Next Article in Journal
Integrating Advanced Technologies for Sustainable Construction Purposes
Previous Article in Journal
An Improved Multi-Timescale AEKF–AUKF Joint Algorithm for State-of-Charge Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Electricity Demand Side Management

by
António Gomes Martins
1,2,
Luís Pires Neves
2,3 and
José Luís Sousa
2,4,*
1
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computers, University of Coimbra, 3030-290 Coimbra, Portugal
2
Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering of Coimbra (INESCC), Coimbra—Institute for Systems Engineering and Computers at Coimbra, 3030-790 Coimbra, Portugal
3
Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal
4
Polytechnic Institute of Setúbal, 2910-761 Setúbal, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(16), 6014; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16166014
Submission received: 12 July 2023 / Accepted: 17 July 2023 / Published: 17 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Topic Electricity Demand-Side Management)
Demand-side management is a resilient concept. It was coined in 1984 by Clark Gellings, from EPRI, long before the wave of liberalization of the electricity industry occurred in many parts of the world. The extraordinary track record of DSM in terms of the efficient use of energy resources was not enough to avoid its crossing of the desert as market liberalization took its course. Nevertheless, it re-emerged as an inevitable toolbox component to tackle climate change and achieve carbon neutrality.
The MDPI Electricity DSM topic attracted many contributions, covering a wide spectrum of themes that show the vitality of scientific research in this area. Demand modelling and load forecasting represent instrumental issues in policy design. Behavioural aspects are considered, in terms of investment behaviour, consumer behaviour, or dealing with strategies to implement flexible load dispatch as a crucial tool for network management in view of the growing penetration of renewable generation. End-uses are thoroughly covered, both in the residential and industrial sectors, identifying opportunities for energy efficiency improvements and network flexibility management through the load shifting of appliances, electric vehicle charging, or energy storage management. The demand response is the theme of a substantial portion of the contributions to this topic. This is approached from several perspectives: the need to adopt DR strategies that are adapted to the preferences of consumers to maximize their effects, the role of DR in the seamless integration of renewable generation in the network operation, and the importance of DR in peak demand limiting, energy price containment and network frequency control.
Berbesi and Pritchard [1] focused on modelling energy data, incorporating spatial and temporal components, using generalized additive models with one-dimensional and two-dimensional smoothers. The inclusion of spatial data was expected to improve the representation of the socioeconomic characteristics of the regions under study. The proposed method was applied to model energy demand in Colombia.
Kanté et al. [2] aimed to forecast and understand the long-term electricity demand of the Taoussa area for the sustainable development of the regions of northern Mali, using the Model for Analysis of Energy Demand (MAED) from the International Atomic Energy Agency. Candela Esclapez et al. [3] developed an algorithm to estimate the accuracy of forecasts, aiming to determine the best schedules to produce accurate forecasts with a limited computational burden. Dejamkhooy and Ahmadpour [4] applied a Gaussian process model to forecast electricity prices in a restructured power system. Shaqiri et al. [5] uses a dynamic regression model for a short-term forecast of the electricity consumption of industrial and institutional customers of an electricity provider.
Turdaliev [6] focused on behavioural aspects by analysing the purchase of major electrical appliances in regions with Increasing Block Rates (IBR) for electricity pricing in Russia, finding significant effects when shaping the behaviour of households using price-based policies. Huang et al. [7] used psychological research to find a direct connection between users’ herd mentality (HM) and their decision-making behaviour towards participation in demand-shaping actions. Manandhar et al. [8] applied machine learning methods to study the energy consumption changes resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures in Dubai.
Senchilo and Ustinov [9] analysed energy storage at the end-use level, applying a novel algorithm to determine the optimal storage capacity for a specific consumer, minimizing the costs of levelling the load schedule when participating in a demand response program. Obi et al. [10], studied communication-enabled water heaters to shift electric load off the peak and move toward periods when renewable resources are more prevalent. Goh et al. [11] applied an orderly electric vehicle (EV) charging approach based on optimal time-of-use pricing and studied the effect of varied degrees of responsiveness on charging strategies for EVs. Hua et al. [12] proposed a voltage control strategy by optimizing the limited regulation capacity of air-conditioners, finding significant potential to provide voltage regulation services to the distribution network. Rodrigues et al. [13] focused on the technological feasibility, economic viability and global impact of using domestic refrigeration and freezing appliances for electrical load shifting from peak to off-peak demand periods, aiming to achieve a greater penetration of renewable energy sources.
Regarding end-uses, Talei et al. [14] aimed to identify smart building inefficiencies using machine learning, applied to a single building’s HVAC consumption data and building usage data in a highly efficient office building. Sanchez-Escobar et al. [15] reviewed the contribution of bottom-up energy models to support policy design for electricity end-use efficiency in residential buildings. Hummel et al. [16] measured the electric power demand of air compressors in industrial facilities, finding key influencing factors for the compressed air electric ratio. Zhang et al. [17] analysed aluminum smelters’ role as a possible flexibility supplier, helping to manage maintenance schemes for the electric power grid. Köberlein et al. [18] also targeted industrial use-cases of energy-flexible manufacturing, identifying challenges and solutions for the simulation of these processes.
Focusing on demand response, Kaczmarski et al. [19] studied how utilities should design direct-load control programs to improve participation. Binyet et al. [20] analysed barriers to participation in demand response programs. Schöne et al. [21] assessed the preferences in residential demand response in a small community on the island of Mayotte, a French overseas department located in the Indian Ocean. Santos et al. [22] applied a mixed-integer linear programming formulation to model DR as a dispatchable resource in the day-ahead hydrothermal scheduling problem. Ming et al. [23] introduced a robust controller to coordinate the demand side with the supply side, aiming to improve the stability and robustness of the grid under large disturbances. Salazar et al. [24] developed combined price- and incentive-based DR models to manage consumer demand with data from a real San Juan’s Argentina distribution network.
Finally, Mimi et al. [25] performed a systematic review of optimization approaches for demand-side management in the Smart Grid, covering publications between 2013 and 2022, revealing the growing use of hybrid approaches involving meta-heuristics and identifying the need for more accurate models of renewable sources and storage elements.
Demand response is the legitimate heir of the load–demand curve objective of the primal DSM, known as “flexible load shape”. The concept already existed; the proliferation of renewable generation gave it great importance in contemporary network management. Demand-side management is here to stay as an invaluable concept for the evolution of the electricity industry and the sustainable development of the energy system as a whole, in view of the growing electrification of the economic activities and the decarbonization strategies adopted by many energy policies around the world. Scientific research on DSM will undoubtedly accompany this trend.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Berbesi, L.; Pritchard, G. Modelling Energy Data in a Generalized Additive Model—A Case Study of Colombia. Energies 2023, 16, 1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kanté, M.; Li, Y.; Deng, S. Scenarios Analysis on Electric Power Planning Based on Multi-Scale Forecast: A Case Study of Taoussa, Mali from 2020 to 2035. Energies 2021, 14, 8515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Esclapez, A.C.; García, M.L.; Verdú, S.V.; Blanes, C.S. Reduction of Computational Burden and Accuracy Maximization in Short-Term Load Forecasting. Energies 2022, 15, 3670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dejamkhooy, A.; Ahmadpour, A. Prediction and Evaluation of Electricity Price in Restructured Power Systems Using Gaussian Process Time Series Modeling. Smart Cities 2022, 5, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shaqiri, F.; Korn, R.; Truong, H.-P. Dynamic Regression Prediction Models for Customer Specific Electricity Consumption. Electricity 2023, 4, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Turdaliev, S. Increasing Block Rate Electricity Pricing and Propensity to Purchase Electrical Appliances: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Russia. Energies 2021, 14, 6954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Huang, Q.; Jiang, A.; Zeng, Y.; Xu, J. Community Flexible Load Dispatching Model Based on Herd Mentality. Energies 2022, 15, 4546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Manandhar, P.; Rafiq, H.; Rodriguez-Ubinas, E.; Barbosa, J.D.; Qureshi, O.A.; Tarek, M.; Sgouridis, S. Understanding Energy Behavioral Changes Due to COVID-19 in the Residents of Dubai Using Electricity Consumption Data and Their Impacts. Energies 2023, 16, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Senchilo, N.D.; Ustinov, D.A. Method for Determining the Optimal Capacity of Energy Storage Systems with a Long-Term Forecast of Power Consumption. Energies 2021, 14, 7098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Obi, M.; Metzger, C.; Mayhorn, E.; Ashley, T.; Hunt, W. Nontargeted vs. Targeted vs. Smart Load Shifting Using Heat Pump Water Heaters. Energies 2021, 14, 7574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Goh, H.H.; Zong, L.; Zhang, D.; Dai, W.; Lim, C.S.; Kurniawan, T.A.; Goh, K.C. Orderly Charging Strategy Based on Optimal Time of Use Price Demand Response of Electric Vehicles in Distribution Network. Energies 2022, 15, 1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hua, Y.; Xie, Q.; Zheng, L.; Cui, J.; Shao, L.; Hu, W. Coordinated Voltage Control Strategy by Optimizing the Limited Regulation Capacity of Air Conditioners. Energies 2022, 15, 3225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rodrigues, L.S.; Marques, D.L.; Ferreira, J.A.; Costa, V.A.F.; Martins, N.D.; Da Silva, F.J.N. The Load Shifting Potential of Domestic Refrigerators in Smart Grids: A Comprehensive Review. Energies 2022, 15, 7666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Talei, H.; Benhaddou, D.; Gamarra, C.; Benbrahim, H.; Essaaidi, M. Smart Building Energy Inefficiencies Detection through Time Series Analysis and Unsupervised Machine Learning. Energies 2021, 14, 6042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sanchez-Escobar, M.O.; Noguez, J.; Molina-Espinosa, J.M.; Lozano-Espinosa, R.; Vargas-Solar, G. The Contribution of Bottom-Up Energy Models to Support Policy Design of Electricity End-Use Efficiency for Residential Buildings and the Residential Sector: A Systematic Review. Energies 2021, 14, 6466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hummel, U.; Radgen, P.; Ülker, S.; Schelle, R. Findings from Measurements of the Electric Power Demand of Air Compressors. Energies 2021, 14, 8395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, B.; Shu, H.; Si, D.; Li, W.; He, J.; Yan, W. Research and Application of Power Grid Maintenance Scheduling Strategy under the Interactive Mode of New Energy and Electrolytic Aluminum Load. Processes 2022, 10, 606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Köberlein, J.; Bank, L.; Roth, S.; Köse, E.; Kuhlmann, T.; Prell, B.; Stange, M.; Münnich, M.; Flum, D.; Moog, D.; et al. Simulation Modeling for Energy-Flexible Manufacturing: Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them. Energies 2022, 15, 3593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kaczmarski, J.; Jones, B.; Chermak, J. Determinants of Demand Response Program Participation: Contingent Valuation Evidence from a Smart Thermostat Program. Energies 2022, 15, 590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Binyet, E.; Chiu, M.-C.; Hsu, H.-W.; Lee, M.-Y.; Wen, C.-Y. Potential of Demand Response for Power Reallocation, a Literature Review. Energies 2022, 15, 863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schöne, N.; Greilmeier, K.; Heinz, B. Survey-Based Assessment of the Preferences in Residential Demand Response on the Island of Mayotte. Energies 2022, 15, 1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Santos, R.; Diniz, A.L.; Borba, B. Assessment of the Modeling of Demand Response as a Dispatchable Resource in Day-Ahead Hydrothermal Unit Commitment Problems: The Brazilian Case. Energies 2022, 15, 3928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ming, G.; Geng, J.; Liu, J.; Chen, Y.; Yuan, K.; Zhang, K. Load Frequency Robust Control Considering Intermittent Characteristics of Demand-Side Resources. Energies 2022, 15, 4370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Salazar, E.J.; Jurado, M.; Samper, M.E. Reinforcement Learning-Based Pricing and Incentive Strategy for Demand Response in Smart Grids. Energies 2023, 16, 1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mimi, S.; Maissa, Y.B.; Tamtaoui, A. Optimization Approaches for Demand-Side Management in the Smart Grid: A Systematic Mapping Study. Smart Cities 2023, 6, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martins, A.G.; Neves, L.P.; Sousa, J.L. Electricity Demand Side Management. Energies 2023, 16, 6014. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16166014

AMA Style

Martins AG, Neves LP, Sousa JL. Electricity Demand Side Management. Energies. 2023; 16(16):6014. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16166014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martins, António Gomes, Luís Pires Neves, and José Luís Sousa. 2023. "Electricity Demand Side Management" Energies 16, no. 16: 6014. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16166014

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop