Next Article in Journal
Adaptive Neural Backstepping Terminal Sliding Mode Control of a DC-DC Buck Converter
Previous Article in Journal
Freight Wagon Digitalization for Condition Monitoring and Advanced Operation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Organic Electrochemical Transistor with MoS2 Nanosheets Modified Gate Electrode for Sensitive Glucose Sensing

1
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Special Functional Materials & Guangdong Research Center for Interfacial Engineering of Functional Materials, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
2
Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Quantum Manipulation and New Energy Materials, College of Physics and Energy, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Sensors 2023, 23(17), 7449; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23177449
Submission received: 3 August 2023 / Revised: 22 August 2023 / Accepted: 22 August 2023 / Published: 27 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical Sensors)

Abstract

:
An organic electrochemical transistor (OECT) with MoS2 nanosheets modified on the gate electrode was proposed for glucose sensing. MoS2 nanosheets, which had excellent electrocatalytic performance, a large specific surface area, and more active sites, were prepared by liquid phase ultrasonic exfoliation to modify the gate electrode of OECT, resulting in a large improvement in the sensitivity of the glucose sensor. The detection limit of the device modified with MoS2 nanosheets is down to 100 nM, which is 1~2 orders of magnitude better than that of the device without nanomaterial modification. This result manifests not only a sensitive and selective method for the detection of glucose based on OECT but also an extended application of MoS2 nanosheets for other biomolecule sensing with high sensitivity.

1. Introduction

Diabetes, a group of metabolic diseases fueled by the prevalence of obesity and an unhealthy lifestyle, has become a major cause of premature mortality or complication diseases including blindness, heart attacks, strokes, and numbness, according to the World Health Organization (WHO) [1,2,3]. Although there is no permanent cure for diabetes, timely glucose level monitoring and then appropriate medication have been regarded as effective methods to hinder complications and reduce the severity of the disease. So far, several types of biosensors have been developed to detect glucose, with the research direction moving from invasive to wearable [4,5,6]. Methods for glucose detection include those based on spectroscopy [7,8], colorimetry [9,10], electrochemistry [11,12,13], and so on. Electrochemical sensors, in particular, have drawn much attention because of their simple equipment, easy operation, fast response time, and high sensitivity. Yet due to working in a complex aqueous environment, the glucose sensor can be mired by humidity, pH, and other chemicals, leading to relatively poor sensitivity and selectivity. Organic electrochemical transistor (OECT), a new branch of organic thin-film transistor, seems to overcome the constraints and show a promised sensing platform due to its stability in aqueous environment operation [14,15,16,17]. It not only combines the advantages of traditional electrochemical detection but also the signal amplification function, and thus has a very high sensitivity with a low detection limit. In addition, the superiority of low working voltage, good biocompatibility, easy fabrication, and potentially flexible form all make OECT an efficient application for biomolecules (such as ions [18,19], biomarkers [20,21], cells [22,23]) and electrophysiology [24,25,26]. Therefore, OECT shows an ideal platform for highly sensitive glucose sensing, which is crucial to the diagnosis of diabetes.
Most commercialized glucose sensors are based on a glucose-enzyme reaction, with their products detected by an amperometric electrode [27]. Thus, the mechanism of sensing in OECT involves boosting the process of the enzymatic reactions. For this purpose, the sensitivity and selectivity can be improved generally by increasing the surface area of the enzymatic electrooxidation reaction or promoting the catalytic activity of the enzyme, which ultimately accelerates the electron transport to the gate electrode and thus an electric signal change in the OECT device. For example, Macaya et al. [28] fabricated an enzymatic OECT with Pt wire, which was coiled to increase the reaction area, leading to a micromolar sensitivity within the clinical range of the glucose level in human saliva. Noble metal nanoparticles (NPs), such as Pt NPs, were also modified for the enzyme electrode to improve the sensitivity of OECT for glucose, owing to NPs’ large specific area, excellent conductivity, and electrocatalytic properties [29,30]. Due to its fascinating structures (high specific surface area and nanosheet morphology) and electronic property (excellent electron mobility), two-dimensional material (2DM) has become a good candidate for electrode modification for OECT to promote the redox reaction and thereby improve the sensitivity and selectivity for glucose detection [31,32,33]. We anticipate that 2DM may be a potential strategy for modification of the OECT gate for glucose detection.
Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), a metal sulfide two-dimensional nanomaterial, has attracted exuberant attention in the area of electrochemical biosensors due to its large surface area, tunable band gap, high electron mobility, excellent electrocatalytic properties, and ion-intercalation surface morphologies [34,35]. MoS2, with its graphene-like structure, has a high surface-to-volume ratio, and its superior layer spacing (0.65 nm) compared to graphene (0.34 nm) facilitates the probability of intercalation of a large number of small biomolecules [36]. The MoS2 obtained can promote redox transfer between the enzyme and the electrode surface. Moreover, there are catalytic active sites at the edge of the MoS2 nanometer lamellar structure [37], which can be used as an electrochemical catalyst for the chemical reactions between the enzyme and detected biomolecules, thereby improving the sensitivity and detection limit of the devices [38,39,40]. The satisfactory analytical properties evidence that the use of MoS2 modified on the reaction electrode holds great promise for detecting glucose of interest. However, the properties of MoS2 are susceptible to being affected by the preparation methods, resulting in slow progress in the application field of biological sensing. Therefore, to fully exploit the superiority of MoS2, the implementation of an optimal production method to improve the sensitivity and selectivity of biosensors is needed.
In this paper, we report a kind of OECT-based glucose sensor in which MoS2 nanosheets were modified on the gate electrode for improving the sensitivity and detection limit. MoS2 nanosheets were exfoliated in different solvents for ease of surface functionalization and modification of the gate electrode of OECT. Nafion was also modified to facilitate the immobilization of MoS2 nanosheets and an enzyme (glucose oxidase, GOx). Nafion, a sulfonated copolymer enjoying good film-forming ability and susceptibility to chemical modifications that has been widely used as a support for enzyme immobilization, could be used to noncovalently associate with the modified materials on the gate electrode, leading to a high selectivity for the glucose sensor. Compared with a non-nanomaterials-modified device, the detection limit could be increased by 1~2 orders of magnitude with high selectivity. This work manifests that the OECT sensing platform holds great promise for sensitive detection of glucose and also indicates that MoS2 nanosheets have great potential in biosensing applications.

2. Experimental Details

2.1. Chemicals and Apparatus

Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) aqueous solution and Nafion solution (diluted to 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%, and 2.0% by PBS solution) were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich Co., Shanghai, China and stored at 4 °C for future use. Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2, MW 160.07, 99.5%), lactic acid, and sarcosine were purchased from Aladdin Reagent Database, Inc., Shanghai, China. Phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH = 7.4) was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. Glucose oxidase (GOx) (100 KU g−1) was acquired from J&K Scientific Ltd., Guangzhou, China and stored at –20 °C. GOx stock solution (10 mg mL−1) in PBS was stored at 4 °C in a refrigerator. Glucose (C6H12O6, AR) was purchased from Shanghai Ling-feng chemical reagents Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. Sodium cholate (C24H39NaO5, MW 430.56, >98.0%), N-Methyl pyrrolidone (NMP), and ethanol were ordered from J&K Scientific Ltd., Guangzhou, China, Damao Chemical Reagent Factory, Tianjin, China, and Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China, respectively.
All electrochemical measurements were performed using a Keithley 2400 source meter. The morphology of MoS2 nanosheets was characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan), an atomic force microscope (AFM, Bruker, Germany), and an X-ray powder diffractometer (XRD, D8 Advance, Bruker, Germany).

2.2. Preparation of MoS2 Nanosheets

The MoS2 nanosheets were mainly prepared by liquid-phase ultrasonic exfoliation. A certain amount of MoS2 powder was mixed with a solvent, milled by a ball for 12 h, and then dried at 50 °C to evaporate the solvent. In order to obtain high-quality MoS2 nanosheets, the NMP solution, sodium cholate solution (1.5 mg mL−1) and aqueous alcohol (45% VOL) were chosen as the dispersed solvents, respectively. An amount of 0.1 g of MoS2 powder was mixed with 20 mL of the above solvents and sonicated continuously for 8 h at 240 W to obtain a stripping solution. The stripping solution was centrifuged for 30 min at 3000 rpm, and the supernatant was decanted. The supernatant was then centrifuged again for 20 min at 12,000 rpm, and the precipitate was collected. The collected precipitate was mixed into deionized water and centrifuged again for 20 min at 12,000 rpm to remove the solvent contained in the precipitate. Finally, the clean precipitate was redistributed in deionized water for future use.

2.3. Preparation of OECT-Based Glucose Sensors

Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of an OECT-based glucose sensor. First, Au/Cr film (100 nm/10 nm) was coated by the thermal evaporation method and patterned for source and drain electrodes on a glass substrate. Then the glass substrate was treated with oxygen plasma to improve the surface hydrophilicity. A PEDOT:PSS layer was spin-coated on the glass substrate, and the channel area on the glass surface was then patterned. The channel length and width of the devices were 0.2 mm and 6 mm, respectively. The OECT device was annealed at 180 °C for 1 h under N2.
For preparing a sensitive and selective glucose sensor, the gate electrode was modified with Nafion, GOx, and MoS2 nanosheets. To prepare the Nafion-GOx/Pt gate electrode, 20 μL GOx (20 mg mL−1) and 20 μL Nafion were mixed, and the solution was drop-coated onto the surface of Pt electrodes with a pipette and then dried at 4 °C overnight. When the Nafion film was formed, the Nafion-GOx/Pt electrodes were immersed in de-ionized water to wash away the residue and stored at 4 °C for future use. The Nafion-MoS2-GOx/Pt gate electrode was prepared in the same way by mixing 20 μL GOx (20 mg mL−1), 20 μL Nafion, and 20 μL MoS2 nanosheets in an aqueous solution.

2.4. Measurement and Characterization

The OECT devices were characterized by using two Keithley 2400 source meters. The OECT devices were placed in phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH = 7.4), using Nafion-GOx/Pt electrodes or Nafion-MoS2-GOx/Pt electrodes as gate electrodes. Before testing, all prepared electrodes were immersed in PBS for 20 min to eliminate interference. The output and transfer characteristics of the device with a pure Pt gate electrode were measured in PBS solution, and the results are shown in Figure S1 (supplementary materials). Different glucose solutions were prepared and slowly added to the PBS solution for testing. In order to obtain the response of the channel current to different concentrations of glucose, the gate voltage and the channel voltage were fixed at 0.5 V and 0.1 V, respectively.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of MoS2 Nanosheets

Figure 2a,b show the XRD patterns of bulk MoS2 and MoS2 nanosheets, respectively. After ultrasonic stripping, the XRD peaks of the sample at 2θ = 15°, 45°, and 60° are attributed to the (002), (006), and (008) planes of MoS2, respectively. This result indicates that MoS2 is separated along the surface of the (00l) plane, and the MoS2 nanosheets have a good monoorientation with a multi-layer structure. TEM images of the morphology and structure of MoS2 nanosheets are shown in Figure 2c,d. The size of MoS2 nanosheets ranges from hundreds of nanometers to several micrometers, and some nanosheets have multi-layer superposition. HRTEM images further reveal that the crystal lattice structure of MoS2 nanosheets is hexagonal, and the d-spacing of the (100) plane is 0.262 nm. Figure 2e is an AFM image of the structural features of MoS2 nanosheets. It shows the same morphology as can be seen in the observations from TEM images and reveals the MoS2 nanosheets have a uniform thickness of 2~5 nm.

3.2. OECT-Based Glucose Sensor with Nafion-GOx/Pt Gate Electrode

Figure 3a shows the IDS-T curve of the response with a pure Pt electrode as the gate electrode of OECT to the glucose solution. As the concentration of glucose solution increased, the channel current IDS of the OECT device did not change significantly, indicating that the pure Pt gate electrode may not be suitable for glucose detection. Therefore, GOx and Nafion were used to modify the Pt gate electrode to improve the sensitivity of the device. Figure 3b,c show the response of the OECT with a Pt gate electrode modified with GOx and Nafion (1.5%) to the additions of glucose at different concentrations. The glucose concentration was initially added at 1 nanomolar and then increased at regular intervals. It can be seen that when the concentration of glucose was 5 μM, the channel current IDS started to show a significant step change, and the response increased significantly with the increase in glucose concentration. Compared with the device without modification of the Pt gate electrode (Figure 3a), the sensitivity of glucose detection is significantly improved. As with our previous research, the reason is the specific catalytic action of GOx on glucose [32]. When glucose is added to the electrolyte, it is catalyzed by GOx to produce H2O2. Meanwhile, H2O2 is further oxidized on the surface of the Pt gate electrode to make the electron transfer (Faraday current). And then the effective gate voltage applied to the OECT device is changed, thereby changing the channel current IDS [32]. Hence, the enzyme GOx plays an important role in the sensitivity and selectivity of the OECT sensor. The chemical reactions on the OECT gate electrode are as follows [32,41]:
D - glucose   Enzyme GOx D - glucono - 1 , 5 - lactone + H 2 O 2
2 H 2 O 2   2 e O 2 + 2 H 2 O
It can be seen that the enzyme GOx makes the sensor both sensitive and selective for the biocatalytic reaction of glucose. During the measuring period, glucose is detected by monitoring the change in channel current IDS. IDS of the OECT is given by [15]:
I DS = G V p ( V p V G eff + V DS 2 ) V DS       ( when   V DS V p V G eff )
where G is the conductance of the organic semiconductor film, V p is the pinch-off voltage, and V G eff is the effective gate voltage. Different glucose concentrations can induce corresponding potential drops, which cause a change in the effective gate voltage. The effective gate voltage can be calculated from the transfer curve of the OECT device. Figure 3b shows the relationship between effective gate voltage and glucose concentration. When the concentration of the glucose solution increases by an order of magnitude, the effective gate voltage changes by 39.82 mV.

3.3. OECT-Based Glucose Sensor with Nafion-MoS2-GOx/Pt Gate Electrode

To obtain a highly sensitive OECT glucose sensor, nanomaterials are usually modified on the gate electrode [33]. MoS2 nanosheets have excellent electrocatalytic performance and a large specific surface area, which can further improve the sensitivity of the device. In addition, unlike NPs and their colloidal dispersions suffering from aggregation or the high production cost of graphene, MoS2 nanosheets can be synthesized by liquid-phase ultrasonic exfoliation methods, which are cheaper and easier. Therefore, we explored the effects of different exfoliated solvents and sizes of MoS2 nanosheets on the detection performance of OECT glucose sensors. Table 1 shows the detection limit of the devices with Nafion-GOx/Pt and Nafion-MoS2-GOx/Pt gate electrodes, where the concentration of the modified Nafion solution on all gate electrodes is fixed at 1.5%. As can be seen, when MoS2 nanosheets exfoliated by aqueous alcohol were modified on the gate electrode, the device had the best detection performance with a detection limit of 0.25 μM. And the change in effective gate voltage was about 53.37 mV when the glucose concentration increased by an order of magnitude. Figure 4 shows the current response of the devices with MoS2 nanosheets stripped with different solvents to different concentrations of glucose. As shown in Figure 4c, there is a significant current response to 0.25 μM glucose. Compared with the device without MoS2 nanosheet modification, the detection limit is optimized from 5 μM to 0.25 μM, and the change of effective gate voltage is increased from 39.82 mV to 53.37 mV per decade, indicating that the sensitivity of the device with MoS2 nanosheet modified gate electrode is significantly improved.
In order to analyze the effect of MoS2 stripping solvents on detection performance, we characterized the morphology and size of MoS2 nanosheets prepared with different stripping solvents. As shown in Figure S2 (supplementary materials), the size of MoS2 nanosheets exfoliated by aqueous alcohol is smaller than that of samples prepared by other stripping solvents. It could be deduced that MoS2 nanosheets exfoliated by aqueous alcohol may have a larger specific surface area, which can increase the effective enzyme load on the gate electrode. In addition, the higher surface area of the thin MoS2 nanosheets would result in more active edge sites, which are crucial for excellent catalytic activity [37]. Overall, MoS2 nanosheets exfoliated by aqueous alcohol have a smaller size and thus more active sites exposed at the edges, which is conducive to increasing the catalytic reaction speed of glucose oxidase and thus improving the sensitivity of glucose detection. Therefore, for liquid-phase exfoliated methods, solvent selection plays an important role in the quality of MoS2 nanosheets.
In addition, the concentration of Nafion solution is also very important to the sensor’s performance. To optimize this condition, four different concentrations of Nafion solution (0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, and 2%) were used to modify the gate electrode, as shown in Table 2. Figure 5 shows the channel current response of the device modified with different concentrations of Nafion on the gate electrode. It can be seen that the OECT with Nafion (1%)-MoS2-GOx/Pt gate electrode reveals the best sensing performance, with glucose detection limits down to 100 nM, which are comparable to or even better than those of some other methods (LOD at the nM level). With a thinner or thicker Nafion layer on the electrode, the sensor demonstrates inferior performance in sensitivity. On one hand, the relatively thin Nafion film (0.5%) could have a poor effect on the immobilization of MoS2 nanosheets and the enzyme GOx, which may cause MoS2 nanosheets and GOx to fall off. On the other hand, a too-thick Nafion film (2%) would hinder the charge transfer to the electrode, thus leading to a weak redox reaction. Therefore, for the modification of the gate electrode in OECT, the optimal concentration of Nafion was 1%.
We consider that the high sensitivity of the device with a Nafion-MoS2-GOx/Pt gate electrode can be attributed to the enhancement of reaction surface area and electrocatalysis and the fast electron transfer to the gate electrode. Firstly, a certain amount of Nafion-MoS2 hybrid was used for GOx enzyme immobilization, in which a small amount of Nafion-MoS2 hybrid may not result in sufficient immobilization and too much hybrid may lead to a thick film and prohibit glucose from reaching GOx. Then, MoS2 nanosheets have a large surface area for enzyme immobilization and fast mass transport due to the large interlayer distance of their ordered structure. The open structures of the Nafion-MoS2-GOx enzyme electrode made the enzyme electrode highly catalytic, strengthening the electrochemical reaction between GOx and glucose. At last, owing to the electrochemically catalytic activity of MoS2 nanosheets, the realization of fast electron transfer to the gate electrode is of great significance for sensitivity.

3.4. Selectivity of OECT-Based Glucose Sensor

In fact, there are many interfering biomolecules in blood, urine, saliva, and other body fluids for practical glucose detection, which would result in a false diagnosis of glucose content. Therefore, it is necessary to study the selectivity of OECT-based glucose sensors to meet the requirements of practical application. Some commonly coexisting interfering substances, such as lactic acid and sarcosine, in human biological fluids are examined [42,43]. Interference experiments were conducted with PBS solution, lactic acid, sarcosine, and glucose added in the reaction process in order, and the concentrations of all analytes were fixed at 10 mM. A sufficient amount of analyte was applied for better signal response so as to verify the selectivity. Figure 6 shows the selectivity of the device with a Nafion (1%)-MoS2-GOx/Pt gate electrode. As can be seen, in the absence of glucose, the other three interfering biomolecules led to negligible changes, and only the glucose solution was essential for a substantial change in channel current IDS. The result indicates that the proposed sensing platform shows a high degree of selectivity toward glucose. Theoretically, the enzyme GOx only reacts electrochemically with glucose, leading to a change in the current signal of OECT. As for the biomolecules catalyzed directly by the Pt gate electrode, such as dopamine, the common practice is to modify some organic membranes with electrostatic repulsion effects to improve the selectivity of the sensor, which is beyond the scope of this work.

4. Conclusions

In summary, OECTs with enzyme (GOx), Nafion (1%), and MoS2 nanosheets modified on the Pt gate electrodes demonstrate good performance in glucose sensing. MoS2 nanosheets were prepared by liquid-phase ultrasonic exfoliation with the optimum exfoliation solvent, and both the size and amount of MoS2 nanosheets were obtained based on the results of glucose detection. Nafion was also modified to facilitate the immobilization of MoS2 nanosheets and the enzyme GOx, which promoted MoS2 functionalization and thus improved the selectivity of the sensor. The device with a Nafion-MoS2-GOx/Pt gate electrode showed a low detection limit of 100 nM and a high selectivity for glucose, with a change in effective gate voltage of 50.37 mV/decade. Summarily, this work not only provides a high sensitivity and selectivity method for the detection of glucose but also extends the modification application of MoS2 for the detection of other biomolecules.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/s23177449/s1, Figure S1: Characterization of OECT with a pure Pt gate electrode measured in PBS solution. (a) Output characteristic of the OECT. (b) Transfer characteristic of the OECT device at VDS = 0.1 V; Figure S2: AFM images of MoS2 nanosheets stripped with (a-1) NMP solvent, (b-1) sodium cholate solution, and (c-1) aqueous alcohol. (a-2), (b-2), and (c-2) are the thickness of positions A, B, C, D, and E in AFM images of (a-1), (b-1), and (c-1), respectively.

Author Contributions

J.H., J.D. and C.H. contributed equally to this interdisciplinary study. J.H. fabricated the OECT-based platform and wrote the chip part of this manuscript; J.D. coordinated experimental design and program implementation; C.H. established biological parameters for on-chip assays, wrote the biological part of this manuscript, and proofread the manuscript. X.Z. assisted in the project administration. Z.W. performed the preliminary tests and advised on data analyses. W.W. and P.L. supervised and financially supported this study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2022A1515010886), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (No. JCYJ20190808142217123), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Ultrafast Laser Micro/Nano Manufacturing ZDSYS20220606100405013), and the Open Fund of Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Quantum Manipulation and New Energy Materials (No. QMNEM2006).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Forouhi, N.G.; Wareham, N.J. Epidemiology of diabetes. Medicine 2014, 42, 698–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. World Health Organization. 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/diabetes (accessed on 25 April 2021).
  3. Reddy, V.S.; Agarwal, B.; Ye, Z.; Zhang, C.Q.; Roy, K.; Chinnappan, A.; Narayan, R.J.; Ramakrishna, S.; Ghosh, R. Recent advancement in biofluid-based glucose sensors using invasive, minimally invasive, and non-invasive technologies: A review. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wei, M.; Qiao, Y.X.; Zhao, H.T.; Liang, J.; Li, T.S.; Luo, Y.L.; Lu, S.Y.; Shi, X.F.; Lu, W.B.; Sun, X.P. Electrochemical non-enzymatic glucose sensors: Recent progress and perspectives. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 14553–14569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lee, H.; Hong, Y.J.; Baik, S.; Hyeon, T.; Kim, D.H. Enzyme-based glucose Sensor: From invasive to wearable device. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018, 7, 1701150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zhang, S.; Zhao, W.J.; Ye, Z.; Zeng, J.Y.; He, Z.T.; Wang, X.; Zhu, Z.H.; Hu, R.Q.; Liu, C.; Wang, Q.Q. Wearable non-invasive glucose sensors based on metallic nanomaterials. Mater. Today Bio. 2023, 20, 100638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Deng, H.; Liu, H.; Kang, W.; Lei, C.; Nie, Z.; Huang, Y.; Yao, S. Biomineralization synthesis of a near-infrared fluorescent nanoprobe for direct glucose sensing in whole blood. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 864–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, Y.; Mao, G.; Ji, X.; He, Z. Synthesis of bio-templated clickable quantum dots and a dual-emitting organic/inorganic complex for ratiometric fluorescence visual assay of blood glucose. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 10, 4473–4478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Prasad, S.N.; Anderson, S.R.; Joglekar, M.V.; Hardikar, A.A.; Bansal, V.; Ramanathan, R. Bimetallic nanozyme mediated urine glucose monitoring through discriminant analysis of colorimetric signal. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 212, 114386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Park, S.; Hwang, J.; Jeon, H.J.; Bae, W.R.; Jeong, I.K.; Kim, T.G.; Kang, J.; Han, Y.G.; Chung, E.; Lee, D.Y. Cerium oxide nanoparticle-containing colorimetric contact lenses for noninvasively monitoring human tear glucose. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 5198–5210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ni, M.; Tan, M.; Pan, Y.; Zhu, C.; Du, H. Rapid preparation of self-supported nickel-iron oxide as a high-performance glucose sensing platform. J. Mater. Chem. C 2022, 10, 12883–12891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. He, C.; Asif, M.; Liu, Q.; Xiao, F.; Liu, H.; Xia, B.Y. Noble metal construction for electrochemical nonenzymatic glucose detection. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2022, 8, 2200272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fang, Q.; Qin, Y.; Wang, H.; Xu, W.; Yan, H.; Jiao, L.; Wei, X.; Li, J.; Luo, X.; Liu, M.; et al. Ultra-low content bismuth-anchored gold aerogels with plasmon property for enhanced nonenzymatic electrochemical glucose sensing. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 11030–11037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kim, S.H.; Hong, K.; Xie, W.; Lee, K.H.; Zhang, S.; Lodge, T.P.; Frisbie, C.D. Electrolyte-gated transistors for organic and printed electronics. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 1822–1846. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bernards, D.A.; Malliaras, G.G. Steady-state and transient behavior of organic electrochemical transistors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2007, 17, 3538–3544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, N.X.; Yang, A.; Fu, Y.; Li, Y.Z.; Yan, F. Functionalized organic thin film transistors for biosensing. Acc. Chem. Res. 2019, 52, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Paudel, P.R.; Tropp, J.; Kaphle, V.; Azoulay, J.D.; Lüssem, B. Organic electrochemical transistors—From device models to a targeted design of materials. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 31, 9761–9790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, P.; Yan, F.; Chan, H.L.W. Ion-sensitive properties of organic electrochemical transistors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2, 1637–1641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, R.; Tao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Q.; Liu, X.; Wang, D. Woven fiber organic electrochemical transistors based on multiwalled carbon nanotube functionalized PEDOT nanowires for nondestructive detection of potassium ions. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2022, 278, 115657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Parlak, O.; Keene, S.T.; Marais, A.; Curto, V.F.; Salleo, A. Molecularly selective nanoporous membrane-based wearable organic electrochemical device for noninvasive cortisol sensing. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, 2904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Palit, S.; Singh, K.; Lou, B.S.; Her, J.L.; Pang, S.T.; Pan, T.M. Ultrasensitive dopamine detection of indium-zinc oxide on PET flexible based extended-gate field-effect transistor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 310, 127850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gu, X.; Yeung, S.Y.; Chadda, A.; Poon, E.N.Y.; Boheler, K.R.; Hsing, I.M. Organic electrochemical transistor arrays for in vitro electrophysiology monitoring of 2D and 3D cardiac tissues. Adv. Biosyst. 2019, 3, 1800248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lieberth, K.; Romele, P.; Torricelli, F.; Koutsouras, D.A.; Bruckner, M.; Mailänder, V.; Gkoupidenis, P.; Blom, P.W.M. Current-driven organic electrochemical transistors for monitoring cell layer integrity with enhanced sensitivity. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021, 10, 2100845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, J.; Lee, S.; Yokota, T.; Jimbo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Nayeem, M.O.G.; Nishinaka, M.; Someya, T. Nanomesh organic electrochemical transistor for comfortable on-skin electrodes with local amplifying function. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2020, 2, 3601–3609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, T.; Cheryl Koh, J.Y.; Moudgil, A.; Cao, H.; Wu, X.; Chen, S.; Hou, K.; Surendran, A.; Stephen, M.; Tang, C.; et al. Biocompatible ionic liquids in high-performing organic electrochemical transistors for ion detection and electrophysiological monitoring. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 12049–12060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Yang, A.N.; Song, J.J.; Liu, H.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Li, L.; Yan, F. Wearable organic electrochemical transistor array for skin-surface electrocardiogram mapping above a human heart. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2215037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Heller, A. Implanted electrochemical glucose sensors for the management of diabetes. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 1999, 1, 153–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Macaya, D.J.; Nikolou, M.; Takamatsu, S.; Mabeck, J.T.; Owens, R.M.; Malliaras, G.G. Simple glucose sensors with micromolar sensitivity based on organic electrochemical transistors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2007, 123, 374–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liao, J.; Lin, S.; Yang, Y.; Liu, K.; Du, W. Highly selective and sensitive glucose sensors based on organic electrochemical transistors using TiO2 nanotube arrays-based gate electrodes. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 208, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Diacci, C.; Lee, J.W.; Dufil, P.G.; Méhes, G.; Berggren, M.; Simon, D.T.; Stavrinidou, E. Real-time monitoring of glucose export from isolated chloroplasts using an organic electrochemical transistor. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2019, 5, 1900262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tang, H.; Yan, F.; Lin, P.; Xu, J.; Chan, H.L.W. Highly sensitive glucose biosensors based on organic electrochemical transistors using platinum gate electrodes modified with enzyme and nanomaterials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 2264–2272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liao, C.Z.; Zhang, M.; Niu, L.Y.; Zheng, Z.J.; Feng, Y. Highly selective and sensitive glucose sensors based on organic electrochemical transistors with graphene-modified gate electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 3820–3829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ren, G.Z.; Fan, H.; Zhang, L.R.; He, S.H.; Zhu, C.C.; Gao, K. A laser-induced graphene-based flexible and all-carbon organic electrochemical transistor. J. Mater. Chem. C 2023, 11, 4916–4928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dalila, R.N.; Md Arshad, M.K.; Gopinath, S.C.B.; Norhaimi, W.M.W.; Fathil, M.F.M. Current and future envision on developing biosensors aided by 2D molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) productions. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 132, 248–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Barua, S.; Dutta, H.S.; Gogoi, S.; Devi, R.; Khan, R. Nanostructured MoS2-based advanced biosensors: A review. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2018, 1, 2–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Raghu, M.S.; Kumar, K.Y.; Rao, S.; Aravinda, T.; Prasanna, B.P.; Prashanth, M.K. Fabrication of polyaniline—Few-layer MoS2 nanocomposite for high energy density supercapacitors. Polym. Bull. 2018, 75, 4359–4375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xie, J.; Zhang, H.; Li, S.; Wang, R.; Sun, X.; Zhou, M.; Zhou, J.; Lou, X.W.; Xie, Y. Defect-rich MoS2 ultrathin nanosheets with additional active edge sites for enhanced electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 5807–5813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, T.Y.; Zhu, H.C.; Zhuo, J.Q.; Zhu, Z.W.; Papakonstantinou, P.; Lubarsky, G.; Lin, J.; Li, M.X. Biosensor based on ultrasmall MoS2 nanoparticles for electrochemical detection of H2O2 released by cells at the nanomolar level. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 10289–10295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kukkar, M.; Tuteja, S.K.; Sharma, A.L.; Kumar, V.; Paul, A.K.; Kim, K.-H.; Sabherwal, P.; Deep, A. A new electrolytic synthesis method for few-layered MoS2 nanosheets and their robust biointerfacing with reduced antibodies. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2016, 8, 16555–16563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mia, A.K.; Meyyappan, M.; Giri, P.K. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenide based biosensors: From fundamentals to healthcare applications. Biosensor 2023, 13, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bernards, D.A.; MacAya, D.J.; Nikolou, M.; Defranco, J.A.; Takamatsu, S.; Malliaras, G.G. Enzymatic sensing with organic electrochemical transistors. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hu, J.; Wei, W.; Ke, S.; Zeng, X.; Lin, P. A novel and sensitive sarcosine biosensor based on organic electrochemical transistor. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 307, 100–106. [Google Scholar]
  43. Nasu, Y.; Murphy-Royal, C.; Wen, Y.; Haidey, J.N.; Molina, R.S.; Aggarwal, A.; Zhang, S.; Kamijo, Y.; Paquet, M.-E.; Podgorski, K.; et al. A genetically encoded fluorescent biosensor for extracellular L-lactate. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 7058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions, and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions, or products referred to in the content.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the MoS2 modified OECT-based glucose sensor.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the MoS2 modified OECT-based glucose sensor.
Sensors 23 07449 g001
Figure 2. XRD images of (a) MoS2 powder and (b) MoS2 nanosheets. (c) TEM image of MoS2 nanosheets stripped in aqueous alcohol. (d) HRTEM image of MoS2 nanosheets stripped in aqueous alcohol. (e) AFM image of MoS2 nanosheets stripped in aqueous alcohol. (f) Thickness of positions 1 and 2 in AFM.
Figure 2. XRD images of (a) MoS2 powder and (b) MoS2 nanosheets. (c) TEM image of MoS2 nanosheets stripped in aqueous alcohol. (d) HRTEM image of MoS2 nanosheets stripped in aqueous alcohol. (e) AFM image of MoS2 nanosheets stripped in aqueous alcohol. (f) Thickness of positions 1 and 2 in AFM.
Sensors 23 07449 g002
Figure 3. Channel current response of OECT with (a) a pure Pt gate electrode, (b) Nafion (1.5%)-GOx/Pt gate electrode, for glucose detection in PBS solution. VG is fixed at 0.5 V. The concentrations of glucose added: in (a), from a to e: 0.5, 1, 5, 10 and 100 μM; in (b), from a to d: 5, 10, 50 and 100 μM. Inset: transfer curve (IDS vs. VG) of the device characterized at VDS = 0.1 V. (c) The change of effective gate voltage ( V G eff ) in (b) versus the concentrations of glucose. Inset: transfer curve (IDS vs. VG) of the device characterized in PBS solution.
Figure 3. Channel current response of OECT with (a) a pure Pt gate electrode, (b) Nafion (1.5%)-GOx/Pt gate electrode, for glucose detection in PBS solution. VG is fixed at 0.5 V. The concentrations of glucose added: in (a), from a to e: 0.5, 1, 5, 10 and 100 μM; in (b), from a to d: 5, 10, 50 and 100 μM. Inset: transfer curve (IDS vs. VG) of the device characterized at VDS = 0.1 V. (c) The change of effective gate voltage ( V G eff ) in (b) versus the concentrations of glucose. Inset: transfer curve (IDS vs. VG) of the device characterized in PBS solution.
Sensors 23 07449 g003
Figure 4. Channel current response of an OECT with Nafion (1.5%)-MoS2-GOx/Pt gate electrodes for glucose detection in PBS solution. The modified MoS2 nanosheets are exfoliated by (a) NMP solution, (b) sodium cholate solution, and (c) aqueous alcohol. The concentrations of glucose added: in (a), from a to f: 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 µM; in (b), from a to f: 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 µM; in (c), from a to g: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 µM.
Figure 4. Channel current response of an OECT with Nafion (1.5%)-MoS2-GOx/Pt gate electrodes for glucose detection in PBS solution. The modified MoS2 nanosheets are exfoliated by (a) NMP solution, (b) sodium cholate solution, and (c) aqueous alcohol. The concentrations of glucose added: in (a), from a to f: 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 µM; in (b), from a to f: 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 µM; in (c), from a to g: 0.25, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 50, and 100 µM.
Sensors 23 07449 g004
Figure 5. Channel current response of OECT with Nafion-MoS2-GOx/Pt gate electrodes for glucose detection in PBS solution. The Nafion solution concentrations of the different Nafion-MoS2-GOx films on the Pt gate electrode are (a) 0.5%, (b) 1%, (c) 1.5%, and (d) 2%. The concentrations of glucose added: in (a), from a to e: 0.5, 1, 5, 10 and 100 µM; in (b), from a to f: 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10 and 100 µM; in (c), from a to e: 0.25, 1, 5, 10 and 100 µM; in (d), from a to e: 0.75, 1, 5, 10 and 100 µM.
Figure 5. Channel current response of OECT with Nafion-MoS2-GOx/Pt gate electrodes for glucose detection in PBS solution. The Nafion solution concentrations of the different Nafion-MoS2-GOx films on the Pt gate electrode are (a) 0.5%, (b) 1%, (c) 1.5%, and (d) 2%. The concentrations of glucose added: in (a), from a to e: 0.5, 1, 5, 10 and 100 µM; in (b), from a to f: 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10 and 100 µM; in (c), from a to e: 0.25, 1, 5, 10 and 100 µM; in (d), from a to e: 0.75, 1, 5, 10 and 100 µM.
Sensors 23 07449 g005
Figure 6. Selectivity of an OECT with Nafion (1%)-MoS2-GOx/Pt gate electrode. VG is fixed at 0.5 V. From a–d, the added analytes are PBS solution, lactic acid, sarcosine, and glucose, respectively. The concentrations of all analytes are 10 mM.
Figure 6. Selectivity of an OECT with Nafion (1%)-MoS2-GOx/Pt gate electrode. VG is fixed at 0.5 V. From a–d, the added analytes are PBS solution, lactic acid, sarcosine, and glucose, respectively. The concentrations of all analytes are 10 mM.
Sensors 23 07449 g006
Table 1. Detection limit and the change of effective gate voltage (α) of the devices with MoS2 nanosheets stripped with different solvents and 1.5% Nafion membrane-modified gate electrodes.
Table 1. Detection limit and the change of effective gate voltage (α) of the devices with MoS2 nanosheets stripped with different solvents and 1.5% Nafion membrane-modified gate electrodes.
Gate ElectrodeStripping SolventDetection Limit
(µM)
α
(mV/Decade)
Nafion (1.5%)-GOx/PtNil539.82
Nafion (1.5%)-MoS2-GOx/PtNMP solution0.547.58
Nafion (1.5%)-MoS2-GOx/PtSodium cholate solution0.548.09
Nafion (1.5%)-MoS2-GOx/PtAqueous alcohol0.2553.37
Table 2. Detection limit and the change of effective gate voltage (α) of the OECT-based sensors for glucose detection.
Table 2. Detection limit and the change of effective gate voltage (α) of the OECT-based sensors for glucose detection.
Gate ElectrodeDetection Limit (nM)α (mV/Decade)
Nafion (0.5%)-MoS2-GOx/Pt50043.20
Nafion (1%)-MoS2-GOx/Pt 10050.37
Nafion (1.5%)-MoS2-GOx/Pt25045.92
Nafion (2%)-MoS2-GOx/Pt75033.80
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, J.; Dai, J.; Huang, C.; Zeng, X.; Wei, W.; Wang, Z.; Lin, P. Organic Electrochemical Transistor with MoS2 Nanosheets Modified Gate Electrode for Sensitive Glucose Sensing. Sensors 2023, 23, 7449. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23177449

AMA Style

Hu J, Dai J, Huang C, Zeng X, Wei W, Wang Z, Lin P. Organic Electrochemical Transistor with MoS2 Nanosheets Modified Gate Electrode for Sensitive Glucose Sensing. Sensors. 2023; 23(17):7449. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23177449

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Jin, Jiajia Dai, Caiping Huang, Xierong Zeng, Weiwei Wei, Zhezhe Wang, and Peng Lin. 2023. "Organic Electrochemical Transistor with MoS2 Nanosheets Modified Gate Electrode for Sensitive Glucose Sensing" Sensors 23, no. 17: 7449. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23177449

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop