Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Hydrogen Storage—A Case Study Exploring Pathways and Investments
Previous Article in Journal
Potential of Demand Response for Power Reallocation, a Literature Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Potential of NiOx/Nickel Silicide/n+ Poly-Si Contact for Perovskite/TOPCon Tandem Solar Cells

1
Graduate School of Energy and Environment (KU-KIST Green School), Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea
2
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 02841, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Energies 2022, 15(3), 870; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030870
Submission received: 29 November 2021 / Revised: 18 January 2022 / Accepted: 19 January 2022 / Published: 25 January 2022

Abstract

:
In this work, nickel silicide was applied to tandem solar cells as an interlayer. By the process of thermal evaporation, a layer of NiOx, hole transport layer (HTL) was deposited on n+ poly-Si layer directly. Nickel silicide was simultaneously formed by nickel diffusion from NiOx to n+ poly-Si layer during the deposition and annealing process. The I–V characteristics of NiOx/n+ poly-Si contact with nickel silicide showed ohmic contact and low contact resistivity. This structure is expected to be more advantageous for electrical connection between perovskite top cell and TOPCon bottom cell compared to the NiOx/TCO/n+ poly-Si structure showing Schottky contact. Furthermore, nickel silicide and Ni-deficient NiOx thin film formed by diffusion of nickel can improve the fill factor of the two sub cells. These results imply the potential of a NiOx/nickel silicide/n+ poly-Si structure as a perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell interlayer.

1. Introduction

With great efforts from the photovoltaic (PV) research community, photoconversion efficiency (PCE) of silicon solar cells is now almost close to the practically achievable limit of 27.1% [1] and the theoretical limit of 29.56% [2]. The highest reported PCEs with tunnel oxide passivated contact (TOPCon) and heterojunction interdigitated back contact (HJ-IBC) structures were 25.8% [3] and 26.7% [4], respectively. In addition to increasing efficiency, silicon solar cells are reaching grid parity, while occupying about 95% of the PV market. Perovskite is also an emerging material in the PV field. The PCE of perovskite solar cells has risen sharply from 3.8% [5] to 25.5% [6] in only a few years. In addition to PCE, various fields have been studied about perovskite solar cells such as: long-term stability, vacuum deposition process, or conformal deposition technology [7,8,9]. Moreover, perovskite solar cell is suitable as the top cell of a tandem solar cell due to its band gap tunability over a wide range of 1.4–2.3 eV. Based on the well-commercialized market of silicon solar cells and the high PCE of perovskite solar cells with easy band gap control, 2-terminal (2-T) perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells have been widely studied [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
The 2-T perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell is constructed by monolithically depositing the perovskite solar cell on the silicon solar cell. In the case of using TOPCon as the bottom cell, TCO is usually deposited on n+ poly-Si or p+ poly-Si, while the silicon emitter is placed on the rear side, as shown in Figure 1a. TCO also acts as an electrode for the perovskite solar cell, which makes it a reasonable choice as an interlayer to connect the top and bottom cells. However, 2-T tandem devices with TCO as an interlayer require additional processing—such as sputtering—for deposition of TCO. Plasma damage, which occurs during the sputtering process, can negatively affect the Voc of the bottom cell [20]. Although there were some reports that the passivation quality of TCO can be cured through heat treatment, it can also negatively affect fill factor (FF) [21] by forming an interfacial oxide on the silicon and TCO surfaces.
In this work, NiOx was deposited on heavily phosphorus-doped n+ poly-Si. NiOx is used as HTL in perovskite solar cells. Its majority carriers are holes, while electrons are the majority carriers in the n+ poly-Si. Since the majority carriers of the two materials are different, carrier transport mechanisms of the NiOx/n+ poly-Si structure can be interpreted as band-to-band tunneling in a band diagram. However, during the evaporation and annealing, nickel silicide is formed at the NiOx/n+ poly-Si interface, and the band structure is changed similar to NiOx/TCO/n+ poly-Si, thereby changing the carrier transport mechanism of NiOx/n+ poly-Si. In this study, NiOx/n+ poly-Si direct contact and NiOx/TCO/n+ poly-Si contact were compared through dark I–V characteristics, and carrier transport mechanisms of two structures were analyzed through band diagram. We also determined that nickel diffusion not only forms nickel silicide, but also changes the properties of NiOx thin films. We confirmed the influence of nickel diffusion on TOPCon bottom cells. Through this study, we discussed the potential of a tandem structure with NiOx/nickel silicide/n+ poly-Si as the interlayer, instead of using TCO, as shown in Figure 1b.

2. Materials and Methods

Samples A, B, and C were prepared and analyzed by following process. A schematic of process flow for the fabrication of sample A, B, and C is shown in Figure 2.

2.1. Au/NiOx/(ITO)/n+ Poly-Si Contact Measurement Sample Fabrication (Sample A)

The Au/NiOx/n+ poly-Si contact samples for measurement were prepared using a float-zone (FZ) monocrystalline n-type silicon (100) wafer. These silicon wafers were cleaned using the Radio Corporation of America (RCA) cleaning process. After cleaning, a silicon oxide layer of ~1.2 nm thickness was grown on the wafer by dipping it in hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) solution. P-doped poly-Si of ~300 nm thickness was then deposited on the silicon oxide surface, using low-pressure chemical vapor deposition at 600 °C. Next, native oxides were removed using dilute hydrogen fluoride (HF) solution. The NiOx layer of ~5 nm thickness was deposited by thermal evaporation, using nickel oxide granules (>99.9%, 3–6 mm) with a deposition rate less than 0.2 Ås−1. After the NiOx deposition, Au was deposited by thermal evaporation. In the case of metal/NiOx/ITO/n+ poly-Si contact samples, an ITO layer with a thickness of ~20 nm was deposited by radio frequency magnetron sputtering before NiOx deposition. NiOx, (ITO), and Au were deposited as TLM patterns with shadow mask on the n+ poly-Si in order to calculate the contact resistivity. The TLM patterns were fabricated at intervals of 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 2.0, and 3.8 mm. The samples were then annealed using rapid thermal annealing at 300 °C, 400 °C, and 500 °C with a ramp-up period of 300 s within a N2 + H2 (95 + 5%) atmosphere. To confirm the I–V characteristics, dark current-voltage (I–V) measurements were taken at room temperature using a Keithley 238 source meter.

2.2. NiOx, NiSi Material Characterization (Sample B)

Samples for NiOx and nickel silicide were fabricated by depositing approximately 5 nm thickness of NiOx thin film on n+ poly-Si/SiOx/n-type c-Si substrate. Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and TEM (Talos F200X) were applied to investigate the diffusion of Ni atom into the polysilicon film. Depth profiling XPS (PHI 5000 VersaProbe) was used to determine nickel silicide and NiOx by Ar+ ion sputtering (2 kV) with a scan size of 1 mm × 1 mm.

2.3. NiOx/TOPCon Bottom Cell Fabrication (Sample C)

TOPCon solar cells with NiOx film were fabricated on 280 μm n-type FZ c-Si wafers. The wafers were cleaned using the RCA process. Both sides of the wafers were doped using BBr3 diffusion at 985 °C. Borosilicate glass and native oxide were etched on both sides using dilute HF solution. The front side p+ emitter was etched by dipping it in 80 °C texturing solution (DI:KOH:IPA = 10:0.25:0.78, volume ratio). Silicon oxide layer and n+ poly-Si layer were deposited in the same way as that of sample A. Rear side n+ poly-Si layer was etched by dipping it in 80 °C tetramethylammonium hydroxide (TMAH, 20 wt.% in H2O, Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) solution. Rear side silicon oxide and native oxide were etched using dilute HF solution sequentially. Then, NiOx/Au (5/100 nm) was sequentially deposited on the front side of the wafers. Next, a ~1 μm thick Ag layer was deposited on the rear side of the samples. The measurements for TOPCon bottom cells with NiOx layer were performed at room temperature, using a light current-voltage, Keithley 2400 source meter under the illumination of an AM 1.5G solar simulator (100 mW/cm2). Quantum efficiency (QE) measurements were carried out by scanning the UV-Vis-Infrared spectrum at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Contact Property of NiOx/n+ Poly-Si

First, the contact properties of the two different structures—NiOx/n+ poly-Si and NiOx/TCO/n+ poly-Si—were measured and compared. Figure 3a,b show the dark I–V characteristics of the samples before and after ITO annealing. Non-ohmic I–V was measured as shown in Figure 3a,b. Furthermore, during the annealing process the SiOx phase was formed between the n+ poly-Si and the ITO [22], which increased the Schottky barrier width and threshold voltage (0.16 -> 0.35 V) of the n+ poly-Si/ITO/n+ poly-Si Schottky diode.
Contact properties of samples without TCO were also measured using the method described above. Figure 4a,b show that the contact between NiOx/n+ poly-Si showed ohmic behavior both before and after annealing. Significantly, the contact resistivity measured by the TLM method was about 30 mΩ·cm2, which was a low value considering that it was an entire surface contact. After annealing, the contact resistivity corresponded to before annealing the sample, as shown in Figure 4c.
The typical energy band diagrams of NiOx/ITO/n+ poly-Si and NiOx/n+ poly-Si are shown in Figure 5a,b. As mentioned before, the dark I–V results of the ITO sample were non-ohmic, which was consistent with the band diagram shown in Figure 5a. The work function of ITO is higher than that of n+ poly-Si and lower than that of NiOx, therefore a Schottky barrier was formed on both ITO/n+ poly-Si and ITO/NiOx interfaces, which resulted in non-ohmic dark I–V results. However, in the case of the NiOx and n+ poly-Si—which are directly in contact—the band diagram of NiOx/n+ poly-Si in Figure 5b was not consistent with those shown in Figure 4a,b, which were measured as an ohmic contact. In the NiOx/n+ poly-Si interface, carrier transport was only possible through band-to-band tunneling, where carriers were transported from the conduction band of n+ poly-Si to the valence band of NiOx due to the band structure, as shown in Figure 5b. It has been reported that diode behavior has been exhibited in the SnO2/p++ emitter [23] and TiO2/p++ emitter [24] interface, which is similar to the NiOx/n+ poly-Si. However, an ohmic contact was confirmed as shown in Figure 4a,b. It was expected that nickel silicide would be formed between NiOx and the n+ poly-Si during thermal evaporation, and that this nickel silicide will assist carrier transport into the NiOx valence band and the n+ poly-Si conduction band, as shown in Figure 5c.

3.2. Nickel Silicide Confirmation

The existence of nickel silicide was confirmed through TEM analysis. To confirm the distribution of Ni atoms, high angle annular dark-field scanning TEM (HAADF-STEM) and corresponding EDS were used. Figure 6a,e correspond to the images of the NiOx/n+ poly-Si structure before and after annealing. In the STEM images NiOx, SiOx, and Si were represented as bright white, dark, and gray regions, respectively. In Figure 6a,e approximately 1.7 nm thick SiOx was observed between NiOx and n+ poly-Si interfaces. This is due to SiOx having a greater negative Gibbs formation energy (ΔG0) value than that of NiO. Therefore, the oxygen in NiO oxidized Si, and the remaining Ni atoms diffused into n+ poly-Si to form nickel silicide [25]. As shown in Figure 6a, white dot-shaped parts were detected under the SiOx layer. It was confirmed from Figure 6b that this dot-shaped region was diffused Ni; nickel silicide is expected to be formed in this region. In addition, the shape of nickel silicide was different before and after annealing. After annealing, Ni atoms aggregated in the n+ poly-Si as shown in Figure 6f, which resulted in partial contact between nickel silicide and NiOx. Attributing to the Ni aggregation, nickel silicide did not distribute uniformly, and this might be the reason for the non-ohmic graph of L1 in Figure 4b.
The chemical state of the diffused Ni atom in n+ poly-Si was analyzed. A nickel silicide peak was detected using depth profiling XPS. Figure 7a,b show the XPS spectra of Ni 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 as a function of the depth position. The spectra of Ni 2p3/2 showed the Ni31Si12 peak at 853.0 eV (1 s), the Ni2Si peak at 853.4 eV (2 s), and the NiSi peak at 853.9 eV (6 s). Likewise, the spectra of Ni 2p1/2 showed the Ni31Si12 peak at 870.2 eV (1 s), the Ni2Si peak at 870.6 eV (2 s), and the NiSi peak at 871.2 eV (6 s) [26]. As the etching time increased, the nickel silicide peak shifted to the left. These results indicated that the nickel silicide phase shifted from Ni rich silicide to the NiSi phase, depending on the depth. As a result, the nickel silicide formed during the evaporation process of NiOx was placed on NiOx/n+ poly-Si interface and assisted the contact between the two layers, which finally resulted in an ohmic contact and a low contact resistivity.

3.3. NiOx Thin Film XPS Analysis

Pure stoichiometric NiO has extremely low electrical conductivity of 10–11 S·cm−1 at room temperature [27]. However, excess oxygen results in Ni vacancy, which changes Ni2+ to Ni3+ for electrical neutrality. Ni3+ serves as an acceptor that donates a hole [28], which means NiOx can act as a p-type semiconductor. In other words, the conductivity of NiOx film can be indirectly compared from the ratio of Ni3+/Ni2+. The larger the ratio of Ni3+/Ni2+, the higher the conductivity of NiOx film. Therefore, the XPS peak was measured to compare the tendency of NiOx film conductivity.
The nickel atoms from NiOx were diffused into silicon, therefore the NiOx thin film deposited on n+ poly-Si was expected to be nickel-deficient NiOx. Therefore, the Ni3+/Ni2+ ratio would be different from that of the NiOx deposited on glass (0.69) [29]. As shown in Figure 8, annealing was conducted under four different conditions; as-deposited 300 °C, 400 °C, 500 °C, and the XPS data were separated into the NiO peak (Ni2+) and the Ni2O3 peak (Ni3+). For all annealing temperatures, the Ni2O3 peak intensity was measured to be greater than the NiO peak. As the annealing temperature increased from as-deposited to 500 °C, the Ni3+/Ni2+ ratio tended to increase to 1.77, 2.83, 3.16, and 7.93. That means that during the annealing process nickel is more diffused to silicon, making the NiOx thin film more Ni-deficient. Therefore, because the Ni2O3 peak intensity is higher depending on the annealing temperature, it is expected to affect the electrical conductivity of NiOx.

3.4. TOPCon Bottom Cell Analysis with NiOx Layer

In the previous TEM and XPS analyses, the silicide formation and the Ni3+/Ni2+ ratio increase was confirmed. For further confirmation on how the characteristics of the TOPCon bottom cell changed with respect to NiOx deposition and annealing, the structure shown in Figure 9d was fabricated. Figure 9 shows the external and internal QEs and JV curves of the NiOx/TOPCon sample. Regardless of the NiOx deposition and annealing, the reflectance of the samples was almost the same. However, the QE data decreased overall after the NiOx deposition and annealing, which was due to the parasitic absorption of nickel silicide [30]. Significantly, nickel silicide had high absorption coefficient at short wavelength [31]. As a result, Figure 9b shows further decrease in IQE at short wavelength in the case of NiOx deposition and annealing. As shown in Figure 9c and Table 1, Jsc also decreased after NiOx deposition and annealing, similar to the trend observed with QE. On the contrary, FF increased from 53.55% to 63.07% from without NiOx to after NiOx annealing. These results indicate that the front surface sheet resistance was improved. Ni diffusion from NiOx formed nickel silicide that assisted carrier transport. Ni3+/Ni2+ ratio of NiOx thin layer was also affected by Ni diffusion. Consequently, lateral conductivity of NiOx and n+ poly-Si interface was seen to improve.

3.5. Potential of NiOx/Nickel Silicide/n+ Poly-Si Interlayer Structure for Tandem

The 2-T tandem connects two sub cells in series; therefore, the role of the interlayer is very important. In particular, two different types of carriers must be recombined in the interlayer, and it is difficult to have ohmic contact with both sides of the interface. The interlayer interface with two sub cells has low barrier height on the energy band diagram. In Section 3.2, the formation of nickel silicide in NiOx/n+ poly-Si interface was confirmed. Nickel silicide has a work function of ~4.8 eV [32], which is similar to that of ITO (4.6~4.8 eV [33]); nickel silicide played an important role in the ohmic contact between NiOx and n+ poly-Si. In addition, we also confirmed an increment in the Ni3+/Ni2+ ratio of the NiOx thin film. It has already been reported that an increase in the Ni3+/Ni2+ ratio improves the carrier extraction and FF in perovskite solar cells [34,35,36]. In other words, in the case of the NiOx/perovskite, many references show that an increase in Ni vacancy improves the electrical and optical properties of NiOx, thereby improving the FF of perovskite solar cells. Therefore, the process of diffusion of Ni atoms into n+ poly-Si from NiOx by thermal evaporation and annealing improved the electrical property of our interlayer structure and the NiOx film itself. These improvements were confirmed by an increase in FF in the bottom cell. Although Jsc reduction due to parasitic absorption of nickel silicide was confirmed, it is expected that Jsc can be improved by controlling the thickness of the nickel silicide by changing the deposition process or optimizing annealing temperature and time. For these reasons, NiOx/nickel silicide/n+ poly-Si interlayer structure showed potential of increasing FF, as well as simplifying the fabrication process in perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells.

4. Conclusions

In this study the contact between NiOx used as a hole transport layer of perovskite solar cell and n+ poly-Si of TOPCon solar cell was studied. Based on the band diagram, NiOx/n+ poly-Si was expected to exhibit non-ohmic behavior, because the carrier transport was only possible through band-to-band tunneling. However, an ohmic dark I–V was observed, and the contact resistivity was also measured to be approximately 30 mΩ·cm2. These dark I–V results are attributed to the formation of nickel silicide between the NiOx and n+ poly-Si, which assisted the carrier transport between the interfaces. As a result of TEM and XPS analyses, the formation of nickel silicide was observed, which helped in carrier transportation. Nickel silicide peaks on Ni31Si12, Ni2Si, and NiSi were observed depending on the depth. The deposited NiOx showed Ni-deficient properties, which is attributed to the diffusion of Ni from NiOx into n+ poly-Si. Therefore, the Ni2O3 peak was the main peak instead of the NiO peak. In addition, the ratio of Ni3+/Ni2+ increased as the annealing temperature increased, implying an improvement in the NiOx film conductivity. We also fabricated a NiOx/TOPCon structure to confirm the electrical improvement by the formation of nickel silicide and Ni-deficient NiOx. As a result, the FF improved after NiOx deposition and annealing. By applying NiOx/n+ poly-Si contact as a tandem interlayer between the perovskite and silicon solar cell an enhanced electrical connection is expected compared to when using TCO.

Author Contributions

J.K. and D.P. contributed equally to this work. Conceptualization, J.K. and D.P.; methodology, D.C. and S.-H.J.; validation, C.L., J.H., H.E.L., S.-W.L., H.S., and S.L.; formal analysis, J.K.; investigation, D.P.; resources, D.P.; data curation, J.K.; writing—original draft preparation, J.K.; writing—review and editing, D.P.; visualization, D.P.; supervision, Y.K.; project administration, D.K.; funding acquisition, H.-S.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was conducted under the New and Renewable Energy Core Technology Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) granted financial from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea (No. 20193010014530). This work was supported by the Human Resources Program in Energy Technology of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), granted financial resource from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea. (No. 20204010600470).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yoshikawa, K.; Kawasaki, H.; Yoshida, W.; Irie, T.; Konishi, K.; Nakano, K.; Uto, T.; Adachi, D.; Kanematsu, M.; Uzu, H.; et al. Silicon heterojunction solar cell with interdigitated back contacts for a photoconversion efficiency over 26%. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schafer, S.; Brendel, R. Accurate Calculation of the Absorptance Enhances Efficiency Limit of Crystalline Silicon Solar Cells with Lambertian Light Trapping. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2018, 8, 1156–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Feldmann, F.; Bivour, M.; Reichel, C.; Steinkemper, H.; Hermle, M.; Glunz, S.W. Tunnel oxide passivated contacts as an alternative to partial rear contacts. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2014, 131, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yoshikawa, K.; Yoshida, W.; Irie, T.; Kawasaki, H.; Konishi, K.; Ishibashi, H.; Asatani, T.; Adachi, D.; Kanematsu, M.; Uzu, H.; et al. Exceeding conversion efficiency of 26% by heterojunction interdigitated back contact solar cell with thin film Si technology. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2017, 173, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kojima, A.; Teshima, K.; Shirai, Y.; Miyasaka, T. Organometal Halide Perovskites as Visible-Light Sensitizers for Photovoltaic Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6050–6051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Min, H.; Lee, D.Y.; Kim, J.; Kim, G.; Lee, K.S.; Kim, J.; Paik, M.J.; Kim, Y.K.; Kim, K.S.; Kim, M.G.; et al. Perovskite solar cells with atomically coherent interlayers on SnO2 electrodes. Nature 2021, 598, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lee, S.W.; Kim, S.; Bae, S.; Cho, K.; Chung, T.; Mundt, L.E.; Lee, S.; Park, S.; Park, H.; Schubert, M.C.; et al. UV Degradation and Recovery of Perovskite Solar Cells. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Hwang, J.-K.; Lee, S.-W.; Lee, W.; Bae, S.; Cho, K.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.; Hyun, J.Y.; Kang, Y.; Lee, H.-S.; et al. Conformal perovskite films on 100 cm2 textured silicon surface using two-step vacuum process. Thin Solid Films 2020, 693, 137694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Park, N.-G. Perovskite Solar Cell: Research Direction for Next 10 Years. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 2983–2985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mailoa, J.P.; Bailie, C.D.; Johlin, E.C.; Hoke, E.T.; Akey, A.J.; Nguyen, W.H.; McGehee, M.D.; Buonassisi, T. A 2-terminal perovskite/silicon multijunction solar cell enabled by a silicon tunnel junction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 121105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Albrecht, S.; Saliba, M.; Correa Baena, J.P.; Lang, F.; Kegelmann, L.; Mews, M.; Steier, L.; Abate, A.; Rappich, J.; Korte, L.; et al. Monolithic perovskite/silicon-heterojunction tandem solar cells processed at low temperature. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bush, K.A.; Palmstrom, A.F.; Yu, Z.J.; Boccard, M.; Cheacharoen, R.; Mailoa, J.P.; McMeekin, D.P.; Hoye, R.L.Z.; Bailie, C.D.; Leijtens, T.; et al. 23.6%-efficient monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells with improved stability. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 17009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sahli, F.; Werner, J.; Kamino, B.A.; Brauninger, M.; Monnard, R.; Paviet-Salomon, B.; Barraud, L.; Ding, L.; Diaz Leon, J.J.; Sacchetto, D.; et al. Fully textured monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells with 25.2% power conversion efficiency. Nat. Mater. 2018, 17, 820–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nogay, G.; Sahli, F.; Werner, J.; Monnard, R.; Boccard, M.; Despeisse, M.; Haug, F.J.; Jeangros, Q.; Ingenito, A.; Ballif, C. 25.1%-Efficient Monolithic Perovskite/Silicon Tandem Solar Cell Based on a p-type Monocrystalline Textured Silicon Wafer and High-Temperature Passivating Contacts. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 844–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Al-Ashouri, A.; Köhnen, E.; Li, B.; Magomedov, A.; Hempel, H.; Caprioglio, P.; Márquez, J.A.; Vilches, A.B.M.; Kasparavicius, E.; Smith, J.A.; et al. Monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell with >29% efficiency by enhanced hole extraction. Science 2020, 370, 1300–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kim, D.; Jung, H.J.; Park, I.J.; Larson, B.W.; Dunfield, S.P.; Xiao, C.; Kim, J.; Tong, J.; Boonmongkolras, P.; Ji, S.G.; et al. Efficient, stable silicon tandem cells enabled by anion-engineered wide-bandgap perovskites. Science 2020, 368, 155–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hyun, J.; Yeom, K.M.; Lee, H.E.; Kim, D.; Lee, H.-S.; Noh, J.H.; Kang, Y. Efficient n-i-p Monolithic Perovskite/Silicon Tandem Solar Cells with Tin Oxide via a Chemical Bath Deposition Method. Energies 2021, 14, 7614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, S.-W.; Bae, S.; Hwang, J.-K.; Lee, W.; Lee, S.; Hyun, J.Y.; Cho, K.; Kim, S.; Heinz, F.D.; Bin Choi, S.; et al. Perovskites fabricated on textured silicon surfaces for tandem solar cells. Commun. Chem. 2020, 3, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Song, H.; Lee, C.; Hyun, J.; Lee, S.-W.; Choi, D.; Pyun, D.; Nam, J.; Jeong, S.-H.; Kim, J.; Bae, S.; et al. Monolithic Perovskite-Carrier Selective Contact Silicon Tandem Solar Cells Using Molybdenum Oxide as a Hole Selective Layer. Energies 2021, 14, 3108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Demaurex, B.; De Wolf, S.; Descoeudres, A.; Charles Holman, Z.; Ballif, C. Damage at hydrogenated amorphous/crystalline silicon interfaces by indium tin oxide overlayer sputtering. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 171604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Messmer, C.; Bivour, M.; Luderer, C.; Tutsch, L.; Schon, J.; Hermle, M. Influence of Interfacial Oxides at TCO/Doped Si Thin Film Contacts on the Charge Carrier Transport of Passivating Contacts. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2020, 10, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Du, H.W.; Yang, J.; Li, Y.H.; Xu, F.; Xu, J.; Ma, Z.Q. Preparation of ITO/SiOx/n-Si solar cells with non-decline potential field and hole tunneling by magnetron sputtering. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 093508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zheng, J.; Lau, C.F.J.; Mehrvarz, H.; Ma, F.-J.; Jiang, Y.; Deng, X.; Soeriyadi, A.; Kim, J.; Zhang, M.; Hu, L.; et al. Large area efficient interface layer free monolithic perovskite/homo-junction-silicon tandem solar cell with over 20% efficiency. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 2432–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Shen, H.; Omelchenko, S.T.; Jacobs, D.A.; Yalamanchili, S.; Wan, Y.; Yan, D.; Phang, P.; Duong, T.; Wu, Y.; Yin, Y.; et al. In situ recombination junction between p-Si and TiO2 enables high-efficiency monolithic perovskite/Si tandem cells. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaau9711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Lee, Y.H.; Song, H.-E.; Kim, K.-H.; Oh, J. Investigation of surface reactions in metal oxide on Si for efficient heterojunction Si solar cells. APL Mater. 2019, 7, 071106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Cao, Y.; Nyborg, L.; Jelvestam, U. XPS calibration study of thin-film nickel silicides. Surf. Interface Anal. 2009, 41, 471–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wittenauer, M.A.; Van Zandt, L.L. Surface conduction versus bulk conduction in pure stoichiometric NiO crystals. Philos. Mag. B 2006, 46, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jang, W.-L.; Lu, Y.-M.; Hwang, W.-S.; Hsiung, T.-L.; Wang, H.P. Point defects in sputtered NiO films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 062103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kim, S.-K.; Seok, H.-J.; Kim, D.-H.; Choi, D.-H.; Nam, S.-J.; Kim, S.-C.; Kim, H.-K. Comparison of NiOx thin film deposited by spin-coating or thermal evaporation for application as a hole transport layer of perovskite solar cells. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 43847–43852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ren, R.; Guo, Y.X.; Wang, J.; Zhu, R.H. Fully passivated radial junction nanowire silicon solar cells with submerged nickel-silicide contact for efficiency enhancement. Electron. Lett. 2013, 49, 767–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sun, H.; Wu, H.C.; Chen, S.C.; Ma Lee, C.W.; Wang, X. Absorption Amelioration of Amorphous Si Film by Introducing Metal Silicide Nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Chang, Y.-J.; Erskine, J.L. Diffusion layers and the Schottky-barrier height in nickel silicide—silicon interfaces. Phys. Rev. B 1983, 28, 5766–5773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Nehate, S.D.; Prakash, A.; Mani, P.D.; Sundaram, K.B. Work Function Extraction of Indium Tin Oxide Films from MOSFET Devices. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2018, 7, P87–P90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pang, S.; Zhang, C.; Dong, H.; Chen, D.; Zhu, W.; Xi, H.; Chang, J.; Lin, Z.; Zhang, J.; Hao, Y. Efficient NiOx Hole Transporting Layer Obtained by the Oxidation of Metal Nickel Film for Perovskite Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019, 2, 4700–4707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, Z.; Zhu, A.; Cai, F.; Tao, L.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Chen, Q.; Cheng, Y.-B.; Zhou, H. Nickel oxide nanoparticles for efficient hole transport in p-i-n and n-i-p perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 6597–6605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, J.; Lee, H.R.; Kim, H.P.; Lin, T.; Kanwat, A.; Mohd Yusoff, A.R.; Jang, J. Effects of UV-ozone irradiation on copper doped nickel acetate and its applicability to perovskite solar cells. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 9284–9292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of 2-T perovskite/TOPCon tandem solar cell, where (a) indium tin oxide (ITO) and (b) NiOx/n+ poly-Si direct contact.
Figure 1. Schematic of 2-T perovskite/TOPCon tandem solar cell, where (a) indium tin oxide (ITO) and (b) NiOx/n+ poly-Si direct contact.
Energies 15 00870 g001
Figure 2. Schematic of process flow for the fabrication of sample A, B, and C.
Figure 2. Schematic of process flow for the fabrication of sample A, B, and C.
Energies 15 00870 g002
Figure 3. Dark I-V characteristics of Au/NiOx/ITO/n+ poly-Si structure: (a) with annealing; (b) without annealing; (c) test sample structure. Transmission line measurement (TLM) structure with ~1.2 nm SiOx; ~300 nm n+ poly-Si continuous layers with ITO/NiOx/metal spacing of 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 2.0, and 3.8 mm.
Figure 3. Dark I-V characteristics of Au/NiOx/ITO/n+ poly-Si structure: (a) with annealing; (b) without annealing; (c) test sample structure. Transmission line measurement (TLM) structure with ~1.2 nm SiOx; ~300 nm n+ poly-Si continuous layers with ITO/NiOx/metal spacing of 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 2.0, and 3.8 mm.
Energies 15 00870 g003
Figure 4. Dark I-V characteristics of Au/NiOx/n+ poly-Si structure. TLM structure with NiOx/metal spacing of 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 2.0, and 3.8 mm: (a) with annealing; (b) without annealing; (c) contact resistivity according to annealing temperature; (d) test sample structure.
Figure 4. Dark I-V characteristics of Au/NiOx/n+ poly-Si structure. TLM structure with NiOx/metal spacing of 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 2.0, and 3.8 mm: (a) with annealing; (b) without annealing; (c) contact resistivity according to annealing temperature; (d) test sample structure.
Energies 15 00870 g004
Figure 5. Energy band diagrams of: (a) NiOx/ITO/n+ poly-Si; (b) NiOx/n+ poly-Si; (c) NiOx/Ni silicide/n+ poly-Si.
Figure 5. Energy band diagrams of: (a) NiOx/ITO/n+ poly-Si; (b) NiOx/n+ poly-Si; (c) NiOx/Ni silicide/n+ poly-Si.
Energies 15 00870 g005
Figure 6. Comparison of NiOx layer on n+ poly-Si: (a) with annealing; (e) without annealing; (a,e) scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images; (bd,fh) energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) mapping images.
Figure 6. Comparison of NiOx layer on n+ poly-Si: (a) with annealing; (e) without annealing; (a,e) scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images; (bd,fh) energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) mapping images.
Energies 15 00870 g006
Figure 7. XPS depth profiling of 5 nm thick NiOx thin film on n+ poly-Si (a) Ni 2p3/2 and (b) Ni 2p1/2 according to Ar+ etching time.
Figure 7. XPS depth profiling of 5 nm thick NiOx thin film on n+ poly-Si (a) Ni 2p3/2 and (b) Ni 2p1/2 according to Ar+ etching time.
Energies 15 00870 g007
Figure 8. XPS spectrum of Ni 2p3/2 according to: (a) as-deposited; (b) 300 °C; (c) 400 °C; (d) 500 °C annealing temperature.
Figure 8. XPS spectrum of Ni 2p3/2 according to: (a) as-deposited; (b) 300 °C; (c) 400 °C; (d) 500 °C annealing temperature.
Energies 15 00870 g008
Figure 9. (a) External quantum efficiency (EQE); (b) internal quantum efficiency (IQE); (c) light current density-voltage (LJV) characteristics; (d) schematic structure of the NiOx/TOPCon bottom cell.
Figure 9. (a) External quantum efficiency (EQE); (b) internal quantum efficiency (IQE); (c) light current density-voltage (LJV) characteristics; (d) schematic structure of the NiOx/TOPCon bottom cell.
Energies 15 00870 g009
Table 1. Comparison of the performance of a TOPCon solar cell with and without NiOx thin film and with and without annealing.
Table 1. Comparison of the performance of a TOPCon solar cell with and without NiOx thin film and with and without annealing.
Voc (mV)Jsc (mA/cm2)FF (%)PCE (%)
Without NiOx562.231.253.559.38
As-deposited NiOx557.625.160.218.42
Annealed NiOx565.321.663.077.72
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, J.; Pyun, D.; Choi, D.; Jeong, S.-H.; Lee, C.; Hyun, J.; Lee, H.E.; Lee, S.-W.; Song, H.; Lee, S.; et al. Potential of NiOx/Nickel Silicide/n+ Poly-Si Contact for Perovskite/TOPCon Tandem Solar Cells. Energies 2022, 15, 870. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030870

AMA Style

Kim J, Pyun D, Choi D, Jeong S-H, Lee C, Hyun J, Lee HE, Lee S-W, Song H, Lee S, et al. Potential of NiOx/Nickel Silicide/n+ Poly-Si Contact for Perovskite/TOPCon Tandem Solar Cells. Energies. 2022; 15(3):870. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030870

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Jiryang, Dowon Pyun, Dongjin Choi, Seok-Hyun Jeong, Changhyun Lee, Jiyeon Hyun, Ha Eun Lee, Sang-Won Lee, Hoyoung Song, Solhee Lee, and et al. 2022. "Potential of NiOx/Nickel Silicide/n+ Poly-Si Contact for Perovskite/TOPCon Tandem Solar Cells" Energies 15, no. 3: 870. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030870

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop