Next Article in Journal
Bioactive Compounds and Potential Health Benefits through Cosmetic Applications of Cherry Stem Extract
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Characterization and Inhibition of a Novel Stress-Induced Mitochondrial Protecting Role for Misfolded TrkAIII in Human SH-SY5Y Neuroblastoma Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Hypervolemia in Dialysis Patients Impairs STAT3 Signaling and Upregulates miR-142-3p: Effects on IL-10 and IL-6
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inhibition of PRMT1 Suppresses the Growth of U87MG-Derived Glioblastoma Stem Cells by Blocking the STAT3 Signaling Pathway
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 25
Issue 7
10.3390/ijms25073721
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Infant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia—New Therapeutic Opportunities

by
Marika Kulczycka
1,
Kamila Derlatka
1,
Justyna Tasior
1,
Maja Sygacz
1,
Monika Lejman
2,† and
Joanna Zawitkowska
3,*,†
1
Student Scientific Society of Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Transplantology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
2
Independent Laboratory of Genetic Diagnostics, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
3
Department of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Transplantology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(7), 3721; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073721
Submission received: 26 February 2024 / Revised: 22 March 2024 / Accepted: 25 March 2024 / Published: 27 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research Progress in Molecular and Cellular Therapy of Cancer)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Infant ALL) is a kind of pediatric ALL, diagnosed in children under 1 year of age and accounts for less than 5% of pediatric ALL. In the infant ALL group, two subtypes can be distinguished: KMT2A-rearranged ALL, known as a more difficult to cure form and KMT2A- non-rearranged ALL with better survival outcomes. As infants with ALL have lesser treatment outcomes compared to older children, it is pivotal to provide novel treatment approaches. Progress in the development of molecularly targeted therapies and immunotherapy presents exciting opportunities for potential improvement. This comprehensive review synthesizes the current literature on the epidemiology, clinical presentation, molecular genetics, and therapeutic approaches specific to ALL in the infant population.

1. Introduction

Infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) constitutes a particular subgroup of malignancy referred to children younger than 1 year at the time of diagnosis. This group of patients is assessed as having the worst survival rate and outcome factors determining the prognosis. It constitutes 1% of all pediatric ALL. The majority of cases concern ALL B lineage, while T lineage and mixed phenotype (MPAL) are only a small percentage. In the survival prognosis of the infants’ leukemia, the age of the patients is not insignificant. ALL, contrary to acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML), is characterized by lower infant outcomes compared to older children with similar cytogenetic features. Moreover, infant leukemia is distinguished by aggressive symptoms, high-risk cytogenetic features associated with chemotherapy resistance, and high relapse rates as well as elevated rates of therapy-related toxicities and long-term effects [1,2,3]. In particular, those types with KMT2A-rearranged ALL are characterized by hyperleukocytosis, a relatively high incidence of central nervous system (CNS) involvement, an aggressive course with early relapse, and early relapses resulting in poor prognosis [4]. The researchers noticed that different types of rearrangements in the KMT2A gene, very high white blood cell count, an age of younger than 6 months, and a poor response to the prednisone prophase were independently associated with inferior outcomes [5]. Moreover, patients with congenital ALL (diagnosed in the first month of life) have been found to have a significantly higher relapse rate [6]. Treatment is based on multidrug chemotherapy consisting of found phases: cytoreductive prophase, induction, consolidation of remission, and maintenance therapy commonly with the subsequent hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The use of HCT in infant leukemia is uncertain due to the fact that only a small minority of KMT2A-r patients at high risk of relapse (very young age (<6 months old), very high WBCs (≥300,000/μL), and persistence of minimal residual disease (MRD) appear to benefit from HCT in first remission. Currently, innovative therapies with the modulation of epigenetic factors or signaling pathways and immunotherapy are being tested [3,7]. In this publication, our focus centers on prognostic factors, molecular basis, conventional and novel therapies with its aftereffects, as well as future directions.

2. Subtypes of Infant ALL

Based on the molecular background, two subtypes of Infant ALL are distinguished: KMT2A-rearranged (KMT2A-r) and non-rearranged KMT2A (wild type KMT2A) [1].

2.1. KMT2A-r Subtype

KMT2A-r is the most common subtype, present in up to 80% of Infant ALL cases [8] It involves a rearrangement of the histone lysine methyltransferase 2A (KMT2A) gene, located on the chromosome 11q23 [9]. Before the HUGO nomenclature change, KMT2A was named the mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene [10]. The domain structure of wild-type KMT2A is shown in Figure 1.
KMT2A-r is caused by multiple genomic lesions, including internal deletions, tandem duplications, and amplifications, yet predominantly, it is a result of a chromosomal translocation that leads to fusion of the KMT2AN subunit with the C-terminal subunit from one of more than 90 identified partner genes [4,11]. The structure of a fusion protein is presented in Figure 2.
The most commonly identified KMT2A fusion partners and frequency of their occurrence in Infant ALL are shown in Table 1 [10,11].
The KMT2A gene encodes a protein which is a transcriptional coactivator playing an essential role in the regulation of gene expression during normal hematopoiesis and stem cell differentiation [12]. Regulation of gene transcription involves histone 3 lysine 4 (H3K4) methyltransferase activity, which is controlled by the C-terminal SET domain (Figure 1). The KMT2A fusion protein preserves the ability to bind DNA and proteins as the MBM, AT hook, and CxxC domains are retained. Nevertheless, the fusion protein does not include, partially or completely, the regulatory BRD and PHD, repressive RD2 domains, and loses the entire KMT2AC subunit with the SET domain (Figure 2), which leads to epigenetic dysregulation and potentially initiates leukemogenesis [9,13].
It has been shown that KMT2A rearrangements are acquired in hematopoietic precursors during prenatal development [14]. Maternal exposure to environmental DNA topoisomerase II (DNAt2) inhibitors during pregnancy may increase the risk of KMT2A-r leukemia in infants [15].
In approximately 50% of cases of infant KMT2A-r ALL, PI3K-RAS mutation can be detected. It is assumed that this may be an independent adverse prognostic factor, however, the exact significance of this mutation is unclear [9,16].
The typical KMT2A-r ALL immunophenotype has the CD19- positive, CD10-negative B-lymphoblastic cells, often co-expressed with myeloid-related antigens (for example, CD15, CD33, and CD68 antigens). This suggests a highly immature lymphoid progenitor origin [4,17].

2.2. Non-Rearranged KMT2A Subtype

The second Infant ALL subtype, known as non-rearranged KMT2A, accounts for approximately 20% of all cases of infant ALL. This variant typically occurs in late infancy, presents a more mature CD10-positive B-cell precursor phenotype, shares similar cytogenetic abnormalities with ALL in older children, and is associated with better outcomes [18,19].
In 20% of cases of infant wild type KMT2A ALL, rearrangement of the PAX5 gene is found and is related with adverse outcomes. On the contrary, NUTM1 rearrangement, present in around 20–30% of cases, has been shown to relate with a better prognosis [20,21].
The majority, over 90% of the wild-type KMT2A ALL cases, occur as CD10-positive B-lymphoblastic leukemia [21] and 4–10% as T-lymphoblastic leukemia [22].

3. The Past and the Present of Infant ALL Treatment

3.1. First Infant-Specific Trials

The therapeutic approach in infant ALL is a major challenge and differs from the childhood ALL treatment [23].
The first clinical trials associated with childhood ALL commenced in the 1950s and have expeditiously shown that infants less than 1 year of age are associated with unfavorable prognosis. Hence, the intensification of a conventional chemotherapy in this age group has been required [24,25]. Consecutive intensification of a conventional chemotherapy in infant ALL patients resulted in drug-related toxicities and led to equalization in survival rate [26].
Thus, new clinical trials on infants based on childhood ALL protocols have begun. Researchers demonstrated that the inferior outcomes are related with features, such as the presence of KMT2A rearrangement, hyperleukocytosis at presentation, absence of CD10 antigen, age < 6 months at diagnosis, and poor response to initial prednisone therapy [25].

3.2. Current Collaborative Groups

At present, there are three large groups focused on performing clinical trials specific to infant ALL: the Children’s Oncology Group (COG), the Japanese Pediatric Leukemia/Lymphoma Study Group (JPLSG), and the Interfant Study Group [25].
As early relapse within 6–9 months of diagnosis is common in infant ALL patients, the COG P9407 trial was designed to deliver shortened, intensified therapy with the elimination of age- and weight-related dose reductions for most chemotherapy agents aiming to improve the event-free survival rate (EFS). P9407 was also modified three times for induction toxicity resulting in three cohorts of therapy. Age ≤ 90 days at diagnosis resulted the most important prognostic factor with the 5-year EFS of 15.5%, compared to 48.5% for those >90 days. Despite the novel approach, EFS remained less than 50% overall in KMT2A-r ALL patients [27].
The Japanese Pediatric Leukemia/Lymphoma Study Group conducted two consecutive studies on infant ALL, named MLL96 and MLL98. Patients with KMT2A-r ALL were supposed to receive allogeneic HCT (allo-HCT) at their first remission after intense chemotherapy. A high rate of early relapse before the HCT resulted in unsatisfactory outcomes. Nevertheless, infants who received HCT at their first remission reached 3-year post-transplantation EFS of 64.4% [28,29].
Based on these findings, the MLL03 trial was performed. Intensification of the pre-transplantation chemotherapy with high-dose cytarabine and assignment of patients to receive HCT in the early post-remission phase resulted in a high rate (90%) of patients able to undergo HCT in their first remission. However, high induction toxicity, and the relevant number of patients who still relapsed after HCT resulted in a 4-year EFS rate of 43.2% [30]. The latest MLL-10 trial of the JPLSG showed a remarkable improvement. Treatment included intensive chemotherapy and the limited indication for HCT to only those from the high-risk group (according to KMT2A status, age, and presence of central nervous system leukemia). The EFS rate for patients with KMT2A-r ALL from intermediate and high-risk groups was 66.2% [18].
The Interfant Study Group conducted a crucial multicenter randomized clinical trial named Interfant-99. A total of 482 infant patients aged 0–12 months were enrolled between the years of 1999 and 2005. Consequently, they were classified into standard- and high-risk groups based on their response to 1 week of daily systemic prednisone and one intrathecal dose of methotrexate. The treatment hybrid 2-year protocol was based on a framework of a standard ALL treatment approach, including phases of a four-drug induction with the addition of variable doses of cytarabine and methotrexate, consolidation chemotherapy (MARAM), a reinduction phase (OCTADD), an intensification phase (VIMARAM), and three maintenance phases. High-risk patients could also receive, if a donor was available, allo-HCT after the reinduction phase. The aims of the study were to assess the outcome of a hybrid treatment schedule in infants with ALL and to assess the efficacy of a late intensification course with high doses of both cytarabine and methotrexate between the reinduction and maintenance phases. The study demonstrated that people treated with the hybrid protocol had higher event-free survival (EFS) than most reported outcomes for the treatment of infants. It also resulted in showing that the late intensification of chemotherapy did not benefit patients [5]. The overall 5-year EFS rate was 46.1% and the survival was 55.2% for the whole study cohort. Large cohort of infants with a presence of KMT2A rearrangement showed that only patients with additional unfavorable prognostic features (age less than 6 month, either white blood cells (WBC) counts ≥ 300 g/L or poor response to steroids at day 8) appeared to benefit from allogenic HCT [31].
In another study, 99 infants treated with the Interfant-99 protocol were comprised to prognose the significance of minimal residual disease (MRD) in infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. MRD was analyzed by PCR technique analyzing different data: rearranged immunoglobulin genes, T-cell receptor genes, and KMT2A genes at various time points (TP) during therapy. Higher MRD levels at the end of induction and consolidation (TP2 and TP3) were significantly associated with lower disease-free survival. Further analysis of TP2 and TP3 allowed the determination of three patients’ groups with different research results, as follows: all MRD-high-risk patients (MRD levels > or = 10(−4) at TP3; 26% of patients) relapsed, MRD-low-risk patients (MRD level < 10(−4) at both TP2 and TP3) constituted 44% of patients and showed a relapse rate of only 13%, whereas the remaining patients (MRD-medium-risk patients; 30% of patients) had a relapse rate of 31%. This analysis proved that MRD is an important prognostic factor and its diagnostics has added value for recognition of risk groups in infant ALL and that MRD analysis can be useful in establishing treatment interventions in infant ALL as well [32].
Based on an Interfant-99 study, researchers performed another Interfant-06 trial. A total of 651 infants with ALL were enrolled and divided into low risk (non-rearranged KMT2A), high risk (presence of a KMT2A-rearrangement and age < 6 months at diagnosis, with a WBC count 300 × 109/L or more at diagnosis or a poor prednisone response), and medium risk (all other patients with KMT2A-r ALL). Patients in the medium and high-risk groups were randomly assigned to receive the lymphoid course low-dose cytosine arabinoside [araC], 6-mercaptopurine, cyclophosphamide (IB) or experimental myeloid cycles, namely araC, daunorubicin, etoposide (ADE), and mitoxantrone, araC, etoposide (MAE). The principal aims were to assess early intensification with post-induction myeloid-type chemotherapy to improve outcomes and prevent early relapse and to compare the results with Interfant-99, where the late intensification was performed. The study also differs from Interfant-99 due to the removal of dexamethasone and vincristine during maintenance. The new treatment approach did not significantly improve outcomes for infant ALL compared with the lymphoid-type course IB. There was also no significant difference in the 6-year EFS when comparing Interfant-06 to Interfant-99 (46.1% in both trials) [33].

4. Novel Therapies

The challenges in treating ALL in infants are multifaceted. Delivering effective chemotherapy requires dose modification due to developmental factors impacting drug pharmacokinetics differently than other age groups. Treatment-related toxicities, such as perineal irritation, mucositis, and skin breakdown, are dose-limiting issues. These pose serious infection risks, requiring aggressive preventive measures like antibiotic prophylaxis and surveillance for viral or fungal infections. Infant ALL survivors face significant long-term complications, with growth failure being the most common. This emphasizes the need to explore innovative therapies to mitigate toxicities associated with traditional chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [34,35].

4.1. Blinatumomab

Blinatumomab, a CD3-CD19 bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE), comprises two recombinant single-chain variable fragments. By connecting CD19-positive B cells to CD3-positive T cells, blinatumomab activates T cells, releasing granzymes and perforins, which triggers a signaling pathway. Ultimately, leukemic B cells undergo destruction through caspase activation and apoptosis [36,37,38,39].
Examining blinatumomab in children under 18 with relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL, an open-label study conducted a phase 1 dosage escalation followed by a phase 2 part with 6-week treatment cycles. The established recommended dosage of 5/15 µg/m2/d revealed notable outcomes, also among 10 infants (8 with MLL translocations). Within two cycles, 60% of them achieved complete remission, and 40% proceeded to allo-HCT in remission [40,41].
In a different set of clinical reports, blinatumomab was administered to children with MRD-positive ALL, serving as a transitional strategy before undergoing transplantation. This included two infants with ALL who successfully attained a complete MRD response but experienced a relapse after the transplant [42].
A retrospective analysis examined 11 infants diagnosed with B-ALL who were treated with blinatumomab for MRD reduction before allo-HCT. All patients had KMT2A rearrangement. The results showed a 100% partial or complete MRD response rate, with nine patients becoming MRD negative. The median time from commencing blinatumomab to HCT was 51 days. The 3-year EFS and OS post-transplant were 47% and 81%, respectively. Four patients relapsed post-transplant, and one patient with a myeloid lineage switch died of progressive leukemia [43].
The potential efficiency of blinatumomab therapy for infants with ALL, alongside the less-than-optimal outcomes observed in Interfant-06 trial (six-year OS 58.2%) [33], highlight an urgent need for new studies to investigate the possible benefits of a combined approach.
This has led to the initiation of a prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study recruiting infants with KMT2A-r ALL. Patients were treated according to the standard Interfant-06 protocol and those with post-induction M1/M2 marrow received one cycle of blinatumomab. The complete course of blinatumomab was administered to all 28 patients without any treatment interruptions. A complete response with negative MRD was observed in 54%, indicating a tendency towards a higher rate compared to the end of consolidation in the Interfant-06 study (40%). After a 26.3 months follow-up period, the two-year EFS was 81.6%, whereas the two-year OS reached 93%. According to Interfant-06, the same criteria were 49.4% and 65.8%, respectively. Despite the study’s limited patient population and a relatively short observation period, its outcomes can be deemed a significant success in the treatment of infants with ALL using blinatumomab [44]. These findings will be utilized in the Interfant-21 study, where patients will undergo two cycles of blinatumomab before HCT [45].
In another phase 3 clinical trial, infants with ALL are being categorized into three groups: low risk with no KMT2A rearrangements, intermediate risk KMT2-ALL without central nervous system damage, and high risk with central nervous system lesions. For high-risk patients, a combination of blinatumomab and allo-HCT in the first remission has been selected. No results have been posted yet [46].

4.2. CAR-T Cells

CAR-T cell therapy has demonstrated remarkable success in treating pediatric refractory/relapsed B-ALL, significantly improving outcomes for children who may not have responded well to conventional treatments [47]. Infants were initially excluded from studies involving CAR-T cell therapy due to concerns about the heightened risk of toxicity in this age group. Additionally, they have a low circulating blood volume, which poses a challenge for effective apheresis. Problems also include obtaining a sufficient number of T lymphocytes and the potential impairment of their function [48]. Furthermore, reports of lineage switch in KMT2A-r leukemia after CD19-targeted therapy raise concerns about an elevated risk of myeloid leukemia relapse following B-lineage CAR-T cell therapy in this group [49,50].
Quasim et al. created untypical, universal CAR19 (UCART19) cells by using lentiviral transduction of donor cells matched to non-human leukocyte antigens. They simultaneously edited the genes of the T cell receptor’s alpha chain and the CD52 gene loci using an effector nuclease-like transcription activator (TALEN). This bridging therapy was applied to two infants, allowing for a 28-day remission before a subsequent and successful HCT [51,52].
PLAT-02 and PLAT-05 are clinical trials investigating feasibility and efficiency of CD-19 and CD-22 specific CAR-T cells in infants with relapsed/refractory KMT2A-r B-ALL following lymphodepleting chemotherapy. The primary inclusion criterion was a lymphocyte absolute count exceeding ≥100 cells/µL. Among 18 infants, CAR-T cell products were successfully manufactured in 17/18 subjects. Of these, 16/17 were infused, with a median follow-up of 26.9 months. The highest CRS grade observed was 3, affecting 2 out of 15 assessable subjects (13%), while neurotoxicity was restricted to a maximum grade of 2. The majority achieved MRD-negative complete remission (93.3%) by day 21, and estimated the one-year LFS was 66.7%, while the one-year OS was 71.4% Outcomes are favorable due to the comparable toxicity and MRD-CR rates observed in non-infant ALL cases [53].
In another study, 13 infants treated with tisagenlecleucel achieved a two-year RFS of 67% and OS of 65%. Nevertheless, it has been shown to have a higher risk of relapses due to myeloid leukemia switch [54,55].
Results from a retrospective study of 14 infants suggest that patients who were in morphologic remission with or without MRD at the time of infusion were able to achieve and largely maintain MRD-free remission after CAR-T. In turn, those children who at the time of infusion were in an advanced stage of the disease (bone marrow > M1) did not respond to this therapy [56].

4.3. Menin Inhibitors

Menin inhibitors are designed to bind KMT2A pocket on menin, preventing the formation of the menin-KMT2A fusion protein complex leading to a rapid inhibition of its expression. This interaction is critical for the abnormal gene patterns observed in leukemia with KMT2A rearrangements [57,58].
Spectacular results of menin inhibitors were shown in mouse models with KMT2A-r ALL xenografts, wherein leukemia burden was dramatically reduced offering the potential for prolonged remission even with the use of a single agent [59]. This led to the development of a clinical trial aimed at assessing the efficacy of SNDX-5613. They are recruiting patients, including infants, with relapsed/refractory ALL, particularly those with KMT2A gene rearrangements, or NPM1 mutations [60]. Another clinical study utilizing the SNDX-5613 is currently in development, specifically recruiting infants and children under the age of 6 [61].

4.4. BCL-2 Inhibitors

BCL-2 is a protein that plays a crucial role in regulating apoptosis processes. Studies have shown that KMT2A-r ALL blasts exhibit an overexpression of BCL-2, potentially leading to the heightened resistance of cancer cells against programmed death [62]. Therefore, targeting BCL-2 proves to be an appealing strategy, as evidenced by significant responses observed in infant patient-derived xenografts with KMT2A rearrangements following treatment with venetoclax [63,64].
Based on this evidence, a phase 1, open-label clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of venetoclax in monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy in pediatric and young adult patients. Among the 11 children with ALL enrolled in the study, there were also infants included. The ORR was 27% in both parts. The most common treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were vomiting, diarrhea, hypokalemia, increased ALT, febrile neutropenia, and anemia. Notably, two patients achieved complete remission with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi) after adding 1 or 2 cycles of venetoclax in combination with dexamethasone-vincristine-peg-asparaginase. Additionally, three patients demonstrated MRD negativity, indicating a positive treatment outcome [65,66].

4.5. FLT3 Inihibitors

FLT3 is a gene encoding a tyrosine kinase receptor that regulates the growth and differentiation of hematopoietic cells. In the context of ALL development, this results in uncontrolled proliferation and survival of leukemic cells. FLT3 mutations are more typical for AML, but they can manifest in a specific subset of ALL cases [67]. While activating mutations in FLT3 are relatively rare in infants suffering from ALL, the overexpression of wild-type FLT3, causing autoactivation, is a notable characteristic and high-risk factor in KMT2A-r leukemias [68].
A phase 3 clinical trial conducted by the Children’s Oncology Group recruited patients with ALL under 366 days of age. The influence of the integrating FLT3 inhibitor lestaurtinib following previous post-induction chemotherapy on EFS was examined. However, the results showed no significant difference in the 3-year EFS between infants treated with chemotherapy plus lestaurtinib (n = 67.36 ± 6%) and those receiving chemotherapy alone (n = 54.39 ± 7%, p = 0.67). Subsequent pharmacodynamic assays proved that patients achieving strong FLT3 inhibition in plasma and those with leukemic cells sensitive to the ex vivo FLT3-inhibition assay achieved a better EFS. A total of 17 patients exhibited both inhibition and sensitivity, resulting in a 3-year EFS of 88 ± 8%. Overall, the study showed that along with optimal patient selection, lestaurtinib added to chemotherapy led to favorable outcomes in the subgroup of infants suffering from KMT2A-r ALL [69].

4.6. Nucleoside Analogues

Clofarabine as a second-generation, purine nucleoside analogue is responsible for orchestrated DNA disruption processes and the promotion of apoptosis in neoplasm cells [70]. A preclinical study investigating the efficiency of nucleoside analogues in infantile, KMT2A-r ALL line cells demonstrated the highest activity of clofarabine. Synergistic cytotoxicity in combination with cytarabine has also been proven. Moreover, clofarabine induced the demethylation of the promoter region in the tumor suppressor gene FHIT (Fragile Histidine Triad), which is typically hypermethylated in infant KMT2A-r ALL [71].
Subsequently, among the 12 infants with ALL enrolled in the phase 3 clinical study, 9 had the KMT2A-r subtype and received a regimen containing clofarabine. The 5-year EFS and OS were estimated at 44.4% and 55.6%, respectively. Six infants initially tested positive for MRD, and four of them attained MRD negativity, while the remaining two exhibited a reduction in MRD levels. At the time of publication, five patients stayed alive and four died due to infection (three) and pulmonary hypertension (one). The results of the study showed that while clofarabine demonstrated efficacy in reducing MRD in infants with KMT2A-r ALL, caution in its upfront use due to significant treatment-related mortality, primarily attributed to grade 5 infections. It suggests contemplating clofarabine as a salvage alternative in case other immunotherapeutic strategies prove ineffective [72]. Novel approaches for infant ALL treatment are visualized in Figure 3. Next generation clinical trials based on new therapeutic strategies are summarized in Table 2.

4.7. Epigenetic Modifiers

KMT2A-r ALL infant cells exhibit abnormal DNA methylation patterns, as revealed by genome-wide methylation studies. Studies suggest that leukemia-specific histone modifications, like H3K79 dimethylation induced by a disruptor of telomeric silencing 1-Like (DOT1L) recruitment in KMT2A fusion proteins, can be effectively controlled by histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors. These findings support the potential use of demethylating agents or HDAC inhibitors to reverse inherent chemotherapy resistance in infant KMT2A-r ALL [77,78,79].
COG created a phase 2, single-arm, pilot trial to assess the safety of incorporating azacitidine into the standard Interfant-06 protocol for infants newly diagnosed with KMT2A-r ALL. A total of 53 infants treated with chemotherapy and at least one course of azacitidine, with a median follow-up 3.8 years, achieved EFS and OS rates of 34.2% and 63.8%, respectively. Treatment failure was observed in six infants. It was proven that EFS significantly correlates with MRD. EFS among infants with any positive MRD was 20.6%, contrasting with the 40.1% EFS for those without MRD. However, the results are not satisfactory, highlighting the need for improvement and further research in new therapies for infants suffering from ALL [74].
The TINI studies are currently testing the feasibility of adding bortezomib (a proteasome inhibitor), and vorinostat (a histone deacetylase inhibitor) to the chemotherapy regimen in infants newly diagnosed with ALL [75,76].

5. Summary

Treatment of infant ALL has faced numerous hurdles. In recent decades, intensification of chemotherapy has improved overall survival outcomes in infant patients with ALL, whereas inferior therapeutic results were strongly related with the KMT2A-r subtype. Furthermore, future studies should consider managing with ALL treatment complications to maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity of the therapy. Better understanding of the infant ALL and worldwide development of immunotherapy led to an increased number of novel treatment options and the next generation of promising clinical trials. Infant ALL still remains a challenge; hence, it is pivotal to continue discovery of new targets and treatment strategies.

Author Contributions

M.L. and J.Z. were responsible for the conception and design of the study; M.K., K.D., J.T. and M.S. were responsible for the acquisition of the literature for the manuscript; M.K., K.D., J.T. and M.S. wrote the original draft of the manuscript; M.S. and M.K were responsible for preparing the figures; J.T. and K.D. were responsible for preparing the tables; M.L. and J.Z. reviewed and edited the manuscript; M.L. and J.Z. supervised the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ibrahimova, A.; Pommert, L.; Breese, E.H. Acute Leukemia in Infants. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2021, 23, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Roberts, I.; Fordham, N.J.; Rao, A.; Bain, B.J. Neonatal leukaemia. Br. J. Haematol. 2018, 182, 170–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Brown, P.; Pieters, R.; Biondi, A. How I treat infant leukemia. Blood 2019, 133, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. El Chaer, F.; Keng, M.; Ballen, K.K. MLL-Rearranged Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Curr. Hematol. Malig. Rep. 2020, 15, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pieters, R.; Schrappe, M.; De Lorenzo, P.; Hann, I.; De Rossi, G.; Felice, M.; Hovi, L.; LeBlanc, T.; Szczepanski, T.; Ferster, A.; et al. A treatment protocol for infants younger than 1 year with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (Interfant-99): An observational study and a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2007, 370, 240–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. van der Linden, M.H.; Valsecchi, M.G.; De Lorenzo, P.; Möricke, A.; Janka, G.; Leblanc, T.M.; Felice, M.; Biondi, A.; Campbell, M.; Hann, I. Outcome of congenital acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on the Interfant-99 protocol. Blood 2009, 114, 3764–3768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Takachi, T.; Watanabe, T.; Miyamura, T.; Moriya Saito, A.; Deguchi, T.; Hori, T.; Yamada, T.; Ohmori, S.; Haba, M.; Aoki, Y.; et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for infants with high-risk KMT2A gene-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood Adv. 2021, 5, 3891–3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Hilden, J.M.; Dinndorf, P.A.; Meerbaum, S.O.; Sather, H.; Villaluna, D.; Heerema, N.A.; McGlennen, R.; Smith, F.O.; Woods, W.G.; Salzer, W.L.; et al. Analysis of prognostic factors of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in infants: Report on CCG 1953 from the Children’s Oncology Group. Blood 2006, 108, 441–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Forgione, M.O.; McClure, B.J.; Eadie, L.N.; Yeung, D.T.; White, D.L. KMT2A rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: Unravelling the genomic complexity and heterogeneity of this high-risk disease. Cancer Lett. 2020, 469, 410–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Meyer, C.; Larghero, P.; Almeida Lopes, B.; Burmeister, T.; Gröger, D.; Sutton, R.; Venn, N.C.; Cazzaniga, G.; Corral Abascal, L.; Tsaur, G.; et al. The KMT2A recombinome of acute leukemias in 2023. Leukemia 2023, 37, 988–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Meyer, C.; Burmeister, T.; Gröger, D.; Tsaur, G.; Fechina, L.; Renneville, A.; Sutton, R.; Venn, N.C.; Emerenciano, M.; Pombo-de-Oliveira, M.S.; et al. The MLL recombinome of acute leukemias in 2017. Leukemia 2018, 32, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Guenther, M.G.; Jenner, R.G.; Chevalier, B.; Nakamura, T.; Croce, C.M.; Canaani, E.; Young, R.A. Global and Hox-specific roles for the MLL1 methyltransferase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 8603–8608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Schneider, P.; Wander, P.; Arentsen-Peters, S.T.C.J.M.; Vrenken, K.S.; Rockx-Brouwer, D.; Adriaanse, F.R.S.; Hoeve, V.; Paassen, I.; Drost, J.; Pieters, R.; et al. CRISPR-Cas9 Library Screening Identifies Novel Molecular Vulnerabilities in KMT2A-Rearranged Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ford, A.M.; Ridge, S.A.; Cabrera, M.E.; Mahmoud, H.; Steel, C.M.; Chan, L.C.; Greaves, M. In utero rearrangements in the trithorax-related oncogene in infant leukaemias. Nature 1993, 363, 358–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Spector, L.G.; Xie, Y.; Robison, L.L.; Heerema, N.A.; Hilden, J.M.; Lange, B.; Felix, C.A.; Davies, S.M.; Slavin, J.; Potter, J.D.; et al. Maternal diet and infant leukemia: The DNA topoisomerase II inhibitor hypothesis: A report from the children’s oncology group. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2005, 14, 651–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pilheden, M.; Ahlgren, L.; Hyrenius-Wittsten, A.; Gonzalez-Pena, V.; Sturesson, H.; Hansen Marquart, H.V.; Lausen, B.; Castor, A.; Pronk, C.J. Duplex Sequencing Uncovers Recurrent Low-frequency Cancer-associated Mutations in Infant and Childhood KMT2A-rearranged Acute Leukemia. Hemasphere 2022, 6, e785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Attarbaschi, A.; Mann, G.; König, M.; Steiner, M.; Strehl, S.; Schreiberhuber, A.; Schneider, B.; Meyer, C.; Marschalek, R.; Borkhardt, A.; et al. Mixed lineage leukemia-rearranged childhood pro-B and CD10-negative pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia constitute a distinct clinical entity. Clin. Cancer Res. 2006, 12, 2988–2994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Tomizawa, D.; Miyamura, T.; Imamura, T.; Watanabe, T.; Moriya Saito, A.; Ogawa, A.; Takahashi, Y.; Hirayama, M.; Taki, T.; Deguchi, T.; et al. A risk-stratified therapy for infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A report from the JPLSG MLL-10 trial. Blood 2020, 136, 1813–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Guest, E.M.; Kairalla, J.A.; Hilden, J.M.; Dreyer, Z.E.; Carroll, A.J.; Heerema, N.A.; Wang, C.Y.; Devidas, M.; Gore, L.; Salzer, W.L.; et al. Outstanding outcomes in infants with KMT2A-germline acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with chemotherapy alone: Results of the Children’s Oncology Group AALL0631 trial. Haematologica 2022, 107, 1205–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Boer, J.M.; Valsecchi, M.G.; Hormann, F.M.; Antić, Ž.; Zaliova, M.; Schwab, C.; Cazzaniga, G.; Arfeuille, C.; Cavé, H.; Attarbaschi, A.; et al. Favorable outcome of NUTM1-rearranged infant and pediatric B cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a collaborative international study. Leukemia 2021, 35, 2978–2982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Fazio, G.; Bardini, M.; De Lorenzo, P.; Grioni, A.; Quadri, M.; Pedace, L.; Corral Abascal, L.; Palamini, S.; Palmi, C.; Buldini, B.; et al. Recurrent genetic fusions redefine MLL germ line acute lymphoblastic leukemia in infants. Blood 2021, 137, 1980–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tomizawa, D. Evolution and optimization of therapies for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in infants. Int. J. Hematol. 2023, 117, 162–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Brown, P. Treatment of infant leukemias: Challenge and promise. Hematol. Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program. 2013, 2013, 596–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. George, S.L.; Fernbach, D.J.; Vietti, T.J.; Sullivan, M.P.; Lane, D.M.; Haggard, M.E.; Berry, D.H.; Lonsdale, D.; Komp, D. Factors influencing survival in pediatric acute leukemia. The SWCCSG experience, 1958–1970. Cancer 1973, 32, 1542–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kotecha, R.S.; Gottardo, N.G.; Kees, U.R.; Cole, C.H. The evolution of clinical trials for infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood Cancer J. 2014, 4, e200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Silverman, L.B.; McLean, T.W.; Gelber, R.D.; Donnelly, M.J.; Gilliland, D.G.; Tarbell, N.J.; Sallan, S.E. Intensified therapy for infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Results from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Consortium. Cancer 1997, 80, 2285–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dreyer, Z.E.; Hilden, J.M.; Jones, T.L.; Devidas, M.; Winick, N.J.; Willman, C.L.; Harvey, R.C.; Chen, I.M.; Behm, F.G.; Pullen, J.; et al. Intensified chemotherapy without SCT in infant ALL: Results from COG P9407 (Cohort 3). Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2015, 62, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Isoyama, K.; Eguchi, M.; Hibi, S.; Kinukawa, N.; Ohkawa, H.; Kawasaki, H.; Kosaka, Y.; Oda, T.; Oda, M.; Okamura, T.; et al. Risk-directed treatment of infant acute lymphoblastic leukaemia based on early assessment of MLL gene status: Results of the Japan Infant Leukaemia Study (MLL96). Br. J. Haematol. 2002, 118, 999–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kosaka, Y.; Koh, K.; Kinukawa, N.; Wakazono, Y.; Isoyama, K.; Oda, T.; Hayashi, Y.; Ohta, S.; Moritake, H.; Oda, M.; et al. Infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia with MLL gene rearrangements: Outcome following intensive chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2004, 104, 3527–3534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Koh, K.; Tomizawa, D.; Moriya Saito, A.; Watanabe, T.; Miyamura, T.; Hirayama, M.; Takahashi, Y.; Ogawa, A.; Kato, K.; Sugita, K.; et al. Early use of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for infants with MLL gene-rearrangement-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 2015, 29, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Mann, G.; Attarbaschi, A.; Schrappe, M.; De Lorenzo, P.; Peters, C.; Hann, I.; De Rossi, G.; Felice, M.; Lausen, B.; Leblanc, T.; et al. Improved outcome with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a poor prognostic subgroup of infants with mixed-lineage-leukemia (MLL)-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Results from the Interfant-99 Study. Blood 2010, 116, 2644–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Van der Velden, V.H.; Corral, L.; Valsecchi, M.G.; Jansen, M.W.; De Lorenzo, P.; Cazzaniga, G.; Panzer-Grümayer, E.R.; Schrappe, M.; Schrauder, A.; Meyer, C.; et al. Prognostic significance of minimal residual disease in infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated within the Interfant-99 protocol. Leukemia 2009, 23, 1073–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pieters, R.; De Lorenzo, P.; Ancliffe, P.; Aversa, L.A.; Brethon, B.; Biondi, A.; Campbell, M.; Escherich, G.; Ferster, A.; Gardner, R.A.; et al. Outcome of Infants Younger Than 1 Year With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated With the Interfant-06 Protocol: Results From an International Phase III Randomized Study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 2246–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shi, Y.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, R.D.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Lin, W.; Yu, J.J.; Wu, Y.; Fan, J.; Qi, P.J.; Huang, P.L.; et al. Clinical characteristics and prognosis of 28 cases of infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi 2024, 62, 49–54. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, K.L.; Xiong, H.; Li, H.; Wang, Z.; Chen, Z.; Yang, L.; Lu, W.J.; Qi, S.S.; Sun, M. Clinical Analysis of Infants with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (18 cases). Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 2023, 31, 1670–1675. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zhu, M.; Kratzer, A.; Johnson, J.; Holland, C.; Brandl, C.; Singh, I.; Wolf, A.; Doshi, S. Blinatumomab Pharmacodynamics and Exposure-Response Relationships in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018, 58, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhu, M.; Wu, B.; Brandl, C.; Johnson, J.; Wolf, A.; Chow, A.; Doshi, S. Blinatumomab, a Bispecific T-cell Engager (BiTE(®)) for CD-19 Targeted Cancer Immunotherapy: Clinical Pharmacology and Its Implications. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2016, 55, 1271–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Viardot, A.; Goebeler, M.E.; Hess, G.; Neumann, S.; Pfreundschuh, M.; Adrian, N.; Zettl, F.; Libicher, M.; Sayehli, C.; Stieglmaier, J.; et al. Phase 2 study of the bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) antibody blinatumomab in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 2016, 127, 1410–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Clements, J.D.; Zhu, M.; Kuchimanchi, M.; Terminello, B.; Doshi, S. Population Pharmacokinetics of Blinatumomab in Pediatric and Adult Patients with Hematological Malignancies. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2020, 59, 463–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. von Stackelberg, A.; Locatelli, F.; Zugmaier, G.; Handgretinger, R.; Trippett, T.M.; Rizzari, C.; Bader, P.; O’Brien, M.M.; Brethon, B.; Bhojwani, D.; et al. Phase I/Phase II Study of Blinatumomab in Pediatric Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, 4381–4389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Gore, L.; Locatelli, F.; Zugmaier, G.; Handgretinger, R.; O’Brien, M.M.; Bader, P.; Bhojwani, D.; Schlegel, P.G.; Tuglus, C.A.; von Stackelberg, A. Survival after blinatumomab treatment in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood Cancer J. 2018, 8, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Keating, A.K.; Gossai, N.; Phillips, C.L.; Maloney, K.; Campbell, K.; Doan, A.; Bhojwani, D.; Burke, M.J.; Verneris, M.R. Reducing minimal residual disease with blinatumomab prior to HCT for pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood Adv. 2019, 3, 1926–1929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Clesham, K.; Rao, V.; Bartram, J.; Ancliff, P.; Ghorashian, S.; O’Connor, D.; Pavasovic, V.; Rao, A.; Samarasinghe, S.; Cummins, M.; et al. Blinatumomab for infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2020, 135, 1501–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Van der Sluis, I.M.; de Lorenzo, P.; Kotecha, R.S.; Attarbaschi, A.; Escherich, G.; Nysom, K.; Stary, J.; Ferster, A.; Brethon, B.; Locatelli, F.; et al. Blinatumomab Added to Chemotherapy in Infant Lymphoblastic Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023, 388, 1572–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Available online: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT05327894 (accessed on 14 February 2024).
  46. Available online: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05029531 (accessed on 14 February 2024).
  47. Myers, R.M.; Jacoby, E.; Pulsipher, M.A.; Pasquini, M.C.; Grupp, S.A.; Shah, N.N.; Laetsch, T.W.; Curran, K.J.; Schultz, L.M. INSPIRED Symposium Part 1: Clinical Variables Associated with Improved Outcomes for Children and Young Adults treated with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cells for B cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Transplant. Cell Ther. 2023, 29, 598–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Maude, S.L.; Laetsch, T.W.; Buechner, J.; Rives, S.; Boyer, M.; Bittencourt, H.; Bader, P.; Verneris, M.R.; Stefanski, H.E.; Myers, G.D.; et al. Tisagenlecleucel in Children and Young Adults with B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lee, B.J.; Griffin, S.P.; Doh, J.; Chan, A.; O’Brien, S.; Jeyakumar, D.; Ciurea, S.O.; Becker, P.S.; Kongtim, P. CD19-directed immunotherapy use in KMT2A-rearranged acute leukemia: A case report and literature review of increased lymphoid to myeloid lineage switch. Am. J. Hematol. 2022, 97, E439–E443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Du, J.; Chisholm, K.M.; Tsuchiya, K.; Leger, K.; Lee, B.M.; Rutledge, J.C.; Paschal, C.R.; Summers, C.; Xu, M. Lineage switch in an infant B-lymphoblastic leukemia with t (1; 11)(p32; q23); KMT2A/EPS15, following blinatumomab therapy. Pediatr. Dev. Pathol. 2021, 24, 378–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Qasim, W.; Zhan, H.; Samarasinghe, S.; Adams, S.; Amrolia, P.; Stafford, S.; Butler, K.; Rivat, C.; Wright, G.; Somana, K.; et al. Molecular remission of infant B-ALL after infusion of universal TALEN gene-edited CAR T cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaaj2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Qasim, W.; Ciocarlie, O.; Adams, S.; Inglott, S.; Murphy, C.; Rivat, C.; Wright, G.; Lucchini, G.; Silva, J.; Rao, K.; et al. Preliminary results of UCART19, an allogeneic anti-CD19 CAR T-cell product in a first-in-human trial (PALL) in pediatric patients with CD19+ relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2017, 130, 1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Annesley, C.; Summers, C.; Pulsipher, M.A.; Wayne, A.S.; Rivers, J.; Lamble, A.J.; Wilson, A.; Wu, Q.V.; Brand, A.; Mgebroff, S.; et al. Clinical experience of CAR T cell immunotherapy for relapsed and refractory infant ALL demonstrates feasibility and favorable responses. Blood 2019, 134, 3869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Leahy, A.B.; Devine, K.J.; Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Myers, R.; DiNofia, A.; Wray, L.; Rheingold, S.R.; Callahan, C.; Baniewicz, D.; et al. Impact of high-risk cytogenetics on outcomes for children and young adults receiving CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy. Blood 2022, 139, 2173–2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Breese, E.H.; Krupski, C.; Nelson, A.S.; Perentesis, J.P.; Phillips, C.L. Use of CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy in an infant with refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J. Pediatr. Hematol. Oncol. 2021, 43, 152–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Moskop, A.; Pommert, L.; Baggott, C.; Prabhu, S.; Pacenta, H.L.; Phillips, C.L.; Rossoff, J.; Stefanski, H.E.; Talano, J.A.; Margossian, S.P.; et al. Real-world use of tisagenlecleucel in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood Adv. 2022, 6, 4251–4255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Issa, G.C.; Aldoss, I.; DiPersio, J.; Cuglievan, B.; Stone, R.; Arellano, M.; Thirman, M.J.; Patel, M.R.; Dickens, D.S.; Shenoy, S.; et al. The menin inhibitor revumenib in KMT2A-rearranged or NPM1-mutant leukaemia. Nature 2023, 615, 920–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Caslini, C.; Yang, Z.; El-Osta, M.; Milne, T.A.; Slany, R.K.; Hess, J.L. Interaction of MLL amino terminal sequences with menin is required for transformation. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 7275–7283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Krivtsov, A.V.; Evans, K.; Gadrey, J.Y.; Eschle, B.K.; Hatton, C.; Uckelmann, H.J.; Ross, K.N.; Perner, F.; Olsen, S.N.; Pritchard, T.; et al. A Menin-MLL Inhibitor Induces Specific Chromatin Changes and Eradicates Disease in Models of MLL-Rearranged Leukemia. Cancer Cell 2019, 36, 660–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04065399 (accessed on 14 February 2024).
  61. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05761171 (accessed on 14 February 2024).
  62. Diaz-Flores, E.; Comeaux, E.Q.; Kim, K.L.; Melnik, E.; Beckman, K.; Davis, K.L.; Wu, K.; Akutagawa, J.; Bridges, O.; Marino, R.; et al. Bcl-2 Is a Therapeutic Target for Hypodiploid B-Lineage Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 2339–2351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Khaw, S.L.; Suryani, S.; Evans, K.; Richmond, J.; Robbins, A.; Kurmasheva, R.T.; Billups, C.A.; Erickson, S.W.; Guo, Y.; Houghton, P.J.; et al. Venetoclax responses of pediatric ALL xenografts reveal sensitivity of MLL-rearranged leukemia. Blood 2016, 128, 1382–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cheung, L.C.; Aya-Bonilla, C.; Cruickshank, M.N.; Chiu, S.K.; Kuek, V.; Anderson, D.; Chua, G.A.; Singh, S.; Oommen, J.; Ferrari, E.; et al. Preclinical efficacy of azacitidine and venetoclax for infant KMT2A-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemia reveals a new therapeutic strategy. Leukemia 2023, 37, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Place, A.E.; Goldsmith, K.; Bourquin, J.P.; Loh, M.L.; Gore, L.; Morgenstern, D.A.; Sanzgiri, Y.; Hoffman, D.; Zhou, Y.; Ross, J.A.; et al. Accelerating drug development in pediatric cancer: A novel Phase I study design of venetoclax in relapsed/refractory malignancies. Future Oncol. 2018, 14, 2115–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Karol, S.E.; Cooper, T.M.; Bittencourt, H.; Gore, L.; O’Brien, M.M.; Fraser, C.; Gambart, M.; Cario, G.; Zwaan, C.M.; Bourquin, J.P.; et al. Safety, Efficacy, and PK of the BCL2 Inhibitor Venetoclax in Combination with Chemotherapy in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Phase 1 Study. Blood 2019, 134, 2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bolouri, H.; Farrar, J.E.; Triche, T., Jr.; Ries, R.E.; Lim, E.L.; Alonzo, T.A.; Ma, Y.; Moore, R.; Mungall, A.J.; Marra, M.A.; et al. The molecular landscape of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia reveals recurrent structural alterations and age-specific mutational interactions. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Taketani, T.; Taki, T.; Sugita, K.; Furuichi, Y.; Ishii, E.; Hanada, R.; Tsuchida, M.; Sugita, K.; Ida, K.; Hayashi, Y.; et al. FLT3 mutations in the activation loop of tyrosine kinase domain are frequently found in infant ALL with MLL rearrangements and pediatric ALL with hyperdiploidy. Blood 2004, 103, 1085–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Brown, P.A.; Kairalla, J.A.; Hilden, J.M.; Dreyer, Z.E.; Carroll, A.J.; Heerema, N.A.; Wang, C.; Devidas, M.; Gore, L.; Salzer, W.L.; et al. FLT3 inhibitor lestaurtinib plus chemotherapy for newly diagnosed KMT2A-rearranged infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Children’s Oncology Group trial AALL0631. Leukemia 2021, 35, 1279–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Xie, J.; Span, M.; van Maarseveen, E.; Langenhorst, J.; Boddy, A.V.; Sia, K.C.; Sutton, R.; Venn, N.; Punt, A.M.; Tyrrel, V.; et al. Optimization of a clofarabine-based drug combination regimen for the preclinical evaluation of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2020, 67, e28133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Stumpel, D.J.; Schneider, P.; Pieters, R.; Stam, R.W. The potential of clofarabine in MLL-rearranged infant acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Eur. J. Cancer 2015, 51, 2008–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Gruber, T.A.; Pei, D.; Choi, J.; Cheng, C.; Coustan-Smith, E.; Campana, D.; Swanson, H.D.; Pauley, J.L.; Inaba, H.; Metzger, M.L.; et al. Clofarabine treatment of KMT2Ar infantile patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in St. Jude Total Therapy Study 16. Blood Adv. 2022, 6, 6131–6134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03330691 (accessed on 14 February 2024).
  74. Andersson, A.K.; Ma, J.; Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Gedman, A.L.; Dang, J.; Nakitandwe, J.; Holmfeldt, L.; Parker, M.; Easton, J.; et al. The landscape of somatic mutations in infant MLL-rearranged acute lymphoblastic leukemias. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 330–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Guest, E.; Kairalla, J.; Devidas, M.; Hibbitts, E.; Carroll, A.J.; Heerema, N.A.; Kubaney, H.; August, A.; Pauly, M.; Wechsler, D.; et al. A Pilot Study of Azacitidine As Epigenetic Priming for Chemotherapy in Infants Less Than 1 Year of Age with KMT2A-Rearranged Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL); Results from the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) Trial AALL15P1. Blood 2022, 140, 3256–3257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Stumpel, D.J.; Schneider, P.; van Roon, E.H.; Pieters, R.; Stam, R.W. Absence of global hypomethylation in promoter hypermethylated Mixed Lineage Leukaemia-rearranged infant acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Eur. J. Cancer 2013, 49, 175–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Stumpel, D.J.; Schneider, P.; van Roon, E.H.; Boer, J.M.; de Lorenzo, P.; Valsecchi, M.G.; de Menezes, R.X.; Pieters, R.; Stam, R.W. Specific promoter methylation identifies different subgroups of MLL-rearranged infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia, influences clinical outcome, and provides therapeutic options. Blood 2009, 114, 5490–5498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02553460 (accessed on 14 February 2024).
  79. Available online: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05848687 (accessed on 14 February 2024).
Ijms 25 03721 g001
Figure 1. Wild-type KMT2A domain structure. Proteolytic cleavage of the KMT2A molecule by enzyme TASPASE1 at the cleavage site (indicated by the orange dashed line) results in the formation of two subunits, bigger KMT2AN and smaller KMT2AC. The KMT2AN subunit includes menin-binding motif (MBM), lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF)-binding domain (LBD), adenosine–thymidine hook (AT hooks), which nonspecifically bind the minor groove of DNA, CxxC (cysteine-rich type of zinc finger domain) region-specific for non-methylated DNA, subnuclear localization domains (SNL1, SNL 2), repression domain 2 (RD2), four plant homeodomain (PHD) fingers, bromodomain (BRD) and F- phenylalanine, Y-tyrosine rich N-terminal (FYRN) domain. The KMT2AC subunit contains transactivation domain (TAD), a FY-rich C-terminal (FYRC) domain and C-terminal SET (Su(var)3-9, Enhancer-of-zest e and Trithorax) domain. CxxC and RD2 regions have intrinsic activity in transcriptional repression. PHD and BRD are essential for the post-translational regulation and mediation of protein–protein interactions. FYRN and FYRC are necessary for interactions between the KMT2AN and KMT2AC subunits and subnuclear localization of this complex. The SET domain is required for KMT2A’s H3K4 methyltransferase activity. The breakpoint cluster region spans exons 9–14 and the KMT2A’s fusion breakpoints, where fusion partners are attached, are typically located within this area. The image was created with Canva Pro https://www.canva.com/pro/ (accessed on 29 January 2024).
Figure 1. Wild-type KMT2A domain structure. Proteolytic cleavage of the KMT2A molecule by enzyme TASPASE1 at the cleavage site (indicated by the orange dashed line) results in the formation of two subunits, bigger KMT2AN and smaller KMT2AC. The KMT2AN subunit includes menin-binding motif (MBM), lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF)-binding domain (LBD), adenosine–thymidine hook (AT hooks), which nonspecifically bind the minor groove of DNA, CxxC (cysteine-rich type of zinc finger domain) region-specific for non-methylated DNA, subnuclear localization domains (SNL1, SNL 2), repression domain 2 (RD2), four plant homeodomain (PHD) fingers, bromodomain (BRD) and F- phenylalanine, Y-tyrosine rich N-terminal (FYRN) domain. The KMT2AC subunit contains transactivation domain (TAD), a FY-rich C-terminal (FYRC) domain and C-terminal SET (Su(var)3-9, Enhancer-of-zest e and Trithorax) domain. CxxC and RD2 regions have intrinsic activity in transcriptional repression. PHD and BRD are essential for the post-translational regulation and mediation of protein–protein interactions. FYRN and FYRC are necessary for interactions between the KMT2AN and KMT2AC subunits and subnuclear localization of this complex. The SET domain is required for KMT2A’s H3K4 methyltransferase activity. The breakpoint cluster region spans exons 9–14 and the KMT2A’s fusion breakpoints, where fusion partners are attached, are typically located within this area. The image was created with Canva Pro https://www.canva.com/pro/ (accessed on 29 January 2024).
Ijms 25 03721 g001
Ijms 25 03721 g002
Figure 2. Structure of a KMT2A fusion protein. MBM—menin-binding motif; LBD—LEDGF-binding domain; AT hooks—adenosine–thymidine hook; SNL1, SNL2—subnuclear localization domains; CxxC—cysteine-rich type of zinc finger domain. Image created with Canva Pro https://www.canva.com/pro/ (accessed on 29 January 2024).
Figure 2. Structure of a KMT2A fusion protein. MBM—menin-binding motif; LBD—LEDGF-binding domain; AT hooks—adenosine–thymidine hook; SNL1, SNL2—subnuclear localization domains; CxxC—cysteine-rich type of zinc finger domain. Image created with Canva Pro https://www.canva.com/pro/ (accessed on 29 January 2024).
Ijms 25 03721 g002
Ijms 25 03721 g003
Figure 3. Summary of novel approaches for infant ALL treatment. FLT3 ligand, Fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligand; FLT3 inhibitors, Fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitors, RAS/MAPK, Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase; JAK/STAT5, Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription 5; PI3K/AKT, Phosphoinositide 3-kinases/Serine/threonine kinase; KMT2A, histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2A; BCL-2, B-cell lymphoma 2; BCL-2 inhibitors, B-cell lymphoma 2. Image created with Canva Pro https://www.canva.com/pro/ (accessed on 29 January 2024).
Figure 3. Summary of novel approaches for infant ALL treatment. FLT3 ligand, Fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligand; FLT3 inhibitors, Fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitors, RAS/MAPK, Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase; JAK/STAT5, Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription 5; PI3K/AKT, Phosphoinositide 3-kinases/Serine/threonine kinase; KMT2A, histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2A; BCL-2, B-cell lymphoma 2; BCL-2 inhibitors, B-cell lymphoma 2. Image created with Canva Pro https://www.canva.com/pro/ (accessed on 29 January 2024).
Ijms 25 03721 g003
Table 1. KMT2A fusion partners.
Table 1. KMT2A fusion partners.
KMT2A Fusion
Partner		Former TerminologyFrequency in Infant ALLType and Localization of Abnormality
AFF1AF448%t(4;11) (q21;q23)
MLLT1ENL24%t(11;19) (q23;p13.3)
MLLT3AF916%t(9;11) (p21;q23)
MLLT10AF106%t(10;11) (p12;q23)
Other-6%-
Table 2. Novel clinical trials for infant ALL treatment.
Table 2. Novel clinical trials for infant ALL treatment.
Drug ClassDrug ClinicalTrials.Gov IdentifierPhaseCompleted/OngoingResponsible PartyKey
Results		References
BiTEBlinatumomabNCT014717821/2CompletedAmgen Research (Munich) GmbHOS 40% at the 24-month follow-up[40,41]
NCT05327894 (Interfant-21)3OngoingPrincess Maxima Center for Pediatric OncologyN/A[45]
NCT050295313OngoingFederal Research Institute of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and ImmunologyN/A[46]
CAR-T cellsCTL019NCT024358492CompletedNovartis Pharmaceuticals1-year EFS 50%[48]
UCART19NCT028084421CompletedInstitut de Recherches Internationales ServierMRD negativity (2 pts) at the 18-month follow-up[52]
CD19-CAR T Cells also expressing an EGFRtNCT020284551/2OngoingSeattle Children’s Hospital1-year OS 71.4%[53]
CD19- and CD22 specific CAR-T cellsNCT03330691 1OngoingSeattle Children’s HospitalN/A[73]
Menin InhibitorsRevumenib (SNDX-5613) NCT04065399 1/2Ongoing Syndax Pharmaceuticals N/A[60]
Revumenib
in		NCT057611712Ongoing Children’s Oncology Group N/A[61]
BCL-2 inhibitorsVenetoclaxNCT032368571CompletedAbbVie ORR 27%;
MRD negativity (3 pts) 		[65]
FLT3 InhibitorsLestaurtinibNCT00557193 3OngoingChildren’s Oncology Group3-year EFS 88 ± 8%[66,69]
Nucleoside analogues Clofarabine NCT00549848 3Completed St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital 5-year EFS 44.4%; OS 55.6%[72]
Epigenetic modifiersAzacitidine NCT02828358 3Ongoing National Cancer Institute EFS 34.2%; OS 63.8% with median follow-up 3.8 years[74]
Bortezomib and vorinostat NCT02553460 1/2Ongoing St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital N/A [75]
-bortezomib, vorinostat,
blinatumomab, ziftomenib		 NCT05848687 1/2Ongoing Tanja Andrea Gruber, Stanford University 3-year EFS 56.5%; OS 70.5%[76]
OS—overall survival; EFS—event free survival; pts—patients; MRD—minimal residual disease; ORR—objective response rate; N/A—not available.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kulczycka, M.; Derlatka, K.; Tasior, J.; Sygacz, M.; Lejman, M.; Zawitkowska, J. Infant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia—New Therapeutic Opportunities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3721. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073721

AMA Style

Kulczycka M, Derlatka K, Tasior J, Sygacz M, Lejman M, Zawitkowska J. Infant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia—New Therapeutic Opportunities. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(7):3721. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073721

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kulczycka, Marika, Kamila Derlatka, Justyna Tasior, Maja Sygacz, Monika Lejman, and Joanna Zawitkowska. 2024. "Infant Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia—New Therapeutic Opportunities" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 7: 3721. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073721

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop