Next Article in Journal
Differential Effects of Oligosaccharides, Antioxidants, Amino Acids and PUFAs on Heat/Hypoxia-Induced Epithelial Injury in a Caco-2/HT-29 Co-Culture Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Pars Distalis and Pars Tuberalis Thyroid-Stimulating Hormones and Their Roles in Macro-Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Formation
Previous Article in Journal
PLVAP as an Early Marker of Glomerular Endothelial Damage in Mice with Diabetic Kidney Disease
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Atlas of Thyroid Hormone Receptors’ Target Genes in Mouse Tissues
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 24
Issue 2
10.3390/ijms24021110
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Unexpected Crosslinking Effects of a Human Thyroid Stimulating Monoclonal Autoantibody, M22, with IGF1 on Adipogenesis in 3T3L-1 Cells

by
Araya Umetsu
1,
Tatsuya Sato
2,3,
Megumi Watanabe
1,
Yosuke Ida
1,
Masato Furuhashi
2,
Yuri Tsugeno
1 and
Hiroshi Ohguro
1,*
1
Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan
2
Department of Cardiovascular, Renal and Metabolic Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan
3
Department of Cellular Physiology and Signal Transduction, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo 060-8556, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(2), 1110; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021110
Submission received: 29 November 2022 / Revised: 29 December 2022 / Accepted: 3 January 2023 / Published: 6 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research on Thyroid Hormone and Thyroid Hormone-Related Compounds)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
To study the effects of the crosslinking of IGF1 and/or the human thyroid-stimulating monoclonal autoantibody (TSmAb), M22 on mouse adipocytes, two- and three-dimensional (2D or 3D) cultures of 3T3-L1 cells were prepared. Each sample was then subjected to the following analyses: (1) lipid staining, (2) a real-time cellular metabolic analysis, (3) analysis of the mRNA expression of adipogenesis-related genes and extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules including collagen (Col) 1, 4 and 6, and fibronectin (Fn), and (4) measurement of the size and physical properties of the 3D spheroids with a micro-squeezer. Upon adipogenic differentiation (DIF+), lipid staining and the mRNA expression of adipogenesis-related genes in the 2D- or 3D-cultured 3T3-L1 cells substantially increased. On adding IGF1 but not M22 to DIF+ cells, a significant enhancement in lipid staining and gene expressions of adipogenesis-related genes was detected in the 2D-cultured 3T3-L1 cells, although some simultaneous suppression or enhancement effects by IGF1 and M22 against lipid staining or Fabp4 expression, respectively, were detected in the 3D 3T3-L1 spheroids. Real-time metabolic analyses indicated that monotherapy with IGF1 or M22 shifted cellular metabolism toward energetic states in the 2D 3T3-L1 cells upon DIF+, although no significant metabolic changes were induced by DIF+ alone in 2D cultures. In addition, some synergistical effects on cellular metabolism by IGF1 and M22 were also observed in the 2D 3T3-L1 cells as well as in cultured non-Graves’ orbitopathy-related human orbital fibroblasts (n-HOFs), but not in Graves’ orbitopathy-related HOFs (GHOFs). In terms of the physical properties of the 3D 3T3-L1 spheroids, (1) their sizes significantly increased upon DIF+, and this increase was significantly enhanced by the presence of both IGF1 and M22 despite downsizing by monotreatment, and (2) their stiffness increased substantially, and no significant effects by IGF-1 and/or M22 were observed. Regarding the expression of ECM molecules, (1) upon DIF+, significant downregulation or upregulation of Col1 and Fn (3D), or Col4 and 6 (2D and 3D) were observed, and (2) in the presence of IGF-1 and/or M22, the mRNA expression of Col4 was significantly downregulated by M22 (2D and 3D), but the expression of Col1 was modulated in different manners by monotreatment (upregulation) or the combined treatment (downregulation) (3D). These collective data suggest that the human-specific TSmAb M22 induced some unexpected simultaneous crosslinking effects with IGF-1 with respect to the adipogenesis of 2D-cultured 3T3-L1 cells and the physical properties of 3D 3T3-L1 spheroids.

1. Introduction

Graves’ orbitopathy (GO) is an autoimmune inflammatory disorder of orbital fatty tissue/connective tissue and extraocular muscles. GO is associated with several characteristic clinical manifestations, including upper eyelid retraction, edema, and erythema of the periorbital tissues and conjunctivae, as well as exophthalmos [1,2]. As a possible explanation of the molecular pathology of GO, it is known that autoimmune responses to the thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) induce inflammation of orbital fatty tissues, resulting in an expanded volume of orbital adipose tissue, extracellular matrixes (ECMs) as well as extraocular muscles due to new fat cell growth [3,4]. In fact, the human thyroid stimulating monoclonal autoantibody (TSmAb), referred to as “M22”, isolated from the peripheral blood lymphocytes of a patient with GO [5], was reported to increase the expression of IL-6 in orbital preadipocyte fibroblasts and the secretion of IL-6 by mature adipocytes [6]. This finding suggests that circulating TSHR autoantibodies in GO might indeed play a direct role in the clinical manifestations associated with the pathogenesis of GO. Furthermore, based upon the well-known cross talk mechanism between G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and receptor tyrosine kinases [7,8], it has been shown that a GPCR family member, TSHR, is also linked with receptor tyrosine kinases, i.e., the IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R), in such cross talk mechanisms [7,8]. In fact, interactions between TSHR and IGF-1R signaling were reported to occur in primary cultures of GO-related human orbital fibroblasts (GHOFs) [9,10,11], and this signaling synergistically enhanced the secretion of hyaluronic acid (HA), a major pathogenic product of GO [2]. Based upon these collective findings, autoantibodies that bind to and stimulate TSHR [12], such as M22, and to IGF-1 to stimulate IGF-1R [13,14] have been used in studies of the pathogenesis of GO.
TSHR is a unique glycoprotein hormone receptor that is made up of A and B subunits that are linked by disulfide bonds. The A and B subunits are released by proteolytic cleavage. Among these two subunits, the A subunit on the cell surface is the primary immunogen and causes the production of thyroid-stimulating autoantibodies (TSAbs) such as M22 [15]. The three-dimensional structure of M22 complexed with the A unit of TSHR has been characterized by X-ray crystallography [16]. Although the crystallographic data clearly confirm that M22 is bound to the TSHR through the leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain, the precise mechanism responsible for the M22-induced activation of TSHR causing GO remains to be elucidated. Regarding this issue, previous studies demonstrated that the binding properties of M22 with the TSHR A subunit were comparable to a nonstimulatory mouse monoclonal antibody (mAb) (referred to as 3BD10) and found some similarities as well as some differences between them [16,17,18,19]. Therefore, these results suggest that the human-specific TSmAb M22 may also have some effects on the mouse TSHR in addition to the human TSHR. In fact, and interestingly, Neumann et al. reported that serum free T4 levels were significantly increased in mice that were given M22 [20]. Therefore, based upon these collective findings, examining the effects of M22 and/or IGF1 on mouse-derived adipocytes would be of considerable interest because such simpler experimental conditions may facilitate a better understanding of the currently unknown mechanisms responsible for causing the M22-induced stimulation of TSHR.
In terms of physiology, the spreading and differentiation of adipocytes should occur within a three-dimensional (3D) space and not on a planar culture. In adipocyte-related research, the use of a 3D cell culture system would be more desirable compared to a two-dimensional (2D) planar cell culture method. Although the use of such 3D cell culture systems has not become popular because of technical difficulties associated with this methodology, the use of such cultures has recently emerged as a useful strategy for modeling several human diseases [21]. In fact, it has been proposed that such a 3D cell culture technique would allow for more representative physiological cell-cell and cell-extracellular matrix (ECM) interactions than conventional 2D culture models [22]. Quite recently, our group independently succeeded in producing 3D spheroids using 3T3-L1 cells [23,24,25,26,27,28] as well as cells from other sources, including human orbital fibroblasts (HOFs) [29,30,31], human corneal stromal fibroblasts [32], human trabecular meshwork (HTM) [33,34,35,36] and human conjunctival fibroblasts (HconF) [37,38,39,40].
Therefore, in this study, we report on an evaluation of the effects of M22 and/or IGF1 on several biological aspects of 2D- and 3D-cultured 3T3-L1 preadipocytes during their adipogenesis.

2. Results

It was previously reported that the anti-human TSHR antibody (referred to as M22) induced an increase in serum free T4 levels in mice [20], suggesting the presence of some interesting unidentified mechanisms effects beyond the species level. To determine whether such unexpected and unidentified cross-reactivities of M22 exist, especially with IGF1 toward mouse adipose tissue, we investigated the effects of IGF1 and/or M22 on the adipogenesis of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes, in which TSHR is not expressed (Supplemental Figure S1). For this purpose, we employed 3D spheroid cultures of these cells in addition to the conventional 2D planar cell cultures. Upon adipogenic differentiation (DIF+), lipid staining and the mRNA expression of Pparγ and Fabp4 in the 2D- or 3D-cultured 3T3-L1 cells substantially increased, as reported in our previous studies [24,25,26] (Figure 1 and Figure 2). However, the additive effects of IGF1 and/or M22 on DIF+ were different between the 2D and 3D cultures. Specifically, IGF1 but not M22 caused a significant enhancement in Oil Red O staining intensities and the gene expressions of Pparγ and Fabp4 in the 2D-cultured 3T3-L1 cells (Figure 1). Such IGF1-induced increase effects were not observed by BODIPY lipid staining nor by the mRNA expression of these adipogenesis-related genes in the case of the 3D 3T3-L1 spheroids (Figure 2). However, some simultaneous enhancement effects by IGF1 and M22 toward lipid staining or Pparγ and Fabp4 expressions were observed in the case of the 3D 3T3-L1 spheroids (Figure 2).
To further study the additive effects of IGF1 and/or M22 to DIF+, a real-time cellular metabolic analysis of the 2D 3T3-L1 cells was conducted using a Seahorse Bioanalyzer, and physical property measurements including the size and stiffness of the 3D 3T3-L1 spheroid were made. As shown in Figure 3, both OCR and ECAR were increased by a monotreatment of IGF1 or M22 in the 2D 3T3L-1 cells upon DIF+ despite the fact that no significant changes in OCR and ECAR were induced by DIF+ alone in the 2D-cultured cells. Quite interestingly, some IGF1- and M22-induced energetic effects on metabolism were synergistic. Similarly, such synergistic effects by IGF1 and M22 on cellular metabolism were also observed in TSHR-positive non-GO-related human orbital fibroblasts (n-HOFs), but not in GO-related HOFs (GHOFs), which may have already been exposed to IGF1 and M22 (Supplementary Figure S2). These results suggest that the presence of IGF1 and/or M22, which mimic the pathogenesis of GO, may be partially synergistic, causing cellular metabolism to shift to a more energetic state, even independent of TSHR. Such unexpected synergistical effects were also observed in the physical properties of the 3D 3T3-L1 spheroids (Figure 4) as follows: (1) their size and stiffness were significantly increased and decreased upon DIF+ as was demonstrated in our previous reports [24,25,26], (2) the 3D spheroid size in DIF+ cells was significantly increased by the presence of both IGF1 and M22 despite downsizing by their monotreatment, and (3) no significant changes brought on by IGF-1 and/or M22 were observed in their stiffness.
To further study these diverse effects generated by IGF-1 and/or M22 between 2D and 3D cell culture systems, we evaluated the mRNA expressions of the major ECM proteins, COL1, 4 and 6, and FN. As shown in Figure 5, upon DIF+, significant downregulation or upregulation of Col1 and Fn (3D), or Col4 and 6 (2D and 3D) were observed, consistent with our previous studies [24,25,26]. In terms of the effects of IGF-1 and/or M22, the mRNA expression of Col4 was significantly downregulated by M22 (2D and 3D) but that of Col1 was differentially regulated by monotreatment (upregulation) or combined treatment (downregulation) (3D) (Figure 5). Such differences in the COL1 and COL4 expressions among treatment groups were also confirmed by immunolabeling of 2D- and 3D-cultured 3T3-L1 cells (Figure 6). Taking these collective data into account, we speculated that some unexpected, simultaneous, TSHR-independent effects of IGF-1 and M22 may be exerted and that these could be more clearly detected in the case of the 3D spheroid culture system.
Therefore, these collective results suggest that IGF1 and M22 may synergistically affect adipogenesis of 3T3-L1 cells in a TSHR-independent manner.

3. Discussion

It is known that M22 is a potent stimulatory human TSmAb that competitively binds to the TSH against the concave surface of the LRR domain, resulting substantial TSH-binding inhibiting activity [5,41]. Alternatively, M22 could also enhance the DIF+ of 2D cultured n-HOFs [42], similar to the case where TSH stimulates the conversion of mouse embryonic stem cells into adipocytes as a pro-adipogenic factor [43], since it is known that a significant increase in lipid accumulation occurs following the TSH-stimulated production of cAMP [44,45]. Interestingly, as with the human-specific TSmAb M22, it was also reported that KSAB1, the mouse-specific TSmAb, also exerted significant stimulating effects toward GHOFs despite the fact that there were differences in the response curve between both TSmAbs [46], suggesting the possibility that cross-reactivity could occur between M22 and mouse TSmAbs. In fact, it was reported that mouse TSmAbs inhibit the binding of 125I-TSH and 125I-M22 Fab to the human TSHR, although the inhibitory effects of the mouse TSmAbs were less than those of M22 [41]. In addition, both M22 and the murine TSAbs KSAB1 and KSAB2 also bind recombinant porins of Y. enterocolitica, which was identified as an infectious pathogen associated with GO [47,48,49], suggesting the possibility of cross-reactivity [50].
In addition to thyrocytes, the expression of TSHR has been detected in numerous extrathyroidal tissues, including the liver [51] and adipose tissues [52,53]. Concerning the role of extrathyroidal TSHR, it was shown that TSHR is an important regulator of adipocyte differentiation based upon the fact that the TSHR expression is increased during the adipogenic differentiation of TSHR-positive 3T3-L1 preadipocytes, and the knockdown of TSHR blocked this adipocyte differentiation [54]. Similar results were also reported for rat preadipocytes [52], n-HOFs [55,56] and mouse embryonic stem cells [43]. In the current study, we also observed that the human-specific TSmAb M22 induced some simultaneous crosslinking effects with IGF-1 toward adipogenesis in 2D cultures of 3T3-L1 cells and toward the physical properties of the 3D 3T3-L1 spheroids despite the absence of TSHR within the 3T3-L1 cells, suggesting the possibility that TSHR exerts effects that are independent of M22. Although the possible molecular mechanisms responsible for these TSHR-independent effects mediated by M22 on 3T3-L1 cells have not been elucidated at the time of writing, we speculate that some LRR [57]-related mechanisms may be involved. In fact, the LRR appears to have been identified within the primary structures of many proteins of diverse origins, including tyrosine kinase receptors [58], enzymes [59], cell adhesion molecules [60], and extracellular matrix-binding glycoproteins [61], in addition to the GPCR receptors for LH, FSH, and TSH [62,63,64,65,66,67,68]. To support this hypothesis, a previous study demonstrated that flightless-I (FLII), a transcriptional modulator of PPARγ, binds directly to PPARγ through the LRR domain and suppresses the transcriptional activity of cells [69]. Furthermore, in addition to the current observations related to the Seahorse real-time cellular metabolic analyses of n-HOFs and GHOFs (Supplemental Figure S2), we previously reported that a significant difference existed between GHOFs and n-HOFs that had been treated with M22 and IGF1 in terms of mRNA expression levels of several molecules including ECM molecules (COL1, 4 and 6 and FN), ECM regulatory factors (LOX and CTGF), inflammatory cytokines (IL1B and IL6) and ER stress-related factors, suggesting the presence of some additional, unrelated TSHR effects by M22 and IGF1 [30]. However, this TSHR-independent cross-reactivity by M22 and IGF1 is speculative at this time, and additional studies such as a TSHR knockdown system and others will be required to reveal the magnitude of this issue.

4. Materials and Methods

Two-dimensional and three-dimensional cell cultures of 3T3-L1 cells, non-GO-related human orbital fibroblasts (n-HOFs) and GO-related HOFs (GHOFs) and adipogenic differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells with or without IGF1 and M22 were used.
In the presence or absence of 100 ng/mL IGF1 and/or 10 ng/mL M22, two-dimensional (2D) planar and three-dimensional (3D) spheroid cultures of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes (#EC86052701-G0, KAK) were maintained for 7 days [24,25], or n-HOFs [30,70,71] or GHOFs [29,72] were maintained for 10 days, as described previously. The induction of adipogenic differentiation of the 3T3-L1 cells was also carried out as described previously [24,25]. Lipid staining of the 2D- and 3D-cultured 3T3-L1 cells by Oil Red O and BODIPY, respectively, was performed as described previously [24,25]. (Information concerning the methods used in this study are shown in the Supplemental Methods).

4.1. Measurement of Real-Time Cellular Metabolic Functions of 2D-Cultured 3T3-L1 Cells

The rates of oxygen consumption (OCR) and extracellular acidification (ECAR) of 2D 3T3-L1 cells were measured using a Seahorse XFe96 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies) as described previously with minor modifications [73,74]. (Information concerning the methods used in this study are shown in the Supplemental Methods).

4.2. Characterization of the 3D 3T3-L1 Spheroids

For the characterization of the 3D 3T3-L1 spheroids, their physical properties, the mean sizes (μm2) and stiffness (μN/μm) were measured as described previously [29]. (Information concerning the methods used in this study are shown in the Supplemental Methods).

4.3. Other Analytical Methods

Immunostaining using antibodies against ECM molecules including collagen (COL1), 4, and 6, and fibronectin (FN), quantitative PCR using predesigned specific primers (Supplementary Table S1), and statistical analyses using Graph Pad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) were performed as described previously [24,25]. All data are presented as arithmetic means ± the standard error of the mean (SEM) and statistical significance among experimental groups was evaluated by ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s multiple comparison test. (Information concerning the methods used in this study are shown in the Supplemental Methods).

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms24021110/s1.

Author Contributions

Author contribution statement: A.U., T.S., M.W. and H.O. were involved in study design and data interpretation. Y.I., M.F. and Y.T. were involved in the data analysis. All authors critically revised the report, commented on drafts of the manuscript, and approved the final report. Three authors (A.U., T.S. and M.W.) contributed equally to this manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Smith, T.J.; Hegedüs, L. Graves′ Disease. New Engl. J. Med. 2016, 375, 1552–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Bahn, R.S. Graves′ ophthalmopathy. New Engl. J. Med. 2010, 362, 726–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Turcu, A.F.; Kumar, S.; Neumann, S.; Coenen, M.; Iyer, S.; Chiriboga, P.; Gershengorn, M.C.; Bahn, R.S. A small molecule antagonist inhibits thyrotropin receptor antibody-induced orbital fibroblast functions involved in the pathogenesis of Graves ophthalmopathy. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, 2153–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Smith, T.J. TSH-receptor-expressing fibrocytes and thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Nat. Reviews. Endocrinol. 2015, 11, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Sanders, J.; Evans, M.; Premawardhana, L.D.; Depraetere, H.; Jeffreys, J.; Richards, T.; Furmaniak, J.; Rees Smith, B. Human monoclonal thyroid stimulating autoantibody. Lancet 2003, 362, 126–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kumar, S.; Schiefer, R.; Coenen, M.J.; Bahn, R.S. A stimulatory thyrotropin receptor antibody (M22) and thyrotropin increase interleukin-6 expression and secretion in Graves′ orbital preadipocyte fibroblasts. Thyroid Off. J. Am. Thyroid Assoc. 2010, 20, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Delcourt, N.; Bockaert, J.; Marin, P. GPCR-jacking: From a new route in RTK signalling to a new concept in GPCR activation. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2007, 28, 602–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pyne, N.J.; Pyne, S. Receptor tyrosine kinase-G-protein-coupled receptor signalling platforms: Out of the shadow? Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2011, 32, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Santisteban, P.; Kohn, L.D.; Di Lauro, R. Thyroglobulin gene expression is regulated by insulin and insulin-like growth factor I, as well as thyrotropin, in FRTL-5 thyroid cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1987, 262, 4048–4052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tsui, S.; Naik, V.; Hoa, N.; Hwang, C.J.; Afifiyan, N.F.; Sinha Hikim, A.; Gianoukakis, A.G.; Douglas, R.S.; Smith, T.J. Evidence for an association between thyroid-stimulating hormone and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptors: A tale of two antigens implicated in Graves′ disease. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 4397–4405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, L.; Grennan-Jones, F.; Draman, M.S.; Lane, C.; Morris, D.; Dayan, C.M.; Tee, A.R.; Ludgate, M. Possible targets for nonimmunosuppressive therapy of Graves′ orbitopathy. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 99, E1183-90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Rapoport, B.; McLachlan, S.M. The thyrotropin receptor in Graves′ disease. Thyroid Off. J. Am. Thyroid Assoc. 2007, 17, 911–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Smith, T.J.; Hegedüs, L.; Douglas, R.S. Role of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) pathway in the pathogenesis of Graves′ orbitopathy. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 26, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Smith, T.J.; Hoa, N. Immunoglobulins from patients with Graves′ disease induce hyaluronan synthesis in their orbital fibroblasts through the self-antigen, insulin-like growth factor-I receptor. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 89, 5076–5080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Chen, C.R.; Pichurin, P.; Nagayama, Y.; Latrofa, F.; Rapoport, B.; McLachlan, S.M. The thyrotropin receptor autoantigen in Graves disease is the culprit as well as the victim. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 111, 1897–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Sanders, J.; Chirgadze, D.Y.; Sanders, P.; Baker, S.; Sullivan, A.; Bhardwaja, A.; Bolton, J.; Reeve, M.; Nakatake, N.; Evans, M.; et al. Crystal structure of the TSH receptor in complex with a thyroid-stimulating autoantibody. Thyroid Off. J. Am. Thyroid Assoc. 2007, 17, 395–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Chazenbalk, G.D.; Wang, Y.; Guo, J.; Hutchison, J.S.; Segal, D.; Jaume, J.C.; McLachlan, S.M.; Rapoport, B. A mouse monoclonal antibody to a thyrotropin receptor ectodomain variant provides insight into the exquisite antigenic conformational requirement, epitopes and in vivo concentration of human autoantibodies. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1999, 84, 702–710. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Chazenbalk, G.D.; Pichurin, P.; Chen, C.R.; Latrofa, F.; Johnstone, A.P.; McLachlan, S.M.; Rapoport, B. Thyroid-stimulating autoantibodies in Graves disease preferentially recognize the free A subunit, not the thyrotropin holoreceptor. J. Clin. Investig. 2002, 110, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sanders, P.; Young, S.; Sanders, J.; Kabelis, K.; Baker, S.; Sullivan, A.; Evans, M.; Clark, J.; Wilmot, J.; Hu, X.; et al. Crystal structure of the TSH receptor (TSHR) bound to a blocking-type TSHR autoantibody. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2011, 46, 81–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Neumann, S.; Nir, E.A.; Eliseeva, E.; Huang, W.; Marugan, J.; Xiao, J.; Dulcey, A.E.; Gershengorn, M.C. A selective TSH receptor antagonist inhibits stimulation of thyroid function in female mice. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 310–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huh, D.; Hamilton, G.A.; Ingber, D.E. From 3D cell culture to organs-on-chips. Trends Cell Biol. 2011, 21, 745–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Wang, F.; Weaver, V.M.; Petersen, O.W.; Larabell, C.A.; Dedhar, S.; Briand, P.; Lupu, R.; Bissell, M.J. Reciprocal interactions between beta1-integrin and epidermal growth factor receptor in three-dimensional basement membrane breast cultures: A different perspective in epithelial biology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 14821–14826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ohguro, H.; Ida, Y.; Hikage, F.; Umetsu, A.; Ichioka, H.; Watanabe, M.; Furuhashi, M. STAT3 Is the Master Regulator for the Forming of 3D Spheroids of 3T3-L1 Preadipocytes. Cells 2022, 11, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ida, Y.; Hikage, F.; Itoh, K.; Ida, H.; Ohguro, H. Prostaglandin F2α agonist-induced suppression of 3T3-L1 cell adipogenesis affects spatial formation of extra-cellular matrix. Sci Rep 2020, 10, 7958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ida, Y.; Hikage, F.; Ohguro, H. ROCK inhibitors enhance the production of large lipid-enriched 3D organoids of 3T3-L1 cells. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 5479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ida, Y.; Hikage, F.; Umetsu, A.; Ida, H.; Ohguro, H. Omidenepag, a non-prostanoid EP2 receptor agonist, induces enlargement of the 3D organoid of 3T3-L1 cells. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 16018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ida, Y.; Watanabe, M.; Ohguro, H.; Hikage, F. Simultaneous Use of ROCK Inhibitors and EP2 Agonists Induces Unexpected Effects on Adipogenesis and the Physical Properties of 3T3-L1 Preadipocytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ida, Y.; Watanabe, M.; Umetsu, A.; Ohguro, H.; Hikage, F. Addition of EP2 agonists to an FP agonist additively and synergistically modulates adipogenesis and the physical properties of 3D 3T3-L1 sphenoids. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2021, 171, 102315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Hikage, F.; Atkins, S.; Kahana, A.; Smith, T.J.; Chun, T.H. HIF2A-LOX Pathway Promotes Fibrotic Tissue Remodeling in Thyroid-Associated Orbitopathy. Endocrinology 2019, 160, 20–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ida, Y.; Ichioka, H.; Furuhashi, M.; Hikage, F.; Watanabe, M.; Umetsu, A.; Ohguro, H. Reactivities of a Prostanoid EP2 Agonist, Omidenepag, Are Useful for Distinguishing between 3D Spheroids of Human Orbital Fibroblasts without or with Graves′ Orbitopathy. Cells 2021, 10, 3196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Itoh, K.; Hikage, F.; Ida, Y.; Ohguro, H. Prostaglandin F2α Agonists Negatively Modulate the Size of 3D Organoids from Primary Human Orbital Fibroblasts. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020, 61, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ida, Y.; Umetsu, A.; Furuhashi, M.; Watanabe, M.; Tsugeno, Y.; Suzuki, S.; Hikage, F.; Ohguro, H. ROCK 1 and 2 affect the spatial architecture of 3D spheroids derived from human corneal stromal fibroblasts in different manners. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 7419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Watanabe, M.; Ida, Y.; Ohguro, H.; Ota, C.; Hikage, F. Establishment of appropriate glaucoma models using dexamethasone or TGFβ2 treated three-dimension (3D) cultured human trabecular meshwork (HTM) cells. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Watanabe, M.; Ida, Y.; Ohguro, H.; Ota, C.; Hikage, F. Diverse effects of pan-ROCK and ROCK2 inhibitors on 2 D and 3D cultured human trabecular meshwork (HTM) cells treated with TGFβ2. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Watanabe, M.; Ida, Y.; Furuhashi, M.; Tsugeno, Y.; Ohguro, H.; Hikage, F. Screening of the Drug-Induced Effects of Prostaglandin EP2 and FP Agonists on 3D Cultures of Dexamethasone-Treated Human Trabecular Meshwork Cells. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Watanabe, M.; Ida, Y.; Furuhashi, M.; Tsugeno, Y.; Hikage, F.; Ohguro, H. Pan-ROCK and ROCK2 Inhibitors Affect Dexamethasone-Treated 2D- and 3D-Cultured Human Trabecular Meshwork (HTM) Cells in Opposite Manners. Molecules 2021, 26, 6382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Oouchi, Y.; Watanabe, M.; Ida, Y.; Ohguro, H.; Hikage, F. Rosiglitasone and ROCK Inhibitors Modulate Fibrogenetic Changes in TGF-β2 Treated Human Conjunctival Fibroblasts (HconF) in Different Manners. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tsugeno, Y.; Furuhashi, M.; Sato, T.; Watanabe, M.; Umetsu, A.; Suzuki, S.; Ida, Y.; Hikage, F.; Ohguro, H. FGF-2 enhances fibrogenetic changes in TGF-β2 treated human conjunctival fibroblasts. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 16006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tsugeno, Y.; Sato, T.; Watanabe, M.; Higashide, M.; Furuhashi, M.; Umetsu, A.; Suzuki, S.; Ida, Y.; Hikage, F.; Ohguro, H. All Trans-Retinoic Acids Facilitate the Remodeling of 2D and 3D Cultured Human Conjunctival Fibroblasts. Bioengineering 2022, 9, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Tsugeno, Y.; Sato, T.; Watanabe, M.; Furuhashi, M.; Umetsu, A.; Ida, Y.; Hikage, F.; Ohguro, H. Benzalkonium Chloride, Even at Low Concentrations, Deteriorates Intracellular Metabolic Capacity in Human Conjunctival Fibroblasts. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sanders, J.; Jeffreys, J.; Depraetere, H.; Evans, M.; Richards, T.; Kiddie, A.; Brereton, K.; Premawardhana, L.D.; Chirgadze, D.Y.; Núñez Miguel, R.; et al. Characteristics of a human monoclonal autoantibody to the thyrotropin receptor: Sequence structure and function. Thyroid Off. J. Am. Thyroid Assoc. 2004, 14, 560–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kumar, S.; Nadeem, S.; Stan, M.N.; Coenen, M.; Bahn, R.S. A stimulatory TSH receptor antibody enhances adipogenesis via phosphoinositide 3-kinase activation in orbital preadipocytes from patients with Graves’ ophthalmopathy. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2011, 46, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Lu, M.; Lin, R.Y. TSH stimulates adipogenesis in mouse embryonic stem cells. J. Endocrinol. 2008, 196, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Valyasevi, R.W.; Erickson, D.Z.; Harteneck, D.A.; Dutton, C.M.; Heufelder, A.E.; Jyonouchi, S.C.; Bahn, R.S. Differentiation of human orbital preadipocyte fibroblasts induces expression of functional thyrotropin receptor. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1999, 84, 2557–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Crisp, M.; Starkey, K.J.; Lane, C.; Ham, J.; Ludgate, M. Adipogenesis in thyroid eye disease. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000, 41, 3249–3255. [Google Scholar]
  46. Krieger, C.C.; Boutin, A.; Jang, D.; Morgan, S.J.; Banga, J.P.; Kahaly, G.J.; Klubo-Gwiezdzinska, J.; Neumann, S.; Gershengorn, M.C. Arrestin-β-1 Physically Scaffolds TSH and IGF1 Receptors to Enable Crosstalk. Endocrinology 2019, 160, 1468–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bech, K.; Larsen, J.H.; Hansen, J.M.; Nerup, J. Letter: Yersinia enterocolitica infection and thyroid disorders. Lancet 1974, 2, 951–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lidman, K.; Eriksson, U.; Fagraeus, A.; Norberg, R. Letter: Antibodies against thyroid cells in Yersinia enterocolitica infection. Lancet 1974, 2, 1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Shenkman, L.; Bottone, E.J. Antibodies to Yersinia enterocolitica in thyroid disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 1976, 85, 735–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hargreaves, C.E.; Grasso, M.; Hampe, C.S.; Stenkova, A.; Atkinson, S.; Joshua, G.W.; Wren, B.W.; Buckle, A.M.; Dunn-Walters, D.; Banga, J.P. Yersinia enterocolitica provides the link between thyroid-stimulating antibodies and their germline counterparts in Graves′ disease. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 5373–5381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Zhang, W.; Tian, L.M.; Han, Y.; Ma, H.Y.; Wang, L.C.; Guo, J.; Gao, L.; Zhao, J.J. Presence of thyrotropin receptor in hepatocytes: Not a case of illegitimate transcription. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2009, 13, 4636–4642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Haraguchi, K.; Shimura, H.; Lin, L.; Endo, T.; Onaya, T. Differentiation of rat preadipocytes is accompanied by expression of thyrotropin receptors. Endocrinology 1996, 137, 3200–3205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Sorisky, A.; Bell, A.; Gagnon, A. TSH receptor in adipose cells. Horm. Metab. Res. = Horm. Stoffwechs. = Horm. Metab. 2000, 32, 468–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lu, S.; Guan, Q.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Xu, W.; Li, X.; Fu, Y.; Gao, L.; Zhao, J.; Wang, X. Role of extrathyroidal TSHR expression in adipocyte differentiation and its association with obesity. Lipids. Health Dis. 2012, 11, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Valyasevi, R.W.; Harteneck, D.A.; Dutton, C.M.; Bahn, R.S. Stimulation of adipogenesis, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma), and thyrotropin receptor by PPARgamma agonist in human orbital preadipocyte fibroblasts. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 2352–2358. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  56. Zhang, L.; Baker, G.; Janus, D.; Paddon, C.A.; Fuhrer, D.; Ludgate, M. Biological effects of thyrotropin receptor activation on human orbital preadipocytes. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2006, 47, 5197–5203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Kobe, B.; Deisenhofer, J. The leucine-rich repeat: A versatile binding motif. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1994, 19, 415–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Martin-Zanca, D.; Oskam, R.; Mitra, G.; Copeland, T.; Barbacid, M. Molecular and biochemical characterization of the human trk proto-oncogene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1989, 9, 24–33. [Google Scholar]
  59. Tan, F.; Weerasinghe, D.K.; Skidgel, R.A.; Tamei, H.; Kaul, R.K.; Roninson, I.B.; Schilling, J.W.; Erdös, E.G. The deduced protein sequence of the human carboxypeptidase N high molecular weight subunit reveals the presence of leucine-rich tandem repeats. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hashimoto, C.; Hudson, K.L.; Anderson, K.V. The Toll gene of Drosophila, required for dorsal-ventral embryonic polarity, appears to encode a transmembrane protein. Cell 1988, 52, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Krusius, T.; Ruoslahti, E. Primary structure of an extracellular matrix proteoglycan core protein deduced from cloned cDNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 7683–7687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Roth, N.S.; Lefkowitz, R.J.; Caron, M.G. Structure and function of the adrenergic receptor family. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1991, 308, 223–238. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Strader, C.D.; Fong, T.M.; Tota, M.R.; Underwood, D.; Dixon, R.A. Structure and function of G protein-coupled receptors. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1994, 63, 101–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. McFarland, K.C.; Sprengel, R.; Phillips, H.S.; Köhler, M.; Rosemblit, N.; Nikolics, K.; Segaloff, D.L.; Seeburg, P.H. Lutropin-choriogonadotropin receptor: An unusual member of the G protein-coupled receptor family. Science 1989, 245, 494–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Vassart, G.; Dumont, J.E. The thyrotropin receptor and the regulation of thyrocyte function and growth. Endocr. Rev. 1992, 13, 596–611. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Sprengel, R.; Braun, T.; Nikolics, K.; Segaloff, D.L.; Seeburg, P.H. The testicular receptor for follicle stimulating hormone: Structure and functional expression of cloned cDNA. Mol. Endocrinol. 1990, 4, 525–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Braun, T.; Schofield, P.R.; Sprengel, R. Amino-terminal leucine-rich repeats in gonadotropin receptors determine hormone selectivity. EMBO J. 1991, 10, 1885–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Ji, T.H.; Ryu, K.S.; Gilchrist, R.; Ji, I. Interaction, signal generation, signal divergence, and signal transduction of LH/CG and the receptor. Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 1997, 52, 431–453, discussion 454. [Google Scholar]
  69. Choi, J.S.; Choi, S.S.; Kim, E.S.; Seo, Y.K.; Seo, J.K.; Kim, E.K.; Suh, P.G.; Choi, J.H. Flightless-1, a novel transcriptional modulator of PPARγ through competing with RXRα. Cell. Signal. 2015, 27, 614–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hikage, F.; Ichioka, H.; Watanabe, M.; Umetsu, A.; Ohguro, H.; Ida, Y. Addition of ROCK inhibitors to prostaglandin derivative (PG) synergistically affects adipogenesis of the 3D spheroids of human orbital fibroblasts (HOFs). Hum. Cell 2022, 35, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hikage, F.; Ichioka, H.; Watanabe, M.; Umetsu, A.; Ohguro, H.; Ida, Y. ROCK inhibitors modulate the physical properties and adipogenesis of 3D spheroids of human orbital fibroblasts in different manners. FASEB Bioadvances 2021, 3, 866–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ichioka, H.; Ida, Y.; Watanabe, M.; Ohguro, H.; Hikage, F. Prostaglandin F2α and EP2 agonists, and a ROCK inhibitor modulate the formation of 3D organoids of Grave′s orbitopathy related human orbital fibroblasts. Exp. Eye Res. 2021, 205, 108489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Sato, T.; Chang, H.C.; Bayeva, M.; Shapiro, J.S.; Ramos-Alonso, L.; Kouzu, H.; Jiang, X.; Liu, T.; Yar, S.; Sawicki, K.T.; et al. mRNA-binding protein tristetraprolin is essential for cardiac response to iron deficiency by regulating mitochondrial function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, e6291–e6300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sato, T.; Ichise, N.; Kobayashi, T.; Fusagawa, H.; Yamazaki, H.; Kudo, T.; Tohse, N. Enhanced glucose metabolism through activation of HIF-1α covers the energy demand in a rat embryonic heart primordium after heartbeat initiation. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 24 01110 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of IGF1 and/or M22 on adipogenesis of 2D-cultured 3T3-L1 cells. Two-dimensional cultures of 3T3-L1 cells were prepared under several sets of conditions: preadipocytes of 3T3-L1 cells (DIF-) or adipogenic-differentiated preadipocytes (DIF+) with or without 100 ng/mL IGF1 and/or 10 ng/mL M22. The specimens were subjected to analysis by Oil Red O lipid staining (panel (A); representative phase contrast images, scale bar: 100 μm, and panel (B); their staining intensities, O.D. 500 nm) and qPCR of the adipogenesis genes Pparγ and Fabp4 (panel (C)). All experiments were performed in duplicate using fresh preparations (total n = 4), each of which consisted of a confluent 12-well dish. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.001.
Figure 1. Effects of IGF1 and/or M22 on adipogenesis of 2D-cultured 3T3-L1 cells. Two-dimensional cultures of 3T3-L1 cells were prepared under several sets of conditions: preadipocytes of 3T3-L1 cells (DIF-) or adipogenic-differentiated preadipocytes (DIF+) with or without 100 ng/mL IGF1 and/or 10 ng/mL M22. The specimens were subjected to analysis by Oil Red O lipid staining (panel (A); representative phase contrast images, scale bar: 100 μm, and panel (B); their staining intensities, O.D. 500 nm) and qPCR of the adipogenesis genes Pparγ and Fabp4 (panel (C)). All experiments were performed in duplicate using fresh preparations (total n = 4), each of which consisted of a confluent 12-well dish. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.001.
Ijms 24 01110 g001
Ijms 24 01110 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of IGF1 and/or M22 on the adipogenesis of 3T3-L1 3D spheroids. Three-dimensional spheroids of 3T3-L1 cells were prepared under several sets of conditions: preadipocytes of 3T3-L1 cells (DIF-) or adipogenic-differentiated preadipocytes (DIF+) with or without 100 ng/mL IGF1 and/or 10 ng mL M22. They were immunostained with DAPI (blue), phalloidin (green) and BODIPY (red). Merged images and BODIPY images are shown in panel (A) (scale bar: 100 μm) and their staining intensities (gray/pixel) were plotted (panel (B)). The mRNA expression levels of adipogenesis-related genes, including Pparγ and Fabp4, under the above conditions were plotted in panel (C). All experiments were performed in duplicate using fresh preparations (total n = 4), each of which consisted of 16 spheroids. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.001.
Figure 2. Effects of IGF1 and/or M22 on the adipogenesis of 3T3-L1 3D spheroids. Three-dimensional spheroids of 3T3-L1 cells were prepared under several sets of conditions: preadipocytes of 3T3-L1 cells (DIF-) or adipogenic-differentiated preadipocytes (DIF+) with or without 100 ng/mL IGF1 and/or 10 ng mL M22. They were immunostained with DAPI (blue), phalloidin (green) and BODIPY (red). Merged images and BODIPY images are shown in panel (A) (scale bar: 100 μm) and their staining intensities (gray/pixel) were plotted (panel (B)). The mRNA expression levels of adipogenesis-related genes, including Pparγ and Fabp4, under the above conditions were plotted in panel (C). All experiments were performed in duplicate using fresh preparations (total n = 4), each of which consisted of 16 spheroids. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.001.
Ijms 24 01110 g002
Ijms 24 01110 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of IGF1 and/or M22 on cellular metabolism in 2D-cultured 3T3-L1 cells. The 3T3-L1 cells were 2D-cultured under several sets of conditions: preadipocytes of 3T3-L1 cells (DIF−) and adipogenic-differentiated preadipocytes (DIF+) with or without 100 ng/mL IGF1 and/or 10 ng/mL M22 were subjected to a real-time analysis of metabolic function using a Seahorse XFe96 Extracellular Flux Analyzer. The oxygen consumption rate (OCR, panel (A)) and extra-cellular acidification rate (ECAR, panel (B)) were simultaneously measured at baseline and following injections of oligomycin (Oligo, complex V inhibitor), FCCP (a protonophore), rotenone/antimycin A (R/A, complex I/III inhibitors) and 2DG (a hexokinase inhibitor). Key parameters of mitochondrial respiration and glycolytic functions are shown in panel (C) and panel (D), respectively. Basal OCR was calculated by subtracting OCR with rotenone/antimycin A from the OCR at baseline. ATP-linked respiration was calculated by subtracting OCR with oligomycin from OCR at baseline. Maximal respiration was calculated by subtracting OCR with rotenone/antimycin A from OCR with FCCP. Basal ECAR was calculated by subtracting ECAR with 2DG from ECAR at baseline. Glycolytic capacity was calculated by subtracting ECAR with 2DG from ECAR with oligomycin. Energy map for basal OCR and ECAR is shown in panel (E). All experiments were performed in duplicate using fresh preparations (total n = 6), each of which consisted of a confluent 6-well dish. * p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Effects of IGF1 and/or M22 on cellular metabolism in 2D-cultured 3T3-L1 cells. The 3T3-L1 cells were 2D-cultured under several sets of conditions: preadipocytes of 3T3-L1 cells (DIF−) and adipogenic-differentiated preadipocytes (DIF+) with or without 100 ng/mL IGF1 and/or 10 ng/mL M22 were subjected to a real-time analysis of metabolic function using a Seahorse XFe96 Extracellular Flux Analyzer. The oxygen consumption rate (OCR, panel (A)) and extra-cellular acidification rate (ECAR, panel (B)) were simultaneously measured at baseline and following injections of oligomycin (Oligo, complex V inhibitor), FCCP (a protonophore), rotenone/antimycin A (R/A, complex I/III inhibitors) and 2DG (a hexokinase inhibitor). Key parameters of mitochondrial respiration and glycolytic functions are shown in panel (C) and panel (D), respectively. Basal OCR was calculated by subtracting OCR with rotenone/antimycin A from the OCR at baseline. ATP-linked respiration was calculated by subtracting OCR with oligomycin from OCR at baseline. Maximal respiration was calculated by subtracting OCR with rotenone/antimycin A from OCR with FCCP. Basal ECAR was calculated by subtracting ECAR with 2DG from ECAR at baseline. Glycolytic capacity was calculated by subtracting ECAR with 2DG from ECAR with oligomycin. Energy map for basal OCR and ECAR is shown in panel (E). All experiments were performed in duplicate using fresh preparations (total n = 6), each of which consisted of a confluent 6-well dish. * p < 0.05.
Ijms 24 01110 g003
Ijms 24 01110 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of IGF1 and/or M22 on mean area sizes (A) and physical stiffness (B) of the 3T3-L1 3D spheroids. Three-dimensional spheroids of 3T3-L1 cells were prepared under several sets of conditions: preadipocytes of 3T3-L1 cells (DIF-) or adipogenic-differentiated preadipocytes (DIF+) with or without 100 ng/mL IGF1 and/or 10 ng/mL M22. The mean area sizes (μm2) of the 3D spheroids on day 7 were measured and plotted in panel (A). On day 7, a single 3D spheroid was placed on a 3 mm × 3 mm plate which was then compressed to 50% deformation during a period of 20 s; the required force (μN) was measured, and force/displacement (μN/μm) was plotted in panel (B). All experiments were performed in duplicate using fresh preparations (total n = 7–16 spheroids) each. ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.001.
Figure 4. Effects of IGF1 and/or M22 on mean area sizes (A) and physical stiffness (B) of the 3T3-L1 3D spheroids. Three-dimensional spheroids of 3T3-L1 cells were prepared under several sets of conditions: preadipocytes of 3T3-L1 cells (DIF-) or adipogenic-differentiated preadipocytes (DIF+) with or without 100 ng/mL IGF1 and/or 10 ng/mL M22. The mean area sizes (μm2) of the 3D spheroids on day 7 were measured and plotted in panel (A). On day 7, a single 3D spheroid was placed on a 3 mm × 3 mm plate which was then compressed to 50% deformation during a period of 20 s; the required force (μN) was measured, and force/displacement (μN/μm) was plotted in panel (B). All experiments were performed in duplicate using fresh preparations (total n = 7–16 spheroids) each. ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.001.
Ijms 24 01110 g004
Ijms 24 01110 g005a 550Ijms 24 01110 g005b 550
Figure 5. Effects of IGF1 and/or M22 on mRNA expressions of ECM molecules of 2D- or 3D-cultured 3T3-L1 cells. Two-dimensional or three-dimensional cultures of 3T3-L1 cells were prepared under several conditions: preadipocytes of 3T3-L1 cells (DIF-) or adipogenic-differentiated preadipocytes (DIF+) with or without 100 ng/mL IGF1 and/or 10 ng/mL M22. The specimens were subjected to qPCR analysis to estimate mRNA expression of major ECM molecules (Col1: collagen 1, Col4: collagen 4, Col6: collagen 6, Fn: fibronectin). All experiments were performed in duplicate using fresh preparations (total n = 4), each of which consisted of a confluent 6-well dish (2D) or 16 spheroids (3D). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.001.
Figure 5. Effects of IGF1 and/or M22 on mRNA expressions of ECM molecules of 2D- or 3D-cultured 3T3-L1 cells. Two-dimensional or three-dimensional cultures of 3T3-L1 cells were prepared under several conditions: preadipocytes of 3T3-L1 cells (DIF-) or adipogenic-differentiated preadipocytes (DIF+) with or without 100 ng/mL IGF1 and/or 10 ng/mL M22. The specimens were subjected to qPCR analysis to estimate mRNA expression of major ECM molecules (Col1: collagen 1, Col4: collagen 4, Col6: collagen 6, Fn: fibronectin). All experiments were performed in duplicate using fresh preparations (total n = 4), each of which consisted of a confluent 6-well dish (2D) or 16 spheroids (3D). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005, **** p < 0.001.
Ijms 24 01110 g005aIjms 24 01110 g005b
Ijms 24 01110 g006a 550Ijms 24 01110 g006b 550
Figure 6. Representative confocal images showing the expression of COL1 and COL4 in 2D or 3D 3T3-L1 cells under several sets of conditions. On day 7, 2D cells and 3D cultures of spheroids of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes as the control (CONT) and adipogenic-differentiated preadipocytes in the absence (DIF) or presence of 100 ng/mL IGF1 and/or 10 ng/mL M22 were immunostained with specific antibodies against ECM molecules including collagen 1 (COL 1) and collagen 4 (COL 4), designated by a green color. Representative immunolabeling images are shown in panels (A) (2D) and (C) (3D) (scale bar: 100 μm) and their staining intensities (gray/pixel) were plotted in panels (B) (2D) and (D) (3D). All experiments were performed in duplicate each using fresh preparations (total n = 4). ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005.
Figure 6. Representative confocal images showing the expression of COL1 and COL4 in 2D or 3D 3T3-L1 cells under several sets of conditions. On day 7, 2D cells and 3D cultures of spheroids of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes as the control (CONT) and adipogenic-differentiated preadipocytes in the absence (DIF) or presence of 100 ng/mL IGF1 and/or 10 ng/mL M22 were immunostained with specific antibodies against ECM molecules including collagen 1 (COL 1) and collagen 4 (COL 4), designated by a green color. Representative immunolabeling images are shown in panels (A) (2D) and (C) (3D) (scale bar: 100 μm) and their staining intensities (gray/pixel) were plotted in panels (B) (2D) and (D) (3D). All experiments were performed in duplicate each using fresh preparations (total n = 4). ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.005.
Ijms 24 01110 g006aIjms 24 01110 g006b
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Umetsu, A.; Sato, T.; Watanabe, M.; Ida, Y.; Furuhashi, M.; Tsugeno, Y.; Ohguro, H. Unexpected Crosslinking Effects of a Human Thyroid Stimulating Monoclonal Autoantibody, M22, with IGF1 on Adipogenesis in 3T3L-1 Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1110. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021110

AMA Style

Umetsu A, Sato T, Watanabe M, Ida Y, Furuhashi M, Tsugeno Y, Ohguro H. Unexpected Crosslinking Effects of a Human Thyroid Stimulating Monoclonal Autoantibody, M22, with IGF1 on Adipogenesis in 3T3L-1 Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(2):1110. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021110

Chicago/Turabian Style

Umetsu, Araya, Tatsuya Sato, Megumi Watanabe, Yosuke Ida, Masato Furuhashi, Yuri Tsugeno, and Hiroshi Ohguro. 2023. "Unexpected Crosslinking Effects of a Human Thyroid Stimulating Monoclonal Autoantibody, M22, with IGF1 on Adipogenesis in 3T3L-1 Cells" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 2: 1110. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021110

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop