Next Article in Journal
Use of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors Gefitinib, Erlotinib, Afatinib, Dacomitinib, and Icotinib in the Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Doctor, What Are My Options? a Prospective Cohort Study of an Individualized Care Plan for Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Computed Tomography–Based Distribution of Involved Lymph Nodes in Patients with Upper Esophageal Cancer

1
Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China
2
Department of Radiology, Shandong Caner Hospital and Institute, Jinan, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2015, 22(3), 178-182; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2365
Submission received: 12 March 2015 / Revised: 14 April 2015 / Accepted: 13 May 2015 / Published: 1 June 2015

Abstract

Background: Delineating the nodal clinical target volume (CTVn) remains a challenging task in patients with cervical or upper thoracic esophageal carcinoma (EC). In particular, the extent of the lymph area that should be included in the irradiation field remains controversial. In the present study, the extent of the CTVn was determined based on the incidence of lymph node involvement mapped by computed tomography (CT) imaging. Methods: Our study included 468 patients who were diagnosed with cervical and upper thoracic ec and who received staging information between June 2005 and April 2011. The anatomic distribution of metastatic regional lymph nodes was mapped using CT images and grouped using the levels established by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. The probability of the various groups being involved was examined. If a lymph node group had a probability of 10% or more of being involved, it was considered at high risk for metastasis, and elective treatment as part of the CTVn was recommended. Results: Lymph node involvement was mapped by CT in 256 patients (54.7%). Not all lymph node groups should be included in the CTVn. For cervical lesions, the involved lymph nodes were located mainly between the hyoid bone and the arcus aortae; the recommended CTVn should consist of the neck lymph nodes at levels iii and iv (supraclavicular group) and thoracic groups 2 and 3P. In upper thoracic ec patients, most of the involved lymph nodes were distributed between the cricoid cartilage and the subcarinal area; the CTVn should cover the supraclavicular group and thoracic nodal groups 2, 3P, 4, 5, and 7. Conclusions: Our CT-based study indicates a specific distribution and incidence of metastatic lymph node groups in patients with cervical and upper thoracic EC. The results suggest that regional lymph node groups should be electively included in the CTVn for precise radiation administration.
Keywords: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; lymph node metastasis; computed tomography; radiation; clinical target volume Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; lymph node metastasis; computed tomography; radiation; clinical target volume

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, M.; Liu, Y.; Xu, L.; Huang, Y.; Li, W.; Yu, J.; Kong, L. Computed Tomography–Based Distribution of Involved Lymph Nodes in Patients with Upper Esophageal Cancer. Curr. Oncol. 2015, 22, 178-182. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2365

AMA Style

Li M, Liu Y, Xu L, Huang Y, Li W, Yu J, Kong L. Computed Tomography–Based Distribution of Involved Lymph Nodes in Patients with Upper Esophageal Cancer. Current Oncology. 2015; 22(3):178-182. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2365

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, M., Y. Liu, L. Xu, Y. Huang, W. Li, J. Yu, and L. Kong. 2015. "Computed Tomography–Based Distribution of Involved Lymph Nodes in Patients with Upper Esophageal Cancer" Current Oncology 22, no. 3: 178-182. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.22.2365

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop