency, a property that is essential in protecting wood [111]. In another study, it was observed that the SiO2 nanoparticles treatment led to a significant reduction in the swelling of the wood, but this also decreased the resistance of the wood [112].
The effect of the properties of SiO2 nanoparticles on the wood surface was also studied by Fu Y. and co-workers. The results show that the water absorption and the hygroscopic expansion rate of the treated wood were lower, compared to the control sample. Also, the resistant properties to discoloration were improved by 1.5 times, compared to the control sample. The contact angle test showed that the treated wood was more hydrophobic than that of the control sample and increased with the time of immersion in the SiO2 solution. Also, the treated wood showed increased resistance to aging compared to the control sample [113]. These studies confirmed that SiO2 can be considered a potential material to be used as a consolidant in wood preservation and restoration, but it is necessary to improve the properties of this material to obtain better performances (e.g., SiO2/Ag, SiO2/TiO2 for anti-mold properties [71,114]).
Copper oxide (CuO) is an inorganic compound produced on a large scale due to the various applications in which it is used successfully. Copper oxide is a semiconductor metal with unique optical, electrical and magnetic properties and has been used for various applications, such as the development of supercapacitors, infrared filters, magnetic storage media, sensors, catalysts, semiconductors, etc. [115,116]. One of the most important parameters in the synthesis of CuO nanoparticles is the control of the particle size, their morphology and crystallinity, and different methods of synthesis have been developed to achieve this objective; several more investigated approaches include the sonochemical method, the sol-gel method, laser ablation, the electrochemical method and surfactant techniques [115,117,118].
The synthesis methods of CuO nanoparticles have advanced significantly in the last ten years due to the various important industrial applications. The synthesis technique is important for the properties of the final nanosystem, because it can control the size and morphology of the nanoparticles. Also, these nanoparticles exhibit various optical, magnetic, mechanical and electrical resistivity properties, which differ from the characteristics of the bulk solid material [115].
In the last few years, metal nanoparticles have been intensively studied as wood protection consolidates. Shiny K. and co-workers obtained CuO nanoparticles using plant extracts (Neem leaves (Azadirachta indica), Pongamia (Pongamia pinnata), Lantana (Lantana camara) and orange peel extract (Citrus reticulata)), which are known to have wood preservation properties. The effectiveness of the obtained CuO nanoparticles was tested against wood termites. It has been found that all CuO nanoparticles obtained from plant extract provide termite protection for a period of six months, compared with control. The development of a synthesis pathway based on sustainable plant extracts for metallic nanoparticles allows the possibility of combining the intrinsic property of the plant extract and the metallic nanoparticles for a potential application in wood protection. The resulting formulation can protect the wood from biodeterioration in a more efficient way, without damaging the environment [119]. In another study, Akhtari M. and D. Nicholas tested and compared the effectiveness of CuO and ZnO nanoparticles as potential wood consolidants. CuO nanoparticles have been found to be much more effective in protecting wood against termites, compared to ZnO nanoparticles [120].
CuO nanoparticles have been used to protect wood against various microorganisms (fungi and bacteria) [121,122]. Also, another important advantage of using the CuO nanoparticles as a wood consolidant is the fact that the effective removal of the CuO layer from the wood surface was achieved with the help of chelated agents, without causing damage to the treated wood initially [123].

4. Tubular Nanomaterials with Applications in the Conservation and Restoration of Cultural Heritage

In the last few years, tubular nanomaterials (like carbon nanotubes, titanium oxide nanotubes, ZnO nanotubes, etc.) have attracted attention for use in different fields due to their structures, as well as their ability to present multiple walls. In addition, their unique physical and chemical properties, their interior voids and exterior surfaces make them ideal candidates for various applications [124,125,126,127,128,129,130].

4.1. Structure and Synthesis Methods of CNTs

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were discovered in 1991 by Sumio Iijima, through the action of a catalyst on the gaseous species created by the thermal decomposition of hydrocarbons. Subsequently, multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) were obtained as by-products for the production of fullerenes in an electric arc without catalysts. Two years later, after repeated attempts to “fill” CNTs with various metals, single-wall nanotubes (SWCNTs) were discovered.
CNTs are large cylindrical molecules consisting of a hexagonal arrangement of hybridized carbon atoms, which can be formed by rolling a single graphene sheet (SWCNTs—Figure 4A) or rolling two or more sheets of graphene linked through van der Waals non-covalent force, that acts between the carbon atoms of the different walls (MWCNTs—Figure 4B). Typically, these nanotubes are coated at both ends with a hemispherical arrangement of carbon networks, called fullerene [131,132,133,134,135].
These two types of CNT differ not only in terms of structure, but also due to their properties; for example, SWCNTs have important electrical properties (they can be excellent conductors), compared to MWCNTs. SWCNTs are still very expensive, and the development of more cost-effective synthesis techniques is vital for their use in a wider range of applications [136].
CNTs are widely used in many applications due to their unique properties (electrical, mechanical, optical, thermal and other properties). The application of CNTs is usually given by their structure (number of walls, diameter, length, chiral angle, purity, structural quality, etc.), which gives the specific properties. These carbon nanotubes can be synthesized by various methods and each of these methods has some advantages and disadvantages that lead to obtaining CNTs with different properties [137,138].
For example, a sonochemical method was also used to synthesize SWCNTs by the ultrasonic irradiation of a solution containing silica, ferrocene and p-xylene powders. In this synthesis, ferrocene was used as a precursor for the Fe catalyst, p-xylene was used as a carbon precursor and the silica powder provided nuclear sites for the growth of CNTs. Ferrocene was sonochemically decomposed to form small Fe groups, and p-xylene was pyrolysed to carbon atoms and carbon moieties. This approach provides a convenient synthetic route for preparing CNTs under environmental conditions. In addition, no extra purification steps were required in this process, which opens up the possibility of large-scale ultrasonic synthesis of SWCNTs [139]. In another study, Wang W. and co-workers synthesized MWCNTs with outer diameters between 9 and 19 nm and inner diameters between 4 and 8 nm by decomposing polyethylene glycol (PEG) into a basic aqueous solution with high NaOH concentration under hydrothermal conditions at a temperature of 160 °C, without the addition of a Fe/Co/Ni catalyst [140]. In another study, Jagadish K. and co-workers synthesized MWCNTs by the hydrothermal method of polystyrene (PS) in the presence of the catalyst (Fe particles) at a temperature of 400 °C. Following the morphological characterization, it was observed that the obtained MWCNTs had inner and outer diameters of 19 and 22 nm, respectively, with a wall thickness of 5 nm, their length being a few millimeters [141]. Also, Manafi S. and co-workers prepared MWCNTs by an easy sonochemical/hydrothermal method. MWCNTs were fabricated hydrothermally using dichloromethane, cobalt chloride and lithium as starting materials in an aqueous NaOH solution, and the ultrasonic pre-treatment of the solution mixture was performed before hydrothermal conditions (150–180 °C for 24 h). Following this synthesis, high purity MWCNTs with lengths of 2–5 μm and diameters of 60 ± 20 nm were obtained [142].
In another study, Chrzanowska J. and co-workers obtained SWCNTs by the laser ablation method (laser source Nd: YAG–neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet), and observed that the properties of the synthesized CNTs are highly dependent on the laser fluency. In the case of the laser with a wavelength of 355 nm, the best SWCNTs (morphologically) were obtained at the fluence of F = 3 J* cm−2, while for 1064 nm, good results were obtained in the fluorescence range of 1 ≤ F ≤ J* cm−2 (the distribution of nanotubes being the smallest at this fluency, with a diameter of 1.3 nm). Also, it has been observed that the distribution of nanotubes, in terms of diameters, became wider as the fluency increases [143].
Wu H. and co-workers tried to obtain CNTs by the electrochemical reduction of CO2 in different molten Li-Na-K carbonate mixtures. By adjusting the density of the electric current, the electrolyte and the temperature, the carbon products had different morphologies of structures. It was observed that in the case of the Li-Na-K electrolyte, no CNTs were formed, but a high efficiency was observed for pure Li, Li-Na or small Li-Ba and carbon electrolytes. Also, it was observed that the diameter of the CNTs increased with the increase in the electrolysis time [144]. In another study, Dimitrov A.T. and co-workers reported the obtaining of MWCNTs with lengths between 50 nm and 3 μm and diameters between 10 and 80 nm, by electrolysis in Li−Cl molten mixtures [145].
In another study, MWCNTs of about 16–55 nm in diameter and 1.2 µm in length were obtained by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method using ferrocene and molybdenum hexacarbonyl as precursors of catalyst nanoparticles and methane as a nontoxic and economical carbon source [146]. Seidel R. and co-workers also tried to obtain SWCNTs at the lowest possible temperature. Thus, dense SWCNT networks were synthesized by the thermal CVD method, at temperatures up to 600 °C using Ni catalyst layers with a thickness of about 0.2 nm [147].
Chemical synthesis is a new technique for obtaining CNTs, being adapted according to the Staudenmaier method [148] and one of the most promising routes for the production of MWCNTs. This technique allows the easy and cheap preparation of MWCNTs, at low temperatures (70 °C) and without applying pressure. The obtaining of CNTs by this technique is incipient, with only a few articles being reported in the literature.
Using this method, Lee D.W. and Seo J.W. obtained MWCNTs with a diameter of about 14 nm and with a zig-zag structure [149]. In another study, Ali B. and co-workers synthesized MWCNTs by chemical synthesis with a diameter of about 13 nm and high thermal stability [150].

4.2. Properties of CNTs Important for Cultural Heritage

Over the years, CNTs have been used in many fields of application due to their highly useful physical, chemical and mechanical properties. For example, CNTs introduced into polymeric matrices, such as epoxy, are a new generation of composite materials with advanced mechanical properties [151]. It has been reported that the introduction of SWCNTs, and MWCNTs into polymeric matrices showed significant increases in resistance and Young’s modulus compared to control (polymeric matrices) [152]. Therefore, CNTs are suitable candidates to be used in conservation and restoration of cultural heritage due to their ideal properties:
Mechanical and elastic properties: CNTs are stiffer than steel and are highly resistant to the application of physical forces (pressing on the top of a nanotube will cause it to bend, without damaging the top) [153,154]. Compared to graphite fibers, CNTs exhibit tensile strength and superior elastic behavior. Graphite fibers have been reported to have a tensile strength of approximately 1 GPa, while MWCNTs have an average of 14.2 ± 0.8 GPa [155], and SWCNTs average 3.66 ± 0.4 GPa [156]. Analyzing the elasticity modulus (or Young’s Modulus), it was reported that SWCNTs have a value of about 1 TPa, and MWCNTs have a higher modulus of elasticity of about 1.28 TPa [152]. These properties differ depending on the obtaining method of the nanotubes and the temperature at which the CNTs are synthesized, respectively. Therefore, the extreme mechanical strength of CNTs makes them the best known material, with great potential for applications that require high mechanical strength materials. The use of CNTs in order to improve the mechanical properties of different materials has been reported in several studies [157,158,159].
Optical properties are very important because they show how the material interacts with light. Presently, there are few studies in the literature on the optical properties of CNTs. In a recent study, it was reported that UV exposure of these CNTs has no direct impact on their properties [160]. For this reason, CNTs have been introduced into the polymeric matrix (poly (methyl methacrylate)), noting that the addition of nanotubes into the matrix was beneficial for improving its resistance against UV radiation. It was concluded that the high-energy radiation was dissipated through the nanocomposite CNT network, thus improving the tolerance to deterioration [161]. Nguyen T. and co-workers investigated the release capacity of CNTs from the polymer matrix in the environment after UV exposure. Thus, after obtaining an epoxy nanocomposite based on MWCNTs, it was irradiated with UV light (with a maximum value of 4865 MJ/m2) at different doses, and the effects of UV exposure on surface accumulation and the potential release of MWCNTs has been studied. After UV exposure, it was observed that the nanocomposite matrix suffered photodegradation, leading to the formation of a dense network structure of MWCNTs, but no release of nanotubes was detected in the environment, even at very high UV doses [162]. Also, Petersen E. J. and co-workers reported that the presence of CNTs on the sample surface reduces the affinity of the epoxy matrix to photodegradation. Before the UV exposure, a smooth and flat surface of the nanocomposite can be observed, and after the UV exposure (1089 MJ/m2), it can be observed that the surface morphology was significantly modified, having a hard, non-uniform appearance, which attests that the upper layer of the polymer degraded, being left on the surface the nanotubes [163]. These studies confirmed the capacity of the CNTs to protect objects against photodegradation.
Hydrophobic properties: this property is indispensable in cultural heritage protection and CNTs’ hydrophobicity has been reported in several studies. For example, Eseev M. and co-workers obtained superhydrophobic surfaces by applying the MWCNT agglomerates made from xerogel milled by the carbon band CVD method and by studying the functionalization time of the MWCNTs. Thus, they obtained a material with a contact angle of almost 151° and concluded that the short functionalization periods of MWCNTs (up to 90 min) are dominated by the cleaning process of the nanotubes (amorphous carbon and metal nanoparticles—the catalyst). The MWCNTs functionalized for 90 min showed an increase in the contact angle from 112° (value obtained for a working time below 90 min) to 140° (90 min operating time), allowing this coating to be considered as being highly hydrophobic [164]. In a recent study, MWCNTs were synthesized by catalytic CVD, and on the surface of these nanotubes was physically adsorbed fluid poly (dimethylsiloxane) fluid, in order to obtain a superhydrophobic nanocomposite material. After analyzing the contact angle, a value of 152° was reported for the nanocomposite, while for the poly (dimethylsiloxane), a value of 57° was obtained. These results confirm once again the high hydrophobicity of CNTs [165]. The presence of these nanotubes in the polymer matrix can lead to significant decreases in the water adsorption capacity of the polymeric matrix, due to the non-polar hydrophobic structure of the CNTs [166].

4.3. CNTs Used in Conservation and Restoration of Cultural Heritage and Future Challenges in This Area

Potential applications of CNTs include obtaining new materials, optical and microelectronic devices, textiles and clothing. Presently, the aim is to create hydrophobic, anti-freeze and self-cleaning coatings in several industrial sectors, particularly in the cultural heritage area. These coatings will also have a wide application in the construction and automotive industries [164]. To date, only a few studies have been reported on heritage conservation by using CNTs, which have been very successful in the consolidation and restoration of the object [167,168]. For example, Cestari B. C. and co-workers reported the successful use of CNTs embedded in epoxy resin as coatings for timber structures. It has been proven that the use of these materials as timber consolidate leads to a significantly improved in mechanical strength of the wood [169]. Valentini F. and co-workers sustained the use of CNTs in cultural heritage by reporting the efficiency of SWCNTs in the removal of the black crust from the surfaces of pentelic marbles from the Basilica Neptuni (Rome, Italy) [170]. The capacity of CNTs in the consolidation and restoration of stone materials was also tested by mixing MWCNTs with mortar. It was observed that the addition of MWCNTs in mortar improves its mechanical properties. Additionally, the results show that the MWCNT concentration plays an important role in the matrix reinforcement capability; around 0.2% wt. of MWCNTs are needed to better reinforce the matrix in terms of increased flexural strength and to achieve optimum properties in terms of piezoresistivity [171,172,173]. In another study, CNTs were used in an innovative and precise instrument for mild heating, designed specifically for art conservation, in the form of lightweight, flexible, transparent and breathable film-like mats. This device is made by various layers, and the main layers consist of a substrate (transparent polyester film-gives good adhesion to any kind of coating), the conductive CNT coating, a protective-insulating coating on top and two copper electrodes glued on polyester film (for the electrical supply). The device is driven by a programmable mobile touch screen console, which gives the operator ultimate control over the temperature and heating pattern, which is unprecedented in art conservation. In this study, the device was successfully applied on paintings, textiles and works on paper and the humidification of the artifacts was maintained in the required parameters, leading to a better preservation of objects over time. Apart from the advantages mentioned above, this device offers the possibility to be designed in ultra-thin, transparent, and woven forms, and also as gas permeable membranes to permit the migration of vapors. This treatment can therefore deal with local, global or specific conservation problems, allowing conservators to easily apply mild heating locally and over very large areas [25]. In a recent study, Eseev M. and co-workers obtained superhydrophobic anti-icing coatings, prepared from milled xerogel based on CNTs and then, the resulting materials were applied on the steel sample surfaces. It was reported that the treated sample presented a water contact angle of approximately 156° at the droplet inclination angle of 3.6°, confirming the superhydrophobicity of the coating. Moreover, the high hydrophobicity of the coating allows the deceleration of frosting formation and the droplet slips from the coating before it can freeze. The authors also suggested that, due to the high sorption capability of the CNTs, lubricants can be loaded on the CNTs surface. The suggested approach can be used to create superhydrophobic coatings, which can be used in the cultural heritage field, for anti-freezing protection, but also for protecting other surfaces, such as aircraft surfaces [174]. Also, Krishnamurthy M. and co-workers reported the superhydrophobicity of the coating based on the polymerization of SWCNTs with thiophene/aryl compounds tested on leather and glass surfaces, with a water contact angle of 155° and 163°, respectively [175].
Due to the promising results obtained for CNTs incorporated in polymeric matrices, in recent years, a new concept has been tried, namely the functionalization of CNTs with metal nanoparticles. For the functionalization of CNTs, several methods have been developed, including covalent modifications (based on the formation of a covalent bond between functional entities and the CNT framework), non-covalent modifications (using various adsorption forces, such as Van der Waals forces, hydrogen bonds, etc.) or electrostatic interactions. Covalent bonding between nanoparticles and CNTs was obtained by various acid treatments to create bonding groups such as carboxyl (–COOH), carbonyl (–C=O) and hydroxyl (–OH); however, the mechanical and electronic properties of CNTs can be significantly degraded after acid treatment due to the introduction of defects. The non-covalent attachment of nanoparticles is more able to preserve the unique properties of CNTs with reduced defects [176]. Depending on the methods used, the functional groups/materials can be introduced on the surface of CNTs. Functionalized CNTs can have mechanical, optical or electrical properties that are different from those of the initial nanotube and significantly improved [177,178]. In a recent study, the functionalization of MWCNTs with Au nanoparticles in three stages was successfully performed: functionalization of the surface of carbon nanotubes; grafting of cysteamine hydrochloride by a thiol reaction and decorating the gold nanoparticles by chemical covalent bonds. After functionalization, it can be observed that Au nanoparticles attached to the surface of MWCNTs have spheroidal shapes, with dimensions between 15 and 35 nm [179]. Also, Ag nanoparticles have been successfully linked on the surface of CNTs, thus expanding the applicability of CNTs in various fields, such as medicine, food industry, controlled release systems, anti-cancer drugs, antimicrobial agents, coating for different surfaces and textile industry [180]. Table 2 presents the structures based on functionalized CNTs and the areas in which these structures were used.
Presently, the application of these functionalized CNTs in the cultural heritage area was not achieved, but studies from other areas confirmed that functionalized CNTs offer superior mechanical, optical or electrical properties, compared with non-functionalized CNTs. Therefore, the presence of CNTs in the field of heritage can bring important improvements in the consolidators, these nanotubes having the most important properties necessary for this area.

5. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

In the last few decades, the conservation of cultural heritage has become a topic of interest worldwide, due to the need to preserve the authenticity of artifacts and constructions, as well as the history of mankind. Classic examples of artifacts include stone tools, wooden tools and objects, metal or personal ornaments and ceramic vessels. Due to the age of these objects and the external degradation factors, their structure is severely affected. For example, wood materials are constantly subject to several serious degradation factors, such as biological or chemical degradation, which more or less affect the structural integrity and mechanical strength of these materials.
Currently, nanomaterials are a good solution for this problem of cultural heritage, due to their ability to consolidate and protect damaged building materials. Nanomaterials used in cultural heritage conservation and restoration applications must meet the following requirements: to have thermal stability, to be biologically and chemically inert, to be non-toxic, to have a low cost, to have good adaptability to various media and good absorption in the solar spectrum. Also, once applied to the surface of objects for preservation and restoration, these nanomaterials must create a self-cleaning system, thus preserving the initial appearance of the treated elements, while decreasing the deposition of pollutants and reducing the onset of external degradation processes due to contamination. Currently, various nanomaterials are successfully used to preserve and restore heritage objects, such as metal nanoparticles (gold, copper and silver) and metal oxides (zinc, titanium, iron and aluminum).
In recent years, tubular nanomaterials have attracted attention for use in different fields due to their structures, as well as their ability to present multiple walls. In addition, compared to their unique physical and chemical properties, their interior voids and exterior surfaces make them ideal candidates for various applications, including for conservation and restoration applications of cultural heritage. The carbon nanotubes are among examples of nanotubular materials, which have the advantage on being synthesized by using several methods (e.g., arc discharge, sonochemical or hydrothermal method, laser ablation, etc.). These nanotubes have properties necessary for the preservation and restoration of objects, such as superior mechanical and elastic strength, high hydrophobicity, optical properties, large specific surface area for absorption of other nanomaterials, relatively good biocompatibility, etc.
Presently, both the introduction into a polymeric matrix of CNTs and the attachment of metal nanoparticles on the surface of CNTs has been successfully achieved. These obtained composites were successfully applied in various applications, but also for the conservation and restoration of objects. It was observed that following the introduction of CNTs in a polymeric matrix, the preservation and restoration capacity of the object treated with this consolidant has increased significantly, with the treated object presenting superior mechanical properties and a better UV resistance. Also, after CNT functionalization and their application as coating for objects, mechanical, optical or electrical properties were achieved that were significantly improved than those of the original nanotube (without functionalization). Therefore, the presence of CNTs in the field of heritage can bring important improvements in the consolidators, with these nanotubes having the most important properties necessary for this area.

Author Contributions

M.E.D., Conceptualization, Writing–Review & Editing; M.E.D., R.-M.I., R.M.G., L.I., E.R.A. Data Curation & Editing; M.E.D., R.-M.I. Funding Acquisition; R.-M.I., Supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the League of Romanian Students Abroad and by Romanian Ministery of Research and Innovation, CCCDI–UEFISCDI, grant number 51PCCDI/2018.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ion, R.-M.; Nyokong, T.; Nwahara, N. Wood preservation with gold hydroxyapatite system. Herit. Sci. 2018, 6, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Ion, R.-M.; Grigorescu, R.-M.; Iancu, L. Polymeric Micro-and Nanosystems for Wood Artifacts Preservation. In New Uses of Micro and Nanomaterials; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; p. 73. [Google Scholar]
  3. Dumitriu, I.; Ion, R.-M.; Fierascu, R. Arheometria Materialelor Suport; Transversal: Târgovişte, Romania, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ion, R.-M.; Doncea, S.M.; Ion, M.-L. Surface investigations of old book paper treated with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 285, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mourdikoudis, S.; Pallares, R.M.; Thanh, N.T. Characterization techniques for nanoparticles: Comparison and complementarity upon studying nanoparticle properties. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 12871–12934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Ion, R.-M.; Doncea, S.-M.; Ţurcanu-Caruțiu, D. Nanotechnologies in Cultural Heritage-Materials and Instruments for Diagnosis and Treatment. In Novel Nanomaterials; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; pp. 173–190. [Google Scholar]
  7. Blee, A.; Matisons, J. Nanoparticles and the conservation of cultural heritage. Mater. Forum 2008, 32, 121–128. [Google Scholar]
  8. Reyes-Estebanez, M.; Ortega-Morales, B.O.; Chan-Bacab, M. Antimicrobial engineered nanoparticles in the built cultural heritage context and their ecotoxicological impact on animals and plants: A brief review. Herit. Sci. 2018, 6, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Barberio, M.; Veltri, S.; Imbrogno, A. TiO2 and SiO2 nanoparticles film for cultural heritage: Conservation and consolidation of ceramic artifacts. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2015, 271, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Evans, P.; Matsunaga, H.; Kiguchi, M. Large-scale application of nanotechnology for wood protection. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Borges, C.C.; Tonoli, G.H.D.; Cruz, T.M. Nanoparticles-Based Wood Preservatives: The Next Generation Of Wood Protection? Cerne 2018, 24, 397–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Teng, T.-J.; Arip, M.N.M.; Sudesh, K. Conventional technology and nanotechnology in wood preservation: A review. BioResources 2018, 13, 9220–9252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Ciliberto, E.; Condorelli, G.; La Delfa, S. Nanoparticles of Sr(OH)2: Synthesis in homogeneous phase at low temperature and application for cultural heritage artefacts. Appl. Phys. A 2008, 92, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kwiatkowska, A.; Wojech, R.; Wojciak, A. Paper deacidification with the use of magnesium oxide nanoparticles. Ann. Wars. Univ. Life Sci. SGGW For. Wood Technol. 2014, 85, 144–148. [Google Scholar]
  15. Giorgi, R.; Dei, L.; Ceccato, M. Nanotechnologies for conservation of cultural heritage: Paper and canvas deacidification. Langmuir 2002, 18, 8198–8203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sassoni, E.; Naidu, S.; Scherer, G.W. The use of hydroxyapatite as a new inorganic consolidant for damaged carbonate stones. J. Cul. Herit. 2011, 12, 346–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ion, R.M.; Fierăscu, R.C.; Fierăscu, I. Stone monuments consolidation with nanomaterials. Key Eng. Mater. 2015, 660, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sassoni, E.; Franzoni, E. Sugaring marble in the Monumental Cemetery in Bologna (Italy): Characterization of naturally and artificially weathered samples and first results of consolidation by hydroxyapatite. Appl. Phys. A 2014, 117, 1893–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ion, R.-M.; Turcanu-Carutiu, D.; Fierascu, R.-C. Chalk stone restoration with hydroxyapatite–based nanoparticles. Sci. Bull. Valahia Univ. Mater. Mech. 2014, 9, 16–19. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ion, R.-M.; Turcanu-Caruţiu, D.; Fierăscu, R.-C. Caoxite-hydroxyapatite composition as consolidating material for the chalk stone from Basarabi–Murfatlar churches ensemble. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 358, 612–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sierra-Fernandez, A.; Gomez-Villalba, L.S.; Rabanal, M.E. New nanomaterials for applications in conservation and restoration of stony materials: A review. Mater. Constr. 2017, 67, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ion, R.-M.; Iancu, L.; Vasilievici, G. Ion-Substituted Carbonated Hydroxyapatite Coatings for Model Stone Samples. Coatings 2019, 9, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Scarfato, P.; Avallone, E.; Incarnato, L. Development and evaluation of halloysite nanotube-based carrier for biocide activity in construction materials protection. Appl. Clay Sci. 2016, 132, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Inagaki, M.; Kang, F.; Toyoda, M. Chapter 2—Carbon Nanotubes: Synthesis and Formation. In Advanced Materials Science and Engineering of Carbon; Inagaki, M., Ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  25. Meyer, H.; Saborowski, K.; Markevicius, T. Carbon Nanotubes In Art Conservation. Int. J. Conserv. Sci. 2013, 5, 633–646. [Google Scholar]
  26. Xu, P.; Cui, D.; Pan, B. A facile strategy for covalent binding of nanoparticles onto carbon nanotubes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 254, 5236–5240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zulikifli, F.W.A.; Yazid, H.; Halim, M.Z.B.A. Synthesis of gold nanoparticles on multi-walled carbon nanotubes (Au-MWCNTs) via deposition precipitation method. In Proceedings of the International Conference “Functional Analysis In Interdisciplinary Applications” (Faia2017), Bohol, Philippines, 4–7 January 2017. [Google Scholar]
  28. Öztank, N. An investigation of traditional Turkish wooden houses. J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 2010, 9, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Freeman, M.H.; Shupe, T.; Vlosky, R. Past, Present, and Future of the Wood Preservation Industry. For. Prod. J. 2003, 53, 8–15. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tuduce Trǎistaru, A.A.; Sandu, I.; Timar, M. SEM-EDX, water absorption, and wetting capability studies on evaluation of the influence of nano-zinc oxide as additive to paraloid B72 solutions used for wooden artifacts consolidation. Microsc. Res. Technol. 2013, 76, 209–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schultz, T.P.; Nicholas, D.D.; Preston, A.F. A brief review of the past, present and future of wood preservation. Pest Manag. Sci. Former. Pestic. Sci. 2007, 63, 784–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Viitanen, H. Factors Affecting Durability of Wood in Buildings. In Proceedings of the Third Nordic Symposium on Insect Pest Control in Museums, Stockholm, Sweden, 24–25 September 1998. [Google Scholar]
  33. Schiopu, N.; Tiruta-Barna, L. 6—Wood preservatives. In Toxicity of Building Materials; Pacheco-Torgal, F., Jalali, S., Fucic, A., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  34. Tuduce-Traistaru, A.-A.; Campean, M.; Timar, M.C. Compatibility indicators in developing consolidation materials with nanoparticle insertions for old wooden objects. Int. J. Conserv. Sci. 2010, 1, 219–226. [Google Scholar]
  35. Traistaru, A.T.; Timar, M.C.; Campean, M. Paraloid B72 versus Paraloid B72 with nano-ZnO additive as consolidants for wooden artefacts. Mater. Plast. 2012, 49, 293–300. [Google Scholar]
  36. Heaton, N. The preservation of stone. J. R. Soc. Arts 1921, 70, 124–139. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bell, F.G.; Coulthard, J.M. Stone preservation with illustrative examples from the United Kingdom. Environ. Geol. Water Sci. 1990, 16, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gauri, K.L. The Preservation of Stone. Sci. Am. 1978, 238, 126–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Toniolo, L.; Poli, T.; Castelvetro, V. Tailoring new fluorinated acrylic copolymers as protective coatings for marble. J. Cult. Herit. 2002, 3, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ion, R.-M.; Fierascu, R.-C.; Fierascu, I. Influence of Fântâniṭa lake (chalk lake) water on the degradation of basarabi–murfatlar churches. In Engineering Geology for Society and Territory-Volume 8; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  41. Scherer, G.W. New treatment for corrosion-resistant coatings for marble and consolidation of limestone. In Proceedings of the Jardins de Pierres: Conservation de la Pierre Dans Les Parcs, Jardins et Cimetières, Paris, 22–24 June 2011; pp. 289–294. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sassoni, E.; Graziani, G.; Franzoni, E. An innovative phosphate-based consolidant for limestone. Part 1: Effectiveness and compatibility in comparison With ethyl silicate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 102, 918–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sassoni, E.; Graziani, G.; Franzoni, E. An innovative phosphate-based consolidant for limestone. Part 2: Durability in comparison with ethyl silicate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 102, 931–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kroftova, K.; Smidtova, M.; Kuritka, I. Nanotechnology In The Cultural Heritage-Influence Of Nanospensions Adopted By Nanoparticles Of Tio2 For Cleaning The Surface Of Historical Plasters. Civ. Eng. J. Staveb. Obz. 2017, 3, 216–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Baglioni, P.; Giorgi, R. Soft and hard nanomaterials for restoration and conservation of cultural heritage. Soft Matter 2006, 2, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Papadopoulos, A.N.; Bikiaris, D.N.; Mitropoulos, A.C. Nanomaterials and chemical modifications for enhanced key wood properties: A review. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Rassam, G.; Abdi, Y.; Abdi, A. Deposition of TiO2 nano-particles on wood surfaces for UV and moisture protection. J. Exp. Nanosci. 2012, 7, 468–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Wang, X.; Liu, S.; Chang, H. Sol-gel deposition of TiO2 nanocoatings on wood surfaces with enhanced hydrophobicity and photostability. Wood Fiber Sci. 2014, 46, 109–117. [Google Scholar]
  49. Van Chu, T.; Van Chuong, P.; Tuong, V.M. Wettability of wood pressure-treated with TiO2 gel under hydrothermal conditions. BioResources 2014, 9, 2396–2404. [Google Scholar]
  50. Clausen, C.A.; Green, F.; Kartal, S.N. Weatherability and leach resistance of wood impregnated with nano-zinc oxide. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2010, 5, 1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Weichelt, F.; Emmler, R.; Flyunt, R. ZnO-Based UV Nanocomposites for Wood Coatings in Outdoor Applications. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2010, 295, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kubel, H.; Pizzi, A. Protection of wood surfaces with metallic oxides. J. Wood Chem. Technol. 1981, 1, 75–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Green, F.; Arango, R.A. Wood Protection by Commercial Silver Formulations against Eastern Subterranean Termites. Available online: https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/31143 (accessed on 10 February 2020).
  54. Wu, Y.; Yao, C.; Hu, Y. Comparative Performance of Three Magnesium Compounds on Thermal Degradation Behavior of Red Gum Wood. Materials 2014, 7, 637–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Lu, Y.; Feng, M.; Zhan, H. Preparation of SiO2–wood composites by an ultrasonic-assisted sol–gel technique. Cellulose 2014, 21, 4393–4403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Matsunaga, H.; Kiguchi, M.; Evans, P. Micro-distribution of metals in wood treated with a nano-copper wood preservative. In Proceedings of the International Research Group on Wood Protection Annual Meeting (IRG/WP), Jackson Lake, WY, USA, 20–24 May 2007. [Google Scholar]
  57. Waked, A. Nano materials applications for conservation of cultural heritage. WIT Trans. Built. Environ. 2011, 118, 577–588. [Google Scholar]
  58. Chen, X.; Mao, S.S. Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: Synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2891–2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Devrim, B.; Bozkır, A. Chapter 7—Nanocarriers and Their Potential Application as Antimicrobial Drug Delivery. In Nanostructures for Antimicrobial Therapy; Ficai, A., Grumezescu, A.M., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  60. He, Z.; Que, W.; Xie, H. Titanium Dioxide: Structure, Properties and Applications. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287364530_Titanium_dioxide_Structure_properties_and_applications (accessed on 15 February 2020).
  61. Kuznetsova, I.; Blaskov, V.; Stambolova, I. TiO2 pure phase brookite with preferred orientation, synthesized as a spin-coated film. Mater. Lett. 2005, 59, 3820–3823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lee, J.H.; Yang, Y.S. Effect of HCl concentration and reaction time on the change in the crystalline state of TiO2 prepared from aqueous TiCl4 solution by precipitation. J. Eur. Ceram Soc. 2005, 25, 3573–3578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Gotić, M.; Ivanda, M.; Sekulić, A. Microstructure of nanosized TiO2 obtained by sol-gel synthesis. Mater. Lett. 1996, 28, 225–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bessekhouad, Y.; Robert, D.; Weber, J. Preparation of TiO2 nanoparticles by Sol-Gel route. Int. J. Photoenergy 2003, 5, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Szurkalo, M.; Oliveira, E.; Bento, R. Synthesis and Characterization of TiO2 Films Obtained by Sol-Gel Method. In Proceedings of the 1st Pan American Conference of Nanotechnology-PanNANO-2107, Fundamentals and Applications to Shape the Future, Guarujá, SP, Brazil, 27–30 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
  66. Sugimoto, T.; Zhou, X.; Muramatsu, A. Synthesis of uniform anatase TiO2 nanoparticles by gel–sol method: 4. Shape control. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 259, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sugimoto, T.; Zhou, X.; Muramatsu, A. Synthesis of uniform anatase TiO2 nanoparticles by gel–sol method: 3. Formation process and size control. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2003, 259, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sugimoto, T.; Zhou, X.; Muramatsu, A. Synthesis of uniform anatase TiO2 nanoparticles by gel–sol method: 1. Solution chemistry of Ti (OH) n (4− n)+ complexes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2002, 252, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Tsega, M.; Dejene, F. Influence of acidic pH on the formulation of TiO2 nanocrystalline powders with enhanced photoluminescence property. Heliyon 2017, 3, e00246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. La Russa, M.F.; Ruffolo, S.A.; Rovella, N. Multifunctional TiO2 coatings for cultural heritage. Prog. Org. Coat. 2012, 74, 186–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Filpo, G.; Palermo, A.; Rachiele, F. Preventing fungal growth in wood by titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2013, 85, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jnido, G.; Ohms, G.; Viöl, W. Deposition of TiO2 Thin Films on Wood Substrate by an Air Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Jet. Coatings 2019, 9, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Espitia, P.J.P.; Otoni, C.G.; Soares, N.F.F. Chapter 34—Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles for Food Packaging Applications. In Antimicrobial Food Packaging; Barros-Velázquez, J., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  74. Ekielski, A. Interactions Between Food Ingredients and Nanocomponents Used for Composite Packaging. In Encyclopedia of Food Chemistry; Melton, L., Shahidi, F., Varelis, P., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  75. Arrieta, M.P.; Peponi, L.; López, D. 12—An overview of nanoparticles role in the improvement of barrier properties of bioplastics for food packaging applications. In Food Packaging; Grumezescu, A.M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  76. Moezzi, A.; McDonagh, A.M.; Cortie, M.B. Zinc oxide particles: Synthesis, properties and applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 185, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. David, M.E.; Ion, R.-M.; Andrei, E.R. Superhydrophobic Coatings Based On Cellulose Acetate For Pinewood Preservation. J. Sci. Arts 2020, 1, 171–182. [Google Scholar]
  78. Clausen, C.A.; Kartal, S.N.; Arango, R.A. The role of particle size of particulate nano-zinc oxide wood preservatives on termite mortality and leach resistance. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Weichelt, F.; Beyer, M.; Emmler, R. Zinc Oxide Based Coatings for the UV-Protection of Wood for Outdoor Applications. In Macromolecular Symposia; WILEY-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  80. Yeh, Y.-C.; Creran, B.; Rotello, V.M. Gold nanoparticles: Preparation, properties, and applications in bionanotechnology. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 1871–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Grigore, M.E.; Ion, R.-M.; Iancu, L. Tailored porphyrin–gold nanoparticles for biomedical applications. J. Porphyr. Phthalocya. 2019, 23, 766–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Louis, C.; Pluchery, O. Gold Nanoparticles for Physics, Chemistry and Biology; World Scientific: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  83. Abdelhalim, M.A.K.; Mady, M.M.; Ghannam, M.M. Physical properties of different gold nanoparticles: Ultraviolet-visible and fluorescence measurements. J. Nanomed. Nanotechol. 2012, 3, 178–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Chow, P.E. Gold Nanoparticles: Properties, Characterization and Fabrication; NOVA Science Publishers Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  85. Ramalingam, V. Multifunctionality of gold nanoparticles: Plausible and convincing properties. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 271, 101989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Taghiyari, H. Nanotechnology in wood and wood-composite materials. J. Nanomater. Mol. Nanotechnol. 2014, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Welles, A.E. Silver Nanoparticles: Properties, Characterization and Applications; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  88. Zhang, X.-F.; Liu, Z.-G.; Shen, W. Silver nanoparticles: Synthesis, characterization, properties, applications, and therapeutic approaches. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Lee, S.H.; Jun, B.-H. Silver Nanoparticles: Synthesis and Application for Nanomedicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Chouhan, N. Silver Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization and Applications. In Silver Nanoparticles: Fabrication, Characterization and Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  91. Zivic, F.; Grujovic, N.; Mitrovic, S. Characteristics and applications of silver nanoparticles. In Commercialization of Nanotechnologies–A Case Study Approach; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  92. Nakamura, S.; Sato, M.; Sato, Y. Synthesis and application of silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) for the prevention of infection in healthcare workers. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Liu, H.-L.; Dai, S.A.; Fu, K.-Y. Antibacterial properties of silver nanoparticles in three different sizes and their nanocomposites with a new waterborne polyurethane. Int. J. Nanomed. 2010, 5, 1017. [Google Scholar]
  94. Burdușel, A.-C.; Gherasim, O.; Grumezescu, A.M. Biomedical Applications of Silver Nanoparticles: An Up-to-Date Overview. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Berrocal, A.; Rodriguez-Zuniga, A.; Veja-Baudrit, J. Effect of silver nanoparticles on white-rot wood decay and some physical properties of three tropical wood species. Wood Fiber Sci. 2014, 46, 527–538. [Google Scholar]
  96. Mantanis, G.I.; Papadopoulos, A.N. The sorption of water vapour of wood treated with a nanotechnology compound. Wood Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 515–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ropp, R.C. Chapter 3—Group 16 (O, S, Se, Te) Alkaline Earth Compounds. In Encyclopedia of the Alkaline Earth Compounds; Ropp, R.C., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  98. Küünal, S.; Rauwel, P.; Rauwel, E. Chapter 14—Plant extract mediated synthesis of nanoparticles. In Emerging Applications of Nanoparticles and Architecture Nanostructures; Barhoum, A., Makhlouf, A.S.H., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  99. Dwight, D.W. 1.08—Glass Fiber Reinforcements. In Comprehensive Composite Materials; Kelly, A., Zweben, C., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  100. Westengen, H.; Rashed, H.M.M.A. Magnesium: Alloying. In Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  101. Franco Castillo, I.; García Guillén, E.; de la Fuente, J.M. Preventing fungal growth on heritage paper with antifungal and cellulase inhibiting magnesium oxide nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. B 2019, 7, 6412–6419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Chirita, M.; Grozescu, I.; Taubert, L. Fe2O3–nanoparticles, physical properties and their photochemical and photoelectrochemical applications. Chem. Bull. 2009, 54, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  103. Martinez, A.; Garcia, M.; Perry, D. Study of The Properties Of Iron Oxide Nanostructures. Res. Nanotechnol. Dev. 2015, 19, 184–193. [Google Scholar]
  104. Matei, E.; Predescu, A.; Vasile, E. Properties of magnetic iron oxides used as materials for wastewater treatment. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2011, 304, 012022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Teja, A.S.; Koh, P.-Y. Synthesis, properties, and applications of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Prog. Cryst. Growth. Charact. Mater. 2009, 55, 22–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Schauwecker, C.F.; McDonald, A.G.; Preston, A.F. Use of iron oxides to influence the weathering characteristics of wood surfaces: A systematic survey of particle size, crystal shape and concentration. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2014, 72, 669–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Knaebe, M.T. Paint, Stain, Varnish, or Preservative? It’s Your Choice. USDA For. Serv. For. Prod. Lab. FinishLine 2013, 4, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  108. Joni, I.; Nulhakim, L.; Vanitha, M. Characteristics of crystalline silica (SiO2) particles prepared by simple solution method using sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) precursor. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1080, 012006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Musić, S.; Filipović-Vinceković, N.; Sekovanić, L. Precipitation of amorphous SiO2 particles and their properties. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2011, 28, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Du, S.-Q.; Ke, Y.-C.; Liu, Q.-L. Preparation and Properties of SiO~ 2 Grease by Nano Scale SiO~ 2 With Large Specific Surface Area. Acta Pet. Sin. Pet. Process. Sect. 2007, 23, 111. [Google Scholar]
  111. Doubek, S.; Borůvka, V.; Zeidler, A. Effect of the passive chemical modification of wood with silicon dioxide (silica) on its properties and inhibition of moulds. Wood Res. 2018, 63, 599–616. [Google Scholar]
  112. Borůvka, V.; Zeidler, A.; Doubek, S. Impact Of Silicon-Based Chemicals On Selected Physical And Mechanical Properties Of Wood. Wood Res. 2016, 61, 513–524. [Google Scholar]
  113. Fu, Y.; Liu, X.; Cheng, F. Modification of the Wood Surface Properties of Tsoongiodendron odorum Chun with Silicon Dioxide by a Sol-gel Method. BioResources 2016, 11, 10273–10285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Nguyen, H.C.; Nguyen, T.T.; Dao, T.H. Preparation of Ag/SiO2 nanocomposite and assessment of its antifungal effect on soybean plant (a Vietnamese species DT-26). Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2016, 7, 045014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Grigore, M.; Biscu, E.; Holban, A. Methods of synthesis, properties and biomedical applications of CuO nanoparticles. Pharmaceuticals 2016, 9, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Balık, M.; Bulut, V.; Erdogan, I.Y. Optical, structural and phase transition properties of Cu2O, CuO and Cu2O/CuO: Their photoelectrochemical sensor applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 18744–18755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Abaker, M.; Umar, A.; Baskoutas, S. Structural and optical properties of CuO layered hexagonal discs synthesized by a low-temperature hydrothermal process. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2011, 44, 155405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Jabbar, S. Synthesis of CuO Nano structure via Sol-Gel and Precipitation Chemical Methods. Eng. J. 2017, 12, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Shiny, K.; Sundararaj, R.; Mamatha, N. A new approach to wood protection: Preliminary study of biologically synthesized copper oxide nanoparticle formulation as an environmental friendly wood protectant against decay fungi and termites. Maderas Cienc. Tecnol. 2019, 21, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Akhtari, M.; Nicholas, D. Evaluation of particulate zinc and copper as wood preservatives for termite control. Eur. J. Wood Wood Prod. 2013, 71, 395–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Rahaman, M.M. Antifungal Activity of Copper Oxide (CuO) Nanoparticle (NP). 2012. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320112916_Antifungal_activity_of_Copper_oxide_CuO_nanoparticle_NP (accessed on 10 March 2020).
  122. Dadi, R.; Azouani, R.; Traore, M. Antibacterial activity of ZnO and CuO nanoparticles against gram positive and gram negative strains. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 104, 109968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Kartal, S.N.; Terzi, E.; Woodward, B. Removal of nano-and micronized-copper from treated wood by chelating agents. In Proceedings of the IRG Annual Meeting: The International Research Group on Wood Protection, Stockholm, Sweden, 16–20 June 2013. [Google Scholar]
  124. Xie, J.; Chen, L.; Srivatsan, M. Tubular nanostructured materials for bioapplications. Biosens. Info-Tech Sens. Syst. 2009, 7291, 729103-1–729103-10. [Google Scholar]
  125. Yuan, Z.-Y.; Su, B.-L. Titanium oxide nanotubes, nanofibers and nanowires. Colloid Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2004, 241, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Samadipakchin, P.; Mortaheb, H.R.; Zolfaghari, A. ZnO nanotubes: Preparation and photocatalytic performance evaluation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2017, 337, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Satish, S.; Tharmavaram, M.; Rawtani, D. Halloysite nanotubes as a nature’s boon for biomedical applications. Nanobiomedicine 2019, 6, 1849543519863625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Sofiah, A.G.N.; Samykano, M.; Kadirgama, K. Metallic nanowires: Mechanical properties—Theory and experiment. Appl. Mater. Today 2018, 11, 320–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Hubbe, H.; Mendes, E.; Boukany, P.E. Polymeric Nanowires for Diagnostic Applications. Micromachines 2019, 10, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Ghassan, A.A.; Mijan, N.-A.; Taufiq-Yap, Y.H. Nanomaterials: An Overview of Nanorods Synthesis and Optimization. In Nanorods-An Overview from Synthesis to Emerging Device Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Scoville, C.; Cole, R.; Hogg, J. Carbon Nanotubes. Notes Lect. 1991, 1–11. Available online: https://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/csep590a/08sp/projects/CarbonNanotubes.pdf, (accessed on 12 March 2020).
  132. Holban, A.M.; Grumezescu, A.M. Nanoarchitectonics for Smart Delivery and Drug Targeting; William Andrew: Oxford, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  133. Saleh, H.M.; Koller, M. Introductory Chapter: Carbon Nanotubes. In Carbon Nanotubes; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Vidu, R.; Rahman, M.; Mahmoudi, M. Nanostructures: A platform for brain repair and augmentation. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Yengejeh, S.I.; Kazemi, S.A.; Öchsner, A. A Primer on the Geometry of Carbon Nanotubes and Their Modifications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  136. Aqel, A.; El-Nour, K.M.A.; Ammar, R.A. Carbon nanotubes, science and technology part (I) structure, synthesis and characterisation. Arab. J. Chem. 2012, 5, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Prasek, J.; Drbohlavova, J.; Chomoucka, J. Methods for carbon nanotubes synthesis. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 15872–15884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Eatemadi, A.; Daraee, H.; Karimkhanloo, H. Carbon nanotubes: Properties, synthesis, purification, and medical applications. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  139. Xu, H.; Zeiger, B.W.; Suslick, K.S. Sonochemical synthesis of nanomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2555–2567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Wang, W.; Huang, J.; Wang, D. Low-temperature hydrothermal synthesis of multiwall carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2005, 43, 1328–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Jagadish, K.; Srikantaswamy, S.; Abhilash, M.R. Hydrothermal Synthesis of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes using Polystyrene: Purification and Characterization. Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2018, 6, 2085–2089. [Google Scholar]
  142. Manafi, S.; Nadali, H.; Irani, H.R. Low temperature synthesis of multi-walled carbon nanotubes via a sonochemical/hydrothermal method. Mater. Lett. 2008, 62, 4175–4176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Chrzanowska, J.; Hoffman, J.; Małolepszy, A. Synthesis of carbon nanotubes by the laser ablation method: Effect of laser wavelength. Phys. Status Solidi 2015, 252, 1860–1867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Wu, H.; Li, Z.; Ji, D. One-pot synthesis of nanostructured carbon materials from carbon dioxide via electrolysis in molten carbonate salts. Carbon 2016, 106, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Dimitrov, A.T.; Tomova, A.; Grozdanov, A. Production, purification, characterization, and application of CNTs. In Nanotechnological Basis for Advanced Sensors; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  146. Yahyazadeh, A.; Khoshandam, B. Carbon nanotube synthesis via the catalytic chemical vapor deposition of methane in the presence of iron, molybdenum, and iron–molybdenum alloy thin layer catalysts. Results Phys. 2017, 7, 3826–3837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Seidel, R.; Duesberg, G.S.; Unger, E. Chemical vapor deposition growth of single-walled carbon nanotubes at 600 C and a simple growth model. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 1888–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Staudenmaier, L. Verfahren zur darstellung der graphitsäure. Ber. Deutsch. Chem. Ges. 1899, 32, 1394–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Lee, D.; Seo, J. preparation of Carbon Nanotubes from Graphite Powder at Room Temperature. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45927880_Preparation_of_carbon_nanotubes_from_graphite_powder_at_room_temperature (accessed on 20 March 2020).
  150. Ali, B.; Radiah, D.; Sapuan, S. Preparation of Carbon Nanotubes via Chemical Technique (Modified Staudenmaier Method). Nanosci. Nanotechnol. A 2017, 7, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Silva, M.; Felgueiras, H.; de Amorim, M. Carbon based membranes with modified properties: Thermal, morphological, mechanical and antimicrobial. Cellulose 2020, 27, 1497–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Shokrieh, M.M.; Saeedi, A.; Chitsazzadeh, M. Mechanical properties of multi-walled carbon nanotube/polyester nanocomposites. J. Nanostruct. Chem. 2013, 3, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Salvetat, J.-P.; Bonard, J.-M.; Thomson, N. Mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes. App. Phys. A 1999, 69, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Yakobson, B.I.; Avouris, P. Mechanical properties of carbon nanotubes. In Carbon Nanotubes; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  155. Kulik, A.J.; Kis, A.; Lukic, B.; Lee, K.; Forró, L. Mechanical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes. In Fundamentals of Friction and Wear; Gnecco, E., Meyer, E., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  156. Li, F.; Cheng, H.-M.; Su, G. Tensile strength of single-walled carbon nanotubes directly measured from their macroscopic ropes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 3161–3163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Zhang, Y.; Fang, J.; Li, J. The effect of carbon nanotubes on the mechanical properties of wood plastic composites by selective laser sintering. Polymers 2017, 9, 728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  158. Flores, N.; Moya, R.; Rodríguez-Zúñiga, A. Application of multilayer carbon nanotubes (mwcnt) on nine tropical wood of costa rica and their impact on mechanical resistance. Interciencia 2019, 44, 88–93. [Google Scholar]
  159. Farsheh, A.T.; Talaeipour, M.; Hemmasi, A.H. Investigation on the mechanical and morphological properties of foamed nanocomposites based on wood flour/PVC/multi-walled carbon nanotube. BioResources 2011, 6, 841–852. [Google Scholar]
  160. Kim, S.J.; Han, J.-W.; Kim, B. Single walled carbon nanotube based air pocket encapsulated ultraviolet sensor. ACS Sens. 2017, 2, 1679–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Najafi, E.; Shin, K. Radiation resistant polymer–carbon nanotube nanocomposite thin films. Colloid Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2005, 257, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Nguyen, T.; Petersen, E.J.; Pellegrin, B. Impact of UV irradiation on multiwall carbon nanotubes in nanocomposites: Formation of entangled surface layer and mechanisms of release resistance. Carbon 2017, 116, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Petersen, E.J.; Lam, T.; Gorham, J.M. Methods to assess the impact of UV irradiation on the surface chemistry and structure of multiwall carbon nanotube epoxy nanocomposites. Carbon 2014, 69, 194–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Eseev, M.; Goshev, A.; Kapustin, S. Simple Method of Creating Hydrophobic Surfaces Based on Modified MW-CNTs. Mater. Sci. 2019, 1, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  165. Sulym, I.; Kubiak, A.; Jankowska, K. Superhydrophobic MWCNTs/PDMS-nanocomposite materials: Preparation and characterization. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process 2019, 55, 1394–1400. [Google Scholar]
  166. Ray, B.C.; Prusty, R.K.; Rathore, D.K. Fibrous Polymeric Composites: Environmental Degradation and Damage; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  167. Ferrari, A. THE EACH PROJECT—Cultural Heritage—Second Report January 2011. Available online: www.eachproject.eu (accessed on 12 February 2020).
  168. Ioannides, M.; Fritsch, D.; Leissner, J. Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference (EuroMed 2012), Lemessos, Cyprus, 29 October–3 November 2012. [Google Scholar]
  169. Cestari, C.; Marzi, T.; Invernizzi, S. Use of nanotechnologies for conservation, reinforcement and maintenance: Timber construction in cultural heritage of the mediterranean basin. In Proceedings of the 4th International Congress on “Science and Technology for the Safeguard of Cultural Heritage in the Mediterranean Basin, Cairo, Egypt, 6–8 December 2009. [Google Scholar]
  170. Valentini, F.; Carbone, M.; Palleschi, G. Carbon nanostructured materials for applications in nano-medicine, cultural heritage, and electrochemical biosensors. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405, 451–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Alexopoulos, N.D.; Boutsioukou, S.; Giannakopoulou, F. Reinforcement at the nanoscale of cementitous materials made from white cement with multiwall carbon nanotubes. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Mechanics and Materials in Design, Ponta Delgada/Azores, Portugal, 26–30 July 2015. [Google Scholar]
  172. Metaxa, Z.; Boutsioukou, S.; Nitodas, S. Nano-additions of multiwall carbon nanotubes in white cement for restoration of monuments of Cultural Heritage. In Proceedings of the Conference “Science in TEchnology”, Athens, Greece, 5–7 November 2015. [Google Scholar]
  173. Nitodas, S.F.; Glonatech, S.A.; Kourkoulis, S.K. Use of Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes in Cement-Based Materials for the Real-Time Monitoring of Smart Structures. In Proceedings of the AIChE Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 10 November 2015; Available online: https://www.aiche.org/conferences/aiche-annual-meeting/2015/proceeding/paper/261b-use-multi-wall-carbon-nanotubes-cement-based-materials-real-time-monitoring-smart-structures (accessed on 22 March 2020).
  174. Eseev, M.; Goshev, A.; Kapustin, S. Creation of Superhydrophobic Coatings Based on MWCNTs Xerogel. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  175. Krishnamurthy, M.; Murugan, P.; Murali, A. ‘Click’polymer of carbon nanotubes for superhydrophobic glass and leather. Green Mater. 2017, 5, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Chen, J.; Lu, G. Carbon nanotube-nanoparticle hybrid structures. In Carbon Nanotubes; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  177. Meng, L.; Fu, C.; Lu, Q. Advanced technology for functionalization of carbon nanotubes. Prog. Nat. Sci. 2009, 19, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Capula-Colindres, S.; Aguir, K.; Cervantes-Sodi, F. Carbon Nanotubes Functionalized by Nanoparticles of Platinum. Mater. Sci. Forum 2014, 793, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Chinh, V.D.; Speranza, G.; Migliaresi, C. Synthesis of gold nanoparticles decorated with multiwalled carbon nanotubes (Au-MWCNTs) via cysteaminium chloride functionalization. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  180. Arumugam, S.; Chakkarapani, L.D. Metal nanoparticles functionalized carbon nanotubes for efficient catalytic application. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 1050e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Sarlak, N.; Sameri, Z.; Pourrahim, R. Design of an Immunochromatographic Kit Using Hybrid Nanomaterial for Rapid Detection of Disease. In Advances in Phytonanotechnology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  182. Sarlak, N.; Sameri, Z.; Meyer, T.J. Design and characteristics of an optical nanosensor based on immobilization of MWCNTs-g-PCA-Au on a triacetylcellulose membrane for determination trace amounts of thiourea. NSTI-Nanotech 2013, 1, 194–197. [Google Scholar]
  183. Rajabzade, H.; Daneshgar, P.; Tazikeh, E. Functionalized carbon nanotubes with gold nanoparticles to fabricate a sensor for hydrogen peroxide determination. J. Chem. 2012, 9, 2540–2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Karumuri, A.K.; Oswal, D.P.; Hostetler, H.A. Silver nanoparticles supported on carbon nanotube carpets: Influence of surface functionalization. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 145603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  185. Dinh, N.X.; Quy, N.V.; Huy, T.Q. Decoration of silver nanoparticles on multiwalled carbon nanotubes: Antibacterial mechanism and ultrastructural analysis. J. Nanomater. 2015, 2015, 814379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  186. Behnam, M.A.; Emami, F.; Sobhani, Z. Novel combination of silver nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes for plasmonic photo thermal therapy in melanoma cancer model. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2018, 8, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  187. Ramoraswi, N.O.; Ndungu, P.G. Photo-Catalytic Properties of TiO2 Supported on MWCNTs, SBA-15 and Silica-Coated MWCNTs Nanocomposites. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2015, 10, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  188. Mohamed, M.M.; Osman, G.; Khairou, K. Fabrication of Ag nanoparticles modified TiO2–CNT heterostructures for enhanced visible light photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants and bacteria. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 1847–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. García-Valdivieso, G.; Velázquez-Salazar, J.J.; Samaniego-Benítez, J.E. Zinc oxide decorated multi-walled carbon nanotubes: Their bolometric properties. Nanotechnology 2018, 29, 125607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Khan, J.; Ilyas, S.; Akram, B. Zno/NiO coated multi-walled carbon nanotubes for textile dyes degradation. Arab. J. Chem. 2018, 11, 880–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Shariatzadeh, B.; Moradi, O. Surface functionalization of multiwalled carbon nanotubes with chitosan and magnesium oxide nanoparticles by microwave-assisted synthesis. Polym. Compos. 2014, 35, 2050–2055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Korneva, G.; Ye, H.; Gogotsi, Y. Carbon nanotubes loaded with magnetic particles. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 879–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. He, H.; Gao, C. Synthesis of Fe3O4/Pt nanoparticles decorated carbon nanotubes and their use as magnetically recyclable catalysts. J. Nanomat. 2011, 2011, 193510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. González-Domínguez, E.; Iturrioz-Rodríguez, N.; Padín-González, E. Carbon nanotubes gathered onto silica particles lose their biomimetic properties with the cytoskeleton becoming biocompatible. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 6317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  195. Zheng, J.; Zhang, Q.; He, X. Nanocomposites of Carbon Nanotube (CNTs)/CuO with High Sensitivity to Organic Volatiles at Room Temperature. Procedia Eng. 2012, 36, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  196. Zhang, Z.; Lin, Z.; Li, C. Controlled preparation of CuO and Cu nanoparticles attached on carbon nanotubes for glucose sensing. Mater. Technol. 2015, 30, A186–A191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Graph of scientific papers published per year in the period 2000–2020 regarding nanoparticles used to consolidate different artifacts. From Scopus (https://www.scopus.com).
Figure 1. Graph of scientific papers published per year in the period 2000–2020 regarding nanoparticles used to consolidate different artifacts. From Scopus (https://www.scopus.com).
Materials 13 02064 g001
Figure 2. Nanomaterials used as consolidates in conservation and restoration of cultural heritage.
Figure 2. Nanomaterials used as consolidates in conservation and restoration of cultural heritage.
Materials 13 02064 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of the treated wood: (a) old wood, (b) old wood treated with HAp, (c) old wood treated with Au, (d) old wood treated with Au and Hap. Reused from an open access source [1].
Figure 3. SEM images of the treated wood: (a) old wood, (b) old wood treated with HAp, (c) old wood treated with Au, (d) old wood treated with Au and Hap. Reused from an open access source [1].
Materials 13 02064 g003
Figure 4. Graphene and carbon nanotubes as structures: (A) single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) and (B) multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT).
Figure 4. Graphene and carbon nanotubes as structures: (A) single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) and (B) multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT).
Materials 13 02064 g004
Table 1. Nanoparticles used in the literature as possible enhancers for wood and their properties.
Table 1. Nanoparticles used in the literature as possible enhancers for wood and their properties.
NanomaterialsPropertiesReferences
TiO2UV protection, hydrophobicity, self-cleaning, fire resistance, protection against microorganisms, dimensional stability[47,48,49]
ZnOUV protection, resistance to fire and scratches, hydrophobicity, protection against microorganisms, dimensional stability[50,51,52]
AuProtection against microorganisms[1,34]
Ag[53]
MgOUV protection, hydrophobicity, protection against microorganisms[54]
FeOUV protection, protection against microorganisms[34]
SiO2Fire resistance, self-cleaning, hydrophobicity, scratch resistance[55]
CuOProtection against microorganisms[56]
HAp/AuAnti-aging protection, mechanical resistance, hydrophobicity[1]
Table 2. Functionalized CNTs and their applications.
Table 2. Functionalized CNTs and their applications.
StructuresApplicationsReferences
MWCNT-g-PCA-Au *Lateral-flow immunochromatography assay for the screening[181]
MWCNT-g-APC-AuOptical nanosensor for determination of trace amounts of thiourea in spring water and orange peel[182]
MWCNT-AuSensor for hydrogen peroxide determination[183]
MWCNT-ms-AgAntimicrobial agent[180]
SiO2-MWCNT/AgWater treatment (antimicrobial effect)[184]
MWCNT-AgAntimicrobial agent[185]
MWCNT-AgPlasmonic photo thermal therapy in melanoma cancer[186]
MWCNT-TiO2Photocatalytic activity[187]
MWCNT-Ag/TiO2Antimicrobial agent[188]
MWCNT-ZnOBolometric sensor[189]
MWCNT-ZnO/NiOTextile dyes degradation[190]
Cs-MWCNT/MgOAntimicrobial agent[191]
MWCNT-Fe3O4Drug delivery system[192]
MWCNT-Fe3O4Magnetic sensor[193]
SiO2-MWCNTNanodevice for medicine[194]
MWCNT-CuOChemical sensors with high sensitivity or catalysts with high activity to organic volatiles at low temperature[195]
MWCNT-CuOGlucose sensor[196]
CNT-PtSensors for ozone gas detection[178]
* PCA—poly(citric acid); Pt—platinum; ms—surfactant matrix; Cs—chitosan.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

David, M.E.; Ion, R.-M.; Grigorescu, R.M.; Iancu, L.; Andrei, E.R. Nanomaterials Used in Conservation and Restoration of Cultural Heritage: An Up-to-Date Overview. Materials 2020, 13, 2064. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13092064

AMA Style

David ME, Ion R-M, Grigorescu RM, Iancu L, Andrei ER. Nanomaterials Used in Conservation and Restoration of Cultural Heritage: An Up-to-Date Overview. Materials. 2020; 13(9):2064. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13092064

Chicago/Turabian Style

David, Madalina Elena, Rodica-Mariana Ion, Ramona Marina Grigorescu, Lorena Iancu, and Elena Ramona Andrei. 2020. "Nanomaterials Used in Conservation and Restoration of Cultural Heritage: An Up-to-Date Overview" Materials 13, no. 9: 2064. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13092064

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop