Next Article in Journal
The Influence of the Continuous Casting Conditions on the Properties of High-Strength Two-Phase CuMg Alloys
Previous Article in Journal
Fast and Efficient Piezo/Photocatalytic Removal of Methyl Orange Using SbSI Nanowires
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 13
Issue 21
10.3390/ma13214802
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Joining Alumina to Titanium Alloys Using Ag-Cu Sputter-Coated Ti Brazing Filler

by
Omid Emadinia
1,2,
Aníbal Guedes
3,
Carlos José Tavares
4 and
Sónia Simões
1,2,*
1
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
2
LAETA/INEGI—Institute of Science and Innovation in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Rua. Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, CMEMS-UMinho, University of Minho, Azurém, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal
4
Centre of Physics, University of Minho, Azurém, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(21), 4802; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214802
Submission received: 28 September 2020 / Revised: 16 October 2020 / Accepted: 24 October 2020 / Published: 28 October 2020
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The joining of alumina (Al2O3) to γ-TiAl and Ti6Al4V alloys, using Ag-Cu sputter-coated Ti brazing filler foil, was investigated. Brazing experiments were performed at 980 °C for 30 min in vacuum. The microstructure and chemical composition of the brazed interfaces were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy and by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, respectively. A microstructural characterization of joints revealed that sound multilayered interfaces were produced using this novel brazing filler. Both interfaces are composed mainly of α-Ti, along with Ti2(Ag,Cu) and TiAg intermetallics. In the case of the brazing of γ-TiAl alloys, α2-Ti3Al and γ-TiAl intermetallics are also detected at the interface. Bonding to Al2O3 is promoted by the formation of a quite hard Ti-rich layer, which may reach a hardness up to 1872 HV 0.01 and is possibly composed of a mixture of α-Ti and Ti oxides. Hardness distribution maps indicate that no segregation of either soft or brittle phases occurs at the central regions of the interfaces or near the base Ti alloys. In addition, a smooth hardness transition was established between the interface of Al2O3 to either γ-TiAl or Ti6Al4V alloys.

1. Introduction

High wear resistance, excellent thermal stability, or even thermal and electrical conductivity are attractive properties of advanced ceramics such as Al2O3 and zirconia. These ceramics are extensively applied in electronics, aerospace, nuclear and transportation industries [1]. However, the application of ceramics is limited for large production and complex shaped components due to inherit brittleness, hardness, and cost [2,3].
Titanium alloys are particularly attractive due to them having a low density, high specific strength and excellent corrosion resistance. However, poor high-temperature oxidation resistance limits the operating temperature of conventional Ti alloys to around 500 °C. In spite of this shortcoming, there is a growing interest in the development and joining of Ti-based alloys such as γ-TiAl, TiNi and Ti6Al4V [4,5].
The joining between Ti alloys and advanced ceramics can be a good option to overcome the limitations of Ti alloys at high temperatures. Dissimilar bonding allows the combination of these materials’ properties, extending their potential applications for the automotive and aerospace industries. The use of a ceramic part on a specific section of a complex metallic structure may grant an adequate performance at higher service temperatures. Nevertheless, dissimilar joining is particularly challenging. Indeed, due to the inherent differences in physical, thermal and chemical properties between metals and ceramics, it is quite difficult to produce adequate metal/ceramic joints. The application of ultrasonic bonding [6,7], electrical discharge pulse welding [8,9], solid state diffusion bonding [10,11], brazing [12,13], and laser lap joining [14] were reported in the literature for the joining of dissimilar materials. Moreover, some authors have prepared comprehensive reviews covering this field [15,16]. Brazing is widely used for the dissimilar bonding between advanced ceramics and Ti alloys. A major advantage of brazing, in comparison to other joining techniques, is related to the ease of producing interfaces that effectively buffer the residual stresses that arise from the mismatch between the coefficients of thermal expansion (CTEs) of ceramics and Ti alloys [17,18]. The commercial active brazing fillers used are often based on the Ag-Cu eutectic, with small additions of Ti which acts as an active element. However, joints resulting from brazing with Ag-based fillers usually present extensive segregation of (Ag) at the center of the interface [19], which limits the service temperature of joints to around 350 °C [20].
The success of brazing depends on having the appropriate heating apparatus, adequate temperature, and proper composition of brazing alloy. These parameters influence the microstructure of the brazed interface, which in turn plays a crucial role in the mechanical integrity and performance of joints. Paiva et al. [21] studied the influence of brazing temperature (850, 900 and 950 °C) on the microstructure and the shear strength of Al2O3/Ti joints brazed with an Ag-26.5Cu-3Ti (in wt.%) filler alloy. Though a brazing temperature increase resulted in the reduction in (Ag) and the increase in Ti at the interface, a decrease in the shear strength was observed and correlated with the formation of pores and cracks. A maximum shear strength was obtained for the joint processed at 850 °C for 40 min. Wu et al. [22] used a (Ag-28Cu)-3Ti foil of 190 µm thick to braze Al2O3 to Ti6Al4V alloy, and evaluated the influence of brazing temperature. The authors remarked the formation of complex oxide layers (Cu2Ti4O/Cu4Ti3O) at the vicinity of Al2O3 for joints brazed at 800 and 850 °C. By increasing the brazing temperature to 900 °C, this oxide transformed to another complex oxide type (Cu3Ti5O + CuAl2O4). It was reported to be (Ag) at all interfaces.
The brazing of an Al2O3 to Ti6Al4V alloy was also reported using filler alloys composed of TiB2 additive ball milled with Cu-Ti powder [23], the same additive milled with Cu powder [24], a commercial Ag-Cu-Ti powder mixed with B powder [25], and Ag-Cu eutectic powders mixed with different contents of B [3]. The common aspect of these studies involved the use of B for in situ formation of TiB whiskers in order to minimize the CTE between the base materials. It was also reported in these studies that the joint strength decreased when proper values of either brazing temperature or holding time were exceeded.
Cao et al. [26] evaluated the influence of an intermediate Cu layer (in 10, 40 and 120 µm) on a sandwiched eutectic Ag-Cu filler for brazing an Al2O3 to Ti6Al4V alloy. Brazing experiments were conducted between 800 and 950 °C, with holding times between 5 and 60 min; the maximum shear strength was obtained for joining at 825 °C for 10 min.
Regarding the brazing of the Al2O3 to γ-TiAl alloy, the use of active Ag-Cu-Ti powder brazing mixtures with TiH2 and B additives [17,27] and W additives [28] was reported. In these studies, the formation of complex oxides was observed at the Al2O3 side of the joints. The nature of these compounds was reported to be influenced by brazing temperature and the type of additive used. The use of a 50-µm foil of Ag-21Cu-4.5Ti (in wt.%) for brazing between 860 and 940 °C for 1 to 15 min [29] was reported to induce the formation of (Ag) and (Cu) at the interface complex oxide ((Cu,Al)3TiO3), which was observed in the vicinity of Al2O3. The maximum shear strength was obtained for joints processed at 900 °C, with a dwelling stage of 5 min.
A novel active filler, consisting of a Ti foil sputter-coated with Ag and Cu films, has been reported to be effective for brazing a γ-TiAl alloy to Hastelloy [30], and for producing similar γ-TiAl alloy joints [31]. γ-TiAl alloy/Hastelloy joints were processed at 900, 950 and 980 °C, but interfaces free of pores, cracks and without unbonded zones were only achieved after brazing at 980°C. The multilayered interfaces consisted mainly of Ti-Al and Ti-Ni-Al intermetallics close to the γ-TiAl alloy, and of Ti-rich, Ti-Ni, and Cr-Ni-Mo-rich phases near Hastelloy. The hardness of the interface, ranging from around 300 to 1100 HV0.01, was higher than both base materials, but no segregation of either (Ag) or coarse intermetallic particles was observed. For similar γ-TiAl alloy joints, brazing was successfully achieved at 950 and 980 °C. The interfaces consisted of a large central region composed essentially of α-Ti but also of Ti-Al and Ti-Ag compounds. Near the base of the γ-TiAl alloy, the interface consists of thin layers, mainly composed of Ti-Al intermetallics. In comparison to commercial Ag-Cu eutectic-based brazing alloys, the use of this Ag-Cu sputter-coated Ti brazing filler prevented the formation of either large amounts of (Ag) and hard phases at the interfaces, potentially enhancing the operating temperature of joints and eliminating the need of post-brazing heat treatments [20]. The reported results are promising for the prospective use of this filler for brazing other systems of dissimilar materials such as ceramics and metals.
In this context, the aim of the present study is to evaluate the use of this novel Ag-Cu sputter-coated Ti brazing filler in the joining of Al2O3 to γ-TiAl and to Ti6Al4V alloys. The interfacial microstructural and chemical features of joints were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The mechanical properties of the brazed interfaces were evaluated by the Vickers microhardness tests and a possible reaction mechanism promoting bonding is discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

The base materials used in this study were Al2O3, with a relative density of 95.7%, a γ-TiAl alloy (Ti-45Al-5Nb (at. %)), with a duplex microstructure (a mixture of γ-TiAl grains and of γ + α2 lamellar grains), and a Ti6Al4V α-β alloy. The base materials were wet ground with SiC paper to a 1200 mesh finish.
The production conditions as well as the microstructural characterization of the Ag-Cu sputter-coated Ti brazing filler were previously described [30,31]. The filler is composed of a Ti foil coated in both sides with a Ag film (20 µm) followed by a Cu film (5 µm); the total thickness of the filler is 150 µm. Prior to brazing, all materials were degreased in acetone with ultrasonic agitation and dried in air. The brazing experiments were conducted by a resistant furnace with a horizontal alumina tube, at 980 °C for 30 min in vacuum (better than 10−4 mbar) with heating and cooling rates set to 5 °C/min. This temperature was selected based on the better results in the brazing of similar and dissimilar γ-TiAl alloys using the same filler alloy [30,31].
Joints for microstructural characterization were prepared using conventional metallographic techniques. The microstructure of the interfaces was characterized by optical microscopy (OM) using for DM4000 equipment (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and by SEM using a FEI QUANTA 400 FEG equipment (Hillsboro, OR, USA). Chemical analysis of the interfaces was performed by the EDS technique (Oxford Instrument, Oxfordshire, UK). SEM/EDS analyses were performed at an accelerating voltage of 15 keV for mapping and for local analysis using the standardless quantification method.
The mechanical behavior of the of brazed interfaces was assessed by microhardness measurements on the polished interfaces. Vickers microhardness tests were performed with a 98-mN load (HV0.01) using Duramin-1 Struers equipment (Ballerup, Denmark). The hardness maps were obtained by indentation matrices up to 10 rows per 14 columns.

3. Results and Discussion

The success of using the Ag-Cu sputter-coated Ti brazing filler in the joining of Al2O3 to γ-TiAl and Ti6Al4V alloys was evaluated through the analysis of the results of the microstructural and chemical characterizations of the brazed interfaces.
OM and SEM images of the interface reveal that the brazing filler was effective in promoting the joining of Al2O3 to both γ-TiAl and Ti6Al4V alloys, after brazing at 980 °C with a dwelling stage of 30 min. Multilayered interfaces, apparently free of pores and cracks, were produced for both brazed systems of materials.
Figure 1 shows SEM images of the interfaces of Al2O3/γ-TiAl alloy and of Al2O3/Ti6Al4V joints. By the observation of Figure 1, it is evident that the microstructure of the interface is strongly influenced by the type of Ti alloy used as base material.
The Al2O3/γ-TiAl alloy interface can be divided into five different layers: a layer close to Al2O3 (Layer A), a thin layer composed of a dark matrix with bright particles dispersed (Layer B), a central layer (Layer C), a dark thin layer (Layer D), a light-grey layer (Layer E) and a diffusion layer (Layer F).
The Al2O3/Ti6Al4V interface exhibits a more complex microstructure and can be divided into six distinct reaction layers: a layer close to Al2O3 (Layer A) mainly composed of a dark-grey phase, followed by a layer consisting of a mixture of grey and bright particles (Layer B), two thin layers (Layers C and E) each bordering the central layer (Layer D) and both essentially composed of a bright phase, and finally, a layer formed close to Ti6Al4V (Layer F) that presents a similar microstructure to Layer B, although slightly coarser.
An EDS line profile in the SEM image of the Al2O3/γ-TiAl alloy interface is presented in Figure 2, showing that the layer close to Al2O3 (Layer A) is Ti-rich. A small declining gradient of oxygen is also observed in this layer, which may depict the formation of oxide(s) phase(s). The line profile also indicates that the sporadic larger bright particles observed close to Al2O3 are Ag-rich. Although Ag and Cu are detected in greater amounts on the Al2O3 side, these elements are present throughout the entire interface and Ag is also detected in the diffusion layer of the γ-TiAl alloy, to an approximate depth of 70 µm from the interface.
In order to identify the possible phases constituting the reaction layers formed at the interfaces, EDS chemical analyses were performed in conjunction with SEM observations and combined with the information provided by the Ti-Al [32], Ti-Al-Ag [33,34], Ti-Ag-Cu [33], Ti-Al-V [35], Ti-Al-Nb [36] and Ti-Al-Cu [37] equilibrium phase diagrams.
The Al2O3/γ-TiAl alloy multilayered interface can be observed in more detail in the SEM image presented in Figure 3. The EDS analysis result of each selected zone marked in Figure 3 is shown in Table 1. The Ti-Al [38], Ti-Ag [39] and Ti-Ag-Cu [40] phase diagrams with indication of the chemical compositions of the analyzed zones are presented in Figure 4, to explain the estimate of the possible nature of the main phases formed at the interface.
Layer A is essentially composed of Ti and consists of a grey matrix where bright particles are dispersed. The grey matrix (zone A1) should be α-Ti since it is composed of more than 98% Ti. Although the size of the white particles is smaller than the interaction volume of the EDS analysis, the results of zone A2 show an enrichment of Ag that is not observed in zone A1. Thus, it is reasonable to accept that the white particles may consist of a Ag-rich phase, which would result from the amount of Ag diffused from the filler foil having exceeded the low solubility limit of Ag in the α-Ti phase. It is also worthy of mentioning that the formation of a complex oxide layer at the vicinity of the Al2O3 was mentioned by some authors [27,29], when these base materials were joined using a commercial Ti-Ag-Cu brazing alloy. However, the formation of an oxide layer was not observed through the SEM/EDS characterization performed in the present study; this may be due to the fact that the oxide reaction layer is too thin to be detected by the techniques used in this investigation.
Layer B, which is located in the vicinity of Layer A, is mainly composed of α-Ti, mixed with a small amount of Ti-Ag intermetallics. Occasionally, white coarser particles (zone B1) consisting of (Ag) are observed in this layer, as illustrated in Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3. The chemical composition of zone B2 lies on the (α-Ti + TiAg) two-phase field on the isothermal section of the Ti-Al-Ag phase diagram (see Figure 4). However, based on the observation of the SEM image, this zone must be composed of a single phase. Since the chemical composition obtained by EDS is rather close to the α-Ti field, it can be concluded that it should be mainly constituted of α-Ti. It should be noted that the light-grey particles observed in this layer present the same chemical composition as the related particles observed in Layer C, corresponding to zones C1 and C2; these zones should consist of Ti2(Ag,Cu) and TiAg, respectively, in both layers.
The central zone of the interface (Layer C), is mainly composed of α-Ti + Ti2(Ag,Cu) with a few dispersed TiAg particles (brighter particles). As it can be observed in Figure 3, Layer C is not uniform. In the vicinity of Layer B, Layer C is mainly composed of a mixture of α-Ti, Ti2(Ag,Cu) and TiAg, but near Layer D, the predominant phase is clearly α-Ti.
Layer D should be mainly composed of α2-Ti3Al and, along with Layer E, which is composed of a mixture of α2-Ti3Al + γ-TiAl, promote bridging to the γ-TiAl alloy. Layer F is a diffusion layer that extends into the γ-TiAl alloy and is essentially composed of γ-TiAl intermetallics. It should be noted that Ag is detected up to ~3% (in %) in this layer. In previous works [30,31], a similar diffusion layer was already observed at the interface of γ-TiAl alloy joints processed using the same Ag-Cu sputter-coated Ti brazing filler. The formation of this layer was explained based on the interdiffusion occurring between the γ-TiAl alloy and the brazing filler foil in the course of the joining thermal cycle. As a result of this process, the α2-Ti3Al phase from the (α2 + γ) lamellar grains of the duplex microstructure was transformed into γ-TiAl, originating from a diffusion zone essentially composed of γ-TiAl. Contrarily to the single-phase γ-TiAl grains of the duplex microstructure (zone F1), the γ-TiAl grains resulting from the transformed lamellar grains (zone F2) dissolved a small amount of Ag.
Regarding the Al2O3/Ti6Al4V brazed interface, EDS elemental distribution maps of Ti, Al, Ag, Cu and O are shown in Figure 5. Based on the Ti map, the layer close to Al2O3 is rich in Ti and, in fact, this element is present throughout the whole interface; this result is similar to what has already been mentioned for the interface with a γ-TiAl alloy as base material. Based on the Ag map, it can be seen that the brightest layers and particles observed at the center of the interface are rich in this element. In addition, in the layer closest to Al2O3 it is also possible to observe that the smallest bright particles are rich in Ag. The distribution map of Cu shows that this element is dispersed throughout the entire interface, but appears to be in more significant amounts near the ceramic. Contrary to the Al2O3/γ-TiAl interface, a diffusion layer is not detected on the Ti6Al4V base material.
Figure 6 shows the zones on the interface of the Al2O3/Ti6Al4V joint where the EDS analysis were performed. The chemical compositions of these zones are presented in Table 2.
Layer A is similar to the one observed close to Al2O3 at the Al2O3/γ-TiAl alloy interface and is composed of α-Ti and small Ag-rich particles. Layer B is composed of a mixture of α-Ti, Ti2(Ag,Cu), and TiAg. A noticeable feature of the Al2O3/Ti6Al4V interface, establishing a marked difference in comparison to the Al2O3/γ-TiAl alloy interface, is the formation of Layers C and E, which are nearly parallel to each base material surface and composed essentially of bright TiAg particles. Located between these layers, Layer D consists of a mixture of lamellar constituent (α-Ti + Ti2(Ag,Cu)), coarse α-Ti (zone D2) grains and bright TiAg particles (zone D3) that are generally elongated and roughly perpendicular to the base materials. Layer F is a reaction layer, mainly composed of α-Ti and Ti2(Ag,Cu) that promotes bonding to the Ti6Al4V alloy.
The hardness distribution maps of the brazed joints are presented in Figure 7. The maps show the exception of the region corresponding to Layer A; the hardness variation is rather smooth throughout both interfaces and similar to the corresponding Ti base alloy. However, in Layer A, the hardness is much higher than in the other regions of the interface, reaching 1872 HV0.01—close to Al2O3. In addition, Layer A presents a sharp hardness gradient, as it decreases to 857 HV HV0.01 near Layer B. The hardness values presented by Ti-rich Layer A indicate that it should be essentially composed of hard phases, instead of only α-Ti. As reported in several studies [28,29], the reaction between Al2O3 and the Ti/Ag-Cu brazing filler must have resulted in the formation of a reaction layer, possibly essentially consisting of hard Ti oxides and/or mixed Ti-Al oxides. These phases play a crucial role in the establishment of joining, as they will ensure chemical compatibility and bonding between the ceramic base material and the metallic phases formed at the interface. The interfacial hardness values of the regions in Layer A near Al2O3 are consistent with the formation of Ti oxides and/or mixed Ti-Al oxides.
The microhardness maps also show that the segregation of brittle particles towards a specific zone of the interface or extensive formation of soft phases was avoided, contrary to what is reported in other studies. For instance, the use of Ag-based fillers was reported to induce the formation of large (Ag) segregation zones [26,27,28,29], limiting the operating temperature of joints to around 350 to 400 °C. In contrast, such features were prevented in the present investigation. This indicates that the use of the novel Ag-Cu sputter-coated Ti brazing filler potentially avoids the need for eventual post-joining heat treatments to eliminate or minimize the undesirable segregated phases formed at the brazed interfaces.
Since the results are similar to those observed in previous studies [30,31] and despite the significant influence of the type of Ti alloy used as the base material on the microstructure of the interface, a common mechanism can be pointed out to explain the formation of the microstructure of the interface in the joining of Al2O3 to Ti alloys. Figure 8 shows a schematic illustration of a possible mechanism for the formation of the interfaces.
Based on the reaction between the Ag- and Cu-sputtered films observed for different brazing temperatures for similar γ-TiAl alloy joints [31], interdiffusion within the brazing filler originates from the formation of an Ag-Cu-rich liquid phase upon heating to the brazing temperature. As soon as it is formed, this liquid begins to dissolve the neighboring zones (reaching eventually the Ti sputter-coated foil and the base materials), until the melt solubility limits are exceeded. Thus, on the Ti alloy base material side of the interface, the liquid will incorporate mainly Ti and Al, while on the Al2O3 side, the liquid will be enriched in Ti, Al and O. As the solubility limits are exceeded, precipitates will consolidate into continuous layers, enabling bridging between the base materials and the filler. Near Al2O3, besides a layer composed of α-Ti and small Ag-rich particles, a thin Ti-Al-O oxide layer may ensure bonding between the base ceramic and the metallic braze. The Ag-rich particles are formed probably in part due to the fact that Ag diffusion into the Al2O3 is rather limited, since no Ag was detected by the EDS analysis in Al2O3, not even near the interface, in contrast to the γ-TiAl alloy. The joining of the γ-TiAl alloy is promoted by the (α2-Ti3Al + γ-TiAl) layer, while a layer composed of α-Ti and Ti2(Ag,Cu) ensures bonding to Ti6Al4V.
However, the Ag- and the Cu-sputtered films are not fully consumed during the liquid phase formation process. So, as interdiffusion is occurring throughout the forming interface, the remain Ag and Cu either dissolve in the base materials or react with Ti and Al, leading, in this case, to the formation of Ti-Ag-Cu intermetallics throughout the central zone of the interface. The extent of diffusion is, however, different depending on the Ti alloy base material. For example, the diffusivity of Ag in the γ-TiAl and α2-Ti3Al phases, which are composed of the base γ-TiAl alloy, appears to be higher than in the α-Ti and β-Ti phases which constitute the Ti6Al4V microstructure. This difference in the diffusivity may justify some of the differences between the interfaces obtained when brazing the two different Ti alloys. For instance, in the case of the γ-TiAl alloy interface, the reaction products formed near the base material present quite low Ag contents. However, a rather extensive diffusion layer containing Ag was detected and extended to about 70 µm into the base intermetallic alloy. In contrast, the volume fraction of Ag-rich intermetallics of reaction products formed near the base of Ti4Al6V is significant, but in this case, no diffusion layer was detected.

4. Conclusions

The joining of Al2O3 to γ-TiAl and to Ti6Al4V alloys was investigated, using Ag-Cu sputter-coated Ti foil as brazing filler. Brazing was carried out at 980 °C for 30 min in vacuum and sound multilayered interfaces were obtained for both systems of joined materials.
Bonding to Al2O3 was promoted by the formation of a Ti-rich layer, possibly consisting of a mixture of α-Ti and Ti oxides. Joining to the γ-TiAl alloy and to Ti6Al4V was ensured by a (α2-Ti3Al + γ-TiAl) layer and by a (α-Ti + Ti2(Ag,Cu)) layer, respectively. The central zones of the interfaces consisted mainly of α-Ti, Ti2(Ag,Cu) and TiAg.
The hardness throughout both interfaces is relatively homogeneous, and similar to the hardness of both base Ti alloys; exception made to the Ti-rich layer formed near Al2O3. This layer is the hardest region of both interfaces and exhibits a steep declining hardness gradient, with approximate hardness values of 1872 HV0.01 close to Al2O3 and 857 HV HV0.01 near Layer B.
The results obtained in this investigation indicate that the use of Ag-Cu sputter-coated Ti foil as brazing filler has significant advantages for joining Al2O3 to either γ-TiAl and Ti6Al4V alloys. Indeed, this filler promotes the formation of more homogeneous interfaces, with a significant reduction in either (Ag) and brittle intermetallic phases, in comparison to interfaces obtained using other Ti-Ag-Cu brazing alloys, or composite brazing fillers reported in the literature. Therefore, it could potentially avoid the need post-joining heat treatments to eliminate or minimize the undesirable phases formed at the interfaces.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G., C.J.T. and S.S.; methodology, O.E.; validation, A.G., C.J.T. and S.S.; formal analysis, O.E., A.G. and S.S.; investigation, O.E.; resources, S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, O.E.; writing—review and editing, A.G., C.J.T. and S.S.; visualization, O.E. and S.S.; supervision, A.G. and S.S.; project administration, S.S.; funding acquisition, S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by: Project PTDC/CTM-CTM/31579/2017—POCI-01-0145-FEDER-031579- funded by FEDER funds through COMPETE2020—Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização (POCI) and by national funds (PIDDAC) through FCT/MCTES.

Acknowledgments

The authors also acknowledge the CEMUP (Centro de Materiais da Universidade do Porto) for microscopy assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Richerson, D.W.; Lee, W.E. Modern Ceramic Engineering: Properties, Processing, and Use in Design, 4th ed.; Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  2. Uday, M.B.; Ahmad-Fauzi, M.N.; Alias, M.N.; Srithar, R. Current Issues and Problems in the Joining of Ceramic to Metal. In Joining Technologies; Ishak, M., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2016; pp. 159–193. [Google Scholar]
  3. Qiu, Q.W.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Z.W.; Wang, D.P. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al2O3 ceramic and Ti6Al4V alloy joint brazed with inactive Ag-Cu and Ag-Cu plus B. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2016, 36, 2067–2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Leyens, C.; Peters, M. Titanium and Titanium Alloys: Fundamentals and Applications; WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germany, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  5. Dai, J.J.; Zhu, J.Y.; Chen, C.Z.; Weng, F. High temperature oxidation behavior and research status of modifications on improving high temperature oxidation resistance of titanium alloys and titanium aluminides: A review. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 685, 784–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ishikuro, T.; Matsuoka, S. Ultrasonic welding of thin alumina and aluminum using inserts. JSME Int. J. Ser. A 2005, 48, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Imai, H.; Matsuoka, S.I. Direct welding of metals and ceramics by ultrasonic vibration. JSME Int. J. Ser. A 2006, 49, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Turan, S. Reactions at ceramic-metal interfaces in capacitor-discharge joined ceramics. Mater. Sci. Forum 1999, 294–296, 345–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Takaki, K.; Mikami, Y.; Itagaki, M.; Mukaigawa, S.; Fujiwara, T.; Nakamura, S. Influence of metal foil width on bonding strength in capacitor discharge ceramics joining. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2006, 34, 1709–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kliauga, A.M.; Ferrante, M. Interface compounds formed during the diffusion bonding of Al2O3 to Ti. J. Mater. Sci. 2000, 35, 4243–4249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Barrena, M.I.; Matesanz, L.; de Salazar, J.M.G. Al2O3/Ti6Al4V diffusion bonding joints using Ag-Cu interlayer. Mater. Charact. 2009, 60, 1263–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Akselsen, O.M. Advances in brazing of ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. 1992, 27, 1989–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shi, J.; Wang, Q.; Li, J.; Xiong, J.; Zhang, L.; Feng, J. Interfacial microstructure and mechanical property of ZrC-SiC ceramic and TiAl joint brazed with AgZr active filler metal. Mater. Charact. 2019, 156, 109850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tamrin, K.F.; Nukman, Y.; Zakariyah, S.S. Laser Lap Joining of Dissimilar Materials: A Review of Factors Affecting Joint Strength. Mater. Manuf. Process. 2013, 28, 857–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Simões, S. Recent Progress in the Joining of Titanium Alloys to Ceramics. Metals 2018, 8, 876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Fernie, J.A.; Drew, R.A.L.; Knowles, K.M. Joining of engineering ceramics. Int. Mater. Rev. 2009, 54, 283–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Niu, G.B.; Wang, D.P.; Yang, Z.W.; Wang, Y. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al2O3/TiAl joints brazed with B powders reinforced Ag-Cu-Ti based composite fillers. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 439–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, Y.H.; Liu, D.; Niu, H.W.; Song, X.G.; Yang, X.D.; Feng, J.C. Vacuum brazing of C/C composite to TC4 alloy using nano-Al2O3 strengthened AgCuTi composite filler. Mater. Des. 2016, 93, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dong, D.; Zhu, D.D.; Wang, Y.; Wang, G.; Wu, P.; He, Q. Microstructure and Shear Strength of Brazing TiAl/Si3N4 Joints with Ag-Cu Binary Alloy as Filler Metal. Metals 2018, 8, 896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hardesty, R.; Jensen, M.; Grant, L. High Temperature Be Panel Development; NASA Contract Report 181777; NASA: Hampton, VA, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  21. Paiva, O.C.; Barbosa, M.A. Brazing parameters determine the degradation and mechanical behaviour of alumina/titanium brazed joints. J. Mater. Sci. 2000, 35, 1165–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wu, M.-F.; Yu, Z.-S.; Liang, C.; Wang, F.-J. Interfacial microstructure of Al2O3/Ti-6Al-4V joints brazed with (Ag72Cu28) 97Ti3 filler metal. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2002, 18, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, M.X.; Lin, T.S.; He, P.; Huang, Y.D. Brazing of Al2O3 to Ti-6Al-4V alloy with in situ synthesized TiB-whisker-reinforced active brazing alloy. Ceram. Int. 2011, 37, 3029–3035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, M.X.; Lin, T.S.; He, P. Cu + TiB2 composite filler for brazing Al2O3 and Ti-6Al-4V alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2012, 512, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, M.X.; He, P.; Lin, T.S. Effect of Brazing Conditions on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al2O3/Ti-6Al-4V Alloy Joints Reinforced by TiB Whiskers. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2013, 29, 961–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cao, J.; Zheng, Z.J.; Wu, L.Z.; Qi, J.L.; Wang, Z.P.; Feng, J.C. Processing, microstructure and mechanical properties of vacuum-brazed Al2O3/Ti6Al4V joints. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2012, 535, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Niu, G.B.; Wang, D.P.; Yang, Z.W.; Wang, Y. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al2O3 ceramic and TiAl alloy joints brazed with Ag-Cu-Ti filler metal. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 6924–6934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, Z.; Lin, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, D. Characterization of microstructure and mechanical properties of Al2O3/TiAl joints vacuum-brazed with Ag-Cu-Ti + W composite filler. Vacuum 2017, 143, 294–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Sun, Z.; Feng, J. Microstructure and mechanical properties of transparent alumina and TiAl alloy joints brazed using Ag-Cu-Ti filler metal. Vacuum 2018, 151, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Simões, S.; Tavares, C.J.; Guedes, A. Joining of TiAl Alloy to Ni-Based Superalloy Using Ag-Cu Sputtered Coated Ti Brazing Filler Foil. Metals 2018, 8, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Simões, S.; Soares, A.; Tavares, C.J.; Guedes, A. Joining of TiAl Alloy Using Novel Ag-Cu Sputtered Coated Ti Brazing Filler. Microsc. Microanal. 2019, 25, 192–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Okamoto, H.; Schlesinger, M.E.; Mueller, E.M. ASM Handbook Volume 3: Alloy Phase Diagrams; ASM International: Almere, The Netherland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  33. Villars, P.; Prince, A.; Okamoto, H. Handbook of Ternary Alloy Phase Diagrams; ASM International: Almere, The Netherland, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lukas, H.L. Ag-Al-Ti (Silver-Aluminium-Titanium) in Landolt-Bornstein New Series. In Light Metal Ternary Systems: Phase Diagrams, Crystallographic and Thermodynamic Data: Light Metal Systems. Part 1; Effenberg, G., Ilyenko, S., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2004; Volume 11A1. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ahmed, T.; Flower, H.M. Partial isothermal sections of Ti–Al–V ternary diagram. Mater. Sci. Technol. 1994, 10, 272–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Raghavan, V. Al-Nb-Ti (Aluminum-Niobium-Titanium). J. Phase Equilibria Diffus. 2010, 31, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Schmid-Fetzer, R. Al-Cu-Ti (Aluminium-Copper-Titanium) in Landolt-Bornstein New Series. Light Metal Ternary Systems: Phase Diagrams, Crystallographic and Thermodynamic Data: Light Metal Systems, Part 2; Effenberg, G., Ilyenko, S., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2005; Volume 11A2. [Google Scholar]
  38. Gupta, R.K.; Pant, B. 4-Titanium aluminides. In Intermetallic Matrix Composites; Mitra, R., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2018; pp. 71–93. ISBN 9780857093462. [Google Scholar]
  39. Li, M.; Li, C.; Wang, F.; Zhang, W. Experimental study and thermodynamic assessment of the Ag-Ti system. Calphad 2005, 29, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gambaro, S.; Muolo, M.L.; Valenza, F.; Cacciamani, G.; Esposito, L.; Passerone, A. Wettability of transparent YAG (Y3Al5O12) by molten Ag-Cu-Ti alloys. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 35, 2895–2906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 13 04802 g001 550
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the brazed interfaces of: (a,b) Al2O3/γ-TiAl alloy, and (c,d) Al2O3/Ti6Al4V joints, produced at 980 °C for 30 min.
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the brazed interfaces of: (a,b) Al2O3/γ-TiAl alloy, and (c,d) Al2O3/Ti6Al4V joints, produced at 980 °C for 30 min.
Materials 13 04802 g001
Materials 13 04802 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM image and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) line profile on the interface of the brazed Al2O3/γ-TiAl alloy joint produced at 980 °C for 30 min.
Figure 2. SEM image and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) line profile on the interface of the brazed Al2O3/γ-TiAl alloy joint produced at 980 °C for 30 min.
Materials 13 04802 g002
Materials 13 04802 g003 550
Figure 3. SEM image of Al2O3/γ-TiAl alloy interface with indication of the EDS analyzed zones in the reaction layers (A–F) of the interface.
Figure 3. SEM image of Al2O3/γ-TiAl alloy interface with indication of the EDS analyzed zones in the reaction layers (A–F) of the interface.
Materials 13 04802 g003
Materials 13 04802 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) Ti-Al [38], (b) Ti-Ag [39] and (c) Ti-Ag-Cu [40] phase diagrams with the EDS chemical composition of the zones marked in the SEM image of Al2O3/γ-TiAl alloy interface. Adapted with permission from [38,39,40]. Copyright 2005, 2015, 2018 Elsevier.
Figure 4. (a) Ti-Al [38], (b) Ti-Ag [39] and (c) Ti-Ag-Cu [40] phase diagrams with the EDS chemical composition of the zones marked in the SEM image of Al2O3/γ-TiAl alloy interface. Adapted with permission from [38,39,40]. Copyright 2005, 2015, 2018 Elsevier.
Materials 13 04802 g004
Materials 13 04802 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) SEM image and (b) Ti, (c) Ag, (d) Cu, (e) Al and (f) O EDS elemental maps of the brazed interface of Al2O3/Ti6Al4V joints produced at 980 °C for 30 min.
Figure 5. (a) SEM image and (b) Ti, (c) Ag, (d) Cu, (e) Al and (f) O EDS elemental maps of the brazed interface of Al2O3/Ti6Al4V joints produced at 980 °C for 30 min.
Materials 13 04802 g005
Materials 13 04802 g006 550
Figure 6. SEM image of the Al2O3/Ti6Al4V interface with marked EDS analysis zones in the reaction layers (A–F) of the interface.
Figure 6. SEM image of the Al2O3/Ti6Al4V interface with marked EDS analysis zones in the reaction layers (A–F) of the interface.
Materials 13 04802 g006
Materials 13 04802 g007a 550Materials 13 04802 g007b 550
Figure 7. Optical microscopy (OM) image and hardness distribution maps of the (a) Al2O3/γ-TiAl alloy, and (b) Al2O3/Ti6Al4V brazed joints.
Figure 7. Optical microscopy (OM) image and hardness distribution maps of the (a) Al2O3/γ-TiAl alloy, and (b) Al2O3/Ti6Al4V brazed joints.
Materials 13 04802 g007aMaterials 13 04802 g007b
Materials 13 04802 g008 550
Figure 8. Schematic illustration of the mechanism for the evolution of microstructure in the interfaces obtained in this study.
Figure 8. Schematic illustration of the mechanism for the evolution of microstructure in the interfaces obtained in this study.
Materials 13 04802 g008
Table
Table 1. EDS chemical composition (in %) of the zones of interest illustrated in Figure 3.
Table 1. EDS chemical composition (in %) of the zones of interest illustrated in Figure 3.
ZoneAlAgTiCuNbPossible Main Phase(s)Thickness (µm)
A11.1-98.9--α-Ti35
A24.71.693.7--α-Ti
B1-97.3-2.7-(Ag)115
B211.37.678.72.4-α-Ti
C12.421.365.710.6-Ti2(Ag,Cu)
C2-48.748.13.1-TiAg
C36.98.878.26.1-α-Ti + Ti2(Ag,Cu)
C44.22.991.11.8-α-Ti
D123.82.472.81.0-α2-Ti3Al5
E131.12.459.51.35.7α2-Ti3Al + γ-TiAl30
F144.1-51.1-4.8γ-TiAl60–70
F240.92.951.5-4.7γ-TiAl
TiAl42.3-52.0-5.7γ-TiAl-
Table
Table 2. EDS chemical composition (in %) of the zones of interest illustrated in Figure 6.
Table 2. EDS chemical composition (in %) of the zones of interest illustrated in Figure 6.
ZoneAlAgTiCuVPossible Main Phase(s)Thickness (µm)
A13.8-96.2--α-Ti25
A22.81.495.8--α-Ti
B110.67.679.12.7-α-Ti 120
B29.212.873.74.2 α-Ti + Ti2(Ag,Cu)+ TiAg
C1-47.751.21.1-TiAg
D12.18.385.24.4-α-Ti + Ti2(Ag,Cu)
D21.95.991.11.1-α-Ti
D3-49.747.13.1-TiAg
E1-47.952.2--TiAg
F16.76.982.91.42.1α-Ti + Ti2(Ag,Cu)55
F21.527.066.84.7-Ti2(Ag,Cu)
F37.75.985.8-0.6α-Ti
Ti6Al4V9.8-87.8-2.4α-Ti + β-Ti-
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Emadinia, O.; Guedes, A.; Tavares, C.J.; Simões, S. Joining Alumina to Titanium Alloys Using Ag-Cu Sputter-Coated Ti Brazing Filler. Materials 2020, 13, 4802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214802

AMA Style

Emadinia O, Guedes A, Tavares CJ, Simões S. Joining Alumina to Titanium Alloys Using Ag-Cu Sputter-Coated Ti Brazing Filler. Materials. 2020; 13(21):4802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214802

Chicago/Turabian Style

Emadinia, Omid, Aníbal Guedes, Carlos José Tavares, and Sónia Simões. 2020. "Joining Alumina to Titanium Alloys Using Ag-Cu Sputter-Coated Ti Brazing Filler" Materials 13, no. 21: 4802. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214802

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop