Next Article in Journal
On the Possibility of Using 5-Aminolevulinic Acid in the Light-Induced Destruction of Microorganisms
Next Article in Special Issue
Improvement in Motor and Walking Capacity during Multisegmental Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation in Individuals with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
Previous Article in Journal
Anti-Melanoma Effects of Miconazole: Investigating the Mitochondria Involvement
Previous Article in Special Issue
Depolarization and Hyperexcitability of Cortical Motor Neurons after Spinal Cord Injury Associates with Reduced HCN Channel Activity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 25
Issue 7
10.3390/ijms25073591
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mechanisms of Action of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation

by
Alaa Abd-Elsayed
1,*,
Swarnima Vardhan
2,3,
Abhinav Aggarwal
2,
Madhurima Vardhan
4 and
Sudhir A. Diwan
3
1
Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53792, USA
2
Department of Internal Medicine, Yale New Haven Health, Bridgeport Hospital, Bridgeport, CT 06605, USA
3
Advanced Spine on Park Avenue, New York, NY 10461, USA
4
Argonne Leadership Computing Facility, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL 60439, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(7), 3591; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073591
Submission received: 19 February 2024 / Revised: 12 March 2024 / Accepted: 19 March 2024 / Published: 22 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular and Electrophysiological Properties of Motoneurons in the Mammalian Brain and Spinal Cord)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The dorsal root ganglion (DRG) serves as a pivotal site for managing chronic pain through dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S). In recent years, the DRG-S has emerged as an attractive modality in the armamentarium of neuromodulation therapy due to its accessibility and efficacy in alleviating chronic pain refractory to conventional treatments. Despite its therapeutic advantages, the precise mechanisms underlying DRG-S-induced analgesia remain elusive, attributed in part to the diverse sensory neuron population within the DRG and its modulation of both peripheral and central sensory processing pathways. Emerging evidence suggests that DRG-S may alleviate pain by several mechanisms, including the reduction of nociceptive signals at the T-junction of sensory neurons, modulation of pain gating pathways within the dorsal horn, and regulation of neuronal excitability within the DRG itself. However, elucidating the full extent of DRG-S mechanisms necessitates further exploration, particularly regarding its supraspinal effects and its interactions with cognitive and affective networks. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for optimizing neurostimulation technologies and improving clinical outcomes of DRG-S for chronic pain management. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the DRG anatomy, mechanisms of action of the DRG-S, and its significance in neuromodulation therapy for chronic pain.

1. Introduction

Chronic pain, a pervasive neurological condition affecting around one-fifth of the global population, poses considerable challenges for patients, physicians, and society [1]. Despite a range of available treatments and emerging options, achieving sustained relief remains elusive for many [2]. Pharmacotherapy, behavioral and physical therapies, minimally invasive techniques, and even surgical interventions often fall short in providing adequate relief. The economic impact is substantial, with chronic pain accounting for over USD 600 billion in annual healthcare costs and remains a central factor in the continuing opioid crisis [3,4]. With a growing demand for enhanced therapeutic alternatives, neuromodulation advancements continue to evolve and transform significantly since the pioneering work by Shealy et al. [5]. These therapies aim to selectively target primary sensory neurons (PSNs) implicated in chronic pain and modify their biophysical characteristics, presenting a novel treatment avenue. Over the past decade, dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) has surfaced as a pivotal advancement in the field of neuromodulation for chronic pain management [6].
The dorsal root ganglion (DRG), housing the cell bodies of the PSNs in the lateral epidural space of the spinal foramen, plays a crucial role in pain transmission to the CNS. Pathophysiologic changes in the DRG during chronic pain states alter the membrane properties and neurophysiological states of these PSNs [7]. Due to its fundamental role in sensory processing, particularly in nociceptive and neuropathic pain genesis, and its accessibility for clinical intervention, the DRG-S has emerged as an excellent target for pain management through neuromodulation [8,9,10]. In contrast to the conventional approach of applying the electrical field directly onto the dorsal columns of the spinal cord in tonic spinal cord stimulation (t-SCS), DRG-S requires the placement of a small electrode array in close proximity to the cell nuclei of afferent neurons within the intra-foraminal space along the dorsal aspect [11]. This targeted modulation of PSNs nestled within the DRG offers a promising, non-addictive, and reversible treatment option for cases of refractory pain unresponsive to standard medical interventions.
Addressing the gaps in comprehension of mechanisms and refining the clinical application of DRG-S could propel advancements in neuromodulation particularly for patients who do not achieve adequate pain relief through this technique, limiting their treatment options [9,10,12]. In this review, we offer an intricate exploration of the anatomy and mechanisms underlying DRG-S. These insights would help in understanding reasons for DRG-S inefficacy in certain patients, to enhance patient selection, and develop innovative DRG-S technologies that specifically target mechanisms to optimize pain relief universally, thereby contributing towards alleviating the substantial burden of chronic pain.

2. DRG Anatomy

The DRG is a crucial structure housing the cell bodies of highly compartmentalized PSNs, facilitating sensory transmission, including pain signaling [13]. Roughly the size of a small peanut, the DRG is enclosed within the dural sheath, nestled bilaterally at the intervertebral foramen along each of the 31 pairs of human spinal nerves. It is surrounded by a thin layer of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and situated within the fixed bony vertebral structures (neuroforamen), bridging the transition from the spinal cord and vertebral column to the peripheral nervous system (PNS) (Figure 1) [14,15,16].
Besides their involvement in sensory neurotransmission, the DRG harbors non-neuronal cells and tissues crucial for supporting and preserving the functionality of the nucleus. Surrounding each neuronal cell body are satellite glial cells, providing support to the soma and establishing interconnected gap junctions implicated in sensitizing neighboring neurons [17,18]. Alongside the connective tissue that separates glial cells, a cluster of immune cells, primarily composed of macrophages and lymphocytes, along with blood vessels and bundles of sympathetic nerve fibres, constitutes the DRG (Figure 2) [19,20].
The distinctive attributes of the DRG, setting it apart from other targets along the sensory neural axis and rendering it more readily accessible for therapeutic approaches, encompass several factors. These include the peripheral localization of primary sensory afferents, the presence of a blood–nerve barrier that poses fewer limitations compared to the blood–brain barrier, and the presence of elongated axons housing distinct, targetable compartments [21].

2.1. DRG Neurons Are Pseudo-Unipolar

DRG neurons possess a distinctive pseudo-unipolar structure, characterized by a single axon (stem axon), which departs from the cell body and bifurcates at a unique T-junction, with one branch extending towards the peripheral target and the other traveling along the dorsal root into the central nervous system (CNS). This anatomic configuration facilitates the uninterrupted transmission of sensory information and is endowed with receptors for various neurotransmitters. The peripheral segment of the axon reaches receptor endings in the periphery, governing afferent signaling. Meanwhile, the central segment extends into the CNS, exhibiting extensive axonal arborizations within the spinal cord, culminating in synapses at ipsilateral or contralateral wide dynamic range neurons, inhibitory interneuron networks, and other dorsal horn targets [13].
Both the cell soma and the stem axon possess electrical excitability, hypothesized to prevent a conduction block at the T-junction. This excitability results in increased membrane capacitance and decreased membrane resistance, essential for spike propagation [22]. The T-junction of the DRG neuron serves multiple functions, potentially impeding electrical impulses from the peripheral nociceptor to the dorsal root entry zone of the spinal cord, participating in the transmission of electrical impulses, or acting as a low-pass filter for peripheral electrical information.

2.2. DRG Size

The dimensions of the DRG are intricately linked to the quantity of the neurons it encompasses, exhibiting variations contingent on its vertebral location [23]. In the cervical region, DRG size exhibits a gradient, demonstrating a progressive increase from a predominantly minimal presence, seen in over 70% at the C1 level, to reaching its maximum dimension at the C8 level [24]. Notably, the C8 DRG displays a greater volume (177 mm3) compared to the adjacent T1 DRG (144 mm3), nearly doubling the volume of the C5 DRG despite having a smaller receptive field [24]. Correspondingly, there is a progressive increase in the dimensions of the DRG from L1 to L5 levels in the lumbar region, ranging from approximately 4 mm × 4.5 mm at L1 to 5.5 mm × 10 mm at L5. Conversely, the sacral DRG exhibits a reduction in size from S1 to S4, with the S1 DRG measuring around 6.5 mm × 13 mm in contrast to 5 mm × 3 mm at S4 [25].

2.3. DRG Soma Size

DRG neurons also exhibit varied soma sizes, spanning approximately from 20 to 100 μm, and are typically categorized as small (<25 μm), medium-sized (25–35 μm), or large (>35 μm) [13]. This variation in sizing directly correlates with the degree of axon myelination, thereby influencing the conduction velocity. Aβ, Aδ, and C fibres relay the peripheral sensation information towards their corresponding somas within the DRG. The largest-diameter, myelinated Aβ primary afferents possess a low mechanical threshold and transmit non-painful tactile and proprioceptive information to the spinal cord [26]. Myelinated Aδ fibres notably demonstrate higher conduction velocities, facilitating the transmission of acute non-noxious information, such as responses to temperature, mechanical stimuli, and chemical triggers, to the DRG. Pain-inducing stimuli are primarily conveyed by unmyelinated C fibres and a subset of myelinated Aδ fibres. The unmyelinated C fibres, characterized by smaller diameters and slower conduction velocities, predominantly play a role in relaying more diffuse and deeper secondary pain signals that manifest after an injury [22].

2.4. DRG Position in the Foramina

The DRG typically maintains a consistent location, primarily situated in the superior part of the foramen in close proximity to the rostral pedicle [27]. In the thoracic and lumbar levels, the DRG resides in close proximity to the vertebral pedicle. For instance, in approximately 75% of cases, the L5 DRG is intraforaminal, with only 6% situated extraforaminal [28]. However, sacral DRGs exhibit distinct categorizations—described either as intracanalar (positioned medial to the medial border of the sacral pedicle) or intraforaminal (situated lateral to the medial border of the sacral pedicle). The S1 DRG is intraforaminal in approximately 60% of instances, while at the S2 level, the majority are within the spinal canal (ranging from 50% to 85%). At the S3 and S4 levels, all DRGs are contained within the canal [27,29].

2.5. DRG Vasculature

The DRG receives its blood supply from the spinal branch of the dorsal trunk of segmental arteries. Blood circulation is facilitated by the radiculo-medullary branches that supply the spinal nerve, traversing along the ventral aspect of the DRG and nerve roots [30]. Upon penetrating the DRG, these vessels form a subcapsular capillary plexus before delving deeper and branching into intra-ganglionic vessels, establishing an intricate capillary network that intimately engagesing with sensory neurons [31].
The DRG houses fenestrated capillaries and lies beyond the blood–brain barrier, facilitating direct access of molecules from the vascular system to the DRG. This structural setup ensures an adequate blood supply essential for the synthesis and transport of proteins [32]. It has been noted that the regulation of blood flow to the DRG is orchestrated by muscular sphincters, dynamically adjusting flow rates in accordance with functional and metabolic requirements. This intricate vascular structure of the DRG plays a vital role in providing metabolic intermediates necessary to sustain the relatively high metabolic requirements of the cellular constituents of the ganglion [33].

2.6. DRG Stimulation (DRG-S) versus Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS)

Over the past decade, extensive research has spotlighted DRG as a promising focal point for neuroelectrical modulation with the first patent for a pioneering device designed to stimulating the DRG filed in 2004 [34,35,36]. The application of a lead onto the DRG has necessitated significant alterations from the conventional SCS systems, such as a reduced lead diameter, smaller contact size, enhanced flexibility, and the development of a novel implantation technique. Notably, the cellular mechanism underlying DRG-S diverges from the reliance on gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) release within the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, a characteristic feature of conventional SCS, with reduced levels of this inhibitory neurotransmitter noted following SCS [37,38].
DRG-S demonstrates several distinct advantages over SCS. Postural adjustments can affect the proximity between electrodes and the dorsal column, influencing the scope of neural tissue stimulation in traditional SCS. Configurations in SCS that diminish this distance expand the neural volume stimulation, recruiting higher-threshold fibres, and resulting in excessive perceived stimulation, resulting in side effects, such as, unintended paresthesias, along with muscular cramping [39,40]. Conversely, DRG-S demonstrates limited susceptibility to postural variations. The placement of DRG leads within the neuroforamen, accompanied by minimal CSF space and strengthened by surrounding vertebral structures, mitigates the concerns regarding lead displacement caused by bodily movements [41].
Physiologically, in the spinal cord compartment, the elements with the highest to lowest conductivity of electricity are the CSF, longitudinal fibres, and grey matter. The efficiency of DRG-S stems from a diminished current loss across thinner subdural CSF layers, as the proximity of leads to the neural target decreases the amplitude requirement compared to SCS. The lower power demand of DRG-S, up to 92.5% less than SCS, can potentially extend battery life, reduce healthcare costs, and enhance treatment adherence. Given the potential patient burden and impact on treatment outcomes, these considerations underscore the significance of DRG-S in pain management. These considerations are crucial given that frequent engagements with the healthcare system create a significant burden on the patients and exacerbate their contemplations regarding pain, potentially leading to inferior treatment outcomes [42,43].
The understanding of stimulation parameters, particularly stimulation frequency, in DRG-S, is still evolving due to the novelty of the technique and the peculiarity of the target structure. Various frequencies have been investigated in DRG-S, with a randomized double-blind clinical trial indicating that 20 Hz stimulation was more effective than frequencies of 40 Hz, 60 Hz, and 80 Hz [44]. It has been hypothesized that stimulation at even lower frequencies (≤5 Hz) may activate action potentials (APs) across all types of low-threshold mechanoreceptor (LTMR) fibres, potentially eliciting a broader engagement of the inherent physiological inhibitory systems of the body via opioid receptor activation. This proposed mechanism distinguishes itself from traditional SCS, which primarily targets Aβ fibres within the dorsal column [45]. In fact, a recent case series by Chapman et al. suggested potential therapeutic advantages of employing even lower frequencies, such as 4 Hz, for pain relief, prompting further investigation [46]. However, a subsequent randomized double-blind clinical trial failed to show significant differences between 4 Hz and the conventional 20 Hz stimulations in terms of pain relief. The authors concluded that the study may have been underpowered to detect subtle differences, suggesting that further studies with extended observation periods may be warranted to comprehensively assess the nuances of frequency response in DRG-S therapy [47].
DRG-S arises as a prospective intervention for individuals who have encountered limited enduring advantages from SCS. The effectiveness of DRG-S as a salvage therapy might be explained by a distinctive, targeted mechanism of action, which focuses on a distinct anatomical structure compared to SCS [48].

2.7. Clinical Applications of DRG-S

The majority of the research on the application of DRG-S has focused on its effectiveness in managing complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). CRPS is typified by pain that is disproportionate to the initiating event and is often accompanied by abnormal sensory responses such as allodynia, along with vasomotor, sudomotor, and/or motor/trophic symptoms. The seminal ACCURATE Trial conducted by Deer et al. demonstrated the superiority of DRG-S over traditional dorsal column SCS in managing focal pain attributed to CRPS I or II in the lower extremities, as evidenced by outcomes observed over a 12-month follow-up period [9]. In 2016, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted approval for the use of DRG-S in treating lower extremity pain associated with CRPS [49].
Recent studies have underscored the favorable outcomes of DRG-S neuromodulation compared to SCS across various conditions, including chronic pelvic pain, painful diabetic neuropathy, restless leg syndrome, and post-surgical or traumatic painful scars. These studies have demonstrated notable enhancements in quality of life, increased patient satisfaction, reduced medication dependency, and long-term cost-effectiveness [50,51,52,53]. Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is usually refractory to conservative medical management. There are several studies which show growing evidence for neuromodulation in the treatment of FBSS and non-surgical low back pain (NSLBP), demonstrating improvement in pain scores, functional and psychological measures, and overall quality of life. While SCS continues to be the preferred therapy in FBSS and NSLBP, recent prospective studies highlight the potential role of DRG-S as a secondary treatment option, particularly following unsuccessful SCS interventions [54,55].
However, the existing evidence largely stems from case reports and observational studies involving small sample sizes and short follow-up durations. There is a pressing need for higher-quality research, such as meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials (RCTs), to establish stronger recommendations regarding the use of DRG-S in the management of chronic pain unrelated to CRPS.

3. DRG Mechanisms

DRG-S represents an important neuromodulatory intervention within the pain management armamentarium for addressing chronic and refractory conditions. Emerging insights underscore the nuanced nature of neuromodulatory therapies, indicating that DRG-S, like its counterparts, operates through a complex interplay of mechanisms rather than a singular pathway. Accumulating evidence suggests that DRG-S potentially engenders analgesic effects by enhancing the attenuation of painful signals at the T-junction of nociceptive neurons through low-pass filtering, stimulating the post-synaptic activation of pain-gating circuitry in the dorsal horn and conceivably within the DRG itself, and by modulating the intrinsic excitability of DRG neurons.

3.1. Effects at T-Junction

The T-junction serves as a large node of Ranvier, where the peripherally projecting axon typically exhibiting a larger diameter compared to the spinally projecting axon, facilitates the selective modulation of electrical impulses originating from the periphery, enabling their potential bypass, blockage, or filtration by the soma (Figure 3) [22,56,57,58].
In vivo intracellular recordings have elucidated the existence of a low-pass filter positioned at this junction, whose adaptability becomes more permissive in contexts of chronic pain [59]. The local expression of ion channels housed in the cell bodies of the DRG neurons influences C-fibre signaling and facilitates the invasion of peripherally generated action potentials into the soma, thereby regulating the transmission of afferent signals from the periphery to the central axon [60]. Considerable evidence from myelinated and unmyelinated sensory neurons suggests that the T-junction serves as a site where the safety margin for spike propagation is diminished and may contribute to the low-pass filtering of action potentials. In myelinated afferents, for example, orthodromic propagation of action potentials can trigger supplementary spikes within the initial segment. These additional spikes may then reverberate towards the T-junction, potentially obstructing subsequent orthodromic action potentials. This phenomenon of self-induced occlusion seems to enhance both short and long inter-spike intervals, while simultaneously diminishing the number of intermediate inter-spike intervals [59].
In unmyelinated afferents, an amalgamation of morphological and electrophysiological attributes, encompassing factors like length of the stem axon and the presence of slow hyperpolarizing conductances, contributes to the creation of a low-pass filtering effect on orthodromically propagating action potentials [61]. DRG-S is postulated to offer analgesic benefits by potentially intensifying this filtering characteristic within the DRG neurons implicated in pain pathophysiology, thereby further modulating pain perception. For instance, in conditions such as CRPS, there is a reduction in filtering across the T-junction of the DRG coupled with increased hyperexcitability.
Endogenous opioids such as endorphins and enkephalins play a crucial role in modulating nociceptive transmission and pain perception by binding to μ, γ, and κ opioid receptors distributed across presynaptic terminals and interneurons within the dorsal horn. The enkephalins activate Aβ neurons, whereas the Aδ and C LTMRs trigger dynorphin release to suppress nociceptive signaling. μ opioid receptors, found presynaptically on select Aδ and C fibres, are responsive to both endorphins and enkephalins. Aβ neurons are linked to δ opioid receptors, while κ opioid receptors are activated by Aδ and C receptors [62,63]. It is proposed that the efficacy of DRG-S in CRPS is due to the inhibition of noxious and autonomic afferent signals at the T-junction and linked to the activation of the endogenous opioid systems in the dorsal horn. In CRPS, it has been observed that repetitive electrical stimulation of afferent C fibres transiently increases the excitability of wide-dynamic-range neurons, a phenomenon known as “windup.” This phenomenon signifies a type of central sensitization and plays a role in chronic pain development. The decrease in windup following DRG-S exerts an inhibitory effect on neuronal sensitization to repetitive noxious stimuli [64].
The sequential amplification of T-junction filtering encompasses the orchestrated interplay of calcium and potassium channels. Stimulation-triggered action potentials originating within the soma trigger a cascade of events, initiating calcium influx. This heightened calcium concentration significantly augments the conductivity of small conductance calcium-activated potassium (KSK) channels, thereby inducing sustained somatic hyperpolarization that distinctly influences the dynamics of both the stem axon and the T-junction, and contribute to filtering at the T-junction [65]. This, in turn, diminishes the input resistance of the soma and the T-junction within nociceptive PSNs, thereby limiting the propagation of high-frequency pain signals towards the central nervous system [59,66].
An alternative hypothesis revolves around the concept of filtration occurring specifically at the T-junction of C neurons. This hypothesis postulates two potential mechanisms: either DRG-S directly intervenes in modulating or disrupting the ongoing activity within C neurons, or DRG-S indirectly influences C-neuron activity through an alternate mechanism. Notably, trains of action potentials exhibit a higher frequency of propagation in the orthodromic direction when traversing through the T-junction compared to the antidromic direction, attributed to the reduction in axonal diameter from the peripheral to the spinal axon [59,65].
There also exists a minimum voltage threshold, termed the excitation threshold, that governs the propagation of an action potential along an axon. Any membrane potential exceeding this threshold constitutes the “safety factor” [59]. Notably, the safety factor is reduced at branching points like the T-junction, elevating the likelihood of interruptions in action potential propagation and neural conduction. It has been established that both myelinated and unmyelinated neurons of DRG cells possess larger diameter peripheral processes with lower impedance, contrasted by a smaller-diameter central processes exhibiting higher impedance. This disparity in impedance contributes to the neural modulation at the T-junction of DRG neurons [67]. Here, electrical signals transitioning from peripheral (low-impedance) to central (high-impedance) axonal fibres results in the attenuation of high-frequency action potentials [61]. Overall, these findings suggest that branch points such as the T-junction within DRG neurons act as a protective switch or a low-pass filter for high-frequency action potentials encoding noxious stimuli, thereby shielding the soma from excessive input, and providing a defensive mechanism to attenuate the perception of pain [68].

3.2. Effect on Nociceptive Neurons: Suppressing PSN Hyperexcitability

The aftermath of nerve damage encompasses a spectrum of changes within both the nociceptors and the central nervous system. Among these alterations, a well-documented phenomenon involves the hyperexcitability observed within DRG neurons subsequent to injuries affecting peripheral axons of the DRG. There is a proposition suggesting that this augmented excitability of DRG neurons post-injury might play a contributory role in the manifestation of neuropathic pain [22]. Moreover, it has been theorized that the increased expression of sodium channel Nav1.3 contributes to the abnormal hyperexcitability observed in injured DRG neurons [69].
An additional proposed mechanism suggests that DRG-S elicits analgesia by diminishing ectopic activity within nociceptive neurons. While certain PSNs exhibit spontaneous activity in a healthy state, nerve injury triggers a significant surge in ectopic activity among nociceptive neurons within the DRG [70,71]. In unmyelinated C-type neurons, this activity manifests as subthreshold membrane potential oscillations (SMPOs) and irregular or bursting action potentials [60]. This aberrant surge in activity potentially originates from the inflammatory cascade triggered by nerve damage, precipitating the release of nerve growth factor and the consequent upregulation of late and persistent sodium channels within nociceptive PSNs [72,73,74]. It is believed that this ectopic activity originates in the soma, potentially involving nearby axons or the T-junction, with ensuing action potentials propagating towards the central nervous system, contributing to sensations of neuropathic pain [75,76]. DRG-S, known to dampen the sensory neuron excitability, might effectively suppress this aberrant ectopic activity, thereby offering analgesic relief. Intriguingly, this mode of DRG-S operates in a seemingly paradoxical manner, where direct stimulation of the stem and soma generates excitation which results in a hyperpolarization effect that effectively impedes pain signals originating from the periphery and attenuates the ectopic activity originating from the soma.
Another hypothesized mechanism underlying allodynia revolves around the development of inherent spontaneous activity observed within Aβ-neurons, traditionally characterized by their non-transmission of pain signals. Consequently, this clinical expression of neuropathic pain results in the perception of pain from stimuli that were previously non-painful [77,78]. Contemporary investigations indicate the potential involvement of the DRG in the genesis of neuropathic pain, marked by heightened excitability and the occurrence of spontaneous ectopic firing within PSNs [65].

3.3. Effect on Glial Cells

The glial cells within the PNS primarily consist of Schwann cells and satellite glial cells (SGCs). Research focused on PNS injuries has revealed significant contributions to the development and persistence of pain from resident macrophages and inflammatory cells that infiltrate this neural network [79]. The DRG encases neurons with distinct membrane characteristics, encircled by SGCs, typically acting as sentinels safeguarding these neural entities. However, post-injury, these glial cells possess the capacity to mobilize immune response cells, thereby modulating the inflammatory milieu within the DRG [80]. Additionally, studies denote that injury to peripheral nerves triggers the release of neurotrophic factors from these glial cells. These factors elicit a proliferative response in the glia, leading to the mechanical compression of sensory neuron cell bodies. This compression augments the nerve irritation within the DRG, perpetuating a sustained influx of immune cells and inflammatory cascades. These factors collectively establish a cyclical pattern of inflammation within the DRG, persisting even upon complete resolution of the peripheral nerve injury [13].
Despite their physical proximity, the cell bodies of DRG neurons typically operate in isolation due to the encasing layers of SGCs. Yet, a small subset (constituting 4–9% depending on the species) of DRG neurons shares a common glial sheath, forming clusters with one or two other neurons. This arrangement opens avenues for the potential “cross-excitation” or “cross-depolarization” of multiple DRG neurons by a single stimulus [35,81]. Studies have shown that almost all DRG neurons experience subthreshold excitation coinciding with the activation of the neighboring cell bodies. Up to 90% of DRG neurons depolarize when a stimulus is applied to the axon of a neighboring neuron within the same ganglion [35,82]. Notably, the gap between SGCs and the neuronal surface is approximately 20 nm, akin to the distance observed in synaptic spaces. This close configuration allows the SGCs to actively engage in cellular communication within the DRG. Previously considered primarily as support for maintaining the cellular equilibrium of DRG neuron cell bodies, recent studies have revealed the active and influential roles played by SGCs in the normal physiological functioning of these ganglia. Consequently, due to this dynamic interaction, dysfunction in SGCs significantly impacts the DRG neuron activity, this contributing to the initiation and perpetuation of neuropathic pain [81].
Nerve damage or inflammation triggers the activation of SGCs within the sensory ganglia. In response to injury, SGCs upregulate the expression of the astrocyte marker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), signaling increased glial reactivity and the coupling of SGCs through gap junctions [83]. This augmented intercellular connectivity among SGCs contributes to a reduction in the pain threshold [84]. Additionally, activated SGCs also release proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-6, TNF, and fractalkine, eliciting augmented neuronal firing rates and excitability, while also simultaneously coordinating the recruitment of circulating immune cells such as T cells, neutrophils, and macrophages [85,86,87,88].

3.4. Orthodromic and Antidromic Effects

A crucial property of nerve conduction involves the activation of primary afferent nerve fibres distant from the terminal DRG, resulting in the generation of bidirectionally conveyed action potentials. This includes orthodromic input towards the spinal cord and antidromic conduction in the peripheral axons. These signals elicit a calcium-dependent release of neurotransmitters. Additionally, orthodromic activity within the intraspinal circuit in the dorsal horn activates GABAergic neurons, which receive input from nociceptive Aδ and C afferent fibres. This suggests that the afferent drive is subject to modulation by the GABAergic neurons [89,90,91].
Action potentials originate in the peripheral terminals of the DRG neurons, with certain small afferent sympathetic fibres capable of conducting action potentials retrogradely along the same axon, a phenomenon termed as the dorsal root reflex (DRR). Gotch and Horsley first described this centrifugally conducted activity in dorsal roots in 1931 [92,93]. Dorsal root reflexes (DRRs) are thought to play an important role in neurogenic inflammation. Neurogenic inflammation is triggered by substances released from sensory nerve terminals and is characterized mainly by arteriolar vasodilation and plasma extravasation. Notably, neuropeptides, such as substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) are potent vasodilators which are present in the peripheral terminals of nociceptive fibres and are released in response to antidromic stimulation. This process is implicated in facilitating the effects of the antidromic propagation of action potentials with DRG-S [94,95].

3.5. Effects on GABA

The effectiveness of DRG-S may be attributed to the release of GABA within the DRG, the expression of GABA-A receptors in sensory neurons, and the subsequent blocking of action potential propagation through the activation of GABA-A receptors within the DRG [96,97,98,99,100,101]. The Gate Control Theory highlights the integral role of inhibitory GABA-ergic interneurons in modulating nociceptive afferents, serving as a fundamental regulatory element in the SCS of dorsal columns. Stimulation of the ascending branch of non-nociceptive large Aβ fibres in the dorsal column induces antidromic activation, initiating synaptic interactions with GABA-ergic interneurons [97,98,99,100,101]. Activation of GABA-ergic inhibitory interneurons in the superficial laminae of the dorsal horn by Aβ fibres amplifies GABA release, leading to elevated extracellular GABA levels [100]. Importantly, peripheral nerve injury disrupts the innate GABA-ergic inhibition, culminating in heightened neuronal excitability within the spinal dorsal horn—a pivotal factor contributing to neuropathic pain [102,103,104,105].
Koetsier et al. conducted a pioneering experimental study assessing the intracellular GABA levels within the spinal dorsal horn during the peak period of pain relief induced by DRG-S in a neuropathic pain model of painful diabetic polyneuropathy (PDPN). Their investigation utilized immunohistochemical analysis to examine the impact of DRG-S on the intensity of intracellular GABA-staining levels specifically within laminae 1–3 of the L4-L6 spinal levels in animals with PDPN. The study results revealed no statistically significant variance in GABA-immunoreactivity between DRG-S and Sham-DRG-S, neither on the ipsilateral nor contralateral sides. Based on these findings, the study concluded that DRG-S does not elicit GABA release from spinal dorsal horn cells. This observation suggests that the mechanisms facilitating pain relief through DRG-S differ from those associated with conventional SCS [37].

3.6. Supraspinal Effects

DRG-S potentially exerts an influence on supraspinal structures, as evidenced in both animal and human studies [106]. The impact of DRG-S extends to the ascending lateral pathways, pain matrix regions, and descending modulatory pathways, as demonstrated through diverse measurement techniques, including LEP, fMRI, and 18 FDG PET/CT. This observation suggests a convergence in supraspinal mechanisms shared between both SCS and DRG-S [107,108]. The prevailing hypothesis concerning the supraspinal mechanism of action of SCS frequently revolves around the modulation of descending nociceptive inhibitory pathways, followed by adjustments in the ascending medial and lateral pathways [109].
In the first study exploring the supraspinal involvement in DRG-S, Pawela and colleagues conducted functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) within a rat model of DRG-S. Their study aimed to evaluate the impact of DRG-S on the blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signal elicited by the noxious electrical stimulation of the hindlimb. This research marked the initial identification of specific brain regions (including the primary/secondary somatosensory cortex, retrosplenial granular cortex, and basal ganglia) responsive to neuromodulation at the DRG level. Furthermore, the findings suggested potential mechanisms for targeted DRG electrical stimulation or ganglionic field stimulation as a therapeutic approach for chronic pain management [106]. Morgalla et al. conducted a prospective study involving 12 patients experiencing unilateral localized neuropathic pain in the lower limbs or inguinal region. Their investigation highlighted that DRG-S contributed to the restoration of normal laser-evoked potential (LEP) physiology by mitigating the hyperactivity of DRG neurons, consequently diminishing the influence of diffuse noxious inhibitory control on the second-order neurons [108].
Verills et al. conducted a retrospective study involving 39 patients to determine if the DRG-S is paresthesia independent. Their findings revealed that 87% of patients reported the absence of paresthesias during follow-up periods at three-, six-, and twelve-month intervals after treatment. Notably, the study observed an average pain relief of 63.1% after 12 months. One plausible mechanism underlying these findings suggests that DRG-S, which does not elicit paresthesias, potentially attenuates the processing of sensory information at supraspinal levels. This observed effect appears to complement the modulation of painful afferents specifically at the DRG level [110].

3.7. Effects on Ion Channels

The key channels involved in the transmission of action potentials within DRG neurons encompass sodium, potassium, and calcium channels. In response to nerve injury, the amplification of ion channel expression induces neuronal hyperexcitability and sustained neuronal stimulation within the DRG. This enhanced sensitivity crucially contributes to the persistent perception of chronic pain [111,112]. Multiple types of sodium channels are expressed in DRG neurons which are involved in spontaneous action potential generation and hyperexcitability within damaged sensory axons. For instance, there is increased expression of tetrodotoxin-insensitive sodium channels, such as Nav1.8, which significantly contributes to the emergence of ectopic spontaneous activity and neuropathic pain [113]. The voltage-gated calcium channels and glutamate receptors, located on the presynaptic membranes, regulate neurotransmitter release which plays a crucial role in modulating synaptic transmission. Following an injury to peripheral afferent fibres, in vitro studies indicated that DRG neurons demonstrate hyperexcitability and manifest ectopic firing patterns [114]. Neuropathic pain is intricately linked with increased excitatory (glutamatergic) transmission. The glutamate release by C fibres elicits an amplified response in dorsal horn neurons known as the “windup phenomenon” [115]. Pain alleviation during DRG-S might be attributed to the decrease in neural excitability and the ectopic firing rate within the neuropathic DRG [72,116,117].

3.8. Reversal of Cytokine Release

Injury to peripheral afferent fibres triggers the activation of microglia within the DRG. Subsequently, this activation initiates a cascade of cytokines, resulting in inflammation and the onset of neuropathic pain. Targeted electrical stimulation of the DRG counteracts the microglial activation within this region, consequently interrupting the aberrant cytokine cascade responsible for driving the genesis of neuropathic pain. Amir and colleagues have demonstrated that damage to peripheral afferent fibres induces irregular neural patterns marked by oscillatory and burst activity within the DRG [72]. It is theorized that the electrical stimulation of the DRG, akin to the effects seen in deep brain stimulation (DBS), could modulate this aberrant electrical activity by stabilizing the microglia and preventing the release of cytokines, potentially alleviating chronic pain [118]. Additionally, a separate study demonstrated that external electrical stimulation of the DRG regulates both tonic and burst activities in pseudo-unipolar neurons within the DRG [7]. An in-vitro animal study showed that the analgesic effect of DRG-S could be attributed to its ability to modulate nociceptive signals through the regulation of calcium influx locally. This modulation results in the attenuation of both the firing frequency and amplitude of multiple action potentials within the DRG neurons, leading to decreased neuron excitability and slowed nerve conduction velocity compared to the baseline levels prior to stimulation [66].

4. Conclusions

DRG-S is emerging as a promising and innovative neuromodulation technique in the arsenal of pain physicians for addressing intractable chronic pain. Like other neuromodulation therapies, DRG-S operates through multiple mechanisms, as evidenced by a growing body of literature. This review aimed to synthesize the latest evidence on the proposed mechanisms of DRG-S, identify gaps in understanding, and highlight unexplored avenues for future investigation. While DRG-S offers several potential advantages over conventional SCS systems, including direct anatomical targeting and reduced risk of complications, its current approval is limited to managing pain in CRPS. However, its application in various other chronic pain conditions is evolving. Despite its promise, the quantity of evidence-based literature delineating its indications, mechanisms, and advantages remains limited. Therefore, comprehensive mechanistic and evidence-based clinical research is urgently needed to bridge our significant knowledge gaps and expand the therapeutic potential of DRG-S. Embracing this emerging paradigm of therapeutic techniques exploiting DRG-S will undoubtedly enrich our armamentarium for chronic pain management, reinforcing the imperative for ongoing research and development in this ever-advancing field.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A.-E. and S.V.; methodology, A.A.-E., S.V. and A.A.; writing—original draft preparation A.A.-E., S.V. and A.A.; writing—review and editing, A.A., M.V. and S.A.D.; supervision, A.A.-E.; validation, A.A.-E. and S.V.; visualization: S.V.; project administration, A.A.-E. and S.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

Sudhir A. Diwan is the founder (owner) and president of the company Advanced Spine on Park Avenue. Swarnima Vardhan works as a research associate at Advanced Spine on Park Avenue. Alaa Abd-Elsayed is a consultant with Medtronic, Curonix and Avanos. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

APAction potentials
BOLDBlood oxygen-level dependent
CGRPCalcitonin gene-related peptide
CNSCentral nervous system
CRPSComplex regional pain syndrome
CSFCerebrospinal fluid
DBSDeep brain stimulation
DRGDorsal root ganglion
DRG-SDorsal root ganglion stimulation
DRRDorsal root reflex
FBSSFailed back surgery syndrome
FDAFood and Drug Administration
fMRIFunctional magnetic resonance imaging
GABAGamma-aminobutyric acid
GFAPGlial fibrillary acidic protein
LEPLaser-evoked potential
LTMRLow-threshold mechanoreceptor
NSLBPNon-surgical low back pain
PDPNPainful diabetic polyneuropathy
PNSPeripheral nervous system
PSNPrimary sensory neurons
RCTRandomized controlled trial
SCSSpinal cord stimulation
SGCSatellite glial cells
SMPOSubthreshold membrane potential oscillations

References

  1. Goldberg, D.S.; McGee, S. Pain as a Global Public Health Priority. BMC Public Health 2011, 11, 770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care, and Education. Relieving Pain in America: A Blueprint for Transforming Prevention, Care, Education, and Research; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gaskin, D.J.; Richard, P. The Economic Costs of Pain in the United States. J. Pain 2012, 13, 715–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Manchikanti, L.; Helm, S.; Fellows, B.; Janata, J.W.; Pampati, V.; Grider, J.S.; Boswell, M.V. Opioid epidemic in the United States. Pain Physician 2012, 15 (Suppl. S3), ES9–ES38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shealy, C.N.; Taslitz, N.; Mortimer, J.T.; Becker, D.P. Electrical inhibition of pain: Experimental evaluation. Anesth. Analg. 1967, 46, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Berger, A.A.; Liu, Y.; Possoit, H.E.; Rogers, A.C.; Moore, W.; Gress, K.; Cornett, E.M.; Kaye, A.D.; Imani, F.; Sadegi, K.; et al. Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) and Chronic Pain. Anesthesiol. Pain Med. 2021, 11, e113020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Krames, E.S. The Dorsal Root Ganglion in Chronic Pain and as a Target for Neuromodulation: A Review. Neuromodulation 2015, 18, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Vancamp, T.; Levy, R.M.; Peña, I.; Pajuelo, A.G. Relevant Anatomy, Morphology, and Implantation Techniques of the Dorsal Root Ganglia at the Lumbar Levels. Neuromodulation 2017, 20, 690–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Deer, T.R.; Levy, R.M.; Kramer, J.M.; Poree, L.; Amirdelfan, K.; Grigsby, E.; Staats, P.S.; Burton, A.W.; Burgher, A.H.; Obray, J.B.; et al. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Yielded Higher Treatment Success Rate for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome and Causalgia at 3 and 12 Months: A Randomized Comparative Trial. Pain 2016, 158, 669–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Mol, F.M.U.; Roumen, R.M.H. DRG Spinal Cord Stimulation as Solution for Patients with Severe Pain Due to Anterior Cutaneous Nerve Entrapment Syndrome: A Case Series. Neuromodulation 2018, 21, 317–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Deer, T.R.; Grigsby, E.; Weiner, R.L.; Wilcosky, B.; Kramer, J.M. A prospective study of dorsal root ganglion stimulation for the relief of chronic pain. Neuromodulation 2013, 16, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Huygen, F.; Liem, L.; Nijhuis, H.; Cusack, W.F.; Kramer, J.M. Evaluating Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in a Prospective Dutch Cohort. Neuromodulation 2019, 22, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Esposito, M.; Malayil, R.; Hanes, M.; Deer, T.R. Unique Characteristics of the Dorsal Root Ganglion as a Target for Neuromodulation. Pain Med. 2019, 20, S23–S30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kostelic, J.K.; Haughton, V.M.; Sether, L.A. Lumbar Spinal Nerves in the Neural Foramen: MR Appearance. Radiology 1991, 178, 837–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Grandhi, R.K.; Abd-Elsayed, A. Neuroanatomy. In Textbook of Neuroanesthesia and Neurocritical Care; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ahimsadasan, N.; Reddy, V.; Khan Suheb, M.Z.; Kumar, A. Neuroanatomy, Dorsal Root Ganglion. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lemes, J.B.P.; De Campos Lima, T.; Santos, D.O.; Neves, A.F.; De Oliveira, F.S.; Parada, C.A.; Da Cruz Lotufo, C.M. Participation of Satellite Glial Cells of the Dorsal Root Ganglia in Acute Nociception. Neurosci. Lett. 2018, 676, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Matsuda, S.; Kobayashi, N.; Terashita, T.; Shimokawa, T.; Shigemoto, K.; Mominoki, K.; Wakisaka, H.; Saito, S.; Miyawaki, K.; Saito, K.; et al. Phylogenetic Investigation of Dogiel’s Pericellular Nests and Cajal’s Initial Glomeruli in the Dorsal Root Ganglion. J. Comp. Neurol. 2005, 491, 234–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Nascimento, A.I.; Mar, F.M.; Sousa, M.M. The Intriguing Nature of Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons: Linking Structure with Polarity and Function. Prog. Neurobiol. 2018, 168, 86–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Martin, S.; Reid, A.J.; Verkhratsky, A.; Magnaghi, V.; Faroni, A. Gene Expression Changes in Dorsal Root Ganglia Following Peripheral Nerve Injury: Roles in Inflammation, Cell Death and Nociception. Neural Regen. Res. 2019, 14, 939–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Middleton, S.J.; Pérez-Sánchez, J.; Dawes, J.D.K. The Structure of Sensory Afferent Compartments in Health and Disease. J. Anat. 2021, 241, 1186–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Devor, M. Unexplained Peculiarities of the Dorsal Root Ganglion. Pain 1999, 82 (Suppl. S6), S27–S35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. West, C.A.; Hart, A.; Terenghi, G.; Wiberg, M. Sensory Neurons of the Human Brachial Plexus. Neurosurgery 2012, 70, 1183–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tubbs, R.S.; Loukas, M.; Slappey, J.B.; Shoja, M.M.; Oakes, W.J.; Salter, E.G. Clinical Anatomy of the C1 Dorsal Root, Ganglion, and Ramus: A Review and Anatomical Study. Clin. Anat. 2007, 20, 624–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ebraheim, N.A.; Lu, J. Morphometric evaluation of the sacral dorsal root ganglia. A cadaveric study. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 1998, 20, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Braz, J.; Solorzano, C.; Wang, X.; Basbaum, A.I. Transmitting pain and itch messages: A contemporary view of the spinal cord circuits that generate gate control. Neuron 2014, 82, 522–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mandell, J.; Czuczman, G.J.; Gaviola, G.C.; Ghazikhanian, V.; Cho, C.H. The Lumbar Neural Foramen and Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections: An Anatomic Review with Key Safety Considerations in Planning the Percutaneous Approach. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2017, 209, W26–W35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Moon, H.S.; Kim, Y.-D.; Song, B.H.; Deog, Y.; Song, J.H.; Lee, M.H. Position of Dorsal Root Ganglia in the Lumbosacral Region in Patients with Radiculopathy. Korean J. Anesthesiol. 2010, 59, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Vialle, E.; Vialle, L.R.; Contreras, W.; Jacob, C. Anatomical Study on the Relationship between the Dorsal Root Ganglion and the Intervertebral Disc in the Lumbar Spine. Rev. Bras. Ortop. 2015, 50, 450–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gilchrist, R.V.; Slipman, C.W.; Bhagia, S.M. Anatomy of the Intervertebral Foramen. Pain Physician 2002, 4, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jiménez-Andrade, J.M.; Herrera, M.; Ghilardi, J.R.; Vardanyan, M.; Melemedjian, O.K.; Mantyh, P.W. Vascularization of the Dorsal Root Ganglia and Peripheral Nerve of the Mouse: Implications for Chemical-Induced Peripheral Sensory Neuropathies. Mol. Pain 2008, 4, 1744–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Kiernan, J.A. Vascular permeability in the peripheral autonomic and somatic nervous systems: Controversial aspects and comparisons with the blood-brain barrier. Microsc. Res. Tech. 1996, 35, 122–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kobayashi, T.; Storrie, B.; Simons, K.; Dotti, C.G. A Functional Barrier to Movement of Lipids in Polarized Neurons. Nature 1992, 359, 647–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bevan, S.; Yeats, J.C. Protons Activate a Cation Conductance in a Sub-population of Rat Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurones. J. Physiol. 1991, 433, 145–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Devor, M.; Wall, P.D. Cross-Excitation in Dorsal Root Ganglia of Nerve-Injured and Intact Rats. J. Neurophysiol. 1990, 64, 1733–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kim, D.H.; Imran, M.A. Leland Stanford Junior University and Spinal Modulation LLC. Method and System for Stimulating a Dorsal Root Ganglion. U.S. Patent 7,580,753, 25 August 2009. [Google Scholar]
  37. Koetsier, E.; Franken, G.; Debets, J.; Heijmans, L.; Van Kuijk, S.M.J.; Linderoth, B.; Joosten, E.A.; Maino, P. Mechanism of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Pain Relief in Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy Is Not Dependent on GABA Release in the Dorsal Horn of the Spinal Cord. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2019, 26, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Franken, G.; Douven, P.; Debets, J.; Joosten, E.A. Conventional Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in an Experimental Model of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Quantitative Immunocytochemical Analysis of Intracellular Γ-Aminobutyric Acid in Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons. Neuromodul. Technol. Neural Interface 2021, 24, 639–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Holsheimer, J.; Den Boer, J.A.; Struijk, J.J.; Rozeboom, A.R. MR assessment of the normal position of the spinal cord in the spinal canal. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1994, 15, 951–959. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Figley, C.R.; Stroman, P.W. Investigation of human cervical and upper thoracic spinal cord motion: Implications for imaging spinal cord structure and function. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007, 58, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Kramer, J.; Liem, L.; Russo, M.; Smet, I.; Van Buyten, J.P.; Huygen, F. Lack of body positional effects on paresthesias when stimulating the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) in the treatment of chronic pain. Neuromodulation 2015, 18, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Lam, C.K.; Rosenow, J.M. Patient perspectives on the efficacy and ergonomics of rechargeable spinal cord stimulators. Neuromodulation 2010, 13, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Turner, J.A.; Jensen, M.P.; Romano, J.M. Do beliefs, coping, and catastrophizing independently predict functioning in patients with chronic pain? Pain 2000, 85, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Piedade, G.S.; Gillner, S.; McPhillips, P.S.; Vesper, J.; Slotty, P.J. Frequency dependency of therapeutic efficacy in dorsal root ganglion stimulation for neuropathic pain. Acta Neurochir. 2022, 164, 1193–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chapman, K.B.; Yousef, T.A.; Foster, A.; D Stanton-Hicks, M.; van Helmond, N. Mechanisms for the Clinical Utility of Low-Frequency Stimulation in Neuromodulation of the Dorsal Root Ganglion. Neuromodulation 2021, 24, 738–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chapman, K.B.; Yousef, T.A.; Vissers, K.C.; van Helmond, N.; D Stanton-Hicks, M. Very Low Frequencies Maintain Pain Relief from Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: An Evaluation of Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurostimulation Frequency Tapering. Neuromodulation 2021, 24, 746–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Piedade, G.S.; Gillner, S.; McPhillips, P.S.; Vesper, J.; Slotty, P.J. Effect of low-frequency dorsal root ganglion stimulation in the treatment of chronic pain. Acta Neurochir. 2023, 165, 947–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Chapman, K.B.; Spiegel, M.A.; van Helmond, N.; Patel, K.V.; Yang, A.; Yousef, T.A.; Mandelberg, N.; Deer, T.; Mogilner, A.Y. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation as a Salvage Therapy Following Failed Spinal Cord Stimulation. Neuromodulation 2022, 25, 1024–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Deer, T.R.; Pope, J.E. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation approval by the Food and Drug Administration: Advice on evolving the process. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2016, 16, 1123–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Ghorayeb, J.H.; Chitneni, A.; Rupp, A.; Parkash, A.; Abd-Elsayed, A. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review. Pain Pract. 2023, 23, 838–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. D’Souza, R.S.; Langford, B.; Dombovy-Johnson, M.; Abd-Elsayed, A. Neuromodulation Interventions for the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2022, 26, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Elsayed, A.A.; Moghim, R.; Reffat, N. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation (DRG-s) for Potential Resolution of Restless Leg Syndrome Symptoms and Increased Cost Savings for Patients: A Case Study. Pain Pract. 2024; Epub ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Abd-Elsayed, A.; Pope, J.E.; Mundey, D.A.; Slavin, K.V.; Falowski, S.; Chitneni, A.; Popielarski, S.R.; John, J.; Grodofsky, S.; Vanetesse, T.; et al. Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management of Painful Scar: A Narrative Review. J. Pain Res. 2022, 15, 925–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Weiner, R.L.; Yeung, A.; Montes Garcia, C.; Tyler Perryman, L.; Speck, B. Treatment of FBSS low back pain with a novel percutaneous DRG wireless stimulator: Pilot and feasibility study. Pain Med. 2016, 17, 1911–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Huygen, F.; Liem, L.; Cusack, W.; Kramer, J. Stimulation of the L2-L3 dorsal root ganglia induces effective pain relief in the low back. Pain Pract. 2018, 18, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Krames, E.S. The Role of the Dorsal Root Ganglion in the Development of Neuropathic Pain. Pain Med. 2014, 15, 1669–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Spencer, P.S.; Raine, C.S.; Wiśniewski, H.M. Axon Diameter and Myelin Thickness—Unusual Relationships in Dorsal Root Ganglia. Anat. Rec. 1973, 176, 225–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Sørenstua, M.; Leonardsen, A.L.; Chin, K.J. Dorsal Root Ganglion: A Key to Understanding the Therapeutic Effects of the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) and Other Intertransverse Process Blocks? Reg. Anesthesia Pain Med. 2023, 49, 223–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Gemes, G.; Koopmeiners, A.S.; Rigaud, M.; Lirk, P.; Sapunar, D.; Bangaru, M.L.Y.; Vilceanu, D.; Garrison, S.R.; Ljubković, M.; Mueller, S.M.; et al. Failure of Action Potential Propagation in Sensory Neurons: Mechanisms and Loss of Afferent Filtering in C-Type Units after Painful Nerve Injury. J. Physiol. 2013, 591, 1111–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Amir, R.; Devor, M. Electrical Excitability of the SOMA of Sensory Neurons Is Required for Spike Invasion of the SOMA, but Not for Through-Conduction. Biophys. J. 2003, 84, 2181–2191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sundt, D.; Gamper, N.; Jaffe, D.B. Spike Propagation through the Dorsal Root Ganglia in an Unmyelinated Sensory Neuron: A Modeling Study. J. Neurophysiol. 2015, 114, 3140–3153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Corder, G.; Castro, D.C.; Bruchas, M.R.; Scherrer, G. Endogenous and Exogenous Opioids in Pain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2018, 41, 453–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Chapman, K.B.; Groenen, P.S.; Vissers, K.C.; van Helmond, N.; Stanton-Hicks, M.D. The Pathways and Processes Underlying Spinal Transmission of Low Back Pain: Observations From Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Treatment. Neuromodulation 2021, 24, 610–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. D’Souza, R.S.; Kubrova, E.; Her, Y.F.; Barman, R.; Smith, B.J.; Alvarez, G.M.; West, T.; Abd-Elsayed, A. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Lower Extremity Neuropathic Pain Syndromes: An Evidence-Based Literature Review. Adv. Ther. 2022, 39, 4440–4473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Graham, R.; Sankarasubramanian, V.; Lempka, S.F. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Pain: Hypothesized Mechanisms of Action. J. Pain 2022, 23, 196–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Koopmeiners, A.S.; Mueller, S.M.; Kramer, J.; Hogan, Q.H. Effect of Electrical Field Stimulation on Dorsal Root Ganglion Neuronal Function. Neuromodul. Technol. Neural Interface 2013, 16, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Suh, Y.S.; Chung, K.; Coggeshall, R.E. A Study of Axonal Diameters and Areas in Lumbosacral Roots and Nerves in the Rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 1984, 222, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Liu, Z.; Chiu, S.Y. Computer Model for Action Potential Propagation through Branch Point in Myelinated Nerves. J. Neurophysiol. 2001, 85, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cummins, T.R.; Dib-Hajj, S.D.; Black, J.A.; Akopian, A.N.; Wood, J.N.; Waxman, S.G. A Novel Persistent Tetrodotoxin-Resistant Sodium Current in SNS-Null and Wild-Type Small Primary Sensory Neurons. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19, RC43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Song, X.; Hu, S.-J.; Greenquist, K.W.; Zhang, J.; LaMotte, R.H. Mechanical and Thermal Hyperalgesia and Ectopic Neuronal Discharge after Chronic Compression of Dorsal Root Ganglia. J. Neurophysiol. 1999, 82, 3347–3358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Amir, R.; Michaelis, M.; Devor, M. Burst Discharge in Primary Sensory Neurons: Triggered by Subthreshold Oscillations, Maintained by Depolarizing Afterpotentials. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 1187–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Amir, R.; Michaelis, M.; Devor, M. Membrane Potential Oscillations in Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons: Role in Normal Electrogenesis and Neuropathic Pain. J. Neurosci. 1999, 19, 8589–8596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kovalsky, Y.; Amir, R.; Devor, M. Simulation in Sensory Neurons Reveals a Key Role for Delayed NA+ Current in Subthreshold Oscillations and Ectopic Discharge: Implications for Neuropathic Pain. J. Neurophysiol. 2009, 102, 1430–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Amir, R.; Argoff, C.E.; Bennett, G.J.; Cummins, T.R.; Durieux, M.E.; Gerner, P.; Gold, M.S.; Porreca, F.; Strichartz, G.R. The Role of Sodium Channels in Chronic Inflammatory and Neuropathic Pain. J. Pain 2006, 7, S1–S29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Amir, R.; Kocsis, J.D.; Devor, M. Multiple Interacting Sites of Ectopic Spike Electrogenesis in Primary Sensory Neurons. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25, 2576–2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ma, C.; LaMotte, R.H. Multiple Sites for Generation of Ectopic Spontaneous Activity in Neurons of the Chronically Compressed Dorsal Root Ganglion. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27, 14059–14068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Amir, R.; Liu, C.; Kocsis, J.D.; Devor, M. Oscillatory Mechanism in Primary Sensory Neurones. Brain 2002, 125, 421–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Campbell, J.N.; Raja, S.N.; Meyer, R.A.; Mackinnon, S.E. Myelinated Afferents Signal the Hyperalgesia Associated with Nerve Injury. Pain 1988, 32, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bethea, J.R.; Fischer, R. Role of Peripheral Immune Cells for Development and Recovery of Chronic Pain. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 641588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Znaor, L.; Lovrić, S.; Hogan, Q.; Sapunar, D. Association of neural inflammation with hyperalgesia following spinal nerve ligation. Croat. Med. J. 2007, 48, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  81. Hanani, M.; Spray, D.C. Emerging Importance of Satellite Glia in Nervous System Function and Dysfunction. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2020, 21, 485–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Utzschneider, D.A.; Kocsis, J.D.; Devor, M. Mutual Excitation among Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons in the Rat. Neurosci. Lett. 1992, 146, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Mohr, K.M.; Pallesen, L.T.; Richner, M.; Vægter, C.B. Discrepancy in the Usage of GFAP as a Marker of Satellite Glial Cell Reactivity. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Huang, T.-Y.; Belzer, V.; Hanani, M. Gap Junctions in Dorsal Root Ganglia: Possible Contribution to Visceral Pain. Eur. J. Pain 2010, 14, 49.e1–49.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Dubový, P.; Klusáková, I.; Svíženská, I.H.; Brázda, V. Satellite Glial Cells Express IL-6 and Corresponding Signal-Transducing Receptors in the Dorsal Root Ganglia of Rat Neuropathic Pain Model. Neuron Glia Biol. 2010, 6, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. De Souza, G.E.; Talbot, J.; Da Cruz Lotufo, C.M.; Cunha, F.Q.; Cunha, T.M.; Ferreira, S.H. Fractalkine Mediates Inflammatory Pain through Activation of Satellite Glial Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 11193–11198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Mitterreiter, J.G.; Ouwendijk, W.J.D.; Van Velzen, M.; Van Nierop, G.P.; Osterhaus, A.D.M.E.; Verjans, G.M.G.M. Satellite Glial Cells in Human Trigeminal Ganglia Have a Broad Expression of Functional Toll-like Receptors. Eur. J. Immunol. 2017, 47, 1181–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Estivill-Torrús, G.; Martínez-Padilla, A.B.; Sánchez-Salido, L.; Evercooren, A.B.-V.; Garcia-Diaz, B. The Dorsal Root Ganglion as a Target for Neurorestoration in Neuropathic Pain. Neural Regen. Res. 2023, 19, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Sorkin, L.S.; Eddinger, K.A.; Woller, S.A.; Yaksh, T.L. Origins of Antidromic Activity in Sensory Afferent Fibers and Neurogenic Inflammation. Semin. Immunopathol. 2018, 40, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Alvarez, F.J.; Kavookjian, A.M.; Light, A.R. Synaptic interactions between GABA- immunoreactive profiles and the terminals of functionally defined myelinated nociceptors in the monkey and cat spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 1992, 12, 2901–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Todd, A.J. Plasticity of inhibition in the spinal cord. In Pain Control. Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; Volume 227, pp. 171–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Toennies, J.F. Reflex discharge from the spinal cord over the dorsal roots. J. Neurophysiol. 1938, 1, 378–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Lobanov, O.V.; Peng, Y.B. Differential Contribution of Electrically Evoked Dorsal Root Reflexes to Peripheral Vasodilatation and Plasma Extravasation. J. Neuroinflamm. 2011, 8, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Willis, W.D., Jr. Dorsal root potentials and dorsal root reflexes: A double-edged sword. Exp. Brain Res. 1999, 124, 395–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Chapman, K.B.; Sayed, D.; Lamer, T.J.; Hunter, C.; Weisbein, J.; Patel, K.V.; Dickerson, D.; Hagedorn, J.M.; Lee, D.W.; Amirdelfan, K.; et al. Best Practices for Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Pain: Guidelines from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience. J. Pain Res. 2023, 16, 839–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Du, X.; Hao, H.; Yang, Y.; Huang, S.C.; Wang, C.; Gigout, S.; Ramli, R.; Li, X.; Jaworska, E.; Edwards, I.; et al. Local GABAergic Signaling within Sensory Ganglia Controls Peripheral Nociceptive Transmission. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 1741–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Guan, Y. Spinal Cord Stimulation: Neurophysiological and Neurochemical Mechanisms of Action. Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2012, 16, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Stiller, C.; Cui, J.; O’Connor, W.T.; Brodin, E.; Meyerson, B.A.; Linderoth, B. Release of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid in the Dorsal Horn and Suppression of Tactile Allodynia by Spinal Cord Stimulation in Mononeuropathic Rats. Neurosurgery 1996, 39, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Janssen, S.; Truin, M.; Van Kleef, M.; Joosten, E.A. Differential GABAergic Disinhibition during the Development of Painful Peripheral Neuropathy. Neuroscience 2011, 184, 183–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Janssen, S.; Gerard, S.; Raijmakers, M.; Truin, M.; Van Kleef, M.; Joosten, E.A. Decreased Intracellular GABA Levels Contribute to Spinal Cord Stimulation-Induced Analgesia in Rats Suffering from Painful Peripheral Neuropathy: The Role of KCC2 and GABAA Receptor-Mediated Inhibition. Neurochem. Int. 2012, 60, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Smits, H.; Van Kleef, M.; Holsheimer, J.; Joosten, E.A. Experimental Spinal Cord Stimulation and Neuropathic Pain: Mechanism of Action, Technical Aspects, and Effectiveness. Pain Pract. 2012, 13, 154–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Moore, K.A.; Kohno, T.; Karchewski, L.A.; Scholz, J.; Baba, H.; Woolf, C.J. Partial Peripheral Nerve Injury Promotes a Selective Loss of GABAergic Inhibition in the Superficial Dorsal Horn of the Spinal Cord. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 6724–6731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Patel, S.; Naeem, S.; Kesingland, A.; Froestl, W.; Capogna, M.; Urbán, L.; Fox, A. The Effects of GABAB Agonists and Gabapentin on Mechanical Hyperalgesia in Models of Neuropathic and Inflammatory Pain in the Rat. Pain 2001, 90, 217–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Somers, D.L.; Clemente, F.R. Dorsal Horn Synaptosomal Content of Aspartate, Glutamate, Glycine and GABA Are Differentially Altered Following Chronic Constriction Injury to the Rat Sciatic Nerve. Neurosci. Lett. 2002, 323, 171–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Drew, G.M.; Siddall, P.J.; Duggan, A.W. Mechanical Allodynia Following Contusion Injury of the Rat Spinal Cord Is Associated with Loss of GABAergic Inhibition in the Dorsal Horn. Pain 2004, 109, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Pawela, C.P.; Kramer, J.M.; Hogan, Q.H. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Attenuates the BOLD Signal Response to Noxious Sensory Input in Specific Brain Regions: Insights into a Possible Mechanism for Analgesia. NeuroImage 2017, 147, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Mehta, V.; Bouchareb, Y.; Ramaswamy, S.; Ahmad, A.; Wodehouse, T.; Haroon, A. Metabolic Imaging of Pain Matrix Using 18F Fluoro-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Patients Undergoing L2 Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Low Back Pain. Neuromodulation 2020, 23, 222–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Morgalla, M.; De Barros Filho, M.F.; Chander, B.S.; Soekadar, S.R.; Tatagiba, M.; Lepski, G. Neurophysiological Effects of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation (DRGS) in Pain Processing at the Cortical Level. Neuromodul. Technol. Neural Interface 2019, 22, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Goudman, L.; De Groote, S.; Linderoth, B.; De Smedt, A.; Eldabe, S.; Duarte, R.; Moens, M. Exploration of the Supraspinal Hypotheses about Spinal Cord Stimulation and Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Verrills, P.; Mitchell, B.; Vivian, D.; Cusack, W.F.; Kramer, J.M. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation Is Paresthesia-Independent: A Retrospective Study. Neuromodulation 2019, 22, 937–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Yu, R.S.; Kayani, K.; Whyte-Oshodi, D.; Whyte-Oshodi, A.; Nachiappan, N.; Gnanarajah, S.; Mohammed, R. Voltage Gated Sodium Channels as Therapeutic Targets for Chronic Pain. J. Pain Res. 2019, 12, 2709–2722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Smith, P.A. K+ Channels in Primary Afferents and Their Role in Nerve Injury-Induced Pain. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 566418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Theile, J.W.; Cummins, T.R. Recent Developments Regarding Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers for the Treatment of Inherited and Acquired Neuropathic Pain Syndromes. Front. Pharmacol. 2011, 2, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Liu, X.; Chung, K.; Chung, J.M. Ectopic Discharges and Adrenergic Sensitivity of Sensory Neurons after Spinal Nerve Injury. Brain Res. 1999, 849, 244–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Mendell, L.M. The Path to Discovery of Windup and Central Sensitization. Front. Pain Res. 2022, 3, 833104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Kajander, K.C.; Wakisaka, S.; Bennett, G.J. Spontaneous Discharge Originates in the Dorsal Root Ganglion at the Onset of a Painful Peripheral Neuropathy in the Rat. Neurosci. Lett. 1992, 138, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kent, A.R.; Min, X.; Hogan, Q.H.; Kramer, J.M. Mechanisms of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in Pain Suppression: A Computational Modeling Analysis. Neuromodulation 2018, 21, 234–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. McIntyre, C.C.; Savasta, M.; Goff, L.K.; Vitek, J.L. Uncovering the Mechanism(s) of Action of Deep Brain Stimulation: Activation, Inhibition, or Both. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115, 1239–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 25 03591 g001
Figure 1. Anatomy of the dorsal root ganglion, vertebrae, grey and white matter. Figure reproduced from Ahimsadasan, N. et al., 2022 [16] under Creative Commons (CC BY) license.
Figure 1. Anatomy of the dorsal root ganglion, vertebrae, grey and white matter. Figure reproduced from Ahimsadasan, N. et al., 2022 [16] under Creative Commons (CC BY) license.
Ijms 25 03591 g001
Ijms 25 03591 g002
Figure 2. Schematic diagram delineating structure and cellular composition of dorsal root ganglion (DRG). (A) The DRG houses the cell bodies of the primary sensory neurons (PSNs), with central and peripheral axon extensions. (B) An illustration of the prominent cells within the DRG. The satellite glial cells (SGCs) surround the neuronal cell bodies, whilst the Schwann cells (SCs) ensheath and myelinate axon fibres, and finally the macrophages are present for the immune response. Image reproduced from Martin, S. et al. 2019 [20] under Creative commons [CC BY] license.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram delineating structure and cellular composition of dorsal root ganglion (DRG). (A) The DRG houses the cell bodies of the primary sensory neurons (PSNs), with central and peripheral axon extensions. (B) An illustration of the prominent cells within the DRG. The satellite glial cells (SGCs) surround the neuronal cell bodies, whilst the Schwann cells (SCs) ensheath and myelinate axon fibres, and finally the macrophages are present for the immune response. Image reproduced from Martin, S. et al. 2019 [20] under Creative commons [CC BY] license.
Ijms 25 03591 g002
Ijms 25 03591 g003
Figure 3. The figure illustrates the location of DRG in the spinal cord. DRG neuron has a unique pseudo-unipolar structure characterized by a single axon which bifurcates at the T-junction. The T-junction serves as a site of selective modulation of electrical impulses originating from the periphery transmitted via the axon. Figure reproduced from Sørenstua, M. et al., 2023 [58] under Creative Commons (CC BY) license.
Figure 3. The figure illustrates the location of DRG in the spinal cord. DRG neuron has a unique pseudo-unipolar structure characterized by a single axon which bifurcates at the T-junction. The T-junction serves as a site of selective modulation of electrical impulses originating from the periphery transmitted via the axon. Figure reproduced from Sørenstua, M. et al., 2023 [58] under Creative Commons (CC BY) license.
Ijms 25 03591 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abd-Elsayed, A.; Vardhan, S.; Aggarwal, A.; Vardhan, M.; Diwan, S.A. Mechanisms of Action of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3591. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073591

AMA Style

Abd-Elsayed A, Vardhan S, Aggarwal A, Vardhan M, Diwan SA. Mechanisms of Action of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(7):3591. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073591

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abd-Elsayed, Alaa, Swarnima Vardhan, Abhinav Aggarwal, Madhurima Vardhan, and Sudhir A. Diwan. 2024. "Mechanisms of Action of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 7: 3591. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25073591

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop