Next Article in Journal
Research on Energy Management Method of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Based on Travel Characteristic Prediction
Next Article in Special Issue
Health Monitoring and Diagnosis System for a Small H-Type Darrieus Vertical-Axis Wind Turbine
Previous Article in Journal
Catalytic Temperature Effects on Conversion Efficiency of PM2.5 and Gaseous Emissions from Rice Husk Combustion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

On-Line EIS Measurement for High-Power Fuel Cell Systems Using Simulink Real-Time

1
Energy ICT Convergence Research Department, Korea Institute of Energy Research, 152 Gajeong-ro, Daejeon 34129, Korea
2
Fuel Cell Laboratory, Korea Institute of Energy Research, 152 Gajeong-ro, Daejeon 34129, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2021, 14(19), 6133; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196133
Submission received: 18 August 2021 / Revised: 20 September 2021 / Accepted: 23 September 2021 / Published: 26 September 2021

Abstract

:
Impedance measurements by EIS are used to build a physical circuit-based model that enables various fault diagnostics and lifetime predictions. These research areas are becoming increasingly crucial for the safety and preventive maintenance of fuel cell power systems. It is challenging to apply the impedance measurement up to commercial applications at the field level. Although EIS technology has been widely used to measure and analyze the characteristics of fuel cells, EIS is applicable mainly at the single-cell level. In the case of stacks constituting a power generation system in the field, it is difficult to apply EIS due to various limitations in the high-power condition with uncontrollable loads. In this paper, we present a technology that can measure EIS on-line by injecting the perturbation current to fuel cell systems operating in the field. The proposed EIS method is developed based on Simulink Real-Time so that it can be applied to embedded devices. Modeling and simulation of the proposed method are presented, and the procedures from the simulation in virtual space to the real-time application to physical systems are described in detail. Finally, actual usefulness is shown through experiments using two physical systems, an impedance hardware simulator and a fuel cell stack with practical considerations.

1. Introduction

Fuel cells have been researched to use widely in stationary power plants, transportation, and buildings. Recently, in consideration of a hydrogen-energy future society, long-term energy storage for the grid has become a potential application of fuel cells [1]. The overall performance of fuel cells is essentially analyzed through the current–voltage characteristics and the power density curve [2]. On the other hand, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is used for more profound and specific analysis to identify the changes in the electrochemical properties of each component of the cell and to diagnosis the associated operations of fuel cells [3,4,5].
Several comprehensive reviews on EIS applications have been published over various electrochemical devices [6,7,8]. Although EIS has been widely used to analyze the operation of most electrochemical devices including fuel cells and batteries, the fuel cell is the most active research area because EIS is more effective for examining the electrochemical characteristics relating to operating variations in fuel cells such as fuel stoichiometry, contamination, flooding, and starvation [9,10,11]. In addition to analyzing the fuel cell properties with operating conditions, EIS is used to diagnose materials and components such as the membrane, the bipolar plates, and the gas diffusion layer (GDL) to optimize the design and fabrication of membrane electrode assembly (MEA) [12,13,14].
Recently, impedance measurements by EIS have been used to build a physical circuit-based model that tries to perform various fault diagnostics [15,16,17,18] and lifetime predictions [19,20]. These research areas have more increasing importance for the safety and preventive maintenance of fuel cell power systems. However, there are several technical challenges to overcome for applying the EIS technique to fuel cell power systems in fields, such as cost, power rating, and configuration. The EIS measurements of fuel cells are performed off-line in a laboratory setup because it is time-consuming and expensive. EIS experiments require expensive frequency response analyzer (FRA) equipment for signal perturbation as well as potentiometers or galvanometers for building a manageable load [21]. Moreover, this equipment has a limitation that only low power capacity is available for the measurements, which cannot handle the power and voltage level of commercial power systems. In a laboratory setup, total power flows directly into an electronic load or potentiostat, which should be controlled by FRA to give a perturbation to fuel cells. However, this configuration cannot be applied to power systems in fields because the power of fuel cells flows into uncontrollable high-power loads not into electronic loads. Therefore, it is challenging to apply the impedance measurement up to commercial applications at the field level. Thus, one of the advancement trends is the shift from off-line to on-line EIS diagnosis [7].
Laboratory-oriented EIS is sufficient to apply for investigating the electrochemical properties of materials at the single-cell level. However, this method has many limitations to use the EIS as a tool for diagnosis or prognostics for fuel cell stacks in an actual field because it needs to handle high power and energy with uncontrollable loads. For this reason, we aim to overcome the limitation of the conventional method and develop an on-line EIS to enable impedance measurement in the high-power environment. We implement the EIS method under a real-time environment using Simulink Real-Time [22] so that all models and algorithms can be directory linked to embedded controllers. This paper is organized into three main sections. In Section 2, a new EIS method for high-power fuel cell systems is proposed, and detailed operations to measure the impedance are described. In Section 3, the procedure for real-time applications including modeling and simulation is described to compare the simulation results with the experiment ones. Finally, Section 4 shows the experiment results for validating the proposed method.

2. On-Line EIS Measurement for High-Power Fuel Cell Systems

2.1. Difference between Laboratory EIS and Proposed On-Line EIS

EIS measurement of fuel cells in the laboratory environment has a configuration, as shown in Figure 1a. FRA generates a perturbation signal into fuel cells and measures the corresponding response voltage/current to calculate the impedance. The perturbation voltage generated from FRA is in the range of several volts, and the current from FRA is at most hundreds of mA [23]. Therefore, FRA operates with a potentiostat/galvanostat to manage the current and voltage capability flexibly. Nevertheless, this equipment can only measure at a single-cell level or a small stack of several cells in series.
To enhance the measurable capacity to the level of fuel cell stacks, a controllable electronic load capable of handling 100 A or more was used, as shown in Figure 1b [24,25,26]. In these studies, a monitoring device including the FRA function interacts with the electronic load to receive voltage and current signals required for an impedance analysis. However, since this method also uses a controllable electronic load as the entire load of the fuel cell, it cannot be applied to a field where a separate uncontrollable load operates in a wide range of power/energy demands. Another approach to handling high power is to merge the EIS function to power converters such as the inverter and DC-DC converter used in power systems [27,28]. However, this approach is very complex to realize and cannot use the EIS method as an independent tool for the diagnosis.
The proposed on-line EIS method in Figure 2 injects a small perturbation current signal in parallel at a location between the fuel cell stack and the load to the fuel cell power systems. The method can be applied to existing power systems without a structural change of the field system, where power converters are installed to regulate powers between fuel cell stacks and loads. Moreover, this method enables EIS measurements for fuel cell stacks of any size with a simple connection, since only the current sensor from the power system is required. Therefore, this leads to a commercial advantage of measuring EIS without any expensive equipment, including FRA and potentiostat/galvanostat, and electronic load.

2.2. Building On-Line EIS by Real-Time Target

The proposed method is implemented with the composition of three parts, as shown in Figure 3. The current injection device has simple connections with fuel cell power systems. Corresponding to Figure 2, a perturbation current is injected into the fuel cell system through two terminals, T1 and T2. At the same time, the fuel cell voltage and current are measured through these two terminals and T3 with a signal of the external current sensor, respectively. These two signals are transmitted to analog-to-digital (A/D) converter inputs in an embedded controller for the impedance calculation. The amplitude of perturbation current is controlled by an isolated signal from a digital-to-analog (D/A) converter up to a maximum of 1 A. In practice, it is convenient to implement the current to inject to the ground direction rather than toward the positive terminal by a current source circuit with MOSFET and op-amp. The reason is that it is difficult to flow the current from the low potential to the high potential. The gate driver circuit driving power devices such as MOSFET are easy to implement when the gate signal ground corresponds to the power ground level. With this topology, MOSFET naturally flows the current from the positive terminal to the ground.
Figure 3 also shows interconnections among the three parts of the proposed EIS. Models and algorithms developed in the real-time host are compiled to C code and downloaded to the real-time target so that the real-time target manages the current injection device according to the generated C code. The real-time target interacts with the real-time host by receiving the start and stop command as well as transmitting the measured information about the voltage and current of the fuel cell stack. The real-time target sets the values of critical parameters such as stop time (Tstop), sweeping frequency (fo), sampling frequency (fs), and measuring cycles (Nw). For every sweeping frequency, the real-time target drives the current injection device and transmits the measured values to the real-time host, which analyzes the impedance characteristics by FFT from the voltage and current information.
In this work, all models and algorithms are developed in the MATLAB environment, but the current injection device needs to be controlled by an embedded controller for commercialization. Therefore, we use a real-time target machine as a universal embedded controller, which operates in a real-time mode under Simulink Real-Time with developed algorithms generated to C code.
The overall specification of the proposed EIS method is in Table 1. The current system can handle stack voltage up to 200 V with an unlimited current range when the current sensor is available. The sweeping frequency of the injection current for EIS is possible from 0.01 to 2000 Hz. The magnitude of the injected current can be controlled up to 1 A. We used a Mobile real-time target machine from Speedgoat [29], which operates at a sampling time of 20 μs for the EIS measurement.

3. Development On-Line EIS Model for Real-Time Application

3.1. Building Model and Simulation for Testing the Proposed Method

Before operating the current injection device in real time, we develop all related sequences and algorithms in a virtual space and examine the operation in advance. We build the simulation model as shown in Figure 4 to implement the concept of Figure 2 under a Simulink environment and test to see if the proposed method can measure impedances successfully. The developed model consists of a fuel cell stack, a current injection device, and an ADC (A/D Converter) model that collects the measured voltage and current signals of the fuel cell stack. The power converter and the load are modeled as an equivalent resistance that consumes power from a macroscopic modeling point of view. The internal modeling of significant components is shown in Figure 4b for the fuel cell stack, Figure 4c for the current inject device, and Figure 4d for the A/D converter. The signals into the A/D converter are set to add a noise component to each measured voltage and current signal, which is closer to the actual operating environment. This signal named Signal_n is a data structure whose variable is stored in the MATLAB workspace and used to calculate the impedance.
EIS is a technique to measure and analyze the impedance of electrochemical systems including fuel cells and batteries by measuring both given perturbation signals and the response signals corresponding to the given one. Most EIS analysis is fulfilled by examining the Nyquist plot, which shows a track of total impedance as a function of sweeping frequency. Modeling and simulation are performed to follow the flow chart suggested in Figure 3 for applying the proposed EIS method to the model. The parameters of the model developed for simulation and their values are shown in Table 2. The perturbation current signal is a sine wave with a magnitude of 0.1 A, sweeping from 0.1 to 5000 Hz. Although the sweeping frequency is possible from 0.01 Hz, we start from 0.1 Hz for efficient experiments. To show the effectiveness of the proposed EIS, the Nyquist plot from the impedance calculated through simulation is compared with one obtained by the mathematical calculation based on the following impedance equation.
Z e q = R s + 1 j ω C a + 1 R a + 1 j ω C c + 1 R c  
Equation (1) is the equivalent impedance equation of Figure 4b, the fuel cell model, where Ca and Ra represent the double-layer capacitance and the charge transfer resistance at the anode of fuel cells, respectively. Similarly, Cc and Rc stand for the capacitance and resistance at the cathode. Rs represents an overall ohmic resistance including contacts and membrane. As described in a recent review paper [7], many researchers use constant phase elements (CPE) or a combination of inductors with capacitors instead of plain capacitors to identify a model from the measured EIS data considering nonlinear electrochemical properties in fuel cells. However, the nonlinear electrochemical elements such as CPE and Warburg cannot be physically implemented with standard electronic components such as capacitors and resistors. In this paper, we focus on showing whether the proposed EIS method can measure the fuel cell impedance in power systems. To this end, we build the hardware simulator that composes the fuel cell impedance with standard capacitors and resistors. Simulations use the same values of the circuit created in the hardware simulator, as shown in Table 2, to compare the simulation result with the experimented one to the hardware simulator, which are described in Section 4.1.
Figure 5b, a Nyquist plot from the simulation, shows no difference from Figure 5a calculated by the impedance shown in Equation (1). Since the root mean square error (RMSE) between Figure 5a,b is 7.53 × 10−4, the proposed method can accurately measure the impedance of the fuel cell regardless of the value of load connected to the fuel cell stack. Figure 5c shows the Nyquist plot when the measured voltage and current signals contain a noise of variance 10−4, where the RMSE is calculated as 0.0115. The figure means that noise affects the calculation more than in a high-frequency band and increases the probability of calculation error. However, since the Nyquist plot follows the mainstream of the entire trajectory correctly, post-processing during analysis can improve accuracy. The simulation is repeated with load values of 1 ohm and 5 ohm to investigate whether the result of EIS is affected by the load impedance. The results are the same in both cases, confirming that the EIS can correctly measure the impedance of the fuel cell without the influence of the load. Therefore, we ensure that the proposed method can correctly calculate the hidden impedance of fuel cells in power systems.

3.2. Building On-Line EIS by Real-Time Target

Simulink Real-Time (SRT) enables real-time applications of Simulink models by running models on a real-time target. We use SRT to design a real-time simulation, test a current injection operation, and extract impedances from signal data. After all the algorithms are tested in a real-time environment, these algorithms can be used in a specific embedded controller without additional coding tasks because all algorithms are converted to C-code for the target operation in a real-time environment.
To run the Simulink model as a real-time application under SRT, real-time scope blocks are added to the developed model of Figure 4a as shown in Figure 6a. Configuration parameters are set for code generation and target execution, including selecting a fixed-step solver and making all model blocks the discrete type. The target scope in Figure 6a displays real-time data of the real-time target on an external monitor, while the host-scope transmits the data to the real-time host. The current injector block is modified as Figure 6b, where a current injection command signal in virtual space goes out through a D/A converter of physical space and returns to the A/D converter to drive the current injection into the fuel cell stacks in virtual space. This operation is a kind of hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) test in which the plant model runs on the real-time target machine to which a physical I/O is connected.
Figure 7a shows a photo of the target scope when the model of Figure 6 runs on the target machine in real-time, displaying the fuel cell voltage and current from which a Nyquist plot is derived, as shown in Figure 7b. The result shows almost the same plot as the ideal case of Figure 5a.
During testing the validation of algorithms in the real-time target in the previous step, the algorithms run under a virtual space in which the fuel cell system is built as a real-time model. After confirming algorithms in this mode, we apply the real-time target machine to a real physical system, fuel cell power system, as shown in Figure 8. The real-time target controls the current injection device and measures the fuel cell voltage and current signal as described in Figure 3. All experiments in the next section are performed according to the configuration of Figure 8.

4. Experiment with a Fuel Cell System and Discussion

4.1. Experiment with a Fuel Cell Impedance Simulator

In order to test the operation of the on-line EIS in the physical domain, we apply the proposed method to a fuel cell impedance simulator shown in Figure 9. The impedance hardware simulator is made to have the same circuit structure as the fuel cell power system model in Figure 4a including the impedance model of Figure 4b, and its values are set to be as equal to those in Table 2 as possible. The load is set to 5 ohm, and the used current sensor is LA55-p. The experimental results are shown in Figure 9, where (a) is the impedance hardware simulator, and (b) is the Nyquist plot from the experiment with the one from the ideal case of Equation (1).
Experiments on real physical devices display two different results compared to the ideal case of Equation (1). First, the actual impedance of the hardware simulator has a deviation from the nominal value of used components due to their tolerance. When connecting the impedance simulator to a DC power supply, resistance of the lead wire and contact resistance of the connector are added. Therefore, the impedance of Figure 9b has a tendency of a bit more increase than simulation. Second, the results of Figure 5 are done up to 5000 Hz, but the current injector device is designed to be able to operate up to 2000 Hz because the sweeping frequency is much lower at the stack level than at the cell level for the analysis of dominant operation regions [25,30]. Since the root mean square error (RMSE) between the ideal case and the experiment with the hardware simulator over the trajectory is 0.165, the EIS method can track the entire trajectory of the Nyquist plot without a significant error so that it can be used for the diagnosis of fuel cell stacks, where it is important to detect the feature indicator through the change of patterns of impedance characteristics [17,18].

4.2. Experiment with a Fuel Cell Stack

To demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed method, we apply the proposed EIS method to a fuel cell stack with an independent load as a final experiment. The stack is assembled by stacking 35 cells with an active area of 200 cm2, providing 1 kW of electric power at a current density of 0.2 A/cm2. Figure 10a is the photo of experiment settings of fuel cell systems, which have been used in our other research [31]. Figure 10b is a photo of the implemented setup of the proposed EIS method, including the real-time target machine and the current injector, and the monitor used as a target scope. We measure the fuel cell stack impedances at six different loads of 10 A, 20 A, 30 A, 40 A, 50 A, and 55 A with the amplitude of the injection current of 0.1 A and the sweeping range of 0.1–2000 Hz.
When we operate the fuel cell stack at six different currents, the electrochemical properties of the stack are varied according to each load current. Thus, it can be considered that the fuel cell is operated at different operating points. Figure 11 shows Nyquist plots of six operating points obtained without any post-processing with the row data measured on-line, showing that the trajectory changes with the operating point. It is noted that the overall trajectory of impedances tends to shrink with the increase of load currents. These results are the same as those reported in other papers [32,33]. These researchers describe that the charge transfer resistance, especially at the cathode, decreases with the load current until a certain range where mass transfer losses become dominant. Therefore, Figure 11 shows that the proposed EIS can measure the variation of the impedance of fuel cells with different operating points in the field.
In the EIS technique, equivalent circuits models (ECM) are prevalent for analyzing the impedance characteristics by fitting Nyquist plots of measured data to circuit models. Researchers seek the physical meanings by relating each circuit value of ECM to the specific electrochemical properties of fuel cells. However, one Nyquist plot can be modeled to many types of equivalent circuits, and the interpretation with different circuit models can cause various physical interpretations for the same data. Nyquist plots are widely changing with operating conditions, as shown in Figure 11. For this reason, different equivalent circuits need to be used according to the operating ranges in certain systems, or complex high-order circuit models covering wide range of operation are required. Due to the limitation of ECM, there is a trend to shift from ECM to physical-based models [7,34]. For fault diagnostics and lifetime predictions, Nyquist plots describing abnormal conditions are required as well as ones measured under normal conditions with different operating points over the operating time. This situation makes it more complex to select ECM and apply models effectively when using on-line EIS. Therefore, we consider that the model based on the geometric or pattern approach of Nyquist plots, which is our next research step, can be preferable to the ECM approach for the prognostics and health management (PHM) research area.
It takes about 15 min for the on-line EIS to measure at one operating point. We resume the measurement at another operating point immediately. In this process of changing operating points, measurements can be performed while the fuel cell stack is not in a completely stable state. Therefore, some parts of the Nyquist plots in Figure 11 reflect such circumstances. Unfortunately, most fuel cell systems in the field have dynamic loads, so it is seldom possible to measure impedances in a completely stable state of fuel cells. Efficient utilization of EIS in these environments is another area of research and beyond the scope of the present paper.
Figure 12 and Figure 13 are AC components waveform of current and voltage of the fuel cell stack at a sweeping frequency of 50 Hz and 500 Hz, respectively, at which the frequency spectrum of voltage and current are also shown. The frequency spectrums are calculated by FFT using the measurement data of 16 cycles. In the figure, the magnitude of the AC component of the stack voltage is a small signal of about 20 mV, so measurements are sensitive to noise. FFT spectrums in the figures show that the main signals can be recovered correctly in the current experiments.
For environments with more noise, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) can be improved by raising the magnitude of the injection current. However, the internal loss of the current injection device also increases, so the trade-off is essential for an optimal operation. Increasing the measurement cycle can also reduce the error due to noise, while the overall measurement time is longer. We use 16 cycles for measurements that take 15 min for an entire sweeping process. Since the sampling frequency is 20 μs, 100 data are measured in one cycle at 500 Hz. In the case of 0.1 Hz, data of 0.5 M should be measured. Therefore, we limit the measurement data to no more than 500 per cycle in experiments to avoid the possible memory shortage in the controller.

5. Conclusions

This paper proposes an on-line EIS method to enable the impedance measurements for high-power fuel cell systems with uncontrollable active loads, which can be found in most field environments. The main idea of the proposed method is to inject a current perturbation signal into fuel cell systems in parallel at a location between the fuel cell stack and the load and then calculate the fuel cell impedance based on the measurement of response current and voltage signals.
The developing process for the method is performed under Simulink Real-Time, including modeling and simulation for real-time applications. This approach enables the developed algorithms for EIS to be used in commercial-level embedded controllers without much effort in code conversion. The usefulness of the proposed EIS is demonstrated by experiments with a fuel cell stack. All results show that the EIS method has a potential to be utilized as a tool to diagnose fuel cell systems used in active power plants and transportations.
The proposed EIS method can contribute to overcoming the limitations of the laboratory setup to commercial power systems by improving cost, power handling, and configuration suitable to on-line measurement. We aim to utilize the impedance data by this on-line EIS to fault diagnosis and prognostics for the preventive maintenance of fuel cell systems as well as for the improvement of reliability and safety. To this end, the following research step will be to develop methods to utilize the impedance data that are not in a completely stable state and devise efficient diagnostic algorithms suitable for on-line.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-B.H. and H.O.; methodology, S.-B.H.; software, S.-B.H.; validation, H.O. and J.W.; formal analysis, S.-B.H.; investigation, H.O. and J.W; resources, W.-Y.L. and S.C. and J.B.; data curation, J.W.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-B.H.; writing—review and editing, H.O.; visualization, J.B.; supervision, S.C. and J.B.; project administration, W.-Y.L.; funding acquisition, W.-Y.L. and S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Same as recorded in Acknowledgments.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by (1) framework of the research and development program of the Korea Institute of Energy Research (C1-2420-01) and (2) the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea Government (MOTIE) (20203030030040, Development of Advanced Technology on Fuel Cell System for Housing).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Staffell, I.; Scamman, D.; Velazquez Abad, A.; Balcombe, P.; Dodds, P.E.; Ekins, P.; Shah, N.; Ward, K.R. The role of hydrogen and fuel cells in the global energy system. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 463–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Larminie, J.; Dicks, A. Fuel Cell Systems Explained, 3rd ed.; J. Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2018; ISBN 9781118613528. [Google Scholar]
  3. Holmström, N.; Wiezell, K.; Lindbergh, G. Studying Low-Humidity Effects in PEFCs Using EIS. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2012, 159, F369–F378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wagner, N. Characterization of membrane electrode assemblies in polymer electrolyte fuel cells using a.c. impedance spectroscopy. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2002, 32, 859–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Song, C.; Liu, H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.; Mackinnon, S.; Peckham, T.; Li, J.; McDermid, S.; et al. Temperature Dependent Performance and In Situ AC Impedance of High-Temperature PEM Fuel Cells Using the Nafion-112 Membrane. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2006, 153, A2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yuan, X.; Wang, H.; Colin Sun, J.; Zhang, J. AC impedance technique in PEM fuel cell diagnosis-A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32, 4365–4380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tang, Z.; Huang, Q.A.; Wang, Y.J.; Zhang, F.; Li, W.; Li, A.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J. Recent progress in the use of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for the measurement, monitoring, diagnosis and optimization of proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance. J. Power Sources 2020, 468, 228361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Meddings, N.; Heinrich, M.; Overney, F.; Lee, J.S.; Ruiz, V.; Napolitano, E.; Seitz, S.; Hinds, G.; Raccichini, R.; Gaberšček, M.; et al. Application of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy to commercial Li-ion cells: A review. J. Power Sources 2020, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. O’Rourke, J.; Ramani, M.; Arcak, M. Using electrochemical impedance to determine airflow rates. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33, 4694–4701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. De Beer, C.; Barendse, P.S.; Pillay, P.; Bullecks, B.; Rengaswamy, R. Online diagnostics of HTPEM fuel cells using small amplitude transient analysis for CO poisoning. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2015, 62, 5175–5186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, Q.; Lin, R.; Técher, L.; Cui, X. Experimental study of variable operating parameters effects on overall PEMFC performance and spatial performance distribution. Energy 2016, 115, 550–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hink, S.; Roduner, E. Application of a contact mode AFM for spatially resolved electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements of a Nafion membrane electrode assembly. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 1408–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Baricci, A.; Mereu, R.; Messaggi, M.; Zago, M.; Inzoli, F.; Casalegno, A. Application of computational fluid dynamics to the analysis of geometrical features in PEM fuel cells flow fields with the aid of impedance spectroscopy. Appl. Energy 2017, 205, 670–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ihonen, J.; Mikkola, M.; Lindbergh, G. Flooding of Gas Diffusion Backing in PEFCs. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2004, 151, A1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kim, J.; Lee, I.; Tak, Y.; Cho, B.H. Impedance-based diagnosis of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell failures associated with a low frequency ripple current. Renew. Energy 2013, 51, 302–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ren, P.; Pei, P.; Li, Y.; Wu, Z.; Chen, D.; Huang, S.; Jia, X. Diagnosis of water failures in proton exchange membrane fuel cell with zero-phase ohmic resistance and fixed-low-frequency impedance. Appl. Energy 2019, 239, 785–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Araya, S.S.; Zhou, F.; Sahlin, S.L.; Thomas, S.; Jeppesen, C.; Kær, S.K. Fault characterization of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack. Energies 2019, 12, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Laribi, S.; Mammar, K.; Sahli, Y.; Koussa, K. Analysis and diagnosis of PEM fuel cell failure modes (flooding & drying) across the physical parameters of electrochemical impedance model: Using neural networks method. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2019, 34, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, J.H.; Lee, J.H.; Choi, W.; Park, K.W.; Sun, H.Y.; Oh, J.H. Development of a method to estimate the lifespan of proton exchange membrane fuel cell using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 6001–6007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Petrone, R.; Vitagliano, C.; Péra, M.C.; Chamagne, D.; Sorrentino, M. Characterization of an H2/O2 PEMFC Short-Stack Performance Aimed to Health-State Monitoring and Diagnosis. Fuel Cells 2018, 18, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Evgenij Barsoukov, J.R.M. Impedance Spectroscopy: Theory, Experiment, and Application, 3rd ed.; J. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; ISBN 9781119074083. [Google Scholar]
  22. MathWorks. Simulink Real-Time User’s Guide; MathWorks: Natick, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  23. Solartron. 1260A Impedance/Gain-Phase Analyzer; Solartron Analytical: Wokingham, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yuan, X.; Sun, J.C.; Blanco, M.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J.; Wilkinson, D.P. AC impedance diagnosis of a 500 W PEM fuel cell stack. Part I: Stack impedance. J. Power Sources 2006, 161, 920–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dhirde, A.M.; Dale, N.V.; Salehfar, H.; Mann, M.D.; Han, T.H. Equivalent electric circuit modeling and performance analysis of a PEM fuel cell stack using impedance spectroscopy. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2010, 25, 778–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bouaicha, A.; Allagui, H.; Mami, A.; Rouane, A. Study of an electronic load for measuring the internal impedance of a PEM fuel cell. In Proceedings of the 10th International Multi-Conferences on Systems, Signals & Devices 2013 (SSD13), Hammamet, Tunisia, 18–21 March 2013; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lee, Y.; Member, S.; Park, S.; Han, S. Online Embedded Impedance Measurement Using High-Power Battery Charger. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2015, 51, 498–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huang, W.; Qahouq, J.A. An online battery impedance measurement method using DC-DC power converter control. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2014, 61, 5987–5995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Speedgoat. Available online: https://www.speedgoat.com/ (accessed on 22 September 2021).
  30. Pérez-Page, M.; Pérez-Herranz, V. Study of the electrochemical behaviour of a 300 W PEM fuel cell stack by Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 4009–4015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Oh, H.; Lee, W.Y.; Won, J.; Kim, M.; Choi, Y.Y.; Han, S. Bin Residual-based fault diagnosis for thermal management systems of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Appl. Energy 2020, 277, 115568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Asghari, S.; Mokmeli, A.; Samavati, M. Study of PEM fuel cell performance by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 9283–9290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yan, X.; Hou, M.; Sun, L.; Liang, D.; Shen, Q.; Xu, H.; Ming, P.; Yi, B. AC impedance characteristics of a 2 kW PEM fuel cell stack under different operating conditions and load changes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32, 4358–4364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rezaei Niya, S.M.; Phillips, R.K.; Hoorfar, M. Process modeling of the impedance characteristics of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 191, 594–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Configuration of laboratory environment EIS. (a) Normal EIS configuration. (b) EIS configuration for enhanced capacity.
Figure 1. Configuration of laboratory environment EIS. (a) Normal EIS configuration. (b) EIS configuration for enhanced capacity.
Energies 14 06133 g001
Figure 2. Configuration of proposed on-line EIS.
Figure 2. Configuration of proposed on-line EIS.
Energies 14 06133 g002
Figure 3. Building on-line EIS by real-time target.
Figure 3. Building on-line EIS by real-time target.
Energies 14 06133 g003
Figure 4. Simulink model for simulations of the proposed EIS. (a) Simulink model for fuel cell power system. (b) Fuel cell model. (c) Current injector model. (d) ADC model.
Figure 4. Simulink model for simulations of the proposed EIS. (a) Simulink model for fuel cell power system. (b) Fuel cell model. (c) Current injector model. (d) ADC model.
Energies 14 06133 g004aEnergies 14 06133 g004b
Figure 5. Nyquist plot by simulations using models. (a) Equation based EIS. (b) Simulation results (no noise). (c) Simulation results (with noise).
Figure 5. Nyquist plot by simulations using models. (a) Equation based EIS. (b) Simulation results (no noise). (c) Simulation results (with noise).
Energies 14 06133 g005
Figure 6. Simulink model for a real-time simulation test. (a) Simulink model. (b) Modified current injector model.
Figure 6. Simulink model for a real-time simulation test. (a) Simulink model. (b) Modified current injector model.
Energies 14 06133 g006
Figure 7. Real-time simulation of models in target machine and Nyquist plot. (a) Waveform of target scope. (b) Nyquist plot by real-time operation.
Figure 7. Real-time simulation of models in target machine and Nyquist plot. (a) Waveform of target scope. (b) Nyquist plot by real-time operation.
Energies 14 06133 g007
Figure 8. Real-time control by target machine with fuel cell system.
Figure 8. Real-time control by target machine with fuel cell system.
Energies 14 06133 g008
Figure 9. Fuel cell hardware simulator and Nyquist plot from experiments. (a) Fuel cell impedance hardware simulator. (b) Nyquist plot from experiments.
Figure 9. Fuel cell hardware simulator and Nyquist plot from experiments. (a) Fuel cell impedance hardware simulator. (b) Nyquist plot from experiments.
Energies 14 06133 g009
Figure 10. Photos of experiment setup with fuel cell system by on-line EIS (1: fuel cell stack, 2: load, 3: monitoring system, 4: reformer, 5: humidifier, 6: heat exchanger, 7: air blower, 8: water tank, 9: water pump). (a) 1 kW fuel cell system. (b) On-line EIS.
Figure 10. Photos of experiment setup with fuel cell system by on-line EIS (1: fuel cell stack, 2: load, 3: monitoring system, 4: reformer, 5: humidifier, 6: heat exchanger, 7: air blower, 8: water tank, 9: water pump). (a) 1 kW fuel cell system. (b) On-line EIS.
Energies 14 06133 g010
Figure 11. Nyquist plots at different operating points of the fuel cell stack.
Figure 11. Nyquist plots at different operating points of the fuel cell stack.
Energies 14 06133 g011
Figure 12. Waveform and spectrum of AC component voltage and current (50 Hz).
Figure 12. Waveform and spectrum of AC component voltage and current (50 Hz).
Energies 14 06133 g012
Figure 13. Waveform and spectrum of AC component voltage and current (500 Hz).
Figure 13. Waveform and spectrum of AC component voltage and current (500 Hz).
Energies 14 06133 g013
Table 1. Operation specification of the proposed EIS.
Table 1. Operation specification of the proposed EIS.
Stack Voltage RangeStack Current RangeInjection Current RangeReal-Time Target
10–200 (V)No limit (when sensor is available)Waveform: sine wave
Frequency: 0.01–2000 (Hz)
Amplitude: 0.01–1 (A)
Machine: Mobile (Speedgoat)
Sampling time: 20 (μs)
Measurement Cycle: 16
OS: Simulink Real-Time R2019b
Table 2. Simulation values of parameters in Simulink model.
Table 2. Simulation values of parameters in Simulink model.
Fuel Cell ModelCurrent Injector ModelADC ModelRload
Ra = 130 (mohm) Ca = 8000 (μF)
Rc = 470 (mohm) Cc = 90,000 (μF)
Rs = 500 (mohm) Vfc = 20 (V)
Frequency: 0.1–5000 (Hz)
Amplitude: 0.1 (A)
Offset: 0.1 (A)
Vgain = 0.26
Igain = 0.096
1 (ohm)
5 (ohm)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, S.-B.; Oh, H.; Lee, W.-Y.; Won, J.; Chae, S.; Baek, J. On-Line EIS Measurement for High-Power Fuel Cell Systems Using Simulink Real-Time. Energies 2021, 14, 6133. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196133

AMA Style

Han S-B, Oh H, Lee W-Y, Won J, Chae S, Baek J. On-Line EIS Measurement for High-Power Fuel Cell Systems Using Simulink Real-Time. Energies. 2021; 14(19):6133. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196133

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Soo-Bin, Hwanyeong Oh, Won-Yong Lee, Jinyeon Won, Suyong Chae, and Jongbok Baek. 2021. "On-Line EIS Measurement for High-Power Fuel Cell Systems Using Simulink Real-Time" Energies 14, no. 19: 6133. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14196133

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop