Next Article in Journal
Performance Enhancement of Nitrogen Dual Expander and Single Mixed Refrigerant LNG Processes Using Jaya Optimization Approach
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing the Alkyl Chain Effect of Ammonium Hydroxides Ionic Liquids on the Kinetics of Pure Methane and Carbon Dioxide Hydrates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ethanolic Media Effect on the Susceptibility to Stress Corrosion Cracking in an X-70 Microalloyed Steel with Different Aging Treatments

by
Adrian del Pozo
1,
Alvaro Torres
2,
Julio César Villalobos
3,
Heriberto Villanueva
1,
Amilkar Fragiel
4,
Jose Gonzalo Gonzalez Rodriguez
1 and
Sergio Alonso Serna Barquera
1,*
1
CIICAp, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Av. Universidad 1001, Col. Chamilpa Cuernavaca, 62209 Morelos, Mexico
2
FCQeI, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Av. Universidad 1001, Col. Chamilpa Cuernavaca, 62209 Morelos, Mexico
3
Departamento de Metal-Mecánica, Ingeniería en Materiales, Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Morelia, Avenida Tecnológico No. 1500, Col. Lomas de Santiaguito, C.P. 58120 Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico
4
Laboratorio de Física de la Materia Condensada, Centro de Física, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas (IVIC), Apartado 20632, Caracas 1020-A, Venezuela
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2020, 13(12), 3277; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123277
Submission received: 15 May 2020 / Revised: 19 June 2020 / Accepted: 22 June 2020 / Published: 25 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Section J: Thermal Management)

Abstract

:
The objective of this research was to evaluate the stress corrosion cracking (SCC) of X-70 micro-alloyed steel in contact with bio-ethanol and E-50 gasohol. Environmental factors, including water (1%, 3% and 5%) and NaCl (10 mg/L and 32 mg/L), as well as two aging treatments were studied. Experimental values were obtained by the Slow Strain Rate Test (SSRT) technique, X-ray fluorescence (XRF), and tensile test according to the information reported in the literature. The results of the SSRT for the SCC determination showed that this steel in these conditions did not show evidence of SCC, which was attributed to the formation of an oxide (Fe2O3) not soluble in ethanol. The oxide layer acts as a protector preventing the formation of pitting, one of the main causes of cracks initiation in SCC.

1. Introduction

The use of fossil fuels plays a major role in climate change due to carbon monoxide emissions. The growth of new technologies solving current and future energy problems has grown in significance, as has the growth of renewable energies including biofuels like bio-ethanol, which has proven to be very useful in reducing greenhouse gases [1,2,3], has a lower energy yield (close to one-third that of petrol) and has lower vapor pressure, suggesting less evaporative emissions, amongst other things [4]. In recent decades, there has been an increase in the use of bio-ethanol as an alternative to fossil fuels, in efforts to make the transport method more efficient [5,6]. Some of the reasons for this increase in the use of bio-ethanol has been the Kyoto protocol and the replacement in the USA of methyl-tert-butyl ether (MBTE) as an octane booster in gasoline, due to its high contaminant potential [7].
The establishment of numerous bio-ethanol production plants by fermentation in several countries has led to an increase in interest for research in the transportation and storage of bio-ethanol and bio-ethanol blends [8]. Currently, bio-ethanol is transported mainly by tank trucks and railway, and the transportation projects in which high-strength and low-alloy steel pipes (HSLA) have been used to increase optimization, reduce costs, and decrease pollutant emissions. These advantages are achieved by the advances in metallurgy and manufacturing techniques of HSLA steels such as thermomechanical controlled processing (TMCP) and controlled cooling, which induce an excellent combination of mechanical properties such as high strength and good toughness [9]. The mechanical properties obtained in HSLA steels produced by TMCP are caused by the refinement of the austenite grain size, increase of defects density by deformation, precipitation of microalloying elements such as Nb, V, and Ti, and the control of phases obtained by post-heat treatments [10]. The increase in mechanical properties allows for the transportation of fuel by pipeline at high pressure with a reduced wall thickness, which reduces the cost of operation and hence the material [11].
A search of the literature revealed few studies that investigate the use of corn bio-ethanol as a substitute fuel. It was found that the bio-ethanol and bio-ethanol blends in contact with some microalloyed steels, zinc–aluminum alloys, carbon steel, castings in fuel pumps, fuel tanks, and welds beside adjacent metal in tank bottoms can exhibit corrosion and stress corrosion cracking (SCC) [12,13]. Few studies found that E-50 bio-ethanol blends have higher SCC susceptibility than in lower or higher bio-ethanol concentration blends [14].
The controversy about the behavior of microalloyed steels in presence of bio-ethanol and its blends has been under constant debate. Mostly, studies have described the roles of water, sodium chloride, acetic acid (CH3COOH), denaturant, methanol, and steel corrosion products [14,15,16] on SCC. Therefore, the present study sets out to assess the effects of the environmental factors (bio-ethanol concentration, water, and NaCl) and metallurgical factors (aging treatments) on SCC of X-70 experimental Ni-microalloyed steel, in order to analyze this steel as a possible candidate for its use in manufacturing of long distance pipes. Previously published work found a higher susceptibility to SCC in carbon steels and microalloyed steels exposed to a mixture of 50% gasoline and 50% ethanol (E-50) [17,18,19]. The novelty in the present work is to focus on the low susceptibility to SCC in different bio-ethanol media of a heat-treated Ni microalloyed steel and to increase its mechanical properties. It was found that the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) was increased as aging time was increased by precipitation hardening, and no cracking was observed on the surface of the Ni-microalloyed steel after being evaluated in different bio-ethanol media. This indicates that this material could be an excellent candidate for use in ethanol transportation.

2. Materials and Methods

In the present work an X-70 microalloyed steel was used. Two aging treatments were applied at 30 min and 1 h respectively. Both heat treatments were carried out at 600 °C, then let to cool inside the furnace. Figure 1 shows a diagram with the time and the temperature.
Table 1 shows the corrosive media used in the study.

2.1. Chemical Composition

Table 2 presents the results obtained from spark emission spectroscopy for chemical composition in wt %. The carbon content is very low (0.039 wt %) with Cr, Nb, Ti and Al as microalloying elements.

2.2. Microstructural Characterization

In order to characterize the microstructure of the steel, a metallographic analysis was carried out on 1 cm × 1 cm × 0.6 cm samples that were polished. The pieces were polished until mirror finished as follows:
  • The steel was sanded progressively with 80, 180, 280, 400, 600, 800 and 1000 grit sandpaper.
  • Subsequently, it was polished with 0.5 µm alumina and water, until obtaining a surface with a mirror finish.
  • Finally, it ended with an attack on the prepared surface, with 3% Nital, for 15 s.

2.3. Tensile Tests

The tensile test was carried out according to ASTM E8 Standard [20] on a subsize specimen shown in Figure 2 using a physical test solutions machine with a displacement speed of 1 mm/min. Table 3 lists the specimen parameters.

2.4. SSRT

The SSRTs were carried out using tensile specimens shown in Figure 3 and Table 4 in order to investigate the effect of SCC according to conventional ASTM G129 standard SSRT testing [21]. The strain rate was constant at 1.36 × 10−6 s−1 until fracture according to ASTM G129, with the gauge length section exposed to air or immersed in the media, respectively.
A 96° corn bio-ethanol was used as test medium. The gasohol solution was E-50 (50% bio-ethanol–50% gasoline 92 octanes). In Figure 4, a schematic of the sealed Nylamid cell employed to contain the gasohol solutions is shown.
The SSRT specimens were polished longitudinally with a 600-grade silicon carbide sandpaper, degreased, and masked, except for the gauge length. The loss in ductility was assessed in terms of the percentage reduction in area (%RA) using Equation (1):
% R A = A i A f A i × 100
where Ai—Initial area; Af—Final area.

2.5. Fractographic Analysis

For the purpose of fractographic analysis a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to obtain images of the fracture zone of the SSRT samples.

2.6. X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer Analysis

X-ray fluorescence analyses were carried out on a S8 TIGER 1KW wave-length X-ray fluorescence spectrometer made by Bruker with the following parameters: angle 0.23 degrees, energy 50 KV.

3. Results

3.1. Microstructural Characterization

Figure 5 shows the longitudinal microstructures of the as received steel (a), aged 30 min (b) and aged 1 h (c), where an acicular ferrite matrix was observed with presence of secondary phases of upper bainite [22] in all conditions. Table 5 shows the volume fraction of microalloyed steel in as-received and heat treatment conditions. It was observed that acicular ferrite was found in a slightly larger than the upper bainite in the as-received condition which represented a good combination of mechanical properties described in Section 3.3. However, as aging time increased, the fraction of acicular ferrite increased about 5% compared with the as-received condition. In general terms, there was not an apparent change in microstructure morphology and the amount of phases remained in the same amount after the steel was heat treated. The ferritic matrix of the as-received steel (Figure 5a) had elongated grains due to the controlled lamination of the low carbon API steel. In the 30 min (Figure 5b) and a1-h (Figure 5c) condition a slight change in grain morphology was observed, showing a tendency towards an equiaxiated form.
Figure 6a,b show numerous nano-sized carbo-nitrides of Nb and Ti precipitates distributed into acicular ferrite matrix analyzed by TEM. In contrast to the as-received sample, the aged samples become more homogeneous in structure and a larger number of fine precipitate particles with a size of approximately 10 nm with small localized zones of precipitate agglomeration found to distribute into the steels matrix.

3.2. Tensile Tests

Figure 7 shows the strain–stress curves corresponding to the as-received steel, 30 min aged steel, and 1 h aged steel. Table 6 shows the values of the strain–stress curves. It can be seen that in both cases the heat treatments increased the ultimate tensile strength (UTS), which presented an increase of 4% for the 30 min aged steel and 14% for the 1 h aged steel with respect to the as-received steel.
The maximum increase of UTS was presented in the condition of 1 h aged, with a value of 654 MPa, as well as the highest deformation limit, with a value of 22%. Because the heat treatment temperature was below the phase change temperature, the increase in resistance was attributable to precipitation kinetics, where the temperature and time of treatment allowed a possible redistribution of niobium and titanium carbonitrides, as well as transition carbides (ε-carbide), in the same way there was the possibility of a co-precipitation of the micro-alloying elements present in solid solution in the matrix [23,24].

3.3. Slow Strain Rate Test

The %RA was determined for all conditions in order to obtain a measure of the steel embrittlement in contact with bio-ethanol and E-50 gasohol, which is shown in Figure 8 and Table 7.
It can be seen that the specimens showed a ductile type behavior in all conditions, with variations in %RA less than 7.9% with respect to the as-received steel in air, which clearly indicated that in these media the presence of SCC was not observed for this particular composition of steel.
Figure 9 shows the fractures of the SSRT specimens in the outer fracture zone for the different test conditions, where a typical morphology of a completely ductile fracture was observed in all conditions, without the presence of cracks. In this type of morphology, the presence of dimples was observed which denoted a fracture caused by holes coalescence. Similarly, the presence of crack initiation was not observed. The fractography results presented consistent results with the SSRT tests, which corroborated the absence of SCC.

3.4. X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometer Analysis

Table 8 shows the results obtained from the X-ray fluorescence spectrometer analysis in different conditions of bio-ethanol. A clear tendency to present very similar oxide compositions can be observed in all conditions, the most predominant being Fe2O3 (varying between 79.33% and 93.06%).

4. Discussion

Many investigations have been carried out in microalloyed steels concerning SCC, in which it has been reported that, in bio-ethanol media, two of the main causative compounds are NaCl and H2O, which induce crack initiation [25,26,27,28] along with points of high stress concentration [29]. An increase in resistance was observed due to aging heat treatment because microalloying elements promote precipitation hardening [30]. The precipitation hardening effect can be increased due to the presence of Ti and Mo in the precipitation of (Ti, Mo) C, being smaller and homogeneous they are thermally more stable [31]. On the other hand, the increase in ductility in all conditions is attributed to the change in the morphology of the ferritic grain, which was modified from being elongated due to thermomechanical processing to a little more equiaxiated grain, which softens the matrix, conferring an increase in ductility, in addition to a stress relief in the matrix.
There are studies that have demonstrated the presence of the SCC phenomenon in certain microalloyed steel compositions in different bio-ethanol media, which is attributed the susceptibility of the material to the source of bio-ethanol; corn bio-ethanol is considered a factor that increases susceptibility and cane bio-ethanol shows immunity to SCC [32]. Many authors agree that two of the main factors in crack initiation caused by SCC are water and Cl- [14,15]. SSRT studies were performed to determine the behavior of the SCC during mechanical loading in two ethanolic media (bio-ethanol and E-50), where the as received X-70 steel and both aging treatments showed a very high area reduction, which denoted a high resistance to the SCC phenomenon.
According to the data obtained in the SSRT tests in this study, X-70 steel proved to be immune to SCC in corn bio-ethanol due to the microalloying elements of the steel inhibiting the anodic dissolution by retarding the rupture of the passive layer [17,18], in which no pitting was observed, that was one of the main causes of crack initiation [33]. The tests carried out on bio-ethanol with higher water and Cl content remained equally immune to SCC, even though these two are the best-known causes of embrittlement SCC factors. Fractographs performed in all conditions did not show evidence of fractures caused by both bio-ethanol media, instead they showed a ductile morphology with a high area reduction and dimples presence, as well as micro-holes coalescence, which are typical in ductile type fractures, which led to a fracture caused by holes coalescence. This was a clear indication that the X-70 steel under study did not show presence of SCC.
There are many types of oxides that can occur in microalloyed steels, and it has been reported that in ethanolic media Fe2O3 (ferric oxide), Fe3O4 and iron acetate (Fe (CH3OO)2) are the most relevant. These oxides can be soluble or protective in bio-ethanol. Samusawa et al. [19] conducted research on the solubility of iron oxide and iron acetate in bio-ethanol and found that iron acetate is the compound with the highest solubility, and conversely, iron oxides Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 are considered ethanol corrosion products with very low solubility, which makes them protective oxides. It was found that the oxide layer formed was likely Fe2O3, which is known to have a very low dissolution factor in ethanol media, unlike iron acetate (Fe (CH3OO)2), which is a corrosion product highly soluble in ethanol (up to 40 times greater than Fe2O3) and its presence has been reported in other microalloyed steels with different chemical compositions [30]. The high resistance to the phenomenon of SCC in bio-ethanol of the API X-70 microalloyed steel is likely related to the formation of a protective oxide (Fe2O3) which retards the anodic dissolution and does not allow pitting. Due to the fact that the anodic solution is connected to the electrochemistry of the steel in contact with the medium. It is necessary to continue with the investigations on this topic, in order to improve the understanding of the phenomenon.
The steel under study presented a very good ethanol SCC resistance, therefore it can be used as material for manufacture of pipes for the transport of ethanol without the need for a coating.

5. Conclusions

  • The aging treatments increased the UTS in both treatments due to precipitation of microalloying elements.
  • The heat treatment increased the ductility in all conditions attributed to the change in the morphology of the ferritic grain and a stress relief in the matrix.
  • For this particular steel in these media no presence of SCC was observed.
  • The values of %RA were in a range of 79.21–89.2.
  • The oxide layer was found to be primarily Fe2O3.
  • Fe2O3 retards the anodic dissolution and does not allow pitting.
  • The X-70 microalloyed steel studied is an excellent candidate for its use as a pipe manufacturing material for use in the transport and storage of bio-ethanol.
  • To increase the understanding the SCC immunity of this microalloyed steel, further research is required, including an in-depth electrochemical analysis, as well as a more exhaustive analysis of the resulting oxide.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.A.S.B. and A.T.; methodology, A.d.P. and J.C.V.; validation, H.V.; formal analysis, A.d.P.; investigation, A.d.P.; resources, S.A.S.B.; data curation, J.G.G.R. And A.F.; writing—original draft preparation, A.d.P.; writing—review and editing, A.d.P. and J.C.V.; supervision, S.A.S.B.; project administration, S.A.S.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by CONACyT, grant number 434894.

Acknowledgments

We want to thank René Guardian Tapia and Ivan Puente Lee for the support in providing the SEM images.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, G.A.; Cheng, Y.F. On the fundamentals of electrochemical corrosion of X65 steel in CO2-containing formation water in the presence of acetic acid in petroleum production. Corros. Sci. 2009, 51, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Balat, M.; Balat, H. Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel. Appl. Energy 2009, 86, 2273–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Blottnitz, H.; AnnCurran, M. A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2007, 15, 607–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Joseph, O.O.; Loto, C.A.; Sivaprasad, S.; Ajayi, J.A.; Tarafder, S. Role of Chloride in the Corrosion and Fracture Behavior of Micro-Alloyed Steel in E80 Simulated Fuel Grade Ethanol Environment. Materials 2016, 9, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Singh, R. Ethanol corrosion in pipelines. Mater. Perform. 2009, 48, 53–55. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sridhar, N. Study examines ethanol pipelines for cracking potential. Mater. Perform. 2007, 46, 18. [Google Scholar]
  7. Canterle, J.O.B.; Moraes, P.M.; Strohaecker, T.R.; Kwietniewski, C.E.F.; Pimenta, G.S.; Baptista, I.P. Evaluation of the Steel API X70 Embrittlement in Different Ethanol Environments. In Proceedings of the Corrosion 2016, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6–10 March 2016; NACE Intnational: Houston, TX, USA, 2016; pp. 6–10. [Google Scholar]
  8. Reynolds, R.E. Coming to Hawaii-Gasolines Ethanol Blends; Downstream Alternatives Inc.: South Bend, IN, USA, 2007; p. 42. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cuddy, J.L. The effect of Microalloy Concentration on the Recrystallization of Austenite During Hot Deformation. In Thermomechanical Processing of Microalloyed Austenite; AIME: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1981; pp. 129–140. [Google Scholar]
  10. Burgmann, F.A.; Xie, Y.; Cairney, J.M.; Ringer, S.P.; Killmore, C.R.; Barbaro, F.J.; Williams, J.G. The effect of niobium additions on ferrite formation in Castrip® steel. Mater. Forum 2008, 32, 9–12. [Google Scholar]
  11. Das, A.K. The Present and the Future of Line Pipe Steels for Petroleum Industry. Mater. Manuf. Processes 2010, 25, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Baena, L.M.; Gomez, M.; Calderon, J.A. Aggressiveness of a 20% Bioethanol-80% gasoline mixture on autoparts: I behavior of metallic materials and evaluation of their electrochemical properties. Fuel 2012, 95, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. API Bulletin 939-E. Identification, Repair and Mitigation of Cracking of Steel Equipment in Ethanol Service, 2nd ed.; API: Washington, DC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  14. Beavers, J.A.; Gui, F.; Sridhar, N. Effects of environmental and metallurgical factors on the stress corrosion cracking of carbon steel in fuel-grade ethanol. Corrosion 2011, 67, 025005-1–025005-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sridhar, N.; Price, K.; Buckingham, J.; Dante, J. Stress Corrosion Cracking of Carbon Steel in Ethanol. Corros. Eng. 2006, 62, 687–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gui, F.; Sridhar, N.; Beavers, J.A. Localized Corrosion of Carbon Steel and Its Implications on the Mechanism and Inhibition of Stress Corrosion Cracking in Fuel-Grade Ethanol. Corrosion 2010, 66, 125001–125001-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Samusawa, I.; Shiotani, K. Steel Material Having Excellent Alcohol-Induced Pitting Corosion Resistance and Alcohol-Induced SCC Resistance. U.S. Patent 10,532 B2, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  18. Samusawa, I.; Shiotani, K. Development of carbon steel for pipe resistant to stress corrosion cracking in fuel grade Ethanol. In Proceedings of the Corrosion 2016, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6–10 March 2016; NACE International: Houston, TX, USA, 2016; p. 7173. [Google Scholar]
  19. Samusawa, I.; Shiotani, K. Influence and role of ethanol minor constituents of fuel grade ethanol on corrosion behavior of carbon steel. Corros. Sci. 2015, 90, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. E 8M Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2012.
  21. ASTM G129-00. Standard Practice for Slow Strain Rate Testing to Evaluate the Susceptibility of Metallic Materials to Environmentally Assisted Cracking; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  22. Aaronson, L.; Abraham, H.I.; Adsit, N.R.; Allen, S.M.; Ambalal, P. ASM Handbook Metallography and Microstructures; ASM International: Cleveland, OH, USA, 2004; Volume 9. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ping, Z. Microstructure and mechanical properties in isothermal tempering of high Co-Ni secondary hardening ultrahigh strength steel. J. Iron Steel Res., Int. 2007, 14, 292–295. [Google Scholar]
  24. Park, J.; Lee, Y.K. Nb(C,N) precipitation kinetics in the bainite region of a low-carbon Nb-microalloyed steel. Scr. Mater. 2007, 57, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cao, L.; Frankela, G.S.; Sridhar, N. Effect of chloride on stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of carbon steel in simulated fuel grade ethanol. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 104, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Youngju, K.; Jaeki, K.; Yooin, J.; Namsub, W.; Sangshik, K. Through-thickness SCC susceptibility of 2024-T351 and 7050-T7451 extrudates in 3.5% NaCl solution. Metals Mater. Int. 2013, 19, 19–25. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zucchi, F.; Trabanelli, G.; Grassi, V. Stress corrosion cracking of 13% Cr martensitic steels in sodium chloride solutions in the presence of thiosulphate. Mater. Corros. 2000, 51, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Leinonen, H.; Pohjanne, P.; Saukkonen, T.; Schildt, T. Effect of Selective Dissolution on Stress Corrosion Cracking Susceptibility of Austenitic and Duplex Stainless Steels in Alkaline Solutions. In Proceedings of the NACE, Corrosion Conference & Expo, Houston, TX, USA, 13–17 March 2011. [Google Scholar]
  29. Giorgetti, V.; Santos, E.A.; Marcomini, J.B.; Sordi, V.L. Stress corrosion cracking and fatigue crack growth of an API 5L X70 welded joint in an ethanol environment. Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 2019, 169, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, C.Y.; Yen, H.W.; Kao, F.H. Precipitation hardening of high-strength low-alloy steels by nanometer-sized carbides. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2009, 499, 162–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Katsumata, M.; Machida, M.; Kaji, H. Recrystallization of Austenite in High-Temperature Hot-Rolling of Niobium Bearing Steels. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Thermomechanical Austenite, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 17–19 August 1981; pp. 17–19. [Google Scholar]
  32. Breitenbach, J.O.; Renck, T.S.; Moraes, P.M.; Kwietniewski, C.E.F.; Strohaecker, T.R.; Pimenta, G.S.; Baptista, I.P. Evaluation of stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of the API 5L X70 steel in corn and sugar cane ethanol environments. In Proceedings of the ASME 34th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, St. John’s, NL, Canada, 31 May–5 June 2015. [Google Scholar]
  33. Lu, B.T.; Chen, Z.K.; Luo, J.L.; Patchett, B.M.; Xu, Z.H. Pitting and stress corrosion cracking behavior in welded austenitic stainless steel. Electrochim. Acta 2005, 50, 1391–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Aging treatments diagram.
Figure 1. Aging treatments diagram.
Energies 13 03277 g001
Figure 2. Geometry and dimensions of the tension specimen according to ASTM E8 Standards [20].
Figure 2. Geometry and dimensions of the tension specimen according to ASTM E8 Standards [20].
Energies 13 03277 g002
Figure 3. Geometry and dimensions of the tensile specimen for Slow Strain Rate Test (SSRT).
Figure 3. Geometry and dimensions of the tensile specimen for Slow Strain Rate Test (SSRT).
Energies 13 03277 g003
Figure 4. Schematic of the Nylamid cell.
Figure 4. Schematic of the Nylamid cell.
Energies 13 03277 g004
Figure 5. X-70 steel microstructures; (a) as-received, (b) treated at 600 °C, 30 min. (c) Treated at 600 °C, 1 h.
Figure 5. X-70 steel microstructures; (a) as-received, (b) treated at 600 °C, 30 min. (c) Treated at 600 °C, 1 h.
Energies 13 03277 g005
Figure 6. API X70 TEM micrographs: (a) as received pipeline steel TEM micrograph showing precipitation level, (b) 1 h aged steel specimen showing an increasing number and homogeneous precipitation distribution.
Figure 6. API X70 TEM micrographs: (a) as received pipeline steel TEM micrograph showing precipitation level, (b) 1 h aged steel specimen showing an increasing number and homogeneous precipitation distribution.
Energies 13 03277 g006
Figure 7. Strain–stress curve for different ageing treatment times of API X-70 steel.
Figure 7. Strain–stress curve for different ageing treatment times of API X-70 steel.
Energies 13 03277 g007
Figure 8. %RA corresponding to the SSRT.
Figure 8. %RA corresponding to the SSRT.
Energies 13 03277 g008
Figure 9. Fractographies of the SSRT tests taken at the edge of the fracture. (a) As-received in air, (b) as-received in bio-ethanol, (c) as-receives in E-50, (d) 30 min aged in bio-ethanol, (e) 30 min aged in E-50, (f) 1 h aged in bio-ethanol, (g) 1 h aged in E-50, (h) as-received in 1% H2O 10NaCl bio-ethanol, (i) as-received in 3% H2O 10NaCl bio-ethanol, (j) as-received in 5% H2O 10NaCl bio-ethanol, (k) As receives n 5% H2O 32NaCl bio-ethanol.
Figure 9. Fractographies of the SSRT tests taken at the edge of the fracture. (a) As-received in air, (b) as-received in bio-ethanol, (c) as-receives in E-50, (d) 30 min aged in bio-ethanol, (e) 30 min aged in E-50, (f) 1 h aged in bio-ethanol, (g) 1 h aged in E-50, (h) as-received in 1% H2O 10NaCl bio-ethanol, (i) as-received in 3% H2O 10NaCl bio-ethanol, (j) as-received in 5% H2O 10NaCl bio-ethanol, (k) As receives n 5% H2O 32NaCl bio-ethanol.
Energies 13 03277 g009
Table 1. Different corrosive media.
Table 1. Different corrosive media.
Corrosive MediaComposition
Bio-ethanolOnli Bio-ethanol
E-5050% Bio-ethanol–50% Gasoline
Modified bio-ethanolBio-ethanol with 1% H2O 10 mg/L NaCl
Modified bio-ethanolBio-ethanol with 3% H2O 10 mg/L NaCl
Modified bio-ethanolBio-ethanol with 5% H2O 10 mg/L NaCl
Modified bio-ethanol5% H2O 32 mg/L NaCl
Table 2. Chemical composition of X-70 steel.
Table 2. Chemical composition of X-70 steel.
CSiMnCrMoNiCuNbTiAl
0.0390.0111.470.0240.0350.1430.2760.0860.0110.083
Table 3. Parameters of the tensile specimens.
Table 3. Parameters of the tensile specimens.
Dimensions
Width6 mm
Thickness6 mm
Radius of fillet1.5 mm
Overall length100 mm
Length of reduced section32 mm
Length of grip section30 mm
Width of grip section10 mm
Table 4. Parameters of the SSRT specimens.
Table 4. Parameters of the SSRT specimens.
Dimensions
Diameter of reduced section3.5 mm
Radius of fillet1.5 mm
Overall length85 mm
Length of reduced section22.5 mm
Length of grip section30 mm
Diameter of grip section5 mm
Table 5. Acicular ferrite and upper bainite volume fraction of the microalloyed steel in the as-received condition and heat treated.
Table 5. Acicular ferrite and upper bainite volume fraction of the microalloyed steel in the as-received condition and heat treated.
Steel ConditionAcicular Ferrite Fraction (%)Upper Bainite Fraction (%)
As-received5941
30 min aged6436
1 h aged6535
Table 6. Results of the tension test for diffeent ageing treatment times of API X-70 steel.
Table 6. Results of the tension test for diffeent ageing treatment times of API X-70 steel.
σy MPaUTS MPaσs MPaε (%)
As received541573.3257.616.1
30 min.543595.833215.97221.43
1 h600.1654.52247.03422.16
Table 7. SSRT test results.
Table 7. SSRT test results.
Ai (mm)Af (mm)%RA
As received in air9.621.2587.01
As received bio-ethanol9.621.7881.50
As received E-509.621.2587.01
30 min bio-ethanol9.621.5683.78
30 min E-509.621.683.37
1 h bio-ethanol9.621.683.37
1 h E-509.62279.21
As received 1% H2O 10NaCl9.621.2587.01
As received 3% H2O 10NaCl9.621.03989.2
As received 5% H2O 10NaCl9.621.5683.78
As received 5% H2O 32NaCl9.621.3186.38
Table 8. X-ray fluorescence data.
Table 8. X-ray fluorescence data.
1% H2O
10 mg/L NaCl
1% H2O
32 mg/L NaCl
3% H2O
10 mg/L NaCl
3% H2O
32 mg/L NaCl
5% H2O
10 mg/L NaCl
5% H2O
32 mg/L NaCl
FormulaConcentration
Fe2O386.43%89.39%93.06%79.33%80.38%85.35%
Na2O4.83%3.80%1.49%9.01%7.55%3.21%
Cl4.72%3.47%1.72%6.30%6.13%5.99%
P2O51.29%0%1.25%1.87%1.79%1.96%
MnO1.18%1.26%1.33%1.22%1.31%1.32%

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

del Pozo, A.; Torres, A.; Villalobos, J.C.; Villanueva, H.; Fragiel, A.; Gonzalez Rodriguez, J.G.; Serna Barquera, S.A. Ethanolic Media Effect on the Susceptibility to Stress Corrosion Cracking in an X-70 Microalloyed Steel with Different Aging Treatments. Energies 2020, 13, 3277. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123277

AMA Style

del Pozo A, Torres A, Villalobos JC, Villanueva H, Fragiel A, Gonzalez Rodriguez JG, Serna Barquera SA. Ethanolic Media Effect on the Susceptibility to Stress Corrosion Cracking in an X-70 Microalloyed Steel with Different Aging Treatments. Energies. 2020; 13(12):3277. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123277

Chicago/Turabian Style

del Pozo, Adrian, Alvaro Torres, Julio César Villalobos, Heriberto Villanueva, Amilkar Fragiel, Jose Gonzalo Gonzalez Rodriguez, and Sergio Alonso Serna Barquera. 2020. "Ethanolic Media Effect on the Susceptibility to Stress Corrosion Cracking in an X-70 Microalloyed Steel with Different Aging Treatments" Energies 13, no. 12: 3277. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123277

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop