Next Article in Journal
Ternary Gas Mixture Quantification Using Field Asymmetric Ion Mobility Spectrometry (FAIMS)
Next Article in Special Issue
Selective Feature Generation Method Based on Time Domain Parameters and Correlation Coefficients for Filter-Bank-CSP BCI Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Monitoring Surface Defects Deformations and Displacements in Hot Steel Using Magnetic Induction Tomography
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recording of Bipolar Multichannel ECGs by a Smartwatch: Modern ECG Diagnostic 100 Years after Einthoven
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Blood Flow Volume Linear Inversion Model Based on Electromagnetic Sensor for Predicting the Rate of Arterial Stenosis

1
College of Information Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
2
Key Laboratory of Data Analytics and Optimization for Smart Industry, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
3
College of Computer Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2019, 19(13), 3006; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19133006
Submission received: 20 May 2019 / Revised: 5 July 2019 / Accepted: 5 July 2019 / Published: 8 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electromagnetic Sensors for Biomedical Applications)

Abstract

:
This paper presents a mathematical model of measuring blood flow based on electromagnetic induction for predicting the rate of arterial stenosis. Firstly, an electrode sensor was used to collect the induced potential differences from human skin surface in a uniform magnetic field. Then, the inversion matrix was constructed by the weight function theory and finite element method. Next, the blood flow volume inversion model was constructed by combining the induction potential differences and inversion matrix. Finally, the rate of arterial stenosis was predicted based on mathematical relationship between blood flow and the area of arterial stenosis. To verify the accuracy of the model, a uniform magnetic field distribution of Helmholtz coil and a 3D geometric model of the ulnar artery of the forearm with different rates of stenosis were established in COMSOL, a finite element analysis software. Simulation results showed that the inversion model had high accuracy in the measurement of blood flow and the prediction of rate of stenosis, and is of great significance for the early diagnosis of arterial stenosis and other vessel diseases.

1. Introduction

Blood is an important carrier of oxygen and nutrients between the organs and tissues of the body. Arterial stenosis will reduce the blood flow to various organs or tissues, causing coronary heart disease, angina, and other cardiovascular diseases. According to the statistics of the World Health Organization, 17 million people died of cardiovascular diseases in 2008, accounting for 30% of the global total [1]. Atherosclerosis is one of the main causes of arterial stenosis, which is characterized by the blockage of blood vessels by the plaques formed by the accumulation of lipids. The best treatment methods for vessels with different degrees of stenosis are also different. Therefore, it is of great value to develop a safe and non-invasive method to monitor arterial vessel blood flow status for common arterial vessel diseases early prevention.
Nowadays, common diagnostic methods for arterial stenosis include digital subtraction angiography (DSA), nuclear magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), spiral CT angiography (CTA), and ultrasonic examination. DSA has a high spatial resolution and can accurately detect the degree and range of arterial stenosis [2]. However, due to its high trauma and high diagnostic cost, DSA is generally used as the examination before angioplasty, rather than suitable for general survey [3]. MRA is a non-invasive angiography technique, which has a good consistency with the results of DSA detection, but the arterial stenosis shown by MRA may be exaggerated [4]. CTA can obtain the complete morphology of complex structures and show calcified plaques [5]. When the stenosis degree is large, the results can be consistent with DSA detection [6]. However, patients need to be injected with contrast media and the method is radioactive [7]. Compared with DSA, MRA and CTA, the ultrasonic diagnosis of arterial stenosis has the advantages of non-trauma and convenience [8]. However, the disadvantage of this method lies in the scattering and echo of ultrasonic signals in human body propagation, which brings certain difficulty to the measurement and relies on the rich experience of operators [9], because the diagnostic accuracy of this method is affected by the Doppler angle of maladjustment, the position and size of the sampling body, the pulse repetition frequency, and the gain setting and other device parameters [10,11]. In addition, MRA and CTA will produce harmful x-rays to physicians, and excessive radiation can damage the activity of human cells [12]. Therefore, it is urgent to find a diagnostic device and method that is harmless to doctors, convenient to use, and takes into account the advantages of existing technologies.
As is known to all, there is an inverse mathematical relationship between blood flow and arterial sectional area, so it is feasible to predict arterial stenosis by measuring blood flow. Traditional blood flow measurement methods include injection tracer method, volume method, impedance method, and the thermal dilution method [12,13,14,15]. The accuracy of these detection methods is low, the operation is complex, and will cause damage to the human body. At present, the commonly used clinical methods include ultrasonic Doppler method, magnetic resonance imaging method, etc. The Ultrasonic Doppler method is to use the Doppler effect of ultrasound to measure blood flow velocity [16]. However, the disadvantage of this method lies in the scattering and echo of ultrasonic signals in the propagation of human body, which brings certain difficulties to the measurement [17]. Magnetic resonance imaging is an imaging technology that measures the velocity of liquid flow by using the phase change of proton signal collected by magnetic resonance due to liquid flow [18]. However, it has its own shortcomings, such as slow imaging speed, and the acquisition of high-quality images depends on the rich experience of operators [19].
Recently, many researchers have made some progress in measuring the flow of uniformly conductive liquid based on electromagnetic induction. Raymond O. Webilor ’work described a novel dual-frequency inductive flow tomography (IFT) system, which relied on the use of a multi-electrode electromagnetic flow meter (EMFM). This flow meter is currently capable of imaging the velocity profile of the conducting continuous phase of both single phase and highly asymmetric multiphase flows ten times every second [20]. László E Kollár’ work improved the previous velocity profile reconstruction method and made it suitable for both axisymmetric and asymmetric flows [21]. X. Li’ work presented a novel finite element procedure for the solution of the electromagnetic flow meter weight function [22]. In H A Abdul Wahhab’ work, electromagnetic induction technique of measuring void fraction in liquid/gas fuel flow was utilized. The results had been proven that the electromagnetic induction is a feasible technique for the actual measurement of void fraction in a Diesel/CNG (Compressed Natural Gas) fuel flow [23]. Current technologies for measuring fluids based on electromagnetic induction make it possible to measure human blood flow.
In view of the shortcomings of existing blood flow measurement methods, this paper proposed a non-invasive blood flow measurement inversion model based on electromagnetic induction. The model combined the characteristics of blood flow with the principle of electromagnetic induction. In a uniform magnetic field, blood flow will create a steady field of induced potential around the blood vessels. Multiple groups of induced potential differences can be collected from the human skin surface by pairs of electrode sensors. The blood flow measurement matrix was established by using weight function theory and finite element method. Finally, the rate of arterial stenosis was predicted based on the mathematical relationship between blood flow and arterial cross-sectional area. This theoretical measurement model based on electromagnetic sensor to detect the rate of arterial stenosis is not affected by the uneven velocity profile and can predict the rate of arterial stenosis in a non-invasive and economical way. In the future, it can be developed into a beneficial, more convenient for physicians, and non-invasive for patients method for the diagnosis of arterial stenosis.

2. Theory of the Electromagnetic Induction

According to Faraday’s law of induction [24], when a conducting fluid moves through a uniform and static magnetic field B with a velocity v as shown in Figure 1, the charged particles of the fluid experience a force called the Lorentz force. In this case, the electric current density J in the conducting fluid, in the presence of electric and magnetic fields, is given by Ohm’s law:
J = σ ( E C + v × B )
where σ is the local fluid conductivity, E C is electrostatic field, The expression ( v × B ) represents the local induced electric field induced by the fluid motion.
According to the relevant theories of electromagnetic induction [24,25,26,27] and assuming that the conductivity in the flow section is uniform, we can obtain the general partial differential equation (Laplace equation) to measure the electromagnetic induced potential of the fluid with uniform conductivity:
2 U = ( v × B )
Solving this equation, by the application of the appropriate boundary conditions, gives the electrical potential distribution U due to the motion of the fluid in the uniform magnetic field B . Hence, the blood flow information can be reconstructed by obtaining the induction electric potential change.

3. Mathematical Model

3.1. Mathematical Model of Induction Potential Difference

The traditional electromagnetic induction calculation method has a large error when the blood flow velocity of human artery is non-axisymmetric in the flow profile. Based on the weight function theory proposed by Shercliff [28] and the finite element analysis method, the three-dimensional mathematical model of flow induced potential difference proposed by Bevir [29] is simplified into a two-dimensional model in this paper:
Δ U = 0 2 π 0 R W ( r , θ ) v ( r , θ ) r d r d θ
where Δ U is the flow induction potential difference, R is the measured section radius, ( r , θ ) represents the flow position, W ( r , θ ) represents the weight function value of each point on the measured section, and v ( r , θ ) represents the velocity value of each axial point. Since the radius of the human artery is small, the information of the center of the artery section can be approximately expressed as the average information of the entire artery section, and Equation (3) can be further simplified as:
Δ U = W ( r , θ ) v ( r , θ ) A
A is the cross section area of the artery, and the stenosis of the artery will directly reduce the cross section area, thus reducing the induction potential difference. Equation (4) is the theoretical calculation model of induction potential difference. By solving the weight function value of each point, the theoretical value of induction potential difference can be obtained.

3.2. Mathematical Model of Weight Function

Based on Bevir’s three-dimensional mathematical model, the virtual current density vector J v [30] is introduced into the weight function, which is defined as follows:
W = B × J v
where B is the magnetic flux density vector, and suppose that the magnetic field only has a non-zero component along the y-axis, that is B = [ 0 , B 0 , 0 ] . Then, the mathematical model of virtual current density vector J v was derived by Laplace equation:
J v = [ J r J θ ] = [ 1 R π n = 1 ( r R ) n 1 ( cos n ( ψ o u t θ ) cos n ( ψ i n θ ) ) 1 R π n = 1 ( r R ) n 1 ( sin n ( ψ o u t θ ) sin n ( ψ i n θ ) ) ]
Combined with Equations (5) and (6), the weight function only has a unique non-zero component along the z-axis, and its mathematical model is as follows:
W ( r , θ ) = B 0 R π n = 1 ( r R ) n 1 [ cos ( n ψ o u t ( n 1 ) θ ) cos ( n ψ i n ( n 1 ) θ ) ]
where ψ i n and ψ o u t , respectively, represent the virtual current inflow and outflow angle, namely the polar coordinate angle of the measured potential and the reference potential in the actual measurement. By selecting different values of ψ i n and ψ o u t , multiple groups of induced potential differences can be obtained. From the above equation, it can be seen that the weight function value is only related to the size of magnetic field, measured section size and measured potential position, and has nothing to do with the inherent characteristics of the fluid.

3.3. Blood Flow Volume Inversion Model

The schematic diagram of arterial blood flow measurement principle is shown in Figure 2. The artery is approximately viewed as a small channel within the measured section, and the blood flow Q through the measured section has a linear relationship with the area:
Q = v A = v π h j 2
Substitute Equation (8) into Equation (4) to obtain the basic formula for arterial blood flow inversion:
Q j = W i j - 1 Δ U i
where Δ U i is the flow induction potential difference at the i t h electrode, W i j represents the weight function of the area of the j t h artery at the i t h electrode, and Q j is the flow rate of the j t h artery.
Assuming that there are i + 1 electrodes and j arteries for the actual measurement, Equation (9) is converted into a multidimensional matrix form for analysis and calculation:
( Q 1 Q j ) = ( W 11 W 1 j W i 1 W i j ) 1 ( Δ U 1 Δ U i )
or:
Q = W 1 U
Equation (11) is the blood flow volume inversion model. Where U is the input vector, Q is the output vector, and W - 1 is the inversion matrix composed of i × j weight function values. But in fact that W is an approximate singular matrix, the direct inverse calculation results have a large error. In this paper, the inversion of W was performed using a Tikhonov regularization technique involving singular value decomposition (SVD) of W .
The arterial blood flow information can be reconstructed through Equation (11), and the degree of arterial stenosis can be approximately predicted by comparing the arterial blood flow with the normal arterial blood flow, and the stenosis rate can be calculated as follows:
δ j = ( 1 Q j Q 0 ) × 100 %
where Q j is the blood flow value of the j t h artery, Q 0 is the normal arterial blood flow, and δ j is the stenosis rate of the j t h artery.
In summary, if the arterial stenosis changes, the arterial blood flow will change, then, the electromagnetic induction potential will change in a uniform magnetic field. Therefore, we can obtain the inductive potential difference by measuring, and calculate the arterial blood flow information by the blood flow inversion model. Finally, we can predict the rate of arterial stenosis accurately by the mathematical relationship between blood flow and the area of arterial stenosis.

4. Simulation Results and Analysis

4.1. Simulation Model of Blood Flow Potential Difference Measurement

Before the formal simulation experiment, we designed an electromagnetic sensor structure for detecting arterial blood flow and predicting the stenosis rate of upper arm artery based on the theories in Section 2 and Section 3, as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3 mainly includes an electromagnetic sensor and cross section of upper arm of human body. Electromagnetic sensors consist mainly of a set of Helmholtz Coils used to generate a uniform magnetic field and 16 electrodes (e0, e1 ... e15) used to detect potential differences in the surface of the skin. The cross section of the upper arm shows the basic components of the upper arm, including skin, fat, muscle, blood vessel wall, blood vessel and bone. The dimensions and positions of these physiological tissues adopted in the simulation have been indicated in Figure 3, and the approximate true value of each tissue size is adopted [31].
According to Figure 3, we established a 3D simulation model in COMSOL Multiphysics, as shown in Figure 4.
The current flowing into the Helmholtz Coil generates a uniform magnetic field, and the simulation results are shown in Figure 5.
In Figure 5a, the value range of the color bar is between 0.953–1.02 mT. It can be seen that the magnetic field distribution of the whole measured section is relatively uniform, and the red arrow represents the direction of the magnetic field. Figure 5b shows the distribution curve of magnetic flux density at each point on the x axis. The measured regional coordinate interval in this paper is [−0.035,0.035], within which the magnetic flux density value is basically stable at 1 mT.
In the simulation study in this paper, the blood flow velocity was set as 0.23 m /s, the conductivity was set as 1.09 S/m [32], and the induction potential was obtained by means of 16-electrode measurement, as shown in Figure 6. According to Figure 3, the electrode e0 was taken as the reference potential, denoted as U 0 , and then the potentials of the other measuring electrodes were arranged counterclockwise as U 1 , U 2 ... U 15 and make the difference with U 0 to get 15 induction potential differences as Δ U 1 , Δ U 2 ... Δ U 15 .

4.2. Verification of Blood Flow Volume Inversion Model

In order to verify that the electromagnetic induction measurement method is insensitive to the number and location of blood vessels, three main tests were performed:
  • Test1: Blood flow was injected into the right artery alone
  • Test2: Blood flow was both injected into two arteries simultaneously
  • Test3: Blood flow was both injected into two arteries after they were rotated 45° to the Y-axis
Firstly, the induction potential distribution of the measured section was simulated by COMSOL, as shown in Figure 7.
Then, 15 groups of induction potential differences were extracted, as shown in Figure 8.
According to Figure 8, the induction potential difference obtained in COMSOL is consistent with the theoretical value. The simulated induced potential difference was used for the inverse calculation of blood flow value, and the results are shown in Figure 9:
The results of blood flow reconstruction in the three groups showed that, the blood measurement method based on electromagnetic induction is not sensitive to the number and location of human arteries and blood non-axisymmetric flow, so it can be applied to the blood flow measurement of different individuals, and the error of measurement results is less than 0.1%, which can accurately reconstruct the blood flow information of limb section artery.

4.3. Prediction of Arterial Models with Different Rates of Stenosis

In this section, four typical stenosis artery simulation models were constructed for tests, as shown in Figure 10. The right artery was artery vessels with different rates of stenosis, and the left artery was normal vessels without stenosis, as the reference object.
The same blood flow was injected into each artery, and the induced potential difference was obtained by COMSOL. The simulation results are shown in Figure 11.
The 15 groups of induction potential differences with U0 as the reference potential were extracted, as shown in Figure 12.
As can be seen from Figure 12, the more severe the artery stenosis is, the smaller the amplitude of the induction potential difference will be. The simulated induced potential difference was input into the flow inversion model to obtain the blood flow volume of each artery, as shown in Figure 13.
In Figure 13, the normal arterial blood flow values reconstructed by the four simulation models were basically the same, and the arterial blood flow values with different rates of stenosis decreased with the increase of rates of stenosis. The predicted rates of stenosis is shown in Figure 14.
As can be seen from Figure 14, the predicted rates of arterial stenosis has a good consistency with the expected value, and the higher the rate of stenosis, the higher the prediction accuracy. This proves that the blood flow volume linear inversion model based on electromagnetic induction for predicting the rate of arterial stenosis is feasible.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, a blood flow volume linear inversion model based on electromagnetic sensor for predicting the rate of arterial stenosis is proposed. According to the electromagnetic induction theory, the blood flow through a uniform magnetic field will generate an inductive potential field. The electromagnetic induction potential signal was obtained from the surface of human skin by the electromagnetic sensor, and the blood flow volume inversion matrix was constructed by combining weight function theory and finite element method, and then the blood flow volume of human artery was calculated. Finally, the rate of stenosis was predicted by the relationship between blood flow and arterial cross section area. The model has been verified by COMSOL and MATLAB simulation, and accurate inversion results of blood flow and prediction results of rates of stenosis have been obtained. The results showed that the blood flow volume linear inversion model based on electromagnetic sensor for predicting the rate of arterial stenosis is feasible. The following work will focus on how to determine the exact location of arterial stenosis, which will be of great significance for the diagnosis and treatment of arterial stenosis.

Author Contributions

The presented work is a result of the intellectual contribution of the whole team. D.Y. designed the inversion model and wrote the manuscript; Y.-j.L. and Y.-h.D. built the simulation model and analyzed the simulation results; B.X. guided the simulation experiments and gave some advice. All authors contributed and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation under Grant 51607029.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Available online: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs310/en/ (accessed on 19 May 2019).
  2. Katzen, B.T. Current Status of Digital Angiography in Vascular Imaging. Radiol. Clin. N. Am. 1995, 33, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Lee, H.M.; Wang, Y.; Sostman, H.D. Distal lower extremity arteries: Evaluation with two-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 1998, 207, 505–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Aschenbach, R.; Esser, D. Magnetic resonance angiography for the head and neck region. Hno 2004, 52, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Randoux, B.; Marro, B.; Koskas, F. Carotid artery stenosis: Prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology 2001, 220, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wittram, C.; Kalra, M.K.; Maher, M.M. Acute and chronic pulmonary emboli: Angiography-CT correlation. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2006, 186, S421–S429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yamada, I.; Nakagawa, T.; Himeno, Y. Takayasu arteritis: Evaluation of the thoracic aorta with CT angiography. Radiology 1998, 209, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bertolotti, C.; Qin, Z.; Lamontagne, B. Influence of multiple stenoses on echo-Doppler functional diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease: A numerical and experimental study. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2006, 34, 564–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ubeyli, E.D.; Guler, I. Neural network analysis of internal carotid arterial Doppler signals: Predictions of stenosis and occlusion. Expert Syst. Appl. 2003, 35, 405–420. [Google Scholar]
  10. Teodorescu, V.; Gustavson, S.; Schanzer, H. Duplex Ultrasound Evaluation of Hemodialysis Access: A Detailed Protocol. Int. J. Nephrol. 2012, 2012, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lui, E.Y.L.; Steinman, A.H.; Cobbold, R.S.C.; Johnston, K.W. Human factors as a source of error in peak Doppler velocity measurement. J. Vasc. Surg. 2005, 42, e1–e972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Maeda, K.; Mies, G.; Olah, L. Quantitative measurement of local cerebral blood flow in the anesthetized mouse using intraperitoneal [C-14]iodoantipyrine injection and final arterial heart blood sampling. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2000, 20, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Delille, J.P.; Slanetz, P.J.; Yeh, E.D. Breast cancer: Regional blood flow and blood volume measured with magnetic susceptibility-based MR imaging–Initial results. Radiology 2002, 223, 558–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hametner, B.; Weber, T.; Mayer, C. Calculation of arterial characteristic impedance: A comparison using different blood flow models. Math. Comput. Model. Dyn. Syst. 2013, 19, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Krivitski, N.M.; MacGibbon, D.; Gleed, R.D. Accuracy of dilution techniques for access flow measurement during hemodialysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1998, 31, 502–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gawlikowski, M.; Lewandowski, M.; Nowicki, A. The Application of Ultrasonic Methods to Flow Measurement and Detection of Microembolus in Heart Prostheses. Acta Phys. Pol. A 2013, 124, 417–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schorer, R.; Badoual, A.; Bastide, B. A feasability study of color flow doppler vectorization for automated blood flow monitoring. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 2017, 31, 1167–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wu, K.J.; Gregory, T.S.; Boland, B.L. Magnetic resonance conditional paramagnetic choke for suppression of imaging artifacts during magnetic resonance imaging. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part h J. Eng. Med. 2018, 232, 597–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Alsop, D.C.; Detre, J.A. Multisection cerebral blood flow MR imaging with continuous arterial spin labeling. Radiology 1998, 208, 410–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Webilor, R.O.; Lucas, G.P.; Agolom, M.O. Fast imaging of the velocity profile of the conducting continuous phase in multiphase flows using an electromagnetic flowmeter. Flow Meas. Instrum. 2018, 64, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kollar, L.E.; Lucas, G.P.; Meng, Y. Reconstruction of velocity profiles in axisymmetric and asymmetric flows using an electromagnetic flow meter. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2015, 26, 055301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, X. A Novel Numerical Approach for Solving Weight Function of Electromagnetic Flow Meter. Mapan-J. Metrol. Soc. India 2019, 30, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wahhab, H.A.A.; Aziz, A.R.A.; Al-Kayiem, H.H. Application of Electromagnetic Induction Technique to Measure the Void Fraction in Oil/Gas Two Phase Flow. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Mechanical, Manufacturing and Process Plant Engineering (ICMMPE), Penang, Malaysia, 22–23 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
  24. Galili, I.; Kaplan, D.; Lehavi, Y. Teaching Faraday’s law of electromagnetic induction in an introductory physics course. Am. J. Phys. 2006, 74, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chemin, J.Y. Theorems of unicity for the tridimensional Navier-Stokes system. J. D Anal. Math. 1999, 77, 27–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Imura, T.; Hori, Y. Unified Theory of Electromagnetic Induction and Magnetic Resonant Coupling. Electr. Eng. Jpn 2017, 199, 58–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Boykin, T.B.; Luisier, M.; Klimeck, G. Current density and continuity in discretized models. Eur. J. Phys. 2010, 31, 1077–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shercliff, J.A. The Theory of Electromagnetic Flow-Measurement; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1962; pp. 472–477. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bevir, M. The theory of induced voltage electromagnetic flowmeters. J. Fluid Mech. 1970, 43, 577590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mita, K. Virtual probability current associated with the spin. Am. J. Phys. 2000, 68, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cheng, Z.; WOOD, N.B.; GIBBS, R.G.J. Geometric and Flow Features of Type B Aortic Dissection: Initial Findings and Comparison of Medically Treated and Stented Cases. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2015, 43, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abdalla, S.; Al-ameer, S.S.; Al-Magaishi, S.H. Electrical properties with relaxation through human blood. Biomicrofluidics 2010, 4, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The schematic diagram of induced potential.
Figure 1. The schematic diagram of induced potential.
Sensors 19 03006 g001
Figure 2. The schematic diagram of arterial blood flow measurement principle.
Figure 2. The schematic diagram of arterial blood flow measurement principle.
Sensors 19 03006 g002
Figure 3. The basic structure of electromagnetic sensor used to predict arterial stenosis rate.
Figure 3. The basic structure of electromagnetic sensor used to predict arterial stenosis rate.
Sensors 19 03006 g003
Figure 4. The basic model of simulation measurement: (a) 3D view; (b) X-Y plane view.
Figure 4. The basic model of simulation measurement: (a) 3D view; (b) X-Y plane view.
Sensors 19 03006 g004
Figure 5. The uniform magnetic field distribution in the section was measured: (a) Uniform magnetic field distribution; (b) magnetic flux density at each point on the X-axis.
Figure 5. The uniform magnetic field distribution in the section was measured: (a) Uniform magnetic field distribution; (b) magnetic flux density at each point on the X-axis.
Sensors 19 03006 g005
Figure 6. The position of the measured induced potential.
Figure 6. The position of the measured induced potential.
Sensors 19 03006 g006
Figure 7. The induction potential distribution of the measured section in different test conditions.
Figure 7. The induction potential distribution of the measured section in different test conditions.
Sensors 19 03006 g007
Figure 8. The difference of potential in different test conditions.
Figure 8. The difference of potential in different test conditions.
Sensors 19 03006 g008
Figure 9. The difference of potential in different test conditions.
Figure 9. The difference of potential in different test conditions.
Sensors 19 03006 g009
Figure 10. The simulation models of arterial with different rates of stenosis: (a) Rate of stenosis: 25%; (b) rate of stenosis: 50%; (c) rate of stenosis: 75%; and (d) rate of stenosis: 100%.
Figure 10. The simulation models of arterial with different rates of stenosis: (a) Rate of stenosis: 25%; (b) rate of stenosis: 50%; (c) rate of stenosis: 75%; and (d) rate of stenosis: 100%.
Sensors 19 03006 g010
Figure 11. The induction potential profiles of arteries with different rates of stenosis: (a) Rate of stenosis: 25%; (b) rate of stenosis: 50%; (c) rate of stenosis: 75%; and (d) rate of stenosis:100%.
Figure 11. The induction potential profiles of arteries with different rates of stenosis: (a) Rate of stenosis: 25%; (b) rate of stenosis: 50%; (c) rate of stenosis: 75%; and (d) rate of stenosis:100%.
Sensors 19 03006 g011
Figure 12. Induction potential difference distribution at different rates of stenosis.
Figure 12. Induction potential difference distribution at different rates of stenosis.
Sensors 19 03006 g012
Figure 13. Inverse results of blood flow in arterial models with different rates of stenosis.
Figure 13. Inverse results of blood flow in arterial models with different rates of stenosis.
Sensors 19 03006 g013
Figure 14. Prediction results of rates of stenosis in different arterial models.
Figure 14. Prediction results of rates of stenosis in different arterial models.
Sensors 19 03006 g014

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, D.; Liu, Y.-j.; Xu, B.; Duo, Y.-h. A Blood Flow Volume Linear Inversion Model Based on Electromagnetic Sensor for Predicting the Rate of Arterial Stenosis. Sensors 2019, 19, 3006. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19133006

AMA Style

Yang D, Liu Y-j, Xu B, Duo Y-h. A Blood Flow Volume Linear Inversion Model Based on Electromagnetic Sensor for Predicting the Rate of Arterial Stenosis. Sensors. 2019; 19(13):3006. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19133006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Dan, Yan-jun Liu, Bin Xu, and Yun-hui Duo. 2019. "A Blood Flow Volume Linear Inversion Model Based on Electromagnetic Sensor for Predicting the Rate of Arterial Stenosis" Sensors 19, no. 13: 3006. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19133006

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop