Next Article in Journal
The Role of microRNAs in Gene Expression and Signaling Response of Tumor Cells to an Acidic Environment
Previous Article in Journal
The Potential of Endophytes in Improving Salt–Alkali Tolerance and Salinity Resistance in Plants
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Proteomics and Metabolomics in Biomedicine

by
Lucia Santorelli
1,
Marianna Caterino
2,3 and
Michele Costanzo
2,3,*
1
Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milano, 20122 Milan, Italy
2
Department of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
3
CEINGE–Biotecnologie Avanzate Franco Salvatore, 80145 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(23), 16913; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242316913
Submission received: 22 November 2023 / Accepted: 27 November 2023 / Published: 29 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Topic Proteomics and Metabolomics in Biomedicine)
The technological advances of recent years have significantly enhanced medical discoveries. In particular, biomedical research has been largely supported by the omics revolution [1]. During this revolution, each omics science has independently grown to deliver branches of knowledge with precious information at different levels, offering new, intriguing resources to integrate such information across these molecular layers [2,3]. Among them, proteomics and metabolomics allow for the description of the layout of the biochemical processes and organization of the human body, in both pathological and physiological contexts. At present, proteomics and metabolomics approaches for biomedicine rely on the most advanced liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) platforms despite many metabolomics investigations being more suitably carried out using gas chromatography (GC)–MS or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) systems for molecule detection and identification [4,5,6].
Relevant metabolic information can be tracked through investigation of the alterations in the proteome or the sub-proteomes of cells or organisms, with clear appreciation of the variations occurring in signaling pathways or interactome networks, as described for cancer, metabolic disorders, or infective diseases [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. To obtain proteome-wide information on proteins and their post-translational modification status, even at the single-cell resolution, protein quantification strategies have been developed, with them mostly relying on MS properties [15,16,17,18,19,20]. On the other hand, metabolomics technologies have helped the discovery of several potential biomarkers of diseases pertaining to renal, intestinal, or hepatic injury, particularly originating from studies performed on biological fluids—so-called “liquid biopsies”—such as saliva, sweat, breath, semen, feces, and amniotic, cerebrospinal, and broncho-alveolar fluid [21,22,23]. Metabolomics generally focuses on small molecules belonging to the hydrophilic classes, while lipidomics has emerged as an independent omics owing to the complexity of the lipid species [24,25,26].
On the verge of achieving conclusive results in biomedicine with the support of omics sciences, many questions related to the most disparate fields remain unsolved. Accordingly, this topic brings together thirty-eight published articles unveiling interesting findings with potential biomedical and clinical applications.
Metabolomics approaches have been largely adopted to investigate the changes in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease associated with therapeutic responses [27], to identify known and novel circulating metabolites and metabolic pathways associated with coronary heart disease [28], to find alterations in acylcarnitine levels in the brain of mice with neonatal hypoxic–ischemic brain injury [29], to explore the causes of low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D after living donor liver transplantation [30], and to analyze the fecal lipidomic profiles of individuals with metabolic syndrome [31]. Moreover, with an application to cancer research, Buszewska-Forajta et al. explored the possibility of using citric acid as a potential biomarker for prostate cancer [32].
Other studies have been conducted with a precise focus on pregnancy and embryonic development. In particular, a metabolomic analysis performed on placenta and cord blood showed deep lipid and energetic metabolic remodeling due to intrauterine growth restriction [33]; another study focusing on the differences between the arterial and venous umbilical cord plasma metabolome pointed out a particular association between venous metabolites and parity, clarifying the importance of the choice of mixed, arterial, or venous cord blood when performing experiments related to this field [34]. In animals, cyclophosphamide was found to induce lipid and metabolite perturbation in amniotic fluid during rat embryonic development [35]; in contrast, the effect of sex steroids on pregnancy-associated hormone receptors and extracellular matrix proteins was evaluated during early–mid pregnancy in cows [36].
Non-human organisms have been analyzed by some authors, resulting in the identification of two proteins, glucose/ribitol dehydrogenase and 16.9 kDa class I heat shock protein 1, as novel wheat allergens [37], or the obtainment of insights into triterpene saponin biosynthesis in the tea plant (Camellia sinensis) [38]. Moreover, the effects of different molecules have been investigated, such as the antiviral effects of Isatis root polysaccharides against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus [39] or the possible anticoagulant and antithrombotic effects of the venom of the snake Deinagkistrodon acutus [40]. Potential pharmacological effects were also found by Xie et al. who associated the antipyretic mechanism to ellagic acid in rats [41,42]. Additionally, a blood deficiency rat model was used to investigate the hematopoietic and antioxidant effects of Maoji Jiu medicinal wine on metabolism [43].
The same nutraceutical approach was employed by Kim et al. in their demonstration of sulforaphane’s protective activity on secondhand smoking-induced pulmonary damage [44] and Jo et al. who elucidated the downstream effects of donepezil treatment on gut microbiota in Aβ-induced cognitive impairment status [45]. The correlation between proteome or metabolome changes and drug perturbation was also explored in some of the selected papers. A proteomic snapshot of progressive molecular signatures was carried out in hippocampal mice tissue after pharmacological inhibition of nitric oxide synthase activity [46], whilst a proteomic analysis highlighted the effects of chitosan hydrogel supplemented with metformin on the neural differentiation of stem cells, with the final aim of employing them in the construction of biomimetic scaffolds for disease treatment [47].
The methodological aspects of the included studies mostly focused on MS, and its developments and applications have also been investigated. For instance, it was demonstrated that the chosen sample preparation process remarkably impacts tissue collection in MALDI imaging approaches [48], and even the sample transport process affects the proteome of clinically relevant samples such as blood extracellular vesicles [49]. Using differential affinity chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry, an antimicrobial peptide was found to interact with common targets in eukaryotes involved in essential pathways [50]; the authors suggest considering this approach to identify drug targets in pathogens and hosts with the aim of eliminating compounds with potential side effects [50]. To improve pharmacokinetic properties, the modification of molecules, such as PEGylation or fusion to PEG mimetic polypeptides, is important. Two PEG mimetic approaches, GlycoTAIL and FlexiTAIL, were applied to increase the hydrodynamic radius of antibody fragments of different sizes and valencies, with them exhibiting a prolonged half-life and increased drug disposition in mice [51]. One paper proposed three diverse techniques to isolate starch grain proteins, demonstrating how different sample preparation processes influence the respective proteomic results [52]. Godbole et al. developed a severity score for respiratory disorders, such as airflow obstruction and emphysema, based on metabolomics analyses [53]. Finally, Terracina et al. evaluated the reliability of an automated urine dipstick analysis method for creatinine and albumin values with respect to quantitative tests. They found that, despite being more rapid and less expensive, dipstick assessment tends to overestimate the albumin/creatinine ratio, resulting in a higher number of false positives [54].
Nonetheless, a total of seven reviews were also published as part of this topic. Some of these revolve around the application of proteomics and metabolomics to biomarkers or pathway discovery for the diagnosis and management of cancer [55,56,57], while others evaluate the impact of metabolomics in the recognition of peritoneal membrane dysfunctions in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis [58]. Opportunities and challenges have been discussed with regards to pharmacometabolomics for the study of lipid-lowering therapies [59] and for the enrichment and characterization of protein lipidation as a form of post-translational modification [60]. Finally, one article extensively describes the proteomic and metabolomic signatures of COVID-19, emphasizing the latest discoveries regarding the disease and the efforts provided by the omics community, unifying them under the term COVIDomics [61].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gonzalez-Covarrubias, V.; Martínez-Martínez, E.; del Bosque-Plata, L. The Potential of Metabolomics in Biomedical Applications. Metabolites 2022, 12, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vandereyken, K.; Sifrim, A.; Thienpont, B.; Voet, T. Methods and applications for single-cell and spatial multi-omics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2023, 24, 494–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Medina, M.Á. Systems biology for molecular life sciences and its impact in biomedicine. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2013, 70, 1035–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Costanzo, M.; Caterino, M.; Ruoppolo, M. Targeted metabolomics. In Metabolomics Perspectives; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; pp. 219–236. [Google Scholar]
  5. Roviello, G.N.; Roviello, G.; Musumeci, D.; Capasso, D.; Di Gaetano, S.; Costanzo, M.; Pedone, N. Synthesis and supramolecular assembly of 1,3-bis(1′-uracilyl)-2-propanone. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 28691–28698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jacob, M.; Lopata, A.L.; Dasouki, M.; Abdel Rahman, A.M. Metabolomics toward personalized medicine. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2019, 38, 221–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ivakhno, S.; Kornelyuk, A. Quantitative proteomics and its applications for systems biology. Biochemistry 2006, 71, 1060–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Manes, N.P.; Nita-Lazar, A. Application of targeted mass spectrometry in bottom-up proteomics for systems biology research. J. Proteom. 2018, 189, 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sun, Y.V.; Hu, Y.-J. Integrative Analysis of Multi-omics Data for Discovery and Functional Studies of Complex Human Diseases. Adv. Genet. 2016, 93, 147–190. [Google Scholar]
  10. Santorelli, L.; Caterino, M.; Costanzo, M. Dynamic Interactomics by Cross-Linking Mass Spectrometry: Mapping the Daily Cell Life in Postgenomic Era. Omi. A J. Integr. Biol. 2022, 26, 633–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Costanzo, M.; Caterino, M.; Cevenini, A.; Jung, V.; Chhuon, C.; Lipecka, J.; Fedele, R.; Guerrera, I.C.; Ruoppolo, M. Dataset of a comparative proteomics experiment in a methylmalonyl-CoA mutase knockout HEK 293 cell model. Data Brief 2020, 33, 106453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Costanzo, M.; Fiocchetti, M.; Ascenzi, P.; Marino, M.; Caterino, M.; Ruoppolo, M. Proteomic and Bioinformatic Investigation of Altered Pathways in Neuroglobin-Deficient Breast Cancer Cells. Molecules 2021, 26, 2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gonzalez Melo, M.; Fontana, A.O.; Viertl, D.; Allenbach, G.; Prior, J.O.; Rotman, S.; Feichtinger, R.G.; Mayr, J.A.; Coatanzo, M.; Caterino, M.; et al. A knock-in rat model unravels acute and chronic renal toxicity in glutaric aciduria type I. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2021, 134, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Manganelli, V.; Salvatori, I.; Costanzo, M.; Capozzi, A.; Caissutti, D.; Caterino, M.; Valle, C.; Ferri, A.; Sorice, M.; Ruoppolo, M.; et al. Overexpression of Neuroglobin Promotes Energy Metabolism and Autophagy Induction in Human Neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y Cells. Cells 2021, 10, 3394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Su, Y.; Shi, Q.; Wei, W. Single cell proteomics in biomedicine: High-dimensional data acquisition, visualization, and analysis. Proteomics 2017, 17, 1600267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Santorelli, L.; Capitoli, G.; Chinello, C.; Piga, I.; Clerici, F.; Denti, V.; Smith, A.; Grasso, A.; Raimondo, F.; Grasso, M.; et al. In-Depth Mapping of the Urinary N-Glycoproteome: Distinct Signatures of ccRCC-related Progression. Cancers 2020, 12, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Doellinger, J.; Blumenscheit, C.; Schneider, A.; Lasch, P. Increasing Proteome Depth While Maintaining Quantitative Precision in Short-Gradient Data-Independent Acquisition Proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2023, 22, 2131–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Matthiesen, R.; Carvalho, A.S. Methods and Algorithms for Quantitative Proteomics by Mass Spectrometry. Methods Mol. Biol. 2020, 2051, 161–197. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ross, P.L.; Huang, Y.N.; Marchese, J.N.; Williamson, B.; Parker, K.; Hattan, S.; Khainovski, N.; Pillai, S.; Dey, S.; Daniels, S.; et al. Multiplexed Protein Quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Using Amine-reactive Isobaric Tagging Reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 2004, 3, 1154–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rotello, R.J.; Veenstra, T.D. Mass Spectrometry Techniques: Principles and Practices for Quantitative Proteomics. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2021, 22, 121–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Di Sario, G.; Rossella, V.; Famulari, E.S.; Maurizio, A.; Lazarevic, D.; Giannese, F.; Felici, C. Enhancing clinical potential of liquid biopsy through a multi-omic approach: A systematic review. Front. Genet. 2023, 14, 1152470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Santorelli, L.; Morello, W.; Barigazzi, E.; Capitoli, G.; Tamburello, C.; Ghio, L.; Crapella, B.; Galimberti, S.; Montini, G.; Pitto, M.; et al. Urinary Extracellular Vesicle Protein Profiles Discriminate Different Clinical Subgroups of Children with Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Di Minno, A.; Gelzo, M.; Caterino, M.; Costanzo, M.; Ruoppolo, M.; Castaldo, G. Challenges in Metabolomics-Based Tests, Biomarkers Revealed by Metabolomic Analysis, and the Promise of the Application of Metabolomics in Precision Medicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, R.; Li, B.; Lam, S.M.; Shui, G. Integration of lipidomics and metabolomics for in-depth understanding of cellular mechanism and disease progression. J. Genet. Genom. 2020, 47, 69–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Han, X.; Gross, R.W. The foundations and development of lipidomics. J. Lipid Res. 2022, 63, 100164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gallart-Ayala, H.; Teav, T.; Ivanisevic, J. Metabolomics meets lipidomics: Assessing the small molecule component of metabolism. BioEssays 2020, 42, 2000052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lee, K.S.; Cho, Y.; Kim, H.; Hwang, H.; Cho, J.W.; Lee, Y.; Lee, S.-G. Association of Metabolomic Change and Treatment Response in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ullah, E.; El-Menyar, A.; Kunji, K.; Elsousy, R.; Mokhtar, H.R.B.; Ahmad, E.; Al-Nesf, M.; Beotra, A.; Al-Maadheed, M.; Mohamed-Ali, V.; et al. Untargeted Metabolomics Profiling Reveals Perturbations in Arginine-NO Metabolism in Middle Eastern Patients with Coronary Heart Disease. Metabolites 2022, 12, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Dave, A.M.; Genaro-Mattos, T.C.; Korade, Z.; Peeples, E.S. Neonatal Hypoxic-Ischemic Brain Injury Alters Brain Acylcarnitine Levels in a Mouse Model. Metabolites 2022, 12, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lin, S.-H.; Wang, C.-C.; Huang, K.-T.; Chen, K.-D.; Hsu, L.-W.; Eng, H.-L.; Chiu, K.-W. Liver Graft Pathology and Low Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D after Living Donor Liver Transplantation. Metabolites 2022, 12, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Coleman, M.J.; Espino, L.M.; Lebensohn, H.; Zimkute, M.V.; Yaghooti, N.; Ling, C.L.; Gross, J.M.; Listwan, N.; Cano, S.; Garcia, V.; et al. Individuals with Metabolic Syndrome Show Altered Fecal Lipidomic Profiles with No Signs of Intestinal Inflammation or Increased Intestinal Permeability. Metabolites 2022, 12, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Buszewska-Forajta, M.; Monedeiro, F.; Gołębiowski, A.; Adamczyk, P.; Buszewski, B. Citric Acid as a Potential Prostate Cancer Biomarker Determined in Various Biological Samples. Metabolites 2022, 12, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. de la Barca, J.M.C.; Chabrun, F.; Lefebvre, T.; Roche, O.; Huetz, N.; Blanchet, O.; Legendre, G.; Simard, G.; Reynier, P.; Gascoin, G. A Metabolomic Profiling of Intra-Uterine Growth Restriction in Placenta and Cord Blood Points to an Impairment of Lipid and Energetic Metabolism. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hartvigsson, O.; Barman, M.; Savolainen, O.; Ross, A.B.; Sandin, A.; Jacobsson, B.; Wold, A.E.; Sandberg, A.-S.; Brunius, C. Differences between Arterial and Venous Umbilical Cord Plasma Metabolome and Association with Parity. Metabolites 2022, 12, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Xu, J.; Fang, H.; Chong, Y.; Lin, L.; Xie, T.; Ji, J.; Shen, C.; Shi, C.; Shan, J. Cyclophosphamide Induces Lipid and Metabolite Perturbation in Amniotic Fluid during Rat Embryonic Development. Metabolites 2022, 12, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jamioł, M.; Sozoniuk, M.; Wawrzykowski, J.; Kankofer, M. Effect of Sex Steroids and PGF2α on the Expression of Their Receptors and Decorin in Bovine Caruncular Epithelial Cells in Early–Mid Pregnancy. Molecules 2022, 27, 7420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Olivieri, M.; Spiteri, G.; Brandi, J.; Cecconi, D.; Fusi, M.; Zanoni, G.; Rizzi, C. Glucose/Ribitol Dehydrogenase and 16.9 kDa Class I Heat Shock Protein 1 as Novel Wheat Allergens in Baker’s Respiratory Allergy. Molecules 2022, 27, 1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, C.; Zhu, H.; Kang, J.; Warusawitharana, H.K.; Chen, S.; Wang, K.; Yu, F.; Wu, Y.; He, P.; Tu, Y.; et al. Comparative Transcriptome and Phytochemical Analysis Provides Insight into Triterpene Saponin Biosynthesis in Seeds and Flowers of the Tea Plant (Camellia sinensis). Metabolites 2022, 12, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jiang, D.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, G.; Zhang, P.; Wu, X.; Yao, X.; Luo, Y.; Yang, Z.; Ren, M.; Wang, X.; et al. The Antiviral Effect of Isatis Root Polysaccharide against NADC30-like PRRSV by Transcriptome and Proteome Analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Huang, J.; Zhao, M.; Xue, C.; Liang, J.; Huang, F. Analysis of the Composition of Deinagkistrodon acutus Snake Venom Based on Proteomics, and Its Antithrombotic Activity and Toxicity Studies. Molecules 2022, 27, 2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xie, F.; Xu, L.; Zhu, H.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Nong, L.; Zeng, Y.; Cen, S. The Potential Antipyretic Mechanism of Ellagic Acid with Brain Metabolomics Using Rats with Yeast-Induced Fever. Molecules 2022, 27, 2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Xie, F.; Xu, L.; Zhu, H.; Li, Y.; Nong, L.; Chen, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Cen, S. Serum Metabolomics Based on GC-MS Reveals the Antipyretic Mechanism of Ellagic Acid in a Rat Model. Metabolites 2022, 12, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zeng, F.; Xu, Y.; Li, Y.; Yan, Z.; Li, L. Metabonomics Study of the Hematopoietic Effect of Medicinal Wine Maoji Jiu on a Blood Deficiency Rat Model by Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry and a Pattern Recognition Approach. Molecules 2022, 27, 3791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kim, H.; Yoo, S.; Lee, J.-D.; Kim, H.-Y.; Kim, S.; Kim, K.-B. A Metabolomics Approach to Sulforaphane Efficacy in Secondhand Smoking-Induced Pulmonary Damage in Mice. Metabolites 2022, 12, 518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jo, J.-K.; Lee, G.; Nguyen, C.D.; Park, S.-E.; Kim, E.-J.; Kim, H.-W.; Seo, S.-H.; Cho, K.-M.; Kwon, S.J.; Kim, J.-H.; et al. Effects of Donepezil Treatment on Brain Metabolites, Gut Microbiota, and Gut Metabolites in an Amyloid Beta-Induced Cognitive Impairment Mouse Pilot Model. Molecules 2022, 27, 6591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hendrickx, J.O.; Adams, C.; Sieben, A.; Laukens, K.; Van Dam, D.; De Meyer, G.R.Y. Proteomic Assessment of C57BL/6 Hippocampi after Non-Selective Pharmacological Inhibition of Nitric Oxide Synthase Activity: Implications of Seizure-like Neuronal Hyperexcitability Followed by Tauopathy. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cai, S.; Lei, T.; Bi, W.; Sun, S.; Deng, S.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Du, H. Chitosan Hydrogel Supplemented with Metformin Promotes Neuron–like Cell Differentiation of Gingival Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Yadav, M.; Chaudhary, P.P.; D’Souza, B.N.; Spathies, J.; Myles, I.A. Impact of Skin Tissue Collection Method on Downstream MALDI-Imaging. Metabolites 2022, 12, 497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Uldry, A.-C.; Maciel-Dominguez, A.; Jornod, M.; Buchs, N.; Braga-Lagache, S.; Brodard, J.; Jankovic, J.; Bonadies, N.; Heller, M. Effect of Sample Transportation on the Proteome of Human Circulating Blood Extracellular Vesicles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 4515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Müller, J.; Boubaker, G.; Imhof, D.; Hänggeli, K.; Haudenschild, N.; Uldry, A.-C.; Braga-Lagache, S.; Heller, M.; Ortega-Mora, L.-M.; Hemphill, A. Differential Affinity Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry: A Suitable Tool to Identify Common Binding Proteins of a Broad-Range Antimicrobial Peptide Derived from Leucinostatin. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Seifert, O.; Kontermann, R.E. GlycoTAIL and FlexiTAIL as Half-Life Extension Modules for Recombinant Antibody Fragments. Molecules 2022, 27, 3272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Provost, Z.; Hansen, E.O.; Lynds, M.V.; Flinn, B.S.; Minic, Z.; Berezovski, M.V.; Altosaar, I. Three Diverse Granule Preparation Methods for Proteomic Analysis of Mature Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Starch Grain. Molecules 2022, 27, 3307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Godbole, S.; Labaki, W.W.; Pratte, K.A.; Hill, A.; Moll, M.; Hastie, A.T.; Peters, S.P.; Gregory, A.; Ortega, V.E.; DeMeo, D.; et al. A Metabolomic Severity Score for Airflow Obstruction and Emphysema. Metabolites 2022, 12, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Terracina, S.; Pallaria, A.; Lucarelli, M.; Angeloni, A.; De Angelis, A.; Ceci, F.M.; Caronti, B.; Francati, S.; Blaconà, G.; Fiore, M.; et al. Urine Dipstick Analysis on Automated Platforms: Is a Reliable Screening Tool for Proteinuria? An Experience from Umberto I Hospital in Rome. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Vellan, C.J.; Jayapalan, J.J.; Yoong, B.-K.; Abdul-Aziz, A.; Mat-Junit, S.; Subramanian, P. Application of Proteomics in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Biomarker Investigations: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Brezmes, J.; Llambrich, M.; Cumeras, R.; Gumà, J. Urine NMR Metabolomics for Precision Oncology in Colorectal Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Bouça, B.; Bogalho, P.; Rizzo, M.; Silva-Nunes, J. The Role of the Metabolome and Non-Coding RNA on Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas: An Update. Metabolites 2022, 12, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kondou, A.; Begou, O.; Dotis, J.; Karava, V.; Panteris, E.; Taparkou, A.; Gika, H.; Printza, N. Impact of Metabolomics Technologies on the Assessment of Peritoneal Membrane Profiles in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Systematic Review. Metabolites 2022, 12, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gianazza, E.; Brioschi, M.; Iezzi, A.; Paglia, G.; Banfi, C. Pharmacometabolomics for the Study of Lipid-Lowering Therapies: Opportunities and Challenges. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 3291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, R.; Chen, Y.Q. Protein Lipidation Types: Current Strategies for Enrichment and Characterization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Costanzo, M.; Caterino, M.; Fedele, R.; Cevenini, A.; Pontillo, M.; Barra, L.; Ruoppolo, M. COVIDomics: The Proteomic and Metabolomic Signatures of COVID-19. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santorelli, L.; Caterino, M.; Costanzo, M. Proteomics and Metabolomics in Biomedicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16913. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242316913

AMA Style

Santorelli L, Caterino M, Costanzo M. Proteomics and Metabolomics in Biomedicine. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(23):16913. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242316913

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santorelli, Lucia, Marianna Caterino, and Michele Costanzo. 2023. "Proteomics and Metabolomics in Biomedicine" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 23: 16913. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms242316913

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop