Next Article in Journal
N-(3-chlorophenethyl)-4-nitrobenzamide
Previous Article in Journal
(2R,4aS,6aS,12bR,14aS,14bR)-N-(2-(2-(2-(2-Azidoethoxy)ethoxy)ethoxy)ethyl)-10-hydroxy-2,4a,6a,9,12b,14a-hexamethyl-11-oxo-1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,6a,11,12b,13,14,14a,14b-tetradecahydropicene-2-carboxamide
 
 
Short Note
Peer-Review Record

1,4-Diiodotetrafluorobenzene 3,5-di-(pyridin-4-yl)-1,2,4-thiadiazole <1/1>

Molbank 2024, 2024(2), M1801; https://doi.org/10.3390/M1801
by Enrico Podda 1,2,*, Anna Pintus 1, Vito Lippolis 1, Francesco Isaia 1, Alexandra M. Z. Slawin 3, Cameron L. Carpenter-Warren 3, John Derek Woollins 4 and Maria Carla Aragoni 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Molbank 2024, 2024(2), M1801; https://doi.org/10.3390/M1801
Submission received: 15 February 2024 / Revised: 24 March 2024 / Accepted: 26 March 2024 / Published: 1 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Structure Determination)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The present Short Note reports on a new halogen-bonded cocrystal obtained from a dipyridyl-thiadiazole derivative and 1,4-diiodotetrafluorobenzene. The crystal structure of the cocrystal is determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction and also characterized by FT-IR spectra. The structural work is performed with high level of accuracy and the results are clearly presented.

My only concern is the description of the present halogen-bonded cocrystal as a ‘charge-transfer’ adduct. According to Politzer’s studies, halogen bond is normally described as an electrostatic interaction, though Valence Bond calculations by Shaik and coworkers have demonstrated that charge-transfer contributions can be relevant particularly for strong halogen bonds. This should not the case for the present cocrystal, as appears from the reported N…I distances.

Minor remarks:

1)      Literature on halogen bond is totally lacking. Some pioneering works on this interaction and its use to create self-assembled supramolecular architectures, particularly those based on the classical dipyridyl scaffold, should be mentioned.

2)      The formation of the present cocrystal cannot be described as a reaction.

3)      Line 79: in the formula of compound 1 L2 should be L1.

4)      Line 93: the CSD version should be specified.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop