Next Article in Journal
Current Oncology: It All Started 20 Years Ago...
Previous Article in Journal
Indicator Measures er/pr and her2 Testing among Women with Invasive Breast Cancer
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Meeting Report

Consensus Recommendations for Cancer Rehabilitation: Research and Education Priorities

by
S. McEwen
1.2,*,
M. Egan
3,4,5,
M. Chasen
3,4,5,
M. Fitch
1,2,6 and
The Partners in Cancer Rehabilitation Research Group
1
Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
2
University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
3
Élisabeth Bruyère Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
4
Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
5
University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
6
Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2013, 20(1), 64-69; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1277
Submission received: 2 November 2012 / Revised: 5 December 2012 / Accepted: 4 January 2013 / Published: 1 February 2013

Abstract

As cancer survivorship increases, there is a need for additional and more complex rehabilitation services. The Partners in Cancer Rehabilitation Research group held a 3-day invitational working meeting aimed at defining the state of the science in cancer rehabilitation research and identifying key areas for development of research and education. In May 2012, 29 participants gathered to present their current work, review a synthesis of the current literature, generate ideas about research and education gaps, and develop consensus on priority areas. The conclusion of the meeting was that a main research priority is to develop and test personalized rehabilitation interventions and brief measures to identify the presence and severity of disabling sequelae. The education consensus statement concluded that a clear description of cancer rehabilitation and its mandate should be developed as a precursor to education activities, including both a conceptualization of complex interdisciplinary rehabilitation and the roles of individual professions, and further, that there is a great need to increase awareness among health professionals, patients, and families of the need for and general effectiveness of cancer rehabilitation. Numerous specific recommendations were also put forward, and it is hoped that those recommendations will provide the foundation for a new and productive era of research and will play a role in the improvement of functional health and participation outcomes for cancer survivors.
Keywords: rehabilitation; research; education rehabilitation; research; education

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

McEwen, S.; Egan, M.; Chasen, M.; Fitch, M.; , The Partners in Cancer Rehabilitation Research Group. Consensus Recommendations for Cancer Rehabilitation: Research and Education Priorities. Curr. Oncol. 2013, 20, 64-69. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1277

AMA Style

McEwen S, Egan M, Chasen M, Fitch M, The Partners in Cancer Rehabilitation Research Group. Consensus Recommendations for Cancer Rehabilitation: Research and Education Priorities. Current Oncology. 2013; 20(1):64-69. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1277

Chicago/Turabian Style

McEwen, S., M. Egan, M. Chasen, M. Fitch, and The Partners in Cancer Rehabilitation Research Group. 2013. "Consensus Recommendations for Cancer Rehabilitation: Research and Education Priorities" Current Oncology 20, no. 1: 64-69. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.20.1277

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop