Next Article in Journal
Diabetes Mellitus Secondary to Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Previous Article in Journal
Conditional Approval of Cancer Drugs in Canada: Accountability and Impact on Public Funding
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis after Abdominopelvic Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Review

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, 4V33–1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2019, 26(1), 106-110; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4339
Submission received: 3 November 2018 / Revised: 4 December 2018 / Accepted: 10 January 2019 / Published: 1 February 2019

Abstract

Objective: Extended prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (vte) after abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery with low molecular weight heparin (lmwh) is recommended by multiple guidelines. The primary objective of the present study was to assess adherence to that guideline recommendation at tertiary care centres within Hamilton Health Sciences (hhs). Methods: Given that an estimated 70% of the study population would be expected to receive extended prophylaxis, a sample size of 105 patients was calculated. Patients who had undergone abdominal or pelvic surgery for cancer from March 2012 to December 2015 were identified, and data were collected from electronic health records. The primary outcome was prescription of extended vte prophylaxis. Results: Of 105 patients, only 3 received extended vte prophylaxis. Those 3 patients had serous carcinoma of the uterus, transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder, and cecal cancer. Of the 3 patients, 2 were followed by the thrombosis service while in hospital; none of the other 102 patients received any form of extended vte prophylaxis. Conclusions: Based on multiple randomized controlled trials, guidelines suggest lmwh prophylaxis for up to 4 weeks after major abdominal or pelvic cancer surgery. Despite those recommendations, postoperative extended vte prophylaxis is not commonly prescribed at hhs facilities. Next steps will include identification of barriers and an examination of how those barriers could be addressed. Failure to use prophylaxis is not consistent with evidencebased guidelines and is placing patients at risk of vte.
Keywords: extended prophylaxis; cancer-associated thrombosis; low molecular weight heparin extended prophylaxis; cancer-associated thrombosis; low molecular weight heparin

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Laureano, M.; Ebraheem, M.; Crowther, M. Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis after Abdominopelvic Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Review. Curr. Oncol. 2019, 26, 106-110. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4339

AMA Style

Laureano M, Ebraheem M, Crowther M. Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis after Abdominopelvic Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Review. Current Oncology. 2019; 26(1):106-110. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4339

Chicago/Turabian Style

Laureano, M., M. Ebraheem, and Mark Crowther. 2019. "Extended Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis after Abdominopelvic Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Review" Current Oncology 26, no. 1: 106-110. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.26.4339

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop