Next Article in Journal
Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of Head and Neck: Clinical Predictors of Outcome from a Canadian Centre
Previous Article in Journal
Expression and Clinical Significance of Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 in Lung Cancer Tissues and Perioperative Circulation from Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Quebec Public Funding Facilitates Fertility Preservation for Male Cancer Patients

1
Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
2
Department of Urology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2016, 23(1), 20-25; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.2793
Submission received: 3 November 2015 / Revised: 4 December 2015 / Accepted: 6 January 2016 / Published: 1 February 2016

Abstract

Background: Sperm cryopreservation remains the only clinically feasible option to preserve male fertility. The quality of counselling provided by the treating physicians and the cost of sperm cryopreservation can both influence a patient’s decision about whether to preserve sperm. On 5 August 2010, the Quebec government introduced provincial coverage of assisted reproductive technologies, with sperm cryopreservation included as a covered service. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether and how such a program affects the behaviour of cancer patients with respect to sperm cryopreservation. Methods: We analyzed the database derived from male patients undergoing sperm cryopreservation from August 2008 to August 2012 at our centre. The retrieved data included patient age, male infertility or oncologic diagnosis, sperm quality parameters, and details about the number of visits for sperm cryopreservation. Results: The number of cancer patients who cryopreserved sperm before and after the policy change did not differ significantly, but a marked increase in the number of non-cancer patients was observed. Further analysis revealed that, after implementation of the public funding program, the total number of sperm cryopreservation sessions per patient increased significantly in cancer patients but not in non-cancer patients. Conclusions: It appears that cancer patients who are willing to freeze sperm are keen to return for more sessions of sperm banking when no fees are associated with the service. Those findings suggest that cost reduction is an important factor for improving delivery of fertility preservation services to male cancer patients.
Keywords: Male fertility preservation; costs; assisted reproductive technologies Male fertility preservation; costs; assisted reproductive technologies

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Herrero, M.B.; García, A.; Buckett, W.; Tulandi, T.; Chan, P. Quebec Public Funding Facilitates Fertility Preservation for Male Cancer Patients. Curr. Oncol. 2016, 23, 20-25. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.2793

AMA Style

Herrero MB, García A, Buckett W, Tulandi T, Chan P. Quebec Public Funding Facilitates Fertility Preservation for Male Cancer Patients. Current Oncology. 2016; 23(1):20-25. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.2793

Chicago/Turabian Style

Herrero, M.B., A. García, W. Buckett, T. Tulandi, and P. Chan. 2016. "Quebec Public Funding Facilitates Fertility Preservation for Male Cancer Patients" Current Oncology 23, no. 1: 20-25. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.2793

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop