Next Article in Journal
Characterisation and Quantification of Upper Body Surface Motions for Tidal Volume Determination in Lung-Healthy Individuals
Next Article in Special Issue
Accurate Measurement of Temperatures in Industrial Grinding Operations with Steep Gradients
Previous Article in Journal
A Composite-Type MEMS Pirani Gauge for Wide Range and High Accuracy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optical Fiber Sensors for High-Temperature Monitoring: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High-Temperature Sensing Based on GAWBS In Silica Single-Mode Fiber

1
Center for Optics Research and Engineering, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
2
Key Laboratory of Laser and Infrared System of Ministry of Education, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
3
School of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2023, 23(3), 1277; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031277
Submission received: 6 December 2022 / Revised: 14 January 2023 / Accepted: 19 January 2023 / Published: 22 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensors for High Temperature Monitoring)

Abstract

:
High temperature detection is a constant challenge for condition monitoring under harsh environments in optical fiber sensors research. In this study, the temperature response characteristics of guided acoustic wave Brillouin scattering (GAWBS) spectra in silica single-mode fiber (SMF) up to 800 °C are experimentally investigated, demonstrating the feasibility of the method for high-temperature monitoring. With increasing temperature, the resonance frequency of GAWBS spectra increases in a nearly linear manner, with linearly fitted temperature-dependent frequency shift coefficients of 8.19 kHz/°C for TR2,7 mode and 16.74 kHz/°C for R0,4 mode. More importantly, the linewidth of the GAWBS spectra is observed to narrow down with increasing temperature with a linearly fitted rate of −6.91 × 10−4/°C for TR2,7 modes and −8.56 × 10−4/°C for R0,4 modes. The signal-to-noise ratio of the GAWBS spectra induced by both modes increase by more than 3 dB when the temperature rises from 22 °C to 800 °C, which indicates that the proposed sensing scheme has better performance in high-temperature environments, and are particularly suitable for sensing applications in extreme environments. This study confirms the potential of high-temperature sensing using only GAWBS in silica fibers without any complex micromachining process, which has the advantages of strong mechanical strength, simple structure, easy operation, and low cost.

1. Introduction

Optical fiber high temperature sensing is a constant challenge for condition monitoring in harsh environments, such as aerospace, nuclear energy production, metallurgy, and deep underground wells [1,2,3]. Typically, fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs), [4,5] based on femtosecond (fs) laser inscription, and various interferometric sensors [6,7,8], based on high-precision microcavities, are widely studied, and they have good high temperature measurement performance. FBGs, usually etched in silica SMF by laser, can be operated under high temperature with temperature sensitivity of about 10 pm/°C [9]. Interferometer-based high temperature sensors are usually realized by fabricating micro-cavity structures using laser writing, mode field mismatch by mismatch fusion splicing, fiber tapers by electric arc discharge or oxyhydrogen flame, and so on. According to the different interference structures, high-temperature fiber-optic sensors can be divided into several types, including transmission type, such as Mach-Zehnder interferometers (MZIs), and reflection type, such as Michelson interferometer (MIs), and Fabry–Perot interferometers (FPIs) [10,11]. Most interferometric high temperature fiber-optic sensors can operate with higher temperature sensitivity (10–165 pm/°C) compared with FBG sensors thanks to the higher sensitivity of the optical phase difference (OPD) on temperature variations [10]. Unfortunately, the use of laser inscriptions or the precision fabrication of microstructures unavoidably increases the complexity of sensor preparation and cost, and reduces the mechanical strength of the sensors.
Different from FBGs and interferometers that require precision laser inscription and microstructure fabrication, Brillouin scattering-based fiber-optic sensors utilizing communication SMF without any modifications can also function as high-temperature sensors, by exploiting the relationship between the Brillouin frequency shift (BFS) and temperature [12,13]. According to the propagating direction of the scattered light relative to that of the incident pump light, Brillouin scattering can be divided into backward Brillouin scattering (BBS) when the scattered light counter-propagates against the incident pump light, and forward Brillouin scattering (FBS) when the scattered light propagates along the incident pump light. As a typical acousto-optic interaction, which is easier to be observed in optical fibers, the study of BBS starts earlier and sensors based on BBS are more mature than those based on FBS, due to the larger gain coefficient for BBS in optical fibers [14,15]. In recent years, distributed fiber-optic temperature and/or strain sensing based on BBS has been intensively investigated and is promising for engineering applications [16]. However, to deal with the large BFS (vBBS ≈ 10.8 GHz in standard SMF) in BBS-based sensors, costly broadband signal processing modules are required, which increases the cost and complexity of the demodulation system [17]. Moreover, the published results also show that when the temperature increases, the temperature-dependent BFS coefficient changes from 1.349 MHz/°C at 22 °C to 0.419 MHz/°C at 1000 °C [18], which reveals a nonlinear relationship between temperature and BFS. These drawbacks limit the development of BBS-based point high temperature sensors. In contrast, the BFS of FBS in standard SMF is usually in the order of hundreds of MHz, which reduces the requirements of broadband detection devices. In addition, the BFS of FBS is theoretically predicted to vary more linearly with the temperature [19,20], offering great potential for high temperature sensing.
FBS is also called guided acoustic wave Brillouin scattering (GAWBS), in which forward scattering of incident pump wave occurs caused by a series of transverse acoustic modes in the circular cross section of fibers, leading to multi-peak feature of the GAWBS spectrum [21]. The resonance frequency and linewidth of the GAWBS spectrum are determined by the transversely transmitted resonant acoustic waves, which are highly sensitive to fiber diameter, temperature, and acoustic impedance outside fiber cladding region [22,23,24]. Therefore, GAWBS has been widely studied in temperature and strain sensing [19,24], fiber diameter uniformity testing [25], material characterization [26,27], and acoustic impedance measurement of liquids [28,29], even towards simultaneous measurement of multiple parameters [30]. To date, the temperature dependence of the GAWBS frequency shift has been investigated for various types of fibers, including single-mode fibers [19], cavity-assisted fibers [31], photonic crystal fibers [32], highly nonlinear fibers [33], and polyimide coated fibers [23]. However, most of the studies are focused on the temperature-dependent resonance frequency shift coefficient over the low temperature range of −20 to 100 °C, to our knowledge. The spectral characteristics of GAWBS at higher temperatures have not been fully explored. As high temperatures would place impacts on acoustic properties of the silica fiber that affect the spectral characteristics of GAWBS [34,35], it is necessary to investigate the feasibility of GAWBS-based fiber optic sensors for high temperature measurement by experimental investigations.
In this paper, we characterize a standard silica SMF for high-temperature measurement based on polarized and depolarized GAWBS. The resonance frequency of R0,4 mode and TR2,7 mode induced GAWBS spectra increases nearly linearly with temperature and has a temperature-dependent resonance frequency shift coefficient of 16.74 kHz/°C and 8.19 kHz/°C, respectively. In the meantime, as the temperature increases, the linewidth of the spectrum becomes narrower and the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) increases, which originates mainly from the increase in viscose lifetime of acoustic phonons with temperature. Theoretical analysis explaining the phenomenon of increasing SNR with temperature is conducted, in which the simulated result agrees well with the experimental result.

2. Theory and Sensing Principle

Standard silica SMF is usually considered as isotropic cylinder due to the similar mechanical properties of the core and cladding materials. In such a waveguide, where GAWBS occurs, the stimulated resonant acoustic waves can be mainly divided into two categories: radial modes (R0,m) and torsional-radial modes (TR2,m); where m denotes the order of the acoustic resonance [21]. R0,m modes perturb the refractive index of the fiber cross-section, thereby modulating the phase of the transmitted light to induce polarized GAWBS, while the TR2,m modes perturb both the refractive index, and the birefringence to induce depolarized GAWBS. Different from the BBS process which typically produces single Stokes light at a frequency shift of 10.8 GHz, the GAWBS process can produce multiple Stokes lights within a frequency range of 20–800 MHz in silica SMF [21]. The study of the vibrational modes in a uniform cylinder shows that the resonance frequency (GAWBS-induced frequency shift) of the mth acoustic mode depends on the cylinder diameter d and the acoustic velocity V.
v m = V y m π d
where d is the fiber cladding diameter, which is 125 μm in our case; vm corresponds to the resonance frequency of R0,m mode when V is the longitudinal acoustic velocity VL; vm corresponds to the resonance frequency of TR2,m mode when V is the shear acoustic velocity VS; and ym is the mth solution to the boundary condition equations comprised of Bessel functions [21]:
  1 α 2 J 0 y m α 2 J 2 y m = 0 ( R 0 , m   modes )
3 y m 2 2 J 2 α y m 6 y m 2 2 J 2 y m 3 y m J 3 y m J 2 α y m α y m J 3 α y m 2 y m 2 2 J 2 y m + y m J 3 y m = 0 ( T R 2 , m   modes )
where J0, J2, and J3 are the zero-order, second-order, and third-order Bessel functions, respectively, α equals to VS/VL. For fused silica, vs. = 3764 m/s, and VL = 5968 m/s, α = 0.63 [36]. VL, vs., and α are dependent on the acoustic properties of the material and their expression are given as follows [19]:
  V L = E 1 γ 1 + γ 1 2 γ ρ
V S = E 2 ρ 1 + γ
α = 1 2 γ 2 1 γ
where ρ = 2203 kg/m3 is the density of silica, Δρ/ρ = −1.83 × 10−6/°C, γ = 0.17 is the Poisson’s ratio, Δγ/γ = 6.7 × 10−5/°C, E = 72.553 GPa is the Young’s modulus [37,38]. For the thermal response of GAWBS, the resonance frequencies of polarized GAWBS and depolarized GAWBS depend on the longitudinal acoustic velocity VL and shear acoustic velocity vs., respectively, and ym, but independent of the effective refractive index n according to Equation (1). In Equations (2) and (3), it is shown that ym is related to α, which equals to VS/VL. To evaluate the temperature dependence of these parameters, theoretical calculations are performed, and it is found that the value of α changes from 0.63 to 0.617 for a temperature increase of 1000 °C [20], which results in the change of ym of less than 0.1%. For comparison, the increase in VL or vs. could be as large as 8% for a temperature increase of 1000 °C. Thus, in Equation (1), ym can be considered as a fixed value that does not vary with temperature due to its much weaker dependence on temperature compared to the acoustic velocities. Since π is a constant, and d does not vary significantly with temperature variations in Equation (1), the resonance frequency of each acoustic mode can be finally considered to be approximately linearly dependent on the temperature in the qualitative theoretical prediction.
In addition to the resonance frequencies corresponding to different acoustic modes, linewidth of the resonance peak in the GAWBS spectra is also an important parameter for characterizing the GAWBS spectra. The linewidth of GAWBS spectra in uncoated silica SMF can be expressed as [39]:
Γ m = Γ i n h o m o + Γ τ
where Γinhomo = (δd/d)vm·× 2π, originated from the variation of diameter δd, which is negligible with temperature change [39]. Γτ = 1/τ is the viscose damping term, which is inversely related to the viscose lifetime τ. As the temperature increases, the viscosity of the FUT increases [40,41], which enhances the phonon lifetime and the associated forward Brillouin scattering efficiency, resulting in the linewidth narrowing.

3. Experimental Results

3.1. Experimental Setup

A standard silica SMF (manufactured by YOFC (Wuhan, China)) with a cladding diameter of 125 μm, a mode field diameter (MFD) of 10.8 μm, and an effective refractive index (neff) of 1.467 at 1550 nm, is used as the fiber under test (FUT). The high-temperature heating device is a temperature-controlled tube furnace with an effective heating zone extending over a length of about 13 cm (in Figure 1), and a thermocouple is placed in the center of the quartz tube for temperature monitoring. As shown in Figure 1, the FUT is wound into a coil with diameters that are fitted with the inner diameter of the heating tube as a high temperature sensing element. Before temperature measurement for each new sample, the FUT is first heated to 800 °C, then kept at the temperature for around 1 h to remove the fiber coating through the coating burning effect [42]. The FUTs used in the subsequent experiments are all annealed fibers that have been heated and cooled down to room temperature naturally with fiber coating removed.
The schematic diagram for investigating the temperature response of the polarized and depolarized GAWBS spectrum is illustrated in Figure 1. For both configurations, output light from a narrow linewidth semiconductor laser (NLLD-0175-3-34-2, center wavelength: 1550.12 nm, linewidth: 15 kHz) is amplified to 19 dBm by an erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA) as the pump light. An isolator (ISO) is placed after the EDFA to block reflected light for protection. As shown in Figure 1a, when pump light enters the Sagnac loop consisting of a 50:50 fiber coupler, this interferometer structure converts the acoustic wave-induced phase modulation to intensity modulation. In the above setup, radial and torsional-radial acoustic waves can both be excited [23], so it is necessary to adjust the polarization controller (PC) in the loop to suppress the torsional-radial acoustic modes as much as possible, and retain only the polarized GAWBS spectrum induced by radial acoustic modes. Then, the beat signal of the pump light and the scattered light by polarized GAWBS is detected by a fast photodetector (PD, bandwidth: 350 MHz). Finally, the polarized GAWBS spectrum is observed by an electrical spectrum analyzer (ESA, bandwidth: 6.2 GHz) with a frequency resolution of 1 kHz after being averaged by 1000 times. Unlike the setup shown in Figure 1a, the setup in Figure 1b is used to excite and demodulate depolarized GAWBS process in FUTs two PCs, and a polarizer (PL) are used to convert the TR2,m modes induced polarization modulation to amplitude modulation. Similar to Figure 1a, the beat signal of the pump light and the scattered light by depolarized GAWBS is detected by a PD, the spectrum of which is analyzed by the ESA.

3.2. Results and Discussion

Figure 2a,b show the measured polarized and depolarized GAWBS spectra at 400 °C by using the above configurations, respectively. A series of resonance peaks corresponding to the first 7 orders of R0,m modes (m = 1,2,…,7) can be observed in Figure 2a, in which the spectrum is also mixed with low-frequency noise caused by the external environmental disturbances and incompletely suppressed resonance peaks induced by low-order TR2,m modes (m = 1,3,4,7). Although the TR2,m modes induced depolarized GAWBS resonance peaks can be suppressed by adjusting the PC in the experimental configuration at low temperatures, these resonance peaks reemerge with the increasing temperatures as both polarized and depolarized GAWBS would be enhanced with temperature increase (detailed analysis later). Resonance peaks in Figure 2b correspond to the first 16 orders of TR2,m modes (m = 1,2,…,16), which have higher radio frequency (RF) powers without the use of a 50:50 fiber coupler in the setup shown in Figure 1b. Considering that the resonance peaks corresponding to the R0,4 mode (near 178 MHz in Figure 2a) and TR2,7 mode (near 140 MHz in Figure 2b) have a relatively large SNR, their temperature dependence are investigated [21]. The acoustic mode order of the resonance peaks in the GAWBS spectra obtained from the experiments for both polarized and depolarized GAWBS can be identified according to the calculated values of the corresponding resonance frequencies using Equations (1)–(3). The numerically calculated results of the resonance frequencies for both polarized and depolarized GAWBS in silica SMF, and the corresponding measured results are listed in Table 1.
To investigate the temperature dependence of the GAWBS spectra, the temperature of the furnace tube is changed from 22 °C to 800 °C with a step of 100 °C. Figure 3 shows the test results of the R0,4 mode and TR2,7 mode induced spectra at different temperatures. It is clearly seen that the center frequency of the resonance peak increases with increasing temperature. Besides the center frequency, it can be found that the SNR of the GAWBS resonance peak of the FUT also increases with the temperature (detailed analysis later), while the linewidth of the peak narrows down with the temperature. Since the two modes have similar thermal response to temperature, and the TR2,7 mode induced GAWBS spectra have higher RF power, narrower linewidth, and less noise interference from the intrinsic noise of the instruments, TR2,7 mode is selected as an example for detailed analysis.
The measured results of the TR2,7 mode induced GAWBS spectra at different temperatures, normalized and Lorentz fitting spectrum at 400 °C, the temperature-dependent resonance frequency shift and linewidth variation of the resonance spectra, and the temperature-dependent SNR of the resonance spectra are shown in Figure 4. In Figure 4a, it is seen that each spectrum measured at each temperature consists of two peaks, one with an almost fixed lower frequency corresponding to the depolarized GAWBS occurring along the fiber chain including delayed fiber and fiber patch cords, and the other one with higher increasing frequencies when temperature increases corresponding to the depolarized GAWBS occurring along the FUT. The center frequency of the first resonance peak contributed by the fiber chain can be used as a reference at room temperature for the absolute temperature measurement when monitoring the center frequency of the second resonance peak in Figure 4a. Note that as the length of the FUT is smaller than that of the fiber chain, the strength of depolarized GAWBS in the FUT is normally smaller than that in the fiber chain at relatively low temperatures, resulting in a higher SNR value of the first resonance peak than that of the second peak in Figure 4a, as observed for temperatures below 600 °C.
In order to accurately quantify the variation of resonance frequency and linewidth, the spectrum is normalized, and Lorentzian multi-peak fitted as exemplified in Figure 4b, which shows the depolarized GAWBS spectrum of TR2,7 mode measured at 400 °C. As illustrated in Figure 4b, both of the measured depolarized GAWBS spectral peaks of TR2,7 mode contributed by the fiber chain at room temperature and the FUT at 400 °C are well fitted with Lorentzian fitting method. The goodness of fitting for the resonance peak of TR2,7 mode at 400 °C is obtained with a high R2 value of 0.9664. In the fitting result, the center frequency of the second resonance peak as induced by the FUT is found to be shifted from 140.42 MHz at room temperature to 143.84 MHz at 400 °C. The linewidth of the TR2,7 mode spectral peak is measured to be 0.4268 MHz at 400 °C. The same treatment is then applied to the spectra obtained at other temperatures to extract the resonance frequency and the linewidth, which are then mapped as a function of temperature as shown in Figure 4c. Then, Polynomial fitting is applied on the raw data, and the obtained fitted functions are added in Figure 4c. It is found that both the resonance frequency and the linewidth of the depolarized GAWBS spectrum are approximately linearly related to the increasing temperature. In Figure 4c, it can be found that the resonance frequency shifts nearly linearly with increasing temperature at lower temperatures (<400 °C). However, as the temperature continues to increase beyond 400 °C, the frequency growth rate begins to decay. In addition to the polynomial fitting in Figure 4c, linear fitting is also performed on the resonance frequency and the linewidth data, and the obtained R2 values are 0.9937 and 0.9715, respectively, which indicates that the variations of the resonance frequency and linewidth of the TR2,7 mode GAWBS spectrum follow an approximately linear relationship with the temperature over the tested range. The temperature-dependent resonance frequency shift coefficient and linewidth variation coefficient of the TR2,7 mode is found to be 8.19 kHz/°C and −0.409 kHz/°C, respectively. These linear fitting results are also used in the subsequent theoretical calculation of the temperature dependence of the GAWBS gain coefficient. Thus, with the linearly fitted temperature-dependent resonance frequency shift coefficient and linewidth coefficient, the resonance frequency shift rate (Δv/v) is calculated to be (5.89 ± 0.06) × 10−5/°C, and the linewidth variation rate (ΔΓ/Γ) is (−6.91 ± 0.14) × 10−4/°C for TR2, 7 modes. In addition, the same operation is applied to the measurement results of R0,4 mode induced polarized GAWBS spectra at different temperatures. Similar relationship between frequency shift (or linewidth) and the temperature is obtained as shown in Figure 5. It can be found that the frequency increases nearly linearly with temperature when the temperature is below 400 °C, and the rate of increase begins to decay as the temperature continues to rise. Similarly, both polynomial fitting and linear fitting are performed on the raw data, and the obtained polynomial fitting functions are added in Figure 5. In the linear fitting results, R2 values for resonance frequency and linewidth are 0.9950 and 0.9804, respectively. The temperature-dependent resonance frequency shift coefficient and the linewidth variation coefficient are extracted to be 16.74 kHz/°C and −0.512 kHz/°C, respectively. As a result, the frequency shift rate and the linewidth variation rate for R0,4 mode are calculated to be (9.44 ± 0.06) × 10−5/°C and (−6.91 ± 0.24) × 10−4/°C, respectively.
The SNR of the resonance peak in both the polarized and depolarized GAWBS spectra is defined as the ratio of the resonance peak power to the floor noise power. By subtracting the noise floor (the spectrum when the FUT is removed from the experimental setup) from the raw data of the FUT GAWBS spectra, a series of more accurate resonance peak data can be obtained [43]. From the new data after noise floor compensation, the SNR for each resonance peak can be easily extracted. As indicated in Figure 4d and Figure 5b, the SNR of the TR2,7 mode and R0,4 mode induced GAWBS spectrum increases with the temperature. The underlying physics for this relationship can be attributed to the enhancement in the gain coefficient g that arises from the enhancement in the coupling efficiency between the optical photons and acoustic phonons in the GAWBS process with temperature increase. In general, a standard GAWBS spectrum g(Ω) can be expressed as follows [36]:
g Ω = g Γ m / 2 2 Ω Ω a 2 + Γ m / 2 2 g = ω 1 γ e 2 Q 0 Q 1 2 n eff 2 c 2 ρ 0 Ω a Γ m
where Ωa = 2π × vm is the angle frequency of resonance peak, ω1 is the pump light angle frequency, γe is the electrostrictive constant, neff is the effective refractive index of silica SMF, c is the velocity of light in vacuum, ρ0 is the mean density of silica. Q0 and Q1 are the acoustic-optical coupling factor, which can be calculated numerically by resolving the normalized density variation distribution ρ2,m of different modes and normalized optical filed distribution E0 [25]. The gain factor g0 for the TR2,7 mode is estimated to be 4.4 × 10−3 m−1W−1, using the initial values at 22 °C: γe = 1.17, neff = 1.467, ρ0 = 2203 kg·m−3, and the experimental values of ω1 = 2π × 194 THz, Ωa = 2π × 140.42 MHz, Γm = 2π × 0.59 MHz.
When the temperature changes, Ωa and Γm perform very important roles in the spectral shape and the value of gT (T denotes temperature), neff and ρ0 also have a weak impact on gT. The rates of change of the parameters for silica fibers at high temperatures are given by [37]: (Δneff/neff) = 7.6 × 10−6/°C, (Δρ0/ρ0) = −1.83 × 10−6/°C. As the linewidth Γm has the largest rate of change with negative values when temperature increases, the gain coefficient gT will increase with temperature according to Equation (8). The rate of change obtained in Figure 4c and Figure 5a can be taken into Equation (8) to derive the relationship between the gain coefficient gT and the temperature. In studying the effect of temperature on the gain coefficient of GAWBS, we selected samples of different lengths for multiple tests to investigate whether the sensing fiber length would affect the high temperature sensing performance. In most of the previously published works on the sensing characteristics of GAWBS in SMF, the FUT lengths chosen by researchers are between 10–15 m [29,30,43], which ensures a relatively highly efficient GAWBS process with high-SNR resonances and at the same time a minimized fiber probe for point sensing. For the above reasons, two groups of FUTs, each consists of three different fiber segments (Sample 1, Sample 2, and Sample 3) with lengths of 10 m, 12 m, and 15 m, respectively, are tested to obtain the gain coefficients gT at different temperatures in the polarized and depolarized GAWBS experiments. Figure 6 shows the measured and calculated gT/g0 of R0,4 mode and TR2,7 mode, where g0 is the gain coefficient at 22 °C. It can be found in Figure 6 that the test results for Sample 1 and Sample 2 for both the R0,4 and TR2,7 modes are almost consistent with the simulation results, with the averaged deviation of the experimental test results from the simulated values less than 10%. These deviations mainly come from different tensile strain, bending stress, and torsional deformation distributed along the FUTs when they are manually looped into ring structures and different heat distributions when placed into the furnace tube with narrow space. It is also seen that the test results for Sample 3 for TR2,7 mode have larger deviations from the simulation results than those for R0,4 mode, which is mainly due to the fact that the depolarized GAWBS process is more sensitive to the stress/strain-induced birefringence changes along the sensing fiber than the polarized GAWBS as Sample 3 is the longest sample which suffers the most nonuniform stress/strain distributions when looped into the ring structure. Additionally, different tensile strain, bending stress, and torsional deformation, and nonuniform heat distribution introduced to the samples for both mode measurements during the processes of manual looping and insertion into the heat tube in each time would also contribute to the deviation differences. It is believed that the inconsistencies in the current results would be alleviated if the test samples are looped to rings with the same size and placed within high-temperature furnace with enough large space.
To illustrate the variation of SNR with temperature for all the measured modes of 16 orders, the test results of the 12 m FUT are shown in Figure 7. The peaks of these modes at 100 °C and 600 °C are extracted, and envelope curves covering resonance peaks for all the modes are plotted, respectively. It can be found that the SNR increases with temperature for all the first 15 orders of TR2,m modes (m = 1,2,…, 15), and it almost does not change with temperature for TR2,m modes of orders m > 15. This is because the linewidth Γm of the resonance spectrum induced by the depolarized GAWBS in the uncoated fiber increases linearly with m, as shown in Equation (7), and the corresponding linewidth changes δΓm (100 °C to 600 °C) are different for different acoustic modes when the temperature changes. Moreover, the relationship between Γm and gT is nonlinear, resulting in inconsistent SNR variations.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the high-temperature sensing characteristics of standard silica SMF based on polarized and depolarized GAWBS are demonstrated experimentally. A nearly linear relationship between the resonance frequency of GAWBS spectrum and temperature is obtained with a linearly fitted temperature-dependent resonance frequency shift coefficient of 16.74 kHz/°C for R0,4 mode, and 8.19 kHz/°C for TR2,7 mode. Structural simplicity and operational advantages confirm the potential of the method for high-temperature sensing in harsh environments. The upper temperature limit of the sensor depends on the melting point of the FUT, higher temperature detection is possible with GAWBS in special high temperature resistant fibers. More importantly, the SNR of the GAWBS characteristic peak is found to increase with increasing temperature, which is attributed to the increased viscose lifetime of acoustic phonons involved in the GAWBS process. The relationship between the gain coefficient and temperature is also analyzed by numerical simulations. The detailed characterization of thermal response of GAWBS in silica SMF to temperature will provide valuable guidance and references for various sensing scenarios with GAWBS in extreme environments, such as nuclear power plants, aerospace, and deep underground wells.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.X.; methodology, Y.X.; investigation, Y.X., S.M., Y.P. and Q.J.; resources, Y.X.; writing—original draft preparation, S.M.; writing—review and editing, Y.X.; supervision, Y.X.; project administration, Y.X., Y.L., X.Z. and Z.L.; funding acquisition, Y.X., Z.Q. and Z.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province, National Natural Science Foundation of China (62105180), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2020MF110, ZR2020MF118), and the Qilu Young Scholar Program of Shandong University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liang, M.; Sun, B.; Sun, X.; Xie, J. Development of a New Fiber-Optic Multi-Target Multispectral Pyrometer for Achievable True Temperature Measurement of the Solid Rocket Motor Plume. Measurement 2017, 95, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rizzolo, S.; Périsse, J.; Boukenter, A.; Ouerdane, Y.; Marin, E.; Macé, J.-R.; Cannas, M.; Girard, S. Real Time Monitoring of Water Level and Temperature in Storage Fuel Pools through Optical Fibre Sensors. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Watson, J.; Castro, G. A Review of High-Temperature Electronics Technology and Applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2015, 26, 9226–9235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. He, J.; Xu, B.; Xu, X.; Liao, C.; Wang, Y. Review of Femtosecond-Laser-Inscribed Fiber Bragg Gratings: Fabrication Technologies and Sensing Applications. Photonic Sens. 2021, 11, 203–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mihailov, S.J. Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors for Harsh Environments. Sensors 2012, 12, 1898–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, S.; Feng, Z.; Jia, X.; Pickrell, G.; Ng, W.; Wang, A.; Zhu, Y. All-Sapphire Miniature Optical Fiber Tip Sensor for High Temperature Measurement. J. Light. Technol. 2020, 38, 1988–1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Machavaram, V.R.; Badcock, R.A.; Fernando, G.F. Fabrication of Intrinsic Fibre Fabry–Perot Sensors in Silica Fibres Using Hydrofluoric Acid Etching. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2007, 138, 248–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Qi, K.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, J.; Yi, G. All-Fiber High Temperature and Refractive Index Sensor Based on Three Microspheres Array Michelson Interferometer. Opt. Laser Technol. 2020, 129, 106300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. He, J.; Xu, X.; Du, B.; Xu, B.; Chen, R.; Wang, Y.; Liao, C.; Guo, J.; Wang, Y.; He, J. Stabilized Ultra-High-Temperature Sensors Based on Inert Gas-Sealed Sapphire Fiber Bragg Gratings. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 12359–12366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ma, S.; Xu, Y.; Pang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Li, Y.; Qin, Z.; Liu, Z.; Lu, P.; Bao, X. Optical Fiber Sensors for High-Temperature Monitoring: A Review. Sensors 2022, 22, 5722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xu, Y.; Lu, P.; Chen, L.; Bao, X. Recent Developments in Micro-Structured Fiber Optic Sensors. Fibers 2017, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, Y.; Zhang, F.; Yoshino, T. Wide-Range Temperature Dependence of Brillouin Shift in a Dispersion-Shifted Fiber and Its Annealing Effect. J. Light. Technol. 2003, 21, 1663–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bao, X.; Chen, L. Recent Progress in Brillouin Scattering Based Fiber Sensors. Sensors 2011, 11, 4152–4187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Horiguchi, T.; Tateda, M. BOTDA-Nondestructive Measurement of Single-Mode Optical Fiber Attenuation Characteristics Using Brillouin Interaction: Theory. J. Light. Technol. 1989, 7, 1170–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Parker, T.R.; Farhadiroushan, M.; Handerek, V.A.; Rogers, A.J. Temperature and Strain Dependence of the Power Level and Frequency of Spontaneous Brillouin Scattering in Optical Fibers. Opt. Lett. 1997, 22, 787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bai, Q.; Wang, Q.; Wang, D.; Wang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, M.; Jin, B. Recent Advances in Brillouin Optical Time Domain Reflectometry. Sensors 2019, 19, 1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Lu, P.; Lalam, N.; Badar, M.; Liu, B.; Chorpening, B.T.; Buric, M.P.; Ohodnicki, P.R. Distributed Optical Fiber Sensing: Review and Perspective. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2019, 6, 041302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bao, Y.; Chen, G. High-Temperature Measurement with Brillouin Optical Time Domain Analysis of an Annealed Fused-Silica Single-Mode Fiber. Opt. Lett. 2016, 41, 3177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tanaka, Y.; Ogusu, K. Temperature Coefficient of Sideband Frequencies Produced by Depolarized Guided Acoustic-Wave Brillouin Scattering. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 1998, 10, 1769–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Polian, A.; Vo-Thanh, D.; Richet, P. Elastic Properties of A-SiO2 up to 2300 K from Brillouin Scattering Measurements. Europhys. Lett. 2002, 57, 375–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shelby, R.M.; Levenson, M.D.; Bayer, P.W. Guided Acoustic-Wave Brillouin Scattering. Phys. Rev. B 1985, 31, 5244–5252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jarschel, P.F.; Magalhaes, L.S.; Aldaya, I.; Florez, O.; Dainese, P. Fiber Taper Diameter Characterization Using Forward Brillouin Scattering. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Li, Y.; Qin, Z.; Pang, Y.; Liu, Z. Simultaneous Measurement of Relative Humidity and Temperature Based on Forward Brillouin Scattering in Polyimide-Overlaid Fiber. Sens. Actuators B 2021, 348, 130702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tanaka, Y.; Ogusu, K. Tensile-Strain Coefficient of Resonance Frequency of Depolarized Guided Acoustic-Wave Brillouin Scattering. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 1999, 11, 865–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hua, Z.; Ba, D.; Zhou, D.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Bao, X.; Dong, Y. Non-Destructive and Distributed Measurement of Optical Fiber Diameter with Nanometer Resolution Based on Coherent Forward Stimulated Brillouin Scattering. Light Adv. Manuf. 2021, 2, 373–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Diamandi, H.H.; London, Y.; Bashan, G.; Shemer, K.; Zadok, A. Forward Stimulated Brillouin Scattering Analysis of Optical Fibers Coatings. J. Light. Technol. 2021, 39, 1800–1807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sánchez, L.A.; Díez, A.; Cruz, J.L.; Andrés, M.V. High Accuracy Measurement of Poisson’s Ratio of Optical Fibers and Its Temperature Dependence Using Forward-Stimulated Brillouin Scattering. Opt. Express 2022, 30, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Antman, Y.; Clain, A.; London, Y.; Zadok, A. Optomechanical Sensing of Liquids Outside Standard Fibers Using Forward Stimulated Brillouin Scattering. Optica 2016, 3, 510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Chow, D.M.; Thévenaz, L. Forward Brillouin Scattering Acoustic Impedance Sensor Using Thin Polyimide-Coated Fiber. Opt. Lett. 2018, 43, 5467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, Z.; Lu, Y.; Peng, J.; Ji, Z. Simultaneous Measurement of Temperature and Acoustic Impedance Based on Forward Brillouin Scattering in LEAF. Opt. Lett. 2021, 46, 1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Matsui, T.; Nakajima, K.; Sakamoto, T.; Shiraki, K.; Sankawa, I. Structural Dependence of Guided Acoustic-Wave Brillouin Scattering Spectra in Hole-Assisted Fiber and Its Temperature Dependence. Appl. Opt. 2007, 46, 6912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Carry, E.; Beugnot, J.-C.; Stiller, B.; Lee, M.W.; Maillotte, H.; Sylvestre, T. Temperature Coefficient of the High-Frequency Guided Acoustic Mode in a Photonic Crystal Fiber. Appl. Opt. 2011, 50, 6543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hayashi, N.; Suzuki, K.; Set, S.Y.; Yamashita, S. Temperature Coefficient of Sideband Frequency Produced by Polarized Guided Acoustic-Wave Brillouin Scattering in Highly Nonlinear Fibers. Appl. Phys. Express 2017, 10, 092501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Parc, R.L.; Levelut, C.; Pelous, J.; Martinez, V.; Champagnon, B. Influence of Fictive Temperature and Composition of Silica Glass on Anomalous Elastic Behaviour. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2006, 18, 7507–7527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Savović, S.; Djordjevich, A.; Simović, A.; Drljača, B. Equilibrium Mode Distribution and Steady-State Distribution in 100–400 Μm Core Step-Index Silica Optical Fibers. Appl. Opt. 2011, 50, 4170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kang, M.S.; Nazarkin, A.; Brenn, A.; Russell, P.S.J. Tightly Trapped Acoustic Phonons in Photonic Crystal Fibres as Highly Nonlinear Artificial Raman Oscillators. Nat. Phys. 2009, 5, 276–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, T.; Shao, L.-Y.; Canning, J.; Cook, K. Temperature and Strain Characterization of Regenerated Gratings. Opt. Lett. 2013, 38, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Chun-Yu, D.; Shang-Lin, H.; Jing-Li, L.; Dao-Bin, W.; Xiao-Xiao, L. School of Science, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China Simultaneous measurement on strain and temperature via guided acoustic-wave Brillouin scattering in single mode fibers. Acta Phys. Sin. 2016, 65, 240702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, R.; Gauthier, D.J. FSBS Resonances Observed in a Standard Highly Nonlinear Fiber. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 5339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Laubereau, A.; Englisch, W.; Kaiser, W. Hypersonic Absorption of Liquids Determined from Spontaneous and Stimulated Brillouin Scattering. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1969, 5, 410–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pohl, D.; Kaiser, W. Time-Resolved Investigations of Stimulated Brillouin Scattering in Transparent and Absorbing Media: Determination of Phonon Lifetimes. Phys. Rev. B 1970, 1, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xu, P.; Dong, Y.; Zhou, D.; Fu, C.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Lu, Z.; Chen, L.; Bao, X. 1200 °C High-Temperature Distributed Optical Fiber Sensing Using Brillouin Optical Time Domain Analysis. Appl. Opt. 2016, 55, 5471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hayashi, N.; Mizuno, Y.; Nakamura, K.; Set, S.Y.; Yamashita, S. Experimental Study on Depolarized GAWBS Spectrum for Optomechanical Sensing of Liquids Outside Standard Fibers. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic setup of the high temperature sensing system based on (a) polarized GAWBS, and (b) depolarized GAWBS. EDFA, erbium-doped fiber amplifier; ISO, isolator; PC, polarization controller; FUT, fiber under test; PL, polarizer; PD, photo detector; ESA, electrical spectrum analyzer.
Figure 1. Schematic setup of the high temperature sensing system based on (a) polarized GAWBS, and (b) depolarized GAWBS. EDFA, erbium-doped fiber amplifier; ISO, isolator; PC, polarization controller; FUT, fiber under test; PL, polarizer; PD, photo detector; ESA, electrical spectrum analyzer.
Sensors 23 01277 g001
Figure 2. Measured polarized (a) and depolarized (b) GAWBS spectrum at 400 °C.
Figure 2. Measured polarized (a) and depolarized (b) GAWBS spectrum at 400 °C.
Sensors 23 01277 g002
Figure 3. Measured (a) R0,4 mode induced polarized GAWBS spectrum, and (b) TR2,7 mode induced depolarized GAWBS spectra at temperatures ranging from 22 °C to 800 °C.
Figure 3. Measured (a) R0,4 mode induced polarized GAWBS spectrum, and (b) TR2,7 mode induced depolarized GAWBS spectra at temperatures ranging from 22 °C to 800 °C.
Sensors 23 01277 g003
Figure 4. (a) Measured TR2,7 mode induced depolarized GAWBS spectra at temperatures ranging from 22 °C to 800 °C; (b) Normalized TR2,7 mode induced depolarized GAWBS spectrum at 400 °C and the corresponding Lorentzian multi-peak fitting result; (c) Resonance frequency and linewidth of TR2,7 mode induced depolarized GAWBS spectra as a function of temperature; (d) Measured SNR of the TR2,7 mode induced depolarized GAWBS spectra as a function of temperature.
Figure 4. (a) Measured TR2,7 mode induced depolarized GAWBS spectra at temperatures ranging from 22 °C to 800 °C; (b) Normalized TR2,7 mode induced depolarized GAWBS spectrum at 400 °C and the corresponding Lorentzian multi-peak fitting result; (c) Resonance frequency and linewidth of TR2,7 mode induced depolarized GAWBS spectra as a function of temperature; (d) Measured SNR of the TR2,7 mode induced depolarized GAWBS spectra as a function of temperature.
Sensors 23 01277 g004
Figure 5. (a) Resonance frequency and linewidth of R0,4 mode induced polarized GAWBS spectra as a function of temperature; (b) Measured SNR of the R0,4 mode induced polarized GAWBS spectra as a function of temperature.
Figure 5. (a) Resonance frequency and linewidth of R0,4 mode induced polarized GAWBS spectra as a function of temperature; (b) Measured SNR of the R0,4 mode induced polarized GAWBS spectra as a function of temperature.
Sensors 23 01277 g005
Figure 6. Measured and calculated gT/g0 of (a) R0,4 mode, and (b) TR2,7 mode induced GAWBS at different temperatures.
Figure 6. Measured and calculated gT/g0 of (a) R0,4 mode, and (b) TR2,7 mode induced GAWBS at different temperatures.
Sensors 23 01277 g006
Figure 7. Measured depolarized GAWBS spectra at 100 °C and 600 °C, respectively.
Figure 7. Measured depolarized GAWBS spectra at 100 °C and 600 °C, respectively.
Sensors 23 01277 g007
Table 1. Calculated and measured resonance frequencies of the polarized and depolarized GAWBS in silica SMF.
Table 1. Calculated and measured resonance frequencies of the polarized and depolarized GAWBS in silica SMF.
Order of Acoustic Mode (m)Resonance Frequencies of Polarized GAWBSResonance Frequencies of
Depolarized GAWBS
Calculation
(MHz)
Measurement
(MHz)
Calculation
(MHz)
Measurement
(MHz)
130.4830.3422.3222.29
281.7281.2938.3439.01
3130.17130.1071.1670.55
4178.23178.2181.3180.79
5226.16226.13109.01108.42
6270.03272.31127.88128.04
7321.86321.97139.51140.42
8 170.27169.12
9 177.80176.34
10 201.81201.14
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ma, S.; Pang, Y.; Ji, Q.; Zhao, X.; Li, Y.; Qin, Z.; Liu, Z.; Xu, Y. High-Temperature Sensing Based on GAWBS In Silica Single-Mode Fiber. Sensors 2023, 23, 1277. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031277

AMA Style

Ma S, Pang Y, Ji Q, Zhao X, Li Y, Qin Z, Liu Z, Xu Y. High-Temperature Sensing Based on GAWBS In Silica Single-Mode Fiber. Sensors. 2023; 23(3):1277. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031277

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ma, Shaonian, Yuxi Pang, Qiang Ji, Xian Zhao, Yongfu Li, Zengguang Qin, Zhaojun Liu, and Yanping Xu. 2023. "High-Temperature Sensing Based on GAWBS In Silica Single-Mode Fiber" Sensors 23, no. 3: 1277. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031277

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop