Next Article in Journal
Research on the Improvement of Concrete Autogenous Self-healing Based on the Regulation of Cement Particle Size Distribution (PSD)
Previous Article in Journal
The Application of Electrical Parameters to Reflect the Hydration Process of Cement Paste with Rice Husk Ash
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 12
Issue 17
10.3390/ma12172817
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Grafting Hyperbranched Polymers onto TiO2 Nanoparticles via Thiol-yne Click Chemistry and Its Effect on the Mechanical, Thermal and Surface Properties of Polyurethane Coating

by
Feng Zhan
,
Lei Xiong
*,
Fang Liu
and
Chenying Li
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(17), 2817; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172817
Submission received: 14 July 2019 / Revised: 24 August 2019 / Accepted: 29 August 2019 / Published: 2 September 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, we proposed a novel and facile method to modify the surface of TiO2 nanoparticles and investigated the influence of the surface-modified TiO2 nanoparticles as an additive in a polyurethane (PU) coating. The hyperbranched polymers (HBP) were grafted on the surface of TiO2 nanoparticles via the thiol-yne click chemistry to reduce the aggregation of nanoparticles and increase the interaction between TiO2 and polymer matrices. The grafting of HBP on the TiO2 nanoparticles surface was investigated by means of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and thermogravimetry analysis (TGA). The thermal and mechanical properties of nanocomposite coatings containing various amounts of TiO2 nanoparticles were measured by dynamic mechanical thermal (DMTA) and tensile strength measurement. Moreover, the surface structure and properties of the newly prepared nanocomposite coatings were examined. The experimental results demonstrate that the incorporation of the surface-modified TiO2 nanoparticles can improve the mechanical and thermal properties of nanocomposite coatings. The results also reveal that the surface modification of TiO2 with the HBP chains improves the nanoparticle dispersion, and the coating surface shows a lotus leaf-like microstructure. Thus, the functional nanocomposite coatings exhibit superhydrophobic properties, good photocatalytic depollution performance, and high stripping resistance.

1. Introduction

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles have been initially applied in the fields of photoelectrochemical solar cell and environmental photocatalysis, because of their strong oxidation and reduction ability [1,2,3,4]. Most recently, the application of TiO2-based photocatalytic products in superhydrophobic coatings is attracting considerable attention. Based on the photocatalytic and superhydrophobic properties of TiO2, the incorporation of TiO2 into coatings can increase the superhydrophobicity of coatings and keep the superhydrophobic surface clean by the action of sunlight and rainwater [5,6,7]. The contaminants, such as dust, can be easily removed by rainwater due to the superhydrophobic property, while the organic contaminants adsorbed on the superhydrophobic coatings containing TiO2 nanoparticles can be gradually decomposed by the photocatalytic action of TiO2 nanoparticles [8,9,10,11,12].
However, to obtain the desirable surface and mechanical properties of nanocomposite coatings, it is necessary to make the TiO2 nanoparticles disperse uniformly in the polymer matrix [13], although TiO2 nanoparticles tend to aggregate due to their extremely large specific surface area, which can affect their photocatalytic efficiency and functionality [14,15,16,17]. As a result, a great deal of efforts has been made to overcome this problem and increase the interaction between TiO2 and the matrix [18]. The aggregation of nanoparticles in the polymer matrix can be minimized by grafting the polymer chains onto the nanoparticles surface. The introduction of polymer chains on TiO2 nanoparticles not only improves their dispersion and compatibility with the polymer matrix, but also facilitates the formation of chemical or physical interaction between nanoparticles and the polymer matrix [19,20,21,22].
The introduction of polymer chains onto the TiO2 nanoparticle surface can be achieved by many different techniques, such as radical polymerization, ring-opening polymerization (ROP), reversible addition-fragmentation transfer (RAFT), and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) [23,24,25,26]. Chen et al. [27] prepared a superhydrophobic material by grafting polystyrene onto a TiO2 surface via an in situ free-radical polymerization strategy. The coating containing the modified TiO2 showed a strong adhesive property, and the water contact angle (CA) was measured at 153.5 ± 1.5°, suggesting that this coating possessed superhydrophobic properties. Vergnat et al. [28] designed a robust approach to graft polymer brushes onto TiO2 nanoparticles via ATRP. The grafting of polymer brushes could enhance the dispersion of TiO2 nanoparticles and interaction between TiO2 and the polymer matrix, resulting in the significant improvement of the mechanical properties of nanocomposites.
However, most of these methods are difficult to apply because of their complex and time-consuming process, environmental pollution, and the requirement of specialized equipment. Recently, much attention has been paid to the grafting method based on click chemistry. Compared with the traditional surface grafting methods, this method exhibits many advantages, including a high selectivity and reaction speed, gentle experimental conditions, a high conversion efficiency, and its environmentally friendly nature, which has been used to graft polymer chains onto inorganic materials [29,30,31].
In this work, the hyperbranched polymers (HBP) were grafted onto the TiO2 surface via thiol-yne click chemistry. The introduction of HBP onto a TiO2 surface can introduce a large number of functional groups on the surface and greatly reduce the tendency of aggregation of TiO2 nanoparticles, resulting in the improvement of dispersion and interaction between TiO2 and the matrix [32,33]. According to our knowledge, few studies have been reported on the grafting of hyperbranched polymers onto TiO2 nanoparticles by this method. The grafting of HBP onto the TiO2 nanoparticle surface was characterized with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and thermogravimetry analysis (TGA) techniques. The influence of TiO2 nanoparticles grafted with HBP on the mechanical, thermal, and surface properties of polyurethane-based nanocomposite coatings was also extensively investigated.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

TiO2 nanoparticles with an average particle size of 50 ± 10 nm were purchased from Zhoushan Nano-materials Co., Ltd (Zhoushan, Zhejiang, China). (3-Mercaptopropyl) trimethoxysilane (KH590) was obtained from Aladdin. 2, 2-Dimethoxy-2-phenylacetophenone (DMPA) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used as a UV photoinitiator. The commercial polyurethane suspension (PU116) was obtained from Hefei Anke Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd (Hehei, China). All other reagents used in this paper were commercially available and used without further purification.

2.2. Synthesis of But-3-ynyl 3-Mercaptopropanoate

The hyperbranched monomer but-3-ynyl 3-mercaptopropanoate (BYMP) was synthesized according to the procedures described in the literature [34]. Typically, 12.5 g of but-3-yn-1-ol, 3.85 g of 3-mercaptopropionic acid, and 1.06 g of sulphuric acid were added to a flask, and the mixture was then stirred at 85 °C for 2 h. After reaction, the mixture was cooled to room temperature and dissolved in dichloromethane. The triethylamine was then added into the mixture, followed by washing with distilled water several times. The crude product was finally purified by silica gel chromatography using an eluent of hexane/ethyl acetate (4:1) to obtain pure BYMP. The chemical structure of BYMP was confirmed by 1H NMR. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3, δ/ppm): 2.5 (1H, H–C≡C), 2.1 (2H, C≡C–CH2–CH2–O), 1.7 (1H, SH), 4.5 (2H, C≡C–CH2–CH2–O), and 2.8 (4H, C(O)–CH2–CH2–S).

2.3. Immobilization of KH590 onto TiO2 Nanoparticles

Specifically, as-received TiO2 nanoparticles (500 mg) were initially dispersed into 100 mL toluene under ultrasonic agitation for 2 h. Then 100 mg of KH590 was added into the TiO2 dispersion, followed by 2 h of ultrasonication. The reaction mixture was stirred at 115 °C for 4 h under reflux and then filtered by air pump filtration. The filtered mass was purified by repeated washing with toluene, and was vacuum-dried at 100 °C for 48 h. The resulted products were noted as KH590 functionalized TiO2 (TiO2-SH).

2.4. Preparation of TiO2 Nanoparticles Grafted with Hyperbranched Polymers

In a typical experiment, 0.5 g of TiO2-SH, 0.8 g of hyperbranched monomer BYMP, and 20 mL of dimethyl formamide (DMF) were added into a beaker, followed by 2 h of ultrasonication. Then an appropriate amount of photoinitiator DMPA was added into the beaker. The beaker was irradiated for 30 min under a 365 nm UV light at room temperature to perform the thiol-yne click reaction between the TiO2-SH and the hyperbranched monomers. After reaction, the mixture was washed with dichloromethane and Soxhlet extracted for 24 h to remove the physically adsorbed polymers and unreacted monomers. The resulted products were vacuum dried at 80 °C for 24 h to obtain TiO2 nanoparticles grafted with hyperbranched polymers (TiO2-HBP). The whole preparation process is shown in Figure 1.

2.5. Cleaving Hyperbranched Polymers from TiO2-HBP

In this work, the hyperbranched polymers were cleaved from the TiO2-HBP surface to determine the structure of grafted polymers. Typically, 200 mg of TiO2-HBP was immersed in 100 mL of 2 M HCl, and the solution was stirred under reflux for 24 h. The solution was then neutralized with NaHCO3, washed with abundant dichloromethane, and vacuum-filtered to remove the TiO2 nanoparticles. The resulted hyperbranched polymer was dried under vacuum at 70 °C for 24 h and subjected to NMR analyses.

2.6. Preparation of TiO2/Polyurethane Nanocomposite Coatings

The raw TiO2 or TiO2-HBP was first dispersed in tetrahydrofuran (THF) and sonicated for 2 h to prepare TiO2 suspension. Then, the TiO2 suspension was slowly added into the PU suspension and stirred at 4000 rpm for 2 h, followed by degassing in vacuum for 30 min. The TiO2/PU nanocomposite coatings were prepared on the glass substrate with a wet film thickness of 100–150 μm by using a film applicator. The free-standing films with a wet thickness of 200–250 μm were obtained by applying the TiO2/PU nanocomposite coatings to the polystyrene sheets. The resulted films were cured at room temperature for one week. The composition of nanocomposite coatings in this work was denoted as raw TiO2/PU-X or TiO2-HBP/PU-X, where X denoted as the content of nanoparticles, and the content of nanoparticles in the nanocomposite coatings was varied as 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 wt%, respectively.

2.7. Characterization

Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) measurements were carried on a Shimadzu IR Prestige-21 spectrometer in the wavenumber range of 500–4000 cm−1. The surface composition of nanoparticles was obtained from AXIS X-ray photoelectron spectra. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images were obtained from Quanta 200 F field emission SEM system (Eindhoven, Netherlands). X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of samples were obtained from a Bruker D8 X-ray diffractometer (Karlsruhe, Germany). The water contact angle (CA) measurement was performed on a JC2000C contact angle tester (Shanghai, China) at room temperature. The water CA values were measured at five different areas on each sample, and the average value was calculated. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on a TGAQ50 instrument (New Castle, DE, USA). The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were acquired using a Bruker DMX 600 spectrometer (Karlsruhe, Germany), employing TMS as an internal standard. The dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) was carried out on a TA Q800-RSA3 dynamic mechanical analyzer (New Castle, DE, USA) under N2 atmosphere. Tensile strength and elongation at break of free-standing films were tested on a universal testing machine following the ASTM D2370 standard [35]. The tensile test was performed at 5 mm/min cross-head speed, and more than seven specimens were tested for each sample.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of TiO2-HBP

FT-IR measurements were adequately performed to observe the chemical structure of the prepared TiO2 after each stage of modification. As shown in Figure 2a, FT-IR spectrum of raw TiO2 nanoparticles exhibits a strong absorption peak at 3360 cm−1 which can be assigned to –OH groups. Ti-O bands at 615 cm−1 can also be observed in this spectrum. From the FT-IR spectrum of TiO2-KH590 in Figure 2b, the absorption peak ascribed to –OH groups became weaker after the immobilization of KH590 on TiO2 nanoparticles, which is due to the hydrolytic condensation between the –OH groups on the surface of raw TiO2 nanoparticles and KH590. In addition, the FT-IR spectrum of TiO2-KH590 exhibits new peaks at 2940 cm−1 and 2550 cm−1 assigned to –CH2 and –SH groups of the grafted KH590. Compared to the TiO2-KH590 spectrum, the appearance of the vibration of C–S–C at 680 cm−1 and the decrease of the –SH absorption at 2550 cm−1 in TiO2-HBP spectrum (Figure 2c) implies that the thiol-yne click reaction has occurred between the –SH groups on the TiO2 surface and hyperbranched monomer. Meanwhile, the characteristic peaks of –CH2 at 2940 cm−1 and C=O at 1735 cm−1 have been distinctly enhanced due to the grafting of hyperbranched polymers. It is concluded that the hyperbranched polymers were successfully grafted onto the TiO2 surface via thiol-yne click reaction.
1H NMR spectroscopy can also prove the success of thiol-yne click reaction and the structure of hyperbranched polymers grafted on TiO2 surface. Figure 3 shows the 1H NMR spectrum of hyperbranched polymers cleaved from TiO2-HBP. The proton peak at 3.9 ppm is ascribed to the ester linkage after click reaction of the alkyne to form a saturated bond (O–CH2–CH2–CH2–C). The signals at 2.5 and 4.2 ppm can be assigned to the unreacted alkyne proton (–C≡CH) and ester linkage near the alkyne (O–CH2–CH2–C≡C), respectively, indicating that the resulted hyperbranched polymer still has alkyne end groups. In addition, a peak at 3.7 ppm corresponds to S–CH–S groups, which can demonstrate the click reaction between thiol and alkyne groups.
13C NMR spectroscopy was used to further verify the chemical structure of the grafted hyperbranched polymers (HBP), and the results are shown in Figure 4. The peaks at 72.4 and 76.7 ppm correspond to the chemical shifts of the carbon atoms in the unreacted alkyne groups (H–C≡C). Peaks at 171.8 and 70.2 ppm are attributed to the carbon atoms in the O–C(O)–CH2 and O–CH2–CH2–CH2–CH groups, respectively. In addition, the signals at 49.8 and 42.8 ppm can be assigned to the carbon atoms in the S–CH–S and CH–CH2–CH2–CH2–O groups, indicating that the alkyne groups react with thiol groups to form saturated bonds via click reaction. 1H NMR and 13C NMR analyses results confirm the chemical structure of hyperbranched polymers on the TiO2-HBP surface, which is the product of the click reaction between thiol groups on TiO2 and hyperbranched monomers.
The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy was used to identify the specific information about the elemental compositions of TiO2-HBP, and the results are shown in Figure 5. It can be found that the spectrum of TiO2-HBP shows C1s at 285.1 eV, O1s at 532.0 eV, Ti2p at 456.8 eV, Si2p at 102.1, Si2s at 151.8 eV, and S2p at 167.8 eV. The Si element originates from KH590 on the TiO2 surface. Furthermore, the S element may originate from KH590 or HBP. The XPS S2p spectrum was fitted into two peak components with binding energies at 167.6 eV and 168.7 eV, which are attributed to C–S–C and C–S–H. The presence of C–S–C demonstrates that the covalent bonds were formed between the TiO2 nanoparticles and HBP. The XPS results further confirm that the hyperbranched polymers were successfully grafted onto the TiO2 surface via thiol-yne click reaction.
The XRD technique was used to investigate the structural changes of TiO2 nanoparticles before and after grafting of hyperbranched polymers. Figure 6 shows the XRD spectra of raw TiO2 and TiO2-HBP. The raw TiO2 nanoparticles exhibited several sharp diffraction peaks at 2θ =25.3°, 37.9°, 48.3°, 54.1°, 55.1°, 62.8°, 68.8°, 70.3° and 75.1°, which are typical characteristics of anatase TiO2. Compared to the raw TiO2 nanoparticles, TiO2-HBP showed a broad hollow at 2θ = 17.9°, which can be assigned to the amorphous state of grafting hyperbranched polymers. The spectrum of TiO2-HBP also showed sharp diffraction peaks at the same position as raw TiO2 nanoparticles, indicating that the grafting of HBP did not change the crystalline structure of TiO2 nanoparticles significantly.
In order to verify the grafting content of hyperbranched polymers on the TiO2 surface, a thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed on the raw TiO2 and surface functionalized TiO2, as shown in Figure 7. It can be found that a weight loss of 3.9% for the raw TiO2, which is attributed to adsorbed water or hydroxyl groups. TiO2-KH590 showed a weight loss of 12.1% at 800 °C, which is mainly due to the loss of KH590 on the TiO2 surface. For the TiO2-HBP, a major decomposition between 320 °C to 450 °C was found, which can be attributed to the decomposition of the hyperbranched polymers and KH590. As shown in Figure 7, weight loss of TiO2-HBP at 800 °C was about 46.7%. Therefore, the hyperbranched polymer content of TiO2-HBP was about 34.6% as estimated by thermogravimetry analysis.

3.2. Effect of TiO2 on the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Nanocomposite Coatings

The tensile strength and elongation at break of nanocomposite coatings are summarized in Table 1. It is apparent that all of nanocomposite coatings containing TiO2 exhibited higher tensile strength and elongation at break than those of neat polyurethane coating. Moreover, the TiO2-HBP nanoparticles had a larger effect on the improvement of the mechanical properties of nanocomposite coatings, compared to the raw TiO2 nanoparticles. When the TiO2-HBP content was about 6 wt%, the tensile strength and elongation at break of TiO2-HBP/PU-6 nanocomposite coating increased to 16.98 MPa and 384%, respectively. Meanwhile, the relatively smaller improvement in tensile strength and elongation at break of about 12.93 MPa and 336% was shown in the nanocomposite coating containing the same content of the raw TiO2. The remarkably enhanced tensile strength and elongation at break can be attributed to less agglomeration of TiO2-HBP in the matrix and strong interaction between TiO2-HBP and the polyurethane matrix. These arise from the wrapping of TiO2-HBP with hyperbranched polymers, leading to the efficient transfer of the external force from the polyurethane matrix to TiO2-HBP nanoparticles. However, as the content of nanoparticles was higher than 6 wt%, the mechanical properties for two nanocomposite systems exhibited somewhat of a decrease, which may relate to an increasing susceptibility of agglomeration of nanoparticles with increasing nanoparticles content.
The effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on thermal properties of coatings was studied by means of DMTA. Figure 8 shows the loss factor (tan δ) curves of neat polyurethane, raw TiO2/PU, and TiO2-HBP/PU nanocomposite coatings, and the peak position of tan δ is defined as the glass transition temperature (Tg). It was clearly found that the introduction of TiO2 nanoparticles in the polyurethane matrix can lead to the increase of Tg values. Moreover, the increase of Tg values was more prominent in the TiO2-HBP/PU nanocomposite coatings, compared to those in the raw TiO2/PU nanocomposite coatings. The reason may be that a layer of hyperbranched polymers was formed on the TiO2-HBP surface after the click reaction. The presence of hyperbranched polymers on the TiO2 surface lead to an increase in the interaction between nanoparticles and the matrix, which limited the mobility of the matrix backbone. In addition, the TiO2-HBP nanoparticles exhibited better dispersibility in the polyurethane matrix and less tendency to form aggregates than the raw TiO2 nanoparticles. As a result, the TiO2-HBP nanoparticles showed a better enhancement effect on the Tg of nanocomposite coatings.

3.3. Surface Structure and Properties of TiO2/PU Nanocomposite Coatings

The introduction of TiO2 nanoparticles into polyurethane coating was expected to generate the superhydrophobicity, which can extend its application range. The superhydrophobicity of the nanocomposite coatings was evaluated by measuring the water contact angle (CA) values, and the results are shown in Figure 9. As shown in Figure 9, the water CA of neat polyurethane coating was only by about 82.4°. Meanwhile, the water CA of raw TiO2/PU nanocomposite coatings increased with increasing the raw TiO2 content. The water CA of TiO2-HBP/PU nanocomposite coatings also increased with increasing the TiO2-HBP content, and the enhancement effect was more notable than the raw TiO2/PU nanocomposite coatings. When the TiO2-HBP content was 6 wt%, the water CA of TiO2-HBP/PU-6 nanocomposite coating reached the largest value of 154.8°, meaning the formation of a superhydrophobic surface. This may be related to the low surface energy of hyperbranched polymers grafted on TiO2 surface and a larger surface roughness of TiO2-HBP/PU-6 nanocomposite coating. However, as the content of TiO2-HBP was more than 6 wt%, the water CA of nanocomposite coatings showed somewhat of a decrease. This is because a large amount of TiO2-HBP tends to aggregate, resulting in the decrease of surface roughness and the water CA value.
Usually, the superhydrophobicity of conventional superhydrophobic coatings was hardly recovered without cleaning when the surface was contaminated with organic dirt. The addition of TiO2 nanoparticles can endow the coating with photocatalytic depollution performance. In this work, oleic acid was used as a representative contaminant, and Figure 10 exhibits the water CA changes on the TiO2-HBP/PU-6 nanocomposite coating in the five consecutive cycles of the oleic acid adhesion and degradation. After the adhesion of oleic acid, the water CA of TiO2-HBP/PU-6 nanocomposite coatings decreased from 154.8° to 77.2°, and the surface was converted to a hydrophilic state owing to a hydrophilic -COOH group on the oleic acid. When the TiO2-HBP/PU-6 nanocomposite coating is irradiated by UV light for 8 h, the water CA returns to 153.5°. Even after five cycles of oleic acid adhesion and UV irradiation, the surface of TiO2-HBP/PU-6 nanocomposite coating could still recover its superhydrophobic state. This is related to the strong photocatalytic oxidation power of TiO2, which can effectively decompose the oleic acid adsorbed on the surface. The experimental results demonstrate that the TiO2-HBP/PU nanocomposite coatings exhibited very good photocatalytic depollution performance.
The stripping resistance of superhydrophobic coating is important for its industrial applications, which can be evaluated by using a bonding-stripping test. As shown in Figure 11, the water CA of TiO2-HBP/PU-6 nanocomposite coating was still over 150° after being stripped by test glues for 8 times, indicating that the nanocomposite coating retained its superhydrophobicity. The high stripping resistance of TiO2-HBP/PU-6 nanocomposite coating mainly originates from the strong interaction between TiO2-HBP and the polyurethane matrix.
The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was adequately performed to observe the morphology of the TiO2/PU nanocomposite coatings, and the SEM images of samples are shown in Figure 12. As shown in Figure 12a, it is clearly seen that the SEM image of neat polyurethane coating formed a relatively smooth surface. Meanwhile, the surface morphology of raw TiO2/PU-6 nanocomposite coating (Figure 12b) exhibits an obvious biphase character and numerous micro-scaled agglomerates of TiO2 nanoparticles, resulting from the high surface energy of raw TiO2 nanoparticles. On the contrary, the dispersion of TiO2-HBP on the surface morphology of TiO2-HBP/PU-6 nanocomposite coating (Figure 12c) was more uniform, which may relate to the presence of hyperbranched polymer chains on the TiO2 surface. The introduction of HBP on the TiO2 surface can significantly weaken the hydrogen bonding interactions between nanoparticles and cause a significant decrease in agglomeration. In addition, TiO2-HBP/PU-6 nanocomposite coating exhibited a lotus leaf-like microstructure. This special structure can increase the surface roughness and endow the nanocomposite coatings with better hydrophobicity. In Figure 12d, there are many irregular aggregates on the surface of TiO2-HBP/PU-8 nanocomposite coating because of an excessive amount of TiO2-HBP which self-aggregates and thus decreases the roughness of the surface and mechanical properties of coating.

4. Conclusions

In order to modify the surface of TiO2 nanoparticles and increase the interaction between nanoparticles and polymer matrix, the hyperbranched polymers were chemically grafted onto the surface of TiO2 via thiol-yne click chemistry. Experimental results show that the introduction of HBP improved the TiO2 dispersion and imparted lotus leaf-like microstructures at the nanocomposite coatings surface, resulting in the increase of the surface roughness and accordingly an increase of the water CA value. As the TiO2-HBP content is about 6 wt%, the water CA of nanocomposite coatings reached a maximum value of 154.8°, indicating the formation of a superhydrophobic surface. The mechanical and thermal properties of the nanocomposite coatings were improved with an increasing TiO2-HBP content. The resulted nanocomposite coating containing 6 wt% of TiO2-HBP showed a high photocatalytic depollution performance and stripping resistance, retaining its superhydrophobicity after being immersed in oleic acid or stripped by test glues for 8 times, which makes this nanocomposite coating a promising candidate for a wide range of superhydrophobic applications.

Author Contributions

L.X. contributed to the conception of the study and did the experiment and data analysis. F.Z. and C.L. did the experiment and data analysis and wrote parts of this paper. L.X. and F.L. reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51463017), Science Foundation of Aeronautics of China (2016ZF56022), and Graduate student Innovation Fund of Jiangxi Province (YC2018-5355).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kumar, S.G.; Devi, L.G. Review on modified TiO2 photocatalysis under UV/visible light: Selected results and related mechanisms on interfacial charge carrier transfer dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 13211–13241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Liao, G.; Yao, W.; Zuo, J. Preparation and characterization of zeolite/TiO2 cement-based composites with excellent photocatalytic performance. Materials 2018, 11, 2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chen, X.B.; Mao, S.S. Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: Synthesis, properties, modifications, and applications. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 2891–2959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, X.; Jin, M.; Liu, Z.; Tryk, D.A.; Nishimoto, S.; Murakami, T.; Fujishima, A. Superhydrophobic TiO2 surfaces: Preparation, photocatalytic wettability conversion, and superhydrophobic-superhydrophilic patterning. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 14521–14529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, C.; Sun, Y.; Cheng, M.; Sun, S.; Hu, S. Fabrication and characterization of a TiO2/polysiloxane resin composite coating with full-thickness super-hydrophobicity. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 333, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chien, D.M.; Viet, N.N.; Van, N.T.K.; Phong, N.T.P. Characteristics modification of TiO2 thin films by doping with silica and alumina for self-cleaning application. J. Exp. Nanosci. 2009, 4, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Charpentier, P.A.; Burgess, K.; Wang, L.; Chowdhury, R.R.; Lotus, A.F.; Moula, G. Nano-TiO2/polyurethane composites for antibacterial and self-cleaning coatings. Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 425606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kamegawa, T.; Irikawa, K.; Yamashita, H. Multifunctional surface designed by nanocomposite coating of polytetrafluoroethylene and TiO2 photocatalyst: Self-cleaning and superhydrophobicity. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lai, Y.; Tang, Y.; Gong, J.; Gong, D.; Chi, L.; Lin, C.; Chen, Z. Transparent superhydrophobic/superhydrophilic TiO2-based coatings for self-cleaning and anti-fogging. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 7420–7426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. González, E.; Bonnefond, A.; Barrado, M.; Barrasa, A.M.C.; Asua, J.M.; Leiza, J.R. Photoactive self-cleaning polymer coatings by TiO2 nanoparticle Pickering miniemulsion polymerization. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 281, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, Y.; Su, D.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L. Anodized TiO2 nanotubes coated with Pt nanoparticles for enhanced photoelectrocatalytic activity. J. Mater. Res. 2017, 32, 757–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hamming, L.M.; Qiao, R.; Messersmith, P.B.; Brinson, L.C. Effects of dispersion and interfacial modification on the macroscale properties of TiO2 polymer-matrix nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2009, 69, 1880–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhou, D.; Ji, Z.; Jiang, X.; Dunphy, D.R.; Brinker, J.; Keller, A.A. Influence of material properties on TiO2 nanoparticle agglomeration. PLOS ONE 2013, 8, 81239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sotto, A.; Boromand, A.; Zhang, R.; Luis, P.; Arsuaga, J.M.; Kim, J.; Bruggen, B. Effect of nanoparticle aggregation at low concentrations of TiO2 on the hydrophilicity, morphology, and fouling resistance of PES-TiO2 membranes. J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. 2011, 363, 540–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, G.; Lv, L.; Fan, H.; Ma, J.; Li, Y.; Wan, Y.; Zhao, X.S. Effect of the agglomeration of TiO2 nanoparticles on their photocatalytic performance in the aqueous phase. J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. 2010, 348, 342–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Low, J.; Cheng, B.; Yu, J. Surface modification and enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction performance of TiO2: A review. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 392, 658–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kim, T.K.; Lee, M.N.; Lee, S.H.; Park, Y.C.; Jung, C.K.; Boo, J.H. Development of surface coating technology of TiO2 powder and improvement of photocatalytic activity by surface modification. Thin Solid Films 2005, 475, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zan, L.; Liu, Z.; Zhong, J.; Peng, Z. Organic modification on TiO2 nanoparticles by grafting polymer. J. Mater. Sci. 2004, 39, 3261–3264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shaikh, T.; Rathore, A.; Kaur, H. Poly (lactic acid) grafting of TiO2 nanoparticles: A shift in dye degradation performance of TiO2 from UV to solar light. Chemistry Select 2017, 2, 6901–6908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Smirnov, E.A.; Meledina, M.A.; Garshev, A.V.; Chelpanov, V.I.; Frost, S.; Wieneke, J.U.; Ulbricht, M. Grafting of titanium dioxide microspheres with a temperature-responsive polymer via surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization without the use of silane coupling agents. Polym. Int. 2013, 62, 836–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Borandeh, S.; Abdolmaleki, A.; Nekuabadi, S.Z.; Sadeghi, M. Poly (vinyl alcohol)/methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) methacrylate-TiO2 nanocomposite as a novel polymeric membrane for enhanced gas separation. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2019, 16, 523–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Khaled, S.M.; Sui, R.; Charpentier, P.A.; Rizkalla, A.S. Synthesis of TiO2-PMMA nanocomposite: Using methacrylic acid as a coupling agent. Langmuir 2007, 23, 3988–3995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liu, H.; Hu, W.; Zhang, Z.; Zhu, L.; Ran, R. Preparation of polypropylene/glycidyl methacrylate modified n-TiO2-PMMA composites via the RAFT Process: Grafting “through” surface-modified nanoparticles. J. Macromol. Sci. B 2014, 53, 1505–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xiong, L.; Liang, H.; Wang, R.; Chen, L. A novel route for the synthesis of poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-co-methyl methacrylate) grafted titania nanoparticles via ATRP. J. Polym. Res. 2011, 18, 1017–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nederberg, F.; Trang, V.; Pratt, R.C.; Mason, A.F.; Frank, C.W.; Waymouth, R.M.; Hedrick, J.L. New ground for organic catalysis: A ring-opening polymerization approach to hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 3294–3297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chen, Z.M.; Pan, S.J.; Yin, H.J.; Zhang, L.L.; Ou, E.C.; Xiong, Y.Q.; Xu, W.J. Facile synthesis of superhydrophobic TiO2/polystyrene core-shell microspheres. Express Polym. Lett. 2011, 5, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vergnat, V.; Roland, T.; Pourroy, G.; Masson, P. Effect of covalent grafting on mechanical properties of TiO2/polystyrene composites. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2014, 147, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, N.W.; Binder, W.H. Click-chemistry for nanoparticle-modification. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 16717–16734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shen, A.; Guo, Z.; Yu, L.; Cao, L.; Liang, X. A novel zwitterionic HILIC stationary phase based on ‘‘thiol-ene’’ click chemistry between cysteine and vinyl silica. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4550–4552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Y.H.; Wang, D.; Buriak, J.M. Molecular layer deposition of thiol-ene multilayers on semiconductor surfaces. Langmuir 2010, 26, 1232–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yu, Y.; Rong, M.Z.; Zhang, M.Q. Grafting of hyperbranched aromatic polyamide onto silica nanoparticles. Polymer 2010, 51, 492–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, J.; Ma, G.; Ling, L.; Wang, B. Grafting of hyperbranched polymer onto the nanosilica surface and their effect on the properties of UV-curable coatings. Polym. Bull. 2016, 73, 859–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Konkolewicz, D.; Gray-Weale, A.; Perrier, S. Hyperbranched polymers by thiol-yne chemistry: From small molecules to functional polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 18075–18077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. ASTM D2370 Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Organic Coatings; ASTM International (ASTM): West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2010.
Materials 12 02817 g001 550
Figure 1. Synthetic route of TiO2 nanoparticles grafted with hyperbranched polymers (TiO2-HBP).
Figure 1. Synthetic route of TiO2 nanoparticles grafted with hyperbranched polymers (TiO2-HBP).
Materials 12 02817 g001
Materials 12 02817 g002 550
Figure 2. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of (a) raw TiO2, (b) TiO2-KH590 and (c) TiO2- hyperbranched polymers (HBPs).
Figure 2. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of (a) raw TiO2, (b) TiO2-KH590 and (c) TiO2- hyperbranched polymers (HBPs).
Materials 12 02817 g002
Materials 12 02817 g003 550
Figure 3. 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrum of HBP cleaved from the TiO2-HBP surface.
Figure 3. 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrum of HBP cleaved from the TiO2-HBP surface.
Materials 12 02817 g003
Materials 12 02817 g004 550
Figure 4. 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrum of HBP cleaved from the TiO2-HBP surface.
Figure 4. 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrum of HBP cleaved from the TiO2-HBP surface.
Materials 12 02817 g004
Materials 12 02817 g005 550
Figure 5. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectrum and S2p high-resolution spectrum of TiO2-HBP.
Figure 5. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectrum and S2p high-resolution spectrum of TiO2-HBP.
Materials 12 02817 g005
Materials 12 02817 g006 550
Figure 6. X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra of raw TiO2 and TiO2-HBP.
Figure 6. X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra of raw TiO2 and TiO2-HBP.
Materials 12 02817 g006
Materials 12 02817 g007 550
Figure 7. Thermogravimetry analysis (TGA) curves of raw TiO2, TiO2-KH590, and TiO2-HBP.
Figure 7. Thermogravimetry analysis (TGA) curves of raw TiO2, TiO2-KH590, and TiO2-HBP.
Materials 12 02817 g007
Materials 12 02817 g008 550
Figure 8. The loss factor curves of (a) raw TiO2/ polyurethane (PU) nanocomposite coatings and (b) TiO2-HBP/PU nanocomposite coatings.
Figure 8. The loss factor curves of (a) raw TiO2/ polyurethane (PU) nanocomposite coatings and (b) TiO2-HBP/PU nanocomposite coatings.
Materials 12 02817 g008
Materials 12 02817 g009 550
Figure 9. The water contact angle (CA) of nanocomposite coatings.
Figure 9. The water contact angle (CA) of nanocomposite coatings.
Materials 12 02817 g009
Materials 12 02817 g010 550
Figure 10. The water CA on TiO2-HBP/PU-6 nanocomposite coating in five cycles of oleic acid adhesion and UV irradiation.
Figure 10. The water CA on TiO2-HBP/PU-6 nanocomposite coating in five cycles of oleic acid adhesion and UV irradiation.
Materials 12 02817 g010
Materials 12 02817 g011 550
Figure 11. Relationship between the water CA of TiO-HBP/PU-6 nanocomposite coating and the number of stripping tests.
Figure 11. Relationship between the water CA of TiO-HBP/PU-6 nanocomposite coating and the number of stripping tests.
Materials 12 02817 g011
Materials 12 02817 g012 550
Figure 12. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (a) neat polyurethane coating, (b) raw TiO2/PU-6 nanocomposite coating, (c) TiO2-HBP/PU-6 nanocomposite coating, and (d) TiO2-HBP/PU-8 nanocomposite coating.
Figure 12. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (a) neat polyurethane coating, (b) raw TiO2/PU-6 nanocomposite coating, (c) TiO2-HBP/PU-6 nanocomposite coating, and (d) TiO2-HBP/PU-8 nanocomposite coating.
Materials 12 02817 g012
Table
Table 1. Tensile strength and elongation at break of the nanocomposite coatings.
Table 1. Tensile strength and elongation at break of the nanocomposite coatings.
SampleTiO2 Content (wt%)Tensile Strength (MPa)Elongation at Break (%)
Neat PU010.58278
Raw TiO2/PU-2211.15313
Raw TiO2/PU-4411.38325
Raw TiO2/PU-6612.93336
Raw TiO2/PU-8812.45313
TiO2-HBP/PU-2212.53348
TiO2-HBP/PU-4414.95368
TiO2-HBP/PU-6616.98384
TiO2-HBP/PU-8815.48370

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhan, F.; Xiong, L.; Liu, F.; Li, C. Grafting Hyperbranched Polymers onto TiO2 Nanoparticles via Thiol-yne Click Chemistry and Its Effect on the Mechanical, Thermal and Surface Properties of Polyurethane Coating. Materials 2019, 12, 2817. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172817

AMA Style

Zhan F, Xiong L, Liu F, Li C. Grafting Hyperbranched Polymers onto TiO2 Nanoparticles via Thiol-yne Click Chemistry and Its Effect on the Mechanical, Thermal and Surface Properties of Polyurethane Coating. Materials. 2019; 12(17):2817. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172817

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhan, Feng, Lei Xiong, Fang Liu, and Chenying Li. 2019. "Grafting Hyperbranched Polymers onto TiO2 Nanoparticles via Thiol-yne Click Chemistry and Its Effect on the Mechanical, Thermal and Surface Properties of Polyurethane Coating" Materials 12, no. 17: 2817. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12172817

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop