Next Article in Journal
Key Points and Current Studies on Seepage Theories of Marine Natural Gas Hydrate-Bearing Sediments: A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing Lifestyle Transformations and Their Systemic Effects in Energy-System and Integrated Assessment Models: A Review of Current Methods and Data
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Cogging Torque Minimization Procedure for Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors Based on a Progressive Modification of the Rotor Lamination Geometry †

Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Building nr. 9, 90128 Palermo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This paper is an extended version of our paper published in: IEEE 2016 Eleventh International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER)—Monte Carlo, Monaco, “A cogging torque minimization procedure for IPMSMs based on different laminate geometry”, Caruso, M., Di Tommaso, A.O., Miceli, R., Schettino, G., Viola, F.
Energies 2022, 15(14), 4956; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15144956
Submission received: 9 May 2022 / Revised: 24 June 2022 / Accepted: 5 July 2022 / Published: 6 July 2022

Abstract

:
This article describes a simple cogging torque minimization procedure for interior permanent magnet synchronous machines (IPMSMs), consisting of a progressive modification of the rotor lamination geometry. This procedure can be generalized for the main topologies of PMSM, independently of the number of stator slots or the location of the permanent magnets. For this purpose, a basic IPMSM structure is analyzed by means of the FEM (finite element method) approach, and then, several other IPMSM geometries, obtained by adequately modifying the rotor lamination geometry of the basic IPMSM model without changing its stator configuration, are proposed and discussed. The trends of the cogging torque generated by each model are computed and compared. From this comparison, it is demonstrated that, by simply acting on the shape of the rotor lamination and by choosing the optimized pattern, the cogging torque components can be theoretically canceled.

1. Introduction

The increasing attention towards IPMSMs over the last decades is justified by the fact that this type of machine provides several advantages if compared with motors of the traditional type. Indeed, higher efficiency, reliability, power factor, torque/weight and power/current ratios can be obtained thanks to the adoption of high-energy rare-earth PMs of either the SmCo-type or the NdFeB-type, which has significantly improved the performance in several commercial and industrial applications. However, one of the main drawbacks of IPMSM is torque pulsation [1,2], which can be generated from various causes [3,4] and which is composed of the ripple torque, determined by the interaction between the PMs flux density and the space harmonics generated by the stator currents, and the cogging torque, caused by the interaction between the rotor PMs and the stator teeth. The cogging torque phenomenon determines a reduction in the IPMSM performance, generating vibrations, acoustic disturbances and mechanical stress [2]. The recent scientific literature proposes several procedures for the minimization of the cogging torque produced by permanent magnet machines [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45], which can be classified into two big areas: design techniques and control techniques. The first ones are finalized to optimize the geometry of either the stator or rotor of the electric machine, taking into account the reduction of the magnetic energy variations during the rotor rotation, leading to significant mitigation of the torque pulsations. An overview of the most commonly adopted techniques concerning this category is given in Section 2. On the other hand, the second category consists of injecting online current harmonics to intentionally generate additional high-frequency torque components, whose profiles are accurately designed to completely compensate for the cogging torque components detected in the related control system [46,47,48,49,50]. In any case, it can be stated that many techniques for cogging torque suppression present the drawback of being either expensive or complex in terms of the PMSM design stage [34,38]. In this context, the authors propose a simple cogging torque minimization procedure, consisting of a progressive modification of the basic geometrical structure of the IPMSM rotor lamination. As demonstrated in this paper, the procedure can be generalized for the main topologies of PMSM, independently from the number of stator slots or the location of the permanent magnets. In addition, by simply acting on the shape of the rotor lamination and by choosing the optimized pattern, the cogging torque components can be theoretically canceled, avoiding the adoption of expensive pole skewing techniques or other more complex methods previously reported. Among the techniques described in the scientific literature, this paper proposes a relatively simple cogging torque minimization procedure, and the structure of this work is given below:
  • Section 2 proposes an overview of the main design techniques for cogging torque minimization described in the most recent literature.
  • Section 3 provides a brief analytical description of the cogging torque phenomenon.
  • Section 4 describes the basic IPMSM model and reports the related FEM analysis and the cogging torque computation carried out from this model.
  • Section 5 deals with the procedure of the rotor lamination modification of the basic IPMSM model, obtaining 13 other IPMSM structures. For each of the proposed models, FEM analysis and cogging torque computation are performed.
  • Section 6 is focused on comparing the cogging torque between the IPMSM models and the results are analyzed and discussed.
  • Section 7 reports the second example of IPMSM structure, obtaining similar promising results obtained for the first IPMSM model.

2. An Overview of the Cogging Torque Minimization Techniques

Figure 1 gives an overview of the main cogging torque minimization techniques presented in the recent literature and adopted for both axial-flux and radial-flux PMSMs.
Some of these techniques involve the optimum design of stator elements, such as, for example, the skewing of the lamination stack [5,6], or the modification of the stator tooth width [7]. The cogging torque can also be minimized by acting on the pole arc width, as described in [8,9]. An interesting alternative to the latest technique is proposed in [10,11], where the cogging torque is reduced by determining not only an adequate width of the polar arc, but also an optimized shape. Wanjiku et al. [12] demonstrated that, by acting on the slot-opening width, the cogging torque can be significantly mitigated. As referred to in Figure 1, the cogging torque can also be reduced by acting on the ratio between stator slot number N and stator pole pairs p [13], or by the so-called axial pole pairing [14], or the axial pole shaping [15]. Other techniques involve the optimization of the ratio between stator and rotor poles [16] or the adequate design of the stator core [17,18]. Teeth notching can be also a valid technique for the cogging torque reduction, as stated by Zhao [19], Koh [20] and Zhou [21]. Interesting techniques have been proposed in [22], where the cogging torque effects are minimized by adopting shifted stator teeth with different widths, and in [13], in which a non-uniform stator teeth distribution is adopted to reduce the cogging torque effects.
Concerning the rotor side modification for the cogging torque minimization, one of the most adopted techniques is magnet skewing [24,25]. M. Lukaniszyn et al. proposed a method based on the optimization of the PM skew angle by developing a genetic algorithm [26], and Jiang improved that work by comparing and minimizing the cogging torque effects on different types of rotor skew patterns by employing his genetic algorithm [27]. Another recently used technique is rotor teeth notching [28,29], whereas Wang et al. [30] proposed a new method based on the adequate selection of PMs with different widths, whereas other researchers have also verified the influence of the surface shape of the PMs [31,32]. The cogging torque effect can be also minimized by adequately shifting the PMs, as presented in [33], or by choosing an adequate PM spacing, according to [34]. As demonstrated in [35], one of the most effective and low-cost approaches is magnet skewing. Based on the latest method, Zhao presented a procedure consisting of a sinusoidal shaping of the permanent magnets located inside the rotor structure, obtaining comparable results to those achieved with the skewing technique [36]. As for the rotor lamination, Kim proposed a method for reducing the cogging torque by acting on an asymmetrical lamination of the rotor core [37].
As stated in [51], the feasibility of these cogging torque reduction procedures is strictly related to the manufacturability of the electrical motor, which can be subjected to relevant manufacturing tolerances. For instance, the accuracy in magnet shape and position is a crucial issue to ensure the cogging torque minimization; possible irregularities due to assembly tolerances or width variations can compromise the effectiveness of the minimization techniques [52]. In terms of global optimization of the motor, slot opening optimization and stator skewing can be assumed as the best solutions; however, these techniques are subject to relevant manufacturing costs.

3. The Cogging Torque Phenomenon

The cogging torque, which represents one of the main components of torque pulsation in IPMSMs, is determined by the interaction between the stator teeth and the permanent magnets located in the rotor structure. Typically, this phenomenon is independent of the stator currents, even if, in the case of saturated teeth, the cogging torque is increased due to the wider slot openings. This phenomenon can be analytically examined by considering the variation of the magnetic energy Wms stored in the air-gap caused by the alternation between slots and teeth:
T c o g g i n g = d W m s d φ
where φ is the angular position of the rotor. By defining μ 0 as the magnetic permeability of air and Bm as the magnetic flux density, Wms can be expressed as follows:
W m s = 1 2 μ 0 V B m 2 d V
where Bm is dependent on the magnetic permeance Pm, which varies with the position of the slot openings to φ, and the magnetomotive force (MMF) Θ P M produced by the permanent magnets:
B m = μ 0 δ 0 Θ P M
By expressing the magnetic flux density and the permeance distributions in terms of the Fourier series, the cogging torque can be computed through the following general formula [1,6]:
T c o g g i n g = π L a 2 μ 0 R 1 2 R 2 2 · i = 1 + P m B m sin i · t · φ
where La is the axial length of the machine, R1 and R2 are the outer and inner stator radii, respectively, and t is the least common multiple between N and p.
Therefore, it can be stated that the cogging torque is dependent on several geometrical parameters of both stator and rotor structures. For instance, an adequate selection of the slots-poles ratio is crucial to minimize the cogging torque, which can be characterized by the following parameter cT:
c T = 2 p N t
In addition, the skew factor ksk and the optimal ratio between rotor pole arc and width, namely βopt, represent very sensitive parameters for the cogging torque reduction [38,39]. These quantities are given, respectively, by:
k s k = sin i · π · t · α s k N i · π · t · α s k N
And
β o p t = t 2 p k 1 t 2 p + k 2
where the values of the parameters (such as k 1 and k 2 ) reported in (6) and (7) depend on the machine geometry, such as air-gap length, magnet shape, pole arc, pole width, rotor lamination shape and N/p ratio.
From this perspective, it appears clear that the cogging torque can be significantly reduced by adequately selecting the optimal geometry of the iron lamination pack, as demonstrated in the next sections.

4. Basic IPMSM Structure and FEM Analysis

Figure 2 shows the basic geometry of the IPMSM considered for this study. This structure is derived from a commercial motor, whose rated values are summarized in Table 1 and whose geometrical parameters are reported in Table 2. It is a fractional power, six-pole, brushless machine with 27 stator slots and 12 NdFeB permanent magnets located inside the rotor. As shown by the Figure, the disposition of the PMs is designed to produce a magnetic flux both in the radial and the tangential directions. The generated torque is equal to 1.8 Nm at 4000 rpm with a voltage supply of 132 V.
By referring to one pole sector, Figure 3 shows a representation of the geometrical parameters of the machine. The iron laminations of the M350-50A type have been considered for both stator and rotor cores, which are spaced by a 0.8 mm air gap, whereas the axial length of the IPMSM is equal to 59 mm.
The three-phase winding chosen for the motor is distributed through the 27 slots in a double-layer, star configuration with 3 pole pairs, as depicted in Figure 4. The plane scheme of the winding clearly shows that it is composed of three repetitions of a base winding located in nine slots per pole pair [40,41]. Moreover, the coil pitch is equal to 4, leading to a shortened pitch configuration of the winding, so that the 5th and 7th order MMF harmonics can be significantly reduced. It can also be noted that the end connections are arranged with groups of 1 or 2 coils for each phase, and the number of slots per pole per phase is equal to 1 + 1/2, which gives a fractional slot configuration of the winding. The general design guidelines used in this work can be found in [53,54,55].
Among the relevant number of approaches adopted by the scientific community to study the phenomenon of cogging torque, from FEM to analytical models [42,43,44,45], the cogging torque effects are here analyzed by using a FEM approach. This method is mainly composed of three phases:
  • pre-processing, which consists in designing the geometry of the machine, selecting the type of materials and assigning the boundary conditions.
  • solution, consisting of the determination of the FEM solution of the problem.
  • post-processing, which processes the solutions in terms of scalar or vector quantities.
By employing this analysis, the behavior of the main electrical quantities involved in the system has been computed, such as the flux density field plot, the spatial distribution of both the tangential and the radial components of the flux density (namely Bt and Bn, respectively) as a function of the coordinate x (measured on the circumference passing through the middle of the air-gap), the average value of the pole flux, the cogging torque as a function of the angular position of the rotor and the related harmonic content.
The determination of the cogging torque values has been achieved through several finite element simulations for different angular positions of the IPMSM rotor and without any driving supply. In more detail, the rotor position δ has been varied from 0° to 360° with steps of 0.2°; therefore, the performance in terms of cogging torque and magnetic flux density has been evaluated for several angular rotor positions, obtaining 1800 rotor positions for the specific model and, consequently, 1800 overall FEM simulations for each of the proposed models (actually, the cogging torque distribution could be obtained just for 6.66/0.2     34 simulations of each model). For instance, the plot of the flux density field at δ = 0 is reported in Figure 5. As expected, the density plot and the distribution of the flux lines show that the areas subjected to the highest fields are located in the stator teeth and some sections of the stator core. As shown by the legenda, the values of the flux density field range up to 1.2 T along the stator yoke and 0.6 T in the air gap. The Dirichlet boundary conditions have been chosen with the value of potential A = 0. Moreover, a steady-state simulation of the magnetic field with no current has been performed for the entire cross-section of all the proposed models. The adopted software allows the automatic creation of the mesh (for the basic model, a mesh with 115,834 nodes was created). It must be noted that the proposed FEM analysis was performed on a simplified version of the IPMSM model, even providing the effectiveness of the proposed optimization technique.

5. The Proposed Minimization Procedure of the Cogging Torque

The basic IPMSM structure presented in Section 3 has been adequately modified by changing the geometry of the rotor lamination pack while maintaining the same stator configuration. In more detail, referring to Figure 6, the angle α, which is computed between the neutral axis and the lamination openings, has been changed from 60° (corresponding to its initial position) to 0° with steps of 10°, with a final refinement around the optimum α angle, which has led to the obtainment of eight models of IPMSM, corresponding to 60°, 50°, 40°, 33°, 30°, 20°, 10° and 0°. Other models have been obtained by increasing α instead of decreasing it. The model corresponding to α = 61° is presented here.
As well as for the basic IPMSM structure, the same FEM analysis has been performed for the other models, which has allowed the determination of the generated cogging torques, and Figure 7 shows the related harmonic spectra for each of the proposed structures. From the comparison between these graphics related to the 9 IPMSM models designed with different angles of rotor laminations, it appears clear that the overall harmonic content detected with the optimized angles of 33° and 61° is minimized compared to the other configurations. Therefore, the rotor lamination of the initial configuration, whose spectrum presents a relatively high number of harmonics, has been optimally designed for the performance improvement of the machine.
This aspect can be also discussed from a numerical point of view. Indeed, the overall harmonic content, namely Tx, can be computed by using the following equation:
T x n = i N T i n 2
where Tin is the n -order harmonic of the i -order configuration and N = 34.
Therefore, by referring to Table 3, which summarizes the values of Tx for each IPMSM structure, it can be noted that the best results are obtained with the optimized angles of 33° and 61°. The third column of the table reports the percentage values of Tx with respect to Tx0 = 0.230 Nm, corresponding to the worst possible condition in terms of harmonic content, as shown in Figure 6b.
The optimization algorithm used for the determination of the αopt of the rotor lamination geometry that minimizes the cogging torque is shown in Figure 8. The search starts with the definition of the actual lamination angle and the determination of the corresponding harmonic content. The procedure continues with the definition of a step angle δ and with the computation of the harmonic content corresponding to the new lamination angle condition. The comparison between the obtained values establishes if the iteration process will continue with a refinement applied to find the optimal condition. This refinement process ends when the overall harmonic content is higher than the one obtained with the previous iteration process. In this case study, the step δ was fixed at 10°, whereas the refinement, detected between 30° and 40°, was fixed at 0.5°. These values can be set depending on the rotor lamination geometry and on the designer’s choice. Due to this aspect, the computational burden and the convergence speed depend on the setting of both the values of the initial and refinement steps.

6. Results and Discussions

This section aims to present the main results obtained from the FEM analysis of the IPMSM models described in the previous Sections, in order to compare their performance in terms of cogging torque reduction. A further objective is to compare the trends of both the radial and tangential components of the flux density field for all the models to verify that the proposed optimization procedure of the iron lamination geometry does not affect the overall electromagnetic behavior of the basic IPMSM configuration shown in Figure 2. In detail, the processing of the data reported in Section 5 has provided interesting results, hereinafter described. The FEM simulations have been carried out by referring to a specific rotor angular section equal to a polar arc area, corresponding to 60°. The comparison between the cogging torque/position angle characteristics parameterized as a function of α is shown in Figure 9. It can be noted that the cogging torque amplitude relevantly decreases in the range of α between 30° and 40°. The optimized geometry of the rotor lamination corresponds to α     33 ° , for which the cogging torque is almost canceled. This result can also be reached for α     61 ° , as shown in the same graph. For α > 60°, the 1st harmonic values of the cogging torque would increase similarly to α < 60° and almost symmetrically to α = 50° (see Figure 10). It has also to be stated that, with α > 60°, the structure of the lamination becomes more complex, leading to a reduction in practical feasibility. Moreover, regarding the manufacturing tolerances, which represent a common issue for many minimization techniques proposed in the recent literature, the accuracy of α, which leads to the accurate shape of the rotor lamination geometry, is crucial to ensure the effectiveness of the presented technique. It is, indeed, evident that a slight variation of α caused by manufacturing tolerances determines an increase of the cogging torque, even if around the optimum α value, not in a significant manner.
Moreover, Figure 10 shows the trend of the 1st harmonic amplitudes of the cogging torque as a function of α. From this graph, it can be observed that two possible IPMSM configurations can achieve a condition of null cogging torque, corresponding to angles of 33° and 61°.
Furthermore, the spatial distribution of the flux density radial component Bn measured along x, which is defined as the mean air gap circumference, is not significantly affected by the described lamination refinements applied to the basic IPMSM. In fact, from the comparison between the Bn/x trends generated by the proposed models shown in Figure 11, the radial flux density maintains almost the same value at around 0.8 T. These considerations lead us to suppose that the maximum deliverable torque value is not significantly affected by the amplitude of the angle α. It can also be noted that the fluctuations of the cogging torque with the minimization procedure are limited.
From the graph in Figure 11, it appears clear that the trend of the flux density field has not been significantly modified in terms of average value by the optimization procedure. The optimal modification of the iron lamination geometry has slightly changed the fluctuations of the flux density as well as its curvature.
In addition, Figure 12 shows the comparison between the gradients of the radial flux densities around the neutral axis (quadrature axis) of the proposed configurations.
While α tends toward zero, two aspects can be detected: the average values of the related gradients increase and the shape of the gradient dBn/dx becomes more and more narrow and high, as depicted in Figure 12.
Other interesting results can be appreciated in Figure 13, which shows the comparison between the trends of the tangential component Bt of the flux density as a function of x. As well as in the previous case, the flux density is not affected by the proposed modifications, except for the neutral axis region. Indeed, from this graph, it is evident that the trend of the tangential component of the flux density field has not been significantly affected regarding its average value by the optimal modification of the iron lamination. The proposed optimization procedure has changed both the fluctuations and the curvature of Bt in a very slight manner.
The comparison between the Bt gradients is shown in Figure 14; as mentioned for the trend of the gradients of Bn, for lower values of α, the average values of the related gradients increase. Therefore, with the optimum α configurations, lower gradient values are obtained.
By comparing the two optimal angles, it can be noted that α = 61° also provides a higher radial flux density, even if this difference is not as relevant.
In addition, with the aim of evaluating the impact of the proposed minimization procedure on other performance indexes for each of the analyzed models with different rotor lamination angles, the magnetic energy stored in the air-gap, the magnetic forces and the average air-gap magnetic field value at no load conditions have been computed and summarized in Table 4. It can be noted that the cogging torque is minimized without affecting the performance of the machine. This aspect is also confirmed under load conditions by comparing the torque generated by the two models (basic IPMSM and optimized IPMSM) and the iron losses in both the stator and rotor cores. The obtained values are, indeed, comparable between each other, as shown in Table 4.
In conclusion, it can be stated that the cogging torque generated in an IPMSM is significantly affected by the geometry of the rotor lamination. The results described in this Section have demonstrated that, at least in simulation, the cogging torque component can be almost completely canceled by adopting a very simple and fast optimization technique on the rotor lamination geometry. Therefore, the proposed optimization procedure can be used as an alternative method to the well-conceived minimization procedures presented in the recent literature for permanent magnet electric machines.

7. Investigation on Other IPMSM Structures

The aim of this Section is to investigate the relationship between the optimal angle and other geometrical quantities to further validate the proposed procedure and provide a generalized conclusion. More specifically, the basic IPMSM model has been modified in terms of rotor geometry (IPMSM2, described in Section 7.1), PM widths (IPMSM3, described in Section 7.2), number of slots and winding arrangement (IPMSM4, described in Section 7.3).

7.1. Rotor Geometry Modification

Figure 15 shows the cross-section of the IPMSM2 model, which is derived from the first IPMSM geometry described in Section 3 by changing the rotor geometry and by maintaining the same stator configuration. As well as for the previous case, the geometry of the rotor lamination has been progressively modified with the same procedure described in Section 4, obtaining five other models with an angle α equal to 20°, 15°, 10°, 5° and 0°, respectively (the initial α angle is equal to 25°).
The cogging torque trend comparison for this case of study is shown in Figure 16, from which it can be noted that a significant reduction of the cogging torque is obtained for α = 15°, where the cogging torque is theoretically canceled. In addition, from (7), the overall harmonic content Tx for each of the proposed configurations has been computed, and Table 4 summarizes the obtained results. In the third column, the percentage values have been computed to Tx0 = 0.0320 Nm. The Table 5 clearly shows a considerable reduction of the harmonic content for values of α tending to 15°.
Finally, Figure 17 shows the trend of the 1st harmonic amplitudes of the cogging torque as a function of α. As well as for the first case of study described in Section 5, the reported graph shows clearly that a condition of null cogging torque could be obtained for α = 16°.
Therefore, this analysis confirms the promising results described in Section 5 and validates the proposed procedure.

7.2. Modification of Stator Slots and Winding Arrangement

A further investigation has been carried out by changing the number of slots and, consequently, the winding arrangement of the IPMSM1 model. The cross-section of the so-obtained IPMSM3 and the corresponding winding scheme are plotted in Figure 18a,b, respectively. In this example, the machine is designed with 24 slots and equipped with a double-layer, three-phase winding.
As well as for the case described in Section 7.1, the optimization algorithm has been applied to the IPMSM3 structure and the cogging torque trend has been minimized with an optimum α angle equal to 31°, as depicted in Figure 19.

7.3. Modification of the PM Width

The IPMSM3 model with 24 slots has been further modified with the aim of investigating the effects of PM width on the proposed procedure. Figure 20a shows the IPMSM4 geometry, whereas the results in terms of first harmonic amplitude as a function of α is shown in Figure 20b. It can be noted that the modification of PM widths has increased the harmonic content with respect to the previous case. However, the selection of the optimum angle of the rotor laminations (equal to 27°) leads to a cogging torque that can be theoretically canceled. Therefore, at least in this case, the PM dimensions do not significantly affect the proposed methodology.

8. Conclusions

This article presents a simple cogging torque minimization procedure for IPMSMs, consisting of a progressive modification of the rotor lamination geometry. This procedure can be generalized for the main topologies of PMSM, independently from the number of stator slots or the location of the permanent magnets. The trends of the cogging torque generated by each model have been computed and compared, and the obtained results have demonstrated that, by simply acting on the shape of the rotor lamination and choosing the optimized pattern, the cogging torque components can be theoretically canceled, avoiding the adoption of expensive pole skewing techniques or other more complex methods. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that the proposed method does not affect the machine performance in a significant manner in terms of magnetization and average trend of the flux density field. In addition, the results presented in this paper have also demonstrated the easiness and fast optimization of the proposed method, which can be generalized for any PM machine, even if not clearly demonstrated here. In fact, the process of searching for the optimum angle of iron lamination can be easily implemented within an optimization algorithm, leading to a fast determination of the cogging torque suppression. In addition, the modification of the iron lamination geometry in an early design stage of the machine does not affect the overall cost of the fabrication process nor the complexity of the design procedure itself. Therefore, the proposed optimization procedure can be used as an alternative method to the well-conceived minimization procedures presented in the recent literature for permanent magnet electric machines.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.O.D.T.; methodology, A.O.D.T. and M.C.; software and validation M.C.; data curation and writing—original draft preparation, M.C.; writing—review and editing, A.O.D.T., M.C. and F.V.; supervision, funding acquisition, R.M. and F.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by PON R&I 2015–2020 “Propulsione e Sistemi Ibridi per velivoli ad ala fissa e rotante—PROSIB”, CUP no:B66C18000290005, by H2020-ECSEL-2017-1-IA-two-stage “first and european sic eightinches pilot line-REACTION”, by Prin 2017- Settore/Ambito di intervento: PE7 linea C—Advanced power-trains and -systems for full electric aircrafts and by ARS01_00459-PRJ-0052 ADAS+ “Sviluppo di tecnologie e sistemi avanzati per la sicurezza dell’auto mediante piattaforme ADAS”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

NNumber of slots
pNumber of pole pairs
WmsMagnetic energy stored in the air-gap
φAngular position of the rotor
μ0Magnetic permeability of air
BmMagnetic flux density
PmMagnetic permeance
ΘPMMagnetomotive force produced by the PMs
δ0Air-gap length
LaAxial length of the machine
R1Outer stator radius
R2Inner stator radius
tLeast common multiple between p and N
askSkew angle
kskSkew factor
βoptOptimal ratio between rotor pole arc and width

References

  1. Jahns, T.; Soong, W. Pulsating torque minimization techniques for permanent magnet ac motor drives-a review. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 1996, 43, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ogidi, P.; Barendse, S.; Khan, M.A. Influence of rotor topologies and cogging torque minimization techniques in the detection of static eccentricities in axial-flux permanent-magnet machine. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2017, 53, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Qian, W.; Panda, S.; Xu, J.-X. Torque ripple minimization in pm synchronous motors using iterative learning control. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2004, 19, 272–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, S.; Namuduri, C.; Mir, S. Controller induced parasitic torque ripples in a pm synchronous motor. In Proceedings of the Conference Record of the 2000 IEEE Industry Applications Conference, Thirty-Fifth IAS Annual Meeting and World Conference on Industrial Applications of Electrical Energy (Cat. No.00CH37129), Rome, Italy, 8–12 October 2000; Volume 1, pp. 171–178. [Google Scholar]
  5. Goryca, Z.; Różowicz, S.; Różowicz, A.; Pakosz, A.; Leśko, M.; Wachta, H. Impact of Selected Methods of Cogging Torque Reduction in Multipolar Permanent-Magnet Machines. Energies 2020, 13, 6108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pristup, A.G.; Toporkov, D.M. Comparing of cogging torque reduction methods in permanent magnet machines with fractional slot windings. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2017, 87, 032032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Li, T.; Slemon, G. Reduction of cogging torque in permanent magnet motors. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1988, 24, 2901–2903. [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu, F.; Wang, X.; Xing, Z.; Yu, A.; Li, C. Reduction of cogging torque and electromagnetic vibration based on different combination of pole arc coefficient for interior permanent magnet synchronous machine. CES Trans. Electr. Mach. Syst. 2021, 5, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ishikawa, T.; Slemon, G.R. A method of reducing ripple torque in permanent magnet motors without skewing. IEEE Trans. Magn. 1993, 29, 2028–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Baig, M.A.; Ikram, J.; Iftikhar, A.; Bukhari, S.S.H.; Khan, N.; Ro, J.-S. Minimization of Cogging Torque in Axial Field Flux Switching Machine Using Arc Shaped Triangular Magnets. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 227193–227201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Afsari, S.A.; Heydari, H.; Dianati, B. Cogging torque mitigation in axial flux magnetic gear system based on skew effects using an improved quasi 3-d analytical method. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2015, 51, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wanjiku, J.; Khan, M.A.; Barendse, P.S.; Pillay, P. Influence of slot openings and tooth profile on cogging torque in axial-flux pm machines. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2015, 62, 7578–7589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dorrell, D.G.; Popescu, M. Odd stator slot numbers in brushless dc machines-an aid to cogging torque reduction. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2011, 47, 3012–3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhu, L.; Jiang, S.Z.; Zhu, Z.Q.; Chan, C.C. Analytical methods for minimizing cogging torque in permanent-magnet machines. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2009, 45, 2023–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Du, Z.S.; Lipo, T.A. Reducing Torque Ripple Using Axial Pole Shaping in Interior Permanent Magnet Machines. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2020, 56, 148–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wu, L.; Ming, G.; Zhang, L.; Fang, Y. Improved Stator/Rotor-Pole Number Combinations for Torque Ripple Reduction in Doubly Salient PM Machines. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2021, 68, 10601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fei, W.; Luk, P.C.K. A new technique of cogging torque suppression in direct-drive permanent-magnet brushless machines. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2010, 46, 1332–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Choi, J.S.; Izui, K.; Nishiwaki, S.; Kawamoto, A.; Nomura, T. Topology optimization of the stator for minimizing cogging torque of ipm motors. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2011, 47, 3024–3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, J.; Quan, X.; Tong, X.; Lin, M. Cogging Torque Reduction in Double-Rotor Hybrid Excited Axial Switched-Flux Permanent Magnet Machine. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2020, 30, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Koh, C.S.; Seol, J.-S. New cogging-torque reduction method for brushless permanent-magnet motors. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2003, 39, 3503–3506. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhu, Z.Q.; Howe, D. Influence of design parameters on cogging torque in permanent magnet machines. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2000, 15, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Liu, C.; Zhu, J.; Wang, Y.; Lei, G.; Guo, Y. Cogging torque minimization of smc pm transverse flux machines using shifted and unequal-width stator teeth. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2016, 26, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, D.; Wang, X.; Qiao, D.; Pei, Y.; Jung, S.Y. Reducing cogging torque in surface-mounted permanent-magnet motors by nonuniformly distributed teeth method. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2011, 47, 2231–2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Aydin, M.; Zhu, Z.Q.; Lipo, T.A.; Howe, D. Minimization of cogging torque in axial-flux permanent-magnet machines: Design concepts. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2007, 43, 3614–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fei, W.; Zhu, Z. Comparison of cogging torque reduction in permanent magnet brushless machines by conventional and herringbone skewing techniques. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2013, 28, 664–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lukaniszyn, M.; JagieLa, M.; Wrobel, R. Optimization of permanent magnet shape for minimum cogging torque using a genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2004, 40, 1228–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jiang, J.W.; Bilgin, B.; Yang, Y.; Sathyan, A.; Dadkhah, H.; Emadi, A. Rotor skew pattern design and optimisation for cogging torque reduction. IET Electr. Syst. Transp. 2016, 6, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhu, X.; Hua, W.; Zhang, G. Analysis and Reduction of Cogging Torque for Flux-Switching Permanent Magnet Machines. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2019, 55, 5854–5864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hwang, M.-H.; Lee, H.-S.; Cha, H.-R. Analysis of Torque Ripple and Cogging Torque Reduction in Electric Vehicle Traction Platform Applying Rotor Notched Design. Energies 2018, 11, 3053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Wang, D.; Wang, X.; Jung, S.Y. Cogging torque minimization and torque ripple suppression in surface-mounted permanent magnet synchronous machines using different magnet widths. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2013, 49, 2295–2298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Simón-Sempere, V.; Simón-Gómez, A.; Burgos-Payán, M.; Cerquides-Bueno, J.-R. Optimisation of Magnet Shape for Cogging Torque Reduction in Axial-Flux Permanent-Magnet Motors. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2021, 36, 2825–2838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, N.; Ho, S.L.; Fu, W.N. Optimization of permanent magnet surface shapes of electric motors for minimization of cogging torque using fem. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2010, 46, 2478–2481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gulec, M.; Aydin, M. Magnet asymmetry in reduction of cogging torque for integer slot axial flux permanent magnet motors. IET Electr. Power Appl. 2014, 8, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Aydin, M.; Gulec, M. Reduction of cogging torque in doublerotor axial-flux permanent-magnet disk motors: A review of costeffective magnet-skewing techniques with experimental verification. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2014, 61, 5025–5034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhao, W.; Lipo, T.A.; Kwon, B.I. Torque pulsation minimization in spoke-type interior permanent magnet motors with skewing and sinusoidal permanent magnet configurations. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2015, 51, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kim, K.C. A novel method for minimization of cogging torque and torque ripple for interior permanent magnet synchronous motor. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2014, 50, 793–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Islam, M.S.; Islam, R.; Sebastian, T.; Chandy, A.; Ozsoylu, S.A. Cogging torque minimization in pm motors using robust design approach. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2011, 47, 1661–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bianchi, N.; Bolognani, S. Design techniques for reducing the cogging torque in surface-mounted pm motors. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2000, 1, 179–185. [Google Scholar]
  39. Barcaro, M.; Bianchi, N. Torque ripple reduction in fractionalslot interior pm machines optimizing the flux-barrier geometries. In Proceedings of the 2012 XXth International Conference on Electrical Machines, Marseille, France, 2–5 September 2012; pp. 1496–1502. [Google Scholar]
  40. Caruso, M.; di Tommaso, A.O.; Emma, S.; Miceli, R. Analysis, characterization and minimization of ipmsms cogging torque with different rotor structures. In Proceedings of the 2015 Tenth International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER), Monte Carlo, Monaco, 31 March–2 April 2015; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  41. Caruso, M.; Di Tommaso, A.O.; Miceli, R.; Schettino, G.; Viola, F. A cogging torque minimization procedure for IPMSMs based on different laminate geometry. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2016 Eleventh International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER), Monte Carlo, Monaco, 6–8 April 2016. [Google Scholar]
  42. Tavakkoli, M.; Madani, S. A new approach to analysis and mitigation of pm motor cogging torque. In Proceedings of the 2008 34th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics, Orlando, FL, USA, 10–13 November 2008; pp. 2003–2008. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhao, W.; Lipo, T.; il Kwon, B. Dual-stator two-phase permanent magnet machines with phase-group concentrated-coil windings for torque enhancement. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2015, 51, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  44. Yan, Y.; Li, W.; Deng, W.; Zhang, G.; Xia, C. Torque ripple minimization of pmsm using pi type iterative learning control. In Proceedings of the IECON 2014—40th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Dallas, TX, USA, 9 October –1 November 2014; pp. 925–931. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhu, H.; Xiao, X.; Li, Y. Torque ripple reduction of the torque predictive control scheme for permanent-magnet synchronous motors. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2012, 59, 871–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sumega, M.; Rafajdus, P.; Scelba, G.; Stulrajter, M. Control Strategies for the Identification and Reduction of Cogging Torque in PM Motors. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Electrical Drives and Power Electronics (EDPE), The High Tatras, Slovakia, 24–26 September 2019; pp. 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xu, D.; Jiang, X.; Tu, Y.; Li, N.; Li, Q. Investigation of cogging torque reduction for a 6/10 hybrid axial field flux-switching permanent magnet machine by harmonic field current injection. IET Electr. Power Appl. 2020, 14, 2499–2506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Girgin, M.T.; Guven, M.K.; Aydin, M. A New Harmonic Current Injection Technique to Reduce Cogging Torque in Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Motors. IEEE Trans. 2022, 58, 8201304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dini, P.; Saponara, S. Cogging Torque Reduction in Brushless Motors by a Nonlinear Control Technique. Energies 2019, 12, 2224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Gao, J.; Xiang, Z.; Dai, L.; Huang, S.; Ni, D.; Yao, C. Cogging Torque Dynamic Reduction Based on Harmonic Torque Counteract. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2022, 58, 8103405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bianchini, C.; Immovilli, F.; Lorenzani, E.; Bellini, A.; Davoli, M. Review of Design Solutions for Internal Permanent-Magnet Machines Cogging Torque Reduction. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2012, 48, 2685–2693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gasparin, L.; Cernigoj, A.; Markic, S.; Fiser, R. Additional Cogging Torque Components in Permanent-Magnet Motors Due to Manufacturing Imperfections. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2009, 45, 1210–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Caruso, M.; Di Tommaso, A.O.; Genduso, F.; Miceli, R.; Galluzzo, G.R. A General Mathematical Formulation for the Determination of Differential Leakage Factors in Electrical Machines with Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Full or Dead-Coil Multiphase Windings. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2018, 54, 8413120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Caruso, M.; Di Tommaso, A.O.; Miceli, R.; Rizzo, R. Computer-aided analysis and design procedure for rotating induction machine magnetic circuits and windings. IET Electr. Power Appl. 2018, 12, 885–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Caruso, M.; Di Tommaso, A.O.; Marignetti, F.; Miceli, R.; Galluzzo, G.R. A general mathematical formulation for winding layout arrangement of electrical machines. Energies 2018, 11, 446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Summary of the main cogging torque minimization techniques in the literature.
Figure 1. Summary of the main cogging torque minimization techniques in the literature.
Energies 15 04956 g001
Figure 2. Basic IPMSM cross-section.
Figure 2. Basic IPMSM cross-section.
Energies 15 04956 g002
Figure 3. Angular cross-section of the IPMSM.
Figure 3. Angular cross-section of the IPMSM.
Energies 15 04956 g003
Figure 4. Plane scheme of the three-phase winding.
Figure 4. Plane scheme of the three-phase winding.
Energies 15 04956 g004
Figure 5. Surface plot of the flux density field of the basic IPMSM structure.
Figure 5. Surface plot of the flux density field of the basic IPMSM structure.
Energies 15 04956 g005
Figure 6. (a) starting α angle position and (b) final angle position of lamination geometry of the rotor.
Figure 6. (a) starting α angle position and (b) final angle position of lamination geometry of the rotor.
Energies 15 04956 g006
Figure 7. Cogging harmonics for (a) α = 60°, (b) α = 50°, (c) α = 40°, (d) α = 33°, (e) α = 30°, (f) α = 20°, (g) α = 10°, (h) α = 0° and (i) α = 61°.
Figure 7. Cogging harmonics for (a) α = 60°, (b) α = 50°, (c) α = 40°, (d) α = 33°, (e) α = 30°, (f) α = 20°, (g) α = 10°, (h) α = 0° and (i) α = 61°.
Energies 15 04956 g007
Figure 8. Flow diagram of the optimization algorithm.
Figure 8. Flow diagram of the optimization algorithm.
Energies 15 04956 g008
Figure 9. Cogging torque/rotor position characteristic comparison.
Figure 9. Cogging torque/rotor position characteristic comparison.
Energies 15 04956 g009
Figure 10. First harmonic amplitude as a function of α.
Figure 10. First harmonic amplitude as a function of α.
Energies 15 04956 g010
Figure 11. Comparison between the spatial distributions of the flux density radial components in the range of 3 to 60 mm.
Figure 11. Comparison between the spatial distributions of the flux density radial components in the range of 3 to 60 mm.
Energies 15 04956 g011
Figure 12. Comparison between the gradients of the radial flux density, around the q-axis region, generated by the proposed models.
Figure 12. Comparison between the gradients of the radial flux density, around the q-axis region, generated by the proposed models.
Energies 15 04956 g012
Figure 13. Comparison between the spatial distributions of the flux density tangential components.
Figure 13. Comparison between the spatial distributions of the flux density tangential components.
Energies 15 04956 g013
Figure 14. Comparison between the gradients of the tangential flux density, around the q-axis region, generated by the proposed models.
Figure 14. Comparison between the gradients of the tangential flux density, around the q-axis region, generated by the proposed models.
Energies 15 04956 g014
Figure 15. Cross-section of the IPMSM2 geometry.
Figure 15. Cross-section of the IPMSM2 geometry.
Energies 15 04956 g015
Figure 16. Cogging torque/rotor position characteristic comparison for the IPMSM2 structure.
Figure 16. Cogging torque/rotor position characteristic comparison for the IPMSM2 structure.
Energies 15 04956 g016
Figure 17. First harmonic amplitude as a function of α.
Figure 17. First harmonic amplitude as a function of α.
Energies 15 04956 g017
Figure 18. (a) Cross-section and (b) winding layout arrangement of the IPMSM3 geometry.
Figure 18. (a) Cross-section and (b) winding layout arrangement of the IPMSM3 geometry.
Energies 15 04956 g018
Figure 19. Cogging torque/rotor position characteristic comparison for the IPMSM3 structure.
Figure 19. Cogging torque/rotor position characteristic comparison for the IPMSM3 structure.
Energies 15 04956 g019
Figure 20. (a) Cross-section of the IPMSM4 and (b) results.
Figure 20. (a) Cross-section of the IPMSM4 and (b) results.
Energies 15 04956 g020
Table 1. Rated values of the IPMSM-A.
Table 1. Rated values of the IPMSM-A.
QuantityValue
Voltage [V]132
Current [A]3.6
Speed [rpm]4000
Torque [Nm]1.8
Number of pole pairs3
Stator resistance [Ω]2.21
Magnetic permeability of stator core [H/m]6.3 × 10 3
Magnetic permeability of laminations [H/m]2.5 × 10 1
Magnetic flux density of PMs [MGOe]40
Table 2. Geometrical data of the basic IPMSM structure.
Table 2. Geometrical data of the basic IPMSM structure.
Geometrical DataValue [mm]
Outer stator diameter81
Inner stator diameter49.6
Outer rotor diameter48
Inner rotor diameter18.46
Axial rotor length59
PM width13.45
PM thickness3
Air-gap0.8
PM typeNdFeB
Table 3. Overall harmonic content of cogging torque for each IPMSM rotor configuration.
Table 3. Overall harmonic content of cogging torque for each IPMSM rotor configuration.
α [°]TxTx%
600.0177.3
500.10043.4
400.06930.0
330.0031.3
300.02510.8
200.11047.8
100.19082.6
00.230100
610.0031.3
Table 4. Comparison between Key Performance Indexes for each IPMSM configuration.
Table 4. Comparison between Key Performance Indexes for each IPMSM configuration.
Quantityα = 60°α = 33°
Air-gap magnetic field energy [J]0.8930.91
Stress tensor force [N]0.040.042
Average magnetic field [A/m]2.95 A/m3.02 A/m
Generated torque [Nm]2.252.28
Iron core losses6.126.55
Table 5. Overall harmonic content of cogging torque for each IPMSM2 rotor configuration.
Table 5. Overall harmonic content of cogging torque for each IPMSM2 rotor configuration.
α [°]Tx [Nm]Tx%
250.022068%
200.008627%
150.00165%
100.013040%
50.018558%
00.0320100%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Caruso, M.; Di Tommaso, A.O.; Miceli, R.; Viola, F. A Cogging Torque Minimization Procedure for Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors Based on a Progressive Modification of the Rotor Lamination Geometry. Energies 2022, 15, 4956. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15144956

AMA Style

Caruso M, Di Tommaso AO, Miceli R, Viola F. A Cogging Torque Minimization Procedure for Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors Based on a Progressive Modification of the Rotor Lamination Geometry. Energies. 2022; 15(14):4956. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15144956

Chicago/Turabian Style

Caruso, Massimo, Antonino Oscar Di Tommaso, Rosario Miceli, and Fabio Viola. 2022. "A Cogging Torque Minimization Procedure for Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors Based on a Progressive Modification of the Rotor Lamination Geometry" Energies 15, no. 14: 4956. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15144956

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop