Development of Surface Mining 4.0 in Terms of Technological Shock in Energy Transition: A Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. The Role of Surface Mining Digitalization in Energy Production in 21st Century
1.2. Surface Mining 4.0 as a Form of Industry 4.0 Implementation in Fossil Energy Resources Supply
2. Methodology
- -
- Artificial intelligence and neural networks, which allow for the development of machine vision and learning, as well as decision making without human intervention;
- -
- The access of engineers, designers, government control representatives to Big Data in the form of digital twins using appropriate mobile devices;
- -
- Augmented reality that combines virtual models of mine workings and machines with their physical prototypes;
- -
- Advanced 3D modeling technologies that are based on distributed and cloud computing.
3. Review of End-to-End Technologies of Industry 4.0 in Surface Mining 4.0
3.1. Mining Machines Intelligent Monitoring
3.2. Neural Networks in Mining Safety
4. Machine Vision and Learning, Unmanned Systems in Surface Mining 4.0
4.1. Machine Scene Analysis and Scene Understanding
4.2. Drones and Robot Inspectors
- -
- Zone I—conditionally unmanned zone (with zero entrance, ZEPA).
- -
- Zone II—places of a person’s presence in the quarry field as needed to maintain machines and mechanisms.
- -
- Zone III—places of a permanent person’s presence.
5. Decision-Making Systems in Surface Mining 4.0
6. Energy 4.0 Achievements in Surface Mining 4.0
7. Green Mining and Post-Mining in Surface Mining 4.0
- -
- Advancing the introduction of environmentally friendly and resource-saving technologies in comparison with technologies that increase the productivity of surface mining enterprises;
- -
- Transition to recycling scarce natural resources (such as fresh water and fertile land) with surface mining expansion in mineral resource clusters;
- -
- The priority of ESG and green investments in the total amount of investments in quarrying;
- -
- The restoration of surface mining clusters to the level of full economic use (transition from brownfields and blackfields to greenfields [147]);
- -
- The achievement of a zero level of workers with serious injuries in areas of open pit mining.
7.1. Restoration of Post-Mining Areas
7.2. Green Surface Mining
7.3. ESG Investment and Risk Management
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bórawski, P.; Bełdycka-Bórawska, A.; Holden, L. Changes in the Polish Coal Sector Economic Situation with the Background of the European Union Energy Security and EcoEfficiency Policy. Energies 2023, 16, 726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nwulu, N.; Damisa, U. Energy 4.0. Concepts and Applications; AIP Publishing: College Park, MD, USA, 2003; 208p. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duda, A.; Fidalgo Valverde, G. The Economics of Coking Coal Mining: A Fossil Fuel Still Needed for Steel Production. Energies 2021, 14, 7682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhironkin, S.; Cehlár, M. Coal Mining Sustainable Development: Economics and Technological Outlook. Energies 2021, 14, 5029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badera, J.; Kocoń, P. Local community opinions regarding the socio-environmental aspects of lignite surface mining: Experiences from central Poland. Energy Policy 2014, 66, 507–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luong, J.H.T.; Tran, C.; Ton-That, D. A Paradox over Electric Vehicles, Mining of Lith-ium for Car Batteries. Energies 2022, 15, 7997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sterba, J.; Krzemień, A.; Riesgo Fernández, P.; García-Miranda, K.E.; Fidalgo Valverde, G. Lithium mining: Accelerating the transition to sustainable energy. Resour. Policy 2019, 62, 416–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ching, T.; Ghobakhloo, M. Energy sustainability and industry 4.0. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 463, 012090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dvinin, D.; Nikolaeva, E. Comparative analysis of traditional and alter-native energy in the Russian Federation. E3S Web Conf. 2020, 157, 03015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adeyemi-Kayode, T.; Misra, S.; Orovwode, H.; Adoghe, A. Modeling the Next Decade of Energy Sustainability: A Case of a Developing Country. Energies 2022, 15, 5083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Figiel, A.; Klačková, I. Safety requirements for mining systems controlled in automatic mode. Acta Montan. Slovaca 2020, 25, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ulewicz, R.; Krstic, B.; Ingaldi, M. Mining Industry 4.0—Opportunities and Barriers. Acta Montan. Slovaca 2022, 27, 291–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olvera, B.C.; Iizuka, M. How does innovation take place in the mining industry? Understanding the logic behind innovation in a changing context. UNU-MERIT Work. Pap. Ser. 2020, 19, 1–33. [Google Scholar]
- Carrasco, Y. Mining 4.0: A Digital Transformation Approach to Mining Sector. In Proceedings of the Conference Technology Management and Leadership in Digital Transformation—Looking Ahead to Post-COVID Era, Portland, OR, USA, 7–11 August 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Bongaerts, J.C. Mining 4.0 in Developing Countries. In Scientific and Practical Studies of Raw Material Issues; Litvinenko, V., Ed.; CRC Press London: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019; pp. 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramani, R.V. Surface Mining Technology: Progress and Prospects. Procedia Eng. 2012, 46, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gajdzik, B.; Grabowska, S.; Saniuk, S. A Theoretical Framework for Industry 4.0 and Its Implementation with Selected Practical Schedules. Energies 2021, 14, 940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frenz, W. Industry 4.0 in Mining. In Yearbook of Sustainable Smart Mining and Energy; Frenz, W., Preusse, A., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY USA, 2022; pp. 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagovitsyn, O.; Churkin, O.; Gilyarova, A. Effects of application of industry-4.0 technologies and digitalization in mining. In Proceedings of the 21st International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2021. STEF92 Technology Ltd, Sofia, Bulgaria, 16–22 August 2021; pp. 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qassimi, S.; Abdelwahed, E.H. Disruptive Innovation in Mining Industry 4.0. In Studies in Distributed Intelligence; Elhoseny, M., Yuan, X., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 7–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clausen, E.; Sorensen, A.; Nienhaus, K. Mining 4.0. In Handbook Industry 4.0. Law, Technology, Society; Frenz, W., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 785–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reichl, C.; Schatz, M. World Mining Data 2020; Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Regions and Tourism: Vienna, Austria, 2020; 265p.
- Selyukov, A.; Zhironkin, S.; Cehlár, M. Improvement of Continuous Lateral Surface Mining Method for Coal Extraction from Closed Mines’ Pillars. Acta Montan. Slovaca 2020, 25, 542–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhironkin, S.; Gasanov, M.; Suslova, Y. Orderliness in Mining 4.0. Energies 2022, 15, 8153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makridin, E.V.; Tyulenev, M.A.; Markov, S.O.; Lesin, Y.V.; Murko, E.V. Overburden management towards higher safety in coal mining regions. Min. Inf. Anal. Bull. 2020, 12, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adeyeri, M.K. From Industry 3.0 to Industry 4.0: Smart Predictive Maintenance System as Platform for Leveraging. Arct. J. 2018, 71, 64–81. [Google Scholar]
- Nad, A.; Jooshaki, M.; Tuominen, E.; Michaux, S.; Kirpala, A.; Newcomb, J. Digitalization Solutions in the Mineral Processing Industry: The Case of GTK Mintec; Finland. Minerals 2022, 12, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carrasco, Y. Technology and Innovation Management in Open-Pit Peruvian Mining: Case Studies. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference for Management of Technology (IAMOT 2019), National Institute of Industrial Engineering, Mumbai, India, 7–11 April 2019; pp. 136–141. [Google Scholar]
- Krajčík, V. Digitalization of SMEs and their perceptions regarding public interventions and supports of digitalization: Evidence from mining and iron industries. Acta Montan. Slovaca 2022, 27, 100–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schindler, M.; Schoone, S.; Clausen, E. Towards an Evolving Software Ecosystem in the Mining Industry. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Adaptive and Self-Adaptive Systems and Applications, Nice, France, 25–29 October 2020; pp. 76–85. [Google Scholar]
- Jacobs, J.; Webber-Youngman, R.C.W.; van Wyk, E.A. Potential Augmented Reality Applications in the Mining Industry. Working Paper, January 2016. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314838396_Potential_Augmented_Reality_Applications_in_the_Mining_Industry (accessed on 10 February 2023).
- Loow, J.; Abrahamsson, L.; Johansson, J. Mining 4.0—the Impact of New Technology from a Work Place Perspective. Min. Metall. Explor. 2019, 36, 701–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, K.; Sepasgozar, S. Governance, Standards and Regulation: What Construction and Mining Need to Commit to Industry 4.0. Buildings 2022, 12, 1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aziz, A.; Schelen, O.; Bodin, U. A Study on Industrial IoT for the Mining Industry: Synthesized Architecture and Open Research Directions. Internet Things 2020, 1, 529–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krylkov, M.Y.; Olivetskiy, I.N. Digital transformations in drive control technology for exploration and mining equipment. Geol. Explor. 2020, 63, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hossein, M.N.; Mohammadrezaei, M.; Hunt, J.; Zakeri, B. Internet of Things (IoT) and the Energy Sector. Energies 2020, 13, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joseph, A.; Balachandra, P. Energy Internet; the Future Electricity System: Overview, Concept, Model Structure and Mechanism. Energies 2020, 13, 4242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.; Jung, D.; Nguyen, H.; Choi, Y. Diagnosis of Problems in Truck Ore Transport Operations in Underground Mines Using Various Machine Learning Models and Data Collected by Internet of Things Systems. Minerals 2021, 11, 1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- IndustriALL Head Office. The Challenge of Industry 4.0 and the Demand for New Answers; IndustriALL Head Office: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020; 36p. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, F.; Liu, M.; Gui, H.; Shen, W. A distributed frequent itemset mining algorithm using Spark for Big Data analytics. Clust. Comput. 2015, 18, 1493–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khudhair, I.Y.; Dhahi, S.H.; Alwan, S.H.; Fadil, O.; Jaaz, Z.A. Data mining and analysis for predicting electrical energy consumption. Bull. Electr. Eng. Inform. 2023, 12, 997–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, W.; Hu, J. SWEclat: A frequent itemset mining algorithm over streaming data using Spark Streaming. J. Supercomput. 2020, 76, 7619–7634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miskinis, C. How Ore Mining Will Be Improved Using Digital Twin Simulations. 2018. Available online: https://www.challenge.org/insights/digital-twin-in-mining/ (accessed on 21 February 2023).
- Vitor, R.F. Enabling Digital Twins in Industry 4.0. Lect. Notes Bus. Inf. Process. 2022, 455, 7–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elbazi, N.; Mabrouki, M.; Chebak, A.; Hammouch, F.-E. Digital Twin Architecture for Mining Industry: Case Study of a Stacker Machine in an Experimental Open-Pit Mine. In Proceedings of the 4th Global Power, Energy and Communication Conference (GPECOM), Nevsehir, Turkey, 14–17 June 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cogswell, D.; Paramatmuni, C.; Scotti, L.; Moffat, J. Guidance for Materials 4.0 to interact with a digital twin. Data-Cent. Eng. 2022, 3, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borro, D.; Zachmann, G.; Giannini, F.; Walczak, K.; Pedrocchi, N. Digital Twin for Industry 4.0. Front. Virtual Real. 2022, 3, 968054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kawtar, A.; Ahmed, A. A Hybrid Method integrating Industry 4.0’s Energy Digitization. WSEAS Trans. Syst. 2022, 21, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dli, M.; Puchkov, A.; Meshalkin, V.; Abdeev, I.; Saitov, R.; Abdeev, R. Energy and Resource Efficiency in Apatite-Nepheline Ore Waste Processing Using the Digital Twin Approach. Energies 2020, 13, 5829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tyleckova, E.; Noskievicova, D. The role of big data in Industry 4.0 in mining industry in Serbia. CzOTO 2020, 2, 166–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassani, H.; Komendantova, N.; Kroos, D.; Unger, S.; Yeganegi, M.R. Big Data and Energy Security: Impacts on Private Companies; National Economies and Societies. Internet Things 2022, 3, 29–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duan, M.; Huang, Q.; Xu, R.; Wang, C.; Xu, J. Optimization of Shearer Drum Based on Multi-Objective Bat Algorithm with Grid (MOBA/G). Machines 2022, 10, 733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Chen, J.; Li, S.; Qin, T. Construction of Conceptual Prospecting Model Based on Geological Big Data: A Case Study in Songtao-Huayuan Area, Hunan Province. Minerals 2022, 12, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jurdziak, L.P.; Błazej, R.; Bajda, M. Conveyor Belt 4.0. In Intelligent Systems in Production Engineering and Maintenance; Kacprzyk, J., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 3–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wajs, J.; Trybala, P.; Gorniak-Zimroz, J.; Krupa-Kurzynowska, J.; Kasza, D. Modern Solution for Fast and Accurate Inventorization of Open-Pit Mines by the Active Remote Sensing Technique—Case Study of Mikoszów Granite Mine (Lower Silesia; SW Poland). Energies 2021, 14, 6853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, H.; Gao, X.; Yang, J.; Deng, K.; Yu, Y. Monitoring Mining Subsidence Using A Combination of Phase-Stacking and Offset-Tracking Methods. Remote Sens. 2015, 7, 9166–9183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilieva, M.; Polanin, P.; Borkowski, A.; Gruchlik, P.; Smolak, K.; Kowalski, A.; Rohm, W. Mining Deformation Life Cycle in the Light of InSAR and Deformation Models. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, S.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, M.; Zhou, D.; Xia, Y. Goaf Locating Based on InSAR and Probability Integration Method. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, Y.; Zhang, Z.; He, G.; Wei, M. An Improved GrabCut Method Based on a Visual Attention Model for Rare-Earth Ore Mining Area Recognition with High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabrys, M.; Ortyl, L. Georeferencing of Multi-Channel GPR—Accuracy and Efficiency of Mapping of Underground Utility Networks. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, S.; Mallorqui, J.J.; Fan, H.; Zheng, M. Improving PSI processing of mining induced large deformations with external models. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackisch, R.; Lorenz, S.; Kirsch, M.; Zimmermann, R.; Tusa, L.; Pirttijarvi, M.; Saartenoja, A.; Ugalde, H.; Madriz, Y.; Savolainen, M.; et al. Integrated Geological and Geophysical Mapping of a Carbonatite-Hosting Outcrop in Siilinjärvi; Finland; Using Unmanned Aerial Systems. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, W.; Wang, S.; Lin, Y.; Li, Y.; Ding, F.; Wang, Y. Ground-Based SAR Moving Target Refocusing Based on Relative Speed for Monitoring Mine Slopes. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, L.; Ostadhassan, M.; Zamiran, S.; Liu, B.; Li, C.; Marino, G.G. Geomechanical Upscaling Methods: Comparison and Verification via 3D Printing. Energies 2019, 12, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Z.; Zhang, N.; Meng, F.; Han, C.; An, Y.; Zhu, R. Deformation Field Evolution and Failure Mechanisms of Coal–Rock Combination Based on the Digital Speckle Correlation Method. Energies 2019, 12, 2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rozmus, M.; Tokarczyk, J.; Michalak, D.; Dudek, M.; Szewerda, K.; Rotkegel, M.; Lamot, A.; Roser, J. Application of 3D Scanning; Computer Simulations and Virtual Reality in the Redesigning Process of Selected Areas of Underground Transportation Routes in Coal Mining Industry. Energies 2021, 14, 2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, G.; Li, R.; Liu, S.; Wei, J. Research on Underground Coal Mine Map Construction Method Based on LeGO-LOAM Improved Algorithm. Energies 2022, 15, 6256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dickey, J.P.; Eger, T.R.; Frayne, R.J.; Delgado, G.P.; Ji, X. Research Using Virtual Reality: Mobile Machinery Safety in the 21st Century. Minerals 2013, 3, 145–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martelet, G.; Gloaguen, E.; Dossing, A.; Lima Simoes da Silva, E.; Linde, J.; Rasmussen, T.M. Airborne/UAV Multisensor Surveys Enhance the Geological Mapping and 3D Model of a Pseudo-Skarn Deposit in Ploumanac’h; French Brittany. Minerals 2021, 11, 1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baek, J.; Choi, Y. A New GIS-Based Algorithm to Support Initial Transmitter Layout Design in Open-Pit Mines. Energies 2018, 11, 3063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robinson, P. Survey of crosschain communications protocols. Comput. Netw. 2021, 200, 108488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pincheira, M.; Antonini, M.; Vecchio, M. Integrating the IoT and Blockchain Technology for the Next Generation of Mining Inspection Systems. Sensors 2022, 22, 899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.; Fan, J.; Yan, Z.; Li, S.; Wang, Y. A Gas Concentration Prediction Method Driven by a Spark Streaming Framework. Energies 2022, 15, 5335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agarwal, D.; Varshney, P.; Goel, S.; Kumar, A. Blockchain Technology Applications for Industry. Int. J. Res. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 2022, 10, 1633–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crespo Marquez, A.; de la Fuente Carmona, A.; Antomarioni, S. A Process to Implement an Artificial Neural Network and Association Rules Techniques to Improve Asset Performance and Energy Efficiency. Energies 2019, 12, 3454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polo, F.A.O.; Bermejo, J.F.; Fernandez, J.F.G.; Marquez, A.C. Failure mode prediction and energy forecasting of PV plants to assist dynamic maintenance tasks by ANN based models. Renew. Energy 2015, 81, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joshi, D.; Paithanka, A.; Chatterjee, S.; Equeenuddin, S.M. Integrated Parametric Graph Closure and Branch-and-Cut Algorithm for Open Pit Mine Scheduling under Uncertainty. Mining 2022, 2, 32–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilson, R.; Mercier, P.H.J.; Navarra, A. Integrated Artificial Neural Network and Discrete Event Simulation Framework for Regional Development of Refractory Gold Systems. Mining 2022, 2, 123–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, M.; Jiang, K.; Shi, H.; Yu, Y.; Hao, N. Application of Lightweight Convolutional Neural Network for Damage Detection of Conveyor Belt. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Senjoba, L.; Sasaki, J.; Kosugi, Y.; Toriya, H.; Hisada, M.; Kawamura, Y. One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network for Drill Bit Failure Detection in Rotary Percussion Drilling. Mining 2021, 1, 297–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brodny, J.; Tutak, M. The Use of Artificial Neural Networks to Analyze Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollutant Emissions from the Mining and Quarrying Sector in the European Union. Energies 2020, 13, 1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swetha, G.N.; Sudhakar, Y. Design and Implementation of Intelligent Energy Monitoring System for Industrial Machines. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Appl. Sci. 2014, 10, 399–405. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, X.; Li, H.; Wang, B.; Zhu, M. Review on Improvements to the Safety Level of Coal Mines by Applying Intelligent Coal Mining. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jablonski, A.; Bielecka, M.; Bielecki, A. Unsupervised detection of rotary machine imbalance based on statistical signal properties. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2022, 167, 108497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bielecki, A.; Bielecka, M.; Jablonski, A.; Staszewski, W. Simple method of failure detection of rotary machines. Diagnostyka 2021, 22, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Staszewski, W.; Jablonski, A. Challenges in application of MEMS sensors for condition monitoring of machinery. In Proceedings of the Conference Diagnostyka Maszyn: XLVI Ogólnopolskie Sympozjum, Politechnika Śląska, Katowice, Poland, 3–7 March 2019; p. 61. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Z.; Li, J.; Meng, Y.; Zhang, X. CAP-YOLO: Channel Attention Based Pruning YOLO for Coal Mine Real-Time Intelligent Monitoring. Sensors 2022, 22, 4331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huize, X.Z. Intelligent Monitoring System for Coal Mining Machine. Patent Pending: CN 201110454763. Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/CN103174422A/en (accessed on 21 February 2023).
- Frimpong, S.; Li, Y.; Aouad, N. Intelligent Machine Monitoring and Sensing for Safe Surface Mining Operations. In Appropriate Technologies for Environmental Protection in the Developing World; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szymański, Z.; Paraszczak, J. Application of artificial intelligence methods in diagnostics of mining machinery. IFAC Proc. Vol. 2007, 12, 403–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, M.; Sun, W.; Song, X. Research Progress on Big Data of Tunnel Boring Machine: How Data Mining Can Help Tunnel Boring. J. Mech. Eng. 2021, 57, 344–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassanien, A.E.; Darwish, A.; Abdelghafar, S. Machine learning in telemetry data mining of space mission: Basics, challenging and future directions. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2020, 53, 3201–3230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meng, X.; Chang, H.; Wang, X. Methane Concentration Prediction Method Based on Deep Learning and Classical Time Series Analysis. Energies 2022, 15, 2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, K.; Zhu, J.; He, M.; Jiang, Y.; Zhu, C.; Li, D.; Kang, L.; Sun, J.; Chen, Z.; Wan, X. Research on Intelligent Comprehensive Evaluation of Coal Seam Impact Risk Based on BP Neural Network Model. Energies 2022, 15, 3292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elmoutti, M.; Hodgkinson, J.; Dean, P. Prediction of Mining Conditions in Geotechnically Complex Sites. Mining 2021, 1, 279–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Bakr, A.Y.; Sazid, M. Application of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) for Prediction and Optimization of Blast-Induced Impacts. Mining 2021, 1, 315–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amoako, R.; Jha, A.; Zhong, S. Rock Fragmentation Prediction Using an Artificial Neural Network and Support Vector Regression Hybrid Approach. Mining 2022, 2, 233–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sunagar, P.; Naik, D.A.; Shruthi, G. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Industry 4.0. In Advances in Industry 4.0; Niranjanamurthy, M., Peng, S.-L., Naresh, E., Jayasimha, S.R., Balas, V.E., Eds.; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2022; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidorov, D.; Liu, F.; Sun, Y. Machine Learning for Energy Systems. Energies 2020, 13, 4708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, P.; Singh, D.; Bhamu, J. Machine Vision in Industry 4.0: Applications; Challenges and Future Directions. In Machine Vision for Industry 4.0. Applications and Case Studies; Raut, R., Krit, S., Chatterje, P., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kodratoff, Y.; Moscatelli, S. Machine learning for object recognition and scene analysis. Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell. 2021, 8, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu-Abed, F.N. Cyber-physical systems and human in the context of intelligent production of Industry 4.0. Econ. Innov. Manag. 2022, 3, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bielecki, A.; Smigielski, P. Graph representation for two-dimensional scene understanding by the cognitive vision module. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 2017, 14, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thepade, S.D.; Idhate, M.E. Machine Learning-Based Scene Classification Using Thepade’s SBTC, LBP, and GLCM. In Proceedings of the Conference: Futuristic Trends in Networks and Computing Technologies, Ahmedabad, India, 10–11 December 2022; pp. 603–612. [Google Scholar]
- Mayek, M.; Devi, C.N. Natural Scene Character Recognition Using CNN. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 2022, 1788, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Peng, G.; De Baets, B. Embedding metric learning into an extreme learning machine for scene recognition. Expert Syst. Appl. 2022, 203, 117505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Halawany, B.M.; Abdel-Kader, H.M.; Eldeen, A.T.; Elsayed, A.E.; Nossair, Z.B. Vision-Based Obstacles Detection for a Mobile Robot. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on INFOrmatics and Systems (INFOS2012), Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt, 14–16 May 2012; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Bielecki, A.; Buratowski, T.; Ciszewski, M.; Śmigielski, P. Vision Based Techniques of 3D Obstacle Reconfiguration for the Outdoor Drilling Mobile Robot. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing, ICAISC, Zakopane, Poland, 12–16 June 2016; pp. 602–612. [Google Scholar]
- Tong, R.; Zhang, Y.; Cui, P.; Xu, S. Characteristic Analysis of Unsafe Behavior by Coal Miners: Multi-Dimensional Description of the Pan-Scene Data. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martins, P.; Soofastaei, A. Data Collection, Storage, and Retrieval. In Data Analytics Applied to the Mining Industry; Soofastaei, A., Ed.; CRC Press: London, UK, 2021; pp. 51–74. [Google Scholar]
- Ali, M.H.; Jaber, M.M.; Alfred Daniel, J. Autonomous vehicles decision-making enhancement using self-determination theory and mixed-precision neural networks. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2023, 1, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Odeyar, P.; Apel, D.B.; Hall, R.; Zon, B.; Skrzypkowski, K. A Review of Reliability and Fault Analysis Methods for Heavy Equipment and Their Components Used in Mining. Energies 2022, 15, 6263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gackowiec, P.; Brzychczy, E.; Kesek, M. Enhancement of Machinery Activity Recognition in a Mining Environment with GPS Data. Energies 2021, 14, 3422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.; Yang, L.; Zhang, X. A Model to Predict Crosscut Stress Based on an Improved Extreme Learning Machine Algorithm. Energies 2019, 12, 896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, A.U.; Salman, S.; Muhammad, K.; Habib, M. Modelling Coal Dust Explosibility of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Coal Using Random Forest Algorithm. Energies 2022, 15, 3169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radchenko, D.; Bondarenko, B. Mining engineering system as an energy asset in industry 4.0. E3S Web Conf. 2018, 58, 01009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.; Choi, Y. Autonomous Driving Robot that Drives and Returns along a Planned Route in Underground Mines by Recognizing Road Signs. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 10235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuo, Z.; Liu, C.J.; Han, Q.-L.; Song, J. Unmanned aerial vehicles: Control methods and future challenges. J. Autom. Sin. 2022, 9, 601–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zweiri, Y.H. Identification schemes for unmanned excavator arm parameters. Int. J. Autom. Comput. 2008, 5, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dabek, P.; Szrek, J.; Zimroz, R.; Wodecki, J. An Automatic Procedure for Overheated Idler Detection in Belt Conveyors Using Fusion of Infrared and RGB Images Acquired during UGV Robot Inspection. Energies 2022, 15, 601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szrek, J.; Jakubiak, J.; Zimroz, R. A Mobile Robot-Based System for Automatic Inspection of Belt Conveyors in Mining Industry. Energies 2022, 15, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahmoradi, J.; Talebi, E.; Roghanchi, P.; Hassanalian, M. A Comprehensive Review of Applications of Drone Technology in the Mining Industry. Drones 2020, 4, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mining Industry. High-Flying Mine Surveyor. 2020. Available online: https://mining-media.ru/ru/article/anonsy/15628-markshejderiya-vysokogo-poleta (accessed on 21 February 2023).
- Porras, D.; Carrasco, J.; Carrasco, P.; Alfageme, S.; Gonzalez-Aguilera, D.; Lopez Guijarro, R. Drone Magnetometry in Mining Research. An Application in the Study of Triassic Cu–Co–Ni Mineralizations in the Estancias Mountain Range, Almeria (Spain). Drones 2021, 5, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dubinkin, D.; Sadovets, V.; Syrkin, I.; Chicherin, I. Assessment of the Need to Create Control Sytem of Unmanned Dump Truck. E3S Web Conf. 2020, 177, 03022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rio Tinto Smart Mining. Available online: https://www.riotinto.com/about/innovation/smart-mining (accessed on 15 February 2023).
- Rylnikova, M.; Radchenko, D.; Klebanov, D. Intelligent Mining Engineering Systems in the Structure of Industry 4.0. E3S Web Conf. 2017, 21, 01032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, D.; Zhang, H.; Han, X. Construction of Enterprise Marketing Management System in Digital Economic Environment from the Perspective of Green Ecology. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poormirzaee, R.; Hosseini, S.S.; Taghizadeh, R. Selection of industry 4.0 strategies to implement smart mining policy. J. Miner. Resour. Eng. 2022, 1, 15–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kainer, L. Industry 4.0—The Evolution of Business Models. Master’s Thesis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, 2017; 62p. [Google Scholar]
- Mateo, F.W.; Redchuk, A.; Tornillo, J.E. Industry 5.0 and new business models in mining. Adoption Case of Machine Learning to optimize the process at a copper Semi Autogenous Grinding (SAG) Mill. In Proceedings of the 5th European International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Rome, Italy, 26–28 June 2022; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Kagan, E.S.; Goosen, E.V.; Pakhomova, E.O.; Goosen, O.K. Industry 4.0. and an upgrade of the business models of large mining companies. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 823, 012057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bi, L.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, Y. A New Reform of Mining Production and Management Modes under Industry 4.0: Cloud Mining Mode. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mammadli, A.; Barakos, G.; Islam, M.A.; Mischo, H.; Hitch, M. Development of a Smart Computational Tool for the Evaluation of Co- and By-Products in Mining Projects Using Chovdar Gold Ore Deposit in Azerbaijan as a Case Study. Mining 2022, 2, 487–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yedla, A.; Kakhki, F.D.; Jannesari, A. Predictive Modeling for Occupational Safety Outcomes and Days Away from Work Analysis in Mining Operations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- da Silva, T.H.H. The circular economy and Industry 4.0: Synergies and challenges. Rev. Gest. 2022, 29, 300–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MobiDev Q4/2022 Company Report. Energy 4.0: Digital Transformation in Energy & Utilities Industry. Available online: https://mobidev.biz/blog/digital-transformation-energy-utilities-sector (accessed on 21 February 2023).
- Laayati, O.; Bouzi, M.; Chebak, A. Smart Energy Management System: Design of a Monitoring and Peak Load Forecasting System for an Experimental Open-Pit Mine. Appl. Syst. Innov. 2022, 5, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosero, D.G.; Díaz, N.L.; Trujillo, C.L. Cloud and machine learning experiments applied to the energy management in a microgrid cluster. Appl. Energy 2021, 304, 117770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasmussen, T.B.; Yang, G.; Nielsen, Y.H.; Dong, Z.Y. A review of cyber-physical energy system security assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE Manchester PowerTech, Manchester, UK, 18–22 June 2017; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abro, G.E.M.; Zulkifli, S.A.B.M.; Kumar, K.; El Ouanjli, N.; Asirvadam, V.S.; Mossa, M.A. Comprehensive Review of Recent Advancements in Battery Technology, Propulsion, Power Interfaces, and Vehicle Network Systems for Intelligent Autonomous and Connected Electric Vehicles. Energies 2023, 16, 2925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mo, J.; Yang, R.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, W. TD3-Based EMS Using Action Mask and Considering Battery Aging for Hybrid Electric Dump Trucks. World Electr. Veh. J. 2023, 14, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varnavskiy, K.; Nepsha, F.; Chen, Q.; Ermakov, A.; Zhironkin, S. Reliability Assessment of the Configuration of Dynamic Uninterruptible Power Sources: A Case of Data Centers. Energies 2023, 16, 1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UN Sustainable Development Goals. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed on 15 February 2023).
- De Souza, R.O.; Ferenhof, H.A.; Forcellini, F.A. Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0 from the Lean Perspective. Int. J. Manag. Knowl. Learn. 2022, 11, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nahavandi, S. Industry 5.0—A Human-Centric Solution. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Xiang, W.; Show, L.; Lin, L. Evaluation Index System of Green Surface Mining in China. Min. Metall. Explor. 2020, 37, 1093–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cehlár, M.; Janočko, J.; Šimková, Z.; Pavlik, T.; Tyulenev, M.; Zhironkin, S.; Gasanov, M. Mine Sited after Mine Activity: The Brownfields Methodology and Kuzbass Coal Mining Case. Resources 2019, 8, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tiganj, J.; Kai, L.; Tobias, R.; Kretschmann, J. German Post-Mining as a Role Model for Develop-ments in China. Glueckauf Min. Report. 2021, 157, 41–49. [Google Scholar]
- Bielecka, M.; Król-Korczakm, J. Hybrid expert system aiding design of post-mining regions restoration. Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36, 1232–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bajcar, A.; Szczepiński, J.; Rogosz, B. Bathymetry Surveys of Post-Mining Pit Lakes Formed after Exploitation of Lignite. Mater. Proc. 2021, 5, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szczepiński, J. The Significance of Groundwater Flow Modeling Study for Simulation of Opencast Mine Dewatering, Flooding, and the Environmental Impact. Water 2019, 11, 848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abu-Abed, F.N. Application of intelligent management technologies and business design of Industry 5.0 in Mining 5.0. Econ. Innov. Manag. 2022, 3, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jamett, I.; Santibanez Gonzalez, E.D.R.; Jimenez, Y.; Carrasco, P. Toward a Circular Economy in the Copper Mining Industry. In Handbook of Smart Materials, Technologies and Devices; Hussain, C.M., Di Sia, P., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jimenez-Paredes, A.E.; Alfaro-Saldana, E.F.; Hernandez-Sanchez, A.; Garcia-Meza, J.V. An Autochthonous Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans Metapopulation Exploited for Two-Step Pyrite Biooxidation Improves Au/Ag Particle Release from Mining Waste. Mining 2021, 1, 335–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Everingham, J.-A.; Svobodova, K.; Lebre, E.; Owen, J.R.; Worden, S. Comparative capacity of global mining regions to transition to a post-mining future. Extr. Ind. Soc. 2022, 8, 101136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nitlarp, T.; Kiattisin, S. The Impact Factors of Industry 4.0 on ESG in the Energy Sector. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benndorf, J.; Restrepo, D.A.; Merkel, N.; John, A.; Buxton, M.; Guatame-Garcia, A.; Dalm, M.; de Waard, B.; Flores, H.; Mollerherm, S. TRIM4Post-Mining: Transition Information Modelling for Attractive Post-Mining Landscapes—A Conceptual Framework. Mining 2022, 2, 248–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gołȩbiewski, D.; Barszcz, T.; Skrodzka, W.; Wojnicki, I.; Bielecki, A. A New Approach to Risk Management in the Power Industry Based on Systems Theory. Energies 2022, 15, 9003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Volkova, A.L. Principles, factors and types of structural transformation of the economy in the light of the human capital reproduction. Econ. Innov. Manag. 2022, 4, 4–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frolova, V.; Dolina, O.; Shpilkina, T. Investment Risk Management at Mining Enterprises. E3S Web Conf. 2019, 105, 01054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashemi, S. Financing and Risk Management of Investments in Mining Sector. Master’s Thesis, Eastern Mediterranean University, Gazimağusa, Cyprus, 2013; 62p. [Google Scholar]
- Guzyr’, V.V. Innovative ESG-Transformation of Firms as a Global Trend of Sustainable Development. Econ. Innov. Manag. 2022, 1, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tubis, A.A.; Werbińska-Wojciechowska, S.; Góralczyk, M.; Wróblewski, A.; Ziętek, B. Cyber-Attacks Risk Analysis Method for Different Levels of Automation of Mining Processes in Mines Based on Fuzzy Theory Use. Sensors 2020, 20, 7210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jonek-Kowalska, I.; Nawrocki, T. Holistic fuzzy evaluation of operational risk in polish mining enterprises in a long-term and sectoral research perspective. Resour. Policy 2019, 63, 101464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huq, N. Cyber Threats to the Mining Industry; TrendMicro: Tokyo, Japan, 2016; 52p. [Google Scholar]
- Lazarenko, Y.; Garafonova, O.; Marhasova, V.; Tkalenko, N. Digital Transformation in the Mining Sector: Exploring Global Technology Trends and Managerial Issues. E3S Web Conf. 2021, 315, 04006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smith, G.L.; Con, C.; Gil, C. Virtual Mine Technology. In Proceedings of the Bowen Basin, Symposium, Rockhampton, Astralia, 22–24 October 2000; pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Danielsson, O.; Holm, M.; Syberfeldt, A. Evaluation Framework for Augmented Reality Smart Glasses as Assembly Operator Support: Case Study of Tool Implementation. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 104904–104914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Century | Stages of Industrial Development | Key Innovations | Stages of Development of Geotechnology | Mining Innovations |
---|---|---|---|---|
First half of the 19th century | Industry 1.0 | Coal and coke, steam engines | Mining 1.0 | Mechanization of auxiliary processes |
Second half of the 19th—early 20th centuries | Industry 2.0 | Electricity, in-line production, oil and gas production, internal combustion engines | Mining 2.0 | Mechanization of the main processes |
Second half of the 20h century | Industry 3.0 | Automation, analog computing and control systems | Mining 3.0 | High capacity equipment, analog telemetry |
Beginning of the 21st century | Industry 4.0 | Digitalization, Internet of Things, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Vision, Blockchain | Mining 4.0 | Unmanned technologies, remote process control, smart robots |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhironkin, S.; Taran, E. Development of Surface Mining 4.0 in Terms of Technological Shock in Energy Transition: A Review. Energies 2023, 16, 3639. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093639
Zhironkin S, Taran E. Development of Surface Mining 4.0 in Terms of Technological Shock in Energy Transition: A Review. Energies. 2023; 16(9):3639. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093639
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhironkin, Sergey, and Ekaterina Taran. 2023. "Development of Surface Mining 4.0 in Terms of Technological Shock in Energy Transition: A Review" Energies 16, no. 9: 3639. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16093639