Next Article in Journal
Dissection of the Genetic Basis of Yield Traits in Line per se and Testcross Populations and Identification of Candidate Genes for Hybrid Performance in Maize
Previous Article in Journal
Sonochemical Combined Synthesis of Nickel Ferrite and Cobalt Ferrite Magnetic Nanoparticles and Their Application in Glycan Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 23
Issue 9
10.3390/ijms23095078
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enamel Matrix Derivative Decreases Pyroptosis-Related Genes in Macrophages

by
Mariane Beatriz Sordi
1,2,
Ariadne Cristiane Cabral da Cruz
2,
Layla Panahipour
1 and
Reinhard Gruber
1,3,*
1
Department of Oral Biology, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
2
Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis 88040-900, Brazil
3
Department of Periodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(9), 5078; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23095078
Submission received: 13 April 2022 / Revised: 25 April 2022 / Accepted: 29 April 2022 / Published: 3 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Pyroptosis is a caspase-dependent catabolic process relevant to periodontal disorders for which inflammation is central to the pathophysiology of the disease. Although enamel matrix derivative (EMD) has been applied to support periodontal regeneration, its capacity to modulate the expression of pyroptosis-related genes remains unknown. Considering EMD has anti-inflammatory properties and pyroptosis is linked to the activation of the inflammasome in chronic periodontitis, the question arises whether EMD could reduce pyroptosis signalling. Methods: To answer this question, primary macrophages obtained from murine bone marrow and RAW 264.7 macrophages were primed with EMD before being challenged by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Cells were then analysed for pyroptosis-signalling components by gene expression analyses, interleukin-1β (IL-1β) immunoassay, and the detection of caspase-1 (CAS1). The release of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) was also detected. Results: We report here that EMD, like the inflammasome (NLRP3) and CAS1 specific inhibitors—MCC950 and Ac-YVAD-cmk, respectively—lowered the LPS-induced expression of NLRP3 in primary macrophages (EMD: p = 0.0232; MCC950: p = 0.0426; Ac-YVAD-cmk: p = 0.0317). EMD further reduced the LPS-induced expression of NLRP3 in RAW 264.7 cells (p = 0.0043). There was also a reduction in CAS1 and IL-1β in RAW 264.7 macrophages on the transcriptional level (p = 0.0598; p = 0.0283; respectively), in IL-1β protein release (p = 0.0313), and CAS1 activity. Consistently, EMD, like MCC950 and Ac-YVAD-cmk, diminished the ROS release in activated RAW 264.7 cells. In ST2 murine mesenchymal cells, EMD could not be tested because LPS, saliva, and IL-1β + TNF-α failed to provoke pyroptosis signalling. Conclusion: These findings suggest that EMD is capable of dampening the expression of pyroptosis-related genes in macrophages.

1. Introduction

Periodontal disease is a global health problem [1]. Currently, peri-implant disease has reached the same level of concern as periodontal disorders. In this scenario, mucointegration—the attachment of soft tissues to the transmucosal portion of an implant—is just as relevant for implant success as osseointegration [2]. A disruption in mucointegration can manifest as peri-implant mucositis and, if not resolved, can progress to inflammatory peri-implantitis [3,4]. Periodontitis and peri-implantitis are universally agreed to begin with a breakdown in the soft tissue attachment and bone loss progression [5,6]. Consequently, methods to strengthen, maintain, or regenerate the soft tissue attachment around the tooth or the dental implant are critical for improving the protection sealing against microbial infections or endogenous danger signals [7]. The underlying pathogenesis of periodontitis/peri-implantitis is a chronic inflammation that drives downstream catabolic cellular events ultimately leading to tooth loss due to a lack of supporting tissues [6,8,9]. There is thus a critical requirement to understand the fundamental pathological mechanisms on a cellular and molecular basis to implement therapies aiming to regulate inflammation and thereby pave the way for regenerative strategies [8,9]. Thus, understanding the pathways connecting inflammation and tissue destruction will help to develop strategies to prevent and treat periodontitis and peri-implantitis.
Pyroptosis is an inflammatory caspase-dependent catabolic process that is relevant for innate immunity. This process is mainly mediated by the activation of caspase-1 (CAS1) by the nucleotide-binding domain (NBD) and leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-containing protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome [10]. Then, CAS1 cleaves the gasdermin D (GSDMD), which is responsible for cell membrane perforation and the release of interleukins-1β (IL-1β) and -18 (IL-18) [10], which, in turn, trigger a robust inflammatory response on the surrounding tissues [11]. NLRP3 and CAS1 are important for bacterial clearance; however, if overexpressed, they may lead to cellular self-destruction, inflammation, and tissue damage [12]. Immunostaining images showed a stronger signalling intensity for NLRP3, cleaved CAS1, and IL-1β in the connective tissue of periodontitis compared to a healthy gingiva [13]. Additionally, using a periodontitis mouse model, higher amounts of NLRP3 and IL-1β were visible in the inflamed gingiva [13]. There is thus evidence for pyroptosis to occur in periodontal diseased tissues.
In vitro periodontal models in pyroptosis research focus on the NLRP3/CAS1/GSDMD-mediated pyroptosis pathway in monocytes, macrophages, and periodontal ligament cells [11,14,15,16]. NLRP3 inflammasome can react to a wide range of bacterial ligands and play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a virulence factor and a strong agonist of toll-like receptor (TLR) that is able to initiate pyroptosis signalling [16,17]. LPS is produced by Gram-negative bacteria [18]. Considering that oral diseases are mainly mediated by Gram-negative bacteria, it makes sense that LPS is related to periodontal disorders [12,18,19]. Taking advantage of this in vitro model, glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) deficiency was identified to lower the LPS-induced pyroptosis through the inactivation of NLRP3 inflammasome [16]. Accordingly, NLRP3/CAS1/GSDMD-mediated pyroptosis bioassays are suitable for identifying the components that lower pyroptosis signalling. Furthermore, considering the impairment caused by pyroptosis on periodontal disorders, finding ways to inhibit or reduce pyroptosis downstream brings prospects for periodontal therapies.
Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) is a xenograft applied to support periodontal regeneration [20] that was also considered a treatment for venous leg ulcers [21]. EMD is an extract of enamel matrix from the tooth germ of piglets and propylene glycol alginate serves as a matrix. Proteome analyses confirmed the presence of enamel matrix proteins amelogenin and ameloblastin [22], and growth factors such as TGF-β have also been identified [23,24]. More importantly for this paper, EMD has been shown to exert anti-inflammatory activity in vitro. LPS-stimulated rat monocytes exposed to EMD exhibited a decrease in TNF-α production [25]. In human blood-derived cells exposed to LPS and peptidoglycan, EMD lowered TNF-α release [26]. In LPS-stimulated human osteogenic cells and immortalized human epithelial gingival keratinocytes, EMD lowered the expression of inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α [27]. Nevertheless, the expression of pyroptosis factors in cells stimulated with pyroptosis-triggering dangers—and primed with EMD—has not yet been explored. It might be hypothesized that the beneficial effects of EMD [25,26,27] are caused by lowering the pyroptosis-mediated cellular self-destruction and inflammation in periodontitis.
Since there is strong in vitro evidence that EMD has anti-inflammatory properties [25,26,27] and pyroptosis is linked to the activation of the inflammasome in chronic periodontitis and peri-implantitis [11,12,16], the question arises whether EMD could reduce pyroptosis in vitro. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that the anti-inflammatory activity of EMD is at least partially involved in a lowering of the LPS-mediated pyroptosis factors.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Primary Macrophages, RAW 264.7 Macrophage-like Cells, and ST2 Mesenchymal Cells

BALB/c mice of 6 to 8 weeks old were purchased from Animal Research Laboratories, Himberg, Austria. Bone marrow cells were collected from the femora and tibiae as previously described [28]. Briefly, mice were sacrificed, and the femora and tibiae were removed. Bone marrow cells were seeded at 1 × 106 cells/cm2 into 24-well plates and grown for 7 days in Dulbecco’s Modified Essential Medium (DMEM; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; Capricorn Scientific GmbH, Ebsdorfergrund, Germany), 1% antibiotics (PS; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 20 ng/mL macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF; ProSpec, Ness-Ziona, Israel). RAW 264.7 macrophage-like cells (LGC Standards, Wesel, Germany) were expanded in growth medium and seeded at 3 × 105 cells/cm2 into 24-well plates. ST2 murine mesenchymal cells (Riken Cell Bank, Tsukuba, Japan) isolated from mouse bone marrow were seeded at 3 × 105 cells/cm2 into 24-well plates. Cells were primed with 30 µg/mL of enamel derivative matrix (EMD; Straumann AG, Switzerland) for 1 h and then exposed to 100 ng/mL of LPS from Escherichia coli 055:B5 (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 6 h to induce an inflammatory response. Alternatively, 5% saliva [29] or 20 ng/mL IL-1β (ProSpec, Ness-Ziona, Israel) and TNF-α (ProSpec, Ness-Ziona, Israel) were used for cell stimulation. Pyroptosis-specific inhibitors were applied to establish the in vitro LPS-induced pyroptosis model: MCC950 (CP-456773 Sodium, Selleck Chemicals GmbH, Houston, TX, USA) was applied at 8 µM for 30 min before cells were exposed to LPS and Ac-YVAD-cmk (≥95%, HPLC; Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was applied at 5 µM for 20 h prior to the LPS challenge. All cell lineages were exposed to the respective treatments under standard conditions of 37 ◦C, 5% CO2, and 95% humidity.

2.2. Reverse Transcription Quantitative Real-Time PCR (RT-qPCR) and Immunoassay

For RT-qPCR, after stimulation, total RNA was isolated with the ExtractMe total RNA kit (Blirt S.A., Gdańsk, Poland) followed by reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction (LabQ, Labconsulting, Vienna, Austria) on a CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The mRNA levels were calculated by normalizing to the housekeeping gene GAPDH using the ΔΔCt method.
The primer sequences were mNLRP3-F: 5′-TCACAACTCGCCCAAGGAGGAA-3′; mNLRP3-R: 5′-AAGAGACCACGGCAGAAGCTAG-3′; mCAS1-F: 5′-GGCACATTTCCAGGACTGACTG-3′; mCAS1-R: 5′-GCAAGACGTGTACGAGTGGTTG-3′; mCAS11-F: 5′-CCTGAAGAGTTCACAAGGCTT-3′; mCAS11-R: 5′-CCTTTCGTGTAGGGCCATTG-3′; mGSDMD-F: 5′-GGTGCTTGACTCTGGAGAACTG-3′; mGSDMD-R: 5′-GCTGCTTTGACAGCACCGTTGT-3′; mIL-1β-F: 5′-CAACCAACAAGTGATATTCTCCATG-3′; mIL-1β-R: 5′-GATCCACACTCTCCAGCTGCA-3′; mIL-18-F: 5′-CAAACCTTCCAAATCACTTCCT-3′; mIL-18-R: 5′-TCCTTGAAGTTGACGCAAGA-3′; mGAPDH-F: 5′-AACTTTGGCATTGTGGAAGG-3′; mGAPDH-R: 5′-GGATGCAGGGATGATGTTCT-3′. RT-PCR data are represented compared to the untreated control. Supernatants and the respective cell lysates prepared with 0.3% Triton X-100 (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were analyzed for IL-1β secretion by immunoassay (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction.

2.3. Western Blot

RAW 264.7 cells were seeded at 3 × 105 cells/cm2 into 12-well plates. On the following day, serum-starved cells were primed with EMD for 1 h and then exposed to LPS for another 6 h. Extracts containing SDS buffer with protease and phosphatase inhibitors were separated by SDS-PAGE (cOmplete ULTRA Tablets and PhosSTOP; Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and transferred onto PVDF membranes (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Membranes were blocked and the binding of the Caspase-1 (D7F10), gasdermin D (E8G3F), and cleaved gasdermin D (E7H9G) first antibodies (rabbit IgG, 1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) were detected with the second antibody labelled with HRP (goat anti-rabbit IgG, 1:10,000; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). After exposure to the Clarity Western ECL Substrate (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) chemiluminescence signals were visualized with the ChemiDoc imaging system (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). Quantification of band intensity was performed using ImageJ software.

2.4. Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Release

RAW 264.7 cells were seeded at 3 × 105 cells/cm2 into 96-well plates and followed the standard stimulation with EMD, MCC950, or Ac-YVAD-cmk, then challenged with LPS for 6 h. Cells were analysed for the release of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (MitoROS 580, AAT Bioquest, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed at least three times. Statistical analyses of gene expression and immunoassays were performed with paired t-tests, while ROS release statistical analyses were performed with one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. Analyses were performed using Prism v.9 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Significance was set at p  < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Pyroptosis Inhibitors Validate Macrophages to Serve as a Pyroptosis Model

To establish a pyroptosis model, primary macrophages generated from murine bone marrow were exposed to E. coli LPS. MCC950 and Ac-YVAD-cmk were introduced as inhibitors raised against NLRP3 and CAS1, respectively. MCC950 significantly reduced the forced expression of NLRP3, CAS11, and IL-1β, but also consistently decreased CAS1 and IL-18 gene expressions in primary macrophages. Likewise, Ac-YVAD-cmk significantly reduced the expression of NLRP3 and IL-18, and showed a trend to the reduction in the expression of CAS1, CAS11, and IL-1β, in primary macrophages (Figure 1). These findings support the LPS-induced primary macrophages to serve as a bioassay to test EMD and its potential for reducing pyroptosis signalling.

3.2. EMD Reduces the Expression of Pyroptosis Markers in LPS-Induced Primary Macrophages

To test EMD and its potential for reducing pyroptosis in the established bioassay, primary macrophages were primed with EMD before being challenged by LPS and then were analysed for gene expression of pyroptosis signalling components. Our chosen dose of 30 µg/mL EMD did not lead to any cytotoxicity either alone or in combination with LPS (data not shown); therefore, we proceeded with the gene expression analyses. LPS caused a robust increase in the expression of the pyroptosis genes NLRP3, CAS1, CAS11, IL-1β, and IL-18 in primary macrophages, with particularly strong expressions of NLRP3 and IL-1β. EMD significantly lowered the LPS-induced expression of NLRP3, CAS1, and IL-18, suggesting that primary macrophages are susceptible to EMD and its pyroptosis-lowering activity (Figure 2).

3.3. EMD Reduces the Expression of Pyroptosis Markers in LPS-Induced RAW 264.7 Macrophages

To implement a cell line-based pyroptosis model, RAW 264.7 macrophages were exposed to LPS followed by the screening for the respective pyroptosis marker genes. Consistent with the findings regarding the primary macrophages, EMD significantly reduced the LPS-induced expression of NLRP3 and IL-1β. There was also a trend toward reducing CAS1 and CAS11 expression (Figure 3).
Differently from primary macrophages though, it was mainly the IL-1β but not the IL-18 expression that was reduced by EMD in RAW 264.7 cells. As expected [30], immunoassays of RAW 264.7 cells revealed negligible amounts of IL-1β in the supernatant (Supplementary Figure S1A). Nevertheless, under the permeabilization of the cell membrane, IL-1β could be confirmed in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells as well as the significant IL-1β reduction with the treatment with EMD (Figure 4A).
Moreover, EMD reduced cleaved CAS1 at the protein level (Figure 4B), suggesting a decrease in the CAS1 activity and that EMD could lower the expression and the activation of CAS1 by NLRP3 reduction. The bands were quantified regarding intensity (Supplementary Figure S2), confirming what can be pictured in the Western blot images. Thus, the RAW 264.7 macrophages are suitable to identify EMD for lowering a pyroptosis response.

3.4. EMD Reduces Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in LPS-Induced RAW 264.7 Macrophages

RAW 264.7 macrophages were again exposed to LPS and analysed for mitochondrial ROS release. EMD reduced the mitochondrial ROS release in RAW 264.7 cells to levels comparable to the untreated control, suggesting a reduction in cellular stress levels by the EMD treatment. Consistently, the pyroptosis specific inhibitors, MCC950 and Ac-YVAD-cmk, diminished ROS release in activated RAW 264.7 cells (Figure 5).

3.5. ST2 Mesenchymal Cells Are Not Suitable to Test the Potential Role of EMD on Pyroptosis

Finally, we introduced LPS and saliva stimulation over ST2 murine mesenchymal cells to serve as a model for pyroptosis testing. However, both, LPS and saliva, failed to considerably increase the expression of the most sensitive pyroptosis marker—the NLRP3—and all other pyroptosis markers, including IL-1β and IL-18, suggesting that neither LPS nor saliva stimulation in ST2 cells were suitable models to evaluate EMD to change pyroptosis (Supplementary Figure S3). When ST2 cells were exposed to IL-1β and TNF-α, there was a strong increase of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and chemokines CCL2 and CXCL2, which were further reduced by EMD application (Figure 6). Nevertheless, no changes in NLRP3 or any other pyroptosis markers were found (Supplementary Figure S3). Thus, LPS, saliva, or IL-1β + TNF-α stimulations on ST2 cells are not applicable to evaluate the potential role of EMD to reduce pyroptosis signalling.

4. Discussion

Pyroptosis is a major driver of inflammatory disorders and is chiefly activated by NLRP3 inflammasome and caspases. Thus, NLRP3 and CAS1, the hallmarks of pyroptosis signalling, are increasingly expressed in periodontal disease compared to healthy tissue [10,12,31]. Considering EMD is widely used in periodontal regeneration and has demonstrated anti-inflammatory properties in vitro [20,25,26,27], we hypothesized that part of the beneficial activity of EMD might involve the modulation of pyroptosis signalling. Indeed, our major finding was that EMD lowered the forced expression of NLRP3 and CAS1 activity in murine macrophage models. Taken together, our findings suggest that EMD diminishes pyroptosis signalling in macrophages.
If we relate our findings to those of other studies, our data completes the overall picture of the anti-inflammatory activity that EMD has in vitro on various models from human, rat, and mouse cells [25,26,27,32]. However, these models mainly used TNFα or interferon-gamma (IFNγ) to simulate inflammation, but TNFα and IFNγ are not drivers of pyroptosis signalling. It was merely the study on LPS-stimulated human osteoblastic cells and human gingival keratinocytes that assessed EMD lowering the expression of IL-1β, however, this study was not focused on pyroptosis [27]. Hence, our findings that EMD reduces the expression of IL-1β in RAW 264.7 macrophages support the existing knowledge on the anti-inflammatory properties of EMD; nevertheless, this observation is not sufficient to support the involvement of EMD in the reduction of the pyroptosis signalling.
Macrophages can be polarized into either classically activated pro-inflammatory (M1) or alternatively activated anti-inflammatory (M2) macrophages depending on the stimulation [33]. M1 macrophages are induced by pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), such as the bacterial LPS used herein, or Th1 cytokines such as IFNγ, producing a wide range of cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), to aggravate inflammation. In contrast, M2 macrophages are induced by Th2 cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-13, and they possess the ability to express arginase-1 (Arg1), chitinase-like 3 (or Ym1), and IL-10 to promote reparative processes and relieve inflammation [34]. Therefore, since we have applied LPS, we know that we are working with M1 pro-inflammatory macrophages. Furthermore, since this is a pyroptosis-related article, we did not focus on IFNγ, TNF-α, IL-6, or iNOS, but on IL-1β and IL-18, which are directly related to pyroptosis. Moreover, the production of ROS is a hallmark of M1 macrophages, which also contributes to the M2 polarization switch [35]. Nevertheless, since we have scientific support that we are working with M1 macrophages, we can affirm that the release of ROS is related to the pro-inflammatory aspect.
Our data showing that EMD significantly reduced the expression of IL-18 in primary macrophages and that NLRP3 and CAS1 specific inhibitors (MCC950 and Ac-YVAD-cmk, respectively) exert a similar activity, can be considered indirect support for EMD to attenuate pyroptosis activity. These findings are in line with other observations showing that MCC950 inhibited IL-18 release in THP1 and monocytes [36,37], reversed the forced IL-1β and IL-18 expression on periodontal ligament fibroblasts [38], HCT116 colorectal cells [39], and canine kidney epithelial cells [40]. Furthermore, Ac-YVAD-cmk reduced the forced expression of IL-18 in whole blood cells [41], in THP-1 cells [42], and also in sepsis-induced acute kidney injury [43]. Even though EMD performs similarly to MCC950 and Ac-YVAD-cmk inhibitors and reduces the expression of NLRP3, CAS1, and IL-18 in primary macrophages, this is not sufficient evidence that EMD reduces pyroptosis activity and should be supported by additional investigation.
Support for EMD to regulate pyroptosis arises from findings that EMD reduces the LPS-induced expression of NLRP3 and IL-1β in RAW 264.7 macrophages. Considering that NLRP3 together with IL-1β and IL-18 are NF-kB-target genes, it can be hypothesized that EMD lowers the LPS-driven NF-kB signalling pathway and thereby the transcription of NLRP3 and IL-1β/IL-18. Consequently, the assembly of the inflammasome is limited by the accessibility of the reduced NLRP3, and our observation that EMD lowers the LPS-induced CAS1 activity supports this concept. Thus, our findings add to the existing knowledge of the anti-inflammatory properties of EMD and guide it towards the regulation of the pyroptosis pathway in macrophages. Furthermore, our data on EMD reducing inflammation in ST2-challenged cells also give additional support to the anti-inflammatory activity of EMD in vitro.
Consistent with other reports [30], immunoassays failed to detect IL-1β in the extracellular media in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells, while the cell membrane permeabilization allowed the detection of IL-1β in LPS-challenged cells. This seems to be related to the weak GSDMD activity that is herein reported. GSDMD is required for IL-1β release in pyroptotic cells or hyperactivated cells [30]. GSDMD knockout cells are unable to form pores and release IL-1β or lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), a molecule that shows signs of membrane pore formation [30]. This agrees with our finding that LDH release was not substantially increased in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages (Supplementary Figure S1B). Likewise, GSDMD is necessary for the release of cleaved IL-1β during infection but is not required for IL-1β processing within cells [30]. Hence, it seems that our model failed to cause membrane pore formation due to reduced GSDMD activity. Thus, our model is valid to test for pyroptosis signalling but not for full pyroptosis induction, including membrane disintegration.
Regarding ROS release, EMD in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages reduced mitochondrial ROS, such as the NLRP3 and CAS1 specific inhibitors (MCC950 and Ac-YVAD-cmk, respectively). In agreement with our findings, MCC950 inhibited the excessive production of ROS in chondrocytes [44], and Ac-YVAD-cmk blocked the forced ROS production in HT22 cells [45] and cerebellar granule neurons [46]. Increased ROS levels drive the transcription nuclear factor and induce the pyroptosis of nucleus pulposus cells through the NLRP3 pathway which is related to the mechanism of degenerative disorders [47]. More importantly, ROS acts downstream of gene transcription, mRNA translation, and IL-1β converting enzyme activation [46]. Furthermore, ROS production occurs after K+ deprivation [30,46], which can induce pyroptosis [12]. Therefore, evaluating ROS release is relevant to pyroptosis signalling as part of the downstream events occurring in the pyroptotic cells.
The clinical relevance of our findings remains at the level of speculation. Clinically, EMD stabilizes blood clots and improves clinical healing in deep pockets after non-surgical periodontal treatment [48]. Minimally invasive periodontal surgery with EMD in periodontitis-affected subjects results in lower values of C-reactive protein as no inflammatory perturbation was noticed [49]. EMD treatment also reduced bleeding on probing and periodontal pocket depth, and post-surgical gingival recession was lowered [49]. Moreover, EMD shows an antibacterial effect on the viability of ex vivo supragingival dental plaque flora collected from patients with periodontitis [50]. Considering that EMD lowers the inflammation also in vivo [51] and that periodontitis is linked to pyroptosis [11,12,16], we can speculate that EMD exerts its beneficial effect by reducing pyroptosis signalling at sites of chronic periodontitis, likely involving the NLRP3 expression.
The complexity of the in vivo situation, however, is not fully represented by primary macrophages or cell lines. Primary macrophages are closer to the in vivo situation than cell lines and, therefore, we have used the primary macrophages to establish the pyroptosis system and to perform the proof-of-principle experiments. However, to reduce and replace animal organ donation—in this case, bone marrow—once we had established our model with the use of pyroptosis-specific inhibitors and evidence that EMD reduces pyroptosis-related genes, we switched to a macrophage cell line. As expected, the cell line performed similarly, although not identically, to the primary cell line. Furthermore, in vitro models are useful for identifying potential cellular responses and signalling pathways that can later be evaluated in a complex in vivo environment. By showing that EMD lowers the LPS-induced expression of pyroptosis-related genes, we provide a fundament for future research in this direction.
This study has the limitations of the in vitro research. For instance, which and how EMD component molecules responsible for the anti-pyroptosis activity reach the target cells in vivo were not explored. Since we have not discovered the molecular structure and the characteristics of the anti-inflammatory components of EMD, the in vitro findings cannot easily be translated into a clinical perspective. Hence, further studies of EMD in the inhibition of pyroptosis in periodontal tissues should be conducted in vivo. Since EMD is available for clinical purposes, studies on its impact on the periodontium are feasible. Another limitation of our model is that LPS alone was not sufficient to increase the expression of, or activate, GSDMD, an executor of pyroptosis required for the IL-1β secretion in macrophages [52]. Future studies could therefore include pyroptosis agonists such as α-hemolysin [53,54], nigericin [30], or ATP [55], together with LPS to impulse cytotoxicity and IL-1β secretion other than the gene expression of pyroptosis-related factors, i.e., the full picture of pyroptosis [52]. It might also be worth considering the impact of EMD on the CAS3 dependent apoptotic pathway, downstream of CAS1 and independent of GSDMD [56]. Further proof for EMD to reduce pyroptosis-mediated periodontal destruction might be based on mouse models with a genetic deletion of NLRP3, CAS1, or GSDMD; hypothetically, EMD cannot exert its beneficial activity when pyroptosis is blocked at the genetic level.
In conclusion, our findings suggest that EMD is capable of dampening pyroptosis-related genes in macrophages. This is relevant as the clinical use of EMD in periodontal therapies could comprise the reduction of pyroptosis downstream under conditions of periodontal tissue inflammation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms23095078/s1.

Author Contributions

M.B.S., A.C.C.d.C., L.P. and R.G. have contributed to the conception, analysis, and development of this article. M.B.S. has conducted experiments. M.B.S., A.C.C.d.C., L.P. and R.G. have been involved in drafting and revising the manuscript critically and have approved the final version for publication. M.B.S., A.C.C.d.C., L.P. and R.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the University Clinic of Dentistry in Vienna.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The bone marrow cells were collected from the femora and tibiae of BALB/c mice, which were purchased from Animal Research Laboratories, Himberg, Austria. According to Austrian law, organ donation from mice required an informal approval of the local veterinarian authorities but not a formal approval by the Ethics Committee.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

M.B.S. was supported by Osteology Foundation (Luzern, Switzerland) Scholarship. EMD was a kind gift from Straumann Österreich (Vienna, Austria).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors state no conflict of interest related to this project.

References

  1. Petersen, P.E.; Ogawa, H. The global burden of periodontal disease: Towards integration with chronic disease prevention and control: Global periodontal health. Periodontol. 2000. 2012, 60, 15–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Klinge, B.; Meyle, J. Soft-tissue integration of implants. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2006, 17, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Berglundh, T.; Armitage, G.; Araujo, M.G.; Avila-Ortiz, G.; Blanco, J.; Camargo, P.M.; Chen, S.; Cochran, D.; Derks, J.; Figuero, E.; et al. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Dis-eases and Conditions. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2018, 89, S313–S318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ramanauskaite, A.; Becker, K.; Schwarz, F. Clinical characteristics of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2018, 29, 551–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lindhe, J.; Meyle, J.; on behalf of Group D of the European Workshop on Periodontology. Peri-implant diseases: Consensus report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2008, 35 (Suppl. S8), 282–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Schwarz, F.; Derks, J.; Monje, A.; Wang, H.-L. Peri-implantitis. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2018, 45, S246–S266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Yuan, X.; Pei, X.; Chen, J.; Zhao, Y.; Brunski, J.B.; Helms, J.A. Comparative analyses of the soft tissue interfaces around teeth and implants: Insights from a pre-clinical implant model. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2021, 48, 745–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kinane, D.F.; Stathopoulou, P.G.; Papapanou, P.N. Periodontal diseases. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2017, 3, 17038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kajiya, M.; Kurihara, H. Molecular Mechanisms of Periodontal Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yu, C.; Zhang, C.; Kuang, Z.; Zheng, Q. The Role of NLRP3 Inflammasome Activities in Bone Diseases and Vascular Calcifica-tion. Inflammation 2021, 44, 434–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, Q.; Liu, X.; Wang, D.; Zheng, J.; Chen, L.; Xie, Q.; Liu, X.; Niu, S.; Qu, G.; Lan, J.; et al. Periodontal Inflammation-Triggered by Periodontal Ligament Stem Cell Pyroptosis Exacerbates Periodontitis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 663037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sordi, M.B.; de Souza Magini, R.; Panahipour, L.; Gruber, R. Pyroptosis-Mediated Periodontal Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cheng, R.; Liu, W.; Zhang, R.; Feng, Y.; Bhowmick, N.A.; Hu, T. Porphyromonas gingivalis-Derived Lipopolysaccharide Combines Hypoxia to Induce Caspase-1 Activation in Periodontitis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cecil, J.D.; O′Brien-Simpson, N.; Lenzo, J.; Holden, J.A.; Singleton, W.; Gonzalez, A.P.; Mansell, A.; Reynolds, E.C. Outer Membrane Vesicles Prime and Activate Macrophage Inflammasomes and Cytokine Secretion In Vitro and In Vivo. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Fleetwood, A.; Lee, M.K.; Singleton, W.; Achuthan, A.; Lee, M.-C.; O′Brien-Simpson, N.; Cook, A.D.; Murphy, A.; Dashper, S.; Reynolds, E.C.; et al. Metabolic Remodeling, Inflammasome Activation, and Pyroptosis in Macrophages Stimulated by Porphyromonas gingivalis and Its Outer Membrane Vesicles. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, X.; He, S.; Lu, W.; Lin, L.; Xiao, H. Glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) deficiency inactivates the NLRP3 inflam-masome-mediated cell pyroptosis in LPS-treated periodontal ligament cells (PDLCs). In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 2021, 57, 404–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, P.; Cui, L.; Shen, L. Knockdown of TRIM52 alleviates LPS-induced inflammatory injury in human periodontal ligament cells through the TLR4/NF-κB pathway. Biosci. Rep. 2020, 40, BSR20201223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. de Andrade, K.Q.; Almeida-da-Silva, C.L.C.; Coutinho-Silva, R. Immunological Pathways Triggered by Porphyromonas gingi-valis and Fusobacterium nucleatum: Therapeutic Possibilities? Mediat. Inflamm. 2019, 2019, 7241312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Pihlstrom, B.L.; Michalowicz, B.S.; Johnson, N.W. Periodontal diseases. Lancet 2005, 366, 1809–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Esposito, M.; Grusovin, M.G.; Papanikolaou, N.; Coulthard, P.; Worthington, H.V. Enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain) for per-iodontal tissue regeneration in intrabony defects. A Cochrane systematic review. Eur. J. Oral. Implantol. 2009, 2, 247–266. [Google Scholar]
  21. Romanelli, M.; Dini, V.; Vowden, P.; Agren, M.S. Amelogenin, an extracellular matrix protein, in the treatment of venous leg ulcers and other hard-to-heal wounds: Experimental and clinical evidence. Clin. Interv. Aging 2008, 3, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Stout, B.M.; Alent, B.J.; Pedalino, P.; Holbrook, R.; Gluhak-Heinrich, J.; Cui, Y.; Harris, M.A.; Gemperli, A.C.; Cochran, D.L.; Deas, D.E.; et al. Enamel Matrix Derivative: Protein Components and Osteoinductive Properties. J. Periodontol. 2014, 85, e9–e17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gruber, R.; Bosshardt, D.D.; Miron, R.J.; Gemperli, A.C.; Buser, D.; Sculean, A. Enamel matrix derivative inhibits adipocyte differen-tiation of 3T3-L1 cells via activation of TGF-βRI kinase activity. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e71046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Sculean, A.; Miron, R.; Gruber, R.; Stähli, A.B.; Bosshardt, D. Common target genes of palatal and gingival fibroblasts for EMD: The microarray approach. J. Periodontal Res. 2015, 50, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sato, S.; Kitagawa, M.; Sakamoto, K.; Iizuka, S.; Kudo, Y.; Ogawa, I.; Miyauchi, M.; Chu, E.Y.; Foster, B.L.; Somerman, M.J.; et al. Enamel Matrix Derivative Exhibits Anti-Inflammatory Properties in Monocytes. J. Periodontol. 2008, 79, 535–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Myhre, A.E.; Lyngstadaas, S.P.; Dahle, M.K.; Stuestøl, J.F.; Foster, S.J.; Thiemermann, C.; Lilleaasen, P.; Wang, J.E.; Aasen, A.O. Anti-inflammatory properties of enam-el matrix derivative in human blood. J. Periodontal. Res. 2006, 41, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ramenzoni, L.L.; Annasohn, L.; Miron, R.J.; Attin, T.; Schmidlin, P.R. Combination of enamel matrix derivative and hyaluronic acid inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory response on human epithelial and bone cells. Clin. Oral Investig. 2021, 26, 1773–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Oishi, S.; Takano, R.; Tamura, S.; Tani, S.; Iwaizumi, M.; Hamaya, Y.; Takagaki, K.; Nagata, T.; Seto, S.; Horii, T.; et al. M2 polarization of murine peritoneal macrophages in-duces regulatory cytokine production and suppresses T-cell proliferation. Immunology 2016, 149, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Pourgonabadi, S.; Müller, H.-D.; Mendes, J.R.; Gruber, R. Saliva initiates the formation of pro-inflammatory macrophages in vitro. Arch. Oral Biol. 2016, 73, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Evavold, C.L.; Ruan, J.; Tan, Y.; Xia, S.; Wu, H.; Kagan, J.C. The Pore-Forming Protein Gasdermin D Regulates Interleukin-1 Secre-tion from Living Macrophages. Immunity 2018, 48, 35–44.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Lu, W.L.; Song, D.Z.; Yue, J.L.; Wang, T.T.; Zhou, X.D.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, L.; Huang, D.M. NLRP3 inflammasome may regulate inflammatory response of human periodontal ligament fibroblasts in an apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD (ASC)-dependent manner. Int. Endod. J. 2017, 50, 967–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yotsumoto, K.; Sanui, T.; Tanaka, U.; Yamato, H.; Alshargabi, R.; Shinjo, T.; Nakao, Y.; Watanabeet, Y.; Hayashi, C.; Taketomi, T.; et al. Amelogenin Downregulates Interferon Gam-ma-Induced Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Expression Through Suppression of Euchromatin Formation in the Class II Transactivator Promoter IV Region in Macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Orecchioni, M.; Ghosheh, Y.; Pramod, A.B.; Ley, K. Macrophage Polarization: Different Gene Signatures in M1(LPS+) vs. Classically and M2(LPS–) vs. Alternatively Activated Macrophages. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gordon, S.; Martinez, F.O. Alternative Activation of Macrophages: Mechanism and Functions. Immunity 2010, 32, 593–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Seong, J.B.; Kim, B.; Kim, S.; Kim, M.H.; Park, Y.-H.; Lee, Y.; Lee, H.J.; Hong, C.-W.; Lee, D.-S. Macrophage peroxiredoxin 5 deficiency promotes lung cancer progression via ROS-dependent M2-like polarization. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2021, 176, 322–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gritsenko, A.; Yu, S.; Martin-Sanchez, F.; Diaz-Del-Olmo, I.; Nichols, E.-M.; Davis, D.; Brough, D.; Lopez-Castejon, G. Priming Is Dispensable for NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation in Human Monocytes In Vitro. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11. Erratum in 2021, 12, 763899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zeng, W.; Wu, D.; Sun, Y.; Suo, Y.; Yu, Q.; Zeng, M.; Gao, Q.; Yu, B.; Jiang, X.; Wang, Y. The selective NLRP3 inhibitor MCC950 hinders atherosclerosis develop-ment by attenuating inflammation and pyroptosis in macrophages. Sci Rep. 2021, 11, 19305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Peng, W.; Zhang, B.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, M.; Guo, L. Targeting the Nod-like receptor protein 3 Inflammasome with inhibitor MCC950 rescues lipopolysaccharide-induced inhibition of osteogenesis in Human periodontal ligament cells. Arch. Oral Biol. 2021, 131, 105269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shi, F.; Wei, B.; Lan, T.; Xiao, Y.; Quan, X.; Chen, J.; Zhao, C.; Gao, J. Low NLRP3 expression predicts a better prognosis of colorectal cancer. Biosci. Rep. 2021, 41, BSR20210280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, H.; Mao, X.; Liu, K.; Sun, J.; Li, B.; Malyar, R.M.; Liu, D.; Pan, C.; Gan, F.; Liu, Y.; et al. Ochratoxin A induces nephrotoxicity in vitro and in vivo via pyroptosis. Arch. Toxicol. 2021, 95, 1489–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tran, T.A.T.; Grievink, H.W.; Lipinska, K.; Kluft, C.; Burggraaf, J.; Moerland, M.; Tasev, D.; Malone, K.E. Whole blood assay as a model for in vitro evaluation of inflammasome activation and subsequent caspase-mediated interleukin-1 beta release. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0214999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Huang, X.; Huang, Q.; He, Y.; Chen, S.; Li, T. Mycophenolic acid enhanced lipopolysaccharide-induced interleukin-18 release in THP-1 cells via activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2019, 41, 521–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yang, M.; Fang, J.-T.; Zhang, N.-S.; Qin, L.-J.; Zhuang, Y.-Y.; Wang, W.-W.; Zhu, H.-P.; Zhang, Y.-J.; Xia, P.; Zhang, Y. Caspase-1-Inhibitor AC-YVAD-CMK Inhibits Pyrop-tosis and Ameliorates Acute Kidney Injury in a Model of Sepsis. Biomed. Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 6636621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Ni, B.; Pei, W.; Qu, Y.; Zhang, R.; Chu, X.; Wang, Y.; Huang, X.; You, H. MCC950, the NLRP3 Inhibitor, Protects against Cartilage Degradation in a Mouse Model of Osteoarthritis. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 4139048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tan, S.; Sagara, Y.; Liu, Y.; Maher, P.; Schubert, D. The Regulation of Reactive Oxygen Species Production during Programmed Cell Death. J. Cell Biol. 1998, 141, 1423–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Schulz, J.B.; Weller, M.; Klockgether, T. Potassium Deprivation-Induced Apoptosis of Cerebellar Granule Neurons: A Sequential Requirement for New mRNA and Protein Synthesis, ICE-Like Protease Activity, and Reactive Oxygen Species. J. Neurosci. 1996, 16, 4696–4706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bai, Z.; Liu, W.; He, D.; Wang, Y.; Yi, W.; Luo, C.; Shen, J.; Hu, Z. Protective effects of autophagy and NFE2L2 on reactive oxygen spe-cies-induced pyroptosis of human nucleus pulposus cells. Aging 2020, 12, 7534–7548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Graziani, F.; Gennai, S.; Petrini, M.; Bettini, L.; Tonetti, M. Enamel matrix derivative stabilizes blood clot and improves clinical healing in deep pockets after flapless periodontal therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2019, 46, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Graziani, F.; Peric, M.; Marhl, U.; Petrini, M.; Bettini, L.; Tonetti, M.; Gennai, S. Local application of enamel matrix derivative prevents acute systemic inflammation after periodontal regenerative surgery: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2020, 47, 747–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sculean, A.; Auschill, T.M.; Donos, N.; Brecx, M.; Arweiler, N.B. Effect of an enamel matrix protein derivative (Emdogain®) on ex vivo dental plaque vitality. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2008, 28, 1074–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Oliveira, R.G.; Junqueira, A.; Picinini, L.S.; Montesino, A.C.; Pearce, M.; Joly, J.C.; Silva, R.C. Histological Effects of Enamel Matrix Deriv-ative Proteins (Emdogain®) on the Healing of Rats Wounds. Dent. Adv. Res. 2017, 10, 100034. Available online: https://www.gavinpublishers.com/articles/research%20arti-cle/dentistry-advanced-research-issn-2574-7347/histological-effects-of-enamel-matrix-derivative-proteins-emdogain-on-the-healing-of-rats-wounds (accessed on 24 February 2022).
  52. He, W.; Wan, H.; Hu, L.; Chen, P.; Wang, X.; Huang, Z.; Yang, Z.H.; Zhong, C.Q.; Han, J. Gasdermin D is an executor of pyroptosis and required for interleu-kin-1β secretion. Cell Res. 2015, 25, 1285–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Craven, R.R.; Gao, X.; Allen, I.C.; Gris, D.; Wardenburg, J.B.; McElvania-TeKippe, E.; Ting, J.P.; Duncan, J.P. Staphylococcus aureus α-Hemolysin Acti-vates the NLRP3-Inflammasome in Human and Mouse Monocytic Cells. PLoS ONE. 2009, 4, e7446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Muñoz-Planillo, R.; Franchi, L.; Miller, L.S.; Núñez, G. A Critical Role for Hemolysins and Bacterial Lipoproteins inStaphylococcus aureus-Induced Activation of the Nlrp3 Inflammasome. J. Immunol. 2009, 183, 3942–3948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Mariathasan, S.; Weiss, D.S.; Newton, K.; McBride, J.; O′Rourke, K.; Roose-Girma, M.; Lee, W.P.; Weinrauch, Y.; Monack, D.M.; Dixit, V.M. Cryopyrin activates the inflammasome in response to toxins and ATP. Nature 2006, 440, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Tsuchiya, K.; Nakajima, S.; Hosojima, S.; Nguyen, D.T.; Hattori, T.; Le, T.M.; Hori, O.; Mahib, M.R.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Miura, M.; et al. Caspase-1 initiates apoptosis in the absence of gasdermin D. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijms 23 05078 g001 550
Figure 1. LPS stimulation caused an increase in the expression of the pyroptosis genes NLRP3, CAS1, CAS11, IL-1β, and IL-18 in primary macrophages. The application of MCC950 prior to LPS stimulation in primary macrophages led to a significant reduction in the expression of NLRP3, CAS11, and IL-1β, and a trend in the reduction of CAS1 and IL-18. The application of Ac-YVAD-cmk prior to LPS stimulation in primary macrophages led to a significant reduction in the forced expression of NLRP3 and IL-18, and a trend in the reduction of CAS1, CAS11, and IL-1β. Different symbol shapes mean independent experiments. Paired t-test statistical analysis was applied to compare the groups.
Figure 1. LPS stimulation caused an increase in the expression of the pyroptosis genes NLRP3, CAS1, CAS11, IL-1β, and IL-18 in primary macrophages. The application of MCC950 prior to LPS stimulation in primary macrophages led to a significant reduction in the expression of NLRP3, CAS11, and IL-1β, and a trend in the reduction of CAS1 and IL-18. The application of Ac-YVAD-cmk prior to LPS stimulation in primary macrophages led to a significant reduction in the forced expression of NLRP3 and IL-18, and a trend in the reduction of CAS1, CAS11, and IL-1β. Different symbol shapes mean independent experiments. Paired t-test statistical analysis was applied to compare the groups.
Ijms 23 05078 g001
Ijms 23 05078 g002 550
Figure 2. LPS stimulation caused an increase in the expression of the pyroptosis genes in primary macrophages. The application of EMD prior to LPS stimulation in primary macrophages led to a reduction in the forced expression of NLRP3, CAS1, and IL-18, and a trend in the reduction of CAS11 and IL-1β in primary macrophages. Different symbol shapes mean independent experiments. Paired t-test statistical analysis was applied to compare the groups.
Figure 2. LPS stimulation caused an increase in the expression of the pyroptosis genes in primary macrophages. The application of EMD prior to LPS stimulation in primary macrophages led to a reduction in the forced expression of NLRP3, CAS1, and IL-18, and a trend in the reduction of CAS11 and IL-1β in primary macrophages. Different symbol shapes mean independent experiments. Paired t-test statistical analysis was applied to compare the groups.
Ijms 23 05078 g002
Ijms 23 05078 g003 550
Figure 3. LPS stimulation caused an increase in the expression of the pyroptosis genes in RAW 264.7 macrophages. The application of EMD prior to LPS stimulation in RAW 264.7 cells led to a significant reduction in the forced expression of NLRP3 and IL-1β, and a trend in the reduction of CAS1 and CAS11 gene expression. Different symbol shapes mean independent experiments. Paired t-test statistical analysis was applied to compare the groups.
Figure 3. LPS stimulation caused an increase in the expression of the pyroptosis genes in RAW 264.7 macrophages. The application of EMD prior to LPS stimulation in RAW 264.7 cells led to a significant reduction in the forced expression of NLRP3 and IL-1β, and a trend in the reduction of CAS1 and CAS11 gene expression. Different symbol shapes mean independent experiments. Paired t-test statistical analysis was applied to compare the groups.
Ijms 23 05078 g003
Ijms 23 05078 g004 550
Figure 4. EMD reduces the pyroptosis factors in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 macrophages. (A) EMD protection on LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages led to IL-1β reduction detected from the immunoassay. Different symbol shapes mean independent experiments. Paired t-test to compare LPS and EMD + LPS groups was applied. (B) Confirming the gene expression, Western blot analyses showed less cleaved CAS1 (20 KDa) protein expression in RAW 264.7 cells primed with EMD. Cleaved GSDMD was present in cells stimulated with LPS and GSDMD was present in all groups.
Figure 4. EMD reduces the pyroptosis factors in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 macrophages. (A) EMD protection on LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 macrophages led to IL-1β reduction detected from the immunoassay. Different symbol shapes mean independent experiments. Paired t-test to compare LPS and EMD + LPS groups was applied. (B) Confirming the gene expression, Western blot analyses showed less cleaved CAS1 (20 KDa) protein expression in RAW 264.7 cells primed with EMD. Cleaved GSDMD was present in cells stimulated with LPS and GSDMD was present in all groups.
Ijms 23 05078 g004
Ijms 23 05078 g005 550
Figure 5. LPS stimulation caused an increase in the reactive oxygen species (ROS) release in RAW 264.7 macrophages. The application of EMD, MCC950, or Ac-YVAD-cmk in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 cells showed a significant reduction in ROS release. Different symbol shapes mean independent experiments. Repeated measures of one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests, comparing every group to the LPS group, were applied.
Figure 5. LPS stimulation caused an increase in the reactive oxygen species (ROS) release in RAW 264.7 macrophages. The application of EMD, MCC950, or Ac-YVAD-cmk in LPS-induced RAW 264.7 cells showed a significant reduction in ROS release. Different symbol shapes mean independent experiments. Repeated measures of one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison tests, comparing every group to the LPS group, were applied.
Ijms 23 05078 g005
Ijms 23 05078 g006 550
Figure 6. IL-1β and TNF-α stimulation caused a strong expression of IL-6, CCL2, and CXCL2 in ST2 cells. The application of EMD prior to IL-1β + TNF-α stimulation in ST2 cells led to a trend in the reduction of the forced expression of inflammatory markers. Different symbol shapes mean independent experiments. Paired t-test statistical analysis was applied to compare the groups.
Figure 6. IL-1β and TNF-α stimulation caused a strong expression of IL-6, CCL2, and CXCL2 in ST2 cells. The application of EMD prior to IL-1β + TNF-α stimulation in ST2 cells led to a trend in the reduction of the forced expression of inflammatory markers. Different symbol shapes mean independent experiments. Paired t-test statistical analysis was applied to compare the groups.
Ijms 23 05078 g006
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sordi, M.B.; Cabral da Cruz, A.C.; Panahipour, L.; Gruber, R. Enamel Matrix Derivative Decreases Pyroptosis-Related Genes in Macrophages. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5078. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23095078

AMA Style

Sordi MB, Cabral da Cruz AC, Panahipour L, Gruber R. Enamel Matrix Derivative Decreases Pyroptosis-Related Genes in Macrophages. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022; 23(9):5078. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23095078

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sordi, Mariane Beatriz, Ariadne Cristiane Cabral da Cruz, Layla Panahipour, and Reinhard Gruber. 2022. "Enamel Matrix Derivative Decreases Pyroptosis-Related Genes in Macrophages" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23, no. 9: 5078. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23095078

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop