Next Article in Journal
Precision Temperature Control System with Low EMI for Applications in Analyzing Thermal Properties of Highly Sensitive Piezoelectric Sensors
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigation of GOx Stability in a Chitosan Matrix: Applications for Enzymatic Electrodes
Previous Article in Journal
An Improved Spatiotemporal Data Fusion Method for Snow-Covered Mountain Areas Using Snow Index and Elevation Information
Previous Article in Special Issue
Classification of Drivers’ Mental Workload Levels: Comparison of Machine Learning Methods Based on ECG and Infrared Thermal Signals
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mediator Microbial Biosensor Analyzers for Rapid Determination of Surface Water Toxicity

1
Department of Chemistry, Tula State University, 92 Lenin Avenue, Tula 300012, Russia
2
M.V. Lomonosov Institute of Fine Chemical Technologies, MIREA—Russian Technological University, Prospect Vernadskogo 86, Moscow 119571, Russia
3
G.K. Skryabin Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms, Federal Research Center “Pushchino Scientific Center for Biological Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences” (FRC PSCBR), Russian Academy of Sciences, 5 Nauki Avenue, Moscow 142290, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2022, 22(21), 8522; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218522
Submission received: 24 October 2022 / Revised: 2 November 2022 / Accepted: 3 November 2022 / Published: 5 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Biosensors Section 2022)

Abstract

:
Microbial mediator biosensors for surface water toxicity determination make it possible to carry out an early assessment of the environmental object’s quality without time-consuming standard procedures based on standard test-organisms, and provide broad opportunities for receptor element modifying depending on the required operational parameters analyzer. Four microorganisms with broad substrate specificity and nine electron acceptors were used to form a receptor system for toxicity assessment. Ferrocene was the most effective mediator according to its high rate constant of interaction with the microorganisms (0.33 ± 0.01 dm3/(g × s) for yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Biosensors were tested on samples containing four heavy metal ions (Cu2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, Cd2+), two phenols (phenol and p-nitrophenol), and three natural water samples. The «ferrocene- Escherichia coli» and «ferrocene-Paracoccus yeei, E. coli association» systems showed good operational stability with a relative standard deviation of 6.9 and 7.3% (14 measurements) and a reproducibility of 7 and 5.2% using copper (II) ions as a reference toxicant. Biosensor analysis with these systems was shown to highly correlate with the results of the standard method using Chlorella algae as a test object. Developed biosensors allow for a valuation of the polluted natural water’s impact on the ecosystem via an assessment of the influence on bacteria and yeast in the receptor system. The systems could be used in toxicological monitoring of natural waters.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Many chemical compounds present in water can have a negative impact on the natural ecosystem. The main polluting components of aquatic environments are solutions of heavy metals and organic compounds. Water toxicity early warning is performed by biotesting and physicochemical methods of analysis.
Physicochemical methods, such as high-performance liquid chromatography [1] and atomic absorption spectroscopy [2], make it possible to accurately define the types of chemical toxicants and their concentrations, but do not determine the degree of the toxic effect of substances on the natural ecosystem and do not reveal synergistic and antagonistic effects. The toxic impact of sample components can be established only using biological techniques, which imply the use of various trophic levels of living organisms: fish [3,4], plants [5,6], invertebrates [7,8], and microorganisms [9,10,11]. Almost all biological methods, however, have inevitable drawbacks that hinder their application. For instance, techniques using algae, daphnia, and fishes are highly sensitive to toxic substances but are time-consuming and low-reproducible. As a rule, the testing times of methods based on algae, daphnia, and fish are 72, 24/48 and 48 h, respectively, which limits the possibility of early warning water toxicity.
Biosensor express analysis is possible due to the application of microorganisms that have physiological reactions with pollutants similar to higher organisms. Compared with relatively high-level organisms, such as fish and daphnia, microorganisms are easily cultured and enable observation of the reaction to toxic substances over short times. Due to these advantages, it has become a tendency over the past 20 years to develop microbial methods for assessing the general toxicity of water [12]. The most successful and widely used technique is based on bioluminescent bacteria. Owing to the ease of operation, high sensitivity to many types of toxic substances, and short testing times (~1 h), bioluminescent bacteria have been commercialized and included in the list of standard ISO methods [13].
Disadvantages of bioluminescent biosensors are that the analytical signal—a change in the intensity of fluorescence—is significantly influenced by the turbidity of the test sample; however, the problem is solved when designing a biosensor [14]. A more significant difficulty in the development of devices for the rapid monitoring of toxicity is that microorganisms are significantly inferior in terms of sensitivity to standard test systems (daphnia, algae, infusoria) [15,16]. One of the approaches to the development of a sensitive express system is the use of a stable microbial association that is sensitive to various kinds of toxicants (heavy metals, organic substances). With the luminescent type of toxicity detection, it is quite difficult to vary the biomaterial, so special attention is paid to the electrochemical biosensors [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. Unlike luminescent biosensors, the amperometric type of detection applies to a significant number of single microorganisms and forms of bioreceptors based on consortia. Quite often, the main biomaterials used to assess toxicity are E. coli bacteria [19,23,24], S. cerevisiae yeast [19,25], and activated sludge [21,26]. Thus, the possibility of creating a whole-cell electrochemical biosensor based on the mediator p-benzoquinone for detecting heavy metal ions present in wastewater was investigated [17]; the biomaterial included an association of microbial strains such as E. coli, B. subtilis, and S. cerevisiae, which allowed for increasing the sensitivity of registration compared with the use of single E. coli microorganisms and the mediator [28]. The results have shown that an electrochemical biosensor based on a consortium of microorganisms and the mediator p-benzoquinone has a high sensitivity in assessing the toxicity of wastewater.
Another approach to increasing sensitivity is to refine electron transfer processes. Electron transfer can be improved by nanomaterials. Thus, in [29], it is suggested to use E. coli bacteria immobilized in a chitosan polymer to assess the toxicity of aqueous media. Thionine adsorbed on the surface of the biomaterial is used for electron transfer from E. coli to the electrode. To increase the sensitivity of the system, a glassy carbon electrode is modified by carbon nanodots. The sensor was tested on 18 samples of natural water from a river, reservoir, and lake and showed a good correlation with the results of the standard luminescent method (R2 = 0.9827). The disadvantage of this technique of forming the receptor system is the possible leaching of the mediator from the analytical system, and consequently, the loss of stability. Another approach to refine electron transfer was used in our previous study [27], where choosing an electron transport mediator for P. yeei bacteria was based on a kinetic study. The most effective system was a biosensor based on the mediator ferrocene, since this redox-active compound has the highest rate of interaction with the biomaterial used—P. yeei bacteria—and the highest rate of electron transfer to the electrode. This approach made it possible to create a laboratory model of a biosensor for determining the toxicity of model wastewater using microorganisms with high sensitivity to toxic substances. Despite the successful use of the kinetic approach for choosing an electron transport mediator (the developed biosensor was more sensitive to heavy metals than luminescent bacteria), the express system was inferior in sensitivity to the standard test object, duckweed. This paper discusses the application of this approach with other microorganisms, which will allow for further formation of sensitivity associations to be able to reach the sensitivity of standard test objects.
The goal of the study is the creation of a more sensitive system for assessing natural water toxicity using the association of microorganisms that are sensitive to various classes of toxicants; increasing the efficiency of electron transfer by selecting a more effective acceptor based on kinetic research. For creating a more sensitive system, it is necessary to ensure the selectivity of toxicity analysis with respect to other integral water quality parameters; for example, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD). The novelty of this research is increasing the selectivity of the analysis by changing the method of the analytical signal recording, which makes it possible to measure the toxicity of those toxicants that are oxidized by the biomaterial. Thus, the approach proposed in this study differs between the toxicity index and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents and Materials

Dialysis membrane (Roth, Germany) with a 14 kDa cutoff, graphite powder (Fluka, Germany), and mineral oil (Helicon, Moscow, Russia) were used to form the working graphite paste electrode. All media for the cultivation of microorganisms were sterilized in a VP-01/75 autoclave (TZMOI, Moscow, Russia) at a pressure of 1 atm and at a temperature of 120 °C. As electron transport mediators, use was made of ferrocene (Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), 1,1′dimethylferrocene (Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), ferrocenecarboxaldehyde (Aldrich, Germany), ferroceneacetonitrile (Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany); neutral red, 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol, thionine, methylene blue, and potassium hexacyanoferrate(III) (purchased in Diaem, Moscow, Russia). All salts used to grow Chlorella vulgaris (Tamiya medium) [30], KH2PO4, MgSO4·7H2O, KNO3, FeC6H5O7, H3BO3, MnCl2·4H2O, ZnSO4·5H2O, MoO3, NH4VO3, Co(NO3)2·6H2O, were of CP grade (Diaem, Moscow, Russia).

2.2. Microorganisms

Bacteria Pseudomonas veronii DSM 11331T (16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, 99.79%) and Paracoccus yeei VKM B-3302 were isolated from activated sludge [30]. Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae VKM Y-1173 was kindly presented by the All-Russian Collection of Microorganisms, G.K. Skryabin Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms, FRC PSCBR, Russian Academy of Sciences (IBPhM RAS); bacteria Escherichia coli K802 was provided by the Laboratory of Biosensors, IBPhM RAS.

2.3. Cultivation of Microbial Cells

Cells of strains P. yeei, Ps. Veronii, and E. coli were grown on an LB medium. The liquid medium had the following composition: tryptone, 10 g/dm3; yeast extract, 5 g/dm3; sodium chloride, 10 g/dm3. The cell growth medium was sterilized by autoclaving at a pressure of 1.15 atm for 45 min. Cells were grown aerobically for 20–24 h in 750-cm3 shake flasks at a temperature of 29 °C. The biomass obtained was centrifuged at room temperature at 10,000 rpm for 10 min and washed twice with a 20-mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.8, to remove the culture medium. The sedimented cells were resuspended in fresh buffer, distributed by portions and sedimented on an Eppendorf centrifuge for 10 min at 10,000 rpm. The washed biomass was weighed and kept in microtubes at a temperature of +4 °C.
Yeast S. cerevisiae was grown on a rich mineral medium (liquid glucose-peptone nutritious medium). The following composition of the liquid medium was used: glucose, 6.25 g/dm3; peptone, 6.25 g/dm3; yeast extract, 3.75 g/dm3; K2HPO4, 0.35 g/dm3. The cell growth medium was sterilized by autoclaving at a pressure of 1.1 atm for 45 min. Cells were aerobically grown for 18–20 h in 750-cm3 shake flasks at a temperature of 29 °C. The biomass obtained was centrifuged at room temperature for 10 min (10,000 rpm). The centrifugate was washed twice with a 20-mM phosphate buffer, pH 6.8. The sedimented cells were transferred into a fresh buffer, distributed by portions and sedimented on an Eppendorf centrifuge for 10 min at 10,000 rpm. The washed biomass was weighed and kept in microtubes at a temperature of +4 °C.

2.4. Formation of Working Electrode

The working electrode was formed by modifying a graphite paste electrode with electroactive material. For this purpose, a 10-mg weight of the mediator was dissolved in 500 μL of acetone and added to 90 mg of graphite powder (the mass fraction of ferrocene was 10% of the total mass of the powder). After the electrode was formed, microorganisms were applied on its surface as a suspension with a titre of 330 mg/mL in the amount of 10 μL. Thus, the specific mass of microorganisms on the surface of the carbon paste electrode was 0.52 mg/mm2. A dialysis membrane was used to fix microorganisms on the electrode surface.

2.5. Registration of Current–Voltage Characteristics

Cycling voltammograms were registered in a three-electrode cell using an Ekotest-VA voltammetric analyzer (Ekoniks-Ekspert, Russia). A carbon paste electrode with immobilized cells served as a working electrode; a platinum electrode served as an auxiliary electrode. A saturated silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl) electrode, in reference to which all voltammograms were presented, was used as a reference electrode. Measurements were conducted at a potential scan rate of 10 up to 200 mV/s in a 0.15 M potassium sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) at a temperature of 22 °C. The cell volume was 15 mL. The rate constants of the interaction of electron-transport mediators with microorganisms are given in Table 1.

2.6. Biosensor Measurements

To register the dependence of the current on time, we used an IPC Micro galvanopotentiostat (Volta, Russia). Measurements were carried out at a constant potential of 0.25 V.
After establishing a stable current level, an aliquot of the analyzed glucose solution was injected into the cell with a micropipette. After that, an aliquot of a mixture of a toxicant solution with glucose was introduced into the washed cell. After each measurement, the cell was washed with a potassium sodium phosphate buffer solution. As a result of the action of the toxicant, the current was significantly reduced.
The inhibition index calculated by Formula (1) served as an analytical signal:
I inh = Δ I glucose Δ I glucose + toxicant Δ I glucose 100 % ,
where ΔIglucose is the current upon addition of the glucose solution; ΔIglucose+toxicant is the current upon addition of the glucose solution with inhibitor. The toxicant inhibition indices are given in Table 2.

2.7. Reference Toxicity Tests: Assessment of Chlorella Growth Inhibition

Biotests using Chlorella were conducted in accordance with the normative documents [31]. A culture of the alga was grown on a 2% Tamiya medium; the culture had an optical density of 0.005. Under aseptic conditions, chlorella was inoculated into the controls and analyzed media. For 7 days of incubation, the experimental and control vessels were continuously illuminated with a fluorescent lamp. The experimental vessels were arranged in the incubator at random (temperature, 24 ± 2 °C). The growth characteristics of the algal culture were determined by turbidimetry on a photoelectrocolorimeter (wavelength, 525 nm; cuvette length, 1 cm).
The relative difference of the average value of optical density for each dilution, as compared with the control, was calculated by the following formula:
I = A c p 0 A c p A c p 0 · 100 %
where Acp0 is the average optical density of a control experiment; Acp is the optical density of an analyzed sample.
When the toxicity exceeded 20% (inhibition), we calculated the TDF, toxicity dilution factor (see Formula (3)). When the toxicity factor exceeded 30% (stimulation), the value of TDF was calculated by Formula (4). The quality of water was established by the largest value of dilution, for which the toxicity criterion was exceeded.
T D F = 10 log P g log P s I s 0.2 I s I g + log P s
T D F = 10 log P g log P s I s 0.3 I s I g + log P s
where Pg is the (greatest) dilution value at which the deviation index was lower than the toxicity criterion; Ps is the (smallest) dilution value at which the deviation index was higher than the toxicity criterion; Ig and Is are the values of indices I (expressed in fractions) corresponding to these dilution indices.

2.8. Biosensor Determination of Water Sample Toxicity

The analyzed water samples for biosensor analysis were prepared similarly to samples for testing algal culture inhibition [31]. As a result, a series of solutions for each water sample were prepared: 100, 33, 11, 3.7, and 1.2% (a series of dilutions with a triple decrease was presented). To each analyzed solution, glucose at a concentration of 0.1 mol/dm3 was added. The degree of inhibition of a bioreceptor element’s metabolic activity (IC) served as a registered analytical signal. By the obtained data, the toxic–nontoxic transition between the two dilutions was determined and the TDF was calculated. The TDF in the case of inhibition or stimulation was calculated by Formulas (3) and (4).

3. Results

3.1. Choice of Analytical Signal Registration Method

The electrochemical registration of the analytical signal in microbial mediator biosensors for toxicity assessment is based on the decrease of the metabolic activity of microorganisms that provide the basis of the test system. The stationary current decreases, due to the impact of a toxicant on the metabolic activity of the microorganisms, if an analyzed sample is added into the measuring cuvette [17,22]. The resulting current that reflects the metabolic state of cells can be converted into equivalent percentage values of inhibition according to Expression (5):
I inh = I 1 I 2 I 1 · 100 % ,
where I1 is the steady-state current before the addition of the toxicant; I2 is the current in a steady state after the addition of the toxicant [17,22].
Easily oxidizable organic substances may be present in natural water. When conducting the toxicological monitoring of natural waters, it can be expected that the addition of a sample to the biomaterial–mediator–electrode analytical system will lead to an increase in the metabolic activity of the biomaterial, which will oxidize the organic substances of the sample. At the same time, the amount of the reduced form of the mediator will increase. However, the reverse oxidation of the reduced form of the mediator on the electrode will contribute to an increase in the current strength recorded by the amperometric converter –this is the basis for the principle of express detection of biochemical oxygen uptake by microbial mediator biosensors [30].
In order to create a bioreceptor system sensitive both to metals and organic substances, it is necessary to choose the most effective biomaterial. The following microorganisms were used for the study: bacteria E. coli K802, P. yeei VKM B-3302, Ps. veronii DSM 11331T, and yeast S. cerevisiae VKM Y-1173. These microorganisms are quite sensitive to heavy metals and organic compounds, as they live in natural reservoirs that are not contaminated with pollutants. E. coli are used as a test object in biotesting methods [32]; these cells react to the presence of heavy metals in solutions and are widely utilized in the formation of biosensors to determine the integral toxicity of aqueous media [7]. P. yeei have been previously shown to be successful in assaying the toxicity of perfumery and cosmetic product extracts [30], and the total content of biodegradable organic substances in water [27,33]. Ps. veronii have been isolated from activated sludge [27]; these microorganisms have been shown to be capable of decomposing various aromatic compounds [34] and adsorbing heavy metal ions from wastewater [35]. With this in mind, all these bacteria are used for cleaning soils and wastewater from various pollutants, as well as for monitoring the state of the environment. The yeast S. cerevisiae is one of the currently well-studied microorganisms [36]; it is used for the biosorption of heavy metals [37], as well as in the development of biosensors for assessing the content of copper ions [38], for the analysis of water body toxicity [18].
The character of the analytical signal under conditions of mediator bioelectrocatalysis will depend on the substrate specificity of the microorganism used in the receptor element relative to easily oxidizable organic compounds. The substrate specificity of the investigated receptor elements was assessed on 32 different substrates belonging to different classes of organic compounds (Figure 1). At the introduction of a substrate with a final concentration of 20 mM in the analyzed cuvette, the current strength increased. The difference between the final and initial values of the current strength was taken to be the biosensor response. The results on substrate specificity are presented as a percentage with respect to the maximum biosensor response.
Microbial biosensors feature low selectivities; analytical responses were obtained for a significant number of different substrates that may occur in the reservoir (Figure 1). The narrowest substrate specificity is characterized by a receptor system based on E. coli bacteria, which is an advantage for determining toxicity. The low selectivity of the biosensor can become a problem in assessing the toxicity of natural waters. To minimize the influence of these substrates in determining toxicity, we chose another method of analytical signal registration (Figure 2) based on measuring the rate of glucose oxidation by microorganisms and the rate of glucose oxidation in the presence of a toxicant.
Glucose was chosen as a model easily oxidizable substrate, which is metabolized by a wide range of microorganisms used for toxicity assessment. The degree of change in the current strength at the introduction of glucose solution in the presence and absence of a toxicant is an inhibition index that was used to assess toxicity. The use of this method of analytical signal registration considers the influence of easily oxidizable substrates occurring in reservoirs, and thereby reduces the error of the analysis.

3.2. Choice of Mediator and Microorganisms for Toxicity Index Assessment

When choosing an electron transport mediator, it is necessary to consider that the analytical signal is of a complex character, and is based on biochemical and electrochemical processes occurring in the analyte–microorganism–mediator–electrode system. Proceeding this, we comparatively assessed the effectiveness of bioelectrocatalytic oxidation of glucose by the investigated microorganisms and found the rate constants of mediator–biomaterial interaction.
At the registration of the cyclic voltammogram in the presence of glucose, there occurs an increase of anodic current (Figure 3) due to the electrocatalytic oxidation of substrate by the investigated biomaterial. To determine the rate constants of the interaction of mediator and biomaterial, we obtained the dependences of the ratio of the limiting anodic currents in the presence and absence of the substrate (Ik/Id) on the value of the inverse scan rate 1/ν1/2; by the slope of the linear regression, the value of rate constant was found according to Expression (6).
I k I d = k E R T n F ν
where Ik is the limiting current in the presence of substrate (A); Id is the limiting current in the absence of substrate (A); k is the rate constant of mediator–biomaterial interaction, dm3/mg × s; R is the universal gas constant, J/mol × K; T is the temperature, degrees Kelvin; [E] is cell titre, mg/dm3; ν is scan rate, V/s; n is the number of transferred electrons; F is the Faraday constant, C/mol.
The obtained constants of the interaction of mediators with investigated microorganisms, as well as the rate constant of the heterogeneous transfer of electrons to the electrode, obtained earlier for the studied mediators [27], are given in Table 1.
Table 1. The rate constants of the interaction of electron-transport mediators with investigated microorganisms and the rate constant of the heterogeneous transfer of electrons to the electrode.
Table 1. The rate constants of the interaction of electron-transport mediators with investigated microorganisms and the rate constant of the heterogeneous transfer of electrons to the electrode.
MediatorRate Constants of the Interaction of Mediators with Investigated Microorganisms, dm3/g × sRate Constant of the Heterogeneous Transfer to the Electrode, cm·s−1 [27]
Ps. VeroniiE. coliS. cerevisiaeP. yeei [27]
Methylene blue2.0 ± 0.50.20 ± 0.040.06 ± 0.010.021 ± 0.0010.025 ± 0.009
Thionine0.05 ± 0.010.010 ± 0.0020.5 ± 0.10.013 ± 0.0040.022 ± 0.005
Neutral red0.020 ± 0.0030.08 ± 0.010.6 ± 0.10.013 ± 0.0030.017 ± 0.005
Potassium hexacyanoferrate(III)0.20 ± 0.030.010 ± 0.0020.002 ± 0.0010.019 ± 0.0030.0067 ± 0.0009
2,6-Dichloro-phenolindophenol0.08 ± 0.020.010 ± 0.0020.3 ± 0.10.013 ± 0.0020.069 ± 0.004
Ferrocene0.00020 ± 0.000020.030 ± 0.0060.3 ± 0.10.023 ± 0.0010.4 ± 0.1
1,1′-Dimethyl-ferrocene0.00020 ± 0.000040.00030 ± 0.000020.00030 ± 0.000080.0038 ± 0.00090.07 ± 0.01
Ferrocene carboxaldehyde0.10 ± 0.050.0040 ± 0.00040.5 ± 0.10.007 ± 0.0010.03 ± 0.01
Ferrocene acetonitrile0.020 ± 0.0030.010 ± 0.0020.07 ± 0.020.0014 ± 0.00010.14 ± 0.05
In general, it can be noted that mediators of the phenazine and phenathiosine series, which can penetrate into the cell [39], interact with microorganisms much faster than ferrocene derivatives. Further use of these mediators is advisable only when forming redox-active polymers based on them, since, in these systems, the heterogeneous transfer constant is inferior to the corresponding constants for ferrocene-series mediators. Among the ferrocene-series mediators immobilized in graphite powder, the mediator ferrocene is the most promising, since this system achieves the maximum rate constant of heterogeneous transfer to the electrode and, in most cases, a high-rate constant of interaction with the studied microorganisms (bacteria P. yeei and yeast S. cerevisiae).
The choice of biomaterial for the formation of bioreceptor elements of a mediator biosensor was based on the sensitivity of microorganisms to harmful environmental factors. These include solutions of copper (II), zinc (II), lead (II), and cadmium (II) ions, as well as phenol and 4-nitrophenol, which are used as model toxicants for test objects in biotesting methods [15,16]. The sensitivity of the biosensor system to model toxicants was fixed by the index of inhibition of microorganisms. The inhibition index was taken to be the degree of reduction in the rate of glucose uptake by microorganisms in the presence and absence of an inhibitor. Inhibitory curves were constructed for each toxicant (Figure 4).
In the data obtained, we found concentrations of toxicants (IC50) that caused a 50% decrease in the activity of the biosensor receptor element. The inhibition index is given in Table 2. The results obtained were compared with similar models represented by microbial mediator biosensor systems [17,18,19,20,21,27], as well as biotesting methods based on various test objects, such as Lemna and Vibrio fischeri [15], and Chlorella vulgaris [16].
Table 2. Inhibitor solution concentration inducing a decrease of the receptor element activity by 50%.
Table 2. Inhibitor solution concentration inducing a decrease of the receptor element activity by 50%.
Mediator/BiomaterialTest FunctionIC50 of the Toxicant, mg/dm3Ref
Pb2+Cd2+Cu2+Zn2+Phenolp-Nitrophenol
Ferrocene/
S. cerevisiae
Microbial metabolic activity decrease6.1– *2.717.71.8– *This work
Ferrocene/
E. coli
0.88.947.646.417.65.8This work
Ferrocene/
Ps. Veronii
169.8– *286.3– *13.5– *This work
Ferrocene/
P. yeei, E. coli association
7.36.623.82.38.129.2This work
Ferrocene/
P. yeei
9.918.221.147.59.92.1[27]
p-Benzoquinone/
E. coli, B. subtilis, S. cerevisiae
– *20.516.5– *– *– *[17]
Menadione and potassium hexacyanoferrate(III)/
S. cerevisiae
34.613.910.1– *44.5– *[18]
Thionine/
E. coli
34.436.220.253.2– *– *[19]
p-Benzoquinone/
Psychrobacter sp. isolated from activated sludge
11047.32.610.9– *– *[20]
Potassium hexacyanoferrate(III)/
activated sludge
– *13.419.81.19– *– *[21]
Duckweed (Lemna)Inhibition of duckweed growth rate 5.50.330.330.9– *– *[15]
Vibrio fischeriDecrease of microbial bioluminescence intensity36.052.534.44.64– *– *[15]
Chlorella vulgarisEvolution of oxygen in the gas phase0.4760.301– *– *– *– *[16]
* not determined.
It can be concluded that Ps. veronii bacteria are the least sensitive to the studied toxicants, which makes further experiments with them impractical. Comparing the ferrocene–S. cerevisiae biosensor system with the described analogs, it can be said that the result of the toxic effect of the Pb2+ ion correlates with the data in [15] (in this work, we use the duckweed as a test object), as well as the data given for Cu2+ ions and described in [20]. In the ferrocene–P. yeei system, the result of the toxic effect of the Cu2+ ion correlates with the data presented in [19,21]. These two studies showed that the developed systems are sensitive to phenol solution. It should be noted that the ferrocene–E. coli system is the most sensitive to the action of Pb2+ ions, thus surpassing other standard test systems in sensitivity. In general, biosensor methods of toxicity determination are characterized by a lower sensitivity to heavy metals than when using duckweed as a test object [15]. Nevertheless, the development of biosensor analyzers is topical, due to the non-reactivity of the method and the possibility of continuous monitoring of water quality, as well as the high expressiveness of the analysis, which enables preventing various kinds of pollution.
By the results of this study, it can be concluded that single P. yeei and E. coli microorganisms can be used to form bioreceptor elements due to their higher sensitivity to the most frequently occurring toxicants in surface waters. To increase sensitivity, we considered the possibility of forming an association based on these microorganisms. This approach can make it possible to create receptor systems sensitive both to heavy metals and to organic toxicants. The yeast S. cerevisiae has a high sensitivity to toxicants, but in an association, it can eventually be displaced by bacteria due to their greater resistance to changes in environmental conditions [17]. For this reason, the association based on the yeast and bacteria was not used in further work. It seemed more expedient to form an association based on P. yeei and E. coli, because both of these microorganisms have the same specific growth rates, as well as the same linear growth phase build-up time, which makes it possible to ensure high stability of the analysis and to avoid the displacement of one microorganism by another during the long-term operation of the bioreceptor system [40] (Table 3).
The receptor element based on associations of P. yeei and E. coli bacteria is not inferior in sensitivity to receptor elements based on single microorganisms (Table 2); at the same time, the bacterial association has a high sensitivity to both organic and inorganic toxicants.

3.3. Toxic Effects of Model Solutions on Characteristics of Ferrocene–P. yeei, Ferrocene–E. coli, and Ferrocene–S. cerevisiae Biosensor Systems

In terms of toxicological monitoring, it is necessary to make certain that the biomaterial used is suitable for analysis. For this purpose, it is recommended to pre-evaluate the sensitivity of the biomaterial to the reference toxicants, which were copper (II) ions and phenol. The concentration of toxicants was selected based on the degree of their inhibition of microorganisms, so that, in the presence of a model toxicant, the metabolic activity of cells decreased by 20% (Table 4). The choice of a toxicant concentration that reduces the metabolic activity of cells by 20% is due to the fact that this concentration of the toxicant allows the visualization of the biosensor response, and also the reduction of the load on the receptor element in long-term measurements. The degree of reversibility of the interaction of biomaterials with toxicants was preliminarily determined. This assessment included a parameter estimating how many times the inhibition index differed from 20% after holding the electrode in a solution of model toxicants.
It can be concluded that the chosen toxicants act reversibly on receptor systems based on single microorganisms and associations; therefore, they can be used as reference toxicants for assessing the quality of the formed working electrodes.
In further experiments, we established the principle of the inhibitory effect of toxicants. For the ferrocene–P. yeei and ferrocene–E. coli biosensor systems, the Michaelis constants were determined (KM, the constant in the presence of substrate; KMI, the constant in the presence of substrate and inhibitor) and the maximum rate of the enzymatic reaction (rmax, the maximum reaction rate without inhibitor; rmaxI, the maximum reaction rate in the presence of inhibitor) proceeding from the calibration dependence parameters (Figure 5A). The type of inhibition was determined when processing the results obtained by the Lineweaver–Burk method (Figure 5B). The data are given in Table 5.
A competitive type of inhibition for copper (II) ion is observed in the P. yeei–ferrocene system. Despite the fact that this type of inhibition is typical for heavy metal ions, a similar phenomenon is also confirmed by studies presented in [41,42,43]. Copper ions in cell systems can act as catalysts for some redox reactions, enter the electron transfer chain, and form complex compounds [44]. In addition, in [43] it was shown that copper bound into a complex compound can compete for the electron–donor site of the enzyme NADH oxidoreductase, which is part of complex I of the electron transfer chain. Additionally, it was indicated in [43] that competitive inhibition includes an effect on an artificial acceptor, which in this work could be the mediator ferrocene. Furthermore, metals can form organic complex compounds structurally similar to substrates [45]. Considering the specifics of microorganisms, heavy metals can, as copper (II) ions, exhibit a competitive type of inhibition in relation to cell enzymes under conditions of the experiment. In the case of the E. coli–ferrocene system, the type of inhibition for Cu2+ ion proved to be mixed, which indicates that copper ions can bind both to the active site of the enzyme and have an effect outside the enzyme. Similar data on the type of inhibition were obtained in the study of the effect of Hg2+ on alcoholdehydrogenase [46]. A phenol solution exerts a mixed inhibition in bacteria-based biosensor systems. In [47], data were provided on the effect of cyclic compounds acting as an inhibitor of the enzyme phenylalanine ammonia lyase. The study revealed that phenol inhibits this enzyme in a mixed way. Identification of the inhibition mechanisms performed in this work will subsequently enable the choosing of a reversible model inhibitor for the receptor element based on an association. In this case, the effect of the toxicant will be different for the microorganisms used in the composition of the receptor element. The model inhibitor chosen in this way will allow for a consideration of possible inhibition mechanisms for the natural microflora when analyzing natural waters.

3.4. Characteristics of Developed Systems

When operating electrodes, it is important to evaluate reproducibility, as well as operational and long-term stability. Long-term stability characterizes the duration of biosensor operation over a certain period of time, which is ensured by the preservation of the vital activity of microorganisms on the surface of the electrode. Long-term stability was determined by measuring the degree of inhibition of microbial activity. For this, we daily measured the biosensor response at the concentration of the toxicant that caused a decrease in the respiratory activity of microorganisms by 20% (IC20). Between measurements, the electrode was kept in a phosphate buffer solution (pH 6.8). If the sensor response decreased by less than 20%, the electrode was considered unfit for work. The obtained dependences are shown in Figure 6. Despite the reversible short-term interaction between the receptor element and the model toxicant, the decrease in the receptor element activity on the 9th day is probably due to the cumulative toxic effect of Cu2+ ions. The results are given in Table 6.
The system based on the ferrocene mediator and P. yeei bacteria had the greatest stability in biosensor operation. The assessment of the operational stability of the biosensor was carried out by introducing a solution of a substrate of the same concentration and an inhibitor causing a 20% decrease in the respiratory activity (IC20). A quantitative characteristic of operational stability is the relative standard deviation in repeated measurements (15 times) of the standard sample (95% confidence probability). The results obtained are presented in Table 6. From these data, it follows that the most stable bioreceptor element for long–term measurements is the ferrocene–P. yeei–Cu2+ system.
The reproducibility of the signals of the receptor elements was evaluated by the magnitude of the relative standard deviation of responses from a series consisting of seven electrodes at the introduction of a model solution (95% confidence probability). Based on the results obtained, the best reproducibility indicator can be said to be the ferrocene–P. yeei–Cu2+ system.

3.5. Determination of Integral Toxicity of Wastewater Samples

Three wastewater samples were analyzed using the developed mediator biosensors based on microorganisms and the method of biotesting (the test object was Chlorella, the reference method). Three samples of river water were used. The registered parameter was the toxicity index defined as the degree of a decrease in the activity of the biosensor bioreceptor element and the degree of inhibition of chlorella growth. The results obtained are presented in Table 7. The criterion for the toxicity of a water sample is a decrease in the average optical density compared to the control by 20% or more, or an increase in the average optical density by 30% or more. The detectable parameter was the toxicity dilution factor (TDF).
The TDF values calculated by Formulas (3) and (4) are given in Table 7.
According to the data obtained, it can be concluded that Sample 1 is highly toxic. The best correlation with the results of the standard method in the analysis of natural waters was achieved using ferrocene–E.coli and ferrocene–association P. yeei/E.coli biosensor systems. The ferrocene–P. yeei biosensor system is not suitable for TDF determination due to its rather low sensitivity to toxicants that can occur in analyzed samples. At the same time, the ferrocene–S. cerevisiae biosensor system possesses a high sensitivity to toxicants of the sample, due to which the results do not correlate with the data of the standard method. The results obtained in the experiment suggest that the ferrocene–E. coli and ferrocene– association P. yeei/E. coli biosensor systems can be successfully used for determining the general toxicity of aqueous media. The developed bioanalytical systems can serve as prototypes for commercial rapid-assay toxicity analyzers. The main limitation of wide application of the developed receptor elements is long-time stability: 3 days for E. coli/ferrocene system and 4 days for P. yeei, E. coli/ferrocene.

4. Conclusions

This study established that the analytical signal of the biosensor in a rapid assay could be adequately treated as a degree of inhibition of the receptor-element respiratory activity as the result of a glucose oxidation rate decrease in the presence of an inhibitor. This enabled an accounting for the effects of substances that could occur in the sample and be oxidized by the biomaterials of the receptor system. The values of EC50 were found for four heavy metals (Cu2+, Zn2+, Pb2+, Cd2+) and two phenols (phenol and p-nitrophenol). The bacteria E. coli and P. yeei were the most sensitive to the action of the model toxicants: Cu2+, Pb2+, and phenol. Therefore, the use of these microorganisms as biomaterials in the development of an amperometric biosensor for integral toxicity determination is more preferable. As the growth parameters of these microorganisms are close, a stable association formed on their basis can be assumed.
The developed ferrocene–E. coli and ferrocene–P. yeei/E. coli systems have high sensitivities to solutions of heavy metals and organic compounds, as compared with other analogs presented in other publications. Mediator biosensors based on an association of E. coli and P. yeei bacteria for integral toxicity assays are reagent-free. The method enables much faster results than other biotesting methods; the assay results are consistent with those of the standard biotesting using Chlorella vulgaris algae as a test object.
The developed biosensor allows for the evaluation of the impact of polluted natural water to the ecosystem via assessment of impacts on bacteria and yeasts in the receptor system. These systems can be used in toxicological monitoring of natural waters.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.A. and A.R.; methodology, V.A. and A.K.; software, R.L.; validation, R.L., A.K. and A.M.; formal analysis, V.A.; investigation, A.K., V.A. and A.M.; resources, V.A.; data curation, A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, V.A., A.R. and P.M.; writing—review and editing, V.A., A.R., P.M. and A.M.; visualization, R.L.; supervision, P.M.; project administration, V.A.; funding acquisition, V.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was carried out within the framework of a grant of the President of the Russian Federation for the State Support of Young PhD Scientists, grant No MK-4815.2022.1.4, agreement No. 075-15-2022-530 (C4422MK) from 13 May 2022.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rekhi, H.; Rani, S.; Sharma, N. A review on recent applications of high-performance liquid chromatography in metal determination and speciation analysis. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2017, 47, 524–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Talaee, M.; Lorestani, B.; Ramezani, M.; Cheraghi, M.; Jameh-Bozorgi, S. Tandem dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction coupled with micro-sampling flame atomic absorption spectrometry for rapid determination of lead (II) and cadmium (II) ions in environmental water samples. Int. J. Env. Anal. Chem. 2019, 99, 1235–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Javed, M.; Usmani, N. Impact of heavy metal toxicity on hematology and glycogen status of fish: A review. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B Biol. Sci. 2014, 85, 889–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Van der Schalie, W.H.; Shedd, T.R.; Knechtges, P.L.; Widder, M.W. Using higher organisms in biological early warning systems for real-time toxicity detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2001, 16, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Robinson, A.A.; Belden, J.B.; Lydy, M.J. Toxicity of fluoroquinolone antibiotics to aquatic organisms. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2005, 24, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sharma, S.; Sharma, S.; Upreti, N.; Sharma, K.P. Monitoring toxicity of an azo dye methyl red and a heavy metal Cu using plant and animal bioassays. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2009, 91, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nelson, S.M.; Roline, R.A. Evaluation of the sensitivity of rapid toxicity tests relative to daphnid acute lethality tests. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1998, 60, 292–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Martins, J.; Oliva Teles, L.; Vasconcelos, V. Assays with Daphnia magna and Danio rerio as alert systems in aquatic toxicology. Environ. Int. 2007, 33, 414–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Girotti, S.; Ferri, E.N.; Fumo, M.G.; Maiolini, E. Monitoring of environmental pollutants by bioluminescent bacteria. Anal. Chim. Acta 2008, 608, 2–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Parvez, S.; Venkataraman, C.; Mukherji, S. A review on advantages of implementing luminescence inhibition test (Vibrio fischeri) for acute toxicity prediction of chemicals. Environ. Int. 2006, 32, 265–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, Y.M.; Park, D.; Lee, D.S.; Park, J.M. Inhibitory effects of toxic compounds on nitrification process for cokes wastewater treatment. J. Hazard. Mat. 2008, 152, 915–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hassan, S.H.A.; Van Ginkel, W.V.; Hussein, M.M.A.; Abskharon, R.; Oh, S.-E. Toxicity assessment using different bioassays and microbial biosensors. Environ. Int. 2016, 92, 106–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. ISO 11348-1:2007/AMD 1:2018; Water Quality–Determination of the Inhibitory Effect of Water Samples on the Light Emission of Vibrio fischeri (Luminescent Bacteria Test)–Part 1: Method Using Freshly Prepared Bacteria. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
  14. Woutersen, M.; Van der Gaag, B.; Boakye, A.A.; Mink, J.; Marks, R.S.; Wagenvoort, A.J.; Ketelaars, H.A.M.; Brouwer, B.; Heringa, M.B. Development and validation of an on-line water toxicity sensor with immobilized luminescent bacteria for on-line surface water monitoring. Sensors 2017, 17, 2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Azizullah, A.; Häder, D.P. A comparison of commonly used and commercially available bioassays for aquatic ecosystems. In Bioassays; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 17, pp. 347–368. [Google Scholar]
  16. Eom, H.; Park, M.; Jang, A.; Kim, S.; Oh, S.-E. A simple and rapid algal assay kit to assess toxicity of heavy metal-contaminated water. Environ. Pollution. 2021, 269, 116–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gao, G.; Qian, J.; Fang, D.; Yu, Y.; Zhi, J. Development of a mediated whole cell-based electrochemical biosensor for joint toxicity assessment of multi-pollutants using a mixed microbial consortium. Anal. Chim. Acta 2016, 924, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gao, G.; Fang, D.; Yu, Y.; Wu, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhi, J. A double-mediator based whole cell electrochemical biosensor for acute biotoxicity assessment of wastewater. Talanta 2017, 167, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fang, D.; Gao, G.; Shen, J.; Yu, Y.; Zhi, J. A reagentless electrochemical biosensor based on thionine wrapped E. coli and chitosan-entrapped carbon nanodots film modified glassy carbon electrode for wastewater toxicity assessment. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 22, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, X.; Liu, M.; Wang, X.; Wu, Z.; Yang, L.; Xia, S.; Chen, L.; Zhao, J. p-Benzoquinone-mediated amperometric biosensor developed with Psychrobacter sp. for toxicity testing of heavy metals. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 41, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, H.; Yong, D.; Kim, H.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, S.; Han, X. A ferricyanide-mediated activated sludge bioassay for determination of the toxicity of water. Electroanalysis 2015, 28, 580–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fang, D.; Gao, G.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Gao, L.; Zhi, J. Redox mediator-based microbial biosensors for acute water toxicity assessment: A critical review. Chem. Electro. Chem. 2020, 7, 2513–2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, Y.; Fang, D.; Liu, Y.; Liu, R.; Wang, X.; Yu, Y.; Zhi, J. Problems analysis and new fabrication strategies of mediated electrochemical biosensors for wastewater toxicity assessment. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 108, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Liu, C.; Xu, Y.; Han, X.; Chang, X. The fabrication and the use of immobilized cells as test organisms in a ferricyanide-based toxicity biosensor. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2017, 3, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Qian, J.; Li, J.; Fang, D.; Yu, Y.; Zhi, J. A disposable biofilm-modified amperometric biosensor for the sensitive determination of pesticide biotoxicity in water. RSC Adv. 2014, 98, 55473–55482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, X.; Zhang, J.; Bu, Y.; Yan, X.; Chen, J.; Zhao, J. Direct toxicity assessment of copper (II) ions to activated sludge process using a p-benzoquinone-mediated amperometric biosensor. Sens. Actuat. B Chemical. 2015, 208, 554–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kharkova, A.S.; Arlyapov, V.A.; Turovskaya, A.D.; Shvets, V.I.; Reshetilov, A.N. A mediator microbial biosensor for assaying general toxicity. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2020, 132, 109435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Li, J.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Qian, J.; Zhi, J. The benzoquinone-mediated electrochemical microbial biosensor for water biotoxicity assay. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 97, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Shao, P.; Liu, R.; Gao, G.; Zhi, J. A portable instrument for monitoring acute water toxicity based on mediated electrochemical biosensor: Design, testing and evaluation. Chemosphere 2020, 255, 126964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kharkova, A.S.; Arlyapov, V.A.; Turovskaya, A.D.; Avtukh, A.N.; Starodumova, I.P.; Reshetilov, A.N. Mediator BOD biosensor based on cells of microorganisms isolated from activated sludge. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2019, 55, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. ISO 8692; Water Quality–Fresh Water Algal Growth Inhibition Test with Unicellular Green Algae. 3rd ed. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012.
  32. ISO 10872; Water and Soil Quality–Determination of the Toxic Effect of Sediment and Soil Samples on Growth, Fertility and Reproduction of Caenorhabditis elegans (Nematoda). ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020.
  33. Arlyapov, V.A.; Yudina NYu Asulyan, L.D.; Kamanina, O.A.; Alferov, S.V.; Shumsky, A.N.; Machulin, A.V.; Alferov, V.A.; Reshetilov, A.N. Registration of BOD using Paracoccus yeei bacteria isolated from activated sludge. 3 Biotech 2020, 10, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nam, I.-H.; Chang, Y.-S.; Hong, H.-B.; Lee, Y.-E. A novel catabolic activity of Pseudomonas veronii in biotransformation of pentachlorophenol. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 62, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Vullo, D.L.; Ceretti, H.M.; Daneil, M.A.; Ramirez, S.A.M.; Zalts, A. Cadmium, zinc and copper biosorption mediated by Pseudomonas veronii 2E. Biores. Technol. 2008, 99, 5574–5581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Goffeau, A.; Barrell, B.G.; Bussey, H.; Davis, R.W.; Dujon, B.; Feldmann, H.; Galibert, F.; Hoheisel, J.D.; Jacq, C.; Johnston, M.; et al. Life with 6000 genes. Science 1996, 274, 546–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Strandberg, G.W.; Shumate, S.E.; Parrott, J.R. Microbial cells as biosorbents for heavy metals: Accumulation of uranium by Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1981, 41, 237–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Lehmann, M.; Riedel, K.; Adler, K.; Kunze, G. Amperometric measurement of copper ions with a deputy substrate using a novel Saccharomyces cerevisiae sensor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2000, 15, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ikeda, T.; Kurosaki, T.; Takayama, K.; Kano, K. Measurements of oxidoreductase-like activity of intact bacterial cells by an amperometric method using a membrane-coated electrode. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yudina NYu Arlyapov, V.A.; Chepurnova, M.A.; Alferov, S.V.; Reshetilov, A.N. A yeast co-culture-based biosensor for determination of wastewater contamination levels. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2015, 78, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fairbanks, V.F. Copper sulfate-induced hemolytic anemia: Inhibition of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and other possible etiologic mechanisms. Arch. Int. Med. 1967, 120, 428–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Eprintsev, A.T.; Gataullina, M.O.; Lyashchenko, M.S. Physicochemical and catalytic properties of NAD+-dependent malate dehydrogenase isoforms from maize mesophyll. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2016, 52, 366–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Naučienė, Z.; Mildažienė, V.; Banienė, R. Interactions of cadmium and copper ions with complex I of the respiratory chain in rat liver mitochondria. Ekologija 2002, 2, 18–21. [Google Scholar]
  44. Mufti, A.R.; Burstein, E.; Duckett, C.S. XIAP: Cell death regulation meets copper homeostasis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2007, 463, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Poisa, L.; Adamovics, A. Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) as an environmentally friendly energyplant. Rigas Tehn. Universit. Zinatn. Raksti. 2010, 5, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhmaeva, E.V.; Bychkov, P.V.; Shekhovtsova, T.N. Enzymatic determination of mercury (II) and methylmercury using alcohol dehydrogenases of different origin. Vestn. MGU Khim. 2002, 6, 404. [Google Scholar]
  47. Alunni, S.; Cipiciani, A.; Fioroni, G.; Ottavi, L. Mechanisms of inhibition of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase by phenol inhibitors and phenol/glycine synergistic inhibitors. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2003, 412, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Substrate specificity of bioreceptor elements based on bacteria E. coli K-802, Ps. veronii DSM 11331T, P. yeei VKM B-3302, and yeast S. cerevisiae VKM Y-1173.
Figure 1. Substrate specificity of bioreceptor elements based on bacteria E. coli K-802, Ps. veronii DSM 11331T, P. yeei VKM B-3302, and yeast S. cerevisiae VKM Y-1173.
Sensors 22 08522 g001
Figure 2. Scheme of analytical signal registration.
Figure 2. Scheme of analytical signal registration.
Sensors 22 08522 g002
Figure 3. Determination of the constant of interaction of the mediator with S. cerevisiae yeast cells by cyclic voltammetry. The voltammograms based on ferrocene mediator (scan rate, 20 mV/s) in the presence of glucose (brown line) and in the absence of glucose (blue line) are presented.
Figure 3. Determination of the constant of interaction of the mediator with S. cerevisiae yeast cells by cyclic voltammetry. The voltammograms based on ferrocene mediator (scan rate, 20 mV/s) in the presence of glucose (brown line) and in the absence of glucose (blue line) are presented.
Sensors 22 08522 g003
Figure 4. Inhibition curve for a bioelectrode based on the mediator ferrocene and bacteria P. yeei. Red line is IC50 value for the Zn2+ toxicant.
Figure 4. Inhibition curve for a bioelectrode based on the mediator ferrocene and bacteria P. yeei. Red line is IC50 value for the Zn2+ toxicant.
Sensors 22 08522 g004
Figure 5. A form of the calibration curve (A) and the Lineweaver–Burk double reciprocal plot of the results obtained in the presence of Cu2+ (B).
Figure 5. A form of the calibration curve (A) and the Lineweaver–Burk double reciprocal plot of the results obtained in the presence of Cu2+ (B).
Sensors 22 08522 g005
Figure 6. Long-time stability of the ferrocene–P. yeei–Cu2+ system.
Figure 6. Long-time stability of the ferrocene–P. yeei–Cu2+ system.
Sensors 22 08522 g006
Table 3. Parameters of microbial growth curves.
Table 3. Parameters of microbial growth curves.
Growth PhaseP. yeei VKM B-3302E. coli K802S. cerevisiae VKM Y-1173Ps. veronii DSM 11331T
Lag phase, h0–20–20–20–6
Exponential phase, h 2–42–42–46–12
Linear growth phase, h4–164–104–812–20
Transition phase (growth slowdown phase), h16–2410–208–1720–36
Stationary phase, h24–3020–3017–3036–52
Specific growth rate, h−10.6 ± 0.20.6 ± 0.10.71 ± 0.040.265
Table 4. Concentrations of toxicant solutions at which the metabolic activity of the bioreceptor element decreases by 20%.
Table 4. Concentrations of toxicant solutions at which the metabolic activity of the bioreceptor element decreases by 20%.
Biomaterial/MediatorToxicant Solution Toxicant Concentration at which the Metabolic Activity of Cells Decreases by 20%, IC20, mg/dm3Reversibility Degree, %
P. yeei–ferroceneCu2+1096 ± 4
Phenol496 ± 2
E. coli–ferroceneCu2+2497 ± 2
Phenol894 ± 4
S. cerevisiae–ferroceneCu2+1.594 ± 3
Phenol193 ± 5
P. yeei/E.coli association–ferroceneZn2+2.396 ± 2
Phenol8.193 ± 4
Table 5. Michaelis–Menten equation parameters in the presence of reference toxicants for P. yeei–ferrocene and E. coli–ferrocene biosensor systems.
Table 5. Michaelis–Menten equation parameters in the presence of reference toxicants for P. yeei–ferrocene and E. coli–ferrocene biosensor systems.
Biomaterial/
Mediator
ToxicantKM,
mmol/dm3
KMI
mmol/dm3
rmax,
μA
rmaxI,
μA
Inhibition Type
P. yeei/
ferrocene
Cu2+8 ± 213 ± 28.1 ± 0.48.1 ± 0.3Competitive
Phenol9 ± 26 ± 15.3 ± 0.34.5 ± 0.3Mixed
E. coli/
ferrocene
Cu2+2.1 ± 0.90.5 ± 0.052.5 ± 0.31.97 ± 0.03Mixed
Phenol2.1 ± 0.51.0 ± 0.32.9 ± 0.22.3 ± 0.2Mixed
S. cerevisiae/
ferrocene
Cu2+1.9 ± 0.11.6 ± 0.21.3 ± 0.10.77 ± 0.04Mixed
Phenol3.2 ± 0.95 ± 21.0 ± 0.21.1 ± 0.4Competitive
Table 6. Analytical characteristics of the developed systems.
Table 6. Analytical characteristics of the developed systems.
Biomaterial/MediatorToxicantLong-Time Stability, DaysOperational Stability, % Reproducibility, %
P. yeei/ferroceneCu2+94.94.5
Phenol105.34.8
E. coli/ferroceneCu2+36.927
Phenol310.819
S. cerevisiae/ferroceneCu2+56.94.9
Phenol511.55.1
P. yeei, E. coli/ferroceneCu2+47.35.2
Phenol410.39.6
Table 7. The results of calculating TDF for analyzed samples.
Table 7. The results of calculating TDF for analyzed samples.
Method of AnalysisTDF of Analyzed Samples
Sample No 1Sample No 2Sample No 3
Chlorella vulgaris biotesting56-fold
(highly toxic)
21-fold
(toxic)
7-fold
(mid toxic)
Ferrocene–E. coli biosensor63-fold
(highly toxic)
16-fold
(toxic)
5-fold
(mid toxic)
Ferrocene–P. yeei biosensor 25-fold
(toxic)
6-fold
(mid toxic)
2-fold
(low toxic)
Ferrocene–S. cerevisiae biosensor 45-fold
(highly toxic)
60-fold
(highly toxic)
32-fold
(highly toxic)
Ferrocene–E. coli/P. yeei biosensor 60-fold
(highly toxic)
19-fold
(toxic)
8-fold
(toxic)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kharkova, A.; Arlyapov, V.; Medvedeva, A.; Lepikash, R.; Melnikov, P.; Reshetilov, A. Mediator Microbial Biosensor Analyzers for Rapid Determination of Surface Water Toxicity. Sensors 2022, 22, 8522. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218522

AMA Style

Kharkova A, Arlyapov V, Medvedeva A, Lepikash R, Melnikov P, Reshetilov A. Mediator Microbial Biosensor Analyzers for Rapid Determination of Surface Water Toxicity. Sensors. 2022; 22(21):8522. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218522

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kharkova, Anna, Vyacheslav Arlyapov, Anastasia Medvedeva, Roman Lepikash, Pavel Melnikov, and Anatoly Reshetilov. 2022. "Mediator Microbial Biosensor Analyzers for Rapid Determination of Surface Water Toxicity" Sensors 22, no. 21: 8522. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218522

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop