Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide DNA Methylation and Transcriptome Integration Associates DNA Methylation Changes with Bovine Subclinical Mastitis Caused by Staphylococcus chromogenes
Next Article in Special Issue
OsBTBZ1 Confers Salt Stress Tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana
Previous Article in Journal
Glymphatic System and Mitochondrial Dysfunction as Two Crucial Players in Pathophysiology of Neurodegenerative Disorders
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seed Priming with MeJa Prevents Salt-Induced Growth Inhibition and Oxidative Damage in Sorghum bicolor by Inducing the Expression of Jasmonic Acid Biosynthesis Genes

1
Life Sciences Building, Department of Biotechnology, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17, Bellville 7535, South Africa
2
SensorLab, Department of Chemical Sciences, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17, Bellville 7535, South Africa
3
Department of Biochemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(12), 10368; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210368
Submission received: 17 April 2023 / Revised: 12 June 2023 / Accepted: 14 June 2023 / Published: 20 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research in Abiotic Stress Tolerance)

Abstract

:
Salinity is one of the major detrimental abiotic stresses at the forefront of deterring crop productivity globally. Although the exogenous application of phytohormones has formerly proven efficacious to plants, their effect on the moderately stress-tolerant crop “Sorghum bicolor” remains elusive. To investigate this, S. bicolor seeds primed with methyl jasmonate (0; 10 and 15 μM MeJa) were exposed to salt (200 mM NaCl) stress, and their morpho-physiological, biochemical, and molecular attributes were measured. Salt stress significantly decreased shoot length and fresh weight by 50%, whereas dry weight and chlorophyll content were decreased by more than 40%. Furthermore, salt-stress-induced oxidative damage was evident by the formation of brown formazan spots (indicative of H2O2 production) on sorghum leaves and a more than 30% increase in MDA content. However, priming with MeJa improved growth, increased chlorophyll content, and prevented oxidative damage under salt stress. While 15 µM MeJa maintained proline content to the same level as the salt-stressed samples, total soluble sugars were maintained under 10 µM MeJa, indicating a high degree of osmotic adjustment. Shriveling and thinning of the epidermis and xylem tissues due to salt stress was prevented by MeJa, followed by a more than 70% decrease in the Na+/K+ ratio. MeJa also reversed the FTIR spectral shifts observed for salt-stressed plants. Furthermore, salt stress induced the expression of the jasmonic acid biosynthesis genes; linoleate 92-lipoxygenase 3, allene oxide synthase 1, allene oxide cyclase, and 12-oxophytodienoate reductase 1. In MeJa-primed plants, their expression was reduced, except for the 12-oxophytodienoate reductase 1 transcript, which further increased by 67%. These findings suggest that MeJa conferred salt-stress tolerance to S. bicolor through osmoregulation and synthesis of JA-related metabolites.

1. Introduction

Sorghum is a sought-after cereal crop in Africa due to its relatively high drought-tolerant characteristics, digestibility, and rich nutritional value [1,2]. The high levels of tannins and phenolic compounds found especially in the red and brown grain varieties are highly beneficial and protect humans against diabetes, cardiovascular, and hypertensive diseases [3]. As a staple food globally, sorghum also serves as a feedstock, fiber, and a source of biofuel [4]. Therefore, its production will not only improve food security but will also be highly beneficial for human health and in solving the rising energy crisis [2]. The sorghum genome comprises a relatively minuscule 730 million base pairs, which makes it a vital model organism for the comparative genomic studies of other C4 crops [5]. Additionally, sorghum’s high inbreeding level and gene flow are highly attractive characteristics in studying genetic systems. Plants play a considerable role in the agricultural sector that benefits the livelihoods of many individuals worldwide and is continuously expanding. The agriculture, forestry, and fisheries sectors contributed to the 1.3% growth for South Africa’s economy experienced in 2017, exceeding the expected 1% [6,7]. Therefore, agricultural sustainability should be prioritized to capitalize on its potential in boosting the world economy.
Regardless of the economic gain, the growing population and challenges associated with climate change are continuously putting severe strain on food security. Thus, food production is required to increase by an estimated 70–100% in order to feed the expected ~9.8 billion global population by the year 2050 [8]. Harsh environmental conditions are the leading cause of low crop productivity and have resulted in a more than 50% reduction in crop yield globally [9]. Salinity has proven to be one of the most severe and tenacious abiotic stressors due to the increased levels of salts found in arable lands globally. Many plant species succumb when exposed to NaCl concentrations exceeding 200 mM, due to induced oxidative stress, which is caused by the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [10]. Reactive oxygen species, including singlet oxygen (1O2), superoxide radical (O2∙−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radical (HO), cause damage to lipids, proteins, carbohydrates, and nucleic acids when produced in high concentrations [11,12]. Malondialdehyde (MDA) is one of the major products of lipid peroxidation and has therefore been extensively accepted as an oxidative stress marker and for assaying the level of lipid peroxidation [13]. Furthermore, salinity causes ion toxicity in cells due to the absorption and accumulation of toxic (Na+ and Cl) ions, while negatively preventing the absorption of essential elements such as K+, P+, Mg+, and Si+ [14]. Ion toxicity leads to nutrient imbalances, loss of membrane function, and decreased photosynthesis, and also affects stomatal conductance and the plant’s ability to scavenge ROS [15]. However, plants, use either exclusion or compartmentalization of these toxic ions as part of their survival strategy, and this is mostly represented as the Na+/K+ ratio [16,17]. The damaging effects of salt stress on plant growth and development have been reported in several plant species such as Solanum lycopersicum L. [18], Zingiber officinale [19], and Gossypium hirsutum L. [20]. The salt-induced changes in plant metabolism regulate the plant’s ROS scavenging capability by altering antioxidant enzyme activities [16,21] and triggering a cascade of signaling networks inducing the expression of stress-responsive genes [22,23]. Plants also counteract stressors by synthesizing metabolites such as polyamines, proline, and soluble sugars to stabilize the osmotic potential, inhibit the over-accumulation of free radicals, and conserve cellular metabolism by protecting cell membranes and proteins [24]. The increase in cellular osmolality due to the induced production of osmolytes is another strategy employed by cells to maintain adequate water to allow the necessary turgor for cell expansion [25].
Phytohormones are essential regulators of plant response and may act synergistically. They also have antagonistic effects on plant growth and development, as observed with the role of ethylene in inhibiting vegetative growth through its interaction with auxins [24,26]. At physiological levels, plant hormones are produced in low concentrations and they regulate diverse plant cellular processes. However, stressful conditions induce their production, which signal downstream developmental processes and therefore alleviate injury, thus providing tolerance to plants [27,28]. Plant growth and yield depend on auxins, cytokinins, and gibberellins, whereas enhanced stress response largely involves the systemic interactions between abscisic acid, salicylates, and jasmonates [29]. Jasmonic acid (JA) plays a key role in a number of developmental processes, including seed germination, plant maturity, and senescence. High concentrations of JA and its derivatives (jasmonate isoleucine conjugate (JA-Ile) and methyl jasmonate (MeJA)) have been reported in halophytes and glycophytes that were exposed to salt stress [30], suggesting their involvement in salt stress tolerance.
Jasmonic acid biosynthesis is mediated by the action of enzymes including lipoxygenase (LOX), allene oxide synthase (AOS), allene oxide cyclase (AOC), and oxophytodienoic acid reductase (OPR). Their expression is often induced by stress stimuli due to their importance in regulating stress tolerance in plants [30,31]. Extensive research exists on the effect of jasmonates in plants under biotic and abiotic stresses. However, the role and mechanism of MeJa-induced salinity tolerance in moderately stress-tolerant crops such as S. bicolor remains elusive. Methyl Jasmonate is an excellent activator of plant response to stress stimuli due to its hydrophobicity and volatile nature, making it easier to pervade the cytoplasm and trigger plant response [31]. Several studies successfully demonstrated the expression of genes involved in important pathways in cereal crops including Salt Overlay Sensitive [16,17], sodium-proton antiporter, antioxidant [22,32], and the JA biosynthesis pathways [33,34,35]. This study aims to investigate for the first time the role of exogenous MeJa in alleviating the negative effects of salt stress in S. bicolor plants. This was achieved by priming S. bicolor seeds with low concentrations of MeJa before exposing them to salt stress, and the responses were evaluated by assaying morpho-physiological traits such as shoot length, biomass, and photosynthetic pigments, whereas biochemical traits included oxidative stress markers (H2O2 and MDA), osmolytes (proline and total soluble sugars), anatomical structure, element content, and nature of biomolecules. The molecular effects of MeJa in alleviating salt stress effects in S. bicolor plants were elucidated by assaying the expression of JA biosynthesis genes.

2. Results

2.1. Morpho-Physiological Response of S. bicolor to MeJa under Salt Stress

To understand the role of priming with MeJa in alleviating the effects of salt stress in S. bicolor, three morpho-physiological traits including, growth (shoot length), biomass (fresh and dry weight), and photosynthetic pigment were assayed from plants primed with 10 µM and 15 µM MeJa before exposing to 200 mM NaCl.

2.1.1. Growth and Biomass

The detrimental effect of salt stress on S. bicolor’s morphological attributes was evident as shown in Figure 1 and Table 1. Under salt stress, shoot length decreased by 53% from 401 mm to 188 mm (Figure 1A,B). Priming with MeJa led to improvements in the growth of S. bicolor under salt stress (200 mM NaCl), where priming with 10 μM and 15 μM MeJa resulted in a 68% and 77% increase in shoot length, respectively. Control plants (without NaCl treatment) primed with MeJa (10 μM and 15 μM) showed no significant differences compared to unprimed plants (Figure S1).
The effects of salt stress on the growth of S. bicolor plants were also assessed based on fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW) as shown in Table 1. Fresh weight decreased by 50% from 0.8 g to 0.397 g in S. bicolor plants stressed with 200 mM NaCl. However, priming with MeJa resulted in 84% (10 µM MeJa) and 68% (15 µM MeJa) increases in FW. Salt stress also decreased S. bicolor’s DW by 42% from 0.091 g to 0.053 g in S. bicolor plants stressed with 200 mM NaCl. Priming with MeJa improved DW, and this resulted in 109% (10 μM MeJa) and 94% (15 μM MeJa) increases for S. bicolor plants stressed with 200 mM NaCl as compared to unprimed plants (Table 1). Priming with MeJa (10 µM and 15 µM) showed no significant effects on the FW and DW of control S. bicolor plants (Figure S2).

2.1.2. Photosynthetic Pigments

Salt stress slightly impacted chlorophyll content, but these effects were reversed by priming with MeJa (Table 2). Salt stress decreased chlorophyll a content by 47% from 8.17 mg/gFW to 4.308 mg/gFW. However, priming with 10 µM MeJa and 15 µM MeJa increased chlorophyll a content by 178% (11.992 mg/gFW) and 111% (9.104 mg/gFW) in S. bicolor plants stressed with 200 mM NaCl. No significant effect was observed in chlorophyll b content for all treatments. Salt stress significantly decreased the total chlorophyll content of S. bicolor plants by 44% from 11.96 mg/gFW to 6.667 mg/gFW. Priming with MeJa increased total chlorophyll content in salt-stressed plants by 151% (16.710 mg/gFW) and 102% (13.438 mg/gFW) when primed with 10 µM and 15 µM MeJa, respectively. Priming with MeJa (10 µM and 15 µM) showed no significant effects on the photosynthetic pigments in control (without NaCl treatment) plants (Figure S3).

2.2. Biochemical Response of S. bicolor to MeJa under Salt Stress

The biochemical response of S. bicolor to MeJa (10 µM and 15 µM) priming under salt (200 mM NaCl) stress was determined by assaying the content of oxidative stress markers (H2O2 and MDA), osmolytes (proline and total soluble sugars), anatomic structure, element distribution and the structure of biomolecules, which were analyzed using FTIR spectra.

2.2.1. ROS Production

Salt stress induced the accumulation of H2O2 as indicated by increased levels of brown formazan (indicative of H2O2 formation) precipitation on S. bicolor leaves in response to 200 mM NaCl (Figure 2A). Priming with 10 µM and 15 µM MeJa resulted in substantial reductions in the formation of brown formazan on the leaves of S. bicolor plants exposed to 200 mM NaCl (Figure 2A). Priming with 10 µM and 15 µM MeJa showed no significant effects on the formation of H2O2 in control (without NaCl treatment) plants (Figure S4).
Lipid peroxidation was assayed based on the MDA content, which increased by 46% from 17.94 nmol/g FW to 26.15 nmol/g FW in S. bicolor plants stressed with 200 mM NaCl (Figure 2B). In S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with MeJa, MDA content decreased from 26.15 nmol/g FW MDA to 20.34 nmol/g FW (10 µM MeJa) and 24.06 nmol/g FW (15 µM MeJa) (Figure 2B). Significant decreases in MDA content were observed in S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with 10 µM MeJa, indicating a 22% decrease. Furthermore, non-significant reductions in MDA content were observed for 10 µM and 15 µM MeJa priming for control (without NaCl treatment) plants (Figure S4).

2.2.2. Proline and Total Soluble Sugars Content

Salt stress significantly increased proline content in S. bicolor plants compared to control plants (Figure 3A). Proline content increased by 203% from 2.27 µmol/gFW to 6.88 µmol/gFW when S. bicolor plants were stressed with 200 mM NaCl (Figure 3A). S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with MeJa resulted in a 27% decrease in proline content from 6.88 µmol/gFW to 4.84 µmol/gFW (10 µM MeJa) and 7.47 µmol/gFW (15 µM MeJa), indicating a 27% decrease for 10 µM MeJa-primed seeds. Priming with MeJa (10 µM and 15 µM) showed no significant effects on proline content in control (without NaCl treatment) plants (Figure S5).
Salt stress increased total soluble sugar (TSS) content in S. bicolor plants (Figure 3B), by 159% from 0.296 mg/g FW to 0.767 mg/g FW. Furthermore, MeJa pre-treated S. bicolor plants resulted in TSS content of 0.856 mg/g FW (10 µM MeJa) and 0.575 mg/g FW (15 µM MeJa) when exposed to 200 mM NaCl. However, only 15 µM MeJa was significant and led to a 25% decrease in TSS for salt-stressed S. bicolor plants. Priming with MeJa was not significant in control (without NaCl treatment) plants (Figure S5).

2.2.3. Anatomic Structure and Element Analysis

Scanning electron microscope micrographs of S. bicolor’s epidermis (blue arrows) and xylem (red arrows) layers indicated slightly rough and shrunken layers under 200 mM NaCl treatment (Figure 4B) as compared to control (without NaCl treatment) plants (Figure 4A). Furthermore, the xylem (red arrows) walls under salt stress treatment showed thinning with an oval shape (Figure 4B, see the zoomed-in area), whereas the xylem walls from the control (without NaCl treatment) plants showed a round shape. This is even clearer when looking at the zoomed-in area (Figure 4A). However, S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with 10 µM and 15 µM MeJa before being exposed to salt stress showed a considerably smooth epidermis (blue arrows), while the thickness of the xylem walls was restored (Figure 4C,D) when compared to those plants under salt stress only (Figure 4B).
The element distribution, particularly Na+, K+ and Si+ in S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with MeJa and exposed to 200 mM NaCl, was analyzed using Scanning Electron Microscopy-Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (SEM-EDX) (Figure 4E–H; Table 3). The Na+ content increased by 100% in S. bicolor plants exposed to 200 mM NaCl stress, while K+ and Si+ decreased by 80% and 100%, respectively. Salt negatively impacted the absorption and distribution of nutrients in S. bicolor plants, as seen by a rise in the Na+/K+ ratio of 1.4 (Figure 4F; Table 3). S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with MeJa before salt stress treatment promoted K+ absorption, as shown by the decrease in Na+/K+ ratio of 0.4 under 10 μM MeJa (Figure 4G) and 0.16 under 15 μM MeJa priming (Figure 4H), indicating 71% and 89% decreases in the Na+/K+ ratio, respectively. MeJa also positively influenced Si+ absorption, as shown by the 100% increase in Si+ under all MeJa concentrations (Table 3).

2.2.4. Changes in Biomolecules

In this study, infrared radiation was used to identify changes caused in the active components of S. bicolor plants in response to pre-treatment with MeJa under 200 mM salt stress (Figure 5). Using FTIR technology, this study focused on a spectral region of 4000–500 cm−1. FTIR analysis identified 10 different functional groups across all samples as indicated by frequency ranges of 3700–3200 cm−1; 3100–2850 cm−1; 2140–2100 cm−1; 1740–1720 cm−1; 1680–1620 cm−1; 1400–1000 cm−1; 1320–1000 cm−1; 1250–1080; 910–665 cm−1; and 600–500 cm−1. Spectral peaks 3604, 3527, 3326, and 3295 represented the O-H stretching vibrations (3700–3200 cm−1), indicating the presence of different forms of phenolic groups (aromatic compounds). Spectral peaks 3068 and 2931 represented C-H stretching vibrations found within the frequency range 3100–2850 cm−1, indicating the presence of alkanes. The peak at 1677 cm−1 under the frequency range 1680–1620 cm−1 represented C=C stretching vibration. Indicating the presence of alkenes. Whereas the peak at 2135 cm−1 under the frequency range of 2140–2100 cm−1 represented the CC stretching vibrations, indicating the presence of alkynes which, together with alkenes and alkanes, represent aliphatic compounds such as carbohydrates. The peak at 1733 cm−1 represented C=O stretching vibration under the frequency range 1740–1720 cm−1, indicating the presence of aldehyde-containing aliphatic compounds. Spectral peaks at 1370 cm−1 represented C-F stretching vibration under the frequency range 1400–1000 cm−1, indicating the presence of alkyl-halide-containing fluoro compounds. The spectral peak at 1041 cm−1 represented C-O stretching vibration, which may be assigned to alcohols and lipids. The peak at 1250 cm−1 represented C-N stretching vibrations under frequency range 1250–1080 cm−1, indicating the presence of aliphatic-amine-containing proteins. Whereas peaks 824 cm−1 and 670 cm−1 represented N-H stretching vibrations under frequency range 910–665 cm−1, indicating the presence of proteins with primary and secondary amines. Lastly, the peak at 551 cm−1 represented C-F stretching vibration under frequency range 600–500 cm−1, indicating the presence of halo compounds.
Salt stress disturbed the metabolism of S. bicolor by greatly altering the composition of organic molecules including phenolic compounds, carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, and secondary metabolites (Figure 5, red spectrum). Constant band patterns were observed throughout all samples analyzed. However, increased band absorption was observed in salt-stressed S. bicolor plants as compared to unstressed plants, which were evident at peaks 3295 (phenolics), 2135 (carbohydrates), 1250; 824 (proteins) and 551 cm−1 (halo compounds).
To understand the effect of MeJa in the composition and alteration of these organic biomolecules under salt stress, the infrared absorption spectra of S. bicolor plants pre-treated with 10 µM and 15 µM MeJa when subjected to 200 mM NaCl were analyzed. A major shift with increased absorption was observed in MeJa-pre-treated (10 µM MeJa) plants at the 3700–2750 cm−1 frequency range at maximum peak values of 3604 and 3295 cm−1, which represent phenolic compounds, whereas 3068 cm−1 represents carbohydrates. However, considerable decreases in absorption were observed at peaks 2135 cm−1 (lipids), 824 cm−1, 670 cm−1, and 551 cm−1 (proteins) compared to salt-stressed plants. S. bicolor plants pre-treated with 15 µM MeJa resulted in slight decreases in the absorption intensity at 2135 cm−1 (lipids) and 824 cm−1 (proteins) compared to salt-stressed plants (Figure 5 green spectrum).

2.3. Gene Expression Analysis of Jasmonic Acid Biosynthesis Pathway Genes in S. bicolor under Salt Stress in Response to MeJa

The expression of genes encoding the JA biosynthesis pathway was analyzed using Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) in S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with 10 µM and 15 µM MeJa under 200 mM NaCl stress. These genes included the (1) putative, S. bicolor linoleate 9S-lipoxygenase 3 (SbLOX); (2) predicted, S. bicolor allene oxide synthase 1, chloroplastic (SbAOS); (3) predicted, S. bicolor allene oxide cyclase, chloroplastic (SbAOC); and (4) predicted, S. bicolor 12-oxophytodienoate reductase 1 (SbOPR) (Table 4; Figure 6).
All the above-mentioned genes were constitutively expressed under physiological conditions in S. bicolor plants. Expression levels of SbLOX (Figure 6A) and SbAOC (Figure 6B) were relatively high, followed by SbAOS (Figure 6C) and lastly SbOPR (Figure 6D). The SbLOX, SbAOS, SbAOC, and SbOPR transcripts significantly increased by 95%, 65%, 145%, and 31%, respectively, in S. bicolor plants exposed to 200 mM NaCl stress. Under 200 mM NaCl stress, a significant downregulation of 42% and 58% in the transcript level of SbLOX was observed in S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with 10 µM and 15 µM MeJa, respectively. Pre-treatment with 15 µM MeJa resulted in a 44%, 63.9%, and 27% decrease in the transcript levels of SbAOS, SbAOC, and SbOPR, respectively, compared to the salt treatment only. However, S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with 10 µM MeJa resulted in a further 67% increase in the relative expression level of SbOPR under 200 mM NaCl stress (Figure 6D).

3. Discussion

Salt stress caused significant reductions in the growth and biomass of S. bicolor plants, observed as the decrease in shoot length, fresh weight (FW), and dry weight (DW) (Figure 1 and Table 1). Thus, the salt-induced growth reduction in S. bicolor plants might be due to the inhibition in cell division and elongation, decreased water uptake, energy diversion for survival, and a decrease in carbon [3,36]. The inhibitory effects of salt stress on the growth of plants are well documented and can also be observed with the decreasing growth of S. bicolor [36,37], Solanum lycopersicum L. [18], Brassica napus L. [38], Chenopodium quinoa [39], and Triticum aestivum L. [40] in response to salt stress. Pre-treatment with MeJa increased the plant biomass of S. bicolor plants under harsh environments (200 mM NaCl) as seen by the significant increase in shoot length, FW, and DW. The enhancing growth under salt stress may be due to MeJa’s role in inducing the plant’s survival strategies and JA’s role in promoting cell expansion [41]. This finding aligns with the results obtained in Oryza sativa L. under arsenic stress [42], Cicer arietinum L. [43], Crithmum maritimum L. [44], Brassica napus L. [38], and Triticum aestivum L. [45] under salt stress.
Chlorophyll is a vital pigment in photosynthesis and can indirectly be used as an indicator of the plant’s photosynthetic capacity and nutritional status [46]. These pigments are susceptible to nutrient deficiency and environmental stresses. To assess the effect of salt stress on the photosynthetic pigments, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and total chlorophyll were measured in S. bicolor plants treated with 200 mM NaCl. Salt stress proved deleterious by significantly decreasing chlorophyll content in S. bicolor plants (Table 2) and therefore inhibiting plant photosystem [46,47]. The reduction in chlorophyll content could be indicative of restricted chlorophyll biosynthesis in conjunction with the induction of chlorophyllases [48]. Reduced chlorophyll content was also observed in Calendula officinalis L. and Glycine max [47,49] upon exposure to salt stress. The effect of MeJa on the chlorophyll content of S. bicolor was assessed in response to salt stress, and the results indicated that MeJa was able to reverse the deleterious effect of salt stress on chlorophyll content by significantly increasing chlorophyll content under salt stress (Table 2). The increased chlorophyll content in MeJa pre-treated S. bicolor plants in response to salt stress might be due to MeJa playing a role in the formation of 5-aminolevulinic acid, which is a vital enzyme in the biosynthesis of chlorophyll [50]. Similarly, improved chlorophyll content was observed in Brassica napus L. [38], Anschusa italica [51], Citrus sinensis [52], Capsicum annuum [53], and Prunus dulcis [54] when exposed to salt stress in response to MeJa treatment [55].
Maintaining the steady state of ROS molecules, including H2O2, is important for regulating many molecular mechanisms in plant cells, but over-accumulation is detrimental to plants causing severe oxidative damage [11]. Salt stress strongly affected ROS homeostasis by promoting the overproduction of H2O2 and therefore inducing oxidative damage in S. bicolor plants (Figure 2). This was illustrated by the over-accumulation of brown formazan, from a reaction catalyzed by horseradish peroxidase with H2O2 as an oxidizing agent [56], on the leaves of S. bicolor in response to salt stress. Consistent with MeJa’s role in reversing the deleterious effect of salt stress on the photosynthetic pigments of sorghum plants, MeJa-pre-treated S. bicolor plants showed substantial decreases in ROS accumulation under salt stress. These results illustrated MeJa’s role in mediating H2O2 scavenging under harsh conditions. The reduced ROS formation might be due to MeJa’s role in maintaining the stability of the chloroplast by protecting the photosystem II [57,58]. The ameliorating effect of MeJa on the over-accumulation of H2O2 in response to abiotic stress was also observed in Glycyrrhiza uralensis [55], Vitis vinifera L. [57], and Zea mays [59].
The cell membrane is a very important structure and houses intricate properties crucial for survival. Disruption in membrane properties can be deleterious due to the inhibition of ionic transport and eventually lead to cell death [60]. Increased lipid peroxidation, as indicated by high MDA content, was observed when S. bicolor plants were subjected to salt stress (Figure 2). Elevated levels of lipid peroxidation could be a result of limited stomatal conductance and increasing lipid membrane damage caused by ROS molecules due to osmotic stress [61]. These findings were previously supported by observations in Oryza sativa [62], Ocimum basilicum [63], Zea mays [59] and Arachis hypogaea [64] when exposed to salt stress. S. bicolor plants had significantly reduced levels of lipid peroxidation when pre-treated with 10 μM MeJa under salt stress, illustrating the dose-dependent ameliorating effect of MeJa on lipid peroxidation under harsh conditions. This ameliorating effect under stress conditions might be due to JA’s role in scavenging free radicals [65]. Decreasing MDA content under abiotic stress was also observed in Brassica napus, Pisum sativum L., and Nitraria tangutorum [38,65,66], in response to MeJa treatment. Pre-treatment with MeJa, therefore, played a beneficial role in maintaining cell membrane complexity under stressful conditions.
Assaying the amount of free proline found in plants is another method of assessing a plant’s tolerance to stress. Over-accumulation is often associated with severely perturbed metabolism whereby these molecules would aid protection against disease and stress mitigation in plants [60]. Salt stress disturbed osmotic potential and thereby triggered the over-accumulation of proline in S. bicolor plants (Figure 3A). Significant increments in proline content were observed under salt stress, illustrating a directly proportional relation between salt stress and proline content in S. bicolor. This increase is due to osmotic adjustment needed for plant survival under harsh environments [67]. The increasing levels of proline in response to adverse conditions are well documented, as observed in Oryza satica, Zea mays, and Origanum vulgare L. [67,68,69]. S. bicolor plants pre-treated with 10 μM MeJa significantly decreased proline content under salt stress conditions. However, the proline content assayed from plants treated with 15 μM MeJa remained at the same level as that of control (those treated with NaCl only) plants. Increasing proline is also generally accepted as it is correlated with decreasing the osmotic potential. This result, therefore, illustrated the role of MeJa in alleviating disturbance in osmotic potential and in maintaining cell turgor in S. bicolor plants under salt stress [50]. The decreasing levels of proline content under harsh environments were also observed in S. bicolor [16,36,37], Anschusa italica [51], Zea mays [59], Pisum sativum [65], and Origanum vulgare L [69].
In addition to proline, soluble sugars also play a crucial role in osmoregulation. Soluble sugars are crucial constituents of cellular respiration, making them an important energy source for plants [40]. Salt stress induced TSS content in S. bicolor plants (Figure 3B). The increasing soluble sugar content is important for osmotic adjustment and the scavenging of ROS molecules, and also aids in providing energy for survival under adverse conditions, as previously observed in Triticum aestivum L. [70], Pisum sativum [65], and Vicia faba L. [71]. Pre-treatment with 10 μM MeJa had no significant effect on TSS content under salt stress. However, 15 μM MeJa proved efficacious in reducing TSS content under 200 mM NaCl stress. The increasing effect of TSS in response to salt stress and the diminishing effect in MeJa pre-treated S. bicolor plants could be the result of a shift to the usage of secondary metabolites, or MeJa’s role in eliciting an early response to adverse conditions during pre-treatment [58,72]. It is well documented that exogenous application of MeJa increases soluble sugars under abiotic stress, but in this study the decreasing levels of TSS content due to 15 μM MeJa under salt stress conditions were consistent with those observed in Glycyrrhiza uralensis [55] and Anchusa italica [51].
Plant survival is highly dependent on systemic acquired adaptation to environmental stressors, and alterations of a plant’s epidermis is a crucial part of this systemic acclimation to environmental challenges [16]. The epidermis forms part of the first line of a plant’s defenses, preventing rapid water loss and excessive uptake of harmful substances [73,74,75]. It is therefore crucial in understanding the plant’s early responses and the regulation of stress-related alterations and adaptations [74,76,77]. Salt stress caused alterations to the epidermal and xylem tissue of S. bicolor plants (Figure 4B). This was indicated by increased shriveling on the epidermis and thinning of the xylem walls of S. bicolor plants under salt (200 mM NaCl) stress. The deformation and shrinkage observed in the epidermis of S. bicolor plants due to salt stress correlate with reduced growth, since previous reports showed that abiotic stress induces stiffening of plant epidermal cells, which may affect growth due to limited cell expansion [74]. Similarly, the vascular bundle (xylem and phloem) plays a major role in the transport of water and nutrients [44], thus any obstruction in their structure will affect plant growth. Thus, the observed stiffening and shrinkage of the xylem was another tolerance strategy employed by S. bicolor plants to limit excessive water loss [74,76,77,78]. MeJa had an ameliorating effect on the epidermis and xylem tissues of S. bicolor under salt stress by successfully preventing the stress-induced shrinkage and thinning of the anatomic structure.
Salt stress reduced the absorption and distribution of essential elements, particularly looking at K+ and Si+ under salt treatment as evidenced by high Na+/K+ (1.4) (Figure 4G,H; Table 3). MeJa improved element absorption and distribution, as seen by the reduced Na+ content, and this is supported by a very low Na+/K+ (0.16) ratio, especially under 15 μM MeJa pre-treatment. Furthermore, S. bicolor plants grown from MeJa-primed seeds showed increased Si+ absorption by 100% under salt stress compared to MeJa-untreated plants. These results suggest that exogenous MeJa promoted Si+ absorption in S. bicolor under salt stress by enhancing the plant’s ability to accumulate silica through activating silicon transporter genes [79,80]. Pre-treatment with MeJa, therefore, proved beneficial to the plant’s structure under adverse environments and enhanced support to the plant’s structure protecting the epidermis, and therefore allowing for optimal photosynthetic activity [79]. This was supported by the increased photosynthetic pigment in MeJa-pre-treated S. bicolor plants under salt stress.
The biochemical changes in the plant’s metabolism are highly dependent on the uptake and accumulation of inorganic and organic elements, which induces changes to lipids, proteins, and carbohydrates [80,81]. Salt stress caused major alterations in the functional groups of most molecules in S. bicolor plants (Figure 5), and changes in biomolecules might be related to initiating strategies for plant survival. These included phenolic compounds (3295 cm−1), such as flavonoids, phenolic acids or tannins [82]; alkyne-containing aliphatic compounds (2135 cm−1), such as acetylenic fatty acids [78]; aldehyde-containing aliphatic compounds (1733 cm−1), which may have been formed during lipid peroxidation [83]; and alkyl-halide-containing fluoro-compounds (1250 cm−1). Whereas the changes in primary or secondary amine-containing proteins (824 cm−1), correlates with the induced proline levels [84]; and the presence of halo compounds (551 cm−1), further suggest the induction in these compounds is related to plant stress tolerance.
S. bicolor plants pre-treated with MeJa had a substantial and clear alteration in their metabolic makeup under salt stress. An increase in the volume of phenolic compounds in S. bicolor plants grown from 10 μM MeJa-primed seeds under salt stress (200 mM NaCl) was observed, suggesting that induction in these secondary metabolites due to 10 μM MeJa is related to stress tolerance in S. bicolor plants. Additionally, FTIR spectroscopy identified decreased volumes of acetylenic fatty acids and primary or secondary amines as indicated by the decreased intensity in peaks found in frequency ranges of 2140–2100 cm−1 and 910–665 cm−1, respectively, in the metabolism of 10 µM MeJa pre-treated S. bicolor plants under salt stress. Slight changes in the metabolic network were observed in S. bicolor plants pre-treated with 15 μM MeJa in response to salt stress. This was indicated by the decreased volume of fatty acids (2135 cm−1) and primary or secondary amines (824 cm−1) identified in pre-treated S. bicolor subjected to harsh salt stress conditions.
The multidisciplinary approaches used in this study to investigate the role of MeJa on the stress tolerance of S. bicolor included comprehensive gene expression analysis to further elucidate stress mechanisms at a genetic level. Research has demonstrated that JA plays a crucial role in mediating the effects of abiotic stress and plant survival under unfavorable conditions [85]. To obtain a better understanding of the role of JA in alleviating salt stress effects in S. bicolor, this study focused on the changes in the transcription profile of JA-biosynthesis genes SbLOX, SbAOS, SbAOC, and SbOPR in S. bicolor plants under salt (200 mM NaCl) stress (Figure 6). All targeted genes SbLOX, SbAOS, SbAOC, and SbOPR were constitutively expressed, followed by significant upregulation in response to salt stress. The upregulation in the JA biosynthesis genes is related to the induction of tolerance in S. bicolor, as previously reported in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana [86] and Arachis hypogaea [87] plants overexpressing JA genes. Pre-treatment with MeJa prevented the salt-induced upregulation in the expression of the JA-biosynthesis pathway genes in S. bicolor plants under adverse salt conditions. This was indicated by a significant downregulation in the transcript levels of SbLOX and SbAOC in S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with both MeJa (10 μM and 15 μM) concentrations, whereas only 15 μM MeJa led to decreased SbAOS and SbOPR transcripts in S. bicolor plants exposed to salt stress. However, 10 μM MeJa, which showed to be the most effective concentration in most assays, did not alter SbAOS transcript, whereas SbOPR’s transcript was further increased under salt stress. The reduced SbLOX and SbAOC transcripts under all MeJa treatments, and SbAOS and SbOPR under 15 μM MeJa, may be the result of a negative feedback loop arising through the induction of JASMONATE ZIM DOMAIN (JAZ) proteins inhibiting the activity of MYC2, which is a key activator for JA response as observed in transgenic A. thaliana [88,89]. The induced expression of JA-biosynthesis genes was also previously observed in response to salt stress [90,91,92]. However, the reduced expression of JA biosynthesis genes under high MeJa concentration (15 μM MeJa) is further supported by exogenous MeJa inhibiting JA biosynthesis through the inhibition of OPR activity in Citrus sinensis [91]. Contrary to this, this study showed a significant further increase in the transcript level of JA precursor gene SbOPR in S. bicolor plants grown from 10 μM MeJa-primed seeds under salt stress, which may indicate induced biosynthesis of JA. Furthermore, this supports the possibility that JA-independent pathways could regulate the synthesis of OPR precursor substrate 12-oxo phytodienoic acid (OPDA) [92,93].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Sorghum Germination and Growth Condition

Sorghum bicolor L. Moench (AgFlash/NIAGARA III: (Sorghum × Sudan), red seeds) were purchased from Agricol Brackenfell, Cape Town, South Africa. The S. bicolor seeds were surface decontaminated as previously described by Mulaudzi-Masuku et al. [94]. Briefly, seeds were washed with 70% ethanol followed by soaking in 5% sodium hypochlorite solution (NaOCl) for 1 hour while shaking at 600 rpm. This was followed by washing thrice with autoclaved ddH2O. After surface decontamination, seeds were left to imbibe by soaking in autoclaved ddH2O overnight at 25 °C while shaking in the dark. After imbibition, ddH2O was removed and the decontaminated seeds were placed on sterile paper to dry at room temperature under the laminar flow until their original moisture content was obtained. Germination was induced by incubating the dried seeds on a sterile water-imbibed sterile paper towel for 7 days at 25 °C while being completely concealed from light. After 7 days of incubation, seedlings were transferred into seedling trays containing 35 g potting soil and vermiculite (2:1). Each seedling was irrigated with 25 mL Dr Fisher’s Multifeed Classic 19:8:16 (43) (Gouws and Scheepers Pty, Ltd., London, UK) every alternate day until the plantlets reached their 3-leaf stage of development. Seedlings were grown under summer conditions where temperatures ranged from 22 °C to 26 °C. Plantlets were harvested when the 5-leaf stage of development was reached. During harvesting the shoots were carefully separated and stored at −80 °C until required for assays. Immediately after separation, plant materials were weighed to determine fresh weight followed by drying in an oven at 80 °C for 24 h to determine dry weight.

4.2. Treatment Application

After reaching the 3-leaf stage of growth in the soil, plantlets were stressed with different salt concentrations, including 0 mM NaCl (serving as the control) and 200 mM NaCl (serving as the salt treatment). The plants were stressed until reaching the 5-leaf stage of development after 7 days. During the imbibition step (as described in Section 2.1), seeds were pre-treated by priming them with different concentrations of MeJa in 50 mL solutions containing 0 μM (control), 10 μM, and 15 μM MeJa concentrations overnight at 25 °C while shaking in total darkness.

4.3. Histochemical Detection of H2O2

Over-accumulation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was determined by histochemical staining based on its role in oxidizing 3,3′-diaminobenzidene (DAB) in a reaction induced by horseradish peroxidase to form brown formazan at the location of enzyme activity [56]. Hydrogen peroxide localization was determined in the leaves as previously described [12,95]. Briefly, leaves were submerged in 1 mg/mL 3′,3′ diaminobenzidine (DAB), pH 3.8, for 12 h at 25 °C while concealed from light. Following incubation, chlorophyll was extracted by boiling the leaves in 90% ethanol for 15 min for clear identification of formazan caused by the oxidation of DAB by H2O2.

4.4. Lipid Peroxidation

Lipid peroxidation is indicative of the oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids in the cell membrane, whereby malondialdehyde (MDA) is produced as a by-product [12,96]. Malondialdehyde accumulation was selected as a biomarker of lipid peroxidation in this study, following the traditional thiobarbituric acid (TBA) reaction method to measure MDA content as previously determined with slight modifications [97]. Macerated plant material (0.1 g) was homogenized with 0.1% TCA (1 mL) and centrifuged for 10 min at 13,000 rpm (4 °C). About 1 mL of 0.5% TBA prepared in 20% TCA was added to 0.4 mL of supernatant after centrifugation. To avoid pressure build-up, caps of the Eppendorf tubes were perforated before being incubated in a hot water bath set at 80 °C for 30 min. The reaction was terminated by immediately placing the samples on ice after incubation, followed by further centrifugation for 5 min at 13,500 rpm (4 °C). Absorbance readings were measured at 532 nm and corrected for nonspecific turbidity by subtracting absorbance from 600 nm using the Helios® Epsilon visible 8 nm bandwidth spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

4.5. Chlorophyll Content

Chlorophyll and carotenoid content were determined based on previously described methods [98,99]. Briefly, 0.1 g of ground plant material was homogenized in 10 mL of 80% acetone. The homogenates were thoroughly vortexed and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. About 1 mL was aliquoted into a cuvette and the pigment absorption was spectrophotometrically measured at 645 nm and 663 nm (Mackinney, 1968) using the Helios® Epsilon visible 8 nm bandwidth spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Chlorophyll content was calculated according to Arnon (1949) as follows:
Chlorophyll a = 12.7 (A663) − 2.69 (A645)
Chlorophyll b = 22.9 (A645) − 4.68 (A663)
Total Chlorophyll = 20.2 (A645) + 8.02 (A663)

4.6. Proline Content

Proline levels were measured as previously described with slight modifications [100]. Macerated plant material (0.1 g) was homogenized with 3% sulfosalicylic acid (0.5 mL), vigorously mixed, and centrifuged for 20 min at 13 000 rpm. The supernatant (0.3 mL) was transferred to a reaction mixture containing 99% glacial acetic acid and acidic ninhydrin solution (2.5% ninhydrin, 60% acetic acid and 20% ethanol). The reaction was induced by heating the samples in a hot water bath set at 95 °C for 20 min and arrested by placing them on ice, followed by further centrifugation at 13,000 rpm. The chromophore (200 μL) was transferred to a 96-well microplate and its absorbance was measured at 520 nm using the FLUOstar® Omega microtiter plate reader (BMG LABTECH, Ortenberg, Germany). Proline concentration was determined according to a calibration curve containing known proline concentrations and expressed as μmol g−1 FW.

4.7. Total Soluble Sugars

Total soluble sugar content was determined as previously described in the anthrone method with some modifications [101]. Ground plant material (0.1 g) was homogenized with 80% acetone and centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000 rpm. About 1 mL of the supernatant was transferred to a 0.2% anthrone solution (0.2 g anthrone dissolved in 96% sulfuric acid) and placed in a hot water bath for 15 min at 80 °C. The reaction was terminated by placing the samples on ice. Thereafter, 1 mL of the sample was aliquoted to a glass cuvette and its absorbance was measured at 625 nm. Levels of total soluble sugars were quantified using a calibration curve containing known glucose concentrations and expressed as mg·g−1 FW.

4.8. Anatomic Analysis Using Scanning Electron Microscopy

The anatomic structure, including the epidermis, xylem, and element distribution, was analyzed at the University of the Western Cape using high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (HRSEM) as described previously [12,37,64]. Microphotographs were taken to obtain the morphological characteristics using the Tescan MIRA field emission gun scanning electron microscope using an in-lens secondary electron detector and set to an operating acceleration voltage of 5 kV. All spectra were analyzed using the built-in Oxford Inca software suite.

4.9. Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopic Analysis of Biomolecules

Samples were analyzed using the Perkin Elmer Spectrum 100-FTIR Spectrometer [PerkinElmer (Pty) Ltd., Midrand, South Africa] as previously described [37]. Briefly, 2 g of dried macerated plant material was homogenized with 0.4 g of a pre-dried KBr, followed by scanning of the pellet mixture (~2 g). A wider spectral window frequency range of 450 to 4000 cm−1 was considered.

4.10. RNA Extraction and cDNA Preparation

Total RNA was extracted from 0.1 g of macerated plant material (treated and untreated) using the FavorPrep TM Plant Total RNA Purification Mini Kit (FAPRK001-1, Favorgen Biotech Corp, Ping-Ting, Taiwan) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The genomic DNA was removed by treating the resulting RNA with an RNase-free DNase solution (New England Biolabs, Massachusetts, MA, USA). Complementary DNA was synthesized from ~1 μg of extracted RNA using the SuperScript TM III First-Strand Synthesis kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The high quality and integrity of both RNA and cDNA were spectrophotometrically assured by quantification using NanoDropTM 2000/2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

4.11. Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to determine expression profiles using the LightCycler® 480 SYBR Green I Master kit (Roche Diagnostics, SA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. One reaction contained 1 μL DNA template, 5 μL 2× SYBR Green I Master Mix (Roche Applied Science, Germany) and optimized primer concentrations made up to a final volume of 10 μL with RNase-free dH2O. Primers were designed using the Primer3 online tool (https://primer3.ut.ee; accessed 3 May 2019) and the primer sequence is shown in Table 4. The reactions were subjected to 95 °C for 10 min, 47 cycles at 95 °C for 10 s, 58 °C for 10 s (SbLOX; SbAOS; SbAOC; SbOPR), 60 °C for 10 s (PEPC; Beta actin) at 40 cycles, 60 °C for 10 s (UBQ) at 46 cycles, and 72 °C for 20 s. A melting curve was performed using default parameters. Primer information is listed below. Transcript expression levels were normalized using Beta actin, Ubiquitin (UBQ) and Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) as reference genes [94] and analyzed using the LightCycler® 480 Software version 1.5.1.62. Expression levels were quantified relative to a calibration curve of serially diluted cDNA. The results obtained serve as a representation of 3 biological and 3 independent repeats including non-template control.

4.12. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were repeated at least three times and data were statistically analyzed by a one-way ANOVA using Minitab® 21 Statistical Software (https://www.minitab.com/en-us/support/downloads/ accessed on 24 November 2022). Data in the Figures and Tables represent the mean ± standard deviation from three biological replicates. Statistical significance between control and treated plants was determined by Tukey’s test for comparison at a 95% confidence interval. The difference was regarded as significant when p < 0.05. Means that do not share a letter in a column were significantly different.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we demonstrated that priming S. bicolor seeds with MeJa enhances salt stress tolerance. Based on the data obtained, we showed that morphologically, S. bicolor is sensitive to salt stress at the seedling stage. This was demonstrated by the reduced growth and biomass. However, priming seeds with MeJa proved that induction of endogenous JA in cells provides some sort of protection and that the concentration is dependent on the severity of the stress, e.g., 15 μM MeJa was more effective compared to 10 μM MeJa for the 200 mM NaCl-stressed S. bicolor plants in maintaining the growth of S. bicolor plants under stress to the same level as that of the control (without NaCl treatment). Furthermore, both MeJa concentrations led to improved photosynthetic performance, reduced oxidative stress, and improved osmoregulation under both salt concentrations. Furthermore, MeJa prevented salt-induced physiological and biochemical changes by reducing the shrinkage and thinning of the epidermis and xylem tissues. This correlated with improved element absorption as confirmed by the reduced Na+/K+ ratio and 100% restoration of Si+ absorption, proving that MeJa played a role in either the exclusion or compartmentalization of toxic Na+ ions. Additionally, MeJa altered the structure of biomolecules by further inducing the synthesis of secondary metabolites. Lastly, MeJa alleviated salt stress and was also assayed based on the expression levels of JA precursor gene SbOPR. We, therefore, propose a preliminary mechanism, and suggest that exogenous MeJa mediated salt tolerance in S. bicolor by inducing the synthesis of endogenous JA through increased OPR transcript under salt stress, therefore activating other signaling cascades including ROS scavenging capacity, osmoregulation, and ion transport to maintain a steady homeostasis and hence improve growth under salt stress. Data from this study will pioneer the establishment of transgenic crop cultivars with improved tolerance and therefore increased crop productivity. Further analyses are required on the effect of exogenous MeJa on the downstream molecules in the JA pathway and investigation of a possible JA-independent pathway playing a role in inducing endogenous JA.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms241210368/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.M.; methodology, G.S., M.N., N.N., K.H. and V.I.; software, T.M., R.F.A. and A.J.K.; validation, T.M., A.J.K. and R.F.A.; formal analysis and investigation, G.S., M.N., N.N., K.H. and V.I.; resources, T.M., R.F.A., A.J.K. and E.I.; data curation, T.M.; writing—original draft preparation, G.S. and T.M.; writing—review and editing, T.M., G.S., M.N., N.N., K.H., V.I., A.J.K. and R.F.A.; visualization and supervision, T.M., R.F.A., A.J.K. and E.I.; project administration, T.M.; funding acquisition, T.M., E.I. and R.F.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Research Foundation of South Africa via the Black Academics Advancement grant UID 112201 and Thuthuka Institutional Funding, grant number UIDs 121939, 116258, and 118469, and the “University of the Western Cape” and “The APC was funded by author’s funds”.

Data Availability Statement

No new data are available.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge our colleagues at the Department of Biotechnology, Molecular Sciences and Biochemistry Laboratory (MSBLab) and the SensorLab Laboratories at the Chemical Sciences Department, University of the Western Cape, for providing the space and equipment necessary to complete this study. We also thank Stephen Chivasa for providing the Minitab statistical analysis software at Durham University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Zhao, Y.; Ambrose, R.P.K. Structural characteristics of sorghum kernel: Effects of temperature. Int. J. Food Prop. 2017, 20, 2630–2638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Kaplan, M.; Kale, H.; Kardes, Y.M.; Karaman, K.; Yılmaz, M.F.; Temizgül, R.; Akar, T. Characterization of local sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) population grains in terms of nutritional properties and evaluation by GT biplot approach. Starch 2020, 72, 1900232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. de Morais Cardoso, L.; Pinheiro, S.S.; Martino, H.S.; Pinheiro-Sant′Ana, H.M. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.): Nutrients, bioactive compounds, and potential impact on human health. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 372–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shen, S.; Huang, R.; Li, C.; Wu, W.; Chen, H.; Shi, J.; Chen, S.; Ye, X. Phenolic compositions and antioxidant activities differ significantly among sorghum grains with different applications. Molecules 2018, 23, 1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Mullet, J.E.; Klein, R.R.; Klein, P.E. Sorghum bicolor—An important species for comparative grass genomics and a source of beneficial genes for agriculture. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2002, 5, 118–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Paterson, A.H.; Bowers, J.E.; Bruggmann, R.; Dubchak, I.; Grimwood, J.; Gundlach, H.; Haberer, G.; Hellsten, U.; Mitros, T.; Poliakov, A.; et al. The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 2009, 457, 551–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Gibson, M. The Feeding of Nations: Redefining Food Security for the 21st Century; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  8. Singh, R.K.; Joshi, P.K.; Sinha, V.S.P.; Kumar, M. Indicator based assessment of food security in SAARC nations under the influence of climate change scenarios. Futur. Foods 2022, 5, 100122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hinojosa, L.; González, J.A.; Barrios-Masias, F.H.; Fuentes, F.; Murphy, K.M. Quinoa abiotic stress responses: A review. Plants 2018, 7, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. He, M.; He, C.-Q.; Ding, N.-Z. Abiotic stresses: General defenses of land plants and chances for engineering multistress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Du, F.; Shi, H.; Zhang, X.; Xu, X. Responses of reactive oxygen scavenging enzymes, proline and malondialdehyde to water deficits among six secondary successional seral species in Loess Plateau. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ndou, N.; Rakgotho, T.; Nkuna, M.; Doumbia, I.Z.; Mulaudzi, T.; Ajayi, R.F. Green Synthesis of Iron Oxide (Hematite) Nanoparticles and Their Influence on Sorghum bicolor Growth under Drought Stress. Plants 2023, 12, 1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kong, W.; Liu, F.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, J.; Feng, H. Non-destructive determination of Malondialdehyde (MDA) distribution in oilseed rape leaves by laboratory scale NIR hyperspectral imaging. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Safdar, H.; Amin, A.; Shafiq, Y.; Ali, A.; Yasin, R.; Shoukat, A.; Ul Hussan, M.; Sarwar, M.I. A review: Impact of salinity on plant growth. Nat. Sci. 2019, 17, 34–40. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gupta, B.; Huang, B. Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants: Physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization. Int. J. Genom. 2014, 2014, 701596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Mulaudzi, T.; Hendricks, K.; Mabiya, T.; Muthevhuli, M.; Ajayi, R.F.; Mayedwa, N.; Gehring, C.; Iwuoha, E. Calcium improves germination and growth of Sorghum bicolor seedlings under salt stress. Plants 2020, 9, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kumari, P.H.; Kumar, S.A.; Ramesh, K.; Reddy, P.S.; Nagaraju, M.; Prakash, A.B.; Shah, T.; Henderson, A.; Srivastava, R.K.; Rajasheker, G.; et al. Genome-wide identification and analysis of Arabidopsis sodium proton antiporter (NHX) and human sodium proton exchanger (NHE) homologs in sorghum bicolor. Genes 2018, 9, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ahmad, P.; Abass Ahanger, M.; Nasser Alyemeni, M.; Wijaya, L.; Alam, P.; Ashraf, M. Mitigation of sodium chloride toxicity in Solanum lycopersicum L. by supplementation of jasmonic acid and nitric oxide. J. Plant Interact. 2018, 13, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Yin, F.; Liu, X.; Cao, B.; Xu, K. Low pH altered salt stress in antioxidant metabolism and nitrogen assimilation in ginger (Zingiber officinale) seedlings. Physiol. Plant. 2020, 168, 648–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Chen, L.; Liu, L.; Lu, B.; Ma, T.; Jiang, D.; Li, J.; Zhang, K.; Sun, H.; Zhang, Y.; Bai, Z.; et al. Exogenous melatonin promotes seed germination and osmotic regulation under salt stress in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0228241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Gupta, C.; Prakash, D. Enhancement of active constituents of medicinal plants through the use of microbes. In Plant Biotic Interactions; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 227–241. [Google Scholar]
  22. Niu, Y.; Hu, T.; Zhou, Y.; Hasi, A. Isolation and characterization of two Medicago falcate AP2/EREBP family transcription factor cDNA, MfDREB1 and MfDREB1s. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2010, 48, 971–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hdira, S.; Haddoudi, L.; Hanana, M.; Romero, I.; Mahjoub, A.; Ben Jouira, H.; Ludidi, N.; Sanchez-Ballesta, M.T.; Abdelly, C.; Badri, M. Morpho-Physiological, Biochemical, and Genetic Responses to Salinity in Medicago truncatula. Plants 2021, 10, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sharma, A.; Shahzad, B.; Kumar, V.; Kohli, S.K.; Sidhu, G.P.S.; Bali, A.S.; Handa, N.; Kapoor, D.; Bhardwaj, R.; Zheng, B. Phytohormones regulate accumulation of osmolytes under abiotic stress. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Hannachi, S.; Van Labeke, M.-C. Salt stress affects germination, seedling growth and physiological responses differentially in eggplant cultivars (Solanum melongena L.). Sci. Hortic. 2018, 228, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, X.; Hou, X. Antagonistic regulation of ABA and GA in metabolism and signaling pathways. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Ku, Y.-S.; Sintaha, M.; Cheung, M.-Y.; Lam, H.-M. Plant hormone signaling crosstalks between biotic and abiotic stress responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Sabagh, A.E.; Mbarki, S.; Hossain, A.; Iqbal, M.A.; Islam, M.S.; Raza, A.; Llanes, A.; Reginato, M.; Rahman, M.A.; Mahboob, W.; et al. Potential role of plant growth regulators in administering crucial processes against abiotic stresses. Front. Agron. 2021, 3, 648694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, L.; Wu, C.; Oelmüller, R.; Zhang, W. Role of phytohormones in Piriformospora indica-induced growth promotion and stress tolerance in plants: More questions than answers. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Trifunović-Momčilov, M.; Motyka, V.; Dobrev, P.I.; Marković, M.; Milošević, S.; Jevremović, S.; Dragićević, I.; Subotić, A. Phytohormone profiles in non-transformed and AtCKX transgenic centaury (Centaurium erythraea Rafn) shoots and roots in response to salinity stress in vitro. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 21471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Jiang, D.; Yan, S. MeJA is more effective than JA in inducing defense responses in Larix olgensis. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 2018, 12, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sujeeth, N.; Mehterov, N.; Gupta, S.; Qureshi, M.K.; Fischer, A.; Proost, S.; Omidbakhshfard, M.A.; Obata, T.; Benina, M.; Staykov, N.; et al. A novel seed plants gene regulates oxidative stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 705–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Wang, G.; Huang, W.; Li, M.; Xu, Z.; Wang, F.; Xiong, A. Expression profiles of genes involved in jasmonic acid biosynthesis and signaling during growth and development of carrot. Acta Biochim. Et Biophys. Sin. 2016, 48, 795–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Ye, J.; Duan, Y.; Hu, G.; Geng, X.; Zhang, G.; Yan, P.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Song, X. Identification of candidate genes and biosynthesis pathways related to fertility conversion by wheat KTM3315A transcriptome profiling. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Su, Y.; Huang, Y.; Dong, X.; Wang, R.; Tang, M.; Cai, J.; Chen, J.; Zhang, X.; Nie, G. Exogenous methyl jasmonate improves heat tolerance of perennial ryegrass through alteration of osmotic adjustment, antioxidant defense, and expression of jasmonic acid-responsive genes. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 664519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mulaudzi, T.; Nkuna, M.; Sias, G.; Doumbia, I.Z.; Njomo, N.; Iwuoha, E. Antioxidant Capacity of Chitosan on Sorghum Plants under Salinity Stress. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rakgotho, T.; Ndou, N.; Mulaudzi, T.; Iwuoha, E.; Mayedwa, N.; Ajayi, R.F. Green-Synthesized Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Mitigate Salt Stress in Sorghum bicolor. Agriculture 2022, 12, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ahmadi, F.I.; Karimi, K.; Struik, P.C. Effect of exogenous application of methyl jasmonate on physiological and biochemical characteristics of Brassica napus L. cv. Talaye under salinity stress. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2018, 115, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Limani, N.; Arraouadi, S.; Hajlaoui, H. Biochemical and Physiological Behavior against Salt Stress effect on two Quinoa accessions (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Int. J. Agric. Anim. Prod. 2022, 2, 9–19. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kanwal, S.; Ilyas, N.; Shabir, S.; Saeed, M.; Gul, R.; Zahoor, M.; Batool, N.; Mazhar, R. Application of biochar in mitigation of negative effects of salinity stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J. Plant Nutr. 2017, 41, 526–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sheteiwy, M.S.; Gong, D.; Gao, Y.; Pan, R.; Hu, J.; Guan, Y. Priming with methyl jasmonate alleviates polyethylene glycol-induced osmotic stress in rice seeds by regulating the seed metabolic profile. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 153, 236–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mousavi, S.R.; Niknejad, Y.; Fallah, H.; Tari, D.B. Methyl jasmonate alleviates arsenic toxicity in rice. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 1041–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lalotra, S.; Hemantaranjan, A.; Srivastava, R. Alleviating role of methyl jasmonate and zinc on morpho-physiological and biochemical attributes in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under salinity stress. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2019, 8, 527–532. [Google Scholar]
  44. Labiad, M.H.; Giménez, A.; Varol, H.; Tüzel, Y.; Egea-Gilabert, C.; Fernández, J.A.; Martínez-Ballesta, M.d.C. Effect of Exogenously Applied Methyl Jasmonate on Yield and Quality of Salt-Stressed Hydroponically Grown Sea Fennel (Crithmum maritimum L.). Agronomy 2021, 11, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Anjum, S.A.; Tanveer, M.; Hussain, S.; Tung, S.A.; Samad, R.A.; Wang, L.; Khan, I.; Rehman, N.U.; Shah, A.N.; Shahzad, B. Exogenously applied methyl jasmonate improves the drought tolerance in wheat imposed at early and late developmental stages. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2015, 38, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Taïbi, K.; Taïbi, F.; Abderrahim, L.A.; Ennajah, A.; Belkhodja, M.; Mulet, J.M. Effect of salt stress on growth, chlorophyll content, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant defence systems in Phaseolus vulgaris L. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2016, 105, 306–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Baniasadi, F.; Saffari, V.R.; Moud, A.A.M. Physiological and growth responses of Calendula officinalis L. plants to the interaction effects of polyamines and salt stress. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 234, 312–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nounjan, N.; Mahakham, W.; Siangliw, J.L.; Toojinda, T.; Theerakulpisut, P. Chlorophyll Retention and High Photosynthetic Performance Contribute to Salinity Tolerance in Rice Carrying Drought Tolerance Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs). Agriculture 2020, 10, 620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Reddy, K.N.; Hoagland, R.E.; Zablotowicz, R.M. Effect of glyphosate on growth, chlorophyll, and nodulation in glyphosate-resistant and susceptible soybean (Glycine max) varieties. J. New Seeds 2000, 2, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nguyen, D.; Rieu, I.; Mariani, C.; van Dam, N.M. How plants handle multiple stresses: Hormonal interactions underlying responses to abiotic stress and insect herbivory. Plant Mol. Biol. 2016, 91, 727–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Taheri, Z.; Vatankhah, E.; Jafarian, V. Methyl jasmonate improves physiological and biochemical responses of Anchusa italica under salinity stress. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2020, 130, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mahmoud, L.M.; Vincent, C.I.; Grosser, J.W.; Dutt, M. The response of salt-stressed Valencia sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) to salicylic acid and methyl jasmonate treatments. Plant Physiol. Rep. 2021, 26, 137–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Özdemir, B.; Tanyolac, Z.Ö.; Ulukapı, K.; Onus, A.N. Evaluation of salinity tolerance level of some pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivars. Int. J. Agric. Innov. Res. 2016, 5, 247–251. [Google Scholar]
  54. Ranjbarfordoei, A.; Samson, R.; Van Damme, P. Chlorophyll fluorescence performance of sweet almond [Prunus dulcis (Miller) D. Webb] in response to salinity stress induced by NaCl. Photosynthetica 2006, 44, 513–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lang, D.; Yu, X.; Jia, X.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X. Methyl jasmonate improves metabolism and growth of NaCl-stressed Glycyrrhiza uralensis seedlings. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 266, 109287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Daudi, A.; O′Brien, J.A. Detection of Hydrogen Peroxide by DAB Staining in Arabidopsis Leaves. Bio-Protocol 2012, 2, e263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Karimi, R.; Gavili-Kilaneh, K.; Khadivi, A. Methyl jasmonate promotes salinity adaptation responses in two grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Food Chem. 2022, 375, 131667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ahmad, F.; Kamal, A.; Singh, A.; Ashfaque, F.; Alamri, S.; Siddiqui, M.H. Salicylic Acid Modulates Antioxidant System, Defense Metabolites, and Expression of Salt Transporter Genes in Pisum sativum Under Salinity Stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 41, 1905–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shah, T.; Latif, S.; Saeed, F.; Ali, I.; Ullah, S.; Alsahli, A.A.; Jan, S.; Ahmad, P. Seed priming with titanium dioxide nanoparticles enhances seed vigor, leaf water status, and antioxidant enzyme activities in maize (Zea mays L.) under salinity stress. J. King Saud Univ. Sci. 2021, 33, 101207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. El-Amier, Y.; Elhindi, K.; El-Hendawy, S.; Al-Rashed, S.; Abd-ElGawad, A. Antioxidant system and biomolecules alteration in Pisum sativum under heavy metal stress and possible alleviation by 5-aminolevulinic acid. Molecules 2019, 24, 4194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Farsaraei, S.; Moghaddam, M.; Pirbalouti, A.G. Changes in growth and essential oil composition of sweet basil in response of salinity stress and superabsorbents application. Sci. Hortic. 2020, 271, 109465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hannan, A.; Hassan, L.; Hoque, N.; Arif, T.-U.; Robin, A.H.K. Increasing New Root Length Reflects Survival Mechanism of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Genotypes under PEG-Induced Osmotic Stress. Plant Breed. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tarchoune, I.; Sgherri, C.; Izzo, R.; Lachaâl, M.; Navari-Izzo, F.; Ouerghi, Z. Changes in the antioxidative systems of Ocimum basilicum L. (cv. Fine) under different sodium salts. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2012, 34, 1873–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rui, M.; Ma, C.; Hao, Y.; Guo, J.; Rui, Y.; Tang, X.; Zhao, Q.; Fan, X.; Zhang, Z.; Hou, T.; et al. Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as a Potential Iron Fertilizer for Peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Manzoor, H.; Mehwish; Bukhat, S.; Rasul, S.; Rehmani, M.I.A.; Noreen, S.; Athar, H.-U.; Zafar, Z.U.; Skalicky, M.; Soufan, W.; et al. Methyl Jasmonate Alleviated the Adverse Effects of Cadmium Stress in Pea (Pisum sativum L.): A Nexus of Photosystem II Activity and Dynamics of Redox Balance. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 860664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Gao, Z.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, W.; Zheng, L.; Borjigin, T.; Wang, Y. Nitric oxide alleviates salt-induced stress damage by regulating the ascorbate–glutathione cycle and Na+/K+ homeostasis in Nitraria tangutorum Bobr. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 173, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Vighi, I.L.; Benitez, L.C.; Amaral, M.N.; Moraes, G.P.; Auler, P.A.; Rodrigues, G.S.; Deuner, S.; Mala, L.C.; Braga, E.J.B. Functional characterization of the antioxidant enzymes in rice plants exposed to salinity stress. Biol. Plant. 2017, 61, 540–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. He, W.; Luo, H.; Xu, H.; Zhou, Z.; Li, D.; Bao, Y.; Fu, Q.; Song, J.; Jiao, Y.; Zhang, Z. Effect of exogenous methyl jasmonate on physiological and carotenoid composition of yellow maize sprouts under NaCl stress. Food Chem. 2021, 361, 130177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Jafari, S.H.; Arani, A.M.; Esfahani, S.T. The Combined Effects of Rhizobacteria and Methyl Jasmonate on Rosmarinic Acid Production and Gene Expression Profile in Origanum Vulgare l. Under Salinity Conditions. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 42, 1472–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nadeem, M.; Anwar-Ul-Haq, M.; Saqib, M.; Maqsood, M.; He, Z. Ameliorative Effect of Silicic Acid and Silicates on Oxidative, Osmotic Stress, and Specific Ion Toxicity in Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2022, 22, 2334–2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Latef, A.A.; Arif, T.U.; Rhaman, M. Exogenous Auxin-Mediated Salt Stress Alleviation in Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.). Agronomy 2021, 11, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Li, H.; Testerink, C.; Zhang, Y. How roots and shoots communicate through stressful times. Trends Plant Sci. 2021, 26, 940–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zörb, C.; Mühling, K.H.; Kutschera, U.; Geilfus, C.-M. Salinity stiffens the epidermal cell walls of salt-stressed maize leaves: Is the epidermis growth-restricting? PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0118406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Pacheco-Silva, N.V.; Donato, A.M. Morpho-anatomy of the leaf of Myrciaria glomerata. Rev. Bras. de Farm. 2016, 26, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Brookbank, B.P.; Patel, J.; Gazzarrini, S.; Nambara, E. Role of Basal ABA in Plant Growth and Development. Genes 2021, 12, 1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hwang, B.G.; Ryu, J.; Lee, S.J. Vulnerability of Protoxylem and Metaxylem Vessels to Embolisms and Radial Refilling in a Vascular Bundle of Maize Leaves. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Kollist, H.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Sengupta, S.; Nuhkat, M.; Kangasjärvi, J.; Mittler, R. Rapid Responses to Abiotic Stress: Priming the Landscape for the Signal Transduction Network. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 24, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Nawaz, M.A.; Zakharenko, A.M.; Zemchenko, I.V.; Haider, M.S.; Ali, M.A.; Imtiaz, M.; Chung, G.; Tsatsakis, A.; Sun, S.; Golokhvast, K.S. Phytolith Formation in Plants: From Soil to Cell. Plants 2019, 8, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Meunier, J.D.; Barboni, D.; Anwar-Ul-Haq, M.; Levard, C.; Chaurand, P.; Vidal, V.; Grauby, O.; Huc, R.; Laffont-Schwob, I.; Rabier, J.; et al. Effect of phytoliths for mitigating water stress in durum wheat. New Phytol. 2017, 215, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  80. Westworth, S.; Ashwath, N.; Cozzolino, D. Application of FTIR-ATR spectroscopy to detect salinity response in Beauty Leaf Tree (Calophyllum inophyllum L). Energy Procedia 2019, 160, 761–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Končitíková, R.; Vigouroux, A.; Kopečná, M.; Andree, T.; Bartoš, J.; Šebela, M.; Moréra, S.; Kopečný, D. Role and structural characterization of plant aldehyde dehydrogenases from family 2 and family 7. Biochem. J. 2015, 468, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kishor, P.B.K.; Kumari, P.H.; Sunita, M.S.L.; Sreenivasulu, N. Role of proline in cell wall synthesis and plant development and its implications in plant ontogeny. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Raza, A.; Charagh, S.; Zahid, Z.; Mubarik, M.S.; Javed, R.; Siddiqui, M.H.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Jasmonic acid: A key frontier in conferring abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 1513–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Rezai, S.; Orojloo, M.; Bidabadi, S.S.; Soleimanzadeh, M. Possible Role of Methyl Jasmonate in Protection to NaCl-Induced Salt Stress in Pepper cv. “Green Hashemi”. Int. J. Agric. Crop Sci. 2013, 6, 1235. [Google Scholar]
  85. Tavallali, V.; Karimi, S. Methyl jasmonate enhances salt tolerance of almond rootstocks by regulating endogenous phytohormones, antioxidant activity and gas-exchange. J. Plant Physiol. 2019, 234, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Chini, A.; Fonseca, S.; Fernández, G.; Adie, B.; Chico, J.M.; Lorenzo, O.; García-Casado, G.; López-Vidriero, I.; Lozano, F.M.; Ponce, M.R.; et al. The JAZ family of repressors is the missing link in jasmonate signalling. Nature 2007, 448, 666–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Thines, B.; Katsir, L.; Melotto, M.; Niu, Y.; Mandaokar, A.; Liu, G.; Nomura, K.; He, S.Y.; Howe, G.A.; Browse, J. JAZ repressor proteins are targets of the SCFCOI1 complex during jasmonate signalling. Nature 2007, 448, 661–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. De Domenico, S.; Aurino, M.; Gallo, A.; Poltronieri, P.; Pastor, V.; Flors, V.; Santino, A. Oxylipin dynamics in Medicago truncatula in response to salt and wounding stresses. Physiol. Plant. 2019, 165, 198–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kashyap, S.P.; Prasanna, H.C.; Kumari, N.; Mishra, P.; Singh, B. Understanding salt tolerance mechanism using transcriptome profiling and de novo assembly of wild tomato Solanum chilense. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 15835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Zhai, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Liu, Q.; He, S. Transcript profile analysis reveals important roles of jasmonic acid signalling pathway in the response of sweet potato to salt stress. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Qiu, X.; Xu, Y.; Xiong, B.; Dai, L.; Huang, S.; Dong, T.; Sun, G.; Liao, L.; Deng, Q.; Wang, X.; et al. Effects of exogenous methyl jasmonate on the synthesis of endogenous jasmonates and the regulation of photosynthesis in citrus. Physiol. Plant. 2020, 170, 398–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lado, J.; Manzi, M. Metabolic and Hormonal Responses of Plants to Cold Stress. In Medicinal Plants and Environmental Challenges; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 137–158. [Google Scholar]
  93. Singh, P.; Arif, Y.; Siddiqui, H.; Hayat, S. Jasmonate: A versatile messenger in plants. In Jasmonates and Salicylates Signaling in Plants; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 129–158. [Google Scholar]
  94. Mulaudzi-Masuku, T.; Mutepe, R.D.; Mkhoro, O.C.; Faro, A.; Ndimba, B. Identification and characterization of a heat-inducible Hsp70 gene from Sorghum bicolor which confers tolerance to thermal stress. Cell Stress Chaperones 2015, 20, 793–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Rahman, A.; Nahar, K.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Fujita, M. Calcium Supplementation Improves Na+/K+ Ratio, Antioxidant Defense and Glyoxalase Systems in Salt-Stressed Rice Seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Vilcacundo, R.; Barrio, D.A.; Piñuel, L.; Boeri, P.; Tombari, A.; Pinto, A.; Welbaum, J.; Hernández-Ledesma, B.; Carrillo, W. Inhibition of Lipid Peroxidation of Kiwicha (Amaranthus caudatus) Hydrolyzed Protein Using Zebrafish Larvae and Embryos. Plants 2018, 7, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Heath, R.L.; Packer, L. Reprint of: Photoperoxidation in Isolated Chloroplasts I. Kinetics and Stoichiometry of Fatty Acid Peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2022, 726, 109248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Mackinney, G. Absorption of Light by Chlorophyll Solutions. J. Biol. Chem. 1941, 140, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wellburn, A.R.; Lichtenthaler, H. Formulae and Program to Determine Total Carotenoids and Chlorophylls A and B of Leaf Extracts in Different Solvents. In Advances in Photosynthesis Research: Proceedings of the VIth International Congress on Photosynthesis, Brussels, Belgium, 1–6 August 1983; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1984; Volume 2, pp. 9–12. [Google Scholar]
  100. Carillo, P.; Gibon, Y. Protocol: Extraction and determination of proline. Prometh. Wiki 2011, 2011, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  101. Watanabe, S.; Kojima, K.; Ide, Y.; Sasaki, S. Effects of saline and osmotic stress on proline and sugar accumulation in Populus euphratica in vitro. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2000, 63, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effect of MeJa on the growth of S. bicolor under salt stress. Phenotype (A) and shoot length (B) of S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with 10 µM and 15 μM MeJa and exposed to 200 mM NaCl. Data in the figure represent the mean ± standard deviation from three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) based on ANOVA one-way variance analysis following Tukey’s comparison test.
Figure 1. Effect of MeJa on the growth of S. bicolor under salt stress. Phenotype (A) and shoot length (B) of S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with 10 µM and 15 μM MeJa and exposed to 200 mM NaCl. Data in the figure represent the mean ± standard deviation from three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) based on ANOVA one-way variance analysis following Tukey’s comparison test.
Ijms 24 10368 g001
Figure 2. Assessment of oxidative damage in S. bicolor in response to MeJa under salt stress. Accumulation of H2O2 on the leaves was determined by histochemical staining (A), whereas lipid peroxidation was determined by measuring MDA content (B) under 200 mM NaCl for S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with 10 µM and 15 µM MeJa. Data in the figure represent the mean ± standard deviation from three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) based on ANOVA one-way variance analysis using Tukey’s comparison test.
Figure 2. Assessment of oxidative damage in S. bicolor in response to MeJa under salt stress. Accumulation of H2O2 on the leaves was determined by histochemical staining (A), whereas lipid peroxidation was determined by measuring MDA content (B) under 200 mM NaCl for S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with 10 µM and 15 µM MeJa. Data in the figure represent the mean ± standard deviation from three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) based on ANOVA one-way variance analysis using Tukey’s comparison test.
Ijms 24 10368 g002
Figure 3. Proline (Pro) and total soluble sugar (TSS) content in response to MeJa pre-treatment in S. bicolor under salt stress. Proline content (A) and total soluble sugars (B) in S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with 10 and 15 µM MeJa and exposed to 200 mM NaCl. Data in the figure represent the mean ± standard deviation from three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) based on ANOVA one-way variance analysis using Tukey’s comparison test.
Figure 3. Proline (Pro) and total soluble sugar (TSS) content in response to MeJa pre-treatment in S. bicolor under salt stress. Proline content (A) and total soluble sugars (B) in S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with 10 and 15 µM MeJa and exposed to 200 mM NaCl. Data in the figure represent the mean ± standard deviation from three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) based on ANOVA one-way variance analysis using Tukey’s comparison test.
Ijms 24 10368 g003
Figure 4. Scanning electron microscopy images illustrating the epidermis, xylem, and element distribution in S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with MeJa and exposed to salt stress. Cross-section images of S. bicolor epidermis and xylem (AD), and EDX spectrum (EH), obtained from plants treated with 0 mM NaCl (A,E), 200 mM NaCl (B,F), 200 mM NaCl + 10 µM MeJa (C,G), and 200 mM NaCl + 15 µM MeJa (D,H). Epidermis and xylem are highlighted by blue and red arrows, respectively. For clarity purposes a small area showing the xylem walls in the SEM micrographs has been selected and enlarged/zoomed.
Figure 4. Scanning electron microscopy images illustrating the epidermis, xylem, and element distribution in S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with MeJa and exposed to salt stress. Cross-section images of S. bicolor epidermis and xylem (AD), and EDX spectrum (EH), obtained from plants treated with 0 mM NaCl (A,E), 200 mM NaCl (B,F), 200 mM NaCl + 10 µM MeJa (C,G), and 200 mM NaCl + 15 µM MeJa (D,H). Epidermis and xylem are highlighted by blue and red arrows, respectively. For clarity purposes a small area showing the xylem walls in the SEM micrographs has been selected and enlarged/zoomed.
Ijms 24 10368 g004
Figure 5. FTIR analysis of the effect of pre-treatment with MeJa on the biomolecules in S. bicolor under salt stress conditions. Changes in functional groups were detected in control S. bicolor plants (black) and pre-treated with 0 (red), 10 (blue), and 15 µM (green) of MeJa under 200 mM NaCl stress conditions [NaCl = mM; MeJa = µM].
Figure 5. FTIR analysis of the effect of pre-treatment with MeJa on the biomolecules in S. bicolor under salt stress conditions. Changes in functional groups were detected in control S. bicolor plants (black) and pre-treated with 0 (red), 10 (blue), and 15 µM (green) of MeJa under 200 mM NaCl stress conditions [NaCl = mM; MeJa = µM].
Ijms 24 10368 g005
Figure 6. The relative expression levels of JA biosynthesis genes in S. bicolor pre-treated with 10 µM or 15 µM MeJa under salt stress (200 mM NaCl). Relative expression levels of SbLOX (A), SbAOS (B), SbAOC (C), and SbOPR (D) were analyzed from the total RNA extracted from S. bicolor plants using qRT-PCR. Data in the figure represent the mean ± standard deviation from three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) based on ANOVA one-way variance analyzed using Tukey’s comparison test.
Figure 6. The relative expression levels of JA biosynthesis genes in S. bicolor pre-treated with 10 µM or 15 µM MeJa under salt stress (200 mM NaCl). Relative expression levels of SbLOX (A), SbAOS (B), SbAOC (C), and SbOPR (D) were analyzed from the total RNA extracted from S. bicolor plants using qRT-PCR. Data in the figure represent the mean ± standard deviation from three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) based on ANOVA one-way variance analyzed using Tukey’s comparison test.
Ijms 24 10368 g006
Table 1. Plant biomass reflecting the effect of MeJa in S. bicolor under salt stress. Fresh weight and dry weight were determined from S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with 10 µM, and 15 µM MeJa and stressed with 200 mM NaCl. Data in the table represent the mean ± standard deviation from three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) based on ANOVA one-way variance analysis followed by Tukey’s comparison test.
Table 1. Plant biomass reflecting the effect of MeJa in S. bicolor under salt stress. Fresh weight and dry weight were determined from S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with 10 µM, and 15 µM MeJa and stressed with 200 mM NaCl. Data in the table represent the mean ± standard deviation from three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) based on ANOVA one-way variance analysis followed by Tukey’s comparison test.
NaCl (mM)MeJa (µM)Fresh Weight (g)Dry Weight (g)
000.800 ± 0.189 a0.091 ± 0.013 a
20000.397 ± 0.027 b0.053 ± 0.005 b
100.730 ± 0.031 a0.110 ± 0.005 a
150.665 ± 0.039 ab0.102 ± 0.00 ab
Table 2. Effect of Methyl Jasmonate (MeJa) on the chlorophyll content in S. bicolor under salt stress. Photosynthetic pigments (Chlorophyll a, Chlorophyll b and total Chlorophyll) were determined from S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with 10 and 15 µM MeJa and stressed with 200 mM NaCl. Data in the table represent the mean ± standard deviation from three biological replicates. Different letters in the column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) based on ANOVA one-way variance analysis using Tukey’s comparison test.
Table 2. Effect of Methyl Jasmonate (MeJa) on the chlorophyll content in S. bicolor under salt stress. Photosynthetic pigments (Chlorophyll a, Chlorophyll b and total Chlorophyll) were determined from S. bicolor plants grown from seeds primed with 10 and 15 µM MeJa and stressed with 200 mM NaCl. Data in the table represent the mean ± standard deviation from three biological replicates. Different letters in the column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) based on ANOVA one-way variance analysis using Tukey’s comparison test.
NaCl (mM)MeJa (µM)Chlorophyll a (mg/gFW)Chlorophyll b (mg/gFW)Total Chlorophyll (mg/gFW)
008.17 ± 1.890 ab4.392 ± 1.075 a11.96 ± 2.98 ab
20004.308 ± 0.949 b3.172 ± 0.820 b6.667 ± 2.078 b
1011.992 ± 3.440 a5.011 ± 0.516 a16.710 ± 3.900 a
159.104 ± 0.656 ab4.585 ± 0.513 ab13.438 ± 0.151 a
Table 3. Element distribution in S. bicolor plants in response to MeJa priming under salt stress. Elements were analyzed from S. bicolor plants that were grown from seeds primed with 10 and 15 µM MeJa and exposed to 200 mM NaCl. Data in the table represent the mean ± standard deviation from three biological replicates. Different letters in the column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) based on ANOVA one-way variance analysis using Tukey’s comparison test.
Table 3. Element distribution in S. bicolor plants in response to MeJa priming under salt stress. Elements were analyzed from S. bicolor plants that were grown from seeds primed with 10 and 15 µM MeJa and exposed to 200 mM NaCl. Data in the table represent the mean ± standard deviation from three biological replicates. Different letters in the column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) based on ANOVA one-way variance analysis using Tukey’s comparison test.
Elements0 mM NaCl (wt%)200 mM NaCl (wt%)200 mM + 10 µM MeJa (wt%)200 mM + 15 µM MeJa (wt%)
Na+0.00 ± 0.00 c2.16 ± 0.52 a0.97 ± 0.24 b0.635 ± 0.155 bc
Si+0.295 ± 0.095 a0.00 ± 0.00 b0.72 0.24 ab0.675 ± 0.225 ab
K+7.46 ± 3.38 a1.49 ± 0.17 b2.53 ± 1.2 ab4.17 ± 1.97 ab
Element Ratio
Na+/K+0.00 ± 0.00 c1.436 ± 0.186 a0.419 ± 0.117 b0.166 ± 0.047 bc
Table 4. Information of the JA biosynthesis pathway genes studied under salt stress in response to priming with MeJa.
Table 4. Information of the JA biosynthesis pathway genes studied under salt stress in response to priming with MeJa.
Gene NameAccession NumbersAmplicon SizePrimer Sequence
LOC IDmRNA Sequence ID Forward (5′-3′)Reverse (5′-3′)
SbLOXLOC8064218GQ369443.1204 bpGTACCGCTACGACGTCTACAGTCAACTCTCGTGCAGCAAA
SbAOSLOC8086184XM_002463784.2191 bpACCATCACCTCGCTCAAGAATCACACAGTATCACGGCACT
SbAOCLOC8063218XM_002465042.2161 bpGTACGAGGCCATCTACAGCTAGGGGAAGACGATCTGGTTG
SbOPRLOC8070775XM_002438007.2166 bpGGGTATGATCGGGAGGAAGGCAACGGGATCTTGCGTGTAG
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mulaudzi, T.; Sias, G.; Nkuna, M.; Ndou, N.; Hendricks, K.; Ikebudu, V.; Koo, A.J.; Ajayi, R.F.; Iwuoha, E. Seed Priming with MeJa Prevents Salt-Induced Growth Inhibition and Oxidative Damage in Sorghum bicolor by Inducing the Expression of Jasmonic Acid Biosynthesis Genes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210368

AMA Style

Mulaudzi T, Sias G, Nkuna M, Ndou N, Hendricks K, Ikebudu V, Koo AJ, Ajayi RF, Iwuoha E. Seed Priming with MeJa Prevents Salt-Induced Growth Inhibition and Oxidative Damage in Sorghum bicolor by Inducing the Expression of Jasmonic Acid Biosynthesis Genes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(12):10368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210368

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mulaudzi, Takalani, Gershwin Sias, Mulisa Nkuna, Nzumbululo Ndou, Kaylin Hendricks, Vivian Ikebudu, Abraham J. Koo, Rachel F. Ajayi, and Emmanuel Iwuoha. 2023. "Seed Priming with MeJa Prevents Salt-Induced Growth Inhibition and Oxidative Damage in Sorghum bicolor by Inducing the Expression of Jasmonic Acid Biosynthesis Genes" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24, no. 12: 10368. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241210368

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop