Next Article in Journal
Trombe Wall Utilization for Cold and Hot Climate Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Fines Content on Fluidity of FCC Catalysts for Stable Operation of Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit
Previous Article in Journal
Simulation of the Filling Capability in Vane Pumps
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thermodynamic Analysis on the Aging of THPP, ZPP and BKNO3 Explosive Charges in PMDs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Liquid-Phase Hydrogenation of Maleic Acid over Pd/Al2O3 Catalysts Prepared via Deposition–Precipitation Method

1
Ulsan Regional Division, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH), Ulsan 44413, Korea
2
Department of Polymer Science and Chemical Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan 46241, Korea
3
Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2019, 12(2), 284; https://doi.org/10.3390/en12020284
Submission received: 14 November 2018 / Revised: 5 January 2019 / Accepted: 16 January 2019 / Published: 17 January 2019

Abstract

:
Succinic acid (SA) is a valuable raw material obtained by hydrogenation of maleic acid (MA). The product selectivity of this reaction is highly dependent on the reaction conditions. This study therefore investigated the effect of the reaction temperature, hydrogen pressure, and reaction time on the liquid-phase hydrogenation of MA by a Pd/Al2O3 catalyst. Complete conversion of MA and 100% selectivity for SA were achieved at a temperature of 90 °C, H2 pressure of 5 bar, and reaction time of 90 min. Fumaric acid (FA) was formed as an intermediate material by hydrogenation of MA under nonoptimal conditions. The impact of the percentage of Pd dispersion and phase of the Al2O3 support (γ, θ + α, and α) was also examined. The Pd/Al2O3 catalyst with 29.8% dispersion of Pd and γ phase of Al2O3 exhibited the best catalytic performance. Thus, catalytic activity depends not only on the amount of Pd dispersion but also on the physicochemical properties of Al2O3.

1. Introduction

The growth of the petrochemical industry has brought about environmental problems such as industrial waste, pollution, and global warming. Therefore, many researchers have been investigating sustainable and renewable resources. In this regard, succinic acid (SA) has attracted attention as an eco-friendly raw material for the production of biodegradable plastics and biosolvents. SA is widely used as an intermediate material in the production of high value products such as γ-butyrolactone, 1,4-butanediol, and tetrahydrofuran [1,2]. It is usually obtained by hydrogenation of maleic anhydride (MAN), although the product of this reaction varies depending on the reaction conditions. Several researches have investigated various catalysts for this reaction, such as Ru/C, Ni/HY–Al2O3, Pd/C, Pd/SiO2, Ni/TiO2 and Pd/Al2O3 [3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. The reaction pathways of hydrogenation of maleic acid (MA) are shown in Figure 1. Kim et al. reported a yield of 99.97% SA using Pd/C as the catalyst and conducting the reaction under 1.0 MPa of H2 at 90 °C for 150 min [3]. Torres et al. reported achieving 100% selectivity for succinic anhydride through the reaction catalyzed by a mesoporous Ni/TiO2 catalyst at low temperature [8]. Yuan et al. reported achieving MA conversion of 98% and succinic anhydride selectivity of 99% using Pd/Al2O3 catalyst under 1.0 MPa of H2 pressure and 1,4-dioxane as solvent [5]. Among the various catalysts, the Pd/Al2O3 catalyst has an advantage for the chemical industry due to the high thermal stability and high dispersion of Pd [10,11]. However, few studies have been performed on the optimization of reaction conditions for the hydrogenation of maleic acid (MA) to SA over a Pd/Al2O3 catalyst. In our previous study, we reported that the particle size distribution of Pd is influenced by the physicochemical properties of Al2O3 (specific surface area and surface functional groups) and catalyst preparation conditions (pH, solution temperature, and reduction agent) [12,13]. Herein, we investigated the effect of reaction temperature (T), H2 pressure (PH2), and reaction time (t) on the liquid-phase hydrogenation of MA over a Pd/Al2O3 catalyst. The catalytic activities of Pd/Al2O3 with varying percentage of Pd dispersion and Al2O3 phase (γ, θ + α, and α) were also compared. Finally, the reusability of the Pd/Al2O3 catalyst was assessed.

2. Experiment

2.1. Catalyst Preparation

The catalyst support, Al2O3 (≥99%, Alfa Aesar, γ phase, average particle size: 20 nm), was dried at 105 °C for 4 h and calcined at various temperatures (900, 1100, and 1150 °C) for 4 h. The Pd/Al2O3 catalysts, containing 5 wt % Pd, were prepared by the deposition–precipitation method. The detailed procedure has been described in our previous research [12]. Briefly, Al2O3 was dispersed in the Pd precursor solution at 60 °C, and the pH was adjusted using 0.25 M NaOH solution. Reduction of the catalyst was carried out in the liquid phase using formalin solution (10 wt %, Sigma Aldrich). The prepared Pd/Al2O3 catalysts are denoted as Pd/Al2O3 (X)_pHY, where X is the heat treatment temperature of the Al2O3 support, and Y is the pH. The physicochemical properties of the catalysts are summarized in Table 1.

2.2. Hydrogenation of Maleic Acid

Liquid-phase hydrogenation of maleic acid was conducted in a 100 mL stainless steel autoclave. MA (0.29 mol), 46 g distilled water, and 0.1 g Pd/Al2O3 were placed in the autoclave. The reactor was purged with nitrogen three times to remove air, and hydrogen was then used to purge out nitrogen. The sealed autoclave was pressurized to the desired pressure and heated to the desired temperature, and the reaction mixture was stirred at 700 rpm. The catalytic reaction was carried out for 15–90 min. The reaction products were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC, Shimadzu Co. Model Prominence) equipped with a refractive index detector and Agilent Hi-Plex H (7.7 mm × 300 mm × 8 µm). The mobile phase was 5 mM H2SO4 with a flow rate of 6 mL min−1. The MA, SA, fumaric acid (FA), and malic acid (MLA) standards (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were analytical grade and used without purification. The reaction was conducted at varying temperature, hydrogen pressure, and reaction time. Conversion and selectivity were calculated as follows:
Conversion   ( % ) =     I n i t i a l   m o l e   o f   M A f i n a l   m o l e   o f   M A I n i t i a l   m o l e   o f   M A × 100
Selectivity   ( % ) =     m o l e   o f   d e s i r e d   p r o d u c t   I n i t i a l   m o l e   o f   M A f i n a l   m o l e   o f   M A × 100

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Reaction Temperature

The effect of reaction temperature on MA hydrogenation over the Pd/Al2O3 (900)_pH7.5 catalyst was investigated within the range of 30–110 °C (Figure 2). As the reaction temperature increased, the conversion of MA increased, while the selectivity for SA decreased from 100% to 85%. At temperatures above 90 °C, the selectivity for FA and MLA slightly increased. It has been reported that, at high temperature, MA is unstable and can isomerize to the more stable FA [14]. On the other hand, the isomer FA undergoes hydration to form MLA at high temperature. Thus, 90 °C is the optimal temperature for high conversion of MA and selectivity for SA.

3.2. Effect of H2 Pressure

The effect of H2 pressure on MA hydrogenation over the Pd/Al2O3 (900)_pH7.5 catalyst was investigated within the range of 1–15 bar (Figure 3). MA conversion and SA selectivity increased from 30% to 100% and 53% to 100%, respectively, as the H2 pressure increased from 1 to 15 bar. Within the range of 1–5 bar, the selectivity for FA gradually decreased from 40% to 1.6%. As demonstrated above, FA can be produced by isomerization of MA at high temperature. However, FA is predominantly produced at low H2 pressure, indicating that FA is an intermediate in the conversion of MA to SA. Kim et al. reported that the formation of FA is determined by the relative reaction rates of hydrogenation and protonation [3]. Protonation occurs faster than hydrogenation at H2 pressures lower than 5 bar but slower at higher pressures.

3.3. Effect of Reaction Time

The effect of reaction time on MA hydrogenation over the Pd/Al2O3 (900)_pH7.5 catalyst was investigated within the range of 15–90 min at a fixed reaction temperature of 90 °C and H2 pressure of 5 bar (Figure 4). The conversion of MA dramatically increased up to 80% upon increasing the reaction time from 15 to 30 min. It subsequently changed more gradually as the reaction time was prolonged from 30 to 90 min. The selectivity for FA initially increased between 15 and 30 min and then decreased as the reaction time increased from 30 to 90 min. Thus, 100% MA conversion and SA selectivity were achieved at a temperature of 90 °C, H2 pressure of 5 bar, and reaction time of 90 min.

3.4. Effect of Al2O3 Support Properties and Pd Dispersion

The effect of the properties of the Al2O3 support and dispersion of Pd on the catalytic activity for liquid-phase hydrogenation of MA were investigated under the following conditions: T = 90 °C, PH2 = 5 bar, t = 60 min, and stirring rate = 700 rpm. The physicochemical properties of the different Pd/Al2O3 catalysts are summarized in Table 1. The order of decreasing catalytic activity was Pd/Al2O3 (900)_pH7.5 > Pd/Al2O3 (105)_pH7.5 > Pd/Al2O3 (900)_pH11.5 > Pd/Al2O3 (1100)_pH7.5 > Pd/Al2O3 (1150)_pH7.5 (Figure 5). The conversion of MA and selectivity for SA increased with increasing dispersion (i.e., decreasing particle size) of Pd, indicating that Pd was the more active species in the hydrogenation of MA. The dispersion of Pd in the Pd/Al2O3 (900)_pH11.5 and Pd/Al2O3 (1100)_pH7.5 catalysts was similar at 13.1% and 11.0%, respectively. However, the catalysts exhibited significantly different MA conversion and SA selectivity owing to the difference in the properties of the Al2O3 support. It has been reported that the isomerization of MA to FA can occur without a catalyst and is strongly affected by the concentration of maleic acid, the reaction temperature, and the pH of the solution [15]. Al2O3 in the Pd/Al2O3 (900)_pH11.5 catalyst was in the γ phase, which has a large specific surface area and strong acid sites, whereas in the Pd/Al2O3 (1100)_pH7.5 catalyst, it was in the θ + α phase, which has a small specific surface area and weak acid sites. The physicochemical properties of the Al2O3 support affect the adsorption strength of the reactant and Pd nanoparticles on the active sites. Al2O3 in the γ phase can provide a large number of active sites for the hydrogenation reaction and allows increased retention time on the catalyst surface, resulting in high conversion of MA and high selectivity for SA. In contrast, the low Pd dispersion, small specific surface area, and weak acid sites in Pd/Al2O3 catalysts with Al2O3 in the θ + α or α phase can cause reduced retention time on the catalyst surface, resulting in low efficiency for the hydrogenation reaction. These results suggest that a decrease in the retention time of MA and H2 on the catalyst surface leads to a lower reaction rate.

3.5. Reusability of Pd/Al2O3 (900)_pH 7.5 Catalyst in Hydrogenation of MA

Reusability and stability are important factors in the chemical industry. The reusability of the Pd/Al2O3 (900)_pH7.5 catalyst was therefore investigated. Liquid-phase hydrogenation of MA was carried out under optimized reaction conditions. After each reaction, the catalyst was separated from the reactant and washed with deionized water. The conversion of MA and selectivity for SA did not decrease significantly for seven cycles, indicating that the Pd/Al2O3 (900)_pH7.5 catalyst was stable during the liquid-phase hydrogenation of MA (Figure 6).

4. Conclusions

Liquid-phase hydrogenation of MA to SA with different Pd/Al2O3 catalysts was investigated, focusing mainly on the effect of two factors on catalytic activity and selectivity: reaction conditions and physicochemical properties of the catalyst. The effect of the reaction conditions was investigated by varying the reaction temperature, H2 pressure, and reaction time. Depending on the reaction conditions, FA was formed as an intermediate or final product through isomerization of MA. Under the optimal reaction conditions of T = 90 °C, PH2 = 5 bar, t = 90 min, 100% MA conversion and 100% SA selectivity were achieved using the Pd/Al2O3 (900)_pH7.5 catalyst. The effect of the Al2O3 phase and Pd dispersion were also investigated. Catalytic activity and selectivity were found to increase with Pd dispersion. The characteristics of the Al2O3 phase strongly affected the adsorption strength of the reactant and Pd nanoparticles on the active sites and, consequently, the catalytic activity.

Author Contributions

Investigation and writing original draft preparation, M.Y.B.; Investigation, J.S.K.; Formal analysis, J.H.B.; writing—review and editing, D.-W.P. and M.S.L.; supervision, M.S.L.

Funding

This research was financially supported by DR AXION CO. (Project No. IR180054) and the Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH) (Project No. EE180054 and JA180001).

References

  1. Shao, Z.; Li, C.; Di, X.; Xiao, Z.; Liang, C. Aqueous-phase hydrogenation of succinic acid to γ-butyrolactone and tetrahydrofuran over Pd/C, Re/C, and Pd-Re/C catalysts. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 9638–9645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hong, U.G.; Park, H.W.; Lee, J.; Hwang, S.; Yi, J.; Song, I.K. Hydrogenation of succinic acid to tetrahydrofuran (THF) over rhenium catalyst supported on H2SO4-treated mesoporous carbon. Appl. Catal. A 2012, 415–416, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kim, J.S.; Baek, J.H.; Ryu, Y.B.; Hong, S.-S.; Lee, M.S. Liquid hydrogenation of maleic anhydride with Pd/C catalyst at low pressure and temperature in batch reactor. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2015, 15, 290–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Feng, Y.; Yin, H.; Wang, A.; Xie, T.; Jiang, T. Selective hydrogenation of maleic anhydride to succinic anhydride catalyzed by metallic nickel catalysts. Appl. Catal. A 2012, 425–426, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yuan, H.; Zhang, C.; Huo, W.; Ning, C.; Tang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Cong, D.; Zhang, W.; Luo, J.; Li, S.; et al. Selective hydrogenation of maleic anhydride over Pd/Al2O3 catalyst prepared via colloid deposition. J. Chem. Sci. 2014, 126, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Herrmann, U.; Emig, G. Liquid phase hydrogenation of maleic anhydride to 1,4-butanediol in a packed bubble column reactor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1998, 37, 759–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jung, S.M.; Godard, E.; Jung, S.Y.; Park, K.C.; Choi, J.U. Liquid-phase hydrogenation of maleic anhydride over Pd/SiO2: Effect of tin on catalytic activity and deactivation. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2003, 198, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Torres, C.C.; Alderete, J.B.; Mella, C.; Pawelec, B. Maleic anhydride hydrogenation to succinic anhydride over mesoporous Ni/TiO2 catalysts: Effects of Ni loading and temperature. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2016, 423, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Regenhardt, S.A.; Meyer, C.I.; Garetto, T.F.; Marchi, A.J. Selective gas phase hydrogenation of maleic anhydride over Ni-supported catalysts: Effect of support on the catalytic performance. Appl. Catal. A 2012, 449, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yan, K.; Javis, C.; Lafleur, T.; Qiao, Y.; Xie, X. Novel synthesis of Pd nanoparticles for hydrogenation of biomass-derived platform chemicals showing enhanced catalytic performance. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 25865–25871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pakdehi, S.G.; Sohrabi, M.; Moghaddam, A.S. Liquid phase hydrogenation of acethydrazo ne to N’-methyl acethydrazide over Pd/γ-Al2O3 catalyst. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 27, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Byun, M.Y.; Kim, J.S.; Park, D.-W.; Lee, M.S. Influence of calcination temperature on the structure and properties of Al2O3 as support for Pd catalyst. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2018, 35, 1083–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Byun, M.Y.; Kim, J.S.; Park, D.-W.; Lee, M.S. Influence of synthetic parameters on the particle size and distribution of Pd in Pd/Al2O3 Catalysts. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2018, 18, 6283–6287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tallon, M.A. Reactions involving maleic anhydride. In Handbook of Maleic Anhydride Based Materials: Syntheses, Properties and Applications; Musa, O.M., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Basel, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 59–149. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gao, Z. Study on the isomerization of maleic acid to fumaric acid without catalyst. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2018, 39, 920–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Reaction pathways in hydrogenation of maleic acid in water.
Figure 1. Reaction pathways in hydrogenation of maleic acid in water.
Energies 12 00284 g001
Figure 2. Effect of reaction temperature on maleic acid (MA) hydrogenation over Pd/Al2O3 (900)_pH7.5 at PH2 = 3 bar and t = 60 min.
Figure 2. Effect of reaction temperature on maleic acid (MA) hydrogenation over Pd/Al2O3 (900)_pH7.5 at PH2 = 3 bar and t = 60 min.
Energies 12 00284 g002
Figure 3. Effect of H2 pressure on MA hydrogenation over Pd/Al2O3 (900)_pH7.5 at T = 90 °C and t = 60 min.
Figure 3. Effect of H2 pressure on MA hydrogenation over Pd/Al2O3 (900)_pH7.5 at T = 90 °C and t = 60 min.
Energies 12 00284 g003
Figure 4. Effect of reaction time on MA hydrogenation over Pd/Al2O3 (900)_pH7.5 at T = 90 °C and PH2 = 5 bar.
Figure 4. Effect of reaction time on MA hydrogenation over Pd/Al2O3 (900)_pH7.5 at T = 90 °C and PH2 = 5 bar.
Energies 12 00284 g004
Figure 5. Effect of Al2O3 phase and Pd dispersion on MA hydrogenation at T = 90 °C, PH2 = 5 bar, and t = 60 min.
Figure 5. Effect of Al2O3 phase and Pd dispersion on MA hydrogenation at T = 90 °C, PH2 = 5 bar, and t = 60 min.
Energies 12 00284 g005
Figure 6. Reusability of Pd/Al2O3 (900)_pH7.5 catalyst in MA hydrogenation at T = 90 °C, PH2 = 5 bar, and t = 90 min.
Figure 6. Reusability of Pd/Al2O3 (900)_pH7.5 catalyst in MA hydrogenation at T = 90 °C, PH2 = 5 bar, and t = 90 min.
Energies 12 00284 g006
Table 1. Summary of physicochemical properties of Pd/Al2O3 catalysts [12,13].
Table 1. Summary of physicochemical properties of Pd/Al2O3 catalysts [12,13].
CatalystsPd/Al2O3
(105)_pH 7.5
Pd/Al2O3
(900)_pH 7.5
Pd/Al2O3
(900)_pH 11.5
Pd/Al2O3
(1100)_pH 7.5
Pd/Al2O3
(1150)_pH 7.5
Al2O3 phase 1γγγθ + αα
Al2O3 surface area 2195146146546
Al2O3 Pore volume 20.820.620.620.280.007
Al2O3 Acidity (mmol/g) 30.470.370.370.220.07
Pd dispersion (%) 420.629.813.111.02.9
1 X-ray diffraction, 2 Brunauer–Emmett–Teller analysis of N2 adsorption–desorption, 3 NH3 temperature programmed desorption, 4 CO chemisorption.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Byun, M.Y.; Kim, J.S.; Baek, J.H.; Park, D.-W.; Lee, M.S. Liquid-Phase Hydrogenation of Maleic Acid over Pd/Al2O3 Catalysts Prepared via Deposition–Precipitation Method. Energies 2019, 12, 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12020284

AMA Style

Byun MY, Kim JS, Baek JH, Park D-W, Lee MS. Liquid-Phase Hydrogenation of Maleic Acid over Pd/Al2O3 Catalysts Prepared via Deposition–Precipitation Method. Energies. 2019; 12(2):284. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12020284

Chicago/Turabian Style

Byun, Mi Yeon, Ji Sun Kim, Jae Ho Baek, Dae-Won Park, and Man Sig Lee. 2019. "Liquid-Phase Hydrogenation of Maleic Acid over Pd/Al2O3 Catalysts Prepared via Deposition–Precipitation Method" Energies 12, no. 2: 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12020284

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop