Next Article in Journal
Tumor Microenvironment: Cellular Interaction and Metabolic Adaptations
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation of Bispecific IgY-scFvs Inhibition Adherences of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (K88 and F18) to Porcine IPEC-J2 Cell
Previous Article in Special Issue
Do Aging and Parity Affect VEGF-A/VEGFR Content and Signaling in the Ovary?—A Mouse Model Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Biology and Toxicology of Gametes, Embryos, and Cancer Cells in Reproductive Systems

1
Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
2
Institute of Advanced Regenerative Sciences, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(7), 3639; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073639
Submission received: 22 February 2024 / Revised: 13 March 2024 / Accepted: 19 March 2024 / Published: 25 March 2024
Reproduction is the important process of transmitting one’s genetic information to the next generation. The maturation of germ cells and the development process of the embryo after fertilization are greatly influenced by the surrounding environment. This Special Issue aims to provide up-to-date information regarding the biology and toxicity of various cells of the reproductive system (gametes, embryo, and cancer cells). In this article, we introduce background knowledge from papers reported in other journals, the six papers reported in this Special Issue, and the latest trends in the field of reproductive medicine.
Recently, decreased fertility has emerged as an important social problem due to the aging of women of childbearing age and environmental toxicity, attracting attention in developed countries. Because of this attention, many meaningful studies are being conducted and published in this field.
Germ cells within the reproductive system play an important role in maintaining reproductive function. Normal germ cell development and function are closely related to fertility via the successful development of an embryo. A variety of factors, including environmental toxins, aging, or stress, can cause the DNA damage of germ cells, leading to abnormal metabolism. Wang and colleagues reported that a well-balanced metabolism is essential to the production of high-quality eggs, based on metabolic analysis [1]. The egg becomes activated, meiosis proceeds, and the egg matures. In this process, specific metabolic pathways are regulated, each of which plays a very important role in controlling the epigenetics of the egg before fertilization.
Pal and Tyler explained that genetic and epigenetic changes such as genomic instability, telomere shortening, the accumulation of DNA damage, and reduced DNA repair capacity increase the frequency of further changes and induce aging [2]. Salonia and colleagues found that somatic cells such as Leydig cells and myoid cells with idiopathic germ cell aplasia in the testis of men deregulated specific genes and pathways and caused the formation of senescent characteristics [3]. This implies that the aging of somatic cells such as Leydig cells affects the normal development of germ cells in the testis. Schumacher et al. reviewed the normal genome maintenance mechanisms in somatic and germ cells, showing that they are completely different in terms of their purposes [4]. They describe that DNA damage in germ cells is more strictly repaired than damage in somatic cells. This is because DNA damage in germ cells can not only cause genetic diseases but also affect the evolution of species, while genetic mutations in somatic cells are only associated with genetic diseases or aging. Somatic cells require maintenance only for the lifespan of an individual, whereas germ cells perpetuate genetic information indefinitely.
Recent studies on genotoxicity under various environmental conditions show that nanoparticles have played an important role in improving our understanding of genetic mutations and cellular damage. Tharmalingam et al. reported the gonadotoxicity of cisplatin in immature human testis, which may be a major factor in explaining chemotherapy-induced infertility [5]. Kohl et al. reviewed the detection of the genotoxicity of various nanomaterials [6]. However, Kim et al. demonstrated the safety of certain nanomaterials by reporting that they do not affect gene expression in the oocytes or embryos, and they are used in various drug delivery systems [7].
Hoffmann et al. reported that chromosomal abnormalities show characteristic patterns depending on the age group of the individual. They found that in female group under 20 years of age, aneuploidy increased due to chromosome segregation abnormalities, while in the group over 33 years of age, chromosomal errors occurred more often due to the loss of the chromosome centromere and cohesion between sister chromatids [8]. Marcet-Ortega et al. reported that ATM-CHK2-p53 is used as a surveillance system to detect the persistence of unrepaired DBSs and activate recombination-dependent arrest during the meiotic prophase process in spermatocytes [9].
A variety of research projects are actively being conducted on various factors affecting the reproductive system, in addition to the research mentioned here. This fact illustrates the continued interest in understanding the effects of various environmental factors and aging on the health of reproductive cells.
We are grateful to the many scientists who took interest in this Special Issue and submitted their research, and we hope that this will be helpful in the development of related fields in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.C.; data curation, M.K.; funding acquisition, Y.C.; investigation, Y.C.; methodology, M.K.; supervision, Y.C.; writing—original draft, M.K. and Y.C.; writing—review and editing, B.K. and Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This paper was supported by Konkuk University in 2022.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Eunmi Chang for her valuable comments and discussion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Li, L.; Zhu, S.; Shu, W.; Guo, Y.; Guan, Y.; Zeng, J.; Wang, H.; Han, L.; Zhang, J.; Liu, X.; et al. Characterization of Metabolic Patterns in Mouse Oocytes during Meiotic Maturation. Mol. Cell 2020, 80, 525–540.e529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pal, S.; Tyler, J.K. Epigenetics and aging. Sci. Adv. 2016, 2, e1600584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Alfano, M.; Tascini, A.S.; Pederzoli, F.; Locatelli, I.; Nebuloni, M.; Giannese, F.; Garcia-Manteiga, J.M.; Tonon, G.; Amodio, G.; Gregori, S.; et al. Aging, inflammation and DNA damage in the somatic testicular niche with idiopathic germ cell aplasia. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 5205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Panier, S.; Wang, S.; Schumacher, B. Genome Instability and DNA Repair in Somatic and Reproductive Aging. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2024, 19, 261–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tharmalingam, M.D.; Matilionyte, G.; Wallace, W.H.B.; Stukenborg, J.B.; Jahnukainen, K.; Oliver, E.; Goriely, A.; Lane, S.; Guo, J.; Cairns, B.; et al. Cisplatin and carboplatin result in similar gonadotoxicity in immature human testis with implications for fertility preservation in childhood cancer. BMC Med. 2020, 18, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kohl, Y.; Rundén-Pran, E.; Mariussen, E.; Hesler, M.; El Yamani, N.; Longhin, E.M.; Dusinska, M. Genotoxicity of Nanomaterials: Advanced In Vitro Models and High Throughput Methods for Human Hazard Assessment-A Review. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kim, H.J.; Lee, S.; Lee, J.H.; Park, J.M.; Hong, S.J.; Lee, O.H.; Park, J.S.; Choi, Y.; Park, K.H. TRITC-Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery Carriers in Mouse Oocytes and Embryos. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 5975–5988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Gruhn, J.R.; Zielinska, A.P.; Shukla, V.; Blanshard, R.; Capalbo, A.; Cimadomo, D.; Nikiforov, D.; Chan, A.C.; Newnham, L.J.; Vogel, I.; et al. Chromosome errors in human eggs shape natural fertility over reproductive life span. Science 2019, 365, 1466–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Marcet-Ortega, M.; Maldonado-Linares, A.; López-Panadés, M.; Roig, I. p53 Controls Meiotic Prophase Progression and Crossover Formation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kang, M.; Kim, B.; Choi, Y. Biology and Toxicology of Gametes, Embryos, and Cancer Cells in Reproductive Systems. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3639. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073639

AMA Style

Kang M, Kim B, Choi Y. Biology and Toxicology of Gametes, Embryos, and Cancer Cells in Reproductive Systems. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(7):3639. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073639

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kang, Minju, Byeongseok Kim, and Youngsok Choi. 2024. "Biology and Toxicology of Gametes, Embryos, and Cancer Cells in Reproductive Systems" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 7: 3639. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073639

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop