Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of a Modified Equivalent Fuel-Consumption Minimization Strategy Considering Engine Start Frequency and Battery Parameters for a Plugin Hybrid Two-Wheeler
Next Article in Special Issue
Elastic and Frictional Properties of Fault Zones in Reservoir-Scale Hydro-Mechanical Models—A Sensitivity Study
Previous Article in Journal
Probabilistic Microgrid Energy Management with Interval Predictions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analyzing the Validity of Brazilian Testing Using Digital Image Correlation and Numerical Simulation Techniques
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Use of Nanomaterials in Shaping the Properties of Cement Slurries Used in Drilling

Division of Hydrocarbon Production Engineering, Oil and Gas Institute–National Research Institute, ul. Lubicz 25A, 31-503 Krakow, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2020, 13(12), 3121; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123121
Submission received: 14 April 2020 / Revised: 9 June 2020 / Accepted: 12 June 2020 / Published: 16 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Petroleum Geomechanics)

Abstract

:
For several decades, constant research has been performed in the world in order to obtain more durable, tighter, or less environmentally harmful binding materials which could be used to seal casing strings in boreholes. There is an increasing search for innovative solutions allowing the production of the highest possible class of binding cements. Since the beginning of the 21st century, one thing which has become synonymous with development is nanotechnology—a dynamically growing branch of science involving both the design, production, and testing of structures with the size of billionths of a metre. Among other things, a set cement stone is made of the grains of hydrated calcium silicates and calcium aluminates, between which there are pore spaces. Fine grains of nanoparticles can successfully settle inside these spaces, causing a decrease in the porosity and permeability of cement matrix. The paper presents the results of laboratory tests performed for formulas of cement slurries containing between 0.5% and 1% of nanosilica, between 1% and 3% of nanosized alumina and approximately 0.1% of carbon nanotubes. The resulting slurries had a density of approximately 1830–1920 kg/m3 and zero water settling. The thickening times of slurries were selected in accordance with the given geological and technical conditions. Early compressive strength amounting to 3.5 MPa (based on a test using an ultrasound cement analyser) was achieved by slurries after times between approximately 7 and 14 h. Upon setting of samples, cement stones produced from slurries featured a very low share of capillary pores. After 28 days of hydration, the compressive strength of the resulting cement stones took on very high values, reaching even up to 50 MPa. Photographs of cement stones containing nanomaterials (taken by means of scanning microscopy) are a confirmation of the exceptionally compact microstructure of the resulting samples.

1. Introduction

Nanotechnology is listed as a field of science focused among other things on testing, designing and producing components of very small sizes. These components have grain sizes of several dozen nanometres, which allows them to constitute a basis for products with specific technological properties. The possibilities of using the so-called nanomaterials, i.e., materials with particle dimensions, pore dimensions, or film thickness ranging between 1 and 100 nm, are very wide, and due to the intense development of science in this field, the early decades of the 21st century have been described as the beginning of the era of nanotechnology.
Over recent years, the development of technologies for perfecting cement compositions proceeded primarily via the use of materials of decreasing sizes [1,2]. Reduction in the grain sizes of the used components took place during specific stages of the development and production of cement, e.g., the grain diameter of ground sand amounts to approximately 0.04–0.05 mm (i.e., approximately 40,000–50,000 nm), with 150–200 nm for silica dust, while for nanosilica, nanosized alumina, or carbon nanotubes (the smallest dimension) it amounts to approximately 10–20 nm. Therefore, the use of nanosilica, nanosized alumina or carbon nanotubes in the composition of cement slurry is a considerable step in the technological development of this branch of industry [3,4,5,6]. Nanoparticles (including n-SiO2 and n-Al2O3 or carbon nanotubes) fill empty spaces between cement grains, resulting in the closure of pore channels in the cement matrix [7,8,9]. Moreover, properly dispersed nanoparticles cause the hydration of cement slurry to accelerate and favour the generation of small crystals and small homogeneous aggregates of the C-S-H phase—the main building block of cement matrix—responsible for one of the most important parameters of the slurry, which is its mechanical strength. In addition, nanoparticles participate in pozzolanic reactions or accelerate them, due to which some of the chemically unstable portlandite Ca(OH)2 is “used up” in cement during setting, and “additional” gel of the C-S-H phase is created, reinforcing the skeleton of cement matrix [9,10]. Further positive features of nanoparticles include improving the structure of contact with cement grains, which results in stronger binding and limiting the number of possible fractures.
Cement products containing nanocomponents are characterised by being harder, stronger, or having much smoother surfaces compared to products made of conventional cements. Even small amounts of nanomaterials used as additions to cement slurry can cause thickening of the crystalline structure of cement formula, reduce the size of pores and their number, and thus noticeably improve the technological parameters of the resulting product. This is why a number of scientific centres in the world have begun research on the use of nanotechnology, e.g., in cementing operations performed when sealing petroleum wells [3,11,12].
Very often, high temperatures and pressures prevalent in a borehole require the use of particularly resistant cement slurries, containing technologically advanced additives, helping achieve proper isolation between zones. Due to the frequent adoption of numerous solutions in drilling, which have been used, e.g., in construction practice, it can be presumed that in the coming years nanomaterials will be found useful when designing cement slurries for sealing the casing strings of boreholes.
In the literature [13,14], there are provided examples of using nanosilica or nanosized alumina, as well as carbon nanotubes, which considerably influence an increase in the compressive strength, along with the durability and tightness of the cement matrix. Even at temperatures of 25 °C cement samples with nano-SiO2 and nano-Al2O3 achieved high compressive strength, as high as 30 MPa after 2 days and almost 50 MPa after 28 days [15]. Set cement slurries with nanosilica had low porosity and their pore distribution were characterized by a small number of pores with diameters greater than 100 nm, in the range 1.3–2.5%, which prove their compact structure and low permeability. Moreover they exhibited low gas permeability [16]. The experimental results showed that the compressive and flexural strengths measured at the 7th day and 28th day of the cement mortars mixed with the nano-particles were higher than that of a plain cement mortar [7]. Porosity and permeability significantly were declined by 33.3% and 99%, respectively, and compressive strength grew from 1486 psi to 3801 psi [17]. Research indicates that, apart from improving the mechanical properties of cement stones, the addition of nanosilica to a certain degree also influences a decrease in the filtration of liquid cement slurry.

1.1. Nanosilica (n-SiO2) in Cement Slurry Technology

The compressive and flexural strength of cement slurry with an addition of n-SiO2 proves to be higher than the strength of conventional cement slurry with a similar water–cement ratio [17,18,19]. Apart from an increase in strength, the addition of nanoparticles also has a positive impact on the distribution of stresses in the set cement stone. Cement is known to be a porous material with a pore size from several nanometres to several micrometres. These pores are filled primarily with an alkaline solution of calcium dissolved in water. This is why environmental conditions characterised by lower pH disrupt the balance and are disadvantageous for concrete. Not only does research conducted in scientific centres for samples in which nanosilica has been used as an addition to the slurry indicate its impact on an increase in the average length of the C-S-H gel chain, but also the fact that it causes the generation of a high stiffness phase of this gel, replacing its low stiffness phase, which considerably contributes to an increase in the strength of the created cement stone.
Cement stone matrix is known to consist mainly of the grains of hydrated gel of calcium silicates and the crystals of hydrated products of hydration, between which there are nanopores and capillary pores. It is an ideal place for nanoparticles to thicken the structure of cement slurry by filling voids present in the matrix. However, due to their high surface energy, nanoparticles can be easily combined into aggregates, causing considerable difficulties in their dispersion (especially for larger amounts). In this case, the creation of aggregates of nanoparticles causes the generation of empty spaces which can affect the weakening of the mechanical properties of cement slurries. To prevent this, it is necessary to properly homogenise batched water containing nanocomponents, e.g., by means of sonicators or high-speed agitators [20]. The most preferable strength parameters for cement stones modified with carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were achieved by dispersing CNTs using sonication [21,22,23,24]. Ultrasound sonicators convert mains voltage into mechanical vibrations. These mechanical vibrations are transferred into a liquid by a probe, creating a pressure wave. This action causes the generation and rapid collapse of microscopic bubbles. This phenomenon, defined as cavitation, creates millions of shock waves, increasing the temperature of the liquid [25]. The cavitational collapse lasts only several microseconds. Although the amount of energy released by each individual bubble is low, the cumulative effect causes the release of extremely high energy levels, causing the dispersion of objects and surfaces inside the cavitation area.

1.2. Nanosized Alumina (n-Al2O3) in Cement Slurry Technology

The use of nanosized alumina (n-Al2O3) in cement slurries has been described by the authors of [8,26]. After the performance of laboratory analyses, they pointed out the great advantages of such slurries, paying particular attention to an improvement in mechanical strength, the compressive strength of composite increased by 30% at 7 days [8]. The authors have also noticed that particles of nanosized alumina did not have a clear impact on the density of cement slurries, and after being added to the formula they caused an acceleration of its binding time. After using nanosized alumina, the authors also observed an increase in the viscosity and yield point of slurry, as well as a decrease in water settling (free water) in the slurry (which constitutes a particular advantage when sealing boreholes). In addition, Al2O3 nanoparticles are able to act as nanofillers and recover the pore structure of the specimens by decreasing harmful pores [9]. Studies performed by the abovementioned authors involved mainly tests performed under conditions defined by the API quality standard, without taking into account in a broader scope the introduction of additives and admixtures necessary to prepare a proper cement formula.

1.3. Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs) in Cement Slurry Technology

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have excellent mechanical properties, and this is why in combination with ordinary Portland cement they can create nanocomposites harder than traditional reinforcing materials (e.g., glass fibres or carbon fibres) [27]. The addition of CNTs leads to an increase in the number of hydrate crystals generated in cement slurry and a change in their morphological structure [10]. The research performed so far proves that the addition of carbon nanotubes can increase the strength of cement stone [28,29]. It was concluded that a small amount of effectively dispersed CNTs can increase flexural strength considerably. The addition of short, multi-walled CNTs in an amount of 0.08% caused an increase in flexural strength by 35% and an increase in Young’s modulus [21,30]. Even better results were produced for compressive strength. The addition of CNTs in an amount of 1.0% in relation to the mass of dry cement led to an increase in compressive strength to a value of 51.8 MPa after 28 days of hydration [8,10,31]. Li et al. [32,33] obtained a 25% increase in flexural strength and a 19% increase in compressive strength. Cwirzen et al. [34] reported that the 50% increase in compressive strength of cement slurry specimens using multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) that were 0.045–0.15% of the cement weight. Improved mechanical properties of cement slurry have been achieved up on addition of 0.1% CNTs [35,36]. Paula et al. [37] reported that an average 15% gain was achieved in tensile strength at ages of 48 h and 7 days for 0.1% CNTs bwoc. Other tests concluded that the addition of nanotubes to cement composites caused a drop in compressive strength [38]. A decline in the mechanical properties has been reached by the addition of 0.15% CNTs [35]. Modification of cement slurry by means of the addition of CNTs in an amount of 0.5% (bwoc) caused a drop in compressive strength by approximately 80% [20]. The increase in the additive concentration causes reduced compressive strength because of unsuitable dispersion of nanoparticles in the cement stone matrix [39]. The varying impact of CNT additions on the mechanical properties of cement materials can be probably explained by various choices regarding the type and number of CNTs and methods for dispersing nanotubes.

1.4. The Mechanism of Improving the Degree of Compactness of Cement Matrix Microstructure

Generally, the mechanism of improving the degree of compactness of cement matrix microstructure and an increase in the strength of cement stones can be presented as follows. Small numbers of nanoparticles introduced into slurry are uniformly dispersed in it. Cement hydration products begin their deposition on nanoparticles due to their high surface energy. During the hydration process, generation of conglomerates containing nanoparticles as nuclei occurs in the slurry. Nanoparticles dispersed in cement slurry will additionally support and accelerate the hydration of cement due to their high reactivity. By achieving uniform dispersion of nanoparticles, it is possible to obtain a microstructure with uniformly dispersed conglomerates [1,40,41].
The following possible ways of increasing the strength of cement stone can be identified:
  • nanoparticles act as nuclei/nucleons strongly bound with cement hydrates, thus favouring the hydration of cement;
  • nanoparticles can prevent the growth of large crystals, such as portlandite-Ca(OH)2;
  • nanoparticles and small agglomerates can fill pores in cement stone (similar to silica dust), thus increasing its mechanical strength.
It is assumed that these mechanisms play a leading role in improving the compressive strength of samples of set cement slurries.
During the preparation of cement slurries containing an addition of nanoparticles, it is extremely important to select a proper water–cement ratio w/c [7]. Because of the w/c ratio being too low, the hydration of cement grains will be incomplete and their considerable part can remain unhydrated. The nanocomponents will then have limited possibilities of fitting into porous spaces. Such a situation can cause the generation of agglomerates, which cause a considerable increase in viscosity of the slurry. On the other hand, with the w/c ratio being too high, the porosity of cement matrix will increase. Some of the water will remain unused and large capillary pores will be created in spaces between grains, which will not be filled with nanoparticles.

1.5. The Purpose of the Study

The cited literature presents the recipes of cement slurries with a limited number of additives modifying the properties of the slurries (e.g., only a liquefying agent was used). These slurries cannot be used in borehole conditions. The Oil and Gas Institute–National Research Institute also attempted the development of innovative cement slurries enriched by an addition of nanoparticles of silica (n-SiO2), nanosized alumina (n-Al2O3) and carbon nanotubes (CNTs), which in the coming years can be used in the process of sealing the casing strings of boreholes at depths from several hundred to approximately two thousand metres, where bottom temperatures are approximately 25–60 °C [15,16,17,18,42,43]. Cement slurries presented in the article contain materials commonly used by cementing services for sealing casing strings (liquefying additive, anti-filtration additive, defoamer, setting time additive). The purpose of the study was to propose innovative formulations for cement slurries with nanocomponents, with improved technological properties for industrial applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

CEM I 42.5R Portland cement and Class G drilling cement was used to make the slurries. Table 1 shows the chemical characteristic of the cement used in these studies.
The materials used in the tests are commonly used by European cementing services for sealing casing strings. Table 2 provides basic information on the measure taken during laboratory tests.
The tests used powdered n-SiO2. Silicon Oxide Nanoparticles/Nanopowder (SiO2, diameter 20–30 nm: 99.5%), with a specific surface area SSA of: 200–600 m2/g (Figure 1a,b).
With respect to nanosized alumina n-Al2O3, Aluminium Oxide Nanopowder, a product was used in which 99% of particles had diameters of approximately 20–30 nm. Figure 2a,b present n-Al2O3 used during the tests and its structure.
The tests used multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) with an external diameter of 10–20 nm and a length of 10–30 μm, and with purity above 95%, with a specific surface area of: 233 m2/g and bulk density 0.22 g/cm3 Figure 3a,b present MWCNTs used during the tests.

2.2. Experimental Procedures and Slurry Preparation

The laboratory tests and examinations of cement slurries containing nanocomponents were performed in the Oil and Gas Institute–National Research Institute (INiG–PIB) according to the following standards: Oil and gas industry–Cements and materials for well cementing–Part 1: Specification (ISO 10426-1:2009) and Oil and gas industry–Cements and materials for well cementing–Part 2: Testing of well cements (ISO 10426-2:2003) [47,48].
Slurries were prepared at ambient temperature. The increase in compressive strength and thickening time was studied in conditions similar to those prevailing in the wells. All nanomaterials were added to batched water and dispersed by means of the Sonics VC505 sonicator (using a homogenisation time of 3 min). Under laboratory conditions, 200 mL of mixing water was measured and the appropriate amount of nanocomponents were added to it. To the nanocomponent suspension prepared as described, the remaining amount of mixing water was added to obtain the required w/c ratio and then particular additives were introduced in the order provided in the tables presenting the compositions of the tested cement slurries. After thorough mixing of all additives and admixtures, a suitable type of cement was added and homogenised for 30 min at 1800 rpm.
In field conditions (at the drill site), it is possible to use a dispersed suspension of nanomaterials delivered in containers.
Screening tests were carried out for different w/c ratios. In case of w/c higher than 0.5, clear sedimentation was observed (cement grains settling and water phase formation at the top of specimens). W/c ratios below 0.44 caused a very clear increase in the density of the slurry (plastic viscosities were very high). Therefore, in all the tested slurries, the w/c ratio was selected individually based on the amount of nanomaterials used. So: the w/c ratio was between 0.44 and 0.49. The dosage of admixtures to slurries was based on safety data sheets of particular chemical substances. Typical amounts of chemical substances were used. The main criterion in determining the compositions was to obtain optimal technological parameters of the final formulation by the slurries. Attempts have been made to prepare cement slurries without free water, with a typical density of about 1.80–1.95 g/cm3. Attention was paid to the rheological parameters in order to enable efficient cementing of casing strings. Thickening times have been adjusted in such a way as to ensure safe pumping of the cement slurry into the annular space in the wellbore, while maintaining a safety margin (in case of any unforeseen situations). The thickening times were therefore selected according to the temperature at the bottom of the wellbore, which depends to a large extent on the final depth to which the wellbore is drilled.
In the course of the task, a number of parameters of cement slurries were determined, namely:

2.2.1. Slurry Density

Determination of the cement slurry density–performed using a Baroid mud balance at 22 °C and atmospheric pressure. The cement slurry was poured into the weighing cup, covered with a lid, and the excess slurry flowing out through the opening was rinsed and the cup was wiped dry. The density reading was made at the horizontal position of the graduated arm.

2.2.2. Slurry Filtration

Filtration measurement was carried out using a filter press. The cement slurry was poured into a vessel in which it was mixed during the increase in pressure and temperature. After the mixing and heating cycle was completed, the vessel was turned without transferring the slurry. During the test, the slurry was subjected to a differential pressure of 7 MPa. The filtrate was collected in the measuring cylinder for 30 min, and the slurry filtration was calculated based on its quantity.

2.2.3. Rheological Properties

Rheological properties were measured using a viscometer. The viscometer is used to directly determine the relationship between the shear rate of a liquid and the occurring shear stress, enabling the calculation of plastic viscosity, apparent viscosity, and yield stress, and the measurement of structural strength. After mixing, the tested cement slurry sample was poured into a measuring vessel, then a rotating cylinder was submerged and readings were taken at specific speeds. Plastic viscosity, yield stress and structural strength were calculated from the formulas given in PN-EN ISO 10426-2:2003 [48].

2.2.4. Thickening Time

A pressurised consistometer was used to determine the thickening time. The prepared cement slurry was placed in the cup of the consistometer, according to the device’s manual. A chart of temperature and consistency changes of the cement slurry was recorded. The thickening start time was determined when the slurry reached the consistency of 30 Bc. The thickening end time (thickening time) was determined when the slurry reached the consistency of 100 Bc.

2.2.5. Free Water

Determination of free water–consisted in measuring the volume of the water solution accumulating above the surface of the slurry. The measurement was performed at 22 °C. 500 cm3 of cement slurry was poured into the measuring cylinder and left for 2 h. After that time, the volume of liquid separated from the slurry was measured and the free water was calculated.

2.2.6. Non-Destructive Compressive Strength Test

Ultrasonic Cement Analyser (UCA) with a SGSM device was used to perform continuous, non-destructive compressive strength tests as a function of the time of cement slurries and stones in HPHT simulated wellbore conditions. The addition of a SGSM device enabled measurements of slurry gelation and determining the so-called TT transition time.

2.2.7. Destructive Compressive Strength Test

Specimens for compressive strength testing using the destructive method were prepared using specially made moulds (2 cm × 2 cm × 10 cm beams) and stored in water baths at appropriate temperature. After 2, 7, 14, and 28 days, the compression strength was measured with a universal testing machine.

2.2.8. Pore Size Distribution and Porosity

Pore distribution in the slurry was measured using the AutoPore IV Model 9500 mercury porosimeter. Glass penetrometers with specimens that are filled with mercury during the test were placed in the device ports. Before testing, the specimens were thoroughly dried in a drying oven (drying time 24 h, temperature 105 °C).
Table 3 presents the testing apparatus used to perform laboratory examinations.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Tests of Slurries and Cement Stones Containing an Addition of n-SiO2

The tests of slurries containing n-SiO2 were performed for conditions prevalent at depths of approximately 1000–2500 metres (dynamic temperatures at the order of 40–60 °C). Preliminary tests involved proper selection of the water–cement ratio (w/c) and the amount of added nanocomponents. As a result of a number of tests, it was concluded that the most preferable results are produced after using a water–cement ratio (w/c) of 0.48 with an n-SiO2 content ranging between 0.5% and 1% in relation to the mass of dry cement. The use of smaller or larger amounts of n-SiO2 was the reason behind the deterioration of the technological parameters of cement slurries. Table 4 presents five compositions of slurries. They included: the base slurry labelled with the symbol I (with no addition of nanocomponents) and containing 0.5% and 1% of n-SiO2, for which the most preferable results were produced. Compositions marked with the symbols II and III were prepared for a temperature of 40 °C and a pressure of 14 MPa, and subsequent formulas marked IV and V were prepared for 60 °C and a pressure of 21 MPa. The formulas of cement slurries were prepared based on tap water. In their composition they contained 3% of potassium chloride and additives to slurries commonly used in drilling, such as: a liquefying additive (plasticiser), a defoamer (an agent putting out foam), an anti-filtration additive (reducing free water from the slurry), and a binding time retardant (a lignosulphonate additive responsible for regulation of the binding process). In order to achieve a proper thickening and binding time, 0.05% of the binding time retardant was used in a temperature of 40 °C, with 0.15% of this agent used in a temperature of 60 °C. The slurries were prepared based on class G drilling cement. The produced test results for slurries under the conditions of HPHT are presented in Table 5. The densities of the tested formulas were 1870 kg/m3, with zero water settling (free water did not occur). The adjustment of the thickening times of slurries proceeded so as to enable safe pumping of slurry into the annular space of the borehole (these times ranged between approximately 3 and approximately 5 h).

3.1.1. Compressive Strength

Tests for formulas were also performed using an ultrasound cement analyser (UCA). As a result of the examinations, it can be noticed that the tested formulas reach an early compressive strength of 3.5 MPa after a time of approximately 8 to 14 h. An early compressive strength value of 3.5 MPa reached by set cement slurry allows the performance of further operations in the borehole. After 48 h, the values of compressive strength reach approximately 25–27 MPa for samples with an addition of 0.5% n-SiO2 and approximately 29–31 MPa for samples with 1% n-SiO2. After 28 days of hydration, compressive strength was tested after preparing and setting cement stone cubes. For samples containing 0.5% n-SiO2, the compressive strength amounted to approximately 35 MPa. On the other hand, the strength of samples containing 1% n-SiO2 was approximately 38 MPa. Dębińska [18] said that with the increase in the amount of nanosilica, the compressive strength increased. The highest results were obtained for concentrations at the level of 1.5%. The addition n-SiO2 in amount of 0.1% caused an increase in compressive strength by 60% [16].

3.1.2. Porosity and Pore Size Distribution

One should also point out the highly advantageous parameters of microstructure generated from cement slurries containing nanocomponents. The share of pores with diameters above 10,000 nm in the whole cement stone matrix was as low as approximately 2%, while the share of pores with diameters below 100 nm was as high as approximately 95–98%. This fact proves that cement matrix thickened by n-SiO2 is exceptionally tight. Dębińska [16] and Rzepka and Kędzierski [43] reported that obtained set cement slurries had low porosity and their pore distribution were characterized by a small number of pores with diameters greater than 100 nm, in the range 1.3–2.5%, which prove their compact structure. It is difficult to directly compare parameters produced for slurries described above to parameters of conventional slurries, mainly because the introduction of an addition of nanoparticles entails a change in the composition of the formula (including a change in the water–cement ratio, the amount of the liquefying agent and the anti-filtering agent). Conventional formulas generally have significantly higher water settling compared to slurries with n-SiO2. Similarly to Dębińska [16], it was found that nanosilica reduces the thickening time of slurry with its addition, compared to the conventional cement slurry. Additionally, cement stone generated from conventional slurries has a noticeably lower strength, and its structure is considerably less compact than in slurries containing nanocomponents.

3.1.3. Microstructure

The exceptionally uniform microstructure of samples with n-SiO2 can be confirmed by photographs of set slurry samples taken using scanning microscopy. Figure 4a,b (magnification 1000×) present the average microstructure of conventional slurry, i.e., with no addition of nanocomponents. On these photographs there are visible pores of quite large sizes, which after merging can form channels in the cement mantle and cause possible flow of gas in the annular space of the borehole. Due to the introduction of 1% of nanosilica (n-SiO2) into the sample, the structure of set slurry is considerably thickened (Figure 5a,b). It can be clearly observed that cement matrix modified with n-SiO2 is much more compact compared to a matrix created by conventional slurry (the areas of macropores are not visible in Figure 5a,b). Biricik show that the scanning microscopy (SEM) images after 7 days of curing show condensed packing of cement hydration products. The SEM study of the microstructures between the cement mortar mixed with the nano-particles and the plain cement mortar showed that the nano-SiO2 filled up the pores and reduced CaOH2 compound among the hydrates [7]. Rzepka i Kędzierski [43] reported that the extremely compact microstructure of the samples with nano-SiO2 is confirmed by scanning electron microscope images of cement samples. They show a compact cement matrix with very low permeability. Moreover, set slurry modified by n-SiO2 exhibits very high tightness and low porosity.

3.2. Tests of Slurries and Cement Stones Containing an Addition of n-Al2O3

The performed tests of slurries with an addition of n-Al2O3 focused on formulas which could be useful when sealing boreholes at depths of 2000–2500 metres (having chosen a dynamic temperature of 60 °C at the bottom of the well). The preliminary tests of slurries with nanosized alumina were aimed at proper selection of the water–cement ratio (w/c) and the amount of nanoparticles in batched water. After the performance of trial analyses, it was concluded that the most advantageous results are produced using coefficients of 0.44 (for slurries based on class G drilling cement).
The compositions of cement slurries for which the tests were performed are presented in Table 6. The tests involved four cement slurries. They included: the base slurry labelled with the symbol VI (with no addition of nanocomponents), as well as slurries containing 1%, 3%, and 5% of n-Al2O3 (marked with the symbols VII, VIII, and IX, respectively). All of the tested slurries (similar to compositions with n-SiO2) contained a defoamer, a liquefying additive, and an additive extending the time of thickening and setting. Class G drilling cement also constituted a binding cement.

3.2.1. The Measurements of Liquid Cement Slurries

Table 7 presents the produced test results. The base slurry marked with the symbol VI had a density of 1900 kg/m3. A slight increase in the density of slurries was observed along with an increase in the concentration of nanosized alumina. Hadi et al. [26] stated that the effect of nanosized alumina on density is very small. Slurry VIII with 3% of n-Al2O3 had a density of 1910 kg/m3, while slurry IX with 5% of n-Al2O3 had 1920 kg/m3. The water settling of the base slurry was 0.3%. After the addition of n-Al2O3, the water settling of slurries amounted to zero. An addition of n-Al2O3 into oil well cement gives better results by reducing free water of slurry [26]. An increase in plastic viscosity and yield point was observed following an increase in the amount of n-Al2O3 in slurries. For example, slurry marked with the symbol VI with no addition of nanosized alumina had a viscosity of 87 mPa·s and a the yield point of 3.4 Pa, while after the addition of 3% of n-Al2O3 to the slurry marked with the symbol VIII, viscosity increased up to 151.5 mPa·s and yield point up to 5.5 Pa. According to Hadi [26] an increase concentration in n-Al2O3 resulted in higher plastic viscosity, yield point and gel strength for oil well cement. Under the conditions of HPHT (60 °C, 25 MPa), the thickening times were also tested, i.e., the times needed for the slurries to reach consistencies of 30 Bc and 100 Bc. Shortening of the thickening times along with an increase in the concentration of n-Al2O3 was observed during the tests. Cement slurry marked with the symbol VIII, containing 3% of n-Al2O3, was characterised by optimal parameters in terms of thickening time, for which a consistency of 30 Bc was reached after 2 h 58 min, with 100 Bc after 4 h 3 min. Determination of the parameters of cement stones was commenced upon completion of the measurements of liquid cement slurries.

3.2.2. Compressive Strength

Sample results of tests involving the increase in early strength produced from an ultrasound cement analyser (UCA) for slurry marked with the symbol VIII containing 3% of n-Al2O3 are presented in Figure 6. From the UCA test, it is visible that already after 12 h the strength of cement stone was approximately 21 MPa, and after 24 h it was approximately 25 MPa. At a later time during the test, there was a further increase in compressive strength up to a value of approximately 31 MPa after 48 h. Patil and Deshpande [1] reports that the addition of nano-alumina resulted in achieving early compressive strength even at low temperatures. Li et al. [8] show that the compressive strength of composites increased by 30% at 7 days. The cement stones prepared from cement slurries with nanoparticles were characterized by high values of compressive strength, which was caused by packing of the small size nanoparticles in the pore spaces [15]. The results of early strength tests for all samples examined in a temperature of 60 °C are listed in Table 5 in the final row. All of the tested slurries were also set in an autoclave (in a temperature of 60 °C and a pressure of 25 MPa), followed by the measurements of compressive strength performed for them after 2, 7, 14, and 28 days of deposition. The results are presented graphically in Figure 7. Slurry VIII containing 3% of n-Al2O3 had the highest strength parameters. Its compressive strength after 28 days reached 40 MPa. Additionally, it should be pointed out that slurry IX with a higher (5%) concentration of nanosized alumina had the lowest compressive strength among the tested samples. This fact can be explained by difficulties in the uniform distribution of large amounts of nanoparticles in the slurry and the possible generation of large agglomerates. Therefore, the so-called “nanoscale effect” can be no longer active once the solution has exceeded a certain concentration of nanoparticles.

3.2.3. Microstructure

Attention should also be paid to the highly advantageous parameters of microstructure generated from cement slurries containing nanosized alumina. This is clearly visible in photographs of set slurry samples taken by means of scanning microscopy (SEM). Figure 8a,b (with the respective magnifications of 500× and 1300×) present a typical image of base slurry microstructure not containing an addition of nanosized alumina. In there, pores with quite large dimensions can be observed, which when merged with each other can generate channels in the set cement stone, due to which possible flow of gas in the annular space of the borehole can take place upon the completion of the cementing process. After applying a modification which used 3% of nanosized alumina (n-Al2O3), the structure of the cement stone was thickened considerably. The pores were also filled with nanoparticles (Figure 9a,b: 9a—magnification 500× and 9b—magnification 1300×). Therefore, it can be seen that cement matrix modified with nanocomponents is exceptionally compact and no macropore areas are observed in it. Therefore, cement stone modified by an addition of n-Al2O3 exhibits very high tightness. Porosity of cement decreased by incorporating nano-alumina into mortars [8].

3.3. Tests of Slurries and Cement Stones Containing an Addition of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWCNTs)

The tests of cement slurries containing multi-walled carbon nanotubes were performed in temperatures of 25–30 °C. Preliminary tests involved determination of the compositions of base slurries, the proper water–cement ratio (w/c) and the number of used carbon nanotubes. Upon performing a number of tests, it was concluded that the most preferable results are produced with a water–cement ratio of 0.45–0.49 and with MWCNT contents amounting to 0.1% and 0.2% in relation to dry cement mass. The use of a larger number of carbon nanotubes was the cause of lower values of compressive strength reached by cement stone. Table 8 presents four compositions of cement slurries marked with the symbols: X, XI, XII, XIII. The base slurry was marked with the symbol X (no addition of carbon nanotubes). Formulas labelled XI and XII contained 0.1% of MWCNTs, while slurry XIII contained an addition of multi-walled carbon nanotubes amounting to 0.2%. All prepared slurries were based on tap water. In their composition they contained 3% KCl and a liquefying additive, a defoamer, an anti-filtering additive, an additive accelerating the CaCl2 binding time, and a swelling additive. The prepared slurries were based on Portland cement CEM I 42.5R.

3.3.1. The Measurements of Liquid Cement Slurries

Table 9 presents the results of laboratory tests. The base slurry labelled with the symbol X was characterised by a density of 1860 kg/m3. Slurries XI and XII with an addition of 0.1% of MWCNTs had a density of 1870 kg/m3, while slurry XIII with 0.2% of MWCNTs had a density of 1830 kg/m3. All slurries were characterised by zero water settling. The addition of multi-walled carbon nanotubes caused an increase in plastic viscosity and a drop in the flowability of cement slurries. De Paula et al. [36] show that the addition of CNTs does not alter the rheological behaviour and stability of the cement slurries considering the dispersant and concentrations employed. The thickening times of slurries were tested under simulated well conditions (30 °C, 10 MPa). Slurry marked with the symbol XI containing 0.1% of MWCNTs was characterised by the most advantageous parameters in terms of thickening time, for which a consistency of 30 Bc was reached after 2 h and 44 min, with 100 Bc reached after 4 h and 9 min.

3.3.2. Compressive Strength

Samples for compressive strength tests using a destructive method were made by means of specially prepared moulds (bars with dimensions of 2 cm × 2 cm × 10 cm) and stored in water baths in proper temperature (30 °C). After 2, 7, 14, and 28 days, measurements of compressive strength were performed by means of a strength machine (destructive method). The compressive strength of cement stone generated from base slurry after 28 days amounted to 33.4 MPa. Slurry XII containing 0.1% of MWCNTs had the highest strength parameters. Its compressive strength after 28 days was as high as 50 MPa. Compared to the base sample, a 50% increase in compressive strength was obtained, similar to Cwirzen [34]. Paula et al. [37] reported that with respect to mechanical properties, no difference in compressive strength was found between paste with and without. El-Gamal [35] improved mechanical properties of cement slurries have been achieved up on addition of 0.1% CNTs. The produced results of the compressive strength of samples are presented graphically in Figure 10.

3.3.3. Porosity and Pore Size Distribution

Based on the performed tests, one can notice the positive impact of carbon nanotubes on the microstructure of cement stones with their addition. Cement stones have a compact microstructure with a low share of macropores and they are characterised by low porosity. The share of pores with diameters of 10,000 nm constituted only approximately 1.5% of the total number of pores, while the smallest pores with diameters below 100 nm constituted more than 95% of all pores. It has been reported in the literature that the porosity and pore size distribution results indicated that the presence of MWCNTs reduced micropore size [23]. Figure 11a–d present the distribution of pore sizes in cement stones.

4. Conclusions

Cement slurries with an addition of nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes presented in the paper can be a basis for the development of a wide variety of innovative formulas of slurries intended to seal boreholes with depths between several hundred and approximately two and a half thousand metres, in which it is required to achieve very high tightness of the cement matrix and high strength of the cement mantle.
Upon performing a series of tests, it can be concluded that these components cause an improvement in the parameters of liquid and set cement slurry. Particular attention should be paid to the fact that cement stones produced from slurries containing nanocomponents and carbon nanotubes were characterised by high values of compressive strength, which is caused by the packing of particles with very small sizes in porous spaces.
Based on the produced results it can be concluded that
  • for cement slurries containing approximately 0.5–1% n-SiO2, the most preferable technological parameters were achieved with a w/c ratio of approximately 0.48 (higher or lower amounts of nanocomponents did not influence the improvement of the technological parameters of fresh and set cement slurries);
  • samples containing n-SiO2 had a very low (approximately 2%) share of capillary pores, in which channels could be generated for the flow of reservoir fluids through the cement mantle of the borehole;
  • pores with the smallest dimensions (below 100 nm) constitute a vast majority (above 95%) of the total number of pores present in the cement matrix of samples with n-SiO2, which evidences very low permeability for a reservoir medium;
  • in temperatures from 40 to 60 °C, the thickening times of slurries with an addition of n-SiO2 can be successfully adjusted by means of commonly available retardants;
  • Slurries with n-SiO2 achieved the value of early compressive strength (3.5 MPa) after times between approximately 8 and 14 h. After this period, the cement stone is strong enough to enable the performance of further work in the borehole;
  • after 28 days of hydration, the compressive strength of samples with n-SiO2 took on high values. For samples with an addition of 0.5% of n-SiO2 they amounted to approximately 34–36 MPa, and with an addition of 1% of n-SiO2–approximately 37–39 MPa;
  • for slurries with n-Al2O3 tested in a temperature of 60 °C based on class G drilling cement, very good technological parameters were achieved for samples containing 1% of n-Al2O3 and 3% of n-Al2O3. The optimal water–cement ratio for such slurries amounted to approximately 0.44, and the slurries had densities of approximately 1905–1920 kg/m3;
  • the most important advantage of slurries with n-Al2O3 involved their high mechanical strength (after 28 days often exceeding 35 MPa), fast increase in early mechanical strength (quickly achieving a strength value of 3.5 MPa) and the creation of a compact microstructure with low porosity after setting;
  • elevated (compared to the base slurry) values of compressive strength were also observed in slurries containing n-Al2O3, resulting from the tight packing of nanoparticles with very small sizes in the cement matrix. The microstructure of slurries with nanosized alumina is uniform and characterised by low porosity, as indicated by photographs taken under a scanning microscope;
  • for cement slurries containing an addition of multi-walled carbon nanotubes, the most preferable results were produced with water–cement ratios of 0.45 and 0.47, and the slurries had densities of approximately 1860–1870 kg/m3;
  • the addition of carbon nanotubes caused an increase in the plastic viscosity of slurries,
  • cement stones with an addition of MWCNTs are characterised by low porosities and a low share of macropores; pores with the smallest sizes (below 100 nm) constitute over 97% of the total number of pores;
  • an addition of 0.1% is an optimal amount of multi-walled carbon nanotubes; in the case of a higher amount, the resulting values of compressive strength were lower,
  • the addition of even a small amount of MWCNTs improves the strength parameters of cement stone by densifying its microstructure. For samples with an addition of 0.1% of MWCNTs, after 28 days of hydration the resulting compressive strength was as high as 50.5 MPa.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.R. and M.K.; Formal analysis, M.R. and M.K.; Investigation, M.R. and M.K.; Methodology, M.R. and M.K.; Writing–original draft, M.R. and M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education within statutory funding for Oil and Gas Institute-National Research Institute.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Patil, R.; Deshpande, A. Use of Nanomaterials in Cementing Applications. In Proceedings of the SPE International Oilfield Nanotechnology Conference and Exhibition, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 12–14 June 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Horszczaruk, E.; Mijowska, E.; Cendrowski, K.; Mijowska, S.; Sikora, P. Wpływ nanokrzemionki o zróżnicowanej morfologii na właściwości mechaniczne zapraw cementowych. Cem. Wapno Beton 2013, 1, 24–32. [Google Scholar]
  3. De La Roij, R.; Egyed, C.; Lips, J.P. Nano-Engeneered Oil Well Cement Improves Flexibility and Increases Compressive Sterngth: A Laboratory Study. Soc. Pet. Eng. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kuilla, T.; Bhadra, S.; Yao, D.; Kim, N.H.; Bose, S.; Lee, J.H. Recent advances in graphene based polymer composites. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2010, 35, 1350–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, X.; Qi, Y.; Boey, F.; Zhang, H. Graphene based composites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 666–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nasibulin, A.G.; Koltsiva, T.; Nasibulin, L.I.; Anoshkin, I.V.; Semencha, A.; Tolochko, O.V.; Kauppinen, E.I. A novel approach to composite preparation by direct synthesis of carbon nanomaterial on matrix or filler particles. Acta Mater. 2013, 61, 1862–1871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Li, H.; Xiao, H.; Ou, J. Microstructure of Cement Mortar with Nano-Particles. Compos. Part B Eng. 2004, 35, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, Z.; Wang, H.; He, S.; Lu, Y.; Wang, M. Investigations on the preparation and mechanical properties of the nano-alumina reinforced cement composite. Mater. Lett. 2005, 60, 356–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nazari, A.; Riahi, S. Al2O3 nanoparticles in concrete and different curing media. Energy Build. 2011, 43, 1480–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Al-Saud, T.S.; Bin Hussain, M.A.A.; Batyanovskii, E.I.; Zhdanok, S.A.; Krauklis, A.V.; Samtsou, P.P. Influence of carbon nanomaterials on the properties of cement and concrete. J. Eng. Phys. Thermophys. 2011, 84, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rahman, M.K.; Khan, W.A.; Mahmoud, M.A.; Sarmah, P. MWCNT for Enhancing Mechanical and Thixotropic Properties of Cement for HPHT Applications. Offshore Technol. Conf. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rahman, M.K.; Murtaza, M. Effect of Nanoclay on Mechanical and Rheological Properties of Oil well Cement Slurry under HPHT Environment. Int. Pet. Technol. Conf. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wilk, K.; Kasza, P.; Czupski, M. Zastosowanie nanocieczy jako dodatków wspomagających proces wypierania ropy naftowej. Naft. Gaz 2014, 1, 14–20. [Google Scholar]
  14. Leon, N.; Massana, J.; Alonso, F.; Moragues, A.; Sanchez-Espinosa, A. Effect of Nano-Si2O and Nano-Al2O3 on Cement Mortars for Use in Agriculture and Livestock Production. Available online: www.elsevier.com/locate/issn/15375110 (accessed on 24 January 2019).
  15. Dębińska, E.; Rzepka, M.; Kremieniewski, M. Nanocząsteczki-nowa droga w kształtowaniu parametrów świeżych i stwardniałych zaczynów cementowych. Naft. Gaz 2016, 12, 1084–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dębińska, E. Niekonwencjonalne zaczyny cementowe z dodatkiem nanokrzemionki. Naft. Gaz 2016, 5, 290–300. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ershadi, V.; Ebadi, T. The Effect of Nanosilica on Cement Matrix Permeability in Oil Well to Decrease the Pollution of Receptive Environment. Int. J. Enviromental Sci. Dev. 2011, 2, 128–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Dębińska, E. Wpływ nanokrzemionki na parametry mechaniczne kamienia cementowego. Naft. Gaz 2014, 4, 229–235. [Google Scholar]
  19. Biricik, I.H.; Sarier, N. Comparative study of the characteristics of nano silica-, silica fume-and fly ash-incorporated cement mortars. Mater. Res. 2014, 17, 570–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Musso, S.; Tulliani, J.-M.; Ferro, G.; Tagliaferro, A. Influence of carbon nanotubes structure on the mechanical behavior of cement composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2009, 69, 1985–1990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kosta-Gdoutos, M.S.; Metaxa, Z.S.; Shah, S.P. Multi-scale mechanical and fracture characteristics and early-age strain capacity of high performance carbon nanotube/cement nanocomposites. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2010, 32, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chuah, S.; Pan, Z.; Sanjayan, J.G.; Wang, C.M.; Duan, W.H. Nano reinforced cement and concrete composites and new perspective from graphene oxide. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 73, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hu, Y.; Luo, D.; Li, P.; Li, Q.; Sun, G. Fracture toughness enhancement of cement paste with multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 70, 332–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Luo, J.; Duan, Z.; Li, H. The influence of surfactants on the processing of multi-walled carbon nanotubes in reinforced cement matrix composites. Phys. Status Solidi 2009, 206, 2783–2790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hielscher, T. Ultrasonic Production of Nano-Size Dispersions and Emulsions. In Proceedings of the European Nanosystems Conference, ENS’05, Paris, France, 14–16 December 2005; pp. 138–143. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hadi, H.A.; Ameer, H.A. Experimental Investigation of Nano Alumina and Nano Silica on Strength and Consistency of Oil Well Cement. J. Eng. 2017, 23, 51–69. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fernandes de Morais, J.; Naked Haddad, A. Analysis by ultrasound of the behavior of carbon nanotubes on cementitious composites. J. Nanotechnol. Adv. Mater. 2014, 2, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, X.; Rafieepour, S.; Miska, S.Z.; Takach, N.E.; Ozbayoglu, E.; Tu, M.; Mata, C. Carbon nanotubes reinforced lightweight cement testing under tri-axial loading conditions. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019, 174, 663–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Campillo, I.; Dolado, J.S.; Porro, A. High-performance nanostructured materials for construction. In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Nanotechnology in Construction, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Paisley, Scotland, 23–25 June 2003; pp. 215–226. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang, B.; Han, Y.; Liu, S. Effect of highly dispersed carbon nanotubes on the flexural toughness of cement-based composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 46, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chaipanich, A.; Nochaiya, T.; Wongkeo, W.; Torkittikul, P. Compressive strength and microstructure of carbon nanotubes–fly ash cement composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2010, 527, 1063–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, G.Y.; Wang, P.M.; Zhao, X. Mechanical behavior and microstructure of cement composites incorporating surface-treated multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2005, 43, 1239–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, G.Y.; Wang, P.M.; Zhao, X. Pressure-sensitive properties and microstructure of carbon nanotube reinforced cement composites. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2007, 29, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cwirzen, A.; Habermehl-Cwirzen, K.; Nasibulin, A.; Kaupinen, E.; Mudimela, P.; Penttala, V. SEM/AFM studies of cementitious binder modified by MWCNT and nano-sized Fe needles. Mater. Charact. 2009, 60, 735–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. El-Gamal, S.M.A.; Hashem, F.S.; Amin, M.S. Influence of carbon nanotubes, nanosilica and nanometakaolin on some morphological-mechanical properties of oil well cement pastes subjected to elevated water curing temperature and regular room air curing temperature. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 146, 531–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. De Paula, J.N.; Calixto, J.M.; Ladeira, L.O.; Ludvig, P.; Souza, T.C.C. Tensile Strength of Oil-Well Cement Pastes Produced with Carbon Nanotubes Directly Synthesized on Clinker. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2018, 7, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. De Paula, J.N.; Calixto, J.M.; Ladeira, L.O.; Ludvig, P.; Souza, T.C.C.; Rocha, J.M.; Vargas de Melo, A.A. Mechanical and rheological behavior of oil-well cement slurries produced with clinker containing carbon nanotubes. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2014, 122, 274–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Collins, F.; Lambert, J.; Duan, W.H. The influence of admixtures on the dispersion, workability, and strength of carbon nanotube-OPC paste mixtures. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2014, 34, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ghajari, A.; Gholinezhad, J.; Soltanian, H.; Alireza Mortazavi, S. An improvement to physical properties of heavy-weight oil well cements using carbon nanotubes. J. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Santra, A.; Boul, P.J.; Pang, X. Influence of Nanomaterials in Oilwell Cement Hydration and Mechanical Properties. SPE Int. Oilfield Nanotechnol. Conf. Exhib. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mondal, P.; Shah, S.P.; Marks, L.D.; Gaitero, J.J. Comparative Study of the Effects of Microsilica and Nanosilica in Concrete. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2010, 2141, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Rzepka, M.; Kremieniewski, M.; Kędzierski, M. Cement slurries for sealing casing in boreholes with increased risk of gas migration. Naft. Gaz 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rzepka, M.; Kędzierski, M. Zaczyny cementowe z dodatkiem nanokomponentów do uszczelniania kolumn rur okładzinowych w otworach wiertniczych o głębokości końcowej około 1000–2000 metrów. Naft. Gaz 2019, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Katalog GetNanoMaterials. Available online: https://www.getnanomaterials.com/nanoparticles/silica/sio2-121-1-um-amorphous-spherical/ (accessed on 25 February 2020).
  45. Katalog GetNanoMaterials. Available online: https://www.getnanomaterials.com/al-0138hw-40-50-nm/ (accessed on 25 February 2020).
  46. Katalog ACS Material. Available online: https://www.acsmaterial.com/carbon-nanotubes-multi-walled-nh2-functionalized-mwcnts.html (accessed on 18 February 2020).
  47. PN-EN ISO 10426-1:2009 Przemysł Naftowy i Gazowniczy–Cementy i Materiały do Cementowania Otworów–Część 1: Specyfikacja; The Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 2009.
  48. PN-EN ISO 10426-2:2003 Przemysł Naftowy i Gazowniczy–Cementy i Materiały do Cementowania Otworów Wiertniczych–Część 2: Badania Cementów Wiertniczych; The Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 2003.
Figure 1. (a): nanosilica n-SiO2 with a grain diameter of approximately 20–30 nm (powdered) used in laboratory tests. (b): microstructure of this nanosilica (photograph taken under a scanning microscope) [44]. The arrow marks a single particle of n-SiO2.
Figure 1. (a): nanosilica n-SiO2 with a grain diameter of approximately 20–30 nm (powdered) used in laboratory tests. (b): microstructure of this nanosilica (photograph taken under a scanning microscope) [44]. The arrow marks a single particle of n-SiO2.
Energies 13 03121 g001
Figure 2. (a): nanosized alumina (n- Al2O3) with a grain diameter of approximately 20–30 nm (powdered) used in laboratory tests. (b): microstructure of this nanosized alumina (photograph taken under a scanning microscope) [45]. The arrow marks a single particle of n-Al2O3.
Figure 2. (a): nanosized alumina (n- Al2O3) with a grain diameter of approximately 20–30 nm (powdered) used in laboratory tests. (b): microstructure of this nanosized alumina (photograph taken under a scanning microscope) [45]. The arrow marks a single particle of n-Al2O3.
Energies 13 03121 g002
Figure 3. (a): multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) with an external diameter of approximately 10-20 nm and length of 10–30 μm (in the form of black powder) used in laboratory tests. (b): microstructure of carbon nanotubes (picture taken under a transmission electron microscope) [46].
Figure 3. (a): multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) with an external diameter of approximately 10-20 nm and length of 10–30 μm (in the form of black powder) used in laboratory tests. (b): microstructure of carbon nanotubes (picture taken under a transmission electron microscope) [46].
Energies 13 03121 g003
Figure 4. (a). Sample microstructure of “conventional” cement slurry (with no addition of n -SiO2). Magnification 1000×. (b). Sample microstructure of “conventional” cement slurry (with no addition of n -SiO2). Magnification 1000×.
Figure 4. (a). Sample microstructure of “conventional” cement slurry (with no addition of n -SiO2). Magnification 1000×. (b). Sample microstructure of “conventional” cement slurry (with no addition of n -SiO2). Magnification 1000×.
Energies 13 03121 g004aEnergies 13 03121 g004b
Figure 5. (a). Sample microstructure of cement slurry containing 1% n-SiO2. Magnification 1000×. (b). Sample microstructure of cement slurry containing 1% n-SiO2. Magnification 1000×.
Figure 5. (a). Sample microstructure of cement slurry containing 1% n-SiO2. Magnification 1000×. (b). Sample microstructure of cement slurry containing 1% n-SiO2. Magnification 1000×.
Energies 13 03121 g005aEnergies 13 03121 g005b
Figure 6. An increase in the early mechanical strength of sample VIII.
Figure 6. An increase in the early mechanical strength of sample VIII.
Energies 13 03121 g006
Figure 7. Changes in the compressive strength of samples VI, VII, VIII, IX after 2, 7, 14, and 28 days of hydration.
Figure 7. Changes in the compressive strength of samples VI, VII, VIII, IX after 2, 7, 14, and 28 days of hydration.
Energies 13 03121 g007
Figure 8. (a). Sample microstructure of “conventional” cement slurry (with no addition of n-Al2O3). Magnification 500×. (b). Sample microstructure of “conventional” cement slurry (with no addition of n-Al2O3). Magnification 1300×.
Figure 8. (a). Sample microstructure of “conventional” cement slurry (with no addition of n-Al2O3). Magnification 500×. (b). Sample microstructure of “conventional” cement slurry (with no addition of n-Al2O3). Magnification 1300×.
Energies 13 03121 g008aEnergies 13 03121 g008b
Figure 9. (a). Sample microstructure of cement slurry containing 3% n-Al2O3. Magnification 500×. (b). Sample microstructure of cement slurry containing 3% n-Al2O3. Magnification 1300×.
Figure 9. (a). Sample microstructure of cement slurry containing 3% n-Al2O3. Magnification 500×. (b). Sample microstructure of cement slurry containing 3% n-Al2O3. Magnification 1300×.
Energies 13 03121 g009aEnergies 13 03121 g009b
Figure 10. Changes in the compressive strength of samples X, XI, XII, XIII after 2, 7, 14, and 28 days of hydration.
Figure 10. Changes in the compressive strength of samples X, XI, XII, XIII after 2, 7, 14, and 28 days of hydration.
Energies 13 03121 g010
Figure 11. (a). Pore size distribution of slurry X. (b). Pore size distribution of slurry XI. (c). Pore size distribution of slurry XII. (d). Pore size distribution of slurry XIII.
Figure 11. (a). Pore size distribution of slurry X. (b). Pore size distribution of slurry XI. (c). Pore size distribution of slurry XII. (d). Pore size distribution of slurry XIII.
Energies 13 03121 g011aEnergies 13 03121 g011b
Table 1. Chemical characterization of Class G drilling cement and Portland cement CEM I 42,5R.
Table 1. Chemical characterization of Class G drilling cement and Portland cement CEM I 42,5R.
Chemical CharacterizationSample (%)
Portland cement CEM I 42,5 RClass G
drilling cement
SiO219.8821.64
Fe2O32.644.90
Al2O34.944.19
CaO63.3364.11
MgO1.060.84
SO33.032.34
Na2O0.130.52
K2O0.95-
Loss on ignition4.040.72
Table 2. Materials used in composition of the oil-well cement slurries.
Table 2. Materials used in composition of the oil-well cement slurries.
ClassMaterial
CementClass G drilling cement
CementPortland cement CEM I 42,5R
Nanosilica n-SiO2Grain diameter of approximately 20–30 nm (powdered)
Nanosized alumina n-Al2O3Grain diameter of approximately 20–30 nm (powdered)
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs)External diameter of approximately 10-20 nm and length of 10–30 μm (in the form of black powder)
DefoamerEsters of unsaturated aliphatic acids
Setting stimulantCaCl2
Liquefying additive (plasticiser)Modified sodium salt of sulphonated naphthalene-formaldehyde polycondensate
Anti-filtration additiveModified carboxymethylcellulose derivates
Setting time retardantLignosulphonate
Swelling additiveOrganic and inorganic lime chemical compounds
WaterTap water
Table 3. Research apparatus used during laboratory tests.
Table 3. Research apparatus used during laboratory tests.
Test TypeName and Model of Apparatus
Density of cement slurryBaroid Ofite scale
Water settling (free water)Calibrated measurement cylinder
Rheological parametersModel 900 Ofite viscometer
Thickening time of cement slurryModel 130 HPHT Ofite consistometer
Slurry FiltrationModel 40 Ofite Stirred Fluid Loss Tester
Early strength of cement stone (using a non-destructive method)Model 120-51 Ofite Ultrasound Cement Analyser (UCA)
Strength of cement stoneChandler Model 4207 strength machine
Porosity of cement stoneAutoPore IV Model 9500 mercury porosimeter
Table 4. Compositions of tested cement slurries with an addition of n-SiO2.
Table 4. Compositions of tested cement slurries with an addition of n-SiO2.
Slurry symbol/Components in [%] Bwoc *Slurry ISlurry IISlurry IIISlurry IVSlurry V
Tap water4848484848
Nanosilica n-SiO2-0.510.51.0
KCl **3.03.03.03.03.0
Defoamer (putting out foam)0.50.50.50.30.3
Liquefying additive (plasticiser)0.30.30.30.20.2
Anti-filtration additive (limiting free water)0.20.20.20.30.3
Setting time retardant (lignosulphonate)0.050.050.050.150.15
Class G drilling cement100100100100100
(*) bwoc: i.e., in relation to dry cement mass, (**) KCl was added in relation to the mass of batched water (bwow).
Table 5. Parameters of slurries and cement stones with an addition of n-SiO2 tested under HPHT conditions.
Table 5. Parameters of slurries and cement stones with an addition of n-SiO2 tested under HPHT conditions.
Slurry Symbol, Temperature and Pressure/Assayed ParameterSlurry ISlurry II
(40 °C/14 MPa)
Slurry III
(40 °C/14 MPa)
Slurry IV
(60 °C /21 MPa)
Slurry V
(60 °C/21 MPa)
Density of cement slurry [kg/m3]18701870187018701870
Water settling from slurry (free water) measured at an angle of 90° [%]0.80.00.00.00.0
Plastic viscosity of slurry [Pa*s]0.10080.10430.10580.13290.1468
Yield point of slurry [Pa]3.43.84.15.66.2
Time needed for the slurry to reach a consistency of 30 Bc under HPHT conditions [hours–minutes]3 h 50 min.3 h 46 min.2 h 59 min.3 h 22 min.2 h 39 min.
Time needed for the slurry to reach a consistency of 100 Bc under HPHT conditions [hours–minutes]5 h 58 min.5 h 07 min.4 h 10 min.3 h 47 min.3 h 04 min.
Time until achieving early compressive strength amounting to 3.5 [MPa]16 h10 h 13 h 14 h 8 h
Filtration, (cm3) After 30 min of Measurement244190182164156
Compressive strength of cement stone after 48 h of hydration (UCA apparatus measurement) [MPa]26.127.431.225.328.9
Compressive strength of cement stone after 28 days of hydration [MPa]31.234.437.136.438.7
The share of pores with diameters above 10,000 nm in the whole cement stone matrix [%]5.52.72.01.42.8
The share of pores with diameters of 100–10,000 nm in the whole cement stone matrix [%]6.10.71.40.32.1
The share of pores with diameters below 100 nm in the whole cement stone matrix [%]88.496.696.698.395.1
Table 6. Compositions of tested cement slurries with an addition of n-Al2O3.
Table 6. Compositions of tested cement slurries with an addition of n-Al2O3.
Slurry Symbol/Components in [%] Bwoc *Slurry VISlurry VIISlurry VIIISlurry IX
Tap water, w/c0.440.440.440.44
Nanosized alumina n-Al2O3-135
KCl **3.03.03.03.0
Defoamer (putting out foam)0.50.50.50.5
Liquefying additive (plasticiser)0.10.10.10.1
Setting time retardant (lignosulphonate)0.30.30.30.3
Drilling cement G100100100100
(*) bwoc: i.e., in relation to dry cement mass, (**) KCl was added in relation to the mass of batched water (bwow).
Table 7. The parameters of cement slurries and cement stones with an addition of n-Al2O3 tested under HPHT conditions.
Table 7. The parameters of cement slurries and cement stones with an addition of n-Al2O3 tested under HPHT conditions.
Slurry Symbol, Temperature and Pressure/Assayed ParameterSlurry VI
(60 °C/25 MPa)
Slurry VII
(60 °C/25 MPa)
Slurry VIII
(60 °C/25 MPa)
Slurry IX
(60 °C/25 MPa)
Slurry density [kg/m3]1900190519101920
Water settling from slurry measured at an angle of 90° [%]0.30.00.00.0
Plastic viscosity of slurry [mPa*s]87.0117.0151.5172.5
Yield point of slurry [Pa]3.44.35.56.0
Time needed for the slurry to reach a consistency of 30 Bc under HPHT conditions [hours: minutes]3 h 51 min.3 h 32 min.2 h 58 min.2 h 35 min.
Time needed for the slurry to reach a consistency of 100 Bc under HPHT conditions [hours: minutes]5 h 02 min.4 h 46 min.4 h 03 min.3 h 48 min.
Filtration, (cm3) After 30 min of Measurement296212208290
Early compressive strength of cement stone after 48 h of hydration–UCA test [MPa]25.928.231.024.4
Table 8. Compositions of tested cement slurries with an addition of MWCNTs.
Table 8. Compositions of tested cement slurries with an addition of MWCNTs.
Slurry Symbol/Components in [%] Bwoc *Slurry XSlurry XISlurry XIISlurry XIII
Tap water, w/c0.470.470.450.49
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs)-0.10.10.2
KCl **3.03.03.03.0
Defoamer (putting out foam)0.20.20.20.2
Liquefying additive (plasticiser)0.050.050.050.1
Anti-filtration additive (limiting free water)0.30.30.30.3
Setting stimulant (CaCl2)1.01.01.51.0
Portland cement CEM I 42,5R100100100100
Swelling additive0.30.3-0.3
(*) bwoc: i.e., in relation to dry cement mass, (**) KCl was added in relation to the mass of batched water (bwow).
Table 9. Parameters of slurries and cement stones with an addition of n-SiO2 tested under HPHT conditions.
Table 9. Parameters of slurries and cement stones with an addition of n-SiO2 tested under HPHT conditions.
Slurry Symbol, Temperature and Pressure/Assayed ParameterSlurry X
(30 °C/10 MPa)
Slurry XI
(30 °C/10 MPa)
Slurry XII
(30 °C/10 MPa)
Slurry XIII
(30 °C/10 MPa)
Density of cement slurry [kg/m3]1860186018701830
Water settling from slurry (free water) measured at an angle of 90° [%]0.00.00.00.0
Plastic viscosity of slurry [Pa*s]0.1470.14850.15300.1701
Yield point of slurry [Pa]3.65.03.810.6
Time needed for the slurry to reach a consistency of 30 Bc under HPHT conditions [hours–minutes]2 h 21 min.2 h 44 min.2 h 05 min.1 h 35 min.
Time needed for the slurry to reach a consistency of 100 Bc under HPHT conditions [hours–minutes]4 h 00 min.4 h 09 min.3 h 50 min.4 h 25 min.
Filtration, (cm3) After 30 min of Measurement186606670
Compressive strength of cement stone after 28 days of hydration [MPa]33.447.550.536.8
The share of pores with diameters above 10,000 nm in the whole cement stone matrix [%]1.41.51.31.3
The share of pores with diameters of 100–10,000 nm in the whole cement stone matrix [%]34.81.30.71.6
The share of pores with diameters below 100 nm in the whole cement stone matrix [%]63.897.298.097.1

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rzepka, M.; Kędzierski, M. The Use of Nanomaterials in Shaping the Properties of Cement Slurries Used in Drilling. Energies 2020, 13, 3121. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123121

AMA Style

Rzepka M, Kędzierski M. The Use of Nanomaterials in Shaping the Properties of Cement Slurries Used in Drilling. Energies. 2020; 13(12):3121. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123121

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rzepka, Marcin, and Miłosz Kędzierski. 2020. "The Use of Nanomaterials in Shaping the Properties of Cement Slurries Used in Drilling" Energies 13, no. 12: 3121. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123121

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop