Next Article in Journal
Allowing Large Penetration of Concentrated RES in Europe and North Africa via a Hybrid HVAC-HVDC Grid
Previous Article in Journal
A Study on Weight Reduction and High Performance in Separated Magnetic Bearings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Strategy for the Siting of Electric Vehicle Charging Stations for Parcel Delivery Service Providers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Analyzing the Role of Renewable Energy in Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals: A Bibliometric Analysis

by
Bartolomé Marco-Lajara
1,*,
Javier Martínez-Falcó
1,2,
Eduardo Sánchez-García
1 and
Luis A. Millan-Tudela
1
1
Management Department, University of Alicante, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Spain
2
Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(7), 3137; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16073137
Submission received: 9 March 2023 / Revised: 23 March 2023 / Accepted: 28 March 2023 / Published: 30 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Development: Policies, Challenges, and Further)

Abstract

:
Academic contributions regarding the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and renewable energy have been steadily increasing, given their essential relevance to economic, societal, and environmental progress. This research aims to examine the structure of scientific knowledge on the connection between SDGs and renewable energy by utilizing bibliometric methods and analyzing 3132 articles published between 1992 and 2022. Results indicate a sharp rise in the production rate since 2015, Environmental Sciences as the most prevalent area of study, and the leading role of publishers Elsevier, MDPI, and Springer in the publication of papers related to the subject. Consequently, this research may prove useful for both novice and veteran researchers who wish to further their understanding of the academic production regarding the SDGs and renewable energy.

1. Introduction

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) can be a key tool to boost renewable energy development [1]. Indeed, Goal 7 of the SDGs focuses on ensuring access to affordable, safe, sustainable and modern energy for all [2]. This means that countries, companies, and individuals are committed to promoting the development of renewable energy, such as solar, wind, and hydropower [3]. These goals were established in 2015 by the United Nations (UN) and set out an agenda for global action to promote peace, sustainable development, and social justice [4]. These goals are based on the principles of equality, equity, and shared responsibility, based on respect for human rights, environmental protection, and the fight against climate change [5].
In today’s free market paradigm, companies are able to have a significant impact on environmental, social, and financial systems, often on a global scale [6]. After the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, several efforts were made to help organizations become more sustainable, both on a theoretical and practical level [7]. In this context, concepts such as Corporate Sustainability (CS) or Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were intensified at the business level and subsequently at the academic level [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. The SDGs offer a singular opportunity for businesses to capitalize upon, consisting of a global set of objectives with governmental, social, and corporate support, all of which can be used to provide a long-term plan of action for the purpose of policy, investment, and innovation. Furthermore, this framework provides a unified language of communication concerning social, environmental, and economic issues, allowing for improved dialogue and coordination [15].
Renewable energy is a clean and sustainable energy source that can be used to meet energy needs [16]. Its use is important as it reduces environmental impacts, contributes to the fight against climate change, provides clean and safe energy, and reduces the cost of electricity production [17]. The use of clean energy contributes to the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions in the atmosphere, which contributes to the fight against climate change [18]. This is largely because renewable energies do not emit greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide, when generating electricity [19]. This means that this type of energy generation is an important part of reducing the world’s carbon dioxide emissions [20]. Renewable energy offers a host of benefits that can help countries, businesses, and individuals achieve the SDGs [21]. These energy sources are clean, safe, and affordable, which means they can help reduce the harmful environmental impact of burning fossil fuels [22]. Furthermore, these types of energy are an inexhaustible source of energy and do not have to be refueled like fossil fuels. Therefore, the SDGs can be a key tool to boost the development of renewable energies [23].
It is important to explore the linkages between the SDGs and renewable energy because this can help countries improve the quality of life of their populations and achieve sustainable development [24]. Renewable energy can improve SDG adherence in several ways. First, it can help reduce levels of greenhouse gas emissions, thereby contributing to SDG 13 to take action to combat climate change and its effects. This will help achieve SDGs 1 and 2 of eradicating poverty and hunger and improving food security. In addition, renewable energy can contribute to SDG 7 to ensure access to modern, affordable, safe, secure, and sustainable energy services for all, facilitating energy access for people in all parts of the world. Furthermore, the transition to renewables can have a positive impact on employment through the creation of direct and indirect jobs in areas such as infrastructure construction and equipment production. This can contribute to SDG 8 of promoting sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment, and decent work for all.
The critical analysis of the state of the art on SDGs and renewable energies is a highly relevant topic today. This is because the SDGs are a set of universally accepted goals that prioritize environmental protection, human well-being, and social equity [4]. Renewable energy is seen as a promising solution to mitigate climate change and reduce dependence on fossil fuels [7]. Studies on SDGs and renewable energies are constantly evolving, with various researchers trying to better understand the impacts of their implementation, from cost-benefit analysis of different technologies to broader approaches to resource management [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25].
Studying this connection can help to understand how increased investment in clean, safe, and affordable energy can contribute to reducing the harmful environmental impact of burning fossil fuels, energy security, and poverty reduction [26]. Despite the importance of this relationship, to the best of our knowledge, there are no previous studies that have reviewed SDGs and renewable energy together using bibliometric methods. To fill this research gap, this research conducts a bibliometric analysis to understand the knowledge structure of the academic literature that has addressed the link between the SDGs and renewable energy. Bridging the research gaps in the joint study of the SDGs and renewable energy is important to better understand how the scientific output that has analyzed the contribution of renewable energy to the achievement of the SDGs is structured. This will enable decision-makers to better understand how renewables can help achieve the global goals and how they can be used to address specific problems in areas such as climate change, food security, energy access, and economic development. Similarly, this information will enable policymakers to take more effective actions that contribute to the generation of basic research in the areas of the SDGs and renewable energy and the SDGs.
There are several reasons for the originality of this study. First, it contributes to the body of knowledge concerning the scientific production that has been focused on the study of the SDGs and renewable energies. Notably, few bibliometric reviews have sought to analyze this topic. Secondly, it provides researchers with the means to identify the leading institutions and geographical regions for research stays and/or joint projects on the topic under analysis. Third, it enables academics to create new networks of collaboration between related institutions and to establish contacts with other researchers for the purpose of conducting joint research or organizing conferences. Fourth, it assists authors in identifying the main journals and publishers for disseminating the results of their research. Fifth, it assists authors in having an understanding of the main theoretical references when conducting research, improving the understanding of the field of study, and generating the theoretical underpinning. Sixth, it allows authors to be aware of the multidisciplinary nature of the subject, as well as existing and new research gaps that could help generate new knowledge on the SDGs and renewable energies. Lastly, it highlights the importance of renewable energies for the achievement of the SDGs and, consequently, for economic, social, and environmental well-being.
This research aims to utilize a bibliometric review to gain an understanding of the knowledge structure of the academic literature that has dealt with the relationship between the SDGs and renewable energies. To accomplish the proposed objective, the study is structured in the following manner: after this introduction, Section 2 elaborates on the research gap to be analyzed; Section 3 outlines the methodology used to conduct the bibliometric analysis; Section 4 presents the results; and Section 5 provides the main conclusions, limitations, and potential future lines of research.

2. Literature Reviews in the Field of SDGs and Renewable Energies

The increasing volume of scientific output on the role of renewable energies in meeting the SDGs has necessitated the collection, classification, and analysis of active research fronts in the area. Table 1 presents the publications in journals that review the literature on the topic, listing the authors, journal, objective, type of review, period, and number of articles analyzed. There are only 21 research papers indexed in the WoS core collection that have reviewed the literature, demonstrating the need to progress the state of the art of the discipline. All articles were published in the last four years (2019–2023) and 11 are bibliometric, four are systematic, and the remaining six use both bibliometric and systematic methods.
As can be seen, only Martinho’s research [27] establishes the same objective as the one pursued in this research, since the rest, despite addressing the SDG–renewable energies link, focus their analysis on other aspects, such as: green storage [28], electricity grids [29], supply and demand of complementary renewable energy systems [30], awareness of radical changes [31], sustainable development agenda [32], renewable energy technologies [33], green investments [34], renewable energy sources [35], biofuels [36], economic growth and development [37], sustainability [38], energy efficiency [39], transition to clean energy [40], supply chain activities [41], smart city facilities [42], artificial intelligence [43], deep learning models [44], African countries [45], environment [46], and sustainable energy trends [47]. Likewise, of the 21 literature reviews, only seven analyzed more than 1000 documents.
Table 1. Reviews indexed in the Web of Science core collection on linking the SDGs and renewable energies.
Table 1. Reviews indexed in the Web of Science core collection on linking the SDGs and renewable energies.
AuthorsJournalResearch ObjectiveType of ReviewPeriod
Analyzed
Papers
Analyzed
Bartolini et al. [28]Journal of Cleaner ProductionThis paper provides an overview and classification of existing research on green storage and renewable energy within the framework of the SDGs.Bibliometric and systematic review2006–201838
Hache and Palle [29]Energy PolicyThis article studies the integration of variable renewable energy sources into electricity grids with the aim of achieving the SDGs.Bibliometric analysis2015–20182119
Gan et al. [30]Sustainable FuturesThe aim of this paper is to summarize research on the relationship between supply and demand for complementary renewable energy systems within the scope of the SDGs.Bibliometric and systematic review1998–2019473
Ziabina and Pimonenko [31]Virtual EconomicsThe aim of the article is to analyze the literature to identify public awareness of radical changes in the economic and ecological spheres, with special emphasis on the development of renewable energies to achieve the SDGs.Bibliometric analysis1999–2019337
Belmonte-Ureña et al. [32]Ecological EconomicsThe study examines current academic research on advancing the sustainable development agenda as expressed in the targets of the SDGs, focusing its analysis on renewable energy.Bibliometric analysis1992–20193270
Bortoluzzi et al. [33]Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsThe aim of this article is to identify patterns in the literature on the use of key performance indicators and multi-criteria decision-making models in the analysis of renewable energy technologies, as well as their contribution to the SDGs set by the United Nations.Bibliometric analysis1988–2019142
Chițimiea et al. [34]SustainabilityThe aim of this study is to examine the importance of the implementation of green investments in organizations, including investment in renewable energy, and their contribution to the SDGs.Bibliometric and systematic review1990–2020444
Jabeen [35]International Journal of Energy Economics and PolicyThis study aims to analyze the renewable energy sources most examined by researchers over the last decade, as well as their links to the SDGs.Systematic review2010–20192868
Nazari et al. [36]Environment, Development and SustainabilityThe research aims to explore the relationship between biofuels and the SDGs, seeking to present the main challenges, perspectives, and current developments being discussed.Systematic review2015–2019942
Oliveira and Moutinho [37]EnergiesThis research aims to provide a systemic review of renewable energy, economic growth, and economic development within the framework of the SDGs.Systematic and bibliometric
review
2008–2021111
Sanak-Kosmowska and Wiktor [38]EnergiesThis paper aims to identify media debates on renewable energy sources and their contribution to sustainability and, as a consequence, the SDGs.Bibliometric analysis2019–20212443
Tang et al. [39]SustainabilityThis study aims to present a systematic and bibliographic overview of the literature on improving the energy efficiency of smart city facilities, thereby contributing to the achievement of the SDGs.Bibliometric analysis1990–20211864
Zhang et al. [40]PLOS OneThe research analyzes the transition to clean energy and its link with the achievement of the SDGs.Bibliometric analysis2000–20192191
Agrawal et al. [41]Business Strategy and the EnvironmentThe research examines the relationship between the SDGs and supply chain activities, as well as their effect on renewable energy deployment.Bibliometric analysis2015–2021144
He et al. [42]Sustainable Computing: Informatics and SystemsThis study aims to present a systematic and bibliographic overview of the literature on improving the energy efficiency of smart city facilities, thereby contributing to the achievement of the SDGs.Bibliometric and systematic review2017–20221370
Martinho [27]EnvironmentsThe main objective of this research is to conduct a systematic review of renewable and sustainable energy and its link to the SDGs.Bibliometric analysis1990–2021743
Nikseresht et al. [43]Environmental Science and Pollution ResearchThis study aims to analyze the effect of artificial intelligence on the SDGs, highlighting the importance of renewable energy.Bibliometric analysis2007–2021534
Ying et al. [44]Journal of Cleaner ProductionThis article provides a detailed literature and bibliometric review of deep learning models for effective renewable energy forecasting and thus for improving SDG compliance.Bibliometric and systematic review2016–2021276
Gyimah et al. [45]Journal of Cleaner ProductionThis study aims to systematically review the existing literature on the achievement of the SDGs in African countries, with an emphasis on the role played by renewable energies to this end.Systematic review2015–2022200
Pestisha et al. [46]EnergiesThis study provides a comprehensive review of trends in renewable energy, environment, and agricultural publications within the framework of the SDGs.Systematic review1988–2022894
Kemeç and Altınay [47]SustainabilityThe study systematically presents publishing trends related to sustainable energy, as well as their link to sustainable development and the SDGs.Bibliometric analysis1980–20221498
Source: own elaboration.
The literature reviews conducted on the topic under investigation have identified several gaps that must be addressed. To begin with, there has been an increasing interest in the role of renewable energy in attaining the SDGs, yet the number of research studies that have reviewed the literature is still low, with only 21 reviews being identified that focus on this goal. Furthermore, only three reviews have included the year 2022 in their review period, necessitating the reviews to be updated up to the present time. In addition, the number of publications examined in each review is mostly fewer than 1000 documents, meaning that a more extensive review of the literature on SDGs and renewable energy is required in order to gain a more comprehensive perspective of the topic. To address these shortcomings, this study aims to conduct a literature review using bibliometric methods, analyzing more than a thousand records, with 2022 being the last year of analysis, with the intention of continuing to expand the knowledge structure of the study of SDGs and renewable energies.
Thus, the originality of this study lies in three main factors. First, the linkage analyzed (SDGs and renewable energies) deserves special attention because its study is necessary to advance the economic, social, and environmental well-being of countries and the people and organizations that comprise them. Second, this section illustrates the scarcity of bibliometric reviews on the subject under study, making its analysis necessary to structure the existing scientific knowledge on the field. Third, the study updates the bibliometric analysis up to the present time, allowing awareness of the new fronts of research on the subject.

3. Materials and Methods

The following research offers a bibliometric analysis through the use of the WoS database. For this purpose, Boolean operators, proximity operators and markers were used, using only WoS as it is one of the most restrictive in the acceptance of articles [47], which ensured the quality and rigor of the works analyzed. Specifically, the following indexes from the main WoS collection were utilized: Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
SCI-E is a multidisciplinary citation index covering scientific and technological journals since 1900, covering more than 8000 scientific journals, as well as 12,000 conference and press journals [47]. SSCI covers more than 3000 social science journals, including press and conference journals [48]. ESCI is a citation index that includes emerging science journals as well as some press and conference journals. It is designed to reflect the diversity of scientific publications, including those from developing countries, covering more than 5000 journals [49].
After determining the use of the WoS core collection, it was necessary to search for papers that were pertinent for the analysis of the topic. Following several attempts to examine the most pertinent results, as well as the least significant ones to eliminate potentially unrelated results, it was concluded that the optimal search equation among those being considered was the following:
TS = (((sustainab* development goal$) AND (renew* energy OR clean* energy OR green* energy)))
It can be observed from the search equation that the search was divided into two groups: SDGs and renewable energies. In order to take into account all possible searching options for these two groups, all potential synonyms of the discussed concepts were examined using the Thesaurus dictionary. In this manner, all terms that could provide relevant results were included. Additionally, the AND operator was utilized, which restricted the valid papers to those that presented results from both groups concurrently [48]. Simultaneously, the wildcard (*) was employed to include possible word variations in the valid results [49]. Finally, it is worth noting that, within the groups, the Boolean operator OR was used when synonyms were involved. Boolean operators are a fundamental tool for conducting a bibliometric review as they allow users to construct complex and specific queries, helping them to gather more relevant information for their research [48]. They can be used, among other purposes, to broaden or narrow the scope of the search to specific topics, publications of certain years or types of documents, allowing researchers to obtain the most relevant results while reducing search time [48]. The parameters were applied to the theme, encompassing the title, abstract, and keywords provided by the author, in addition to the keywords included by WoS itself, until the final full year of 2022.
Following the application of the search algorithm on 25 October 2023, a total of 4330 articles were accepted. The “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses” (PRISMA statement) was chosen for the analysis of the scientific output in a sequential manner due to its capacity to enhance the reliability and reproducibility of the reviews, the comprehensive nature of the method, and its pervasiveness in bibliometric studies [50,51,52]. The PRISMA methodology is a useful tool for improving transparency and communication between authors and readers, helping to ensure that the results presented are reproducible and reliable [50]. Its use is recommended to improve the quality of research studies and readers’ understanding of the results, helping to reduce the risk of bias and errors in data collection by allowing information to be collected systematically [51]. The data were filtered to only include articles as the accepted scientific output format and duplicates were removed, resulting in a decrease from 4330 to 3132 documents (see Figure 1).
Selection of several classificatory variables was made in order to comprehend the knowledge structure of the scientific production studied. In order to determine the interest in the subject over time, the records were divided according to the year of publication in the corresponding journals. This made it possible to observe the time of initial results and the moment when the topic began to garner significant attention, as well as its current state. Additionally, the records were differentiated in accordance with the area or areas of knowledge to which they corresponded. For this purpose, the WoS classification system (known as WoS Categories) was employed. A network map was also generated with the help of the VOSviewer tool in accompaniment to the analysis.
This software application enables the construction and visualization of bibliometric networks [53], which can incorporate journals, researchers, and individual publications, based on citation, bibliographic linkage, co-citation, or co-authorship relationships [54]. The authors of the records were identified, and their influence in the field was evaluated by number of publications and citations. Additionally, a bibliographic coupling map was generated with the VOSviewer application to analyze the connections between the authors. Furthermore, the institutions (known in WoS as affiliations) associated with the authors were examined. Lastly, the main journals, volume of records, publisher, and geographic classification by countries and regions of scientific production were analyzed.
For the generation of bibliometric maps, keyword co-occurrence analysis and bibliographic linkage by country and author were used. Keyword co-occurrence analysis is a useful tool to identify emerging themes and patterns in the literature. This can help researchers to better understand the topics that are related to a specific research topic and help them identify new areas of research, as well as provide an overview of the current state of research and allow researchers to establish new lines of research [54]. On the other hand, bibliographic linkage analysis, both by authors and by institutions, is a useful tool to analyze the links between documents published by the same author or a group of authors. This tool helps to identify the number of collaborations between authors and the direction in which research is developing, provides an overview of the patterns of collaboration between authors and the related topics they are researching, and allows the researcher to identify the main contributors to the field of study and to determine whether there are topics that require further investigation [53].
There are different motivations for conducting a bibliometric review, as opposed to a narrative and systematic review. These include: (1) a bibliometric review can provide a broader and more generalized view of the topic, as it is based on a wide range of published materials; (2) it allows to identify trends in a field of research, detect areas of interest, and establish relationships between different papers and authors; (3) it provides an objective assessment of the research conducted in a particular field and can be useful to establish priorities for future research; (4) it studies the evolution of a topic through a follow-up of the publication of papers in a particular field; (5) it reduces the time required to perform a manual literature review; (6) improves coherence and consistency when evaluating scholarly output; (7) a bibliometric review provides an idea of the importance of a topic with a visual representation of published articles; (8) it helps to visualize the structure and connection of the available literature on a given topic; (9) it offers a quick and easy way to check citations and references for all articles related to a topic; (10) it can help researchers identify and evaluate works published by an author or a group of authors [53].

4. Results and Discussion

Scientific production related to the SDGs and renewable energies began to intensify from 2015. This is evidenced by a 1176.38% increase in articles from 2015 to 2022, going from 72 to 919 (see Scheme 1). This is attributed to the United Nations’ approval of the SDGs in 2015, which marked the beginning of research centered on sustainability with the SDGs as its framework [55].
Nevertheless, as depicted in Scheme 1, although the SDGs were adopted in 2015, the historical series of scientific production analyzed commences in 1992. This is due to the UN Conference on Environment and Development which took place in Rio de Janeiro, which had already begun to discuss the concept of devising a prospective Agenda 21 to address the issues that the planet would face in the 21st century, with a particular emphasis on the significance of fostering renewable energy [56].
It should be duly noted that there was a moderate augmentation in the production of scientific output in the latter half of the opening decade of the 21st century, leading to exponential growth up to the present day. This can be attributed to two primary factors. In 2000, the Millennium Summit saw the establishment of the MDGs, thereby forming a foundational blueprint for bettering economic, social, and environmental sustainability with the implementation of targets [57]. Subsequently, in 2012, the United Nations launched the SD21 project, with the intention of furthering the cause of sustainable development in the modern century, wherein renewable energy plays an essential role in realizing this objective [58].
Regarding the distribution of scientific output by research field, Table 2 shows that the top ten fields in terms of scientific output on SDGs and renewable energy are Environmental Science (1157), Sustainable Science and Technology (923), Energy Fuels (811), Environmental Studies (614), Environmental Engineering (283), Economics (209), Chemical Engineering (118), Thermodynamics (90), Regional Urban Planning (79), and Management (78). This reflects the fact that the literature analyzed is mainly in environmental, energy, and business management studies.
This highlights the multidisciplinary nature of the study of the SDGs and renewable energy, since, among other aspects, the literature reviewed can improve the understanding of the possible aspects that can enhance the environment (Environmental Sciences, Environmental Studies, and Development Studies) the diversification of energy sources at the country, organizational, and personal levels (Energy Fuels, Engineering Environmental, and Engineering Multidisciplinary), or the improvement of profitability and business productivity (Economics, Management, and Business). Furthermore, some of these research fields exhibit a considerable capacity to expand upon the knowledge of the research topic addressed in this paper. For instance, those areas focusing on the field of geography and urban studies can aid in enhancing knowledge regarding regions where renewable energy can be pursued, while simultaneously facilitating financial prosperity and encouraging the realization of the SDGs.
A keyword co-occurrence analysis was conducted in order to supplement the analysis of the correlation between the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) field and renewable energy, as well as other fields. This analysis allowed us to recognize the affiliations between keywords, as demonstrated by their adjacency on the map in Figure 2. As can be seen, the main keywords used in the scientific production analyzed, apart from SDGs and renewable energies, are sustainable development and sustainability (these being two approaches under which to study the field of SDGs and renewable energies), economic growth (the economic dimension being one of the three on which the SDGs are based), and CO2 emissions (the reduction of CO2 emissions being one of the main objectives of renewable energies).
The results of Table 3 indicate that Festus Victor Bekun is the main author researching the analyzed topic, with 28 records. This is followed by Andrew Alola (24 records), Avik Sinha (22 records), Muntasir Murshed (17 records), Mahmood Ah-mad (16 records), and Umer Shahzad (15 records). A difference of 21 articles is evident between the first author and the 30th author, Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie (1570), Andrew Alola (1502), and Festus Victor Bekun (1339). Furthermore, it is evident that seven of the top 30 authors are affiliated with Chinese organisations, six to Turkish institutions, and three to Cypriot ones.
Although the content of Table 3 reflects the main authors in the field, it is also necessary to look at the relationships between them in order to understand their influence on the development of the analyzed field. To this end, Figure 3 shows an author-based bibliographic linkage analysis. Bibliographic coupling is a measure of similarity that uses citation analysis to establish a similarity relationship between documents [59]. It occurs when two works reference a common third work in their bibliographies [60]. According to the linkage analysis, Festus Victor Bekun, Andrew Alol, Avik Sinha, Muntasir Murshed, Umer Shahzad, and Khalid Zaman appear as the most influential in the research area analyzed by having the highest proportion of linkage among the literature analyzed. This is in line with the results in Table 3, as they are the authors with the highest scientific production in this area.
With regard to the main institutions that support research on SDGs and renewable energy, Table 4 reveals that the Chinese Academy of Sciences is the leader in terms of the number of articles with 62 articles, followed by Istanbul Gelisim University (50 articles), the Egyptian Knowledge Bank Ekb, and the Indian Institute of Technology System Iit System (both with 49 articles). Additionally, China is the nation with the highest number of institutions in the top 30 for scientific production on the subject, which is consistent with the results seen in Table 3, given that the country has the most academics on the topic of this study. Moreover, it is noteworthy to emphasize the role of the United States, United Kingdom, and the Netherlands, each of which has two institutions. This analysis is supplemented by the study of bibliographic coupling by institutions shown in Figure 4, where it is observed that the two main nodes and therefore the two main institutions by bibliographic coupling are the Chinese Academy of Sciences and Istanbul Gelisim University, both of which have the largest scientific production on SDGs and renewable energies.
Regarding the main journals that disseminate research results, Table 5 shows that Sustainability is the leader with 262 publications, followed by the Journal of Cleaner Production (181) and Energies (167). It is noteworthy that the top 30 journals have a Journal Impact Factor (JIF), which is a measure used to assess journals that are considered to have sufficient quality and research impact [61,62]. Of these, 20 are in the first quartile of their respective categories, while eight are in the second quartile, indicating they are in the top 25% and 50% of the journals deemed to have sufficient quality and impact, which are mostly specialized in environmental research and, to a lesser extent, business studies. Scheme 2 demonstrates that Elsevier is the most prominent publisher in terms of academic publications, with 1118 publications, followed by MDPI (536), Springer (389), Taylor & Francis (159), and Wiley (138).
As for the geographical distribution of the scientific production analyzed, Figure 5 shows that China is the country with the largest contribution in terms of number of papers. A total of 677 publications are related to North American institutions, followed by the United States with 362 and the United Kingdom with 255. In fact, these three countries account for 23.76% of all existing scientific production on the subject. The role of India (227), Germany (217), and Turkey (193) also stands out in terms of scientific production, occupying fourth, fifth, and sixth place, respectively.
This research advances the study of the knowledge structure of the SDGs and renewable energies. First, despite the growing interest in the role of renewable energy in achieving the SDGs, the number of research studies that have reviewed the literature remains low, as only 21 reviews addressing this objective have been identified [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. This highlights the importance of continuing to review the academic literature on the topic. Second, only three reviews include the year 2022 in their review period [42,45,46], so the present study aims to contribute to updating the literature reviews on the subject. Third, the number of publications analyzed in each review is mostly less than 1000 documents, with only one review with more than 3000 records [32], so it is necessary to review the literature on SDGs and renewable energies more broadly to obtain a more complete view of the subject. Through the present research, it is possible to analyze a vast amount of scientific production on the topic under analysis, exceeding the 3000 records analyzed.

5. Conclusions

This research allows to analyze the structure of knowledge on the study of the SDGs and renewable energies, and is therefore useful both for experienced academics in the field and for those who want to start researching the link between the two topics, as well as to know the evolution over time of scientific production on the subject analyzed.
Academics and practitioners can benefit from studying the link between renewable energy and the SDGs. The knowledge gained through studying this area will enable them to become more aware of the challenges the world faces in achieving the SDGs, while also helping them to better understand how renewable energy can contribute to the achievement of these goals. This means that they will also be able to apply these ideas and knowledge in their work and contribute significantly to the development of solutions to global problems.
SDGs most closely linked to renewable energy are Goal 7 (Ensure universal access to affordable, reliable, and modern energy servers) and Goal 13 (Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts). This linkage is due to the fact that the use of renewable energy sources is an effective way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate climate change. The implementation of the SDGs can be seen as an optimal way to encourage the use of renewable energy. This can be achieved through the promotion of alternative energy projects, such as solar and wind energy, which are a good way to ensure that energy is produced in a clean and sustainable way. Investments in clean technologies, such as energy storage batteries and electric vehicles, should also be promoted, as they help to ensure that energy resources are used efficiently. In addition, governments should incentivize the use of renewable energy through subsidy schemes, reduced taxes, and education programmes for sustainable energy use. These incentives will help reduce the cost of renewable energy, which will make it more accessible to all, as well as promote research and development of new technologies to improve the efficiency and production of renewable energy sources.
A review of the academic literature that has examined the SDGs and renewable energy together is useful to help better understand the relationship between the two concepts. This is important to help decision-makers understand how renewable energy can contribute to the achievement of the SDGs, as well as to identify current challenges and opportunities in implementing renewable energy to improve energy access, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and promote sustainability. This review of the academic literature on SDGs and renewable energy can also help to develop effective strategies for the energy transition to sustainability, identify regulatory and financial barriers to renewable energy deployment, determine the effects of renewable energy deployment on energy markets, the local economy, and everyday life, and serve as a starting point for developing local and regional action plans and global strategies to achieve the SDGs.
The research concludes that scientific production linked to the SDGs and renewable energies began to intensify from 2015, experiencing exponential growth until the last year analyzed (2022). One of the main reasons for the exponential growth of the academic literature analyzed since 2015 is the Paris Agreement. The Paris Agreement was signed in 2015 and is the first international agreement that obliges countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. This obligation has driven interest in the search for clean and sustainable energy solutions globally. Other reasons include the growing concern about climate change, the urgency to accelerate the transition to clean energy, or the need to improve energy access for developing countries. These issues have attracted the attention of academics and experts from around the world, which has led to a significant increase in the academic research studied in this bibliometric review.
As for the distribution of scientific production by research field, the study shows that the top ten research fields in which scientific production on SDGs and renewable energies is framed are Environmental Sciences, Sustainable Science and Technology, and Energy Fuels. In terms of the main authors researching the topic analyzed, the bibliometric review shows that the main author is Festus Victor Bekun, followed by Andrew Alola, Avik Sinha, and Muntasir Murshed. Concerning the country of the institutions to which the top authors on the studied topic belong, it should be noted that seven researchers are affiliated with Chinese organizations, six with Turkish institutions, and three with Cypriot ones.
From these results stems China’s interest in researching and developing renewable energy. China has ratified the SDGs, and is committed to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 2030. The Chinese government is investing in research on renewable energy and the SDGs to develop efficient and sustainable technologies. This has motivated Chinese academics to research and develop new solutions in this area. Furthermore, in addition to its commitment to the SDGs, China is also seeking to reduce its dependence on fossil fuels. This means that the Chinese government is looking to develop new ways of obtaining energy, including renewables. Similarly, there is great interest in renewable energy development because of its potential to contribute to the country’s energy security and to reduce the cost of energy. Researchers in Turkey and Cyprus are also particularly interested in analyzing the academic literature on renewable energy and SDGs as these issues are directly linked to the economic and social development of both countries. On the one hand, in Turkey, the government has adopted ambitious energy development plans to boost the use of renewable energy in the country, as well as to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. On the other hand, the government of Cyprus has adopted a national policy to increase the use of renewable energy and improve its energy security. These initiatives require in-depth research on renewable energy and SDGs to better understand the challenges and opportunities they face.
Moreover, it should be noted that the main institutions supporting research on SDGs and renewable energy are the Chinese Academy of Sciences, followed by Istanbul Gelisim University, the Egyptian Knowledge Bank Ekb, and the Indian Institute of Iit System. Likewise, in terms of scientific production by country, China is the country with the highest number of institutions in the top 30 in terms of scientific production on the subject analyzed, followed by the United States and the United Kingdom. It is worth noting that the latter two countries are leaders in renewable energy technology, so there is much interest in investigating how renewable energy can be used to meet the SDGs, as well as in identifying how the SDGs and renewable energy can help improve the quality of life of citizens in these countries. As for the main journals that disseminate research results, Sustainability (MDPI) has the highest number of contributions, followed by Journal of Cleaner Production (Elsevier), and Energies (MDPI). These three journals are the leading journals for disseminating research on SDGs and renewable energy because they provide holistic coverage of research related to sustainable development and the SDGs. They specialize in topics related to the environment, sustainability, and renewable energy, such as natural resource management, green infrastructure, renewable energy, and air quality assurance, providing a platform for the publication of high-level scientific articles and serving as a forum for discussion on sustainable development issues. Along the same lines, in terms of the weight of importance of publishers by academic publications, Elsevier ranks first, followed by MDPI, Springer, Talylor & Francis, and Wiley.
Based on the scientific production analyzed, it can be stated that developing countries show the greatest interest in research on renewable energies and the SDGs. This can be explained for different reasons. First, these countries have an urgent need to address the climate crisis, as many of them depend on fossil fuels for energy and are experiencing the negative effects of climate change first-hand. Second, developing countries have limited resources to invest in clean and alternative energy, with research on renewable energy and SDGs in this context being an optimal way to make the best use of available resources. Thirdly, developing countries have the opportunity to become leaders in the fight against climate change. This is because these countries have greater flexibility to experiment with new technologies, allowing them to be at the forefront in the adoption of alternative energies, as well as to contribute significantly to the fight against climate change and help improve the quality of life of their population.
Linking renewable energy with SDGs is an urgent necessity for a better future. The use of renewable energies, such as solar, wind, and hydropower, is one of the main solutions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This measure contributes to the fight against climate change and to the reduction of air pollution, while at the same time helping to improve the quality of life of people living in areas affected by pollution. Renewable energies also contribute to improving the energy security of states. These clean sources not only renew themselves quickly, but are also cheaper than the use of fossil fuels. This means that governments can save money on their energy bills, allowing them to invest in education, health, infrastructure, and other essential services. In addition, renewable energies also contribute to job creation. The renewable energy sector requires many people to manufacture and maintain solar panels and wind turbines. This contributes to improving the quality of life of the population, while at the same time helping to reduce inequality. This is why the use of renewable energy is one of the most effective measures to achieve the SDGs. These clean sources contribute to reducing pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, improving the energy security of States, and creating jobs. It is therefore imperative that states adopt measures to boost the use of renewable energies.
The study has a number of theoretical and practical implications. First, the study advances the understanding of the scientific production that has focused its efforts on the study of SDGs and renewable energy. Second, the research can be used by researchers to identify the main institutions and geographical regions for research stays and/or joint projects on the analyzed topic. Third, it allows researchers to establish contacts with other researchers in case they wish to conduct joint research and even organize conferences on the topic under study. Fourth, through this study, academics can identify the main journals and publishers with which to disseminate their research results. Fifth, it enables authors to know the main theoretical references when conducting their research. Sixth, it allows authors to learn about the multidisciplinary and existing gaps in the examined subject matter, as well as to identify new research gaps that allow them to generate new knowledge on the study of SDGs and renewable energies. Research gaps in the study of renewable energy and the SDGs occur in all areas of sustainability, from technological to financial, social, environmental, and governance dimensions. Key research gaps include improving the understanding of the infrastructure needed to address environmental and social challenges, improving the efficiency of resource use, reducing the environmental impact of renewable energy production and consumption, and improving governance for the implementation of renewable energy-related policies and strategies. Seventh, it highlights the importance of renewable energy in achieving the SDGs and, as a consequence, economic, social, and environmental well-being.
This research can help identify policies that promote the link between renewable energies and the SDGs. First, an appropriate regulatory framework should be put in place to encourage investment in renewable energy. This would include adopting national renewable energy targets, guaranteeing long-term revenues for investors, and ensuring reliable market access. Second, fiscal and financial incentives for renewable energy investors, such as tax reductions, low-interest loans, and other financial instruments, should be provided. Third, research and development of renewable energy technologies can be encouraged through subsidies, incentives, and education programs. Fourth, compensation mechanisms could be set up for renewable energy users, such as tariff reductions, rebates, and other incentives. Fifth, support mechanisms for the inclusion of renewable energy in the economy, such as green investment funds and renewable energy funds, should be implemented. Sixth, collaboration between governments, industry, and civil society could be fostered to promote renewable energy and achieve the SDGs. Seventh, programs should be instituted to improve awareness and education on the importance of renewable energy in achieving the SDGs.
Despite the significant contributions of this bibliographic analysis, it has to be pointed out that the study also suffers from certain shortcomings. In this regard, it is worth noting the inherent limitation of bibliographic reviews, given that the scientific production is analyzed quantitatively but the content of the articles is not examined in depth. To overcome this limitation, a systematic review of the literature is suggested as a future line of research in order to identify the objectives, methodologies used, and conclusions of the published scientific output analyzed in this research. Likewise, the SDGs are only one of the possible frameworks for analyzing sustainability. For this reason, as a future line of research, we intend to analyze the link between renewable energies and sustainability, thus broadening the scope of the benefits that can be achieved through this type of energy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.M.-F. and B.M.-L.; methodology, E.S.-G.; software, L.A.M.-T.; validation, B.M.-L., E.S.-G. and J.M.-F.; formal analysis, L.A.M.-T.; investigation, L.A.M.-T.; resources, E.S.-G.; data curation, J.M.-F.; writing—original draft preparation, L.A.M.-T.; writing—review and editing, B.M.-L.; visualization, E.S.-G.; supervision, B.M.-L.; project administration, J.M.-F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The present study did not involve humans or animals.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are avail-able from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, G.; Sadiq, M.; Bashir, T.; Jain, V.; Ali, S.A.; Shabbir, M.S. The dynamic association between different strategies of renewable energy sources and sustainable economic growth under SDGs. Energy Strat. Rev. 2022, 42, 100886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. He, J.; Yang, Y.; Liao, Z.; Xu, A.; Fang, K. Linking SDG 7 to assess the renewable energy footprint of nations by 2030. Appl. Energy 2022, 317, 119167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Schwerhoff, G.; Sy, M. Financing renewable energy in Africa—Key challenge of the sustainable development goals. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 75, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Allen, C.; Metternicht, G.; Wiedmann, T. Initial progress in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A review of evidence from countries. Sustain. Sci. 2018, 13, 1453–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pizzi, S.; Caputo, A.; Corvino, A.; Venturelli, A. Management research and the UN sustainable development goals (SDGs): A bibliometric investigation and systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 276, 124033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Omer, M.A.; Noguchi, T. A conceptual framework for understanding the contribution of building materials in the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 52, 101869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zakari, A.; Khan, I.; Tan, D.; Alvarado, R.; Dagar, V. Energy efficiency and sustainable development goals (SDGs). Energy 2022, 239, 122365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marco-Lajara, B.; Zaragoza-Sáez, P.; Martínez-Falcó, J.; Sánchez-García, E. Does green intellectual capital affect green innovation performance? Evidence from the Spanish wine industry. Br. Food J. 2022, 125, 1469–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Marco-Lajara, B.; Zaragoza-Sáez, P.; Martínez-Falcó, J.; Ruiz-Fernández, L. The effect of green intellectual capital on green performance in the Spanish wine industry: A structural equation modeling approach. Complexity 2022, 2022, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Marco-Lajara, B.; Sánchez-García, E.; Martínez-Falcó, J.; Poveda-Pareja, E. Regional specialization, competitive pressure, and cooperation: The cocktail for innovation. Energies 2022, 15, 5346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fuentes-Fernández, R.; Martínez-Falcó, J.; Sánchez-García, E.; Marco-Lajara, B. Does ecological agriculture moderate the relationship between wine tourism and economic performance? A structural equation analysis applied to the ribera del duero wine context. Agriculture 2022, 12, 2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Martínez-Falcó, J.; Sánchez-García, E.; Millan-Tudela, L.A.; Marco-Lajara, B. The role of green agriculture and green supply chain management in the green intellectual capital–Sustainable performance relationship: A structural equation modeling analysis applied to the Spanish wine industry. Agriculture 2023, 13, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Marco-Lajara, B.; Martínez-Falcó, J.; Millan-Tudela, L.A.; Sánchez-García, E. Analysis of the structure of scientific knowledge on wine tourism: A bibliometric analysis. Heliyon 2023, 9, e13363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sánchez-García, E.; Marco-Lajara, B.; Seva-Larrosa, P.; Martínez-Falcó, J. Driving innovation by managing entrepreneurial orientation, cooperation and learning for the sustainability of companies in the energy sector. Sustainability 2022, 14, 16978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pedersen, C. The UN sustainable development goals (SDGs) are a great gift to business! Procedia Cirp 2018, 69, 21–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Imaz, O.; Eizagirre, A. Responsible innovation for sustainable development goals in business: An agenda for cooperative firms. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bertheau, P. Assessing the impact of renewable energy on local development and the Sustainable Development Goals: Insights from a small Philippine island. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2020, 153, 119919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dahlmann, F.; Stubbs, W.; Griggs, D.; Morrell, K. Corporate actors, the UN Sustainable Development Goals and Earth System Governance: A research agenda. Anthr. Rev. 2019, 6, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Wahab, S.; Imran, M.; Safi, A.; Wahab, Z.; Kirikkaleli, D. Role of financial stability, technological innovation, and renewable energy in achieving sustainable development goals in BRICS countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 48827–48838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Razmjoo, A.A.; Sumper, A.; Davarpanah, A. Energy sustainability analysis based on SDGs for developing countries. Energy Sources 2022, 42, 1041–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cheng, X.; Chen, J.; Jiang, S.; Dai, Y.; Zeng, J.; Shuai, C.; Liu, G. Pursuing sustainable development goals: A review of renewable energy and poverty alleviation nexus. Environ. Dev. 2021, 40, 100679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Omri, A.; Belaïd, F. Does renewable energy modulate the negative effect of environmental issues on the socio-economic welfare? J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 278, 111483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Udemba, E.; Emir, F.; Khan, N.; Hussain, S. Policy inference from technological innovation, renewable energy, and financial development for sustainable development goals (SDGs): Insight from asymmetric and bootstrap Granger causality approaches. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 59104–59117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Boubaker, S.; Omri, A. How does renewable energy contribute to the growth versus environment debate? Resour. Policy 2022, 79, 103045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ullah, I.; Safdar, M.; Zheng, J.; Severino, A.; Jamal, A. Employing bibliometric analysis to identify the current state of the art and future prospects of electric vehicles. Energies 2023, 16, 2344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, Z.; Ben Jebli, M.; Madaleno, M.; Doğan, B.; Shahzad, U. Does export product quality and renewable energy induce carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from leading complex and renewable energy economies. Renew. Energy 2021, 171, 360–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Martinho, V.J.P.D. Bibliographic coupling links: Alternative approaches to carrying out systematic reviews about renewable and sustainable energy. Environments 2022, 9, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bartolini, M.; Bottani, E.; Grosse, E.H. Green warehousing: Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 226, 242–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hache, E.; Palle, A. Renewable energy source integration into power networks, research trends and policy implications: A bibliometric and research actors survey analysis. Energy Policy 2018, 124, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gan, L.; Jiang, P.; Lev, B.; Zhou, X. Balancing of supply and demand of renewable energy power system: A review and bib-liometric analysis. Sustain. Futures 2020, 2, 100013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ziabina, Y.; Pimonenko, T. The green deal policy for renewable energy: A bibliometric analysis. Virtual Econ. 2020, 3, 147–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Belmonte-Ureña, L.J.; Plaza-Úbeda, J.A.; Vazquez-Brust, D.; Yakovleva, N. Circular economy, degrowth and green growth as pathways for research on sustainable development goals: A global analysis and future agenda. Ecol. Econ. 2021, 185, 107050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bortoluzzi, M.; de Souza, C.C.; Furlan, M. Bibliometric analysis of renewable energy types using key performance indicators and multicriteria decision models. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 143, 110958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chițimiea, A.; Minciu, M.; Manta, A.-M.; Ciocoiu, C.; Veith, C. The drivers of green investment: A bibliometric and systematic review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jabeen, S.; Malik, S.; Khan, S.; Khan, N.; Qureshi, M.I.; Saad, M.S.M. A comparative systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis on sustainability of renewable energy sources. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy 2020, 11, 270–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nazari, M.T.; Mazutti, J.; Basso, L.G.; Colla, L.M.; Brandli, L. Biofuels and their connections with the sustainable development goals: A bibliometric and systematic review. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2020, 23, 11139–11156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Oliveira, H.; Moutinho, V. Renewable energy, economic growth and economic development nexus: A bibliometric analysis. Energies 2021, 14, 4578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sanak-Kosmowska, K.; Wiktor, J.W. The morphology and differentiation of the content of international debate on renewable energy. A bibliometric analysis of web of science, Scopus, and twitter. Energies 2021, 14, 7094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tang, W.; Niu, Z.; Wei, Z.; Zhu, L. Sustainable development of eco-cities: A bibliometric review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, W.; Li, B.; Xue, R.; Wang, C.; Cao, W. A systematic bibliometric review of clean energy transition: Implications for low-carbon development. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0261091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Agrawal, R.; Majumdar, A.; Majumdar, K.; Raut, R.D.; Narkhede, B.E. Attaining sustainable development goals (SDGs) through supply chain practices and business strategies: A systematic review with bibliometric and network analyses. Bus. Strat. Environ. 2022, 31, 3669–3687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. He, P.; Almasifar, N.; Mehbodniya, A.; Javaheri, D.; Webber, J. Towards green smart cities using internet of things and op-timization algorithms: A systematic and bibliometric review. Sustain. Comput. Inform. Syst. 2022, 36, 100822. [Google Scholar]
  43. Nikseresht, A.; Hajipour, B.; Pishva, N.; Mohammadi, H. Using artificial intelligence to make sustainable development de-cisions considering VUCA: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 42509–42538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ying, C.; Wang, W.; Yu, J.; Li, Q.; Yu, D.; Liu, J. Deep learning for renewable energy forecasting: A taxonomy, and systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 384, 135414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gyimah, P.; Appiah, K.O.; Appiagyei, K. Seven years of United Nations’ sustainable development goals in Africa: A bibliometric and systematic methodological review. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 395, 136422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pestisha, A.; Gabnai, Z.; Chalgynbayeva, A.; Lengyel, P.; Bai, A. On-farm renewable energy systems: A systematic review. Energies 2023, 16, 862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kemeç, A.; Altınay, A.T. Sustainable energy research trend: A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer, RStudio bibliometrix, and CiteSpace software tools. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Clarivate. Web of Science Core Collection—Web of Science Group. Available online: https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/web-of-science-core-collection/ (accessed on 25 November 2020).
  49. Clarivate. Operadores de Búsqueda. 2021. Available online: http://webofscience.help.clarivate.com/es-es/Content/search-operators.html (accessed on 12 February 2023).
  50. Clarivate. Reglas de Búsqueda. 2021. Available online: http://webofscience.help.clarivate.com/es-es/Content/search-rules.htm (accessed on 12 February 2023).
  51. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int. J. Surg. 2021, 88, 105906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.; Prisma Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and me-ta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Int. J. Surg. 2010, 8, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Rethlefsen, M.L.; Kirtley, S.; Waffenschmidt, S.; Ayala, A.P.; Moher, D.; Page, M.J.; Koffel, J.B. PRISMA-S: An extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Syst. Rev. 2021, 10, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010, 84, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Shah, S.H.H.; Lei, S.; Ali, M.; Doronin, D.; Hussain, S.T. Prosumption: Bibliometric analysis using HistCite and VOSviewer. Kybernetes 2020, 49, 1020–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. United Nations. Back to Our Common Future: Sustainable Development in the 21st Century (SD21) Project. 2012. Available online: http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/UN-DESA_Back_Common_Future_En.pdf (accessed on 12 February 2023).
  57. Bastida, R.; Molas, N. Aprovechar los ODS para aumentar el impacto social y medioambiental de las empresas. Harv. Deusto Bus. Rev. 2022, 318, 66–75. [Google Scholar]
  58. United Nations Division for Sustainable Development. Agenda 21. In United Nations Conference on Environment & Development; SAGE Publications, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Agirreazkuenaga, L. Education for Agenda 2030: What direction do we want to take going forward? Sustainability 2020, 12, 2035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Maseda, A.; Iturralde, T.; Cooper, S.; Aparicio, G. Mapping women’s involvement in family firms: A review based on bib-liographic coupling analysis. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2022, 24, 279–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Patrício, L.D.; Ferreira, J.J. Blockchain security research: Theorizing through bibliographic-coupling analysis. J. Adv. Manag. Res. 2020, 18, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. McKiernan, E.; Schimanski, L.; Muñoz Nieves, C.; Matthias, L.; Niles, M.; Alperin, J. Use of the Journal Impact Factor in aca-demic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations. eLife 2019, 8, e47338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow diagram about the bibliometric review procedure developed. Source: own elaboration based on PRISMA guidelines.
Figure 1. Flow diagram about the bibliometric review procedure developed. Source: own elaboration based on PRISMA guidelines.
Energies 16 03137 g001
Scheme 1. Scientific production analyzed by year of publication. Source: own elaboration based on WoS.
Scheme 1. Scientific production analyzed by year of publication. Source: own elaboration based on WoS.
Energies 16 03137 sch001
Figure 2. Network map on the co-occurrence of keywords. For practical reasons, we have included those keywords that appear at least 5 times in the records considered. The size of the nodes is proportional to the number of times the keyword appears. Source: elaborated on the basis of WoS and VOSviewer.
Figure 2. Network map on the co-occurrence of keywords. For practical reasons, we have included those keywords that appear at least 5 times in the records considered. The size of the nodes is proportional to the number of times the keyword appears. Source: elaborated on the basis of WoS and VOSviewer.
Energies 16 03137 g002
Figure 3. A bibliographic linkage map by authors with at least 30 citations using citation analysis software VOSviewer. Source: elaborated on the basis of WoS and VOSviewer.
Figure 3. A bibliographic linkage map by authors with at least 30 citations using citation analysis software VOSviewer. Source: elaborated on the basis of WoS and VOSviewer.
Energies 16 03137 g003
Figure 4. Bibliographic linkage map by authors with at least 30 citations. Source: elaborated on the basis of WoS and VOSviewer.
Figure 4. Bibliographic linkage map by authors with at least 30 citations. Source: elaborated on the basis of WoS and VOSviewer.
Energies 16 03137 g004
Scheme 2. Top publishers by number of publications. Source: Own elaboration based on WoS.
Scheme 2. Top publishers by number of publications. Source: Own elaboration based on WoS.
Energies 16 03137 sch002
Figure 5. Number of records by countries. Source: Own elaboration based on WoS.
Figure 5. Number of records by countries. Source: Own elaboration based on WoS.
Energies 16 03137 g005
Table 2. Number of results by research fields (Top-30).
Table 2. Number of results by research fields (Top-30).
WoS CategoriesRecordsWoS CategoriesRecords
1Environmental Sciences115716Ecology55
2Green Sustainable Science Technology92317Multidisciplinary Sciences52
3Energy Fuels81118Materials Science Multidisciplinary50
4Environmental Studies61419Meteorology Atmospheric Sciences50
5Engineering Environmental28320Engineering Multidisciplinary49
6Economics20921Engineering Electrical Electronic47
7Engineering Chemical11822Biotechnology Applied Microbiology44
8Thermodynamics9023Water Resources42
9Regional Urban Planning7924Public Environmental Occupational Health40
10Management7825Urban Studies40
11Business7626Geography38
12Construction Building Technology7427Chemistry Physical36
13Engineering Civil6028Public Administration31
14Development Studies5629Social Sciences Interdisciplinary31
15Chemistry Multidisciplinary5530Geosciences Multidisciplinary29
Source: own elaboration based on WoS.
Table 3. Number of records, citations, work impact, and affiliation country for each main author (Top-30).
Table 3. Number of records, citations, work impact, and affiliation country for each main author (Top-30).
AuthorRegistersCitationsRatioInstitutionCountry
Festus Victor Bekun28133947.8%Istanbul Gelisim UniversityTurkey
Andrew Alola24150262.6%University of VaasaFinland
Avik Sinha22117053.2%Goa Institute Of ManagementIndia
Muntasir Murshed1744226.0%North South UniversityBangladesh
Mahmood Ahmad1646729.2%Shandong University of TechnologyChina
Umer Shahzad1546030.7%Anhui University of Finance & EconomicsChina
Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo1431622.6%Cyprus International UniversityCyprus
Bright Akwasi Gyamfi1421315.2%Istanbul Ticaret UniversityTurkey
DaliaStreimikiene1430421.7%Lithuanian Energy InstituteLithuania
Dervis Kirikkaleli1243636.3%European University of LefkeCyprus
Khalid Zaman1216113.4%Hazara UniversityPakistan
Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie111570142.7%Nord UniversityNorway
Edmund Ntom Udemba11807.3%Istanbul Gelisim UniversityTurkey
Zahoor Ahmed1021221.2%Cyprus International UniversityCyprus
Abdelmohsen Nassani1014614.6%King Saud UniversitySaudi Arabia
Rafael Alvarado939543.9%Universidad Nacional de LojaEcuador
Muhammad Khalid Anser919721.9%Xi’an University of Architecture and TechnologyChina
Ahsan Anwar926829.8%ILMA UniversityPakistan
Tomas Balezentisç920823.1%Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian EconomicsLithuania
Buhari Dogan933337.0%Suleyman Demirel UniversityTurkey
Yong Liu911312.6%Beijing University of Chemical TechnologyChina
Yang Zhang911813.1%Hunan University of Technology & BusinessChina
Mehmet Altuntas815919.9%Nisantasi UniversityTurkey
Sinan Erdogan816320.4%Mustafa Kemal UniversityTurkey
Yao Li8455.6%University of Electronic Science & Technology of ChinaChina
Haider Mahmood816821.0%Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz UniversitySaudi Arabia
Arshian Sharif839649.5%Sunway UniversityMalaysia
Farhad Taghizadeh-hesary840150.1%Tokai UniversityJapan
Syed Ahtsham Ali7385.4%Shanghai Jianqiao UniversityChina
Raja Jayaraman712317.6%Khalifa UniversityUnited Arab Emirates
Source: elaborated on the basis of WoS.
Table 4. Institutions by number of records and region (Top-30).
Table 4. Institutions by number of records and region (Top-30).
InstitutionsRecordsRegion
Chinese Academy of Sciences62China
Istanbul Gelisim University50Turkey
Egyptian Knowledge Bank Ekb49Egypt
Indian Institute of Technology System Iit System49India
Cyprus International University35Cyprus
Beijing Institute of Technology32China
Ilma University30Pakistan
Tsinghua University30China
South Ural State University29Rusia
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Iiasa28Austria
Ministry of Education Science of Ukraine28Ukraine
University of London28United Kingdom
Anhui University of Finance Economics27China
University of California System27United States
Helmholtz Association26Germany
Royal Institute of Technology25Sweden
Utrecht University25The Netherlands
Islamic Azad University23Iran
Norwegian University of Science Technology Ntnu23Norway
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Cas23China
Bucharest University of Economic Studies22Romania
GOA Institute of Management21India
United States Department of Energy21United States
Beijing Normal University19Norway
King Saud University19Saudi Arabia
State University System of Florida19United States
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia19Malaysia
University College London19United Kingdom
University of Tehran19Iran
Wageningen University Research19The Netherlands
Source: Own elaboration based on WoS.
Table 5. List of journals by number of records (Top-30) and their 2021 Journal Impact Factor (JIF) quartile.
Table 5. List of journals by number of records (Top-30) and their 2021 Journal Impact Factor (JIF) quartile.
JournalsRecordsHighest 2021 JIF QuartilePublishing Houses
Sustainability262Q2MDPI
Journal of Cleaner Production181Q1Elsevier
Energies167Q3MDPI
Environmental Science and Pollution Research134Q2Springer
Energy Policy82Q1Elsevier
Renewable Energy74Q1Elsevier
Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews59Q1Elsevier
Energy51Q1Elsevier
Applied Energy50Q1Elsevier
Science of the Total Environment41Q1Elsevier
Frontiers in Environmental Science36Q2Frontiers
Journal of Environmental Management34Q1Elsevier
Energy Reports31Q2Elsevier
Energy Research Social Science31Q1Elsevier
Environment Development and Sustainability30Q2Springer
Environmental Research Letters25Q1IOP Publishing
Sustainable Cities and Society25Q1Elsevier
Energy Environment21Q3SAGE
Sustainable Development21Q1Wiley
Technological Forecasting and Social Change21Q1Elsevier
Energy for Sustainable Development20Q2Elsevier
International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology19Q1Taylor & Francis
Climate Policy18Q1Taylor & Francis
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17Q1MDPI
Resources Policy17Q1Elsevier
Applied Sciences Basel16Q2MDPI
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy16Q2Springer
Energy Conversion and Management16Q1Elsevier
Resources Conservation and Recycling16Q1Elsevier
Energy Strategy Reviews15Q1Elsevier
Source: Own elaboration based on WoS.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marco-Lajara, B.; Martínez-Falcó, J.; Sánchez-García, E.; Millan-Tudela, L.A. Analyzing the Role of Renewable Energy in Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals: A Bibliometric Analysis. Energies 2023, 16, 3137. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16073137

AMA Style

Marco-Lajara B, Martínez-Falcó J, Sánchez-García E, Millan-Tudela LA. Analyzing the Role of Renewable Energy in Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals: A Bibliometric Analysis. Energies. 2023; 16(7):3137. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16073137

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marco-Lajara, Bartolomé, Javier Martínez-Falcó, Eduardo Sánchez-García, and Luis A. Millan-Tudela. 2023. "Analyzing the Role of Renewable Energy in Meeting the Sustainable Development Goals: A Bibliometric Analysis" Energies 16, no. 7: 3137. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16073137

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop