Next Article in Journal
A Hybrid Prediction Model for Solar Radiation Based on Long Short-Term Memory, Empirical Mode Decomposition, and Solar Profiles for Energy Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks
Next Article in Special Issue
Integral Sliding-Mode Control-Based Direct Power Control for Three-Level NPC Converters
Previous Article in Journal
The Environmental Assessment on Chinese Logistics Enterprises Based on Non-Radial DEA
Previous Article in Special Issue
Wide Load Range ZVS Three-level DC-DC Converter: Modular Structure, Redundancy Ability, and Reduced Filters Size
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Operation and Control of a Seven-Level V-Clamp Multilevel Converter

School of Electrical Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2019, 12(24), 4761; https://doi.org/10.3390/en12244761
Submission received: 19 November 2019 / Revised: 6 December 2019 / Accepted: 12 December 2019 / Published: 13 December 2019

Abstract

:
Multilevel converters are well suited for high-power and high-quality power conversion. This paper presents a new seven-level V-clamp multilevel converter (VMC) with reduced clamping devices. All phases of the VMC share common DC-link capacitors and realize bidirectional power conversion without flying capacitors. Each branch of the VMC sustains only a single-level voltage of the DC-link capacitors during its commutation process. Hence, the series switches can be controlled as simple as one switch and the dynamic voltage unbalancing issue is avoided. In this paper, the operation principle and the modulation method of the VMC are analyzed in detail. In addition, compensation control for non-ideal factors is designed to improve the output performance. The output fundamental distortion is compensated and the harmonics are reduced. Finally, a laboratory prototype of the seven-level VMC is set up to verify the feasibility of the presented topology and analysis.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Featured with prominent AC output performance, low common-mode voltage and reduced switching stress, multilevel converters attract much attention from industry and academia since their emergence. They have found widespread applications in medium-/high-voltage fields, such as motor drive, power quality improvement, and high-voltage DC (HVDC) transmission, etc. [1,2,3,4]. Additionally, three-level or four-level converters are also considered for low-voltage fields to improve the power-density and power-quality [5,6].
Conventional multilevel topologies, such asthe neutral point clamped converter (NPCC), flying capacitor converter (FCC), cascaded H-bridge converter (CHBC), as well asthe modular multilevel converter (MMC), have been well studied and commercialized in the past decades [7]. However, when the voltage levels increase, the number of clamping diodes in the NPCC and flying capacitors (FCs) in the FCC rises tremendously [8,9]. Furthermore, the NPCC suffers from indirect clamping of the inner devices when the voltage level is higher than three [10]. The CHBC and MMC are easier to expand the voltage levels due to their modular design [11]. But the CHBC needs a phase-shifting transformer to provide isolated DC sources, which results in substantial investment and volume [12]. The MMC shows good prospects for HVDC transmission. But the complex controls (e.g., capacitor voltage balancing control and circulating current suppression control) and relative high primary investment make the MMC less attractive in medium-voltage applications [13].
The hybrid multilevel topologies are also reported recently to pursue the reduction of devices or improvement of DC-link voltage availability [1,4], such as active NPCC (ANPCC) [14], nested NPCC (NNPCC) [15], and boost ANPCC (Boost-ANPCC) [16]. However, a certain number of FCs are still required in the multiphase system, which imposes excessive cost and accommodation space on the converters [7]. Besides, the dynamic voltage unbalancing problem in series switches and multilevel voltage jumping of the output voltage may occur during the commutation process. It further results in permanent damage to the series switches and over-pressure on the insulation of the filter/motor [17].
In this paper, a new seven-level converter in which the clamping branches resemble a “V” shape, named as a V-clamp multilevel converter (VMC), is introduced [18]. With reduced clamping devices and no FCs, the VMC has a smaller footprint and simple control. Meanwhile, the issues of dynamic voltage unbalancing in series switches and multilevel voltage jumping of the output voltage are avoided with appropriate switching states’ design.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, the configuration and operation principle of the seven-level VMC are introduced. Its commutation process is described in Section 3. Then the modulation method is discussed in Section 4, and the sinusoidal pulse-width modulation (SPWM) is applied. In Section 5, the effects of non-ideal factors including dead-time, switching delay, and voltage drop of devices are analyzed in detail. In addition, a compensation control for the seven-level VMC is designed to improve its output performance. In Section 6, experimental results are presented to validate the presented theory and analysis. Finally, conclusions are summarized in Section 7.

2. Topology and Operation Principle

2.1. Topology Configuration

Figure 1 illustrates the configuration of the three-phase seven-level VMC. All phases share six common DC-link capacitors in series (C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6), whose rated voltage is the single-level voltage (E = Vdc/6). Considering “O” as the reference zero-point, the DC-link is evenly divided into seven levels, i.e., +3E, +2E, +E, 0, −E, −2E and −3E.
In each phase leg, there are one power arm and six clamping branches, composed of 18 power switching devices (such as IGBT or MOSFET) and six diodes. All power components have the same rated voltage of E. The power arm is composed of S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, and S8. Meanwhile, S9, S10, and D1 form three forward clamping branches, which diode currents flow to the power arm. D2, S11, and S12 form three backward clamping branches, which diode currents flow to the DC-link. Corresponding nodes of the DC-link and the power arm are linked by these six clamping branches respectively, then the AC terminal potential can be clamped to any of the seven levels.
In the presented topology, series switches are applied to achieve higher withstand voltage. Then, S4 represents three series switches (S4a, S4b, and S4c) and so does S5. Likewise, S10 and S11 represent two series switches, D1 and D2 represent three series diodes, as seen in Figure 1.

2.2. Switching States Analysis

To ensure the availability of the seven-level VMC, the switching states analysis hereafter is given under the following operation principles:
  • Series switches operate simultaneously. Then, the states of S4a, S4b, and S4c are represented by S4. So does S5, S10, and S11.
  • In order to prevent the short-circuit of capacitors, switches S1 and S9, S2 and S10, S3 and S5, S4 and S6, S7 and S11, and S8 and S12 operate in a complementary way, respectively.
  • To reduce the switching times, only one complementary switching pair should change in each commutation process.
Therefore, the switching states of the seven-level VMC are designed as Table 1. Where “1” represents the switching state is on, and “0” represents the switching state is off. The corresponding current paths of each state are illustrated in Figure 2, where the red line represents a positive phase current (io > 0) and the blue line represents a negative phase current (io < 0).

2.3. Topology Comparison

Table 2 presents the number of power components required in the three-phase seven-level VMC and other conventional multilevel converters, including the NPCC, FCC, CHBC and MMC. The rated voltages of capacitors, diodes, and power switches are all set as E here. It can be seen that, only one power source and six capacitors are required in the proposed topology and the NPCC. Moreover, the number of total required power components in the VMC is reduced from 132 to 78 in comparison with the NPCC.

3. Commutation Process

One concern in the seven-level VMC is that the inconsistent switching actions of the series switches (S4, S5, S10, and S11) may result in dynamic voltage unbalancing. But, since the output voltage of the converter only changes one level in each commutation process, the dynamic over-voltage would not appear in the presented topology.
For better understanding, the commutation process from state of +2E (seen as Figure 2b) to state of +E (seen as Figure 2c) is discussed in the following text. During this commutation process, S2 is turned off firstly, then the series switches of S10a and S10b are turned on, the current paths are shown in Figure 3.
At a condition of io < 0 (blue line), io freewheels through the anti-paralleled diode of S2. The output voltage is +2E, and the total blocking voltage of S10 is E. Thus, when switching actions of S10a and S10b are inconsistent, the last turned-on switch will withstand whole blocking voltage stress, which is E.
At a condition of io > 0 (red line), io freewheels through the diodes of S10a and S10b. The output voltage is +E, and the total blocking voltage of S10 is 0. So the voltage stress of both S10a and S10b keeps to 0 during this commutation process.
Other commutation processes can be deducted similarly. To summarize, series switches only sustain E during their commutation process. Thus, the unbalancing voltage of the series switches caused by inconsistent switching actions will not exceed their rated voltage stress.
It is also noted that the multilevel voltage jumping of the output voltage would not appear in the VMC. During the commutation process between any two adjacent levels, the output voltage depends on the current direction of io. When io > 0, the output voltage is connected to the lower level; and when io < 0, the output voltage is connected to the higher level. Thus, the output voltage keeps unchanged or only changes a single level in each commutation process.

4. Modulation Method

In this paper, phase disposition SPWM (PD-SPWM) is adopted in the VMC due to its low complexity and superior performance [19]. Figure 4 illustrates the PD-SPWM waveforms arrangement and the corresponding switching signals. Six triangular carriers (vtri1, vtri2, vtri3, vtri4, vtri5, and vtri6) are compared with a reference wave (vref) to get control signals for switches. The peak-to-peak value of each carrier is 1/3, the peak value of output voltage is Vo, then the modulation index m can be expressed as:
m = 2 V o V dc
The relationship between comparison results and switching signals are as follows:
  • When vref > vtri1, S1 is turned on and S9 is turned off.
  • When vref > vtri2, S2 is turned on and S10 is turned off.
  • When vref > vtri3, S3 is turned on and S5 is turned off.
  • When vref > vtri4, S4 is turned on and S6 is turned off.
  • When vref > vtri5, S11 is turned on and S7 is turned off.
  • When vref > vtri6, S12 is turned on and S8 is turned off.

5. Compensation Control Strategy

During each commutation process of the VMC, the dead-time is generally introduced to prevent the short-circuit of capacitors. Whereas, the dead-time, along with the switching delay and voltage drop of devices, will cause inevitable output distortion and finally deteriorate the system performance [20,21]. To solve this problem, a compensation control for the seven-level VMC is proposed in this section.

5.1. Non-Ideal Factors Analysis

The effects of the above-mentioned non-ideal factors in the VMC are discussed firstly. Referring to the analysis in Section 3, each phase can be decomposed to six half-bridge converters as the basic operation cells, as shown in Figure 5a. When the output voltage of converter changes between any two adjacent levels, it can be considered that the corresponding operation cell is shifting its higher level and lower level output. Where, SP/SN is the equivalent upper/lower switch. The output phase voltage is vo. VP and VN represent the higher level and lower level in the operation cell respectively, and
V P V N = E
Figure 5b illustrates the actual vo of the converter considering non-ideal factors. Where, GP_ref and GN_ref are the reference signals of SP and SN respectively, and GP_actual and GN_actual are the actual signals with dead-time. T is the switching period, and tr represents the duration of the positive reference signal. td is dead-time, ton and toff are the switching turn-on and turn-off time, respectively. According to Figure 2, the expression of conduction voltage drop (Von) is shown in Table 3, where Vsat is the collector-emitter saturation voltage of switches, and VD is the diode forward voltage.
For simplifying the calculation, Vsat and VD are considered approximately equal here. Then the Von of each conduction path is the same and can be expressed as (3).
V on = V on 0 + r | i o |
where Von0 represents the equivalent on-state threshold voltage of six switches, and r represents the equivalent on-resistance [5].
The direction of io is defined as:
d i r ( i o ) = { 1 ,     i o > 0 1 , i o < 0
From Figure 5b, the equivalent dead-time (td_eq) in one switching period can be expressed as:
t d _ eq = t d + t on t off
Based on the pulse area equal principle, the reference phase voltage (vo_ref) and actual vo are shown as (6) and (7), respectively.
v o _ ref = t r T V P + ( 1 t r T ) V N
v o = t r T V P + ( 1 t r T ) V N d i r ( i o ) [ V on + t d _ eq T E ]
Then, the distortion of the output voltage ( Δ v o ) is obtained:
Δ v o = d i r ( i o ) [ V on + t d _ eq T E ]
To analyze the effects of non-ideal factors, define the instantaneous value of io as:
i o ( t ) = I m sin ( ω t φ )
where Im is the amplitude of the phase current, ω is the phase angular frequency, and φ is the initial phase angle.
From (3)–(9), the instantaneous value of Δ v o can be expressed as:
Δ v o ( t ) = { ( V on 0 + t d _ eq T E ) r I m sin ( ω t φ ) ,   φ + 2 k π ω t < φ + 3 k π V on 0 + t d _ eq T E + r I m sin ( ω t φ ) ,    φ + 3 k π ω t < φ + 4 k π
It is noted that Δ v o ( t ) is the superposition of a square and a sinusoidal waves with a period of 2π, and they are both odd-symmetrical about axial of ωt = φ. Then (10) can be decomposed by Fourier transform:
Δ v o ( t ) = ( K + r I m ) sin ( ω t φ ) K n = 1 1 2 n + 1 sin [ ( 2 n + 1 ) ( ω t φ ) ]
where
K = 4 V on 0 π + 4 t d _ eq π T E
As shown in (11), a fundamental variation and odd harmonics with decreasing amplitude are introduced to vo. Moreover, the value of K is independent of vo_ref, which means a serious distortion is introduced at the condition of a low modulation index. For the load voltage and current in the three-phase three-wire system as shown in Figure 1, the harmonics with 3n times of fundamental frequency are canceled out. Whereas, the fundamental variation and the harmonics with (6n ± 1) times of fundamental frequency still remain.

5.2. Compensation Control Strategy

According to the previous analysis, the non-ideal factors compensation control (NFCC) for the seven-level VMC is proposed, as shown in Figure 6. Current sensors are required to acquire the phase current. The compensation value ( Δ v ref ) is obtained in each switching cycle for the reference voltage (vref). In this way, the output distortion caused by non-ideal factors can be compensated.

6. Experiment Results

To verify the validity of the above-mentioned analysis and control strategy, a 7.2 kVA prototype of the three-phase seven-level VMC was designed and constructed as shown in Figure 7. Six cascaded DC power supplies with E = 120 V are employed to provide DC-link input. In addition, three-phase resistors in series with inductor filter are connected in Y-style for the load of the converter. The values of Von0, r, ton, and toff can be obtained in the datasheet of switches and diodes. Other main system parameters are shown in Table 4.
The experimental results are shown in Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10, Figure 11 and Figure 12. Among them, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11 illustrates the operation characteristics of the seven-level VMC without the NFCC. Figure 12 shows the comparison results for the NFCC.
Figure 8 shows the output waveforms of vA and vAB. As can be seen, vA contains seven levels and vAB contains eleven levels at m = 0.86, the voltage of each level is 120 V. Each voltage ladder is clear, no multilevel voltage jumping is observed. In the zoom-in picture of vA, a voltage drop of the conduction path at state 0 can be observed. Von changes polarity with the direction of io, and its value increases with |io| from 4 V to 6.5 V.
FFT analysis of vA is illustrated in Figure 9. The total harmonic distortion (THD) is 24.4%, and most harmonics are distributed around the switching frequency. It is noted that the non-ideal factors cause a fundamental voltage loss of about 22 V (rated value is 310 V), and low order odd harmonics are also observed in the zoom-in picture. This distortion will be compensated after the NFCC is applied.
Figure 10 shows the voltage and current waveforms of the load. The high-frequency harmonics are attenuated by a filter, then good load voltage and current waveforms are achieved. The THD of the phase current is 2.24%.
The voltage distribution of series switches S10, and S11 are shown in Figure 11. Each switch withstands static voltage of 60 V (E/2) and 120 V (E) respectively in one fundamental cycle. When the switches are turned off, the total blocking voltage of S10 or S11 is 120 V, so the dynamic voltage of the single switch caused by the switching inconsistencies will not exceed its rated value. Detailed waveforms are shown in the zoom-in picture, the voltage spike results from stray inductance are about 15 V.
It can be seen from Figure 8 to Figure 11, the VMC operates well under the presented switching states and the modulation method. The dynamic voltage unbalancing in series switches and multilevel voltage jumping of the output voltage are avoided.
Figure 12 illustrates the comparison results of io for the NFCC at both m = 0.2 and m = 0.86. The experimental results at m = 0.2 are provided in Figure 12a,c,e. The current waveforms, FFT analysis, and vector trajectory are illustrated respectively. Noted that, after the NFCC is applied, an obvious improvement of the waveform and vector trajectory can be observed in Figure 12a,e. In Figure 12c, the amplitude of the fundamental current increases from 91.0% to 100.1% of the rated value (3.6 A), the content of 5th and 7th harmonics are reduced, the THD decreases from 7.36% to 5.50%.
The comparison results at m = 0.86 are shown in Figure 12b,d,f. As seen in Figure 12d, the amplitude of the fundamental current increases from 95.1% to 99.4% of the rated value (15.5 A), and the THD decreases from 2.24% to 1.88%. The distortion caused by the non-ideal factors is compensated well by the NFCC, which means better waveforms and vector trajectory are achieved, as shown in Figure 12b,e.

7. Conclusions

A new seven-level V-clamp multilevel converter (VMC) is presented and implemented in this paper. From the analysis and experimental results, the following conclusions can be obtained:
  • The seven-level VMC reduces the clamping devices compared with conventional topologies.
  • With the switching states designed in this paper, the VMC is free of the issues on dynamic voltage unbalancing in series switches and multilevel voltage jumping in its output voltage.
  • With the proposed non-ideal factors compensation control, the output fundamental distortion is well compensated and the THD is reduced.
The theoretical and experimental validity of the seven-level VMC is demonstrated. This topology shows good potential for medium-voltage high-power applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.Q.Z. and Y.X.; methodology, X.Y.; software, Y.X.; validation, Y.X., L.Y.; formal analysis, Y.X.; investigation, L.Y.; resources, Y.X.; data curation, L.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.X.; writing—review and editing, X.Y.; visualization, Y.X.; supervision, T.Q.Z.; project administration, T.Q.Z.; funding acquisition, X.Y.

Funding

This research was funded by the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China under Award Number 51737001.

Acknowledgments

We thank all the journal editors and the reviewers for their valuable time and constructive comments that have contributed to improving this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kouro, S.; Malinowski, M.; Gopakumar, K.; Pou, J.; Franquelo, L.G.; Wu, B.; Rodriguez, J.; Perez, M.A.; Leon, J.I. Recent Advances and Industrial Applications of Multilevel Converters. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2010, 57, 2553–2580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rodriguez, J.; Franquelo, L.G.; Kouro, S.; Leon, J.I.; Portillo, R.C.; Prats, M.A.M.; Perez, M.A. Multilevel Converters: An Enabling Technology for High-Power Applications. Proc. IEEE 2009, 97, 1786–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Rodriguez, J.; Lai, J.; Peng, F.Z. Multilevel Inverters: A Survey of Topologies, Controls, and Applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2002, 49, 724–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Zhang, J.; Xu, S.; Din, Z.; Hu, X. Hybrid Multilevel Converters: Topologies, Evolutions and Verifications. Energies 2019, 12, 615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Jin, B.; Yuan, X. Topology, Efficiency Analysis, and Control of a Four-Level π-Type Converter. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2019, 7, 1044–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Soeiro, T.B.; Kolar, J.W. The New High-Efficiency Hybrid Neutral-Point-Clamped Converter. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2013, 60, 1919–1935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dargahi, V.; Abarzadeh, M.; Corzine, K.A.; Enslin, J.H.; Sadigh, A.K.; Rodriguez, J.; Blaabjerg, F.; Maqsood, A. Fundamental Circuit Topology of Duo-Active-Neutral-Point-Clamped, Duo-Neutral-Point-Clamped, and Duo-Neutral-Point-Piloted Multilevel Converters. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2019, 7, 1224–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nabaep, A.; Takahashi, I.; Akagi, H. A New Neutral-Point-Clamped PWM Inverter. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 1981, 17, 518–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meynard, T.A.; Foch, H.; Thomas, P.; Courault, J.; Jakob, R.; Nahrstaedt, M. Multicell converters: Basic concepts and industry applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2002, 49, 955–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yuan, X.; Barbi, I. Fundamentals of a New Diode Clamping Multilevel Inverter. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2000, 15, 711–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, X.; Xue, Y.; Chen, B.; Lin, Z.; Mu, Y.; Zheng, T.Q.; Igarashi, S.; Li, Y. An enhanced reverse blocking MMC with DC fault handling capability for HVDC applications. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2018, 163, 706–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mariethoz, S. Systematic Design of High-Performance Hybrid Cascaded Multilevel Inverters with Active Voltage Balance and Minimum Switching Losses. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2013, 28, 3100–3113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, X.; Wen, P.; Xue, Y.; Zheng, T.Q.; Wang, Y. Super Capacitor Energy Storage Based MMC for Energy Harvesting in Mine Hoist Application. Energies 2017, 10, 1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bruckner, T.; Bernet, S.; Guldner, H. The Active NPC Converter and Its Loss-Balancing Control. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2005, 52, 855–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Narimani, M.; Wu, B.; Cheng, Z.; Zargari, N.R. A Novel and Simple Single-Phase Modulator for the Nested Neutral-Point Clamped (NNPC) Converter. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2015, 30, 4069–4078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Siwakoti, Y.; Mahajan, A.; Rogers, D.; Blaabjerg, F. A Novel Seven-Level Active Neutral Point Clamped Converter with Reduced Active Switching Devices and DC-link Voltage. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2019, 34, 10492–10508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sheng, W.; Ge, Q. A Novel Seven-Level ANPC Converter Topology and Its Commutating Strategies. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2018, 33, 7496–7509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zheng, T.Q.; Xue, Y.; Yuan, L.; Yang, X. V-clamp Multilevel Converter—A New Type Multilevel Converter with Common DC-Link Capacitors. In Proceedings of the Jing-Jin-Ji High-End Forum for Power Electronics, Beijing, China, 9 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
  19. McGrath, B.P.; Holmes, D.G. Multicarrier PWM strategies for multilevel inverters. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2002, 49, 858–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kerkman, R.J.; Leggate, D.; Schlegel, D.W.; Winterhalter, C. Effects of parasitics on the control of voltage source inverters. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2003, 18, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shen, Z.; Jiang, D. Dead-Time Effect Compensation Method Based on Current Ripple Prediction for Voltage-Source Inverters. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2019, 34, 971–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The configuration of the three-phase seven-level V-clamp multilevel converter (VMC).
Figure 1. The configuration of the three-phase seven-level V-clamp multilevel converter (VMC).
Energies 12 04761 g001
Figure 2. Current paths of each state: (a) state: +3E (b) state: +2E (c) state: +E (d) state: 0 (e) state: −E (f) state: −2E (g) state: −3E.
Figure 2. Current paths of each state: (a) state: +3E (b) state: +2E (c) state: +E (d) state: 0 (e) state: −E (f) state: −2E (g) state: −3E.
Energies 12 04761 g002aEnergies 12 04761 g002b
Figure 3. Current paths during the commutation process from state of +2E to state of +E.
Figure 3. Current paths during the commutation process from state of +2E to state of +E.
Energies 12 04761 g003
Figure 4. Phase disposition (PD)-(SPWM) sinusoidal pulse-width modulation waveforms and switching signals.
Figure 4. Phase disposition (PD)-(SPWM) sinusoidal pulse-width modulation waveforms and switching signals.
Energies 12 04761 g004
Figure 5. Operation cell of the VMC: (a) equivalent circuit (b) output voltage in one switching period.
Figure 5. Operation cell of the VMC: (a) equivalent circuit (b) output voltage in one switching period.
Energies 12 04761 g005
Figure 6. Control diagram for the seven-level VMC.
Figure 6. Control diagram for the seven-level VMC.
Energies 12 04761 g006
Figure 7. Experiment platform of the three-phase seven-level VMC.
Figure 7. Experiment platform of the three-phase seven-level VMC.
Energies 12 04761 g007
Figure 8. Waveforms of output voltage (m = 0.86).
Figure 8. Waveforms of output voltage (m = 0.86).
Energies 12 04761 g008
Figure 9. FFT analysis of vA (m = 0.86).
Figure 9. FFT analysis of vA (m = 0.86).
Energies 12 04761 g009
Figure 10. Output voltage and current of load (m = 0.86).
Figure 10. Output voltage and current of load (m = 0.86).
Energies 12 04761 g010
Figure 11. Voltage distribution of S10 and S11 (m = 0.86).
Figure 11. Voltage distribution of S10 and S11 (m = 0.86).
Energies 12 04761 g011
Figure 12. Comparison results of phase current for the NFCC: (a) phase current waveforms (m = 0.2); (b) phase current waveforms (m = 0.86); (c) FFT analysis (m = 02); (d) FFT analysis (m = 0.86); (e) vector trajectory (m = 0.2); (f) vector trajectory (m = 0.86).
Figure 12. Comparison results of phase current for the NFCC: (a) phase current waveforms (m = 0.2); (b) phase current waveforms (m = 0.86); (c) FFT analysis (m = 02); (d) FFT analysis (m = 0.86); (e) vector trajectory (m = 0.2); (f) vector trajectory (m = 0.86).
Energies 12 04761 g012
Table 1. Switching states of the seven-level VMC.
Table 1. Switching states of the seven-level VMC.
States S 1 / S 9 ¯ S 2 / S 10 ¯ S 3 / S 5 ¯ S 6 / S 4 ¯ S 7 / S 11 ¯ S 8 / S 12 ¯
+3E111000
+2E011000
+E001000
0000000
E000100
−2E000110
−3E000111
Table 2. Topology comparison between five different topologies.
Table 2. Topology comparison between five different topologies.
DevicesVMCNPCCFCCCHBCMMC
Power Sources11191
DC-link capacitors66690
Flying capacitors0045036
Clamping diodes1890000
Power switches5436363672
Table 3. Conduction voltage drop of the seven-level VMC.
Table 3. Conduction voltage drop of the seven-level VMC.
StatesVon (io > 0)Von (io < 0)
+3E6Vsat6VD
+2E5Vsat +VDVsat + 5VD
+E4Vsat + 2VD2Vsat + 4VD
03Vsat + 3VD3Vsat + 3VD
E2Vsat + 4VD4Vsat + 2VD
−2EVsat + 5VD5Vsat + VD
−3E6VD6Vsat
Table 4. Experimental parameters.
Table 4. Experimental parameters.
ParametersSymbolValue
DC-link voltageVdc720 V
Modulation indexm0.86
Fundamental frequencyf50 Hz
Carrier frequencyfs10 kHz
Load resistanceR20 Ω
Filter inductanceLf2 mH
Dead-timetd2 μs

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xue, Y.; Yang, X.; Yuan, L.; Zheng, T.Q. Operation and Control of a Seven-Level V-Clamp Multilevel Converter. Energies 2019, 12, 4761. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12244761

AMA Style

Xue Y, Yang X, Yuan L, Zheng TQ. Operation and Control of a Seven-Level V-Clamp Multilevel Converter. Energies. 2019; 12(24):4761. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12244761

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xue, Yao, Xiaofeng Yang, Lutian Yuan, and Trillion Q. Zheng. 2019. "Operation and Control of a Seven-Level V-Clamp Multilevel Converter" Energies 12, no. 24: 4761. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12244761

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop