Next Article in Journal
Evaluating and Enhancing the Energy Efficiency of Representative Residential Buildings by Applying National and International Standards Using BIM
Previous Article in Journal
Utilization of Mechanical Resonance for the Enhancement of Slider-Crank Mechanism Dynamics in Gas Compression Processes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Development of the Use of Water Energy in the Mountain Catchment from a Sociohydrological Perspective

Department of Geoecology and Geoinformation, Institute of Geography, Pedagogical University of Krakow, Podchorążych 2, 30-084 Krakow, Poland
Energies 2022, 15(20), 7770; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15207770
Submission received: 24 September 2022 / Revised: 12 October 2022 / Accepted: 18 October 2022 / Published: 20 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section B: Energy and Environment)

Abstract

:
Man has been using the energy of flowing water since antiquity. Water milling flourished in Europe in the Middle Ages, reaching its maximum development in the 19th century. Since the beginning of the 20th century, water energy has been used to produce electricity. Acquiring the energy of water involves modifying the natural environment. Milling is considered to be the activity that started the emergence of fluvial anthropospheres in Europe. For centuries, the construction of watermills and millraces has caused the densification of the river network, raised the level of groundwater, and forced the deposition of sediments. From the point of view of sociohydrology, milling has been an expression of the economic and technological development of societies. The milling industry and, therefore, the natural environment have also been affected by political factors and beliefs. At the beginning of the 20th century, water drives were replaced with steam and later electric drives in mills. These changes resulted in the abandonment of millraces and the liquidation of weirs, which reversed the hydromorphological processes regulated by milling since the Middle Ages. The development of hydropower seems to be environmentally friendly owing to the use of renewable energy, but the environmental costs associated with the construction of a hydroelectric power plant cannot go unnoticed. The problem of the development of water energy use over the centuries has been studied on the basis of the example of the catchment of the mountain River Skawa. The study shows how many factors determined the development of the milling industry and, consequently, the transformation of the natural environment. These factors were largely local or regional, which shows that comprehensive analyses of anthropopressure cannot be of a global nature.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Water milling and hydropower should be considered not only in terms of the use of water energy by humans, but also in the context of the impact of this activity on the natural environment. As much as 95% of the floodplains in Central Europe have been destroyed or transformed by man [1]. It is believed that milling was one of the first manifestations of anthropopressure within river channels and floodplains [2]. The construction of watermills and millraces also affected the flows, including flood flows, and sediment transport [3]. Changes in the relief, on the other hand, were the cause of landscape changes [4,5], which could even lead to the creation of a specific type of landscape, the so-called molinotope [6]. Millraces and mill ponds related to the historical milling industry, which have survived to this day, are considered archaeological objects for their era [7]. On the other hand, modern hydropower is often considered a pro-environmental activity [8].
From the sociohydrological point of view, the study of the causes and effects of anthropopressure should be supplemented with issues related to the development of communities [9]. During a comprehensive analysis of dependencies, it is possible to capture the cultural causes of changes in the environment and predict their further impact on society [10]. The beginning of the Anthropocene is considered to be the transition from processes dominated by nature to processes dominated by man. In the case of water systems, it is associated with the formation of the fluvial anthroposphere covering the river with its floodplains [11]. Historical reasons for the initiation of anthropopressure in river systems, however, vary from region to region [12]. The growing human impact on the environment can be traced through the study of the modification of natural conditions within the valley bottom resulting from, among other things, the reconstruction of the river network for the needs of the milling industry [13].
According to Macklin and Lewin [7], studying the complexity of the effects of anthropopressure associated with historical and contemporary human activity is essential for proper water management in the 21st century. This study aims to identify the causes and effects of the development of water energy use in the catchment area of a mountain river. The catchment of the River Skawa in the Polish Carpathians was selected, which, apart from its typical mountain cast of features, has a long kriging method documented history of human activity. The indirect goals included (1) studying the change in the number of water-using facilities over time since the beginning of their existence to the present day, (2) determining the types of activities that use water energy, (3) studying the direct environmental effects of the development of milling and hydropower, and (4) identifying the cultural causes of anthropopressure, taking into account the level of technological development of societies. This issue fits in with the goals of multidisciplinary works that Werther et al. [14] considered necessary to answer the question of when and why humans became an important factor controlling the formation of floodplains in Central Europe. The problem of the impact of water milling on the natural environment in the mountains, despite the great popularity of this activity until the 19th century, has very rarely been analyzed [15].

Research Area

The catchment area of the River Skawa, located in the Baltic Sea drainage basin in the Outer Western Carpathians in Poland, was selected as the research area (Figure 1 and Figure A1). The River Skawa is a right-bank tributary of the Vistula River. The length of the River Skawa is 103 km, and the catchment area is 1175 km2 [16]. In its upper reaches, the catchment of the River Skawa is located in middle-type mountains, i.e., in the Orawa-Jordanów Foothills and the Beskid Mountains. The springs of the Skawa River are located at an altitude about 700 m asl. The highest peak of the catchment is Babia Góra (1725 m asl). In the farthest part, the rivers drain the inter-mountain basin, the Orawa-Jordanów Foothills (the highest peak—Kiełek, 960 m asl), which belong to the Beskid Mountains. In its lower reaches, the River Skawa drains the Western Beskidian Foothills and the piedmont Oświęcim Basin (the mouth of the River Skawa is at an altitude of about 220 m asl). In their upper reaches, rivers have rock channels, while in the middle and lower runs, gravel channels. In pre-regulation conditions, the tributaries of the River Skawa had sinuous channels with braiding sections. The River Skawa, on the other hand, had very wide sections of the anabranching and braiding type [17]. Following the 20th-century regulations, winding channels with rip-rap, and on the typically mountain tributaries channels with concrete barrages also appeared.

2. Methodology and Criticism of the Sources

In this article, all human activities that use the energy of water are referred to as water milling, as proposed by Walter and Merritts [3], and all facilities that use the energy of water as watermills.
The study analyzed the number and location of devices powered by flowing water, which have been located in the River Skawa catchment area since the 13th century to the present day, thus throughout the period of permanent settlement in this area. This period is divided into two time intervals differing in terms of the sources of knowledge about mills: (I) 13th–18th centuries, only written sources; (II) 19th–21st century, mainly maps, but also statistical data.
Residual information about watermills from the beginning of the 1st period (13th–15th centuries) was obtained from the literature on regional history. Data on watermills from a later period were obtained from the inspections of royal estates carried out in 1564 [19], 1659–1664 [20] and 1765 [21] (Table A1). Watermills were inventoried very meticulously, often providing information about the number of water wheels, the owner, and the purpose of the device. Unfortunately, these data do not make it possible to indicate the exact location of the facilities. The issue of the supply watercourse was also very rarely mentioned in the inspections, so it is impossible to discuss the development of millraces on their basis.
The royal estates covered 44.6% of the River Skawa catchment area (in the second half of the 18th century it was 31 towns and villages). Unfortunately, the lack of inventories of estates belonging to the nobility and the Church from similar periods makes it impossible to calculate the actual number of watermills. Therefore, the number of watermills in the remaining non-royal estates was estimated taking the number of watermills in 1855 as a reference value. According to Munro [2], the average power of a medieval water wheel was 2 HP (1.47 kW according to Equation (1)). On this basis, the power of the mills in 1564, 1659–1664, and 1765 was estimated.
Data for the second period include both the exact location of watermills as well as of artificial millraces. The study used: (1) the administrative map of the Kingdom of Galicia and Lodomeria together with the Grand Duchy of Kraków and the Duchy of Oświęcim, Zator, and Bukovina, the so-called Kummersberg map, from 1855, scale 1: 115,200 [22]; (2) the map of the Austro-Hungarian monarchy (the so-called Spezialkarte), 1909, scale 1:75,000 [23]. These maps were rectified, and the position of watermills and millraces was digitized. In addition, data on watermills located in Galicia in 1880 and 1930 were used, which were made available by the team of Ostafina et al. [24]. Data from 1880 come from the updated Kummersberg map. Hence, slight differences in relation to the data from 1855. The data from 1930 were obtained from the maps of the Military Geographical Institute (Tactical Map of Poland) in the scale of 1:100,000.
By analysing the location of watermills on subsequent maps, it was determined which facilities were marked on more than one map. In this way, the “mills location” layer was created, taking into account all locations.
Statistical data were also used in the study. In the statistical yearbooks for Galicia, which were published annually in the period 1886–1913, only the first edition [25] presents data on the number of watermills. The number of water wheels and turbines as well as their total power expressed in horsepower were provided (Table 1). In 1886, the River Skawa catchment area was within the administrative boundaries of 3 poviats: Wadowice poviat (43% of the catchment area), Myślenice poviat (42.4%), and Żywiec poviat (14.6%).
Using the averaged data from Table 1, the estimated power expressed in kW, which was obtained by converting the average value of power expressed in horsepower for a gristmill or a sawmill into kW according to the dependencies, was added to the attributes of gristmills and sawmills:
1 HP = 0.735 kW
Among the facilities listed in the table as ‘others’, the following facilities were included in the River Skawa catchment area: fulling mills and paper mills from the Wadowice poviat (3 facilities) and the Żywiec poviat (10 facilities). However, on the basis of the analyzed maps, they cannot be distinguished from the group of the facilities marked with the signature of a water wheel. It can be said with certainty that the forges from the Żywiec poviat presented in the table were not located in the River Skawa catchment area.
Along with the analysis of the development of milling and its impact on the aquatic environment, social changes that determined the approach to the use of water energy were recorded. This information was provided by the literature on regional history as well as by statistical data. In this way, all components of the sociohydrological analysis were included.

3. The Use of Water Energy

3.1. Water Milling

3.1.1. From the First Mills to the End of the 18th Century

In the 12th century, intense settlement activity began in the River Skawa catchment area, progressing from the north to the south, upstream the River Skawa and its tributaries. By the end of the 16th century, 79 towns and villages, out of the 89 that have survived to this day, were established [26]. Water milling spread along with the progressive settlement. As early as in the 13th century, Zator had the right to maintain three water mills with ponds [19]. As early as 1406, there was a gristmill in Woźniki, a village belonging to the Cistercian monastery [27]. The development of water damming skills meant that from the end of the 15th century the number of watermills with an overshot water wheel was increasing [19] (Table 2).
In the 16th century, more than one water wheel operated in three watermills in the royal estates. As many as four wheels worked in the castle mill in Zator, two for grinding grain, one for malt, and one for grinding groats [19]. Around 1660, there were several wheels working in eight watermills. The work of a gristmill was most often combined with a sawmill [20]. In 1765, however, all watermills were already single-wheeled.

3.1.2. The Rise and Fall of Water Milling, 19th–20th Centuries

In all of the analyzed periods, watermills were most often established in the Beskid Mountains (1855—55%, 1880—54%, 1909—50%, 1930—60%, Figure 2). The second region in terms of the frequency of establishments was the Western Beskidian Foothills. Gristmills dominated in the River Skawa catchment area. In the Western Beskidian Foothills and in the Oświęcim Basin, their share in the total number of watermills ranged from 69% to 100% (Table 3). On the other hand, sawmills were numerous in the Beskid Mountains and in the Orawa-Jordanów Foothills. However, in the years 1855–1909, they did not dominate in any region.
In the years 1855–1909, in the Western Beskidian Foothills and in the Oświęcim Basin there was one gristmill per 5.5–11 km2, and one sawmill per 77–115.5 km2. In the Beskid Mountains and in the Orawa-Jordanów Foothills, there was one gristmill per 17.2–24.3 km2, and one sawmill per 22.7–32.8 km2 (in the Orawa-Jordanów Foothills in 1909, there was even one sawmill and one gristmill/82 km2). In 1930, when the total number of watermills in the whole catchment area decreased by 49% compared to 1909, the values were even higher, reaching one gristmill/35.3 km2 in the Beskid Mountains and one sawmill/82 km2 in the Orawa-Jordanów Foothills. It should be emphasized here that in 1930 there were no gristmills in the Orawa-Jordanów Foothills, and there were no sawmills in the Oświęcim Basin.
In the River Skawa catchment area, only in 13 locations (eight in the Beskid Mountains) out of 206 did watermills operate continuously in the period 1855–1930 (Figure 3). In as many as seven of them, the type of device was changed (six locations in the Beskid Mountains), including four transformations of a sawmill into a gristmill. In 43 locations, watermills operated from 1855 to 1909. Of them, 22 were located in the Beskid Mountains and 15 in the Western Beskidian Foothills. In seven cases, the type of the device was changed (in three instances, a gristmill was transformed into a sawmill). Moreover, 68 watermills operated only in the period 1855–1880, and 18 in the period 1909–1930, when the type of device was changed four times, including three times a gristmill was transformed into a sawmill.
The natural water conditions in the River Skawa catchment area favored the establishment of watermills at natural channels. Nevertheless, millraces or mill ponds were often built in the valleys to help control the flow of water (Figure 4). Out of 206 locations of watermills in the entire catchment area, 100 were located over natural watercourses, 14 had a mill pond on a natural watercourse, 78 were over millraces, and 14 were over millraces with a mill pond. Establishing watermills on natural rivers and over millraces was most popular in the Beskid Mountains (70% and 42%, respectively). On the other hand, mill ponds were dug only in the Western Beskidian Foothills and the Beskid Mountains.
Only one watermill was located directly over the River Skawa channel in the entire period under study. However, seven weirs were built in the natural channel of the River Skawa, which directed part of the river’s flow to artificial millraces. Two of them were built in the Orawa-Jordanów Foothills, four in the Beskid Mountains, and one in the Western Beskidian Foothills. Millraces in the Beskid Mountains and in the Western Beskidian Foothills made it possible to use the waters of the River Skawa to drive watermills in the sections of the valley where the River Skawa channel was braiding or anabranching.
In the entire analyzed period, the average power of a watermill decreased along with the downstream movement of the catchment area (Table 4). This is typical of mountain catchments where the potential energy of a watercourse decreases with the course of rivers.

3.2. Hydroelectric Power Stations

Technical progress in the field of exploiting water forces to power devices led in the second half of the 19th century to the replacement of water wheels with turbines. Out of 7084 watermills in Galicia, 31 turbines operated there in 1885 [25]. It happened that along with the modernization of watermills, generators were installed. In 1912, a small hydroelectric power plant operated in the River Skawa catchment area of the manor estate in Jaszczurowa [28].
At the beginning of the 20th century, owing to the backwardness in the development of the energy sector in Galicia, a large river measurement campaign was carried out to determine the possibilities of obtaining water energy for the purposes of producing electricity. Importantly, it was not proposed to build power plants directly on rivers, which, especially in the case of the River Skawa, would generate problems with navigability, but on canals running parallel to rivers. The developed concept assumed the construction of 10 open or closed canals (with a pipe diameter of up to 2.11 m) running along the River Skawa from the mouth of the Skawica to Zator, and three canals along the Skawica River. The longest canal (12.3 km and with a slope of 212 m) was to allow the commissioning of a power plant with a capacity of 1.98 MW. The total capacity of all thirteen power plants was to reach 5.57 MW. In order to ensure a sufficient amount of water to supply the canals, three storage reservoirs were designed, i.e., on the Skawica River in Zawoja (8.53 million m3 of capacity), on the Paleczka River in Budzów (8.65 million m3 of capacity), and on the River Skawa in Mucharz (36.36 million m3 of capacity) [29]. Ultimately, even before World War I, the Galician Parliament decided to build only one storage reservoir, i.e., that on the Skawica River [30]. In the interwar period, these plans were also abandoned.
The possibility of building a hydropower reservoir on the River Skawa near Świnna Poręba was first tested in 1919 [31]. In 1935, the construction of reservoirs on the Skawica and on the Skawa in Witanowice was planned [32]. Ultimately, no new hydropower facility was built in the River Skawa catchment area, and most of the watermills that survived until World War II were liquidated at the turn of the 1940s and 1950s.
Today, the hydropower potential of the River Skawa is used to a small extent. There are three hydropower plants throughout the entire catchment area. The power plant in Skawica on the Skawica River was built in the late 1980s and has a capacity of 50 kW. Since 2011, a 940-kW power plant has been operating at the weir in Grodzisko. This weir was built in the 19th century in order to dam up the waters of the River Skawa to supply the fish ponds on its right bank. In the 1920s, it was modernized so that it could also supply the navigation canal built along the Vistula River [33]. In 2019, a power plant in the Świnna Poręba reservoir dam, with a capacity of 4.61 MW, started operating. The primary function of the facility is flood protection and water retention for municipal purposes, but the hydropower function was taken into account from the beginning of construction. The reservoir has a capacity of 160 million m3 and covers approx. 12 km of the length of the River Skawa valley. The dam is 604 m long and 54 m high. In 2014, permission was granted to build a small hydropower plant at the existing barrage in Wadowice [34]. The construction of the 0.6-MW facility has not yet started.
However, the possibilities of using the hydropower potential of the River Skawa catchment area are much greater. According to the authors of the RESTORE Hydro project, it is possible to use the barriers existing on rivers to build hydroelectric power plants [8]. In the River Skawa catchment area, 255 locations were identified, mainly including concrete barrages, which are supposed to prevent erosion in mountain streams. Taking into account the average flow in the watercourses and the height of the barriers, it was calculated that all these facilities are capable of generating 2.64 MW of power. The largest number of facilities, a total of 209, was identified in the Wieprzówka (89), Stryszawka (58), Paleczka (40), and Choczenka River (22) catchments.

4. The Impact of Water Energy Use on the Natural Environment

Out of 44 artificial watercourses identified on the analyzed maps, as many as 41 were built as millraces. Three facilities were created for a different purpose and were adapted to be millraces. The oldest of them is the Zator millrace, supplied by the Wieprzówka, which could have been built at the turn of the 14th and 15th centuries, when man began to introduce the first significant changes to the river network in the River Skawa catchment area for the supplying of fish ponds with water. The Tomice millrace was also built to supply the complex of fish ponds with water in the 16th century [26]. On the other hand, the Andrychów millrace was dug in the first half of the 17th century as a source for the defensive moat of the Andrychów manor [35].
In 1909, the total length of the millraces in the River Skawa catchment area reached its highest value of 72.5 km (Table 5). In the southern, source part of the catchment, in the Orawa-Jordanów Foothills, there were five short millraces (0.65–1.6 km long) with a total length of 3.2 km. Further, 24 millraces were dug in the Beskid Mountains (24.6 km in total), 23 of them were less than 2.52 km long, and one (the Maków millrace) was 3.9 km long. Further, 11 millraces (a total of 22.6 km) were located in the Western Beskidian Foothills. Only four millraces (22.1 km in total) were located in the Oświęcim Basin, including the longest millraces in the River Skawa catchment area, the Wieprz millrace (10 km) and the Zator millrace (9.2 km).
In the period 1855–1930, there were 44 functioning millraces, of which eight were marked only on one of the maps and no traces of them have survived (Figure 5). These were short millraces, 287–1579 m long, over which only one watermill worked. Another 10 millraces were marked on two or three maps, but no traces of them have remained either. Traces of 26 millraces have survived to this day, and three of them have survived in their entirety. In the case of 32 millraces, no or insignificant changes in length were found during their operation. Eight millraces were lengthened in the 20th century and four were shortened.
The construction of 44 artificial millraces with a total length of approximately 70 km resulted in an increase in the density of the river network in the transformed valley bottoms. Further, 19 millraces did not receive any watercourses. Their length did not exceed 2.4 km. 10 millraces were additionally supplied by one watercourse. Their length did not exceed 2 km. Seven millraces were additionally supplied by two watercourses. The longest of them was 4.3 km. Four millraces received three additional watercourses. The longest of them, the Wadowice millrace, was 7 km long. Two millraces received four watercourses each. In the mountains, the Budzów millrace was only 1.6 km long, and the Wieprzówka millrace in the Oświęcim Basin was 10 km long. The largest number of additional watercourses was received by the mountain Maków millrace (6.5 km long), i.e., as many as 10.
Traces of 26 millraces with a total length of 48.1 km have survived to this day (Figure 6). An important role in water management is still played by the Zator and Tomice millraces, which are almost completely preserved and supply fishponds. Moreover, 15 sections of the millraces have survived because they have been left as sections of stream channels. Owing to the existing sections of the millraces, 35 watercourses have changed their course or lost their natural mouths. The Maków millrace, with three sections remaining, still changes the course of eight tributaries of the River Skawa (Figure 6). The other 10 sections of the millraces do not affect the course of the natural river network, being side channels usually filled with water. In the River Skawa catchment area, today, there are 3112.7 km of open channels [36], including artificial channels built to supply fish ponds or as flood control channels or derivative canals. The remains of the former millraces (48.1 km) constitute as much as 1.5% of this contemporary river network.
Weirs on 20 natural rivers were built in the entire River Skawa catchment area in the period 1855–1930 in order to supply millraces. In the case of short millraces, the flow in them can be estimated at a level of 0.1 m3/s, but in the case of large ones, e.g., in the Wadowice millrace, the measured flow reached as much as 2.5 m3/s [29]. They caused the distribution of water over a much larger area, thus affecting the increase in the level of groundwater. Weirs were also an obstacle in the transport of gravel and forced its deposition.
Mill ponds affected in particular the flow conditions in the millraces and watercourses into which the millraces flowed. Watermills operated during the day and, therefore, the discharge of the pond water was much greater during the day than at night, which resulted in fluctuating flows. Unfortunately, these changes are impossible to reproduce. Undoubtedly, mill ponds marked a change in the water network and in the relief. Most mill ponds were marked on the map from 1855. They were located both in the Wastern Beskidian Foothills and in the Beskid Mountains. At that time, eight out of 19 ponds operated at millraces. To this day, seven mill ponds have been preserved.
The direct impact of the three existing hydroelectric plants on the natural environment cannot be determined. All of the power plants are located next to hydrotechnical facilities, which were built for a purpose other than the damming of water for the purposes of the power industry. Moreover, all of the power plants operate in a flow-through mode, so there are no discharges disrupting the natural flow. However, the impact of the damming structures next to which the existing power plants are located on the natural environment is unquestionable.

5. Discussion

Along with their appearance in the River Skawa catchment area, humans began to use the fluvial environment. The first fish ponds were established near Zator in the 13th century within the oxbow lakes which constituted natural pools [26]. The first watermills, on the other hand, were built over natural watercourses with the simplest undershot water wheels installed in them. These devices did not require the damming of water, which was a skill unknown in southern Poland until the end of the 15th century [37]. The period until the end of the 15th century was distinguished by the ability to use the fluvial environment in its natural state. Watermills of that time, having 2 HP water wheels, could replace the work of 30–60 people who would grind the grain by hand. Moreover, as early as in the Middle Ages, a watermill made it possible to save the capital and grain which would be needed to obtain the same energy in horse mills [2]. The rapid development of milling, causing changes in the medieval river network, was considered to be part of the “medieval industrial revolution” [38].
Starting in the 16th century, man began to exert noticeable pressure on the fluvial environment. According to Baranowski [37], water milling in the Kingdom of Poland was the most important branch of industrial production from the 16th to the 18th century. Watermills were already being built then regardless of natural conditions. Despite this, no mill settlements were found in which the watermill was an impulse to establish a new town or village [39]. The onset of anthropopressure on the floodplain is, therefore, associated with settlement, the progress of which was a result of the clash of various political influences in the Silesian-Krakow borderland [40].
The number of watermills in the River Skawa catchment area increased successively until around 1880 and then declined. In Western Europe, the flourishing development of milling peaked at the beginning of the 19th century [6]. The peak of the milling development in the River Skawa catchment area fell on the last wet phase of the Little Ice Age [41], which is confirmed by the high frequency of floods in Europe [42]. The upward trend was disturbed at the end of the 17th century as a result of the Polish-Swedish war [43]. Gristmills were often the target of attacks as facilities for the provision of enemy troops [6]. The reduction of human pressure on the environment, as a result of the regression in milling, was, therefore, politically motivated. The reconstruction of the post-war damage began at a time when the technical level of milling had risen significantly. The adjustment of the position of the transmission shaft, popular since the 18th century, made it possible to avoid damage during minor floods. It was particularly important at that time because in the Kingdom of Poland approximately 1.6–2% of the population lived off milling [37].
In the 19th and 20th centuries, watermills were established most often in the Beskid Mountains, and, in the second place, in the Western Beskidian Foothills. This resulted from the natural conditions in the River Skawa catchment area. The greater density of sawmills in western Galicia resulted from the location of nearby markets for wood, i.e., Silesia and Kraków, numerous ironworks, and the policy of the owners of goods focused on the acquisition of wood [24].
In 1885, in the whole of Galicia, 7829 people were employed in water milling, which constituted 9.4% of people working in industry. These data confirm the important role of watermills in the underdeveloped Galician industry. At that time, water sawmills accounted for 88% of all saw mills, and water gristmills accounted for 97% of the total number of gristmills [25]. At the end of the 19th century, Galician milling and sawmilling were dominated by watermills, while in Europe steam or electric machines were used more and more often for propulsion [44]. The level of development of Galician milling in the 19th century was, therefore, the result of natural conditions and political factors. The slight pressure on the flood plains in the River Skawa catchment area and in the whole of Galicia, compared to other parts of the Habsburg Empire [45,46,47], was the result of the country’s political and economic peripherality.
Watermills were exposed to destruction during floods and fires, but their existence was also closely related to the economic situation. Declines in the number of gristmills or at least their short-term shutdowns probably also took place during famines, especially in the 19th century [48], but the analyzed sources do not support this thesis. Owing to these factors, a watermill in a given location did not always work for a long period of time. On the other hand, in lowland areas, the durability of one location reached as many as 700 years [6]. In the River Skawa catchment area, it also happened that the type of devices was changed, or transmission devices were adapted to work for both grain grinding and wood cutting.
The development of the use of water energy was possible thanks to the acquisition of the ability to dam water for overshot water wheels and to dig millraces. Therefore, the development of milling reflects the technical progress that was taking place among the local population. More than half of the 19th and 20th-century locations of watermills in the River Skawa catchment area were found at millraces or mill ponds. The longest millraces were dug in the Oświęcim Basin, where the relief was the least diversified. Mill ponds in the River Skawa catchment area were in addition, rarely dug, and then only in the Beskid Mountains and at the Western Beskidian Foothills. In the case of mill ponds in the UK, it was noted that those in mountainous areas provided additional security for the water supply, as river slopes were sufficient to power watermills [49]. Moreover, ponds in the mountains were rarely dug owing to terrain difficulties [50].
The construction of millraces caused changes in the relief and water distribution in the catchment area, which resulted in an increase in the groundwater level. According to Kaiser et al. [51], the first changes in the water balance of German rivers were caused precisely by the construction of weirs at watermills. The construction of watermills on the Havel in the 13th century resulted in an increase in the groundwater level and the spread of peatland [52]. Traces of millraces with a total length of 48.1 km have survived to this day, accounting for 1.5% of the contemporary river network in the River Skawa catchment area. The existing sections of millraces change the course of 35 streams. Also, 7 mill ponds have survived. Both the non-existent sections of millraces and those still existing today should be taken into account when designing renaturalization activities [53]. Weirs, on the other hand, were an obstacle in the transport of gravel and forced its deposition. Until the end of the 19th century, this process probably had a slight impact on the sediment balance in the main watercourse of the catchment, which had a multi-thread channel. On the other hand, at the beginning of the 20th century, when the regulation of the River Skawa and its tributaries began, the supply of sediment through weirs was significantly limited, contributing to the initiation of rapid and intensive channel incision [54]. The high level of groundwater in the Carpathian valleys was prevented from the second half of the 19th century using agricultural drainage [33]. Until the mid-twentieth century, raising the groundwater level was a major obstacle to the cultivation of land, especially in the flat parts of mountain valleys. In France, on the other hand, agricultural drainage on the Rhine valley had been carried out a hundred years earlier [55]. The subsequent liquidation of millraces, especially weirs, starting in the 1940s, resulted in an increase in flows in natural watercourses [30]. In the case of watermills on the Wurm River, it was found that channel incision was triggered by the liquidation of the weir [56]. Similar effects were observed in the USA [3].
In the middle and lower reaches of the River Skawa, under natural conditions, there were several anabranching or braiding sections [17], which were too unstable for watermills to be established on them. The problem was both the frequent changes in the relief and the large fluctuations in the flow divided into several threads. Weirs were built in the channel of the River Skawa, damming water for millraces, which bypassed the multi-thread sections of the river. However, these weirs were a problem for the timber rafting [26]. At the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries, Galicia began to consider building a network of waterways, which meant that the full patency of channels was expected [33,57]. For this reason, at the beginning of the 20th century, the only weir in the lower reaches of the River Skawa was equipped with a ramp for the rafting [30]. However, the subordination of milling to other forms of economic activity was not the norm in Europe. In the River Elbe catchment area, watermills took priority over the interests of agriculture which, through the construction of numerous weirs, resulted in the consolidation of large swamps, which made it difficult to cultivate the land [52].
Building a watermill required knowledge, skills, and permission. For this reason, as early as in the 16th century, in the River Skawa catchment area, it was mainly village leaders that became millers [19]. Watermills were associated with class oppression and the wealthy miller was treated as someone who wanted to cheat the farmer. Fears concerning honesty were additionally fueled by the superstition of uneducated peasants who believed that in order to build a watermill and control flowing water, it was necessary to use satanic forces. It was a common phenomenon throughout Europe, which persisted in many, especially mountain villages, until the beginning of the 20th century [58]. Therefore, beliefs limited the demand for milling services.
The average power generated by gristmills in the River Skawa catchment in the 19th century did not exceed 4 kW, and by sawmills—7 kW. These values are lower than for the entire territory of Poland, where the average power of gristmills was estimated at 6–7.5 kW [44]. The reasons for this difference lie in the low technological level in Galicia and in more difficult terrain conditions than in the lowlands. On the other hand, the average power of devices serving other purposes in the River Skawa catchment, such as paper mills, was much higher, even 21 kW. Such big differences result from the different technical requirements of the facilities.
The economic backwardness of Galicia [59] meant that at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries, mill wheels were very rarely replaced with much more efficient water turbines, despite the fact that there was a need to develop both large hydropower for the needs of the country and small hydropower for individual facilities or housing estates [60]. Watermills were replaced just as reluctantly with steam mills. In Galicia, watermills were occasionally transformed into power plants. On the other hand, in the northern part of contemporary Poland, at the end of the 19th century, the first large hydroelectric plants [61] began to be built, similarly to Western Europe [62]. Along with the failure to implement the project of building a power plant in the River Skawa valley at the beginning of the 20th century [29], the era of using water forces in the River Skawa catchment area, lasting continuously since the 13th century, ended. Only in the sub-catchment of the Skawica River, with the highest energy potential, did individual sawmills operate in the second half of the 20th century [63].
The gradual decommissioning of water wheel-driven devices was a process expected by society. The decommissioning was related to technical advances that increased the efficiency of devices and reduced the workload of employees. The abandonment of water wheels also reduced human dependence on the shortage or excess of water. Devices could be installed in a place convenient for the owner, not necessarily close to the river. The technological displacement of the water drive also displaced water milling from the local identity. Out of the thousands of Galician watermills still operating at the beginning of the 20th century, only a dozen have remained, most of them moved to open-air museums [64]. Nevertheless, there is a tourist potential in the traces of water milling, both in the locations of watermills [65] and in restored facilities [66].
At the beginning of the 20th century, despite the plans [29], the hydropower potential of the rivers in the River Skawa catchment area was not used. The hydrotechnical facilities with three hydroelectric power plants in the River Skawa catchment area were built for other purposes. This is particularly important in the context of the Świnna Poręba reservoir, the construction of which had a huge impact on the local community displaced from the reservoir bowl [67]. However, in this case, the negative human impact on the fluvial and social environment should not be linked to the development of hydropower.
The use of water for human needs without taking into account environmental costs is in line with the general trend prevailing during the industrial revolution in the world. The construction of millraces, weirs, and watergates was an element of the conquest of nature, showing the possibilities of man to subordinate these unfavorable forces to himself [68,69]. Traces of negative historical human impact on the environment are particularly visible in post-socialist countries [70].
Important from the point of view of sustainable development is the RESTORE Hydro project, which assumes the possibility of building a hydroelectric power plant in the places of the existing weirs [8]. The environmental impact of many of these barriers is significant and the benefits of their existence are relatively small at present. For this reason, many of them could be dismantled, but it is a time-consuming and cost-intensive process, as evidenced by a small number of such activities in Poland [71]. So far, no weir in the River Skawa catchment area has been dismantled. The construction of hydroelectric power plants at the existing weirs would reduce human impact on the environment by increasing the production of renewable energy while using to this end the facilities negatively affecting the environment. The interest in the development of such hydropower is low, mainly due to small production capacities in relation to huge investment costs. However, Scotland has proven that such a compromise is acceptable [62].
It is necessary to continue research on changes in the fluvial environment in the context of the historical human economy. These studies will make it possible to accurately capture the time of the onset of anthropopressure and will make it possible for us to look at the effects of human activity, which, although it is of a local nature, covers areas with a large surface. The inclusion of human activity in research not only as a source of pressure allows for full recognition of the conditions of the environment functioning. Continuing the thought of Werther et al. [14], the importance of multidisciplinary work involving the study of changes in the natural environment in the context of human activity, with particular emphasis on feedback loops, should be emphasized. In the case of research on fluvial anthropospheres, it is necessary to (1) identify changes in the natural environment, (2) trace the history of human activity in the fluvial environment, and (3) define interrelationships. Such analyses will significantly facilitate the management of riverside areas in the spirit of sustainable development.

6. Conclusions

The use of water energy in the River Skawa catchment area covers two periods. In the first one, water energy was used with the help of a water wheel to drive various devices, mainly gristmills and sawmills. This period began with the development of settlement in the 13th century and lasted until the beginning of the 20th century. In the second period, man utilized the potential of hydropower. Despite planning the construction of hydroelectric power plants at the beginning of the 20th century, their actual implementation took place only at the end of the 20th century. In the entire period under study, man did not fully use the energy potential of flowing water in the River Skawa catchment area. Watermills in the River Skawa catchment area were unevenly distributed and were also established on watercourses with low energy potential. This resulted from the economic needs of the local community and a not well-thought-out use of water resources.
The influence of man on the environment owing to water milling was significant. It was intensified as early as the 16th century, when the first millraces and weirs began to be built. Owing to water milling, barrages began to be built on rivers in Central Europe. The compaction of artificial millraces and weirs led to a successive increase in the groundwater level, the distribution of the flood risk within the flood plain, and the reduction of sediment transport. These processes continued until the end of the 19th century. With the disappearance of water milling, the processes were reversed. In many places, however, the landscape remained altered despite the lack of watermills. Pressure on fluvial systems from the milling industry was replaced by river regulation for other purposes. This environmentally destructive process led to the complete transformation of the Carpathian rivers. Contemporary ideas, such as the RESTORE Hydro, give hope for the use of at least some of the regulatory structures for the purposes of sustainable development.

Funding

This research was funded by Pedagogical University of Krakow Project No. WPBU/2022/04/00252. The APC was funded by Pedagogical University of Krakow Project No. WPBU/2022/04/00051.

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Figure A1. Research area. (A). Catchments of the Skawa tributaries: DCS—the direct catchment of the Skawa; CST—Skawa tributaries catchment with an area of more than 4 km2: 1—Łowiczanka, 2—Czarczówka, 3—Zygodówka, 4—Dopływ z Witanowic, 5—Radoczanka, 6—Choczenka, 7—Dąbrówka, 8—Ponikiewka, 9—Bystrz, 10—Łękawka, 11—Stryszówka, 12—Jaszczurówka, 13—Śleszowicki, 14—Tarnawka, 15—Dąbrówka, 16—Grzechynka, 17—Żarnowianka, 18—Wieprzczanka, 19—Cadynka, 20—Malejówka, 21—Dzialski, 22—Pożoga; (B). Main localities of the Skawa catchment: B1—Zator, B2—Grodzisko, B3—Woźniki, B4—Witanowice, B5—Andrychów, B6—Wadowice, B7—Barwałd Średni, B8—Świnna Poręba, B9—Jaszczurowa, B10—Mucharz, B11—Stryszów, B12—Budzów, B13—Stryszawa, B14—Sucha Beskidzka, B15—Maków Podhalański, B16—Skawica, B17—Zawoja, B18—Sidzina, B19—Jordanów, B20—Spytkowice.
Figure A1. Research area. (A). Catchments of the Skawa tributaries: DCS—the direct catchment of the Skawa; CST—Skawa tributaries catchment with an area of more than 4 km2: 1—Łowiczanka, 2—Czarczówka, 3—Zygodówka, 4—Dopływ z Witanowic, 5—Radoczanka, 6—Choczenka, 7—Dąbrówka, 8—Ponikiewka, 9—Bystrz, 10—Łękawka, 11—Stryszówka, 12—Jaszczurówka, 13—Śleszowicki, 14—Tarnawka, 15—Dąbrówka, 16—Grzechynka, 17—Żarnowianka, 18—Wieprzczanka, 19—Cadynka, 20—Malejówka, 21—Dzialski, 22—Pożoga; (B). Main localities of the Skawa catchment: B1—Zator, B2—Grodzisko, B3—Woźniki, B4—Witanowice, B5—Andrychów, B6—Wadowice, B7—Barwałd Średni, B8—Świnna Poręba, B9—Jaszczurowa, B10—Mucharz, B11—Stryszów, B12—Budzów, B13—Stryszawa, B14—Sucha Beskidzka, B15—Maków Podhalański, B16—Skawica, B17—Zawoja, B18—Sidzina, B19—Jordanów, B20—Spytkowice.
Energies 15 07770 g0a1
Table A1. Number of watermills in towns and villages belonging to royal estates according to the inspection from 1564 [19], 1659–1664 [20] and 1765 [21].
Table A1. Number of watermills in towns and villages belonging to royal estates according to the inspection from 1564 [19], 1659–1664 [20] and 1765 [21].
No.Towns (t) and VillagesPhysico-Geographical MacroregionsTime of the SettlementNumber of Watermills
15641659–16641765
1Zator (t)Oświęcim Basin12th century222
2Wadowice (t)Western Beskidian Foothills13th century221
3BaczynWestern Beskids14th century201
4Barwałd DolnyWestern Beskidian Foothills14th century010
5Barwałd ŚredniWestern Beskidian Foothills14th century212
6BieńkówkaWestern Beskids14th century104
7BudzówWestern Beskids14th century214
8ChoczniaWestern Beskidian Foothills14th century011
9JachówkaWestern Beskids14th century102
10JaroszowiceWestern Beskidian Foothills14th century001
11PalczaWestern Beskids14th century001
12PiotrowiceOświęcim Basin14th century222
13StronieWestern Beskidian Foothills14th century001
14ŚleszowiceWestern Beskids14th century001
15ZachełmnaWestern Beskids14th century001
16ZakrzówWestern Beskidian Foothills14th century001
17JuszczynWestern Beskids15th century103
18KojszówkaWestern Beskids15th century104
19Maków (t)Western Beskids15th century104
20TrzebieńczyceOświęcim Basin15th century000
21BiałkaWestern Beskids16th century114
22KaczynaWestern Beskids16th century000
23KoziniecWestern Beskids16th century000
24OsielecWestern Beskids16th century102
25PonikiewWestern Beskids16th century335
26RzykiWestern Beskids16th century014
27SidzinaWestern Beskids (Orawa-Jordanów Foothills)16th century008
28SkawicaWestern Beskids16th century064
29Zagórnik (Nowa Wieś)Western Beskids16th century200
30ZawojaWestern Beskids16th century008
31ŻarnówkaWestern Beskids17th century-010

References

  1. Tockner, K.; Tonolla, D.; Uehlinger, U.; Siber, R.; Robinson, C.T.; Peter, F.D. Introduction to European Rivers. In Rivers of Europe; Tockner, K., Zarfl, C., Robinson, C., Eds.; Elsevier: London, UK, 2009; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  2. Munro, J.H. Industrial energy from watermills in the European economy, 5th to 18th Centuries: The limitations of power. MPRA Pap. 2002, 34, 223–269. [Google Scholar]
  3. Walter, R.C.; Merritts, D. Natural Streams and the Legacy of Water-Powered Mills. Science 2008, 319, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Lazdāne, L. Watermill and Small-Scale Hydroelectric Power Plant Landscapes Assessed According To Ecological Aspects. Sci. Future Lith. 2013, 5, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lazdāne, L. The historical development of watermills and small-scale hydroelectric power plants landscape in Latvia. Res. Rural Dev. 2011, 17, 200–206. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brykała, D.; Podgórski, Z. Evolution of landscapes influenced by watermills, based on examples from Northern Poland. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2020, 198, 103798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Macklin, M.G.; Lewin, J. River stresses in anthropogenic times: Large-scale global patterns and extended environmental timelines. Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ. 2019, 43, 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Punys, P.; Kvaraciejus, A.; Dumbrauskas, A.; Šilinis, L.; Popa, B. An assessment of micro-hydropower potential at historic watermill, weir, and non-powered dam sites in selected EU countries. Renew. Energy 2019, 133, 1108–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sivapalan, M.; Savenije, H.H.G.; Blöschl, G. Socio-hydrology: A new science of people and water. Hydrol. Process. 2012, 26, 1270–1276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gregory, K.J. The human role in changing river channels. Geomorphology 2006, 79, 172–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Messerli, B.; Grosjean, M.; Hofer, T.; Núñez, L.; Pfister, C. From nature-dominated to human-dominated environmental changes. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2000, 19, 459–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ellis, E.C. Anthropocene: A Very Short Introduction; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  13. Meybeck, M. Global analysis of river systems: From Earth system controls to Anthropocene syndromes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2003, 358, 1935–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Werther, L.; Mehler, N.; Schenk, G.J.; Zielhofer, C. On the Way to the Fluvial Anthroposphere—Current Limitations and Perspectives of Multidisciplinary Research. Water 2021, 13, 2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Witkowski, K.; Witkowski, M. The impact of watermills on changes in the hydrographic network in the Carpathian Foothills in Poland. Carpathian J. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 13, 605–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. National Water Management Board National Water and Environmental Programme. Available online: https://apgw.gov.pl/pl/II-cykl-materialy-do-pobrania (accessed on 26 June 2022).
  17. Witkowski, K. Reconstruction of Nineteenth-Century Channel Patterns of Polish Carpathians Rivers from the Galicia and Bucovina Map (1861–1864). Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 5147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Head Office of Geodesy and Cartography Map of Relief Shading, WMTS. Available online: https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/ (accessed on 26 June 2022).
  19. Małecki, J.M. Lustracja Województwa Krakowskiego w 1564 Roku. Cz. 1; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 1962. [Google Scholar]
  20. Falniowska-Gradowska, A.; Leśniak, F. Lustracja Województwa Krakowskiego w 1659–1664; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  21. Falniowska-Gradowska, A. Lustracja Województwa Krakowskiego w 1765 Roku. Cz. 1; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Poland; Kraków, Poland, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  22. von Kummersberg, C.K.R. Administrative Map of Kingdom of Galicia and Lodomeria Together with the Grand Duchy of Kraków and the Duchy of Oświęcim, Zator and Bukovina. 1:115 200 1855. Available online: https://polski.mapywig.org/viewpage.php?page_id=43 (accessed on 1 June 2022).
  23. KKMGI Spezialkarte der Österreichisch-Ungarischen Monarchie. 1:75,000 1909. Available online: https://polski.mapywig.org/viewpage.php?page_id=43 (accessed on 1 June 2022).
  24. Ostafin, K.; Jasionek, M.; Kaim, D.; Miklar, A. Historical dataset of mills for Galicia in the Austro-Hungarian Empire/southern Poland from 1880 to the 1930s. Data Br. 2022, 40, 107709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rutowski, T. Rocznik Statystyki Galicji. Rok I. 1886; Krajowe Biuro Statystyczne: Lwów, Ukraine, 1887.
  26. Siemionow, A. Ziemia Wadowicka. Monografia Turystyczno-Krajoznawcza; KTG O. PTTK Ziemia Wadowicka: Wadowice, Poland, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  27. Baran, A. Rola cystersów mogilskich w zagospodarowaniu terenu dawnego księstwa zatorskiego (XIII–XVII w.). Wadoviana. Przegląd Hist. 2014, 17, 7–39. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sadurska, B. W Ruchu; MIK: Kraków, Poland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  29. Pomianowski, K. Siły Wodne w Galicyi. 4. Skawa; Fundusz Krajowy: Lwów, Ukraine, 1908. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kędzior, A. Roboty Wodne i Melioracyjne w Południowej Małopolsce Wykonane z Inicjatywy Sejmu i Wydziału Krajowego. Część I. Ogólna; Tymczasowy Wydział Samorządowy: Lwów, Ukraine, 1928. [Google Scholar]
  31. Narutowicz, G. Sprawozdanie z podróży do Małopolski w czasie od 18-ego do 22 września 1919 r. Gospod. Wodna 2005, 1, 15–21. [Google Scholar]
  32. Herbich, H. Zagadnienia zbiornikowe. Gospod. Wodna 1935, 1, 60–63. [Google Scholar]
  33. Witkowski, K. The Galician Canal—An unrealized project that changed the rivers in the northern part of the Carpathians. River Res. Appl. 2021, 37, 1343–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Burmistrz Wadowic Decyzja Nr 02/2014 O Środowiskowych Uwarunkowaniach Zgody Na Realizację Przedsięwzięcia. 2014, p. 10. Available online: https://bip.malopolska.pl (accessed on 19 August 2022).
  35. Zwoliński, A. Miasto Ankiwczów. Z Dziejów Andrychowa; Drukarnia Akcydensowa: Kraków, Poland, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  36. Head Office of Geodesy and Cartography Topographic Objects Database. Available online: https://www.geoportal.gov.pl/dane/baza-danych-obiektow-topograficznych-bdot (accessed on 26 June 2022).
  37. Baranowski, B. Polskie Młynarstwo; Ossolineum: Wrocław, Poland; Warszawa, Poland; Kraków, Poland; Gdańsk, Poland, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lucas, A. Wind, Water, Work. Ancient and Medieval Milling Technology; Brill: Leiden, Poland; Boston, MA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  39. Rutkowski, H.; Chłapowski, K. Województwo Krakowskie w Drugiej Połowie XVI Wieku; Część, I., Ed.; Wydawnictwo Instytutu Historii PAN: Warszawa, Poland, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  40. Rajman, J. Pogranicze Śląsko-Małopolskie w Średniowieczu; Wydawnictwo Naukowe WSP: Kraków, Poland, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  41. Marchese, E.; Scorpio, V.; Fuller, I.; McColl, S.; Comiti, F. Morphological changes in Alpine rivers following the end of the Little Ice Age. Geomorphology 2017, 295, 811–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Schmocker-Fackel, P.; Naef, F. Changes in flood frequencies in Switzerland since 1500. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2010, 14, 1581–1594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Davies, N. God’s Playground A History of Poland. Volume I. The Origins to 1795; Columbia University Press: Oxford, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  44. Gładkowski, A. Historia techniki młynarstwa polskiego. In Inżynierowie Polscy w XIX i XX Wieku; Mrugalski, Z., Ed.; Polskie Towarzystwo Historii Techniki: Warszawa, Poland, 2008; pp. 13–100. [Google Scholar]
  45. Pinke, Z. Modernization and decline: An eco-historical perspective on regulation of the Tisza Valley, Hungary. J. Hist. Geogr. 2014, 45, 92–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Janáč, J. European Coasts of Bohemia. Negotiating the Danube-Oder-Elbe Canal in a Troubled Twentieth Century; Amsterdam University Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; ISBN 9789089645012. [Google Scholar]
  47. Ujházy, N.; Biró, M. The ‘Cursed Channel’: Utopian and dystopian imaginations of landscape transformation in twentieth-century Hungary. J. Hist. Geogr. 2018, 61, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Łubieński, R. Nieurodzaj i Głód w Galicyi. R. 1879–1880; Wł. Anczyc i Spółka: Kraków, Poland, 1880. [Google Scholar]
  49. Bishop, P.; Muñoz-Salinas, E. Tectonics, geomorphology and water mill location in Scotland, and the potential impacts of mill dam failure. Appl. Geogr. 2013, 42, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bishop, P.; Jansen, J.D. The geomorphological setting of some of Scotland’s east coast freshwater mills: A comment on Downward and Skinner (2005) “Working rivers: The geomorphological legacy…”. Area 2005, 37, 443–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kaiser, K.; Keller, N.; Brande, A.; Dalitz, S.; Hensel, N.; Heußner, K.-U.; Kappler, C.; Michas, U.; Müller, J.; Schwalbe, G.; et al. A large-scale medieval dam-lake cascade in central Europe: Water level dynamics of the Havel River, Berlin–Brandenburg region, Germany. Geoarchaeology 2018, 33, 237–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zielhofer, C.; Schmidt, J.; Reiche, N.; Tautenhahn, M.; Ballasus, H.; Burkart, M.; Linstädter, A.; Dietze, E.; Kaiser, K.; Mehler, N. The Lower Havel River Region (Brandenburg, Germany): A 230-Year-Long Historical Map Record Indicates a Decrease in Surface Water Areas and Groundwater Levels. Water 2022, 14, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Müller, G.U.; Koll, K. River re-naturalization: Historic and anthropogenic constraints, ecosystems and their interaction. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Ecohydraulics, Madrid, Spain, 12–17 September 2004. [Google Scholar]
  54. Ingarden, R. Rozwój budownictwa wodnego w Galicyi w ostaniem dzisięcioleciu (dokończenie). Przegląd Tech. 1910, 28, 361–377. [Google Scholar]
  55. Götze, B. Die Untere Havelniederung—Eine gewachsene Kulturlandschaft? Über die Entstehung einer Kulturlandschaft im westlichen Havelland. In Die ökologische Station Gülpe der Universität Potsdam. Forschungen an der Unteren Havel. In Brandenburgische Umwelt Berichte 13; Mühle, R.U., Kaden, K., Jeltsch, F., Eds.; Potsdam University: Potsdam, Germany, 2003; pp. 5–15. [Google Scholar]
  56. Buchty-Lemke, M.; Lehmkuhl, F. Impact of abandoned water mills on Central European foothills to lowland rivers: A reach scale example from the Wurm River, Germany. Geogr. Ann. Ser. A Phys. Geogr. 2018, 100, 221–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ingarden, R. Rozwój budownictwa wodnego w Galicyi w ostatniem dziesięcioleciu. Czas. Tech. 1910, 28, 341–355. [Google Scholar]
  58. Rzepkowski, K. Złoty Kciuk. Młyn i Młynarz w Kulturze Zachodu; Wydawnictwo Naukowe UMK: Toruń, Poland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  59. Davies, N. God’s Playground a History of Poland: Volume II: 1795 to the Present; Columbia University Press: Oxford, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  60. Chmielewski, H. Turbiny Wodne; Politechnika Warszawska: Warszawa, Poland, 1939. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kałuża, T.; Hämmerling, M.; Zawadzki, P.; Czekała, W.; Kasperek, R.; Sojka, M.; Mokwa, M.; Ptak, M.; Szkudlarek, A.; Czechlowski, M.; et al. The hydropower sector in Poland: Historical development and current status. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 158, 112150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Slee, B.; Whitfield, R.; Whitfield, S. Discourses of power: The development of small-scale hydropower in North East Scotland. Rural Soc. 2011, 21, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Franczak, P.; Listwan-Franczak, K. Dawne młyny, folusze i tartaki wodne w dorzeczu Skawicy. Rekonstrukcja rozmieszczenia tradycyjnych siłowni wodnych w ciągu ostatnich 450 lat. Rocz. Babiogórski 2018, 19, 53–69. [Google Scholar]
  64. Mosakowski, Z.; Brykała, D.; Prarat, M.; Jagiełło, D.; Podgórski, Z.; Lamparski, P. Watermills and windmills as monuments in Poland—Protection of cultural heritage in situ and in open-air museums. Muzeol. A Kult. Dedičstvo 2020, 8, 41–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Hognogi, G.-G.; Marian-Potra, A.-C.; Pop, A.-M.; Mălăescu, S. Importance of watermills for the Romanian local community. J. Rural Stud. 2021, 86, 198–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gagliano, A.; Tina, G.M.; Nocera, F.; Patania, F. Technical and Economic Perspective for Repowering of Micro Hydro Power Plants: A Case Study of an Early XX Century Power Plant. Energy Procedia 2014, 62, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Piróg, D.; Fidelus-Orzechowska, J.; Wiejaczka, Ł.; Łajczak, A. Hierarchy of factors affecting the social perception of dam reservoirs. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2019, 79, 106301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Benton, T. Environmental sociology: Controversy and continuity. J. Sociol. 2001, 1–2, 5–49. [Google Scholar]
  69. Cosgrove, D. An elemental division: Water control and engineered landscape. In Water, Engineering and Landscape: Water Control and Landscape Transformation; Cosgrove, D., Petts, G., Eds.; Bellhaven: London, UK, 1990; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  70. Ianos, I.; Sirodoev, I.; Pascariu, G. Land-use conflicts and environmental policies in two post-socialist urban agglomerations: Bucharest and Chisinau. Carpathian J. Earth Environ. Sci. 2012, 7, 125–136. [Google Scholar]
  71. Łapuszek, M.A. Analysis and Modeling the Streambed Evolution After the Check Dam Restoration: The Case of Krzczonówka Stream. J. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 20, 188–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Research area. (A)—the main rivers of the catchment; (B)—physico-geographical regions: macroregion Oświęcim Basin is divided into mesoregions: 1—Upper Vistula River Valley, 2—Wilamowice Submontane Region; macroregion Western Beskidian Foothills is divided into mesroegions: 3—Silesia Foothills, 4—Wieliczka Foothills; macroregion Western Beskids is divided into mesoregions: 5—Mały Beskid Mts, 6—Pewel-Krzeszów Ranges, 7—Makowski Beskid Mts, 8—Żywiec-Orawa Beskid Mts, 9—Wyspowy Beskid Mts, 10—Orawa-Jordanów Foothills (it is an intra-mountainous basin); (C)—the relief shading [18].
Figure 1. Research area. (A)—the main rivers of the catchment; (B)—physico-geographical regions: macroregion Oświęcim Basin is divided into mesoregions: 1—Upper Vistula River Valley, 2—Wilamowice Submontane Region; macroregion Western Beskidian Foothills is divided into mesroegions: 3—Silesia Foothills, 4—Wieliczka Foothills; macroregion Western Beskids is divided into mesoregions: 5—Mały Beskid Mts, 6—Pewel-Krzeszów Ranges, 7—Makowski Beskid Mts, 8—Żywiec-Orawa Beskid Mts, 9—Wyspowy Beskid Mts, 10—Orawa-Jordanów Foothills (it is an intra-mountainous basin); (C)—the relief shading [18].
Energies 15 07770 g001
Figure 2. Number of gristmills [G] and sawmills [S] broken down into the main physico-geographical regions of the River Skawa catchment in the years 1855, 1880, 1909, 1930.
Figure 2. Number of gristmills [G] and sawmills [S] broken down into the main physico-geographical regions of the River Skawa catchment in the years 1855, 1880, 1909, 1930.
Energies 15 07770 g002
Figure 3. The continuity of operation of watermills in the River Skawa catchment in the period 1855–1930. Blue cells represent a period of uninterrupted work.
Figure 3. The continuity of operation of watermills in the River Skawa catchment in the period 1855–1930. Blue cells represent a period of uninterrupted work.
Energies 15 07770 g003
Figure 4. Water source for the watermills in the River Skawa catchment area, broken down into main physico-geographical regions.
Figure 4. Water source for the watermills in the River Skawa catchment area, broken down into main physico-geographical regions.
Energies 15 07770 g004
Figure 5. The continuity of operation of millraces in the River Skawa catchment area since 1855. Blue cells (both shades) indicate a period of uninterrupted operation.
Figure 5. The continuity of operation of millraces in the River Skawa catchment area since 1855. Blue cells (both shades) indicate a period of uninterrupted operation.
Energies 15 07770 g005
Figure 6. Selected millraces in the contemporary river catchment network of the River Skawa: MR—main rivers, CTM—contemporary traces of millrace in: (A)—Maków, (B)—Lachowice, (C)—Jaroszowice, (D)—Bystra Podhalańska. Relief shading in underlay [18].
Figure 6. Selected millraces in the contemporary river catchment network of the River Skawa: MR—main rivers, CTM—contemporary traces of millrace in: (A)—Maków, (B)—Lachowice, (C)—Jaroszowice, (D)—Bystra Podhalańska. Relief shading in underlay [18].
Energies 15 07770 g006
Table 1. Power of watermills in selected poviats in Galicia in 1886 [25].
Table 1. Power of watermills in selected poviats in Galicia in 1886 [25].
PoviatGrain MillingWood IndustryForgesOthers (Fulling Mill, Paper Mills, etc.)
Number of Water WheelsTotal Power [HP]Water Wheel Average Power [HP]Number of Water WheelsTotal Power [HP]Water Wheel Average Power [HP]Number of Water WheelsTotal Power [HP]Water Wheel Average Power [HP]Number of Water WheelsTotal Power [HP]Water Wheel Average Power [HP]
Wadowice862583.023893.9 36321.0
Myślenice672413.6582985.1
Żywiec361444.0513567.02950817.51010610.6
6 123539.2
1 data for water turbines in the Żywiec County.
Table 2. The number of watermills in the 16th–18th centuries in the River Skawa catchment area [19,20,21,22].
Table 2. The number of watermills in the 16th–18th centuries in the River Skawa catchment area [19,20,21,22].
Estates15641659–166417651855
number of watermillsroyal domain24218173
other~11~9~3657
total~35~30~117130
total power of watermills in the River Skawa catchment [kW]~51.5~44.1~172* 348
~ estimated data. * value from Table 4.
Table 3. The share of sawmills in the total number of water-wheel-driven devices in the years 1855–1930.
Table 3. The share of sawmills in the total number of water-wheel-driven devices in the years 1855–1930.
Physico-Geographical Macroregions1855188019091930
Orawa-Jordanów Foothills38%43%50%100%
Western Beskids44%43%46%41%
Western Beskiden Foothills5%5%5%31%
Oświęcim Basin13%10%0%0%
Table 4. Average power of watermills in the years 1855–1930, broken down into the main physico-geographical regions.
Table 4. Average power of watermills in the years 1855–1930, broken down into the main physico-geographical regions.
Physico-Geographical Regions1855188019091930
Number of WatermillsTotal Power [kW]Watermill Average Power [kW]Number of WatermillsTotal Power [kW]Watermill Average Power [kW]Number of WatermillsTotal Power [kW]Watermill Average Power [kW]Number of WatermillsTotal Power [kW]Watermill Average Power [kW]
Orawa-Jordanów Foothills1341.93.221443.63.11412.83.227.63.8
Western Beskids712022.85722062.86561733.1341033.03
Western Beskidian Foothills3884.82.233782.62.233782.62.2313312.38
Oświęcim Basin819.62.451022.62.261430.82.2817.62.2
total130348 133355 111299 57159
Table 5. General characteristics of millraces and the watermills located over them.
Table 5. General characteristics of millraces and the watermills located over them.
1855188019091930Contemporary Traces (Fully Preserved)
number of millraces3535353126 (3)
total length of millraces [km]68.268.272.569.448.1 (8.3)
number of gristmills363744230
number of sawmills121119100
total power of watermills [kW]130.1128.8164.6900
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Witkowski, K. The Development of the Use of Water Energy in the Mountain Catchment from a Sociohydrological Perspective. Energies 2022, 15, 7770. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15207770

AMA Style

Witkowski K. The Development of the Use of Water Energy in the Mountain Catchment from a Sociohydrological Perspective. Energies. 2022; 15(20):7770. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15207770

Chicago/Turabian Style

Witkowski, Karol. 2022. "The Development of the Use of Water Energy in the Mountain Catchment from a Sociohydrological Perspective" Energies 15, no. 20: 7770. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15207770

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop