Next Article in Journal
Dimensioning Cuboid and Cylindrical Objects Using Only Noisy and Partially Observed Time-of-Flight Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Ethanol-Gas-Sensing Performances of Built-in ZrO2/Co3O4 Hybrid Nanostructures
Previous Article in Journal
Autonomous State Estimation and Observability Analysis for the Taiji Formation Using High-Precision Optical Sensors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Semiconductor Gas Sensors for Detecting Chemical Warfare Agents and Their Simulants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Gas-Sensing Mechanisms and Performances of MXenes and MXene-Based Heterostructures

1
School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India
2
Research Center for Advanced Materials, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), South Tangerang City 15314, Indonesia
3
Advanced Functional Materials Research Group, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
4
Faculty of Textile Science and Technology, Shinshu University Ueda Campus, Ueda 386-8567, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2023, 23(21), 8674; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23218674
Submission received: 7 September 2023 / Revised: 6 October 2023 / Accepted: 15 October 2023 / Published: 24 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Collection Gas Sensors)

Abstract

:
MXenes are a class of 2D transition-metal carbides, nitrides, and carbonitrides with exceptional properties, including substantial electrical and thermal conductivities, outstanding mechanical strength, and a considerable surface area, rendering them an appealing choice for gas sensors. This manuscript provides a comprehensive analysis of heterostructures based on MXenes employed in gas-sensing applications and focuses on addressing the limited understanding of the sensor mechanisms of MXene-based heterostructures while highlighting their potential to enhance gas-sensing performance. The manuscript begins with a broad overview of gas-sensing mechanisms in both pristine materials and MXene-based heterostructures. Subsequently, it explores various features of MXene-based heterostructures, including their composites with other materials and their prospects for gas-sensing applications. Additionally, the manuscript evaluates different engineering strategies for MXenes and compares their advantages to other materials while discussing the limitations of current state-of-the-art sensors. Ultimately, this review seeks to foster collaboration and knowledge exchange within the field, facilitating the development of high-performance gas sensors based on MXenes.

1. Introduction

In recent years, the discovery of 2D materials has revolutionised the field of materials science and engineering [1]. Among these, MXenes have emerged as a promising class of 2D materials with diverse properties and applications. MXenes, a class of two-dimensional (2D) transition-metal carbides, nitrides, and carbonitrides, have emerged as a fascinating material family with exceptional properties, which are promising for a wide range of applications [2,3,4,5]. The story of MXenes began in 2011, when researchers at Drexel University discovered a novel method to etch and exfoliate MAX phases, layered ternary carbides, and nitrides, resulting in the creation of a new family of 2D materials [6]. For example, Ti3C2Tx MXenes were obtained by selective etching of the A element (e.g., aluminium) from their corresponding MAX phases (e.g., Ti3AlC2) using hydrofluoric acid (HF) or other etchants [6].
MXenes are typically composed of transition metals, such as titanium (Ti), vanadium (V), niobium (Nb), chromium (Cr), zirconium (Zr), etc., and have the chemical formula Mn+1XnTx, where M represents the transition metal, X represents carbon and/or nitrogen, and T symbolises surface termination groups, such as hydroxyl (–OH), fluorine (–F), or oxygen (–O) [5]. The number n is determined by the number of X layers, and can range from 1 to 4, while n+1 represents the number of transition metal layers [7]. The T groups on the surfaces of MXenes can be chemically modified, leading to tuneable surface chemistry and wettability. Due to this, MXenes exhibit a range of unique physical, chemical, electronic, electrical, and mechanical properties, including high electrical conductivity, high thermal conductivity, high mechanical strength, and large surface area. Additionally, they have excellent chemical stability, good biocompatibility, and good optical properties [8,9]. These properties make MXenes attractive candidates for various applications, such as supercapacitors, batteries, electrocatalysts, and sensors.
One of the most promising applications of MXenes is in gas sensors [10,11,12]. Gas sensors play a crucial role in many aspects of our lives, including environmental monitoring, industrial process control, and medical diagnostics [13,14]. A gas sensor is an electronic device that detects the presence of various gases in the environment and converts this information into a measurable signal [15]. The critical parameters for gas sensors include sensitivity, selectivity, response time, and stability [16,17,18]. Currently, the most common materials used for gas sensors are metal oxides such as tin oxide, zinc oxide, and titanium dioxide [19,20]. However, these materials have some limitations, including low selectivity, poor stability, and the need for high operating temperatures [19,20]. MXenes, on the other hand, have demonstrated exceptional gas-sensing properties, making them a promising candidate for replacing the current materials. For example, MXenes have exhibited high sensitivity and selectivity towards various gases, including nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ammonia (NH3), and hydrogen (H2) [11,21,22]. Moreover, MXenes have shown excellent stability and low power consumption, making them ideal for long-term use and portable applications. Furthermore, MXene-based heterostructures have shown significant advancements in gas-sensor performance compared to state-of-the-art technologies. A heterostructure is a material consisting of two or more different materials with different electronic properties [23,24]. The combination of MXenes with other materials in heterostructures can enhance gas-sensing properties by increasing sensitivity and selectivity. For example, MXenes can be combined with metal oxides or polymers to create heterostructures that exhibit enhanced gas-sensing performance [23,24,25]. Despite these advantages, MXenes and MXene-based-heterostructure gas sensors face several notable challenges. One key challenge lies in achieving optimal selectivity towards specific gas analytes while maintaining high sensitivity, as gas mixtures in real-world environments can be complex. Furthermore, the long-term stability and robustness of these sensors need improvement to ensure reliable and continuous operation over extended periods. Integration into practical devices and scaling-up of production processes are also areas of concern for the commercialisation of MXene-based gas sensors. Lastly, addressing issues related to the cost-effectiveness and availability of MXene materials at a larger scale is essential for widespread adoption. Overcoming these challenges is pivotal in realising the full potential of MXenes and MXene-based heterostructures in gas-sensing applications [23,25,26].
As stated above, MXenes have gained a lot of attention in the field of gas sensors, and numerous published reviews have highlighted their potential applications. Nevertheless, these reviews mainly focused on the synthesis of MXenes and their sensor performance [23,24], without delving into the fundamental understanding of the sensor mechanism. As a consequence, the MXene-gas-sensor field lacks a mutual comprehension of the sensing mechanism. To address this gap, a comprehensive review is needed to explain the gas-sensor mechanism of MXene-based heterostructures in depth. Thus, this review aims to foster mutual understanding within the field and pave the way for designing high-performance MXene-based gas sensors. Given the importance of the sensor mechanism in achieving high-performance MXene-based gas sensors, a thorough understanding of this mechanism is of utmost importance.
The present review addresses the lack of fundamental understanding of the sensor mechanism of MXene-based heterostructures for gas-sensing applications. By conducting a comprehensive analysis of the existing literature, this paper will highlight the significance of MXene-based heterostructures and their contribution to the advancement of the field. The review begins with gas-sensing mechanism in the pristine and MXene-based heterostructures, followed by an in-depth discussion of the properties of MXene-based heterostructures (such as compositing with other materials and their potential for gas-sensing applications). Furthermore, the review will examine various engineering strategies for MXenes and their potential for enhancing gas-sensing performance. This discussion will also cover the advantages of using MXenes over other materials, as well as the limitations of the current state-of-the-art sensors. Overall, the review aims to provide a comprehensive and detailed analysis of MXene-based heterostructures for gas sensing, with the aim of fostering mutual understanding in the field and paving the way for the development of high-performance MXene-based gas sensors.

2. Synthesis and Properties of 2D MXenes

We aim to provide a concise overview of the synthesis and primary characteristics of 2D MXenes to facilitate a better grasp of the relationship between synthesis, properties, and activity. Generally, MXenes emerge through the selective elimination of A layers from MAX phases, giving rise to two-dimensional materials that are usually composed of three or more atomic layers. These 2D materials possess distinct properties when compared to their three-dimensional (3D) precursor counterparts [27]. In their early synthesis, the primary etching agents predominantly comprised fluorine-containing compounds, such as HF, LiF+HCl, bifluoride salts, and molten salts containing fluorine. These etchants dictated the surface terminations of MXenes, yielding three primary variations: -F, -OH, and -O. However, in 2017, alternative non-fluorine etching methods, including electrochemical etching and concentrated alkaline hydrothermal etching, were introduced, resulting in the production of fluorine-free MXenes. More recently, a non-aqueous molten salt etching approach, employing Lewis acidic salts as etchants, has been documented to yield accordion-like MXenes with modifiable surface terminations.
In contrast to the stacked configuration of MXenes, single-layer MXene nanosheets exhibit superior chemical properties, such as a notable increase in specific surface area, favourable hydrophilicity, and a wealth of surface chemistry. In fact, the initial report on MXenes employed ultrasonic treatment to disassemble accordion-like MXenes into layers, albeit with limited success due to the robust bonding between these layers, resulting in low yields and impractical outcomes [28]. The process of obtaining single-layer nanosheets from accordion-like MXenes can be accomplished through appropriate delamination techniques, with the ease of this process directly influenced by the composition of surface functional groups. Furthermore, increasing the interlayer spacing of MXene flakes through ion intercalation is a common strategy for delaminating multilayered MXenes [28]. Unlike typical etchants like LiF+HCl, which only include metal cations without additional intercalators, the use of intercalation agents such as organic intercalation, e.g., tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (TBAOH) and dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) and inorganic cation intercalation, e.g., Li+ and Na+, have also proven effective in delaminating multilayered MXenes into monolayer MXenes. For readers interested in a comprehensive understanding of fundamental synthesis, we recommend referring to comprehensive reviews authored by Salim et al. [27], Naguib et al. [29], Wei et al. [28], and Lim et al. [30].
Following this, depending on the synthetic route, the produced MXenes can have significantly different properties because these properties rely on the functional groups, defects, interlayer structures, etc. MXenes are versatile materials that fulfil the essential requirements for fully functional gas-sensing devices [31]. Herein, we highlight key properties of MXenes in relation to their gas-sensing capabilities. Delaminated MXenes exhibit remarkable mechanical properties, particularly in the form of monolayers. The Young’s modulus of a Ti3C2Tx monolayer, for instance, approaches 333 ± 30 GPa, demonstrating their exceptional strength. Nitride-based MXenes generally possess even higher Young’s modulus values compared to carbides, and surface terminations also influence their stiffness. O-terminated MXenes are stiffer than F- and OH-terminated MXenes due to their shorter in-plane lattice constant. Additionally, the mass of the transition metal affects stiffness, with heavier metals leading to stiffer MXenes. MXenes exhibit high electronic conductivity, attributed to metallic bonding. Ti3C2Tx MXenes, for instance, display electrical conductivities ranging from 850 to 9880 Scm−1, making them among the most conductive MXenes. Conductivity varies due to factors like crystal defects, surface-terminated groups, layer spacing, and delamination. Nitride-based MXenes tend to display more metallic properties than carbide-based ones, owing to the higher electron content in nitrogen. These properties can be modulated through functional-group modifications and solid-solution formation, and some MXenes can exhibit narrow band gaps due to electron withdrawal from the transition metal to surface groups.
MXenes offer high transparency and light absorbance, with Ti3C2Tx MXenes in the range of 1–2 nm thickness achieving up to 91.2% optical transparency and excellent light-to-heat conversion efficiency. Different terminations impact their optical properties, with -F and -OH groups reducing visible light absorption and reflectivity but enhancing reflectivity in the UV region. They demonstrate excellent thermal stability, with Ti3C2Tx (T = F, OH) remaining stable up to 500 °C, or 800 °C in argon atmosphere. Surface functionalisation with functional groups helps mitigate surface oxidation. Moreover, MXenes possess high thermal conductivity, making them suitable for self-heating gas-sensing devices and aiding in heat dissipation in electronics. Hf2CO2, for instance, exhibits a room-temperature thermal conductivity of 86.25 W m−1 K−1, increasing with flake thickness. N-doped single-layer Mo2C MXene also shows promising thermal conductivity. There are available reviews that focus on the progress of MXene properties, which interested readers can explore [31,32,33,34].

3. Fundamental Sensing Mechanisms in 2D MXenes and MXene Heterostructures

The sensing mechanism within MXene structures distinguishes itself from that of metal oxides and exhibits a higher level of complexity compared to the surface adsorption or charge transfer commonly observed in traditional 2D materials. In metal-oxide-based sensors, the sensing mechanism is well-established as relying on the interactions between gas molecules and pre-adsorbed oxygen species at the surface [35]. However, the case is different for MXenes.
The fundamental sensing mechanisms inherent to 2D MXenes and MXene heterostructures play a pivotal role in their gas-sensing capabilities. While the gas-sensing mechanism of pristine 2D MXenes can be intuitively explored through computational simulations, MXene heterostructures introduce unique attributes. These attributes, including electronic structures and adsorption models, give rise to a distinct gas-sensing mechanism. Consequently, this section undertakes a comparative analysis of the gas-sensing mechanisms in both pristine 2D MXenes and MXene heterostructures, offering an in-depth elucidation of the contributing factors that shape their sensing performance.

3.1. Sensing Mechanism in Pristine 2D MXenes

Among the MXene family, Ti3C2Tx stands out as the most extensively explored member for its applications in gas sensors. The behaviour of a Ti3C2Tx sensor typically resembles that of p-type semiconductors, a trait attributed to the presence of functional groups such as −F, −OH, and −O. In the realm of gas sensing, the transfer of charge carriers is governed by two primary mechanisms: physisorption and chemisorption. At ambient temperatures, physisorption takes precedence, involving the gas molecules’ physisorption onto the surface, circumventing the participation of adsorbed oxygen species. Consequently, alterations in the electrical signal stem from the adsorption and subsequent desorption processes.
The nature of gas analytes significantly influences these changes in the electrical signal. For instance, highly reducing gases elevate electrical resistance, whereas highly oxidising gases lead to its decline. To illustrate, consider the research conducted by Kim et al. [36]. When Ti3C2 MXene encountered ammonia, the electrons generated will get combined with the holes in MXene, which decreases the majority charge-carrier concentration and thereby increases the resistance of Ti3C2Tx sensors. The reaction mechanism of p-type Ti3C2Tx MXene and reducing gas is depicted in Equations (1) and (2).
2NH3 + 3O→N2 + 3H2O + 3e
NH3 + OH→NH2 + H2O + e
This scenario mirrors the behaviour observed in V2CTx MXenes. However, in the case of the V2CTx sensor exposed to oxidising gases like NO2, the dynamic changes are distinct. NO2 molecules attach to the active sites of V2CTx through surface terminations like single-bonded O and single-bonded OH. Consequently, a transfer of electrons from V2CTx to NO2 molecules transpires, augmenting hole concentration within V2CTx (Equations (3)–(5)). This, in turn, amplifies conductivity and diminishes resistance in the V2CTx sensor. Furthermore, the reaction between NO2 and O2− yields NO2−, consuming electrons and thereby reducing the resistance of the V2CTx sensor [22]. This intricate process can be encapsulated in the following equations.
O2 (ads) + e → O2, (at RT)
NO2 (gas) + e → NO2 (ads)
2NO2(g) + O2 (ads) + e → 2NO2 (ads) + O2
Based on the results of these experimental studies, the gas-sensing mechanism in pristine MXenes can be comprehensively depicted in a general model, as illustrated in Figure 1. This model effectively illustrates the intricate interplay between molecular interactions and the surface of MXenes, and how these interactions relate to changes in electrical resistance and the band diagram. In this context, when oxygen molecules from the surrounding air come into contact with the MXene surface, they become adsorbed and transform into distinct species based on the operational temperature. Specifically, they assume the form of O2 at temperatures below 150 °C, O at 150–250 °C, and O2− at temperatures exceeding 250 °C. This transformation involves the oxygen molecules drawing electrons from the MXene surface. Because of this electron deficiency, MXenes that exhibit p-type conductivity will display low resistivity. Notably, the situation might differ if the MXene possesses a metal-like or n-type conductivity.
Typically, MXene-based gas sensors function at room temperature to prevent surface oxidation. As a result, the most prevalent adsorbed oxygen ions are of the O2 type. When external gas is introduced, the reaction between the adsorbed O2 ions on the surface and the gas leads to changes in the conductivity of the MXenes. In the presence of a reducing gas, the above-mentioned reaction results in the return of electrons to the MXenes, generating both holes and electron recombination. This phenomenon leads to an increase in resistivity due to the depletion of holes. Conversely, when an oxidising gas is present, the reaction consumes more electrons, causing an accumulation of holes. Consequently, this accumulation causes a decrease in resistivity. While this model effectively explains the gas-sensing mechanism in most pristine MXenes, it is important to note that variations could arise if the surface functional groups are altered. Take the case of APTES-functionalised Nb2CTx MXene, for instance. Here, APTES acts as an electron acceptor, leading to a transfer of electrons from Nb2CTx to APTES. This process establishes a new equilibrium when combined with the transfer of an electron from APTES to NO2. Consequently, the result is an increased resistance of the sensor, exhibiting n-type behaviour [37].

3.2. Sensing Mechanism in 2D MXene Heterostructures

The gas-sensing mechanism in MXene heterostructures is inherently more complex due to their ability to be combined with various types of materials, such as metal oxides, polymers, metal nanoparticles, and others. This combination leads to diverse configurations in the energy-band diagram when these components come into contact, interacting with target molecules of either reducing or oxidising gases. This complexity is further heightened when heterostructures consist of more than two materials, introducing additional challenges and uncertainties into the gas-sensing mechanism. For example, MXenes with p-type conductivity can be integrated with n-type or p-type semiconductors, resulting in the formation of p–p or n–p junctions, depending on the arrangement within the sensor device. Establishing a comprehensive model for the gas-sensing mechanism and the configuration of energy-band alignment requires addressing these complexities. Numerous studies have aimed to elucidate the gas-sensing mechanism within metal oxides/Ti3C2Tx heterostructures in order to develop a generalised framework.
Hermawan et al. [38] fabricated a sensor device consisting of p-type CuO semiconductor with metallic Ti3C2OH2 and found that the work function played a significant role in regulating the gas-sensing mechanism, charge transfer, and energy-band alignment. The Ti3C2Tx MXene with –OH termination exhibits a work function of around 3.9 eV, lower than CuO’s work function of 4.7 eV, creating a Schottky barrier at their interface and aligning the Fermi energy levels. Charge transfer occurs bidirectionally between metal and semiconductor across the interface, limited by the barrier height ΔΦB, resulting in high room-temperature resistivity. During the gas-sensing mechanism, O ion adsorption reduces interface band bending, aiding charge transfer with the temperature rise. The Schottky barrier leads to poorer mobility in p-type/metallic CuO/Ti3C2Tx than in p-type CuO, explaining the slightly higher resistance despite Ti3C2Tx’s better conductivity. O removal by reducing gas thins the depletion region (HALs), raises band bending, and reinstates the Schottky barrier, causing hole trapping in Ti3C2Tx (See Figure 2). One thing which should be highlighted is that Schottky hole trapping may occur if the work function is lower than the tandem p-type materials. The Schottky barrier also forms when metallic Ti3C2Tx is combined with an n-type semiconductor such as W18O49 and SnO2 [39,40,41], regardless of the type of target gas. We have noted that, in most reported experiments, shifts in electrical conductivity tend to mirror the inherent characteristics of the paired oxides. For instance, the resistivity of n-type paired MXenes decreases and increases upon encountering reducing and oxidising gases, respectively. Therefore, the gas-sensing mechanism trends will largely align with those of the paired oxides.
Now, turning to the discussion of the gas-sensing mechanism in MXene/non-oxide heterostructures, it is worth noting that conducting polymers also exhibit n-type or p-type conductivity. The energy levels of the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) and the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) in polymers, whether they act as donors or acceptors, are crucial factors. Given this, the gas-sensing mechanism in MXene-polymer heterostructures is likely to bear similarity to that observed in MXene/metal-oxide heterostructures. PEDOT:PSS is categorised as a donor (n-type) conjugated polymer. The formation of a band depletion stems from the absorption and ionisation of oxygen molecules, achieved by capturing electrons from the conduction band of PEDOT:PSS/MXene heterostructures. This depletion results in elevated sensor resistances. Upon exposure to reducing gas, the depletion thins, permitting electron flow and leading to a decrease in electrical resistance (Figure 3). In the case of MXene/polymer heterostructures with acceptor (p-type) conjugated polymers, the electrical resistivity of the sensors would demonstrate the opposite behaviour. However, the incorporation of MXenes in p-type polymer nanocomposites for gas-sensor applications has not been reported thus far.
Interestingly, in additional MXene composites, such as those involving carbonaceous or chalcogenide materials, the gas-sensing mechanism is similarly governed by the band-gap and work-function interactions between MXenes and the accompanying materials. In particular to the number of captured electrons, when the molecules of the adsorbed gas species are less numerous than the available electrons on the sensor surface, the sensing behaviours are influenced by the quantity of adsorbed gas species. Conversely, in situations of an abundance of adsorbed gas molecules, the sensing behaviours are determined by the electron count. In this scenario, possessing a smaller initial electron conduction volume/concentration becomes advantageous for heightened sensing, as the relative change in electron concentration due to the adsorption/desorption of the target gas becomes more pronounced. In such cases, the nature of the sensing conductivity aligns with the behaviour of the tandem materials rather than the MXenes themselves. Across all MXene-based sensor heterostructures, MXenes function as charge-carrier-trapping sites from the tandem materials during the sensing process.
The stability of MXenes is of paramount significance in the context of device manufacturing, given that the sensors in development are exposed to various and ever-changing environmental conditions. Nevertheless, prolonged resistance to oxidation at room or elevated temperatures is exceedingly inadequate for Ti3C2Tx aqueous solutions, causing titanium carbide to transform into its oxidized state (TiO2), consequently impacting its electronic attributes. An in-depth inquiry[JY1] has revealed that MXenes can be preserved for extended periods at lower temperatures, in conjunction with certain solvents such as isopropyl alcohol (IPA), ethanol, and similar compounds. Lipatov and his collaborators engineered field-effect transistors (FETs) using single-layered Ti3C2Tx flakes as conductive pathways to investigate the electronic characteristics and environmental durability of Ti3C2Tx [42]. The findings unveiled a field-effect electron mobility of 2.6 ± 0.7 cm2V1s1 and a resistivity of 2.31 μΩm (equivalent to 4600 Scm-1) for single-layered Ti3C2Tx flakes, which is an order of magnitude greater than that of the bulk Ti3C2Tx. The data regarding environmental robustness indicated that Ti3C2Tx FETs remain steadfast and remarkably conductive even following prolonged exposure to humid air for a duration of 70 hours. Reports have suggested that the interlayer spacing in multi-layered MXenes can be manipulated through the introduction of K+ and Mg2+ ions, thereby heightening the absorption of target gases and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Muckley and his team [43] documented the intercalation of K+ and Mg2+ions into MXene assemblies, resulting in an augmentation of the c-lattice parameter, which dictates the extent of H2O adsorption in the context of humidity sensing. The durability of MXenes can be assessed through the use of Raman spectroscopy, enabling the direct observation of the oxidation process. This is accomplished by monitoring the Raman shift in the G and D spectral bands, especially the emergence of graphene bands. These spectral features indicate disruptions in the MXene lattice structure and the oxidation of MXenes [44].
Upon careful consideration of the multitude of empirical data available in many reports, we elucidate the intricate gas-sensing mechanism inherent within the MXene heterostructures. This mechanism manifests through electrical responses and the consequential alignment of band energies, as visually depicted in Figure 4. Notably, the nature of the electrical response, signifying alterations in resistivity or current flow, is intrinsically tied to the inherent properties of the paired materials constituting the tandem structure. Moreover, the band-energy alignment during contact is a pivotal aspect of this sensing mechanism. This alignment, crucially influenced by the work function, serves as a critical determinant of the ensuing gas–surface interactions. Specifically, it is noteworthy that band-depletion events correspondingly coincide with the presence of adsorbed oxygen species, a phenomenon of profound significance in the context of gas-sensing mechanisms within MXenes heterostructures.
To elucidate the gas-sensing mechanism in MXene heterostructures, one can consider the following steps:
  • Determine the conductivity (metallic, p-type, or n-type), work functions, as well as the band configuration of pristine MXenes and tandem materials using standard measurements.
  • Illustrate the potential energy-band diagram alignment before and after contact, and depict the potential band bending resulting from Fermi level equalisation.
  • Conduct gas-sensing evaluations under both reducing and oxidising atmospheres, and observe the resultant change in the resistance of the MXene heterostructures.
  • Illustrate the possible charge-carrier transfer (holes or electrons) at the interface of the heterostructures during oxygen adsorption and gas exposure, and relate to the change of electrical resistance.

4. Engineering Approach to Enhance 2D MXene Sensing Performances

Despite displaying notable sensing properties, the MXene’s stability is compromised and it deteriorates under oxidising or humid conditions, attributable to its hydrophilic nature arising from the existence of terminal groups [45,46]. This predicament is a critical concern that necessitates addressing for the development and widespread adoption of MXene-based gas sensors in the global market. The current trends in gas-sensor technology heavily emphasise the engineering aspects of MXene, encompassing surface functionalisation and morphological tuning, among others [47]. In this discussion, we delve into two highly effective engineering strategies aimed at optimising the sensing capabilities of 2D MXenes.

4.1. Surface Functionalisation

In recent years, researchers have explored various approaches to functionalise pure MXenes and enhance their surface properties and reactivity. Among these approaches are ion intercalation using K+ and Mg2+ ions, decoration with noble metals, fluoroalkyl-silane treatment, and transition-metal oxyfluoride modification, to name a few [45,47,48,49]. By improving the VOC-sensing attributes of MXenes, functionalisation has opened up exciting possibilities for these materials in diverse applications. Notably, functionalisation using nanostructures and ion intercalation has led to significant improvements in sensor performance, as reflected in Table 1. Furthermore, ion intercalation serves as an alternative to overcome the limitation of MXenes due to their highly conductive nature and to improve sensor characteristics. For example, Yang et al. [50] found that intercalation of Na+ into MXene increased the N–Ti sites and O/F ratio, resulting in a marked enhancement of sensor response to NH3. The proposed work achieved high-humidity sensing attributes and 28.87% response for 100 ppm NH3 gas. Muckley et al. [51] demonstrated that intercalation of K+ and Mg2+ ions in MXenes causes spacing between MXene sheets, leading to trapping of water molecules and an increase in c-lattice parameters. Koh et al. [48] investigated Na+ intercalation in MXenes to analyse interlayer swelling for the sensing of CO2 and C2H6O via in situ XRD measurements. The work assessed the sensor performance under various NaOH concentrations and obtained a 9.99% response for 0.1% C2H6O for 0.3mM NaOH (Figure 5a). Shuvo et al. [49] proposed sulfur(S)-functionalised MXenes that showed appreciable sensing parameters towards various VOCs, particularly for toluene detection at the parts per billion level [49]. S-doping enhanced the spacing between the layers of Ti3C2Tx (from 0.96 to 1.91 nm) for the (002) plane. This increases the surface-to-volume ratio and thereby the analyte interaction. Moreover, the electronegative S ions extract electrons from MXene and vary the sensor current and response of 79.5% to toluene at room temperature (Figure 5b). In addition, Chen et al. [47] presented a novel method of fluoroalkylsilane (FOTS) intercalation with Ti3C2Tx to increase the oxidative stability of MXene. The Ti3C2Tx-F displayed an enhanced surface area and highest response of 14% to ethanol gas due to the enhanced interspacing.
Noble metal decoration is another effective methodology for improving the sensor characteristics of MXenes. For instance, Li et al. [52] suggested Ag-modified MXenes as humidity sensors with a polymer adhesive layer. The novel approach increased the ionic conductivity and thereby introduced a flexible sensor with a high sensitivity of 106%, which records the fluctuations in humidity with the change in human voices and motion of hands, which shows its potential for application in robotics. Zhu et al. [53] reported a novel hydrogen sensor by decorating Pd on MXene. The sensor exhibits a fast response time of (32 ± 7) s and an appreciable sensitivity (23.0 ± 4.0), and the highest adsorption rate is due to the induced doping of electrons by Pd nano-clusters (Figure 5c). Zou et al. [54] proposed composite Fe2(MoO4)3/MXene nanocomposites for the effective detection of n-butanol. Kumar et al. [37] revealed an amine-functionalised MXene for effective sensing of NO2 gas detection. Wang et al. [55] suggested intercalation of TiOF2 for the surface functionalisation of MXene for a humidity sensor. The presence of TiOF2, which has a larger band gap, catalytic behaviour, and a capability of adsorbing hydrophilic groups, advances the specific surface area and stability of MXene and stabilises the terminal groups, thereby enhancing the sensitivity and selectivity of MXene towards humidity.
Surface functionalisation with various strategies has been found to increase the adsorption rates and sensing capability of MXenes for various analytes. The detailed analysis reflected that the sensor characteristics of pure MXenes are enhanced by surface functionalisation with strategies such as ion intercalation, doping with sulfur or noble metals, and modification of terminal groups. Overall, the diverse functionalisation techniques have the potential to expand the range of applications for MXene-based sensors.
Figure 5. (a) Schematic of in situ XRD measurements of Ti3C2Tx films (transferred from 0.3 mM NaOH solution) upon gas introduction and summarised (002) peak shift of Ti3C2Tx films upon CO2 and ethanol introduction [48]. (b) Formation energy per atom for finding the preferential functional group of the MXenes, horizontal binding energy of toluene to titanium carbide MXenes with −O and −S as the surface termination group at four different sites, and ELF indicating variation in the charge distribution of S atoms around the adsorbed molecule [49]. (c) Sensitivities and response times of MXene@Pd CNC film sensor to 4% H2 under different bending angles and after n-time bending cycles and one bending cycle show from θ = 0° to 180° and back to 0° [53].
Figure 5. (a) Schematic of in situ XRD measurements of Ti3C2Tx films (transferred from 0.3 mM NaOH solution) upon gas introduction and summarised (002) peak shift of Ti3C2Tx films upon CO2 and ethanol introduction [48]. (b) Formation energy per atom for finding the preferential functional group of the MXenes, horizontal binding energy of toluene to titanium carbide MXenes with −O and −S as the surface termination group at four different sites, and ELF indicating variation in the charge distribution of S atoms around the adsorbed molecule [49]. (c) Sensitivities and response times of MXene@Pd CNC film sensor to 4% H2 under different bending angles and after n-time bending cycles and one bending cycle show from θ = 0° to 180° and back to 0° [53].
Sensors 23 08674 g005
Table 1. Comparative study on sensor parameters of surface functionalised and layered MXene-based compositions.
Table 1. Comparative study on sensor parameters of surface functionalised and layered MXene-based compositions.
MaterialTarget GasTResponse Time (s)Recov. Time (s)Conc.Response (Ra/Rg) or (Rg/Ra)Refs.
Alkalised organ-like
MXene
NH3RT--100 ppm28.87[50]
Ti3C2-Mg and Ti3C2-K H2ORT---0.8[51]
NaOH-treated Ti3C2TxCO2 and
C2H6O
RT--1 %9.995[48]
S- Ti3C2TxC7H8RT--50 ppm79.5[49]
Ti3C2Tx-FC2H6ORT--30 ppm14[47]
Ti3C2/AgH2ORT80 ms--106 800%[52]
Ti3C2Tx MXene@PdH2RT---40[53]
Fe2(MoO4)3/MXeneC4H8O and C8H10120 °C1824100 ppm43.1 and 39.5[54]
Ni(OH)2/Ti3C2TxNH3RT--10 ppm6.2[56]
Nb2CTx MXeneNO2RT--25 ppm31.52[37]
TiOF2@Ti3C2TxH2ORT1620-993[55]

4.2. Layering Structures

With regards to their functional attributes, MXenes are prospective materials for gas-sensing applications. However, the stacked sheets of MXene can lead to reduced specific surface areas, thereby diminishing the sensing performance, as evidenced by previous studies [25,57]. The influence of 2D layered materials is particularly noteworthy because of their diverse benefits, including a significant surface-to-volume ratio, exceptional flexibility, modifiable electronic structure, and remarkable mechanical stability [58]. The etching technique used for structuring MXene from the MAX phase typically leads to the development of layered structures. To achieve mono-layered MXene, an additional exfoliation approach is necessary, usually followed by mechanical shaking or sonication [59]. Delamination or intercalation allows for the exploration of exclusive characteristics of 2D materials. Mashtalir et al. demonstrated the intercalation of organic molecules into the layers of MXene structures, resulting in the intercalation of f-Ti2C2. This work involved the intercalation of (CH3)2SO, which aided the delamination of the f-Ti3C2 layers into discrete 2D sheets of MXene.
The appropriate selection of the intercalant, along with the parameters used for the process, significantly impact the sensing and functional attributes of the material. The most commonly reported intercalants include dimethyl sulfoxide, isopropyl amine, urea, and hydrazine [60,61,62,63]. Mashtalir et al. investigated the effects of hydrazine intercalation on the characteristics of MXene and found a decrease in surface groups, resulting in surface modification. Additionally, the intercalation increased the number of active sites on the surface, leading to improved adsorption and sensor parameters of the material [63]. Another crucial property of MXenes as layered structures in gas sensors is the thickness of the sensor material. Therefore, thinner MXene layers exhibit a higher sensor response due to the active sites available in the exposed MXene-based sensor [64].

5. Two-Dimensional MXene-Based Heterostructures as High-Performance Gas-Sensing Materials

Recent investigations have substantiated that MXenes boast an extensive surface area, exceptional electrical conductivity, and a multitude of functional groups. Despite these advantages, the metallic nature of MXenes, their poor stability, narrow band gap, and low detection limit have been identified as major shortcomings of these materials in their role as gas-sensing elements. Recent advances have sought to address these issues by utilising MXene-based composites with diverse materials such as metal oxide, chalcogenides, and carbonaceous materials, to name a few. These composite materials have been shown to offer improved adsorption sites, defects, and sensing characteristics. In this section, we elucidate the pertinent findings reported in the existing literature on gas sensors that are based on MXene-nanocomposites.

5.1. MXene/Metal-Oxide Heterostructures

Metal-oxide semiconductors (MOS) have been widely investigated for gas sensing due to their exceptional specific surface area, facile synthesis, and high response to toxic gases [65,66,67,68]. However, MOS gas detectors have drawbacks such as cross-selectivity, low selectivity, and high working temperature [38,41,69,70,71]. Nevertheless, recent research has shown that hybridising metal oxides with MXenes can overcome these limitations and improve the performance of volatile organic compound (VOC) sensors [72]. Researchers have prepared and tested various MXene/metal-oxide composite combinations, such as Co3O4 [70,73], WO3 [74], TiO2 [71], SnO2 [41], and CuO [38,75] for VOC detection in breath analysers, food quality, and environmental applications [76,77]. Detailed summaries of the relevant literature are provided in Table 2.
The use of MXene/metal-oxide composites has also been explored for NH3 detection, with promising results. Tai et al. [71] designed a TiO2/Ti3C2Tx film for NH3 detection, which showed a significantly improved sensor response and response/recovery times compared to pure MXene due to modulation of a self-built electric field. Ranjbar et al. [78] proposed a non-invasive breath analyser for early detection of chronic kidney diseases, using a marigold-flower-shaped V2O5/CuWO4 integrated with Ti3C2Tx sheets for NH3 sensing. This sensor is portable, cost-effective, and has high sensitivity due to transduction in electrical resistance (Shottky junction) when exposed to air and NH3. Zhang et al. [75] investigated the characteristics of MXene/CuO composites for NH3 sensing applications, demonstrating their potential as wearable NH3 sensors, using a triboelectric nanogenerator and polytetrafluoroethylene for room-temperature sensing. Guo et al. [74] developed a highly sensitive NH3 sensor with minimised power consumption using Ti3C2Tx/WO3 composites, which showed remarkable stability, response (24.8/100 ppm), and reproducibility, due to numerous active sites and adequate electron transportation between the heterojunction. He et al. [41] proposed an MXene/SnO2 composite sensor for room-temperature NH3 sensing, which exhibited high selectivity, fast response, and recovery time (<30 s), in exposure to NH3 gas, thanks to the difference in Fermi level driving the sensing mechanism, and a wireless sensor developed using inductor–capacitor antenna and a heterojunction developed using the LTCC technique.
In addition, the MXene/metal-oxide composites have successfully detected various VOCs that were previously difficult to detect, including triethylamine, toluene, acetone, nitrogen dioxide, methanol, hexanal, and formaldehyde. Liang et al. [79] proposed using SnO2/Ti3C2Tx composites for detecting triethylamine gas at 140 °C. The optimised configuration and band structure of the sensor are displayed in Figure 6a. The MXene’s interconnected porous composite structure resulted in enhanced sensing attributes toward triethylamine. Hermawan et al. [38] discovered a sensor using CuO/Ti3C2Tx to detect toluene gas, which is the least detected gas using metal oxide to date. The work proposes a work-function matching strategy as a sensing mechanism and highlights electronic self-assembly’s impact on enhancing sensing parameters. The proposed work shows a speedy response time of 5 s and a good response of 11.4 to toluene. Sun et al. [39] developed a ppb-level acetone sensor using in situ prepared W18O49 nanorods on Ti3C2Tx sheets via a solvothermal procedure. The sensor exhibited enhanced sensing parameters such as fast response and recovery times, low detection limit, and a good response of 11.6 for 20 ppm of acetone gas. This improvement is attributed to the uniform distribution of W18O49 on MXene sheets, combined interfacial reactions, and the removal of –F during the synthesis route. Wang et al. [80] synthesised SnO-SnO2/Ti3C2Tx via a hydrothermal step to detect acetone gas. The Ti3C2Tx served as conductive sheets for carrier transportation and as a hole accumulation region when the sensor was exposed to acetone gas, and the p–n junction enhanced the response and decreased the induction temperature. Liu et al. [81] developed α-Fe2O3/Ti3C2Tx composites for effective sensing of acetone at room temperature. The study used DFT calculations to explain the gas-sensing mechanism behind the prepared material and acetone gas at room temperature. Zhu et al. [82] synthesised ZnO/Ti3C2Tx composites for effective sensing of acetone gas and obtained a response of 14.4 for 100 ppm of target gas at 320 °C, which is a six-fold response compared to pure ZnO. Furthermore, Liu et al. [71] proposed another composite of MXene with TiO2 and tested the sample for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) detection. The study is a combination of first-principle calculations and experimental tests, and the study highlights the room-temperature sensing of 5 ppm of the target gas with speedy response and recovery times. Yang et al. [69] discussed a room-temperature NO2 sensing approach for MXene by preparing a composite with ZnO. The p–n heterojunction, formed between the 3D-crumpled MXene sphere and ZnO, resulted in appreciable sensing attributes of the composite towards NO2 compared to those of 3D-crumpled MXene and ZnO tested separately towards NO2 (Figure 6b). Sun et al. [73] proposed and prepared Co3O4@PEI/MXene to detect NOx molecules, and the diffusion capability of the target gas and the electron transportation at the interface contributed to the enhanced sensing attributes. Wang et al. and Gasso et al. also proposed NO2 sensors by developing composites with ZnO and WO3, respectively, and their works made use of interfacial interactions for improved sensing attributes.
Nanocomposites consisting of MXene and In2O3 were investigated by Liu et al. [83] to determine their ability to sense methanol. The formation of the Schottky junction contributed to the enhanced surface area, mesoporous nature, and improved band gap (ranging from 1.18 eV to 2.08 eV). Meanwhile, Kuang et al. [84] demonstrated that Ti3C2Tx/TiO2, which they synthesised and analysed structurally and morphologically, was capable of sensing various volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with a response improvement ranging from 1.5 to 12.6 times that of purely MXene-based sensors. The altered carrier density and interfacial heterojunction attributed to the heightened sensitivity. The MXene skeleton’s presence in the sensor facilitated a high signal-to-noise ratio. This, combined with the facile fabrication technique and low power consumption, rendered the sensor ideal for health monitoring purposes. Furthermore, Zhang et al. [70] developed an MXene/Co3O4 composite that senses formaldehyde at room temperature. The wearable device uses piezoelectric nanogenerator (PENG) technology to capture human motion energy. The interfacial interactions between the materials contributed to the exceptional sensing properties, including a low detection limit of 0.01 ppm and a speedy recovery time of 5 s. Lastly, Bu et al. [85] highlighted the ethanol-sensing capabilities of in situ grown Co3O4/Ti3C2Tx composites. The 2D Ti3C2Tx sheets in the composite facilitated platform nucleation and metal oxide’s rapid growth, while the porous Co3O4 provided more adsorption sites for gas sensing. The heterojunction played an essential role in augmenting the sensing properties of the proposed MXene/metal-oxide composite.
The detailed literature survey summarised the pros, cons, and gaps of MXene/metal-oxide composites for gas-sensing applications. TiO2, Co3O4, and SnO2 were the most recurrently used metal oxides as a composite with MXene for detecting target gases and it is noted in Table 2 that MXene’s composites with SnO2 and WO3 provided maximum sensor attributes for various gases. The most explored gases are ammonia and acetone, whereas ZnO showed good sensing characteristics for oxidising gases such as nitrogen dioxide. There are other reducing VOCs, particularly acetone and methanol, that were detected using α-Fe2O3 and In2O3.
MXenes are known for their unique semiconducting properties, with p-type characteristics that make them particularly responsive to various gases. When exposed to reducing gases, these materials exhibit a positive response, causing an increase in device resistance. However, the thickness of the MXene film plays a crucial role in determining their sensing performance. As the thickness of the MXene sheets increases, the sensor's responsiveness diminishes, affecting both reducing and oxidizing gases. The sensing behavior of MXenes is also influenced by the choice of carbon precursors, such as graphite, TiC, and lampblack, as well as the size of Ti3C2Tx flakes. Smaller flakes have been observed to provide superior responses due to their shorter gas diffusion paths. Ti3C2Tx film serves as an excellent metallic conduit, ensuring optimal electrical conductivity, minimal noise, and enhanced signal generation, especially in the context of ethanol sensing. Remarkably, single-layered Ti3C2Tx displays exceptional selectivity towards NH3 at room temperature, combined with reasonable sensitivity. This selectivity has been confirmed through first-principles calculations, emphasizing factors such as strong negative adsorption energy, charge transfer, and the smaller size of NH3 compared to that of other test gases, all contributing to the interaction and deformation of the Ti3C2O2 surface [36].
In a separate study, Soo-Yeon Cho et al. [86] synthesized two phases of molybdenum carbide (a-MoC1-x and b-Mo2C) with high porosities and metallic characteristics. These unique properties stem from variations in the density of state (DOS) localizations, as revealed through DFT calculations. a-MoC1-x with a nanorod morphology and b-Mo2C as nanoparticles exhibited extraordinary physical and chemical properties, resulting in high sensitivity to NO2 and a low detection limit. However, it is worth noting that MXenes are prone to oxidation, which can hinder their electronic properties during long-term storage, especially in the presence of water, leading to the conversion of titanium carbide into its oxidized form (TiO2). The sensing characteristics of Ti3C2Tx for both reducing (CO and NH3) and oxidizing (NO2) gases at room temperature was also investigated. Stable response-recovery curves were observed for reducing and oxidizing gases, although NO2 sensing resulted in a significant baseline resistance drift, potentially due to the oxidation of Ti3C2Tx in an oxidizing environment. The study also evaluated various volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including acetone, ethanol, and toluene, for their sensing behavior with MXenes.
A novel class of MXenes, V4C3Tx, demonstrated effective acetone sensing at room temperature, attributed to substantial differences in adsorption behavior. MXenes with surface functional groups (–O and –OH) showed interactions with various VOCs. Mo2CTx exhibited higher chemical activity compared to that of Ti-based MXenes, leading to increased gaseous interactions and improved sensing performance. Toluene detection with 2D Mo2CTx yielded impressive results. Furthermore, a sensor based on V2CTx was created on a flexible polyimide substrate for the detection of nonpolar gases at room temperature. It successfully detected benzaldehyde, DNT (2,4-dinitrotoluene), and indole with low detection limits for each gas. The excellent properties of MXenes, as discussed earlier, offer a promising avenue for effective humidity sensing at room temperature. Single-layered Ti3C2Tx, Ti2C3 layers, and Ti3C2, in conjunction with quartz crystal microbalances (QCMs),[JY2] have shown impressive results in relative humidity sensing. Rapid response and high sensitivity were observed in various studies involving MXenes paired with QCM for humidity detection. In Table 2, we provide an overview of the performance of pristine MXene-based sensors for gases, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and humidity. It is noteworthy that the majority of the target gases and VOCs are of the reducing type, and these sensors exhibit remarkable detection capabilities at room temperature. Pristine MXenes, characterized by their metallic conductivity, are enriched with terminal groups, such as –OH and –F, owing to the etching process. These functional groups play a pivotal role in offering a wealth of active sites and charge transfer opportunities.
Table 2. Comparison of various literature studies of MXene/metal-oxide composite-based gas sensors.
Table 2. Comparison of various literature studies of MXene/metal-oxide composite-based gas sensors.
Tandem
Material
Target GasTResponse Time (s)Recov. Time (s)Conc.Response (Ra/Rg) or (Rg/Ra)Refs.
CuOC7H8250 °C270 s10 s50 ppm11.4[38]
TiO2NH325 °C0.650.5210 ppm3.1[71]
Co3O4NO2RT1.6 s73.1 s100 ppm27.9[73]
ZnONO225 °C--100 ppm41.93[77]
Co3O4HCHORT83 s5 s10 ppm9.2[70]
W18O49C3H6O300 °C5.6 s6 s20 ppm11.6[39]
WO3NH3RT--1 ppm22.3%[74]
CuONH3RT43 s26 s100 ppm24.8[75]
SnO2NH3RT36 s44 s50 ppm40[41]
SnO-SnO2 (p-n junction)C3H6ORT18 s9 s100 ppm12.1[80]
TiO2C6H14O25 °C293 s461 s10 ppm3.4[84]
V2O5/CuWO4NH325 °C--51 ppm53.5[78]
α-Fe2O3C3H6ORT5 s5 s5 ppm16.6[87]
In2O3CH3OHRT6.5 s3.5 s5 ppm29.6[83]
TiO2NO2RT23.85 ppm1.13[88]
SnO2C6H15-N140 °C1 s1 s50 ppm33.4[79]
ZnOC3H6O320 °C8 s12 s100 ppm14.4[82]
WO3NO2RT182 s75 s0.2 ppm78[89]
Co3O4C2H6O200 °C50 s45 s50 ppm190[85]
ZnONO2-17 s24 s50 ppb81[90]

5.2. MXene/Polymer Heterostructures

Polymers belong to a class of materials that showcase various properties like conductivity, flexibility, sensitivity, and an array of functional groups for surface reactions, target gases, and low-temperature operating conditions. These characteristics make them ideal for chemical-sensor applications when combined with MXene [91,92,93]. A thorough review of the existing literature demonstrates that MXene/polymer composites can sense VOCs at room temperature, and this information is compiled in Table 3. MXene/polymer composites have been prepared and tested for gases such as ammonia, acetone, and methanol, making them suitable for use in various industries, healthcare, food quality monitoring, and other applications [94,95,96].
While pure MXene-based NH3 sensors are known to have excellent sensing attributes, they are limited by their long recovery times due to the adsorption energy of NH3, which causes drift in the baseline resistance of the sensor. To address these limitations, researchers have developed MXene composites with polyaniline (PANI) [92], poly(styrene sulfonic acid) (PEDOT:PSS) [97], and other materials. For instance, Li et al. [98] created a flexible polymer (PANI)/MXene composite using an in situ method to develop an NH3 sensor with enhanced sensing characteristics compared to pure Ti3C2Tx. The sensor showed 20–80% humidity dependence at a lower operating temperature, which makes it a viable option for agricultural applications. The sensor’s superior sensing attributes are due to Schottky-junction formation, and simulation studies have confirmed its practicality for use [98]. Similarly, Jin et al. [97] synthesised an NH3 sensor with an PEDOT:PSS/MXene composite using in situ polymerisation. The sensor had a fast recovery time and a good response of 95 for 1000 ppm of gas at room temperature as shown in Figure 7a. The synergistic effect of both polymer and MXene was responsible for the appreciable sensing parameters.
Zhao et al. [91] explored a novel ethanol sensor, based on a polyaniline/MXene (PANI/Ti3C2Tx) composite, for real-time electronic sensing. The study used density functional theory (DFT) simulations and electrosensitive experiments to demonstrate the composite’s excellent electrocatalytic properties. The PANI/Ti3C2Tx composite showed an impressive response of 41.1% and fast response and recovery times of 0.4 s and 0.5 s, respectively, when exposed to ethanol gas at room temperature (Figure 7b). Wang et al. [93] investigated the volatile organic compound (VOC) sensing properties of a Ti3C2Tx/poly(3,4ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) composite at room temperature. The sensor exhibited a response to various VOCs, with the highest response being to methanol due to the synergistic effect of the polymer and MXene. The sensor demonstrated a 5.54 response to methanol at room temperature, with fast response and recovery times, as depicted in Figure 7c.
Moreover, Wang et al. [99] presented a humidity sensor using poly(vinyl alcohol)/MXene (PVA/Ti3C2Tx), and a monolayer of MoSe2-based piezoelectric nanogenerator (PENG) was produced using the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) technique. The sensor demonstrated a significant response (∼40), fast response/recovery time (0.9/6.3 s), and excellent repeatability. The sensor is capable of detecting moisture in human skin, highlighting its potential for real-time sensing. Li et al. [100] discussed a polymer/MXene composite-based humidity sensor as a non-invasive monitor of physiological processes. The study used Ti3C2Tx/chitosan–quercetin layers to enhance the response of Ti3C2Tx to water molecules. Incorporating the polymer layer into MXene enhanced the adsorption of water molecules and contributed to the intercalation effect, resulting in an improved sensor response. Zhou et al. [101] developed a CO2 sensor using a nitrogen-doped Ti3C2Tx/polyethyleneimine (PEI) composite with reduced graphene oxide (rGO). The study utilised the notable hydrophilicity of N-Ti3C2Tx and PEI, the reversibility of reactions between amino-enriched polymer and acidic gas molecules, and an rGO layer to support the sensor’s performance. Zhi et al. presented a flexible MXene/polyaniline/bacterial-cellulose composite [102]. Additionally, Sardhana et al. [95] demonstrated a MXene/TiO2/cellulose-acetate composite for the smart detection of ammonia. The hybridisation of carbon nanofibers as a substrate provided flexibility as well as an enhanced surface area. The heterojunction facilitated the adsorption/desorption ability of NH3 molecules. Lastly, Liu et al. [103] discussed a humidity detection sensor using an MXene/chitosan composite. The study demonstrated the sensor’s characteristics and morphological images.
MXene/polymer composites have been shown to have excellent sensing properties for various gases, VOCs, CO2, and humidity, exhibiting fast response and recovery times, high sensitivity, and good repeatability. The use of MXene/polymer composites in sensor technology has opened up new possibilities for the development of high-performance sensors for various applications, including real-time electronic sensing and physiological monitoring. The flexibility and enhanced surface area provided by the composites make them suitable for the development of flexible sensors that can be used for wearable technology.
Figure 7. (a) A room-temperature ammonia (NH3) sensor based on PEDOT:PSS/MXene composites [97]. (b) Dynamic transient for response of Ti3C2Tx and PANI/Ti3C2Tx-based flexible sensors exposed to 50–200 ppm ethanol gases. Response and recovery times of PANI/Ti3C2Tx-based flexible sensors to 150 ppm ethanol gases [91]. (c) A methanol gas-sensor performance based on a blend of PEDOT:PSS and Ti3C2Tx [93].
Figure 7. (a) A room-temperature ammonia (NH3) sensor based on PEDOT:PSS/MXene composites [97]. (b) Dynamic transient for response of Ti3C2Tx and PANI/Ti3C2Tx-based flexible sensors exposed to 50–200 ppm ethanol gases. Response and recovery times of PANI/Ti3C2Tx-based flexible sensors to 150 ppm ethanol gases [91]. (c) A methanol gas-sensor performance based on a blend of PEDOT:PSS and Ti3C2Tx [93].
Sensors 23 08674 g007

5.3. MXene/Carbonaceous Heterostructures

Carbonaceous materials refer to any materials containing carbon, including graphite, carbon nanotubes, graphene, activated carbon, and carbon fibres, among others. These materials are known for their high thermal and electrical conductivities, making them useful in a variety of applications, such as electrodes for batteries and fuel cells, conductive additives for polymers and composites, and sensors. Graphene, for example, is considered one of the most conductive materials known, with a conductivity that is orders of magnitude higher than copper. Carbon nanotubes and carbon fibres are also highly conductive and are used in applications where strength and conductivity are required, such as in the aerospace and automotive industries. Activated carbon, on the other hand, is highly porous and is commonly used for adsorption and purification processes due to its large surface area and ability to selectively adsorb certain molecules.
Graphene and its derivatives have been widely studied for their potential in detecting volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and humidity due to their high surface area, porosity, and thermal stability. Liu et al. [104] developed a VOC sensor at room temperature using a CuO/Ti3C2Tx/rGO composite. The porous networks, high surface areas, uniform CuO dispersion, and high electron conductivity of the composite led to acetone sensing at room temperature with excellent sensing properties. The sensor showed a response of 52% to 100 ppm acetone gas with a quick response/recovery time (6.5 s/7.5 s) and exceptional selectivity and reproducibility. This approach using 3D rGO/MXene structures with MOS offers a new way for the development of room-temperature VOC sensors. Wang et al. [105] reported a room-temperature formaldehyde (HCHO) sensor using a rGO/N-Ti3C2Tx/TiO2 composite. The rGO sheets acted as an excellent conduction stage for charge carriers in wet conditions, while the layered N-Ti3C2Tx promoted the diffusion and adsorption of formaldehyde and H2O molecules [105]. TiO2 nanostructures provided more sorption spots and enabled the dissociation of adsorbed water. Lee et al. [106] analysed the sensing behaviour of MXene/GO-fibres using the wet spinning technique as shown in Figure 8a. The synergetic effect of electronic attributes and adsorption of MXene and graphene allowed the fibres to display an NH3 response of 6.77% at room temperature. Song et al. [107] introduced a MOS-graphene-based MXene composite for the smart detection of NO2. The TiO2/rGO showed a sensitivity of 400% compared to pristine rGO due to the increased surface area and enhanced adsorption sites. The sensor displayed a very low detection limit of 50 ppb. The improved sensor properties were due to the homogeneous incorporation of MOS nanostructures in the rGO and the increased rGO interlayer distance initiated from the nanostructure intercalation [107]. Chachulia et al. [21] proposed a hydrogen sensor with a high response (159) for 1000 ppm of target gas at an operating temperature of 250 °C. MXene/polyurethane (PU) was introduced as an acetone sensor by Tang et al. [94] as a wearable VOC sensor. The microcracks formed in the sheath fibre could intensify the swelling due to transduction, resulting in an improved sensor response of 40% compared to the flat sheath fibre. Tran et al. [96] discussed a VOC sensor using a rGO/Ti3C2Tx composite for the detection of multiple harmful gases (NO2, CH4, and Toluene). The improved sensor performance of the composite was due to the active sites on the surface of the MXene and exceptional electron transfer across the MXene/rGO boundary [96] (Figure 8b).
Figure 8. (a) Schematic illustration of the spinning process for MXene/GO hybrid fibre, and the corresponding gas response of MXene film, rGO fiber, and MXene/rGO hybrid fibre (40 wt % MXene) [106]. (b) Schematic illustration of NO2-sensing mechanism of rGO/Ti3C2Tx heterostructure and comparative response behaviours of rGO/Ti3C2Tx, MoS2/Ti3C2Tx, and g−C3N4/Ti3C2Tx towards multiple gases [96].
Figure 8. (a) Schematic illustration of the spinning process for MXene/GO hybrid fibre, and the corresponding gas response of MXene film, rGO fiber, and MXene/rGO hybrid fibre (40 wt % MXene) [106]. (b) Schematic illustration of NO2-sensing mechanism of rGO/Ti3C2Tx heterostructure and comparative response behaviours of rGO/Ti3C2Tx, MoS2/Ti3C2Tx, and g−C3N4/Ti3C2Tx towards multiple gases [96].
Sensors 23 08674 g008
Table 3. Comparison of various literature studies based on polymer/MXene and carbonaceous/MXene composite-based gas sensors.
Table 3. Comparison of various literature studies based on polymer/MXene and carbonaceous/MXene composite-based gas sensors.
MaterialTarget GasTResponse Time (s)Recov. Time (s)Conc.Response (Ra/Rg) or (Rg/Ra)Refs.
PANI/
Ti3C2Tx
NH320 °C--50 ppm400%[98]
PANI/
MXene
C2H6ORT0.4 s0.5 s200 ppm41.1%[91]
Ti3C2Tx/
PEDOT:PSS
CH3OHRT--500 ppm5.54[93]
PEDOT:PSS/MXeneNH3RT116 s40 s(10 ppm), (1000 ppm)9.6, 95[97]
PVA/MXeneHumidity-0.9 s6.3 s11–97% RH40[99]
MXene/
chitosan
H2O-0.75 s1.6 s1–98 %
RH
317
MXene/
rGO/CuO
C3H6ORT6.5 s7.5 s100 ppm52[104]
rGO/nitrogen-doped MXene/
TiO2
HCHO20 °C--4/20 ppm26/132[105]
MXene/
graphene
NH3RT--100 ppm7.21[106]
MXene/
Poly
ethyleneimine
CO220 °C--3000 ppm~1[101]
MXene-derived TiO2/rGONO2RT78 s210 s20 ppm.165[107]
[21]
MWCNTs/
graphene/
MXene
H2250 °C--1000 ppm159.07[94]
MXene/
polyurethane
------[96]
rGO/
Ti3C2Tx
VOCRT----[102]
MXene/
TiO2/
cellulose
NH3RT76 s62 s100 ppm6.84[98]

5.4. MXene/Noble-Metal Heterostructures

Theoretical research has suggested that substitution of surface groups of MXenes with noble metals can potentially enhance the gas-sensing abilities of MXene/noble-metal compounds. The incorporation of noble metals brings about environmental resistance to corrosion and oxidation and contributes to the catalytic nature, thereby improving the sensor reactions. Additionally, noble metals act as electron traps, halting the rapid electron-hole recombination, which is beneficial to the sensor performance. Therefore, noble-metal functionalised MXenes represent a promising solution for improved sensing mechanisms, charge carriers, and VOC selectivity [108]. In this regard, Zhu et al. [53] proposed a room-temperature H2 sensor, utilising Pd-activated MXene nanosheets, which are lightweight and flexible. The sensor indicated a response time of 32 s and a sensitivity of 23 at 4% H2. Furthermore, Xu et al. [109] investigated the H2S sensing ability of Ag-incorporated MXene at room temperature and in a humid atmosphere. The study elucidates that the H2S-detection performance can be attributed to chemical and electronic sensitisation. The morphological images of the as-synthesised samples. The Ag/MXene sensor exhibited a wide range of detection from 0.05–10 ppm, a good LOD of 35 ppb, and fast response and recovery times of 34 s and 58 s, respectively. See Table 4 for the detailed sensing properties of MXene/Noble-Metal Heterostructures.

5.5. MXene/Metal Chalcogenide Heterostructures

Out of various gas-sensing materials, metal chalcogenides are commonly used for the detection of different VOCs, but there is a lack of research on MXene/metal-chalcogenide composites for gas-sensing applications. Only a handful of articles in the literature highlight on MXene/metal-chalcogenide composites’ potential for detecting gases such as ethanol and nitrogen dioxide. Chen et al. [110] proposed a flexible ethanol sensor employing Ti3C2Tx/WSe2, which demonstrated good reproducibility and repeatability. The band diagram showed an n-type response and modulation of the Schottky barrier, with the sensitivity being 11 times greater than that of pure MXene. Additionally, the dichalcogenide enhanced response and recovery times (9.7 s/6.6 s) compared to pure MXene. The work’s schematic is shown in Figure 9. Xia et al. [111] explored a room-temperature NO2 sensor with fast response and recovery times and excellent repeatability. Visible-light photoactivation improved the optoelectronic properties and NO2 sensing, while the heterointerface effectively separated photocarriers. See Table 4 for the detailed sensing properties of MXene/Metal Chalcogenide Heterostructures.
Figure 9. Energy-band diagram of the Ti3C2Tx/WSe2 in air and ethanol, showing the variation of the depletion layer with interaction between adsorbed oxygen species and ethanol molecules. Response and recovery times calculated for 40 ppm of ethanol and selectivity test of the Ti3C2Tx and Ti3C2Tx/WSe2 sensors upon exposure to various VOCs at 40 ppm [110].
Figure 9. Energy-band diagram of the Ti3C2Tx/WSe2 in air and ethanol, showing the variation of the depletion layer with interaction between adsorbed oxygen species and ethanol molecules. Response and recovery times calculated for 40 ppm of ethanol and selectivity test of the Ti3C2Tx and Ti3C2Tx/WSe2 sensors upon exposure to various VOCs at 40 ppm [110].
Sensors 23 08674 g009
Table 4. Comparison of various literature studies based on noble-metals/chalcogenide/MXene composite-based gas sensors.
Table 4. Comparison of various literature studies based on noble-metals/chalcogenide/MXene composite-based gas sensors.
MaterialTarget GasTResponse Time (s)Recov. Time (s)Conc.Response (Ra/Rg) or (Rg/Ra)Refs.
MXene@PdH2RT---40[108]
Ag-MXeneH2S-345810 ppm-[109]
Ti3C2Tx/WSe2C2H6ORT9.76.640 ppm0.24[110]
MXene/WS2NO2RT565310 ppb-[111]

6. Conclusions and Outlook

Continuing the discussion of the potential of MXene-based heterostructures for gas-sensing applications, it is important to note that these materials hold promise due to their unique properties that distinguish them from other gas-sensing materials. For example, MXenes possess high surface-to-volume ratios, which enable efficient gas adsorption and increase the chances of gas–molecule interactions. Additionally, the tuneable band gaps of MXenes allow for the detection of different gases through selective tuning of their electronic properties. However, despite these promising properties, there are still several challenges and limitations that need to be addressed to fully exploit the potential of MXene-based heterostructures for gas-sensing applications. One of the primary challenges is the degradation of MXenes when exposed to certain gases, which can affect their sensing performance. Therefore, there is a need to develop strategies to enhance the stability of MXenes in different gas environments to improve their sensing capabilities.
Another significant challenge is the development of highly sensitive and selective gas sensors using MXene-based heterostructures. Achieving this requires a deep understanding of how these materials interact with different gases. To accomplish this, it is vital to comprehend how MXene-based heterostructures interact with gases, which can be achieved by utilising the DFT computational method. This approach enables the accurate prediction of electronic and structural characteristics based on atomic and molecular configurations, making it an ideal tool for investigating gas sensing in MXenes. DFT calculations can also be used to simulate the adsorption of various gases on the surfaces of MXene-based heterostructures, providing insights into their gas-sensing performance and identifying the most promising materials for gas-sensing applications. Additionally, DFT calculations can evaluate the impact of functionalisation on the structural and electronic properties of MXene-based heterostructures, providing a roadmap for improving their gas-sensing capabilities. However, DFT calculations are limited to theoretical predictions and may not reflect the actual behaviour of MXene-based gas sensors in real-world environments. Therefore, it is essential to combine computational simulations with experimental investigations to verify the effectiveness of MXene-based heterostructures for gas sensing. In situ measurement techniques, such as gas chromatography, infrared spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry, can provide real-time information on the interaction between MXene-based heterostructures and gases. These techniques enable researchers to measure the gas concentration and determine the reaction kinetics and mechanisms of gas adsorption and desorption on MXenes’ surfaces. By combining theoretical simulations with experimental measurements, researchers can gain a comprehensive understanding of the gas-sensing mechanism of MXene-based heterostructures and identify the most promising materials for gas-sensing applications.
The economic feasibility and environmental assessment of MXene-based heterostructures for gas-sensing applications are important factors to consider in the development of these materials. One advantage of MXenes is that they are relatively low-cost materials, which makes them economically feasible for large-scale production. However, the cost of synthesising MXene-based heterostructures can increase significantly due to the additional processing steps required to create the heterostructures. Therefore, cost-effective fabrication techniques should be developed to reduce the overall cost of production. In terms of environmental assessment, MXenes have several advantages over other gas-sensing materials. MXenes are highly stable and do not degrade easily when exposed to different gases, which reduces the need for frequent replacement and disposal of sensors. Additionally, MXenes can be synthesised from abundant and environmentally friendly sources, which makes them more sustainable compared to other materials that require rare or toxic elements. However, the environmental impact of the fabrication processes for MXene-based heterostructures should be carefully evaluated to ensure that they do not pose any risks to the environment or human health. Strategies such as green synthesis techniques and efficient waste management practices should be implemented to minimise the environmental footprint of MXene-based heterostructures.
In conclusion, MXene-based heterostructures hold great promise for gas-sensing applications due to their unique properties. However, there are still several technical challenges and limitations that must be addressed, including improving the stability of MXenes in different gas environments and developing highly sensitive and selective gas sensors using these materials. In addition to technical challenges, the economic feasibility and environmental impact of MXene-based gas sensors must also be considered. The large-scale synthesis of MXene-based heterostructures requires cost-effective and environmentally friendly synthesis routes. Additionally, the disposal of MXenes after use must be handled in an environmentally sustainable manner. Therefore, researchers must work towards developing scalable and sustainable synthesis routes and explore environmentally friendly methods for the disposal of MXenes. Despite these challenges, the potential applications of MXene-based heterostructures in gas sensing are vast, ranging from environmental monitoring to medical diagnostics. The continued exploration and optimisation of these materials for gas-sensing applications can lead to the development of highly sensitive, selective, and reliable gas sensors, ultimately contributing to the advancement of various industries and the betterment of society as a whole.

Author Contributions

R.A.B.J.: literature collection, writing—original draft, K.V.: literature collection, writing—original draft, A.H. (Angga Hermawan): conceptualization, writing—original draft, revision, supervision, funding acquisition, N.L.W.S.: revision, supervision, A.H. (Andri Hardiansyahand): writing—original draft, A.R.K.: supervision, funding acquisition, B.Y.: supervision, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financed by The Indonesia Endowment Funds for Education (LPDP) and the National Research and Innovation Agency under the Riset dan Inovasi untuk Indonesia Maju (RIIM) scheme with grant number 82/II.7/HK/2022.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gupta, A.; Sakthivel, T.; Seal, S. Recent Development in 2D Materials beyond Graphene. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2015, 73, 44–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Amrillah, T.; Hermawan, A.; Alviani, V.N.; Seh, Z.W.; Yin, S. MXenes and Their Derivatives as Nitrogen Reduction Reaction Catalysts: Recent Progress and Perspectives. Mater. Today Energy 2021, 22, 100864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Amrillah, T.; Supandi, A.R.; Puspasari, V.; Hermawan, A.; Seh, Z.W. MXene-Based Photocatalysts and Electrocatalysts for CO2 Conversion to Chemicals. Trans. Tianjin Univ. 2022, 28, 307–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Amrillah, T.; Hermawan, A.; Cristian, Y.B.; Oktafiani, A.; Dewi, D.M.M.; Amalina, I.; Darminto; Juang, J.-Y. Potential of MXenes as a Novel Material for Spintronic Devices: A Review. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2023, 25, 18584–18608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Amrillah, T.; Abdullah, C.; Hermawan, A.; Sari, F.; Alviani, V. Towards Greener and More Sustainable Synthesis of MXenes: A Review. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 4280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Naguib, M.; Kurtoglu, M.; Presser, V.; Lu, J.; Niu, J.; Heon, M.; Hultman, L.; Gogotsi, Y.; Barsoum, M.W. Two-Dimensional Nanocrystals Produced by Exfoliation of Ti3AlC2. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 4248–4253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alhabeb, M.; Maleski, K.; Anasori, B.; Lelyukh, P.; Clark, L.; Sin, S.; Gogotsi, Y. Guidelines for Synthesis and Processing of Two-Dimensional Titanium Carbide (Ti3C2Tx MXene). Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 7633–7644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. VahidMohammadi, A.; Rosen, J.; Gogotsi, Y. The World of Two-Dimensional Carbides and Nitrides (MXenes). Science 2021, 372, eabf1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gogotsi, Y.; Anasori, B. The Rise of MXenes. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 8491–8494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Z.; Wang, F.; Hermawan, A.; Zhu, J.; Yin, S. Surface Engineering of Ti3C2Tx MXene by Oxygen Plasma Irradiation as Room Temperature Ethanol Sensor. Funct. Mater. Lett. 2022, 15, 2251007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bhardwaj, R.; Hazra, A. MXene-Based Gas Sensors. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 15735–15754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Zeng, W. Preparation and Application of 2D MXene-Based Gas Sensors: A Review. Chemosensors 2021, 9, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, J.; Liu, X.; Neri, G.; Pinna, N. Nanostructured Materials for Room-Temperature Gas Sensors. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 795–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yamazoe, N. Toward Innovations of Gas Sensor Technology. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2005, 108, 2–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yuan, W.; Shi, G. Graphene-Based Gas Sensors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 10078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yamazoe, N.; Shimanoe, K. Theory of Power Laws for Semiconductor Gas Sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2008, 128, 566–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Das, S.; Jayaraman, V. SnO2: A Comprehensive Review on Structures and Gas Sensors. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2014, 66, 112–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, C.; Yin, L.; Zhang, L.; Xiang, D.; Gao, R. Metal Oxide Gas Sensors: Sensitivity and Influencing Factors. Sensors 2010, 10, 2088–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dey, A. Semiconductor Metal Oxide Gas Sensors: A Review. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2018, 229, 206–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Korotcenkov, G. Metal Oxides for Solid-State Gas Sensors: What Determines Our Choice? Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2007, 139, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chachuli, S.A.M.; Hamidon, M.N.; Ertugrul, M.; Mamat, M.S.; Coban, O.; Tuzluca, F.N.; Yesilbag, Y.O.; Shamsudin, N.H. Effects of MWCNTs/Graphene Nanoflakes/MXene Addition to TiO2 Thick Film on Hydrogen Gas Sensing. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 882, 160671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhang, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Duan, Z.; Huang, Q.; Wu, Y.; Liu, B.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, S.; Yuan, Z.; Tai, H. Highly Sensitive and Selective NO2 Sensor of Alkalized V2CTx MXene Driven by Interlayer Swelling. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 344, 130150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, H.-F.; Xuan, J.-Y.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, M.-L.; Jia, F.-C.; Wang, X.-M.; Yin, G.-C.; Lu, S.-Y. Strategies and Challenges for Enhancing Performance of MXene-Based Gas Sensors: A Review. Rare Met. 2022, 41, 3976–3999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xia, Q.; Fan, Y.; Li, S.; Zhou, A.; Shinde, N.; Mane, R.S. MXene-Based Chemical Gas Sensors: Recent Developments and Challenges. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2023, 131, 109557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nahirniak, S.; Saruhan, B. MXene Heterostructures as Perspective Materials for Gas Sensing Applications. Sensors 2022, 22, 972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Mehdi Aghaei, S.; Aasi, A.; Panchapakesan, B. Experimental and Theoretical Advances in MXene-Based Gas Sensors. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 2450–2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Salim, O.; Mahmoud, K.A.; Pant, K.K.; Joshi, R.K. Introduction to MXenes: Synthesis and Characteristics. Mater. Today Chem. 2019, 14, 100191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wei, Y.; Zhang, P.; Soomro, R.A.; Zhu, Q.; Xu, B. Advances in the Synthesis of 2D MXenes. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2103148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Naguib, M.; Barsoum, M.W.; Gogotsi, Y. Ten Years of Progress in the Synthesis and Development of MXenes. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2103393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lim, K.R.G.; Shekhirev, M.; Wyatt, B.C.; Anasori, B.; Gogotsi, Y.; Seh, Z.W. Fundamentals of MXene Synthesis. Nat. Synth. 2022, 1, 601–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hermawan, A.; Amrillah, T.; Riapanitra, A.; Ong, W.; Yin, S. Prospects and Challenges of MXenes as Emerging Sensing Materials for Flexible and Wearable Breath-Based Biomarker Diagnosis. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021, 10, 202100970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gao, L.; Bao, W.; Kuklin, A.V.; Mei, S.; Zhang, H.; Ågren, H. Hetero-MXenes: Theory, Synthesis, and Emerging Applications. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 202004129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pang, J.; Mendes, R.G.; Bachmatiuk, A.; Zhao, L.; Ta, H.Q.; Gemming, T.; Liu, H.; Liu, Z.; Rummeli, M.H. Applications of 2D MXenes in Energy Conversion and Storage Systems. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 72–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ronchi, R.M.; Arantes, J.T.; Santos, S.F. Synthesis, Structure, Properties and Applications of MXenes: Current Status and Perspectives. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 18167–18188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gai, L.-Y.; Lai, R.-P.; Dong, X.-H.; Wu, X.; Luan, Q.-T.; Wang, J.; Lin, H.-F.; Ding, W.-H.; Wu, G.-L.; Xie, W.-F. Recent Advances in Ethanol Gas Sensors Based on Metal Oxide Semiconductor Heterojunctions. Rare Met. 2022, 41, 1818–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, S.J.; Koh, H.-J.; Ren, C.E.; Kwon, O.; Maleski, K.; Cho, S.-Y.; Anasori, B.; Kim, C.-K.; Choi, Y.-K.; Kim, J.; et al. Metallic Ti3C2Tx MXene Gas Sensors with Ultrahigh Signal-to-Noise Ratio. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 986–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kumar, A.N.; Pal, K. Amine-Functionalized Stable Nb2CTx MXene toward Room Temperature Ultrasensitive NO2 Gas Sensor. Mater. Adv. 2022, 3, 5151–5162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hermawan, A.; Zhang, B.; Taufik, A.; Asakura, Y.; Hasegawa, T.; Zhu, J.; Shi, P.; Yin, S. CuO Nanoparticles/Ti3C2Tx MXene Hybrid Nanocomposites for Detection of Toluene Gas. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 4755–4766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sun, S.; Wang, M.; Chang, X.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Wang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Lei, Y. W18O49/Ti3C2Tx Mxene Nanocomposites for Highly Sensitive Acetone Gas Sensor with Low Detection Limit. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 304, 127274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gasso, S.; Sohal, M.K.; Mahajan, A. MXene Modulated SnO2 Gas Sensor for Ultra-Responsive Room-Temperature Detection of NO2. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 357, 131427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. He, T.; Liu, W.; Lv, T.; Ma, M.; Liu, Z.; Vasiliev, A.; Li, X. MXene/SnO2 Heterojunction Based Chemical Gas Sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 329, 129275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lipatov, A.; Alhabeb, M.; Lukatskaya, M.R.; Boson, A.; Gogotsi, Y.; Sinitskii, A. Effect of Synthesis on Quality, Electronic Properties and Environmental Stability of Individual Monolayer Ti3C2 MXene Flakes. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2016, 2, 1600255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Muckley, E.S.; Naguib, M.; Ivanov, I.N. Multi-Modal, Ultrasensitive, Wide-Range Humidity Sensing with Ti3C2 Film. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 21689–21695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Adomavičiūtė-Grabusovė, S.; Ramanavičius, S.; Popov, A.; Šablinskas, V.; Gogotsi, O.; Ramanavičius, A. Selective Enhancement of SERS Spectral Bands of Salicylic Acid Adsorbate on 2D Ti3C2Tx-Based MXene Film. Chemosensors 2021, 9, 223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, Y.-T.; Zhang, P.; Sun, N.; Anasori, B.; Zhu, Q.-Z.; Liu, H.; Gogotsi, Y.; Xu, B. Self-Assembly of Transition Metal Oxide Nanostructures on MXene Nanosheets for Fast and Stable Lithium Storage. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1707334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhao, X.; Vashisth, A.; Prehn, E.; Sun, W.; Shah, S.A.; Habib, T.; Chen, Y.; Tan, Z.; Lutkenhaus, J.L.; Radovic, M.; et al. Antioxidants Unlock Shelf-Stable Ti3C2Tx (MXene) Nanosheet Dispersions. Matter 2019, 1, 513–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chen, W.Y.; Lai, S.-N.; Yen, C.-C.; Jiang, X.; Peroulis, D.; Stanciu, L.A. Surface Functionalization of Ti3C2Tx MXene with Highly Reliable Superhydrophobic Protection for Volatile Organic Compounds Sensing. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 11490–11501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Koh, H.-J.; Kim, S.J.; Maleski, K.; Cho, S.-Y.; Kim, Y.-J.; Ahn, C.W.; Gogotsi, Y.; Jung, H.-T. Enhanced Selectivity of MXene Gas Sensors through Metal Ion Intercalation: In Situ X-Ray Diffraction Study. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 1365–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shuvo, S.N.; Ulloa Gomez, A.M.; Mishra, A.; Chen, W.Y.; Dongare, A.M.; Stanciu, L.A. Sulfur-Doped Titanium Carbide MXenes for Room-Temperature Gas Sensing. ACS Sens. 2020, 5, 2915–2924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yang, Z.; Liu, A.; Wang, C.; Liu, F.; He, J.; Li, S.; Wang, J.; You, R.; Yan, X.; Sun, P.; et al. Improvement of Gas and Humidity Sensing Properties of Organ-like MXene by Alkaline Treatment. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 1261–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Muckley, E.S.; Naguib, M.; Wang, H.-W.; Vlcek, L.; Osti, N.C.; Sacci, R.L.; Sang, X.; Unocic, R.R.; Xie, Y.; Tyagi, M.; et al. Multimodality of Structural, Electrical, and Gravimetric Responses of Intercalated MXenes to Water. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 11118–11126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Li, N.; Jiang, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Meng, B.; Xing, C.; Zhang, H.; Peng, Z. A Fully Inkjet-Printed Transparent Humidity Sensor Based on a Ti3C2/Ag Hybrid for Touchless Sensing of Finger Motion. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 21522–21531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhu, Z.; Liu, C.; Jiang, F.; Liu, J.; Ma, X.; Liu, P.; Xu, J.; Wang, L.; Huang, R. Flexible and Lightweight Ti3C2Tx MXene@Pd Colloidal Nanoclusters Paper Film as Novel H2 Sensor. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 399, 123054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zou, S.; Gao, J.; Liu, L.; Lin, Z.; Fu, P.; Wang, S.; Chen, Z. Enhanced Gas Sensing Properties at Low Working Temperature of Iron Molybdate/MXene Composite. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 817, 152785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, Z.; Yu, K.; Feng, Y.; Qi, R.; Ren, J.; Zhu, Z. Stabilizing Ti3C2Tx-MXenes with TiOF2 Nanospheres Intercalation to Improve Hydrogen Evolution Reaction and Humidity-Sensing Performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 496, 143729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kuang, D.; Guo, X.; Zhu, Z.; Ding, Y.; Sun, X.; Wu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, Y.; He, Y. Enhanced Room Temperature Ammonia Response of 2D-Ti3C2Tx MXene Decorated with Ni(OH)2 Nanoparticles. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 19471–19480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pei, Y.; Zhang, X.; Hui, Z.; Zhou, J.; Huang, X.; Sun, G.; Huang, W. Ti3C2Tx-MXene for Sensing Applications: Recent Progress, Design Principles, and Future Perspectives. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 3996–4017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xin, M.; Li, J.; Ma, Z.; Pan, L.; Shi, Y. MXenes and Their Applications in Wearable Sensors. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhan, X.; Si, C.; Zhou, J.; Sun, Z. MXene and MXene-Based Composites: Synthesis, Properties and Environment-Related Applications. Nanoscale Horiz. 2020, 5, 235–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yazdanparast, S.; Soltanmohammad, S.; Fash-White, A.; Tucker, G.J.; Brennecka, G.L. Synthesis and Surface Chemistry of 2D TiVC Solid-Solution MXenes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 20129–20137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Naguib, M.; Unocic, R.R.; Armstrong, B.L.; Nanda, J. Large-Scale Delamination of Multi-Layers Transition Metal Carbides and Carbonitrides “MXenes”. Dalt. Trans. 2015, 44, 9353–9358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Maleski, K.; Mochalin, V.N.; Gogotsi, Y. Dispersions of Two-Dimensional Titanium Carbide MXene in Organic Solvents. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 1632–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mashtalir, O.; Lukatskaya, M.R.; Kolesnikov, A.I.; Raymundo-Piñero, E.; Naguib, M.; Barsoum, M.W.; Gogotsi, Y. The Effect of Hydrazine Intercalation on the Structure and Capacitance of 2D Titanium Carbide (MXene). Nanoscale 2016, 8, 9128–9133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kim, S.J.; Choi, J.; Maleski, K.; Hantanasirisakul, K.; Jung, H.-T.; Gogotsi, Y.; Ahn, C.W. Interfacial Assembly of Ultrathin, Functional MXene Films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 32320–32327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. John, R.A.B.; Shruthi, J.; Ramana Reddy, M.V.; Ruban Kumar, A. Manganese Doped Nickel Oxide as Room Temperature Gas Sensor for Formaldehyde Detection. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 17654–17667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. John, R.A.B.; Ruban Kumar, A.; Shruthi, J.; Ramana Reddy, M.V. FeXZn1−XOy as Room Temperature Dual Sensor for Formaldehyde and Ammonia Gas Detection. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2022, 141, 109506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. John, R.A.B.; Kumar, A.R. Structural, Morphological and Optical Aspects of Novel Synthesized Pristine and Hafnium Doped Nickel Oxide Nanoparticles. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2022, 99, 100415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. John, R.A.B.; Ruban Kumar, A. A Review on Resistive-Based Gas Sensors for the Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds Using Metal-Oxide Nanostructures. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2021, 133, 108893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yang, Z.; Jiang, L.; Wang, J.; Liu, F.; He, J.; Liu, A.; Lv, S.; You, R.; Yan, X.; Sun, P.; et al. Flexible Resistive NO2 Gas Sensor of Three-Dimensional Crumpled MXene Ti3C2Tx/ZnO Spheres for Room Temperature Application. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 326, 128828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Zhang, D.; Mi, Q.; Wang, D.; Li, T. MXene/Co3O4 Composite Based Formaldehyde Sensor Driven by ZnO/MXene Nanowire Arrays Piezoelectric Nanogenerator. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 339, 129923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Tai, H.; Duan, Z.; He, Z.; Li, X.; Xu, J.; Liu, B.; Jiang, Y. Enhanced Ammonia Response of Ti3C2T Nanosheets Supported by TiO2 Nanoparticles at Room Temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 298, 126874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bhati, V.S.; Kumar, M.; Banerjee, R. Gas Sensing Performance of 2D Nanomaterials/Metal Oxide Nanocomposites: A Review. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 8776–8808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sun, B.; Lv, H.; Liu, Z.; Wang, J.; Bai, X.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Kan, K.; Shi, K. Co3O4 @PEI/Ti3C2Tx MXene Nanocomposites for a Highly Sensitive NOx Gas Sensor with a Low Detection Limit. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 6335–6344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Guo, X.; Ding, Y.; Kuang, D.; Wu, Z.; Sun, X.; Du, B.; Liang, C.; Wu, Y.; Qu, W.; Xiong, L.; et al. Enhanced Ammonia Sensing Performance Based on MXene-Ti3C2Tx Multilayer Nanoflakes Functionalized by Tungsten Trioxide Nanoparticles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 595, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wang, D.; Zhang, D.; Yang, Y.; Mi, Q.; Zhang, J.; Yu, L. Multifunctional Latex/Polytetrafluoroethylene-Based Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Self-Powered Organ-like MXene/Metal–Organic Framework-Derived CuO Nanohybrid Ammonia Sensor. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 2911–2919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Shuck, C.E.; Han, M.; Maleski, K.; Hantanasirisakul, K.; Kim, S.J.; Choi, J.; Reil, W.E.B.; Gogotsi, Y. Effect of Ti3AlC2 MAX Phase on Structure and Properties of Resultant Ti3C2Tx MXene. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 3368–3376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Liu, X.; Zhang, H.; Song, Y.; Shen, T.; Sun, J. Facile Solvothermal Synthesis of ZnO/Ti3C2Tx MXene Nanocomposites for NO2 Detection at Low Working Temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 367, 132025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ranjbar, F.; Hajati, S.; Ghaedi, M.; Dashtian, K.; Naderi, H.; Toth, J. Highly Selective MXene/V2O5/CuWO4-Based Ultra-Sensitive Room Temperature Ammonia Sensor. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 416, 126196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Liang, D.; Song, P.; Liu, M.; Wang, Q. 2D/2D SnO2 Nanosheets/Ti3C2Tx MXene Nanocomposites for Detection of Triethylamine at Low Temperature. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 9059–9066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, Z.; Wang, F.; Hermawan, A.; Asakura, Y.; Hasegawa, T.; Kumagai, H.; Kato, H.; Kakihana, M.; Zhu, J.; Yin, S. SnO-SnO2 Modified Two-Dimensional MXene Ti3C2T for Acetone Gas Sensor Working at Room Temperature. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 73, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Liu, M.; Ji, J.; Song, P.; Wang, J.; Wang, Q. Sensing Performance of α-Fe2O3/Ti3C2Tx MXene Nanocomposites to NH3 at Room Temperature. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 898, 162812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Wu, D.; Jiang, G. Preparation and Gas Sensing Properties of ZnO/MXene Composite Nanomaterials. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2022, 344, 113740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Liu, M.; Wang, Z.; Song, P.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Q. In2O3 Nanocubes/Ti3C2Tx MXene Composites for Enhanced Methanol Gas Sensing Properties at Room Temperature. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 23028–23037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kuang, D.; Wang, L.; Guo, X.; She, Y.; Du, B.; Liang, C.; Qu, W.; Sun, X.; Wu, Z.; Hu, W.; et al. Facile Hydrothermal Synthesis of Ti3C2Tx-TiO2 Nanocomposites for Gaseous Volatile Organic Compounds Detection at Room Temperature. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 416, 126171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Bu, X.; Ma, F.; Wu, Q.; Wu, H.; Yuan, Y.; Hu, L.; Han, C.; Wang, X.; Liu, W.; Li, X. Metal-Organic Frameworks-Derived Co3O4/Ti3C2Tx Mxene Nanocomposites for High Performance Ethanol Sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 369, 132232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Choi, J.; Chacon, B.; Park, H.; Hantanasirisakul, K.; Kim, T.; Shevchuk, K.; Lee, J.; Kang, H.; Cho, S.-Y.; Kim, J.; et al. N–p-Conductor Transition of Gas Sensing Behaviors in Mo2CTx MXene. ACS Sens. 2022, 7, 2225–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Liu, M.; Ji, J.; Song, P.; Liu, M.; Wang, Q. α-Fe2O3 Nanocubes/Ti3C2Tx MXene Composites for Improvement of Acetone Sensing Performance at Room Temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 349, 130782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Liu, S.; Wang, M.; Liu, G.; Wan, N.; Ge, C.; Hussain, S.; Meng, H.; Wang, M.; Qiao, G. Enhanced NO2 Gas-Sensing Performance of 2D Ti3C2/TiO2 Nanocomposites by in-Situ Formation of Schottky Barrier. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 567, 150747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Gasso, S.; Mahajan, A. MXene Decorated Tungsten Trioxide Nanocomposite-Based Sensor Capable of Detecting NO2 Gas down to Ppb-Level at Room Temperature. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2022, 152, 107048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wang, J.; Yang, Y.; Xia, Y. Mesoporous MXene/ZnO Nanorod Hybrids of High Surface Area for UV-Activated NO2 Gas Sensing in Ppb-Level. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 353, 131087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zhao, L.; Wang, K.; Wei, W.; Wang, L.; Han, W. High-performance Flexible Sensing Devices Based on Polyaniline/MXene Nanocomposites. InfoMat 2019, 1, 407–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Liu, J.; Cui, N.; Xu, Q.; Wang, Z.; Gu, L.; Dou, W. High-Performance PANI-Based Ammonia Gas Sensor Promoted by Surface Nanostructuralization. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2021, 10, 027007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wang, X.; Sun, K.; Li, K.; Li, X.; Gogotsi, Y. Ti3C2T/PEDOT:PSS Hybrid Materials for Room-Temperature Methanol Sensor. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31, 1018–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Tang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Yang, J.; Song, Y.; Yin, F.; Yuan, W. Stretchable and Wearable Conductometric VOC Sensors Based on Microstructured MXene/Polyurethane Core-Sheath Fibers. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 346, 130500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sardana, S.; Kaur, H.; Arora, B.; Aswal, D.K.; Mahajan, A. Self-Powered Monitoring of Ammonia Using an MXene/TiO2/Cellulose Nanofiber Heterojunction-Based Sensor Driven by an Electrospun Triboelectric Nanogenerator. ACS Sens. 2022, 7, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tran, N.M.; Ta, Q.T.H.; Noh, J.-S. RGO/Ti3C2Tx Heterostructures for the Efficient, Room-Temperature Detection of Multiple Toxic Gases. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 273, 125087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Jin, L.; Wu, C.; Wei, K.; He, L.; Gao, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, K.; Asiri, A.M.; Alamry, K.A.; Yang, L.; et al. Polymeric Ti3C2Tx MXene Composites for Room Temperature Ammonia Sensing. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 12071–12079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Li, X.; Xu, J.; Jiang, Y.; He, Z.; Liu, B.; Xie, H.; Li, H.; Li, Z.; Wang, Y.; Tai, H. Toward Agricultural Ammonia Volatilization Monitoring: A Flexible Polyaniline/Ti3C2T Hybrid Sensitive Films Based Gas Sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 316, 128144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wang, D.; Zhang, D.; Li, P.; Yang, Z.; Mi, Q.; Yu, L. Electrospinning of Flexible Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)/MXene Nanofiber-Based Humidity Sensor Self-Powered by Monolayer Molybdenum Diselenide Piezoelectric Nanogenerator. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021, 13, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Li, X.; Lu, Y.; Shi, Z.; Liu, G.; Xu, G.; An, Z.; Xing, H.; Chen, Q.; Han, R.P.S.; Liu, Q. Onion-Inspired MXene/Chitosan-Quercetin Multilayers: Enhanced Response to H2O Molecules for Wearable Human Physiological Monitoring. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 329, 129209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, X. Humidity-Enabled Ionic Conductive Trace Carbon Dioxide Sensing of Nitrogen-Doped Ti3C2Tx MXene/Polyethyleneimine Composite Films Decorated with Reduced Graphene Oxide Nanosheets. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 16033–16042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Zhi, H.; Zhang, X.; Wang, F.; Wan, P.; Feng, L. Flexible Ti3C2Tx MXene/PANI/Bacterial Cellulose Aerogel for e-Skins and Gas Sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 45987–45994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Liu, F.; Li, Y.; Hao, S.; Cheng, Y.; Zhan, Y.; Zhang, C.; Meng, Y.; Xie, Q.; Xia, H. Well-Aligned MXene/Chitosan Films with Humidity Response for High-Performance Electromagnetic Interference Shielding. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 243, 116467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Liu, M.; Wang, Z.; Song, P.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Q. Flexible MXene/RGO/CuO Hybrid Aerogels for High Performance Acetone Sensing at Room Temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 340, 129946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Y. Humidity Activated Ionic-Conduction Formaldehyde Sensing of Reduced Graphene Oxide Decorated Nitrogen-Doped MXene/Titanium Dioxide Composite Film. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 323, 128695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Lee, S.H.; Eom, W.; Shin, H.; Ambade, R.B.; Bang, J.H.; Kim, H.W.; Han, T.H. Room-Temperature, Highly Durable Ti3C2Tx MXene/Graphene Hybrid Fibers for NH3 Gas Sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 10434–10442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Song, Y.; Xu, Y.; Guo, Q.; Hua, Z.; Yin, F.; Yuan, W. MXene-Derived TiO2 Nanoparticles Intercalating between RGO Nanosheets: An Assembly for Highly Sensitive Gas Detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 39772–39780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Chen, W.Y.; Sullivan, C.D.; Lai, S.-N.; Yen, C.-C.; Jiang, X.; Peroulis, D.; Stanciu, L.A. Noble-Nanoparticle-Decorated Ti3C2Tx MXenes for Highly Sensitive Volatile Organic Compound Detection. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 29195–29203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Xu, Q.; Zong, B.; Li, Q.; Fang, X.; Mao, S.; Ostrikov, K. (Ken) H2S Sensing under Various Humidity Conditions with Ag Nanoparticle Functionalized Ti3C2Tx MXene Field-Effect Transistors. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 424, 127492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Chen, W.Y.; Jiang, X.; Lai, S.-N.; Peroulis, D.; Stanciu, L. Nanohybrids of a MXene and Transition Metal Dichalcogenide for Selective Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Xia, Y.; He, S.; Wang, J.; Zhou, L.; Wang, J.; Komarneni, S. MXene/WS2 Hybrids for Visible-Light-Activated NO2 Sensing at Room Temperature. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 9136–9139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Gas sensing mechanism of the pristine 2D MXenes and the corresponding energy band diagram and electrical conductivity changes in reducing and oxidising gas.
Figure 1. Gas sensing mechanism of the pristine 2D MXenes and the corresponding energy band diagram and electrical conductivity changes in reducing and oxidising gas.
Sensors 23 08674 g001
Figure 2. Gas sensing mechanism of (a) pristine CuO nanoparticles and (b) CuO nanoparticles/Ti3C2Tx MXene hybrid heterostructures. (c) Band-structure alignment of CuO/Ti3C2Tx before contact, after contact, in ambient air, and in toluene gas. [38]. Red color in arrow and X mean the mechanism will not occur.
Figure 2. Gas sensing mechanism of (a) pristine CuO nanoparticles and (b) CuO nanoparticles/Ti3C2Tx MXene hybrid heterostructures. (c) Band-structure alignment of CuO/Ti3C2Tx before contact, after contact, in ambient air, and in toluene gas. [38]. Red color in arrow and X mean the mechanism will not occur.
Sensors 23 08674 g002
Figure 3. Gas sensing mechanism in Ti3C2Tx MXene/PEDOT:PSS heterostructures.
Figure 3. Gas sensing mechanism in Ti3C2Tx MXene/PEDOT:PSS heterostructures.
Sensors 23 08674 g003
Figure 4. Gas sensing mechanism in MXene heterostructures; electrical response to different gas and band-energy alignment.
Figure 4. Gas sensing mechanism in MXene heterostructures; electrical response to different gas and band-energy alignment.
Sensors 23 08674 g004
Figure 6. (a) Band−energy diagram of SnO2-nanosheet/Ti3C2Tx-MXene nanocomposites in air and triethylamine [79]. (b) The schematic diagram illustrating the increase of the edges and defects of a 3D-crumpled MXene sphere and the effect of ZnO nanoparticles on NO2 sensing of 3D−crumpled MXene sphere/ZnO [69].
Figure 6. (a) Band−energy diagram of SnO2-nanosheet/Ti3C2Tx-MXene nanocomposites in air and triethylamine [79]. (b) The schematic diagram illustrating the increase of the edges and defects of a 3D-crumpled MXene sphere and the effect of ZnO nanoparticles on NO2 sensing of 3D−crumpled MXene sphere/ZnO [69].
Sensors 23 08674 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

John, R.A.B.; Vijayan, K.; Septiani, N.L.W.; Hardiansyah, A.; Kumar, A.R.; Yuliarto, B.; Hermawan, A. Gas-Sensing Mechanisms and Performances of MXenes and MXene-Based Heterostructures. Sensors 2023, 23, 8674. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23218674

AMA Style

John RAB, Vijayan K, Septiani NLW, Hardiansyah A, Kumar AR, Yuliarto B, Hermawan A. Gas-Sensing Mechanisms and Performances of MXenes and MXene-Based Heterostructures. Sensors. 2023; 23(21):8674. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23218674

Chicago/Turabian Style

John, Riya Alice B., Karthikeyan Vijayan, Ni Luh Wulan Septiani, Andri Hardiansyah, A Ruban Kumar, Brian Yuliarto, and Angga Hermawan. 2023. "Gas-Sensing Mechanisms and Performances of MXenes and MXene-Based Heterostructures" Sensors 23, no. 21: 8674. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23218674

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop