Next Article in Journal
Surface Modification of Polymer Substrates for Biomedical Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
A New Ion-Imprinted Chitosan-Based Membrane with an Azo-Derivative Ligand for the Efficient Removal of Pd(II)
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Comparison of Different Carbon Fiber Composites in Reinforcement Layouts for Wooden Beams of Historical Buildings
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

New ZnO@Cardanol Porphyrin Composite Nanomaterials with Enhanced Photocatalytic Capability under Solar Light Irradiation

Laboratório de Produtos e Tecnologia em Processos (LPT), Departamento de Química Orgânica e Inorgânica, Universidade Federal do Ceará, 60440-900 Fortaleza, Brazil
Laboratório de Telecomunicações e Ciências e Engenharia de Materiais (LOCEM), Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal do Ceará, 60440-970 Fortaleza, Brazil
Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Innovazione, Università del Salento, Via Arnesano, 73100 Lecce, Italy
CNR NANOTEC—Istituto di Nanotecnologia c/o Campus Ecotekne, Università del Salento, Via Monteroni, 73100 Lecce, Italy
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2017, 10(10), 1114;
Received: 12 August 2017 / Revised: 15 September 2017 / Accepted: 17 September 2017 / Published: 21 September 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hard and Soft Hybrid Functional Materials)


This work describes the synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic activity of new composite nanomaterials based on ZnO nanostructures impregnated by lipophlilic porphyrins derived from cashew nut shell liquid (CNSL). The obtained nanomaterials were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and steady-state photoluminescence spectra (PL). The results confirm nanostructures showing average diameter of 55 nm and an improved absorption in the visible region. Further, the FTIR analysis proved the existence of non-covalent interactions between the porphyrin molecules and ZnO. The photocatalytic activity of prepared photocatalysts was investigated by degradation of rhodamine B (RhB) in aqueous solution under visible light irradiation and natural sunlight. It was demonstrated that the photocatalytic activity increases in the presence of the porphyrins and, also, depends on the irradiation source. The development of composite photocatalysts based on porphyrins derived from CNSL provides an alternative approach to eliminate efficiently toxic wastes from water under ambient conditions.

1. Introduction

There is growing concern about water pollution due to increased industrial activity worldwide. Among the main pollutants present in wastewaters, dyes are one of the most compromising of the aquatic life and potable water quality. Every day, large amounts of dyes are discharged into the water, from textile, paper, plastic, and cosmetics industries [1,2,3]. Many of them are of a synthetic origin with complex aromatic structures and difficult to degrade [4]. Conventional methods are not efficient for eliminating toxic organic dyes and, nowadays, heterogeneous photocatalysis using nanostructured semiconductors has been regarded as a promising technology and applied to the purification of contaminated water [2,5,6]. Photocatalytic technology has potential economic and significant environmental benefits because it has advantages, such as being non-toxic, inexpensive, highly efficient, and reusable [7]. The process is based on the generation of the electron-hole pairs on the catalyst surface that induce the production of highly-reactive radicals in solution [7,8].
Among the semiconductors, zinc oxide (ZnO) has been be shown to be an excellent photocatalyst due to its benefits and favorable attributes, such as a wide band gap (e.g., ~3.2 eV), good optoelectronic properties, high quantum efficiency, mechanical-thermal stability, non-toxicity, and versatility in synthesis [9,10,11]. Furthermore, at the nanoscale, ZnO has demonstrated improved photocatalytic performance due to the enhancement of the surface area and the quantum confinement effect [12,13,14]. However, the main disadvantage of ZnO lies in the fact that it is active only under UV light irradiation, due to its large band-gap, thus limiting its photocatalytic applications, especially under sunlight.
Without a doubt, sunlight is by far the source with the highest energy potential in the world [15] and the search for photocatalysts that make use of this clean and abundant energy, besides being appropriate, represents a sustainable alternative. There is about 47% visible light (400 < λ < 700 nm) in the solar spectrum which can, and should, be used in the treatment of dyes and organic pollutants [16]. Therefore, in order to activate ZnO with visible light, many methods have been applied, such as the coupling with other semiconductors, doping with non-metals (C, N, S, or P), noble-metals, transition metal and use of photosensitizers [9,10,14,15,17,18]. Among them, the use of porphyrins as photosensitizer agents of semiconductors has been considered one the most promising methods to extend the light absorption of ZnO due their strong absorption in the visible region of the solar spectrum, good chemical stability, and higher efficiency of electron transfer, non-toxicity, and compatibility with the environmental [17,18,19]. Composites based on porphyrin immobilization on the surface of semiconductors have been considered as efficient materials in light-harvesting systems and photocatalysis [18,19,20].
Porphyrins are versatile molecules with optical, photophysical, and electrochemical properties adjustable by peripheral substitution or metallic complexation [21]. Many efforts have been made towards the development of novel porphyrins to enhance electron transfer efficiency to semicondutors, among which molecules containing mainly carboxyl, sulfonyl, or hydroxyl groups are included [22,23,24]. Moreover, although some studies using porphyrins as photosensitizers of ZnO have been performed [8,17,18,19,25,26,27], the influence of long alkyl groups in porphyrins on photocatalytic activity of these materials it still is exploited very little. In particular, in order to make the process even more environmentally friendly, it is interesting to use porphyrins derived from natural and renewable sources, such as the cardanol present in the cashew nut shell liquid (CNSL), obtained as a byproduct of agribusiness of the cashew nut (Anacardium occidentale L.) [28,29]. Cardanol is the main constituent of the technical CNSL (65%) and presents unique structural features that allow for application in the preparation of a variety of fine chemicals and hybrid materials [30,31,32,33].
Based on these considerations, here we report the synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic activity of new environmentally friendly composite nanomaterials based on ZnO@porphyrin derived from cardanol. The photocatalytic performance of the composite nanomaterials was evaluated by the degradation of Rhodamine B (RhB) dye in aqueous solution under visible light irradiation and natural sunlight.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

All the reagents and solvents used in this work were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and Vetec Química (Duque de Caxias, Brazil). The solvents used were methanol, ethanol, hexane, dichloromethane, dimethylformamide (DMF), and chloroform. The chemical reagents were dibromoethane, 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde, boron trifluoride diethyl etherate (BF3·OEt2), 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-p-benzoquinone (DDQ), pyrrole, copper acetate (Cu(OAc)2·nH2O), zinc oxide (ZnO), and rhodamine B (RhB). The 3-n-pentadecylphenol (hydrogenated cardanol) was obtained through chromatographic separation of the constituents of CNSL according to the established procedure reported in [34].

2.2. Synthesis of the Porphyrins H2Pp (3) and CuPp (4) from Cardanol

Figure 1 shows the steps and reagents used in synthetic route of porphyrins obtained from hydrogenated cardanol. The compound 4-[2-(3-n-pendacylphenoxy)-ethoxy]benzaldehyde (2), derivated from hydrogenated cardanol (1), was prepared and characterized according to the procedure described by Mota et al. [28]. The procedure followed two steps. The first step involved the synthesis of the brominated precursor (1-(2-bromoethoxy)-3-pentadecylbenzene) which was obtained by reaction of hydrogenated cardanol (13.16 mmol) and 1,2-dibromoethane (174.00 mmol) using KOH (39.49 mmol) as the base. The system was maintained at 70 °C, stirring for about 6 h. The product was purified by recrystallization according to the following procedure: 50 mL of distilled water was added to the reaction mixture and the solution was filtered. After this, 100 mL of methanol was added to the obtained solid and the solution was heated at 65 °C for 10 min, yielding two phases: one colorless and the other yellow. The colorless phase was separated and the solution cooled for 20 min at −10 °C to recrystallize the product of interest. Then, the product was filtered and a white solid was thus obtained with a reaction yield of 86% (4.6 g). In the second step, the brominated precursor (7.30 mmol) and 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde (10.90 mmol) were used and accordingly KOH (23.30 mmol) as a base in 50 mL of DMF was added. The system was stirred at 100 °C for 6 h, then purified by recrystallization following the same above reported procedure. The product was obtained as a white solid with 56% (1.8 g) of reaction yield.
The compound 5,10,15,20-tetra-[4-(2-(3-pentadecyl)phenoxy)ethoxy]phenylporphyrin (3) was synthesized according to the procedure reported in the literature [35]. It was obtained by reacting the compound 2 (2.21 mmol) with pyrrole (2.21 mmol) and NaCl (55.25 mmol). The mixture was dissolved in 50 mL of chloroform containing 0.8% ethanol and kept under stirring for 10 min under inert atmosphere (N2). Then, BF3·OEt2 (0.72 mmol) was added. After about 10 min, DDQ (1.64 mmol) was added to the mixture. The system remained under stirring at room temperature and in an inert atmosphere for 1 h. At the end of the reaction, the product was concentrated and treated with 100 mL of a mixture DMF/ethanol (8:2 V/V) under vigorous stirring. The crude product was filtered and then purified by chromatography on a silica gel column with a dichloromethane as eluent. The product was obtained as a purple solid with a 27% (300 mg) of reaction yield.
H2Pp: Yield 27%. Anal. Calcd. for C136H182N4O8: C, 81.64%; H, 9.17%; N, 2.80%. Found: C, 81.14%; H, 9.76%; N, 2.99%. MALDI-TOF MS m/z: 2000 [M]+; Molecular weight: 2001 amu; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ, ppm: −2.70 (s, 2H, NH), 0.98 (t, 12H, CH3), 4.59 (dd, 16H, O–(CH2)2–O), 6.87–8.15 (m, 24H, o-Ph, m-Ph and p-Ph), 8.89 (s, 8H, β-Pyr); FT-IR (KBr), cm−1: 966 (δ N–H), 1286 (ν C–N), 2848 and 2918 (ν C–H Aliphatic), 3034 and 3068 (ν C–H Aromatic), 3325 (ν N–H); UV-Vis, CHCl3max, nm): 421; 519; 556; 594; 651.
The compound Cu (II) 5,10,15,20-tetra-[4-(2-(3-pentadecyl)phenoxy)ethoxy]phenyl porphyrin (4) was synthesized according to the procedure reported by [29], with some modifications. Initially, the compound 3 (0.05 mmol) was solubilized in 20 mL of dichloromethane and the solution heated to 70 °C. Then, Cu(OAc)2·nH2O (5.00 mmol) was dissolved in 20 mL of DMF. The system was stirred under nitrogen for approximately 3 h. Then, the reaction mixture was treated in a separatory funnel containing 40 mL of distilled water and 40 mL of dichloromethane. The organic phase was separated, concentrated, and purified by chromatography using a silica gel column and dichloromethane/hexane (7:3, V/V) as eluent. The product was obtained as a pink solid with a 93% (95 mg) reaction yield.
CuPp: Yield 93%. Anal. Calcd. for C136H180N4O8Cu: C, 79.20; H, 8.80; N, 2.72. Found: C, 79.28; H, 9.75; N, 2.16%. MALDI-TOF MS m/z: 2062 [M]+; Molecular weight: 2062 amu; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz): δ, ppm: 0.88 (brs, 12H, CH3), 4.46 (brs, 16H, O–(CH2)2–O), 6.85 (brs, o-Ph, m-Ph and p-Ph); FT-IR (KBr), cm−1: 998 (N–M), 1287 (ν C–N), 2849 and 2917 (ν C–H Aliphatic), 3029 and 3067 (ν C–H Aromatic); UV-Vis, CHCl3max, nm): 419; 541; 578.

2.3. Preparation of the H2Pp-ZnO and CuPp–ZnO Photocatalysts

The photocatalysts were obtained according to the method previously reported by [17], with some modifications. Initially, a 4 µmol amount of the porphyrin H2Pp was dissolved in 15 mL of dichloromethane and then 1 g of nanoparticulate ZnO was added into this solution. The mixture was placed under ultrasound irradiation at 40 °C for 1 h and, afterwards, stirred at room temperature for 24 h. Then, the solvent was removed under vacuum and the H2Pp–ZnO photocatalyst was collected. The same procedure was performed with CuPp to obtain nanostructures of CuPp–ZnO.
In particular, the samples impregnated with of 4 µmol per gram of ZnO exhibited the highest photoactivity. For this reason this amount was considered as the optimal loading of porphyrins onto the surface of the ZnO powders. Increasing the loading (5 and 6 µmol of Pps/1 g ZnO) no further beneficial effect were observed. A decrease of photoactivity was observed for loading ranges between 3 µmol Pps/1 g ZnO and bare ZnO.

2.4. Sample Characterizations

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on X-ray powder diffractometer Xpert Pro MPD (Panalytical, Almelo, Netherlands) using CoKα radiation (λ = 1.7889 Å) operated at 40 kV and 30 mA over the 2θ range from 20° to 80°. The phase identification analysis was made by comparing the obtained powder diffractograms with standard patterns from Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD). UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) were recorded on a Shimadzu UV-3100 spectrophotometer (Kyoto, Japan) by using BaSO4 as a reference. FT-IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer Frontier spectrometer (Boston, MA, USA) using KBr pellets. The morphologies of the samples were examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a JEOL JEM-1011 instrument (Tokyo, Japan), operating at 100 kV and equipped with a CCD camera ORIUS 831 from Gatan (Pleasanton, CA, USA). Photoluminescence spectra (PL) were measured on a high-resolution Ocean Optics HR4000 CG-UV-NIR spectrometer (Winter Park, CO, USA), using a multi-channel LED light source (MCLS) as the source of excitation at a wavelength of 385 nm and a maximum output power of 9 mW.

2.5. Photocatalytic Activity Measurements

The photocatalytic activity of H2Pp–ZnO and CuPp–ZnO samples were measured by monitoring the degradation of RhB under visible light and natural sunlight irradiation. For measurements under visible light irradiation, a 300 W halogen lamp, with a wavelength range of 380–780 nm, was used as a light source and a 420 nm cutoff filter was placed between the lamp and the beaker to absorb the UV light. The distance between the lamp and the solution was set at 12 cm and an average light intensity of 208 W/m2 was measured at the position of the sample surface, through an HD 2302-0 (Delta OHM, Padua, Italy) radiometer. The reactor atmosphere was thermostated at 25 °C by means of continuous water circulation. The entire experimental setup was then located inside a black box, as shown in Figure 2a. In each experiment, 50 mg of photocatalyst and 50 mL of RhB solution (1 × 10−5 mol/L) were employed, while stirring and with constant bubbling of air. Prior to the photocatalytic performance test, an adsorption equilibrium was performed in the dark to determine the time to reach the adsorption equilibrium, in which the time of 30 min was found. Thus, before light irradiation, the solution was stirred for 30 min to establish the adsorption–desorption equilibrium of dye onto photocatalyst. Then, during the irradiation, about 3 mL of solution was periodically collected and analyzed by a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Cary 60, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) at a wavelength of 554 nm.
Concerning investigations under sunlight irradiation, the experimental setup was arranged in an external environment (Figure 2b) during consecutive sunny days in August 2016 between 10:30 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. (GPS coordinates: 3°44′45.5′′ S, 38°34′37.7′′ W). The average light intensity at the position of the sample surface was about 530 W/m2. The same experimental protocol previously reported was conducted under these conditions as well.
The reuse tests of the photocatalyst was carried out following the same procedure of photodegradation of RhB. For the first cycle, similar parallel tests were executed five times. In each test, the catalyst was collected by centrifugation, washed with ethanol and dried at room temperature overnight. After this, it was reused in a new photocatalytic cycle. The photostability was analyzed by DRS spectra after the last cycle.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. XRD Analysis, FT-IR Spectroscopy, UV-Vis DRS and Photoluminescent Properties

The XRD patterns of the bare ZnO and of H2Pp–ZnO and CuPp–ZnO synthesized photocatalysts are shown in Figure 3a. As can be observed, the ZnO sample showed well-defined diffraction peaks at {100}, {002}, {101}, {102}, {110}, {103}, and {200} corresponding to the hexagonal wurtzite crystal structure [36], with space group P63mc, as confirmed by Rietveld refinement (ICSD 65119). In addition, it is largely evident that the patterns of H2Pp–ZnO and CuPp–ZnO fit the same profile as observed for pure ZnO, whereby no diffraction peaks were detected related to the porphyrins due to its low doping amount [26].
The FT-IR spectra of H2Pp, CuPp, ZnO, H2Pp–ZnO, and CuPp–ZnO are shown in Figure 3b. The H2Pp shows axial and angular deformation of the N-H bond of the macrocycle at 3327 cm−1 and 967 cm−1 respectively, two bands between 2919 and 2856 cm−1 attributed to stretching of the C–H bond of the aliphatic side chains derived from cardanol and a band at 1245 cm−1 due to the axial deformation of the C–N bond typical of the pyrrole ring [37]. For metalloporphyrin CuPp, the main change observed is in the disappearance of N–H vibrations and the appearance of N–Cu absorption band at 995 cm−1 [38]. Furthermore, in the spectra of ZnO, the observed characteristic peaks corresponding to the absorption bond of Zn–O and Zn–O–Zn in the range of 400–500 cm−1. The peak appearing at 3438 cm−1 is related to the OH groups and water adsorbed onto ZnO [8,39]. Additionally, concerning the H2Pp–ZnO and CuPp–ZnO photocatalysts, it is to be noted that the ZnO-related bands were not displaced, and the characteristic peaks of porphyrinic chains could be detected at very low intensity. This can be interpreted as a weak interaction between ZnO and H2Pp or CuPp, that is, interactions of a non-covalent nature, such as Van der Waals or hydrogen bonding [40].
Figure 3c shows the UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra of the bare ZnO and composite nanomaterials recorded in the range of 200–800 nm. Pure ZnO shows a strong absorption in the UV region with a limit around λ = 385 nm, corresponding to the oxide band gap [17], and no considerable absorption in the visible region of the spectrum. On the other hand, the photocatalysts presented strong absorption bands, characteristics of H2Pp and CuPp porphyrins, in the visible region. Their respective UV-Vis spectra can be seen in Figure S1 of the Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI). Typical UV-Vis spectra of porphyrins exhibit absorptions in two regions respectively known as the Soret or B-band (~380–420 nm) and the Q-bands (~500–800 nm) which are attributed to π–π* transitions. The metalloporphyrin CuPp shows a blue shift in the soret-range compared to free-base porphyrin H2Pp because of the atomic orbitals of metallic center strongly overlapping with the occupied molecular orbitals of the ligand and, thus, resulting in a increase of the electronic transition energy [41]. Moreover, a red-shift was observed studying the DRS of the composite nanomaterials when they were compared with the data obtained for the porphyrins solution and in powder form (see Table S1 ESI), and it was more pronounced for H2Pp (19 nm) than CuPp (8 nm). This behavior could be related to the formation of aggregates of porphyrins of J-type on catalyst regarding monomeric form of the porphyrins in solution, while the peak at 396 nm indicate the presence of H-type in powder form. Nevertheless, J-aggregate formation does not represent a limitation for photocatalytic applications since the directional energy transfer makes the aggregate more suitable for broader spectral sensitization, besides improving the interfacial charge separation on the ZnO surface [20]. This result clearly indicates that the adsorption of the cardanol-derived porphyrins onto the surface of the oxide nanostructures enhances and extends the range of light absorption in the visible part of solar spectrum.
Additionally, the photoluminescent properties of ZnO, H2Pp–ZnO, and CuPp–ZnO photocatalysts were studied, as shown in Figure 3d. Photoluminescent spectra of semiconductor oxides originates from the radiative recombination of photogenerated electron–hole pairs [11]. After excitation of the ZnO near the energy band edge (λ = 385 nm), an emission band at 521 nm, which can be ascribed to the oxygen vacancies or defects happening at the ZnO surface was observed [36,42,43]. On the contrary, the intensity of the 521 nm emission band of the H2Pp–ZnO and CuPp–ZnO photocatalysts, was lower than that of bare ZnO. This observation clearly indicates that an electronic interaction between porphyrin molecules and ZnO may have arisen. Generally, the weaker the emission spectrum of semiconductor materials, the higher the rate of separation of photoinduced charge carriers and, possibly, the higher the photocatalytic activity [44]. Moreover, it is worth noting that the emission spectrum of the sample H2Pp–ZnO presented two intense peaks, respectively at 657 nm and 723 nm, attributed to the emission of pure porphyrin H2Pp [35]. The photoluminescent spectra of H2Pp and H2Pp–ZnO with visible light excitation can be seen in Figure S2 of the Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI), showing that even in the presence of ZnO, H2Pp fluorescence was not suppressed. Free base porphyrins generally have higher fluorescence quantum yields than metalloporphyrins being, for this reason, more efficient in the formation of singlet oxygen, a reactive species of great interest in photochemical reactions [45].

3.2. Morphology Analysis Based on TEM

With the aim at observing the size and the morphology of the photocatalysts, TEM analysis of the samples were performed. Reasonably, reports in the literature [10,14] have shown that the size and the morphology directly affect the photocatalytic activity of nanosized ZnO. Figure 4a shows TEM images of ZnO nanostructures organized as irregular agglomerates of nanoflakes and nanorods, which are typical morphologies of ZnO [10]. The diameter of ZnO nanoflakes were about 53 nm (Figure 4b), whereas the nanorods showed an average diameter of 55 nm. No changes in the original morphology could be discriminated after impregnation of the porphyrins onto the surface of the nanostructured ZnO (see Figure 4c,d). The nanometric size of the photocatalysts can be considered beneficial to photocatalysis process, since it affect the dynamics of the recombination of electron–hole pairs and enables a rapid migration of the photogenerated charges to the catalyst surface [46].

3.3. Effect of Catalyst Loading

The response of the catalysts concentration on the efficiency of photodegradation in aqueous solution was investigated, as the use of a dosage above or below an optimal concentration may negatively influence the removal process. Figure 5 illustrates that the degradation rate of RhB increases with an increase in the catalyst loading, up to an amount of 1.0 g/L and decreased for an amount of 2.0 g/L. This is due to the fact that, at low concentrations there are few active sites available to catalyze the reaction, whereas, for very high concentrations, the light penetration is impaired by the excess particles in the solution, thus preventing the photons from reaching the surface of the photocatalyst and, consequently, decreasing the efficiency of the process [47]. Experiments provided 1.0 g/L as the most favorable concentration.

3.4. Evaluation of Photocatalytic Activity

The photocatalytic activities of ZnO, H2Pp–ZnO, and CuPp–ZnO were evaluated by the degradation of rhodamine B (RhB) in water under visible light and natural sunlight irradiation. Figure 6a shows the concentration variation of the dye as a function of time achieved by the decrement of the characteristic absorbance of RhB at 554 nm. The degradation profiles have been provided in Figures S3–S6 of the Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI). In the blank experiment, namely under irradiation of continuous visible light, however, in the absence of any photocatalyst, the RhB solution exhibited 19% of degradiation after 150 min. The bare ZnO showed RhB decomposition as large as 80%. In fact, ZnO does not absorb visible light due to its high band gap energy, hence, the photoactivity presented by the sample is due to the photosensitization mechanism promoted by RhB and leading to its self-oxidation on the surface of the oxide [48]. H2Pp-ZnO and CuPp–ZnO photocatalysts proved to be more efficient than pure ZnO, because of a percentage of RhB decomposition of 91.5% and 96.2%, respectively. It is well-known that copper porphyrins improve the separation of photogenerated charges (electron–hole pairs) by capture of electrons and, hence, increases the efficiency in photocatalytic degradation [22,49,50]. Based on these results, it is possible to affirm that the photocatalysts synthesized with the porphyrins derived from the CNSL exhibited higher activity to degrade a dye under visible light illumination compared to previous reports [17], wherein only 63% RhB photodecomposition was shown. In this direction a pivotal role is performed by the peripheral substituent of porphyrins which, because of their length and flexibility (from cardanol), contribute to improve the charge transfer to ZnO [51].
Since a majority of the solar spectrum is visible light, it is imperative to seek a way to make use of all this available solar energy, mainly in tropical countries, like Brazil. Thus, with the aim at evaluating the influence of the UV component on the photocatalytic activity of the samples, as well as the effect of visible light intensity, tests were carried out under irradiation of natural sunlight. As illustrated in Figure 6b, only 30 min irradiation of sunlight was sufficient to both porphyrin-based photocatalysts to achieve almost complete decomposition (98%) of RhB. The degradation profiles have been provided in Figures S7–S10 of the Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI). This indicates that the presence of porphyrins is crucial for better photoactivity under sunlight.
The observed increase in the rate of decomposition herein can be explained by the cooperative mechanism of process activation, respectively involving the visible light which sensitizes the porphyrins and the UV component which activates the ZnO nanoparticles. Taking into account that under visible light irradiation only the porphyrins, but not ZnO, can be activated to the excited state [17]; nevertheless, the effect of the incident light intensity on the solution which, in the first trial had a mean value of 208 W/m2, and under natural sunlight of 530 W/m2, cannot be ruled out. Some previous studies have reported that the photocatalytic efficiency increases when a higher visible light intensity is applied [46,52]. The light intensity is related to the number of photons generated, while the energy of a photon is related to its wavelength [53]. Therefore, herein we have investigated whether, upon increasing the light intensity, more radiation reaches the surface of the photocatalyst in this fashion, producing more reactive radicals in the reaction environment.
The kinetic analysis of the majority of the photocatalytic processes is based on the Langmuir–Hinshelwood model [50]. This kinetic model describes a linear relationship obtained between the reaction rate and the concentration of the substrate in the solution. The equation predicts a pseudo-first order kinetic, which is based on the assumption that the substrate is adsorbed by a photocatalyst obeying to a Langmuir isotherm, i.e., adsorption as a mono-layer and in a condition of adsorption-desorption equilibrium maintained during the process [1,54]. In other words, the adsorption-rate onto the substrate is much faster than the reaction-rate with the photogenerated charges (e/h+). In a simplified way, the equation is described by: ln(C0/C) = −kt , where C0 and C are the concentrations of RhB in the reaction solution at irradiation time zero and t, respectively, and k (min−1) represents the pseudo-first-order rate constant.
Figure 6c,d shows the linearized experimental data, through which it was possible to obtain the kinetic constants for the photocatalysts under irradiation with visible light and sunlight. In general, a good linear correlation of the experimental data (R2 > 0.95) is observed, adjusted to the kinetic model of pseudo-first order. By evaluation of the kinetic constants (k) obtained, it can be inferred that CuPp–ZnO represents the most efficient photocatalyst under the experimental conditions investigated herein. Precisely, the rate constant of CuPp–ZnO under sunlight irradiation (k = 0.1559 min−1) was approximately 6.36 times greater than the value found under visible light irradiation (k = 0.02449 min−1). Notably, this proves that besides the presence of the UV component in solar radiation, the increase in the light intensity promotes a gain in the rate of photodegradation.

3.5. Proposed Photocatalytic Mechanism

Based on the experimental results discussed above, a possible mechanism for photodegradation of RhB, which portrays the performance of H2Pp–ZnO and CuPp–ZnO, is proposed in Figure 7. Essentially, the photocatalytic process is based on the specific acceleration of oxidation and reduction reactions due to the presence of a light activated photocatalyst. The process is initiated when the semicondutor (ZnO), absorbs photons with energy greater than its band gap, that is, the energy between the valence band (VB) and the conduction band (CB). Thus, after the light absorption, electrons (e) are transferred from the valence band to the conduction band, which leads to hole (h+) generation in the valence band [16]. These photogenerated electrons and holes migrate to the catalyst surface and tend to perform redox reactions with oxygen and water present in solution to produce superoxides (•O2) and hydroxyl (•OH) radicals, respectively. These highly-reactive radicals are responsible for reactign with RhB and degrade it during the process. However, when under visible light irradiation (Figure 7a), ZnO it cannot be excited due to its large band-gap (3.2 eV), predominating the photosensitization process by the photosensitizer. In this case, first the electrons are excited from the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of H2Pp or CuPp, and are then transferred into CB of ZnO, subsequently forming •O2 for degrade the RhB [25]. Simultaneously, holes in the sensitizer can react with water to produce hydroxyl radicals (•OH) and also act as an oxidizing agent of RhB [27,55,56]. In addition, porphyrins are able to produce singlet oxygen (1O2) [45], a reactive oxygen species formed by the interaction of sensitizer excited triplet state with molecular oxygen, contributing toward the oxidation process of RhB. In particular, is associated with fluorescence behavior of porphyrin, here demonstrated in the photoluminescent analysis of composite nanomaterials. The fact that CuPp–ZnO presents higher photocatalytic performance is due to the metal operating as an electron trap changing the oxidation state during the process and participating in the reduction of O2 to •O2 [49,50].
The beneficial effect on the photoreactivity observed under sunlight irradiation (Figure 7b), could be ascribed to a cooperative mechanism similar to that previously reported involving a class of photocatalysts based on semiconductor@sensitizer (e.g., TiO2@porphyrin, TiO2@ bis-phthalocyanines) [57]. In that context, the photoexcitation of the semiconductor was essential for the improvement of the photocatalytic process that confirmed the existence of a synergic action involving both the photoexcitation of the semiconductor (UV light component activing ZnO) and the photoexcitation of the sensitizer occurring also under visible light. Due to this cooperative mechanism the enhanced production of reactive species (•OH, •O2, etc.) generated in the system was considered responsible for the more efficient degradation of RhB. In this situation, the presence of cardanol porphyrins is very important to increase the process efficiency due to their ability to capture the visible component of sunlight, as well as to suppress the recombination of photogenerated charges [17,19]. Therefore, photocatalytic efficiency is improved in large part by the synergistic effect of cardanol porphyrins, which collect visible light, and the high performance of ZnO under UV irradiation.

3.6. Reusability of Photocatalyst

It is possible to consider that porphyrins simply cannot resist the oxidative stress to which they are subjected in the photocatalytic process. Regarding this, a past study reports that the dye (RhB), itself, undergoes a series of oxidation steps which lead its degradation, reducing the porphyrin (Pp*+) to its ground state [17], while other authors suggest the use of sacrificial electron donors (i.e., triethanolamine) to sensitizer regeneration [27]. However, Sardar et al. [58] reported that water, itself, acts as an electron donor to regenerate the photosensitizer, replacing the need for any undesirable sacrificial electron donors. In many cases, photostability can be demonstrated by means of infrared and UV-Vis spectroscopy techniques. Thus, to prove the photostability of porphyrins and the reusability of photocatalyst, analysis of UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy was performed, after some successive cycles of RhB photodegradation. As shown in Figure 8a, after four cycles, the degradation efficiency of CuPp–ZnO decreased from 96.2% to 82.7%, indicating a slow reduction of its photocatalytic efficiency. The reduction of the photocatalytic activity could be due to the adsorption of intermediate species of degraded RhB upon composite nanomaterial. UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra of CuPp–ZnO, collected after several cycles of photocatalysis (Figure 8b), showed that the Soret and Q bands of the CuPp are still present, though with minor modifications, which might be attributed to the byproducts adsorbed on photocatalyst or the formation of porphyrin H-aggregates [20]. Therefore, CuPp–ZnO has proved to be a photocatalyst which can be in an effective and efficient way employed in environmental decontamination processes.
Although many authors, concerning the mechanism of photosensitization, have indicated a peripheral polar substituent of porphyrins as responsible for a significant electronic interaction with the semiconductive support [22,27,50], thus promoting the raise of the photocatalytic performance, in the present study, it was verified that the functionalization of porphyrins with non-polar chemical groups can also act effectively in the photocatalytic processes.

4. Conclusions

In summary, in the present work new composite nanomaterials with enhanced photocatalytic properties were successfully achieved through impregnating the CNSL-derived porphyrins onto ZnO. The FTIR analysis showed that interaction between porphyrins and ZnO are of a non-covalent nature. The samples H2Pp–ZnO and CuPp–ZnO presented nanometric sizes and improved light absorption in the visible region, both beneficial properties for application in photocatalysis. The presence of porphyrins has proved to increase the recombination times of charge carriers photogenerated in the ZnO, it is confirmed by photoluminescence. The analysis of the photodegradation process of RhB promoted by sunlight, allowed us to establish the positive effect of the incident light intensity on the solution, through a cooperative mechanism involving the UV component of the incident radiation. The results demonstrate the effectiveness photocatalytic of composite nanomaterials obtained by non-covalent approach to photosensitize ZnO with porphyrins derived from renewable sources. Thus, the production of alternative photocatalysts, like these that make use of sunlight-induced photocatalysis, are extremely important to the environment and should be encouraged.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at, Figure S1: UV–Vis spectra of H2Pp and CuPp in solution and powder.; Figure S2: Photoluminescence spectra of H2Pp and H2Pp-ZnO excited at 470 nm.; Figure S3: RhB degradation profile in blank experiment under visible light.; Figure S4: RhB degradation profile in the experiment with ZnO under visible light.; Figure S5: RhB degradation profile in the experiment with H2Pp-ZnO under visible light.; Figure S6: RhB degradation profile in the experiment with CuPp-ZnO under visible light.; Figure S7: RhB degradation profile in blank experiment under sunlight.; Figure S8: RhB degradation profile in the experiment with ZnO under sunlight.; Figure S9: RhB degradation profile in the experiment with H2Pp-ZnO under sunlight.; Figure S10: RhB degradation profile in the experiment with CuPp-ZnO under sunlight.; Table S1: UV–Vis data of H2Pp and CuPp.


The authors would like to thank the support from CAPES and CNPq (Brazilian agencies) PVE 401359/2014-0, the Almonds Company of Brazil for providing the CNSL. Luigi Carbone acknowledges financial support by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research through the Cluster Tecnologici Regionali Project NANOAPULIA, “Nano-Photocatalysts for a Cleaner Atmosphere”, (MDI6SR1—CUP B38C14001140008).

Author Contributions

Viviane Gomes Pereira Ribeiro and Selma Elaine Mazzetto conceived and designed the experiments; Ana Maria Pereira Marcelo, Kássia Teixeira da Silva, and Fernando Luiz Firmino da Silva performed the experiments; João Paulo Ferreira Mota and Claudenilson da Silva Clemente analyzed the data; João Paulo Costa do Nascimento and Antonio Sérgio Bezerra Sombra contributed analysis tools; Luigi Carbone performed the TEM analyses of the samples; and Giuseppe Mele contributed to the design the experiments and coordinated the work between the Brazilian and Italian authors of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Soltani, T.; Entezari, M.H. Photolysis and photocatalysis of methylene blue by ferrite bismuth nanoparticles under sunlight irradiation. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2013, 377, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Peter, A.; Mihaly-Cozmuta, A.; Nicula, C.; Mihaly-Cozmuta, L.; Jastrzębska, A.; Olszyna, A.; Baia, L. UV Light-Assisted Degradation of Methyl Orange, Methylene Blue, Phenol, Salicylic Acid, and Rhodamine B: Photolysis Versus Photocatalyis. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2017, 228, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, Y.; Guo, H.; Zhan, Y.; Tang, W.; Cheng, X.; Liu, H. Activation of peroxymonosulfate by BiVO4 under visible light for degradation of Rhodamine B. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2016, 653, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hassan, H.S.; Elkady, M.F.; El-Shazly, A.H.; Bamufleh, H.S. Formulation of Synthesized Zinc Oxide Nanopowder into Hybrid Beads for Dye Separation. J. Nanomater. 2014, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pigeot-Rémy, S.; Dufour, F.; Herissan, A.; Ruaux, V.; Maugé, F.; Hazime, R.; Foronato, C.; Guillard, C.; Chaneac, C.; Durupthy, O.; et al. Bipyramidal anatase TiO2 nanoparticles, a highly efficient photocatalyst? Towards a better understanding of the reactivity. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 203, 324–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, C.; Yu, J.; Li, Q.; Yu, Y. Facile synthesis of monodisperse porous ZnO nanospheres for organic pollutant degradation under simulated sunlight irradiation: The effect of operational parameters. Mater. Res. Bull. 2017, 87, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Samadi, M.; Zirak, M.; Naseri, A.; Khorashadizade, E.; Moshfegh, A.Z. Recent progress on doped ZnO nanostructures for visible-light photocatalysis. Thin Solid Films 2016, 605, 2–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rahimi, R.; Yaghoubi-Berijani, M.; Zargari, S.; Rabbani, M.; Shariatinia, S. SnTCPP-modified ZnO nanorods prepared via a simple co-precipitation method: Application as a new photocatalyst for photodegradation and photoreduction processes. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2016, 42, 4697–4714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, C.; Wu, D.; Wang, P.; Ao, Y.; Hou, J.; Qian, J. Effect of oxygen vacancy on enhanced photocatalytic activity of reduced ZnO nanorod arrays. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 325, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kumar, S.G.; Koteswara Rao, K.S.R. Zinc oxide based photocatalysis: tailoring surface bulk structure and related interfacial charge carrier dynamics for better environmental applications. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 3306–3351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hamrouni, A.; Moussa, N.; Parrino, F.; Di Paola, A.; Houas, A.; Palmisano, L. Sol–gel synthesis and photocatalytic activity of ZnO–SnO2 nanocomposites. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2014, 390, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Maiti, U.N.; Maiti, S.; Chattopadhyay, K.K. An ambient condition, one pot route for large scale production of ultrafine (<15 nm) ZnO nanowires from commercial zinc exhibiting excellent recyclable catalytic performance: Approach extendable to CuO nanostructures. CrystEngComm 2012, 14, 640–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Petronella, F.; Truppi, A.; Ingrosso, C.; Placido, T.; Striccoli, M.; Curri, M.L.; Agostiano, A.; Comparelli, R. Nanocomposite materials for photocatalytic degradation of pollutants. Catal. Today 2017, 281, 85–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Selvam, N.C.S.; Vijaya, J.J.; Kennedy, L.J. Effects of Morphology and Zr Doping on Structural, Optical, and Photocatalytic Properties of ZnO Nanostructures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51, 16333–16345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Elumalai, N.K.; Vijila, C.; Jose, R.; Uddin, A.; Ramakrishna, S. Metal oxide semiconducting interfacial layers for photovoltaic and photocatalytic applications. Mater. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2015, 4, 11–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bora, L.V.; Mewada, R.K. Visible/solar light active photocatalysts for organic effluent treatment: Fundamentals, mechanisms and parametric review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 76, 1393–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sun, W.-J.; Li, J.; Mele, G.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, F. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B by surface modification of ZnO with copper (II) porphyrin under both UV-vis and visible light irradiation. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2013, 366, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, X.; Cheng, Y.; Kang, S.; Mu, J. Preparation and enhanced visible light-driven catalytic activity of ZnO microrods sensitized by porphyrin heteroaggregate. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 256, 6705–6709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rabbani, M.; Heidari-Golafzani, M.; Rahimi, R. Synthesis of TCPP/ZnFe2O4@ZnO nanohollow sphere composite for degradation of methylene blue and 4-nitrophenol under visible light. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2016, 179, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Verma, S.; Ghosh, H.N. Exciton Energy and Charge Transfer in Porphyrin Aggregate/Semiconductor (TiO2) Composites. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 1877–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Xu, Z.; Mei, Q.; Hua, Q.; Tian, R.; Weng, J.; Shi, Y.; Huang, W. Synthesis, characterization, energy transfer and photophysical properties of ethynyl bridge linked porphyrin–naphthalimide pentamer and its metal complexes. J. Mol. Struct. 2015, 1094, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhao, X.; Liu, X.; Yu, M.; Wang, C.; Li, J. The highly efficient and stable Cu, Co, Zn-porphyrin-TiO2 photocatalysts with heterojunction by using fashioned one-step method. Dyes Pigments 2017, 136, 648–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Su, X.-Q.; Li, J.; Zhang, Z.-Q.; Yu, M.-M.; Yuan, L. Cu(II) porphyrins modified TiO2 photocatalysts: Accumulated patterns of Cu(II) porphyrin molecules on the surface of TiO2 and influence on photocatalytic activity. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 626, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, X.; Yu, M.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, X.; Li, J. Solvothermal preparation of copper(II) porphyrin sensitized mesoporous TiO2 composites: Enhanced photocatalytic activity and stability in degradation of 4-nitrophenol. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2016, 42, 5197–5208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sarkar, S.; Makhal, A.; Bora, T.; Lakhsman, K.; Singha, A.; Dutta, J.; Pal, S.K. Hematoporphyrin—ZnO Nanohybrids: Twin Applications in Efficient Visible-Light Photocatalysis and Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 7027–7035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kar, P.; Sardar, S.; Alarousu, E.; Sun, J.; Seddigi, Z.S.; Ahmed, S.A.; Danish, E.Y.; Mohammed, O.F.; Pal, S.K. Impact of Metal Ions in Porphyrin-Based Applied Materials for Visible-Light Photocatalysis: Key Information from Ultrafast Electronic Spectroscopy. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 10475–10483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Devi, L.G.; ArunaKumari, M.L.; Anitha, B.G.; Shyamala, R.; Poornima, G. Photocatalytic evaluation of Hemin (chloro(protoporhyinato)iron(III)) anchored ZnO hetero-aggregate system under UV/solar light irradiation: A surface modification method. Surf. Interfaces 2016, 1–3, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mota, J.P.F.; Ribeiro, V.G.P.; da Silva, F.L.F.; Costa Junior, A.E.; Oliveira, D.R.; Kotzebue, L.R.V.; Mele, G.; Lomonaco, D.; Mazzetto, S.E. Developing eco-friendly methods for purification of compounds derived from hydrogenated cardanol. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2016, 51, 2473–2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Attanasi, O.A.; Del Sole, R.; Filippone, P.; Mazzetto, S.E.; Mele, G.; Vasapollo, G. Synthesis of novel lipophilic porphyrin-cardanol derivatives. J. Porphyr. Phthalocyanines 2004, 8, 1276–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Voirin, C.; Caillol, S.; Sadavarte, N.V.; Tawade, B.V.; Boutevin, B.; Wadgaonkar, P.P. Functionalization of cardanol: Towards biobased polymers and additives. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 3142–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lomonaco, D.; Mele, G.; Mazzetto, S.E. Cashew Nutshell Liquid (CNSL): From an Agro-industrial Waste to a Sustainable Alternative to Petrochemical Resources. In Cashew Nut Shell Liquid, 1st ed.; Anilkumar, P., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 19–38. ISBN 978-3-319-47455-7. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mele, G.; Vasapollo, G. Fine Chemicals and New Hybrid Materials from Cardanol. Mini-Rev. Organ. Chem. 2008, 5, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mele, G.; Lomonaco, D.; Mazzetto, S.E. Cardanol-Based Heterocycles: Synthesis and Applications. In Cashew Nut Shell Liquid, 1st ed.; Anilkumar, P., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 39–56. ISBN 978-3-319-47455-7. [Google Scholar]
  34. Lomonaco, D.; Santiago, G.M.P.; Ferreira, Y.S.; Arriaga, A.M.C.; Mazzetto, S.E.; Mele, G.; Vasapollo, G. Study of technical CNSL and its main components as new green larvicides. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 31–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Clemente, C.S.; Ribeiro, V.G.P.; Sousa, J.E.A.; Maia, F.J.N.; Barreto, A.C.H.; Andrade, N.F.; Denardin, J.C.; Mele, G.; Carbone, L.; Mazzetto, S.E.; et al. Porphyrin synthesized from cashew nut shell liquid as part of a novel superparamagnetic fluorescence nanosystem. J. Nanopart. Res. 2013, 15, 1739–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, X.; Qin, J.; Xue, Y.; Yu, P.; Zhang, B.; Wang, L.; Liu, R. Effect of aspect ratio and surface defects on the photocatalytic activity of ZnO nanorods. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sandrino, B.; Clemente, C.S.; Oliveira, T.M.B.F.; Ribeiro, F.W.P.; Pavinatto, F.J.; Mazzetto, S.E.; Lima-Neto, P.; Correia, A.N.; Pessoa, C.A.; Wohnrath, K. Amphiphilic porphyrin-cardanol derivatives in Langmuir and Langmuir–Blodgett films applied for sensing. Colloids Surf A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2013, 425, 68–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mota, J.P.F.; Costa Júnior, A.E.; Ribeiro, V.G.P.; Sampaio, S.G.; Lima, N.M.A.; Silva, F.L.F.; Clemente, C.S.; Mele, G.; Lomonaco, D.; Mazzetto, S.E. Synthesis, Characterization and Dielectric Properties of New 5-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)-10,15,20-tri-4-[2-(3-pentadecyl phenoxy)ethoxy.phenyl porphyrin and Their Ni, Co and Cu Complexes. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2017, 28, 1063–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Senthilkumar, S.; Hariharan, R.; Suganthi, A.; Ashokkumar, M.; Rajarajan, M.; Pitchumani, K. Synergistic photodynamic action of ZnO nanomaterials encapsulated meso-tetra(4-sulfonatophenyl) porphyrin. Powder Technol. 2013, 237, 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Di Mauro, A.; Smecca, E.; D’Urso, A.; Guglielmo, G.; Condorelli, G.G.; Fragalà, M.E. Tetra-anionic porphyrin loading onto ZnO nanoneedles: A hybrid covalent/non covalent approach. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2014, 143, 977–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Valicsek, Z.; Horváth, O. Application of the electronic spectra of porphyrins for analytical purposes: The effects of metal ions and structural distortions. Microchem. J. 2013, 107, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vanheusden, K.; Warren, W.L.; Seager, C.H.; Tallant, D.R.; Voigt, J.A.; Gnade, B.E. Mechanisms behind green photoluminescence in ZnO phosphor powders. J. Appl. Phys. 1996, 79, 7983–7990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Akir, S.; Barras, A.; Coffinier, Y.; Bououdina, M.; Boukherroub, R.; Omrani, A.D. Eco-friendly synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles with different morphologies and their visible light photocatalytic performance for the degradation of Rhodamine B. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 10259–10265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liqiang, J.; Yichun, Q.; Baiqi, W.; Shudan, L.; Baojiang, J.; Libin, Y.; Wei, F.; Honggang, F.; Jiazhong, S. Review of photoluminescence performance of nano-sized semiconductor materials and its relationships with photocatalytic activity. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2006, 90, 1773–1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zoltan, T.; Rosales, M.C.; Yadarola, C. Reactive oxygen species quantification and their correlation with the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 (anatase and rutile) sensitized with asymmetric porphyrins. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 3967–3980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sudrajat, H.; Babel, S. Comparison and mechanism of photocatalytic activities of N-ZnO and N-ZrO2 for the degradation of rhodamine 6G. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 10177–10188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bhatia, V.; Malekshoar, G.; Dhir, A.; Ray, A.K. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of atenolol using graphene TiO2 composite. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2017, 332, 182–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, C.; Ma, W.; Zhao, J. Semiconductor-mediated photodegradation of pollutants under visible-light irradiation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 4206–4219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wang, C.; Li, J.; Mele, G.; Yang, G.-M.; Zhang, F.-X.; Palmisano, L.; Vasapollo, G. Efficient degradation of 4-nitrophenol by using functionalized porphyrin-TiO2 photocatalysts under visible irradiation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2007, 76, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yu, M.; Li, J.; Sun, W.-J.; Jiang, M.; Zhang, F.-X. Preparation, characterization, and photocatalytic properties of composite materials of copper(II) porphyrin/TiO2. J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49, 5519–5528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, C.; Yang, G.-M.; Li, J.; Mele, G.; S1ota, R.; Broda, M.A.; Duan, M.-Y.; Vasapollo, G.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, F-X. Novel meso-substituted porphyrins: Synthesis, characterization and photocatalytic activity of their TiO2-based composites. Dyes Pigments 2009, 80, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ba-Abbad, M.M.; Takriff, M.S.; Kadhum, A.A.H.; Mohamad, A.B.; Benamor, A.; Mohammad, A.W. Solar photocatalytic degradation of 2-chlorophenol with ZnO nanoparticles: Optimisation with D-optimal design and study of intermediate mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 24, 2804–2819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chakrabarti, S.; Dutta, B.K. Photocatalytic degradation of model textile dyes in wastewater using ZnO as semiconductor catalyst. J. Hazard. Mater. B 2004, 112, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Pichat, P. (Ed.) Photocatalysis and Water Purification: From Fundamentals to Recent Applications, 1st ed.; Wiley: Berlin, Germany, 2013; pp. 80–82. ISBN 9783527645404. [Google Scholar]
  55. Vargas, E.; Vargas, R.; Núnez, O. A TiO2 surface modified with copper(II) phthalocyanine-tetrasulfonicacid tetrasodium salt as a catalyst during photoinduced dichlorvos mineralization by visible solar light. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 156–157, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. La, D.D.; Rananaware, A.; Salimimarand, M.; Bhosale, S.V. Well-dispersed assembled porphyrin nanorods on graphene for the enhanced photocatalytic performance. ChemistrySelect 2016, 1, 4430–4434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mele, G.; Garcìa-Lòpez, E.; Palmisano, L.; Dyrda, G.; Słota, R. Photocatalytic degradation of 4-nitrophenol in aqueous suspension by using polycrystalline TiO2 impregnated with lanthanide double-decker phthalocyanine complexes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 6581–6588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sardar, S.; Sarkar, S.; Myint, M.T.Z.; Al-Harthi, S.; Dutta, J.; Pal, S.K. Role of central metal ions in hematoporphyrin functionalized titania in solar energy conversion dynamics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 18562–18570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Synthetic scheme for porphyrins from cardanol: (1) hydrogenated cardanol; (2) aldehyded precursor; (3) H2Pp; (4) CuPp.
Figure 1. Synthetic scheme for porphyrins from cardanol: (1) hydrogenated cardanol; (2) aldehyded precursor; (3) H2Pp; (4) CuPp.
Materials 10 01114 g001
Figure 2. Photocatalytic reactor under 300 W halogen lamp irradiation (a) and under natural solar irradiation (b).
Figure 2. Photocatalytic reactor under 300 W halogen lamp irradiation (a) and under natural solar irradiation (b).
Materials 10 01114 g002
Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns of the photocatalysts; (b) FT-IR spectra; (c) UV-Vis reflectance spectra; and (d) photoluminescence spectra.
Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns of the photocatalysts; (b) FT-IR spectra; (c) UV-Vis reflectance spectra; and (d) photoluminescence spectra.
Materials 10 01114 g003
Figure 4. TEM image of bare ZnO (a) and sample size distribution (b); and TEM images of H2Pp–ZnO (c) and CuPp–ZnO (d).
Figure 4. TEM image of bare ZnO (a) and sample size distribution (b); and TEM images of H2Pp–ZnO (c) and CuPp–ZnO (d).
Materials 10 01114 g004
Figure 5. Effect of different amount of H2Pp–ZnO on photodegradation efficiency of RhB under visible light irradiation.
Figure 5. Effect of different amount of H2Pp–ZnO on photodegradation efficiency of RhB under visible light irradiation.
Materials 10 01114 g005
Figure 6. Photodegradation of RhB vs. irradiation time by bare ZnO, H2Pp–ZnO, and CuPp–ZnO photocatalysts (a) under visible light irradiation; and (b) under natural sunlight irradiation. Kinetic model of pseudo-first order for RhB photodegradation under irradiation of visible light (c); and natural sunlight (d).
Figure 6. Photodegradation of RhB vs. irradiation time by bare ZnO, H2Pp–ZnO, and CuPp–ZnO photocatalysts (a) under visible light irradiation; and (b) under natural sunlight irradiation. Kinetic model of pseudo-first order for RhB photodegradation under irradiation of visible light (c); and natural sunlight (d).
Materials 10 01114 g006
Figure 7. Proposed mechanism for reactive species formation by photocatalysts under visible light (a) and natural sunlight (b).
Figure 7. Proposed mechanism for reactive species formation by photocatalysts under visible light (a) and natural sunlight (b).
Materials 10 01114 g007
Figure 8. Reusability of CuPp-ZnO in the photodegradation of RhB (a); and UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra after last cycle of CuPp–ZnO photocatalyst (b).
Figure 8. Reusability of CuPp-ZnO in the photodegradation of RhB (a); and UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra after last cycle of CuPp–ZnO photocatalyst (b).
Materials 10 01114 g008

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ribeiro, V.G.P.; Marcelo, A.M.P.; Da Silva, K.T.; Da Silva, F.L.F.; Mota, J.P.F.; Do Nascimento, J.P.C.; Sombra, A.S.B.; Clemente, C.D.S.; Mele, G.; Carbone, L.; et al. New ZnO@Cardanol Porphyrin Composite Nanomaterials with Enhanced Photocatalytic Capability under Solar Light Irradiation. Materials 2017, 10, 1114.

AMA Style

Ribeiro VGP, Marcelo AMP, Da Silva KT, Da Silva FLF, Mota JPF, Do Nascimento JPC, Sombra ASB, Clemente CDS, Mele G, Carbone L, et al. New ZnO@Cardanol Porphyrin Composite Nanomaterials with Enhanced Photocatalytic Capability under Solar Light Irradiation. Materials. 2017; 10(10):1114.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ribeiro, Viviane Gomes Pereira, Ana Maria Pereira Marcelo, Kássia Teixeira Da Silva, Fernando Luiz Firmino Da Silva, João Paulo Ferreira Mota, João Paulo Costa Do Nascimento, Antonio Sérgio Bezerra Sombra, Claudenilson Da Silva Clemente, Giuseppe Mele, Luigi Carbone, and et al. 2017. "New ZnO@Cardanol Porphyrin Composite Nanomaterials with Enhanced Photocatalytic Capability under Solar Light Irradiation" Materials 10, no. 10: 1114.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop