Next Article in Journal
Recent Trends in Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Utilization in Canada, Using Self-Reported Data from 2008 and 2012
Previous Article in Journal
Patient Preferences for Timing and Access to Radiation Therapy
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Organization of Colposcopy Services in Ontario: Recommended Framework

1
Ontario Cervical Screening Program, Cancer Care Ontario, and University Health Network, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Toronto, ON, Canada
2
Cancer Care Ontario, Program in Evidence-Based Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
3
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada
4
Division of Anatomical Pathology, Juravinski Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada
5
Division of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Infectious Diseases, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
6
Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
7
Barrie, ON, Canada
8
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2015, 22(4), 287-296; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2575
Submission received: 6 May 2015 / Revised: 10 June 2015 / Accepted: 9 July 2015 / Published: 1 August 2015

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this guideline is to help ensure the provision of high-quality colposcopy practices in the province of Ontario, including those conducted as diagnostic procedures in follow-up to an abnormal cervical screening test. Methods: This document updates the recommendations published in the 2008 colposcopy guideline from Cancer Care Ontario, The Optimum Organization for the Delivery of Colposcopy Service in Ontario. A systematic review of guidelines was conducted to evaluate the existing evidence and recommendations concerning these key aspects of colposcopy: (1) Training, qualification, accreditation, and maintenance of competence; (2) Practice setting requirements; (3) Operational practice; (4) Quality indicators and outcomes. Results: This guideline provides recommendations on training and maintenance of competence for colposcopists in the practice settings in which colposcopic evaluation and treatments are conducted. It also provides recommendations on operational issues and quality indicators for colposcopy. Conclusions: This updated guideline is intended to support quality improvement for colposcopy for all indications, including the follow-up of an abnormal cervical screening test and work-up for lower genital tract lesions that are not clearly malignant. The recommendations contained in this document are intended for clinicians and institutions performing colposcopy in Ontario, and for policymakers and program planners involved in the delivery of colposcopy services.
Keywords: Cancer Care Ontario; colposcopy; cervical cancer screening; frameworks; guideline recommendations Cancer Care Ontario; colposcopy; cervical cancer screening; frameworks; guideline recommendations

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Murphy, J.; Varela, N.P.; Elit, L.; Lytwyn, A.; Yudin, M.; Shier, M.; Wu, V.; El-Khatib, S. The Organization of Colposcopy Services in Ontario: Recommended Framework. Curr. Oncol. 2015, 22, 287-296. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2575

AMA Style

Murphy J, Varela NP, Elit L, Lytwyn A, Yudin M, Shier M, Wu V, El-Khatib S. The Organization of Colposcopy Services in Ontario: Recommended Framework. Current Oncology. 2015; 22(4):287-296. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2575

Chicago/Turabian Style

Murphy, J., N.P. Varela, L. Elit, A. Lytwyn, M. Yudin, M. Shier, V. Wu, and S. El-Khatib. 2015. "The Organization of Colposcopy Services in Ontario: Recommended Framework" Current Oncology 22, no. 4: 287-296. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2575

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop