Next Article in Journal
The Human Pre-miRNA Distance Distribution for Exploring Disease Association
Next Article in Special Issue
The Cytoplasmic Region of SARAF Reduces Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Metastasis through the Regulation of Store-Operated Calcium Entry
Previous Article in Journal
Toll-like Receptors and Thrombopoiesis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Expression of pH-Sensitive TRPC4 in Common Skin Tumors

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(2), 1037; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021037
by Bernadett Kurz 1,†, Hannah Philine Michael 1,†, Antonia Förch 1, Susanne Wallner 1, Florian Zeman 2, Sonja-Maria Decking 3, Ines Ugele 3, Constantin Hintschich 3, Frank Haubner 4, Tobias Ettl 5, Kathrin Renner 3, Christoph Brochhausen 6 and Stephan Schreml 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(2), 1037; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021037
Submission received: 14 November 2022 / Revised: 29 December 2022 / Accepted: 4 January 2023 / Published: 5 January 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

We congratulate the authors for the subject approached in the manuscript under evaluation. As can be seen, although it is a pioneering study, the results are relevant to highlight the major role that TRPC4 plays in skin cancer.

In order to improve the quality of the manuscript, we recommend the following revisions to the authors:

- for the entire manuscript – in vivo (use italics) (eg, lines 58, 246);

- for the entire manuscript – use super or subscript if needed Ca2+, H2O2;

- first entry of the term within the manuscript – description for PBS abbreviation – Phosphate Buffer Solution (line 107);

- proper form for subchapter (line 149);

- proper form – skin cancer (line 283 and Supplementary Figure S10)

 

- replace "need to be verified by" with "need to be confirmed on" (line 260).

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper describes the expression profiles within different skin tumour entities based on a single antibody staining.

The specificity of the obtained signal is not proven by e.g. WB or in situ RT-PCR experiments. 

Their is no rationale for the scoring system.
Why was no densitometric analysis applied?

In case of overstaining, why was the IHC not repeated?

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

No further comments

Back to TopTop