Evaluation of Excavation-Damaged Zone around Underground Tunnels by Theoretical Calculation and Field Test Methods
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Closed-Form Solutions of EDZ around Circular Tunnels
2.1. Extent of the Plastic Zone in Terms of the Mohr–Coulomb Failure Criterion
2.2. Extent of Plastic Zone in Terms of the Hoek–Brown Failure Criterion
3. Fankou Lead-Zinc Mine in Situ Stress Distribution Laws
4. Investigations of EDZ in the Fankou Lead-Zinc Mine
4.1. Test Method and Apparatus
4.2. Field Measurements
4.3. Measurement Results and EDZ Analysis
5. Theoretical Calculations of EDZ Extent in Terms of the Mohr–Coulomb and Hoek–Brown Criteria
5.1. Results Based on the Mohr–Coulomb Failure Criterion
5.2. Results Based on the Hoek–Brown Failure Criterion
6. Affecting of EDZ Thickness
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cho, W.J.; Kim, J.S.; Lee, C.I.; Choi, H.J. Gas permeability in the excavation damaged zone at KURT. Eng. Geol. 2013, 164, 222–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, S.; Cho, W.J. The influence of an excavation damaged zone on the thermal-mechanical and hydro-mechanical behaviors of an underground excavation. Eng. Geol. 2008, 101, 110–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.M.; Rutqvist, J.; Jeong, J.H.; Choi, B.H.; Ryu, D.W.; Song, W.K. Characterizing excavation damaged zone and stability of pressurized lined rock caverns for underground compressed air energy storage. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2013, 46, 1113–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, D.; Rezania, M.; Yu, H.S.; Bai, H.B. Variations of hydraulic properties of granular sandstones during water inrush: Effect of small particle migration. Eng. Geol. 2017, 217, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Suchowerska, A.M.; Merifield, R.S.; Carter, J.P.; Clausen, J. Prediction of underground cavity roof collapse using the Hoek–Brown failure criterion. Comput. Geotech. 2012, 44, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.P.; Chen, W.Z.; Zhao, W.S.; Tan, X.J.; Tian, H.M.; Yang, D.S.; Ma, C.S. Geohazards of tunnel excavation in interbedded layers under high in situ stress. Eng. Geol. 2017, 230, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, X.W.; Nong, Z.; Gong, L.Y.; Fei, X.; Zheng, X.G. Application of a Backfilling Method in Coal Mining to Realise an Ecologically Sensitive “Black Gold” Industry. Energies 2015, 8, 3628–3639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Z.L.; Cheng, R.S.; Cai, X.; Ma, D.; Jiang, C. Discrimination of Rock Fracture and Blast Events Based on Signal Complexity and Machine Learning. Shock Vib. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Jiang, B.S.; Wang, S.L.; Ge, X.R.; Zhang, H.Q. Elasto-plastic analysis of a circular opening in strain-softening rock mass. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2012, 50, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, S.; Lee, C.S.; Cho, S.J.; Jeon, S.W.; Cho, W.J. An investigation of the excavation damaged zone at the KAERI underground research tunnel. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2009, 24, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, S.B.; Yu, C.Y.; Tang, C.A. Numerical modeling of the time-dependent development of the damage zone around a tunnel under high humidity conditions. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2018, 76, 48–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Souley, M.; Renaud, V.; Al Heib, M.; Bouffier, C.; Lahaie, F.; Nyström, A. Numerical investigation of the development of the excavation damaged zone around a deep polymetallic ore mine. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2018, 106, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, F.Q.; Liu, J.Y.; Liu, T.; Zhuang, H.Z.; Yan, C.G. A method for assessment of excavation damaged zone (EDZ) of a rock mass and its application to a dam foundation case. Eng. Geol. 2009, 104, 254–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharan, S.K. Elastic–brittle–plastic analysis of circular openings in Hoek–Brown media. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2003, 40, 817–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zareifard, M.R.; Fahimifar, A. Analytical solutions for the stresses and deformations of deep tunnels in an elastic-brittle-plastic rock mass considering the damaged zone. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2016, 58, 186–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carranza-Torres, C. Elasto-plastic solution of tunnel problems using the generalized form of the hoek-brown failure criterion. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2004, 41, 629–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, K.H.; Kim, Y.J. Analytical solution for a circular opening in an elastic–brittle–plastic rock. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2006, 43, 616–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roateşi, S. Analytical and numerical approach for tunnel face advance in a viscoplastic rock mass. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2014, 70, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.; Rao, K.S.; Ayothiraman, R. Effect of intermediate principal stress on cylindrical tunnel in an elasto-plastic rock mass. Proc. Eng. 2017, 173, 1056–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, H.X.; Li, J.; Rong, X.L.; Hao, Y.Q.; Dong, X. A displacement solution for circular openings in an elastic-brittle-plastic rock. Geomech. Eng. 2017, 13, 489–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vrakas, A.; Anagnostou, G. A finite strain closed-form solution for the elastoplastic ground response curve in tunnelling. Int. J. Numer. Anal, Method. Geomech. 2014, 38, 1131–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, X.P.; Li, J.L. Hoek–Brown criterion applied to circular tunnel using elastoplasticity and in situ axial stress. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mec. 2011, 56, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Z.Z.; Gong, B.; Li, W.R. Instability analysis of a deep tunnel under triaxial loads using a three-dimensional numerical method with strength reduction method. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2019, 86, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, A.Z.; Xu, G.S.; Sun, F.; Sun, W.Q. Elasto-plastic analysis of a circular tunnel including the effect of the axial in situ stress. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2010, 47, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, K.W.; Li, X.D.; Hao, H.; Li, X.B.; Sha, Y.Y.; Wang, W.H.; Liu, X.L. Study on the raising technique using one blast based on the combination of long-hole presplitting and vertical crater retreat multiple-deck shots. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2019, 113, 41–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.H.; Jiang, Q.H.; Zhang, Q.B.; Zhao, J. Dynamic stress adjustment and rock damage during blasting excavation in a deep-buried circular tunnel. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2018, 71, 591–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.H.; Lee, C.I.; Ranjith, P.G.; Tang, C.A. Modeling the Effects of Heterogeneity and Anisotropy on the Excavation Damaged/Disturbed Zone (EDZ). Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2009, 42, 229–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.T.; Hong, K.B.; Ryou, H.S. Numerical Analysis on the Effect of the Tunnel Slope on the Plug-Holing Phenomena. Energies 2018, 12, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golshani, A.; Oda, M.; Okui, Y.; Takemura, T.; Munkhtogoo, E. Numerical simulation of the excavation damaged zone around an opening in brittle rock. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2007, 44, 835–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.Q.; Zeng, Y.Y.; Lan, Y.F.; Zhou, X.P. Analysis of the excavation damaged zone around a tunnel accounting for geostress and unloading. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2014, 69, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perras, M.A.; Diederichs, M.S. Predicting excavation damage zone depths in brittle rocks. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2016, 8, 60–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ren, M.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, C.; Wu, D.; Ding, Y. The Elastic–Plastic Damage Analysis of Underground Research Laboratory Excavation for Disposal of High Level Radioactive Waste. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Ma, H. Investigation of the excavation damaged zone around deep TBM tunnel using a Voronoi-element based explicit numerical manifold method. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2018, 112, 158–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, W.C.; Bruhns, O.T. Simulating excavation damaged zone around a circular opening under hydromechanical conditions. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2008, 45, 815–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sofianos, A.I.; Halakatevakis, N. Equivalent tunnelling Mohr–Coulomb strength parameters for given Hoek–Brown ones. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2002, 39, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoek, E.; Brown, E.T. The Hoek–Brown failure criterion and GSI—2018 edition. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jimenez, R.; Serrano, A.; Olalla, C. Linearization of the Hoek and Brown rock failure criterion for tunnelling in elasto-plastic rock masses. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2008, 45, 1153–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, S.C.; Zhang, S.H.; Zhang, G. Three-dimensional strength estimation of intact rocks using a modified Hoek-Brown criterion based on a new deviatoric function. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2018, 107, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, M.; Kaiser, P.K.; Tasaka, Y.; Maejima, T.; Morioka, H.; Minami, M. Generalized crack initiation and crack damage stress thresholds of brittle rock masses near underground excavations. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2004, 41, 833–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.W.; Jiang, Y.D.; Xue, S.; Shen, B.T.; Wang, C.; Lv, J.G.; Yang, T. Assessment of excavation damaged zone around roadways under dynamic pressure induced by an active mining process. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2015, 77, 265–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Liu, M.; Xing, W.; Shao, S.; Zhou, J. Failure Mechanisms and Evolution Assessment of the Excavation Damaged Zones in a Large-Scale and Deeply Buried Underground Powerhouse. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2017, 50, 1883–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yong, S.; Loew, S.; Schuster, K.; Nussbaum, C.; Fidelibus, C. Characterisation of Excavation-Induced Damage Around a Short Test Tunnel in the Opalinus Clay. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2017, 50, 1959–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
No. | Depth/m | σh-max/MPa | Average σh-max/MPa | σh-min/MPa | Average σh-min /MPa | σv/MPa | Average σv/MPa | σh-max/σv | σh-max/σh-min |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1# | 370 | 17.96 | 18.93 | 7.35 | 9.20 | 9.66 | 10.39 | 1.860 | 2.44 |
2# | 370 | 18.79 | 9.16 | 10.28 | 1.827 | 2.05 | |||
3# | 370 | 20.03 | 11.08 | 11.23 | 1.784 | 1.81 | |||
4# | 450 | 22.30 | 23.00 | 9.79 | 11.24 | 12.10 | 12.82 | 1.843 | 2.28 |
5# | 450 | 22.84 | 11.22 | 12.80 | 1.78 | 2.04 | |||
6# | 450 | 23.88 | 12.72 | 13.56 | 1.76 | 1.88 | |||
7# | 530 | 24.62 | 27.12 | 12.62 | 12.97 | 13.55 | 15.39 | 1.82 | 1.95 |
8# | 530 | 26.88 | 12.98 | 15.12 | 1.78 | 2.07 | |||
9# | 530 | 29.85 | 13.29 | 17.48 | 1.71 | 2.25 | |||
10# | 680 | 33.25 | 34.63 | 15.02 | 17.17 | 17.94 | 19.80 | 1.85 | 2.21 |
11# | 680 | 34.67 | 17.16 | 19.77 | 1.75 | 2.02 | |||
12# | 680 | 35.96 | 19.34 | 21.68 | 1.66 | 1.86 | |||
13# | 780 | 37.09 | 39.36 | 18.98 | 19.63 | 22.34 | 22.78 | 1.66 | 1.95 |
14# | 780 | 39.73 | 19.74 | 22.37 | 1.78 | 2.01 | |||
15# | 780 | 41.27 | 20.15 | 23.62 | 1.75 | 2.05 |
Number | Overburden Depth (m) | Roadway Type | Equivalent Radius of Tunnels (m) | Boreholes Diameter (mm) | Boreholes Depth (m) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | 370 | Ventilation roadway | 2.70 | 51 | 3.2 |
II | 450 | Haulage roadway | 2.45 | 51 | 3.2 |
III | 530 | Main track roadway | 2.80 | 51 | 3.2 |
IV | 680 | Across-vein roadway | 2.00 | 51 | 3.2 |
V | 780 | Main return-air roadway | 2.40 | 51 | 3.2 |
Number | Density (kg·m−3) | Young’s Modulus (GPa) | Poisson’s Ratio | Vertical Principal Stress (MPa) | Lateral Pressure Coefficient |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | 2740 | 15.27 | 0.25 | 10.39 | 1.30 |
II | 2632 | 18.49 | 0.23 | 12.82 | 1.24 |
III | 2845 | 21.52 | 0.24 | 15.39 | 1.18 |
IV | 2786 | 17.21 | 0.25 | 19.80 | 1.25 |
V | 2801 | 19.51 | 0.27 | 22.69 | 1.15 |
Number | Cohesion (MPa) | Friction Angle (°) | mi | GSI | Disturbance Factor (D) | Uniaxial Compressive Strength (MPa) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | 4.8 | 21.35 | 12 | 39 | 0.40 | 145.00 |
II | 5.0 | 20.00 | 15 | 37 | 0.50 | 130.50 |
III | 5.3 | 20.36 | 17 | 40 | 0.60 | 141.45 |
IV | 6.0 | 18.15 | 10 | 40 | 0.40 | 135.27 |
V | 5.7 | 20.60 | 7 | 42 | 0.25 | 150.66 |
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Tao, M.; Hong, Z.; Peng, K.; Sun, P.; Cao, M.; Du, K. Evaluation of Excavation-Damaged Zone around Underground Tunnels by Theoretical Calculation and Field Test Methods. Energies 2019, 12, 1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091682
Tao M, Hong Z, Peng K, Sun P, Cao M, Du K. Evaluation of Excavation-Damaged Zone around Underground Tunnels by Theoretical Calculation and Field Test Methods. Energies. 2019; 12(9):1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091682
Chicago/Turabian StyleTao, Ming, Zhixian Hong, Kang Peng, Pengwei Sun, Mingyu Cao, and Kun Du. 2019. "Evaluation of Excavation-Damaged Zone around Underground Tunnels by Theoretical Calculation and Field Test Methods" Energies 12, no. 9: 1682. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12091682