Next Article in Journal
Non-Intrusive Load Decomposition Based on Instance-Batch Normalization Networks
Previous Article in Journal
Spray Cooling Investigation of TiO2–Water Nanofluids on a Hot Surface
Previous Article in Special Issue
Logistics and Costs of Agricultural Residues for Cellulosic Ethanol Production
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Biomass Energy for Environmental Sustainability

Future Technology Research Center, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, 123 University Road, Section 3, Douliou 64002, Taiwan
Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, UTM, Johor Bahru 81310, Malaysia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(7), 2939;
Received: 27 February 2023 / Revised: 9 March 2023 / Accepted: 16 March 2023 / Published: 23 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomass Energy for Environmental Sustainability)
Global population growth and rising living standards have significantly impacted global energy consumption. Using fossil fuels contributes to severe environmental pollution due to the emission of large volumes of greenhouse gases [1]. Many researchers are actively developing renewable energy from alternative sources to address these concerns. Biomass energy can provide cleaner combustion and reduces greenhouse gas emissions to the atmosphere compared with fossil fuels, leading to environmental sustainability. However, significant challenges must be addressed for this energy resource to compete with fossil fuels, including improving the quality of products, ensuring economic feasibility, etc. Thus, this editorial presents the recent advances in the synthesis, processing, technology, and applications of bioenergy and biofuel resources toward environmental sustainability and economic viability.
The biochemical approach is one of the advanced technologies for converting biomass into biofuel. Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a promising and established technology for converting biomass to biogas, which can be used to generate electricity. The AD of biomass wastes poses several challenges, including low biogas yields, poor buffering capacity, low-quality end products, and potential variability. Two possible explanations for these deficiencies are low mass transfer or a recalcitrant feature of biomass wastes. Some techniques have been proposed to overcome these issues, improving the anaerobic process’s efficiency. Khan and Ahring proposed wet explosion pretreatment to degrade wheat straw lignin [2]. The molecular weight of lignin can be reduced, while the degree of methoxylation of the lignin fraction in biomass can be increased through wet explosion pretreatment, facilitating anaerobic digestion. The authors observed that the lignin pretreated via wet explosion resulted in the highest lignin degradation and methane production compared with the untreated lignin. Borek et al. presented a new approach for the leaching of organic liquid followed by methane fermentation [3]. A prototype installation was designed to enhance the efficiency of the process by flushing manure with distilled water. Flushing the manure improved production efficiency, and a significant amount of biogas was produced after 4 days. However, raw biogas usually contains impurities, including water vapor, CO2, and H2S. Nguela et al. developed a biogas purification system to enhance the biogas quality [4]. The solutions in this system rely on purification methods comprising water absorption processes and iron oxide, activated charcoal, and steel wool adsorption. Applying the purification system could significantly enhance biogas production by up to 95%.
Physiochemical conversion is another technique to convert biomass into solid fuel. Kantová et al. investigated the energy potential of pellets derived from spruce sawdust, spruce bark, and pine cones in different ratios [5]. They demonstrated that adding pine cones and spruce bark to spruce sawdust changes the nitrogen content, ash content, and melting temperature. The energy requirement for the grinding process was analyzed, and it was found that drying temperature, grinding system, and biomass types are the significant factors influencing grindability. In addition, forage grain centrifugal-rotary grinders have emerged as promising equipment for grinding grain materials. Romaniuk et al. employed the theory of physical similarity and dimension in investigating a centrifugal-rotary chopper of forage grains [6]. This method allows researchers to scale the experimental data and acquire an improved centrifugal-rotary shredder while ensuring product quality. It also outlines the energy costs of the grinding process and helps to determine the ratio of shredder parameters that will result in lower energy consumption. Moreover, biodiesel has gained recognition as a viable alternative to fossil fuels, as it is a renewable and environmentally friendly energy source. Heterogeneous catalysts have raised interest among researchers because they eliminate many problems associated with homogeneous catalysts, such as elongated separation, purification stages, and waste generation [7]. The advantages of calcium oxide catalysts over other heterogeneous catalysts include their affordable price, low solubility in methanol, low toxicity, and high availability in nature.
Cultivating perennial wild plant mixes (WPMs) is gaining more critical attention in achieving sustainability with bioenergy generation. WPMs are prospective perennial cultivation systems for biogas generation [8]. In comparison with conventional biogas crops, WPMs contribute to an increase in agrobiodiversity by providing a dynamic and various species composition of flowering plants in the form of primarily wild plants. Although WPM cultivation provides significant social–ecological benefits over conventional biogas crop rotation systems, its average methane yield remains significantly less than that of conventional biogas crops. Thus, more land is required to generate the same quantity of bioenergy (as biogas). Despite this, WMPs have several complementary advantages, particularly concerning biomass production’s diversity and ecological performance. Moreover, the polluted soil-grown plants (Elymus elongatus L. and Zea mays L.) might be utilized to improve biomass production for energy purposes. Boros-Lajszner et al. examined the heating value of the plants growing on soil containing Ni2+, Co2+, and Cd2+ [9]. Due to its high tolerance to heavy metals, Elymus elongatus L. was more effective than Zea mays L. in the phytoremediation of the soils contaminated with Cd2+, Co2+, and Ni2+. The biomass of Elymus elongatus L. and Zea mays L. grown in the soil contaminated with heavy metals had a high heating value ranging from 14.6 to 15.1 MJ per kg of air-dried biomass. In addition, Wyszkowska et al. studied the effects of Ni2+, Co2+, and Cd2+ on the biomass yield and calorific value of Festuca rubra, and the heavy metal concentrations in soils and plants [10]. As a result of these studies, it has been established that this plant species is capable of growing in soil polluted with Ni2+, Co2+, and Cd2+. Festuca rubra had C, O, H, N, S, and ash contents of 46.05%, 34.59%, 5.91%, 3.49%, 0.19%, and 9.76%, respectively. Festuca rubra had a calorific value of 15.924–16.790 MJ/kg plant dry mass and a combustion heat value of 17.696–18.576 MJ/kg. Despite heavy metal contamination, Festuca rubra has a stable calorific value; therefore, it can be used to produce energy from soils contaminated with heavy metals.
When developing biomass as an alternative energy resource, an extensive assessment of the logistic supply chain of biomass feedstocks is required to make biofuels profitable. The evaluation of the logistics and costs for the production of cellulosic ethanol in Mexico was conducted by Becerra-Pérez et al. [11]. Seven links and three minimum selling prices (MSPs) for agricultural wastes were analyzed using a value chain methodology. In addition, the harvest index (HI), the crop residue index (CRI), nutrient substitution via the extraction of agricultural wastes, and the harvest costs of corn stover were estimated. As a result, feedstock cost significantly influences the economic feasibility of cellulosic ethanol, and it is crucial to have logistical information on agricultural residues and their costs in Mexico.
In conclusion, biomass energy presents an effective solution to the present energy and environmental concerns. The articles collected for this editorial offer insights into advanced conversion and upgrading techniques that could improve the quality of biomass products. Thus, this editorial provides a preliminary step in this emerging field and a guideline for policymakers and investors for the commercialization of biomass energy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, supervision, writing—review, and editing, H.C.O.; writing—original draft, investigation, A.K.; validation, writing—review, and editing, N.A.S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Holechek, J.L.; Geli, H.M.E.; Sawalhah, M.N.; Valdez, R. A Global Assessment: Can Renewable Energy Replace Fossil Fuels by 2050? Sustainability 2022, 14, 4792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Khan, M.U.; Ahring, B.K. Anaerobic Biodegradation of Wheat Straw Lignin: The Influence of Wet Explosion Pretreatment. Energies 2021, 14, 5940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Borek, K.; Romaniuk, W.; Roman, K.; Roman, M.; Kuboń, M. The analysis of a prototype installation for biogas production from chosen agricultural substrates. Energies 2021, 14, 2132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nguela, L.J.M.; Bakari, H.; Fadimatou, H.; Christophe, G.; Michaud, P. Storage and Upgrading of Biogas by Physicochemical Purification in a Sudano-Sahelian Context. Energies 2021, 14, 5855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kantová, N.; Holubčík, M.; Čaja, A.; Trnka, J.; Jandačka, J. Analyses of Pellets Produced from Spruce Sawdust, Spruce Bark, and Pine Cones in Different Proportions. Energies 2022, 15, 2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Romaniuk, W.; Savinykh, P.; Borek, K.; Roman, K.; Isupov, A.; Moshonkin, A.; Wałowski, G.; Roman, M. The Application of Similarity Theory and Dimensional Analysis to the Study of Centrifugal-Rotary Chopper of Forage Grain. Energies 2021, 14, 4501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mazaheri, H.; Ong, H.; Amini, Z.; Masjuki, H.; Mofijur, M.; Su, C.; Badruddin, I.A.; Khan, T. An Overview of Biodiesel Production via Calcium Oxide Based Catalysts: Current State and Perspective. Energies 2021, 14, 3950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. von Cossel, M. How to reintroduce arable crops after growing perennial wild plant species such as common tansy (Tanacetum vulgare L.) for Biogas Production. Energies 2022, 15, 4380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Boros-Lajszner, E.; Wyszkowska, J.; Borowik, A.; Kucharski, J. Energetic Value of Elymus elongatus L. and Zea mays L. Grown on Soil Polluted with Ni2+, Co2+, Cd2+, and Sensitivity of Rhizospheric Bacteria to Heavy Metals. Energies 2021, 14, 4903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wyszkowska, J.; Boros-Lajszner, E.; Kucharski, J. Calorific value of Festuca rubra biomass in the phytostabilization of soil contaminated with nickel, cobalt and cadmium which disrupt the microbiological and biochemical properties of soil. Energies 2022, 15, 3445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Becerra-Pérez, L.A.; Rincón, L.; Posada-Duque, J.A. Logistics and costs of agricultural residues for cellulosic ethanol production. Energies 2022, 15, 4480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ong, H.C.; Kusmayadi, A.; Amin, N.A.S. Biomass Energy for Environmental Sustainability. Energies 2023, 16, 2939.

AMA Style

Ong HC, Kusmayadi A, Amin NAS. Biomass Energy for Environmental Sustainability. Energies. 2023; 16(7):2939.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ong, Hwai Chyuan, Adi Kusmayadi, and Nor Aishah Saidina Amin. 2023. "Biomass Energy for Environmental Sustainability" Energies 16, no. 7: 2939.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop