Next Article in Journal
Discovery and Mechanism of Novel 7-Aliphatic Amine Tryptanthrin Derivatives against Phytopathogenic Bacteria
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigating the Crime Scene—Molecular Signatures in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Untangling Macropore Formation and Current Facilitation in P2X7
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review of Pre-Clinical Murine Models of Human Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CRP in Outpatients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Is Linked to the Blood Microbiota

1
Department of Food Technology, Engineering and Nutrition, Lund University, 22100 Lund, Sweden
2
Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, 21428 Malmö, Sweden
3
Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Skåne University Hospital, 20502 Malmö, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(13), 10899; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310899
Submission received: 11 May 2023 / Revised: 20 June 2023 / Accepted: 26 June 2023 / Published: 30 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Inflammatory Bowel Disease: From Pre-clinial Models into Translation)

Abstract

:
The circulation is a closed system that has been assumed to be free from bacteria, but evidence for the existence of a low-density blood microbiota is accumulating. The present study aimed to map the blood microbiota of outpatients with Crohn’s disease (CD) or with ulcerative colitis (UC) by 16S metagenomics. A diverse microbiota was observed in the blood samples. Regardless of the type of disease, the alpha diversity of the microbiota was positively associated with C-reactive protein (CRP). The blood microbiota had a surprisingly high proportion of Proteobacteria in comparison with human oral and colonic microbiotas. There was no clear difference in the overall pattern of the microbiota between CD and UC. A non-template control (NTC) was included in the whole process to control for the potential contamination from the environment and reagents. Certain bacterial taxa were concomitantly detected in both blood samples and NTC. However, Acinetobacter, Lactobacillus, Thermicanus and Paracoccus were found in blood from both CD and UC patients but not in NTC, indicating the existence of a specific blood-borne microbiota in the patients. Achromobacter dominated in all blood samples, but a minor amount was also found in NTC. Micrococcaceae was significantly enriched in CD, but it was also detected in high abundance in NTC. Whether the composition of the blood microbiota could be a marker of a particular phenotype in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or whether the blood microbiota could be used for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes deserves further attention.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The circulation is a closed system, and for a long time, the blood in healthy individuals has been assumed to be free from bacteria, a presumption that is a prerequisite for safe blood transfusions. However, viable bacteria have been found in blood from healthy blood donors and individuals [1,2,3]. Consequently, the suspicions about the existence of a blood microbiota in non-septic individuals are accumulating [4]. On the other hand, the origins, identities and putative functions of these unanticipated micro-organisms are unknown and open for speculation. For example, it is not known how the blood microbiota is linked to the microbiota of other locations such as the gastro-intestinal (GI) tract or how the blood microbiota will be affected by diseases that increase bacterial translocation through the mucosa, e.g., in immune-driven diseases such as Crohn’s disease (CD).
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) such as ulcerative colitis (UC) and CD are public health problems, but the aetiology of IBDs is obscure. Microbial agents seem to be involved in the pathogenesis, and intestinal bacteria can be one contributing factor to the development and progression of these diseases [5,6,7]. Dysbiosis is found in IBD patients, but other taxonomic alterations are revealed during periods of both clinical remission and relapse [8,9]. The human GI tract harbours bacteria in abundance, and these bacteria not only play a role in intestinal homeostasis and function but also in the onset and perpetuation of chronic intestinal inflammation. On the one hand, innate tolerance to commensal microorganisms must be maintained. On the other, antagonistic interactions between the host and the pathogenic organism are necessary for a favourable outcome of an infection. To cope with the situation, the body has evolved multifarious defensive and homeostatic mechanisms towards microbial infections versus harmless colonization [10]. In IBD, something in this complex balance has gone wrong, resulting in inflammation and an increased translocation of bacteria into circulation. Research on the IBD blood microbiota is, however, still scarce, and knowledge is lacking. In a few studies, it has been shown that the total bacterial DNA concentration is increased in peripheral blood from IBD patients compared to healthy controls irrespective of disease activity and that bacterial DNA is still detected in blood in patients in remission, although in lower concentrations than in patients with active IBD [11,12].
The aim of the present study was firstly, to investigate the possible existence of a blood microbiota of outpatients with CD and UC by 16S-targeted metagenomics and secondly, to compare the blood microbiota with clinical characteristics including commonly used biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin. Elevated serum CRP levels can indicate active inflammation although some patients may show normal levels. Despite the disadvantages of CRP such as low specificity and variability in individuals, it is a relatively inexpensive test that is widely adopted by clinical laboratories for the rapid assessment of inflammation and disease activity in IBD patients [13,14]. In contrast to CRP, serum albumin is used as a long-term marker of disease severity and nutritional status [15,16]. Faecal calprotectin, among others, is another biomarker that can also aid in the diagnosis of IBD [14,17].
The present work is a pilot study on the investigation of the putative translocation of the microbiota into blood circulation in IBD patients.

2. Results

2.1. Patient Characteristics

In the whole group of IBD patients, the mean age was 43 years (range 19–70), including eleven women. In the CD subgroup, the mean age was 42 years (range 23–70), including seven women, and six patients had ileal-, three had colonic- and ten had ileocolonic involvement (Table 1). In the UC subgroup, the mean age was 46 years (range 19–68), with four women, and nine patients had extensive colitis, and five had left-sided colitis. The mean disease duration for the UC subgroup was 12 years (range 0–46 years), and for the CD subgroup, 14 years (0–46). Calprotectin taken during the visit was only available in five of the studied patients, and the results are therefore not reported. CRP had a skewed distribution with a median of 2.2 (IQR 1.0–6.3). At the visits, all patients that participated in the trial came for a routine check-up and not for any extra visit due to flare-ups. One patient had a CRP of 67 and therefore had verified active disease, while the remaining 32 patients had CRP levels ranging between 0.6 and 17. Five patients felt well, two did not report any symptoms at all, eleven had diarrhoea and four had diarrhoea with abdominal pain. Five reported only abdominal pain, and four had blood in their stool. Two patients had been treated with antibiotics during the last two months, but their microbiota did not differ in any substantial way from the others.

2.2. Blood Microbiota in IBD Patients

Analysis of the bacterial microbiota in the blood of IBD patients revealed a diverse range of bacterial DNA affiliated with different taxa in the blood samples. Contamination from the environment or reagents was detected in the NTC. The composition of the microbiota from blood samples differed from the one detected in NTC, which indicated the existence of a true blood microbiota in the studied patients (Table 2, Figure 1).
Proteobacteria dominated the blood samples at the phylum level, whereas Actinobacteria was predominant in NTC (Figure 1). The phyla detected in the CD group were Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and a group of “unclassified bacteria”. The same phyla were found in the UC group, and in addition, Deinococcus-Thermus was detected in one UC sample. The NTC harboured mainly Actinobacteria and Firmicutes and only to a lesser extent Proteobacteria.
The genus Achromobacter, which is affiliated with the family Alcaligenaceae (class Betaproteobacteria; phylum Proteobacteria also named Pseudomonadota), dominated in abundance (median [IQR], 63.8% [50.2–77.6%]) and was found in all blood samples (Figure 2) and to a minor extent in the NTC (0.07%). The top ten abundant genera are shown in Figure 2. The taxa that are included under the heading “others” comprised 45 different genera. The detailed taxonomic identities and abundance levels are depicted in the Supplementary Materials Table S1. Abundant genera found in both blood samples and in the NTC were Probionibacterium, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus and Rothia (Figure 1). Genera found only in blood samples were Acinetobacter (18/33 samples), unclassified Lactobacillaceae (13/33) and Lactobacillus (10/33), Paracoccus (7/33) and Thermicanus (5/33).
Micrococcaceae was the only taxon that with statistical significance was enriched in the CD group compared to the UC group based on LefSe analysis (Figure 3). The genus Rothia which belongs to the family Micrococcaceae, was found in abundance in the NTC (Figure 1).
The alpha diversity of the blood microbiota was, regardless of being CD or UC, positively associated with CRP (Figure 4). On the other hand, no statistically significant correlation was found between the alpha diversity and albumin.
Alpha diversity, measured using Shannon’s and Simpson’s diversity indices, showed no significant differences between CD and UC patients (Table 3).
No significant differences were found between CD and UC patients in terms of beta diversity, i.e., when the microbiota of each individual blood sample was compared with each other (Figure 5).

3. Discussion

Achromobacter was found in the blood of all patients. Even though this dominance of Achromobacter could be due to contamination in the clinic or in the laboratory, it may also be a consequence of colonization in the human body. Members of the genus Achromobacter, which belongs to the family Alcaligenaceae (in the class of Gammaproteobacteria), are ubiquitous non-fermenting, gram-negative, multi-resistant and invasive and have been linked to abscesses and deep infections [18,19]. Achromobacter is an opportunistic pathogen and can cause various infections in cystic fibrosis patients, as well as in hosts with different underlying conditions weakening the immune system. Achromobacter is predominantly recovered from patients with cystic fibrosis as a pathogen involved in chronic pulmonary colonization. Outside the context of cystic fibrosis, pneumonia and bacteremia are the two most common clinical presentations of Achromobacter infections [20,21]. Occasionally, Achromobacter infections can occur in immunocompromised individuals [22]. Achromobacter can penetrate the mucosa and aggravate the immunological defence, especially if the barrier effect is weakened. On the other hand, this type of microorganism can also be expected in cases of environmental contamination. A commonly reported contaminated germicide is chlorhexidine solution, used as both an antiseptic and a disinfectant. Atomizers, dispensers and various product containers were identified as reservoirs [19]. Awareness of the high survival ability of Achromobacter in germicides and the possible hospital reservoirs of these microbes will help to improve infection control and prevent nosocomial outbreaks or pseudo-outbreaks caused by Achromobacter [19]. The majority of Achromobacter infections are acquired nosocomial, as this bacterium can colonize various medical devices and could be found in contaminated solutions used in hospitals, such as dialysis water, demineralized water, humidifiers and even antiseptic and disinfectant solutions. Not only are Achromobacter species able to establish chronic infections, they can also resist common disinfectants and readily acquire antibiotic resistance [21]. Achromobacter species are frequently carriers of antimicrobial resistant genes and therefore contribute to the global public health threat of antibiotic resistance. Under the condition that the Achromobacter species in the present study primarily originated from blood and not from a contaminated environment, Achromobacter species seem to be more prone than many other taxa to translocate through the mucous membrane and find their way into circulation. In a mouse model, Achromobacter could translocate to mesenteric adipose tissue and exacerbate colitis in mice [23]. This is puzzling as Achromobacter are gram-negative bacteria with lipopolysaccharides (LPS) in the cell wall, and LPS are generally assumed to be strong immune-aggravating components. On the other hand, Achromobacter species seem to have several strategies for immune evasion. In patients with cystic fibrosis, Achromobacter species survive in the lungs under the selective pressure imposed by the host immune system and antibiotic therapies by increasing efficiency in nutrient acquisition, developing the ability to avoid toxic compounds and to evade the immune response and in this way, promote the colonization of new areas [24]. In a systematic review on nosocomial outbreaks of bacteraemia due to Achromobacter, seven studies were selected, and for true or pseudo-bacteraemia, positive blood culture results were most commonly reported in immunosuppressed patients or those with indwelling catheters [19]. An increase in Achromobacter species in the colon mucosa of patients during the exacerbated phase of ulcerative colitis has been observed [25]. Further investigation is needed to determine the origin of Achromobacter species detected in the blood samples of IBD patients in the present study.
Abundant genera found in blood in the present study, but not in the negative control, were Acinetobacter, unclassified Lactobacillaceae and Lactobacillus, Paracoccus and Thermicanus in both CD and UC. Even if Achromobacter occurred due to environmental contamination, it is less likely that the presence of these other genera were caused by contamination as well. They are not normally related to skin and chemical reagents, and the concomitant occurrence of several different genera also makes environmental contamination less likely. Acinetobacter, a genus of gram-negative bacteria belonging to the class Gammaproteobacteria (phylum: Proteobacteria), is just as widely spread as Achromobacter in the environment by soil and water and is commonly a carrier of resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents [26]. The species Acinetobacter baumannii has emerged as a major cause of healthcare-associated infections and, for example, Acinetobacter guillouiae can cause sepsis by other means [27]. Paracoccus species are widely spread in soil and water. These are gram-negative organisms that belong to the class Alphaproteobacteria [28]. At present, there is only one described species of the gram-positive genus Thermicanus (class: Bacilli; phylum Firmicutes also named Bacillota), and that is T. aegyptius, originally isolated from soil [29].
An important finding of the present study is the positive association between the bacterial diversity and the increased CRP (Figure 4). Increased bacterial diversity regardless of dead or live microorganisms is a direct indication of increased translocation. Although found with high prevalence, Achromobacter alone is not directly linked to the increased CRP. Thus, it is also interesting to look further into other taxa detected in lower abundance in the blood. The increase in CRP is probably linked to an increased number of bacteria and the presence of more pro-inflammatory taxa. Looking at the taxa that could be identified to the species level in the present study, a majority of them are well-known opportunistic pathogens (Table S2). The high proportion of well-known opportunistic pathogens is striking in Table S2; and six out of nine are Proteobacteria. Taking the whole blood microbiota into account, Proteobacteria is the dominant phylum (see the Supplementary Table S1). This is in contrast to the frequently reported microbiotas of the GI tract, which is usually dominated by Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes [30,31]. Despite being gram-positive (no LPS in the cell wall) and belonging to the phylum Firmicutes, the genera Staphylococcus and Streptococcus in Figure 2 include many notoriously pathogenic species and can therefore be suspected to act in a pro-inflammatory way. However, the pathogenicity varies within wide limits between different species and strains, especially within the genus Streptococcus. Propionibacterium and Acinetobacter are also genera that include some pathogenic or opportunistic pathogenic species and can, depending on the species, be suspected to execute pro-inflammatory effects on the immune system. Staphylococcus and Propionibacterium are typically and frequently found in high numbers on the skin [32]. Streptococcus is typically found in the mouth and in the small intestine, while Rothia can be found in various sites of the GI tract. IBD patients are also well known to harbour an unbalanced gut microbiota with an abundance of taxa with pro-inflammatory capacity, for example, taxa belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae and the genus Bacteroides [33,34,35,36]. These bacterial groups have lipopolysaccharides (LPS) associated to the cell wall, and a translocation into circulation will certainly aggravate inflammatory markers such as CRP.
Blood from CD patients in the present study had a higher abundance of Micrococcaceae than blood from UC patients. Rothia, Micococcus and Nesterenkonia are genera belonging to the family Micrococcaceae. Rothia was dominant, but the relative abundance of only Rothia was not significantly different between the two groups of patients. Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a liver disease known for its frequent concurrence with inflammatory bowel disease. When the salivary microbial communities of PSC patients and UC patients were compared with healthy controls, the beta diversity showed significant differences among the three groups. Taxonomic assignment revealed that the PSC salivary microbiotas were characterized by significant decreases in the abundances of Rothia and Haemophilus compared to the control group [37]. The faecal microbiotas of patients with PSC and UC had low diversity. Rothia, Enterococcus, Streptococcus and Veillonella were markedly overrepresented in PSC, regardless of concomitant UC [38]. The family Lactobacillaceae was surprisingly detected in the blood of 17 out of 33 patients. All taxa of this family are generally regarded as safe (Table S2).
Of course, there are some limitations in the present study. Unfortunately, the majority of the patients did not have sufficient samples for the analysis of calprotectin, which could have contributed to a better evaluation of disease activity than CRP or subjectively reported symptoms. On the other hand, the consecutive recruitment resulted in a cohort of patients that had mild to moderate symptoms that could be expected at regular visits. Patients without any complaints tend to postpone their visit to a later occasion. Furthermore, no biopsies were available, which could also have given information about disease activity. Mucosal samples for determination of the mucosal flora could also have been obtained in that case. Another problem with this type of study is the risk of contamination that must always be taken into consideration. Repeated investigations with meticulous precautions are crucial to avoid false-positive results. In the present study, we included a non-template control for controlling the laboratory process. However, we did not have controls from healthy subjects for comparison. The research on blood microbiota is scarce, and our first aim was to investigate the mere existence of any blood microbiota in the IBD patients. We acknowledge the need for and importance of including samples from healthy subjects in future studies to clarify the potential differences in blood microbiota between healthy and IBD patients. Furthermore, a comparison between microbiota in the gut (but also other sites) and the blood is warranted in order to clarify the origin of the blood microbiota. A strength is the NGS analysis that provides a full picture of both culturable and non–culturable species. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report about blood microbiota in IBD and its relation to CRP as a marker of inflammatory activity. The consecutive recruitment of IBD patients attending an out-patient clinic for regular visits illustrates the varying degree of disease activity that can be seen in a real-world scenario.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Design

Patients attending the outpatient clinic at the Department of Gastroenterology and Nutrition at Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden, for regular check-ups were consecutively recruited and invited to participate. Any antibiotic treatment during the last two months was recorded. After written informed consent, blood samples were drawn from 19 outpatients with CD and 14 outpatients with UC. Standard procedures with regard to antiseptic sampling and sterile equipment were applied. The blood samples were frozen immediately and stored at −80 °C until analysis. The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (protocol number 2018-577). Written informed consent was obtained from all participating patients. All methods used in this study were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

4.2. 16S-Targeted Metagenomics

The frozen whole blood samples were thawed, and the total DNA was extracted using the EZ1&2 DNA Tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with minor modification. A bead beading step was added to aid the bacterial cell lysis prior to the automated protocol for the DNA extraction on the EZ1 Advanced XL BioRobot (Qiagen). A non-template control (NTC) was included from the DNA extraction and downstream of sequencing. To increase the specificity of the bacterial DNA amplification, a nested PCR was performed. First, PCR was performed targeting a longer region of 16S (V1–V4) with the AllTaq PCR core kit (Qiagen) using a primer pair (ENV1 5′-AGAGTTTGATIITGGCTCAG-3′ and 805R 5′-CTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′). The PCR was performed at 94 °C for 3 min followed by 25 cycles at 94 °C for 1 min, 50 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 2 min. The amplicons were cleaned with a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen). Then, the purified amplicons were used as a template for 16S V3–V4 amplicon sequencing following the Illumina 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation protocol. A final library of 6 pM with 5% PhiX spike-in was loaded on a MiSeq sequencer using the Miseq reagent kit V3 (600 cycle).
Sequence data analysis was performed using an open-source bioinformatics tool, i.e., Qiime2 (2022.2) [39]. Briefly, adapter and primer sequences were trimmed using the cutadapt plugin [40]. Then, the sequences were further processed with the dada2 plugin [41]. The identified amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were used for downstream analysis. For the classification of the bacteria, the naïve Bayes classifier was trained on the V3–V4 region of reference sequences from Greengenes 13_8 (99% sequence similarity) using the QIIME2 plugin feature-classifier [42]. Alpha diversity was estimated with Shannon and Simpson’s diversity indices, and beta diversity was calculated using the Bray–Curtis distance matrix. Sequence data were submitted to SRA with BioProject ID PRJNA954608.

4.3. Statistics

Most statistical tests were performed in R (version 4.2.1) [43]. For non-normally distributed data, Wilcoxon’s rank sum test and Spearman’s correlation test were used. For multiple comparisons, p-values were corrected with the Benjamini–Hochberg method, and p < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) analysis [44] was performed to detect differentially abundant taxa between the CD and UC groups.

5. Conclusions

To conclude, DNA from Acinetobacter, Lactobacillus and unclassified Lactobacillaceae, Thermicanus and Paracoccus was found in blood from both CD and UC but not in the control, indicating the existence of a blood-borne microbiota at least in the studied patients. It is noteworthy that these patients came for a regular check-up and not because of flare-ups. It remains to be seen whether fare-ups result in higher amounts of bacteria and other species than those found under more inactive conditions. Acinetobacter must be regarded as the most negative from a health point of view while Lactobacillaceae must be regarded as safe. If these bacteria fill any yet unknown function or are apparent just as a consequence of translocation remains to be clarified. If the blood microbiota could be used for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes, clinical work-up in these patients could be facilitated. Achromobacter dominated all blood samples. It is not clear if this microorganism originated from contamination or from the patients. This has to be studied further.

Supplementary Materials

The supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms241310899/s1.

Author Contributions

Overall design of the study, Å.H. and K.S.; overall procurement of funds, K.S.; sample collection, S.D. and B.R.; data analysis, J.X. and G.M.; drafting of the manuscript, G.M., J.X., Å.H. and K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was financed by the Albert Påhlsson Foundation for Research and Charity foundation (Dnr 143587).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by Swedish Ethical Review Authority (protocol code 2018-577).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data discussed are presented within the article.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully thank the IBD outpatients who participated in this research study, and we also thank Elin Oscarsson and Anna Kjellström for their laboratory work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nikkari, S.; McLaughlin, I.J.; Bi, W.L.; Dodge, D.E.; Relman, D.A. Does blood of healthy subjects contain bacterial ribosomal DNA? J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 1956–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Moriyama, K.; Ando, C.; Tashiro, K.; Kuhara, S.; Okamura, S.; Nakano, S.; Takagi, Y.; Miki, T.; Nakashima, Y.; Hirakawa, H. Polymerase chain reaction detection of bacterial 16S rRNA gene in human blood. Microbiol. Immunol. 2008, 52, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Damgaard, C.; Magnussen, K.; Enevold, C.; Nilsson, M.; Tolker-Nielsen, T.; Holmstrup, P.; Nielsen, C.H. Viable Bacteria Associated with Red Blood Cells and Plasma in Freshly Drawn Blood Donations. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0120826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Castillo, D.J.; Rifkin, R.F.; Cowan, D.A.; Potgieter, M. The Healthy Human Blood Microbiome: Fact or Fiction? Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Alam, M.T.; Amos, G.C.A.; Murphy, A.R.J.; Murch, S.; Wellington, E.M.H.; Arasaradnam, R.P. Microbial imbalance in inflammatory bowel disease patients at different taxonomic levels. Gut Pathog. 2020, 12, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Frank, D.N.; Amand, A.L.S.; Feldman, R.A.; Boedeker, E.C.; Harpaz, N.; Pace, N.R. Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 13780–13785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Ott, S.J.; Musfeldt, M.; Wenderoth, D.F.; Hampe, J.; Brant, O.; Folsch, U.R.; Timmins, K.N.; Schreiber, S. Reduction in diversity of the colonic mucosa associated bacterial microflora in patients with active inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2004, 53, 685–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Pisani, A.; Rausch, P.; Bang, C.; Ellul, S.; Tabone, T.; Cordina, C.M.; Zahra, G.; Franke, A.; Ellul, P. Dysbiosis in the Gut Microbiota in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease during Remission. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e0061622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Serrano-Gomez, G.; Mayorga, L.; Oyarzun, I.; Roca, J.; Borruel, N.; Casellas, F.; Varela, E.; Pozuelo, M.; Machiels, K.; Guarner, F.; et al. Dysbiosis and relapse-related microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease: A shotgun metagenomic approach. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2021, 19, 6481–6489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Khan, I.; Bai, Y.R.; Zha, L.J.; Ullah, N.; Ullah, H.; Shah, S.R.H.; Sun, H.; Zhang, C.J. Mechanism of the Gut Microbiota Colonization Resistance and Enteric Pathogen Infection. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 716299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Vrakas, S.; Mountzouris, K.C.; Michalopoulos, G.; Karamanolis, G.; Papatheodoridis, G.; Tzathas, C.; Gazouli, M. Intestinal Bacteria Composition and Translocation of Bacteria in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Gutierrez, A.; Frances, R.; Amoros, A.; Zapater, P.; Garmendia, M.; NDongo, M.; Cano, R.; Jover, R.; Such, J.; Perez-Mateo, M. Cytokine Association with Bacterial DNA in Serum of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2009, 15, 508–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ishida, N.; Higuchi, T.; Miyazu, T.; Tamura, S.; Tani, S.; Yamade, M.; Iwaizumi, M.; Hamaya, Y.; Osawa, S.; Furuta, T.; et al. C-reactive protein is superior to fecal biomarkers for evaluating colon-wide active inflammation in ulcerative colitis. Sci. Rep.-UK 2021, 11, 12431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lewis, J.D. The Utility of Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Therapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Gastroenterology 2011, 140, 1817–1826.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Shiga, H.; Abe, I.; Onodera, M.; Moroi, R.; Kuroha, M.; Kanazawa, Y.; Kakuta, Y.; Endo, K.; Kinouchi, Y.; Masamune, A. Serum C-reactive protein and albumin are useful biomarkers for tight control management of Crohn’s disease in Japan. Sci. Rep.-UK 2020, 10, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Khan, N.; Patel, D.; Shah, Y.; Trivedi, C.; Yang, Y.X. Albumin as a prognostic marker for ulcerative colitis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 8008–8016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Vernia, F.; Di Ruscio, M.; Stefanelli, G.; Viscido, A.; Frieri, G.; Latella, G. Is fecal calprotectin an accurate marker in the management of Crohn’s disease? J. Gastroen Hepatol. 2020, 35, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Gomez-Cerezo, J.; Suarez, I.; Rios, J.J.; Pena, P.; de Miguel, M.J.G.; de Jose, M.; Monteagudo, O.; Linares, P.; Barbado-Cano, A.; Vazquez, J.J. Achromobacter xylosoxidans bacteremia: A 10-year analysis of 54 cases. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 22, 360–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yoon, S.H.; Kim, H.; Lim, S.M.; Kang, J.M. Nosocomial outbreak of Achromobacter spp. bacteremia due to germicide contamination: A systematic review. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2022, 26, 6374–6381. [Google Scholar]
  20. Marion-Sanchez, K.; Pailla, K.; Olive, C.; Le Coutour, X.; Derancourt, C. Achromobacter spp. healthcare associated infections in the French West Indies: A longitudinal study from 2006 to 2016. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Isler, B.; Kidd, T.J.; Stewart, A.G.; Harris, P.; Paterson, D.L. Achromobacter Infections and Treatment Options. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, e01025-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Weitkamp, J.H.; Tang, Y.W.; Haas, D.W.; Midha, N.K.; Crowe, J.E., Jr. Recurrent Achromobacter xylosoxidans bacteremia associated with persistent lymph node infection in a patient with hyper-immunoglobulin M syndrome. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2000, 31, 1183–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. He, Z.; Wu, J.J.; Gong, J.L.; Ke, J.; Ding, T.; Zhao, W.J.; Cheng, W.M.; Luo, Z.H.; He, Q.L.; Zeng, W.Y.; et al. Microbiota in mesenteric adipose tissue from Crohn’s disease promote colitis in mice. Microbiome 2021, 9, 228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Houry, A.; Gohar, M.; Deschamps, J.; Tischenko, E.; Aymerich, S.; Gruss, A.; Briandet, R. Bacterial swimmers that infiltrate and take over the biofilm matrix. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 13088–13093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Walujkar, S.A.; Kumbhare, S.V.; Marathe, N.P.; Patangia, D.V.; Lawate, P.S.; Bharadwaj, R.S.; Shouche, Y.S. Molecular profiling of mucosal tissue associated microbiota in patients manifesting acute exacerbations and remission stage of ulcerative colitis. World J. Microb. Biot. 2018, 34, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Munoz-Price, L.S.; Weinstein, R.A. Acinetobacter infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 358, 1271–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hafiz, T.A.; Alghamdi, S.S.; Mubaraki, M.A.; Alghamdi, S.S.M.; Alothaybi, A.; Aldawood, E.; Alotaibi, F. A two-year retrospective study of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii respiratory infections in critically Ill patients: Clinical and microbiological findings. J. Infect. Public. Health 2023, 16, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. van Spanning, R.J.; Stouthamer, A.H.; Baker, S.C.; van Verseveld, H.W. Paracoccus. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gossner, A.S.; Devereux, R.; Ohnemuller, N.; Acker, G.; Stackebrandt, E.; Drake, H.L. Thermicanus aegyptius gen. nov., sp nov., isolated from oxic soil, a fermentative microaerophile that grows commensally with the thermophilic acetogen Moorella thermoacetica. Appl. Environ. Microb. 1999, 65, 5124–5133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Eckburg, P.B.; Bik, E.M.; Bernstein, C.N.; Purdom, E.; Dethlefsen, L.; Sargent, M.; Gill, S.R.; Nelson, K.E.; Relman, D.A. Diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora. Science 2005, 308, 1635–1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Zoetendal, E.G.; Rajilic-Stojanovic, M.; de Vos, W.M. High-throughput diversity and functionality analysis of the gastrointestinal tract microbiota. Gut 2008, 57, 1605–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hannigan, G.D.; Grice, E.A. Microbial Ecology of the Skin in the Era of Metagenomics and Molecular Microbiology. Csh Perspect. Med. 2013, 3, a015362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Swidsinski, A.; Weber, J.; Loening-Baucke, V.; Hale, L.P.; Lochs, H. Spatial organization and composition of the mucosal flora in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 3380–3389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Wang, M.; Molin, G.; Ahrne, S.; Adawi, D.; Jeppsson, B. High proportions of proinflammatory bacteria on the colonic mucosa in a young patient with ulcerative colitis as revealed by cloning and sequencing of 16S rRNA genes. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2007, 52, 620–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Imhann, F.; Vila, A.V.; Bonder, M.J.; Fu, J.Y.; Gevers, D.; Visschedijk, M.C.; Spekhorst, L.M.; Alberts, R.; Franke, L.; van Dullemen, H.M.; et al. Interplay of host genetics and gut microbiota underlying the onset and clinical presentation of inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 2018, 67, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Altomare, A.; Putignani, L.; Del Chierico, F.; Cocca, S.; Angeletti, S.; Ciccozzi, M.; Tripiciano, C.; Piccola, B.D.; Cicala, M.; Guarino, M.P.L. Gut mucosal-associated microbiota better discloses inflammatory bowel disease differential patterns than faecal microbiota. Dig. Liver Dis. 2019, 51, 648–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Iwasawa, K.; Suda, W.; Tsunoda, T.; Oikawa-Kawamoto, M.; Umetsu, S.; Takayasu, L.; Inui, A.; Fujisawa, T.; Morita, H.; Sogo, T.; et al. Dysbiosis of the salivary microbiota in pediatric-onset primary sclerosing cholangitis and its potential as a biomarker. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Bajer, L.; Kverka, M.; Kostovcik, M.; Macinga, P.; Dvorak, J.; Stehlikova, Z.; Brezina, J.; Wohl, P.; Spicak, J.; Drastich, P. Distinct gut microbiota profiles in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 4548–4558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Bolyen, E.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.R.; Bokulich, N.A.; Abnet, C.C.; Al-Ghalith, G.A.; Alexander, H.; Alm, E.J.; Arumugam, M.; Asnicar, F.; et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 852–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011, 17, 10–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Rosen, M.J.; Han, A.W.; Johnson, A.J.A.; Holmes, S.P. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Bokulich, N.A.; Kaehler, B.D.; Rideout, J.R.; Dillon, M.; Bolyen, E.; Knight, R.; Huttley, G.A.; Caporaso, J.G. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2 ’ s q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome 2018, 6, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  44. Segata, N.; Izard, J.; Waldron, L.; Gevers, D.; Miropolsky, L.; Garrett, W.S.; Huttenhower, C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, R60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Composition of the blood microbiota detected in the IBD (n = 33) and NTC (n = 1) at the phylum level.
Figure 1. Composition of the blood microbiota detected in the IBD (n = 33) and NTC (n = 1) at the phylum level.
Ijms 24 10899 g001
Figure 2. Prevalence of Achromobacter in blood samples of IBD patients. Top-ten abundant genera are shown. PCR-grade water served as the NTC (non-template control). Relative abundance > 0.1% is shown. The higher the value, the darker the color.
Figure 2. Prevalence of Achromobacter in blood samples of IBD patients. Top-ten abundant genera are shown. PCR-grade water served as the NTC (non-template control). Relative abundance > 0.1% is shown. The higher the value, the darker the color.
Ijms 24 10899 g002
Figure 3. LefSe analysis. (a) Significantly enriched Micrococcaceae in the blood of CD patients compared to UC patients. LDA > 2.5 and p < 0.05 were considered significant; (b) Relative abundance of Micrococcaceae detected in the blood samples of IBD patients.
Figure 3. LefSe analysis. (a) Significantly enriched Micrococcaceae in the blood of CD patients compared to UC patients. LDA > 2.5 and p < 0.05 were considered significant; (b) Relative abundance of Micrococcaceae detected in the blood samples of IBD patients.
Ijms 24 10899 g003
Figure 4. Alpha diversity, measured by Shannon’s and Simpson’s diversity indices, was positively associated with CRP.
Figure 4. Alpha diversity, measured by Shannon’s and Simpson’s diversity indices, was positively associated with CRP.
Ijms 24 10899 g004
Figure 5. Beta diversity analysis between blood from CD (blue dots) and UC patients (red dots). ANOSIM (analysis of similarities) test using the Bray–Curtis distance matrix resulted in p = 0.90. NTC (yellow dot) = non-template control.
Figure 5. Beta diversity analysis between blood from CD (blue dots) and UC patients (red dots). ANOSIM (analysis of similarities) test using the Bray–Curtis distance matrix resulted in p = 0.90. NTC (yellow dot) = non-template control.
Ijms 24 10899 g005
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the two study groups.
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the two study groups.
Whole GroupCrohn’s DiseaseUlcerative Colitis
Patients (n)33 19 14
Age, years (range)43 (19–70) 42 (23–70) 46 (19–69)
Duration, years (range)12 (0–46) 14 (0–46) 9 (0–29)
Gender11 F/22 M 7 F/12 M 4 F/10 M
Localisation L16E10
L23E25
L310E39
Behaviour B19
B26
B32
B2/B31
B3/B41
Missing 0
Smoking (n)
Never 16 9 7
Past13 6 7
Current4 4 0
Laboratory data
CRP, mg/L (range)6.0 (0.6–67) 3.1 (0.8–7.7) 9.7 (0.6–67)
Median (IQR)2.2 (1.0–6.3) 2.3 (1.1–4.7) 2.0 (0.9–9.8)
Hb, g/L (range)134 (102–163) 136 (102–163) 132 (108–153)
Albumin, g/L (range) 41 (21–49) 40 (21–49) 41 (33–47)
Description of disease location and behaviour according to the Montreal classification: Localisation: In Crohn’s disease, L1 = ileal, L2 = colonic and L3 = ileocolonic, in ulcerative colitis, E1 = rectum (excluded due to too limited inflammation), E2 = left sided and E3 = extensive colitis; Behaviour: B1 = non-structuring, non-penetrating, B2 = structuring, B3 = penetrating and B4 = perianal disease modifier.
Table 2. Summary of amplicon sequence variant (ASV) counts and number of taxa detected in the blood samples and non-template control (NTC).
Table 2. Summary of amplicon sequence variant (ASV) counts and number of taxa detected in the blood samples and non-template control (NTC).
ASVs *PhylumFamilyGenusSpecies
CD108,217 (49,524–245,291)5283643
UC120,973 (75,627–220,242)5233242
NTC78,2093667
* ASVs for CD and UC median (min–max).
Table 3. Alpha diversity of the blood microbiota from IBD patients.
Table 3. Alpha diversity of the blood microbiota from IBD patients.
Shannon’s Diversity Index
Median [IQR]
Simpson’s Diversity Index
Median [IQR]
p-Value
CD patients (n = 19)2.05 [1.53–2.51]0.65 [0.47–0.72]0.87
UC patients (n = 14)2.04 [1.46–2.57]0.61 [0.45–0.73]0.93
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xu, J.; Molin, G.; Davidson, S.; Roth, B.; Sjöberg, K.; Håkansson, Å. CRP in Outpatients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Is Linked to the Blood Microbiota. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10899. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310899

AMA Style

Xu J, Molin G, Davidson S, Roth B, Sjöberg K, Håkansson Å. CRP in Outpatients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Is Linked to the Blood Microbiota. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(13):10899. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310899

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xu, Jie, Göran Molin, Sanna Davidson, Bodil Roth, Klas Sjöberg, and Åsa Håkansson. 2023. "CRP in Outpatients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Is Linked to the Blood Microbiota" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 13: 10899. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310899

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop