Next Article in Journal
Morphological and Molecular Functional Evidence of the Pharyngeal Sac in the Digestive Tract of Silver Pomfret, Pampus argenteus
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of Electrochemical Methods to Determine the Effect of Nitrides of Alloying Elements on the Electrochemical Properties of Titanium β-Alloys
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 2
10.3390/ijms24021658
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Silver and Copper Nanoparticles as the New Biocidal Agents Used in Pre- and Post-Milking Disinfectants with the Addition of Cosmetic Substrates in Dairy Cows

by
Aleksandra Kalińska
1,*,
Sławomir Jaworski
2,
Mateusz Wierzbicki
2,
Magdalena Kot
1,
Daniel Radzikowski
1,
Sebastian Smulski
3 and
Marcin Gołębiewski
1,*
1
Animal Breeding Department, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-786 Warszawa, Poland
2
Department of Nanobiotechnology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-786 Warszawa, Poland
3
Department of Internal Diseases and Diagnostics, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznań, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(2), 1658; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021658
Submission received: 14 December 2022 / Revised: 2 January 2023 / Accepted: 11 January 2023 / Published: 14 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Microbiology)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Mastitis is one of the most common issues for milk producers around the world. Antibiotic therapy is often ineffective, and therefore, scientists must find a new solution. The aim of this paper is to estimate the influence of common and well-known cosmetic substrates and mixtures of nanoparticles (NPs) and cosmetic substrates on the viability of frequently occurring mastitis pathogens, Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus). The obtained results suggest that only collagen + elastin and glycerine influenced and increased bacteria viability. In case of the rest of the cosmetic substrates, the viability of E. coli and S. aureus was decreased, and the results were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.01). Prepared pre-dipping and dipping mixtures decrease (p ≤ 0.01) the viability of the mentioned pathogens. The obtained results of the in vitro analysis are very promising. In the next step, prepared mixtures should be tested in different herd conditions if they can be used in mastitis prevention or decrease the number of subclinical mastitis cases. Furthermore, these mixtures could become an interesting alternative for organic milk production where conventional preparations and antibiotics are forbidden. However, further analysis, especially on the influence of prepared mixtures on other bacteria species and, algae, fungi, are necessary.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, nanotechnology is one of the most rapidly developing fields of technology and science. The possibility of producing materials, objects, and substances on a nanoscale level gives scientists new skills and tools [1] to fight, e.g., diseases. However, the use of NPs in udder disinfectant preparations is still limited, but some authors indicate their high potential in mastitis prevention [2]. Our previous studies revealed that AgNPs, CuNPs, and AgCuNPs are non-toxic for human and bovine mammary gland cells and decrease the viability E. coli and S. aureus [3]. Similar data were also presented in previous papers [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Moreover, the combination of AgNPs and CuNPs can decrease pathogens viability and has high biocidal properties that can also reduce bacterial biofilm by nearly 100% [11]. Therefore, many papers revealed that NPs can be used as new agents in alternative therapies to treat bovine mastitis [3,11].
One of the biggest concerns in case of nanoparticles is their persistence in the environment. The toxic influence of AgNPs and CuNPs is mainly observed in water environments [12]; however, some researchers point out that CuNPs are more toxic than AgNPs [13]. The exposure to NPs can cause several negative changes in the aquatic organisms, e.g., increased oxidative stress, reproductive disorders or impairing activity of the immune system [12]. On the other hand, there are several experiments proving that the effect of NPs on living organisms can be beneficial. For example, the in ovo inoculation of calcium carbonate nanoparticles on chicken embryo influence bone quality by improving their mineralization if the process is conducted during embryogenesis [14]. This phenomena are not completely understood; therefore, further studies are necessary to document the long-term influence of NPs on living organisms.
In general, disinfectant preparations used as pre-dipping or dipping solutions have an antibacterial effect, but frequently, they do not positively influence udder skin. Moreover, they can dry udder skin and as a consequence cause secondary skin problems. On the other hand, effective mastitis prevention should include disinfectant preparation because of their antibacterial activity but also to protect the teat canal from closing for at least 30 min after milking. This period of time is longer in older cows.
Nowadays, many moisturizing and nutritional skincare components are available in the marketplace. Although the list of components may be similar, differences in the emulsion properties of the final products provide different therapeutic efficacy [15]. Modern products contain different moisturizing agents such as humectants or occlusives. Humectants, e.g., glycerin, propylene glycol, sodium lactate, urea, vitamins, proteins, etc., can help the skin retain moisture and promote flexibility of the skin. Occlusives, e.g., petrolatum, lanolin alcohols, jojoba oil, cocoa butter, paraffin, cholesterol, heavy lipid mixtures, olive oil, and heavy mineral oil create a barrier on the skin that allows the skin to maintain its own and natural moisture [15].
However, the number of agents used in skincare products is much larger. They can include products such as vitamins A, E, D, and B, retinoids, linoleic acid, biotin, or flower and herbal extracts. On the other hand, these substances must be present in the product at the sufficient concentration to positively affect the skin physiology [15].
Therefore, the authors decided to select common, inexpensive, and widely available cosmetic substrates and evaluate whether they can be used in mastitis disinfectant preparations. The chosen cosmetic substrates were collagen + elastin (1%), glycerine (5%), sorbitol (5%), propylene glycol (8%), d-panthenol (1.3%), vitamin C (5%), sodium lactate (5%), urea (5%), and marigold flower extract (5%).
The first aim of the study was the in vitro analysis of the influence of cosmetic substrates and the impact of both, NPs and cosmetic substrates, on the viability of mastitis pathogens: E. coli and S. aureus. In the second part of the study, the viability of bacteria was calculated after 24 h incubation in two pre-dipping (Pre1 and Pre2) and dipping (Dipp1 and Dipp2) mixtures containing AgCuNPs and cosmetic substrates.

2. Results

2.1. The In Vitro Viability of Mastitis Bacteria Species after Incubation with Cosmetic Substrates

The viability of E. coli and S. aureus cells after incubation with commercially available cosmetic substrates and an addition of 1 ppm NPs is presented in Table 1 and Table 2. The number of bacteria cells in the control group was estimated as 100%. The obtained results from each group were presented as a percentage of the control group. The viability of selected bacteria species decreased (p ≤ 0.01) by 20–30% after incubation with only AgNPs, CuNPs, or AgCuNPs.
In general, the viability of bacteria species decreased if they were incubated with NPs, cosmetic substrates, or both. The exceptions for E. coli were media with the addition of collagen + elastin (122.74%), AgNPs + ce (104.75%), glycerine (146.69%), AgNPs + g (101.89%), CuNPs + g (122.97%), AgCuNPs + g (107.33%), and AgNPs + mfe (134.66%). For S. aureus, increased viability was observed in similar groups: glycerine (130.68%), AgNPs + g (111.18%), CuNPs + g (124.88%), AgCuNPs + g (110.36%), and in the group containing an addition of collagen + elastin: CuNPs + ce (116.26%), AgCuNPs + ce (105.72%).
The in vitro analysis revealed that for collagen + elastin, propylene glycol, urea, and d-panthenol in the E. coli group, the viability of bacteria cells decreased (p ≤ 0.01) after incubation with all NPs compared to the control group. Statistical differences within groups (p ≤ 0.01) occurred in media with the addition of collagen + elastin, d-pantenol, urea, and marigold flower extract. The addition of sorbitol, glycol propylene and urea generally decreased the viability of bacteria by 50–60%. In case of collagen + elastin, lower viability than in the control group was observed in groups CuNPs + ce (p ≤ 0.05) and AgCuNPs + ce (p ≤ 0.01). The usage of d-panthenol decreased bacteria viability (p ≤ 0.01). However, the lower viability (31.19%) was observed in group containing only this substrate without NPs. In all groups with vitamin C, the viability of E. coli was decreased (p ≤ 0.01) compared to the control group. In the experimental group with the addition of glycerine, statistical differences occurred only in comparison with CuNPs (p ≤ 0.01). However, the viability of bacteria in all flasks with medium containing glycerine addition was higher than in control group (by 10–45%). Only in the group with the addition of sodium lactate were no statistical differences observed.
The results of in vitro analysis of the influence of glycerine, propylene glycol, vitamin C, sodium lactate, urea, and marigold flower extract on the viability of S. aureus were similar to E. coli groups. However, in case of S. aureus, statistical differences occurred in all groups (p ≤ 0.01). The addition of glycerine influenced an increase in bacteria viability compared to the control group (p ≤ 0.01). The usage of sorbitol, propylene glycol, sodium lactate and urea decreased the viability of S. aureus by 20% (p ≤ 0.05) to even 50% (p ≤ 0.01). The strongest effect was observed in the vitamin C group, and the decrease (p ≤ 0.01) was similar within the group (around 65%).

2.2. The In Vitro Viability of Mastitis Bacteria Species after Incubation with Evaluated Pre-Dipping and Dipping Mixtures

The in vitro viability of E. coli and S. aureus cells after incubation in prepared pre-dipping and dipping mixtures was presented as a percentage of the control group, which was estimated as 100% (Table 3).
The general phenomenon in the E. coli group was decreased viability in Pre1, Pre2, Dipp1, and Dipp2 compared to the control group and mixtures with the addition of NPs. This decrease was statistically significant (p ≤ 0.01) between the control group and the mixtures containing only NPs as well as all pre-dipping and dipping mixtures. For Pre1 and Pre2, a decrease in viability compared to the mixture with AgNPs was also observed.
For S. aureus, a statistically significant decrease in viability was observed between the control group and the mixtures with the additions of NPs and Dipp2. However, a decrease in in vitro viability was observed after incubation with all prepared mixtures, and this difference in viability was significant (p ≤ 0.05) between the mixtures with NPs and Pre1 and Pre2.

3. Discussion

Disinfectant pre-dipping and dipping preparations should mix antibacterial and udder skincare properties. The authors decided to estimate the incubation time for 24 h even though the pre-dipping and dipping products have contact with teat skin for 30–40 s or 8–10 h, respectively. However, the important aspect of the conducted experiments was the fact that selected cosmetic substrates could not increase the bacteria multiplication. Therefore, the authors decided to extend incubation time.
Cosmetic substrates were chosen to complement each other and affect udder skin in different ways: moisturize, nourish, create biofilm and present preservative effect. The substrates included collagen + elastin (1%), glycerine (5%), sorbitol (5%), propylene glycol (8%), d-panthenol (1.3%), vitamin C (5%), sodium lactate (5%), urea (5%), and marigold flower extract (5%). Glycerine, sodium lactate, and urea have a strong moisturizing effect and are basic components of numerous skin-care cosmetics in different brands [15]. Collagen and elastin are used together because their properties complement each other and have regenerating and rejuvenating effects, restore freshness, smoothness, and elasticity of the skin [16]. Another important feature of soluble collagen is the fact that it creates a thin layer on the skin—a biofilm that protects tissue against environmental pollutions and excessive water loss. Propylene glycol has a positive impact on other cosmetic substrates and is a promotor for them to penetrate skin tissue, but it also can be treated as a preservative [17]. D-panthenol is a provitamin B5 and can easily penetrate deep skin layers, hair, and nails. It penetrates the epidermis, accumulates in the dermis, and changes into vitamin B5 or pantothenic acid. D-panthenol applied externally acts on the skin—it accelerates the division of skin cells and soothes irritated and red skin [18,19]. The basic and biologically active form of vitamin C is ascorbic acid. Vitamin C stimulates better blood supply to the skin by supporting the collagen synthesis process, but it also improves the firmness and elasticity of the skin and strengthens the walls of blood vessels [20]. Marigold flower extract is rich in flavonoids and carotenes. It accelerates wound healing, soothes irritations, prevents flaking, and has anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, and antifungal properties [21].
Good hygiene of milking routine is a key factor that can reduce the number of mastitis pathogens in a herd and decrease the rate of udder inflammations [22]. Unfortunately, using pre-dipping and dipping solutions is still not as popular as it should be, especially in small farms. One of the main factors affecting milk producers’ decisions regarding udder disinfectant preparations is the price. However, farmers should mainly focus on the composition of the solution. It should be balanced between antibacterial and antifungal properties and its influence on udder skin [22].
Previous papers have revealed that mastitis is a multifactorial disease. Several factors can contribute to maintaining a low infection rate in non-disinfected teats, e.g., low herd somatic cell count (SCC), poor herd parity, a high standard of the parlor and a clean environment, systematic liner changes, and regular cow tail clipping. Furthermore, the application of disinfectant preparations to uncleaned teats may affect the effectiveness of the products [23].
The fact that udder cleaning before milking and manual drying with a clean towel decreases the number of bacteria was described in the 1980s [24,25]. In herds with high infection rates and the risk of infection spread, the pre-milking teat disinfection of clean teats may bring benefits if followed by teat drying. However, some authors suggest that routine pre-milking teat disinfection in pasture-grazed herds will probably not be beneficial in herds with an SCC below 200 × 103 cells/mL [23]. It should also be pointed out that pre-dipping can be the most effective way of reducing the amount of environmental bacteria, e.g., E. coli or Streptococcus uberis [26]. However, the same author indicated that post-milking teat dipping is crucial in mastitis management and prevention. Proper dipping coats each teat thoroughly in dipping solution and should be routine during lactation [23]. Good pre-dipping disinfectants also have another valuable trait—they help with the formation of the keratin plug in the teat canal after milking. The proper formation of the keratin plug is necessary to close the teat canal between each milking and reduce the probability of bacterial penetration of the teat canal [22]. The comparison of different forms of dipping application suggests that coating is better than spraying. It requires less solution and is more accurate. However, dipping preparations should always be used according to producers’ recommendations [26].
Improvement in mastitis prevention is necessary. New substances, methods, and alternative and natural solutions should be the main interest of scientists as well as their major challenge, as the inappropriate and excessive use of antibiotics in mastitis treatment for dairy cows has contributed to the increased antibiotic resistance of several mastitis pathogens [27].
Metal NPs are a potential alternative in mastitis prevention and the treatment of subclinical cases [3,11]. An interesting idea could also be the usage of propolis and honey. The authors of the study revealed that propolis presented higher antibacterial activity against S. aureus in comparison with honey. In the same research, E. coli was less susceptible to both honey and propolis [28].
Previous papers have presented the influence of AgNPs on the antimicrobial activities of common antibiotics against S. aureus and E. coli. The authors suggested that the combination of penicillin G, amoxicillin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and vancomycin together with AgNPs caused an increased activity of the mentioned drugs against both strains. The strongest enhancing effects of AgNPs were observed if vancomycin, amoxicillin, and penicillin G were used against S. aureus [29].
Results obtained in this study revealed that the viability of E. coli and S. aureus decreased if NPs, or most of the cosmetic substrates, or both were present in the mixtures. Previous papers have also reported that AgNPs and CuNPs have antibacterial effects on the pathogens studied in this article [3,30,31,32]. Furthermore, some authors also suggest that the combination of AgNPs and CuNPs and their synergistic effect should have a more complete bactericidal effect against mixed bacteria species [3,33].
In some groups, the selected cosmetic substrates could influence the increase in the number of bacteria. The increased viability of E. coli and S. aureus in mixtures with an addition of glycerine may occur because glycerine is used by bacteria as an effective nutrition component that results in a higher number of bacteria. The higher number of E. coli and S. aureus bacteria observed in collagen + elastin and marigold flower extract could be connected with different and random mistakes during analysis or just errors in pipetting. However, collagen and elastin are valuable proteins and excellent sources of amino acids that could be used by bacteria in the replication process. It is well known that these substrates are a valuable component of antiaging human cosmetic and are often used in aesthetic medicine treatments in order to improve skin condition [18,19]. The antimicrobial effect of propylene glycol has been presented in previous studies [34,35]. This substrate is also an effective preservative. In this study, sodium lactate also showed effective antimicrobial activity and decreased bacterial viability by around 30%. These results confirm previous findings about its antibacterial effect [36,37]. Vitamin C also seems to be an effective substrate that can have toxic impact on some bacteria. It is well known that vitamin C is a strong antioxidant. However, the in vitro research evaluating the influence of vitamin C on E. coli and S. aureus has already been examined [37]. These results suggest that vitamin C especially affects the metabolism of S. aureus and is likely to result in growth inhibition. The aerobic metabolism of vitamin C increases oxidative stress on bacterial cells, and therefore, vitamin C may be a safe and natural alternative if S. aureus growth must be inhibited in non-toxic conditions [38]. The antimicrobial influence of vitamin C on E. coli was stronger than its influence on S. aureus in this paper. The viability of the bacteria was 22.02% and 35.64%, respectively. The combination of glycol propylene and vitamin C should be an effective and natural preservative for the designed mixtures if they will be commercialized.
Prepared mixtures of NPs with cosmetic substrates were prepared on the basis of the viability results explained above. The combination of cosmetic substrates and NPs decreased the viability of E. coli and S. aureus by around 30–50% in each preparation (Pre1, Pre2, Dipp1, Dipp2). Presented data are also a promising perspective for further analysis, because in general, the number of bacteria in herd conditions should be lower and NPs should have more a favorable environment for their way of action. These results suggest that the formulated mixtures negatively influence bacteria viability and therefore could be used in mastitis prevention and maybe in the treatment of subclinical cases. The mixtures contain antibacterial substances, but also should have a positive impact on udder skin because they contain moisturizing components and create a protective biofilm on the skin. The experiment described in this paper included data only from the in vitro analysis. Therefore, another step should be the experiment in different herd conditions. Moreover, one of the major advantages of the prepared mixtures is fact that they do not contain parabens, silicones, or preservatives that are generally considered as harmful, e.g., by consumers buying human skin care products. These mixtures could possibly become an interesting solution especially in ecological farms where conventional treatments are forbidden or require a long waiting period after the antibiotic therapy. Pre-dipping and dipping mixtures containing substrates from natural sources should be a very promising innovation for ecological farms. However, the main key in mastitis prevention and management is always regularity and consistent compliance with hygiene rules. In addition, all mixtures have been reported to the Polish Patent Office.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Preparation of AgCuNPs through Self-Organization Phenomenon

The AgCuNP solution was prepared by mixing hydrocolloids of AgNPs at a concentration of 50 mg/L (Nano-Tech, Warsaw, Poland) and CuNPs at a concentration of 50 mg/L (Nano-Tech), using a 1:1 ratio. The prepared AgCuNP solution was incubated for 24 h at a temperature of 24 °C and then used in further analysis.

4.2. Bacterial Cultures

The bacteria of E. coli and S. aureus were obtained from LGC Standards (Łomianki, Poland) and kept in a 20% glycerol solution at −20 °C.
Bacteria cells were thawed and rinsed with sterile distilled water in order to remove glycerol. In the next step, bacterial cells were added to a nutrient broth medium (Bio-Rad, Warsaw, Poland) that was previously sterilized in glass flasks in an autoclave (Classic 2100, Prestige Medical, Chesterfield, UK). Flasks were placed in a rotating incubator at a temperature of 37 °C (SI500) for 24 h with a speed rotation of 70 rounds per hour.

4.3. Influence of Cosmetic Substrates on Bacterial Viability

Bacterial cells pipetted from the cell culture and incubated for one night at 37 °C were used. Experimental groups contained nutrient broth (Biomaxima, Lublin, Poland) and AgNPs, CuNPs, or AgCuNPs at concentrations of 1 ppm as well as one of the common cosmetic substrates. The cosmetic substrates were collagen + elastin (1%), glycerine (5%), sorbitol (5.4%), propylene glycol (8%), d-panthenol (1.3%), vitamin C (5%), sodium lactate (5%), urea (5%), and marigold flower extract (5%) (zrobsobiekrem.pl (accessed on 12 December 2022), Poland). The concentrations were chosen according to manufacturer’s suggestion (www.zrobsobiekrem.pl (accessed on 12 December 2022), Poland) and the author’s preliminary tests (not included in the paper) in order to achieve the most effective activity of each substrate. The control group was nutrient broth without the addition of NPs or any cosmetic substrate. Each group was prepared in triplicate.
In the next step, 100 μL of the microorganism species mentioned in previous sub-section was added to prepared flasks. Samples were incubated for 24 h in a rotating incubator (SI500) at a temperature of 37 °C with a rotation speed of 70 rounds per minute. The viability of microorganisms was calculated using a PrestoBlue test. After incubation, 90 µL of medium was placed in 96-well plates, and 10 µL of PrestoBlue reagent (ThermoFisher Scientific, Warszawa, Poland) was added to each well. Each sample was placed in the plate in six repetitions. Plates were incubated for 20 min at 37 °C. Absorbance was measured using a wavelength of 570 nm in an immunoenzymatic Infinite M200 reader (Tecan, Durham, NC, USA). The only exception was vitamin C, because it immediately breaks down the PrestoBlue reagent. Results for this group are presented using an XTT kit and calculated according to the producer’s instruction.
The viability of pathogens was presented as a percentage of the viability of the control group, according to the following equation:
X = (optical sample density × 100%)/optical control group density
X = pathogen viability.

4.4. Influence of Pre-Dipping and Dipping Mixtures on Bacterial Viability

Bacterial cells pipetted from the cell culture and incubated for one night at 37 °C were used. Experimental groups contained nutrient broth and AgNPs, CuNPs, or AgCuNPs at concentrations of 1 ppm as well as one of the preliminary mixtures of cosmetic substrates. Prepared mixtures contained: Pre1—vitamin C 2%, glycerine 2%, d-panthenol 1%, propylene glycol 8%, urea 5%, sodium lactate 5%; Pre2—vitamin C 2%, glycerine 1,5%, d-panthenol 1%, propylene glycol 8%, urea 5,5%, sodium lactate 5%; Dipp1—vitamin C 2%, glycerine 2%, collagen + elastin 1%, d-panthenol 1%, propylene glycol 8%, marigold flower extract 2%, sorbitol 5%, urea 5%; Dipp2—vitamin C 2%, glycerine 1%, collagen + elastin 1%, d-panthenol 1%, propylene glycol 8%, marigold flower extract 1%, sorbitol 4.2%, urea 5.4%. The control group was nutrient broth without the addition of NPs or any cosmetic substrate. Each group was prepared in triplicate.
In the next step, 100 μL of each bacteria species was added to prepared flasks. Samples were incubated for 24 h in a rotating incubator (SI500) at a temperature of 37 °C with a rotation speed of 70 rounds per minute. The viability of microorganisms was calculated using an XTT kit. After incubation, 100 µL of mixture was placed in 96-well plates, and 50 µL of XTT reagents mix (ThermoFisher Scientific, Poland) was added to each well. Each sample was placed in the plate in six repetitions. Plates were incubated for 20 min at 37 °C. Absorbance was measured using a wavelength of 450 nm in an immunoenzymatic Infinite M200 reader (Tecan, Durham, NC, USA).
The viability of pathogens was presented as a percentage of the viability of the control group, according to the Equation (1) (Section 4.3).

4.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted in the IBM SPSS Statistics 24 program. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to estimate if there were statistical differences between and within the groups.

5. Conclusions

In summary, the in vitro experiment revealed that the combination NPs and cosmetic substrates could be an effective combination against S. aureus and E. coli in mastitis prevention. The obtained results suggest that the combination of AgNPs, CuNPs, or AgCuNPs and common cosmetic substrates could be a new and innovative solution in mastitis prevention, because most of the commercially available preparations have mainly antibacterial function. Most of the selected substances do not positively influence bacteria growth during 24 h of incubation. Moreover, some of them, e.g., propylene, glycol, or vitamin C, can decrease the number of bacteria by 35–50%. The prepared pre-dipping and dipping mixtures of NPs and cosmetic substrates could also be an alternative in mastitis prevention in organic farms where antibiotics are strictly forbidden. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate the biocidal effect of designed mixtures against other mastitis pathogens and achieve higher biocidal properties of prepared mixtures.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and supervision, writing—original draft preparation, review and editing, investigation— A.K. and S.S.; M.G.—statistical analysis, original draft preparation, formal and funding supervision; methodology and investigation— S.J. and M.W.; writing—original draft preparation, review and editing— M.K. and D.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Financial support for this study was obtained from the project LIDER/6/0070/L-7/15/NCBR/2016 entitled “Designing of an innovative system for the prevention and support of treatment of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows based on the synergistic interaction of silver and copper nanoparticles’’ provided by the National Centre for Research and Development.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

Silver nanoparticles—AgNPs, copper nanoparticles—CuNPs, silver–copper nanoparticles—AgCuNPs, somatic cell count—SCC.

References

  1. Albrecht, M.A.; Evans, C.W.; Raston, C. Green Chemistry and the Health Implications of Nanoparticles. ChemInform 2006, 37, 417–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Radzikowski, D.; Kalińska, A.; Ostaszewska, U.; Gołębiewski, M. Alternative solutions to antibiotics in mastitis treatment for dairy cows—A review. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 2020, 38, 117–133. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kalińska, A.; Jaworski, S.; Wierzbicki, M.; Gołębiewski, M. Silver and Copper Nanoparticles—An Alternative in Future Mastitis Treatment and Prevention? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Jagielski, T.; Bakuła, Z.; Pleń, M.; Kamiński, M.; Nowakowska, J.; Bielecki, J.; Wolska, K.; Grudniak, A.M. The activity of silver nanoparticles against microalgae of the Prototheca genus. Nanomedicine 2018, 13, 1025–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kruk, T.; Szczepanowicz, K.; Stefanska, J.; Socha, R.P.; Warszyński, P. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of monodisperse copper nanoparticles. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2015, 128, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shende, S.; Ingle, A.P.; Gade, A.; Rai, M. Green synthesis of copper nanoparticles by Citrus medica Linn. (Idilimbu) juice and its antimicrobial activity. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 31, 856–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pramanik, A.; Laha, D.; Bhattacharya, D.; Pramanik, P.; Karmakar, P. A novel study of antibacterial activity of copper iodide nanoparticle mediated by DNA and membrane damage. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2012, 96, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ramalingmam, P.; Muthukrishnan, S.; Thangaraj, P. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using an endophytic fungus, Curvularia lunata and its antimicrobial potential. J. Nanosci. Nanoeng. 2015, 1, 241–247. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kalińska, A.; Gołębiewski, M.; Wójcik, A. Mastitis pathogens in dairy cattle—A review. World Sci. News 2017, 89, 22–31. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kalińska, A.; Wójcik, A.; Slósarz, J.; Kruzińska, B.; Michalczuk, M.; Jaworski, S.; Wierzbicki, M.; Gołębiewski, M. Occurrence and aetiology of Staphylococcal mastitis—A review. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 2018, 36, 263–273. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lange, A.; Grzenia, A.; Wierzbicki, M.; Strojny-Cieslak, B.; Kalińska, A.; Gołębiewski, M.; Radzikowski, D.; Sawosz, E.; Jaworski, S. Silver and copper nanoparticles inhibit biofilm formation by mastitis pathogens. Animals 2021, 11, 1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Szudrowicz, H.; Kamaszewski, M.; Adamski, A.; Skrobisz, M.; Frankowska-Łukawska, J.; Wójcik, M.; Bochenek, J.; Kawalski, K.; Martynow, J.; Bujarski, P.; et al. The Effects of Seven-Day Exposure to Silver Nanoparticles on Fertility and Homeostasis of Zebrafish (Danio rerio). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 11239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ostaszewska, T.; Chojnacki, M.; Kamaszewski, M.; Sawosz-Chwalibóg, E. Histopathological effects of silver and copper nanoparticles on the epidermis, gills, and liver of Siberian sturgeon. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 1621–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Matuszewski, A.; Łukasiewicz, M.; Niemiec, J.; Kamaszewski, M.; Jaworski, S.; Domino, M.; Jasiński, T.; Chwalibóg, A.; Sawosz, E. Calcium Carbonate nanoparticles—Toxicity and effect of in ovo inoculation on chicken embryo development, broiler performance and bone status. Animals 2021, 11, 932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Spencer, T.S. Dry skin and skin moisturizers. Clin. Dermatol. 1988, 6, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bolognia, J.L. Dermatologic and cosmetic concerns of the older woman. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 1993, 9, 209–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fiume, M.M.; Bergfeld, W.F.; Belsito, D.V.; Hill, R.A.; Klaassen, C.D.; Liebler, D.; Marks, J.; Shank, R.; Slaga, T.; Snyder, P.; et al. Safety assessment of propylene glycol, tripropylene glycol, and PPGs as used in cosmetics. Int. J. Toxicol. 2012, 31 (Suppl. 5), 245–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, L.H.; Tseng, S.W. Direct determination of d-panthenol and salt of pantothenic acid in cosmetic and pharmaceutical preparations by differential pulse voltammetry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 432, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nayak, D.S.; Shetti, N.P. Electrochemical oxidation of provitamin B 5, d-panthenol and its analysis in spiked human urine. J. Anal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 7, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. May, J.M.; Harrison, F.E. Role of vitamin C in the function of the vascular endothelium. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 19, 2068–2083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Essassi, M.; Ibrahimi, A.; Khedid, K. Evaluation of antibacterial activity of extracts from Calendula aventis flowers. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 2014, 6, 156–161. [Google Scholar]
  22. Biggs, A. Mastitis in Cattle; Crowood Press: Marlborough, UK, 2009; pp. 26, 117. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gleeson, D.; Flynn, J.; O’Brien, B. Effect of pre-milking teat disinfection on new mastitis infection rates of dairy cows. Ir. Vet. J. 2018, 71, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Galton, D.M.; Adkinson, R.W.; Thomas, C.V.; Smith, T.W. Effects of pre-milking udder preparation on environmental bacterial contamination of milk. J. Dairy Sci. 1982, 65, 1540–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Galton, D.M.; Petersson, L.G.; Merrill, W.G. Effects of pre-milking udder preparation practices on bacterial counts in milk and on teats. J. Dairy Sci. 1986, 69, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Edmondson, P. Teat Dipping Trouble. In Proceedings of the British Mastitis Conference; Institute for Animal Health: Brockworth, UK, 2002; pp. 15–19. [Google Scholar]
  27. Oliver, S.P.; Murinda, S.E. Antimicrobial resistance of mastitis pathogens. Vet. Clin. Food Anim. Pract. 2012, 28, 165–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Rahman, M.M.; Richardson, A.; Sofian-Azirun, M. Antibacterial activity of propolis and honey against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2010, 4, 1872–1878. [Google Scholar]
  29. Shahverdi, A.R.; Fakhimi, A.; Shahverdi, H.R.; Minaian, S. Synthesis and effect of silver nanoparticles on the antibacterial activity of different antibiotics against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Nanomedicine 2007, 3, 168–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ruparelia, J.P.; Chatterjee, A.K.; Duttagupta, S.P.; Mukherji, S. Strain specificity in antimicrobial activity of silver and copper nanoparticles. Acta Biomater. 2008, 4, 707–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Birla, S.S.; Tiwari, V.V.; Gade, A.K.; Ingle, A.P.; Yadav, A.P.; Rai, M.K. Fabrication of silver nanoparticles by Phoma glomerata and its combined effect against Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 48, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kim, S.H.; Lee, H.S.; Ryu, D.S.; Choi, S.J.; Lee, D.S. Antibacterial activity of silver-nanoparticles against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Korean J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 39, 77–85. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ramyadevi, J.; Jeyasubramanian, K.; Marikani, A.; Rajakumar, G.; Rahuman, A.A. Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of copper nanoparticles. Mater. Lett. 2012, 71, 114–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kinnunen, T.; Koskela, M. Antibacterial and antifungal properties of propylene glycol, hexylene glycol, and 1, 3-butylene glycol in vitro. Acta Derm. Venereol. 1991, 71, 148–150. [Google Scholar]
  35. De Spiegeleer, B.; Wattyn, E.; Slegers, G.; Van Der Meeren, P.; Vlaminck, K.; Van Vooren, L. The importance of the cosolvent propylene glycol on the antimicrobial preservative efficacy of a pharmaceutical formulation by DOE-ruggedness testing. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2006, 11, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. De Wit, J.C.; Rombouts, F.M. Antimicrobial activity of sodium lactate. Food Microbiol. 1990, 7, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Miller, R.K.; Acuff, G.R. Sodium lactate affects pathogens in cooked beef. J. Food Sci. 1994, 59, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kallio, J.; Jaakkola, M.; Mäki, M.; Kilpeläinen, P.; Virtanen, V. Vitamin C inhibits Staphylococcus aureus growth and enhances the inhibitory effect of quercetin on growth of Escherichia coli in vitro. Planta Med. 2012, 78, 1824–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. The in vitro viability (%) of Escherichia coli cells after incubation with commercially available cosmetic substrates and NPs.
Table 1. The in vitro viability (%) of Escherichia coli cells after incubation with commercially available cosmetic substrates and NPs.
Control GroupCollagen + Elastin 1%Glycerine 5%Sorbitol 5.4%Propylene Glycol 8%
C100.00 Acollagen + elastin122.74 ABCDEGglycerine146.69 Csorbitol59.95 AaDpropylene glycol47.66 ABCD
AgNPs79.20 AaBAgNPs + ce104.75 aBCDEFAgNPs + g101.89 CAgNPs + s53.68 ABAgNPs + pg50.05 ABCD
CuNPs82.66 AaCCuNPs + ce98.64 acDGCuNPs + g122.97 CCuNPs + s53.76 ABCuNPs + pg44.03 ABCD
AgCuNPs79.17 AaDAgCuNPs + ce88.56 AcDFAgCuNPs + g107.33 CAgCuNPs + s55.72 ABAgCuNPs + pg39.22 ABCD
D-panthenol 1.3%Vitamin C 5%Sodium Lactate 5%Urea 5%Marigold Flower Extract 5%
d-panthenol31.19 ABCDJvitamin C22.02 Asodium lactate74.62urea41.17 ABCDmarigold flower extract92.17 AHd
AgNPs + dp66.10 AJCKAgNPs + vit C64.27 AAgNPs + sl62.80AgNPs + u51.00 ABCDbAgNPs + mfe134.66 ABCDHI
CuNPs + dp34.48 ABCDKCuNPs + vit C82.38 ACuNPs + sl75.06CuNPs + u43.01 ABCDCuNPs + mfe69.12 AaDHI
AgCuNPs + dp47.85 ACAgCuNPs + vit C74.95 AAgCuNPs + sl48.80AgCuNPs + u39.82 ABCDbAgCuNPs + mfe76.06 ADdI
Differences significant at p ≤ 0.01 for A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K. Differences significant at p ≤ 0.05 for a, b, c, d.
Table
Table 2. The in vitro viability (%) of Staphylococcus aureus cells after incubation with commercially available cosmetic substrates and NPs.
Table 2. The in vitro viability (%) of Staphylococcus aureus cells after incubation with commercially available cosmetic substrates and NPs.
Control GroupCollagen + Elastin 1%Glycerine 5%Sorbitol 5.4%Propylene Glycol 8%
C100.00 Aecollagen + elastin87.71 iglycerine130.68 ABCDsorbitol87.57 Defpropylene glycol54.04 ABCD
AgNPs62.72 ABbAgNPs + ce85.28 jAgNPs + g111.18 AbDAgNPs + s87.28 DegAgNPs + pg59.79 ABCD
CuNPs93.16 AaBCDgCuNPs + ce116.26 ABgDijCuNPs + g124.88 ABCDCuNPs + s76.44 AbCDCuNPs + pg55.61 ABCD
AgCuNPs85.67 ABCDhAgCuNPs + ce105.72 AhAgCuNPs + g110.36 AbDAgCuNPs + s75.12 AbCDfgAgCuNPs + pg55.07 ABCD
D-panthenol 1.3%Vitamin C 5%Sodium Lactate 5%Urea 5%Marigold Flower
Extract 5%
d-panthenol88.93 ADdvitamin C35.64 ABCDsodium lactate66.11 ABCDGurea52.07 ABCDmarigold flower extract90.13 ABCDI
AgNPs + dp97.88 bcdEAgNPs + vitC35.10 ABCDAgNPs + ms68.42 ABCDHAgNPs + u56.40 ABCDAgNPs + mfe65.23 ABCDIJ
CuNPs + dp98.40 bcdFCuNPs + vitC35.40 ABCDCuNPs + ms82.54 ABCDGHCuNPs + u52.15 ABCDCuNPs + mfe91.87 IJK
AgCuNPs + dp84.45 AaDEFAgCuNPs + vitC35.81 ABCDAgCuNPs + ms82.19 ABCDGHAgCuNPs + u51.76 ABCDAgCuNPs + mfe73.94 AghIK
Differences significant at p ≤ 0.01 for A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K. Differences significant at p ≤ 0.05 for a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j
Table
Table 3. The in vitro viability (%) of E. coli and S. aureus cells after incubation in prepared pre-dipping and dipping mixtures containing cosmetic substrates and NPs.
Table 3. The in vitro viability (%) of E. coli and S. aureus cells after incubation in prepared pre-dipping and dipping mixtures containing cosmetic substrates and NPs.
E. coliS. aureus
C100 AC100 Aa
AgNPs67.32 AaBAgNPs30.51 Ab
CuNPs57.16 ACuNPs28.14 Ac
AgCuNPs49.81 AaAgCuNPs26.75 Ad
Pre148.58 AaBPre173.95 bcd
Pre242.47 ABcPre274.11 bcd
Dipp151.43 AcDipp147.23 a
Dipp257.84 ADipp244.32 A
Differences significant at p ≤ 0.01 for A, B. Differences significant at p ≤ 0.05 for a, b, c, d.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kalińska, A.; Jaworski, S.; Wierzbicki, M.; Kot, M.; Radzikowski, D.; Smulski, S.; Gołębiewski, M. Silver and Copper Nanoparticles as the New Biocidal Agents Used in Pre- and Post-Milking Disinfectants with the Addition of Cosmetic Substrates in Dairy Cows. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1658. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021658

AMA Style

Kalińska A, Jaworski S, Wierzbicki M, Kot M, Radzikowski D, Smulski S, Gołębiewski M. Silver and Copper Nanoparticles as the New Biocidal Agents Used in Pre- and Post-Milking Disinfectants with the Addition of Cosmetic Substrates in Dairy Cows. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(2):1658. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021658

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kalińska, Aleksandra, Sławomir Jaworski, Mateusz Wierzbicki, Magdalena Kot, Daniel Radzikowski, Sebastian Smulski, and Marcin Gołębiewski. 2023. "Silver and Copper Nanoparticles as the New Biocidal Agents Used in Pre- and Post-Milking Disinfectants with the Addition of Cosmetic Substrates in Dairy Cows" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 2: 1658. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021658

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop